Skip to main content

What was the biggest mistake made by Meghan Markle?

Confusing celebrity and royalty.
Celebrity is about the celebration of an individual. A celebrity (see: Kim Kardashian, Elizabeth Hurley, any of the Real Housewives) has fans that see their own reflection made larger-than-life. Fans admire the positive aspects of their lives - the fashion, the riches - and gossip about the negative aspects, such as a revolving door of personal relationships.
(This is not female-only phenomenon; for men, sports celebrities tend to create the same love-hate dynamic, and the revolving door of relationships is usually with teams, teammates, and cities. LeBron James and his various franchises is a good example.)
Royality isn’t celebrity
Royalty isn’t celebrity; royalty isn’t about an individual. It’s about the audience, whether broad (all the citizens and residents of the country, plus foreign admirers) or specific (whatever charity is being visited that day.) The goal is to highlight the values and bonds that hold the audience together.
The Duchess of Sussex struggled as an actress for nearly a decade before working her way to the middle of the profession in a supporting role on a little-seen cable series. She leveraged her position well, running a lifestyle blog in order to position herself as an “influencer” and lending her name to a clothing collection sold by a Canadian retailer. That said, in the celebrity world she was still small potatoes.
Meeting and marrying Prince Harry was an extremely lucky break for an actress approaching 40 who would soon no longer be able to play the “hot girl” roles she specialized in. It’s not hard to understand why Meghan would rush to leverage her relationship to finally be a star.
This was clear at her wedding, when she invited A-list stars like George Clooney and Oprah Winfrey whom she didn’t know well, people who wouldn’t have given her the time of day just a few months before.
Royalty is about putting the focus on others
Unfortunately, being a Royal is not about being a star. It’s about being a cog in a hundreds-of-year-old institution, one that no longer has religious authority, but still has moral authority.
The “boring jobs” of royalty - going to a special kitchen set up for struggling single mothers, opening a provincial dog show, visiting the aftermath of a terrible accident or natural disaster - confirm to the ordinary people of the country that they are an important part of the nation’s rich canvas.
Having a Duchess or an Earl or a Prince turn up to meet hard-working charity staff or rescue teams or troubled students reflects and recognizes their value, and emphasizes that they and their struggles are respected.
It’s not about the royalty. It’s about their subjects.
The Duchess of Sussex’s big mistake
The Duchess of Sussex, Princess Henry of Wales, still wants to be a celebrity. She wants to be admired. She wants to be the center of attention. Unfortunately, she is in the wrong job.

Comments

Nathalia said…
Hi Nutty. Your blog is great. Anyway, about the topic, I think she does not care to be royal and a subject. By the way she acts it seems that she does not want to be a part of the royal family for the long run lets say for when William is King. To me it seems she is using Harry as prop to get known around the world and whenever time comes she would ditch him to be an actress in Hollywood.
Her wrong approach to her new role is what I think make people do not like her. As she comes out fake and fame hungry.
Kate said…
Yes this was just a business opportunity for her. Only a moron would've gone into it the way she did if they were in it for the long haul. I think she'll be gone in a year or less.
I caught a video online of selfish Meg rudely arming a young white man because he was in line of the camera. Meghan is walking into a room with her husband with a fake smile plastered on her face the whole time. It's a meet and greet of some people. She's totally aware of the man near the camera, elbows him, and just keeps walking in the direction of the people she is supposed to shake hands with. Most people would never think to elbow anyone, especially a complete stranger. Aggressive much?
bootsy said…
Hi Nutty, great blog!
Whilst I agree with you on this topic, I don't think it is as straightforward as you think. i think you're 95% correct, but the 5% missing is the idea that people are changing and are becoming more celeb obsessed here in the UK. We have Love Island and all that crap, and the older generation are naturally dying off to be replaced with a more vapid younger generation. There is the slight possibility that Markle will eventually appeal to the the younger (and dumber) generation as she embodies what they like to see, even if it is not technically the royal thing to do.
And as you mention elsewhere, the PR team are positioning themselves very well in order to ensure any criticism is invalidated as it can be tied to non existent racism. Whatever happens, the game is most certainly on....:)

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids