There just hasn't been a lot from really either of them together or individually lately, has there?
But why?
Have they blown all their bridges, connections and are down to toss the proverbial kitchen sink for attention? I don't know.
We've heard that moving vans showed up at the house. And nothing more like pictures from a neighbor happy to see the back of them.
We've heard they bought a house on Portugal.
But the wording was kind of funny. Multiple sources of the same thing - yes but that isn't a guarantee of proof as it could all be from the same source. It was more along the lines of "We've been told that...". It came off as a we really don't know if we believe this to be true or not so we are putting it out there but hedging our bets. Or at least it did to me.
And nothing more like exactly when, where or for how much or when they might visit it again. Or pictures of the awesome inside. Or outside. Or requisite photo of the back of one of the kids in the garden. Oh, wait. The kids really don't seem to travel with them on most trips, vacation or otherwise.
Come to think of it, I don't remember them even visiting the country in their various travels but I have been wrong before so I could easily be wrong about this. If they did, I was thinking it must have been a long time ago. So why a house now? Very few people buy a place sight unseen or with only a single visit. A recent house sell convinced me of the magnitude of details.
Thinking about that, it would probably more likely be a time share or actual owned pad where it is about just the money changing hands as opposed to a condo like in NYC where you not only have to have the money but be able to pass the board (meaning they like you and think you will fit in as opposed to disliking you/turning down your application).
Nothing more about any of the shows - cooking or deal similar to Spotify. Or the retail arm for jam and other not yet specified products since that brief flurry of activity. And the trademark issues (which I thought I remembered as a logo deal breaker).
Jan Moir (Daily Mail) points this out in a way I had not thought of. Missing the Christmas panic buying and that clouding the title is a long existing company Royal Rivera who apparently is in the gift basket market.
Fruit was their first foray but they expanded in many directions. They also have smoked salmon, beef, vegan charcuterie, their own wine and more to cover any situation where some type of food is needed. Very trendy in terms of expensive with good quality items (how be it small portions it looks like - why else would they sell two lobster pot pies as a save you $20 deal?). The jam doesn't have RR (but probably still is a proprietary product) on the label so they are correct that it could be confusing to a consumer.
This company comes off as it looks like it is everything she might have wanted her company to be.
Granted the couple seem to be doing their own thing now instead of lock-step movement. A little flurry here or there.
Even so, it's almost like they both fell off the edge of the world. Especially when you think about how they used to be here or there all the time with very few days passing without being in the press somewhere. And with photos.
Maybe they are saving up for a Hail Mary Pass? If so, what do you think that would look like?
Comments
“ Yes, I saw three dolls. One at Windsor, one at the polo match where Megabully's wearing the army tent, and then in Canada with the doll without diapers Megabully's carrying in that sling on her chest. Three absolutely lifeless babies.”
https://x.com/NotoriousSzin/status/1868690727515075045
https://x.com/RNN_RoyalNews/status/1868748247898243363
This is Grok's (twitter's AI chatbot)strategy to cover for the situation of fake kids.
The formerly royal doofus squatting? With his legs spread? On a z Christmas card? An alleged daughter with ratty hair taller than her brother whose hair became straighter and redder. Why bother. Id rather see the chickens wearing Santa hats.
Archewell 2023 Tax Returns, The DM Lawsuit, ‘The Welcome Project’, And Ignored Announcements
Rather scathing article about those two over the pond. There is a reference to He's case against the DM, with the trail date now being set for 14 January 2026. What is interesting and which I must have missed is that H has joined forces with Baroness Lawrence to fight the case with him. The article makes interesting points.
What strikes me though is hat her proportions are wrong for a 3 year-old - she's more like 5 or six (or even older? judging her head size against the length of her torso and that against the length of her legs.
I think her head needs to be larger and her legs shorter if they are to go with that torso length.
BTW, IIRC when she produced the photo on the Bear Path in Canada, ( Archie looking like a dead frog floating in a pond, legs extended , hanging down lifelessly ) I thought he had to be a doll. Were he alive, it would've been child abuse/cruelty to carry him like that.
Likewise the pic where she's heading for Frog Cott with a child under each arm. I can't imagine a living, conscious child totally letting itself go so limp. They were, IMO, rag dolls.
https://x.com/nancytsidley/status/1868755320501387695
The card has that photo and also photos featuring the duo, mainly * centre stage. The photo grandly states 'On behalf of the office of Prince Harry and M the duke etc Archewell Production and Archewell Foundation '. I think they've had aso much flak they're now trying to present a positive image. Not sure who the card is for, who cares about Archewell?
The first link is just the photo of the happy family, complete with dogs, , the second one is for the article, should you wish to read that tripe.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/16/23/93205425-14199519-image-a-7_1734390585522.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14199519/lilibet-long-hair-harry-meghan-holiday-card.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14201209/Harry-Meghan-holiday-card-sparks-wild-conspiracy-theories.html
At this point I am not so convinced the theories are wild or conspiracy level but that's my opinion after these many years of reading the board. Perhaps it is a legal CYA move. Or stir the pot. Or both.
When I look at the array of the photos: you see each one of them displaying a I'm a kind caring person reaching out to help this other, three we are happy, smiling, do dress up and are a package deal and then the happy family of parents each reaching out to a kid we cannot see with a sprinkling of dogs.
Five close ups and a distance far enough to make details difficult. In the past, her photographers have been allowed to get close enough to see the details of clothing, the face (think of the one of L sitting in the grass looking at the camera) but now - not so much. Interesting move, generating interest but is it in ways desired long term?
My lands, girl, where’d you get that hot tea about * gender-transitioning? Long ago, when the Twats were newly married, I recall reading a comment about how Haz’s woman is really a man…and her “mannish personality” was one of the proofs. By which I think her pathological need to dominate every situation was meant.. not that she appeared masculine per se. Uncouth, unprincipled, unoriginal and I groomed maybe, but the idea that * was secretly a dude was a con too far even for an uber-sceptic like me. Her physicality after all, is undeniably petite and there aren’t the usual tells fit someone who is “passing”. Her alto voice which I found pleasant before I knew anything about her is in the normal register for a female. She’d obviously worked hard, or rather, spent a ton of sugar daddy money to transform herself from the spectacularly homely preteen she was into her current iteration. Were she a nice person and well liked, she’d qualify as attractive on a good day, if not a great beauty.
But we know too much now to find her remotely attractive. Ugly is as ugly does. But I’ve been marinating over things these last several years and what once seemed completely outlandish gossip fodder I am now leaning toward as quite plausible. My theory is different from yours, though related. If we consider the possibility that the Duchess was born a genetic male with androgen insensitivity disorder….that would explain SO MUCH. In the absence of internal problems in childhood, most of these individuals are not diagnosed until they reach adulthood and start pursuing reproduction. Since many if not most of them externally present as female, they and their families usually don’t have any idea of the anomalies until some medical intervention. In 1981, this wouldn’t have been a widely recognized issue and they weren’t doing DNA testing on newborns as a standard practice. So everyone, including *, her family and multiple male partners assumed she was a female…until perhaps she and Trevor started talking kids, or rather, he did. Interesting isn’t it that ere together for a decade but split after less than two years of marriage because he wanted a child? * and her doctors, maybe her mother would know if she’d ever had normal monthly functions. Maybe these rumors of a teenage pregnancy, getting her eggs harvested in Toronto, blather about “menstrual poverty” as a cause…and not one but two ostentatious fauxnancies complete with circus are all an elaborate smoke screen to obscure that the Duchess isn’t transitioning to a man than that she’s always technically been one.
I imagine that a particular set of attributes like that would appeal to a certain demographic—ie, sexually confused men with kinky tastes that are willing to pay for sex. Madam might have had quite a lucrative niche clientele—including a certain screwed up ginger Prince who is at a minimum in my estimation, bisexual with a preference for men and a barely veiled contempt/fear of women. For H, making an alliance with such a person would be like having his cake and eating it. He could get a wife, a Royal wedding, a title, a beard and a kinky boudoir companion all rolled into one. Or at least that’s what he was presented with at Invictus in 2017: He declares his undying devotion and makes * a Royal bride….OR the Soho House cohort will tell H’s gran, the Fuke of Edinburgh and Fleet Street at large that the future King’s son has been consorting with a she-male. H’s ego couldn’t take that. There was the small problem of not being able to procreate…hard to do that when the couple lacks the requisite equipment.
We always say that * has more balls than H and that may well be true on more than a figurative level.
Ordinarily, my heart goes out to the individuals who suffer with this birth anomaly through no fault of their own. They are misunderstood, demonized and grow up with all kinds of self-esteem issues. I am not able to feel one iota sorry for Harry’s wife, but viewing her through this lens illuminates much…is this the root of her pathology…? Could it partially explain why Dorito needed drugs to cope and her maternal abandonment? Why Thomas felt compelled to totally cater to setting his kid up as the epitome of feminine desirability (in her own mind)? The hypersexualized behavior and sideline gigs exhibited by * are hallmarks of the female narcissist…as well as sexual abuse survivors. * is likely both of these…and a reproductive anamoly to boot.
*’s pathological hatred of Catherine has yet another layer. She is in every respect the woman * wishes she were. * had zilcho interest in being a mother—except as a marketing opportunity. H never wanted kids either, for their own sake—yammering on about phantom fatherhood is just another manifestation of his covetousness toward everything William has or has achieved.
This latest truly pathetic “Christmas card” shows that they haven’t learned a damn thing. At least we could see faces on the fake kids in the 2021 photoshop effort. That shot of the “kids” looks like it was taken with a drone purchased on Amazon…from 1000 feet away, with Vaseline smeared on the lens. Just how stupid do they think we are? Their utter failure to produce a single normal family photo in over 5 years—or legit birth certificates for either tot is all the proof we need that the kids are a charade. She’s great at creating cockamamie grandiose schemes when she’s high and marinated in Tignanello. But she can’t come up with a viable exit strategy, ever. This family snapsyis as authentic and well-thought out as Madam’s pitiful rotten lemon gift baskets. All either of them can produce is rot.
Now they are expecting that all the international politics will be organized according their feelings.
Harry is expecting that "Kate Middleton" will take care of his return to the Royal Family because that is her task in this life: To take care of Hairy.
All this according to the mirror (yes, minuscules).
Yes, Lady C did have an episode touching on this rumor…IIRC, a viewer had written in asking for Lady C’s opinion on this subject. For legal reasons she couldn’t confirm an unknown of course… but she as good as said she agreed with her response … “I think that is a VERY interesting idea,” she said with a twinkle in her eye and then steered the topic elsewhere.
Given that Lady C has personal experience with being deemed gender-amorphous, she’s got a unique perspective. I don’t think the idea hadn’t gained much traction in the mainstream, but it’s seeming increasingly plausible to me.
The “Ozempic face” may be from other things, and it’s hard to look at her physical attributes (or lack thereof) and wonder, innit? Her odd proportions and the weird hyper-extension of her limbs could point to some genetic anomaly. Like her mental disorders, these physical anomalies are probably attributable to drug exposure in utero.
That’d be a turn-up for the ages, huh? This Kraken beastie has multiple heads. There may well be a secret they are keeping that is even bigger than the provenance of “the children”. Hazza has stepped in it so deep there’s no extricating himself from these La Brea tarpits of his own stupidity.
I, too, vividly remember when “Lady C addressed the point that * might be between genders…”
I thought the suggestion credible, and had no problem with anyone who has faced such a situation.
My problem is with the noisome twosome’s faking and lying. Which might, and in my opinion includes, fake pregnancies, and the odd provenance of the two living children.
I pray, I genuinely pray those tykes have a small army of loving stable adults to raise them to adulthood, and that the dook and his doucheass have only the bare minimum interaction with the innocent children.
With all the trend du jour noise about trans issues, I feel like the relatively rare individuals who suffer from true genetic transgenderism vs. the societally approved engineered kind get lost in the shuffle. I can hardly imagine the private hell those individuals go through. I wish them happiness and safe futures, but that is a challenging road to walk. Those people have always been with us, but it has to be a very lonely road, too. Partners would have to be open-minded and sensitive. Hawwy doesn’t come across as that enlightened; I think we can all agree by this point that the manufactured Cinderella and the Prince twue wuve story was all a cynical pile of BS designed to make * famous. What’s love got to do with it?…Absolutely nothing.
It would be interesting to know if Hawwy knew from the off about his Soho companion’s special attributes (alleged), or if he was subjected to a “Crying Game” moment when he was already embroiled with her. Was that shortly before he broke it off in 2016…or at the time of the Skippy Inskip wedding? 5 months after THAT she turns up uninvited to Invictus—Markus got those tickets, not Hawwy—and their appearance made both Hawwy and Jussie Trudeau break into cold sweats and look like they were going to soil themselves. Lots to unpack there. After the skybox pile-on, Hawwy debuts “his girlfriend” publicly and 2 months after that they’re engaged and have bumped Eugenie’s wedding. Whatever the skybox cohort said to Haz, it was very persuasive.
One can’t help who one loves, and were this a love match, I d wish them mazel tov. If it’s a smash and grab job by a grifting poseur and her mother, that’s a different tale. Bringing home a person of indeterminate gender who is incapable of reproductive functions is a thorny problem when one is a Royal, as is being too transparent about one’s deviant boudoir practices. Those have always gone on, but for people of Hawwy’s station, they can’t become public knowledge. Hawwy’s proclivities are incompatible with the expectations his family has of him and they aren’t socially acceptable either…hence the lying. I’m sure that all the foul behavior and depravity we DO know about is only the tip of the iceberg. I also think all the senior royals have been advised of the facts, which is why the omerta concerning the Sussex activities and “children” is ansolute.
Shemantics
Might get her wish
as a Disney champion
Forget princess She-Ra
she’ll transform to She-Man…
Polorising
Megskimo Knell and flaccid fukka
Flogging a dead horse
ain’t quite pukka
Whistle blown
time to chukka…
All this talk
is she a he or a she
Nah, not convinced
she’s Just Bad energy…
As far as the awareness of such issues is concerned, I bought a physiology text in 1967/8 which included something about chromosomal intersex. I recall talking about it to my students who were aiming for medical school. The focus was on sex-testing' Olympic athletes to eliminate those who were not so much masculinised females as feminised males. One student looked very uncomfortable and I thought `Oh dee-ar... Quick! change the subject...’
In the mid-70s though, I do recall teaching staff being informed about one pupil with Turner's syndrome (just one X chromosome).
I don’t think I heard the term `androgen insensitivity’ until much later although I did teach that the default position of foetal development was female and that maleness developed in response to hormonal influences.
So I’d say that the medical and allied professions were aware but not the general public.
I wonder if the surgery * allegedly underwent in her youth could have been to `tidy’ her up – to remove undescended testes for instance. Had Harry been the firstborn, any gynae. anomaly would have been detected in the mandatory examination for a bride of the Heir– or would she have dodged that?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14210265/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-suspicious-Manhattan-car-chase-paparazzi-case-stalls.html
'Prince Harry pressured New York cops to speed up their investigation and make arrests after their 'high speed' chase with photographers through the streets of Manhattan.
He even claimed there was a cover-up, letters and emails obtained by DailyMail.com show.
'The duke feels intentionally misled and is suspicious of a cover-up,' one missive from his security company to the New York Police Department said.
Harry also demanded that arrests be made the very next day and threatened to make an official complaint.'
Will he also sue the NYPD? The sheer brass neck! It's old history now, does he not have anything better to do? He seems to be permanently disgruntled but then if he's living with * that's understandable. He's on a hiding to nothing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14210265/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-suspicious-Manhattan-car-chase-paparazzi-case-stalls.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14214571/supermodel-petra-nemcova-survived-tsunami-tree.html?ico=related-replace
What really impressed me was that they go in and stay around for like a year.
(hard to think it's been 20 years)
`Meghan Markle 'no longer wearing the as Prince Harry taking 'dominant role' in relationship'
trhttps://www.gbnews.com/royal/meghan-markle-prince-harry-body-language-dominant-royal-news?ousers
'
Has the worm turned?