Lots of questions about the future.
Are they likely to do some sort of flash PR for the holidays?
Or more from the prior publicized joint ventures? When will we see something from Netflix? Or more Spotify?
Or even Pearl?
And, what do you think the Holiday card will be?
Comments
Ah, Swampie, time zones
are a bugger!!
Good to *see you* too
Both ends are normally asleep
when I come out to play!
How’s those grandbabies?
I’m in the middle of dragging
balls and bits out, not very
Christmassy, weather’s
bloody awful!
How about you?
2 in the morning
and once more… 💃
The Little Marelaid
Grimms’ lairy tales
Of the two daily fails
Cited by an unknown person
More grift for the shill
Against Charles,
her own FIL
Stans Christopher Andersen
She wasn't there - it's called `hearsay' and that doesn't count as evidence. On the other hand, I bet there are those who can truthfully say on oath that they witnessed * being a complete cow to her staff or were on the receiving end themselves. She has no way of proving that it didn't happen, whereas I bet there's plenty of evidence that it did.
I recall a report about the staffer secretly recording her raving at someone but that it had been hidden away. Whether secret recordings are admissible in Court or not is another matter.
My own experience is that a narc in the witness box will give themselves away, they are so convinced that they are right that they are incapable of seeing that they are damaging their own case by saying downright stupid things, even in a `he said, she said...' engagement.
What happened in my case when it became clear that narc refused to acknowledge that Divorce Law had moved on over the previous 100 years or so:
Judge: `Well, Mr X, I don't what you hope to achieve by opposing this application. What do you want the Court to do?'
Mr X: `I want the court to send my wife back to me so she can do her duties as a wife- '
Judge: `Really, Mr X? What about your duties as a husband?'
At least I got a laugh out of it.
Doomsday
Remember, remember
the 27th of November
Lies, deception, and rot
We’ll always remember
that bad day in November
When Haz got engaged
to THOT
WildBoar
Hearsay or Heresy
Same same where
Sheresy’s concerned
Some interesting tweets from the Theresa Longo Fans account, some repeated from last year.
* The Harkles spend hours on their phones reading everything about themselves.
* He is super conscious about his image.
* She has screaming fits if she gets criticism in the press.
@WBBM
Thanks for sharing your personal experience. It may be difficult for any normal person to understand and even empathize with a narc. I find that I need constant reminders that one cannot use normal behaviour to predict what they say or do. They seem to have a baffling stupidity. Using 'normal' reasoning, I think it is likely everything is going to get worse and not better for them. The base material from which difficult but lasting change can be made seems to be missing with them.
The Body Language Guy has a new video about the night she supposedly was suicidal. It is so very creepy the way she behaved that night. He was obviously in turmoil.
https://youtu.be/Upu_b07wla0
Neil Sean suggests that according to insiders, the reason the BBC was so biased in favour of the Harkles, is because Amol Rajan is hoping to get a sit down interview with Prince Dumbass when his book is released next year.
Meghan - Harry - & The BBC what next ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvmKrWjzJTg
It's high time the BBC got a mighty slap on the wrist.
I expect most, if not all, of us here say the same.
The Body Language Guy actually got me to feel sorry for Harry again.
*'s evil narc smile, after she had turned his emotions topsy-turvy, and then taunted him some more with that "Thank you," was chilling.
I personally thought the Body Language Guy got it wrong in this instance.
Not only was this the night of TBW's 'supposed' suicide story to her hubby earlier in the day... but it was also the night that the crowd were heard to BOO them both. Haz found it hard to conceal his anger, whilst the actress did what she does best and simply grinned away as if she didn't have a care in the world.
from above the rumor is it was a video of the meltdown with catherine and charlotte. that will never see the light of day. if it were a staffer i think the same thing since they wouldn’t want to have it plastered all over the media. over been blasted at work. however, it could be used in an inquiry but one that doesn’t come with criminal charges and the summary with some incidents and worker names blacked out could be made public. remember the inquiry is about how to improve the chain of command and handling complaints. well she’s gone so that part of the solution has already been reached.
Most of us just want everybody around us to be happy.
on another off topic note. saw the Barbados pics. Dame Sandra- love the outfit she looks fierce. Rihanna. Honey it’s a state ceremony. put on a bra and some shapewear. ok that is my snarky comment for what i would have said for the day but i’m in a mood so i’ll say it’s my snarky comment for this hour 😉
That 'Thank You', once she had secured his hand on her lap, was the creepiest thing I have ever seen.
@Miggy
I agree, that we don't get the full picture without considering the supposed booing. However, I don't think the supposed booing (supposedly clearly heard on the video) changes what is revealed about the pathology of the couple and the context of her supposedly being suicidal is very informative. In other words, the booing might have been the trigger for this behaviour in this instance but it is not the cause of the pathology that is revealed.
@snarkythebeast
You pinpoint a bizarre aspect of the video: he looks so miserable he is suicidal, not her. Yes, I think she is crazy enough to co-opt his breakdown and make it all about her.
I would love The Body Language Panel to analyse the body language in the videos of this night!
Thanks for the reminder about the booing. You're right that it's possible that that was what got Harry upset, rather than his wife's tearful confessions. Even Mr. Rosas is hugely skeptical of * saying that that was the day she told Harry about being suicidal.
There's another reason for my compassion for Harry in the video. Everyone who has ever been the "primary source" to a narcissist says that there is an incredible drain on you that you can barely understand -- and when you're at your lowest, the narcissist is like a cat that got both the cream and the canary. It's almost as if they have the opposite of empathy, because they do sense that you're in pain, but that's because they're feeding off it with gusto. Harry's distress coupled with *'s smug smile seems to be the clearest illustration of that we've ever had. (I keep thinking that the one great thing about the Harkle union is the opportunity to educate the world about narcissism.) It almost doesn't matter that she may not have caused it.
I also have a theory that * is grandiose enough that no random day for the suicidal thoughts would do. So when she was drafting her fanfiction about herself, she deliberately chose a day we have a lot of footage of. She wanted people to go straight from the Oprah interview to clips from the Cirque du Soleil. And I suspect that she picked that day, over several other possible choices, because she remembered how bad Harry felt. That's the reason she has a special fondness for it. He's probably like to forget that night, but when she mentioned it during the interview, she got a lot of people to replay the clips and hear him get booed all over again.
from above the rumor is it was a video of the meltdown with catherine and charlotte. that will never see the light of day. if it were a staffer i think the same thing since they wouldn’t want to have it plastered all over the media.
You're right that a video which involves Catherine and Charlotte would never be leaked. Yes, it might topple *, but it would drag two innocent people down with her. And Charlotte is only a child; she doesn't need a story like that linked to her reputation before she can begin to carve it out herself.
I had been hoping there was a video of the teapot incident in Australia. But I wouldn't be surprised if that rumor were an amalgam of two stories: The wedding meltdown (which does have video) and the teapot throwing (which doesn't).
* Haz shakes the hand of the man to his right, sits back down, she grabs his hand and he let's go... then they both applaud the gentleman while the host is speaking.
* The host then says something that I can't quite make out but he ends with a loud THANK YOU. Moments earlier Haz has given TBW his hand... she takes it and says nothing at first, but at the exact moment the host says 'thank you... TBW appears to say it too.
Probably a coincidence... who knows?
Watch from approx 3:22
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2wG5n71yQY
This 🔝
They are so smug and they then smirk at you with satisfaction!
Mission accomplished!☹
Perhaps I need to write my own fan fiction.
Meanwhile, I'm wondering if the 60 people trapped by snowfall in a pub for three days were ever released from their horrific situation (grin). It sounds very appealing to me right now as husband is having anxiety attacks over just the right drain to install in his new shower.
Meanwhile, I'm wondering if the 60 people trapped by snowfall in a pub for three days were ever released from their horrific situation (grin).
They escaped yesterday. 😄
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10255881/RICHARD-KAY-Sussexes-blame-race-slur-witchhunt.html
So, I was thinking about all the truly innocent ways one might question the future skin color and this rolled around:
What if the question of skin color was not about how she might impact the skin color but him? with his really pale skin and reddish hair?
They would, of course, be much more familiar with him and sun concerns.
That's a really good point. Remember that Prince Charles's first words upon seeing Harry included a comment on his red hair. And being "ginger" seems to carry a lot more baggage for the British than I may ever understand.
Had Charles been speculating aloud about how a new grandchild would look, he would have been more likely to have the "ginger gene" in mind than any black genes.
So IF the conversation about Fauxrchie's coloring had happened, it wouldn't even have had anything to do with what DNA * was bringing to the table. But she still managed to twist it and make it about herself.
If it were my little girl being screamed at by Bridezilla, I would NEVER forgive her or even be civil to her. It would be very difficult to restrain myself from putting a size 10 shoe up her scrawny butt.
I agree that Catherine must have been so angry and frustrated. She would have already had to overlook *'s attempt to take sneaky photos of George, while in William and Catherine's own home. That wasn't just a trampling of boundaries (which would have been bad enough), but a possible security breach. So a direct attack on another one of her children must have pushed a pregnant Catherine to her limit. And * was just getting started!
How it must have rankled Catherine, who loves children, to see *, who hates children, blatantly strap on that moon bump for ten months. And then to be forced to participate in the christening photo farce. (I wonder whether the Cambridges got a direct order from the Queen to play nice that day.)
When Megxit happened, Catherine might have thought she were finally free. But then * told Oprah that Catherine had actually made her cry and that * had been nice enough to forgive her.
The cheek. The gall. The narcissism.
@Enbre said,
If anyone was concerned about what the baby's "complexion" would turn out to be, it was *.
___
This is huge and how true! I really did know a girl in my youth who was Mexican-American who's surname ended in ate (pronouced ah-teh). She told everyone she was Italian and pronounced the ate as ah-tti. Her first cousin was a bestie so I knew the truth. As sad as that was, when she was carrying her first child, she told us girls in our social group she hoped the baby didn't come out dark! Her husband was lightskinned of Spanish German descent, she was about *s color. Sadly for both her children they were born with dark skin. I say sadly because of HER attitude. SMH.
I know many here won't watch Netflix but the new film Passing portrays this phenomena quite well. Passing is what TBW has been doing for years until it benefited her more to be "Black".
It's understandable as a protective measure example when Jewish families anglicize their names. This happens in my culture as well. As obnoxious as it may sound, in some cultures it's understandable but when she went after the titled and priviledged and well protected spare, it crossed the line into disgusting.
@SwampWoman: I have relatives who are happy when everyone else is miserable. That's because their self-esteem and self-worth are at the bottom of the abyss.
That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did...
You deserved it.
It sounds like she was practicing her speech for the court almost. Except in real life, that kind of thing (given to the level it was within a "documentary"), could be viewed as potentially prejudicing the potential juror pool. This was not some small sound bite in the evening news which gets forgotten by the public by the next topic. No. This had reverb in multiple media.
I don't think it would be a jury pool if ANL were able to go forward though. It just strikes me as rather reel life where you get this wonderful moment to make your speech and the opposition crumbles. Similar thinking that popularity could possible change the line of succession.
"Imitation of Life" is a great film about a black girl who tries to pass as white and breaks her mother's heart. I cry every single time I have watched it.
He just filled out the questionnaire for his mother's hospice experience and when they asked for her race, he crossed out the choices and put "NASCAR".
Government entities with their quotas and categories care waaaay more about race than real people do.
I thought about that film as well. Haven't seen it in many years but it's a tear jerker. Hugs.
Whenever I have to fill out a paper application and I come to the line that asks "Sex" I just write "Yes."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPlFsBpzuk4
If there’s one person I detest nearly as much as I detest Harry’s First Wife, it has to be Head Flying Monkey Wench Lainey Lui. Maggot is what she is—a Major Dark Triad head case. Is she a spawn of Satan or just so mentally off-center it’s pitiable? I have not personally known any psychopaths, and it’s a thorny question. The damage she caused this is the same, irregardless of whether she is actually capable of helping herself or not. But what do we make of all of these twisted disciples of hers, these sycophants who caca with glee as they lay into they are chief nemesis, the Duchess of Cambridge, with maniacal glee? If Catherine evidence is a tiny bit of irritation over having Maggot and Mole Shoved into her face yet again as she’s just trying to carry out her official royal duties…Duties which Maggot and Mole Took a huge dump all over while flipping off the entire family…Does she not have cause? Maggot and Mole act like spiteful toddlers, spewing the most awful lies but they are supposed to be welcomed with smiles and joy, even in passing mention? Maggot chief complaint I guess the royal family, apart from racism and misogyny and having too many rules, of course, was those a natural and unhealthy stiff upper lips they were always displaying. Yet if one of them dares show a tiny glimmer of a natural human reaction, who is all over that they could stink bug on shit?
This kind of blind adulation and collective viciousness by proxy reminds me of the rise of Herr Hitler really…Has another public figure inspired such mass toxic devotion to her evil agenda than has St.Maggot? Even other notorious cult leaders we’ve had since have had a much lesser sphere of influence because the Internet hadn’t been invented. It truly boggles my mind. Hitler had his downfall, but it took 12 long years, the last half of which was comprised of incomprehensible carnage. Is maggots downfall at hand, or are we just gearing Up for the real carnage phase?
tell us how you really feel!
@valentinelow · 1h
So, Meghan's lawyer Jenny Afia said on the BBC there were 'massive inaccuracies' in my Meghan bullying story. How odd. Perhaps she would care to let me know what they were.
https://mobile.twitter.com/valentinelow
Supposedly 'the lawyer' was interviewed in May. A lot has happened since then, including 'Liegate'. I wonder if 'the lawyer' regrets anything about appearing on the BBC programme?
As for catherine - yea, maybe she did smack down ^s wife, and that's why we dont have a video because of possible assault. Then again, if they released that, most Brits would demand Catherine be made Queen on the spot!!!
1) watch the spectacle
2)yank a wig
3) throw her in the mud
4)do the same to H
5)Slap either one
6)ultimate fight the narc
price scale for the type of activity. One day of misery for them and $millions as a result.
Thanks for the link to Lady C's video, aka trouble in paradise. I listen to the bit about the 6s' marriage but she doesn't really say anything factual. I wonder what's going on in Montecito?
------------
I braved it and watched The Princes and the Press on iPlayer. It was watchable except when it came to * - her fake laugh really grates. What is clear, and which I'd forgotten, was that * was fêted when she arrived in the UK. The press was even talking of 'Meghan mania'. I'd forgotten about it because I never liked her from the star - nothing to do with colour, I didn't even know she was biracial, but I saw through her. I know, however, that many were taken in by her and thought she was wonderful. And she had the gall to say the British are racist 😤.
Apologies for stealing your thunder.
I agree Lady C didn’t actually say much, she said she couldn’t otherwise it might have given her source(s) away. I got the impression there was more to come…but who knows with Lady C! 😂 I do wish she’d stop imitating Maggot though! 😛
@ GWAH no worries, I tend not to worry about such things, besides I didn’t post the link and you did. 🤗
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10260215/Trump-says-Meghan-disrespected-Queen-used-Prince-Harry-new-interview-Nigel-Farage.html
Lainey is obsessed with these Korean boy bands and talks about how attractive these guys are. Incessantly. Yet, she is married to a white, Polish guy. LOL
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10260215/Trump-says-Meghan-disrespected-Queen-used-Prince-Harry-new-interview-Nigel-Farage.html#comments
This video from Dr. Ramani is seven months old, but it was new to me as I have just discovered her channel. This entry “When the Narcissist knows you know” To be scarily accurate as to *.
Thanks for the DM link Nigel Farage. <3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bdQjfupZEw
I have thought for two years now that the one truly good thing that has come from the * debacle is that the world is getting educated on narcissists. The targets of narcs used to have a hard time getting people to believe them, because it's hard for the average person to wrap their heads around how diabolical a narc can be. So not only were they not believed, but we were not properly warned.
But now we have an example of a narc who is wrecking havoc on both her own family and her husband's unfolding before our eyes. And many intelligent commenters like Taz and Mr. Rosas breaking her behavior down for us. (I wish Dr. Ramani would, too, but she seems to prefer speaking in general terms rather than making case studies out of celebrities.) Those who have a * in their own families or social circles can be savvier about them now.
Recycled from last year,
too lazy to edit, but it’s
still rather apt! 🔔
Megativity Revisited 🎄
On the first month of megxit
Old megsie did decree
A thick bush to take a sly pee…
12 more to go, a fakers dozen!
Miggy & WildBoar
Thank you,
I’ll be bum swizzled 😉
Busted Royal Flush
Trump and Farage
And their en pointe badinage
A treat for all to see
Forget politics
They’re calling out her tricks
Trump is right
she is plain nasty
God Save the Queen
Apologies:
Little Miss Muffet
Played Again, Ham
Little Miss Muffed-it
Carried on ‘til she’d stuffed it
Scaring her backers away
She performed for sly Oprah
Then Ellen, the joker
Not much left
for madam to play
GWAH
Wasn’t Lainey responsible
for the rumour of Kate
not taking madam shopping?
I also remember reading that
madam told Harry that she
didn’t feel quite accepted
by the RF, as she wasn’t
invited for Christmas.
Hence the unprecedented
un-married invitation
to Sandringham.
Rachism!!
Oh, that's brilliant! It wasn't * who was a victim of the BRF's supposed racism, but they who were victims of her insufferable Rachism!
I was reading the article on Trump and Farage and then looked at the blog. One of the comments said "The LA bike will be fuming, hazbeen better keep out of her way" 😁
@Magatha
Please recycle away, it's always a treat to read your poems 😄
It wasn't * who was a victim of the BRF's supposed racism, but they who were victims of her insufferable Rachism!
Quite! This is what is called projection in psychology. I am well au fait with it as my [workplace] bully was a case in point. This is why I really want that witch to be found guilty of bullying.
This is an early video of Dr. Ramani, before she had her own channel. It was done three years ago. 3 years ago, No one had a clue how very bad things would be between the Suxxits and the Royal family; the Still newlywed Duchess had just announced her “pregnancy with Archie” and come back from Australia, Where I dare say that all the members of the Australia house staff, The tour coordinators and most functionaries who met * in person Had a preview of what we would later learn: The insidious narcissism of this woman.
In this video, Dr. Ramani discusses in an interview the four distinct types of narcissism commonly accepted to exist in the lingo of her field. These 4 types Have very porous boundaries, seems to me; but in the case study of Harry’s wife, we have a specimen who seems to embody all 4 types to some degree. Watch and decide which subcategory you think best describes Rachel.
I rewatched the video about 4 different types of narcissism. The Sussexes' soap opera has been going on for so long that it was pre-virus times that I first watched it!
You hit the nail on the head when you speak of porous boundaries! Here's my quick look at the types and how they fit her pathology.
Grandiose? Most definitely. She has always been grandiose.
Malignant? Most definitely. This is what will unravel her. Blatant perjury. Even if she does escape consequences this time, her patholgy will get her into trouble again. She is so hell bent on going after those who did not worship at her feet and give her everything she demanded immediately, and especially those who did call her out ...!
Covert? Nope. Yes, she always blames everyone else, but she never accepts failure at all. (Even when she apologised for forgetting because she was so busy, she did not admit that she lied and she sent her lawyer to go after those who dared to expose her .. as she did nothing wrong and they did!) She just continues to push her grandiose fantasies ... most successful royal tour ever, supermodel, successful A-list Hollywood actress, global style icon, bestsellng author, global humanitarian, standing ovation led by the UN Secretary-general ...
Communal? Nope. She only pushed the charity stuff to get attention, specially when they got to LA and it was the only legitimate way she could get out there and get attention. How do you do pap walks in the time of the virus? Deliver food to vulnerable people, and when the organisation does not give you a slot or you quckly get tired if the activity, travel miles from your huge property to walk the dogs. She is not an Anjelina Jolie (a very successful communal narcissist) but a grandiose narcissist desperate to get papped.
yes, Lainey was responsible for the story about Catherine not inviting that thing to go shopping with her, and she kept bringing it up, as though it was a crime against humanity.
Lainey was also responsible for spreading the rumour about Rose and William. She brings it up often and at every opportunity.
Prince Harry has linked COVID-19 to the HIV pandemic, during which Princess Diana did some of her most inspiring work.
The Duke of Sussex said both global public health emergencies were prolonged by "corporate greed and political failure" blocking access to treatment.
He called for major pharmaceutical companies to share vaccine technology and allow doses to be produced locally in the developing world, as part of the People's Vaccine campaign.
In a video marking World AIDS Day, Harry said: "There are striking parallels between COVID-19 and another deadly pandemic, one that emerged 40 years ago—HIV."
In the footage, he added: "This is a story about how corporate greed and political failure have prolonged both pandemics and what we can do to stop it."
Why Prince Andrew, Clinton, Trump Mentions in Maxwell Trial Could BackfireREAD MOREWhy Prince Andrew, Clinton, Trump Mentions in Maxwell Trial Could Backfire.
Has to try and stay relevant by jumping on a bandwagon - clearly influenced by TBW. I'm not sure anybody is listening.
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-compares-covid-19-hiv-cause-princess-diana-championed-1654846
Let's step back and not get into specifics of this country or that country is/was or will be doing about covid.
It's just a topic which seems to generate a lot of heated discussion in not friendly ways.
And it gets away from the general topic of the blog.
If you are thinking of what else now? what do you think she will give him for Christmas?
(thank you)
I also diagnose * as mainly a Malignant Narc with about evenly split Grandiose & Covert characteristics. Women are more likely to be covert, which is characterized by a high level of passive-agressivity, pot-stirring, Chinese whispers, etc. Essentially all those Mean Girl high school games ratcheted up to the 100th power.
She can certainly grandstand and be Grandiose when given the spotlight/platform (the way she crashed the British Fashion Awards; the pontificating to poor black women in South Africa about how she was their sister in suffering, etc.) but Grandiosity is not her primary public face. Donald Trump would be an example of Grandiosity as his primary characteristic. These types are much more Extravert and dynamic than * is. I would not apply either of these traits to her. She *tries* (painfully) to be that breezy charming, charismatic life of the party type but it is just so false. For all of the Donald's faults, he admires and supports the Queen, which is quite stunning really since he so rarely thinks as well of anyone as he does himself.
*'s brand of narcissism is a whole lot more sneaky and interior, so definitely covert. But also malignant. I get the feeling that the Grandiose Narc, though he/she hurts people by way of collateral damage is just a whole lot more straightforward in pursuing their Looking out for #1 goals. Once they are done with somebody, they're done. They don't spend months and years plotting revenge and planting smear stories in the media like someone else we could mention. Compare how Grandiose Narc DT tries his staff he's used up and run through vs. how the Duckarse of Suxxit treats others who've 'wronged' her. DT's likely forgotten the names of most of the people who he views as having let him down. They are no longer relevant to his present day. Someone else we know is fueled by vendetta because look how she's going after Catherine still.
To paraphrase a line from BBC Sherlock, "She will outlive God trying to have the last word."
The Community Narcissism caught my eye due to the mode by which she and HaznoNutz are attempting to stay famous--as philanthropic influencers. But this is just a means to an end--fame--for her, and she picked it because it's trendy and because it doesn't require any special work or talent--it's just promoting herself essentially. Dressing up for photoshoots with celebs like Gloria Steinem and Melissa McCarthy is *really* gonna change the world, sure. It looked like an easy route to being like Kim Kardashian. If * had any other means besides virtue-signalling to stay in the papers--like actual artistic talent or drive of any sort--she'd do it.
Thanks for your explanation of covert narcissism! Dr Ramani's description did not ring true for me as a dscription of TBW, but mainly because she says they blame failure on others but TBW never admits failure. She just keeps pushing what she wants to be true (global style icon, global hunanitarian, and so on) and completely ignores reality. She does kind of fake humility and vulnerability, using her status as a woman and as a mother and as a person of colour, but failure is never even acknowledged. I guess I got caught up with that aspect of covert narcissism!
She is definitely grandiose, hence the mansion, the huge entourage, the private planes, the huge amount spent on ill-fitting clothes she will wear once, the clearing of the stands at Wimbledon ...
Change of topic: Why have they not produced anything for Spotify? They hired a couple of people to do that and those people have been in place for months and months now. What the heck is going on? Are we going to be subjected to another Christmas special and that will be it for the next year?
Is she going to manifest another pregnancy to be unveiled at Christmas as a distraction?
Sandie-
baby maybe? I don't think so only because they made such a big deal about over population, just having two (compared to his brother who had three).
But, never say never. If they did, I would guess twins.
For such high profile faux Royalty, Spotify is requiring video. For Ed's Basement Jam Band it is not required
It's like the new hires don't do *any* due diligence before signing on.
OTOH, neither did Oprah, Netflix, or Spotify.
1) 10 minutes in the main house for the day
2) another "baby"
3) a visit with his balls
4) a divorce
all wrapped in a bow ;-)
---
True enough. I think there was something about that with the woman who came from Pinterest.
In thinking about it, what about the royal ones? The ones that they poached from the Cambridges? Like Jason Knauf? Seems like he was taken in by the love bombing that she does to males. Harder to understand the female ones being taken in by her.
Maybe in the beginning they were excited to be part of something new? Maybe had nowhere to elevate to in current job and this was a chance to level up?
Wasn't Samantha Cohen asked to work for them by the Queen? To specifically delay her retirement to help get the Harkles up and running?
"Meghan was 'very inappropriate' when asked by Mr Farage about claims she used her royal title to meddle in US politics, by writing on the Sussexes' headed paper to lobby Congress members on issues such as paternity leave. 'She is trying to do things that I think are very inappropriate,' he said."
and...
"Earlier this year, Trump said he would campaign for the White House in 2024 if Meghan was joining the race. The former president was commenting on rumors that the duchess was 'meeting with Democrat operatives [and] she may want to run'. He told Fox News: 'I hope that happens because if that happened then I think I'd have an even stronger feeling towards running. I'm not a fan of hers. I've met with the Queen and I think the Queen is a tremendous person and I'm not a fan of Meghan.' Pictured: The former president boarding Air Force One before departing Harlingen, Texas, on January 12, 2021."
www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-makes-shocking-claims-about-meghan-markle
The tell-all interview of Trump was conducted by the UK politician, Farage and advertised in the article as..."Donald Trump makes SHOCKING claims about Meghan Markle."
"In an interview to be aired on GB News at 7pm tonight in the UK, the former US president claims the actions of both the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in recent years have caused pain to the monarch."
I recall reading that one of *'s circle during the pre-Suits/pre-Trevor years saying that * would take to her bed for days with a bottle of rose (not affording Tig back in those days) when she had another failed audition. So there are elements of bipolarity with her too, I think, muddying the waters of her narcissism. So she may be partly the vulnerable/covert type--her MO is playing the 'poor victimized Black/female/American/woke me, victimized by so many heartless institutions . . .the heartless British royal family, British public, particularly the nasty Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and the little old lady they report to with all her rigid rules. And all the casting directors/producers/auteurs who refused to acknowledge my thespian greatness, dazzling beauty and iconic style--ALL of them have kept me down from claiming my due to the Emmy/Oscar/Tony, the Nobel Peace Prize and the Presidency of the United States. And all the Vogue covers on all the international editions ever!" She still refuses to admit to mistakes or being anything lesser than she thinks she is, but she's honed the blame game to a high gloss.
A lot of covert narcs might want to fly under the radar and not go for global fame or global style icon status with pictures in the tabloids every day. It's enough for many narcs to exert control over their immediate circle and they aren't really looking to be famous. Too bad for us that * isn't this type because we wouldn't know anything about her. * is a particularly Hollywood strain of Narc, but she seems to be even more deluded and sick than most, because the dsymorphia she's got about herself is extreme. * has got reverse dysmorphia--when she looks in the mirror, she sees a 5'10" willowy supermodel with the most brilliant mind known to womankind. Ha!
Yes, they went on at some length during the engagement interview about how they'd love to be the first royals to adopt and have a diverse family of love that way.
To mention this so overtly in their very first appearance together told me that they were both absolutely aware at that time that one or both of them was sterile and natural children would not be happening. I view this as the first of *'s trial balloons--testing the waters to see how something she wants to happen will be received. Sometime between that interview and October 2018, they were informed that children via adoption would not be entered into the line of succession because there was no provision for that in an entirely heredity system. So then she had to scramble to debut a 'real pregnancy' which would have, if authentic, have had to transpire a scant 6-8 weeks after their wedding. She was allegedly already past the 3-month scan in mid-October, meaning she was in her fourth month in Australia. Sure, Rachel. Even 20 year old Diana took longer than 6 weeks to conceive a royal heir.
I think * is definitely a malignant narc. When Dr. Ramani said, "They lie, they cheat, they steal," I remembered when * was arranging things with Jessica so she could merch designer clothes and pocket the money Prince Charles was giving her for her wardrobe. That was a time she did all three in one go. I'm sure other Nutties can think of more.
* has grandiose traits, too, but I think both her limited success in Hollywood and Toronto, and all the rules and protocols of the BRF, did quite a bit to keep them in check. Which must have been frustrating for her. I think the baby shower was the best it ever got for her.
Wimbledon, on the other hand, was just a tantrum. She didn't want to clear a section for herself and her non-celebrity "university friends" as much as she wanted to sit in the royal box with a glamorous entourage. But maybe she couldn't get the "right" people or the "right" clothes, and her nose got out of joint. So she showed up in jeans -- which someone on her staff must have told her wouldn't be allowed -- in order to spoil things for as many people as possible, just as she felt things had been spoiled for her. How dare the world not allow her a proper Wimbledon moment.
So she may be partly the vulnerable/covert type--her MO is playing the 'poor victimized Black/female/American/woke me, victimized by so many heartless institutions
I recognized someone I know in Dr. Ramani's description of the covert narcissist. As more and more people experience what it's like to work with him, it gets harder and harder for him to claim that the only reason he hasn't done better in life is that circumstances were usually against him.
So my sense of covert narcissism is that it's the province of unsuccessful people. They know they can't get away with being grandiose, so they settle for this.
Accordingly, it creates a little cognitive dissonance for me to see the same traits in *, who actually did succeed in lots of ways. She got a recurring role on a series. (Yes, it's small potatoes, but if a friend of ours who was a decent person got it, we'd be so thrilled, wouldn't we?) She gave a speech at the UN. She married a British prince in a ceremony televised all over the world. She got to mingle with A-list celebrities (at least for a little while). She got deals from Netflix and Spotify. She was on the cover of multiple magazines. She gave an interview to Oprah. Again, these are all hollow victories, but they keep her from saying that she never got a break. Which must be an awkward position for a covert narcissist. * is the most successful failure in the world.
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the duo state at one time that they would consider adoption.
Yes, now that you said it, they did. But maybe that was playing on words: wouldn't they have to adopt a child born to a surrogate to make him/her legally theirs? 🤔
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt." Maybe it's just my perception, but I do believe that Harry removed all doubt.
At least the UK can see the reveal of the man previously kept hidden within the protection of the royal pageantry.
While most of us would look admiringly at what she has achieved with so little talent, it is a pittance to her.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10264727/BBC-man-centre-royal-storm-attacked-Kate-William-total-frauds.html
Why Meghan Can't Get What INFLUENCE Really Is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKtYmhMZngU
On the second month of megxit
Old megsue did decree
Two surrogate’s
And a thick bush to take a sly pee
In the infamous words of DJT: Losing!
At least the rest of us can benefit from this. If the best thing about * is that the world is now learning about the pathology of narcissists, then the second best thing is that we're also learning what not to do, if we want to succeed in life.
As for that despicable journalist, do you think he may have Short Man's Syndrome?
----
That was my 1st thought.
The Theresa Longo Fans Twitter account is spilling tea about TBW being behind the People article in which the letter to daddy was revealed. It was a PR campaign that she concocted. Supposedly Palace staff were against it but she went ahead anyway. Even if ANL does not win the right to appeal, there is a lot of tea to be spilled. Messy Megsy has a peculuar talent for shooting herself in the foot!
I feel sick 🤢🤮
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59502787
It doesn't make any sense. I'm still in shock. How could her lawyers say the letter was "deeply personal" and "self-evidently was intended to be kept private" (my italics). It's absolutely mind boggling. Are the judges in the case of a certain political persuasion? (they usually are). It's sickening, this is not justice.
I can't believe she's got away with it again!
I feel sick too!!
I agree with everyone that this is sickening. She did not win because of a technicality but because the judges swallowed everything she said as gospel truth and ignored her perjury.
I was expecting a win on technical grounds but this victory goes way beyond that.
Oh boy, is she going to gloat about this victory, and make a huge claim for damages.
The Sussexes' Christmas card is going to be epic!
The worst is she'll probably be gloating. I suppose she'll be awarded costs? This won't help her sense of grandiosity, she's now invincible. I really, really hope she's found guilty of bullying, particularly as I was bullied at work and I can't abide bullies. I wonder what's happening to that but I'm not holding my breath.
This is from Hello! A statement by the witch (sick bucket at the ready strongly recommended):
In a powerful statement Meghan said: "This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what's right. While this win is precedent setting, what matters most is that we are now collectively brave enough to reshape a tabloid industry that conditions people to be cruel, and profits from the lies and pain that they create.
"From day one, I have treated this lawsuit as an important measure of right versus wrong. The defendant has treated it as a game with no rules. The longer they dragged it out, the more they could twist facts and manipulate the public (even during the appeal itself), making a straightforward case extraordinarily convoluted in order to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers - a model that rewards chaos above truth. In the nearly three years since this began, I have been patient in the face of deception, intimidation, and calculated attacks.
"Today, the courts ruled in my favor - again - cementing that The Mail on Sunday, owned by Lord Jonathan Rothermere, has broken the law. The courts have held the defendant to account, and my hope is that we all begin to do the same. Because as far removed as it may seem from your personal life, it's not. Tomorrow it could be you. These harmful practices don't happen once in a blue moon - they are a daily fail that divide us, and we all deserve better."
"making a straightforward case extraordinarily convoluted in order to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers". Projection, as I said before.
@Sandie
Perjury indeed. The woke judges fell for her lies, sorry, memory lapses.
I'd better shut up before I burst a blood vessel.
When I was watching the BBC2 documentary and listened to her lawyer spouting off whilst the case still hadn't been settled... I had an uneasy feeling in my stomach that she already knew she'd won. I didn't mention my feelings here as didn't want to tempt fate.
Yes, she'll be gloating... and how!! That smug grin of hers will be on show for the whole world to see.
I'm still in shock here!!!
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/16915583/meghan-markle-wont-go-trial-dad-letter/
She's going to be even more unbearable now! 😒
A two-fingered salute, printed twice - on the front, one Churchill-style, showing thumb on the front and inside, with back of hand towards us.
If, in some nightmare, she were to become POTUS, her first act would probably be to nuke the UK.
By the way, the bizarre PR appearance of the lawyer in the BBC programme (both parts) really came across to me as a narcissist's defence. The behaviour did happen and the distress/damage was real, but legally/technically it cannot be defined as bullying.
...........
@Sandie
I don't think Markle's lawyer knows the details of all the bullying claims and was just deflecting. And I'm sure Markle has told her lawyers a lot of porkies.🤣
From what Valentine Low reported it sounded to me like what she did could easily meet the legal definition. There was sustained repeated bullying on certain targets enough to cause some employees to quit their jobs. Here's to hoping she gets doesn't get away with something yet again.🤞
We were without electricity for about 12 hours, so, by candlelght and torchlight, I got out my tarot cards, and no matter how many times I did a spread, the same messages came through.
After the fact, but a win for her in court and a huge payout. But, ultimately, the truth, untainted by emotions, will prevail.
Staff problems. My interpretation is that they are going to blame lack of delivery on contracts signed on their staff.
Big PR from them around marriage and family. Her as the earth mother protecting and nurturing her family. A renewal of vows (keeps coming up!). Possibly another pregnancy. Tree of life kind of vibe for Christmas card.
There is some dark stuff that was underlying every reading. Yucky, so I don't want to look into it too deeply!
I definitely want to do some more spreads for them, and do a really in-depth analysis rather than the quick readings I did last night.
I can't even be bothered to read the Sun article, anyway they've always been pro *.
Yes, the witch will be even more insufferable if that's possible 🙄. I'm still in shock too so will lie down in a dark room with a cold compress on my fevered brow.
@Magatha
We need you now more than ever. I know it's bedtime or close to it in your neck of the woods but if you find some inspiration in the morning, do regale us with a few poems so we can keep our sanity 😊.
I’m not in the least bit surprised. This case going to court would have been unprecedented,. I have no idea how 3 appeal judges came to this conclusion, but I think you only have to look at how the establishment is, and see why they wanted it this way. There’s no different way or verdict this case can go now, with near zero chance of the court sanctioning an appeal of the appeal ever likely.
This whole stinky mess could very likely backfire on the Establishment . I don’t see how this conclusion will benefit the Royal Family. 🧐
'While this win is precedent setting'.
The whole second paragraph paints herslf as a defender of truth ... completely ignorng her perjury!
Oh, and little miss porky pies completely ignores the pain inflicted on her father in that People article that she orchestrated.
She really is one crazy woman!
But, yeah, I am feeling sick about her triumph in this matter!
Hollow Swallow Victory
Pulling rank with her title
For madam is vital
Showing roth, a mere Lord
That she’s scored
Addressing her tales
against Daily Mail
She slips in a sly daily fail
I can only hope that there is something bigger in the offing and she's been thrown a tiddler so to speak. It was rumoured that Jason Knauf had engaged the services of a lawyer whose speciality is financial fraud, embezzlement and in particular, frauds involving charities and misappropriation of funds.......
Perhaps it was thought that with the bullying investigation in progress, Archwell still under a question mark and goodness knows what else could be under investigation behind the scenes, the RF/establishment are picking their battles. I can only hope so.
Rajan has, sort-of, apologised for some nasty things he said about the Royals in the past: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2021/12/02/bbc-media-editor-says-embarrassed-attacks-royal-family-former/
I suppose that's something. In the past the Beeb has usually responded to criticism with self-justification.
Ah, Maneki, wish I’d just gone
to bed and not checked the blog!
Her Pap
(passive aggressive perfidious)
missive is repugnant.
There’s not a big enough bucket
to go round!!
Snarky, yes naming
Lord Rothermere, no doubt some
vile reason behind it, I could only
come up with “rank” due to her
grandiosity?
And the sneaky dig at DM,
“daily fail”
All of it too much to swallow!
The Body Language Guy.
Especially in the first part of the video, he really made me laugh. He does make a really good case for the Harkles being famous but not influential.
He showed a clip of the lawyer speaking about bullying, and the camera was focused on the face of the interviewer. I am not familiar with him so maybe that is how he always looks, but I really got a 'I am really not buying this BS' kind of vibe from him.
@Sandie- I took it that the BLG was saying that Mr*'s face was hidden so his expression couldn't be read. Rajan put himself in the firing line instead.
I am surprised at the rather casual attitude displayed by the judges toward *'s misleading statements regarding her cooperation with the authors of the book about her. In the US, even in a civil case, the litigants would be deposed under oath. Was this not the case here? A US president lost his law license for lying in a deposition. Is 'forgetfulness' an adequate excuse for misleading the court in the UK?
The judge indicated that the court was releasing some further statements regarding the case. It will be interesting to see if there are any changes in the terms of the SJ settlement. Like @JennS, I have read that ANL can appeal to yet another court. Don't know if that's true.
I have to point out that the bullying charges are not a legal matter before any court of law. They are part of an internal investigation into the inner workings of the offices of the RF. The RF most likely has the last word on how much of the investigation is revealed to the public, & it will not result in any legal penalties.
Still can't believe she got away with perjury ... not even a harsh reprimand.
Sorry to cause confusion. Yes, the camera was focused on his face when the lawyer was speaking. So, The Body Language Guy could not analyse her body language. But, I picked up the vibe 'I am not buying this BS' on his face as he listened to her. I am not familiar with him, so maybe that is his standard listening face in an interview.
@NeutralObserver
According to the Sun article
Miggy posted:
“The newspaper could now
appeal against the decision
to the Supreme Court,
but permission to grant this
next step is usually always refused”
Wonder how she will spend the cash? Chanel, new nose or boobs?
Not a good idea to look at the blog before you to bed! Hope you won't have any nightmares but a peaceful night.
Your statement ".....I agree with everyone that this is sickening. She did not win because of a technicality but because the judges swallowed everything she said as gospel truth and ignored her perjury."
For a moment I thought I was reading about the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard case. This is history repeating itself but in another case. UK judges have shown themselves to be unreliable with the truth and perjury does not exist in their courts. As long as the WOMAN swears to tell the truth, her words can only be the truth or at worst, a lapse of memory. We know Judge Nicol in the Johnny Depp case was bought, what about Warby?