Skip to main content

The Nutty Flavor Challenge: Why doesn't Prince Charles take action?

When questions are raised about why Meghan and Harry have been allowed to get away with so much, all roads seem to lead back to Prince Charles.

Charles reportedly calls Meghan "tungsten", an allusion to one of the hardest metals on Earth. (Only diamonds have a harder rating on the Mohs scale - 9 for tungsten, 10 for diamonds.)

That would suggest that he knows very well that Meghan is not the kind, soft-hearted personality she likes to suggest she is.

Press manipulation

He should also know that she likes to manipulate the press, dating back to the time when she supposedly took photos inside Kensington Palace for sale to the tabloids and he sent her on a plane back to Canada.

And Charles must know that she cannot be trusted, given the drama surrounding the wedding, when she insisted that "everything is under control" with relation to her father's appearance, only for it to become a tabloid drama that overshadowed the ceremony.

Why, then, doesn't Charles take action?

Foundation, merching, Archie

Why does he allow the Sussexes to set up a foundation that will clearly have commercial implications?

Why did he allow Meg to merch cheap jewelry at royal events?

And why doesn't he insist that they publicly unravel the mystery that is Archie, the giant "two-month-old" baby whose face is hidden whenever possible?

As the heir to the throne and the de-facto monarch under his aging mother, his reputation and the reputation of the entire monarchy is endangered by the Sussexes' actions.

What keeps him from doing something?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oh, Nutty -- I think we have a new cause of action on the horizon :) Looks like stories are dropping that the reason for mm's "secrecy" re Vogue is that she lied to BP and denied her involvement. Interesting... and that would explain the "secrecy."
August 2, 2019 at 7:06 PM
Oldest Older 201 – 201 of 201
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei
980 comments
Read more

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  
763 comments
Read more

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids
741 comments
Read more