Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from December, 2020

Open Post: Meg's Christmas Card

Hello from vacation, where I've just noticed the Sussexes truly dreadful Christmas card as profiled in the New York Post. My immediate guess was that Meg used Photoshop's dry brush filter to hide any traces of photo manipulation and, perhaps, the insertion of a substitute Archie. What a mess. What was she thinking?  And how does it help the Sussexes build their brand?  They're supposed to be multi-million-dollar Netflix producers and Spotify podcasters, yet they're releasing something that looks like the very best product of a night school art class at a provincial community college. All the bases "The original photo of the family was taken at their home earlier this month by the Duchess's mother," according to a statement by Archewell. Not that Doria has ever been known as being a keen photographer before, particularly when it comes to what was clearly a posed shot. (All three family members plus two dogs in the same frame, all smiling? This must of been...

Meg and Kamala

Although I haven't been around much recently, I've enjoyed reading the comments. Recently the group was discussing whether or not the Sussexes would release a Christmas card this year, given what Meg's tragic miscarriage last summer (if you believe the official version of events) or their lack of access to the baby playing the role of Archie (if you don't). I was struck by Enbrethiliel's suggestion that if the Sussexes do a Christmas card this year, it might include a quote from Kamala Harris. Birds of a feather Actually, I'm surprised that Meghan hasn't tried harder to publicly associate herself with Harris.  Both women are biracial, both California natives, both "woke" Democrats. They even have similar hairstyles and fashion preferences. Both are fond of big, airy language with minimal substance, and both are openly ambitious.  In fact, there's quite a bit of chatter suggesting that Joe Biden will have quite a short presidency and quickly res...