Skip to main content

New post to discuss the Sussex saga

 So much going on in the world of the Sussexes!  Removal of patronages, upcoming interview with Oprah, and Prince Philip's admission to hospital. Here's a new post to discuss.

Comments

Nutty Flavor said…
New post: What Oprah will ask the Sussexes - and what I would ask them
AnT said…
Thank you everyone for you kind words, trying to lighten the mood a bit as we worry about Prince Philip and gnash our teeth at the bride of Hackula.

But I get equally excited whenever I see fresh posts by all of you. We give so much fun and richness to one another as we parse this mystery from all angles and perspectives. The brilliance here has made workdays and churning computers and lockdown and rough days survivable, at least for me.

This board is a wonderful place to snark, debate, learn and share findings.

Huge thanks to Nutty and charade and abbyh for making it possible. We are like a big platoon inching ever closer to VE Day 2.
jessica said…
Wow, Harry’s friend speaking out against him.

Maybe this is their new strategy. He won’t listen to anyone. Maybe he will listen to his friends in the press. Nothing more humiliating, honestly.
lizzie said…
@Puds,

Thanks for the link. That article was published when he was 3rd in line for the throne too. Really dumb, Harry.
Acquitaine said…
@AnTsaid....

"the Queen herself on the last day of 2012 issued Letters Patent that allowed all children of the Prince of Wales to be titled Prince or Princess, and be styled HRH — not just the eldest son. So I guess Harry has only been rolling in HRH clover for 8 years?"

Why do you think Harry has only been HRH for 8yrs?

As the son of PoW he has been HRH from birth as per Letters patent 1917..

The amendment in 2012 was about William's children.

If not for this amendment in 2012, only George would have been automatically HRH Prince while Charlotte, Louis and any other children would be Lord / Lady.
Acquitaine said…
@LavenderLady said.....

"To me, much of the speculation everyone does on all the Harry and Meghan sites are fanfiction. That's a big part of the fun!

Since we really don't know 100% what is really going on..."

True, but there are somethings that can be predicted accurately based upon historic behaviour and patterns without needing to go so wildly off the reservation.

As an example, it's easy to predict Harry and Meghan's behaviour gping forward after what has been revealed in the past 2yrs. It wasn't easy to do the same 4yrs ago.

With rare exceptions of course.

We are surprised by Harry's behaviour now because he had a huge royal PR nachine determined to obsfucate and create a false image.

And yet, his true character leaked out from time to time. Eg there is a famous article from 2005 that discusses his behaviour around the Nazi incident and general attitude.

@AnT has just posted his rather rude 2013 interview about the media and loose lipped comments about the Army.

When he quit tye army in 2015, a military journalist wrote an article, largely ignored, about his poor Army discipline and behaviour that had forced his resignation as the army stopped putting up with his nonsense.

Then there is his interview in 2016 in which he displayed so many bad traits, but is best described as Harry thinks he is a literal magical Prince ie 'magical' being the operative word.

What about a quickly forgotten article from last year in which the father of a friend admitted that friendship with Harry was a one sided affair where any friends were at his beck and call as he wished, but it was never reciprocated and they were all required to entertain him at tgeir own expense rather like a medieval monarch.

When you read all these and more, you see that his current behaviour isn't really an aberration. He simply doesn't have the PR to obsfucate as they did before.

LavenderLady said…
@Acquitaine,
Speculation and truth are apples and oranges.

Stating facts is good but so is speculating for fun.
Oldest Older 201 – 207 of 207

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids