Skip to main content

Open post: The Sussex Settlement

According to a settlement with the British Royal Family, Harry and Meghan will no longer use their HRH titles and will repay 2.4 million pounds of public cash spent on Frogmore Cottage. They will no longer formally represent the Queen, and receive no more public money in return for Royal duties.

The Queen's Statement was as follows:

Statement from HM The Queen 

Following many months of conversations and more recent discussions, I am pleased that together we have found a constructive and supportive way forward for my grandson and his family.

Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved members of my family.

I recognise the challenges they have experienced as a result of intense scrutiny over the last two years and support their wish for a more independent life.

I want to thank them for all their dedicated work across this country, the Commonwealth and beyond, and am particularly proud of how Meghan has so quickly become one of the family. 

It is my whole family’s hope that today’s agreement allows them to start building a happy and peaceful new life.



What do you think of the statement, and of the settlement?

Comments

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Glow W said…
What is FKAP??? Lol.
Ann Christensen said…
Not enough Nutty here. Whole LOT of comments. Is this a Nutty blog or an open forum?
Anonymous said…

@PortCitygirl you go, girl! It's way too early here, so pls have one for me. I'm not thru all of the articles yet, but may need a plain hot chocolate to get thru it all.



As for Serena, can you imagine being her, having fought her way to the top with talent and effort, and then her press conference turns to a faux friend who had no talent and got to "the top" thru a variety of jobs, none of which were terribly impressive except to a limited few?

“Yeah, I have absolutely no comments on anything to do with that,” Serena Williams said. “Good try. You tried! You did good,” she said in a condescending tone.

IMO: those tweets were def re the charlatan.
Miggy said…
@MeliticusBee & @poppycock

Meg's attendance at the New York Open didn't appear to go down too well with Serena at all, so here's hoping the tweets were aimed at her. I think in the next few weeks we'll start to see who is and who isn't supporting the dastardly duo!

Mulroney doesn't strike me as someone who would shy away from criticism but hell,what do I know? lol
Anonymous said…
@Tatty FKAP, my acronym for Harry, Formerly Known As Prince lol. Just having a little fun. Pronounce that "A" any way you like. I'm going with the "[É‘] AH Vowel" lol
poppycock said…

Ava C said...

@HappyDays on narcissistic stare - yes it is downright scary. On seeing that clip of Meghan looking at Kate I felt like a medieval peasant who accidentally met eyes with a witch and is now cursed. My cow is going to die and I'm going to starve to death. It came through the screen at me. Never seen anything like that, even though it's such a short clip and so blurry.

ROFL My cow is going to die and I'm going to starve to death. Perfect.
Anonymous said…
Ditto! Brilliant, @Ava C

My cow is going to die and I'm going to starve to death.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Elle, do you remember Martina Navratilova's comment at the tennis match where both Serena and MM were present? She said "The difference is one worked hard to become royalty the other married into it".

Nobody outdid this and it remains the best quote about MM and her endeavors.
poppycock said…
Elle, Reine des Abeilles said...


As for Serena, can you imagine being her, having fought her way to the top with talent and effort, and then her press conference turns to a faux friend who had no talent and got to "the top" thru a variety of jobs, none of which were terribly impressive except to a limited few?

That's a hell of her own making. She seemed so thirsty and crass during those first months of their 'friendship'. Hopefully, she saw the light. Her mum completely ignored Meghan at the US Open.
Anonymous said…

@Fairy Crocodile, I had forgotten that one, but thank you for the reminder! It gives me a warm, cozy feeling inside that some women see it and are willing to call it out.
Anonymous said…

@Poppycock, I mostly agree. But we all make some stupid choices, and I think Serena is now living with hers in a public way.
Hikari said…
@Poppycock,

Short of painting the queen as a Nazi sympathizer, which has been done by another commentator here, it’s hard to imagine that suggesting that Harry is mentally compromised based on his very public and quizzical self-destructive behavior which has been escalating ever since he was a teen, brought to full ugly flower by his association with a partner who is enabling his deficiencies for her own ends Would be more offensive to the British public then what is currently happening. I am an educator with a great deal of compassion for differently abled children. Harry is making it increasingly difficult to find sympathetic explanations for his behavior, but given the soft soap excuses for his immature behavior up till now, we must at least entertain the possibility that his intellect is significantly below average. I did not say he was retarded; I suggested that if his intellectual capacity is below an average intelligence of 100 that he would be Significantly impaired in his independent decision making skills. Do you to his position as a high-ranking member of the royal family as Charles son, He has been allowed at mission to elite schools which she never would have earned a place at on his own merit. They’ve passed him along because he is the son and brother of future Kings, but that has only fed into his feelings of inferiority and rage which.made him so susceptible to Meghan. He alone of all his family seems blind to her true motives... I think there’s a good reason why he was the weakest link in the royal family, apart from his bachelor status which made him available. I think it’s his long-standing sense of inferiority That is making him double down so hard on his choice of her. He is desperate to vindicate himself. I would like to see Harry reinstated to his family, but the ultimate objective must be the survival of that family. I think it’s obvious to everyone that Harry can only function with in a support system, and he most certainly is not going to get that with his wife. I feel like it’s really too late to channel Harry’s real abilities Vs. His imagined abilities into any sort of productive role within the family. Megan is going to destroy him ...That process is already well underway. We see him diminishing by the day. Her version of their freedom from the royal family is going to eat him alive. He is currently acting like a real ass hat, but I also think he is an incredibly vulnerable person lacking normal mental acuity Denying that reality has not done him any favors so far, and he’s determined to pass out of his families ability to help him. That is the real tragedy here. So it might sound harsh to call out his mental deficiencies But should they be sugarcoated at the expense of the monarchy? The family is now paying a very high price for maintaining the fiction that there is nothing wrong with Harry other than willfulness. Expecting him to fully realize the ramifications of what he has done and repent and change now seems futile.
Anonymous said…
@Hikari

I think it’s his long-standing sense of inferiority That is making him double down so hard on his choice of her. He is desperate to vindicate himself...
I think it’s obvious to everyone that Harry can only function with in a support system, and he most certainly is not going to get that with his wife...


Yes, she will destroy him, and the slow, degrading process has already begun. What will end it, though? That's the question.
Mel in SoCal said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
poppycock said…
Fairy Crocodile and Elle, Reine des Abeilles,

Navratilova said it out loud, but I'm sure many feel the same. Megsie is a gold digger and it's as simple that.

True about stupid choices, Elle. Meg's victims could start a football club or two probably, so she must be very good at charming them.
none said…
@Hikari Agree. We are watching the destruction of Harry. He's been Markled.
Anonymous said…
Mel in So Cal

Fast forward: People are backing away very casually especially in Hollywood, but Disney is ABC and they broadcast the Academy Awards which has had a huge rating drop in the last decade. MM would be a ratings boost, so unless QEII forbids it Meghan is going to present at the Oscars which I hope for because it will ultimately be the last straw.
JMHO.


Well, huge ratings boost minus 1. Just disgusts me. Will Harry FKAP present with her? Or will she flounce up there solo? Or maybe present with George lolololhellno, please no.

And by 'last straw', do you mean with the BRF?


Personally I can't wait to see what hideous gown she will wear, she has the worst sense of style and I firmly believe that was part of her downfall with the public....too ticky tacky. Givenchy is rolling in his grave as is Christian Dior.

She is the Ultimate in Ticky-Tacky. That's her one best public trick. I hope for a sausage casing again. Those Lion King photos are just frightening, but also, one look and I step away from the brownie lol.
Fedde said…
I can't be bothered to read the ~500 new comments since yesterday, but am wondering if we could get a new post for Harry's (lame) speech about why he "had no choice" but to step back, @Nutty?
Anonymous said…
@Poppycock

Meg's victims...she must be very good at charming them.

Narcissists / sociopaths are terribly charming, and that's why it's easy enough to fall prey at first. But there are certain patterns. The pity card is always a clue (poor baby - narcs love to seek out that public sympathy and recenter the spotlight). Also, when praised, even if the world is burning down, they perk up immediately and swan on over. The irrational anger at anyone who offends them, even if the "offense" is nonsensical (think of those Inskip wedding photos). And, the kicker, their public tales of amazing and daring high-wire feats and accomplishments (standing ovation anyone?), their exceptional beauty lauded by strangers (and the mile high legs that go with!), etc. I watch for those signs and back slowly towards the door at the first inkling, while a lot of the room is still mesmerized.
Nutty Flavor said…
Sure, Fedde. Will do it right now. Sorry, busy working day today!
Unknown said…
The Duchess of Glowworm here...not truly ‘unknown’...please don’t fear me...plus it’s just after noon here so I’m not one of those nighttime bedevilers some are worrying about...
My question is can some kind person link me to Serena’s hubby’s tweet? I’ve searched for it to no avail.....
Portcitygirl said…
@Hikari, I'm an educator as well, trained in the field of disabilities, behaviorally emotionally challenged being one of my specialties. I can definitively say PH is on the spectrum, which most lay people can see from a mile based on his actions. I can understand how a parent/grandparent may give leeway to his actions and behaviors based on this, however, we are dealing on a world stage here with a literal institution and country affected by his deep seated problems, with MM fanning the proverbial flame. The Firm could do nothing to help Diana, of whom I adored as a young girl, and I believe they see history repeating itself with Harry. It is a lose lose situation. MM will discard him and hopefully he can be recovered.
Until then, he has made an ass out of himself. But his mental maturity is that of a 12 year old when his mom died. Even with my level of education on the situation I still find myself hating what he has done and is doing to HM and his brother- and his father, who is immobile to help.

abbyh said…

Oscars are not until February 9th. So there is some time for all kinds of things to shake out of the sky.

I can see her being asked to present but I think on some level, someone knows that having her walk the red carpet would be a bad visual caught live on camera and difficult to edit on the fly. Also that there are already enough people who need minders to keep from meeting certain others, having a couple more minders to keep her from pestering people for work would just be more headaches before, during and after the walk that can be avoided from the start.

I think the people who think the Queen was weak to only ask them to not use the HRH publically haven't thought of the fallout from Diana or that making the visual appearance of conseeding something which can later be rescinded if (and when) the rules are broken are playing checkers not chess. Another lovely example of See how We tried. Just more blatant.
@Elle Reine des Abeilles

There you go on an on about posters discussing religion and politics, even criticizing me saying I was part of it last night when when I WAS The One Who FIRST pointed out there should be no discussion of religion and politics.

I posted something on topic and you attacked me last night as you have done before when I posted something on topic (just because I use an 'Unknwn' screen name). You try to turn other Nutties against me when I post things on topic (I stay on topic while it is not uncommon you do not).

You are turning this blog into your own little clique and the other 'Unknown" was right in many things they said (although I disagreed with their use of a horrible swear word).
Unknown said…
Hi Nutty

I am curious as to what Boris Johnson had to say to Harry. Possibly can that question also be tackled?
poppycock said…
Hikari,

I agree in part, but if the family unable to deal with the most vulnerable of them in a dignified and honest way crumbles and loses its power - so be it. True modern monarchy should not be a greedy, dishonorable, sleazy institution.

I am the same age as Harry and watched him grow up. He has a quick sense of humour, which is not an attribute of those with severe mental deficiencies. I think Charles said it best when he referred to him as 'c**ntstruck'. Harry's learning problems and traumas have little to do with his intelligence which is average. His sense of inferiority is tragic and may lead him to ruin. I'd still be sorry to see his family throw him under the bus in such a humiliating manner just to preserve themselves. He's doing the whole throwing under the bus thing quite well on his own anyway.
FrenchieLiv said…
@Hikari, @Portcitygirl :
Rebecca English - Daily Mail - 16 January 2020
"Harry has never been blessed with intellectual intelligence — and I mean that in the nicest possible way — but he has an emotional intelligence that few in the Royal Family can match."
I do think Rebecca chose her words carefully....
Mel in SoCal said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Portcitygirl said…
@frenchieliv,
She is obviously wrong. However, I do admire her loyalty. Her subject will need it as he has been thrown to the wolves. His wife being the Shemale.
Hopefully, this will fizzle sooner than later for his sake and the Monarch's.
poppycock said…
Porcitygirl,

Agree. Harry is definitely on the spectrum and probably still using drugs. He needs professional help and support of his family, but that doesn't make him Forrest Gump.
LavenderToast said…
Longtime lurker finally wanted to post a possibility about the Queen technically not taking the HRH designation away from the Sussex. I think it is a temporary situation because she feels that things may not work out for the Harkles in the next year, meaning their marriage may break down. If it did, Harry can come back into the fold and retain his HRH title, however, if HMTQ took it away now, he could not get it back no matter how good he acted. And the Queen can yank it away from Megs if the marriage goes belly up, like a bloated dead frog. Then the obvious that you wonderful posters already thought of and the Queen did so, she is holding that HRH bargaining chip as a means to keep them in line in the next year. I am betting that Meghan screws up though.
Portcitygirl said…
@Poppycock, no it does not.
Anonymous said…
@abbyh

Oscars are not until February 9th. So there is some time for all kinds of things to shake out of the sky.

I can see her being asked to present but I think on some level, someone knows that having her walk the red carpet would be a bad visual caught live on camera and difficult to edit on the fly....

I think the people who think the Queen was weak to only ask them to not use the HRH publically haven't thought of the fallout from Diana or that making the visual appearance of conseeding something which can later be rescinded if (and when) the rules are broken are playing checkers not chess. Another lovely example of See how We tried. Just more blatant.



This is a cheery perspective! Yay!


@Glowworm The Unknown Personally, I think that's a great name lol. Here you go:

https://twitter.com/alexisohanian/status/1216652538667094018

He does not ever deny that it's about Rach. He just says he can only speak to the tech industry, but that does not mean he can't look at the charlatan from the perspective of a tech genius.
poppycock said…
Mel in SoCal said...

Why was this catastrophe happen? I don't know maybe it's as simple as his family being just too tired of cleaning up his messes.

I've been wondering the same for months. Maybe if she weren't partially black - thus good for the image of the Firm - they would deal with her sooner and better. It's crazy they didn't recognise her histrionics and egotism as something that could be detrimental in the future.
Anonymous said…


@HIKARI!!!! Hurry, there are no comments yet! You can hit first :)
abbyh said…


Elle, I try to be an optimist in life. Sometimes, it is hard to figure out where the positive might be sometimes.
CookieShark said…
Does anyone think this scenario is NOT what MM wanted?

They are now under more scrutiny than ever. They do not represent the Queen, and cannot use the HRH. They don't have to do official engagements, but I predict the unofficial engagement list will dry up as well. Why invite the not-royal-anymores when you can invite W&K?

Harry cutting his family ties and military ties is so sad. And not needed. It is as if all of this is just saying "We hate you" publicly to the Firm. And I think MM is going to be seething that she is now not just an actress has-been, but a royal has-been too. And all of her own doing!
Mel in SoCal said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
Glowworm the Unknown here:
Thank you, HRH Elle...very much. Now scurry over to the new post before @Hikari, that scallywag gets there first!
Hikari said…
Re. Harry’s mental powers/age

Everyone’s moving over to the new thread but I just wanted to make one last response to my earlier comments.

Harry’s IQ may fall within the normal range, and he may have a quick wit sometimes...His quip at Canada house, “my wife will now speak French” shows a glimmer of the old Harry, albeit passive aggressive. I think Harry has been rolling that way for a long time. He’s been a problem child for two decades, long before meeting Meg, And his family has been making excuses for him since before Diana died. His dysfunctional coping strategies are not all down to Megan’s influence and whatever body parts she’s striking him with; Nor can we attribute His struggles completely to Diana’s death or drug use. A variety of factors conspire to make his self management extremely immature. He’s functioning was never going to be tested in the cosseted environment of the royal family. It is now, and we see he’s not managing well at all. Rebecca English has basically said in print what few have done til now... if there is a “nice“ way to call someone stupid, she has just done it. And that’s coming from someone Who’s been on friendly terms with Harrysince he was 20. Imagine what non-friendlies will do to him out in the world.
Oldest Older 1201 – 1242 of 1242

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids