It's a quote usually misattributed to Einstein, and it appears on thousands of inspirational posters, tea towels and coffee mugs: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Whoever originally said it, the quote is apt when it comes to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's participation in a TV documentary about their recent trip to Southern Africa.
They didn't like us despite all of the flattering magazine articles about us.
They didn't like us after we paid for glossy newspaper and online articles praising us to the skies.
They didn't like us when we seeded commenters on message boards to say that anyone who fails to support us is an ugly racist.
Maybe they'll like us if we release a TV documentary about what wonderful people we are?
Journalist Tom Bradby, the man behind the show, says it will "explain a lot."
Whoever originally said it, the quote is apt when it comes to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's participation in a TV documentary about their recent trip to Southern Africa.
They didn't like us despite all of the flattering magazine articles about us.
They didn't like us after we paid for glossy newspaper and online articles praising us to the skies.
They didn't like us when we seeded commenters on message boards to say that anyone who fails to support us is an ugly racist.
Maybe they'll like us if we release a TV documentary about what wonderful people we are?
What do you expect?
What do you expect from the documentary?Journalist Tom Bradby, the man behind the show, says it will "explain a lot."
Comments
https://mobile.twitter.com/wizkid101UK
This is ominous. I believe the Toxic Couple's ultimate targets are not the UK press, but bloggers, tweeters, and commenters on sites like Daily Mail.
"I believe Harry has an engagement somwhere in the UK next week. On the 10th?"
Yes, I posted about it this morning. It's in Nottingham.
I hope they ignore the petulant oik!
They haven't said anything yet because although they know there is a case against them, they don't have the details yet. They still don't know WHY he is suing them!
I totally agree. First they came for Piers Morgan.....
They ultimtely want to stifle all negative comment about them, on twitter, in comment sections and of course in little blogs like this.
I do think that this period of- relatively - free speech on the net is something we will look back at wistfully in time to come. Obviously that's not just about Harry by any means, there are all sorts of powerful forces looking to restrict free speech. But it's a symptom of this increasing desire to curtail unfavourable comment everywhere.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
In total agreement!
According to the BBC he is suing the now closed News of the World. The owners are still in business so they're fair game apparently. So I think this means it goes back to the original phone hacking.
Makes you think about the new documentary even more alongside all the comments with the MM court action. They are setting up a narrative that's for sure.
So Sun is confirming that the case is from 2000. Please what was the outcome of the case in 2000? What is Harry's endgame? To remind those who have forgotten how the tabloids hacked into people's phones in order to further discredit them?
‘However, the BBC's royal correspondent, Jonny Dymond, believes the claims relate to dates in the early 2000s.
It is believed that Harry may be alleging he was the victim of unlawful information gathering for the purpose of publishing articles about him, possibly dating back to when he had a mobile phone in his late teens.’
It’s not confined, but I think it’s true. All rather ridiculous.
What a mess!
Speaking of which, who here doubts that the case against the Mirror is actually a case against Piers Morgan, who loses no opportunity to ridicule Meghan? I don't like him, and a lot of what he says is petty and reeks of sour grapes - he'd be fawning all over her if only he'd got an invite to the wedding - but if you're 'royal' you're supposed to rise above all that, knowing that it will pass and you'll still be around with your fancy titles and palaces. But that's not Meghan's game. She wants out. It's completely obvious at this stage.
Suing all kinds of tabloids, and now suing for something that's 15 years old is very strange.
Megs must have egged PH on with her assertions that they're being abused by the media. It was reported somewhere that PH is using his trust funds to pay legal fees. Meg got skinflint PH to spend money on a form of PR, because that's what this is all about.
Maybe this is their new cottage industry, and they are out of cash. Very curious considering that they need the press in order to make their move tto America. Unless they are robbing Peter to pay Paul, i.e. using the British press as a revenue source and thinking that they won’t need them in the future, because they are in the process of leaving the U.K. anyway. Curious.
@Catty, ‘Looks like Harry is going after Piers Morgan’,
‘If’ it is him, it could be more likely to do with what Piers has said about Meghan in his column article’s, and the hacking is a guise.
Towards the end of it she explains who and why she got banned.
It appears there's a correlation between Strongwrite and Read something? can't make it out cuz Yankee's Welsh accent is a little thick on that word/name and that's who went after Yankee Wally!
To think Megs really got a college degree. Surely one of her foreign relations classes had the US Constitution and the First Amendment as part of curriculum? Even UK has freedom of speech.
Any other public funding that should be withdrawn to allow them that secrecy? What about people who cannot afford such a legal battle? Do they have the right to not be photographed in public? Basically, it seems the luvvies can afford to sue but ordinary folk cannot.
I have been photographed in a crowd, without my permission or knowledge, and the photograph appeared on the front page of a newspaper. It was an illegal march ... people were being arrested for marching.
I think William and Kate have found the right balance, but for all we know they may be supporting Harry and Meghan in these lawsuits.
Ironically, they have just been to Africa (and managed to project an image of South Africa as the most dangerous and violent place in the world ... thanks for the blow to the industry, as was the case with the false story about Zika in Zambia!) and they are now spending millions on a legal case because their feelings are hurt.
I really am not liking luvvies right now!
Piers has a lot of love/hate for him going on for his past behavior, but it appears on the DM comments that the folks in the UK are really angry at the Harkles for bringing the lawsuits because they are footing the bill for the cases. I don't blame them for being angry. It's like they want to say: You bring the pitchforks and pikes and we'll bring the torches type of angry mob feelings. Commenter Ozzie states: "If he thinks suing the press, screaming at reporters, or threatening them, is going to buy him and his wife favorable coverage, they have another thing coming. This is a huge misstep for them." Ozzie got almost 13,000 Likes and only about 750 dislikes! Wow! usually the arrows hang around 6K or so, but double? Yipes.
If the hacking is recent, then it is illegal,but that case from all those years ago was a criminal case and he seems to be pursuing a private prosecution ...
As for the documentary ... such basically PR pieces on the royal family are usual. This is the pinnacle for Meghan ... to be so important and global and get so much attantion and so many privileges. It will be a PR spin fluff piece, but these sort of documentaries on the royals usually are.
Harry and Megs better make it very transparent to the UK taxpayers that they, the taxpayers are not paying for these lawsuits.
Apparently, Heather Mills brought a private suit about a decade after the alleged hacking and won. And in April 2019, Elton John received a settlement for a phone hacking scandal. ( https://inforrm.org/2019/02/05/phone-hacking-time-the-police-stepped-in-brian-cathcart/ ) Makes me wonder if the summer private jet to Elton John's included discussion and sharing of notes of how Harry could successfully sue like Elton...
He is also known to tell different outlets different opinions on the same subjects depending on what is later revealed eg when story broke, he told Today that Harry must have done this with full backing of the Queen and no way would he do it behind her back. After the Palace made it very clear that they only found out at the same time as the public, he told sky news that 'someone else rather than palace officials must be advising Harry because they only found out as we did'. The statement to sky news doesn't involve the Queen because he has found out that she wasn't informed.
He may have had a long career with the Queen and raised Victoria at KP, but they are both out of the loop which hasn't stopped them from creating a career out of their long ago association. Victoria only gives positive obsequious commentary about the royals and refuses to analyse them critically if the outcome is negative. She's a true believer.
Just mentioning the blind because, if true, it illustrates your point. Besides, I believe you!
"I want to rename the Sussex, the Duck and Duchess of Censorship.
To think Megs really got a college degree. Surely one of her foreign relations classes had the US Constitution and the First Amendment as part of curriculum? Even UK has freedom of speech."
Probably not. One of my majors was IR and there was nothing regarding the US Constitution required within the IR major. The US Constitution was covered in a specific class on the Constitution as an elective. The 1st Am is constantly under attack, so don't think it's sacrosanct in the US. Additionally, she's a social justice warrior, many of whom have no qualms about limiting free speech. They want to criminalize hate speech and any speech that may offend a protected class or member of a marginalized community.
The Duck and Duckess of Suxxit.
However, this is Megs and Harry we're talking about, so they'd expect all the laws and limitations to be changed just for them, to suit them. And even as you said earlier, there are lawyers who get stuck into taking cases their clients insist upon, no matter that it's a loser of a case.
The press is going to fight this and drag it on and on, too, is my guess. It's going to get bloody and if it "bleeds it reads..."
serve and file them within 14 days of service of the claim form." So we may have to wait a bit to see the details, but if so, wonder if it is to stir up gossip.
No doubt in my mind reporters were covering for Andrew. It's usually a quid pro quo and having Andy or Fergie as a source would be worth tons to have in my pocket.
from https://www.inbrief.co.uk/claim-preparations/civil-claim-limitation-periods/
"Will the limitation period defence automatically apply?
In theory, no. A civil claim can still be made by the claimant even if the limitation period has passed. If the defendant wishes to strike it out on the basis that it is time barred, it must actively raise this as a defence.
The court can still allow a claim can proceed, even where the limitation period has passed. However, the claim would have to be extremely strong for the court to do so, and there would normally have to be very good reasons for the court to allow the claim to continue; for instance, if the claim is not defended."
"Situation where certain facts have been concealed from the claimant
In some cases, facts in relation to the claim may have been concealed from the claimant by the defendant. In these circumstance, the limitation period will only commence when the claimant becomes aware of these relevant facts, or the date that he or she should have become aware of them." (same source as linked to above)
(snark) Maybe Harry will claim he was too dim to understand at the time all the relevant facts, but that his woke wife shined a light on the issue and now he's aware and ready to sue, hence limitation period commences this year! :P (end snark)
As others have said, I expect that this will explain a lot about how self absorbed the subjects of the film are. I have no intention of making an effort to see it. Do they not have to clear any of this with the Queen or the men in charge? Somehow I don't see it being another "Queen at 90" type production.
I remember watching a bio show about Elton. In one of the segments he was between shows and either at a resort or at his home playing tennis. He was having a wing ding temper tantrum because someone shouted hello to him through the hedge. He hates to be hailed in any way by anyone when he's in his private places, so it does make sense that he'd be the go to guy for all things super injunction/lawsuit etc. And of course, of course, Megs would only want to have her referrals from hoity toity famous folk because you know, she's so very important now. Meanwhile her dad is stuck with "Better Call Saul" even though Megs is the one who set up her dad with that stupid scripted disingenuous and contrived letter in the first place.
Nah, IF we get caught owing the taxes, we mostly just man up (so to speak) and make a payment plan if we don't have the cash. If she wanted to go to tax court over the principle, the representative that she should have had assisting her may cost more than the amount she owed the government. Even when we disputed our taxes, we would sit down and ask "How much will it cost to fight this? Holy crap, THAT much?" She probably claimed expenses that were disallowed in an audit. It has happened to us many times.
Actually, the feds can be more reasonable than county tax agents. We have tried to fight the valuation of some swampland on the grounds that it is under four feet of water during tropical storms or even an unusually wet season, only to be told that we could develop it and build houses on it. House boats, maybe.
I am wondering about Venue in this as it was Thomas who revealed the letter to the MoS. So I'm wondering why MoS is being sued for it when the source of the original letter was Thomas, and he lives in Mexico. To me it's like the Plaintiff is conveniently Daisy Chaining the Venue in order to force liability onto the MoS. I don't know about UK venue law, but in the US, you file a suit against someone, the venue is in the Defendant's location, unless it's stipulated and agreed to and ordered by a judge that it can be changed.
Another thing that comes to mind, ya I know... I overthink everything. It comes from working for lawyers before going into journalism, I just can't imagine that the MoS legal team would have let the letter and story go to press without fully vetting and green lighting it first. I think the publisher's legal team would be far more cautious than say, Epstein's jail guards, warden, cameras...
Blogger Marie said...
Btw, for everyone talking about a statue of limitations, I don't know exactly what you mean, but after googling a bit, the UK has a Limitation Act of 1980 that seems to outline limitation periods for different kinds of things. But for civil claims, it's not clear cut that one cannot pursue after the period runs out.
Yes, that is what I meant, sorry if unclear. .
Thomas Markle is judgement proof, ie, he ain't got no monies. They are suing MoS, because MoS has the money to pay a judgement, or their insurer does.
UK law is likely very similar to US law on venue and most other things, after all, English Common Law was the foundation for US jurisprudence, Louisiana not withstanding.
I believe UK copyrights may extend to the US by treaty... The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.
And it's true TM is judgement- proof besides.
Ah but Thomas Markle is in Mexico, not USA. The jurisdictions are ... playing Twister.
(And, NO, this dream does not *directly* pertain to Meghan, although it does relate to Harry—just a little. So if you’re expecting some kind of prophesy, you can skip what I think will be a long-ass comment right now.)
In the dream I was at a pets (mainly dogs) event, there was a wooden boat and I got off quickly as something under one of the benches scared me.
I got off on the next stop which happened to be a film festival where I spotted an acquaintance, I quickly approached him because I knew nobody there. To gain entry into a screening, you had to sign your autograph with a Sharpie on a film poster/backdrop (this was the way you “buy a film ticket” in the dream).
We get in and the acquaintance starts playing with a baby and a Snoopy plushie. Apparently the baby is (somehow) the offspring of my old crush in undergrad! Which was odd because he wasn’t even married in the dream... How did he end up with a baby if there’s no wife?
Anyway, back to REAL LIFE... I used to codename my crush “Lennon” (because from a certain angle I thought he looked a bit like John Lennon—just my type, tall and lanky and all that). We majored in international law together. He was enrolled a year above me, but because he was a spoiled rich kid who didn’t take his studies serious (which to be fair most of the pupils at that university were) and I was always in a rush in life and getting into the advanced courses early, we often attended the same classes.
One summer he and his family go on holiday to England (apparently to survey graduate schools for him to attend, I later learn).
He goes to Madame Tussaud’s (in England) and takes a photo together with a wax figure of Hitler. And guess what Lennon does? He does the NAZI SALUTE next to wax Hitler and proudly posts it on Friendster (yeah I’m showing my age).
Being the dumbass he is, he didn’t know any better (although given we’d both studied WWII’s atrocities in International Humanitarian Law class together, he really should have).
This was around the time (can’t be sure before/after) Harry wore that Nazi costume at a costume party.
Then I justified it with the fact that he was best friends with the son of the Minister of Foreign Affairs at the time... In my self-denial I convinced myself that if the sun of MoFA thought he was cool to befriend, then It should be okay for me to still crush on him.
After I woke-up, I Googled him again. I know you’re not supposed to Google your exes but I did. He seems to be doing fine...
I recently (2018–2019) found the old photos of him. I put it down the paper shredder.
I don’t know how Meghan does it.
Or how she justifies it.
Sorry if that was weird. I am in a different timezone.
It's Saturday morning here.
Hi everyone! ☀️
At this stage if Meghan Markle upstages your wedding, you've pretty much just brought it onto yourself.
I mean people should know better than to invite this a-hole to their weddings by now.
If you don't disinvite them, you're practically *asking* for it imo. Sorry.
If you did dusinvite her from a life event where you would naturally expect them to be invite, she'd just upstage you in the press with
"DUCHESS MARKLE BUTTHURT AND HEARTBROKEN OVER SNUB"
You can't win with this level of a-hole.
What is life
Lainey runs a post about Andrew almost daily and keeps comparing his treatment to Meghan's. She doesn't know the difference between allegations and criminal accusations.
Am certain Elton schooled and encouraged Harry to sueon the hacking.
Have you seen the DM? It is nothing but Elton exclusives, no comments allowed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PrAOBqRkGg
Thanks for that. I had a good laugh. I love hearing these YouTubers read out loud and LOL at what they're reading.
When YW puts it like that, it makes these supposed "monarchy modernisers" APPEAR BACKWARD doesn't it.
I like YW a lot.
It's interesting that she's old enough to remember what pre-60's England was like.
Meanwhile Harry us acting just like a typical self-pitying everything-is-somebody-else's-fault millennial.
As is Meghan.
That's what Millenials do. They shift blame on something else instead of taking responsibility. If they act like a-holes they claim people hate them for their gender/race.
Harry's just itchy to play victim about SOMETHING (as are many other privileged Millenials twisting their lives to make them into SOME kind of marginalised hooman, ANY KIND). Too bad he was born a privileged white male, can't whine about much now can he? He must be having the time of his life with Meghan.
To be a finger-wagging SJW one needs a victimhood license. Privileged white males aren't typically granted that license so now he gets the permit through marriage. It's like a GREEN CARD I tell you!
The irony tho is that the action taken to play victim involved oppression freedom of teh presses. HAHAAAAAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHAHA the level of stupid I can't
And yes Meghan is technically a millennial. She was born 1981 which is the cut-off year for the beginning if the generation. Sometimes we forget she's a millennial because she's pushing 40 (nevermind how depressing it is that we've gotten so old so fast lol).
PS: Before anyone says Im a whiny old fart nagging "youngsters these days", I'm a millennial myself but I try not to be that way. I'm actually quite ashamed of my generation and would prefer to identify as Gen-X (like the Spice Girls).
For something far more pleasant, there’s a lovely video out of Sophie Wessex dancing the waltz on one of her engagements - classy all around!
This may be oot but I was just re-watching Di's funeral and it suddenly struck me that Meghan may do the ultimate to remain the victim and never be forgotten, forever. What is this ultimate act? To become his widow. Why do I get flashes that she wants to be seen dressed in a black dress and pearls like Diana at Versace's funeral and she carrying her fatherless son, Archie at the funeral. I wonder if she has a hand in Prince Harry's seemingly downward spiral... I do not wish deathwish on anyone but the image and thoughts just flashed across my mind....
And celt was like "that's harsh" but you could tell she was giggling?
THAT WAS THE BEST 👏🏼😂🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂
Maybe this whole phone hacking thing is just H&M sunding up a balloon. All that has been done is that his law firm has 'issued proceedings'.
"Issuing proceedings is the first court step of possible legal action against a defendant. Once papers are lodged with the court, the claimant has four months to decide whether to proceed with the action by serving the defendant. Until that action has been taken, it would be possible for a defendant to be unaware of the content of the claim".
The main thing about that item (from the Guardian I think) is that Harry has 4 mths to decide if he even wants to sue. Which makes it seem like more of a 'back off-threat', aimed mainly at Piers than an actual intent to go through with it, or is GingerMegs hoping for a big financial settlement out of court. With proceeds going into their charitable foundation no doubt(snort).
H&M should just jump in the hole they are digging for themselves and be done with it.
The lawsuits aren’t top stories or headline news. The Cambridge’s aren’t being overshadowed. Why are always so dramatic and read into stuff which isn’t true?
I can't imagine either of them will make credible witnesses, Meghan because she lives in her own narrative and Harry because he seems to be her creature with little independent thought.
In the witness box he's going to be asked why he's taking action now on an historic matter. I can't think of a believable reason, short of stifling free speech. He's going to have to convince the court that he has good reasons and is suffering harm from the hacking.
After a lifetime of deference the shredding he's going to be subjected to by the Defence Counsel will be totally gloves off. He recently shouted at poor Rhiannon for asking a polite question- how will he cope with cross-exaination?
I can't wait for the movie!
On a sadder note, this must be causing many crisis meetings in The Windsors production office. How will they make the toxic royals amusing?
Personally I think it's the cuckoo in the RF nest and Harry’s own plan to get money out of the tabloids (against every ones advice). Megs would have had no trouble convincing him the evil tabloids were both Her and Harry's arch enemies whom they should BOTH take revenge on for not falling for their fluff and hustle and being so mean to his NEW mummy. Harry certainly has enough money to set the wheels in motion and they are both counting on coming out of it with inflated bank balances in the end.
I don't think he needs the masquerade at the corner to back him up, his upbringing and lifelong family bailouts and indulgences along with Meghan's bedtime whispers have probably led him to believe he is bullet proof.
However, I do believe that many in the family are quaking in their boots and well they should be , she is proving to be as much as a loose cannon as Diana and no doubt Harry has spilled a lot of scandal beans about the family to her, I'm sure blackmail or writing a tell all book is not beyond her money making vision. Perhaps she also thinks she is bullet proof.
My mind just boggles at the stupidity of this pair when they have had everything handed to them, including the good will of most of the nation at the time of the wedding, all squandered within a year.
One thing I do know is that she applied for her own bank account with Coutt's a while back and was denied (H&M do have a joint account there). That's a real kick in the pants from the upper class establishment. Quite a few LOL's about that doing the rounds.
Nobody's funding him, except maybe their dodgy 'foundtion'. They are paying privately for Meghan's lawsuit which I'd say has a good chance of success. The cases against the Sun and Mirror haven't been filed yet, and going by the history of such cases - which usually end up in substantial out-of-court settlements - probably they won't be.
I think she has the potential to be much worse.
Diana was an aristocrat and believed in the monarchy. She had a vested interest in the continued existence of the royals, since her son would be king one day. And it's said that shortly before her death, she and Charles were on good terms and she was starting to regret the divorce.
Meghan by contrast, is an outsider, javascript:void(0)an American who couldn't care less about the royal family, as we have seen so clearly. All she wants is as much money and fame as anyone could possibly imagine. If that means trashing the royals, so be it. And Harry is stupid enough to go along with it. Only consolation is that Harry and Meghan don't really count in the long run.
^ Coutts not Coutt's, damn auto correct.
You embellish and you do dramatise. The lawsuits aren’t all over the news, it’s merely a flicker compared to other lawsuits filed in the past by the royals.
"It’s time the ‘terrible’ British press stopped covering any public engagement by the Duke & Duchess of Sussex. Let’s all give them the privacy they purport to crave, and spare them the ‘torment’ of having their myriad causes get huge beneficial publicity."
Yes please!
@swampwoman, thanks for the info. Seems to add to the narrative that Meghan is a bit litigious or at least not a shrinking violet. Also seems like the IRS is suggesting you can open a new luxury house boat settlement - glamping is so last year, meet swamping. :D
Hmm. If true, why would she need to have her own account - now?
Loving Piers' utter twistedness. 🌝
He *KNOWS* the true terrible torment for them would be if we all stopped paying them any attention... 🌚
Maybe the press should stop reporting them altogether... See how they'll like it then.
(They'd probably just start posting 27 Instagram posts and 54 IG stories daily.)
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/jul/08/heather-mills-receives-apology-and-payout-in-phone-hacking-case
My guess is the “charity” that benefited is Sunshine Sacks, which has stated it is helping the Foundation.
Is there any kind of legal timeline for reporting donations UK versus USA (if going to LA is the end game)?
Different topic: I am amused at the idea of all that money they sunk into the positive press to make themselves look so good could be used to fund the papers to defend themselves from them. And, would they have difficulty getting people to pay for positive press in the future? Would their price go up or down because of their reputations?
I agree :)
I rarely view her 'Me me me' Instagram page, so she can treble her posts for all I care, as I won't see them! LOL
Meg's fuel is mostly greed and how to create buzz to supply her NPD.
That segment on Yankee Wally about Megs and Harry's big fat FU's over the past year is so true. It's a good reminder for us to be more aware and call Megs out on it when she does that. She loves to be trolled, too.
Another thing I've noticed over time is how much people who have never experienced surviving the clutches of an NPD person is how quick they are to defend their behavior. It's a shame so many are enabling and feeding the monster. And as far as people saying Harry is still in the love bomb bubble, my view is that the love bombing isn't an ongoing thing, that it waxes and wanes. Right now I think it's waxing.
At least William had the wherewithal to put as much distance as he could between himself and MM. His choosing Catherine as consort and recognizing MM's pathology from the very beginning demonstrates a level of wisdom that makes him exceptionally primed for the throne.
Hopefully the rumours are true that were the monarchy to no longer prevail, he would be perfectly content to live a fulfilling life nestled in the comforts of his close-knot family unit. Harry is already destined as the David and Margaret perjorative that will forever be a cause for the BRF to heave a sigh.
I hate to say, but so far Harry and MM are winning. They have big guns on their side with the law suits; and despite Harry's truculence toward the British press, the press seem ever more preoccupied with the Sussexes
That's an interesting take on the current situation. I would love to know what led you to your conclusions.
What I see is the media circling the wagons against a wildly unpredictable prince who appears to be in thrall to a woman who despises his family, the British and the UK: in fact she appears to loathe us lowly citizens.
If you're referring to Ellen Degeneres - well that's purely transactional,they share a PR Agent and doubtless she's angling for the big interview.
As for new BFF Elton John, he's happily using the Mail to promote his memoirs.
All high profile endorsements are meaningless. They will make one statement and that's it;Serena, Michelle, Hillary - we'll hear no more from them. They will get their payback through the circuitous PR route.
I think perhaps you underestimate how deeply angry the Press are with the Sussex's. They have sat on so many damning stories and left them unpublished because of the contract that exists with the Royals, only to be attacked quite savagely.
I wouldn't want to be Harry and Meghan now. The sh!t will really hit the fan; the stories will be released, probably slowly and through indirect sources, but there's no way back for the Harkles.
VRsutz Brossard