Skip to main content

Open Post: Keeping Up with Meghan & Harry

 Let's try this again...

Comments

Este said…
@Maneki Neko...Thanks for sharing the latest from Our Man, Piers. :) I guess he's playing Gayle to the RF and I'm here for it. The only people supporting The Markles are the Wokies, who don't give a toss about the truth. Everyone else can smell the stench of their lies and half truths, since refuted, a mile away.
Maneki Neko said…
'I've had some messages communicated to me on behalf on several members of the Royal Family,' Morgan said.

What a fantastic endorsement! A great slap in the face for Megalo. I hope she's hopping mad.



Pantsface said…
So what i have read on twitter, have to keep an open mind here as it may be tosh, Amazon planned a fund raiser for Invictus and it was quashed by the Harkles deal with Netflix, shame if true as could have got a lot of donations for the charity to help the people who truly matter - the vetrans
SirStinxAlot said…
@Constant Gardener...I did not mean to sound hostile or unsympathetic to your situation either. Just frustrated with the ghastly duos endless whine fest. This is not Red Lobster, throw the shrimp back already. They must be victims every week it seems like. Just grating my nerves considering so many people lost loved ones, jobs, homes, relationships, etc this past year and they blather on about Charles not dropping an infinite amount of $$$$ on those worthless grifters. I do hope your situation improves and anyone else who is suffering loss or frustration.
Este said…
@HappyDays:

"I think that due to Harry’s soiled reputation outside of the US, especially in the UK and Canada, which have both been crapped on by the Sussexes, the ratings won’t be that great."

100% agree here. Back in the day Diana could have gotten the press for something like this but she put in the time with the Firm and was a global and beloved celebrity, not a divisive figure of Wokeism like these 2. Even had Meghan put in the time, she couldn't replicate Diana's magic, tho over time, Diana's legacy has faded. I know I'm plum sick of the fame game and B/C/D list celebrities using charities to promote themselves. It was fresh when Diana did it. It's stale as Wonder loaf that's expired these days. The Delusional Duchess can crib all the notes from Diana's playbook and still never approach her success. They have nothing to sell but dirt on the RF and they dropped the payload with Oprah. And a year to think of something good and they are still cashing in on the RF.
@Pantsface, Thank you so much! I'm really sorry you've been having a hard time, too. I really appreciate people here and this community and the last thing I want to do is upset anyone.
Maneki Neko said…


MM Not faring well
American Nutties, can you confirm?

'MM is not faring well in all the tabloid news in US.

Latest headlines state: Harry and Meghan TV Lies exposed they were not abused they were not pushed out their only regret is losing royal status and privileges. Plus Mean Meghan targeted in palace bullying probe. Then there is MM pregnant trying to save marriage. Meghan’s Drug Secret exposed. Bombshell about sister she is hiding from Harry. Experts unmask Harry’s cruel and vindictive wife. Meghan’s secret psych analysis. Threatened sucide to get her own way. Wanted to destroy William and Kate. Not all is true, but interesting she is not suing. Interesting they are now coming out with all those headlines. Last year, you would of never seen such negative press about her.' (Skippy)

Pantsface said…
@ConstantGardene33 - I don't think you have upset anyone, it's tough for us all that are unemployed/at risk of unemployment and don't have a trust fund or Daddy to pick up the bills :) Things will get better, we have to believe that and they will, this is all just a blip, a big blip admittedly, but we will get through it x
Pantsface said…
@Maneki Neko - Blimey, that's a list!!
@SirStinxAlot, thank you for clarifying. I am so relieved! Sorry, my apologies for the confusion. Agree with you completely-those two could not be more out of touch and spoiled. So many have lost jobs, insurance, a roof over their heads, loved ones, health, futures, and so many still are losing those things. Neither of them have any idea of what it's really like, and their continued whining about how hard they have it...they deserve nothing they have and I look forward to watching them get their comeuppance.
I hope you get one of those jobs you've interviewed for!! Knock 'em dead!
@Maneki Neko, I read that as "MM not farting well". Hooo boy. One of those days!
Snarkyatherbest said…
ConstantGardener33 - I just spit out my iced tea!!! Thanks for putting a smile on my face. Hopefully the Markle reads here and she's spitting her oat milk slave latte in fury!
The R-hand photo of the pair on Angela Levin's Tweet suggests that, if it's a genuine pregnancy, the babe is elbowing for space just under the diaphragm, partly protected by the rib cage, in competition with HuMbug's spleen, stomach, liver lobes and transverse colon.

The idea that the uterus wanders about (making a woman hysterical in the ptocess) was disproved yonks ago and I wonder at the level of intellect of those who swear it's a genuine pregnancy.

Could she be so convinced she's `really' black that she chooses a black moonbump?
Maneki Neko said…
@ConstantGardener33

'not farting well'!! Thanks for the laugh:-)
https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/queen-stripping-honours-record-rate-172146274.html


Queen is stripping people of honours at record rate, investigation shows
Rebecca Taylor·Royal Correspondent


Mostly sex offenders, nothing to get excited about but is it significant that this has been published at this time?
JennS said…
Re the news about Harry and the Netflix doc of Invictus...is Harry still a patron of this organization?
I think I remember that he was not removed from Invictus as it is not directly related to the UK military but is a private group?? Can anyone confirm?
Regardless of whether he is still a formal patron or not, this news just emphasizes how they have nothing to offer other than their ties to royal matters.
Pantsface said…
@WBBM - is her second son included? - not that he's been charged of any crime to date
Animal Lover said…
Caitlyn Jenner is considering a run for Governor against Newsom in California. Meghan missed her change. Also Forbes declared Kim Kardashian is a billionaire today. If Americans can make that woman a billionaire there's no reason why M&H can't run their scams. In reading the British tabloids, I'm puzzled about Katie Price. What does that woman do?
Museumstop said…
@Pantsface

Pantene!!! buhahahhaha

I was trying to look-up that connection. I went to Invictus Games partners' page on their website.

https://invictusgamesfoundation.org/foundation/our-partners/

Safe to say, the Harkles will tap into some of these names here, perhaps have already.




Museumstop said…
@JennS

Re the news about Harry and the Netflix doc of Invictus...is Harry still a patron of this organization?

-----------------------------------------
Yes, in big font size. But notice he's just there by title not name, unlike others on the page, I wonder why that is. Bit odd. Is there a meaning to that?

The write-up under credits him with bringing the Games to London.

https://invictusgamesfoundation.org/foundation/governance/
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Acquitaine said…
@JennS said…
"Re the news about Harry and the Netflix doc of Invictus...is Harry still a patron of this organization?
I think I remember that he was not removed from Invictus as it is not directly related to the UK military but is a private group?? Can anyone confirm?"

It started life as a royal charity created to give Harry something to do. It had funding from the MoD and strong military ties.

Somewhere in time it became it's a foundation. Still has strong military ties and funding from military charities, but doesn't need a royal patron.

IMO, ELF is one of the trustees and perhaps he retains an affection for Harry and or Harry's usefulness to the organisation as patron.

It's funny because around 2016 / 2017 when Harry became involved with Meghan he gave an interview in which he said he didn't see his involvement with Invictus as a long term thing. Now he is firmly attached to it as if his life depends on it.
Fifi LaRue said…
Re: The Harkles putting their names on wine. They must have watched the Schitt's Creek episode where Johnny and Maura spend a day tasting cheap wine, and trying to pick out the one that was the least vile.

Markle has a cousin with a successful pot farm. They'd be better off putting their label on a cannabis mix.
Wolpertinger said…
OT just for fun, I came across this :-)
https://www.bookdepository.com/Kate-Meghan-Paper-Dolls-Eileen-Rudisill-Miller/9780486834276
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
JennS said…
**@Fifi
That is her half-brother's son - MM's nephew.
Remember when he came out with a special weed blend to celebrate the royal wedding?
It was supposed to be super strong...I'm sure Doria would have loved it!
I believe he called it the "Markle Sparkle"!
ROTFLOL!!!
Hikari said…
@Fifi

I can imagine how Meg & Harry’s cannabis blend would go over in BP.

Maybe the reality would be withheld from HM and PP.

“Well, Mummy, evidently Harry and Tungsten have added botanical supplements to the coffee line and it seems to be a nice little earner."

"How nice. One feels that a Bombay Sapphire is calling, don't you?"

Sussex Sparkle: get Royally lit up
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Oh Floof said…
I was reading an American news article on the BRF’s diversity inquiry, and to no surprise, many of the comments were anti-monarchy and anti-royalty. But the article posed a glaringly unanswered question, what about the diversity practices of other royal families? After a little digging, I discovered the Malaysian royal family is the most likely to marry outside of their cultural group. But Japan, Swaziland, Bhutan, Lesotho, Tonga, Qatar, Thailand...these royal families have married almost exclusively within their own cultural groups. So why don’t they get accused of racism? Well, we know why, but it is an interesting counter point the next time someone brings up the diversity of the BRF.
Acquitaine said…
@JennS: why is Netflix and or Quibi interested in the Harkles?

Subscribers.

The Harkles are signed for their ability to put spotlight on the service and therefore attract new subscribers to the platform. Netflix and or quibi have the deep money pockets to throw them a bone to absorb the vanity projects they produce.

The Harkles will always remain a vanity signing until Netflix decides they aren't worth keeping on the books.

Spotify have already publicly admitted that they are a vanity signing specifically to advertise that platform. So far they are happy enough with how the signing is going that they included it in their recent quarterly report. They didn't sign them up for podcasts despite everyone pretending they did.
Fifi LaRue said…
@JennS: Thanks, I forgot about that. Too bad for Markle that she kicked her entire family to the curb. She lost out on some real endorsements that could have netted her some $$$.

@Hikari: LOL!
JennS said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
KCM1212 said…

I recommend a stiff drink or an airsickness bag for this one. Meghan is trying to drum up a baby shower that people may "mistake for the Oscars!"

https://www.theroyalobserver.com/p/meghan-markle-planning-massive-baby-shower-hollywood-friends

From The Royal Observer:

Part One

EXCLUSIVE: MEGHAN MARKLE IS PLANNING A 'MASSIVE' BABY SHOWER WITH HER 'HOLLYWOOD FRIENDS' NOW THAT SHE'S 'OFFICIALLY OUT OF THE ROYAL FAMILY,' INSIDER REVEALS

When Meghan Markle was expecting son Archie in 2019, she flew to New York for a $300,000 A-List baby shower at the Mark Hotel, hosted by Serena Williams, Amal Clooney and pal Jessica Mulroney. However, that was just a small get together compared to the shower she is planning for her baby girl, an insider reveals.

“Meghan was still trying to play by the royal rules when she had her first baby shower in New York. Now she is officially out of the family and can do whatever she wants, which includes having a massive celebration,” a source exclusively tells The Royal Observer. “Expect Oprah [Winfrey] and Gayle [King] to be involved, along with Tyler Perry and all the pair's new Hollywood friends. This is going to feel more like the Oscars than a baby shower.”

There is even talk about family and friends around the world being able to Zoom in, like they did for Archie’s first birthday.
KCM1212 said…
Part Two

“The Queen will be very welcome if she wants to jump on Zoom,” adds an insider. “Baby showers are much more American than British, but the Queen certainly is aware of them after all the backlash and headlines that followed Meghan’s first in New
York."

According to the source, the invite is eco-friendly and gender neutral, despite the couple revealing that they are having a little girl.

While chatting with Winfrey in an interview that aired on March 7, the duo gushed about adding a new member to their brood.

“A girl, you know, what more can you ask for? But now, you know, now we’ve got our family. We’ve got, you know, the four of us and our two dogs, and it’s great," Prince Harry, 36, said.

It was recently revealed that the pair are planning on having a home birth in their Montecito, Calif., home. "It’s a beautiful setting to give birth to her baby girl," the insider dished.
After the former actress, 39, and Harry welcome their baby girl into the world, the two "will both take some proper time off," a friend of the couple shared.

"It will be the summer and they want to make sure they both take their leave so they have some real quality time together once the baby arrives," the insider added.

End

Its really kind of pathetic, isnt it? We all know she is tge "insider".

@JennS
Love the new Avi!! You have some serious skills!


YankeeDoodle said…
To @Ava C and all Georgette Geyer fans ( if you are not a fan already, you will be, especially “Sylvester” which is a take on Jane Austen).

My great-great great(?) uncle on my maternal side was a friend turned bodyguard to Empress Elisabeth of Austria. He had stopped two attempted assassinations on her life. He received many awards for his heroics. He was walking several yards behind her when an Italian anarchist finally killed her in 1898. My uncle and aunt were childless, so the rewards of diamond jewelry and medals were dispersed with his nieces, nephews, et al. I have a pair of diamond earrings that was given to my great whatever wife.

Georgette Heyer wrote ‘Envious Cascade’ around - well, not to give the plot away, but throughout the Heyer mystery book were references to Elisabeth and her biography gone missing. It is my family!

Ian's Girl said…
This Heyer fangurl is majorly impressed and...well.... envious, @YankeeDoodle! And don't you just hate autocorrect?!
Hikari said…
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/amp36037574/princess-eugenie-spring-easter-instagram-2021/

Nutties, you will appreciate this. Princess Eugenie posted a special family photo to mark Easter on her Instagram. Have a look. We mustn’t assume that the royal family isn’t finding ways to have a bit of fun with the current debacle. The Suxxits are being mocked, my friends, and it is glorious.
YankeeDoodle said…
@Ian’s Girl,

Yes, autocorrect can be annoying. It is Casca, too.
abbyh said…
Hikari - great (and funny) photo. Living well is the best (and having fun while you are doing it makes it better).
SirStinxAlot said…
Massive baby shower??? They must really be poor. Most families I know only have a shower for the first, they keep the hand me downs for the second. Unless the babies are born super far apart. Maybe its just us poor folks. Also, arent there still Covid restrictions in CA? They will still have to document all the gifts and claim them on taxes. Just one more example of Sussexs tone def and desperate for hand outs.

BTW, is it normal to plan your own baby shower?
JHanoi said…
baby shower - i think this is a fake report.....but keeps them in the headlines

but if it isn’t, i agree, typically in the US baby showers are for the first baby and the second / future babies get to use the hand me down car seat, crib, etc. but the Harkles are rich folks with nouveau rich friends so their flaunting their wealth standards are different than the rest of us plebs.
secondly, the article states it will be a Zoom shower too so friends ans family can attend. UH, wat family? MM has none except Dorai and JH immediate family havn’t been speaking to him, reports indicate the entire BRF hasn’t spoke to him. again, What family?

Third and most important - baby showers are thrown by Friends and / or Family for the expectant mom. The mom does’t throw her baby shower, thats seen as super tacky ( but MM is tacky). And as I already said , What family? and Baby Showers are an American thing not a Brit thing, so I doubt the BRF are ‘throwing it’.

I think this is another lame SS planted story meants to bring sympathy, attention, press, and but actually makes the Harkles look very foolish.
SwampWoman said…
Blogger SirStinxAlot said...
Massive baby shower??? They must really be poor. Most families I know only have a shower for the first, they keep the hand me downs for the second. Unless the babies are born super far apart. Maybe its just us poor folks. Also, arent there still Covid restrictions in CA? They will still have to document all the gifts and claim them on taxes. Just one more example of Sussexs tone def and desperate for hand outs.

BTW, is it normal to plan your own baby shower?


Didn't she give the hand-me downs to the women in Africa (which I thought was extremely gauche)? We all know that any baby accoutrements were never used...

I wouldn't give that witch (and we all know how I spell it) anything considering that she apparently just tossed the expensive baby swag in the trash.

I have *never* heard of anybody soliciting baby items via press release before.

“Meghan was still trying to play by the royal rules when she had her first baby shower in New York. Now she is officially out of the family and can do whatever she wants, which includes having a massive celebration,” a source exclusively tells The Royal Observer. “Expect Oprah [Winfrey] and Gayle [King] to be involved, along with Tyler Perry and all the pair's new Hollywood friends. This is going to feel more like the Oscars than a baby shower.”


Oh, I see. Her first baby shower was a paltry mere $300,000 event. What a bunch of LOSERS. Now people with REAL money are going to be showering gifts on her, er, I mean, baby. All her new Hollywood friends will throw a more Oscars than a baby shower party? I'm divided as to whether she is going to be crashing Oscar parties or didn't get invited to anything and she MAD.
SirStinxAlot said…
I feel like the baby shower story is just another "Look at Me" solicitation. Just like her Kate is throwing her a baby shower, Queen making her a birthday cake, Big bash last year over margaritas in Montecito. Nothing happened, they stayed home and H cooked dinner. No Oscar's baby shower, nada. They have burnt so many bridges. The Alisters she really wants aren't biting. Remember the stories Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Aniston fighting over who her best friend will be???
SwampWoman said…
JHanoi said: Third and most important - baby showers are thrown by Friends and / or Family for the expectant mom. The mom does’t throw her baby shower, thats seen as super tacky ( but MM is tacky). And as I already said , What family? and Baby Showers are an American thing not a Brit thing, so I doubt the BRF are ‘throwing it’.


Yes, a BFF, a sister-in-law, friends from work, THAT is who throws baby showers. That is, if she actually had any of those things that were on speaking terms with her.
punkinseed said…
Old tradition is the moms auntie does the baby shower. Never ever the mom herself. That is very tacky.
JHanoi said…
And lastly, why would MM want a huge Spectacle for a Baby shower?
Shes already had a 300,000 dollar spectacle in NYC the first time around.....and now she wants a second Spectacle for her second baby?

I thought she didnt like Spectacles !!!

Didnt she prove her dislike of Spectacles with her 2nd wedding overnthe top 30 million dollar wedding with all the accouturemenys personally choosen or approved by her with the exception of the tiara? Her mile wide smile that day was proof for the world!

Didnt she also show her disdain of Spectacles when she and her husband did an Oprah interview that was viwed globally by millions?

She hates Spectacles!
Oldest Older 1001 – 1049 of 1049

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids