There just hasn't been a lot from really either of them together or individually lately, has there?
But why?
Have they blown all their bridges, connections and are down to toss the proverbial kitchen sink for attention? I don't know.
We've heard that moving vans showed up at the house. And nothing more like pictures from a neighbor happy to see the back of them.
We've heard they bought a house on Portugal.
But the wording was kind of funny. Multiple sources of the same thing - yes but that isn't a guarantee of proof as it could all be from the same source. It was more along the lines of "We've been told that...". It came off as a we really don't know if we believe this to be true or not so we are putting it out there but hedging our bets. Or at least it did to me.
And nothing more like exactly when, where or for how much or when they might visit it again. Or pictures of the awesome inside. Or outside. Or requisite photo of the back of one of the kids in the garden. Oh, wait. The kids really don't seem to travel with them on most trips, vacation or otherwise.
Come to think of it, I don't remember them even visiting the country in their various travels but I have been wrong before so I could easily be wrong about this. If they did, I was thinking it must have been a long time ago. So why a house now? Very few people buy a place sight unseen or with only a single visit. A recent house sell convinced me of the magnitude of details.
Thinking about that, it would probably more likely be a time share or actual owned pad where it is about just the money changing hands as opposed to a condo like in NYC where you not only have to have the money but be able to pass the board (meaning they like you and think you will fit in as opposed to disliking you/turning down your application).
Nothing more about any of the shows - cooking or deal similar to Spotify. Or the retail arm for jam and other not yet specified products since that brief flurry of activity. And the trademark issues (which I thought I remembered as a logo deal breaker).
Jan Moir (Daily Mail) points this out in a way I had not thought of. Missing the Christmas panic buying and that clouding the title is a long existing company Royal Rivera who apparently is in the gift basket market.
Fruit was their first foray but they expanded in many directions. They also have smoked salmon, beef, vegan charcuterie, their own wine and more to cover any situation where some type of food is needed. Very trendy in terms of expensive with good quality items (how be it small portions it looks like - why else would they sell two lobster pot pies as a save you $20 deal?). The jam doesn't have RR (but probably still is a proprietary product) on the label so they are correct that it could be confusing to a consumer.
This company comes off as it looks like it is everything she might have wanted her company to be.
Granted the couple seem to be doing their own thing now instead of lock-step movement. A little flurry here or there.
Even so, it's almost like they both fell off the edge of the world. Especially when you think about how they used to be here or there all the time with very few days passing without being in the press somewhere. And with photos.
Maybe they are saving up for a Hail Mary Pass? If so, what do you think that would look like?
Comments
“ Yes, I saw three dolls. One at Windsor, one at the polo match where Megabully's wearing the army tent, and then in Canada with the doll without diapers Megabully's carrying in that sling on her chest. Three absolutely lifeless babies.”
https://x.com/NotoriousSzin/status/1868690727515075045
https://x.com/RNN_RoyalNews/status/1868748247898243363
This is Grok's (twitter's AI chatbot)strategy to cover for the situation of fake kids.
The formerly royal doofus squatting? With his legs spread? On a z Christmas card? An alleged daughter with ratty hair taller than her brother whose hair became straighter and redder. Why bother. Id rather see the chickens wearing Santa hats.
Archewell 2023 Tax Returns, The DM Lawsuit, ‘The Welcome Project’, And Ignored Announcements
Rather scathing article about those two over the pond. There is a reference to He's case against the DM, with the trail date now being set for 14 January 2026. What is interesting and which I must have missed is that H has joined forces with Baroness Lawrence to fight the case with him. The article makes interesting points.
What strikes me though is hat her proportions are wrong for a 3 year-old - she's more like 5 or six (or even older? judging her head size against the length of her torso and that against the length of her legs.
I think her head needs to be larger and her legs shorter if they are to go with that torso length.
BTW, IIRC when she produced the photo on the Bear Path in Canada, ( Archie looking like a dead frog floating in a pond, legs extended , hanging down lifelessly ) I thought he had to be a doll. Were he alive, it would've been child abuse/cruelty to carry him like that.
Likewise the pic where she's heading for Frog Cott with a child under each arm. I can't imagine a living, conscious child totally letting itself go so limp. They were, IMO, rag dolls.
https://x.com/nancytsidley/status/1868755320501387695
The card has that photo and also photos featuring the duo, mainly * centre stage. The photo grandly states 'On behalf of the office of Prince Harry and M the duke etc Archewell Production and Archewell Foundation '. I think they've had aso much flak they're now trying to present a positive image. Not sure who the card is for, who cares about Archewell?
The first link is just the photo of the happy family, complete with dogs, , the second one is for the article, should you wish to read that tripe.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/12/16/23/93205425-14199519-image-a-7_1734390585522.jpg
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14199519/lilibet-long-hair-harry-meghan-holiday-card.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14201209/Harry-Meghan-holiday-card-sparks-wild-conspiracy-theories.html
At this point I am not so convinced the theories are wild or conspiracy level but that's my opinion after these many years of reading the board. Perhaps it is a legal CYA move. Or stir the pot. Or both.
When I look at the array of the photos: you see each one of them displaying a I'm a kind caring person reaching out to help this other, three we are happy, smiling, do dress up and are a package deal and then the happy family of parents each reaching out to a kid we cannot see with a sprinkling of dogs.
Five close ups and a distance far enough to make details difficult. In the past, her photographers have been allowed to get close enough to see the details of clothing, the face (think of the one of L sitting in the grass looking at the camera) but now - not so much. Interesting move, generating interest but is it in ways desired long term?
My lands, girl, where’d you get that hot tea about * gender-transitioning? Long ago, when the Twats were newly married, I recall reading a comment about how Haz’s woman is really a man…and her “mannish personality” was one of the proofs. By which I think her pathological need to dominate every situation was meant.. not that she appeared masculine per se. Uncouth, unprincipled, unoriginal and I groomed maybe, but the idea that * was secretly a dude was a con too far even for an uber-sceptic like me. Her physicality after all, is undeniably petite and there aren’t the usual tells fit someone who is “passing”. Her alto voice which I found pleasant before I knew anything about her is in the normal register for a female. She’d obviously worked hard, or rather, spent a ton of sugar daddy money to transform herself from the spectacularly homely preteen she was into her current iteration. Were she a nice person and well liked, she’d qualify as attractive on a good day, if not a great beauty.
But we know too much now to find her remotely attractive. Ugly is as ugly does. But I’ve been marinating over things these last several years and what once seemed completely outlandish gossip fodder I am now leaning toward as quite plausible. My theory is different from yours, though related. If we consider the possibility that the Duchess was born a genetic male with androgen insensitivity disorder….that would explain SO MUCH. In the absence of internal problems in childhood, most of these individuals are not diagnosed until they reach adulthood and start pursuing reproduction. Since many if not most of them externally present as female, they and their families usually don’t have any idea of the anomalies until some medical intervention. In 1981, this wouldn’t have been a widely recognized issue and they weren’t doing DNA testing on newborns as a standard practice. So everyone, including *, her family and multiple male partners assumed she was a female…until perhaps she and Trevor started talking kids, or rather, he did. Interesting isn’t it that ere together for a decade but split after less than two years of marriage because he wanted a child? * and her doctors, maybe her mother would know if she’d ever had normal monthly functions. Maybe these rumors of a teenage pregnancy, getting her eggs harvested in Toronto, blather about “menstrual poverty” as a cause…and not one but two ostentatious fauxnancies complete with circus are all an elaborate smoke screen to obscure that the Duchess isn’t transitioning to a man than that she’s always technically been one.
I imagine that a particular set of attributes like that would appeal to a certain demographic—ie, sexually confused men with kinky tastes that are willing to pay for sex. Madam might have had quite a lucrative niche clientele—including a certain screwed up ginger Prince who is at a minimum in my estimation, bisexual with a preference for men and a barely veiled contempt/fear of women. For H, making an alliance with such a person would be like having his cake and eating it. He could get a wife, a Royal wedding, a title, a beard and a kinky boudoir companion all rolled into one. Or at least that’s what he was presented with at Invictus in 2017: He declares his undying devotion and makes * a Royal bride….OR the Soho House cohort will tell H’s gran, the Fuke of Edinburgh and Fleet Street at large that the future King’s son has been consorting with a she-male. H’s ego couldn’t take that. There was the small problem of not being able to procreate…hard to do that when the couple lacks the requisite equipment.
We always say that * has more balls than H and that may well be true on more than a figurative level.
Ordinarily, my heart goes out to the individuals who suffer with this birth anomaly through no fault of their own. They are misunderstood, demonized and grow up with all kinds of self-esteem issues. I am not able to feel one iota sorry for Harry’s wife, but viewing her through this lens illuminates much…is this the root of her pathology…? Could it partially explain why Dorito needed drugs to cope and her maternal abandonment? Why Thomas felt compelled to totally cater to setting his kid up as the epitome of feminine desirability (in her own mind)? The hypersexualized behavior and sideline gigs exhibited by * are hallmarks of the female narcissist…as well as sexual abuse survivors. * is likely both of these…and a reproductive anamoly to boot.
*’s pathological hatred of Catherine has yet another layer. She is in every respect the woman * wishes she were. * had zilcho interest in being a mother—except as a marketing opportunity. H never wanted kids either, for their own sake—yammering on about phantom fatherhood is just another manifestation of his covetousness toward everything William has or has achieved.
This latest truly pathetic “Christmas card” shows that they haven’t learned a damn thing. At least we could see faces on the fake kids in the 2021 photoshop effort. That shot of the “kids” looks like it was taken with a drone purchased on Amazon…from 1000 feet away, with Vaseline smeared on the lens. Just how stupid do they think we are? Their utter failure to produce a single normal family photo in over 5 years—or legit birth certificates for either tot is all the proof we need that the kids are a charade. She’s great at creating cockamamie grandiose schemes when she’s high and marinated in Tignanello. But she can’t come up with a viable exit strategy, ever. This family snapsyis as authentic and well-thought out as Madam’s pitiful rotten lemon gift baskets. All either of them can produce is rot.
Now they are expecting that all the international politics will be organized according their feelings.
Harry is expecting that "Kate Middleton" will take care of his return to the Royal Family because that is her task in this life: To take care of Hairy.
All this according to the mirror (yes, minuscules).
Yes, Lady C did have an episode touching on this rumor…IIRC, a viewer had written in asking for Lady C’s opinion on this subject. For legal reasons she couldn’t confirm an unknown of course… but she as good as said she agreed with her response … “I think that is a VERY interesting idea,” she said with a twinkle in her eye and then steered the topic elsewhere.
Given that Lady C has personal experience with being deemed gender-amorphous, she’s got a unique perspective. I don’t think the idea hadn’t gained much traction in the mainstream, but it’s seeming increasingly plausible to me.
The “Ozempic face” may be from other things, and it’s hard to look at her physical attributes (or lack thereof) and wonder, innit? Her odd proportions and the weird hyper-extension of her limbs could point to some genetic anomaly. Like her mental disorders, these physical anomalies are probably attributable to drug exposure in utero.
That’d be a turn-up for the ages, huh? This Kraken beastie has multiple heads. There may well be a secret they are keeping that is even bigger than the provenance of “the children”. Hazza has stepped in it so deep there’s no extricating himself from these La Brea tarpits of his own stupidity.
I, too, vividly remember when “Lady C addressed the point that * might be between genders…”
I thought the suggestion credible, and had no problem with anyone who has faced such a situation.
My problem is with the noisome twosome’s faking and lying. Which might, and in my opinion includes, fake pregnancies, and the odd provenance of the two living children.
I pray, I genuinely pray those tykes have a small army of loving stable adults to raise them to adulthood, and that the dook and his doucheass have only the bare minimum interaction with the innocent children.
With all the trend du jour noise about trans issues, I feel like the relatively rare individuals who suffer from true genetic transgenderism vs. the societally approved engineered kind get lost in the shuffle. I can hardly imagine the private hell those individuals go through. I wish them happiness and safe futures, but that is a challenging road to walk. Those people have always been with us, but it has to be a very lonely road, too. Partners would have to be open-minded and sensitive. Hawwy doesn’t come across as that enlightened; I think we can all agree by this point that the manufactured Cinderella and the Prince twue wuve story was all a cynical pile of BS designed to make * famous. What’s love got to do with it?…Absolutely nothing.
It would be interesting to know if Hawwy knew from the off about his Soho companion’s special attributes (alleged), or if he was subjected to a “Crying Game” moment when he was already embroiled with her. Was that shortly before he broke it off in 2016…or at the time of the Skippy Inskip wedding? 5 months after THAT she turns up uninvited to Invictus—Markus got those tickets, not Hawwy—and their appearance made both Hawwy and Jussie Trudeau break into cold sweats and look like they were going to soil themselves. Lots to unpack there. After the skybox pile-on, Hawwy debuts “his girlfriend” publicly and 2 months after that they’re engaged and have bumped Eugenie’s wedding. Whatever the skybox cohort said to Haz, it was very persuasive.
One can’t help who one loves, and were this a love match, I d wish them mazel tov. If it’s a smash and grab job by a grifting poseur and her mother, that’s a different tale. Bringing home a person of indeterminate gender who is incapable of reproductive functions is a thorny problem when one is a Royal, as is being too transparent about one’s deviant boudoir practices. Those have always gone on, but for people of Hawwy’s station, they can’t become public knowledge. Hawwy’s proclivities are incompatible with the expectations his family has of him and they aren’t socially acceptable either…hence the lying. I’m sure that all the foul behavior and depravity we DO know about is only the tip of the iceberg. I also think all the senior royals have been advised of the facts, which is why the omerta concerning the Sussex activities and “children” is ansolute.
Shemantics
Might get her wish
as a Disney champion
Forget princess She-Ra
she’ll transform to She-Man…
Polorising
Megskimo Knell and flaccid fukka
Flogging a dead horse
ain’t quite pukka
Whistle blown
time to chukka…
All this talk
is she a he or a she
Nah, not convinced
she’s Just Bad energy…
As far as the awareness of such issues is concerned, I bought a physiology text in 1967/8 which included something about chromosomal intersex. I recall talking about it to my students who were aiming for medical school. The focus was on sex-testing' Olympic athletes to eliminate those who were not so much masculinised females as feminised males. One student looked very uncomfortable and I thought `Oh dee-ar... Quick! change the subject...’
In the mid-70s though, I do recall teaching staff being informed about one pupil with Turner's syndrome (just one X chromosome).
I don’t think I heard the term `androgen insensitivity’ until much later although I did teach that the default position of foetal development was female and that maleness developed in response to hormonal influences.
So I’d say that the medical and allied professions were aware but not the general public.
I wonder if the surgery * allegedly underwent in her youth could have been to `tidy’ her up – to remove undescended testes for instance. Had Harry been the firstborn, any gynae. anomaly would have been detected in the mandatory examination for a bride of the Heir– or would she have dodged that?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14210265/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-suspicious-Manhattan-car-chase-paparazzi-case-stalls.html
'Prince Harry pressured New York cops to speed up their investigation and make arrests after their 'high speed' chase with photographers through the streets of Manhattan.
He even claimed there was a cover-up, letters and emails obtained by DailyMail.com show.
'The duke feels intentionally misled and is suspicious of a cover-up,' one missive from his security company to the New York Police Department said.
Harry also demanded that arrests be made the very next day and threatened to make an official complaint.'
Will he also sue the NYPD? The sheer brass neck! It's old history now, does he not have anything better to do? He seems to be permanently disgruntled but then if he's living with * that's understandable. He's on a hiding to nothing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14210265/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-suspicious-Manhattan-car-chase-paparazzi-case-stalls.html
https://www.prompthunt.com/prompt/cl9e9l5681442qhowgpgqosmb?selectedAsset=cl9e9l57z1467qhowunrx0qjj
It says so much about their relationship.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14214571/supermodel-petra-nemcova-survived-tsunami-tree.html?ico=related-replace
What really impressed me was that they go in and stay around for like a year.
(hard to think it's been 20 years)
`Meghan Markle 'no longer wearing the as Prince Harry taking 'dominant role' in relationship'
trhttps://www.gbnews.com/royal/meghan-markle-prince-harry-body-language-dominant-royal-news?ousers
'
Has the worm turned?
Christmas Singalong
Apologies:l: Various
Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer
Slay Bells
Omid the brown nosed nadir
Has a very plastic pose
And if you ever saw him
You would really know he blows
All of the other media
Like to laugh and call him names
They never let poor brown nose
Forget that he wrote Endgames…
Ellen is cheesed off that she can't drive right up to her `local' by the most direct route on account of bollards. I hasn't occurred to her that they are there precisely to stop urban posers in wide, heavy vehicles damaging the bridge. Should have got a Fiat 500...
Polonic Irratation
Flogging a dead horse
Buyers remorse
Nowt left to say
They’re so passe…
I echo Girl with a Hat’s fine sentiments. I send each and every Nutty good wishes for a Merry Christmas or Happy Hanukkah, or just a more general seasonal good vibe if that’s how you roll.
Special thanks and good wishes go to our indefatigable moderator Abby, and our founder-with-vision Nutty. Did Nutty have the gift of foresight to realize years ago that this whole charade would be still ongoing lo! these many years later?
I would’ve taken a bet that the grift, the marriage, the outrageous conduct, indeed the all-around offensiveness we’ve witnessed would’ve been seen only in the rear-view mirror at the end of this blog’s first two years. I would’ve lost that bet.
How lucky we are that NuttyFlavorBlog exists to document the innumerable astounding things the Dumbarton Sussex duo have unleashed on the public that even a fiction writer would discard as unbelievable.
I’m shooting into the universe an early Happy New Year’s wish: may all of our dreams come true.
Cheers!
Also, I want to say to sandie that I miss her comments and her take on events, and I hope that she's doing well.
Christmas card was worthy of the harkles Best pics are of her and the kids get a blurry photo once again
A few thoughts:
she never labels the picture that the kids are in fact the invisikids Plausible deniability? Rachel playing games? yes!!!
The kids running to the parents looks like what happens in custody visits on neutral ground. We are here for visitation now that may be the only truth in there ;-)
Does feel of late that Harry is MIA from Meghan and you know she would not have the invisikids to herself. if she did she would start merching them asap and the family pap walks in the car parks would be every day
i still find it so curious the brand (whatever version) had no social media (well except for the burner accounts) I think that goes back to the sandringham agreement. nowadays no brand goes without social media three year or is it four later and still nothing? very odd
also the kids merching - i dont think thats a harry blocking thing i think it is sandringham again if she had legal custody of those kids there is no way she wouldnt remember this is the gal who asks for forgiveness not permission Also if she had lilybuck$ that would not be covered by sandringham? so why not merch her
no matter. hope you all have a great Christmas - im off to wrap the last few presents
It gave me quite a shock to see `Harry' on TV for the Pr. of Wales Carol Service. Is it possible that he would ever admit that he was wrong and his critics were right?
Last week, a friend told me I was the only person she knows who doesn’t believe that Archie and Lily are real and genuine and implied that I had swallowed Fake News and manipulated photos/films. I’d said that as far as I was concerned there was no solid evidence that they are as the Harkles say there are and actually have met their Royal relatives.
Upon reflection. I can think of only 2 pieces of evidence which could not be fakes, both documents with subtexts that say that `Archie’ was not born according to the law on Royal babies and the Succession, without actually saying it.
1)The birth announcement at BP, giving rise to the Discombobulation of Nicholas Witchell who was filmed at the gates reporting on the unverified announcement and gave up, lost for words. I assume he knew full well what the wording, and the lack of doctors’ signatures, meant but daren’t say. Hence what he later called his `brainfreeze’.
2)The unstamped birth certificate we were shown for Archie, in the form used for adopted children .
Can any Nutties add to this list with any other evidence that can’t be questioned as fake?
Finally, I too wish to thank all who keep this blog going. May all Nutties have a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Healthy New Year.
Happy Hanukkah (to those who celebrate it)
Happy Holidays (to those who celebrate other special days in this season or celebrate none)
Hugs to you!
(Catherine looked lovely, as always, at church)
'Prince Harry's role at mental health firm BetterUp is to 'advocate for mental fitness' and 'guide the company's social mission’.
The Duke of Sussex is also a vocal champion for its app, described as 'life coach Tinder for millennials', revealing that he used it to find his own 'truly awesome' mental health trainer when he joined in 2021 post-Megxit.
But past and present employees suggest there is much work to be done after describing the US-based business as a ‘toxic train wreck’ and 'psychologically unsafe place to work’ where ‘everyone is uncomfortable and living in fear’.
There are also choice words for BetterUp's 'elitist club of leaders', who according to one worker 'have no moral compass' and 'lack self awareness’.
And a company chief executive who used their services recently vowed never to use them again, claiming: 'I had concerns about the confidentiality of my discussions and privacy during coaching calls with coaches'.
Another described the sales team as 'predatory'. 'I am glad I backed out because I read reviews by former employees and it didn't look good and also highlighted the poor pay pressure to sell and lay offs and that they pay Prince Harry over a million dollars a year', they said.'
Harry is certainly the last person (or *) who should be its Chief Impact Officer. Another success!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14122257/prince-harry-mental-health-firm-condemned-staff-toxic.html
It could also be that they still feel the family has failed to fully accept how much the couple added way back when like from the Down Under tour or that they heard some (unwelcome) words of how to behave when representing the monarchy as criticism?
or maybe it was that they feel that everything which hasn't worked out as thought (have several family members who spent much of Christmas complaining bitterly about this or that person who has kept them from happy life)?
or even something we don't know which was said/not said, done/not done in private?
or just that William, Katherine and their kids have the future on many levels?
Eh, still thinking about my family at Christmas. Sometimes ... too frequently ... one of them keeps trying to engage to create drama (for their own benefit of proving how justified they are to view their life as a victim). They keep trying (because it has always worked eventually to get someone upset enough to respond). So they stick with patterns of success.
However, in the case of the BRF, that is a family which kind of wrote the book on how to grey rock in the never explain, never complain.
I don't know.
“…Harry said “They know what they did” because they showed him all the background information they had on ‘Meg the grifter’s’ long history and in his paranoia, he thought that not only were they lying, but that they were feeding BS to the media to destroy his poor Megsy. They were so intimidated of her awesomeness they needed to bring her down.” - end snip -
We know for a fact that Harry dumped the many friends who tried to warn him - with specifics - about his deviously manipulative, grifting intended.
He was bound and determined to marry her, so he chose to believe her lies and to dump every person who tried to help him avoid the biggest mistake he could make in life…including his loving brother, sister-in-law, father, and other relatives, all of whom, I believe, loved him sincerely and had only his best interests at heart.
In my opinion Harry is sick beyond help, and delusional: he still believes he is in the right, and everyone else is in the wrong; that if the world and Royal Family would’ve just let his bride do only what she wanted, when she wanted, wearing what she wanted, rather than letting the RF keep reining her in, she would shine more brightly than any other royal, and the world would see her fabulousness through his fawning eyes.
Again, in my opinion, since Harry was raised in the most awful manner where he never heard the word no, and his mother actively encouraged him to do naughty things but cautioned him to not get caught, Harry thinks there is nothing wrong with both he and Meghan lying and taking shortcuts, some specifically against the law, to achieve whatever they want. They both think that we honorable people are chumps to adhere to honorable actions rather than to agree that “the means justify the ends”.
Harry is likely aggravated with some of Meghan's crude un-royal actions, but he congratulates her cunning and still hopes the two of them will come out ahead of everyone else. I believe he thinks they would never have needed to resort to their underhanded shenanigans if the Royal Family would’ve simply let them have the vaunted half-in, half-out they demanded.
He therefore blames everyone else for forcing his dominant bride, and his submissive self to pull all these monumentally crass stunts and offensive gaffs. He will never look inward, nor feel shame or blame.
For example, Radar Online ran a story today re: Mm threatening to fire her lawyer over the ARO trademark fiasco, like it was a new story.
But they first ran it a while back, on Nov. 29th. And a few times since then.
Megicide
Merry Christmas abbyh
and all of you here
Wishing glad tidings
Good luck for next year
A year that will bring
much joy and much cheer
As the harkles finally get
a boot up their rear…
Bedlam
Away from the danger
no kids for the crib
Our lowly broad sleazus
Must admit to her fib…
@GWAH 😘
@OCGal 👍
Were this real, she would orchestrate the biggest media event since the passing of QEII (one tear, left eye, go!)
It was the piece about Dukey and Flukey at Infectus 2023, so good!
Whoever is behind this is totally plugged in about excrable clothing choices, lack of crowds at her speaking events, and so much more. I love it and will watch the other bits too.
Cheers!
I bet it was my glowing mention that got it deleted, for which I am both sorry and extremely angry.
Hey Douche and Douchass and Sucks Squadies, you cannot delete every single truth you see on the internet.
To my mind it was the most overt snub any of the Royal Family ever gave to Has-been and Never-was, as they continued spiraling ever more out of control.
Please see link at bottom to Her Late Majesty the Queen’s Christmas photograph (likely taken from her annual Christmas video message) and bask in the warm glow of her not-so-subtle message to the fakes of Montecito.
Queen Elizabeth II sits in the magnificent room, surrounded by photos of her beloved family:
Her father King George VI, her husband Prince Philip, her son Prince Charles and daughter in law Camilla, and her grandson Prince William and his photogenic family.
The Mountebanks of Montecito are conspicuously missing from this family tableau.
Her late Majesty must’ve really had all she was going to take by that point, and decided to give a message that no-one in the complete world could possibly misinterpret. The relationship was unsalvageable and she was no longer going to pretend otherwise.
Kudos to “Harry’s Grandma” for being absolutely done with the lunacy!
Enjoy this:
https://x.com/storiesbyjemay/status/1872965652929233278/photo/1
Aye, according to the Harkles, their omission from the photos was the last straw! That was the deciding factor precipitating their flouncing off to Canada in a huff. After all they had done, this was the final insult, especially their omission from the photo of Her Majesty with the next THREE in line!.
Recollections may vary.
Baba Megdear
I’m no Mother Shipton
but I can foresee
The end is nigh
for H and me me
Daily Mail mocking
an unending flame
They’ll never give up
‘til madam is slain…
Sod Off
Let’s not look backwards
at what they’ve done
Look to the future
what they’ll become
A boil on the arse
soon to be lanced
A failed courtesan
we’ll call her askant…
'Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's 'Sussex Squad' have been slammed for creating a 'ridiculous' Christmas card featuring an AI-generated image of Archie and Lilibet.
Last week, a member of Harry and Meghan's 'Sussex Squad' created a fake Christmas card showing an AI-generated portrait of the couple's rarely-seen children.
The digital card - which appears to have been made on Canva Pro by the anonymous royal fan - reads: 'Merry Christmas & Happy New Year from Prince Archie & Princess Lilibet.'
In the middle of the card is a black-and-white image of an AI-generated Archie and Lilibet, which has been created using images already in the public domain.
The fake image, which appears to have been first published two days after Christmas, shows Lilibet wearing a floral dress similar to the one the couple's daughter donned in their official festive card.
Meanwhile, the computer-generated Archie is dressed in a cable-knit and cargo pants - which jut out at an odd angle - as he beams for the camera.'
....
Why do they bother?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14235887/meghan-markle-prince-harry-fake-christmas-card-sussex-squad.html
Thank you for Megicide, Bedlam, Baba Medgear and Sod Off. Your ditties never fail to entertain😁
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoiKHszl_G0
Worse, she's still here - the tabloids won't let us forget her . I fervently hope that we are at least at the beginning of the end, rather than just the end of the beginning. It's been a long and weary road so far. Let us hope for some kind of deus ex machina to descend and scupper her once and or all.
The pr nonsense of *’s self-absorbed delusions will continue on rota: Olive branches, H will help with duties, H demands an apology- they know what they did-, England is unsafe so we need VIP security, * is the new Martha Stewart, etc.
2025 will be the Year of Diminishing Returns for the Desperate Duo.
' As well as her first post, the @meghan account also updated its profile picture to a black-and-white shot of Meghan smiling and wearing and elegant white dress. [elegant and * do not belong in the same sentence. And how she loves those arty b&w pix!]
The return to Instagram comes after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex vowed never to return to social media after claiming to have dealt with an 'almost unsurvivable' amount of abuse.'
Hypocrisy at its finest.
It remains to be seen if their Netflix contract will be renewed. The rest of their poor endeavours have not exactly been a roaring success and I'm not sure *'s new Instagram account will bring home the bacon. All in the DM.
The only career she has had since she left her "royal duties": relaunching herself with short idiotic films doing idiotic meaningless things.
She does not accept that she is a middle aged woman, the youth is behind her forever. She should act her age. That would be more dignified.
are some of the comments section words of Daily Mail, so response seems to be quite tepid.
https://x.com/according2_taz/status/1874937589641437549
Seriously twisted, especially the last two pics.
https://x.com/radar_online/status/1874855745084084308
This is radar on line, a pretty big internet gossip site's tweet.
https://x.com/MeghansMole/status/1874913007320670624
Otherwise the Plebs do not know Who Is Who!
Montecitno
I would never, ever
put cream on the top
A Victoria sponge will
sop and then flop
Sliced browned bread
topped with cucumber and cheese
That bowl of mess
more Harrow, please
Dropping petals raised her dish
Howls of laughter, not what she’d wish
Her ‘at home’ appears to be filmed elsewhere
Begged and borrowed
no invite to their lair
This to me the
cherry tomato on top…
Happy New Year @Maneki
& all you Nutties
She’ll still be here
ever diminishing
until…
It's obvious that Emma Thynn, Marchioness of Bath, was copying *, not the other way round (sarc). * is mentally unbalanced. Mind you, she was cosplaying Diana so this should come as no surprise (and Emma Thynn is genuinely half Nigerian).
I couldn't see very much on X but then am not on it. Lady Colin did answer someone's question about *'s change of name on Archie's birth certificate in a recent video. Harry originally informed the registrar that the person who gave birth to Archie was HRH the Duchess of Sussex, first names Rachel Meghan, maiden name Markle. This was changed a few weeks later to remove her Christian names. * said she was forced by the Palace who said they had nothing to do with it. [now, who would you believe?] According to Lady C, it makes a difference in that a woman purporting the be HR etc gave birth at the Portland but her Christian names were not Rachel Meghan so the names had to be removed. That's one interpretation.
As always with *, nothing is clear, nothing is straightforward and I think she loves playing with the public and creating intrigue and mystery.
'At home with Meghan.. just not HER home: Duchess rents £5m reality TV mansion a stone's throw from her own Montecito mansion for new Netflix cookery show - kitted out with a £15,000 range, £600 pans and chopping boards a snip at £60 each!'
Saw this in the DM, I didn't bother reading it, I just read some comments, they are way more interesting than an article on her cooking. As people have said, imagine cooking with her long rat's tails hanging over the food.
So where DID you get your ideas from Meghan? The scenes in Duchess' new cookery show that feel very familiar - from Marchioness of Bath to Ladybug Bruschetta and even Kate
Ooh, even the DM which are normally so fawning, get in a kicks.
"MM is probably offended by a recipe because it tells you what to do. "
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Falternate-show-name-let-them-eat-cake-v0-ojcsjrrr5sae1.jpeg%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dfb2ebdfbfb31db5f00681e7512de43187b879f12
In the Amanda Goff article about the latest (something) dazzle drop from *, she goes back and talks about the polo on NF. And there are pictures. I'm scrolling along and then realize that the photo of * wearing white cross over turtle neck - she's not wearing a slip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14240861/Harry-Meghan-2025-Amanda-Goff.html
(personally I doubt this was an intentional Diana cosplay - I will hold up a skirt or dress to a window or light to see if this a slip required outfit. I guess others do not think about this kind of thing before putting it on writes the person who dislikes seeing straps - bra or something else = cringes at seeing a bra and spaghetti top together but ... maybe I am old)
The see-thru skirt being a bonus.
Like @Mel, I thought *'s white outfit was a split skirt. It is quite see through with the sun shining through it. This photo shows it quite clearly and the very high and spiky stilettos - a must on the polo field - only serve to emphasise her spindly legs. Not a good look.
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a60471407/meghan-markle-harry-polo-match-palm-beach-fashion-2024/
I believe wholeheartedly that Megsy is trying to get the NF marketing team fired. That’s been her style from the git-go.
Cut-and-pasted:
“ This is JAW-DROPPING TEA from a credible source!!! Mike Zeroh is a youtuber who covers mostly Disney and Marvel studios. He does have industry contacts so is credible. He's reporting Markle is demanding AMONG OTHER THINGS the Marketing team be fired AND the NF Board agrees with her.
ALLEGEDLY
Not only does she and the Board want YT comments turned off but for the trailer to be redone.And Markle is demanding to hand pick a new Marketing team. Markle is claiming the Marketing team used rejected takes! Zeroh is credible, whether he is infallible is another question. Many more details in the video
https://youtu.be/6yKo6CDEw-4
” -end snip -
Whole subreddit link is here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1htnpat/this_is_jawdropping_tea_from_a_credible_source/
Aggrieved
Madam and Peeve
hoped to receive
A billion dollars plus
the right to deceive
Spinning lies
easy to perceive
Especially the deconception
impossible to conceive
A smatter of petals
and a flick of her weave
Won’t change her image
all make believe…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1htmzci/exclusive_meghans_father_im_leaving_america_for_a/
The comments are brutal against her show and the majority can be distilled down to her inauthenticity, lack of original ideas and culinary, gardening skills-not even her own home, gardens, recipes-, her unlikable personality and divisive, damaged reputation that precedes this show. Many around the world will never forgive or forget what she did to the late PP and HMQEII. It’s been a slow downward spiral to commonness ever since the Oprah whinefest of 17 proven lies.
Can’t believe I’m writing this but H did the right thing by going silent after the horrendous reviews of his Polo docuseries. He must be acting upon the good advice from his team. * will never listen to the good advice of her managers.
Meghan Markle wants Netflix CEO fired, claims this woman on a twitter live
It wouldn’t surprise me to find out that laughingstock-Meghan has put in a formal complaint against any and all Netflix executives, with the ultimate aim to get them fired, since despite Netflix spending a fortune and putting a seasoned team behind her to prop her and her unremarkable show up, the new show’s sneak-peek reveals her to be exactly what she is (I won’t be unladylike by specifying the myriad negative attributes she displays in the short piece).
Aside: Meghan, if you are reading this, please note that no-one who isn’t directly earning filthy lucre by trying to shore up your tarnished-but-accurate image is interested in you in any way, except to mirthfully witness yet another flop.
I pray that Madame la Doucheass never again has the power to successfully get people sacked, or put on leave, as she did with Piers Morgan and the Cut writer Alison P. Davis respectively.
Who knows how many “small” people who don’t have name recognition she has managed to destroy? Sadly, I bet they are legion.
https://x.com/KTHopkins/status/1875966568502636818
This vlogger believes that * has been fired by Netflix.
I can understand that.
But does The Family want cordial relations with the baroness?
Netxit
Buyers remorse
from the team @Netflix
Conned and cajoled
as per usual megstrix
Too little, too late
streaming turds on a plate
QVC calling
I’ll watch and wait…
abbyh, Mel & Maneki
The sk’or’t commandoing
the polho position
Hell and Damegtion
Nothing clevr about madam
all hersay
All in hand
beforeplay
Sold her soul to the devil
time to pay…
I'll stick to Ina Garden and Julia Child reruns. I would LOVE to hang out with Ina in the kitchen.
Hanging out with the creature would make one yack hairballs. Extension-balls?
"Want to help crash her? Watch it for 20 minutes 10 minutes and then switch to anything else on Netflix except for Polo. That's "abandonment," and Netflix pays close attention to that"
I don't have Netflix. Otherwise I would.
Royal News Network
@RNN_RoyalNews
Meghan Markle’s dog Guy has passed away. I say Meghan because apparently he didn’t belong to Harry or the family as the message is from Meghan alone, even though he lived with both of them for the majority of his life with her. It’ll be curious if she can muster up this much for her father when he passes away.
Thank you for Katie Hopkins' impersonation of *. I could watch it but am not on X and couldn't get the sound, I was able, however, to watch it on YouTube. Here is the link for those not X. Katie Hopkins takes the p out of * and it is funny.
https://youtu.be/pP9IqvzaNQs?feature=shared
There's also a whisper that Emma Bath/Weymouth may be aiming legal guns at *. That would be very satisfying as it would neutralise any screams about R-ism from *
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhSqF9cjsjw
Emma is a far better person than I - in her position I'd be trying to decided whether to feed * to the lions or the tigers, to say nothing of the wolves.
I watched Animal Park yesterday as Kate Humble and a keeper rode in the meat-trailer (a protective cage pulled by a tractor) to feed the wolves. The wolves chased the equippage and the meat was pushed out through a trap, as if the woles were hunting. It'll be on BBC iplayer somewhere.
https://x.com/MeghansTowel/status/1877505116649013324/photo/1
Bedlam
Abandon all hope
ye who enter here
You’ll not see the house
just the rear
Straight to chick ‘n’ Inn
or a tent by their tree
A berth in Guys basket
for the lucky
Prepare to be snapped by paparazzi
they worship the modern Trinity
Money, sex, celebrity…
Infernally Yours
So kind to invite
homeless celebs to theirs
In the hope of future backing
in selling her wares
I doubt any plebs
will cross her threshold
All calls for assistance
unanswered, foretold
Usual edict
parsimonious bagatelle
Just had to mention the Kitchen
Arsewell…
SCrufts
Poor old Guy
no more Sit Up and Beg
His role taken over
when H married meg
Leave It she said
Drop it Now for my bed
Taken to Heel, Stay
Lay Down and Play Dead…
Puke...
Is his apparent presence in the news reports today evidence of his actually being there?
Neil Sean talks about some of the behind the scenes events and schemes behind some of the incidents during *'s tenure in the BRF. (Like the poo emoticon hat)
While the greetings were typically laddish – hugs and fist pumps – a tipsy Harry made a blokey joke about the actor’s appearance that left Corden ‘absolutely raging’. My source tells me: ‘James had arrived straight from the theatre and was obviously stone cold sober.
He walked in to find a group of drunken men. You can only imagine what he must have thought. It is pretty tedious when you turn up somewhere having not had a drink but James had been grafting on stage for hours.
‘There was rapture when he arrived. He was a much-loved part of the group and there were hugs and giggles. The group was pretty large. There were some of Harry’s friends, some of James’ friends and some of David’s gang and they all intertwined.
‘Then it all kicked off, James was furious. It quickly emerged that Harry had told a joke and James definitely did not find it funny.
‘To an outsider, it would have looked like there was a right carry on taking place.’
Corden, who is known for not always having the most relaxed sense of humour, was on a ‘different level’ to his inebriated friends.
So who should jump to the rescue but David Beckham, then a close friend of both parties. Ever the peacemaker, he talked to both sides and reassured Corden that no harm was meant by the cruel comment – which this newspaper has decided not to share.M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGY-c2REYmo
Politicians including Newsom's wife were in the photo.
* was photographed hugging someone. Everyone assumes it was a victim of the fire, but it actually was one of *'s staff.
As far as the cooking show is concerned, the longer NF delays its viewing the more time* will have to annoy and disgust potential viewers. I canceled my NF subscription right after this pr stunt and told them I cannot support any company that works with this talentless, pernicious, lying couple. The toxic twins are getting brutal comments regarding the Pasadena ‘disaster tourists’. Some have pointed out that fire investigators have not had the time to sift the wreckage of each home and there could be victims still to be identified. Truly horrible behavior from the grief grifters.
The Babylon Bee
@TheBabylonBee
Meghan Proudly Announces That Harry Has Of His Own Free Will Decided To Transition Into Princess Harriet
https://babylonbee.com/news/meghan-proudly-announces-that-harry-has-of-his-own-free-will-decided-to-transition-into-princess-harriet
------------
Interesting that they choose not to print the comment because it's too cruel.
Harry has form for this. Remember when the court refused to reveal one of H's texts to her dad because it was too hideous?
He sure thinks he can run around saying whatever ugly thing he wants, with no consequences.
Free speech for him, but not for anyone else.
Trageday Trippers
LA burned while ARO meddled
Like thots to a flame
pix to be peddled
Timed to deflect from her
Netflix no-show
Her flippers bit the ground
Zero…
All Smoke and Mires
You’ve lost everything
that you held dear
Have no fear
methane’s here
She’ll give you a hug
and drop one tear
Anything to inflame
her guttering career…
@GWAH @Maneki
Let’s hope this snuffs out
her inflammatory emissions 😉
@GWAH
Any chance of a peek at
the latest Maureen Callahan DM article?
Justine Bateman article in DM
Photo of volunteers, *Berk and Her, centre stage
I’m surprised the other volunteers,
faced with with this catastrophe, have the time, and appetite, to be posing
with the infernals?
*Burke and Hare- body snatchers
The couple, who live 90 miles away from the Californian city in Montecito near Santa Barbara, were spotted on Friday handing out food packages and speaking to survivors of the wildfires.
But Hollywood actress Bateman, 58, took to X/Twitter to blast the couple as 'disaster tourists' after they were spotted in footage dressed in plain clothes and speaking with victims and other helpers - and said they were only there for a 'photo op'.
Now, sources have told PageSix that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex find her comments 'offensive' and Meghan's heart is 'broken' due to her close ties with LA, including growing up in the area.
The source told the outlet: 'It's offensive to Meghan and Harry that anybody would think this is merely a photo opportunity.
'Meghan was born and raised in Los Angeles so this is, and always will be, home to her.'
They added that Meghan, 43, is 'not just a tourist', and that her 'heart is completely broken for all the lives that have been lost and for those whose homes have been destroyed in these fires'.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14281783/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-offended-Justine-Batemans-claims-disaster-tourists-wildfires.html
https://x.com/noel602022/status/1879063975213793482/photo/1
Congratulations to Catherine - in remission (with her thanks to the people who helped her).
And this piece from the a person was a ghost writer - not for Spare but the 2011 trek for Wounded. Being a ghostie is clearly not easy.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14279197/Prince-Harrys-ghostwriter-truth-contribution.html
I thought * didn't like to mix with the public when she was still in the BRV - remember, she wasn't paid for it - and yet there she is acting like
Diana (but not succeeding).
I read that Hairy wouldn't hold *'s hand after their photo op and that he walked out far ahead of her. Maybe their marriage will be their next failure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jbEcd0COy0
https://x.com/hrrysgreysuit/status/1879348455887512063
I did read last week about the Marchioness of Bath meeting with lawyers to discuss suing *. Wouldn't that be delightful to watch? The vexatious litigants getting a dose of their own medicine.
this video discusses the issue and also gives an idea of what the Marchioness' youtube videos are all about
My prediction is that we aren't ever going to see the entire series because it's going to be yanked by Netflix for breach of copyright. * can't even find some recipes of her own to produce, a different kind of apron and dress? Does she really have to copy Emma down to the last detail?
* is very mentally ill.
Emma resides in stately splendour at Longleat House in the south-west of England. Longleat has 128 rooms. Eat your heart out, Rachel.
https://longleatshop.co.uk/collections/emmas-kitchen/products/clementine-marmalade-350g
the staff at TMZ discuss the disaster tourist couple.