Skip to main content

Open Post: New Hires and Fergie Going to Bat for the Sussexes

Is there a new chapter for the Sussexes? Are things looking up for them after Fergie signals support and they have a new former Disney+ exec heading Archewell content?

Let's discuss this and more...

Comments

LavenderLady said…
Just wondering if maybe Fergie is letting her bodice rip now that her father in law has passed. She's been quite the Chatty Cathy lately.

RE: TBW's "jewel box" party. What the bloody H? Any mention of her and a jewel box in the same sentence could only mean she's carrying paste in her Yak nether regions.

@Magatha my dear, please feel free...😉❤️
SwampWoman said…
Maybe she's hinting strongly that that jewel box is a bit empty; guests can bring jewelry.
SwampWoman said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
LavenderLady said…
@Swampwoman,
Only if the jewelry is baby shaped lol...
Fifi LaRue said…
@SwampWoman: TBW is for sure 6's boat anchor, dragging him down to the bottom.
Magatha Mistie said…

@LL

Chatty Cathie hahaha!!!
Magatha Mistie said…

PS. @LL I read DM comments also!
Este said…
So, Meghan can't even rustle up 65 of her closest friends to fete her big 40. Well color me surprised! Funny how their so-called "sources" leak one thing and then another to the press. So desperate for attention, these 2 are.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9856371/Prince-Harry-planning-surprise-trip-Meghan-Markles-40th-birthday-not-party-sources-say.html
LavenderLady said…
@Magatha,

Those DM comments are comedy gold, especially those from England. The dry sense of humor is hilarious in it's indifference 👍
Magatha Mistie said…

@LL

Too dry to get it?
Maneki Neko said…
@Magatha

Look at me, look at me
~~~~~
Exactly what I was thinking 🤣
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
snarkyatherbest said…
So lost in the drama - what is going on with the Yorks? - both york girl husbands in the spotlight with suggestions of inappropriate behaviour with women who are not the wives. Is this harkles hand. Is she mad about something and is burning them left and right? Fergie - shut up already - stop with all the articles. Overload! Is Charles attempting to show that the York girls (or at least their spouses) make them unfit to take on royal duties? Its all curious timing as we await the distribution of Madame's (or madman!) patronages.

So is there a party for the 40th or is there not. And where's my invite. For sure we could wrestle up 65 of us to show up and see what is happening. Maybe we could get a private viewing of the tiara i mean wig vault.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0SpgvfkpnA

HG Tudor produced this, about the ageing narcissist, last November. I wonder how well it predicts TBW's future?
Enbrethiliel said…
@SwampWoman
They're trying to compete in the giant swimming pool of life while chained to an anchor.

If @Hikari is still awarding lattes of the day, I'd like to nominate this comment!
Enbrethiliel said…
@LavenderLady
Just wondering if maybe Fergie is letting her bodice rip now that her father in law has passed. She's been quite the Chatty Cathy lately.

Oh, my! What an image!

I had always thought of Sarah as chatty and uninhibited, but if you think she is a little looser-lipped than usual, then it might have something to do with Prince Philip passing. At least she waited a few months before bombarding us with all this new publicity. She may be incredibly vulgar, but she's still classier than her red-haired nephew and his wife.

(Someone predicted a few years ago that Prince Andrew and Sarah wanted to remarry and were just waiting for Prince Philip to die before doing so. Now that would be interesting!)
Humor Me said…
So.....this intimate party with a half-iced cake and grazing tables is on the par with a birthday party at Balmoral given by the Queen and Kate's hosting a baby shower....
I have to admit - I bought it until the news broke 48hrs later about Obama's 60th bash. The view from Monticeito must be so out of focus from the California smog that the owners live in a perpetuall skewed world. Just wow.
Enbrethiliel said…
@snarkyatherbest
So lost in the drama - what is going on with the Yorks? - both york girl husbands in the spotlight with suggestions of inappropriate behaviour with women who are not the wives.

I agree that it's odd. Edo's breaking up with the mother of his son is old news; if that's still all they've got against him, he's doing well. Plus, at least one big thing she has done since the break-up have only proven he was right to end that relationship. Maybe he got roped in because one misbehaving York husband is a single news cycle waiting to die but two misbehaving York husbands make for a much longer saga.

This might all be perfectly "innocent": Sarah is getting press, which calls some attention to her daughters as well. And then Jack was photographed in a scandalous situation. Any other time, he would have still made headlines; but it just happens to be a bigger story this week.

As for whether someone is behind it . . . I think the Harkles are too focused on looking like gems in a Californian jewel box to be pulling these strings. And I'd like to hope that Prince Charles wouldn't sink so low as to smear his nieces' husbands. As far as I can tell, no one but their parents want the girls to be full-time working royals; there's no PR battle he needs to win with dirty tactics.
snarkyatherbest said…
Enbrethiliel - you are prob right about charles (or I would hope) it may be just a little more on the passive aggressive side with reporters going to BP before running a story and the response is they arent working royals (like the sussexes) so the press protection is not extended. That would be a not so subtle way of reminding them they are not and will not be working royal.

love the jewel box quote - perhaps an emerald tiara in all of that?!!!
abbyh said…
Moderator here

Please cease and desist from bringing problems and comments about or messages to others about other blogs to this blog.

We are sorry you are having troubles but this is not the place to get them sorted out.
xxxxx said…
and a party for 65 people is 'absolutely not happening', sources tell Page Six

If Neg's birthday party was not a SS placement than nothing is. Anyway laughs all around. Hapless should whisk her off to Elton's in Italy? South of France? was it? for her birthday. Just stay away from Ol' Blighty. The natives are restless there.
xxxxx said…
Of course Obama and Michelle can host a huge party for his political associates and friends. They overlap somewhat. O and Michelle have been networking for years in the political and other realms. If O and M threw a party for 1000 of them, 975 would show up. Not just to kiss Obama's ring, but to see and network with all the others who will attending.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Snarkyatherbest
it may be just a little more on the passive aggressive side with reporters going to BP before running a story and the response is they arent working royals (like the sussexes) so the press protection is not extended. That would be a not so subtle way of reminding them they are not and will not be working royal.

Oh, that's a good one!

I confess I do feel for the York princesses a bit. They spent all their formative years believing they would be full-time working royals, only to have their futures suddenly changed. It took them a while to land on their feet. Maybe they already believe it is better for them this way. They are freer and less in the spotlight. Well, except in moments like these.
Karla said…
In case any one has forgotten, it’s a royals birthday tomorrow!
So let’s all celebrate and wish Happy Birthday to ….Queen Elizabeth, the Queen mother, born 4 th August 1900.🍰🎂🎂

https://www.royal.uk/queen-elizabeth-queen-mother
abbyh said…
We do not tolerate racial slurs.

We do not tolerate criticizing other bloggers.

Nor profanity.

Thank you for those who are blogging on topic. Carry on.

Moderation is on.
snarkyatherbest said…
I agree - I like the york girls and their lives have been turned over. if only mom would stay out of the limelight and i think no one would care lately about what is going on in their personal lives.

Karla - yes - I will eat cake for that birthday - heck i will eat cake any day!!

snarkyatherbest said…
I am also guessing someone floated the 65 person party to make it look like she had something special going. (and 65 is a weird number, is it covid compliance or another secret message)
Question is - did PH say no and made sure that was the corrected in page six? did they suddenly get an invite to Martha's vineyard or will she photoshop herself waiting for a ferry to MV. Interesting the clap back about no party. maybe hes getting fed up with some of her antics and is telling her Im making the money now so you listen to me?
Sandie said…
The trademark application for the Archewell brand has been delayed again! The problem, in a nutshell, is they ticked everything on the list and they have no proof of any commercial activity through the Archewell brand or any concrete plans for such.

The Harkles are going to feel persecuted and I wonder if they will lawyer up yet again?

When the Cambridges have applied for trademarks they have not ticked everything on the list but only those items that will be official fund raising merchandise. Also, the Cambridges applied from a charity organization that uses the sale of merchandize to raise money for charity, and they have a track record in doing so. I assume that is why tgey did not have such hassles, although William has had trouble with Earthshot.

Archewell is set up as a commercial company, and has no track record nor anything concrete in the works. (For example, if they are going to sell branded merchandize linked to their podcast series, then show actual plans seems to be what the trademark organization is saying if my understanding is correct.)

Messy Megsie and Hapless Harry must feel as if they are swimming through treacle! I wonder if HH misses 'the institution' and if MM misses the easy days of being Cory's girlfriend behind the scenes and blogging, merching, holidaying publicly?
Karla said…
Snarkyatherbest...LOL... That made me laugh a lot.👏
Hikari said…
@Embre

From your keyboard to mine eyes....Swampie gets whatever she’d like to drink and I saw sno-cones all around to everyone for enduring the Harkle saga. What a cluster. The Queen does not deserve her family. No wonder she tried to spend half the year in Scotland.
snarkyatherbest said…
Sandie - and two babes to boot - its exhausting keeping up all the pretenses!
snarkyatherbest said…
Hikari - and this is the Queen prefers her corgis too!
Fifi LaRue said…
I can find nothing going on/amiss with Edo; Jack just seems like he needs to be schooled in social skills for the married man. Like, he needs to get a clue, or two. Stupid people generally don't need help with being stupid.
LavenderLady said…
@Magatha,
Yes, sometimes.
We Yanks are so in your face direct that when a British person makes a joke, it may a bit too dry to get the gist right off. By indifference I mean, that attitude that comes across as cool as a cucumber, tongue in cheek/off the cuff, but hilarious once it sinks in.

I watched a lot of British shows from back in the day-on cable. I loved KUA/Hyacinth and Are You Being Served. My kids loved Monte Python, my dad loved Benny Hill. I have to admit I had a hard time when younger, but now as an older person (and living with the Irish who have a similar sense of humor) I can get it much better. But not always...

Maybe style of humor changes with the generations?

@Enbre said,
(Someone predicted a few years ago that Prince Andrew and Sarah wanted to remarry and were just waiting for Prince Philip to die before doing so. Now that would be interesting
____

I don't remember where I read during the Epstein scandal that Sarah and Andrew will remarry due to Andrew's possible testimony being looked at, but Sarah will be protected if she is his legal wife. Something like that. Maybe you remember the statement.
SwampWoman said…
Thank you, thank you Hikari and Enbrethiliel. (I feel like I should be making an Oscar-type speech about what a thrill it is to just to be nominated.) I really need a fan like River's to carry it off with the proper elan. (Too lazy to look up how to add the accent mark.)

I shall donate my suitably strong drink(s) of choice to Abby and Charade. It appears that they had a lot of cleaning and disinfecting to do. I dunno what just went down here (looking around at overturned tables and busted chairs) but, whatever it was, it must have had psychiatrists scrabbling frantically to find their prescription pads.
lizzie said…
@LavenderLady wrote:

"I don't remember where I read during the Epstein scandal that Sarah and Andrew will remarry due to Andrew's possible testimony being looked at, but Sarah will be protected if she is his legal wife."

I do remember seeing suppositions along those lines. But I'm not sure that reasoning makes sense. (And I had read they might remarry prior to the Epstein stuff heating up. After all, they do live together.)

State laws vary but in the US it's generally true that a person can't be compelled to testify against a spouse. However, there are limits to spousal immunity. Testimony about events and conversations occuring in the time prior to a marriage is not protected. So I wouldn't think testimony about events and conversations occurring between marriages would be protected either. In other words, it's not a blanket immunity.
LavenderLady said…
@Swampwonan said,
I shall donate my suitably strong drink(s) of choice to Abby and Charade. It appears that they had a lot of cleaning and disinfecting to do. I dunno what just went down here (looking around at overturned tables and busted chairs) but, whatever it was, it must have had psychiatrists scrabbling frantically to find their prescription pads.

---

Amen! I second the motion...
SwampWoman said…
I would think that if they remarry, it wouldn't be for 'legal' reasons but because they enjoy each other's company. I know a lot of divorced people that would rather spend a few years in solitary confinement rather than remarry the ex.
Karla said…
MM's cake (🤔,)
"Harry is pulling out all the stops to make Meghan's 40th a special day, and has ordered a cake – dubbed "ludicrous" by The Sun – from nearby bakery Posies & Sugar, Tatler has reported.The bakery's speciality is a "naked" cake where some of its layers are visible underneath the icing."

I don't understand: who will be naked? The cake or Harry? ( Las Vegas 😂)

...
SHOWBIZ DEBUT Prince Harry and Meghan lined up to make Hollywood debut and present Emmy award next month.

EMMY awards bosses want Prince Harry and wife Meghan to make their Hollywood debuts at the ceremony next month.

TV execs are keen for the pair to attend the A-list event in downtown LA.

They may even try to persuade the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to present an award, insiders say.

It comes with chat show queen Oprah Winfrey the clear bookies’ favourite to take home the award for Outstanding Hosted Nonfiction Series or Special Emmy for her bombshell interview with the royal outsiders.

An LA TV source told The Sun: “The Sussexes are in high demand — it would be their first red carpet appearance since Megxit and their full-time Californian move.

“Oprah is planning to attend the night, which could help get them there.

IN HIGH DEMAND'
“Certainly, there would be a VIP invite for them from Netflix at its evening celebration event.

“Netflix knows that shots of them with big Hollywood names would be huge PR.”

It is not yet known whether Harry and Meg, who gave birth to the couple’s second child, daughter Lilibet, in June, will attend.

The main ceremony is being held on September 19 and will be hosted by Us actor and comedian Cedric the Entertainer.

All guests must show proof of vaccination on entry.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15771322/meghan-markle-prince-harry-present-emmy-award/
Unknown said…
Summary: The Queen prefers corgis to her unruly Royals and prefers living in Scotland.
LavenderLady said…
@Karla,
Naked cake sounds to me like the bakery being cheap by trying to save on product and passing it off as trendy. If so, very fitting for the discount store Duke and Duchess. 😂
Sandie said…
Meghan wants to smugly parade her prince of nothing and her duchess title of nothing in front of Hollywood.

Oprah wants another dig at the royals that politely declined her numerous attempts to woo them.

Netflix desperately want to make the Harkles worth the deal they gave them.

I can see the 2021 Emmys being the night of the Sussexes.

Remember the Hollywood crowd, including Oprah and other prominent A-listers, fawned all over Harvey Weinstein for years when it was an open secret what he was up to.

The Obamas have sort of followed a celebrity path and have just been more successful than the Harkles because they have a lot more going for them, including management skills, diplomatic and press experience, and the gravitas of two terms in office, plus they talk sense and are likeable and skilled in engaging with people and behaving themselves appropriately. I doubt they have any interest in the wife, but they are likely to want Harry as a guest at the birthday party.

I do hope we get lots photos of the outfits she wears! How badly can she mess up in that department and how much will the media fawn over the emperor's new clothes?
Karla said…
LL...Cake Sale😂
Sandie said…
However, the Harkles do seem to have put the word out that they will not be at the Obama party and have worded it in such a way to imply that they refused the invitation.
snarkyatherbest said…
Karla - Ha whose naked Good one!!! actually naked cakes are so several years agos, at least the ones where the cake is sometimes through the icing. Now a naked harry cake, well that would take the cake!!!

If I were harry i would get her a princess cake with a big ole emerald tiara made of fondant. He better like the flavor because I certainly feel that he will be wearing that cake ;-)

Sandie - no one would refuse an invite to the Obama bash - its the networking and elite to be there. Now if she were invited as one of the many "entertainers" or after the white shirt, black skirt pregnancy ensemble maybe they asked if she could be waitstaff ;-)
Karla said…
I read that Oprah's category won't be live.
...

This year’s Creative Arts Emmys will be split into three ceremonies the weekend of September 11-12. Unlike the main ceremony, the Creative Arts ceremonies are not broadcast live, but an edited version will air on Saturday, September 18 at 8/7c on FXX
...

2021 Creative Arts Emmys: Sunday, September 12 – 1 p.m. PT.
Outstanding Hosted Nonfiction Series Or Special


https://www.goldderby.com/feature/when-are-the-emmys-1204330913/
...
Sandie...Perfect!👏
SwampWoman said…
Sandie said: However, the Harkles do seem to have put the word out that they will not be at the Obama party and have worded it in such a way to imply that they refused the invitation.


What a great way to guarantee that they will *never* receive an invitation in the future! Putting down the hosts (and the people at the party) and implying that it was not as important as another engagement is always a winning strategy. So is 'turning down' an invitation that was not extended.
SwampWoman said…
My gracious. Does one really need to have a press announcement that one's husband is getting one a cake without frosting for the big 4-0? Guess one needs to watch those calories! (Harry, have you considered a fruit cup?) I guess this means no special diamond sparkly things.

/Woohoooo! I just successfully put together and connected another electronic device and didn't refer to the instructions ONCE! Reading instructions is for LOSERS. I had to switch out the too short HDMI cable, though.

//This stuff appears to be completely idiot proof. They probably have a picture of me somewhere in IT support saying "You gotta make this so intuitive that this woman is going to be able to put it together without calling us. She NEVER reads directions."
Sandie said…
Both the Obama birthday story and the Emmy story are crazy. Are the tabloids just making stuff up?

@Karla
Thanks for the reminder that the interview nomination is not part of the big ceremony. It is a Sunday lunch-time gig that won't be broadcast live!

However, maybe Netflix will want the Sussexes at their after-party for the main awards ceremony to try and push their image as the most desirable A-list couple in order to justify the contract and the huge advance they supposedly gave them. Or maybe that bus has also left the station and the source in LA for the story is the Harkles themselves.

What are the Covid restrictions? Would the Obamas ignore them and have a huge party? The tabloids keep adding another hundred to the number of guests!
SwampWoman said…
Sandie said: What are the Covid restrictions? Would the Obamas ignore them and have a huge party? The tabloids keep adding another hundred to the number of guests!

None of the prominent Dems follow any restrictions.
Sandie said…
By the way, folk on LSA are posting social media posts of people who have received a special gift copy of The Bench from the wife. Each person is supposedly an influencer and each posts a photo of them with a child or two ... the photos look like something from a photo agency catalogue. The accompanying text reads like it was written by a PR agency, and one is simply a copy and paste of the publisher's blurb.

One woman also got a journal to write in, and it was all packed in this wooden crate that looks as if it is filled with sand.

There is something quite sad but also disturbing about all of this.

@SwampWoman
Congrats on triumphing over technology. Yep, instructions are for dummies. Just finding the English version takes much too long, so all technology should be 'plug in and use', like a kettle!
Karla said…
Sandie..."Or maybe that bus has also left the station and the source in LA for the story is the Harkles themselves" - I agree With you.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Snarky

Now a naked harry cake, well that would take the cake!!!

A naked Harry cake should have a pool cue with it.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Fiifi LaRue
Jack just seems like he needs to be schooled in social skills for the married man.

Remember around the time of his wedding to Princess Eugenie, when his own loving grandmother said he wasn't very smart?

The direct quote: "He's a charming boy and all that but not the most intelligent and I would never have thought this would happen." (Hahahaha . . .)

She's probably not very surprised by this latest faux pas. But yes, it could have easily been avoided -- and if Jack truly loves his wife, I'm sure it will be avoided in the future.
Enbrethiliel said…
@LavenderLady
I don't remember where I read during the Epstein scandal that Sarah and Andrew will remarry due to Andrew's possible testimony being looked at, but Sarah will be protected if she is his legal wife. Something like that. Maybe you remember the statement.

That sounds familiar, so I must have read it, too. But the prediction was based on their truly loving each other and regretting having been forced to divorce. Both scenarios, however, can simultaneously be true! And I'm sure they wouldn't mind killing two birds with one stone, if that is the case!
Enbrethiliel said…
Quoted by @Karla:
An LA TV source told The Sun: “The Sussexes are in high demand — it would be their first red carpet appearance since Megxit and their full-time Californian move.

How can they be "in high demand" when it will be their first red carpet appearance in their year and a half of trying to penetrate the Hollywood set?

Is "LA TV source" code for "source who grew up in LA and then filmed a TV show in Toronto"?

“Certainly, there would be a VIP invite for them from Netflix at its evening celebration event.

"Certainly"?

It is not yet known whether Harry and Meg, who gave birth to the couple’s second child, daughter Lilibet, in June, will attend.

If she's not crowing about it from the rooftops by now, then we know how "certain" this is going to be.

It's odd that this is becoming Netflix PR rather than Oprah PR, when they were nominated for the Oprah interview. (The article mentions O only because it has to, in order to give proper context. Of course, the context just highlights the oddness of the new emphasis.) Has she been asked to stop name-dropping Oprah for her own ends?
Enbrethiliel said…
@Girl with a Hat
A naked Harry cake should have a pool cue with it.

OMG! They really set themselves up with that one, didn't they? Girl, your comeback is perfect!
snarkyatherbest said…
Ok I am getting nervous - by now the next month vogue cover is released by now. did she get it and will it be tomorrow? i gotta bad feeling about this - talk me down from this nutties
Enbrethiliel said…
@Snarkyatherbest
@Karla
@LavenderLady

I really should have checked before publishing my last comment. You all also caught the obvious joke in the naked cake! I'm not sure why the Harkles set themselves up like that. Surely even they know that "naked" is not a word they want associated with them!

One of my pet theories these days (which is only slightly tinhatty!) is what I call The Disgruntled Intern. A lot of their press releases and articles these days seem to have more shade than usual. And I think it's because the people stuck writing them have had enough of the Harkle BS. It started with the "Mr and Mrs. H WANT" article about a Windsor Christening. Now we're seeing it with a reference to the "naked" cakes. I've been to the bakery's Web site and Instagram page and "naked" cakes are certainly not advertised as their specialty!
DesignDoctor said…
@Sandy @SwampWoman
One of the lures of Apple products was the computers and devices were “plug and play.”
@SwampWoman
Congrats on conquering the tech!
@Girl with a hat, re naked Harry cake: I bet I know where she'd make the first cut...
Fifi LaRue said…
@snarky: the b*tch wife ain't getting the Vogue cover.

Take a deep breath.

Maybe Sunisa Lee, or Simone Biles for the cover.
Remember, Vogue wants to be woke, and they have changed the focus audience for the magazine.
Vogue no longer sells to average or above average white women, or even wealthy women.
Vogue and Vanity Fair, for that matter, have changed their focus to people of color, both in their covers and content.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Sandie
I do hope we get lots photos of the outfits she wears! How badly can she mess up in that department and how much will the media fawn over the emperor's new clothes?

I recall Tumblr blogger Scorpiotwentythree's theory that Mrs. H did intend to leave the BRF, with Harry in tow, even before she married into it. Her terrible outfits while a working royal were part of a long-term plan to bust out of there like a beautiful butterfly out of a cocoon. Then she could say that she only looked dowdy and unkempt because the BRF dictated her outfits and messed with her mental health.

After Megxit, her style did seem marginally better. But due to you-know-what, proper photos have been hard to come by. The only real fashion statement from her in a year and a half was the pigeon-poop dress from the Oprah interview.

So she might want to look really polished for the Emmys.

On the other hand, if she's once again making mental health an excuse for why she isn't producing much content for Netflix and Spotify, it's a more plausible excuse if she still looks sloppy.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Sandie
By the way, folk on LSA are posting social media posts of people who have received a special gift copy of The Bench from the wife. Each person is supposedly an influencer and each posts a photo of them with a child or two

Interesting. After Heidi Klum's Instagram story, I had thought Mrs. H was focusing on A-list mothers. And maybe a lot of copies did get sent out to them. But she also apparently targeted non-celebrity influencers. Presumably "Mommy bloggers" or whatever they're called these days.

I don't follow any influencers in that demographic at all, so I can't appraise this PR move. What do you think? Apart from the interest on LSA, are the free copies at least keeping The Bench in the public eye?
Sandie said…
Very diplomatic of the royal family to wish her happy birthday on their IG accounts. They all used almost identical wording and old photos, but Kensington and Cornwall accounts wished her a happy 40th birthday.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9859751/Prince-William-Kate-Middleton-wish-Meghan-Markle-happy-birthday.html

Astrologers and a psychic made their predictions as well. Good for a laugh! William and Catherine will be king and queen and they are the sort of people who will maintain cordial relations and even look friendly when appearing together in public (remember Prince Phillip's funeral?) but I doubt that in private there will ever be a close family bond.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9853321/Leading-astrologers-predict-lies-ahead-Meghan-Markle-celebrates-milestone-birthday.html

Miggy said…
From Camilla Tominey

"I understand the Duchess of Sussex will also be announcing a charitable initiative to mark her 40th birthday later."

*groans*

Snarkyatherbest said…
miggy evidently is called 40 for 40. british vogue editor had the post and then deleted it. guess it was too early
Natalier said…
@ Enbrethiliel

I think she ran out of A list mums as she had to buy and dispose of probably 90% of the total books sold to date. She had already given to the libraries, A list mums, influencer mums and probably also sent some off to some schools willing to accept the freebie.
Sandie said…
I did a quick Google search for '40 for 40' and it seems the idea is not a new one.

https://www.google.com/search?q=40+for+40&oq=40+for+40&aqs=chrome..69i57.6920j0j7&client=tablet-android-alcatel&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

On another topic ... Obama has 'read the room' and scaled down his birthday celebrations to family and a handful of close friends.
Miggy said…
@Snarkyatherbest,

Oh, right!

Read this just now too: Meghan Markle celebrates her 40th birthday Wednesday after her fans raised more than $46,000 for a menstruation charity.

Do you think there might be a connection?
SwampWoman said…
O/T re tech: Yes, computers and other devices certainly have come a long way since using prompt commands and the Blue Screen of Death!

OTOH, I can see where it is a Bad Thing as well. It has been a *very* long time since I've checked the code on anything and, frankly, I have mostly forgotten what I used to have to use routinely. When I plug it in and it works, why debug?
SwampWoman said…

Blogger Miggy said...
From Camilla Tominey

"I understand the Duchess of Sussex will also be announcing a charitable initiative to mark her 40th birthday later."


If there is one person that takes to heart the aphorism "charity begins at home", it's TBW. I suppose announcing "a charitable initiative to mark her 40th birthday" sounds better than announcing "another attempt to take 95% of the donated funds to fund plastic surgery and expensive wine".

Good luck with that. If I'm going to fund anybody's plastic surgery and wine addiction, it will be my own.
Miggy said…
@Swampwoman said:

" If I'm going to fund anybody's plastic surgery and wine addiction, it will be my own."

Ha ha! I'm with you on that one! 😁
SwampWoman said…
Sandie said: On another topic ... Obama has 'read the room' and scaled down his birthday celebrations to family and a handful of close friends.

It is soooo difficult to sustain a panic when the people that are crying about the fire (COVID) are fanning the flames. If you want to tell the rest of the world how to act, maybe you should walk the walk.

I also idly wonder whether the fingerprints on the knife in New York Gov. Cuomo's back would trace back to the Obama faction or the Clintons. (If he did what is alleged, he should have criminal charges against him but he doesn't. Why not?) OTOH, he DID knowingly order the deaths of senior citizens by having COVID patients placed in nursing homes and the charges were dropped by the Department of 'Justice'.)
SwampWoman said…
Miggy said...
@Swampwoman said:

" If I'm going to fund anybody's plastic surgery and wine addiction, it will be my own."

Ha ha! I'm with you on that one! 😁


We should start our own charity!
SwampWoman said…
Well, nutties, I have taken copious amounts of mood stabilizer of choice (coffee). It is waaaay past time to get chores done. Unless (or maybe I should rephrase that as 'until') the rain starts pouring from the sky and the God of Thunder Mighty Thor starts his daily routine of attempting to smite me with his lightning, I'm out of here for the day.

Y'all are going to have to keep an eye on Vogue for me to see what deviltry/thievery/con job TBW is up to. (My eyeballs would probably fall out from boredom if I had to peruse it. It always seemed to me to be expensive advertisements for trophy wives.)
Enbrethiliel said…
@Sandie
Obama has 'read the room' and scaled down his birthday celebrations to family and a handful of close friends.

Does this count as getting Markled?

Now that I think about it, it was a bit tone-deaf to announce that you're having 600 people over (even under compliant conditions), when many people around the world are virtually locked up and unable to visit anyone. I'm not surprised that the Obamas would have such a party (as the elite follow different rules from the rest of us), but it was tactless to announce it that way. What did they hope to get out of informing the world of this detail? A bit of clout? I'm sure a huge party that the public never hears about in advance, with a catering staff who have signed NDAs, would be just as fun as a party you could brag about.

Or conversely, were the Obamas planning to be tactful . . . only for someone to leak the guest list?
Snarkyatherbest said…
ha. the royal family pic of 6s wife. one of her staring straight at the camera while the queen is not looking at the camera but other people. we are ready for a pic so we can compare noses.

if true in the project: nothing says 40 like menstruation. does the wife know that menopause is knocking at her door 😉.
Miggy said…
Or it could be this...

Meghan Markle poses with over TEN copies of her book as Duchess shares birthday message.
MEGHAN MARKLE has publicly marked her 40th birthday by launching a new appeal to help some of the women who have lost their job during the COVID-19 crisis.


MORE TO FOLLOW

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1472220/meghan-markle-birthday-message-archewell-40x40-initiative-melissa-mccarthy-the-bench-book
Miggy said…
Confirmed. From Scobie...

"To mark her 40th birthday, Duchess Meghan has launched a new Archewell initiative encouraging people around the world to spare 40-minutes of their time to help women reentering the workforce through mentorship or community service."
Karla said…
Enbre said..."How can they be "in high demand" when it will be their first red carpet appearance in their year and a half of trying to penetrate the Hollywood set?"
....
Yes this is true. But I always think the Markles respond in the media when an article upsets them. I ask if it wasn't the case of Archewell that @Sandie already mentioned here.

America's giving Harry and Meghan new headache.
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20210803/282226603769313
...

DE also reported.

Meghan and Harry losing US support as Archewell targeted with new rulings.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1471682/meghan-markle-prince-harry-news-us-turning-archewell-red-tape-rulings-california-sussexes
....
Both articles suggest a loss of support in the US. Those of the Sussex, hours later, claim otherwise.
Not: Just a thought.
Miggy said…
New photo of the Birthday Girl now in The Express article I posted above.
Svetlana said…
If you haven’t eaten your breakfast yet, Harry’s first wife has a video up on the Archewell website, rolling out her bad acting skills and some new facework. Kibbutzing with Melissa McCarthy, poor woman. Harry makes an appearance in the background through a window, singing for his supper. If I didn’t detest these two greatly, I’d feel sorry for the reek of desperation in this sad little clip.
Miggy said…
@Svetlana,

Yes, Harry seen juggling balls! ( probably his own amputated ones plus an extra one.)

While the *KWEEN* sits next to a chair chair bearing an initial 'H' whilst resting her laptop on a stack of her own books.

Can't stop laughing. 😂😄😅

Karla said…
Miggy...I read the article and and a cameo from juggling Prince Harry)🤡
Wow! Meghan is Meghan. I loved the cup. Is it English tea?
...
Svetlana...I couldn't agree more.
Sandie said…
I know I am critical of her, but she calls to action and then provides no practical advice.

Mentor. What eactly does that mean and if you have no training nor have done it before, how do you know what you are supposed to do?

And mentor woman for what exactly? Why do they need mentoring? They lost jobs because of the economy.

How do you find and connect to the women you want to mentor?

And how is this going to provide employment for women?

I see husband has been reduced to the court jester in the garden.

Has she listed the 40 friends? Imagine her and her woke friends mentoring women in various professions! A comedy series in the making ...
Sandie said…
Confused ... so she hasn't lined up the 40 people yet?

Why is the media linking her with Nelson Mandela? Just stop it!
Miggy said…
@Sandie,

Among those who have committed 40 minutes of their time to mentor a woman in their community are singer Adele, poet Amanda Gorman, Sophie Gregoire Trudeau, the wife of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and fashion designer Stella McCartney, all friends of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

From the DM
Humor Me said…
Just watched the video without sound: aside from her mouth, her face does. not. move.
And in case any one in interested, the beagle makes an appearance and does in fact look like a live dog, resting on a very comfy dog cushion that makes the overal decor.
Miggy said…
@Sandie said:

Why is the media linking her with Nelson Mandela?

I read somewhere earlier today that Nelson Mandela was the one who first created the idea of 40 x 40. Of course, as usual, I can't find the article now!
Karla said…
I think On the back of the chair next to the Duchess of Sussex is a
@Hermes_Paris Avalon Baby Blanket. https://hermes.com/us/en/product
LavenderLady said…
@Karla said,
Miggy...I read the article and and a cameo from juggling Prince Harry)��

___

Of course Harry has to be in the picture. Without her royal husband she would get zero attention. Poser/loser etc. etc.

Where are their children????
Miggy said…
@LavenderLady,

Where are their children????

She's probably sent them up the chimney to give it a good sweep. 😉
Snarkyatherbest said…
well she didn’t disappoint. we wanted theater and we got it. lots of fillers and botox and a boob job? or is she pretending that she’s breast feeding the new doll. so sad about Melissa McCarthy. she is quite funny. now she will be markled.
LavenderLady said…
I'll bet the Royals had a puke in the royal can after gritting their teeth and posting birthday wishes to TBW. Good on them, the view is better from the high road...

Good news is she has officially hit the wall -according to HollyWooWoo. Like Kim K, she is circling the drain...

She is already getting that over Botox-ed puffy face. Courtney Cox learned the hard way how quickly it happens. Courtney is very financially successful and has a damn good guy at her side. TBW? Not even a hint of success nor genuine marital happiness. She married the village idiot. But hey, he came with a title. UGH!🤮🤮🤮
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
🤣🤣🤣
Sandie said…
@Miggy

Please do find the reference and share it with me. As a South African, I am bemused. Nope, not true!

Mentor: Please do look up the various definitions and explanations of mentoring and explain how a celeb can assist a woman in their community (would that be in the servant's quarters or would it be an equally wealthy neighbour?) to get back to work in a time when businesses have crashed because of the pandemic ... in 40 minutes.

@Humor Me
Yep, and all the lines on her forehead and around her eyes have gone. Botox seems to be quite common with women in the West. I don't remember the person it was, but way back when botox was first used I remember a woman in the public sphere shared her story: she had two major frown lines unfortunately placed on her forehead so that she always looked very cross and forbidding, so she used botox treatments to soften those lines and it made a world of difference to her appearance. Now, 'everyone' seems to do it at the slightest sign of a wrinkle or line anywhere, from increasingly younger ages.
Sandie said…
@Miggy

Apologies if it seems as if I am gunning for you. Not fair to you to do that.
HappyDays said…
SwampWoman said…
Enbrethiliel said: But I still think the real reason he's not getting invited anywhere is that nobody wants to deal with his wife. There have been several instances in my life when I saw how a man's choice of spouse could make or break him. In this case, she's breaking him.

I hadn't thought of that, but you are sooooo right. We've probably all seen examples of people that would be better off *without* their significant other. They're trying to compete in the giant swimming pool of life while chained to an anchor.

@SeampWoman and Enbrethiliel:

Shortly after the Harkles got married, there was a news story about how Harry’s social group had stopped inviting H&M to dinner parties because Meghan refused to be seated away from Harry and she spent the evenings pawing him.

I’ll see if I can locate the article. Will post it here if I find it. I believe it was a DM article.
Miggy said…
@Sandie,

It's an article in The Telegraph.

Duchess of Sussex launches Nelson Mandela inspired '40x40' project to mark birthday
The initiative invites 40 'activists, artists, thought leaders and friends' to commit 40 minutes to community service or mentorship.





Miggy said…
Sorry... here's the link.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2021/08/04/duchess-sussex-launches-nelson-mandela-inspired-40x40-project/
Miggy said…
@Sandie said:

Apologies if it seems as if I am gunning for you.

Don't worry about it. After the life I've had... I'm pretty much bulletproof!
Miggy said…
@Sandie,

I just noticed this comment in the DM.

Doxi, CapeTown, South Africa, moments ago

This isnt a bad idea but it definitely isnt an original one . Here in South Africa we are encouraged to give 60 minutes of our time in service in honour of our late President Nelson Mandela on his birthday in July . He always gave huge parties for children on his own birthday as he really loved children and took great pleasure out of seeing them enjoy themselves.
snarkyatherbest said…
So whats with the tank top, robe thingy draped like she just got out of bed (or waking up from a hang over) and suede heels. Harry juggling (i love who every just said his balls plus one) and not invited in. Maybe madame has a date later. and no sign of anything baby. Doesnt prince william juggle Archie and Lilabuck$ are probably manning the achewell site
Hikari said…
Apologies if this has already been mentioned by somebody else but I've been here very little over the last few days. As I was getting ready this morning, the radio DJ reminded us all that today is Barack Obama's birthday. I knew all about the birthday bash the Harkles pretended they were invited to but *declined* (sure Jan) due to be so much more busy and influential and important than the Obamas. I'd forgotten the actual day of his birthday.

That brought me short. So the succubus pictured so fetchingly in Miggy's avatar photo--oh, my God, Harry, why did you not run away to Malaysia when you saw that visage glowering at you from across the room? It makes the blood run cold, it does . .--**just happens** to share the same birthday with the Queen Mother AND the first black President of the United States? Ie, the representatives of the two sides of her 'brand', *exactly*? Royal and black-humanitarian-Nobel prize winner-bona fide trailblazing famous Black person?

I share my birthday with many famous people, and all of us can find famous others in history and now living that were born on the same say of the year as we were. With only 365 days in the year to go 'round to all the people in the world past present and future, everybody is going to have a long list of celebrity birthday-doppelgangers.

But the statistical chances must be fairly miniscule that Yak-head would have the identical birthday to both the great-grandmother of her current husband, the one who just happened to be the last Empress of India . . AND the first black President of the U.S., when she keeps flapping her dentures about getting involved in politics. I'm sure Meggy eyes Kamala Harris with barely suppressed rage. Does anybody else find that weird?

TBW is determined to present a facade in which the stars always align for her wonderful, astronomical self, to highlight how SPECIAL she is. She'd certainly make hay over having Barack's birthday if she'd been invited and would have probably made his party all about her. She's got form for taking over other people's birthdays.
snarkyatherbest said…
And isnt it sweet - mentor 40 women so they can get jobs. So does this mean shes the mentor or the mentee Mrs needs some hollywood employment maybe this is her not so subtle way of getting someone to help her
Enbrethiliel said…
Quoted by @Miggy
Among those who have committed 40 minutes of their time to mentor a woman in their community are singer Adele, poet Amanda Gorman, Sophie Gregoire Trudeau, the wife of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and fashion designer Stella McCartney, all friends of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Is this a list of women up for a Markling after Melissa McCarthy, or did they independently decide to help the charity and now feel dismayed that Mrs. H is making it all about her?

It's probably not a coincidence, though, since all of them have had a previous connection to Mrs. H. You'd think some of them would know better, though.

For instance, wasn't Adele suddenly out of Mrs. H's good graces after she lost weight and became more of a threat?

And I guess Mrs. Trudeau has a short memory, if she doesn't remember how angry her husband's constituents became when they learned they might have to foot the security bill for the Harkles. Weren't there other charities that help women to which she could have lent her time and her name?

As for Stella McCartney, I suppose she didn't get the Jennifer Meyer treatment after bragging that Mrs. H was wearing one of her coats for Memorial Day. She's clearly still willing to play ball.
Hikari said…
The Telegraph clip is behind a paywall, so I found this one on DM.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9860923/See-video-Meghan-Markle-celebrates-turning-40-launching-new-woke-40x40-project.html

I watched it twice and all I have to say is: What the actual hell.

Sooooooo bad! So juvenile! It makes Aaron Spelling look the the Bard of Stratford. Melissa's extended riff on 'yacht party' winkwinknudge . . .did TBW actually put that into this script?

#6w is so inept as an actress she can't even do a 2-minute PSA for her own project and make it bearable.

As for Harry, spotted distantly through the window juggling his balls . . the Village Idiot is no longer an irritated nickname amongst ourselves but an actual fact.

Uncle Edward and Co.'s disastrous foray into 1980s game show TV now has a serious contender for an embarrassment beyond words.
Sandie said…
There are hundreds of volunteering opportunities in South Africa, but this is one organization that I have experience with ...

https://www.forgood.co.za/campaigns/mandela-day-2021-online

This is the sort of approach that I am used to, so please forgive me for not being impressed by Meghan's approach.

Perhaps because organized volunteering is such a big thing in South Africa (e.g. Habitat for Humanity or Help2Read), the Mandela link is not invoked as some sort of woke inspiration.

It just comes across as woke opportunism from Hollywood.
Karla said…
Jul, 15, 2020
"Royal sources claimed the Queen’s absence was due to logistics, and suggested it was incorrect to link the decision to debates with Baroness Scotland, who has the “backing of the 52 Commonwealth member states who elected her”.

Baroness Scotland faced more backlash last month, when Commonwealth leaders refused to elect her for an automatic second term"
...
Jul, 01, 2021

The Commonwealth announces new prize at Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition

" Today, Commonwealth Secretary-General Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC announced the ‘Christof Heyns Memorial Commonwealth Prize’ during the 13th Nelson Mandela World Human Rights Moot Court Competition.

The competition is the largest gathering of students, academics, and judges around the theme of human rights in Africa.

https://thecommonwealth.org/media/news/commonwealth-announces-new-prize-nelson-mandela-world-human-rights-moot-court-competition

...
Jul, 15, 2021.
Be the change we wish to see" The Commonwealth and United Nations Population Fund celebrate Mandela Day.

"As we prepare to celebrate Nelson Mandela International Day - a day to honour the legacy of the much-loved icon - the Rt Hon Patricia Scotland QC Secretary-General of the Commonwealth invited UNFPA’s Executive Director, Dr Natalia Kanem, to discuss the values of championing social justice, volunteering and community service".
https://thecommonwealth.org/media/news/commonwealth-and-united-nations-population-fund-celebrate-mandela
...
...
Today, MM And Nelson Mandela.🤔🤔🤔
Miggy said…
Oooh... the suspense!! 😅

Who will be Meghan's power 40? Duchess names first 12 celebrity mentors including Adele, poet Amanda Gorman, Justin Trudeau's wife Sophie and fashion designer Stella McCartney - but still has 28 more to identify.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9861081/Who-Meghan-Markles-power-40-40x40-initiative.html
Miggy said…
So far...

Adele
Amanda Gorman
Amanda Nguyen
Deepak Chopra
Dr Ibram X Kendi
Gloria Steinem
Katie Couric
José Andrés
Melissa McCarthy
Dr Nadine Burke Harris
Sophie Grégoire Trudeau
Stella McCartney
Enbrethiliel said…
River has a new video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75VMTmltcnY
Mel said…
Took her long enough to connect with Amanda Gorman. Although maybe the Bench poetry was an attempt to ride Ms. Gorman's coattails?

*************

Not only copied Nelson Mandela's idea, but also copied Ellen's idea of having the producer outside the window asking to be let in.
Well, we were certainly right about the new face, weren't we?
xxxxx said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9860755/Meghan-Markle-launches-initiative-help-mothers-work.html

There will be zero follow through on M's new mentoring project. Doesn't cost her one thin Montecito dime. But Megs and 40 other women get their feel good gesture at the top of The DM and in other media outlets. Duly noted ladies! You are politically correct to the Max! Hooray!

An obvious PR placement by SS, that also corralled these ladies. They sure weren't picking up the phone for Megs. As in Megs who?
snarkyatherbest said…
Miggy- Oooh... the suspense!! 😅 yes love it!

so she has to have english tea with Melissa McCarthy because shes an american actress? Still trying to be english - moving on would be doing everything from the colonies ;-)

We need a betting pool on how long before she drops this initiative.

Oh no just saw on twitter than Princess Eugenie is supporting her 40 minutes of mentoring. Clearly something is going down between the harkles and the yorks.
Svetlana said…
In the next clip……. She lets Harry IN the house!
Hikari said…
@Svetlana

In the next clip……. She lets Harry IN the house!

After he proves (on camera) that he can use the potty by himself without supervision.

Even though his wife likes to pee (and more) outside and made sure we knew about it. In retrospect, given "roast chicken", and Arch's first (advanced) words of "crocodile" and "waffle maker" (not forgetting "Hydrate!"), I am now convinced that the inclusion of how H was SO IMPRESSED that M was so gung ho for al fresco wee (and how capably she hoiked down her clothing and 'went to' (haha)--I think that was another of their little perverted in-jokes about their sex life. Probably signaling how TW is up for golden showers anytime, anywhere.
Miggy said…
DM now updated to confirm Eugenie is participating.

The scheme received extra Royal support later in the day when Princess Eugenie pledged to take part in an Instagram post for 'dear Meghan's 40th birthday'.

The 31-year-old, who is still close to Harry and Meghan, wrote: 'To celebrate dear Meghan's 40th birthday I'm contributing 40 minutes of mentorship to support women reentering the workforce.'


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9860755/Meghan-Markle-launches-initiative-help-mothers-work.html
ADF said…
So only 40 women (across the US? World? Universe?) get up to 40 minutes of time each to be mentored. Wow, that’s a big time commitment for these famous people. No point in interviewing these 40 people herself for those precious 40 minutes apiece and publishing their advice so more than 40 people can benefit from their expertise and experience and publicity. Heck, if Samantha Ettus could do it for “The Experts’ Guide to 100 Things Everyone Should Know How to Do” (and similar titles), a compendium of 100 interviews with experts, then certainly 40 interviews would be manageable and, more importantly, the insights could be made accessible to all. Is there a drawing? Do we have to write essays on why we are worthy of this largess? Wait, what am I thinking - why would this make any sense?
D1 said…
No idea if this has been mentioned, have been out and about getting some Vit D today.

TBWs nose has changed once again, either that or I have serious probs with my eye sight.

I was skimming the newspapers and just noticed her latest photo, it could have been a trick of the light but her nose looked wider than normal.

Thought she'd had surgery to narrow it in the past.
Karla said…
Miggy..."The 31-year-old, who is still close to Harry and Meghan, wrote: 'To celebrate dear Meghan's 40th birthday I'm contributing 40 minutes of mentorship to support women reentering the workforce."

Eugenie Nonsense 🤪
CookieShark said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Snarkyatherbest said…
I am so disappointed in Eugenie - they yorks are so kissing Montecitos you know what. I am now convinced they are doing this because they dont want some dirty little secrets to get out in the book. And the secrets are not about dear old dad

and what a dumb thing - 40 minutes of mentoring how insulting moms going back to work need child care and help getting everything done and getting a job. 40 minutes or word salad and woke platitudes is not gonna help Again - philanthropy without spending a dime.
Karla said…
RE: Eugenie


Snarky... I agree with you. I left a msg for Eugenie, in her Story IG, asking her why she is supporting someone who disrespects her grandmother and the Monarchy. I honestly don't understand.
Miggy said…
@CookieShark said,

It sure looks like she enlisted Melissa to ridicule the RF.

Doesn't it just! Melissa in her flowery dress, hat & white gloves, dressed as if she's going to Ascot, sipping tea in china cups with TBW who herself is sitting at a table surrounded by family photographs trying her damned hardest to emulate the Queen when she gives her annual Christmas speech!

That woman has her head stuck so far up her own backside it's not surprising that what comes out is nothing more then garbled word salad!

Miggy said…
@Snarkyatherbest said,

I am so disappointed in Eugenie - they yorks are so kissing Montecitos you know what. I am now convinced they are doing this because they dont want some dirty little secrets to get out in the book. And the secrets are not about dear old dad.

I agree.

@Karla - I think the girls are more like their parents than some here give them credit for.
Beatrice was the one who told Andrew that his TV interview was excellent. Now Eugenie backs TBW like her mummy does?

I'm sickened.
Hikari said…
That 'skit' for Mugsy's "All about MeMe on My Birthday" initiative is so f'n juvenile and ridiculous. Cringeworthy is too mild. It's like they set out on purpose to do the broadest parody of bad panto imaginable. But I'm kinda shocked that TBW had so many references to 'yacht parties' in the script. Her way of thumbing her re-re-re-reconstructed schnozz at her critics for the yachting? Trying to get out in front of it and laugh it off because the Kraken Beastie has poked its snout above the water? First come the yachting histories, followed by just how many husbands she's actually had/swindled . .then comes the truth about Archewell and LiliBuck$.

We can hope.

It's patently obvious that TBW can't act her way out of a paper bag and never could, if she's this cringe, fakey stilted-bad in her *own* project. Melissa McCarthy may have been drunk/high when she agreed to this because she certainly looked drunk/high while doing it. As to why she'd want to get involved with the Toxic Twosome when things seem to be going so well for her mystifies me. No doubt we will learn that Melissa is a Sunshine Sachs client, too. But surely even SS clients have free will over who they collaborate with?

If we hadn't experienced the last 3+ years of Harkle insanity and this was our only exposure to Harry's wife, what would we think of her? There's no getting around the canned/cheesy awkwardly produced video, but would a complete Harkle virgin be predisposed to think badly of Her based on this snippet?

On Eugenie's alleged involvement . . .
"The 31-year-old, who is still close to Harry and Meghan, wrote: 'To celebrate dear Meghan's 40th birthday I'm contributing 40 minutes of mentorship to support women reentering the workforce."

'dear Meghan'??? The showboating B* that stole the spotlight from me at my own wedding? That 'dear Meghan'? The one I had to make way for for over a year because I wasn't allowed to have the date of my choice for my wedding owing to Ginger Tw*t's precedence? The one who's abused Granny and possibly drove Grandpa into an earlier grave than he otherwise might have had, ensuring he wouldn't be around for his 100th birthday . . that very same dear Meghan?

I cannot figure this 'Eugenie/Sarah' alliance out at all, or even if it's real. If Sarah's making overtures of support because she smells money in it for her, that doesn't mean E. has aligned herself with Mum, does it? Lie down with a b*tch and get fleas and worse where M is concerned. Why would Eugenie, a bona fide humanitarian princess, who has put real work, not just lip service into causes dear to her heart, like the Scoliosis Foundation and feeding the hungry jump on this fake bandwagon . . .40 minutes? That's barely enough time to get a pizza delivered--meaningless. Why would E. publicly attach her name to this?


It sure looks like she enlisted Melissa to ridicule the RF. And mentoring women so they can return to work? Isn't she being investigated for literally bullying people at work?

Maybe she thinks this 'good work' will derail the investigation in its tracks or at least obfuscate it. She probably doesn't even remember the names of the staffers she abused and drove into mental breakdowns three whole years ago.
Karla said…
Eugenie at People Magazine. What a disappointment. I haven't words, but I have too many mental insults.
Eugenie...
@@#$&
👎🤪🤡
😠😡😱
🤮🥴👀
...

Princess Eugenie Joins Adele, Hillary Clinton and More in Taking Meghan Markle's Birthday Challenge
Meghan celebrated her milestone birthday by announcing her 40x40 initiative — with the help of Melissa McCarthy.

"Meghan Markle's 40th birthday challenge is being taken up by stars and royals alike!

The Duchess of Sussex released a new video (with the help of comedian Melissa McCarthy) on the Archewell Foundation website she shares with husband Prince Harry on Wednesday to announce 40x40, "a global effort encouraging people around the world to commit to giving 40 minutes of their time to support women going back to work," her office said in a statement.
"For my birthday, I have asked 40 friends, activists, athletes, artists, and world leaders to help kickoff a global effort by contributing 40 MINUTES OF MENTORSHIP to support women re-entering the workforce," Meghan added on the site. "With this time, I hope they each help someone advance a professional life on her own terms, and, I hope that they inspire countless others to give 40 minutes of their time as well."

Prince Harry's cousin Princess Eugenie shared the initiative on her Instagram story, writing, "To celebrate dear Meghan's 40th birthday I'm contributing 40 minutes of mentorship to support women reentering the workforce." Queen Elizabeth's granddaughter added a colorful "Happy Birthday" sticker as well as an image of a cartoon of a cute figure with a birthday hat.
Celebrities also took up the cause, with Hillary Clinton, Sarah Paulson, Ciara, Gabrielle Union, Diana Award CEO Tessy Ojo, Katie Couric, Deepak Chopra and Sofia Carson among those who posted about their support on social media.

According to the Duchess's office, other participants who have committed to the cause include Adele, Amanda Gorman, Amanda Nguyen, Ibram X. Kendi, Gloria Steinem, José Andrés, Dr. Nadine Burke Harris, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau and Stella McCartney.


https://people.com/royals/princess-eugenie-adele-hillary-clinton-more-support-meghan-markle-40x40-birthday-challenge/
...
Well, that's how we got to the truth. In fact, Eugenie supports H&M.
Miggy said…
Meghan's mentors to get women back to work 'could do more harm than good' regardless of how well-meaning they are, warns expert, as she says Duchess's woke 40th birthday project 'feels like a publicity stunt'

Snippet

Meghan Markle and her mentors 'could do more harm than good' with a new initiative to help women get back to work after the pandemic, the founder of a website helping new mothers get jobs has warned.

The Duchess of Sussex needs to ensure her team is made up of the right advisers because the wrong one can 'destroy' their clients' self-belief, Hannah Martin from the Talented Ladies Club said.

Ms Martin, who is a member of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Women and Enterprise, also blasted the scheme as 'a little like a publicity stunt' with 'no structure or advice for how anyone can participate'.
But the Duchess and participants in the scheme were warned they need to be careful when acting as mentors.

Ms Martin, who has been inspiring and empowering mothers to work through her website since 2013, told MailOnline: 'In principle it's a great idea.

'Mentorship can be incredibly powerful, especially if your confidence has been knocked.

'The right person offering you tailored advice and encouragement will make an enormous difference.

'However, the key words here are ''right person''. The wrong words or poor advice can do more harm than good - however well meaning they may be.

'I've spoken to women whose self-belief has been destroyed through working with the wrong mentor.

'It's such an important area that the All Party Parliamentary Group I am a member of, Women and Enterprise, have spent nearly 18 months researching best practice for coaching and mentoring women, with a view to producing recommended guidelines that will protect women.

'I'm sad to say that this also feels a little like a publicity stunt to me. On the face of it it's a great gesture, but beyond galvanising 40 of her friends to offer their time, there's no structure or advice for how anyone can actually participate.

'If Meghan is genuinely passionate about helping two million women back to work, it would be good to see more insights shared on what specific problems these women face, and proposed, concrete solutions that are followed through with on-the-ground action from the right people. That really would be something to celebrate.'
Snarkyatherbest said…
2 million back to work. well school is coming up so a whole lot of people will be going back when they don’t have to homeschool their kids due to public school shut downs. is her’s a shovel ready plan so to speak.

there is something weird with the yorks and the harkles. i still think they are hoping to avoid something in print. but we know headlines sell and if the mrs can get major headlines especially in the UK you bet there will be something about all the Yorks in this book.

uh oh. vogue posted a tweet about 10 things meghan markle has in her beauty bag. yesterday they teased about princess margaret having an affair with mick jagger. i’m getting a bad feeling. make it go away. 😉
Karla said…
Miggy... Great text. Congratulations on posting. 👏👏
- @Hikari referred to TBW's new nose.

I too thought it looked wider.

Now I wonder why? (Rhetorical question!)
CookieShark said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Maneki Neko said…
Gosh! Is there no end to the wife's 'talents'?


Meghan Markle's 40th will see the start of her creating a 'business empire' as she looks to 'take Oprah Winfrey's crown' and may even launch a TV show with Prince Harry, PR gurus claim

• Talent manager Professor Jonathan Shalit OBE, who worked with couple's friend Elton John, said Meghan's 40th birthday will see start of her creating an 'empire'
• Andy Barr, PR expert and founder of 10 Yetis, added that 'ambitious' Meghan is driving force between her and Harry's career choices and future goals
D•uchess of Sussex today unveiled latest initiative - a campaign branded '40x40'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9860751/Meghan-Markles-40th-start-creating-empire-PR-gurus-claim.html

To be taken with a large pinch of salt, methinks (based on past performance).
Ugh-because any of those rich famous people have ever had to worry about childcare, or paying the rent on a lousy salary, or being able to afford food and healthcare. Yeah, go back to work, losers!

Have lost all respect for the york girls. Are they trying to take down Charles, too, as revenge, or pressure him into getting their stuff paid for? I feel for William and Kate. Sometimes it must feel like they're the island of sanity in the middle of a hurricane of knives. Some kind of Twilight Zone. Once The Queen passes away, Charles better get rid of all but William and Kate, and maybe the Wessexes.

The vomitous amount of treacly PR stories from the harpy today has been sickening. I don't think she could be more full of herself. It must have been months of preparation to get all that garbage written and pulled together. Melissa McCarthy? Really? That's who you got? More has-beens for the pile. All while trying too hard to look stylish and oooh so English sitting at that staged desk. Please. What a joke. Happy 45th!

@Swampwoman, which brand & formulation of horse paste did you and your husband use? I went to the feed store today and all they had was ivermectin mixed with something else, so I hesitated. Many many thanks!
CookieShark said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
hunter said…
Meghan may have gotten a "liquid nosejob" which is done with injectables and can be temporary unless you continue the treatments every 8-14 mos depending on how your face processes it.

It is cheaper and MUCH lower recovery time than a real nose job and depending on what you're looking for, certainly better than going under the knife (in theory).
Hikari said…
If the York women are colluding, even passively, with the Harkles, it may be precisely to protect Andrew to the best of their ability. Though if TW has insider knowledge of Epstein parties and what Andrew might have gotten up to there, that doesn't do her own reputation any favors.

Epstein was a guest at Beatrice's 18th birthday party. Could Andrew and Sarah be guilty of pimping out their own daughter, a royal Princess for some exorbitant sum? I'd hate to think even Andrew would stoop that low. What one might do to another man's nubile teenage daughter one does not want other men doing to one's own. Presumably. But what might H or M know about *that* that nobody in the RF wants daylight shone on?

I'm disheartened, to say the least.
Miggy said…
SARAH VINE: Anyone fancy a sugary slice of Brand Sussex? This is the Queen in her Montecito castle, and I have to admit, it's very impressive... and so very Meghan.

So who lives in a house like this? Come with me now as we go Through The Keyhole and survey the clues left for our grateful gaze by the birthday girl. Over here, a pile of identical white books, their spines carefully arranged in elegant symmetry. Over there, a vase of velvety white roses. On the table, a snowy block of energising quartz.

And is that an Hermes throw I see draped on the chair? Or could the H be a clue for the HRH captured ‘by mistake’ (oh, how we laughed) juggling ineptly in the ‘yard’ outside her window, not quite the court jester, but then again not exactly not, either.

Who knows, if he plays his cards right (and takes his shoes off) he might one day be allowed on to the seagrass, to take a nap alongside the snoozing beagle, to worship at those elegantly turned ankles.

For this is the Queen in her Montecito castle and, I have to admit, it’s very impressive. Very enviable. And so very Meghan.

The rough-hewn sandstone, a hint of regal grandeur, offset by the cosy informality of that off-the-shoulder sweater (cashmere?), that plate of biscuits, that cup of shabby-chic tea.

And, of course, the A-list sidekick, Melissa McCarthy, drawing the viewer in, creating an illusion of casual intimacy. When, of course, it’s anything but. Turning 40 is a significant birthday in any woman’s life but, this being Meghan, it had to, of course, be a SIGNIFICANT significant birthday. She can’t just celebrate like everyone else, throw a party and knock back a few proseccos.

It has to be an opportunity to reach out to the world and, crucially, to enhance the all-important, ever-expanding Brand Sussex.

Forty women, 40 minutes of compassion and caring, 40 chances to help the needy and the disadvantaged.

And, however much I try, however much I want to believe she’s genuine, and that she is only doing this for the sisters, I’m afraid the snake of cynicism uncoils itself out of shot and whispers: ‘This is a masterclass in image management.’

Genuine? Not after the past few months. Not after everything she and Harry have said and done to hurt those closest to them – and not after they have proven themselves such arch hypocrites.

Admittedly, things may look different Stateside. I’m sure the duchess’s American audiences – and they, after all, are the only ones she really cares about – will lap this latest performance up, gorge themselves silly on her saintly sincerity.

But for me it’s going to take more than a sycophantic celebrity sidekick and some guff about female empowerment to convince me that this is anything other than what my gut tells me it is: a carefully orchestrated PR exercise.

Not in itself a bad idea – indeed, rather commendable. But the problem is, this is Meghan.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9862203/SARAH-VINE-fancy-sugary-slice-Brand-Sussex.html

Anonymous said…
TBW story is front and center at the Times and the Telegraph. Many excellent comments at the Times, overwhelmingly anti-TBW, some of them very entertaining.

“ Pickman's Model
6 HOURS AGO

I'm not even all that anti-Meghan, but I can't think of many things less funny than watching her and Melissa McCarthy. Septicaemia, maybe.

O
ObjectiveBob
6 HOURS AGO

I’d give 40 minutes of my time if she didn’t return to ‘work.’

avid Agress
6 HOURS AGO

...Is there any way that these people could be confined to California until there are accommodations available on the moon?...


missfliss
2 HOURS AGO

Looks like Meghan still can't act, and has found yet another "less-attractive-than-me" BFF as a foil for her wonderfulness. Still beige, boring, and ostentatious.

D
Diana Cox
3 HOURS AGO

This is Cruella do Vil and Harry is one of the little puppies. This is all so pathetic.
HappyDays said…
From CDAN today plus one of the comments.

Apparently Meghan won’t be at the Emmys because Oprah got the nomination and not her. Poor dear.

Also, I was wondering what Harry and Meghan were doing at Stanford University last year. Perhaps the comment answers my question.

Crazy Days And Nights
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 04, 2021
Blind Item #9

The alliterate one only will attend an award ceremony if she is guaranteed a win in some category whether it is real or honorary. 

Comments:
Stevie S
2 hours ago
you know she was trying to pump Stanford University for an honorary doctorate for approaching them to work on one of her initiatives with her foundation. Most people who get honorary doctorates get one after years of hard work on some initiative, but she wanted one last year for doing nothing, basically

Anonymous said…

Bruce Duncan Ross
4 HOURS AGO

I thought Doofus was washing the window. He was juggling?

D
Donald Hebert
4 HOURS AGO

Replying to Bruce Duncan Ross
When you’re merely set decoration, the days are long…….

O
Observation Post
5 HOURS AGO

One can only imagine how much she is bearing the brunt of the crisis. Meanwhile the celebrity friends consider spending 40 minutes ‘mobilising the workforce’ - is this pushing a wheelchair, or telling their Filipino maid to ‘lean in’? Or will they send an email to a niece and then spend 35 minutes drafting a ‘feel good’ Tweet about the initiative?

P
Patricia Matthewman
5 HOURS AGO

Great idea! Thanks Megs. I’m off to offer 40mins of my time to the Queen, Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Royal & Sophie Wessex who have all had their workload increased thanks to you & Harry. Family first.
Looks like Eugenie, who did not marry money, is all in on making a few bucks. Something about Apple, Trees, and revenge against Charles….I find it all in rather poor taste, but she and Meghan don’t care- they need their $ or £
Miggy said…
'They've lost the plot': Today hosts Karl Stefanovic and Sophie Walsh BRUTALLY mock Meghan Markle's woke 40th birthday video - and ask 'why doesn't she talk normally?'

The straight-talking hosts of Australia's Today show certainly don't pull their punches when it comes to the divisive Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

And on Thursday, Karl Stefanovic and Sophie Walsh couldn't resist mocking the royal couple after Meghan Markle released a 40th birthday message announcing her new initiative to help women get back to work after the Covid-19 pandemic.

Sophie, 35, thought it was rich for Meghan to 'lecture' the public about returning to work after she 'quit her job' as a senior royal during the Megxit saga.

'I love that she's lecturing people about getting back to the workplace and she quit her job as a royal after less than two years,' she sneered.

And Karl, 46, noted that the Sussexes were already making millions 'from home' thanks to their deals with Netflix, Spotify and other major corporations.

Taking aim at Meghan's video, he added: 'And to have that dog's life, just lying there in front of the fire that's not on, on a pillow.'

Karl then ridiculed the Duchess' Californian corporate speak, asking: 'Why doesn't she talk normally? [American accent] "To harness the woman's mobility as she works back..." I mean, come on!'

'No wonder Harry's outside juggling!' he said, to which Sophie replied dryly: 'Harry's lost the plot.'



snarkyatherbest said…
oooh love the quote to harness a women's mobility - yikes I have to listen to the video now for sure. Harness mobility - is she advertising?

Hikari - there were rumors that sarah took the girls to epstein island too. I think this is more than just Andrew now - i think there is more with the whole family. I wish the girls would just break free and tell their parents no, and whatever comes out comes out. I think of the gymnasts who were all abused by the team doctor (and just watched a really creepy scene of an american male coach consoling and hugging and kissing the head repeatedly of a diver that didnt do well) it wouldnt be the york girl's fault and yes it would make the parents look bad.
Let them be their own adults and own anything that may have happened to them.
SwampWoman said…
Ten things in her beauty bag? Can I guess on some things that aren't there? Topping my list of things that ain't there would be a mirror.

How about her diaper bag? What sort of snacks/treats does she carry for Harry? Does he still use a pacifier? Has he completed toilet training yet?
SwampWoman said…
Miggy said: Karl then ridiculed the Duchess' Californian corporate speak, asking: 'Why doesn't she talk normally? [American accent] "To harness the woman's mobility as she works back..." I mean, come on!'

Wait, what? Is she planning on making them drag a plow or a cart? And what in the world is Adele going to tell somebody who used to make a living growing organic fruit and veggies in California until their water supply was cut and she's losing her land? Will she sing a song about it? What about a woman that bought a duplex and rented out half, then bought another, and another, and an apartment building, but now she can't collect rent or kick out tenants that have been living there rent free for over a year, but she still has to pay the mortgage to the bank? Deepak Chopra to the rescue?
SwampWoman said…
I wonder if the people voluntolding to mentor were able to at least set out some conditions such as "I am NOT getting a tattoo from a failing tattoo artist!" or "I'm on the carnivore diet, there is no way that I am going to be able to advise a cake decorator."
SirStinxAlot said…
Maneki Neko said...
Gosh! Is there no end to the wife's 'talents'?


Meghan Markle's 40th will see the start of her creating a 'business empire' as she looks to 'take Oprah Winfrey's crown' and may even launch a TV show with Prince Harry, PR gurus claim.


But wait, don't they already have an empire? They signed multiple deals that are worth hundreds of millions this past year during the pandemic alone!!! In less than 10 years they are projected to be worth over a billion, remember!?!?
More smoke and mirrors. They are bleeding $$$ and have no definitive plan other than jump from one band wagon to the next begging for 'donations'.
snarkyatherbest said…
40x40 sounds a bit like a ponzi scheme - go out and get 40 women hooked in and if they get 40 women to contribute then the first 40 will get a cut and so on and so on. Maybe she wants to be bernie madoff?
luxem said…
The strapless bra makes another appearance.

Why isn't the cake "naked"?

Did she wear tan suede shoes so her hair/clothes/shoes matched the look-a-like Guy dog behind her?

If Ginge is unhappy with how he is portrayed on the Prince/Janetti cartoon, why is he giving them more material?

I'm embarrassed for the women who agreed to this. It's a sham activity with no way to "follow-up" on how successful it was. "Results" is just not a word in the Harkles' vocabulary and you'd think by now companies would realize that. By the way, why isn't Amal offering 40 minutes???
DesignDoctor said…
@WBBM
I think her nose looks wider, too.
lizzie said…
@Hikari wrote:

"Epstein was a guest at Beatrice's 18th birthday party. Could Andrew and Sarah be guilty of pimping out their own daughter, a royal Princess for some exorbitant sum?"

@snarkyatherbest wrote:

"there were rumors that sarah took the girls to epstein island too. I think this is more than just Andrew now - i think there is more with the whole family."

I don't know what's going on with the Yorks but I think it's going too far to suggest Andrew and/or Sarah sold their daughter(s) to Epstein. (And frankly, if the suggestion is it happened when Bea was 18, that would have been way too late for Epstein's taste.)

@Puds suggests about Eugenie "As to Eugene, birds of a feather flock together, both desperate to hang onto their titles and HRH, both want their protection paid for by Charles, both want to get paid for being non working Royals it seems, with accomodation provided."

I don't know that we know if Eugenie wants RPOs paid for by Charles. The sisters did expect to become actual working royals making appearances, holding royal patronages and so on..a very reasonable expectation at the time. But they learned that wasn't going to happen well over a decade ago. And there's no reason for them OR Harry to worry about losing their HRH designation. That's not going to happen. So whatever the reason for Eugenie's actions, I don't think it has to do with her HRH.

I think it's possible it's no more than "the enemy of my enemy is my friend " I don't think there's any love lost between Kate and the York sisters (for a host of reasons) or for that matter, between William and the sisters. (Reports suggest the sisters were always close to Harry but haven't been close to Will for years.) Now that the friction between the Cambridges and the Sussexes is out in the open, Eugenie has publicly aligned herself with Meghan and Harry. In other words, IF the situation is perceived as Team William vs Team Harry, the Yorks aren't going to go Team William no matter what.
HappyDays said…
Hi All,

Add The Times to the list of non-complimentary reviews of Meghan’s birthday video. This is text only. Age article featured a still image close-up of a grinning Meghan holding a cup of tea. The second still image is the one most of you have also seen of her at the desk.

I am still chuckling how Harry attempting to juggle outside of the window looks like a cross between a court jester, a peeping Tom, and the village idiot all rolled into one!

****************************************
Her study! Those books! Meghan’s 40th birthday video unpicked
By Hilary Rose
August 4 2021, The Times

It was exactly 3.51 this afternoon when I realised that I must spend the rest of my life in a dark and remote cave, where Meghan Markle’s 40th birthday video can never reach me again. It’s barely more than two minutes long, but I beseech you, do not go there. Let me take this one for the team. Let’s start with how it ends because then at least we can be sure that it does.

Prince Harry is standing in the background, like a spare part, juggling balls. It may be a metaphor for something. I couldn’t say. The main event, naturally, is the birthday girl herself, front, centre and softly lit in her “home office”. It must have taken teams of people weeks of effort to create a set like this. Our heroine sits at an enormous pale wood desk big enough for a board meeting, although I do wish there’d been one of those little name plates that you get at conferences with her preferred method of styling herself: “Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex”.

I digress. There is a vase of white flowers, a brace of big white in-trays, a white Hermès blanket folded perfectly to show off the big H — because otherwise what’s the point? It could be from Primark — and a large pile of her recent children’s books, so it’s good to know that someone enjoyed it.

Continuing the natural colour palette, there’s a huge white crystal — would rose quartz have spoilt the vibe? — and a white notepad with a black pen laid across it just so. There is, naturally, a teacup and saucer and a couple of flimsy-looking chocolate biscuits. Hobnobs might have been more apt. Our leading lady is wearing not one but two white sapphire “constellation” necklaces costing £1,300 a pop. One is Gemini for Lili and the other Taurus for Archie.

She’s wearing the sort of no-make-up make-up that takes a seasoned professional several hours and 47 different products to perfect, and layers of white clothes styled to the Nth degree. The chair is taupe, the wildly expensive nude suede stilettos are taupe, the fireplace and floor are shades of taupe. So, too, is the dog, which also adds texture. Would the dog have been allowed if it were the wrong colour? A red setter, say? The fate of Harry, shut outside, suggests not.

Meghan has a toe-curling exchange with the comedian Melissa McCarthy about the latest act of empathy and compassion with which she is fast becoming synonymous. In honour of her birthday, she has asked 40 of her friends to mentor other women, and it is to be hoped that at least one of them said, “Oh bugger off.”

I jest. Her idea is definitely more fun than presents and cake and not po-faced and joyless at all. Honestly, by the time we got to that point, I’d endured so many “jokes” about wearing hats and drinking tea and sledgehammer references to the royal life she led for all of about ten minutes that I had to go and lie down. Somebody show me to my cave.
Martha said…
@swampwoman...just getting started on tonight’s comments, so far, yours are gold. As if any of these 40 will make a particle of difference to any woman who’s in a tight spot.
As the bard said, words, signifying nothing,
Martha said…
So many great comments tonight, as usual, should have taken notes.
I share everyone’s disappointment in Eugene. We’ve all wondered for months about her..whether or not she’s pro TBW. And, she is.. it cannot be disputed, but why? There’s so many reasons she wouldn’t be this way, and yet. Perhaps it is the Epstein connection? Perhaps she is anti Charles. And I read somewhere, that her husband isn’t wealthy and that they perhaps need money, I guess he earned some this last weekend!
What I cannot understanding he treachery of the grandchildren. Harry, Eugenie. Doesn’t seem as if Bea is onside. I hope not.

And the birthday codswallup. Someone posted it’s a PR, advertisement, And of course it is. There is absolutely nothing about them that isn’t or, advertisements.
Certainly, neither own an iota of the compassion they so love to expand upon.
Anonymous said…
I wonder if the Yorks might not be playing a game of triangulation with other members of the RF. The Queen reportedly favors Andrew over Charles and is very fond of Beatrice and Eugenie. Prince Charles is said to not have a good relationship with his brother Andrew, and has made it fairly clear that the Yorks will not make the cut when he becomes King and executes his slimming down of the Monarchy. Beatrice and Eugenie can’t be happy about that, and are rumored to not be on the closest terms with the Cambrides (jealousy of Kate?), either.

Like the Yorks, the Sussexes more and more are on the outside looking in. Their future(s) in the Royal Family is not looking all that bright. But Granny is still calling the shots and remains loyal to them—she would never do anything to embarrass them or cause them distress. Granny is the Golden Goose and their critically important champion and ally. The Cornwalls and Cambridges are fair game, and the more damage they can inflict on them, the better. Take them down before they do us in by marginalizing us.

That’s my theory.
Anonymous said…
@HappyDays

Thanks for the Hilarie Rose piece. Priceless. “ Would the dog have been allowed if it were the wrong colour? A red setter, say? The fate of Harry, shut outside, suggests not.” 😂
Karla said…
EDEN CONFIDENTIAL: For The Daily Mail

Wills and Kate's charity booms following Megxit

When Prince Harry and Meghan quit the Royal Foundation they led with Prince William and Catherine, their cheerleaders predicted it would have a dramatic effect on the charity's finances. And it has — they've soared!

I can reveal that the Royal Foundation of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge enjoyed a surge in income last year, to a staggering £11.78 million.

That's almost double the £6.68 million raised in 2019, when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were still involved. 'It's the Meghan effect,' one courtier jokes, somewhat unkindly.

Newly published documents disclose that the 2020 total includes a £2.59 million grant from American Friends of the Royal Foundation.

Clearly, the California-based Sussexes haven't won over all Americans.
....

HRH, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge inspires trust, respect and dignity.
❤️
...
Harry? Well, as Poe said
"When a madman appears thoroughly sane, indeed, it is high time to put him in a straight jacket".
Harry, with your juggling today, 🎪 doesn't seem to be sane.

Good Night
Enbrethiliel said…
I join everyone who is baffled by Princess Eugenie's support of the Harkles. It was at her wedding that Mrs. H pulled a totally unnecessary stunt to grab headlines from her, and apart from that, I'm sure she has the same insider information as the rest of the BRF. Right now, my best guess as to why she's not icing them out is that she relates to them. Not just because her mother was also persona non grata for an embarrassing while and her father a "spare," but also because she knows what it's like to lose what you were raised to believe was your royal birthright.

The more I try to get into her head, the more I wonder how much of the slimmed-down monarchy plans was a dispassionate strategic plan by Prince Charles . . . and how much was a ruthless strike at a favored younger brother whom he had resented for decades. It must have been humiliating for the Yorks when the two princesses lost the roles and privileges they just assumed they would eventually have. Prince Andrew had to pay for their own protection himself and the princesses were reduced to pap walks to get extra cash. (Rich people problems, I know!)

Meanwhile, here's Catherine, a middle-class married-in, just hoovering up all the good stuff. The York princesses must not have been too impressed by her early (dismal) work record. And well, they probably would have put in a lot more time than she did, had they been given the chance.

I guess it's not surprising that the destruction Harry is now unleashing is being abetted by another second son. I just hope we don't see a rehasing of this drama in Prince Louis (or even Princess Charlotte!).
Maneki Neko said…
@luxem said

The strapless bra makes another appearance.
.........

It did! I'm late to the party, only having glanced at the wife's birthday antics on video this morning (with M McCarthy). Your remark reminds me that I thought the wife had had some chest enhancement procedure. Did anyone notice the same thing? Ah no, she must be breastfeeding, that's why!
Maneki Neko said…
There is an article in the DM that slams TBW's latest attempt at publicity.

Meghan's mentors to get women back to work 'could do more harm than good' regardless of how well-meaning they are, warns expert, as she says Duchess's woke 40th birthday project 'feels like a publicity stunt'

One of the comments sums it up:

BostonBrahmin, Duh, United States, 11 hours ago

How is an actress like Melissa McCarthy going to mentor a woman who is looking for a job in the tech sector?
. . . . .
Indeed. And will 40 minutes be enough? This is just a stunt to mark her birthday.
Maneki Neko said…
I forgot to mention that the card the Melissa M showed in the video was misleading: besties forever. Forever? That's not how it works with TBW. Incidentally, TBW could do with some acting mentoring. She is so fake and cringe making. Meryl Streep she ain't.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Karla
I left a msg for Eugenie, in her Story IG, asking her why she is supporting someone who disrespects her grandmother and the Monarchy. I honestly don't understand.

So did I.

Normally, I don't bother to message celebrities or people I don't personally know. I just follow them for entertainment, so if they do something disappointing, it's not really a big deal. But this time, I figured it was worth adding my voice to what is undoubtedly a chorus of disapproval. If Princess Eugenie and her team were hoping that this would earn them PR points, I hope they learn as quickly as possible that it will not have the desired effect.

What I wrote was: "Harry's 'dear' wife repeatedly and publicly disrespects your grandmother, who is also your Queen. She called your family racist on TV while your grandfather was dying. She made you delay your wedding for the sake of her own, then pulled a stunt during yours that she obviously knew would grab headlines from you. I don't know what she's blackmailing you with, with whatever it is, it's not worth kissing her arse like this."

I wonder if this will get me blocked . . .
`To harness the woman's mobility'

SwampWoman's comment on this reminded me that I've recently read Giles Milton's White Gold, `The extraordinary story of Thomas Pellow and North Africa's one million European Slaves'. Apparently one despotic potentate of the Barbary Coast travelled around in a chariot pulled by his wives.

Btw: This is a little-known aspect of 17th & 18th century history. Not only did the Barbary corsairs intercept European shipping but conducted raids on coastal villages - in England, the people living near the shores of the South West lived in fear of them. Also,the population of the original Baltimore, in West Cork, Ireland, for example were seized in 1631 by pirates led by a Dutch renegade,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Baltimore

The pirates even stole Icelanders from their villages.
Enbrethiliel said…
This just occurred to me:

What if Princess Eugenie isn't doing this for the Harkles per se, but because she, too, is now a Sunshine Sachs client and it's just part of the package?
Nelo said…
This is a very interesting read. Daniella Esler points out the many flaws in the Sussexes approach to charity.
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markles-wellmeaning-birthday-video-seems-unlikely-to-help-women/news-story/e40599103c1609f321f9f305690fc627
abbyh said…
All that white is not infant or toddler friendly.
Miggy said…
Revealed: 26 of Meghan's 40x40 power players who have been revealed so far, including Hillary Clinton, Ciara and Princess Eugenie.

1. ADELE

2. DR NADINE BURKE HARRIS

3. DEEPAK CHOPRA

4. PRIYANKA CHOPRA

5. CIARA

6. HILLARY CLINTON

7. KATIE COURIC

8. EDWARD ENNINFUL

9. PRINCESS EUGENIE

10. AMANDA NGUYEN

11. MISHA NONOO

12. DANIEL MARTIN

13. MELISSA McCARTHY

14. STELLA McCARTNEY

15. SARAH PAULSON

16. SHERYL SANDBERG

17. SOPHIE TRUDEAU

18. TESSY OJO

19. SOFIA CARSON

20. TRACEE ELLIS ROSS

21. DR IBRAM X KENDI

22. GLORIA STEINEM

23. JOSE ANDRES

24. AMANDA GORMAN

25. GABRIELLE UNION

26. STACEY ABRAMS
Snarkyatherbest said…
ok the one thing we haven’t talked about is the slut strands. even bigger than ever. i. guess it’s her signature. she looks so much better when the wigs/extensions are pulled back in a pony tail. but like the narc we think she is she just that’s to have them. or is she hiding some facelift scars that were at the hairline. usually those are behind the ears but who knows.
LavenderLady said…
@abbyh said,
All that white is not infant or toddler friendly.

____

Great catch! No kids...Ha! 😆
Snarkyatherbest said…
but abbyh archie and lilibuck$ never make a mess. the perfect children. and they don’t even cry in the background of a video shoot 😉

again. missed opportunities. she has the fake pics on her desk but a good audio tech would have had some crying in the. sick ground or toddler giggles or a mommy. so disappointed that her skills (at least the non x rated ones) are only photoshop

the more i read the posts the more i think it was a big troll of the brf and all of us who know she’s a faker. the harry juggling his ball thing (a stab at william). and catherine always looks good in color as does the queen so she wears all white and tan on the video. and having the dog there - she knows the rumors of her and what really happened to the beagle (and where is his grey muzzle by now he should be greying or did he get a dye job at the groomers too!) so have him there. where was the black lab and why didn’t his hair show up anywhere in that white house.
LavenderLady said…
@snarky,

I noticed those too. Not all women who wear them are sluts like not all women who wear fu** me boots are sluts (those cute ankle boots that girls everywhere are wearing) but in TBW's case,
yes that's the perfect label for her drapes, eh? LOL... Love it! ❤️
The Cat's Meow said…
Haven't been able to bring myself to watch that video...

But I can't imagine how anyone would take this seriously. It is all for a club of women to band together to create PR. How would these pinnacle-types find those who are truly struggling and figure out how to get "down to their level" for 40 minutes of meaningful connection?!

What a joke. The more TBW does "movements" like this the more irrelevant she seems.

This is all about being at the top of a fake, unreal world of marketing where nothing is real -- it just might look good to some with $$.

Now...if JCMH were to donate juggling events to foster kids parties (with no online showing off THAT might count for something!!!)
I thought these were supposed to be 40 women she was lining up as `mentors?

5 of the list are blokes, as far as I know, or have they transitioned?
Miggy said…
For those that don't like Lady C, please scroll on by.

For those that do, here's her latest video.

Meghan's APOLOGY & b'day CON/OUTCRY 4 kids/SUING over The Prince/Obama's 60th/Jack CHEATING?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXCuGNHNx_U
snarkyatherbest said…
Maybe 6w is smarter than we think. The video was pathetic and as others have noted here Netflix should cringe. And maybe thats what she wanted. They gave and advance (likely less than reported) but also the ability to get more depending on content. So netflix sees this and decides to cancel the contract (netflix is still dripping in money so what do they care) i am curious if netflix cancels how much is owed to the other party (the harkles) She gets more cash and can be lazy and not offer any content. Hmmm plausible its like when she sues to get cash/settlement that way. For someone who supposedly loved bombed her husband, charles and the AoC she coudl have tried a little harder, especially since the rumor is that this was the anniversary of her 40th. not like it felt the first time she turned 40
snarkyatherbest said…
Yeah - NO VOGUE COVER - they just posted the cover. September issue is like the vanity fair oscar up and comer issue - american models - next gen of modeling on the cover. Visually the oscar issue is so much better definitely not a cover to take off the new stands. but no hag so that makes me happy!!!
Enbrethiliel said…
@The Cat's Meow
It is all for a club of women to band together to create PR.

This is it exactly. I really think this is a Sunshine Sachs initiative conceived independently of Harry's wife. She just happened to be the one turning 40 (allegedly) this year.
CookieShark said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
JHanoi said…
TBW 40 list and its purpose

I had thought Prianka and TBW were over, after the kerfluffle a couple of years ago. but both are desperately thirsty so they obviously kissed and made up? Pri is so very thirsty, but shes worked very hard to get where she is and wants more, and i can’t knock her for that, so why she hooked up with TBW again isnt really clear to me. TBW took the lazy way yachting / golddigging way get where she is so how that relates to womens empowerment and such is beyond me.

PE - i dont get the PE and maybe whole York family sympathy for the Harkles. is it because PAndy was the randy popular spare once too so they understand more? or because the Harkles take the spotlight off of the sordid PRandy Epstein troubles? or passive aggressiveness towards PC (maybe PW too) slimmed down Monarachy scheme? and PC’s wanting to drop the girls security, etc?

Are there more family dvisions/ civil wars than just the Harkle drama? that dont see the light of day due to HM - respect , respect for institution?

and this whole PR concept of celebs spending 40 minutes to “mentor” women. do mostt of those people really have any concept of how to mentor a woman for a job? and isnt this odd at this time? there are Plenty of job openings now. Employers are desperate for workers. The issue is people dont want to work right now ( covid , unemployement bennies, etc)

and lastly - i didnt watch the video but Melissa McCarthy looed ridiculous mocking the British Tea Time look , the over the top hat, floral gown, etc. I found it offensive.

But Harry as the TBW’s Court Jester was spot on!

xxxxx said…
Prianka is kind of a nothing in America. She cannot make a dent in Hollywood, partly due to her age. But she was a big deal movie actress in India when she was under 30. She won a big beauty pageant in 2000

lol read her Wikipedia. It looks self authored -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priyanka_Chopra

Does SS write and monitor Megs Wikipedia entry?
DesignDoctor said…
JHanoi said:
and lastly - i didn't watch the video but Melissa McCarthy looked ridiculous mocking the British Tea Time look , the over the top hat, floral gown, etc. I found it offensive.

I totally agree. I found Melissa's take on British tea very mocking and offensive. As well as TBW's use of the English tea cup and "biscuits." How ridiculous the whole concept was/is.
In Britain, TBW emphasized being an American. In America, she wants to play the CA cool girl while appropriating British habits to galvanize her Royal "Duchess" status? I say fake and foul.
JHanoi said…
totally agree- i forgot to mention the “Twinings Tea Cup” and cookies / aka “biscuits”
she’s such a FAKER. as she herself has said.

wonder if she used oatmilk in that teacup…or if there was even any tea in there?

I saw a profile picture of her and her “duck lips” were showing… not as abvious as some, but definitely there
xxxxx said…
And the vinyl kids are nowhere to be seen. That's what she thinks of him and this is the real her. -- CookieShark
Blonde Gator said…
As an American....let me tell you TBW's "friends" are more Hazbeen than H. Hillary Clinton ~ OVER! Gloria Steinem ~ 87 years old! K-K-Katie Couric ~ WAY OVER! (another age-inappropriate 60 yr. old teenager). Jose Andres ~ TBSpaniard and woke annoying trying-to-be celeb chef. The guy never shuts up! As for the rest of TBW's "list" of pals, never heard of them. They must be trying-to-be's, minor actors or perhaps wannabe "influencers"! Truly, I hope one of the Kardashians sign up for this idiocy! Talk about "arrived".

And by the way, CDAN's Blind #6 from yesterday had some of the most hilarious comments yet to date. My favorite had to do with Mudslide Manor becoming the new "Grey Gardens". If one is unfamiliar....Grey Gardens belonged to a cadet branch of the Bouviers (distant cousins of Saint Jackie of Camelot). It was a big scandal back in the day of JFK's administration that Jackie's cousin & aunt were eating cat food in a hoarder's shack. There was even a movie, sad, but true. Literally laughed out loud at that notion...I just hope TBW feeds the rent-an-elderly beagle first when it happens to them.
snarkyatherbest said…
Blonde Gator - and didnt the cousins dress up in old furs and dresses when they were eating their cat food Now at mudside manor I do think someone probably has a copy of the tiara she wanted and wears that off camera
Blonde Gator said…
@snarkyatherbest Yes, I think you are over the target. Both about the furs, and TBW gliding around Grey Gardens II in her faux tiara. By the way, there was a documentary film AND a fictionalization (for TV, HBO, naturally). The thought of the condition of Grey Gardens II in a decade or three has me giggling. Wonder what will happen to the playhouse and the chickens? Srsly!!!! Chickens in Montecito! I'm surprised they neighbors haven't called animal control.....likely a rooster has infiltrated the "rescue birds"....and they make such a racket!
snarkyatherbest said…
Also missed opportunity - there is a brand of china called Calamity Teaware but when you look closely it has godzilla or dinosaurs and other things sticking out. Now if she had only used that I would have to give props to her for at least cleverness.

https://calamityware.com/products/calamityware-tea-set-things-could-be-worse?variant=27911909474327

LavenderLady said…
I'm an American who also found Melissa M's take on British teatime offensive. It's obvious her, the village idiot and TBW he's married too wanted to be offensive and mocking. Just showing their asses and how full of resentment they are.

Making fun of another's culture is not ok. I thought they are enlightened and supposed to know better.
Peppa said…
Forgive me if this has already been pointed out and am I imagining this? Melissa M's hat. Doesn't it look like a cabbage? Is this yet another hurtful jab at the Queen, utilizing yet another nickname from her dearly departed husband?! If so, then Mrs #6 definitely orchestrated that. The whole thing was OTT awful and if M actually went to that length of cruelty, well I have no words. But I'm sure we'll never know, will we?
SwampWoman said…
@Peppa OMG at the cabbage hat. Ever so often I feel some compassion for her crashing and burning so publicly and spectacularly but, after something like this, I'll get the marshmallows for toasting over her flames.
LavenderLady said…
@Peppa,
Oh dear.. yes it does look like a cabbage. Those Bitches...
Miggy said…
Apologies if this has already been posted.

GB News interviewed Samantha Markle today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2XnukaoTiA

WittleWabbit said…
I know once a little while back that a Nutty poster wondered why Prince Philip had a pet name of 'Cabbage' for the Queen. I might have the answer..while reasearching pet names in French to call my new romantic interest (who is German but loves French), I found out 'cabbage' is a term of endearment in the country. The young married couple lived in Malta and there they speak French along with Italian hence how Prince Philip may hae acquired the name 'Cabbage' for his beloved!

As for me. I settled on calling my guy'mon nounours' (my teddy bear) rather than a vegetable. It he turns out to be not so good he might become an rutabaga, lol.
JerseyGirl said…
I'm shocked really that MM would make such a terrible video about a serious issue and add someone like Melissa McCarthy. Melissa just lost a fan who will never watch another movie or show that she is in.

Now about this 40x40, is this a joke? Does MM think this is feasible or is this truly a publicity stunt? It takes real dedication, real time, and real resources to help women who are struggling through this pandemic.

They offer no idea of what's necessary to help other's and this video is just a clowning around farce mocking the RF. Add to that H literally in the backyard juggling, what a mess. I somehow doubt anyone involved in a MM event (right word?) will come out of this a better person who made any impact of anyone's life or the world.

I'd like to MM get off her fat arse and do some real something selfless and compassionate. I don't think she has it in her being the true narc that she is.


abbyh said…
Ah but I happen to like rutabaga (chopped,boiled with chopped apple until cooked, drained, add butter, milk, puree and a dash of nutmeg - Martha S).

Anonymous said…
The Telegraph

Could Eugenie be the one to reunite Meghan and Harry with the Royals?
Harry has always been close to his cousin, which has led to speculation that ties with the wider family could be repaired


By Eleanor Steafel

In the five months since the Sussexes’ bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, Prince Harry has only returned to Britain twice: for his grandfather’s funeral in April, and for the unveiling of a statue to commemorate his late mother for what would have been her 60th birthday in July.

On both occasions, returning to the UK for such poignant events – and under a shroud of headlines generated by his latest tell-all interview – must have made for a fraught homecoming. But it could have been even more difficult had it not been for the support of his younger cousin, Princess Eugenie.

Flying in from LA on each of his visits, the Duke went straight to Frogmore Cottage to form a bubble with Eugenie, her husband Jack and baby August. The family moved into the house on the Windsor estate – where the Sussexes once renovated and lived with a newborn Archie – in November 2020. "Frogmore Cottage continues to be the Duke and Duchess of Sussexes' residence in the UK," a source told People magazine, "and they are delighted to be able to open up their home to Princess Eugenie and Jack as they start their own family."

Given Covid restrictions, the relative with whom he has had the most contact since moving to California will have been his cousin. It has led many to speculate that hopes of repairing ties with the Sussexes now lie on the shoulders of the younger of the York sisters.

If anyone was going to act as a peace broker, it would be Princess Eugenie, who this week voiced her support for her cousin’s wife, “dear Meghan”, on Instagram, backing the Duchess's new charitable initiative, 40x40. Launched to coincide with her 40th birthday, the Duchess is encouraging her well connected friends to donate 40 minutes of time mentoring women who have “shouldered the brunt” of the Covid crisis.

Her husband’s cousin appears to have been one of them, writing on Instagram: “To celebrate dear Meghan’s 40th birthday I’m contributing 40 minutes of mentorship to support women re-entering the workforce.”

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids