Loud noise about how Harry "won" a review of his protection status - although the article (DM so far) was that it may/was initiated by the Home Office. Maybe? Maybe not. One of the comments was that actually it was part of a periodic review to see if the safety status has changed. It's been, what, five years? That would be logical. Status can change and therefore their interpretation of safe/not safe would need to be adjusted. Timing is good. The comments are running heavily in the No, don't give him an upgrade. Hot and heavy there. But ... sometimes I like to read the opposite comments to see how they phrase/look at the world. And, how their supportive numbers are running. Only a fraction supportive when you compare to don't give in group. Vocal? yes. Massive? no.