If the Duchess of Sussex was about 12 weeks along when she announced her pregnancy at Princess Eugenie's wedding in October, her full-term delivery date would be around April 29, 2019.
Of course, babies come whenever they are ready. This one is likely to arrive sometime in April or early May.
Here are five scenarios of what might happen.
Although I'm no Meghan fan, this would be the best case for the reputation of the Royal Family and for the British public, who have enough on their minds with Brexit.
It's unlikely that the baby will get a HRH designation from the Queen at this late date, but if it is proven to have the proper bloodline, this is still a possibility.
Meg certainly wants people to believe she is pregnant: she wore a 4 or 5-month size prosthetic belly on the Australia tour when she was supposedly only 12 weeks pregnant, and a 6 or 7 month belly in early December, when she was not yet 5 months along.
Perhaps there is a real baby underneath the prosthetic. That said, her belly's tendency to fold when she bends down to greet children and swing from side to side when she walks suggests that Meg may not be personally pregnant and that a gestational carrier is being used.
If the bloodline is correct, the British Royal Family could accept the child in the line of succession and maintain a facade of business as usual.
This would cause succession problems; British aristocrats care about bloodlines, and they are unlikely to agree to a place in the line of succession for a child with no blue blood at all.
In this scenario, Meg and Harry would probably have to pretend that they are voluntarily removing their child from the line of succession, perhaps so it can "have a normal life."
(Alternately, this would be a great opportunity to remove Meghan from the Royal Family, should it be announced that she has delivered a baby who is not her husband's child.)
Carrying out a birth scenario - with all the attendant publicity - when there is no baby is difficult to pull off, but there is a precedent for it.
Louis Tomlinson, a member of the boy band One Direction, has been caught up in a fake pregnancy situation for nearly four years. In 2015 it was announced that he had conceived a child with a groupie; the idea was to prove Tomlinson was heterosexual and disprove rumors that he was romantically involved with his hearthrob bandmate Harry Styles.
The original plan was that it would all be a false alarm wrapped up quickly, but for reasons that are unclear, the charade was carried through to a faked birth. Photoshop images were made of the uncooperative Tomlinson together with the "newborn", and a realistic plastic doll was also used for some Instagram images.
Finally, a real child was brought in to play Tomlinson's "son." The charade has never been officially ended, and the "son" is now supposedly a very large three-year-old. (He is probably older). The boy and Tomlinson are never photographed together, and Tomlinson never voluntarily brings up his "child" in interviews.
This would be incredibly upsetting to the families who have had to go through this terrible experience in real life.
Furthermore, if such a heartless fraud was uncovered and the Royal Family were seen having gone along with it, it would deeply undermine support for the monarchy as a whole.
Although Meg and her PR woman, the former Hillary Clinton attaché Sarah Latham, are pretty desperate, let's hope they're not this desperate.
Of course, babies come whenever they are ready. This one is likely to arrive sometime in April or early May.
Here are five scenarios of what might happen.
The best scenario
The best scenario is that Duchess Meghan's PR is all true, and she will give birth in the traditional manner (vaginal or C-section) to a child who shares her and Prince Harry's DNA.Although I'm no Meghan fan, this would be the best case for the reputation of the Royal Family and for the British public, who have enough on their minds with Brexit.
It's unlikely that the baby will get a HRH designation from the Queen at this late date, but if it is proven to have the proper bloodline, this is still a possibility.
The second-best scenario
The second-best scenario is that a surrogate gives birth to a child that shares Meghan and Harry's DNA, and the Royal Family decides to accept this child as an heir, perhaps without notifying the public that a surrogate was used.Meg certainly wants people to believe she is pregnant: she wore a 4 or 5-month size prosthetic belly on the Australia tour when she was supposedly only 12 weeks pregnant, and a 6 or 7 month belly in early December, when she was not yet 5 months along.
Perhaps there is a real baby underneath the prosthetic. That said, her belly's tendency to fold when she bends down to greet children and swing from side to side when she walks suggests that Meg may not be personally pregnant and that a gestational carrier is being used.
If the bloodline is correct, the British Royal Family could accept the child in the line of succession and maintain a facade of business as usual.
Less positive scenarios
The third scenario is that a surrogate gives birth to a child, but it does not share Meghan and Harry's DNA.This would cause succession problems; British aristocrats care about bloodlines, and they are unlikely to agree to a place in the line of succession for a child with no blue blood at all.
In this scenario, Meg and Harry would probably have to pretend that they are voluntarily removing their child from the line of succession, perhaps so it can "have a normal life."
(Alternately, this would be a great opportunity to remove Meghan from the Royal Family, should it be announced that she has delivered a baby who is not her husband's child.)
If there is no baby at all
The fourth scenario is there is no surrogate and Meghan is not pregnant; there is no child at all.Carrying out a birth scenario - with all the attendant publicity - when there is no baby is difficult to pull off, but there is a precedent for it.
Louis Tomlinson, a member of the boy band One Direction, has been caught up in a fake pregnancy situation for nearly four years. In 2015 it was announced that he had conceived a child with a groupie; the idea was to prove Tomlinson was heterosexual and disprove rumors that he was romantically involved with his hearthrob bandmate Harry Styles.
Finally, a real child was brought in to play Tomlinson's "son." The charade has never been officially ended, and the "son" is now supposedly a very large three-year-old. (He is probably older). The boy and Tomlinson are never photographed together, and Tomlinson never voluntarily brings up his "child" in interviews.
Would Meghan go so far as to use a realistic doll for images outside the birthing hospital, at least until a real baby - perhaps a trafficked baby - could be brought in to play the part?
It seems outlandish, and likely to be uncovered at some point, which would damage the Royal Family's credibility.
There would be obvious questions: what did Harry know and when did he know it? What did the Queen know and when did she know it?
There would be obvious questions: what did Harry know and when did he know it? What did the Queen know and when did she know it?
What role would the Royal Doctors play?
Interestingly, when Duchess Kate gave birth to each of her three children, her obstetric teams were announced in official statements one to two months in advance. No similar announcement has been made for Duchess Meghan.
These obstetricians would be required to affix their signatures to a public document that would validate the birth of baby Sussex.
For scenarios two, three, or four, highly respected doctors would be required to be publicly associated with a story that is not entirely truthful.
Perhaps Meghan will announce an "unexpected home birth" carried out with only Harry to assist her - "The baby just came so fast!"
Alternately, she could plan a "home birth" and hire a midwife - preferably a slightly shady character who would be willing to sign off on anything.
For scenarios two, three, or four, highly respected doctors would be required to be publicly associated with a story that is not entirely truthful.
Perhaps Meghan will announce an "unexpected home birth" carried out with only Harry to assist her - "The baby just came so fast!"
Alternately, she could plan a "home birth" and hire a midwife - preferably a slightly shady character who would be willing to sign off on anything.
The worst possible scenario
The worst possible scenario, in my mind, would be for Meghan and Harry to try to cover for the lack of a true pregnancy by claiming a stillbirth.This would be incredibly upsetting to the families who have had to go through this terrible experience in real life.
Furthermore, if such a heartless fraud was uncovered and the Royal Family were seen having gone along with it, it would deeply undermine support for the monarchy as a whole.
Although Meg and her PR woman, the former Hillary Clinton attaché Sarah Latham, are pretty desperate, let's hope they're not this desperate.
Comments
There can be a Sixth scenario-
The baby maybe of MeAgain's and not of Hazza. Nowadays all actresses and celebrities freeze their eggs and later use them. Sperms of anonymous person's can be used for external fertilization and a surrogate can carry it. This scenario might occur when MeAgain wants a baby for attention and Harry may not be willing.
The seventh scenario can be -
MeAgain is pregnant with someone else's child and not of Harry's,just in case she had hookups with other men,either to conceive because harry was unwilling, or just to get favors from some VVIP guy.
Having a baby may keep MeAgain safe from any kind of attack from Royals. She gets to do what she wants and yet not face consequence for it. The baby may not get a title and she will blame BRF for not giving title to a black(mixed heritage) woman's child. Although she will leak this to press through friends.
If baby doesn't have Harry's DNA, it cannot be part of the line of succession. I'm sure the Sussexes and their minions can think up some reason why it is "their choice" that the baby not be a potential heir. "Security reasons" perhaps?
Hard to believe that Harry would accept this type of situation, having been questioned about his own parentage for much of his life.
In a world where DNA testing is inexpensive and simple, it would be hard to keep the secret about non-Royal DNA for very long.
MeAgain seems to be in hurry to make the most of this situation and elevate her celebrity status. She knows this is going to end very soon and might have planned an exit strategy. Sara might be brought in to increase the pace and also handle MeAgain's image post divorce. At least they want positive image in US..
I feel that MeAgain is aiming for much higher than we think. She may even run for US president in future. MeAgain is sharp and active when it comes to playing with the media and has all the qualities of being a shrewd politician. Giving speeches,media manipulation, networking are all the qualities of a politician.Given a proper team she can do better. Now it looks like she is restricted to some extent by the palace courtiers and she cant meet the people the way she wants to. She was mostly running the show all by herself through calls and chats until Sara joined. Once she is free,she will be more dangerous.
Granted she is not the best representative of the BRF and Harry comes across as a dolt now - but:
I doubt such an elaborate hoax as a wedding would have taken place regardless of what secret was being maintained.
Sending those two on tour thereafter as representatives of the Crown would not have been done either if there was any doubt of the couple.
Nor would the Queen give out patronages to her if there was any doubt about the relationship with her grandson.
Curbing her thirst for celebrity exposure and training her to behave as a royal family member is the biggest challenge it seems -
Hopefully Lord G can clamp down on her pr stunts and keep her at the back of the royal bus where she belongs.
I do pity the child - however it is obtained ........................theirs will be a difficult life.
The "holistic, homeopathic" remedies Meghan generally prefers might not be the best choice for a man suffering from PTSD and depression, as Harry has publicly acknowledged.
I also think it's rather odd we haven't seen a bikini photo or a yoga photo of Meghan with her belly.
After Beyoncé's pregnancy with Blue Ivy was widely doubted, she went out of her way to pose wearing a midriff top while pregnant with Sir and Rumi to make sure everyone knew she was carrying her own children.
Also,I never felt Charles and Camilla had good relations with Will and Kate. So when Meghan came,Charles thought it would be a good idea to present himself as a good father in law to Meg and a good grandpa to sussex baby. Charles received some good pr with Meg's articles. But now both Will and Charles see Meg as a threat to royals as her excessive presence in the media is making people ask for republic. Both are heirs and that is the last thing they want.
https://blindgossip.com/pregnancy-bombshell/
Too bad Meg's PR has created a kind of environment where this kind of nonsense sounds credible, at least by Blind Gossip readers.
That's what the Queen did, which is why Charles turned out the way he did.
I'd rather see Will and Kate keep their focus on raising their children properly.
Those kids will be out of the house by the time they're 10 or so - boarding school - so this is the only extended time they have with their kids.
I came across your blog while reading comments on CDAN and I'm so glad I did. Love, love it.
For their sake, I hope it's the first scenario. But hard to believe she's really pregnant with all the squatting. I'm a mother of one and I had a healthy pregnancy. I was quite fit, still out and about visiting friends the day before my delivery but there's no way I could squat like that (knees closed) even if someone promised to pay me a million dollars. But Meghan is doing it at 8 months while it was impossible to do it even at 6 months and I wasn't that big. I know every pregnancy is different but this one takes the cake.
I can ignore the ever changing, squishy bump, but not the squatting 😁 I can't wait to see how this plays out.
( Sorry for any grammatical mistakes, English isn't my first language and I'm still learning, thank you 😊)
Much of what the account reports has already been mentioned elsewhere, but the writer is very good at suggesting that he or she has inside information.
It's also been pointed out that some of its Tweets are sent at odd times for Toronto, such as 4am Toronto time on a weekday. Whoever runs the account is probably located someplace else.
(For what it's worth, 4am Toronto time is 9am London time)
One thing is sure, media n social media needs her..
I agree that Meg's ability to squat in high heels with knees together at 8 months is bizarre.
In general, Meg doesn't carry her weight the way a pregnant woman does - babies are heavy! Pregnant women are often seen supporting their lower backs because of the strain, and when they walk they lean slightly backwards and don't bend their legs as much as non-pregnant women.
Meg was never a great actress - if she had been, she could have studied these movements and done a much better job of appearing pregnant.
I just hope Harry can get away from this shrew, I have great affection for Dianas boys and hope that he isn’t in on anything to hurt his brother or Kate and their kiddos
Wondering where she will be when the water breaks. Are any of the cousins getting married in the near future?
When and where would be the most dramatic place to go into labor?
what i stated above was my hypothesis regarding allocation of more patronages and more royal engagements to Meghan in the initial days of her marriage. Those are not my personal views. I said that based on many articles I read where they mentioned queen was not happy with Kate skipping many events. Nothing against Kate or The elder Monarch. Peace#
Link -http://web.archive.org/web/20190329224111/https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2019/03/29/meghan-markle-does-the-british-tax-payer-know-how-much-me-gain-royal-is-costing/
I'm glad Kate's putting her emphasis on her parenting for now, particularly when most of her patronages focus on the importance of early childhood.
The Jesuits used to say, "Give me the boy until he is 7, and I will give you the man."
An odd choice for a first birth by a somewhat older mother. The excuse is that the hospital is "close to their home in Windsor", but they haven't moved into Frogmore yet.
Looks like scenario #2 or scenario #3 from above are in play.
I didn't find it that harsh, but apparently someone did - or someone just had the right number to call and have the article taken down.
I doubt that the reporter asked to withdraw the story. He's a freelancer, and freelancers are usually pretty hungry. He wouldn't want to miss a paycheck.
He's an older gentleman as well, a financial journalist, and he doesn't appear to have a Twitter account - so I doubt he'd collapse under pressure from social media.
My money is on Meg's new PR guru Sarah Latham, who used to work for Hillary Clinton. I'm sure she knows some numbers at Forbes.
I have no insight as to whether the rumors are true or not, but the Cambridges' circle is very tight, and there have never been any leaks like this in all the time they have bene married.
Then news of Meg's sex video appears. Suddenly there are numerous stories about William's potential infidelity pushing the Meg video stories out of the headlines.
More fine work of Meg and her PR people, including Sarah Latham, who used to work for Hillary Clinton and is used to dirty pool.
Harry has probably cheated on Meg as well - he was openly seeing other women when they were dating, and spent some time in Soho House Berlin last month.
I don't think she'd be best pleased if the Cambridge-friendly media focused on that.
I mean Meghan is making out that she personally is pregnant, so it would look more than funny if they come out after the birth with "the child was carried by surrogate and Meghan just wore the belly for funnsies". Any child carried by surrogate would not be in the line of succession legally, but treated as an adopted child (he/she would get the title Lord [Name] or Lady [Name] and be a Prince/ Princess once Charles ascends the throne, but a boy would not inherit the Duke of Sussex title, nor be styled as Earl Dumbarton)
In addition I don't think Harry can renounce a place in succession for a child already in existence. He could have done so before Baby Sussex was conceived, but now, especially so late in the pregnancy, I think it's too late.
All this means that we are talking about scenario 1 and she really is pregnant (whose eggs really aren't important, though you'd hope it was Harry's swimmers, even if legally it doesn't matter) or the terrible Scenario 5, a fake stillbirth.
Sorry for the novel, I've clearly thought a lot about this.
Love your blog!
By avoiding the standard photo outside the hospital after giving birth, Meg would have the opportunity to sell the first baby pictures to a glossy magazine like Hello or People.
Even if she's unable to accept money for the photos, she would be able to merch whatever she, Harry, and the baby are wearing in the photos, as well as any furniture, household goods, or baby goods in the background.
It could add up to a nice payday for her.
I generally avoid Thomas Markle stories because I find them repetitive, but one thing he said has stuck with me: "She bends the rules. She's good at that."
Although I understand that surrogacy contracts aren't legal in the UK, if there was anyone who was going to bend the rules it would be the royal family, and if there was anyone within the family who was going to bend the rules it would be Meg. (And perhaps Andrew, but that's another story).
What's the story with Meg's UK visa by the way? That was supposed to be problematic, but magically it seems to have been ironed out. Also, merching and borrowing of clothes by royals isn't allowed, but she seems to be doing plenty of that.
One of the most interesting aspects of the entire Meghan Markle story is that all these "rules" for royals, the ones Kate and Sophie Wessex and Autumn Philips have been so carefully following for years, don't have any enforcement mechanism.
If somebody chooses to break them, like "Tungsten" Markle, there's nothing to stop her except a few withering looks, which she doesn't care about.
She probably feels the same about the legal aspects of the surrogacy system in the UK. She's going to do what she's going to do - try and stop her!
This is what I read -
"If you use a surrogate, they will be the child’s legal parent at birth.
If the surrogate is married or in a civil partnership, their spouse or civil partner will be the child’s second parent at birth, unless they did not give their permission.
Legal parenthood can be transferred by parental order or adoption after the child is born."
So when she has the baby delivered through a surrogate,it's not illegal and hence the hospital need not worry. And if I am not wrong,she is not going to deliver at lindo wing but an American hospital.
If the woman delivering her baby is ready to transfer parenthood by parental order or adoption immediately after the birth,it shouldn't be a problem. '
At the most the titles will not be given to the new born which is perfectly fine for Meghan. I don't think the palace is going to come up with true story in front of press. It is not going to declare that the birth was through a surrogate. They will just announce that Meghan has delivered the baby.
I think an It will be easy for her to get that adoption done quicker in american hospital -The Portland Hospital.,even if the senior royals are not too happy about it.
Under what theory did Meghan decide to knock up a surrogate and WHY would the surrogate have anyone else's but Harry's sperm!??!?!
As for her ever-morphing bump, I am astonished that someone as intelligent and capable and scheming as MM would be so careless in her charade as to wear a 4-5 month bump at 12 weeks - that seriously is so inconceivable to be (though clearly it happened) I just record-scratch in my brain because WHY shoot yourself in the foot like that??
Anyway, stupidity aside - can anyone fill me in on why MM would possibly have established a surrogate that DID NOT have Harry's sperm? Because that is equally inconceivable as is the thought of no baby at all (!!).
I can understand why England hasn't updated its surrogacy rules in relation to royalty; they've never really needed to before!
Surrogacy is actually illegal in most parts of the world - check out this map on Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogacy_laws_by_country
Unless Meg had eggs pre-stored, getting them harvested, fertilized and successfully implanted within 2 months of her wedding is a pretty quick turn of events.
From Harry's point of view, agreeing to give Meg some sperm to use for her experiments seems a bit rushed. Don't couples usually try for a naturally-conceived baby for a a few months before going the IVF route?
You're right that it seems counter-intuitive to have a baby that isn't Harry's biological son, but Meg was in a hurry.
And you're right, the link does not load. I did cut and paste the story into the comments for this reveal on Saturday: https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2019/03/blind-items-revealed-5_29.html
The link auto directs to some other page. When the page loads 90%,click on cross(x) on browser. This way redirect to another page can be avoided. This link still shows the article-
http://web.archive.org/web/20190329224111/https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2019/03/29/meghan-markle-does-the-british-tax-payer-know-how-much-me-gain-royal-is-costing/
Is PH so besotted/squeemish that he's not seen his wife's "blossoming" figure these last 8mo?Not interested in feeling fake baby kick move around ? Never saw pic of him pattying her jelly belly like MM has repeatedly in almost every picture
. How could he be so blind?OR is he in on it for another reason?
Why would he play along? It could be because he is desperately in love - the same kind of love that lands so many women in prison for doing something stupid suggested by the men in their lives. It could be out of jealousy towards his brother. It could be because Meg convinced him that this would be the quickest and best way to have the family he's long wanted.
Or a combination of all of these things.
I have been an egg donor (I have 11 kids WAT) and can say from experience that while ambitious, it would not take more than two months to arrange an IVF baby, assuming everything takes on the first try.
I'm also confused as to why Harry might be into this BUT as to why Meg would - she is already over 35 - nobody wants to waste 8 mos trying if she can lock a baby down now PLUS she probably doesn't want to carry it herself so surrogacy for that reason is an A+ from my perspective. Her horrible representation of an appropriate belly is astonishing.
I used to be totally pro-Meghan but I was apparently duped.
Now I am starting to wonder if she is like that Fyre Festival guy and that Theranos chick - the people who take something WAY WAY PAST where it would conceivably have reasonably been pulled and just keep going, we'll see.
But does MM want kids, and is she willing to grow and birth them herself? That's another matter. We've also all seen those stories about MM telling her former husband she couldn't, and those rumours of a pregnancy contract. Maybe she's infertile, or maybe she has medical conditions. Maybe she just refuses to ruin her figure. What is clear is she wants to keep *PH.* Surrogacy seems like an option that could work for both of them. As long as the baby has Harry's DNA, it's an "heir of his body," which is what the law requires.
The couple were known to have visited fertility doctors before the wedding: https://www.journalpost.com/news/harry-meghan-markle-fertility/. Who knows what they *really* found out? They could have been prepping for IVF or even starting it before the wedding, which could explain why the gown was loosely-fitted.
They have plenty of money to get things done, buy silence, and hide the surrogate. There are any number of ways they could keep the "delivery" under wraps, especially if they give out the story that she birthed too quickly to get to the hospital at all. It happens, even with first-timers -- and all the raspberry leaf tea can really speed up labor. ;-) Even if she checks into a hospital, I don't think anyone will find out. There are lots of babies on maternity wards, and it's probably not too difficult to sneak one in. This might have even been the reason they hired Latham when they did; she knows how to cover the tracks.
No bets on whether the marriage will last, but hopefully PH will be happy as a father. We all know MM is a disaster and has no clue how to behave (let alone convincingly fake a pregnancy), so it will be interesting to see which scenario unfolds. I have plenty of tea and biscuits on hand so I can enjoy the show.
I've said before that this is like 8 different Shakespearean dramas going on at once.
All the elements are there - lust, power, greed, deception.
And nobody knows the ending. No wonder people are fascinated.
Since Meghan believes she is modernizing the monarchy, she probably thought that using a surrogate an aspect of that modernization. As Thomas Markle stated, she's very good at bending the rules.
She probably went ahead without explicit permission, which she wouldn't have gotten, thinking, "What are they going to do about it when the baby is on the way?"
Can't wait to see what they do about it.
Skippy is an acquired taste, as I say in my blog entry below.
However, for a while Meg seems to have been sending anonymous messages to directly to Skippy, which I think is worth writing about.
But you're right, that focus could be her undoing. When you're used to always being able to get your way, suddenly not being able to get your way could be a shock. I would imagine her reaction would be nasty.
Thanks for your insight as an egg donor. Meg doesn't seem to be the type of person to freeze her eggs; she didn't seem to be particularly looking forward to motherhood.
I wonder if the egg isn't hers - after all, it's not all that important if the baby carries her DNA.
Harry's contribution could have been obtained much more quickly, and his is the only DNA anyone really cares about.
However, if Meg "gives birth" in secret, they will have a hard time convincing people that Scenario #1 is the truth. Scenarios 2-4 start looking more likely.
https://blindgossip.com/pregnancy-bombshell/
http://web.archive.org/web/20190329225305/https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogeraitken/2019/03/29/meghan-markle-does-the-british-tax-payer-know-how-much-me-gain-royal-is-costing/amp/
https://twitter.com/harpers1niter/status/1112909948105633792?s=19
Now when I look back on all the pics of meg, many are photoshopped,nearly 50%.
Show me celebs coming out of someplace embarrassing or carrying something off-brand - say, Meg carrying a giant bag of fast food - and I'll show you an authentically candid pap shot.
In general, I don't understand how Meg helps sell clothing. Everything looks rumpled and ill-fitting on her - she never takes time for the exquisite tailoring that is the mark of the truly wealthy.
If I had a clothing brand, I would not want Meg wearing it.
It's clearly staged, though. I like the sign in the back saying "love" and "inner peace."
As I said to Judy above, show me a photo of Meg coming out of a Gregg's (British fast food) or an Arby's (US low-end fast food) with a giant plastic bag of junk food. That would be a candid photo.
Now i understand the pap walk. To build hype prior to this event.
I recall what I did like about the dress she wore in Morocco? it reminded me of one that Grace Kelly had worn to something many years ago - of course she had a good figure and wore the dress well - but MM always looks over dressed for wherever she goes and in the worst taste of all -
Well the saying goes you cannot make a silk purse out of a sows ear and she certainly proves that point. She makes designer clothing look like trash ......
What suits her is the torn blue jeans .....her old Hollywood clothing -
I'm becoming more and more convinced that PH is in cahoots with her in spite of the photo shopped pics - I think his spouting of that speech she wrote which was so out of character for him or any royal to blather on about with her word salads just struck me as ringing true to his current thinking.
She may well be the Trojan horse that takes down the Royals if they cannot stop her soon. So far they seem to be allowing her to do what she pleases......its unsettling.
No such thing is necessary. When I donated my eggs they had the recipient right there in the next room with her husband's spermos on hand (presumably in a cup). They did the transfer that day.
Which is to say Meg COULD have said - don't want to carry the baby but let's pull some eggs (one month notice & prep shots to boost eggs for collection), line up a surrogate (one month notice/prep shots to align cycle) - then wheel them both in - BADDA BING BADDA BOOM!! Pregnant surrogate.
No freezing required.
It is these small gestures that make me think maybe she really is a sociopath.
Also, if Meghan doesn’t give birth or present a baby in the next two weeks, the announcement would have been seen as premature and (thus) clearly announced just to take some of the focus on Princess Eugenie’s wedding.
I note MeAgain is choosing a less public hospital, her own doctors etc. Seems to me she is trying hard to not have her own people at the surragocy handov-err..birth.
If mm were a true feminist, she could've been honest about a "surrogacy/fertility" troubles. Or this could have been her out to use a surrogate. Feminists and women around the world would've flocked to her. It would've given plenty of free headlines about being "brave and honest with an emotional and sensitive topic no one talks about". But no, she missed her chance, and now no one believes she's actually pregnant.