Skip to main content

New post to discuss the Sussex saga

 So much going on in the world of the Sussexes!  Removal of patronages, upcoming interview with Oprah, and Prince Philip's admission to hospital. Here's a new post to discuss.

Comments

Nutty Flavor said…
New post: What Oprah will ask the Sussexes - and what I would ask them
AnT said…
Thank you everyone for you kind words, trying to lighten the mood a bit as we worry about Prince Philip and gnash our teeth at the bride of Hackula.

But I get equally excited whenever I see fresh posts by all of you. We give so much fun and richness to one another as we parse this mystery from all angles and perspectives. The brilliance here has made workdays and churning computers and lockdown and rough days survivable, at least for me.

This board is a wonderful place to snark, debate, learn and share findings.

Huge thanks to Nutty and charade and abbyh for making it possible. We are like a big platoon inching ever closer to VE Day 2.
jessica said…
Wow, Harry’s friend speaking out against him.

Maybe this is their new strategy. He won’t listen to anyone. Maybe he will listen to his friends in the press. Nothing more humiliating, honestly.
lizzie said…
@Puds,

Thanks for the link. That article was published when he was 3rd in line for the throne too. Really dumb, Harry.
Acquitaine said…
@AnTsaid....

"the Queen herself on the last day of 2012 issued Letters Patent that allowed all children of the Prince of Wales to be titled Prince or Princess, and be styled HRH — not just the eldest son. So I guess Harry has only been rolling in HRH clover for 8 years?"

Why do you think Harry has only been HRH for 8yrs?

As the son of PoW he has been HRH from birth as per Letters patent 1917..

The amendment in 2012 was about William's children.

If not for this amendment in 2012, only George would have been automatically HRH Prince while Charlotte, Louis and any other children would be Lord / Lady.
Acquitaine said…
@LavenderLady said.....

"To me, much of the speculation everyone does on all the Harry and Meghan sites are fanfiction. That's a big part of the fun!

Since we really don't know 100% what is really going on..."

True, but there are somethings that can be predicted accurately based upon historic behaviour and patterns without needing to go so wildly off the reservation.

As an example, it's easy to predict Harry and Meghan's behaviour gping forward after what has been revealed in the past 2yrs. It wasn't easy to do the same 4yrs ago.

With rare exceptions of course.

We are surprised by Harry's behaviour now because he had a huge royal PR nachine determined to obsfucate and create a false image.

And yet, his true character leaked out from time to time. Eg there is a famous article from 2005 that discusses his behaviour around the Nazi incident and general attitude.

@AnT has just posted his rather rude 2013 interview about the media and loose lipped comments about the Army.

When he quit tye army in 2015, a military journalist wrote an article, largely ignored, about his poor Army discipline and behaviour that had forced his resignation as the army stopped putting up with his nonsense.

Then there is his interview in 2016 in which he displayed so many bad traits, but is best described as Harry thinks he is a literal magical Prince ie 'magical' being the operative word.

What about a quickly forgotten article from last year in which the father of a friend admitted that friendship with Harry was a one sided affair where any friends were at his beck and call as he wished, but it was never reciprocated and they were all required to entertain him at tgeir own expense rather like a medieval monarch.

When you read all these and more, you see that his current behaviour isn't really an aberration. He simply doesn't have the PR to obsfucate as they did before.

Anonymous said…
@Acquitaine,
Speculation and truth are apples and oranges.

Stating facts is good but so is speculating for fun.
Oldest Older 201 – 207 of 207

Popular posts from this blog

Cliff Hanger

Deadlines for responses have passed.  Will they show?  Won't they show?   And, rumors of demands for money to cross hands to make appearances (new level of pay to play). Such drama.  You would think this was a soap opera where every episode ends with a crazy cliff hanger story plot to drive the next installment.  Sadly, I don't expect it to change any time soon either.  No.  For them, there appears to be way too much energy left in the will they, won't they to end it now even though everyone else is pretty much tired of it.  Hardly something one can point to and claim that they are trying to reconcile with those who feel distressed about what was printed. Just noticed something: remember that talk of trying to reach out and reconcile after the book, etc.?  It seems to have drifted away, hasn't it?  Hmm.  Interesting.  I wonder if that is recognized as a total lost cause or just delayed into the summer (or fall) campaign (c...

Here comes Trevor

If you're a Beatles fan, you'll know that in the fifty years since the group went its separate ways, almost everyone involved with them has sold his or her story. Only one major figure has not: Jane Asher , who was Paul McCartney's girlfriend for five years during the heyday of the group, and accompanied him on the famous trip to India in 1968. An actress, Jane went on to become a TV personality and famous cake-baker. She has never spoken about her time with McCartney and dislikes being asked. Until recently, the Sussex saga had included a similar figure: Trevor Engelson, Meghan Markle's ex-husband.  Trevor has never spoken about Meg. But he has done well for himself: he married a wealthy woman , continues to work as a producer , and seems to have a loyal (and multi-racial!) circle of friends , unlike some people we know.  He appeared to have excused himself from the whole soggy mess.  Until yesterday, when he was papped. Driving his black Porsch...

But Really, Could they?

 Richard Eden has an interesting article in the DM which references an article in The Guardian about the necessity of the passport applications for the kids as including HRH and the last name of Sussex. Why?  Well supposedly this is all because they want to allow the kids to decide for themselves to become a working royal or continue to stay in private life. The main focus becomes how this bewilders the Palace considering how difficult the parents found it all and then left.  As well has his thoughts that this is about maintaining royal aura ("links" is his term) before ending with how a push for the daughter might be as the American Princess might be helpful to her mommy's business. What I wonder about is:  What or where did they get the idea that the kids would be welcomed into the fold and become working royal? I am not convinced that was ever an option once they stepped back. America doesn't do British history quite the same way or to the same detail.  Manne...