Title pretty much says it all. The sarcastic side of me says that maybe in another 10 years they will allow a real face shot.
But let's think about this.
Allegedly * bristles as the criticism of the unkempt hair. Couple thoughts about that.
Archie doesn't seem to have the same issue. He seems to get regular hair cuts.
Roll this around: She is raising her daughter to be a California Girl, just like her. What does that mean and look like?
So how is this going to play out once the kid discovers what ever the current equivalent of Tik Tok is and lets loose? Goes whole hog into the showing off of herself. You know kids are better than a cheating spouse at being able to hide technology they don't want others to find out about themself.
Do we really think she will want to present herself as, well, unkempt hippy not pulled together later on? Maybe but maybe not.
In a lot of high end places, there is a lot of social pressure to wear the right clothes, have the right accessories, drive the right car and, look good at all times. Middle school is less of the pressure cooker that high school is. And, although many schools have shifted to a uniform, kids still manage to dress it up.
And, how will she look back on her childhood as a series of events where she had to stand just do, move just so in order that her face is not seen by the camera. Seen but not really seen.
What we are shown is a snip. Performative. Appearing not necessarily relaxed but controlled. Directed. Edited. Unlike real kids who are a lot more relaxed and unscripted.
We may never know if there exists alternate photos of the kids where they get to smile into the camera.
Or alternate photos where the hair is brushed or plaited.
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation is still on.
It could also be that * doesn't want to compete with her daughter, >she< has to be the one to be admired/noticed/fêted etc, the child is just a prop and must not detract from *'s image.
Narcissists are totally incapable of love but love for themselves. I know for my mother was one and because of her mental illness and cruelty I never loved her I just survived her and I hope that Harry's children will survive his wife. For there is no tenderness towards his little girl in his wife. If there were any warm feelings in the baroness Harry's daughter's hair would be groomed in those photos. I had two little girls so I know. But she does not give a damn. Maybe she hates her for she is a true princess and the baroness is not nor will she ever be.
I wonder if Harry understands what he is doing to his children. He had very cruel things to say about his father in his childhood. He seems to be even lousier father than his "pa", for he is a man without any backbone.
If you need a laugh...
Folie a’ but
The camel hued ho
was never best in show
Despite her desperate delusions
As she forced tongue in cheek
Haz was rendered
gelded weak
And willingly agreed
their collusions…
Liven up Nutties!
This blog is dying
Come on
Join in
He is such a sunshine, Harry is. Maybe Charles will apologize everything Harry's wife demands and Harry and his family get this half-in-half-out deal they crave.
(info Dan Wootton)
There might, however, be fresh take on H's security here: https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1tzk7ye/harry_must_be_considered_a_highsecurity_risk_and/
It's the suggestion that it's not just a matter of him being at too low risk to warrant special protection that RAVEC hasn't granted what he wants. Is it being used to keep him, and hence her, out of the country?
It's an interesting thought - what do Nutties think?
I sounded off about them in draft form a few weeks ago but held back from posting it. Have just looked at it again and have decided that it sums up just what I think about them:
`I long to have an end to their activities that have wasted so much of my time and life. I just wish they'd get the message, shut up, clear off and enjoy the privacy they claim they need so much. Shirley Conran said that Life's too short to stuff a mushroom - yet I wonder how many person-hours we have, between us, squandered on them?
I ask myself why I got involved - and the answer I get is that it seemed necessary to do it, to hinder their attempts to overturn our Constitution. We may not have a single document enshrining our principles but our Constitution does exist. It is the entire body of our law, hammered out over the centuries, with the Monarch at its head.
How a quisling prince and his whore of a wife imagined that they could disrupt this is beyond me. Criminal insanity seems the only explanation and the nearest they should be allowed to get to Windsor, is that `palace' at Crowthorne, as someone else here has recently suggested. They'd be in good company - it's where the guy who tried to kidnap Princess Anne resides.
Harsh words I know but justified I feel. Life is too precious and brief to be wasted on them'.
The other reason I got involved was that once I grasped what had been going in on with my most recent nasty narcissist acquaintance, I swore I'd put my experience to good use and use it as a warning to others. I had no idea then, in April 2018, that another such monster was emerging onto the public stage. I knew from the Engagement Interview that I wouldn't employ her in my office, as even a lowly clerk, but the true horror soon emerged.
I had hoped that she would soon learn how to conduct herself but one friend pointed out that she had given the `wrong' answer to one particular question.
When asked if she'd use her new royal position as a platform for her humanitarian work, she picked up the ball and ran with it, making it all about her. The correct answer should have been along the lines of primarily supporting the Queen, upholding the Monarchy and backing her husband in his royal duties, before doing anything off her own bat.
(I see I've used 2 examples of English /British sporting imagery there which ilustrate just how unlikely she was to fit in - can you imagine her with a rugger ball or cricket bat?)
I don't however, share your opinion on this being wasted time.
I think we all have a need to observe and analyze other human beings' behaviour for our own understanding. It helps us to protect ourselves and to explain some of the events in our own lives, so it's very necessary to use extreme examples, like * to help us figure it out.
@GWAH
I got into this because I had managed to figure out, at last, what had been going on with my immediately preceding narcissist (female). That, in turn, enabled me to work out what went on in the head of the spouse I'd left within a year of marriage . I had worked out that he had a personality disorder of some unknown description but that was all. This was just before the Harkle marriage - the general recognition of narcissism is such a recent development.
Getting involved with the Harkles has enabled me to put all this bitter experience to some use in a worthy cause. It's over 8 years since * appeared on the horizon with her intention of `modernizing' the monarchy and I had become war-weary, wondering if I had succumbed to the `sunk-cost fallacy', especially as there's so much else I need to do on the personal front.
I've thought carefully about this and can see that we have not been struggling in vain. Our Constitution, which is enshrined in the whole body of the law rather than a single document, still stands even if the desired denouement hasn't happened yet - it will surely come in time, just as my Decree Absolute did. I really do need to hang on in here, just being more efficient about it.
It took me years of trying to understand why a seemingly very intelligent person would behave the way they did.
When I read a book detailing the characteristics of narcissists, everything fell into place. It described the rationale behind behaviours which I couldn't begin to comprehend.
Took me forever to realize that they *didn't want* to get it. And even longer to recover. Not that I'll ever recover. I imagine I'll always be highly attuned to narc behavior.
I wasn't really paying attention to the monarchy particularly. Aware of them in a vague sort of way. Then along comes Markle.
I remember being *so* disappointed in the wedding. She stepped out of the carriage and I thought....that's it???? That's the best she could do???? I shut the tv off right then.
But then I got curious and started looking into it further. Saw the engagement interview and thought yikes!!!! I'm surprised that wedding was allowed to happen. She was something else.
In 1989 I even spent time in our local university library trying to work it out - the nearest I could get was that my husband was somewhat like a psychopath (no conscience or remorse) but didn't quite fit the description.
It was the internet that revealed all but not until 2018, shortly before That Wedding. I'd had a weekend of difficulty with the behaviour of a house guest whom I understood to have had treatment to deal with her mental state . I'd bitten my tongue to keep the peace but finally told her to stop criticising me. I was treated to such a display of rage I couldn't decide whether to call an ambulance or the police.
She did calm down eventually but persisted in her criticism until she left - I turned to the computer to try and find out what the heck was going on. I didn't even know what search terms to use.
I tried `emotional blackmail' - and, lo, all was revealed. I went No Contact and vowed I'd do what I could to unmask the blighters.
Misan Harriman back in the news for antisemitic comments.
It is extremely worrying because in England they would have family around now they are alone without protection.
I do know what I am saying for my younger brother's escape was suicide.
I realise I am so lucky I've never come into to contact with a narcissist.
Re *, I never liked her from the start, I first saw her at the Invictus games in Toronto and she looked too smug for my liking. I also noted the so-called 'husband shirt' and wondered whether it was a subliminal hint to Harry and the world. The engagement interview didn't improve things and it went downhill from then on. Harry never knew what he let himself in for and even if he does know now, he's stuck with her. The children are away from their cousins, who could have given them a sense of normality. I wonder how they'll end up.
The only consolation we have is that as more is understood about narcissists and narcissism, that victims will not have to stumble around in the dark to understand why this is happening to them and in this way, minimize their suffering.
The article and photos - one an obvious screen shot - are worth a look if you want to have a snigger.
https://www.dailymail.com/lifestyle/article-15887237/Meghan-Markle-rare-photos-home-Prince-Harry.html
CDAN Blind item #13
With the new launch of her new company, the alliterate one wants to white label a GLP-1 product.
I thought that's what she was doing with As Ever. Another fail.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2026/06/blind-item-13_0735682679.html#disqus_thread
Quickie 🎤
Apologies: Dusty Springfield
In the Middle of Nowhere
Medi-ocrazy
Where does their life lie
In the middle of nowhere
World has now passed them by
In the middle of her glare
Megsy, won’t you tell us
What you’re gonna do
You’re in the middle of nightmare
Just haz and you
Over and over again
It feels like deja vu
Haz like many men
Struck in the middle
by you…
Grapes of Froth
Whiffs of desperation
and haz’s perspiration
Top notes of beige neige
on the nose
Her midsummer quaffing
Has us all laughing
More plonk from the planks
ain’t no rose…
She was definitely something
else!!!
Truly fascinating
Thank you
My last word is
What a fucking joke she is
Hahahaha!!!!
I wanted to find a word that describes his attitude against the Baka people in Africa when he enjoys the champagne dos of African Parks in the States.
`Lout belongs to a large group of words that we use to indicate a particular sort of offensive and insensitive person, that group also including such terms as boor, oaf, jerk, and churl. English speakers have used lout in this way since the mid-1500s. Well before the 12th century, however, lout functioned as a verb with the meaning “to bow in respect.” No one is quite sure how—or even if—the verb sense developed into a noun meaning “an awkward brutish person.” The noun could have been coined independently, but if its source was the verb, perhaps the awkward posture of one bowing down led over the centuries to the idea that the bowing person was base and awkward as well.'
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lout
Teenage louts roam the streets at night.'. Think also of 'lycra louts' - for non UK Nutties, aggressive, ill-mannered, selfish cyclists.
Harry is not a young man, neither is he a lout as defined above. Yes, he can and has been be rude, obnoxious etc but in the case of African Parks, it's more a question of rectitude and decency. He is weak, amoral and unprincipled. I'm sure they are other words to describe him re African Parks.
When i thought about it, I did realise that `lout' wasn't quite right for . this particular context although we use in phrases such as `litter lout' and `football lout' but I can't think of anything better.
And yet, here she is, offering them up to the pubic (in dribs and drabs) in increasing amounts each week.
“ she's doing to the royal family what her father is doing to her and they both dont get it. Mr Markle doesn't get that he's dead to meghan and meghan doesn't get that she is dead to the royal family...”
That thought makes me happy.
Lengthy discussion here about Harkle umbrage at King apparently not displaying photos they claim to have given him of the Invisikids.
This triggered the thought in my mind that, were His Maj ever to meet them, the girl's name would stick in his throat and he would refuse to call her by the stolen name, even if he were physically capable of saying it.
I'm sure everybody will rush to buy this concoction. 'For $56, customers will receive Clevr's blend of ceremonial-grade matcha and functional ingredients, Meghan's Strawberry Spread, and flower sprinkles to 'add beauty to each bite'.' 'functional ingredients'? Such as? I think * is trying to flog her spread as the stuff is now nearing expiry date.