Skip to main content

The Long Slow Walk into the Sunset

 I've been quite worried about The Queen.  Each morning I wake up and wonder - did she pass?  how do I put a black border around this space?  what to write?  

I know that this would be a well planned out announcement and ceremony (the plans probably were started before her coronation) as  these are the people who live/breath, are immersed in protocol of how this should be done and think of all kinds of contingencies.  It is in good hands.

But I also think about the emotional fall out for the family, the employees who have a chance to see her in situations none of us get or the citizens of the UK - many of whom have never known another monarch before you get to the world's response. 

Or just the sheer loss of knowledge from dealing with the intricacies the politics of different countries, regime changes.  The world has changed so dramatically since she was crowned, let alone born.  I am reminded of my grandmother who once said that she could remember her first car ride and how fast it seemed to be zipping along at a racy 20 miles an hour.

Today I read that she will not have the traditional welcome to Balmoral ceremony.  Craigowan Lodge was fitted for a wheelchair lift.  Yes it is good to be accessible but I kind of wish it had happened before this.  It would have lessened the sadness of the need for it now.

The future is feels more heavy with each day.  Her world is getting harder to move about.  

So let's talk.

Please take a moment to read the rules as they change over time in response to what is happening.

Thanks you.



  

Comments

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if * were a thief. I had suspected that she had been caught with her fingers in the Royal Foundation till, so to speak (perhaps claiming for personal expenditure on the QT?). I can also see how she might have been a risk, given how she had previously been caught snooping around.

It's bad enough that it's believable, even if it didn't happen.
Maneki Neko said…
@Hikari

I'm not surprised a French diplomat complained about loud boozy parties and fireworks being let off on the grounds of Nott Cott as the French ambassador's residence backs onto Kensington Gardens. He knew what he was talking about.

Yes, TBW's new home (Frogmore Cottage) was next to a bog and the bones of Queen Victoria but also Wallis, remember 😁
Sandie said…
Some supposed tea from an Anon, true, made up or partly true is anyone's guess:

-----
Ive been a fan of yours for a while and I have some info to pass on, this info ended up at my work which is in the education policy field in California… apparently Mrs H is wanting her son to get preferential treatment at school and singled out as better… she is unhappy that the teaching staff rebuffed her. So obviously it’s become a joke and passed around us with links to the source that can’t believe her behavior… no child is treated differently or pushed as better than the others and she is to be insinuated bribing higher ups and even had a list of demands for ALL staff in Archie’s school to follow… she also made threats name dropping important people to intimidate trustees & the NAIS as well. She (and H) also doesn’t do anything with the school such as shows, fairs or drop/pick him up…
-----
https://the-empress-7.tumblr.com/post/693229266032263168/ive-been-a-fan-of-yours-for-a-while-and-i-have#notes
Ralph L said…
I wonder if the duo were not offered the Gloucester's large apartment at Kensington Palace (not rent free) but refused

That could only have happened very early. No way the Cambridges wanted them next door by the time of the wedding. It is probably due for the same expensive refurbishment their apartment had last decade.
Ralph L said…
On a Friday in 2013, my narc step-monster announced that she and Dad were selling their expensive condo in Virginia and moving full-time into my late grandmother's usually unoccupied house next door to me in NC. I had a miserable weekend, to put it mildly. On Monday, she dropped dead of a pulmonary embolism getting out of the car after visiting one of her doctors. Fortunately for my dad, then 85, a paramedic was walking by and helped. I'm keeping that car as long as I can after my father dies.
Sandie said…
"Befriending the son of a Bolivian president at school, Meghan boasted for a few days, 'I’m going to be Queen of Bolivia’”.

The above is from Bower's book. As we worked out, she was in a co-ed school until at least the end of Grade 6. (Her biographies are not clear about when she started at the girls-only high school.)
Sandie said…
"Befriending the son of a Bolivian president at school, Meghan boasted for a few days, 'I’m going to be Queen of Bolivia’”.

The above is from Bower's book. As we worked out, she was in a co-ed school until at least the end of Grade 6. (Her biographies are not clear about when she started at the girls-only high school.)
Sandie said…
Interesting:

"William and Kate will pay market value on the property from their own private funds, not from taxpayers' money via the Sovereign Grant, and will foot their own moving costs."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11133963/Prince-William-Kate-Middleton-Adelaide-Cottage-Windsor.html
Sandie said…
https://twitter.com/NewTimesRwanda/status/1561657907611160580?s=20&t=Jsi3_5ZBudbuq3v1XxAJ0w

The hapless one is now in Rwanda, where African Parks manages two parks.
Hikari said…
@Sandie

Re. The tea from the education policy Anon…

While it certainly sounds in character for *, I’m going to need independent confirmation that Master Archie actually exists before I could accept that Twit and Twat have a child that features in this anecdote. Also since the ostensible child in question is only 3 years old, his “school” is a nursery. Unless he would be in a full-time daycare, “school” for toddlers is generally 2.5 -3 hours a day of learning how to use crayons and not hit our classmates. Some early literacy stuff happens but it’s very basic and very short. This anecdote makes it sound like he’s a full-fledged elementary school student. (Of course * wants everyone to know how advanced her son is. But he’s only been 3 for a few months. Some nurseries do offer programs for 2-year olds, but again unless it’s also a full time daycare, generally the kids need to be potty trained before they are enrolled.)

I suspect that * herself or her bots are generating rumors about Archie’s school life to bolster his existence. Without naming his nursery, every one in the Montecito area can say “We’re glad he doesn’t go here!”—but that doesn’t actually prove that he does go anywhere. When’s the last time we saw Archie in a photo? Can anyone remember? Over a year ago when ostensibly expecting Lilibet, * Took the opportunity when Harry was out of the country to get herself papped, Float carrying Archie to school”. So at the time Archie would’ve been barely two— Absolutely the youngest nursery student in any institution anywhere— And the child she was pictured carrying looked to be at least four years old and a girl wearing a wool beanie pulled over her ears in the spring.

Going back to school day for the Cambridges real and verified children will be happening soon, so we might expect a flurry of staged photo opportunities from Montecito… Whether that will be before or after the faux Royal tour in September is anyone’s guess.

The queen of Bolivia anecdote just illustrates that her penchant For living in a completely self-absorbed fantasy world remains unchanged since she was 12. As for moving over to the girls Catholic secondary school, I think that probably occurred right after this, for 7th grade.
OKay said…
@Ralph L. On the bright side, it seems that your father will be living near you during his final days and without all the (presumed) drama. Sometimes, the universe gives you exactly what you need!

___________
@Hikari I'm inclined to agree with you that Archie more likely than not does NOT exist. However, if this is the work of * and/or her minions, it makes her look pretty bad. I'd expect to hear something more along the lines of how brilliant Archie is at finger painting and the like; everyone is so amazed by (and jealous of) his natural talent!
Fifi LaRue said…
Just a quick note before I continue reading comments: At one time my then husband and I were friends with a couple. The wife was from Bolivia, and the husband/wife boasted that she was related to the President of Bolivia. I relayed the exciting information to friends in the following days, only to be deflated by the news that Bolivia had a new President every year because the country was so unstable.
Sandie said…
I believe that the children do exist, but the crazy parents are absolutely clueless. As you say, she lives in a self-absorbed fantasy world.

In my culture, children do not go to pre-school from such an early age unless the parents work full-time and need to put the kids in daycare. Formal pre-school is for the two years before starting school. Archie is still too young for this.

I realize that the obvious reason for the absurd lies they tell about the children is that they do not exist, but that is from a reasonable and rational perspective.

Could Archie be in daycare? Yes. Why? Because they are unable to retain a nanny to take care of him, and Doria has taken off.

Here is one pre-school in Montecito that takes children from age two.

https://live-montecito-preschool.pantheonsite.io/

There seem to be a lot of such places in Montecito. The education and socialisation of children seems to start at a very early age. I find it odd but it does seem to be the norm in this area.

If photos of the duo and their children are worth a lot, why have the paps not staked out these pre-schools? Is it because they only turn up if they get a call from Mudslide Manor?
-----
I notice that Oprah is defending her and 'her truth' in that interview. Perhaps someone should do an interview with someone about Oprah, for a global audience, and defend all the bombshell claims and stories about Oprah as the person's truth?
Mel said…
The hapless one is now in Rwanda, where African Parks manages two parks.
-------
He's stalking the US delegation, pathetically hoping for a photo with them.

They've called security to keep the weirdo stalker away from them.

Do have to wonder who is paying his expenses, though.
African Parks is declining to comment...so probably them?
I sure hope the US isn't paying for him.
Este said…
BenGlow got married over the weekend, trying to make the biggest spectacle of their rekindled love possible. Casey Affleck, Leah Ramini and all the Kardashians had better things to do. Matt and his wife showed up as did Kevin Smith. That's it for celebrity endorsements and we know Matt and Ben have at least a lot of business in the hopper between them. Matt and Ben then jetted off alone, not afraid to court any unsavory rumors on what's alleged to be the happiest day of Ben's life.

Me? I think all this is a con and that BenGlow is a PR creation meant to rekindled both their careers and help them obtain that all-important mogulship that Jay Z and Beyonce have. Jay Z and Beyonce might not have any love between them but they have a lot of zeroes in their bank, which is really what this is all about: let's make an empire! But this spectacle didn't bring in the vital assist from the stars, who seem embarrassed to be associated with this Kodak moment of marital bliss is brought to you our proud platinum corporate sponsor, Charmin, Enjoy the go!. Nor did it generate more than a passing interest from the media.

So how will the Netflix sponsored wedding of the second row royals go? in this jaded error of diminished expectations, post-thrive era? I say the past (BenGlow) is prologue (the pretend royals).
VetusSacculi said…
@Hikari - "Archie" with the ginger hair was on their December 2021 Christmas card, the photo of her carrying him to pre-school was in April 2021 (so before he was 2 - she has a "bump" for Lillibucks). The most recent one, but unconfirmed, is when they are on the pavement in Jackson, Wyoming. Archie may well be very intelligent - in every shot he seems desperate to not be with them. Smart kid (whoever he is).
Girl with a Hat said…
@Ralph L

I empathize with your situation.
@Ralph L: Are we to assume that you may have had some difficulty in maintaining a respectful composure of the sad-there's-been-a-death-in-the-family-kind when your narc step-monster departed this life?

Have you still got the car? Good for you!
Some people just don't know when they're well off:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11134239/Adelaide-Cottage-secrets-Royal-scandal-linked-Prince-William-Kate-Middletons-retreat.html

Apparently, HM offered * & H Adelaide Cottage but they turned it down.
lizzie said…
MM is so fluid with dates it's hard to know when she started at Immaculate Heart. But IH does have a middle school that would start in 5th grade. (The Little Red Schoolhouse went through 6th grade so there was overlap.) In her phony graduation speech about George Floyd/BLM she said she started Immaculate Heart the fall after the King riots. Those were in April/May of 1992. MM would have been 10, turning 11 in Aug of 1992 (although she sometimes says she was 12 during the King riots.). She likely would have been in 6th grade that fall.

--------
Archie-- There is a Montessori "school" in Montecito. (The one @Sandie mentioned.) Per its website, the "Stars" group there is for kids 2-3.5 years old. Being in that group doesn't require kids to be toilet trained initially but they can't advance to the "Suns" group in diapers.

No idea if the candids (polo, July 4) were really Archie. But the child did look like he had on diapers. And at 3 plus a few months, that wouldn't necessarily be unusual especially for a boy.
Karla said…

WBBM❤️
...
MM always brings Archie out when H leaves the country.
Twitter
"We don’t do Social Media’ believes no one ever.
Suddenly natural hair, makeup free & appétit her mom & son make an appearance"

https://twitter.com/MissAkuaAfriyie/status/1561776821473083392?s=20&t=tytaURtYCGseXcwBPEBDHA

....

According to sugars (Minutes later)

"The original photos have been removed so tabloids are going to use reposts from social media in their articles instead. Think about whether you want your account to be the one featured in the Daily Fail. IJS"

https://twitter.com/SussexDetective/status/1561777189112221698?s=20&t=RFKH7BzhgEACmuyLu7eV2A
Sandie said…
https://mobile.twitter.com/missakuaafriyie/status/1561776821473083392

TBW doing a Zoom call, with Archie and Doria making an appearance.

She looks younger, seems to have lost
weight, and is either easing up on the hair straightener or trying a different wig.
Hikari said…
Until I started following the adventures of twit and twat in earnest, I was pretty naïve about how things worked. I knew of course that people in show business, or those who aspire to be, have agents and managers working for them. I guess I assumed before that large PR firms such as Sunshine Sachs Would be hired to represent a client on behalf of his or her studio, record label or publishing house… Not that a nobody like Markle with virtually no resume could hire such a firm for a relative pittance to completely fabricate flattering stories about her and relentlessly push those fictions as truth until they were accepted as such. I also thought that the bulk of charitable donations, minus administrative costs, went to the cause they ostensibly represented.

I also erroneously believed that popular magazines and the editorial staff there of autonomously decided who they wanted to feature on a cover or in a spread, based on some sort of merit which would sell copies, and the magazine would reach out to the celebrities representation to work out the agreement. I also figured the magazine would pay the featured celebrity because they were essentially being hired to sell magazines and keep the advertisers happy. But I find the shoe is on quite the other foot when the list slebs can pay the magazines for a feature, and the magazines take these kickbacks from PR firms to keep whipping up that gloss.

Silly rabbit.

The “studio romance” to push the star(s) of an upcoming movie into the public eye for box office goes back to the earliest days of motion pictures. Of course this is still going on… Did anyone believe for a minute that RPatz and KStew were a legit couple? They were under orders to their studio to pretend to be a couple in order to sell twilight tickets to teenyboppers. Now with BenGlow 2.O, We’ve got two middle-aged past it slebs going at it. Ben is, gee, let's see...JLo's 4th? husband? How many engagement rings has this chick collected? Ben’s Given up any pretense whatsoever that he still pursuing sobriety… Or grooming. J Lo is so desperate to stick one to A-Rod that she’s willing to take anything at this point.

Casey Affleck might have been expected to take on best man duties for his big Bro, but he cited “family responsibilities” For blowing off WeddingPalooza. His eldest boy is 18 and ostensibly could have been responsible to stay home with his 14-year-old brother if dad had really wanted to be at this wedding. But Casey’s divorced dad and it was probably his custodial weekend and he didn’t want to miss it in order to participate in a Wedding reality show. Can’t blame him. But if your own brother refuses to attend your wedding, that’s a pretty damning indictment that it’s not worth going to.
Hikari said…
Wild Boar,

I can believe that the queen offered the dip shit duo Adelaide Cottage, Because when it was first announced that William and Kate would be moving their family to Windsor to Adelaide Cottage, I distinctly remember a Squak being raised from Monteshitshow about how Adelaide Cottage actually was the property intended for the Suxshitses. So now it seems we may add Adelaide Cottage to Diana’s blue sapphire engagement ring as items which William has stolen from Harry, the “rightful owner”.

H&M Have not gotten it into their grasping little heads That if someone offers them a gift, which they spit on and then fling into the gift giver‘s face, that person is free to offer the gift to someone else. It is no longer Harry and M‘s gift since they didn’t except it in the first place. They don’t see it like that though. In their mind everything should be their’s, including everything which they have previously rejected or thrown into the garbage. There must’ve been larger and slightly grander properties on the Windsor estate which William could have applied to Granny for. Adelaide is so small that while all the children can have their own room, there’s no space for Namny Maria to live in. I know William and Kate say they’re done with children, but she could ostensibly have one more baby, and if that happened, the boys would have to share a room. So the fact that Adelaide has come up trumps for the Windsor residence of the future Prince of Wales, relatively modest by any standard for his position, feels like a poke in the eye to Harry and his bint for fobbing it off. I look forward to reading the articles about how charming and peaceful a retreat Catherine has made Adelaide cottage and the Duchess of Monteshitshow can chew on her Tig-pickled liver.
snarkyatherbest said…
the zoom call. omg she has catherine hair. the soft curls from the national portrait pics. and i am thinking the reason “archie” appeared is Harry is gone and she was able to hire for the hour. Doris was a nice touch. laying the explanation as to who’s watching the “kids” next time they are out of town.
Ralph L said…
There were no tears at the funeral. She hadn't spoken to one of her two sons for 7 years, but he showed up. She and her equally nasty sister had tried to get each other (and my father) arrested for burglary 6 years before (they were actually fighting over custody of their 90+ y.o. father and his USAF pension and $300k cash, which the sister got). Fortunately, the DA declined to act, but Dad spent thousands on a lawyer (I found a stack of video DVDs of her grievances that I did not look at). We were expecting the sister to act up at the funeral, but she didn't. She did use a walker and neck brace (they both had Munchausen's, too).

I'm sure she'd be pleased that 9 years later, she can still wind me up. Don't get me started on her lies AKA conversational bricks, as my SIL called them, or how she treated my father, who'd been pampered by his females relatives for 60 years previously. The bitch was karma.
Ralph L said…
I wonder how much jet noise abatement Adelaide cottage has. P Philip said something like "you get used to it--No, you really don't."
Hikari said…
William and Harry how they used to be. H was still in the Army. Compare then and now…it’s shocking, the deterioration he’s undergone.

Clock the eye rolls from William …


https://youtube.com/shorts/Mgys7PS_X-I?feature=share
snarkyatherbest said…
Ralph L. like that bad ass move. keep the car!
Este said…
Kate and William's move to Adelaide cottage keeps them near HMTQ thus ensuring the right people are around her. It also undermines the sixes' argument over their supposed bad treatment. Kate and William are more than happy to settle for the cottage that wasn't good enough for Meghan. Plus, it validates their tightness as a family.
lizzie said…
It may just be the shot that was posted and maybe some weird shadows. But the pic of MM alone from the zoom call hardly looks like her to me. I doubt that's her real hair as I doubt she has that much hair that will still curl that much. But what's oddest to me are her two front teeth on top. They seem to be, not "buck teeth" but not aligned either & set farther forward than the teeth on each side. That's definitely not how her teeth usually look. We've seen plenty of grinning shots and open-mouthed laughing shots to know. Odd.
Fifi LaRue said…
@Este: LOL! My opinion also, that Jennifer Lopez is sticking it to Alex Rodriguez over whatever he did.
JLo does have an impressive collection of engagement rings, the ring collection was posted somewhere on social media.
Hikari said…
Combed Twitter for any pics of that Zoom call— all disappeared. They are talking about it but there is nothing still up that I could see. I am not on Twitter… What a waste land. But sometimes there’s Tea there or on Instagram and I wonder if I should get accounts.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Hikari,

the photos are on reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/wv26ut/this_has_since_been_deleted_on_twitter_sneak_peek/
SwampWoman said…
lizzie said...
It may just be the shot that was posted and maybe some weird shadows. But the pic of MM alone from the zoom call hardly looks like her to me. I doubt that's her real hair as I doubt she has that much hair that will still curl that much. But what's oddest to me are her two front teeth on top. They seem to be, not "buck teeth" but not aligned either & set farther forward than the teeth on each side. That's definitely not how her teeth usually look. We've seen plenty of grinning shots and open-mouthed laughing shots to know. Odd.


Same here. Maybe it's a matter of perspective, but kid looks way too big for a just-turned 3-year-old. Her nose looks like it is from a couple of surgeries ago. Doria looks different. e
Everything photoshopped, probably.
snarkyatherbest said…
curious why the pics were deleted from twitter. her idea to create buzz. harry upset about the “archie” photo. ? why?!!
Here's a good 'un, although it should read `Archewell-outshone-by-tiny-':

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10380379/Harry-Meghans-Archewell-outshone-tiny-cat-sanctuary-boy-tent.html

The Boy-in-a-Tent and a tiny cat sanctuary in Wales are just two charities which raised more more money for charity in 2020 than the much-vaunted Archewell
Maneki Neko said…
Re Harry in Rwanda:

Meghan Markle's friend Omid Scobie today gave details of what Harry wrote in a visitor book during his time at the site.

He said: 'I am profoundly moved by what I have witnessed. What an incredible show of unity and resilience we now see.

'Thank you for showing us all the way to healing and forgiveness. You are setting an example across the world.'


Healing and forgiveness? The example across the world hasn't reached the 6s. He obviously doesn't see the irony.
Sandie said…
Coincidence that when hubby is away she brings out the boy for photos! Who was taking the photos?

Can't find the origin of the rumour, but she is supposedly going on a press tour for the Archetypes podcast.

And they are harassing the Queen again, but did not take into account that she will not be at Balmoral as she will have a new prime minister to meet, probably at Windsor:

"In early September, the couple will be in Manchester, Dusseldorf and London and there are even rumours they could visit the Queen at Balmoral Castle in Scotland."

https://honey.nine.com.au/royals/prince-harry-meghan-markle-return-to-uk-europe-for-mini-royal-tour-without-restrictions-opinion/c6e8f47c-5175-418a-8e
Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11135949/RICHARD-KAY-homes-slimmed-royals-justify.html

The criticism is inevitable, but he missed one ... William has his own holiday home at Balmoral! This is what he says about the property at Balmoral:

"(There remains uncertainty over the precise ownership of a fourth property, Tam-Na-Ghar, a cottage on the Balmoral estate which the Queen gave William when he was a student at St Andrews University. For some years he and Kate stayed there often but it is thought it is no longer a royal address and is now let commercially.)"

It sounds as if Richard Kay would do well as a supporter of the dastardly duo: his whining is all about optics. The money spent on refurbishing Kensington Palace benefits the taxpayer because it is part of Crown Estate property and in future can be leased, bring in extra income. The move to Adelaide Cottage is not costing anything for the taxpayer, and since they are paying rent, there is no loss of income for the Crown Estate. Their other two homes are on their private estate.
Sandie said…
"When Harry returns to the UK, could the Queen use her constitutional powers to orchestrate a reconciliatory meeting between him and William?"

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11136383/EPHRAIM-HARDCASTLE-Queen-orchestrate-make-meeting-warring-William-Harry.html

And then there is this:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11135743/Prince-Harry-praises-Rwandas-incredible-unity-resilience-genocide-memorial-visit.html

This is a most unfortunate narrative that is being peddled. Forgiveness and healing requires: admit you have done wrong, accept your punishment, never repeat the behaviour, never forget the wrong that was done. The perpetrators of the Rwandan genocide were arrested, tried and jailed. That was part of the forgiveness and reconciliation process. The genocide is remembered, not swept under the carpet.

Forgiveness for the dastardly duo and reconciliation requires: admit guilt, accept punishment, keep a record of wrongdoings, never repeat bad behaviours, change so that it never happens again. And you don't get to be in charge anymore.
Sandie said…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/wvn2h2/the_first_episode_of_the_meghan_markles_new/

And her podcast is as expected ... a defence of herself and her behaviour and the framing of herself as a victim. She will get a lot of support, but what she is talking about is stereotypes, not archetypes.

I am summoning the courage to listen ...

Serena Williams is one of the first guests.

The rumours of Oprah and Serena distancing themselves in any way have never been true. Both woman are her firm supporters no matter what she does.
Sandie said…
Megsie dear, it is not your ambition nor strength that people dislike. It is your lies and utter selfishness and shallow character. Women like you harm women because it reinforces stereotypes that hinder the success of women!
Birdie said…
This latest picture of * has the same facial structure/chin as the * in the Lilibet birthday pictures.
Stephanie_123 said…
The photos on Reddit look somewhat blurred and grainy. My first reaction was that Doria had been Photoshopped into the photo on the right. The lighting on her is different and she is out-of-focus in a different way than * and the heart-faced child (presumably Archie).

I think the comment that * is trying to portray herself as a single Mom with maternal support is very accurate.

* stirs the pot so much that everything in it should evaporated by now…
Hikari said…
GWAH,

One word comes to mind, and that word is RACHET.

She looks stoned out of her mind and like she just rolled out da bed for this Zoom call.

Obviously judging by the overbite that so invites one to punch her in the gob, she's not wearing her normal Chiclet plate. Interferes too much with the bong.

I'd have said this was an old and doctored photo, but her heavy dark caterpillar brows are the current Insta fashion. Pre-Suits, M always had very thin overplucked eyebrows such as were the fashion when she was in high school circa 1998.

We have never ever before seen these flowing waves on her head, ever. So I'm guessing, new wig, all the better to imitate the Duchess of Cambridge.

The leering gargoyle figure of Doria next to her (my, for a very petite framed person, she really manages to look like a dude. I'm getting a very Orange is the New Black vibe off the Big D, and I sure wouldn't want to meet her in a dark alley when she's pissed off, I can tell you) looks suitably aged for this to be a current picture of the two of them.

Well, all I can say is, it's a terrible, terrible photo if she was hoping to present herself as 'thriving'. She looks out of it AF. And in my humble estimation, Doria is there in the capacity as her weed dealer and the beard for this cover story of happy familes. Nanny Doria my arse.
Sandie said…
She starts with the dishwashing advertisement!

She attacks the Catholic church and the monarchy next!

I need to take a break. It's awful! And still nothing at all about archetypes.

...

Major theme: she was and is victimized because she is ambitious. So far, it is so shallow and so self-centered. Still a lot more to listen to, but I really need to limit this to 5-minute chunks.
Maneki Neko said…
First episode of Meghan Markle's Archetypes podcast has finally been released

The first episode is entitled The Misconception of Ambition with Serena Williams.

I know this has been eagerly awaited by all my fellow Nutties😁

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11137873/Meghan-Markle-finally-releases-episode-Archetypes-podcast.html
snarkyatherbest said…
sandie. pushing hard to get back in the royal $ i mean fold. money must be running out.

serena? we she us in a pr blitz with retiring. can’t wait to see who else shows up. gloria steinem for sure. but who is left? madea?

oh ain’t it sweet that scoobie do is. back in the fold. his puppet master must be happy with him again

for anyone who will listen to it i would be curious if she lets her guests talk or is she mostly the duchass talking? saw they used the 1993 nickelodeon interview. now do p&g

the new soft duchass look. totally taking a page from Catherine’s 40th pics. but i guess they couldn’t afford the photo retouches. flyaways on one side. shaking my head. where are the stylists?!!
snarkyatherbest said…
looking at comments on line and have to agree. why the quiet launch? why today? the cambridges aren’t having a major moment. louis isn’t going to school to compete? perhaps trying to get ahead of the spotify repo man. look we did the work and released it can’t call it breach of contract. trying to compete with the game of thrones prequel? how many episodes will air? will she interview herself?
snarkyatherbest said…
well i guess it was tied to the cambridges since there was a lot of press yesterday about their move to windsor. however there was a bunch of criticism so the release of the podcast actually detracts from that. ha. duchass always gets it wrong 😉
Humor Me said…
You may want to start a new column, Nutty et al:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11137873/Meghan-Markle-finally-releases-episode-Archetypes-podcast.html#comments

I hope someone is fact checking at the DM.
Please do not read while eating.....
abbyh said…
How current do you think that podcast is?

I'm wondering if it was from long ago and finally edited into something useable.
abbyh said…
Good idea.

Hold off on more podcast comments for the next one.

Thanks!
Fifi LaRue said…
The NY Post has a headline that the nursery at Montesh*tshow caught fire. I haven't read the "story" yet.
Oldest Older 401 – 456 of 456

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids