Well the court case has decided against him. And are asking for him to pay the court costs.
Ouch on many levels and one of them is in the pocketbook.
Decisions, decisions.
If he doesn't try to take it farther, he may be able to increase the chances he could see his father again. or not.
As much as KC may have wanted to see his son, he couldn't afford to (with or without observers). The king needed to appear neutral in the decision. Full stop. It was about sending a message to the people making the decision, the public, his other son/wife/kids and ... his own wife about his values, how he needs to respond - which is following the lead of his mother, being neutral in decisions of what is best for the united kingdom. Kingdom above family as much as you love them.
With the never explain, the king would have quite the problem of how to handle things if somehow there was a release that he was trying to sway the decision (even if he said no such thing).
Optics - something H does not seem to think about for the long term consequences of an action. An example would be making a big deal about his battle count. Why would we need to know this unless we routinely got in conversations of feeling a need to be able to best the people around us in something we think they cannot top?
So the visual of H visiting his father would be something when the decision was not yet made and it would lead to a lot (a really lot) of stories about how difficult this is for the king and what should happen, likely to happen and so on. So why go there? thinks the palace.
But I think it goes deeper on the H side. What I have been told, is that when kids get involved pretty heavily in the recreationals, they sort of stay at that emotional age even though they continue to have annual birthdays celebrating chronological age.
So perhaps there is some part of H still hoping his dad would step in and help him the way his dad had in the past - making his life easier. Like sending over prepared food (making certain his kid got fed). And, I suspect money when needed. H had a really good cushy life where he was well managed and helped to look good at being part of the BRF. He was part of a team and wasn't front and center like his dad or brother.
His wife, also had a lot of help from her father when she needed it in a similar fashion. Meaning both had help from their family as an adult. This continued from his family when she was in the process of joining the BRF (needing clothes, then pregnancy clothes).
Help (especially financial) does happen a lot (I know). The problems come when the younger but still an adult doesn't learn how to handle their life without the continued help from the parent generation. Hearing that it cannot continue is a really difficult conversation for everyone in it. We know the king tried to have this and it did not go well. Well, no one wants to hear that the tap is being cut off.
The other thing in play is the HRH.
I don't know but maybe someone was thinking the gag rule was off since the Queen had passed on or something.
I think of it as trying get a response, of some kind of acknowledgement of her. A response would be positive as it is still a win because you finally got them to respond (as in I'm important enough for them to finally recognize me). To have it show up now comes off as a little tossing of the kitchen sink though. The only things left would be the kids or a divorce. Or filming something at their house for what ever is left of the options to film something.
The other thought about the HRH is that it is a dangerous game. Not the personal safety aspect but it will limit long term options (open or close or remove a door or window permanently). Tolerance is already known to be low and this action comes off as ... highly provocative. William is being schooled in playing the long game for strategic diplomatic moves for when he becomes king. She may think of herself as a queen, powerful in chess, but I would bet good money that William would still out maneuver her in that match.
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
I suppose Henry can be said to be sincere, insofar as he genuinely believes he's been hard done by. Reminds me of a previous PM who escaped charges of lying on the grounds that he believed what he was saying was true.
Hope somebody reminds him that he had plenty of opportunity to bring the kids to the UK previously but there was no solid evidence that they actually exist, let alone came here, despite the claims of a proven liar that they had had clung to the legs of a 96 yr old monarch who was shortly to die of bone cancer.
My heart goes out to His Majesty King `IamnotaBank', and the rest of the immediate family, especially as those who haven't been following this forensically are likely to be sympathetic to Henry. Bloody BBC.
(Guardian online article)
He had that fine word he told the world he expected of his family - ACCOUNTABILITY. Yes everybody else never himself.
As it is, anything issued by the Palace is likely to be greeted with `They would say that, wouldn't they?' regardless . It should be for the Court to make the the evidence public, examine it closely and then decide. For instance, the Court, I imagine, could order DNA tests of the alleged kid's DNA, without His Majesty being involved.
I am incandescent over the sheer effrontery of the Duke of Windsor.2 and hesitate to check my own blood pressure ...
God Save the King and perdition to faithless princes.
That is not entitlement it is psychiatric illness!
Very entertaining?
That depends on one's sense of humour.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/05/blind-item-4_2.html#disqus_thread
(And NEVER mind that his father is old and fighting cancer. He is not important. Harry is.)
Harry truly seems to do his best to make his father's last years as miserable as possible. Such a charming character.
@RoyalDelhiite
“...not only did they remove my security in the UK but they also signaled to every single government around the world.”
So Prince Harry finally agrees that it was NEVER only about the UK, it was about his IPP status - that would entitle him to free security around the world.
https://x.com/RoyalDelhiite/status/1918367236420497799
@MeghansMole
Prince Harry is a despicable, treacherous, traitorous, backstabbing, lying, pathetic excuse for a human being
Harry was aware of the verdict & the date it would be released, which is why he sat down for an interview & made sure it got out to overshadow Princess Charlottes birthday
https://x.com/MeghansMole/status/1918352796484813193
Kind of funny in that I was reading a SMM questioning if they were pushed out or not.
Just to show how unaware and delusional he is, Harry said 'I would love reconciliation with my family there's no point in continuing to fight anymore, as I said life is precious.'. But who is fighting constantly? And since he seems to be at war with the BRF, one has to ask why he wants reconciliation unless, of course, it's for financial ends. In the past, Harry has managed to slip into the UK unnoticed and he the missus like to fly private so what's the problem? He's hardly likely to pop into a McDonald's or KFC down the road for lunch/dinner, the threats to his life are imaginary, I'd say. I see *'s hand in this, she's been playing the Diana tape from the start.
Stop digging.
It was * who(m) the late Queen had pulled out of a meeting at the National Theatre, following her refusing to see the Queen because she was off to the NT . We weren't told why HM wanted to see her, was it to give her a dressing-down? Had she already gone too far.
By going to the NT despite HM's or `request', she must have sealed her own fate. In effect, she defied a Royal Command.
Now for Henry. There was a report that * gave him the choice of going with her or staying here - but she made it clear that if he didn't go with her, the marriage was over and he could say goodbye to Archie as well.
It was reported that she did this by some sort of dumb show with her wedding ring. I've no idea if this was true but I got the impression that Henry did hesitate and I hoped he would stay, if only to put an end to their pantomine.
But I believe his beady-eyed weasel of a son is destroying The King's health with alarming efficiency and is quite clearly going to go on destroying it till he gets everything he wants. And I don't believe the security is the only thing he wants. After he gets it he is going to start with all the financial demands he has. Every time he gets something there will be the next thing that is his RIGHT. It is so he and his wife function.
Destroying the Monarchy if his demands are not accepted full is baron Harry's modus operandi. I wonder if anyone has ever tested his IQ in the school or the army. The results are of course quite clear: His grandfather, his father, his uncle Andrew and his brother William are all competent pilots and there are lots of pictures of all of them flying different sort of machines. In spite of the best tuition there is in Britain's air forces baron Harry that living legend of aviation NEVER learned to fly. That tells his life's story better than anything. And that maybe the reason to all his anger management issues: raging inferiority complex?
A wise counsellor once encouraged me to `respond' and not `react'. It took me time to appreciate the difference.
Newton's 3rd Law says that `to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction'- he was certainly thinking of the physical world but in the present context the key is `equal and opposite' ie giving back what you got, to te same degree or possibly more, in fierce opposition.
I believe the King has responded in a considered way, stating undeniable facts and not offering anything to precipitate a fuller outburst.
Am sure I've said before that doing nothing is not necessarily a sign of weakness - it takes determination not to rise to the bait and be caught on a fatal `hook'. Sooner or later, something will happen to change the state of affairs and cut through the knots. Perhaps it will at last dawn on * that they are up against an immoveable object but their force is not irresistible. She might suddenly walk out on him, who knows?
And all will be fine and all the repugnant feelings vanish immediately when he gets everything he demands.
Well I do not believe that The Princess Royal or her family, The Edinburghs, The Gloucesters, The Kents, The Princess Alexandra, The York Princesses or any of The Princess Margarets children not to mention all the more distant cousins are ready to accept the baron of boo-hoo-hoo back to their family happenings and to the knowledge of their private affairs. Today they all know they are just juicy potential for filthy tabloid cash. If Harry believes they are ready to welcome him back with open arms he does not know his family or ANY normal family.
I'm not saying anything about the Spencers. They are a different issue.
But his idea that the majority of his father's subjects love and adore him and want him back with full security?
Yes, he can believe whatever he wants if it comforts and pacifies him in that tiny restricted area that exists between his ears.
But he ALSO thought (still is thinking, no apology there) that he had the RIGHT to accuse The Princess of Wales of racism and risk HER security and safety in the hands of some violent race baiter who would want to attack and punish her because of his filthy insinuations?
HM's went to 43 pages in all, 55 in ILBW's case; given their respective ages and achievements, it tells you quite a lot, before you even read them.
Even he runs to only 48 pages...
Yet again, the kids don't look age-appropriate.
The Duke of Windsor had that same problem and his life was very tragic because of it.
So it goes.
Neil Sean said they’d planned a huge party to celebrate winning.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/05/blind-items-revealed-5_01830146509.html#disqus_thread
MAUREEN CALLAHAN: Thought Harry and Meghan had done the most egregious thing imaginable? New bombshells are coming... Diana's brutal verdict on her son was correct
Here is a link to the article behind the paywall, but it's a waste of time reading it.
https://archive.is/8j2xA
In the photo, Archie's head is encircled by the setting sun, creating a halo around his head. How artistic! (Sarc). Maybe she'll reinvent herself as a top photographer, like she's a top author, cook, jam maker etc.
* claims to have taken "magic mushrooms" during both megnancies.
When it's confirmed that the children are not legitimately in the Line of Succession?
When their titles are removed?
When divorce is sought?
When their marriage is decreed fake?
if none of the above, when?
Or shall I celebrate at each positive step towards us being freed from the diabolical duo? Suggestions please.
What caught my eye is that the DM had something about it could have been taken at their house but I don't think so. I didn't think the water was that close to them. I thought they had neighbors all around them (from what I remember of the photos of when they first bought the house) but it's been years.
WBBM - all of the above?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e4b8495763dd644073ca92d089864379bfd4a873c7c3ce8863164ae5a6c8ca5.jpg
Sounds reasonable to me, after all, there was an enigmatic post, supposedly from legit Royal sources, that there was no need to worry about Archie because he was with a/his family who love him. Does anyone else remember this?
Also, he's not eligible for the LoS as his father is not lawfully married to his mother.
You're right, *'s father is living in Asia. I didn't express myself clearly, what I meant was she can travel to Mexico, in fact much further than where her father lived, but couldn't make the effort to go as far as Rosarito. Maybe visiting him was too dangerous? (sarc).
Royal family ex-advisor admits that Andrew was boinking under age girls.
The man sucking Fergie's toes, John Bryan, was her financial advisor. I remember the story. I'm not sure why he's called 'Andrew crisis advisor'. If he knew, why didn't he say anything until now?
R Sole Mio
It’s not surprising
her sun setting/rising
Was set to gain traction
for her solar refraction
Photo-synthetic megodramas
The cunning stunt
with her balcony punt
Dimmed the light of her
boy in striped pyjamas…
The woman, however, is diabetic and as such shouldn't have used Epsom salts in her bath.
'But Meghan's lawyer hit back saying she should have known the risks of diabetic people using Epsom salts, declaring: 'There can be no negligence claim against anyone involved in the production or distribution of the series'.'
*'s lawyers might well be right but this might be interesting if * has to pay the woman damages. Should the recipe have come with a warning?
Most other passenger were older than I and every one said `VE Day’ but in generalities without any convincing detail of their own experience. I’d hoped for specifics like `We had the day off school and ran riot’ or `Mum opened the tin of salmon she’d saved in September ‘39’. It was as if they’d constructed their `memories’ from what they’d read. Not like my history teacher who was so excited because it was her 15th birthday that she forgot that there was no school and arrived to find everything locked up!
I, on the other hand, was too young for VE day and offered watching the spectacular Coronation procession from a stand in Whitehall in 1953. So I had to defend my choice in front of an audience as to why this was not only memorable but `historically significant’. I felt waves of disapproval and mockery from the lecturer for being an unreconstructed imperialist.
Had I said something more p.c, like hearing announcements about the death of Jan Masaryk (1948), that British troops had gone into action in Korea (1950) or that the Rosenberg’s had gone to the electric chair (1953), I’d have been safe, even though I had no personal involvement. I felt humiliated and too taken back to challenge him. Hell’s teeth, I was only a little girl in ‘53.
There was one consolation. One kind lady came up to me afterwards and congratulated me for being was the only one who had actually answered the question – as it was about personal memory and experience.
Nothing changes about the Beeb’s attitude, does it?
To her credit, most warnings about risk are about keep out of the eye area.
Maybe a not good for broken skin but that does not make one automatically conclude that that this also means about at risk for diabetes if your skin is not broken.
Sometimes you pay money to just make a problem disappear (as in no more ink on the pages in ways you don't want to be remembered for ... or ... give someone else some idea of how to sue *).
Interesting.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5ee9da2c3d88f0bfa6dd70e507074b12f997f9f6a9972517e906eba8977f174d.jpg
Talking of Archie, *'s delusions of grandeur never stop. 'Donors from around the globe have raised $14,300 (£10,800) for charity in honour of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children.
Assistance League Los Angeles, a non-profit striving to improve the lives of vulnerable children, has invited people to donate in light of Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet's birthdays.' . . .
. . . 'From May 4 to July 4, 2025, we invite you to make a donation in honour of the Royal Children of Sussex' 'The Royal Children of Sussex' ??? Is this a title now or *'s demented obsession ? As for uplifting youth in need, what does she mean exactly? Actually the fans, not H&M, have raised the money - rather a paltry sum, $14,300 (£10,800), though.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14695131/Harry-Meghans-fans-raise-thousands-honour-Archie-Lilibet-uplift-youth-need-LA.html
https://x.com/TheSun/status/1920935913992908809
DoorDashHash#
Ding Dong Bell
Harry looks like hell
Why did he ring
Supplies were getting thin…
Deliverwho…
Reddit has a perfect cartoon of haz
ME Day, kamikaze pilot wearing a hachimaki emblazoned with a red N
for netflix 👌
He gets lost in London - a city he should know well, and does his phone not have Google Maps? - but is worried about security. This incident obviously highlights the fact that that he doesn't need security.
Phallusy
Keep on knocking
you’ll not get back in
Burnt the door-jambs
when you married madam sin
Judge made the right ruling
after you forced force to the dock
Secure in the knowledge
you are led by your cock…
`Open caskets' are not used in British funerals; family members visit the Chapel of Rest before the funeral if they wish to see their loved ones for a final time, before the solid coffin lid is screwed down. We are not a nation which needs to see our our dead leaders displayed just to prove that they are really dead.
My opinion of South Park is now very low.
BTW On a darkly humorous note, as a Brit, I find the American usage of `Funeral Home', for what we call a Chapel of Rest, rather disturbing. It conjures up an image of a circle of corpses sitting in the mandatory high-back chairs, staring at emptily at a TV on permanent Channel 3, just as many of them would have done in a `Care Home'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECaQ_8MXlxc
Anyway, this set me wondering who might be the best candidate as a patron Saint for Henry?
St Lucy/Lucia perhaps? She’s the patron of those with sight impairment, on the grounds that there’s none as blind as them as won’t see. Then I realised – St Jude, patron saint of Lost Causes…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14700589/Meghan-shares-new-picture-Archie-Lilibet-celebrates-Mothers-Day-US-Cheers-juggling-joy.html
Ass-umption
St. Rita of Cascia
impossible causes
Addendum addended
megxits clauses
Forget Anthony
and Christopher
Haz is in need of
St. Dymphna…
@WildBoar
Can’t see kamikaze harrykari
cartoon on Reddit properly
It’s there if you scroll down
not able to enlarge it anymore
or see the details…
Apparently a Times cartoonist
Or was …
https://archive.is/De86s#selection-487.0-487.196
For example, when there is mention of reconciliation with the BRF, if the journalists slipped in a mention of Thomas Markle and ask why he is being forgotten.... or when she keeps changing her story, if the journalists recall that there was a previous version to her story.
Or would this kind of behaviour on the part of the media be futile?
And O/T - I have to laugh, Harry wants reconciliation with his family but he cannot return unless he is given IPP security. If Harry really wanted a reconcilation with his family, he would bring them over, pay for his own security, let the family know where he is staying and await a response with no press leaks. Note the no press leaks. That...is the catch that neither of them will given up.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/secret-epstein-video-allegedly-showing-prince-andrew-virginia/
This is one of those really rare moments when I am grateful the Queen has not had to live through the uproar. She had some really tough years.
BTW I found a neat observation about hypocrisy by Diarmaid MacCulloch in his `Silence : a Christian History', p 202, when he talking about the hitherto
respected theologian Paul Tillich:
`One can without too many ethical problems rely on the professional expertise of a hypocritical car mechanic, but the stock in trade of theologians is honesty , and the same rules do not apply', a sentence that is easily amended to cover members of the Royal Family, whether renegade or loyal.
`
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/katie-price-claims-three-constant-113418660.html
https://uk.yahoo.com/style/meghan-markle-doesnt-understand-huge-070000766.html
Looking at the photos, I wonder, Is ILBW morphing into Katie Price, or is it the other way round? Not a pretty look which ever it is.
I doubt if Wm feels the same.
Yes, one might wonder 'ILBW is morphing into Katie Price, or is it the other way round?' Katie Price now looks like a caricature of *.
Re the second Yahoo article, I don't know if the duo 'are enjoying “a honeymoon period” at home in Montecito' - that's debatable - but this is absolutely spot on: “One of Meghan’s biggest issues was that she never fully understood the gravitas of what it means to be marrying into the Firm,” the source told us. “She didn’t necessarily understand the rules and how it operates. The royal family isn’t a normal family, so a family argument or, even worse, an estrangement, isn’t the same for the royals as it is for everyone else, including her.“ I would say * didn't understand the rules at all, didn't care and wasn't interested. Her loss.
Things ... get quiet here. And I think more so over time.
I call it fatigue (maybe). People maybe reading us but may not be commenting.
And, it seems like the more time passes, the more it feels like we've seen this same kind of thing before - a deja vu repeat. (that gets boring in a world where people only want new, exciting and repeats are on the boring me attention span).
Also, IF you think that the kraken will be released "soon", that you might begin to lose some faith that it will happen at all when it shows not sign of suddenly appearing like deus ex machina, then other things begin to take a higher priority than staying in touch with what just happened and then a post doesn't happen. And another day passes, the desire to post lessens and people drift off. Their life is happening on a different stage than here.
This blog has been around for over 6 years. That's a long time. Especially if you thought this would be wrapped up after a couple of years.
I might have offended someone (and I'm sorry when I do). They might have become upset about something someone else posted (that I allowed to post). Most people don't tell me why they are ending posting.
So this is still here. And with *, she's still active and doing things we can find to talk about.
A Stepford too Far
Fetch and Retrieve
Would have us believe
They’re living their
ultimate dreams
The reverse is true
ask harry, who
is inured to
screams, scenes and memes…
It's small wonder we're feeling war weary - from the announcement of the engagement in November 2017 , when so many of us thought `Oh deear...', it's been nigh on 7 and a 1/2 years, still with no definite end in sight, if there ever is one...
It seems that the kraken is going to be baron Harry's health. He is losing it rapidly.
And there is no money in the world you can earn by selling non existent "spreads". That is the baroness's kraken.
She is so past her youth and she was very ugly in that podcast with that woman with red ugly face and sick ugly "smile". No one is buying the story of baroness's happiness. She is happy only when she has money, money, money and when every one in the world envies her. Well, she has no money and nobody envies her.
This is a very good blog. With intelligent and sophisticated people who have ideas worth reading. That's all I have to say about that. But I understand the fatigue, I do.
So true! I gave them 2 years max, and yet 7 very long years later, we're still here. And we've been waiting for the kraken to be released but it looks like it won't be. As @abbyh said, we keep having these feelings of déja vu and are suffering from * fatigue. They're boring and predictable, yet do manage to surprise us. I don't think now anything major is going to happen so it'll be same old, same old for some time.
An unwillingness to consider partial goals a stepping stone to get the final goal. Or the sense that this is cutting off your nose to spite your face when you don't get what you want, when you want it and exactly how you want it down to the hair curl.
It's like being offered the already working and in good shape farm of his father - where they could create the fruit, veg products she's now trying to pull off as well as being part of a larger (and increasingly the more important part of the BRF with the plan of slimming the monarchy) had they stayed on. Making money, support for making the product profitable, a continuation of the existing lifestyle, a place to call your own and also part of being something bigger than being totally on your own and lacking all the resources they could have had to maintain that life.
That was part of his father thinking ahead, trying to create a future for his other son when William became the POW which meant the money tap from the duchy would cease and be only for William and his family.
I saw the article. The DM seems to have a relentless drip drip drip of negative articles about *. These are just a rehash of old stories and I'm not sure why they need to reuse these stories. Today there's a story about how * wasn't happy with a vegan dish in the run-up to the wedding. She said she could taste egg in it and had 'a tense exchange with a member of staff'. Translation : the said member of staff got hauled over the coals. Her Majesty had some stern words of advice for Meghan. 'Suddenly the Queen walked in and said: "Meghan, in this family we don't speak to people like that."' The article also mentions a story where * 'was allegedly so rude to an under gardener that the head gardener in Windsor felt the need to complain to the late Queen, who is said to have then drove over to Meghan to give her a dressing down.'. We've heard it all before but it's good to be reminded how awful * is and how she blew every chance she had while she was in the BRF.
@abbyh
The duo never think ahead, never plan properly, never have a strategy or even any direction, so the result is the failed ventures that we see.
1. This may be just somebody's idea to sell the world for clicks.
2. This may be true. If it is deep suck. Harry may think that he has rights because he is the son of The King. But what Harry thinks is irrelevant. The one thing the Royal Household can not do is invite Harry to any happening because after that it has nothing to do with the do and everything to do with the Markles i.e. an ugly circus from hell.
We may see more comments about what Harry wants and demands when we move towards June and the Trooping of Colour.
I don't believe Harry is going to ride with his army comrades as a member of the Royal Family ever again, but what do I know?
It reminds me of a narc I know who used to complain about depression to me and my ex-husband, who is an MD. He would tell her that he would give her a prescription for antidepressants, but it would take a few weeks to kick in. She would always respond "I want to feel better NOW" and refuse. Then, 3 months later, the whole scenario would repeat itself. This went on for 5 years until we both had enough of her.