Skip to main content

Judgement Day

 

Comments

Magatha Mistie said…

Bad Tidings

‘Twas the night before Christmas
and smegs and her smouse
Started to ponder
can they afford this big house
Hazards forgotten
all thoughts of the throne
He’s more concerned with
who’ll pull his wishbone
The cupboards are bare
he’s smoked the last cone
Smegs cut up rough
looking for children to loan…

Rinse & re-tweak from last year

Magatha Mistie said…

Desert Storm

Beautiful photo of the Cambridge Clan
Kate and Louis, pure Middleton
William, wow, astride golden chair
Showing haz
his royal golden pair
George and Charlotte
and the camel saddles show
They’re having a laugh at
Auntie M’s camel toe…


Magatha Mistie said…

My take on the Charles
and Camilla card is
“Take care of each other”
Help and protect others.
Unfortunately they’ll need
more than masks to protect
themselves from Dire & Mire!!


Maneki Neko said…
Not sure how reliable the Advertisers (@Magatha?) but they have an article that states that * never had to worry about where she ate (this is old news) and quotes Thomas Markle:

'Thomas is now considering going on YouTube to read the unpublished parts of Meghan’s letter to him.

He added: “Someday that letter’s going to be released. I still love my daughter but I hate what she’s become. She’s changed so much.”'

https://tinyurl.com/yckmn9vv

Do it, Thomas, what have you got to lose now?
Quoting the Camilla Tominey article Sandie posted:

It’s also surely infantile of Harry to suggest that work should always be enjoyable.


I've always said if work was supposed to be enjoyable, it wouldn't be a four letter word lol
Sandie said…
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17003985/thomas-markle-blasts-meghan-and-candyass-harry-over-salads/

Thomas Markle is like his daughter: never shuts up, rarely says anything interesting, and loves playing the blame game! He has a right to speak though. He has a right to 'have a voice'!

I wonder if she was 'seen' at Sizzlers by one of her schoolmates from that expensive Hollywood private school, and projected her feelings of shame on them (appearances are everything to a narc), and now has dug up that memory and re-inagined it (just look at me now) so that she can use it for whatever is her platform for the week. It is just bizarre that she would claim her family had financial struggles when she was growing up when she went to expensive Hollywood private schools. Another trait of narcissism: does not experience cognitive dissonance?
Magatha Mistie said…

@Maneki
Advertisers?

Pith and Skin

Tom should unfurl
What’s wrong with his girl
Surely a screw loose,
or two
She’s a damned feckin liar
A cheater, with prior
Speak up Tom
she’s forgotten about you

Magatha Mistie said…

@Lurking

I’ve not seen the Camilla Tominey
article, could someone please
post it?
@Magatha, Sandie posted it close to the end of the previous page, here's the link to the archived article:



https://archive.ph/qWX58


(Sandie's original post is timestamped December 11, 12:48am)
LavenderLady said…
Candyass.
Now there's a word I had'nt heard in yonks. LOL 😂😂😂

Look out world. Little Louis is going to be quite the heartbreaker. A gorgeous photo of the future, future King William and his beautiful family.
Magatha Mistie said…

Thanks @Lurking

Good article, rather liked
WINO
goes well with DINO! 😜
Magatha Mistie said…

@Sandie

I think some of her insecurities
stemmed from attending
private schools.
Her father/house was never
rich enough.
Competing,
against much richer students,
is what drove her.
She reached the top of the world,
and fell!!
Hard!!!

What a feckin idiot!!






Maneki Neko said…
Apparently, only 'a tiny handful' of people who worked for * have been interviewed re bullying. 'The revelation has prompted fears that the investigation, set up nine months ago, is being 'kicked into the long grass'.

She's won (a victory of sorts) the appeal against ANL, is she going to win this as well? Workplace bullying is horrendous and I hope the Palace won't brush this under the carpet.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10297869/Fears-Buckingham-Palace-inquiry-allegations-Meghan-Markle-bullied-staff.html
Fifi LaRue said…
Re: bullying by the witch. I hope those in charge at the palace, the administrators, the BRF, make amends to those who were bullied, all of those who were assigned to assist the witch and ball-less, all those who left employment, because those two abused everyone.
Este said…
“He’s a candyass. I’d take him on at my age any time. He’d run away from me.”

I love Thomas Markle. And I'd put money on him taking Hazbeen down. I love that he won't shut up or go quietly. You know Megsy-baby is reading this and her dimwitted husband. In some way, they are cast in the role of the Royal Family here. They can't respond directly to the attacks, fair or not, and they can't control him. Yes!! Thomas Markle is the karmic gift that keeps on giving.
Elsbeth1847 said…
I get the sense that the wheels at the Palace move slowly under normal circumstances (re: inquiry).

And, they have had a lot which may be considered higher level to respond to. Although they have plans well thought out in advance about, say, the passing of Prince Philip, a sudden change in the health of HM, the reality may not exactly play out as neatly as the plans were drawn up. Reality has a way of not being completely cooperative.

And, the folks in LA are doing pretty well at making themselves irrelevant to the world at large while this is all playing out so perhaps allowing them more opportunities to shoot themselves in the foot may then allow you to come back later to announce the results with a greater impact (especially if there are more dicier things afoot).
Sandie said…
Did you watch the latest Palace Confidential? Tessa Dunlop always defends the Harkles, in a balanced way. Basically, her argument is that as they are no longer funded by British taxpayers, they have to make a living, hence they cross lines ... she pretty much defends everything they do with that argument.

However, I think the problem is much more complicated than that. An ant has more talent and skills than those two combined. All they have going for them is being royal. It is that which has opened doors, enabled them to sign contracts, and allowed them to jump onto any and every bandwagon for appearances. They don't even have a large constituency in the terms of social media following. But, the more they cross lines, and attack and try to destroy or, when appropriate, distance themselves from the royal family, the less royal they are and the more their worth nosedives.

The narc and her hapless husband must be furious (a narc never lets go of a grudge) that they were not allowed the half in, half out deal that they proclaimed in their pretentious and grandiose manifesto.

https://www.mailplus.co.uk/tv/palace-confidential
Enbrethiliel said…
@Este

That's an interesting perspective on Thomas Markle's role in the Harkles' life. He gives them a taste of their own medicine! If only they had the self-awareness to see it.
Mel said…
@Este.... haha.
Louise said…
Sandie: I would never call Tessa Dunlop "balanced". She is a Markle type blowhard who ceaselessly interrupts (and sometimes insults) co speaker Richard Eden.

Eden, being a proper gentleman, does not fight back and the moderator does nothing.

I follow Palace Confidential pretty regularly, but have given up trying to watch when she is a guest.
Sandie said…
Thomas is now considering going on YouTube to read the unpublished parts of Meghan’s letter to him.
He added: “Someday that letter’s going to be released. I still love my daughter but I hate what she’s become. She’s changed so much.”


If he did this, could she still sue him? Do you think she would?

By the way, I think the poor man is still deluded about his daughter. She has not changed as a person. All that has changed is that, once she got the engagement ring from Harry, she moved onto a life where her father was of no use to her (and he possibly deeply wounded the narc ego without even being aware that he had done so). Did he not notice her doing this to other people, before she met Harry? Always made excuses for her? Surely he can look back (as Samantha has done) now and see that she was always this person? Maybe he needs to do a session with Dr Phil!
Sandie said…
I'm not going to have a look at the Lainey blog, but supposedly she is putting out the word that the Harkles are going to do a Christmas podcast and are a planning a royal overseas tour for next year. Who is going to cover the costs of the latter, I wonder.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie,

a royal overseas tour by ex-royals? LOL I wonder what countries they will visit?
Sandie said…
@Girl With A Hat

I think Australia was one country mentioned, which is bizarre since mocking them on TV is a national pastime over there!

The New York tour should have shown them that the idea of royal tours is ridiculous.

Who do they represent? Archewell? No money or power there. They have climbed onto bandwagons, like Global Citizen, but don't raise any money, have any formal role, nor do any meaningful work.

Without people who actually do work and entrepreneurs who actually create businesses and industry, and so on, where do the Harkles think their money and privileges come from? I am just amazed that they have based themselves in America because their values seem so anti-American to me. But, I think the majority of Americans have no interest in them and don't really know or care who they are and what they do.

Basically, they are talentless wannabe influencers without the work ethic and style and dedication required to build and maintain a brand and make money off it.
Fifi LaRue said…
There was a comment on CDAN that their Q Factor is way down, and has dropped significant points, like 30 points downward. They are the most unpopular "royals." One thing is that the witch can't read a room, meaning she doesn't believe her Q factor is really that low, and so is ball-less' Q factor. Sinking Q factors. Witch is certainly blowing through ball-less' money on useless PR, fake tours, and now a bigger tour? She'd be better off hiring a stylist, getting clothes that fit, and shutting her trap.
Mimi said…
Someone please explain to this ignoramus what the definition of “a royal tour” is. Are they still considered “ROYALS”? Who is planning and authorizing this “royal” tour? who will be picking up the tab this “tour” will cost? Have they been invited to “tour” or will they simply impose themselves upon these people?
Fifi LaRue said…
@Mimi: It appears that the Icks are imposing themselves on unfortunate folks. Royal Tour = LOL!!
Mimi said…
FiFi….are you serious????????
Mimi said…
and where er they choose to i pose the selves upon will have to accept them and foot the horrendous bills?
Mimi said…
ugh…..too many glasses of “tea”!
snarkyatherbest said…
so they are going to do a christmas podcast. is that like the queen’s christmas speech. is she gonna go up against hubby’s grandma. no more competing wi the the cambridges. now just compete with queen liz? bold.

royal your? yep go to australia and be ushered into one of their quarantine camps. and never let them out!!
Maneki Neko said…
A royal tour!😂 Is the tour official? Sanctioned by BP? Will the Palace pay for it? No, I don't think so. There's no mention of an itinerary. Perhaps they could go to Australia and stay at Admiralty House but have the whole house and not just a wing 😁.

While checking where they stayed in Australia (I couldn't remember), I found this in the Express: 'MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry's infamous tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey helped trigger waves of republicanism in Australia and may prove a "danger" for the future of the monarchy, claimed political scientist Professor Jenny Hocking.' This from an article written yesterday.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1533956/meghan-markle-prince-harry-oprah-australian-republican-movement-barbados-royal-family-spt
@Maneki Neko posted:

'MEGHAN MARKLE and Prince Harry's infamous tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey helped trigger waves of republicanism in Australia and may prove a "danger" for the future of the monarchy, claimed political scientist Professor Jenny Hocking.'

That's probably the idea...
Miggy said…
Apologies if this was already posted. ( The Telegraph)

BBC delays podcast on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after related documentary draws 925 complaints.

The podcast, about 'Harry, Meghan and the media', examines the provocative themes of 'sexism, racism and strategic leaks'

https://archive.ph/taUCg#selection-1071.1-1071.122
Sandie said…
https://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/emotionally-intelligent-leaders-work-life-balance-no-off-hours-email-reduce-stress-anxiety-improve-employee-engagement.html

A quick read ... basically, do not send employees after-hours emails (and texts).

Ironically, while TBW was feeding the media about her great work ethic, she was actually admitting to abusing staff! A great employer would take the trouble to program messages to send during work hours, and work out time differences if needed.

Wasn't she sending Jason messages about briefing Scobie/letter to dear Daddy while he was overseas organizing a royal tour for them? Priorities are clear, and they never were serving Queen and country!

However, I kind of feel sorry for her because she is handicapped by her extreme narcissism.
Sandie said…
The Body Language Guy has been busy.

https://youtube.com/c/thebodylanguageguy

What struck me is that she always was a piece of work. Is this what Harry fell in love with and decided to marry? Was he fully aware of her true nature all along?
Sandie said…
Excerpts from a New York Post article, that I copied from somewhere else:

-----
"The type of narcissist we’re seeing in today’s indulgent world are those who are truly legends in their own minds,” he told The Post. “They are at war with the ultimate power: the truth. They’re setting their own rules, not defensively but aggressively. They tell you what reality is and they expect you to believe it.”
-----

-----
“When someone launches something like this, there’s a grandiose assumption they’ll be able to get away with it,” Dr. Ramani Durvasula, a clinical psychologist and expert on narcissism, told The Post. “Then it slides into something delusional and the delusion becomes the truth and it becomes the truth he lives in. It becomes his reality.”
-----

-----
Dr. Simon says the only cure for narcissism like what Smollett seems to show is for them to be “totally defeated.”

“But these folks rarely cave,” he said. “They have a total abhorrence of giving into anything they see as bigger than themselves.”
-----

The article kind of explains why TBW lies so much, why the husband colludes with her (not included in the excerpts, but basically, they live in a bubble), and why she is never going to stop unless she is completely defeated. Her defence against the truth and defeat is just to lie some more and play the victim, so I don't see how she could be totally defeated, but fun to imagine how that would play out!
Girl with a Hat said…
Dr Ramani, the expert on narcissism, said something very interesting in one of her videos. She said that all the narcs she treated had difficult personalities as children. And that having a difficult personality as a child doesn't mean you will turn into a narc, but that all of the narcs she has treated had difficult and weird personalities as children. This means that Thomas Markle's claim that Meghan turned into a narc isn't true. Maybe he didn't notice, but she, like all narcs, was probably a handful as a child.

Don't ask me for the link, because I haven't got it, though.
Enbrethiliel said…
I'd actually love for them to do a "royal tour" of Australia. I have faith that the Australian press and people would really let them have it. Any "waves of republicanism" they would have trigged the last time they were there would lead to someone asking them directly about the banana bread, the tea "spilling," the bullying, the maternity coat vs. the flat stomach, the blood earrings, etc.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Sandie
What struck me is that she always was a piece of work. Is this what Harry fell in love with and decided to marry? Was he fully aware of her true nature all along?

A few years ago, I was telling a new acquaintance about a friend's awful marriage. I'm afraid that the friend had quite the victim narrative and that my past self swallowed it whole. My new acquaintance was not so tolerant. In his experience, he said, "like attracts like." If one spouse is a piece of work, the other spouse most likely is, too.

And sure enough, a few weeks later, the friend's true colors came to light. Everyone who started out feeling sorry for her were so turned off that they started feeling sorry for her husband! But I'll bet that if we had got to know him better, we wouldn't have had much pity to spare for him, either. They were two unpleasant, whiny peas in the same pod. Like H and *.
Sandie said…
@Girl With A Hat

Yep, I concur.

She didn't change; she just kicked her father out of the golden circle. While he was in the golden circle, he enabled her.

Early predictions were that she would ditch husband when she got herself settled in LA, but then the virus happened and her dreams of becoming Queen of the world hit reality checks (that had nothing to do with the virus). She can't dump him for so many reasons, so they are locked into a toxic co-dependent relationship.
Fifi LaRue said…
The "royal tour" will be paid for out of Ball-less' inheritance/funds. Witch is putting off Netflix with promises of more film to come. The Icks have damaged the Monarchy, as the Monarchy's Q factor has dropped points since Megxit.

We've seen that both Icks have no loyalty to anything, anyone except themselves. Like recognized like, but remember Witch was a "professional" and did things Ball-less had never experienced. By the time of the "scarfing" incident, the sex was pretty much over, except for times when the Witch needs to get Ball-less under her thumb.
Sandie said…
Possble theory: to leave her, he must not only recognise her for what she is, but also choose self growth in which he returns to the path of trying to lead the life of a decent human being. It seems easier for him to stay with her and fully collaborate in her toxicity and delusional pack of lies and grand self-image. (Also, she has separated him from family, friends, country, life, all the while convincing him that it was his doing as saviour; and he has burned so many bridges in his attacks ... he would have to be highly delusional to think he could just walk out and go back to the UK.)

Richad Grannon has an interesting video on how to leave a narc:

https://youtu.be/abhsthTkfBQ
snarkyatherbest said…
Sandie - he will have to admit to everyone he made a mistake. I know people in their 70s that keep doubling down on the same things to "prove" they were right. Its tough to admit to oneself let alone others who were right all along. You are right, she would have kicked him to the curb if LA embaced her. She was no one before and for all the bad (i would say good and bad but there is no good) she did increase her "star power" or more likely infamy so she's thinking she's ahead of all of this.

I still think he wont leave - she will when he either runs out of cash or she finds another suitor (sucker) with money. Still would love to know how they resolve the kids thing. She leaves him she puts out a statement that he has them (BRF took them away) and leaves that mess with him.
Girl with a Hat said…
Comments about this picture of Harry with a baby girl taken from behind the girl in front of a christmas tree? have you seen this photo before? could it possibly be Lilibucks?

https://pixhost.icu/avaxhome/b4/ac/008aacb4.jpg
TeddyTheMaltese said…
I’d say that picture/magazine cover looks fake…also The date on the left hand corner says December 20th 2021.
TeddyTheMaltese said…
****date on the upper RIGHT hand corner. Oops 🤦🏼‍♀️
Sandie said…
The child is 6 months' old. She can sit on her own without support and is begining to crawl, but no way can she stand without support. The baby in the photo is round about 12 months.

I have had a look at some of the covers of this magazine:

Kate pregnant with 4th baby!
Royal baby custody battle! (Referring to the Sussexes - lots of cover stories about him walking out, marriage bust-up ...)
Sandie said…
@snarkyatherbest

Very interesting ... I gave never considered that storyline, and always assumed she would act like Angelina Jolie and take the kids away from him. But, she could let him take the kids. She acts the victim, is not left having to take care of kids that probably don't really like her, and, if him and the kids return to the royal fold, she keeps and reinforces that royal connection.

However, how does a toxic, malignant narc operate? Maybe the above rationale is too normal and reasonable an analysis to predict what she would do!
Girl with a Hat said…
@Teddy, magazines always have a date that's a little in advance. That's not really an issue. For example, you can buy The National Enquirer for December 20th today.
snarkyatherbest said…
Sandie - i am in the camp there are no kids so by leaving them with him and weaving a victim narrative she makes him clean up the mess of where are the kids forever taints him if he comes forward about it. Maybe she does "a year at a mental health retreat" and then really blasts him and the family for perpetuating the myth when they should have been helping her. As a narc im thinking she would want everyone to pay for any perceived failure on her part.
Sandie said…
I think the magazine cover is real (publication date and available to buy dates for magazines are not the same).

However, that is not a photo of Harry and Lilli. The child in the photo is round about 12 months and the younger Sussex child is 6 months (huge difference in terms of development). I suspect that Harry has too much hair in the cover photo, as well!

Photoshop or a photo taken at another time with another baby/toddler? I would guess the former.
Elsbeth1847 said…
And, if it were "real", it would likely be a higher ranked magazine.

Would People or Vanity Fair or similar turn down a chance to show the real baby? nope - they would be all over it if it were an exclusive. If the photo came from a dodgy source where the magazine might be afraid of being sued for not having a good release, then I could see someone turning down the chance - maybe. Or maybe they would be willing to risk it for the money generated and the publicity as well.

This? Doubt it.
Enbrethiliel said…
@Girl with a Hat
Dr Ramani, the expert on narcissism, said something very interesting in one of her videos. She said that all the narcs she treated had difficult personalities as children.

I find it interesting that we haven't really heard from anyone who knew * as a child. I recall exactly one anecdote from a classmate who said that * told everyone she was Italian (presumably because she didn't want to be considered black).

As unpopular as the Harkles are, they're still clickbait. But this time, what's selling is articles and videos that point out exactly why they're hypocrites whom nobody likes. Now that The Body Language guy is getting thousands of likes for his analysis of her body language from before she even met Harry, there's obviously a demand for stories about what * was like before we all "met" her. We're either going to get something soon or it's being actively suppressed. And I can't imagine why the latter scenario should be so.
Sandie said…
The baby in the cover photo is too old to be Lilli ... round about 6 months too old.

It is a photoshopped fake photo, unless Harry did a public engagement with kids round about Christmas time and this is an unseen photo, or this is a private photo of Harry with a friend's child. I doubt that this magazine got hold of some unseen photo of Harry, but who knows what kind of games TBW may be playing.

Definitely not Lilli and they are definitely not at any palace associated with the BRF. They are in America, trying to persuade their few remaining friends to come and spend Christmas with them at Mudslide Manor. No one in the BRF wants them to ruin the Queen's first Christmas without Phillip, which they would do if they went to the UK.
TeddyTheMaltese said…
@girlwithahat yea I thought that the future date might be a normal thing with a magazine cover… but womens day? My mother used to ALWAYS buy womens day at the checkout at the grocery and I would always read it when we got home… unless the magazine has changed dramatically, that’s not how I remember it. It wasn’t a gossipy type of magazine, it was more about recipes, home decorating and organization, diy, style tips, staying healthy, maybe an inspirational story about a family overcoming some obstacle. Im actually on this blog rn bc I’m procrastinating going out in the cold to go grocery shopping lol so I’ll have to take a look in the checkout aisle for a copy of Womens Day magazine and see if it indeed has turned into another gossip rag and I’ll report back :)
And yes, that baby looks way older than what LillyBuck$ is supposed to be. And of course, you can’t see her face so it could literally be just a stock photo photoshopped in. What a weird world of lies, manipulation, and callousness they’ve created and live in… and for what? These are 2 extremely unhappy people pretending to be living in a fairytale world that they want to make clear is totally out of reach for us mere plebs, who would rather try their hardest to make everyone else feel as miserable as they truly are behind their masks. How exhausting. It’s so much easier and less stressful to just live your life and be happy and be kind to others. I can’t even imagine how mentally and physically draining it is to hold so much anger, toxicity, and contempt in your life.
Sandie said…
@TeddyTheMaltese

I think you are remembering a different magazine.

There is this one:

https://www.womansday.com/

And then there is this one:

https://www.nowtolove.com.au/womansday

Sandie said…
https://www.geo.tv/latest/387270-prince-harry-meghan-markle-branded-most-photogenic-royal-couple-of-all-time

This is hilarious. The origin seems to be a print and photo shop in New York, and they are probably usung the duo to get free publicity. I don't know if I would want to use a print and photo shop that does not understand the meaning of the word 'photogenic'!

TBW will add it to her CV under list of acgievements, along with 'bestselling children's book author'!
Girl with a Hat said…
@Teddy,

the one I posted is the Australian Woman's Day. I think you might be thinking about the American version which is indeed about recipes and not gossip.
Enbrethiliel said…
The Body Language Guy has a fantastic analysis of the Cambridges' Christmas card:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdlJ3wLkJt0

I enjoyed it so thoroughly that I didn't come up with any snarky thoughts about what Harry and * might do as a follow up until it was done! And even then, it was only semi-snarky.

All our hilarious Harkle card predictions are based on their most famous (and most contradicted) message so far: "We want privacy." It's so predictable of them that they probably won't surprise us much -- and Mr. Rosas might not even have bodies to analyze.
Miggy said…
(SueMe)

Just Chattin' - Harry & Meghan: Celebrities Who Have Called Meghan Out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZSpjL6E8Ew
Teasmade said…
Good morning/good-day all,

There's a retweet of a photo on Twitter, which I'm wondering is supposed to be the long-anticipated Christmas card? The original photo has a background of a plastic tablecloth (folds intact) and a wineglass, with some store-bought cupcakes and a plate with some cheese and crackers. There's some confetti and some tea lights for merriment. In the distance, teasingly, is a framed photograph that defies enlargement.

There's no explanation and I don't know where the photo originated. Or maybe it's a fan toasting them?

Anyway, I don't recognize the framed photo.

https://twitter.com/delilahc401/status/1470139618188140553/photo/1
Sandie said…
Perhaps off topic, but Neil Sean shares a funny story about Princess Anne:

https://youtu.be/xHj8953Q74U,
Sandie said…
@Teasmade

That is a painting a Sussex fan did (from imagination, not from a sitting).

In the absence of a Christmas card from the Sussexes, plenty of folk are making up their own for them - mostly cartoon ones poking fun at them. If they ever do post a card, it will be lost among the 'fake' ones, and they would have Markled themselves yet again!
Teasmade said…
@Sandie: Oh, thanks! That would actually be a smart move from a NON-fan, in that case!
Sandie said…
Just some thoughts ... compare line of succession before Charles got married and had children with line of succession after:

Then:..................... Now:
Elizabeth ................ Elizabeth
Charles (1)............... Charles (1)
Andrew (2)................ William (2)
Edward (3)................ George (3)
Anne (4).................. Charlotte (4)
Margaret (5).............. Louis (5)
David Linley (6).......... Harry (6)
Sarah Chatto (7).......... Archie (7)

If TBW understood this, the truth would have been unbearable for her.

Security, titles, media attention, a share of the Sovereign Grant, access to jewellery, rank are all linked to line of succession, unless there is a scandal, which would bring more media attention. Even as senior working royals, there were restrictions that she perceived that Charles, Camilla, William and Catherine did not have, and were imposed on her, and, no matter how much she bought followers and fed the media with PR, this would not change.

What her and her hapless husband did not realize, and still do not, is that being royal is the only asset they have.
Sandie said…
"Royal Family: 'Hurt' Harry takes swipe at Queen for removing military titles – letter

PRINCE Harry has appeared to take a swipe at the Queen, in a heartfelt letter the Duke wrote about his dismay at no longer being able to help veterans after being stripped of his military titles."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1534920/royal-family-live-prince-harry-queen-military-titles-meghan-markle-kate-middleton

They are so trapped in whining victimhood, that he fails to see what he could do, especially as he has crossed the line so many times that he is essentially free of 'royal restrictions'.

He could raise funds to build a memorial for those who served and have committed suicide, and have at that memorial a research centre for suicide among veterans, a help centre dedicated to veterans ...

What he does not acknowledge, and is completely untruthful about, is that as a senior working royal/having honorary military positions would have restricted him in what he could do.

Zoom calls, making speeches, writing letters, making appearances ... none of this actually builds anything or changes anything. Have they not realized that yet?
Sandie said…
Perhaps unconsciously he is expressing his grief at being cut off from family, friends, country, all that was his life and gave it meaning and purpose?
Louise said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bN4HXHTU01c&t=2255s

"2021: The Queen's Terrible Year - Royal Family Documentary"

Good documentary
Sandie & Teasmade: The plastic tablecloth photo - I though he was in a kilt, displaying his todger. I see now he has a child on his lap.

It's so ghastly it must be a spoof.
Sandie said…
@WBBM ... LOL!

@Louise ... I enjoyed the documentary. What really struck me is how the Queen abided by the lockdown rules even as her government were breaking them behind closed doors.

Sandie said…
What the heck does this mean?

https://mobile.twitter.com/Knesix/status/1470373454302130186?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1470373454302130186%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=

It is the tweet of TBW greeting Elton John at the Disney premiere. What does Hail Hydra mean?

You have to scroll down to find that specific tweet, but there is a lot of other interesting stuff on the page:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Knesix
OKay said…
@Sandie Hail Hydra is from the Avengers movies/TV series, produced by Disney. Hydra are the bad guys, BTW.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucfS8x4ZT9Y

Trevor Coult calls hairy an entitled ginger c**t.

Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3pQ-0BWK88

the body language guy with his hilarious take on hairy pitching his wife's voice over skills at the Lion King première.
Enbrethiliel said…
The Body Language Guy really took Harry down for unprofessionalism in that one!

But my favorite part was when Mr. Rosas told me something I didn't know: That the cue for when someone finally understands what you're saying is that they blink.

At the end of the video, he says that an analysis of Beyoncé's body language when she is all but molested by * is next. I can hardly wait!
Magatha Mistie said…

“todger” WildBoar 😂😂😂
Haven’t heard that expression
in donkeys!
Magatha Mistie said…

Roast of the Clown

Chickens roasting on the cito mire
Bunions nipping at her toes
Haz all trussed up
stuffed up to his nose
Merry Christmas
SoHo Ho’s 🦃

shrivelled walnuts rather than
chicken @Snarky 😉




New freedom of speech reforms to be revealed amid fears controversial rulings by liberal judges are fuelling 'woke' and 'politically correct' campaigner….

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10306323/New-freedom-speech-reforms-revealed-amid-controversial-rulings-liberal-judges.html

The sooner this Bill goes through the better! 🥴Ever hopeful the MoS does appeal and the case is allowed to go to the Supreme Court. 😀
Magatha Mistie said…

Cardcashians
All Seasons Bleatings

Dodger on her bench with her book
look at me
Lodgers, their backs to the camera
no can see
As Todger hangs his balls on the
fake family tree…




Magatha Mistie said…

About time @Raspberry
megfeasance claws
Overuled and outlawed
Maneki Neko said…
Any ideas of presents to her Californian great-grandchildren from the Queen? Was it last year that the Queen graciously sent Archie a waffle maker which, I beli, the precocious toddler had asked for? I wonder what he'll ask for this year (a telescope? An encyclopedia? As for LiliBuck$, a plastic tiara?
Enbrethiliel said…
@Maneki Neko

Is "Archie" old enough to be woke? He could ask for something PC or something that can make his parents brag that he's advanced enough to understand the latest issues they want to exploit.

Oh, wait. Of course "Archie" is old enough. Wasn't "Lili" sitting up in a chair and just "chilling" at a few months?

As for "Lili's" gift, * I'm sure * would like to say that she got a priceless, historical heirloom that a blood princess had once owned. Maybe something with pearls, to help promote the Netflix project no one has heard anything about in months?

But the BRF fights back now, and if she tried that, I'm sure they'd find a classy way to reveal that it is still in their possession.
Miggy said…
Neil Sean's 'take' on the bullying investigation, which was recently reported to have stalled, as only 3 people had been interviewed.

He hints as to where this leak may have come from...

MEGHAN STRANGE CLAIMS & THIS MYSTERY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--0zJX-tiTI
Sandie said…
Reading for the day:

https://pagesix.com/2020/05/23/harry-and-meghan-ran-up-a-53-million-taxpayer-bill-brit-politician/

OCGal said…
@Magatha Mistie, you commented “I give up” a couple of comments before mine.

Uh oh! What do you mean?

I hope you’re referring to the whole disgusting Harkle mess, and not referring to giving up on posting on Nutty Flavor blog?

I live for your magnificent poetry and insightful wit. You are our very own Poet Laureate. All hail Magatha Mistie.
OCGal said…
@Maneki Neko, you wondered what Christmas gift Great Grandma Elizabeth could send to Montecito. I recommend she send a bicycle pump so the two gritting losers can inflate their polyvinyl chloride children to lifelike status.
OCGal said…
*grifting, not gritting
Maneki Neko said…
@OCGal 3.15 pm

The same occurred to me too. Hang on in there, Magatha!

Sandie said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10306787/CRAIG-BROWN-Whats-score-Meg-quiz.html

Making fun if the Harkles is, well, so much fun!
For me, `I give up!' is an expression of total exasperation - of trying to understand/explain/trying to get someone to understand what you're saying, rather than throw in the towel.

It's for the moments when one feels like bashing one's own head against the wall.
... or when you realise you might as well have been talking to brick wall for all the good it's done.
OCGal said…
@Wild Boar Battle-maid, I am with you on the use of the expression “I give up”, however I am wondering to whom Magatha Mistie was aiming the phrase. I do hope it was aimed at the Harkle Duo, and not at Nutty Flavor Blog and it’s readers and contributors.
Maneki Neko said…
@Sandie

Thanks for the link to the quiz! 🤣
Elsbeth1847 said…
Bike pump as a gift:

Great idea.

And baby carriers to be able to attach the children to bikes. He did mention that he wanted to be able to ride around with his kids on bikes as he felt his father never had with him.
Sandie said…
This post on Tumblr contains an image of a tweet from Elizabeth Thorp, a VP at Sunshine Sachs, that she posted in January:

https://the-cat-with-the-emerald-tiara-1.tumblr.com/post/670561981358620672/submission#notes

https://mobile.twitter.com/ElizabethEThorp/with_replies

Sorry that I can't work out how to actually copy and paste her text her because it is very enlightening ... because she is from SS, and it shows clearly just how trashy and hungry TBW is.
Sandie said…
"Meghan wants to do the international superstar thing. Not the community centre opening on a wet Wednesday in Stokes on Trent. She wants to schill Duke and Duchess merch on QVS to Kardashian-ize the monarchy."

That is the relevant tweet I referenced above.

What is QVS?
OCGal said…
@Sandie, you asked “what is QVS?” in reference to Elizabeth Thorp’s tweet. I suspect Elizabeth Thorp meant QVC which is a (crappy quality) TV and online site flogging stuff to buy for self, home, etc… see QVC dot com

I think most of the QVC products are useless and a waste of money. Even so, I think QVC’s caliber is higher than that deserved by Merchie Meg. Selling fertilizer would be too good for her. Selling herself is about right.
snarkyatherbest said…
Maneki - i hear archie was asking for Doge coin and Lilibuck$ wanted a real castle
snarkyatherbest said…
OK, they need to come up with a card soon. I am getting bored with the duo from Montecito. This lack of news better mean a bigger build up to the Lilibuck$ pic.
Sandie said…
@OCGal

Thanks!

One of her many delusions is that she is a style icon. What we have seen of their home/office reminds me of that generic look that estate agents use to sell apartments with a sea view (which makes them expensive) in Cape Town. Those with real money in South Africa have big comfy buffed leather chairs and sofas, bespoke unvarnished solid wood furniture, lots of book shelves, paintings, lots of framed family photos ...

But, I think TBW jumps from one grand idea to the next, none of which she has the required expertise or knowledge, and, contrary to her PR, she is lazy and just does not put the time and hard work into anything that will build something solid and lasting. Sending off emails at 5 a.m. could be a sign of a sleeping disorder and lack of consideration for others!
Sandie said…
What platform could they use for a Christmas card?

I think for the past couple of years they relied on organizations in the UK with which they still have connections to leak their card to the media.

I think the photoshoot is done, and it was a nightmare, the layout and text has been done by her, and she is waiting for 'the perfect time', which would be, for her, taking the spotlight off the BRF during a major appearance. Perhaps to coincide with the Christmas walk to Sandringham?
OCGal said…
@Sandie, spot on with everything you’ve just said
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie,

she works but she doesn't apply herself. She only scratches the surface of anything she gets involved with because she seems to have issues with Attention Deficit Disorder. She needs hype and excitement and doesn't have the focus to delve into issues. Perhaps she's also lacking in the intelligence as well. She may be up at 5:30 but it's not to read books. It's to check social media and whip the servants to do her bidding. Maybe she also has bipolar disorder and has been on a very long up phase.

In any case, there's something wrong with her. When I think about an investment or the possibility of starting a type of business, I do loads of research, which she doesn't seem capable of doing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10306179/Eton-refuses-let-Netflix-film-Crown-college-ahead-new-series.html

Sadly, Winchester College has agreed to let them in.
LavenderLady said…
Was at the store earlier and saw the National Inquirer while in line. Blaring headline with a wacky pic of Duchess of Puke.
Headline:

MEGHAN LAUGHED OUT OF HOLLYWOOD!

Not the most stellar publication but vast amounts of Americans will see that headline while waiting in line. Especially this time of year.

It made my day :D :D :D. I can only imaginge her reaction LOL.
DesignDoctor said…
@LL
Love the National Enquirer headline!

@Sandie and @GWAH
I agree with both of your comments.
Miggy said…
@LavenderLady,

I needed a good chuckle before bed, so thanks for prompting me take a quick look.

https://www.discountmags.com/magazine/national-enquirer-december-13-2021-digital

Hahahahaha! :)

Fifi LaRue said…
There have been several comments about the witch's lack of applying herself, lack of doing much of anything, just scratching the surface, not wanting to work. I believe that not wanting to work, and expecting others to support financially is a tell of a psychopath. Garden variety psychopaths don't like to work, and they don't have a conscience. The witch is a narcissist with a side order of psychopathy. Some psychopaths will turn to religion because they realize they don't have a conscience, and try to make up for a lack of an internal true north, while evil psychopaths play the fake humanitarian/minister/mega church leader/etc. in order to collect the big bucks from people they can fool.
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
So happy you found it!

Isn't it grand? :D
LavenderLady said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngcn9OHtAcU

New Body Language Guy.
Miggy said…
Neil Sean.

Meghan Harry -set to SPLIT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quY_PvkwDGw

***************************************************

@LavenderLady -'Twas great! 😄 Goodnight from me... finally!


Natalier said…
@ Lavender Lady

That National Enquirer cover gave me a good chuckle. Thank you for sharing that with us.

As for Scoobie, wonder how he is feeling at the moment knowing that he is holding on to a sinking ship? He must know that by now. Got to admit I feel gooooood for him.

I also want to say I really enjoy watching The Body Language Guy videos. He is really good at his reading and very likeable with a good sense of humour. I find myself looking forward to his videos, more so that Lady C. Given up on River - he has no source at all.
SwampWoman said…
Good evening (or, more properly, good very early morning) y'all! I was trying to make candy with artificial sweeteners for diabetic sister in law, and the xylitol that I was using did NOT agree with me AT ALL. (It is much the same reaction I get whenever I see * and the spare.) I think I'll just get her alcohol.

I'm pretty happy that (as far as I know) * and spare did not see fit to enact the doll in the manger scene in Montecito with * playing the Virgin Mary. They DO have chickens for the stable atmosphere and spare is a great big jackass. I believe that if there ARE three wise men in the area, they would stay far, far away in case * is looking for another jackass to ride to the ATM.

But, if they do any Christmas pageant spectacle in competition with the BRF (as if), I will be blissfully unaware.

Miggy said…
Stopping by briefly to post this very interesting video.

DID THE QUEEN TAKE ACTION AND WE ALL MISSED IT?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hg10aHzEmVA




Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sandie said…
@Miggy

That video is brilliant. Daily Mail could do a series just investigating the history of her Wikipedia page.

I did not fully understand the bit about the Queen taking action. Something about Meghan not being considered royal anymore? I'll have to go to Wikipedia and take a look ...
Sandie said…
Old news about her 'victory' against Daily Mail. I found the final paragraph interesting:

https://archive.vn/bQCSw#selection-1199.0-1199.65

"Meghan is playing to an American audience, but her husband is a prince of the realm and will always have a British audience. He can leave this country physically, but he never leave this country in terms of media coverage. Because of who he is, he will always be a news story. For them to go around destroying relationships with the British press may not have much of an effect on her, but it will have a profound effect on him. He has an audience here and people care about him.”
Sandie said…
Does anyone have an anon profile that they can use to tip off the Daily Mail about the treasure trove of information in the editing data of her Wikipedia page, especially the history? (I can't access that information myself.)

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/contactus/index.html

Interesting how she tried to push a humanitarian profile round about the time she met the prince, and then tried a philanthropist profile, and how she tried to portray herself as a Hollywood A-lister ...

Maybe Tom Bower also needs to be sent this info?
LavenderLady said…
O/T
Xylitol is poisonous to dogs. And yes, if you do not build it up in your body, it will give you a bad case of the trots. It's a fantastic sugar substitute once your body adjusts to it. It only took me a few days to get passed that phase and it wasn't explosive. I've been using it exclusively for several years now. I am off sugar thanks to Xylitol.

Ok. Back to the ranch. Here's hoping that National Inquirer headline gave * the GI's. Embarrassing 😂
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie, you can send them an email yourself at tips@dailymail.com

I don't see the need for an anonymous profile. If anything, the DM will be happy to get your information about this and celebrate you and do everything they can to hide your identity
OKay said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
OKay said…
OT - @SwampWoman Speaking as a fellow diabetic, your SIL should NOT be drinking much, if any, alcohol. Nothing shoots up the blood sugar faster!
Sandie said…
https://youtu.be/gffuX7Us8R4

An oldie, but a goodie! Looking directly into the camera, always.

Never actually interested in being an actress, but just wanting to be posing on the red carpet?

Read somewhere sometime that this behaviour helps her connect personally with her audience and thus a useful strategy for becoming popular?

A part of her extreme narcissism?
Sandie said…
PRINCE WILLIAM "envies" Prince Harry for his "21st century quality, his emotional intelligence, and his easygoingness" claimed Filmmaker and broadcaster Bidisha.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1536125/prince-william-news-prince-harry-sussexes-royal-family-meghan-markle-spt

One has to laugh at the stupidity of some people!
Sandie said…
I'm looking for psychic predictions, but have not found much. Here is one:

He will reconcile with Catherine especially and Willuam, but never fully with Charles. He will return to the UK to live in London.

She will never reconcile with the BRF or the UK and that will drive a wedge between them.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/psychic-says-prince-harry-will-reconcile-with-william-live-in-uk-2-years-from-now/ar-AALBqTE
Fifi LaRue said…
@Sandie: That might be decades before Ball-less returns to the UK. He's still got money, perhaps an inheritance from Phillip, one from the Queen, one from Charles, etc. It seems there will be an endless supply of money unless the family decides to put the cash in a trust that cannot be accessed until Ball-less reaches the age of 50.

Kim Kardashian has more positive press than Twat will ever have, and Kim can't get a date. So Twat doesn't really have any prospects for another wealthy suitor, she's aging out, and her Q factor is sinking, never to recover. With all those factors in play, Twat is going to hang on for dear life to Ball-less.
Hikari said…
https://dailysoapdish.com/2021/12/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-will-spend-christmas-with-hollywood-elites-and-not-with-the-royal-family/


I think I have stopped laughing hard enough to post this now. Had to wait for the tears of mirth from my eyes so that I could see.

Hazmat & Mess have announced that they’ll be spending Christmas with THE HOLLYWOOD ELITE (emphasis mine) instead of with those boring stuffy racist bullies in England—The same ones who fund their lifestyle and gifted those titles they refuse to relinquish.

Sweet holy Jesus on a cracker, show of hands anybody who thinks that there is a single “Hollywood elite” who would invite these to tossers anywhere. I guess the Montesh*tshow Might go on the road and shop the dolly babies around to Auntie Ellen & Portia’s Finishing up at auntie Oprah and uncle Steadman’s place for Christmas dinner.

The delusions are strong with this one. Where is that Christmas card, Duckarse?
Hikari said…
The more steadfastly and totally the Montesh*tters are iced out by the BRF and ignored, the more relentless their self promotion becomes.

I am begging all the PR firms out there to stop taking the Toxic Twats’ money for pity’s sake. And that goes quadruple for law firms. Have some self respect!

Sandie said…
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1535928/queen-news-Christmas-Meghan-Markle-prince-harry-royal-family-Sandringham

Neil Sean talks about the Queen and the Cambridges sending Christmas gifts to the Harkles.

I doubt this. It is well known that the royal family exchange very small gifts on Christmas eve, and they usually are some kind of joke item. 1. The family are completely out of touch with the Sussex family (how they live, what their home is like, what their likes and dislikes are, what the children are like). 2. It seems bonkers to spend all that money on sending a parcel of gifts to California.

@Fifi LaRue

I doubt that Harry inherited any financial or other gift from his grandfather, or will from his grandmother or father. The Queen's wealth will be handed down to her son, because that is how the wealth is preserved. There may be gifts of significant meaning (e.g. carriage and horses for Louise), but I think that very much depends on the person. Perhaps some members of the family got a painting done by Phillip or some other personal item. The Harkles would not value or appreciate or cherish such a gift so I doubt they were even mentioned in his will. The Queen may leave some of her personal jewellery to members of her family, but Catherine wears some of the Queen Mother's jewellery, so I think the collection tends to ge kept together rather than given away.
Hikari said…
@Sandie,

I feel fairly sure that the Duke of Edinburgh made certain amendments to his will after his ingrate grandson, the erstwhile, ersatz Captain General of the Royal Marines sh*t all over his duty in favor of pimping out his wife on a urine-colored movie carpet. That was absolutely indefensible and that showed me that HazNowt was lost forever to human decency. He showed zero remorse or repentance for his actions, offered no apology. Had the gall to whinge and pout that he was booed for having the audacity to still play dress-up in the uniform.

That * could make him so easily abandon the Royal Marines at THAT event in particular, for a Lion King premiere shows me that he never gave a jack-sh*t about his duty to the service . . all he cared about was the dress-up and the photo ops. When presented with a 'sexier' photo opportunity, he didn't think twice. Tosser.

I hope PP did not leave him a red farthing.
snarkyatherbest said…
Hikari - if i were PP i would have left him a pile of horse dung and given his sense of humor i may not be wrong!

I am guessing a lot of wills were being rewritten after the Oprah interview and I bet hazmat and the wife know it so they dont really care how the BRF feels about their antics
Fifi LaRue said…
@Sandie: Thanks, I didn't know how all that works. I assumed they all accumulated wealth, and passed it down. So Ball-Less' money comes from his mother's family wealth, and whatever settlement she got from Charles. It must be that not being a working Royal family member leaves one out on a financial limb.
Girl with a Hat said…
let's do a chain poem.

I start and whoever wants to continue, can add to it.

'Twas the night before Christmas
And Harry was seeking forgiveness
Mimi said…
for sins which have never seen a likeness……..
DesignDoctor said…
in British Royal Family history.
H burned his bridges back to Blighty
By talking to O on the Telly
Whether PP left him pounds sterling is a mystery.
Seriously now said…
When Santa comes 'round in his jaunty 'ol sleigh
He'll reel with horror - he'll just say 'Nay!"
"The kids are still missing, they are M.I.A"
"No presents for you on Christmas Day."
Seriously now said…
PS. Veeeery long time lurker here. Nice to meet you all.

Welcome, Seriously now. Good to have you aboard.

`... as for that b*nt
who likes things that glint.
she's getting gift wrap
to hold all her cr*p..
Seriously now said…

One more in tribute to house poet - S.W.

Delusions of grandeur
Away in a mange(r)
The laughter and dafter
have never been stranger
snarkyatherbest said…
ok off poem topic ( haven’t had my coffee yet😉). the daily mail has an article that the foursome in montecito our struggling wi the work life challenges. (work? ha!). and the quotes are coming from. one other than daniel the missing make up artist. wow must be priming social media ahead of the big card. so happy he ans 6s wife have made up. now if he would only reveal more instagram pics. his last set caused a flurry because he claimed she made brunch for him and it broke the internet when sleuths revealed the setting was in fact soho house increasing speculation she either wasn’t living with harry or they were kicked out of nottingham cottage.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Snarky, to cover up that lie, I remember that the story turned into * buying the same tableware as the Soho House, even though it was the uglies tableware ever made. LOL
Girl with a Hat said…
ugliest tableware ever made. sorry for my poor typing.

Yes, * tried to make it seem like she had bought this horrible tableware and was serving her makeup artist breakfast of avocado toast at her home, Frogmore cottage.
Girl with a Hat said…
I remember at the time when the story about her having breakfast or whatever meal it was with her makeup artist that I thought she was making a big issue of her cutting an avocado in two and spreaking it on a piece of bread, as though it was a gourmet meal by a Michelin chef. She always makes a big deal of the most trivial stuff that most of us don't give a second though to.
@Girl with a Hat: We do have a bit of information about what * was like as a child. There's a video of her at her best friend Ninaki's birthday party where * put on a paper crown, told the other children that she was a queen and they had to obey her, and proceeded to boss them around. There are also pictures of her as a child with a conceited smirk on her face - not an attractive expression.

As for Thomas Markle, I do think he is deluding himself into thinking she changed. Other family members have said that he fell head over heels in love with his baby daughter and I believe she learned early on how to lovebomb her daddy to get whatever she wanted from him. He didn't see it for what it was and simply thought she was reciprocating his love for her. I'll bet he noticed the way she treated other people but never believed she'd do the aame thing to him.
Hikari said…
From the "Well, that was Inevitable" files . .

I've just read that the Queen has cancelled the annual pre-Christmas lunch due to Covid. So far, so 2020, eh?

Given the galloping cases in the U.K. and Her Majesty's delicate state of health, it was the only decision. On the bright side, if we can find one, perhaps this will give us a tiny respite from the Montesh*tshow's relentless faked-up articles about royal invitations they have declined in favor of having avocado toast with the Hollywood elite. If Catherine isn't getting PR for her fabulous look at this event, * will be made happy in her twisted black way. Looks like things are on course for the Sandringham Christmas walk to also be cancelled.

**************

In other news designed to drive * mad with rage on another front, President Biden has just appointed U.S. figure skating legend Michelle Kwan United States ambassador to Belize.

Like *, Michelle is a divorced woman of color in her 40s (she is 41) who is a native Californian. After her skating career, she graduated from Tufts University with a masters in international relations & diplomacy. (A *real* one). She's held numerous official and unofficial IR positions within the Democratic party and campaigned for Hillary Clinton. Based on her impressive resume and name recognition, she's got an excellent shot at having the kind of influential political career that * thinks *she's* entitled to.

I assume she's fairly fluent in Spanish due to this appointment, though it is not specifically mentioned in her bio.

I don't know about you, but I find this quite delicious. Catherine is not the only accomplished woman for Princess Twat to be jealous of.

Sandie said…
https://www.mailplus.co.uk/tv/palace-confidential/136075/is-the-palaces-meghan-markle-bullying-investigation-on-ice?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=organic_twitter&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1639674147-1

New Palace Confidential!

The bullying story: I have always believed that rather than an investigation getting a full account of the bullying, the focus would be on policies and procedures that would, essentially, protect staff. What makes it complicated is that the principals have their position of power by virtue of birth or marriage. There is no screening process, no training, no formal job description, no performance management. (A perfect environment for TBW to blossom into a full-blown toxic, malignant, crazy narc!)

Has TBW got away with it again? Jason showed that NDAs are not an impediment to spilling the beans, albeit in a court case. I'm not sure that she is safe from full disclosure.

My suggestion is that the ex-staff hire a ghost writer to write a book and then publish under a pseudonym. Would TBW really want to go through another long and costly court case, in which there would be testimony and more emails and texts being published in the Daily Mail?

We could give these ex-staff plenty of suggestions for a title for the book!

But the press in the UK are all going to want to interview these staff, so we may not have to wait for a book!
LavenderLady said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10317769/Meghan-Markles-mask-slipped-interview-says-body-language-expert.html

Yay! Our fave guy on the DM.

After that NI headline, will MegsyBaby be checking into a "health resort" soon? LOL. No one is buying her crap seems like...I'm loving it!
Fifi LaRue said…
IMO a tell-all book about the witch and ball-less will get the unofficial, under-the-rug okay when William becomes king. His is protective of his family, has a long memory for the abuse intended by the witch, and payback will be stinging retribution.
DesignDoctor said…
Have people seen Sarah Ferguson's comments on Harry's happiness with * in an Italian interview?

https://www.purewow.com/news/sarah-ferguson-meghan-harry-relationship?utm_medium=email&utm_source=News&utm_campaign=52517&utm_content=News_editorial
DesignDoctor said…
@LL
I loved this video from the Body Language Guy. His analysis is fab.
Miggy said…
Talking of The Body Language Guy...

His latest.

Could Meghan And Harry Be Emotionally Underdeveloped?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmZ0Zwjxnkg
Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10316199/Usain-Bolt-says-no-longer-speaks-Prince-Harry-got-really-Meghan-Markle.html

Hairy became friends with Usain Bolt but is no longer in touch with the ex-royal
Mel said…
Hikari...fun news about Michelle Kwan! Sounds like she's earned that appointment. Nothing handed to her on a silver platter.

Whereas Mm expected it to be just handed to her. No qualifications whatsoever.
Sandie said…
Silly season while waiting for the next piece of substantial gossip or the next idiotic public stunt by the dastardly duo (the obvious gushing PR pieces making their way into the media are just boring!) ...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10320697/Duchess-Cambridge-sports-festive-1-350-red-Miu-Miu-cardigan-Carol-Concert.html

Imagine if the Harkles put on Christmas show of some sort.

He would overplay 'the prankster prince', outdoing his juggling outside the window performance.

She would wear an expensive bespoke designer outfit, which would not be true bespoke as it would not fit properly. Of course, there would be diamonds galore on the fingers, competing with lots of 'meaningful' itty bitty jewellery.

There definitely would be the narc staring 'lovingly' into his eyes, and some near-accidents caused by constant hand holding.

There would be lots of speeches, from her, and if she let him speak, the narc stare and grip on his hand would ensure she gets the attention. (Would he cause a major international incident and try and evade the grip?)

Performers? Anyone desperate for publicity and with superhuman endurance, as she will micro manage and force redo after redo during rehearsals.

Back to reality ... What is this about them moving their non-existent podcast series to the BBC? And Spotify gets paid off by who? And British taxpayers would willingly hand over millions from licensing fees to the duo? And in what alternate universe do they have a UK audience for their narcissistic BS, devoid of talent as those two are? What would it be called? Spot the lies? Bashing royals the Sussex way?
Miggy said…
SueMe

Just Chattin' - Newsweek: Meghan's Father Responds to Her Claims of "Tough Childhood"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPVd_5cOkE0
Este said…
Sarah Ferguson's comment about Meghan making Harry happy really doesn't mean that much. Sarah is being diplomatic and is, for reasons unknown to me, standing by Andrew and isn't looking to burn any bridges. That's my take anyway. I think the Markles are already becoming passe.
Miggy said…
She's back. :(

Duchess's day out! Masked up Meghan goes undercover with oversized LeSpecs shades for a 'solo' pre-Christmas shopping trip to her favourite stores in Montecito.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10317221/Meghan-Markle-goes-undercover-solo-shopping-trip-Montecito.html
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
She's doing the pap stroll to prove she's not yet checked into that "health spa". Yet...

I'm betting the folks in Montecito are plotting how to get her out of their once peaceful community; this looks like her two fingers up to them.

And she looks like she's wearing her bathrobe which is her returning to poop colored clothing.

Ugh!
Sandie said…
Meghan doing pap walks/shopping again. Is Harry out of town or does he not care anymore?

Pemanently attached to her phone as well.

Oh, and bodyguard used to carry shopping for her!

The photographer has only been around a few years and specializes in photographing celebrities doing arranged pap walks in LA.
Sandie said…
@Lavendar Lady

Sussex watchers recognize a pap walk immediately!
Sandie said…
https://www.geo.tv/latest/388123-real-reasons-behind-meghan-markles-bullying-allegations-unearthed-report

Duchess Twat is on her phone again because she is getting her PR to work non-stop in getting her good PR.

I have no idea who this Christopher Andersen is or how he has insider connections at the Palace. (Maybe a connection with Sarah Latham, who hopes to return to work for the Sussexes when they become global billionaires, or when Dushess Twat runs for office?)

It is the old story that British staff misunderstood her work ethic, which is American.

Nonsense. British people know what bullying is, and bullying in the workplace, especially by women, is acknowledged in the UK. I worked for a typical British bully, and she is not unique. It was not a work ethic/performance/issue thing; it was bullying behaviour that reduced me to tears and then a breakdown.

There was no cultural misunderstanding with Duchess Twat. She was a bully ... of the worst kind.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Sandie,

I remember reading somewhere that * tried to turn the tea throwing incident into a tea spilling accident so I'm sure she'll try to spin the abuse she hurled at people into something else.

I loathe her more and more every day.
LavenderLady said…
@Sandie,
That she has to do the pap walk at all proves she nowhere near the icon she thinks she is. Icons never do the pap stroll. They don't have to.
Mel said…
It was 20° where I live yesterday, and even I didn't have that much outwear on. It was 60° where she was.

Plus, no way would you even know who that was unless someone told you. Think it's interesting how the body guard is an H look alike? Does she think that we won't notice that that isn't H?
LavenderLady said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JnjZKYHDks
Neil Sean's latest. Sorry if already posted. I'm behind.
___

What happened to the podcast? Nobody wants them IMO.
Elsbeth1847 said…

Shopping:

As others have pointed out, real security guards don't carry even a cup of coffee so they can respond to a threat immediately. And, they certainly don't leave the side of the protected one (because if they don't need protecting in this store, why would they in the prior one(s) that day?

I thought it a little on the smarmy side to mention the names of the clothing (not where it was worn before) but that is all you apparently need to do to show you are clearly relatable and then the backhander comment about how most of the local wealthy shun such dress up. Maybe this was in response to the criticism about expensive clothing in Harlem? IDK but it still comes off as Lady Bountiful.


LavenderLady said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
LavenderLady said…
@Mel
re: bodyguard

I hadn't noticed him. Not enough footage. But from what I can see he's better looking than spare and younger (!)...

___

But why does she need a bodyguard? What a poser. I don't think anyone there would even give a rat's and isn't Montecito well patrolled? I mean even in the NYC subway at night could she get anyone to pay her one iota of attention. Pathetic!

No way in H are those boots worth that kind of money. I have a gorgeous pair of vintage Frye Campus boots in excellent condition from the 1960s that I paid under $175 for. We do know she'd merch her own granny if she could get a few quid.

Princess Pathetic!
Sandie said…
Off Topic, just for a simle:

When Prince Philip was asked if he was looking forward to Christmas "You must be joking," he replied. "It means trying to stop the grandchildren killing each other or busting up the furniture and acting as marriage guidance counsellor to their parents."
LavenderLady said…

P.s.

Haha just now getting to the comments. The verdict is in. Many are using the term pathetic! Perfect word for what she is doing.
snarkyatherbest said…
aw she does pay attention to us. a little christmas present. a pap walk. and the dear girl is wearing full on winter coat when weather is in the 50s. and looks staged. as one poster above mentioned Harry must be out of town. now do one with the kids!
Fifi LaRue said…
Good catch there! That's not a bodyguard, that's a male personal assistant, picking up dry-cleaning. When she has to call a photographer to take a pap shot, then that's proof right there that she's of no consequence. I'll bet everyone in Montecito gives her a wide berth when she shows up in town.
Louise said…
Kate Middleton came out today with her promotional video for her Christmas concert on ITV, so I guess this is why Markle released her pap shot today.
Louise said…
Wondering how the Daily Mail had the details on everything that she was wearing in that pap photo.
I think she must have persuaded H that British security forces are out to get her, you know, `like they did Diana', and this is part of the charade,
Anonymous said…
Whenever I need a lift I turn to the always entertaining never disappointing comments on the DM. This one isn’t the most original but it made me laugh out loud:

Ken Ward, Bristol, United Kingdom, 5 hours ago

“It would be more preferable if she wore a bag over her head instead of a mask”

Elise Jones, Melbourne, Australia, 57 minutes ago

“And a sock in her mouth...”
LavenderLady said…
@Rebecca,
Those comments give me so much laughter. People are so clever ☺️
Miggy said…
LavenderLady said: "She's doing the pap stroll to prove she's not yet checked into that "health spa". Yet..."

Health spa? lol

The type of facility she needs to be checked into closed its doors, (at least in the UK) many years ago!!

*************************************************************************************

Good video from Taz... who according to The Daily Express is now a Royal Commentator. 😉

The Princes and the BBC!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7XMLC4TtLE
Thanks for sharing those hysterical comments from the DM Rebecca 😂😃
Maneki Neko said…
@LavenderLady

Exactly what I thought when I saw the photos - thanks @Miggy for the link. Why does her highness (sarc) need a bodyguard? Especially as you can't see her face, what with the !ask, oversize sunglasses and hat. No one would notice her, I bet, so she obviously tipped the paps. Desperate or what?
Maneki Neko said…
Re * Christmas shopping in Montecito, I love this comment:


joanofarcinc, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago

She'll give herself away when she does her trademark squat on the sidewalk. I hope the bodyguard was carrying a poop a scoop for that eventuality

🤣🤣
Sandie said…
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/12/how-the-only-known-photo-of-prince-andrew-and-the-pedophile-happened

A long read and a well-researched article about Andrew and Epstein.

I saw parallels with the Harkles ...

A wife who is a big spender, and what she was given was just not enough (Frogmore Cottage, lower down in a hierarchy with certain slippage for the future, tiaras and other royal jewels witheld, state banquets at the castle denied ...).

Security paid for by the British taxpayer, the Sussex Royal brand and social media platform, the magical HRH, occasional royal appearances and tours to maintain the brand was the plan to become very rich and powerful on her terms. And then the Queen said no to all of that. The Sussexes lashed out like petulant children, and now he is grifting frantically to feed her voracious appetite for a billionaire lifestyle, while she dreams up more schemes to find platforms for her grandiosity (reduced to a pap walk in Montecito this week).

The chances of a tragic end are high, but it might be tacky and pedestrian rather than the downfall of Andrew.
Sandie said…
@Fifi LaRue

What you say makes sense ... that is not a bodyguard, or at least not a proper one. That is a driver/general go-get-me guy (carry, fetch, take dog for walk ...).
Sandie said…
I noticed that for the first time, she ignored the photographer instead of looking straight into the camera. I wonder who advised her to change that habit of a lifetime and why she listened.
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy.
LOL! Yeah, "health spa" in quotes as she will use that as a ploy...
because she's really in the psych ward :D :D
Sandie said…
The photographer is a woman ...

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3087485/bio

Does not sound like a nice character ...

https://pagesix.com/2009/01/13/sleazy-does-it/
Snarkyatherbest said…
Sandie - I am betting she initially did look at the camera but didnt submit those photos.

Does the "bodyguard" with her look like the guy they hired for programing? Damn masks cant tell.

I agree She has to keep the paps chasing her narrative alive

But where are the kids? no santa pics? no stroller?
Miggy said…
@LavenderLady,

If Harry's brain ever ascends from his nether regions and he decides to call it quits... I can imagine TBW singing this to him. 😂😄😅

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fn36l_z3WY
Miggy said…
Daily Mail really pushing The Body Guy's videos. He'll be happy. (I hope)


When I posted the original link to the DM article about her little 'shopping trip' I don't recall seeing his video at the end of the article... but it's there now!
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
When I was a kid in the 60s that song creeped me out. Now I know why! And I only remembered the chorus lol.

I would pay big money to see her hauled off in a straight jacket😂
Mel said…
If you saw someone looking like that when you were out in a boat, went you stay far far away, in case they were a terrorist or something?
Mel said…
Out and about, not out in a boat. Although if I was in a boat and saw someone looking like that, I would still stay far, far away.
Miggy said…
OT

@LavenderLady,

I was almost a teenager when that song was released and felt as though I'd already been imprisoned in an institution for too many years! Not going to go into too much detail, other to say that the tormentors wore black & white and were religious!

However, needless to say, myself & my friends would sing certain parts of it, plus the chorus at the top of our voices because we identified with some of the lyrics.

Far from creepy to us. On the contrary...it gave us a good laugh!! 😉

Miggy said…
The Body Language Guy.

Meghan EXPOSED herself CHOOSING between William and Harry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn8PHkUamMw
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
Just saw that. Yes our guy went there! He's def one of us lol.
LavenderLady said…
@Miggy,
I was an angsty kid so I didn't find it funny. My older sister who was my abuser-bullying-made me hate that song. But now I think it's pretty funny :D We play it here in the states during Halloween.

@Mel,

I agree. She looks like she has a bomb under her coat LOL!

Popular posts from this blog

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seeing more articles which not only talk

The Opening Act of New Adventures in Retail

 I keep thinking things will settle down to the lazy days of spring where the weather is gorgeous and there is a certain sense of peacefulness.  New flowers are coming out. increasing daylight so people can be outside/play and thinking gardening thoughts.  And life is quiet.  Calm. And then something happens like a comet shooting across the sky.  (Out of nowhere it arrives and then leaves almost as quickly.)   An update to a law suit.  Video of the website is released (but doesn't actually promote any specific product which can be purchased from the website).  A delay and then jam is given out (but to whom and possible more importantly - who did not make the list?).  Trophies almost fall (oops).  Information slips out like when the official date of beginning USA residency.  (now, isn't that interesting?) With them, it's always something in play or simmering just below the surface.  The diversity of the endeavors is really quite impressive.  This award, polo, speech, speech,