Skip to main content

Casting Meg in Hollywood: What roles would you choose for her?

Duchess Meghan is in the US today, supposedly to watch Serena Williams play tennis. But she may also take a meeting with her PR team at Sunshine Sachs and the US-based agent, manager, and lawyer she has retained to help guide her future Hollywood career.

Meg didn't have much of a career before marrying into the British Royal Family, except for her minor role on cable drama Suits, but she's apparently hoping to do better now that she has the Duchess of Sussex brand name behind her.

What showbiz roles would you like to see Meghan take on?

Game show host?

Meg has experience on game shows - she started out famously as one of 26 miniskirted suitcase girls on Deal or No Deal.

But would she be suitable as a game show host?

Hosting game shows is an easy and lucrative gig - generally it's just a few days' work per month for a very attractive salary, the sort of schedule that would appeal to any member of the Royal Family.

That said, game show hosts are generally men, not women. And Meghan would probably want to keep all the prizes for herself.

Stunt casting on a sitcom?

Stunt casting - which The Guardian defines as getting a distractingly famous person to pop up in a small TV or movie role - would also fit Meghan's busy schedule well.

Stunt casting goes as far back as the 1950s sitcom I Love Lucy, which featured then-hot country singer Tennessee Ernie Ford in a story arc.

More recently, the sitcom Will and Grace made a habit of stunt casting: Britney Spears, Cher, JLo and Madonna all stopped by for single episodes. Unfortunately, the reboot of the show was recently cancelled, because it aligned well with Meghan's political viewpoints

If Meghan does go the sitcom route, my guess is that she will turn up on one of Tyler Perry's sitcoms. Perry is a good friend of Oprah and Gayle King, and Meghan could use an appearance on say, the upcoming comedy-drama Sistas to highlight her support in the Black community.

(I'm not sure how much support Meg has in the Black community - like Dave Chapelle said of Jussie Smolett, they may be "supporting her by being silent" - but that's a matter for the Lipstick Alley ladies to discuss, not me.)

Talk show host?

Meg would love to be a talk show host, an Ellen DeGeneres-type figure with a brand that generates lots of money.

Unfortunately, talk show hosts have to be able to listen to other people - it's a key part of the job.

Listening to other people isn't Meg's strength: she generally just waits, somewhat impatiently, until it's her turn to talk.

Let's just cross this one off the list right away.

Movie actress?

Meg's ultimate dream is probably to be an Oscar-winning movie actress, perhaps taking on the evil lady roles Glenn Close is aging out of.

After all, Meg can't be Hot Girl #2 forever, and she'd be a great fit for a remake of Fatal Attraction.

The problem is that Close is a gifted and nuanced actress, which Meghan is not.

Close does both serious evil lady roles and comic evil lady roles, but Meg doesn't have enough talent for the former or self-awareness for the latter.

Some bad actors make a living by acknowledging they are bad actors - William Shatner comes to mind - but Meg would never. Just never.

My recommendation 

There's one genre where Meg would fit in just fine, however, and which I think matches her talent well.

For generations, horror movies have been hiring fair-to-middling actors and actresses to serve as the victims of its furry monsters and men in rubber masks.

Meg would be perfect for this. They could set her up in some Instagram influencer-type setting - one of those tea parties her friends are always posting about, avocado toast for all! - and then have a bad guy (casting call for an actor who looks suspiciously like Prince William) burst through the French doors and create bloody havoc.

Screaming, swearing, and bulging her eyes would all be a part of Meg's script, and she's publicly shown she can handle the part.

What do you think?


Comments

Mischief Girl said…
"Weaponized hairpiece"

You have no idea how upset I am that I didn't come up with that phrase myself!

But I don't think she wants to be President. I don't know what she wants, except it appears a life as a senior member of the British Royal Family isn't it. So tell me again why she married Prince Harry?

My two cents--if the Sussexes move EVEN PART TIME to America, they are OFF the gravy train. Their job is to represent Her Majesty within the UK and around the world. If they start spending even long weekends in the US, kick them To. The. Curb. (or Kerb, as it might be spelt in England)
Nefarious P. said…
Hi! Been lurking for a while. Nutty and the commenting crew are so astute and eloquent, it’s hard to interject with equivalent quality!

My snarky movie casting for MM would be a remake of Showgirls. So so close to the reality of her pre-marital life! Lol.
Jdubya said…
i'm on
https://skippyv20.tumblr.com/
and scrolled way down are alot of pics and video's of MM sitting next to SW mom and MM is trying to talk to her and she is being ignored. Her reaction is priceless. Looks like she wants to cry.
Jdubya said…
still on the above site
https://skippyv20.tumblr.com/
but scrolled scrolled scrolled way way way down, to "London Scoop" and the "i am still skippy" post. very small print but it seems to talk about MM blackmailing PH and how the wedding almost didn't take place (she was made an offer and turned it down). Talks bout her handlers, how the plan was to get dirt on PH and she took over the plan, against their wishes, and married him. Hard to read but very interesting take.
HappyDays said…
This one’s easy. Question: What role best fits a narcissist from Los Angeles who already has a large following of flying monkeys (the psychology business uses this term for sycophantic supporters who attack and do general dirty work on behalf of the narc)? Answer: The Wicked Witch of The West.
HappyDays said…
Paula and Blue Ridge: Yup, she could send it through a diplomatic pouch. But she could carry it herself. In a past career, I knew people on the White House staffs from Reagan through Obama. If the staff was traveling with the President on Air Force One coming in from a foreign trip, they did not go through customs. I don’t know if that procedure has changed, but I’m guessing it has not.

I think the PM and the royals receive the same ‘no customs’ treatment. My guess is if it’s Meghan coming in, even on one of those commercial flights that is all first class, she doesn’t go through customs. She’s flanked by a UK security detail, and I doubt that any UK customs official wants to be the person who says, “Her luggage needs to be searched and sniffed by the dogs.” Not likely to happen. They probably want to keep their jobs. She could probably bring back a kilo of high-grade coke with no problems.
HappyDays said…
Nelo: Interesting they’ve started doing this so soon, but it’s an indicator how they feel about Meghan and Harry. In other words, they’ve had enough.
I remember the palace did this with Diana. They started using staffers or close friends of the royals as vehicles to get information out into the public forums without having to take direct responsibility for it as they would if they were directly quoted in a speech or interview or through an official press release.

Meghan has basically been doing a form of this stuff herself. But she is releasing false info to attempt to manipulate the RF. The letter allegedly written by Harry probably came from Meghan or someone from her PR or legal team because she was dying to get the word out to the international press that she and Harry were a couple. Likely she wasn’t being bothered to the extent claimed in Harry’s unprecedented statement.

She also did it last fall with the “Doria has been invited to spend Christmas with the queen” story that never materialized.

Same with the story about how HM was going to throw Meghan a birthday tea and H&M would have an entire wing to themselves at Balmoral. That sure didn’t happen either.

By doing this, they are probably hoping to lessen the accusations of racism that Meghan and Harry will hurl at the RF. Narcissists go nuclear in any sort of breakup, especially when their behavior is the root cause. They will NEVER take any true responsibility for their toxic actions. If Harry and Meghan eventually divorce, the battle will make the McCartney-Mills divorce look like a church picnic.
HappyDays said…
If H&M divorce before she becomes a citizen of the UK, I don’t see how as an American citizen who will never be a UK citizen, she would get to keep what is at this time, a courtesy title. Diana and Fergie got to keep their titles, but both are natural born citizens of the UK. However, both lost the HRH part. I also read that if Fergie marries again, she loses the Duchess title too.

Without a royal title and no Harry to prop her up as a celebrity, I don’t think Meghan would have many Hollywood or famous friends. They are just as shallow as Meghan is.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ava C said…
Yes if there's one thing defined Lee Radziwill and Carolyn Bessette Kennedy it was ruthless, constant and totally on-the-ball editing of their lives in an aesthetic sense. An austere, original sense of style that never deserted them. Meghan only seems to consider how much something cost and how braggable it is on social media. Even the name of her blog. I also like that there's not much more information around to expand on Lee and Carolyn's way of life now they've gone. If they were here now, they'd stay off social media.

Another great style icon was/is Babe Paley. Sheer perfection. Not that many photos around comparatively speaking. You just have to enjoy the ones she did leave. Apart from her duties as a hostess at the odd spectacular party, she kept herself to herself.

Meghan did look reasonable on the red carpet during her Suits days, by her standards. At the time I thought she managed to do it herself. Bringing along whoever that stylist was would have been worth any number of PR companies on retainer. I don't mean it was exceptional, but miles better than anything since. I guess she still had to take advice in those days though. Bang goes that idea.
Veena, You mean, lowkey and normal by her standards, right?

I think for a spectator and a contenders best friend , she was too I've the top. And by that , I mean her behaviour was show-offey. If she wanted to act so much, she could have just as well been overly dramatic with her cheering, been tense and flustered, even crying or consoling Serena's mum. But she is self centered and whole point of her being there was to be seen. And she did that brilliantly. This might have been Serena's big day, but it will forever be remembered as the time when Meg's dropped everything to fly last minute to see her best friend play.

I also suspect she wanted to be in news get people talking before the tour.
The tour is meant to be a formal affair. But she wants to drive the narrative and make it about her. And the popularity can be controlled and increaiby tapping into the US market. The Americans don't get the fornalilty and the purpose of a Royal tour - namely to promote the monarchy, that it's teltesentinv the queen, catching up on the UKs work and charities in that country etc. Outside of the UK that message is lost and honestly, it's a little difficult to.make others understamd the official nature of their work as well.

That's why she does these US appearances just before the tours, so that people get interested in her legend before she goes on official tours. Then she can make it's all about her clothes, her appearances etc. It's like the carefully orchestrayed humanitarian work she did preHarry. She sees as the same. Only the palace is arranging it all for her, and not her own PR agency.

If you notice carefully, she has also lost weight, her hair is better, her face looks touched up. She clearly hit a salon first thing on landing. And any good dermatologist or plastic surgeon will be able to bet their ass that she has had little touch ups done. It's good work and very subtle, and in a few weeks will show the actual results.

This US trip will also be very carefully planned to make her seem normal and low-key, no extravagant designer clothes, subtle rrwear jewellary, always smiling and hugging people around her. This is an SS job after all.
catskillgreen said…
I agree with you. She really thinks buying an expensive Givenchy means she has great fashion sense. Yet her choices are rarely flattering with no flair or sense of tailoring importance. She will try now to be Victoria Beckham. Harry is known to be cheap, will he finance this like David?
As for the yoga and no photos I think she made demands for no phones like at Wimbledon. Or it's just another lie. I am not sure what 'organic' yoga even is.
Girl with a Hat said…
that makes sense! thank you for the info.
KnitWit said…
I can't imagine MM getting movie or TV roles except by playing herself in a cameo.

Perhaps she will do a weight watchers or yoga tape, getting back in shape after a "pregnancy".

She may take a tip from Paris Hilton and the Kardashians and release a sex tape. Zzzz.

I think she will cling to her royal position as long as possible then "trade up" for a wealthy man. Perhaps a fashion or media executive who could support her ambitions.

Feminist icon my bleepity bleep bleep.
Mom said…
Meghan Markle in... "The CLAW"
Lurking said…
Mischi.... we don't want her back! Perhaps we could come up with a deal where Canada takes Smeggle, the UK takes Bieber, and the US take Piers? There are any number of celebrities we could reassign, the most distasteful game of musical chairs imaginable.
fairylights said…
Nutty, Real Royal Housewives would be a hoot if they put Sarah Ferguson on with Meggy and let them duke it out!
fairylights said…
This is a little off topic, but looking at the link of the Queen at the Braemar games, I couldn't help but notice that Charles looks absolutely horrid. The whole side of his face is a purplish red.
Oldest Older 201 – 218 of 218

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids