Skip to main content

Did Meghan Markle plan to be an Oscar presenter in this dress?



On Sunday evening, February 24, 2019, the Duchess of Sussex appeared at a party wearing a sand-colored Dior cape gown with long, crystal-embellished sleeves.

The party, at the British ambassador's residence in Rabat, Morocco wasn't particularly dressy; Prince Harry wore an ordinary business suit, not a tuxedo, and most of the other women present wore conservative office clothes.

Meghan was by far the most elaborately dressed person in the room, and it was soon revealed that she was the most expensively dressed person in the room as well.

The dress was Dior haute couture, and the fashion house released a statement saying that the dress had been designed and made specifically for Meghan.

Similar custom-made haute couture dresses are priced at $50,000 or above. The Daily Mail priced this one at £98,945.84 without giving a specific source for that price.

Why was Meg wearing a dress that cost more than many people's homes for a glorified house party?


The Oscars took place the same day

Movie fans will note that Sunday, February 24 was the date of the 91st annual Academy Awards, popularly known as the Oscars. 

This years' Oscar ceremony tried some new approaches in an attempt to reduce a long decline in TV ratings. One new approach was the idea of having non-traditional presenters; in addition to the usual actors and actresses, celebrities from other fields were brought in to present awards.

Among them were John L. Lewis, a civil rights pioneer who worked with Martin Luther King, Rage Against the Machine singer Tom Morello, the chef José Andres, TV host Trevor Noah, and tennis ace Serena Williams.

Isn't it possible that Meghan and Harry were also asked to present?

They would, after all, be unusual celebrities in a year when the Academy was looking for new faces. Meg is also biracial, a plus for a group that is always looking for diversity, and had the advantage of being the newest adult member of the world's best known Royal Family. 

Meg was in New York City for her extremely expensive baby shower the week before the Oscars, and it's easy to speculate that she planned to go directly to Los Angeles to appear on the Oscar telecast - perhaps with Harry, or perhaps sharing the screen with her friend Serena Williams.

Best Picture presenters were generally matched with specific movies, and Meghan would have been an obvious choice to present "The Favorite", a movie about a British queen.

A rushed trip to Morocco

A haute couture dress that was intended for the Oscars is much more believable than a haute couture dress intended for a small party in Rabat, Morocco. 

The trip to Morocco was, by all accounts, quite rushed. It was announced only a week or two before it happened, and seemed to have little diplomatic purpose, since Morocco is not a major trade or political partner to Britain.

The events planned on the trip were minimal, with the Sussexes visiting only five or six spots and working as little as three hours per day.

And the diplomatic preparation seems to have been so poor that no one instructed Meghan to accept the traditional Moroccan food offered to her at the airport. Men in national costume offered her a date and some milk, and she said no.

How did a couture dress that must have been ordered well in advance end up on a hurried trip to a low-priority country?

The failed PR gambit

My belief is that Meg thought she was going to be a presenter at the Oscars, which is why she ordered the specially-made dress. 

She is reportedly working with Serena Williams' PR people, who may have convinced Meg that they could get her onstage just like they were doing for Serena. 

The Royal Family vetoed the Oscar appearance, but after Meg arranged for a flattering People Magazine cover story without their approval, they may have worried that she would go to the Oscars without their approval as well.

Suddenly, the Sussex's trip Morocco trip was announced for precisely the weekend of the Oscar telecast. 

The Dior cape gown, sized for maternity wear, could not be saved for another occasion. It ended up not onstage at the Dolby Theater in Los Angeles, but at the ambassador's residence in Rabat, and on the front page of the Daily Mail.

Coming just days after the overpriced baby shower in New York, it provided extra ammunition for British taxpayers who feel that "Meghan Antoinette" is spending too much of their money. 

Comments

Ann Christensen said…
Hmmm! Very logical. Highly probable.
jeshor7 said…
MM was overdressed at the event. That Dior dress looked like her Oscar gown that she's so eager to attend. Also, the Morocco trip was odd, not sure what they aimed to achieve with very little public appearance and no speeches.
Now! said…
I think they were just trying to keep her from slipping away to the Oscars. It could be that the Moroccans had been asking for a Royal visit and nobody wanted to go, so the Sussexes were drafted at the last minute. I think the lack of public appearances had a lot to do with the recent street riots.
Now! said…
I think Meg feels that this year is "her year." Heaven knows where she will be this time next year when the Oscars rolls around again.
Totto_ said…
You know what sucks? That even though that dress was expensive as heck, it looked cheap on her. I don't know why but I think its so sad how she dresses in this super expensive couture but always manages to look tacky and frumpy, even on her wedding day, she really is the prime example that money can't buy you class.
Fifi LaRue said…
"Meg Antoinette." That's a good one. How long before the British public begin yelling, "Off with her head" at public events? Markle must have been enraged at not getting her way to go to the Oscars.
Now! said…
I really believe it is a dangerous time for the royals, particularly with the little-loved Charles getting ready to ascend to the throne. They should probably dial down and become a Scandinavian-size monarchy; this is not the time to be flaunting their wealth.

There have already been scattered boos and hecklers at Meg's events. For the moment, they seem like isolated cases.

I think Meg is enraged quite often. If I were a courtier who worked for the royals, I would arrange for a video leak of one of her tantrums.
Snuggz Bear said…
@Torontopaper1 posted a tweet briefly today at some point- since deleted - "Darling as soon as the surrogate gives birth, your bags will be packed. DNA will decide where the child goes. it's not royal, as they will discover. so you get the kid, but zero money. This is so interesting as it lines up with Harry's snide comment to Markle asking her if she was having his child at the photo opp in Morroco. I guess Harry thought it was in child until he got better intel. This train wreck of a marriage is really something. Yes, I agree that she was going to present at the Oscars in that gown- the color is horrid with her skin tone, btw. Did you see photos of how her pillow "fetus" was lumpy in the strangest places? Bravo to the royal family for sending her to Morroco- the site of a beheading of two Norwegian women.
Now! said…
Yes, it was not worn well. Often design houses send a stylist to public appearances to make sure that their dresses are shown to their best advantage; clearly Dior didn't do that here. They also chose not to use a photo of Meg in the dress on their own social media. Their post acknowledging that they had created the dress was text-only, which I find telling.

Part of the problem was Meg's poor choice of undergarments for the dress; she looked frumpy and bumpy, perhaps because of mismatching shapewear. (Or a low-quality moon bump, depending on your own point of view.)

Anyway, a smooth dress like this one requires a smooth body look beneath it. A good stylist could have made that happen.
Now! said…
Yes, the beheadings work with the Ann Boelyn wedding date, doesn't it? Meg and Harry were married on May 19, the day Ann was beheaded.

I agree that the beige color of the gown was a poor choice. She wore a similar bright blue gown in Fiji that looked much better on her.

Toronto paper is either an expert troll or a very interesting source. Wonder why the tweet was deleted.

I certainly hope Meg is not going to be left alone with an unwanted baby. She doesn't seem like the maternal type - she has little chemistry with the kids she meets at public appearances - and it's not like she has any family that would help her raise it.
jeshor7 said…
I am surprised no one hasn't released a video showing her tantrums, maybe they will wait after the baby is born. I am beginning to think the Morocco trip was planned so she doesn't end up going to the Oscars with Serena. Especially after her random British fashion award appearance and baby shower in NY.

jeshor7 said…
She always looks uncomfortable around kids! lol Maybe one of her "friends" will help her raise the kid though she is more interested in publicity and going back to using Instagram. I am pretty sure the kid will end up staying with the Royals, regardless what happens next,.
Peony2 said…
Nutty - Great blog - I love your comments on Cdan
Actually I rather liked the dress - found it very elegant - but agree it was not suitable for the occasion - You could be right it was meant for the Oscars -

Yes I did find it odd to suddenly hear about the Morocco trip -
Whatever! My 2 cents worth on this ill advised marriage is this - I find her very photogenic - and attractive in most photos - she certainly does love the camera and attention. Seems they kept the dating under the radar and then suddenly they were getting married - and in everyones face daily.

Admittedly its like watching a car crash in slow motion.

So how to become more likeable is her challenge and I think it starts with being a civilized human and making amends with her family members especially her father - Like it or not he will be the grandfather of "bump" - so instead of yet spending another half a mill on "rags" as my Dad called my clothes horse obsession - Bring Dad over to meet your new family -

Harry should be a stand up guy and apologize and so should "the new wife" .....clear the air - do what we all must do to get over the hurdle of mistakes being made -
Just ignoring the rest of the family will not make them go away - so address the problem and solve it - Like them or not - they are her family - so deal with it and them in person.

It does not mean you have to have them visit often or keep in touch often but you do need to address the problem in person and thrash out the issues before you can lay it to rest -

Turn the page and stop buying every expensive designer outfit you can imagine and start acting like a classy lady instead of like the winner of the lottery going hog wild in a department store ......thats what makes everything she puts on look cheap and out of place - She needs to dial down the excess and stop trying to hog centre stage in the Royal Family -
She is merely a bit player - and extra in this production so she must stop trying to be the tail wagging the dog -

Anyway thats enough blabber from me ......mainly I did want to say thanks for your take on cdan - and your thoughts on your blog -
hunter said…
I'm very confused about what this tweet is implying.

They are saying:

- The surrogate's child is *not* of royal blood (?!) and therefor she will be left alone with the baby.

What? Is that to imply she somehow arranged the zygote in a surrogate but didn't use Harry's sperm? Why TF would she do that, it literally makes zero sense.
SwishyFishy said…
Another great post. I enjoy your blog a lot.
Why do you think the royal family lets Meghan spend such obscene amounts of money on clothes? Kate spent about $56,000 for her entire wardrobe her first year of marriage. Meghan spent much more than that amount on her one engagement dress. They did a survey of what all the European royalty spend on clothes for 2018 and Meghan was by far the most...something like over $500,000 in only the 7 months since the wedding, compared to the Queen of Spain, who only spent about $39,000 for the entire year. When you're a minor royal outspending a bonafide queen and all the other royals of UK/Europe, something is off. Why does the royal family seem nonplussed by her outrageous spending?
VP said…
Excellent blog as always Nutty. You've hit the nail right on the head with this one. I think the RF got wind of the Oscar jaunt & sent them to Morrocco. I'm still undecided as to whether Harry was going to be a part of it though.
Fifi LaRue said…
The word "nonplussed" is confusing. I had to look it up. It means something like being confused, rather than "not bothered."
Fifi LaRue said…
Nutty Flavor: I traveled with several women last year. One of them was very charming, witty, and fun. I agreed to travel with her in Europe. She turned out to be a raging narcissist. She raged every day, all day, when she wasn't being charming to strangers. So, yes, your comment that Markle rages a lot makes sense. Poor Harry is the most common and available target. He used to be so likable, and happy.
SwishyFishy said…
It has a second meaning:
INFORMAL•NORTH AMERICAN
(of a person) not disconcerted; unperturbed.
i.e. the family is not bothered by her spending habits.
Unknown said…
collecting ammo against her for who the inevitable will happen

'see Harry, we tried to warn you, but you wouldn't listen..'

at this point the RF are trolling Sparkles, and Sparkles is too stupid and self absorbed to realise
Now! said…
Thank you, Peony2!

Reconciling publicly with her father would make for great PR at some point when she desperately needs it - perhaps on Oprah after the divorce? "Coming up next, Meghan reconciles with her father after x years of estrangement."

But I think when the story of Meghan's royal adventures is finally written, it will be revealed that Meg and her father have been working together.

Dad conveniently pops up in the UK tabloids whenever Meg has been having a hard time of it, conveniently transferring public anger onto himself. Most recently, he revealed a letter Meg had supposedly written to him in her try-hard calligraphy, asking him to "stop victimizing her."

First of all, who writes paper letters these days? I also have elderly parents who live far away, and I email, text, or Skype them. And if they do write letters, who writes a five-page personal letter in calligraphy? Unless you are a 13th-century monk, calligraphy is for wedding invitations and table place cards. It takes time to write and it isn't easy to read.

The obvious conclusion is that Meg intended to have her father release the letter, which is why it is full of high-minded accusations and totally devoid of any truly personal asides.

Meg is rather vain about her handwriting, having earned some side money as an actress doing calligraphy from events, and I'm guessing she was looking forward to having everyone admire her pretty letters.
Now! said…
I agree that the BRF need some ammo against the inevitable accusations of racism when Meghan departs.

While it's impossible to prove a negative - "No, we're not racist!" - the bills for her dresses are a quantifiable complaint.
Now! said…
Hard to tell. She could have shared the stage with Serena, or with Queen Latifah, who was eventually chosen to present "The Favorite" as a Best Picture candidate.

I think it's significant that the list of Best Picture presenters wasn't announced until February 21, the Thursday before the Sunday ceremony.

There could have been a lot of back and forth with the list of presenters before the announcement.
jeshor7 said…
"at this point the RF are trolling Sparkles, and Sparkles is too stupid and self absorbed to realise" Good point, I am beginning to wonder if the RF are trolling her, allowing her to make mistakes and wear expensive clothes. But she's too self absorbed and deluded to realise what's going on, she only cares about the cameras and publicity. I see People Magazine have realised another article about Meghan, her PR team are working overtime.
jeshor7 said…
I remember reading somewhere else that it's possible that Meghan and her Dad are working together. Meghan's letter to dad seemed too forced and intended for the public to read. Otherwise, why did her 5 friends mention the letter to People's Magazine? Who writes letters nowadays, why not call the dad? I think, Meghan wants to play the victim, she had no real family and now the royals are her family. Harry believed her. It's odd, that we don't hear from the Dad for weeks but then randomly he organises a TV interview to speak about his daughter.
Peony2 said…
Good points Nutty Flavor - about the letter in calligraphy - so true that it would take such an enormous amount of time to create it and it is a very much a narcissists missive - nothing sympathetic to the father for his health and heart attack and surgery - no mention of when they can plan to get together for a visit - as I recall -
I admit I didn't spend much time reading her whine...

Now why he wrote and released it when he did is interesting to me - I thought immediately she had baited him to have it seen by the world but he did not do that immediately - but for some time I have felt both Dad and the sister Samantha are gaining some extra $$$ with these efforts - and Dad if he had to pay $100,000. for his heart surgery would be needing the funds for sure.

I actually don't fault them for trying to get her attention in this way - I see her "friends" are reaping the benefits now from the baby shower -

Medical costs are high and this family has had bankruptcies so there is likely not a surplus of cash floating around for these medical emergencies....anyway thats my guess on those issues.

BUT its true that the Hollywood crowd seems to thrive on any sort of publicity - good or bad as long as people keep talking about them they are able to gain extra funds from the advertisers and its ka-ching in their jeans -

Seems the Kardashians have made a small fortune off of being criticized - so MM is following that brands formula.

Likely the RF is not bothered by the massive clothing spending - in reality all they do is go visit a few places - and get paid massive amounts of funds for showing up -

So this obscene spending is nothing to them - If you live in a desert water is valuable - but if you live where water is plentiful you take it for granted -

Think of it this way - if every time you went Shopping the stores you went to would give you the merchandise and pay you for coming - thats the royals "job"
Likely why Harry said - "What MM wants she gets"...............

Think of the massive campaign that will be unveiled when "bump" arrives......I'm stocking up on my popcorn.....
Henriette said…
That dress did her no favors. It looks like a beige onsie that you wear to watch TV in. It's a horrible color and cut on her. Of all the colors out there, why beige?
Amzz Naylor said…
Just come across your blog, very informative and a great read. Another commentor asked how come no Palace staff have leaked videos online. Strangely enough about 3/4 weeks ago a flood of reports came out via talko that a royal aide had done exactly that. They said that the clip secretly filmed showed her having a meltdown about kates children getting royal highness titles and her child will only have a Lord or lady title some have panned it as empty gossip and a part of me is inclined to think so soon as no videos have surfaced but a part of me thinks that's exactly the sort of thing she would absolutely hate and lose her mind over it.
Who knows maybe it got stopped before getting that far.
I genuinely believe this woman is a threat to the monarchy, and I and many others have strong suspicions that she is a financially backed trojan horse. To me her blatent flashy behaviour in public is so over the top to the point of being deliberate. A huge portion of the British public can sense something is off about her.
The calls recently for a Republic have sky rocketed I read somewhere by like 50% because her actions are causing such a
negative backlash against the entire royal family as many people think she is being allowed to get away with it, but over the last week a few stories have come out that has confirmed to many that have implied that the Queen is well aware of what is going on and they are being watched and monitored as they can't be trusted. I think up until now they have been giving her enough rope to hang herself to let her damage her own reputation, now they seem to be taking action.
Re: Nonplussed. Yes a lot of people get this wrong.. ..I think it is sounds similar to the expression "not fussed" so people take it to have that meaning, (rather that exact opposite: confused, bewildered, taken aback, astonished, etc). I constantly see even very famous authors using it in the incorrect context.
And yes, there is now supposedly an INFORMAL, North American meaning, (not bothered) but one word can't really have 2 meanings which are polar opposites. Anyway,
Anonymous said…
You know those late night infomercials for Snuggies? (That blanket thing that you slip your arms into to stay warm?) That's what her Dior dress looks like to me.

Do you need Personal Loan?
Business Cash Loan?
Unsecured Loan
Fast and Simple Loan?
Quick Application Process?
Approvals within 24-72 Hours?
No Hidden Fees Loan?
Funding in less than 1 Week?
Get unsecured working capital?
Contact Us At :oceancashcapital@gmail.com
Phone number :+16474864724 (Whatsapp Only)

LOAN SERVICES AVAILABLE INCLUDE:
================================
*Commercial Loans.
*Personal Loans.
*Business Loans.
*Investments Loans.
*Development Loans.
*Acquisition Loans .
*Construction loans.
*Credit Card Clearance Loan
*Debt Consolidation Loan
*Business Loans And many More:

LOAN APPLICATION FORM:
=================
Full Name:................
Loan Amount Needed:.
Purpose of loan:.......
Loan Duration:..
Gender:.............
Marital status:....
Location:..........
Home Address:..
City:............
Country:......
Phone:..........
Mobile / Cell:....
Occupation:......
Monthly Income:....

Contact Us At oceancashcapital@gmail.com
Phone number :+16474864724 (Whatsapp Only)
gail de scot said…
Nutty, have you heard anything about MM getting clothing from a friend who gets items from designers for free, and then MM sends along an invoice to the RF for the value of the item? the clothing item is paid for -- thanks Prince Charles!! -- and the resulting payment is split between MM and the friend providing the clothing? I read this on another site, don't remember where, and just wonder if there's any truth to her doing such a thing. It also accounts for the clothing not fitting properly as it's sized for the friend, not MM, and she doesn't even put it in for tailoring.
Unknown said…
I feel quite certain Smegs planned to go to the Oscars hence the red outfit (worn on the plane runway instead of the red carpet...it was so funny that they wouldn't let her walk on the red carpet at the airport only Harry could). So the red outfit for the red carpet and that ghastly beige thing for presenting. BRF arranged this trip in haste to keep her from going to Oscars. Narcs often have a deluded sense of their own abilities hence Smegs doing her own makeup and "styling" - her makeup speaks for itself and no stylist would have let her out of the house without decent undergarments for her beige kaftan. Her boobs! Her moonbump! Her belly button! (I still find it impossible to believe that hideous tent was $90K). She also has no sense of occasion and more than once she has worn a ballgown to what is essentially a cocktail party...
thebigmoj said…
I write calligraphy and I can tell you,her writing is not calligraphy.It's a failed,pretentious attempt embellished like every aspect of her life.
thebigmoj said…
The friend is supposedly Jessica Molroney. Also,Meghan leaves tacking stitches and tags in clothes so she can return them as unworn.If she is billing for such clothes,it's fraud.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids