Their MO has always been one offs or hit and run type flashy photo ops and then crickets into the night style. That we know.
But they seem to be having longer and longer time periods between these PR moments. Is this because they are finding less and less organizations willing to take the little offered by them? Or is it that they are working behind the scenes to pull together something for their commitments to Netflix or Spotify as in their backs are up against the wall contractually?
And what about the idea of people being paid by Sunshine? Is it a bunt to deceive or could it be real? Or a little of both? If is it not real, is there a way they could use it to swing people to their version of their truth without long term fallout?
Comments
They must have received some sort of money from somewhere.
Markled!
I came here to say the same thing. We can only hope that Penguin Random House is next.
In other words, Markle and her friends at Ethic Investments, Netflix, etc as well as the Oprahs of the USA did not want to pay for it.
As we know, Markle's companies are registered in Delaware, where companies that conduct business outside of Delaware don't pay corporate taxes. Together with her various "charities" and corporations, I doubt that she pays anything near her fair share.
She wants social programs only if other people subsidize them. Her letter writing campaign would have been more believable had she expressed a personal willingness to pay more taxes in order to subsidize the program.
yes, you are right. She wants other people to pay, always.
I think she thought that the family leave thing would pass, and that she could hitch her name to it, the way she did the Procter and Gamble commercial when she was young. P&G were going to change the commercial anyway, but she managed to make it look like she made them do it.
Instead, all that people will remember is her ridiculous sob story about Sizzler.
this is the report about the so called hate Twitter account spewing hate and racism about *
I see a few accounts that I used to follow when I was on twitter, like the Toadours, and kylieer, scammingduchess, but no Yankee Wally.
They also have examples of 'hate tweets" but judge for yourself if you think they are hate or just the truth. Things like "she said she was too light for the black community" etc. Not hate at all.
And yet, this report is going to be used forever to try to make her look like a victim.
In other words, any questioning of her behaviour was labeled "hate".
However, I don't know whether this will help her much. It was one thing to claim that the British press and Royal Family was mean to her as an excuse to leave the UK. Now that she's left the UK, who is she going to blame? She can't even complain about the "evil internet" because her new gig, Ethic Investments, is invested in Facebook, Twitter,etc.
(Well, at least she should not complain about the internet, although I don't think that the hypocrisy of doing so will matter to her.)
I i notice that Merkymeg is also gone, but this occurred prior to the release of the report that you referenced. Apparently her "Sussex Squad" bots closed down several accounts.
I have a great deal of respect for anyone who takes wild boars seriously. My own ancestors were mostly Scottish, so I understand the respect of the beast. Any Battle Maid who aligns herself accordingly has my respect.
Sorry I am just now catching up on the comments. As a new retiree, I have not yet found my daily rhythm.
https://uk.yahoo.com/style/as-concern-for-the-queen-grows-is-harry-heading-home-093805991.htmlAs concern for the Queen grows, is Harry heading home at last?
Flic Everett
Thu, 28 October 2021, 10:38 am
Part 1
It's been a dramatic few years for the royal family. From Harry and Meghan's US move to the death of Prince Philip, new babies, and COVID-19 – not to mention Prince Andrew's well-documented problems –the soap opera has remained unmissable.
Throughout, the Queen has been steadfast as ever, and since her return from Balmoral in September, has embarked on a packed programme of events and meetings. Earlier this month, however, she was seen walking with a stick, and last week she spent a night in hospital.
She cancelled her planned trip to Northern Ireland, and will no longer travel to the climate conference COP26 next week – instead, Prince Charles will give a speech.
While updates on her health remain uncertain, reports suggest that Prince Harry is very worried about his grandmother. He has not visited the UK since June, when he briefly attended the unveiling of the Princess Diana statue at Kensington Palace before flying home to California.
Now, however, Harry could be heading home. According to reports, other royals have rallied around the Queen this week, sending flowers and visiting her at Windsor Castle where she is resting.
Prince William and Kate's children, George, Charlotte and Louis, have all sent hand-drawn cards. By contrast, however, Harry is feeling "helpless", a source has claimed.
The insider told US Weekly, "The royals went into a state of panic when they heard the Queen was admitted to hospital and are taking turns to call her daily and visit her at Windsor Castle.
Harry went into "panic mode" after hearing the news that the Queen was in hospital, the source went on.
"He felt helpless being 5000 miles away in Montecito and has been checking in non-stop with her."
According to the unnamed source, the Prince "feels guilty about not saying goodbye" to Prince Philip and said he "would never forgive himself if the same thing happened with his beloved grandmother".
They claim that Harry is keen to come back to Britain with Meghan as soon as possible, so The Queen "can finally get to meet Lilibet and see Archie again."
Harry has been back twice since the move in 2020, for Prince Philip's funeral and for the statue unveiling.
Reports suggest that he and Prince William are still barely speaking after the Oprah interview given by Harry and Meghan last Spring.
They told the legendary TV interviewer that a senior member of the royal family had questioned Archie's skin colour before he was born, and implied that racism was a factor, while Harry also claimed that Prince Charles had 'cut him off.'
On a podcast later in the summer, he told host Dax Shepard that the royals were 'trapped'.
Before his marriage, it was generally thought that Harry and the Queen had an exceptionally close relationship – "a very warm and jokey grandmother-grandson rapport", according to one source.
In line with the family policy of 'joke-only' Christmas presents, he once gave her a shower cap with "Ain't life a b**ch" written on it – she reportedly found it "hilarious".
Royal author Katie Nicholl has said that "exceptionally close to her grandson, the Queen trusts Harry".
She also insisted that rather than being concerned about his relationship with Meghan, contrary to reports, told him: "'This is your wedding, this is your day. Plan it as you want it."
Speaking to Oprah about the fall out of 'Megxit', Harry later insisted, "I never blindsided my grandmother, (with the news) – I have too much respect for her."
The Queen and Harry have kept in touch via Zoom – they talk "all the time", and Nicholl recently said: "She is in touch with them, she knows what is going on in their lives, they discuss their plans with her. Harry has always seen his grandmother as a mentor. While he might be in LA, that has not changed."
Royal watchers are now urging Harry to 'get on a plane' and come and see The Queen – with or without the rest of his family.
I don’t think his brain knows what his tongue has been doing, his ears don’t listen to what comes out of his mouth.
End
Sorry I don’t believe a single word of the Yahoo article, 🤨they aren’t exactly known for knowing royal insider news. As if Mole cares about anyone in his family let alone The Queen.🙄 Particularly his treatment of his family, notably how he treated his Grandfather before he died, and so obviously not giving a rats arse about the Queen or her feelings.😖😳
I’m guessing it’s another nonsense story via SS. 🤨😖
"This is your wedding, this is your day. Plan it as you want it."
Yeah, this is where the article revealed itself as another ghostwriting sample by *.
It's a variation of the "This is our time" phrase that she said during the engagement . . . and then said again, through one of her five "friends" in the People magazine article.
It looks as if @GWAH is right that the Harkles have come into more money. That's the only way these blatant lies could have been published.
@Enbrethillel
I thought the same thing about the Yahoo article, i.e., PR spin.
I also immediately thought of Harry selling Prince Phillip’s prized gun collection that he inherited because madam wanted him to. Did he sell them to a family member who would appreciate the provenance and family memories? No. Did he sell the guns for market value? I remember reading they were bought for a steal considering they belonged to PP. Harry is fooling no one; he’s a selfish twit man-child. He is afraid to return to England to see his grandmother and family because he KNOWS he betrayed them.
Murky Meg talking about the bot sentinel report
https://thecrownsofbritain.com/blog-posts/
Her Majesty is 95-years-old. She was forced to cancel a two-day visit to Northern Ireland and had to make an overnight stay at the King Edward VII Hospital in London, where Buckingham Palace said she underwent some preliminary tests.
Word is coming out that Charles, Camilla and William were incandescent with rage at Meghan Markle’s embarrassing lobbying letter to two big names in US politics, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
Harry had previously been warned by Charles not to dabble in US politics. It was made clear to him that as a Prince of the Realm, he must not get involved in political matters.
But what enraged the Royals was the way Markle engineered her association with the Family to push her own agenda.
She had written on paper headed "The Office of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex”.
She thought she was being clever by saying, “I'm not an elected official, and I'm not a politician.”
This didn’t fool the Queen - but it worried her immensely. The Monarch is concerned about what will come next from the actress. According to those within the Palace walls, Meghan Markle’s crass behaviour is making the Queen ill.
This situation cannot continue. The big hitters in the Family, Charles and William, have got to step up to the mark. Decisions must be made. Her Majesty, at her age, and without the guiding hand of Philip, needs protecting. But more importantly, she deserves a life without the stress of being bullied by that woman.
Benjamin Smallbrook - Quora
Peg is always making them incandescent with rage lol.
(Hope this link works, if not it is Harry's Wife Pt. 82.26 : A Wave of Hatred)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VprQX-XyxCk
Thank you for that link! very interesting.
Meghan Markle mocked as Aussie TV hosts burst into laughter at Duchess reading her book
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxmYDzclUjMoWJHQH7UoVzm9KN--Jxf6f_
The whole tweet reads: ".@amnesty please investigate this YouTubers channel for spreading anti * DUCHESS of Sussex hate on his channel. He is white Hispanic who hates black women and he monetizes his channel by spreading hate speech."
Her flying monkeys (those who are still getting a paycheck, at least?) must be out in full force again!
That is nuts.
She is falling apart.
Narcissistic Rage.
Delusion and Desperation.
At this point, it's not clear which Twitter accounts are acting upon her orders and which are über-fans doing all that for their golden calf for free.
Thanks. For me, the best part of his analysis starts at around @15.29, when he asks: "What is the actual motivation behind this report?"
Remember when * described herself as "the most trolled person in the entire world, male or female" in 2019? I think she wants that title (heh) back for 2021. Her brand is now professional victim. The biggest professional victim.
He also asks: "Why hasn't this report, for good measure, taken into account other people and analyzed other individuals who are on the receiving end?"
Here's another memory: The time an interviewer told *, "You're not the only powerful woman." A perfectly neutral statement, but *'s chin came up, her jaw clenched and her neck muscles tightened. She's now making sure she seems like the only true victim out there.
And di anyone else notice that Tudor spoke about * for over twenty minutes without mentioning the "r" word that * is also trying to tie to her brand?
Now, Yahoo! seems like a step down from People magazine. And perhaps the study didn't cost as much as I imagine it did. But money is money, and how they chose to spend it speaks volumes. No wonder they could only afford two boxes of (allegedly) rotten tomatoes for the Harlem school children they tried to take advantage of. (At least it wasn't bananas, I guess?) Every other charity and cause they have pledged support to can consider themselves equally used and lied to.
Sounds to me like she's trying to convince her dog what's "the truth."
@Gracie Spinner: It is common knowledge that stress, especially long-term
stress, can produce many negative effects on a person’s health.
The Queen is very elderly, she was already 90 in 2016 when Meghan successfully wormed her way into Harrys’s life, but I believe tge real stress from Meghan's toxic presence began with the engagement to Harry in late 2017 and the lead-up to the May 2018 wedding where HMTQ sat stone-faced in St. George’s Chapel during the wedding.
Narcissists are incredibly divisive and toxic people. They have no conscience and will attempt to destroy anyone who gets in the way of their agenda, even if that person is the Queen of England.
Narcissists gain their fuel, power, and control largely through triangulation which is a method of pitting their victim against two or more parties in a divide and conquer strategy to benefit themselves. Meghan successfully pitted Harry against his family in general, and she repeated it by pitting Harry against the Queen and Charles (passing genetic pain through generations of the family), Harry against William and again by pitting Harry against William and Kate.
She also pitted Harry against his male friends who he had known for most of his life. In all of these triangulations, she played the damsel in distress and each time, Harry has aligned with her, falling for it hook, line, and sinker.
To maintain absolute control of Harry, which she must have in order be able to exploit Harry and the royal title that cones with him, she HAS to keep tossing bombs across the pond to make sure any bridges Harry has to the UK, especially to his family, stay burned to a crisp.
To Meghan, Harry’s grieving, elderly grandmother is just collateral damage. She doesn’t receive any special consideration.
Narcissists have no conscience, and anyone who they view as a threat to their ability to maintain control will receive no special treatment, even if they are 95 years old and just lost their husband of 73 years.
When someone has a certain level of stress continually present in the background as a threat, it often makes its presence felt by negatively affecting one’s health.
It is a shame and it breaks my heart that the last years of The Queen’s reign have been marred by a malevolent individual like Meghan, who with the unwitting assistance of dimwit Harry, may pkay a role in The Queen’s recent apparent fragile health.
For anyone reading this, ask yourself if it would be a cakewalk to have someone like Meghan enter your family and create endless havoc that makes you feel like you’re always walking on glass. Would you want someone like her to marry into your formerly close family and seek to destroy it? Probably not.
The added stress of dealing with Harry and his odious wife has likely taken a toll on The Queen and it could easily be a contributing factor to ending her time on this earth sooner than it would have if Meghan Markle had never gotten near her grandson.
When HMTQ does pass, Meghan will portray herself as grieving, but at her core, she won’t care one bit. The only thing she will care about is how much Harry’s inheritance from his grandmother will be.
Friday Singalong 🎤
Apologies:Tom Jones
What’s New Pussycat
Shat on a Shot Spin Truth
Muckycat, Muckycat
We see you, yes #Wetoo
You and your Tomcat lives
Why ho, Why ho
What’s up, Alleycat lo lo lo go yo
Pussyscat, Pussyscat
What to do, who to screw
You and your puss assed lies
You with your boss crossed eyes
Miaow, Miaow Ow
@GWAH
Thanks, I listened to half of
Murky Megs, disgusted!!
How did the sugars pay Boozy,
via archeole?
Keep Buggering On!!
�� As if * had any influence, especially in political circles.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10141917/Meghan-Markles-lobbying-fails-Biden-drops-paid-leave-infrastructure-bill.html
@Maneki
The only influence madam has
is over pillock!
Feel sorry for the families
missing out on much needed
payments.
She could donate $5 sizzler
vouchers 😉
Slay Bells Ringing
That woman is a bane, a blight
Clinging on with all her might
Doesn’t give a flying f.ck
Who she hurts,
it’s all pot luck
That our Queen
stands in her way
Makes no difference,
she’ll make her pay
Someone soon will stop her slay
She cannot carry on this way
Camilla made a powerful
“Abuse against Women” speech.
Jan Moir denigrated said speech
by calling her a royalette?
#NotHappyJan!
TBW is more than a bane, a blight: I'd say she's a carbuncle, to use Prince Charles's word 😉
Things That Make You Go Hmm
Whatever she says,
and wherever she goes
We know she’ll be stomping
her cloven hooved toes
On to her next pitch,
her legacy
Stopping en route,
to cock a leg for a pee
Onwards now, to Washington
Who’s gonna stop her,
President Biden?
Recently changed phone,
just realised I’ve lost all
archived poems!!
So pissed off!!!
There must be a way for the owner/administrator/moderator of this blog to access all your comments, including your delightful poems. I know WordPress blogs have that capability; not sure about Blogger.
Your poems are works of art and I hope you remember to make printed backups in the future!
@Eowyn@Swampie
Suddenly returned
Thank God
Bit strange?
`Through our detailed research and determined campaigning, we help fight abuses of human rights worldwide. We bring torturers to justice. Change oppressive laws. And free people jailed just for voicing their opinion.'
it seems to me that we should be reporting her.
@Swampie
Thank you, so very much X
@Eowyn
Diolch X
https://youtu.be/Fx5IgUCKuWc
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/meghan-markle-mental-health/
Thanks for that link. It's an excellent analysis of the report on the alleged harassment campaign aimed at * on Twitter.
Several years ago while Markle was still living in England, there was an item about her on CDAN. One of the commenters threatened the other posters with Scotland Yard if they didn't stop the negative comments about Markle. I suspected then, and still do that was Markle threatening people. Now she's threatening her detractors with Amnesty International. Desperation.
Round and round she goes. Her modus operandi remains basically the same and it's easy to pick out the patterns after you've known her for a while. I'm sure that what has been happening since she starting dating Harry is just a grandiose version of what she was already doing with Corey, with Trevor, and with her Markle relatives.
/Gotta stop blogging, cooking, and talking to the spouse at the same time.
Yep. "OMG, I'm helpless and must be protected from mean Tweets" isn't exactly an indication of strength. She must have another man that she's appealing to for protection.
Asterisk (Ass for short)
HAHAHAHA! Oh, that's perfect! You get the latte for the day!
She must have another man that she's appealing to for protection.
I wonder if this is it, as I can't imagine a business that would be willing to partner with her after this. She has very openly screwed Netflix and Spotify -- and if the Oprah interview wasn't enough of a PR disaster, the blatant, easily-proven lies in her latest letter should have sealed the deal.
But while a business would do some amount of dispassionate research, an individual sucker to fall for her damsel in distress act could still be reeled in. (Maybe she's telling him he's "the husband she never had"?) I doubt he's wealthy enough for her to leave Harry for him, but he can pay for a sympathetic article here and a bogus study there. A useful tool while she holds on to the primary source of fuel.
https://www.quora.com/Is-Amnesty-International-funded-by-the-CIA?share=1
I'm supposed to be working so I just grabbed the first link in my search results but it's long be rumoured that Amnesty International is a CIA front because it never seems to attack American policies or governments favoured by the Americans
Could be a woman that she wants to appeal to to protect her fragility.
Given the narc's penchant for triangulation, a new woman sponsor would mean that she is throwing an older woman sponsor under the bus . . . and at this point of the timeline, that would be Oprah.
I can hear the sob story now. Oprah manipulated her into doing the interview, promising that it would get everyone on her side, only to abandon her after it all blew up in their faces. Now neither Oprah nor Gayle are returning her calls (boo hoo), and * has no idea what to do.
Cue the love bombing. Thank goodness, I found you. You have been kinder to me in these past months than Oprah has been in a year. I had forgotten what real kindness was ever since the BRF completely disillusioned me. And everyone has used me terribly since then. Especially people I thought were my friends. Like Oprah. But not you. You're a true friend. The only real friend I have in the world now.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1513321/royal-family-live-kate-middleton-prince-william-prince-harry-meghan-markle-earthshot-prize
Several years ago while Markle was still living in England, there was an item about her on CDAN. One of the commenters threatened the other posters with Scotland Yard if they didn't stop the negative comments about Markle. I suspected then, and still do that was Markle threatening people. Now she's threatening her detractors with Amnesty International. Desperation.
___
Well now she can roll out the big gun threat "I'm a member of the British Royal Family!"
Oh wait...
What a dumbass.
Isn't there a search feature on this blog? Search and print?
I hope you can retrive them. They are gold.
the 6's wade into politics again with a letter to g20 leaders
Then again, they played it safe this time by not using the Sussex letterhead.
I don't know what BP's next move will be.
One of the things about couples who have been together for many years is that when one of them passes on, the other seems to lose their reason for continuing on without their spouse and they often pass soon after, often times within a year or two.
An online article that I believe was from Meghan’s mouthpiece People magazine said that under the guise of bringing Lilibet to meet great grandma and allow granny to see Archie again, Harry and Meghan plan to spend Christmas in the UK to be with The Queen.
The last thing Her Majesty needs is the stress of a visit from her traitorous grandson and his poisonous wife, who due to her profound narcissism will find a way to create drama and make it all about herself.
They want the money shot photograph of Her Majesty with Harry, Poisonous Wife and the two bargaining chips to shore up the Sussexes failing royal connection and public image. I hope she denies them that photo, which will only be used by the Sussexes for financial gain as they sell their link to a much-beloved monarch to the highest bidder.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10145787/Harry-Meghan-accuse-G20-leaders-failing-ensure-poorer-nations-access-Covid-vaccines.html#comments
ahem - looks like they are yelling a bit louder to get (any) notice.
I needed a laugh. thank you, DM
Back to lurking.
Not a shred of Authority between them, but these two act as if they are eminent physicians/research scientists/Nobel laureates for medicine/physiology/diplomats and so on, rolled up in their very dubious persons?.
How come so many, who should know better, fail to see through them? Or is it simply that, because they advocate what everyone sees as a Good Thing, it's difficult to argues against them?
https://64.media.tumblr.com/6580027f11e805e49db1c6da63e34087/b6fec754c752a046-dd/s1280x1920/9ed983838a3db4266f93543f3c484d520bb7b7a5.png
According to their newsletter, "the Duke and Duchess convened a World Health Organization roundtable in New York."
I wonder if Dr. Ghebreyesus, if his focus truly is on medicine, research, and other very technical things, even has any idea who the Harkles are. And I'm betting that he doesn't. Maybe someone told him that putting their names on the letter would get it more attention, and that was all he wanted.
Or did they? Some tea from Tumblr:
To add to H&M in UN. My bro words in UN as a security officer. Although he refuses to spill confidential issues 😖 here are some tidbits: H&M was not on the agenda that day, they were not popular with the UN staff and they pissed some; they were not treated as Royal visitors or dignitaries only “important” as with others who visit per SOP. 🤩 this connects the dots with other anons tidbits.
Source: https://the-best-soap-opera-ever.tumblr.com/post/666419319771742208/to-add-to-hm-in-un-my-bro-words-in-un-as-a
It's generic not specific. Poor countries not this country, here are the logistics for transporting X number of vax, here are the people to help administer the vax and here is how it we will get it to all these places within this country. Done, just give the vax to us and the flight plan is already filed.
If my mom were reading it, she might make a comment about how it doesn't sound like they are using the magic words.
the fact is that a lot of people in developing countries do not trust vaccines, and for good reason. Often, strict hygiene standards aren't used when administering vaccines in those countries, so people become ill after receiving one. Also, the CIA has used vaccine drives for their nefarious purposes for years. Finally, some people believe that they are used to make people infertile to fulfill the government's policy of limited population growth.
@WBBM,
the fact is that a lot of people in developing countries do not trust vaccines, and for good reason. Often, strict hygiene standards aren't used when administering vaccines in those countries, so people become ill after receiving one. Also, the CIA has used vaccine drives for their nefarious purposes for years. Finally, some people believe that they are used to make people infertile to fulfill the government's policy of limited population growth.
There are a lot of parents in this country who are not convinced of the need for their 5 to 11-year-old children, many of whom have already had COVID with no sequelae, to have the vaccination. All of my grandchildren have had COVID; why should they be exposed to the vaccine which DOES have potentially fatal side effects? There are also a lot of people that have had 2 doses of Pfizer or Moderna who are questioning why they should take a third and fourth booster of the same vaccine that has quickly worn off. Some, like my husband who got the Delta variant about three and a half months after having the Pfizer vaccine, doesn't see why he should get the same vaccine that failed him the first time.
It people do not want the vaccine, it probably doesn't matter how much infrastructure is in place. If people do want the vaccine, the infrastructure has to be there.
the 6's risk alienating all of the people who don't believe in the vaccine's efficacy or even it's use.
I know that I could have a vaccine tomorrow if I wanted to but I choose not to. A lot of people feel the same way.
On the other hand, many countries will donate a token amount of vaccines which will only be a small percentage of the number that was hoped for and she will claim victory and say that it was her intercesssion that was the influencing factor.
little girl dresses up as the Queen for Halloween and even has corgis.
I take your point about attitudes towards vaccination being another factor to be taken into account, as well as the need for infrastructure.
Here in the UK, husband and I had AZ for our first 2 shots in the spring, then Pfizer last week. No significant problems for us, no more than I'd expect for any jab.
That is apart from the injection I was given as a toddler, just after war - one of those `multi-pointed needle' (smallpox? diphtheria? My first boss had the latter as a child in the 1920s - he was in a ward with 20+ other children with it and was the only one that survived). On that occasion I screamed the place down and was reassured that I didn't have to have another one until I was 12, really grown-up!
I also recall the fear of TB and polio in the 1950s. I know that improvements in sanitation and general living standards have gone a long way towards preventing such epidemics but that takes time.
It may be personal choice, I suppose, provided one accepts the consequences.
------------------
Meanwhile, anyone prepared to predict how * will try to upstage COP 26?
Royal Expert Warns Meghan Markle of the ‘Biggest Problem’ She Could Face in the Near Future
Ever since she stepped down as a senior royal in 2020 with Prince Harry, Meghan Markle has been trying to establish a brand in the United States. However, according to a royal expert, Meghan could soon face an unexpected “problem” that might cost her some PR points.
Meghan’s popularity has been declining this past year. According to research firm YouGov, she has been receiving less favorability in both the United Kingdom and the United States. In the U.K., Meghan is the second-least popular royal, just ahead of Prince Andrew.
. . .
According to royal commentator Neil Sean, Meghan’s reputation could be affected by another “problem” in the future. Sean pointed out that, in the near future, there are books coming out about Meghan. The authors of these books might talk to people who have secrets about the duchess.
“These particular books are really interesting, I find,” Sean said in a YouTube video, “because when you get an unauthorized biography, what you normally find—and I’ve written quite a few myself—is that people come out of the woodwork wanting to reveal all.”
Sean went on to note that, while it’s possible these people are discarded friends, others could be people that one would overlook, such as waiters and cab drivers.
“These are the people that—and I don’t mean this rudely—tend to blend in,” Sean said. “When you get in a cab and you think the cab driver is not listening. They’re always listening. And that’s going to be the biggest problem for Meghan going forward.”
. . .
[Tom] Bower added, “But I think, much to her dismay, more will come out. I think Thomas is keeping some things back and that he has a lot of embarrassing stuff on her. There are skeletons in the closet and, when provoked, I think the secrets could all come out.”
Bring on these books! (One can dream)
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/royal-expert-warns-meghan-markle-biggest-problem-she-could-face-near-future.html/
Millionairess TBW - social media plug
25.00 starbucks gift card to staff for working overtime on the her family paid leave political stunt
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10149551/Meghan-Markle-buys-coffee-employees-group-campaigning-paid-family-leave.html
they typically donate small amounts of money/ things for social media plugs and o stay relevant. i really dont think their multi zillion dollar deals have provded them with much cold hard cash yet.
I was going to post the MoS headline and saw your comment but as the headline is in ££ it will mean more to UK Nutties.
Meghan Markle donates £18 for employees to buy ‘a few cups of coffee’ as they work overtime in fight for paid family leave
Good grief! Her generosity knows no bounds 🙄. And is this for her lattes that she was promoting?
I might feel differently were I offered a year's-worth of Italian coffee - her `generosity' is nothing short of an insult.
This reminds me of when * publicized her generosity and kindness in bringing breakfast to palace aides . . . only for the world to learn later on that she had brought the croissants at 11 am to a staff that had already eaten.
Whenever a (non-)story like this breaks, I have to wonder. Does * really, truly believe that that's the sort of magnanimous gesture that would, if people knew about it, boost her popularity? Or is my Disgruntled Intern theory back at work here? It's possible that someone on her staff who can't stand her, but who has some wiggle room, put this story out precisely to make her look bad. There's no way that an intelligent PR person would miss the subtext in giving gift cards to employees working overtime on something involving paid leave.
Maybe they have more underling staff who don't rate a photo and job description but this isn't a very big place. It specifically mentions only employees.
https://paidleave.us/about
I always get curious about just how much they really donate when it is not clearly marked.
no one talks about it, but there were many controversies about the vaccines we consider to be safe now like polio, etc. When they were rolled out, people were dying of them because of problems in the ingredients they were using.
Let's also not forget that those vaccines kill the diseases they are supposed to treat, unlike the vaccines they are trying to force everyone to have. Unlike these vaccines, which are only supposed to mitigate the risk, and this, for only a short period of time, and have not been fully tested to see what the effects will be years from now.
Also, 40% of the people hospitalized due to covid are fully vaccinated, and there's only a 13% difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated in transmission rates.
Lady C has just recently said that *'s favourite word is "classy".
So, guess who wrote that press release?
LOL
Lady C has just recently said that *'s favourite word is "classy".
So, guess who wrote that press release?
Well spotted! * really does like using the same words and phrases over and over.
The problem with the word "classy" is that it isn't something you can say about yourself without making the opposite seem true. And now that she has obviously said it about herself, well . . .
She has a long, long way to go, if she wants to come off as a "classy" boss.
Just for comparison, how much would an employee stand to earn if overtime hours were being compensated? How much is an hour of overtime pay in what we can presume is a white-collar job?
I want to see how $25 stacks up, setting aside the complete insult that it was a gift card for overpriced coffee.
you had better do some more research. The number of vaccinated in hospitals is almost the same as the unvaccinated everywhere.
COVID-19: Vallance corrects mistake to say 60% of people being admitted to hospital with coronavirus are unvaccinated
https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-vallance-corrects-mistake-to-say-60-of-people-being-admitted-to-hospital-with-coronavirus-are-unvaccinated-12359317
I follow the stats carefully because I am working on a machine learning model to group the data.
So, guess who wrote that press release?
-------
Another phrase she loves to use as a descriptor about herself is down to earth.
Guess who used the phrase down to earth recently? Yep, the owner of that restaurant where they supposedly donated $25,000. Somebody wrote that woman's comments, too.
sorry about my harsh words.
I’d guess it’s currently now a minimum of about $15.00 an hour, and overtime is typically time and a half, so that’s $22.50 an hour.
Many factors affect hourly wage, more now with Covid.
supply & demand of workers- currently there is an over supply of jobs and not enough people that want to work or can fill the skill requirement, for example truckers, nurses, etc.
in addition many companies, local governments, etc, have begun requiring employees to be vaccinated, so the unvaxxed are being put on leave or fired, resulting in more job openings that aren’t being filled.
there are many other factors invlolved, but $ 25.00 is chicken feed.
the data aren't that different in Canada. The Delta variant seems to be able to bypass the immunity offered by the vaccine.
We know perfectly well that the vaccine doesn't give complete immunity but that's no reason not to have it. No vaccine gives total protection.
Those who die here now are, so far, overwhelmingly the unvaccinated. Those who've got the bug, but aren't critical, are mainly the younger people now - those who thought it'd only get the old 'uns, so they still crowd , and the children we haven't yet vaccinated.
Andrew Wakefield's MMR `research' was found to be flawed to the point of being fraudulent, his theory completely debunked and he was struck off. So he went to the US and now, allegedly, is making a fortune from those who believe him.
I assume we've all thought about it and come to our settled decisions, even the H$Ms. They've decided to exploit it for their own ends.
I completely agree. 🤗
the mortality rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated aren't that different. Transmittability neither.
It's not like a normal vaccine. Normal vaccines like for example measles, will help you prevent the disease altogether. that's not the case with the mRNA vaccines. They will help your immune system produce a defense against the disease, but for those whose immune systems don't function that well, it won't help much. Also, some variants of the disease seem to be able to bypass any immunity that the vaccines confer.
I'm dropping the issue now because this isn't a blog about vaccines.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1514289/prince-harry-news-royal-family-role-counsellor-of-state-princess-beatrice-takeover-vn
By the way, currently it's not very convenient for me, but I love Starbucks coffee and would pass up any other retail outlets to get some. And not the frou-frou whipped cream confections, but the black coffee itself. Just had to get my vote in as a lifelong coffee lover!
When I was able to drink coffee, I loved Starbucks too and know many people who do.
I appreciate you.
(that photo of the costume was so stinking cute - made me wish I had thought of it).
Its about time! How can he remain Counsellor if hes given up his role as a working royal, his country, and his commitment to serve the Monarchy?... (unless he were to, god forbid, become the top dog ?)
Re H as Counsellor of State: it's very simple, Counsellors of state must be domiciled in the UK. So that automatically bars H.
A lot of places have staff on salary so you don't get overtime when you work late. They might give you some comp time but not a guarantee. Salary, working late unpaid and then someone gives you a gift card for $25? Not sure how many hours this was over or how many days but that seems tiny compared to how many hours people probably put in.
I've seen gift cards from Starbucks used in the "Holiday Gift Steal Game" where they and a make it yourself paper narcissus were the most fought over (Set gift price, draw by numbers and pick a box, when you get your gift, if you don't like it, you can walk over and steal/take someone else's opened gift and put yours back in the pick pile. Some places have a limit to the number of times a gift can be "stolen"). Another one of those charming supposed to fun corporate games which ended in the last couple of years - thank goodness.
I'm not wild about Starbucks coffee, more into some of the other stuff. Their food always looks good and tasty but just never seems to as good as it looks.
"The good news, Walensky [Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has said, is that all three coronavirus vaccines available in the United States can provide strong protection against severe disease and death from covid-19, the disease caused by the virus. Preliminary data from several states over the past several months suggests that 99.5 percent of covid-19-related deaths occurred among unvaccinated people, she said. In fact, recent data released by the CDC shows that unvaccinated people were 10 times more likely to be hospitalized and 11 times more likely to die of covid-19 over the spring and summer."
From "What you need to know about the highly contagious delta variant," The Washington Post, 9/16/21.
This shows that Delta has killed 390 unvaccinated people and 679 fully vaccinated people. So, although you’re less likely to get Delta if you’re fully vaccinated, you’re more likely to die from it if you do!
https://medium.com/illumination/why-has-delta-killed-more-vaccinated-than-unvaccinated-people-in-england-bb095a75
Also,Israel is the most vaccinated country in the world, and it also is the country with the highest covid % and death % in the developed world....
Someone's not telling the truth
More unvaccinated people have caught Delta than fully vaccinated people
More people under 50 years old have caught Delta
More fully vaccinated people have died of Delta than unvaccinated people
More people over 50 have died of Delta than people under 50.
If you’re over 50, you’re more likely to catch Delta if you’ve been fully vaccinated, and you’re more likely to die from it whether you’ve been vaccinated or not.
The Dumbarton's left a couple of zeros off the amount.
Here in the states, A $25 dollar donation is a huge insult. That's like coffee for 5 people. WTH?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSL2N2OD2CJ
"Social media posts have claimed that those who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are more six times more likely to die from being infected by variants than those who have not been inoculated. While the data was indeed taken from a Public Health England (PHE) briefing held in June, it was taken out of context...In England, approximately 85% of the adult population have had one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine and 65% are fully inoculated, Dr Cevik [clinical lecturer in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St Andrews] said.
'When most people are vaccinated, most infections and deaths are expected to be among those vaccinated,' she added.
The vaccination program also prioritised 'clinically vulnerable' individuals, and thus the majority of those vaccinated will 'disproportionately represent elderly and those with underlying comorbidities, who are already at significant risk of hospitalisation and death,' Dr Cevik, said.
"The posts do not consider the overall higher number of cases due to the Delta variant for those who are unvaccinated compared to those who are inoculated...
VERDICT
"Missing context. Vaccinated people are not at higher risk of dying from the Delta variant than those who are unvaccinated. The figures were taken out of context from a PHE briefing released in June."
[This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here (https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/about).]
We can argue until the cows come home, but I don't trust the American data. When they start reporting the data honestly, I will.
As this is not a covid blog, I will not continue belabouring this point.
For my daily coffee fixes, it’s a black dark roast, no fancy stuff.
a couple of the comments in the DM were:
The Gift Cadrs came from Archewell, ..which is actually donations from the general public, not the Sussexes.
At the Harlem school, the TBW books were NOT handed out for free, there was a $5.00 ‘requested’ donation to the Archewell fund so the Harlem Moms essentially paid for those Gift Cards!
don’tknow if either of those comments are true, but they maybe ?
Could you please step in concerning the derailing of this thread ie Covid O/T?
Thanks.🙏
Sweet Affu•kato
They’re making a mocha
Of the staff who stay latte
25 bucks, for ristretto star sucks
A piccolo, espresso nero f•cks
Thanks for answering my questions about what someone could expect to be making from overtime work. I realize that it could vary from area to area, or even from company to company.
@JHanoi
I’d guess it’s currently now a minimum of about $15.00 an hour, and overtime is typically time and a half, so that’s $22.50 an hour.
When you also said that 25US$ is "chicken feed," did you mean that the Harkles' staff would be earning more than minimum wage or that they obviously did more than an hour's work and were only "paid" for an hour?
@Teasmeade
Were these clerical workers helping * with her written campaign? So let's say--and I'm not trying to start a thread here, but we can--that's $21.54/hr, which is $42,000 a year (I searched on "administrative asst average starting pay") a year. So time and a half for that would be $32.00-ish an hour.
Assuming that this is what the Harkles' staff could reasonably expect . . . I'd see why the gift card was insulting. The last time I was "paid" that way was when I was a student, helping the paid staff out with orientation. (It was considered volunteer work, but they also wanted to say thank you.)
My current employer is and my last two employers were all very professional about tracking and compensating overtime, but my very first boss was not. It was generally accepted that teachers would stay until "late" working on things the school needed them to do. The principal would sometimes make up for it by buying us all dinner, but we always accepted it grudgingly. No one liked the situation, but if you even talked of reporting it to a labor authority, you weren't being "a team player" -- or worse, you were a diva. I can only imagine what kind of work culture the Harkles have among their staff.
Where I live, it's considered a delicious treat. The simple coffee orders (which includes lattes, mocchas, et. al.) are obviously overpriced, so people who want to feel they're getting their money's worth order one of the fancier blended drinks. There are other cafés which offer blended drinks, but there's still some shine to Starbucks's "Frappuccino" trademark.
I'm more of a tea drinker, and when I compare what they charge for a tea latte to what I paid for the tea, milk, spices and sugar I have at home, I get a little woozy. I only order it when I'm with friends who really want to get the day's treat there.
At the Harlem school, the TBW books were NOT handed out for free, there was a $5.00 ‘requested’ donation to the Archewell fund so the Harlem Moms essentially paid for those Gift Cards!
This would be so awful if it were true! Do you know who else asks for very specific "donations" in exchange for a "free" book?
Those Hare Krishnas who try to recruit you on the street! Is this the level of "classy" that * is aspiring to?
It seems to me that this would be so easy to verify. There must be hundreds of disgruntled parents whose children were used by the Harkles. Has any reporter followed up on this lead?
I overlooked you earlier when thanking the American Nutties who replied to my question about overtime compensation. I'm sorry about that. And thank you very much!
Salary, working late unpaid and then someone gives you a gift card for $25? Not sure how many hours this was over or how many days but that seems tiny compared to how many hours people probably put in.
This was my own initial thought. Even if the value of the gift card did cover some of what they would have been entitled to, I doubt it covered the full amount.
A truly "classy" gesture would have been to compensate them fairly and to buy them dinner. For each night they had to be there. And for those who had to work really late, to get them rideshares and follow up that they got home safely. But there's only so much you can skim off the Archewell donations, I guess!
In medieval England it was considered bad form to eat the thick slice of bread on which one's meat was served because that's what the servants got for dinner; I think it was probably the origin of the later habit of cutting the crusts off bread and always leaving something on the plate. If guests scoffed the lot, the servants went hungry and revealed themselves as being ill-mannered.
I think I've mentioned before how every `friend' who proved to be a narcissist cut the nose off the brie - it's a good test, as long as one has kept some off the cheese back, to be sure of getting a look-in after they've gone..
Meghan Markle will speak on 'women reaching economic and professional parity' at New York Times online summit - after sending controversial lobbyist letter pleading for paid family leave (DM).
I didn't think she'd on another bandwagon so soon 🙄 but then the lobbying letter failed.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1514665/prince-charles-falls-over-cop26-speech-climate-change-royal-family-latest-news
/Charles needs a bilateral boob reduction; Harry and *. Other than that, no.
___
It was a slight trip. Nothing big. He handled it with grace.
TW Reads A Scary Tale In Time For Halloween.
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2021/10/31/tw-reads-a-scary-tale-in-time-for-halloween/
I am more intrigued with the Last Chance Saloon comment by Charles. Sounds like someone has been watching reruns of Petticoat Junction on Amazon Prime
I am thinking someone is shuttering in her cashmere lined boots (only available on Meghan's Mirror) King William is not a good prospect for her ;-)
This actually would have been a great time to be papped. She wouldn't have to worry about casting a convincing child actor for "Archie" because she could put a mask on him!
Do you suppose even the paparazzi are sick of her?
It would even funnier if the BRF didn't even have to pay competitive prices for the photos because they weren't worth that much to the tabloids to begin with!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10154023/Oprah-gives-Meghan-Markles-woke-coffee-brand-Clevr-Blends-boost-Favorite-Things-list.html
its kind of ridiculous for TBW to speak about something she has no knowledge or expertise on….kind of like their whining about vaccines for all. its a feel good easy to support talking point. she and her handbag are soo lame!
Magazines take a while to get printed. After 9/11, the monthly magazines did not mention it until about the December issue.
This is why I admire HM as much as I do. She admonishes world leaders to "rise above politics".
She's amazing. It takes a much loved, time proven, female world leader to say it. But will they listen? More than likely the ego reigns in most of them.
If so, watch for eyes rolling. I suppose she's too professional for that.
Imagine someone of her caliber being set up with an Mm to have a live conversation. #awkward
TBW has over exposed herself and the dog. People are getting bored, and yawning when their names come up.
@Snarky
She’s going to schill her schtick
at what/whom ever, till it schticks.
Washington here she blows!!
As for coffee, I prefer mine
hot, and strong, like my men 😉
What’s with the coffee?
Clevr she ain’t.
Grindrs 2 go, her hot
streaming service 😳
@Mel
I doubt it’ll be live.
Wasn’t her first, and last
real live performance, the
cringe worthy Fab Four alliance?
@WildBoar
Gorgonzola
As she chopped off the edge
From the thin end of the wedge
She took the very best slice
Like chalk and cheese
Didn’t know cheddar, from Bries
Her manners lacking, not quite nice
Coffee au fait
Grind control to Clevr Con
Mix the oats, put kettle on
Find a mug
To take a slug
Here comes Oprah, plug, plug, plug!
Very witty again! Both Gorgonzola and Coffee au fait are excellent. Love 'hot streaming service' and 'find a mug'. Thank you for keeping us entertained 😄. Laughing at madam is the best thing anyone can do.
its an online conference so people can hop in and out on their computers as needed. half hour, two people and likely the moderator andrew ross sorkin. For any of you that watch CNBC squawk box he is sooooo annoying.
https://www.quora.com/Did-anyone-like-Prince-Philip
I have not read all the posts yet but found this one making me wish I had been able to personally meet him.
I'm kind of shocked that all angles of shots from the camera, types of photos, how people stood next to each other, hands, feet - all seem to have originated when 6w got together with 6. Nothing seemed to have existed in photos before that point in time (or so I am almost lead to believe).
Prince Harry's name was "glaringly" left out of the Queen's speech to the COP26 climate change summit despite her immense praise for Prince William and Prince Charles, a body language expert has claimed.
. . . .
Although the speech highlighted an extremely important issue, the failure to mention Prince Harry while covering his older brother and father in praise will not go unnoticed, body language expert Judi James claims.
-----------------
If true, someone in SoCal won't be happy, especially as they couldn't/didn't gatecrash the event.
Yes, and I hope the plates are flying too 😉
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry Vow to Reach 'Net Zero' Carbon Emissions by 2030: Here's What That Means
How about keeping their mouths shut for a start?
-
Love yr latest offerings, Magatha.
And the COP26 are going...who? Thank you again DM for the chuckles.
was it more passive aggressive jealously on TBW’s part?
is she going to use her broom instead of a private jet?
but seriously, Archwell doesnt make, construct, or produce anyhing (except hot air) so how much emissions do they have? just employee transportation (alot if you take multiple SUVS and air transportation instead of your bike), electricity/ heat/ utlities.
are they going to buy farm land and plant trees?
maybe thats why bill gates has bought up so much farmland… hes going to plant trees!
Got it in one! Right after the Queen failed to mention them.
@GWAH
Very good 🧙🏽♀️!
The queen was talking about working Royals. Why on earth would she mention a private citizen in the US?
"Someone who does not want to admit their weakness can only show their evil side to the whole world."
That Bloody Woman = TBW
So many great comments!
The last time I wrote a long comment on my phone I lost it. So I have been quiet lately.
One item I wanted to mention, are any US Nutties watching the Diana series on CNN? I think they are doing a good job in their portrayal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXsZ3bu1fpE
MEGHAN STAFF dish DIRT/cock ups/in BED with China/Prince Andrew & his ACCUSER: DISTASTEFUL
@DesignDoctor. No, I never watch CNN; I actually don’t even get cable. I watch Prime Video and buy any series, movies, etc. separately.
@GWAH. * on her 🧹 broom, Thanks for the laugh. Americans dislike hypocrites and empty suits which pretty much sums up the Harkles.
I'm not surprised, given her known links with a couple of very dodgy people. I heard the rumour that they were keeping a `close eye on her' (NB euphemism!) via one of her female `friends', in summer 2020 - I can guess who they meant.
"Democrats add four weeks paid family leave to Biden’s spending plan after campaign from Meghan Markle:"
I'm sure that Markle believes this, but why is the DM going along with this???
Apparently, she has somehow obtained the private tel numbers of both Democrats and Republicans and has been calling them from a blocked number and introducing herself as "Duchess of Sussex". I guess that she fancies herself as Netflix's Frank Underwood.
I can't understand why she continues this Duchess farce when meddling in American politics. If this is what she wants to do, she should do it as an American and not as exiled royalty.
Not everything which happens is some kind of slam. Sometimes it is about other things which are not intended as some kind of snub. Like the way the photos were about updating existing photos of the direct line of succession. (Which the other siblings were not attending either.)
this explains why the Dems re-introduced the family leave into their bill. Basically, it's because women in Virginia swung heavily Republican in yesterday's election for Virginia governor so they are trying to find issues that appeal to women voters.
"Here's the deal: Democrats are the ones behind the party-line social spending bill that could include paid leave. But none other than Meghan Markle is calling senators in both parties about the topic. Capito got an unexpected call from the duchess.
“I couldn’t figure out how she got my number,” the West Virginia Republican added. Capito wasn't alone in the GOP: Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) also got a call from the erstwhile royal.
Who sent Meghan? Sen. Kirsten Gilibrand (D-N.Y.), who's pushed her party to include paid leave in its social spending bill, said Wednesday that she gave senators' numbers to Markle. "I talked to each of the women senators and let them know that she's going to reach out, because she only completed two of the calls," Gillibrand said. "She's going to call some others, so I let them know in advance."
"She wants to be part of a working group to work on paid leave long term and she's going to be. Whether this comes to fruition now or later, she'll be part of a group of women that hopefully will work on paid leave together."
— Sen. Kirsten Gilibrand (D-N.Y.) on Markle
I do not watch CNN as a rule. A relative told me about the series so I recorded it (because I was interested in the portrayal of Diana).when it aired on my streaming service.
I cannot imagine working on any committee or working group with * !
It would be a total nightmare. We have a narc on our team and she is awful to work with on anything!
They take over.
My experience is that they elect themselves chairperson but are seldom challenged as `they get things done' and it's too much trouble to stand up to them. They are petty dictators.
My friendship-group was considering a memorial to one of our departed number. Instead of us all making donations that we felt able to give, then deciding what to do, the narc informed us of what we'd be doing and how much we'd each have to contribute, with no regard for us all having different depths of pocket. Not the way to do it.
hmmm.
If you want to be a mover and shaker, people have to be able to call you so you need an unblocked phone number.
I don't know.
Maybe she wants to try to work the system this way for people she can use to try to get support for her to be either some sort of paid position or a run for political office. Working groups tend to be a lot of volunteer and not so much paid. (Saving the money for thank you gifting and goodie bags filled with stuff to remember why you want to vote for this or that bill)
I would have said sort of like Huma's job because of the visibility but I don't see her being able to work long term under someone and be at their beck and call 24/7. I've done that and it is miserable. You either are with them, usually being told this, that, do this (no magic words), you didn't do this exactly how I wanted it (which wasn't specified), the instructions from that point on are micromanaged until the reason for that is forgotten so it drifts back to you call to verify (how stupid are you that you need to check with me, just do it) and then mistakes are made or you are dreading the next call - which is not a relaxing down time moment).
Besides, she would really need to move to Washington.
What I want to know is where and who will be invited to what if Prince William and Catherine make a USA visit. And, what will Catherine wear?
She will NEVER be elected to any office worth anything in the major leagues. Delusions of grandeur. Again.
She looks foolish, erratic, and untrustworthy. They are questioning how she got phone numbers. Oprah?
I can't even fathom working with her on a team for any issue. She has not proven that she can even be a team player. She seems to create havoc wherever she lands. Sure we all have bad days and blips but the measure of our character is do we recognize or faults? Do we make amends for our faults? Do we grow and become better as a result of our shortcomings? To me, that's a valued team member. Not those who think they are fault free and perfect, who refuse to do better. Like other Nutties have said, I too had my share of working with those types in my career. Never again
She's done NOTHING to show the world she's capable of being trusted.
So * has moved on to politics, or as some people call it, show business for ugly people.
When she gets the same reaction from everyone, I guess she will have to move on to the circus industry where she can try to work as a clown.