Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event? Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th? Oscar's - March 10th? In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US. The IRS just never goes away. Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on). There's always another one. Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California. That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales. Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere. But. The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.
Comments
Oh, to be a fly on the wall in the spider's lair, indeed!
I think, if their attorney has any inkling they will lose, neither Cash and Harry [that was so funny!] will show up for the final proceeding--which would be par for the course!
p
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/12546940
Note: Harry gives his place of residence as the United Kingdom.
Have a look at the last couple of pages of the application to register Travalyst as a company ... an interesting summary of its aims and how it intends operating. (I have said before, sustainable tourism and how tourism impacts local communities has been standard practice in many parts of Africa for more than a generation. I don't know what Harry thinks he is going to bring to the table on this, other than try to get a slice of an established industry.)
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/document-api-images-live.ch.gov.uk/docs/QApshvPyL0QTfeR0NUrHooTMgsJl9CuV8xMjNTduGe0/application-pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAWRGBDBV3O2UGUCW2%2F20200428%2Feu-west-2%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20200428T185341Z&X-Amz-Expires=60&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEK%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCWV1LXdlc3QtMiJHMEUCIGi%2BvCsZrGiU9REhG6l6IdGhj8329%2FQkjDlec9eZISH4AiEAryL7mzoPKh4sm2rG6GRdPhohhBAza%2BCj9Ny3uXaclr4qvQMI2P%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FARACGgw0NDkyMjkwMzI4MjIiDO19%2FEa4MjgSjH4VbiqRA9O4%2Bp43Hmdxj32cjmJE%2FEf7lk4zy4DhNLau7o1oDiyM41M0jHBUQB4A%2F96ZqxzEwlG8b1M6CLKXUtiZneKdqgOK%2FiOL5SpvrXpGkwcKc2hX3ZvIwoqpY26Ktnx1Ga460HyA707NGpX0W9WvGn5xiCJ0R66xx0qfuXgHPv%2BsEW3kgYbkI7ViNu7MhLTu0zK58bg282or3rCTAkUu9B7Ry7BAxJAGbuHH9iLiRa1af%2FkmexOkgxBn63IUsuUUcHZcnJs%2B8Ain%2F1fm1wrT8PYcvL7Bg9nBgaMuH2dXDeRZ1wQkJEIexxKL5ILcEHMOCY5uTjUpFRd%2BH%2FimmIGQgN%2Bg6er2FyeBaPzEOn5cSiPCdFmXp%2FEb0U0LZSUT%2F317TGY5y%2BbcgBFE3rNMLom%2FbxceLWLRSYE4NgP4M7mcbiM%2B%2FEg4t8mVj0tSk%2B2dFvInHVdbrwPuOOQtY7gcL0mrXeUoLu%2B1boVNw%2BF%2Fyus1f6%2FkULjpF3TBJK59qtSW0mCWG4vfYjoT6uHrSlY5ea92paIqysNHMJD8oPUFOusBpwZ6T9snWzX41NH1lwa8%2B7Z%2Bo0vxoHg7hzOGabRdM1hWwN0impeT9blF85PIgMYJo%2FZh5q5jFAvo%2BJHTC5EknpANkJw9%2FTpkSDpkzTUy0Ml7NN5vrwYBPCe69x5hodE6HzPeDOMxGLUkGvb6h%2BB3V1ee%2B5sbfUqQkD2oiK6L4r4b5S1aPnk3%2BFz%2B42qpFWAflU4pvRYzQFP2khtWNZgisDnCBo7c27SJuF9k5KNO2OUF0B%2BITw1tWM8mJ5YECN0A%2Bg7oGP4mKLTSGaYTUhblFy8bWTJ3k3tfAWnN2LSZAXWJyC4hQXFHFFuQZw%3D%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=37f67b970c5e729950a339c89805a8fcde0cdecc806b23e82700af7eb9544d38
Yes you got it right re a tighter fit around midsection would cause it wrinkling. That is precisely why the choice of fabric looked so wrong. A nearly identical dress on Angela of Liechtenstein which she designed herself looked so much better, possibly because the fabric was different and provided a better fit. Angela's whole look was lighter and more effortless. Megs looked like she tried very very hard but still failed to nail it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKCAF4418A
It reminds me of the many dodgy companies, working various scams, that used to attract the attention of Roger Cook, an investigative journalist. His recordings from visits to the registered addresses of these companies often ended with the sounds of a scuffle or worse.
For example http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/1402725/index.html
Comments please - Heather Wong is a person of more than ordinary significance, it would appear.
No, Meghan will manipulate and beguile and persuade her way into a separation (Harry may not even be aware that it is a separation), and then, once she has her own independent household, she will get the divorce papers delivered.
I wonder why Harry still lists his place of residence as being the UK? Is he exploiting a loophole that benefits him, or was he unaware that there would be no return when he moved to Canada and then the USA with Megsy?
"I wonder why Harry still lists his place of residence as being the UK? Is he exploiting a loophole that benefits him, or was he unaware that there would be no return when he moved to Canada and then the USA with Megsy?"
Harry apparently does not plan to get a "Green Card." So I'm assuming he's on some sort of visa. That wouldn't make him a US resident. And US citizens (no matter where they live) AND US residents are supposed to pay income taxes on their worldwide income, I believe. So he likely doesn't want to be a US resident. I believe he was also considered a visitor in Canada.
I don't know what H thought when but wasn't it reported that some of the exit discussions in the UK were about the tax implications of a move abroad?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/pagesix.com/2020/04/28/lindsay-lohan-gives-paparazzi-tips-to-meghan-markle-prince-harry/amp/
If y'all can just give me the highlights I would appreciate it. Thank in advance.
It seems rather odd though. Harry is setting himself up for a life independent of the BRF in London/Windsor (still has Frogmore Cottage). Meghan is setting herself up for an independent life outside the BRF in the USA.
1. Stay off the beaches unless they own a private one. (By law, all beaches in CA are public up to the average high tide line, something Lindsay may not know.)
2. Get drivers.
___________
@Sandie,
He could get a couple of different visas that would work for a few years. Right now he could be in the country simply as a visitor from the UK (works for 90 days)
I'm not an expert but this article seems to have good info.
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a32008083/prince-harry-taxes-immigration-us-la/
I agree, it's all odd!
They had a hearing, is it over and in the judges hands now? When does the judge make a decision?
When is the next hearing or the final hearing scheduled?
I need more distraction from the virus and the Harkles are it.
The “lunch” with MO was consumed whilst emailing each other.
Wonder how many of her celeb friends supposed interactions with her have been mainly via email/text?
Love it, she is Diesel 10 with pinchy claw, perfect.
Aka The Fact Controller!!
https://mol.im/a/8252451
"Mr. Justice Warby said at the end of today's six-hour hearing that he will give his ruling ... at a later date ... hopefully within the next week. Today's routine hearing is a stepping stone to a full High Court hearing in late 2020 or early 2021."
I can't wait either!
LOL! sorry I will shut up now
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3583260/PIERS-MORGAN-Good-King-Henry-Harry-make-Sorry-William.html
"Here comes Archie: Waiting for the Birthday Photo"
Harry must be on a spouse visa which should give him permanent residency? I'm not in America so googled it:
Getting your spouse a US visa
You can "sponsor" your spouse's immigrant visa for entry to the United States. If you follow this process, your foreign spouse will complete the visa process completely outside the US, and then arrive in the US and obtain permanent residency status immediately. I'm happy to stand corrected!
Could be but H supposedly has said he's not applying for a Green Card (which is what that visa essentially is)
Plus, it takes at least a year's lead time, often up to 18 months. And no, these days I don't think all the requirements on that one would be skipped for H...for some other visas like those requiring the applicant have an "extraordinary ability" yeah, there probably were or will be lots of winks. Of course, they've probably been planning this move for some time. I do wonder though if they would have felt confident British intelligence wouldn't have heard if H was interviewed for a spousal visa at the US Embassy or Consulate in the UK over a year ago before Archie was even born.
They haven't yet been married two years so his first spousal visa would be conditional and require renewal in 2 years.
All that said, I personally doubt he's on a spousal visa.
Wow that gives MM too much time too try to make it right with her Dad.
So, I posted this there and I'm posting it here. This way you'll know why I disappeared and took my comments with me.
To all Nuttiers:
Re my "many" names: I changed them for a few days to make it more difficult for Cat Eyes to stalk me off this blog on other sites. Many of you know what she did on Lipstick Alley making derogatory statements about Nutty and me.
Lucky Dog is one of Cat Eyes' many names. Cat Eyes is also ApplesOranges, so is Flooper, long list. I deleted my stuff to save Nutty's blog from absolute merde. I did not turn tail and run. Her legal advice was cray, but I didn't want to blow up Nutty's blog calling it out. Just so wrong. I trust that those who care will do their own homework.
It is pointless for me to try and share anything when it just results in rabid posting and multiple personalities created by Cat Eyes who then googles wildly and posts "expert" opinion. Only problem is, nothing in the law is that simple, and even murder one can be debated.
I do not know why anyone continues to engage with Cat Eyes under any of her many names, but for as long as you do, and until Nutty has a new format, Cat Eyes will stay.
See ya, elle