Skip to main content

New post to discuss the Sussex saga

 So much going on in the world of the Sussexes!  Removal of patronages, upcoming interview with Oprah, and Prince Philip's admission to hospital. Here's a new post to discuss.

Comments

Nutty Flavor said…
New post: What Oprah will ask the Sussexes - and what I would ask them
AnT said…
Thank you everyone for you kind words, trying to lighten the mood a bit as we worry about Prince Philip and gnash our teeth at the bride of Hackula.

But I get equally excited whenever I see fresh posts by all of you. We give so much fun and richness to one another as we parse this mystery from all angles and perspectives. The brilliance here has made workdays and churning computers and lockdown and rough days survivable, at least for me.

This board is a wonderful place to snark, debate, learn and share findings.

Huge thanks to Nutty and charade and abbyh for making it possible. We are like a big platoon inching ever closer to VE Day 2.
jessica said…
Wow, Harry’s friend speaking out against him.

Maybe this is their new strategy. He won’t listen to anyone. Maybe he will listen to his friends in the press. Nothing more humiliating, honestly.
lizzie said…
@Puds,

Thanks for the link. That article was published when he was 3rd in line for the throne too. Really dumb, Harry.
Acquitaine said…
@AnTsaid....

"the Queen herself on the last day of 2012 issued Letters Patent that allowed all children of the Prince of Wales to be titled Prince or Princess, and be styled HRH — not just the eldest son. So I guess Harry has only been rolling in HRH clover for 8 years?"

Why do you think Harry has only been HRH for 8yrs?

As the son of PoW he has been HRH from birth as per Letters patent 1917..

The amendment in 2012 was about William's children.

If not for this amendment in 2012, only George would have been automatically HRH Prince while Charlotte, Louis and any other children would be Lord / Lady.
Acquitaine said…
@LavenderLady said.....

"To me, much of the speculation everyone does on all the Harry and Meghan sites are fanfiction. That's a big part of the fun!

Since we really don't know 100% what is really going on..."

True, but there are somethings that can be predicted accurately based upon historic behaviour and patterns without needing to go so wildly off the reservation.

As an example, it's easy to predict Harry and Meghan's behaviour gping forward after what has been revealed in the past 2yrs. It wasn't easy to do the same 4yrs ago.

With rare exceptions of course.

We are surprised by Harry's behaviour now because he had a huge royal PR nachine determined to obsfucate and create a false image.

And yet, his true character leaked out from time to time. Eg there is a famous article from 2005 that discusses his behaviour around the Nazi incident and general attitude.

@AnT has just posted his rather rude 2013 interview about the media and loose lipped comments about the Army.

When he quit tye army in 2015, a military journalist wrote an article, largely ignored, about his poor Army discipline and behaviour that had forced his resignation as the army stopped putting up with his nonsense.

Then there is his interview in 2016 in which he displayed so many bad traits, but is best described as Harry thinks he is a literal magical Prince ie 'magical' being the operative word.

What about a quickly forgotten article from last year in which the father of a friend admitted that friendship with Harry was a one sided affair where any friends were at his beck and call as he wished, but it was never reciprocated and they were all required to entertain him at tgeir own expense rather like a medieval monarch.

When you read all these and more, you see that his current behaviour isn't really an aberration. He simply doesn't have the PR to obsfucate as they did before.

LavenderLady said…
@Acquitaine,
Speculation and truth are apples and oranges.

Stating facts is good but so is speculating for fun.
Oldest Older 201 – 207 of 207

Popular posts from this blog

Gosh It Is Quiet In Here

 There just hasn't been a lot from really either of them together or individually lately, has there? But why? Have they blown all their bridges, connections and are down to toss the proverbial kitchen sink for attention? I don't know.  We've heard that moving vans showed up at the house.  And nothing more like pictures from a neighbor happy to see the back of them. We've heard they bought a house on Portugal.   But the wording was kind of funny.  Multiple sources of the same thing - yes but that isn't a guarantee of proof as it could all be from the same source.  It was more along the lines of "We've been told that...".  It came off as a we really don't know if we believe this to be true or not so we are putting it out there but hedging our bets.  Or at least it did to me. And nothing more like exactly when, where or for how much or when they might visit it again.  Or pictures of the awesome inside.  Or outside.  Or requisite ...

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seein...

Will She or Won't She?

 I am talking about Catherine and Trooping the Color. It's barely over a week away and will she/won't she decision is leaning toward not in public media. The ceremony is almost three and a half hours beginning really at 10, parade starting 10:30 and flyover at 1.   That's a long time even if you are sitting.  Especially if you have not been out in public in a long time plus you have or feel you have to be the face of being the parent while your spouse is busy being officially second to His Majesty.  And He won't be on a horse this time (uproar over tradition). Yeah but, but ... what if she showed up for just part of it, like the flyover? OH, that would be heartwarming after worrying about her as she has been coping with her disease.   But ... eh, my guess is not.  Just because if she showed up, it would become the Catherine's back show instead of the celebration of the King's birthday.  And Catherine is known for being able to  be in the...