It seems so fresh, Meg and Harry's wedding ceremony. Could it have really been just two years ago that Meg stepped out of the Rolls Royce Phantom IV that had also been used by Wallis Simpson, wearing the long veil that the Queen supposedly had specifically ordered her not to wear?
Was it only 24 months ago that we were all really wondering if Thomas Markle (or any of the Markles) would show up for their darling Meghan's second - or third - wedding?
Could it have been just 104 weeks since the world was waiting to see Meg's wedding dress, only to see her enter St. George's Chapel in something that looked like she made it herself with a Simplicity pattern and an IKEA sewing machine? (Even Meg's supporters said it looked like it was lacking "one last fitting.")
Has it only been 730 days since Harry's lifelong friends like Tom Inskip were denied tickets to the reception dinner to make room for new friends Oprah, Idris Elba, Priyanka Chopra, and George and Amal Clooney, most of whom appear to have now cut their ties with the bride and groom?
Yes, it has been. May 19, 2020 will be Meghan and Harry's second wedding anniversary.
Cotton for a second anniversary gift
The traditional second anniversary gift is "cotton."
If you were to give Meg and Harry a second anniversary gift, what would it be?
Comments
Great actress. She was fabulous as Madam Mercarti in Blythe Spirit
I do hope you were `at' and not `in Fulbourn'... such a sad place.
BP are well accomplished in deleting derogatory comments.
Harry said himself that they spent the eve of his announcement of his courtship
fending off/deleting negative comments.
Must have been bad ??
It's a silly thing to do, upsetting one's vendors.
I've known vendors' kids take unauthorised revenge on the purchaser before leaving the house - putting a dead fish or two under the floorboards and taking the disputed fitted carpet for which the purchaser refused to pay and then hammering down the teeth on the gripper rods!
I'm sure you'd never do anything like that.
We were once gazumped when buying - and the blighters took a load of fixtures & fittings that should have been left. We stopped the cheque we were sending separately for a fitted carpet then paid them the balance left after we'd replaced the missing stuff. They were livid.
Hahahahaha
I think the Queen was tied.
If she denied, screams of racism.
Awful situation.
Here, here. The RF were hamstrung. HMTQ could not say no.
I stopped by to ask you all, in case the folks from the DM and other sites that cater to SS and Oprah read here: How many of you have stopped or significantly reduced the frequency of your visits to the DM? I was a regular reader and commenter there for years, and not just about the Harkles. In the last month, I have grown so exhausted from the Harkle nonsense stories - especially given the global Covid crisis - that I no longer bother to read DM articles. I’d be really interested to see if their readership numbers/clicks have gone down. I suppose SS could spin it and blame Covid, but I think DM may find itself Markled in the end by bombarding readers with all these Harkle stories.
OT (sorry)
Magatha, I too love that photo of Margaret Rutherford. I forget she wasn't just Miss Marple (personally, my favourite Miss Marple is Joan Hickson).
@WBBM and Magatha - yes, that was my first thought! That's where I ended up - AT Fulbourn - after my narcissistic partner I mentioned ages ago, where I was the only one of his partners who wasn't actually committed or admitted somewhere like that. I was there just a couple of hours and the doctor said I too beautiful to be there and I'd get through it. Highly unconventional. No one would risk saying that these days!
Reminds me of my favourite actress Gene Tierney, who was committed to an institution. A legendary beauty. She asked if that had anything to do with it and her doctor said 'No, we have ugly people here too'.
Funny that this links up to Miss Marple, mentioned here today. Gene Tierney was the true story behind 'The Mirror Crack'd'. A servicewoman in the war knowingly broke German Measles quarantine because she wanted to see Gene Tierney who was volunteering at the Hollywood Canteen. Gene was pregnant and her baby was born virtually blind, totally deaf and brain-damaged.
Gene was heartbroken to have to institutionalise her as a toddler and her daughter lived to be an old lady with the brain of an 18-month-old child. After the war she ran into the woman again, who told her excitedly about breaking quarantine as she was such a fan. Gene ended up in and out of institutions and even outside on the ledge of a New York skyscraper contemplating suicide. Such a tragic story. She stars in my favourite film, 'Laura'. 1940's film noir.
Is that true for others here?
At a tenuous time for periodicals and their websites, I think it’s time they stop carpet bombing readers with Harkle nonsense and taking paid SS stories.
If you like Josephine Tey, have you read Patricia Moyes? I always adored her Murder Fantastical.
RE: David Foster and H
The comment by his wife: "Me and David put ourselves in a position where we could at least say hello and they were really gracious."
s/b David and I I'm not a heavy grammar nut but my mum was touchy about that one so it is like chewing on aluminum foil when I hear it.
As for the idea that he would look up to DF, I could see some of that considering how at loose ends JH was and is during this time period. Someone paying attention to him would be something to grasp onto.
I either skip or skim, and you can see most of the Dubious Duo article’s are utter tripe. I’m suffering from Sussex fatigue most days now, so I catch up here for anything new.
My GP offered me voluntary in-patient treatment at Park Prewett (Basingstoke) after being treated very badly by Significant Other but I declined as I was looking for a job at the time and didn't dare declare something thing like that.
I must have spent a small fortune on private counselling as a result of the narcissists in my life.
I have “Laura” taped not watched it yet.
I love the old films.
Wuthering Heights, Now Voyager.
Rebecca. Love them.
Only The Daughter of Time
I hope it doesn't take centuries for the truth to come out. Will anyone be buried under a car park?
Their stirring really doesn't help. Sometimes I imagine what their headlines would have been during Dunkirk. We'd have been in such a state. Thank goodness the old DM wasn't like that.
I do see it as my duty to get back at the sugars, the brainless and the wilfully ignorant in Harkles comment boards though. Thankfully they are increasingly in the minority. The one that always gets me is the 'when Meghan is Queen' one. I know I should ignore it but it sets me off every time.
Not sure if they have thin black elastic or if wearers have to do what I had to when wearing a formal hat with a shallow crown and wide helical brim - ie work small loops in thread at edge of inner band, which can then be secured invisibly with hair pins, grips, bobby pins or, in my case, traditional hatpins from my mother. It helped to have long hair put up (those were days, she says wistfully).
I agree most heartily. I too was almost `spitting tacks' at this morning's comment by s/o from US hoping she'd be Queen. What the hell has it got to do with her? -As I thought when MM came up with `modernisation'.
We like our quirks and oddities.
I like Richard the third!!!
I bet Meghan can't repair an engine like the Queen, as a teenager in the ATS during the war. Imagine Meghan in an air-raid shelter wailing 'No one's asked me if I'm OK!'
It's unfortunate that some people don't recognize that the blog is here due to your goodwill. And respect it accordingly.
I really enjoy the discussions, even the ones that are off-topic.
@Raspberry Ruffle
@Ava C
I used to visit DM first thing every morning to “go straight to comments” on the Harkle articles. Now I will go days without ever reading anything there. Definitely suffering from incipient Sussex fatigue. Except for this blog, of course (and a certain upcoming book).
Didn't she win a Best Supporting Oscar for The VIPs?
Oh yes those ones, and there’s always ‘one’. lol I think they are resident trolls who really have little to nothing to do. You’d have to be a complete fool to believe Megsy will be Queen one day. Either that, wishing death on so many; shocking.
*****************
On an off-topic note, so many great films being mentioned here, all on my list to watch. I’m kinda big on Alfred Hitchcock films right now, The Birds had a lingering effect in me as a child, I saw it again recently, seeing Tippi Hedren in her prime and a younger Jessica Tandy, still a great scary classic even now.
Yes , yes, and yes. I used to read DM first thing in the morning. Got my morning dose of snark from the comments. But I too grew tired of the constant stream of Harkle puff pieces sprinkled with a few "possibly true" articles. So I quit reading the DM for about 8 weeks now.
People magazine. I read it as a young woman, thought it was the greatest thing on earth. Then I grew up, but People didn't.
@Nutty
So sorry your morning breakfast consists of deleting the rantings of one or two BSC posters. I do hope they go away or you can figure out a way to stop them. Their threats to others are concerning.
"We always were English and we always will be English and it's just because we ARE English that were're sticking up for our right to be Burgundians."
'Twas she who first taught the great Elizabeth David to cook I believe.
Yes, JH was the greatest Miss Marple, IMO
Agree. I skim, look at pictures and seldom click on anything. The video playbox in the right hand corner is so annoying. And it has to be closed each time you click on a story. For that reason alone I seldom read the stories anymore.
The over-the-top preacher, the gospel choir, etc. may have been Megs way of reminding the BRF that accusations of racism would offend a large, vocal, and vital group of people whose goodwill the Monarchy needs. Not the Americans so much, but the Commonwealth countries whose POC would be offended.
Why would she risk that when Megs, at that point, could have been seen as a pushy, sketchy American with grandiose airs, but her really vicious intent was probably not clear until later. They may have hoped for a quick, painful marriage that would be over with little damage. They are probably reeling from the depths of her corruption, and Harry's compliance.
It's seems like it's been going on forever now, doesn't it?
@KCM1212 - yes I think you're right about Margaret Rutherford and the Oscar. It was really a cameo but it made the film.
@Raspberry Ruffle - I watched North by Northwest last week and was blown away by how seductive the scene was in the dining car. I could watch Cary Grant forever. I'm always trying to work out how he could be THAT immaculate. Imagine what he'd think of Harry! I read Cary Grant was still wearing shirts he bought in the 1930s in the late 1970s. From Jermyn Street in London. Exquisite workmanship of course.
@WBBM - I'm off to watch Passport to Pimlico now! We really haven't changed.
I know we're veering OT today but it soothes our ruffled feathers.
Agree about the video play box. Haven't found an article recently worth putting up with that to read.
I think Markle was using the preacher as a way to remind everyone she was black and they had better play nice or the race card would be pulled out. Notice how Markle is only black when she needs to be.
Sometimes the video box causes my computer to freeze. Especially if there's something else on the main DM page that's also playing. Then you realize 99% of the stories are lacking in any truth or real interest and you think why am I putting myself through this? I use to really enough the DM. No longer.
Earlier this week there was the tragic news of a baby boy who had died in what was thought to be a COVID-19-related disease. Near the tip of that article, next to the photos of that beautiful baby boy and his loving parents, was a trashy grinning closeup of Gemma Collins in the Newzit box. On every article that day. I uninstalled the app and haven't gone back.
The over the top preacher was by personal invite by no other than The
Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, he admitted it was him as part of a royal documentary. I was as surprised as anyone could be, most think it was Meghan it even Prince Charles. :o/
I think Markle was using the preacher as a way to remind everyone she was black and they had better play nice or the race card would be pulled out. Notice how Markle is only black when she needs to be.
This was also Megs' way of saying that proggy Harry and Megs, their mission is to modernize The Monarchy. To bring the old stiffs up to date in the new multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural Great Britain.
A reader in the Telegraph housing column, who had signed a contract to buy a house before the lockdown, asked if he could reduce what he was willing to pay by £40K now. One of the answers was 'Yes you can if you can live with yourself'.
The last time we moved was nearly 40 years ago. I still can't believe that our move has coincided with the biggest pandemic for a century.
"The photo was real but the brightness, colors, shadows, etc were altered from the original version."
I agree the colors in the published photo were altered as they looked too-saturated to me. But the proportions look off too. Maybe it was just a bad composition. And maybe the back leg of Kate's chair was hidden although I can't quite figure out how. (Was Will's leg somehow slid under her chair?) But I can't figure out how the clock figure seems to be caressing Jane Fellowes' neck. The mirror isn't reflecting what it should be either. It's not just that a distracting reflection has been removed, it's that there is at least one thing there that looks to be in the wrong place-- the reflection of what seems to be the back of Sarah's hat.
Even the exact setting seems odd for a professional photo. I know the castle is very old. No doubt beautiful but imperfect handcrafted elements abound. But the wonky out-of-plumb mirror/doorway reflections remind me of a fun house. Just odd to have that as one of the central elements. Reminds me more of blooper photos I've taken where I've not noticed weird background elements.
-------
@Raspberry Ruffle wrote
"The over the top preacher was by personal invite by no other than The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, he admitted it..."
I remember hearing that although the BBC reported he was Harry and Meghan's choice. (Of course, the BBC also said people "appeared transfixed." Not what I would call it.)
https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-44180777
But I've also read M wanted the Dalai Lama. If she did or if she considered inviting the "spiritual director" of Doria's church, a church M attended when young (The Agape International Spiritual Center) then Rev. Curry would have been a conservative choice. As the presiding bishop of the US Episcopal Church he was at least acceptable on paper.
“To do what our buyers have done, after signing the contract, is called gazundering and is certainly not an ethical way to behave.”
I learned a new word today—“gazundering”—but am so sorry to hear you are a real life victim of it. It is despicable of the buyer. I agree with Snippy’s advice to “lawyer up”. Good luck!
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a32625832/meghan-markle-prince-harry-anniversary-gift-ring/
It's increasingly obvious the BRF insisted on TOO MUCH privacy for their liking. They really want to be in our newsfeeds on an almost daily basis no matter how trite and trivial. They really are made for a Kardashian-style TV show or Big Brother.
I only saw the first Big Brother series, years ago, but it would work really well... Camera shot on a huddled shape under the duvet. Afternoon sunshine filtering through the curtains. Narrator: "While Harry's still in bed, Meghan's in the kitchen trying to work out how to roast a chicken."
Re: the OTT preacher,
Although ole Justin Welby admitted to inviting him, I wouldn’t put it past Megsy to have asked or at least colluded with him. He’s a big fan of hers let’s not forget. I think most Brits were mesmerised by Bishop Curry, but not in a good way, lol I was mortified and embarrassed, I wanted to hide behind the sofa, when he rambled on and on about everything under the sun! Lol Did Megsy invite the Gospel Choir, or was that Charles’ idea? I can’t remember now, it’s a wedding I want to forget! ��
It’s much fairer and you know you’re locked in and safe, the English system is truly pants. :o( I’ve moved 7 times, and too many have been a living Hell at the time, 3 included big moves across several counties too.
I still can't get over the Harkle wedding being on the same date as the execution of Anne Boleyn. In the chapel where Henry VIII is buried. Another raven-haired woman arriving from left-field to sow chaos in the monarchy and infuriate the people. I used to admire Anne Boleyn, but now I'm older I'm more sympathetic to Catherine of Aragon. Although you can't get around the need for a male heir. It's a conundrum even now. No wonder so many are still absorbed in that period. If I could go back in time though, the one thing I'd want to do is tell Henry VIII about Elizabeth I. Even better, tell Anne Boleyn. What a perfect revenge, to have given birth to the most famous sovereign we ever had. A woman!
The `Offers-over' and `sealed bids' mean you're making an offer completely in the dark.
Also, my bro=in-law said he'd had a survey done on each of 5 houses before making an offer, only to be outbid each time.
Five lots of survey fees wasted. Bro -in-law keeps a very keep eye and extremely tight rein on the bawbees - it must have hurt like crazy.
(Caution: racial stereotyping) Bro-in-law and wife invited one of our friends up to stay, as she'd never been to Scotland. When she returned, she said `I hope you don't mind me saying this, but your brother is the sort that gets Scotsmen a bad name'.
We roared with laughter `So you noticed?' we cried `He's an out and out cheapskate. Only comes to see us when he can claim it on expenses.'
Never pays for parking - when he had the `firm's car' I think he'd tell the authorities, as a Director, that there was no knowing which salesman was driving when it attracted the fine. Ditto for speeding. He gloated when his wife qualified for a Disability Blue Badge.
I'm delighted to be able to say that my husband's the complete opposite.
As for buying and selling houses, an estate agent told me that he thought the process brought out either the best or the worst in people, nothing in between.
I recorded the wedding. I was able to go back and look at the faces. Yes of Zara ! Lol William, Catherine and Beatrice struggled not to laugh. I remember Megsy’s expression full of smugness and like the cat who got the cream (sour cream though, because Harry is no catch IMHO). The Queen’s expression didn’t flinch from that one look, she never smiled, unlike all the other weddings we’ve witnessed over the years.
No respect or regard shown for history or past protocols. Overall, I couldn’t believe what I was watching it wasn’t by any means a typical royal wedding, not even a British one. At least we were spared one small mercy, no clapping at the end which after seeing the lively Bishop, I was half expecting. ;o)
"Did Megsy invite the Gospel Choir, or was that Charles’ idea? I can’t remember now, it’s a wedding I want to forget!"
Pretty much me too! I think I've read Charles suggested the choir. Of course, no telling what other ideas H&M might have had that could have been worse. And honestly, I didn't think the choir was so bad--- a bit of an odd choice for a bride who had described herself as Caucasian but ok. What was weird to me was having them do Stand by Me.
Loved the music at Eugenie's wedding though.
We decided long ago that were we to move again, we'd sell first and then rent, putting our stuff into storage, rather than be messed about by dodgy purchasers.
Wikipedia suggests 2 possible derivations for the word `gazumping' - but the opposite `gazundering' also refers to a chamber pot, something that gazunder the bed.
Just about sums it up, doesn't it?
latke707@outlook.com --- Is where Nutty can contact me if she is so inclined (I will re-post this in her next thread too)
I have registered and set up a free wordpress blog for her to test drive and move there at any time she is so inclined. Wordpress blog allows her to block abusers- disruptors such as our resident loony toon CatsEye and disruptors who like to operate by using the name unknown.
Of course this blog also gets unknowns who are honest and are not disruptors
Nutty -- I will send you the user name and password // Anytime- I will transfer it over to you completely.
May 21, 2020 at 2:55 PM
@xxxx
Oh please do set up a new blog for Nutty since she will be needing it I think. WordPress is not owned by Google so she can use your escape plan. I think she should take your suggestion and 'cut and run' maybe!!!! LOL
Not just the Commonwealth but the threat to Britain's internal stability could have been considerable.
This is a list of riots where race and allegations of discrimination have been contributory factors, also those where white nationalists have met resistance to their demonstrations:
(taken from wikipedia)
In London:
1958: Notting Hill race riots between White British and West Indian immigrants.
1974: Red Lion Square disorders happened following a march by counter-fascists against the National Front.
1976: Riots during the Notting Hill Carnival.
1977: The Battle of Lewisham occurred when the Metropolitan Police attempted to facilitate a march by the National Front[10]
1979: Southall riots during an Anti-Nazi League demonstration in opposition to the National Front.
1981: Brixton riot against the Metropolitan Police. Especially on 10 July, rioting extended to other parts of London and numerous other cities around the UK
1985: Brixton riot against the Metropolitan Police after they shot the mother of suspect Michael Groce
1985: Broadwater Farm riot, residents of Tottenham riot against the Metropolitan Police following a death during a police search
1995: 1995 Brixton riot against the Metropolitan Police occurred after a death in police custody
.
2011: England riots, initially in London, following the police shooting of Mark Duggan in Tottenham
2017: Forest Gate n following the Death of Edson Da Costa.
In Liverpool: Toxteth (1981)
Bristol: -St Pauls (1980)
These riots are chiefly ones involving the Afro-Caribbean community.
Then there are those in areas with populations of Pakistani/ Bangladeshi origin:
Bradford (1995 & 2001)
Oldham (2001)
Need I go on?
Did she want the Pope and Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople as well?
That's a good one!!
However, being a Catholic, I think the Pope would have to perform an Exorcism on MM first before the wedding!
re exorcism - my goodness yes! Incense, crucifix and probably garlic as well. With bell, book and candle at the ready for excommunication.
That is interesting! That Welby is, erm, unusual.
@AvaC
That is the loudest trick I have ever heard of. Especially now! I hope they never have a good night's sleep there.
And who knew gazundering was a word? The first time I saw it on here, I thought it was some creative cussin'.
@WBBM
I had no idea that there were any recent issues (I shouldn't have assumed). The UK seems so well integrated compared to the US. Sigh.
And it's too bad Anton LeVay is dead. The Church of Satan would have loved that gig.
Wow. That was pretty mean, even for me! But I'm leaving it. Lol
@Sarcastic Bimbo
>>>In short, Hikari, I think that if you had the connections to go into gossip writing, you'd be one of the best there ever was. I think that anyone who you turned your attention to would both respect and fear you, but would be secretly be dying to get into your column/show/blog.
Just call me Luella! ROFL.
I do enjoy my gossip hobby but my connections are zero. I am often encouraged to write something for publication besides here. Dissecting Meg is a fun albeit frustrating way to pass the time but I aspire to writing columns on a more meaningful subject one day. Not sure what, but thank you for your kind words. :)
Overall I believe we are, in no way are we comparable to America, you don’t hear of issues monthly, let alone daily. Certain areas have trouble spots and a history of them (as you can see from the info WBBM has stated), but it’s not like that everywhere.
This is way off topic and controversial, so I’m leaving the topic here. :o)
>>What I find most odd about this was that she was staying with Harry but he did not make a car available to take her to a salon (or to go shopping or buy flowers as she was papped doing that and walking back to KP as well). Was Harry too mean, did he have another reason for not making a car available, or did she insist on walking and/or using taxis so that she could get papped (i.e. she would have control)? If she was his formal partner, living with him, I find it odd that she was walking/calling taxis. Even if he would not pay, as a supposedly wealthy woman could she not hire a car and driver for the day?<<
The exhausting thing about the Harkles is that we can never really be 100% sure what they are up to. So much effort/deception/planted stories/fake pictures, etc. are employed to obfuscate things which should be straightforward and easily verifiable, such as where they are living and if they had a baby on a certain date, and where. But Meg creates drama around even the most minor events, like what she wore for a charity photo or if she has an invitation to guest-edit a magazine, yes or no. This constant guesswork and drama and keeping everyone on the back foot is like nectar to Narcs. Meg has no legitimate skills or projects to offer, so her only alternative to maintaining interest in her is to whip up a constant air of mystery . . What will Meg do next? Whatever it is, it's a SURPRISE and it is going to save the world!
Then they crash a Zoom meeting or put up a really half-assed video word salad about nothing and that is their big surprise.
This was evident from the very earliest days of the Harkle Debacle. As you point out above, her behavior was exceedingly odd for a very serious love interest of Harry's who was confident in a proposal, presumably the reason she upped sticks in Canada and moved to London. We all assumed back that that the besotted Haz, certain he'd found the companion of his future life had invited her .. begged her even, to fold up her life in North America and join him at NottCott. We had no reason to doubt that narrative back then.
But we've learned since how Meg loves to gate-crash things. She is determined to get in where she wants to be, regardless of whether anyone wants her there. She knows that if she followed normal manners and requested an invitation, she'd be turned down. Often she will try the tactic of having stories printed about the wonderful invitations she has received in order to bully the intended giver into capitulating. When she does not get a response, she shows up in inappropriate clothing and bulldozes her way in anyway. Given this pattern, serious doubt is cast upon Meg's story that Harry invited her to move in with him at Kensington, that she ever darkened the threshold of NottCott for any length of time or that there was ever a bended knee proposal over a chicken dinner. I call it all bollocks.
Multiple sources have indicated that she was most likely staying at Soho Farmhouse in the run-up to the nuptials. Seems like she was well and truly not welcome at Kensington, whether by royal degree or because Harry did not want her there. The Prince Charles story seemed credible to me, since, while he does not reside at KP, he might have been there for a family event, to visit William and the children and Meg was there in the company of Harry. I had read this incident as occurring a year before the engagement--in the late fall of 2016 when she was visiting Harry, making it seem a possible reason for the breakup which followed on the heels a month or so later. I had also assumed that these alleged photos she was trying to get would have been from inside the palace, in private rooms, and not just outside on the grounds. Were Charles physically present when he witnessed some larceny like that occurring, he certainly would have the authority to put a stop to it . . who else there is going to outrank him?
But you are probably right that this was a game of Chinese Whispers. A game very easy for Megs to get started because everything she does is so shifty.
Two and a half years on from the engagement, and we are still collectively scratching our heads over how it all happened. How do we get from Harry's face at Invictus in September to the patio at Frogmore House a scant two months later? It doesn't compute. If Harry had genuinely been happy and misled in the happiness, I could understand it . . but his family tried to pay her a big packet of money to Go Away. Whose idea was that? Then, at the 11th hour, Markle forces through a sham wedding. Harry looks throughout like he's waiting to be shot. Was it marriage in general he was so frightened of, or was it *her*? If we take the most cynical view of the Harkle marriage, and I think I am in that camp . . the entire relationship was fabricated. How does a man walk down the aisle with a woman who he has barred from his house, if that was the case? Why were they sleeping in separate rooms and having blazing rows in their fifth month of marriage and newly expectant parents while for public consumption they traipsed all over Sydney plastered on each other?
I am beginning to believe that Meghan is a hypnotist and Harry is so susceptible to suggestion that he is propelled through Meg's narrative without conscious consent. Sometimes the robot mask slips and you glimpse the drowning, miserable man on Meg's arm.
One last wonderment . .
The staged papp posing at the beauty shop prior to the engagement is the sole time, apart from one other time when Meg had the patrons of a shop chased out so she could go in by herself (so the legend runs) . .that we heard of Meg doing a normal activity in London like shopping. The Duchess of Cambridge is snapped all the time out and about . . visiting Waitrose, buying books, doing the school run. One would suppose the security risk/detail for the future Queen Consort is a lot heftier than for Harry's wife, but Catherine still gets out and does things which are not official engagements. Apart from official engagements or what passed for them with Meg, or her orchestrated PR shots which are so obvious and so poorly executed . . we have *never* had a shot of Meghan hitting the shops, buying a coffee, visiting one of the many museums in London, or walking in Kensington Park as Kate is often photographed doing. Kate visits fun fairs with her kids. Meghan totes a plastic baby around at the polo. There were those clandestine shots of Meg meeting with some mystery woman in an apothecary shop, leading to speculation that this may have been the surrogate. More likely her drug dealer, but whatever. In two years of London residency Meg was *never* seen doing anything casual or social, either with other royals or by herself. No jaunts to Fortnum & Mason with Sophie Wessex for Megsie. For a gal who loves to shop as much as she does, and to garner attention for wherever she goes, isn't that odd? It was kind of like she was on house arrest between 'work' appearances.
Holly, MustySyphone and any others unhappy with the video always playing
If you have Chrome (or it may be available in other formats) google
Video Autoplay Blocker Robert Sulkowski
If you want to see a video, there is a spot on the screen which says play video. If they have a ad, you still have to watch the ad and then press the watch video spot again to see the video ...
I have a technical question. On a couple of Nutty’s threads (one over a month ago, and the latest one posted on 21/5/2020) I am unable to write a comment because the page is scrolling frantically (very rapidly) up and down, and only half of the page is visible. I use an iPad Pro and keep the software up to date, so I am assuming the issue must be at Nutty’s end?
If anyone reads this and has some advice on how to fix the issue, I’d appreciate it.
Thanks!
Dr.OBODO The binding love spell you suggested worked perfectly. She was really thinking about this other guy and it was obvious to everyone except her. My heart ached horribly. It was almost a month after you cast the spell when she finally saw him for what he was, a slimy man whore that cared about nothing but his own personal needs but your spell.We are back on track now and totally focused on one another.contact DR.OBODO @ templeofanswer@hotmail . co . uk or all him +(234)8155425481