Skip to main content

What Harry should say: A totally fake news interview



Sitting on an embroidered couch in a receiving room at Windsor Palace, The Duke of Sussex exchanges a smile with his four-month-old son, Archie Harrison.

"He's wonderful," he says, holding the baby on his lap and enjoying its healthy grip around his index finger. "I don't want anyone thinking I love him any less because of the manner in which he came to us. This is my son."

A mature man and a father

Harry is no longer the little boy who walked behind his mother's coffin or the muscular soldier who volunteered for the front lines in Afghanistan. This is a stronger, more mature man - and a father.

"When we married, Meghan and I were eager to hit the ground running quickly, and that included starting a family," he says in measured tones. "The truth is, both of us had experienced medical problems which affected our fertility. I don't want to be more explicit than that. 


"But I can say that the ordinary way of bringing a child into the world would have been difficult for us."


Without consulting his family, Harry and his new wife contracted the services of a specialist in surrogate births, who matched them with an experienced professional surrogate. Ten months later, in March 2019, Archie Harrison was born. 



Stress with William

The unconventional method of adding to their family had not been approved by anyone in the Royal Family, and the family was slow to accept it.

In particular, his brother William was upset by Meghan's insistence on wearing a false pregnancy belly whilst carrying out Royal engagements.


Harry takes a deep breath before speaking about his brother. 
"William takes his position very seriously," he says carefully. "He did not like the idea of deceiving anybody. So he was unhappy that Meghan did what she did."

In general, Harry feels his wife has been misunderstood. "She is an actress, a trained actress. Actors learn to see their body as an instrument, which is what she was doing. She wanted everyone to experience the joy of a royal pregnancy, as we were experiencing it."


By contrast, his father Prince Charles was supportive after learning of the couple's choice.


"Pa has been there for both of us, and we are so grateful," Harry said.



The question of titles

Will Archie be part of the Royal Family?  

"Archie is my son, so of course he must be part of the family," Harry says. "We want him to get to know his cousins, because growing up my cousins have been some of my closest and most loyal friends."

But Harry understands the edict that children must be born "of the body" of a royal wife in order to be in line for the throne. 

"It is an outmoded rule, and I think it should be abolished," he says. "But I understand that it was in force when Archie was born, so I do not expect him to be part of the line of succession. 

"This is also why he has not been given a title, which is fine with me. My cousins Zara and Peter have no titles and they are very much part of the Royal Family."

A growing family

The Duke remains committed to his wife and to creating his own family, which will ultimately be based at the still-unfinished Frogmore Cottage.

"We hope to have at least one more child in the same manner," he says. 


-------------------

The above text is totally fake - it is solely my idea of what Harry should say to begin putting this whole sad epsisode to rest. Any comments or input? 


Comments

hardyboys said…
Totally amazing interview. But I would think these 2 are screwed in the head...why come out later why not before..and why should we support them if they are capable of such deceit...but it sounded so real in terms of how he should approach it. Good job nutty
Now! said…
Thank you, Veena!

I intentionally did not address the DNA situation - was Harry's and Meghan's DNA used, or was it not - because I see no strong indications either way, and I'm not entirely sure it matters.

But yeah, the deceit thing is big. Maybe "Harry" should acknowledge his own role and take a bit of time abroad so the British public can forgive him.
abbyh said…
Is it real or is it Memorex?

(very funny)
Now! said…
LOL - that's why I made sure to say in three places that it was fake!

Don't want Lord Geidt coming after me.
abbyh said…
For me, good satire is almost believable real.
Silli_emperors said…
Heads-up that yesterday's post made it to Tumblr where another agreed with you as spot-on but added comments about calling protective services. You may have extra visitors to your site who disagree with your analysis.
Miss_Christina said…
He totally should and while he's at it explain why he indulges the whims of that ridiculous wife of his.
Trudy2 said…
Now that the cat is out of the bag with the majority of people who aren't blind, I really need the RF to come clean so I can gloat about being right to everyone who has suggested I'm some kind of crazy conspiracy theorist over the last 12 months!
Now! said…
OK, thanks.

If anyone is wondering, I don't think there's any reason to call Protective Services.

Meghan is clearly not the person in charge for caring for that baby, who appears to be clean and well-fed.

My guess is that after the photo session he was returned to his actual caregiver.
Now! said…
I think originally he was in love, or thought he was.

Not sure about now.
Now! said…
What I think is so worrisome is how much supposedly respectable media has aided and abetted this farce.

All those once-trusted names, from Vogue to the Daily Beast to the Guardian to People to Vanity Fair to Oprah & Gayle to CNN. How long have they known it's fake?

Speaking of which, it'll be pretty sad for Vogue if they already have their September issue printed when this thing blows up. Should be going to press right about now.
Hikari said…
Nutty,
Your faux interview with Harry is more authentic than anything uttered by the Sussex pair since their engagement. All this time I've been assuming the marriage is legitimate, but who knows, maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury had his fingers crossed while he was administering the vows.

You've made "Harry" hit all the right notes. If and when (not holding my breath), Haz ever does decide to come clean and issue a statement/apology/explanation for the Bizarro Show they have put us through for the last year, I hope it sounds like this. Though if and when he does say anything of the kind, or the Palace does, it will be too unconscionably late to do much good in repairing the damage that has been done. The time for such frankness would have been back in March, when the baby was born, or, ideally, 6 months or so prior, after the surrogate's pregnancy was well-established.

One could argue, fruitlessly, that the best course of all would have been for H. and M. to be honest about their intentions with the Family from the start and demonstrate that they had thought through, and were willing to accept the repercussions of their choice, ie., no title or place in the succession for a child conceived via this route. After all, the thing that really matters, since Harry was never in danger of being anywhere near the crown once William had three children, was that he be able to become a father, something he had been claiming for years now that he wanted more than anything.

Harry is not demonstrably happier since the birth of this child, apart from giddy, incomprehensible 'interviews' about the baby. Regular, more candid shots show a man not pleased with his situation in life at all. He can forget for a few moments, perhaps, when he's at a solo engagement without his encumbrances.

I could totally see Charles accepting the situation better, perhaps, since he was obviously hoping to have a closer relationship to Harry's children than he seems tobe permitted with William's. William apparently, more so than Harry, has never been able to forgive his father for his conduct during his marriage to Diana, and must regard Chas. as a crap dad. It's natural that he would feel more animosity to Charles than Harry does, since he was old enough to understand his mother's unhappiness in a way that Harry wasn't at the time, and since Diana had (quite unfairly) made her eldest son her confidante, pitting his love for Charles against his love for her.

If Charles has welcomed the new baby and is thrilled to have another grandchild to bond with, it is rather quizzical that we've only got one (1) shot of dubious authenticity of him with Archie in the same room. Wouldn't the Sussexes be keen to show up the Cambridges by providing cute snaps of Charles with his latest grandson . . to show how much more inclusive and *forgiving* they are?

Trudy2 said…
Timed to coincide with the inevitable Epstein/PA sh*t storm really gaining traction in the mainstream UK media perhaps.
Hikari said…
When I first became convinced that M. was using a surrogate (December, 2018, and the infamous visit to the old people's home in That Dress), I still had some compassion toward her as a new royal adjusting to the rigors of a very different, codified world than she was used to. My thoughts then were, 1. They're using a surrogate 2. They are afraid to be honest about it; maybe the revelation that MM could not have her own children would have meant that they would not be allowed to marry, and so they are faking it.

The question, then as now, but now even more so . . .Did they also try to deceive the entire BRF with this charade, or just the general public? If the royals are allowing her to walk around in public holding a doll and pretending it's a baby, surely they have to be read in. Not to mention all the 'official' photographs they are allegedly in.

I also briefly considered the possibility that she had been genuinely pregnant, but miscarried early, and the wearing of Moonbump was a form of . . .therapy? Stalling for time? Maybe they were trying to conceive again quickly so they wouldn't have to make a sad announcement . .? I was trying to offer justifications for the bizarreness back then, but I'm done with that. The performance at the polo yesterday has demonstrated amply that they are going to continue this ridiculousness for years to come, if they can get away with it. The giant green muumuu is to prime us for the inevitable pregnancy announcement, next month or the next, probably. They might have another surrogate cooking a sibling for 'Archie' as we speak. 'Cause it went *so smoothly* the last time . . .

An announcement that they were using a surrogate could have been handled straightforwardly, and Meg could still have had the baby shower and the nursery and the congratulations owing to an expectant mum. I love your 'her body is an instrument; she just wanted people to experience the excitement of a Royal pregnancy . . ' In other words, she wanted all eyes on her at all times, lest anyone forget that she was 'expecting a baby!!!!' Other people's happiness is never a factor for Meg, unfortunately. She only pleases herself. But if only the real article were more like the one filtered through your "Harry's" eyes, she at least wouldn't be quite so unpalatable.
punkinseed said…
I'd imagine that if protective services are called, they'd bring their checklist to Frogmore and find there's no food, clothing, baby formula, etc., in the cupboards. Plus, the parents would be drug tested, right? Oh boy...
Humor Me said…
Good thoughts well put regarding an article we wish was forth coming from Harry. Sadly, MM's antics tipped the scales of object journalism with the polo outing and her handling of baby Archie. The couple needs PR help in the worst way.
Hikari said…
Not to mention Hello! . . I needed a barf bag after their coverage of the visit to the polo yesterday.

In what sodding universe was the travesty we witnessed 'a playdate for Archie and his cousins'?? The insults to our intelligence are legion. Somehow I don't think Royal coverage was this obsequious and fictional, even in the Diana era, was it? Of course coverage was generally skewed in her favor, while Charles was depicted as a goat, but Diana's mental problems were generally kept hidden from journalists, not indulged by them.

What, oh, what, are we going to see coming out in the next weeks or months that is going to dwarf Meg's Monstrous Mess? Will it get a lot worse? Is that possible?

What interesting times we live in.
Girl with a Hat said…
PR help is not the only type of help they need. Some help from some sort of mental health practitioner would also benefit them.
Louise said…
I see that $mirkle couldn't be bothered to attend the Commonwealth youth conference with Harry.

She seems to be so uninterested by anything UK or Commonwealth related. Nothing but theatre premieres and baseball games for this one......
MLRoda said…
@punkinseed If protective services are called they're not going to find anyone at Frogmore Cottage. They don't live there unless that's happened in the last couple of days. I don't know where they live - Nottingham Cottage or somewhere else but not at Frogmore.

@Nutty I agree with you - she probably handed him over to a caregiver/nanny after her not so private photo op.
Trudy2 said…
The comments on the Daily Mail app are suggesting similar thoughts to those on here. Surely this has *got* to come out soon? They aren't even deleting the ones pointing out the meta data from the Christening or suggesting that readers look up this blog or the Harry Markle one like they used to. I can only surmise that the press have been sitting on so much, for so long, that they're desperate for the dam to finally break so that they can really go to town.
MLRoda said…
Well said. As a member of the British Royal Family, and official representative of The Queen, she should be promoting all things British. So far she hasn't. Not in her clothes or patronages. Oh, she did well when they were on the engagement tour and the overseas tour but other than that, nothing to promote British anything. Which is really sad because the British taxpapers fund her lifestyle and they're getting really surly about not being represented and her overspending.
hhstarr said…
I follow a British journalist on Twitter and he said that the press was invited to Harry's event today and then asked to leave before Harry said his few words he wanted to share. The media was quite mad. About an hour later they got a statement from the firm as to what harry said. At this point, the media wasn't sharing. He said "Prince Harry had an official engagement this morning and made some remarks but colleagues covering it were thrown out before he spoke. There is nothing interesting to report."
Maddie said…
LOL abbyh. I’m old so I remember that commercial.

Thank you Nutty for the new post. Excellent job you are doing.🥂
Anonymous said…
Nutty, cheers! Contemptinis on the house! The only thing wrong with this is that I doubt Harry could speak so eloquently! Otherwise, perfect, and their solution. When this finally happens, I hope he'll use your interview as a guide. I also hope that the situation has changed a bit and MM will be summering (wintering, falling, and springing) in Canada (sorry).

Now I want to find out what happened at Harry's event today where reporters were thrown out...
Jdubya said…
Not sure which blog mention this on, so if here is not the place, go ahead and delete.
I was just reading online article from publication New Idea about illegitimate royal children . this magazine is very anti-royal and I'm wondering who is behind it.

Has it been around long? I think RF is going to be hit with a lot of controversy in near future . Between Hardles and Andy/Epstein, going to be very rocky
MLRoda said…
Wow. that was unexpected. Well, this is an official engagement, he can't claim "privacy" and that would be silly of him. They're really alienating the media and the people.
Anonymous said…
I saw that @RoyalReporter tweeted that. So when I saw @Nutty's new post, I first thought it was about that. Maybe Harry has decided to be an ass so that the Mrs. doesn't look so bad? Hard to imagine because he doesn't seem to like her much either.
Anonymous said…
Trudy2, you may be (and I hope you are) quite right!
Nathalia said…
Which journalist?
Amzz Naylor said…
I saw this on twitter. It is all very odd. Do you think it is another warning telling the press and the public to back off why else would they not be telling us what he eventually said.
I have had a shocking 24 hours on twitter I commented on an article about the 2 racist thugs who got prosecuted. I was trying to say not everyone in Britain is racist and basically people can have opinion and debates with out it spiralling into something nasty. F*** me they swarmed me like a horde of angry wasps. I'm still dealing with the fall out now after clarifying what I meant. I have left twitter alone for the last couple of hours as it made me feel so crappy.
Anonymous said…
https://twitter.com/RoyalReporter?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Anonymous said…
Twitter is a soul-sucking abyss. It's rather like the MM of apps. It can seem normal and good, then all hell breaks loose and craziness ensues without warning. I stay away for weeks at a time and just set my tweets to private so I don't return to a mess.

But I want to know what Harry did today because really?
hhstarr said…
I follow Richard Palmer, @RoyalReporter
Amzz Naylor said…
I know it does seem a strange turn of events. Why invite them to a event to speak and throw them out. The press did go hard with the way she was holding archie at the polo match. I do think he is livid with them probably spurned on by her insistence that she is being vilified and has done nothing wrong. Just my two pence.
MLRoda said…
Not to derail or anything but I just stumbled across a site called Meghanpedia. WTH? If anyone's interested here's the link https://meghanpedia.com/

I think I'm in shock. OK carry on, nothing to see here....
Amzz Naylor said…
Holy shite I have just gone on it. Duchess of impact!!! What on earth. OK i can tell already this is going to annoy me lol
Now! said…
I also doubt he could speak eloquently! But the palace staff tend to clean things up for him.
Now! said…
Maybe, and maybe on some level he knows there is some truth in the criticism and is embarrassed.
Amzz Naylor said…
That sounds like a very angry person. The public and press are gaslighting her?!?! Wtf
Girl with a Hat said…
let's stop treating these two as though they are able to be redeemed. Every time they have a chance to dig a deeper hole, they do. It keeps getting worse and worse.
Anonymous said…
Her outrageous behavior and the giant, overgrown “2” mo. Old bb are a great distraction from Epstein.. and his ties to Ghislaine Maxwell.. who is an “alleged” madame (amongst other criminal allegations).. who happens to have ties with none other than yours truly, MM... Could this be the link to her alleged “yachting” ? 🧐
OKay said…
I've noted in several interviews that Harry comes across as neither particularly intelligent nor articulate. It's especially surprising for Royals! But then again, Wills doesn't exactly speak as I would expect a highly educated "gentleman" to speak either. Little things, like "Me and Catherine..." etc. I'm starting to wonder if either of them actually graduated from high school on their own merits, much less university.
Anonymous said…
MM Ties with -> Ghislaine Maxwell and *Hannah Bronfman
MLRoda said…
YIKES!!! If that's true.... wonder what the fallout is going to be.
Amzz Naylor said…
Wow I had always wondered what her ties to Epstein were. If they existed. Hannah Bronfman wasn't she the one involved in the NXVIM? I have probably just written that wrong but you know what I mean. :) I had seen that she was friendly with her in the past.
And yes they could have helped themselves so many times but it seems to me that they don't want to. Still waiting and watching Richard Palmers twitter to see what went down today!!
Lottie said…
I think it is noble of you Nutty to give PH an 'out'
But in all honesty why should e be offered an out?
In my opinion he is as bad as MM, possibly worse
PH has just been lucky to have been protected by the BRF for a very long time
I, like many others can now see that the happy chappy he has been portraying is a facade
We now get to see the true PH ...He shows that he is an angry,sulky, entitled spoilt brat
I think they are a match made in heaven, or as most people are starting to see it....hell

Paja said…
It was bigger reborn doll, not a kid, he didn´t move.
Avery said…
The one where she was 4 months pregnant and looked 8 months pregnant?
MaLissa said…
I know right? I'm still kinda numb.. just stumbling on to it. Don't quite know what to make of it.

BTW - this is MLRoda but I had to log out of that account because that is my family reunion site and I forgot about it until I just checked :) LOL :)
Now! said…
It's actually Sara and Claire Bronfman who are involved with NXVIM. Claire pleaded guilty to financing it.

Hannah is their niece - their brother's daughter. I don't know how close she is to her aunts.

FWIW, Hannah is biracial, like Meg.
Now! said…
I don't see any evidence that Hannah was involved in yachting. Not only is she from a wealthy family, she's started a couple of businesses of her own, graduated from Bard College, and is married.
Unknown said…
Hi

The book on Camilla by ...either Penny Junor or Juror, can't recall exact name , has an interesting quote by Camilla. She mentions...my heart was shattered into a million pieces....this is almost the very same quote that MM used in that staged letter to her father. Both women off course were talking about different people. But. If MM read that book on Camilla and started using that quote.... ask the royal reporters to add plagiarism or plagiarist to this long growing list of untoward names....
Now! said…
I know I'm in the minority here, but unless something new on Andrew comes out of the Epstein revelations, it may not be that big of a deal for the RF.

The Virginia Roberts stuff has been known for years; it's been "priced in" to Andrew's current low regard in the eyes of the public.

Virginia was 17, which is above the age of consent in many European countries. I don't think plain-vanilla interaction with a female of that age, or even several females of that age, is going to take down the BRF.

Of course, there could be plenty of shocking information on Andrew that hasn't emerged yet. But the Virginia Roberts story isn't shocking any more.
Now! said…
Harry supposedly had to be dragged through Eton with the help of tutors.

I don't know that William is an intellectual giant, but neither is his grandmother. And sometimes hyper-intelligent people lack emotional intelligence, which the Queen seems to have a lot of.

Charles' way of speaking actually bothers me more than William's. Charles is SO posh, so totally disconnected from the way anyone under 50 speaks English.
Now! said…
Interesting point! Meg borrows a lot from Kate and from Diana and occasionally even from Princess Mary of Denmark, but borrowing from Camilla would be something entirely new.
Now! said…
He's certainly behaving very badly. I don't know that he deserves an 'out' either - I just thought it might be interesting to speculate what a "frank interview with Harry" might look like.
Bubbles said…
If they waited for marriage to try to conceive then they didn't give it enough time to work on its own before turning to surrogacy, which leads me to believe it was planned off the bat. But if being infertile (her) then this is a beautiful platform for them to open up the global (ugh, I hate allowing them the term 'global' but it works here) discussion on fertility awareness and options. Perhaps modernize that dusty Monarchy as MM's plants claim she wants to so badly.

If he is infertile then this entire farce is a scam and they owe lots of money and apologies to their Public paying the way. The family should be ashamed for allowing the parade knowing full well he can't produce children.

This proves titles are more important to them than anything. Poor baby.

Coming clean is Step #1 in every misdeed.
Bubbles said…
Off topic but LOL! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7237711/Meghan-Markle-tried-job-Wendy-Williams-Show.html
Bubbles said…
The marriage wouldn't have been denied for infertility, she'd publicly blame it on race. One he asked there was no turning back, approval or not. Does he have to ask the Queen before he asks her?
Trudy2 said…
I avoid Twitter. It's a bit like chucking mud and seeing what sticks. Some of it may be juicy but it's rarely reliable. In this instance it was where the mud stuck but that was ages ago and we're way past those whispers now.
Lottie said…
I do like and admire your theory Nutty, it's definitely a positive spin
Although PH and 'frank' in the same sentence is a fantasy
I have a feeling that PH is behind a lot of the secrecy & privacy issues surrounding Archie.
Maybe it is a trauma from the death of his mother which he blames the press for, forgetting that Diana actually used, courted & manipulated the press for her own means, quite similar to what Harry & Meghan are doing right now.

d.c. said…
Guido F. Awkes = Guy Fawkes.
lollll
I am dead - you're hysterical. Thanks for the laughs. We cry b/c it's true...

I would absolutely love it if this interview, or something like it, ever happened. The gas-lighting by the entire Royal Family, at this point, is far beyond anything that is okay. The whole thing (yes I'm #TeamPillow), from start to finish.

I worry that they will try to follow the current prevailing PR theme of denying everything, admitting nothing, and hoping no one looks for evidence indicating otherwise. I understand it's what they want everyone to believe, and it's too much for a narcissist to bear, to ever even hint at (or imagine) admitting a flaw/mistake, despite all the evidence (I'm carefully avoiding any political references to try and keep our dialogue civil and smoothly flowing). Gah, I think so much could be done to help de-stigmatize surrogacy as an option, they could even try to change the archaic laws if they really wanted to, but they'd have to admit the whole farce first...

Thanks, Nutty, as always, for your blog, and to the all the great commenters - I love reading everyone's (not-attacking each other) thoughts. Also, I hope you know we all really appreciate your blog and this space that you've created for us. I know there are naysayers who negatively spew their judgements, but I hope you see the shield of sanity and love/support we all have created around you and this site. :) <3
d.c. said…
Yikes, thanks for the heads-up. Your and Amzz's reactions are enough to convince me, it is in my mental health's best interest to avoid that site. Eek.
Anonymous said…
I'm with you @Nutty. The MM connection I could imagine (long-shot possibility) is if she were yachting and if she were a prostitute on those yachts and if she had regulars and if someone trusted her enough, she might be used in strawman capacity if someone needed to move money they couldn't otherwise explain. I've seen no evidence of that and tend to move away from the more imaginative theories, not because they aren't possible, but because, based on what I've seen, they're not probable, and there's a difference. So, we wait...
Jdubya said…
Wow. I mean, just wow
d.c. said…
I know right? Like surely he can see, with his own two eyes, the way she holds their son (it's so hard not to put quotes around that last word, but I'm trying not to stir-up unnecessary whirlpools of poo).

And why add to all the gaslighting with all the unnecessary extra lies (breastfeeding, how Meg is basically raising him all on her own - nvm the nannies, Frogmore Cottage, just everything on top of the original lie... it's just snowballing the heck out of reality).
Anonymous said…
I wonder if Lord G has followed the trails on *that* one.
Lady Muck said…
Harry's playing a dangerous game screwing with the British press. I'd never do that - not unless I wanted my character to be completely eviscerated.
Anonymous said…
He should be embarrassed, @Nutty. I want to know what happened before I choose a team, though.

@D.C., the one sure thing that I know about narcissists is that even when called out on the lie, they deny. And they're happy to lie outrageously about things that can be easily verified and yet they still do it. MM did it about so many things, this is really just a different version of the same delusion. It won't stop until she is stopped and I don't know how that last bit happens.
Lady Muck said…
I think William dumbs his accent/grammar down slightly when he's with various members of the people. I've been known to do it too depending on the situation. If you see the Cambridges on Radio 1 (youtube) Catherine mentions 'the kiddies' which is not considered a proper way to speak at all, but the Radio 1 youthful under 30 audience would identify that has more approachable and down to earth.
Maddie said…
I absolutely agree Ladies. I have been using the comments from DM for many months as a gauge. The comments have increased from 2 to 3k per story up to 8 to 12k and 90% are negative. The commenters, like you said are all saying the same things, asking the same questions. Something has to give soon.
d.c. said…
I resonate with your exasperation. *sigh* I think many of us are sort of "ever hopeful," in the face of the mounting evidence suggesting otherwise, but if we are not hopeful, then we become hopeless and jaded. While that may be more "in tune with reality," it leaves us feeling wretched. So, I sort of blissfully imagine that there is at least a shred of possibility that there remains a core of human decency and truth inside most of us (yes, even these two). It makes it easier to face each day, even though I know it's not that likely, I like hoping. Maybe it's like the lottery, idk. lol.
d.c. said…
Oh, Nutty, I've been meaning to say, I think some of the issues with deleted comments, at least on my end, seems to be when I use my iPad or Mac and view this site in "Safari." For some reason, those comments act like they're submitted just fine, but then never show. But, if I copy and paste the comments into either of those devices in Chrome, it works fine. Idk if this is actually what's happening to anyone else, but in case it's useful to anyone, maybe try to use Chrome or some other browser, if it's happening in Safari.
Lady Muck said…
@Trudy2 YES! I totally want to gloat, as everyone I've told has thought I'm some nutcase conspiracy theorist too. In the Tom Hanks movie 'Splash' the scientist sprays water turning Tom Hank's character's girlfriend into a mermaid on the streets of NYC. He yells "I WAS RIGHT! BEHOLD... THE MERMAID!" to a stunned crowd. That scene keeps playing in my head about MM - now I'm just waiting for one of the big revelations!
d.c. said…
Yeah, Elle, I think that's the real kicker. How to stop all the lies. I honestly don't know either. Not just with her/them, but all the folks who act this way. I mean, therapy, obviously, but that's very hard to implement on a mass-population level, unless we start infiltrating the sitcoms/serial-shows, demonstrating it's ok to admit mistakes, and redemption after a fall, or something, idk.
d.c. said…
Elle, I think they're referencing a (popular?) press person, who announced in his twitter earlier today (based on screen shots, b/c yes, I too avoid the twitter riptide) that Harry threw his press brethren out of one of his public events, before speaking. It did seem a little strange. He allowed pics to be taken, with various groups of youths, looking pretty engaged, but not to hear what he had to say - I'm not sure what the thought process there was.
d.c. said…
(the first person's brethren, not Harry's; and public event (singular, not plural))
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ozmanda said…
Only thing is I would think Harry would have issues with the bigger words and Sparkles would be upset at not having all the attention on her!

(ok I am especially snarky today, I am really sick and it is early here:)
d.c. said…
aww, sending thoughts of nutritious soup and crackers, with a side of fun tv shows to stream... hope you feel better soon, Ozmanda.
snarkyatherbest said…
Maybe he wants to play with the press so he finally has a reason to come out with everything. Its like he's almost begging and no one in the traditional press is listening.
Hikari said…
Trusting one's prostitute seems to be a bit of a paradox . . is that ever a great idea?
snarkyatherbest said…
Amzz so you were the one that broker twitter today; heard it was down for a few hours ;-)
snarkyatherbest said…
Hi love the blog. Newby here. I would add the interview should add something about a divorce. If he stays with her, there will be no redemption. Like he knew that they were going to use a surrogate and suddenly she is faking a pregnancy. It all snowballed and he didn't know how to get out of it. And then he found out about her double dipping on the clothes, history of yachting, maybe she lied about her age, maybe she started cheating on him, and well that kind of fraud I can get behind so we are divorcing.
Ozmanda said…
Off topic but of interest..

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7236809/Duchess-Sussex-set-walk-red-carpet-glittering-Lion-King-premiere-Prince-Harry.html

So it seems she doesn't care so much about taking "private" time when she gets the chance to waste more money on designer clothing, be on a red carpet and meet "stars" who wouldn't have given her the time of day.
Trudy2 said…
Neither look at one another remotely. I do think we're all going over old ground time and again now; no one on this blog is surprised by the eye rolling shenanigans anymore.
I've been watching this blog from the beginning and have preferred it of late to Harry Markle due to Nutty and the community. When someone posted as Trudy I was surprised because it's not a common name where I live, hence the 2 to differenciate, you used to sign as anon I think?
Trudy2 said…
Ffs differentiate... It's certainly time to kip when the words don't look quite right!! The good thing about time zones is waking up to new posts...
Hikari said…
I wonder how much 'Meghanpedia.com' is costing herself in PR bucks?

How can there still be people who think she's the second coming of Diana when they seeing the same pictures we are? It's enough to make me doubt my sanity at times.



Here's a joyful shot of Meghan and Archie cheering Harry on at the polo . .Daddy looks SO cheered (Not.) It's that glum shot of them walking to the car after the match, not speaking. He's staring straight ahead and looked pissed. And I don't think it's just because William got the cup.
---------------------------------
https://duchess-meghan.com/meghan-and-archie-polo/

This is their selection for "Meghan is Back and More Radiant than Ever!"
(Her TOTC carriage ride. Has anyone ever truly looked 'radiant' in baggy navy blue? Another poorly-fitted garment that suggests something a maiden aunt in her 80s might wear to a spring funeral. Radiance does not come to mind.)
-----------------------
https://duchess-meghan.com/duchess-meghan-is-back/

They also want us to know that the SussexRoyal Pride post is VERY IMPORTANT. All the rainbow colors do show up nicely, sure.

This Kool-Aid, it's potent stuff. Harry was the first to drink it, but it seems to be wearing off a bit . . .
punkinseed said…
Harry is playing a very dangerous game. The old adage goes: "Never threaten anyone who gets their ink by the barrel." His actions are going to bite him very hard for this.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
abbyh said…
Punkin, love the comment about threatening those buying ink by the barrel. a good laugh
Blackbird said…
Dearest Nutty, thank you SO much for the new posts - I probably sound like a creepy stalker but I really do love your writing and all the commenters' views so very much 😋.

I love your spin on your posts, too ... you don't just re-hash what everyone else is reporting; rather, you suggest other perspectives - things others haven't thought of - which is interesting to read and comment on.

Imagine if Harry did give this interview! He would be respected. Although, if he gave it now, people would be outraged ... it would have been far better if he and Meghan announced they were expecting a baby via surrogate - citing their infertility issues as the reason - in an interview conducted after they returned from their tour down under. Instead, we had Meghan trying to upstage Eugenie's wedding, and the constant baby bump focus on that tour, rather than on the actual tour itself.

Dearest commenters, please don't turn on each other ... I know this is Nutty's blog and not mine, but I just don't want to see it go the same way as others have. In the last post, a few people got a bit salty ... just let people have their say and if you don't agree, challenge the argument respectfully or scroll on by.

About M's narcissism. I just wanted to add a new perspective. Growing up, she was different to everyone on Thomas' side of the family because of her colour and I suspect they all made a big deal of it by telling her she was special, she was unique, she was a very bright star, etc. She had what sounds to be an idyllic childhood doing some very cool things (going to a TV set on a regular basis and being educated at a school that obviously harnessed creative talents). What you are exposed to in your first few years on this planet sets you up for life. And that is how she came to be what she is - she still thinks she's special and unique, etc.

One of the Narcs in my life (my mother) was an only child up until the age of seven, and was treated like a princess up until that point. When it came time to share the spotlight with her younger brother there were issues ... and then when her youngest sibling was born another seven years after that, there were even more severe issues. It was what she was exposed to in her first seven years that shaped her into the person she is today, which is not pleasant. She looks down her nose at everyone, does not have anyone to call a true friend, mimics others' behaviours, and inserts herself in younger relatives' lives ... it's a very sad yet dangerous thing to witness.
Wolpertinger said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7238923/Tennis-fan-told-not-selfie-Meghan-Wimbledon-says-didnt-know-there.html

:-)
Jen said…
I just love you people! Great stuff Nutty...but so sad at the same time. As many here have said, had they just been honest from the very beginning that they were unable to have children the natural way, they could have done so much good! There are so many couples who cannot have children of their own, and this not only would have endeared them to those people, but would have made them seem real to everyone else. We are so far gone from the age of "everyone must be perfect all the time" that it boggles the mind why they lied to begin with.

Again, its so very sad.
Blackbird said…
Haha, I too was thinking he wouldn't speak quite at the level this article quotes him as saying.

BUT, in his defence, in person, he is a wonderful conversationalist. He doesn't put on airs and graces like Charles does - he talks WITH people rather than AT them ... he's quite charming. He just speaks regular, everyday-person language. He's quite the charmer.
Blackbird said…
That's what they do - steal others' sayings, ideas, behaviour, hobbies, mannerisms, etc., as their own. As soon as she'd 'met' Harry she would've been using her downtime to research everything the married-ins had done and said before her.
Anonymous said…
Of course it is. Do you trust the upstanding citizen? Hell, no. You trust someone who is also in deep. That is precisely the point. And once someone has helped to launder, they are guilty, too. Once someone is compromised, they're compromised. It's why honest people flee at the first true signs of impropriety. Besides, MM would not even have had to understand the full implications, just the outcome in dollars or pounds or bitcoing.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
@D.C. yes, I'm referring to @RoyalReporter. He seems pretty linked in and that's all I know about the story.
Anonymous said…
I think it might be as simple as:
1. They used a surrogate but lied their asses off about it because
2. MM loved the attention and couldn't admit anything otherwise and
3. Foolishly she & PH thought the BRF would not find out so
4. By the time the BRF did find out, it was too late to backtrack because PC and William did not have her sunny-side up -- how would they know without investigating?
5. Plus, see #2 above, and note, a narcissist is not shamed by the truth - their brains work very differently
6. I think that "Archie" might be a real baby, but whether or not she and Harry have custody of him is another story (I hope not, for all of the reasons @Hitaki addressed earlier in her narc post) (Also, I am concerned about his face - what is wrong with his eye and skin?)
7. I think that William and Kate were onto MM from the beginning BUT
8. Narcissists have a way of drawing their prey into their net and PH was prey ready for the taking
9. I think the BRF is letting this all fall down and I can't predict the outcome at all

Also, I could be wrong and this is not set in stone, but a malleable interpretation of facts I have on a given day.
Anonymous said…
Exactly, Summer Bay. That's why all of those rich people whose accounts have been IDd from computerized fraud alerts believe their online prince/princess really understands them... because they've left themselves open to it somehow by providing all of the push-button emotional information. It's sad, but pretty simple. Harry's buttons are so easy, and it is just working down from there.
Anonymous said…
Therapy doesn't seem to work as well on narcs and sociopaths because it's brain v. behavior. You can't make someone's brain respond like a normal one. What you can do is spot it, believe it, move away from it. All this stuff about how people have to be slower mentally and isolated, etc., there is a lot of evidence that shows anyone can be played. Just takes the right player and the right game. Sad, but true.
MaLissa said…
I've posted like 5 times over the last 2 threads and didn't get published. No deleted posts just not published and I'm using computer. I use my iPad to read but not post.
MaLissa said…
Again not to derail but I just stumbled on another site where bella2491 has an interesting post on how the Sussexes want to monetize their charities and merch. It's goes against all the rules and I'm sure not too many people will be happy.

https://princeharryandme.tumblr.com/post/186219930576/this-covers-what-i-believe-to-be-the-sussexes

Give that a read and tell me that this is a bad thing just to confirm.
Life's Lessons said…
Surely the Queen would have talked to the Dr. who examined Megan to make sure she was pregnant...This whole relationship has been very strange, but do you think the Queen really just let Megan pretend in front of everyone that she was pregnant..l did find it strange that Megan would not use the Queen's Obstetrician but wouldn't the Queen have been wondering why and found out the reason??
l think this whole thing with Megan is really out of control and since there is no turning back, wouldn't that be a big stain on the whole RF ??
lt is almost as though Megan went into that family in hopes that in doing all the things against Protocol starting with the Engagement and not wearing leggings,, might bring the downfall of the Monarchy since this has spread across the World now and how do the PR team deal with Megan at this point?? l never thought l would live to see another crisis involving the wives of the RF since Diana..and l have to add, Diana was nothing like Megan and never caused so much damage.
Life's Lessons said…
l think this is going to end up as a big crisis that will be out of control for the PR that is so desperately trying to plug leaks in every story to do with Megan and not doing a very good job ... The people of the UK are getting fed up as the rest of the world is with all the idiotic things both Megan and Harry have done since they got engaged...Wills was definately correct in telling Harry to slow down because he did not know Megan that well...l think the Queen is trying to stay out of this whole mess but she is going to have to address these problems sooner rather then later or there just might not be any more Monarchy..People were very slow to forgive what happened to Diana, so the people might be even slower to forgive if this keeps going on with nothing but silence, just like she did when Diana died.
Life's Lessons said…
As time passes, Harry is looking more like a simpleton and his wife is looking like a cunning shrew...How can the Royals go along with this lunacy ??
Anonymous said…
Oh, quite true! It's funny, in legal research/writing, pretension was once the rule, but now it's to keep everything simple, but professional. If someone must reach for a dictionary, then the writer is at fault. I have had years of practice putting the financial process into easily understood bits, but legalese is posing its own challenge. I'm learning to write with the "big words" in there and then leave on the explanation behind. I would bet that William has that common touch / relatable persona down. There is something about the Cambridge's that really doe warm my heart, and then add the kids, and I'm ready for a picnic in the back of the boot lol.
Anonymous said…
How dare you @SummerBay! LOL. Sorry, I had to practice turning on you :) I'm so not funny.

Anyway, I agree with all you said, and there's so much debate about nature v. nurture and narcs/sociopaths, but the one thing we do know for sure is that the family environment can really nurture what is already there in terms of nature.
I have watched it and wondered so many times: how the hell can that person sleep at night? But the truth is, they sleep soundly and do not care. It is that "thing", whatever that thing is, that allows them to do the deed and feel happy that they won or are "important", etc. And it's how fraud aligns with fraud. Some people are just able to cross that line without a care and they look for victims (Harry, I think) and co-conspirators (Markle & Marcus? or ???)
Amanda said…
It seems that Harry has had a lifetime of people covering up and not holding him accountable for his numerous negative actions. As such now it appears he doesn't have the ability to have a backbone and take some responsibility. He is so used to being loved and forgiven for his "larrikin" rep.

I will predict we will see a recording released that has Haz either drunk or "unaware" he was being recorded laying it all out there. Of course3 he would know but at this stage this is what I can see him thinking this is how he will get out of this whole situation with some of his reputation intact.
Anonymous said…
Contemptinis: I've done some research, and I think I've worked out a recipe. Everyone invited to the (Give MM) The Boot Party, pls feel free to make suggestions, but I am going to suggest:
Vodka, Rye, and brandied cherries.
Those are supposed to taste quite good with Rye, and the cherry pink to honor Kate's dress. This has the added benefit of the initial play on words re vodka and wry. I would be willing to test case this for everyone. (I'm a humanitarian, too.)

Quoting: "Rye whiskies are known for their biting, spicy flavors, and this vodka made from rye grain proves that those qualities translate to other spirits as well."
Life's Lessons said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Amanda said…
My career is about profiling people and why they do what they do (ok mostly criminals but the fundamentals are the same). Sociopaths are neurologically unable to show empathy or understand the consequence of their actions. The elements of what makes them are:
1) Grandiose sense of self
2) Olympic champions of lying (so much so they can easily beat a lie detector test as this essential measures blood pressure and pulse fluctuations, which wont happen if you don't think you are deceiving anyone or just don't care)
3) Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
4) Shallow Emotions and not able to love. They see people as tools to enable them to reach their goal
5) Need for stimulation - This raises the endorphins and is a bit like those who are "adrenaline junkies"

Those with Narcissism Personality Disorder shows similar traits - they are also self centred and arrogate without the empathy or consideration for others and how their actions may impact others. Added to this is the excessive and ongoing need for attention and admiration - which ties in to being manipulative and demanding.

Not saying any of this ties to the situation but....:)


hardyboys said…
There is a new article saying that MM raised the name Archie to a new level of popularity and it's now in the top tier of baby names. Does she pay for this shit? Bc she is 38 plus there is no way she can convince any millenial that Archie is a trendy name. I'm 52 so I grew up with archie bunker as a reference. 3 or 4 channels watching Alice with Flo in the diner on Sunday nights. There is no way anyone would ever in their wildest dreams ever grow up thinking that archie is a trendy name. It's a throw back name to something to make Harry happy.
Blackbird said…
It's an incredibly difficult thing to grow up with, Elle. I spent many years trying to be the very best I could to please my mother but nothing was ever good enough; nor will it ever be. You have to walk away and live your own life, which some people seem as cruel but so be it ... unless you've actually lived through it, it's hard to understand.

Harry is likely still in his love bubble - although he doesn't appear as loved-up with her as he once was ... but he will be taking any criticism of her personally, as he chose her. I hope he sees for himself what she is really like ... give it time (not too much time), and I think he will. People like this find it very hard to maintain long-lasting relationships.
Girl with a Hat said…
this explains everything. Meghan has sold Harry an idea and he will be able to surpass his brother and make all of his dreams come true because of it. They must be stopped.
SwishyFishy said…
It's unclear if Meghan showed up for the polo game for the full three hours or a 20 minute photo op. The one thing that is certain is that the baby was never fed, it's diaper was never changed, it was in the hot sun without protection (I don't count Nivea sunscreen as proper protection, like a hat) and it rarely shifted position. I'm hoping it was a quick photo op and then she left because the idea of that child stuck in that position, hungry with a potentially dirty diaper really concerns me. I think child protective services is too cowed by the royal family to ever investigate. The fact that the queen sealed the christening documents shows that she believes they are above the law. So disturbing.
SwishyFishy said…
She is more interested in promoting herself and her "Brand Sussex" than anything else. She's setting herself up for life after Harry. She want's to be the next Gwyneth Paltrow/Goop. I do wonder if The Tig will be resurrected or if she's going to do something with Sussex in the title. I will be interested to see if the RF bands her from using the name "Sussex" after the divorce, as she will only use it for merching.
Unknown said…
MM's awkward actions are intentional. She knows full well the bad press she is going to receive.
The questionable baby holding, bizarre privacy requests, non-conformist outfit choices, Wimbledon shenanigans... It's all part of her plan to pull a Wallace Simpson 2.0.
She knows the press is going to eat her alive after her offences. But behind the scenes, I believe she's playing a naive victim to Harry; she knows she can manipulate him due to his myopia and skewed mindset, after what the press did to his mother. I absolutely agree with posters assessing her as being a full blown narcissist/master manipulator. I think her ultimate goal is to reach a point where Harry feels forced to leave (or at the very least gives Meagan and Archie permission to leave) London with his family full-time or at least part-time to LA. That way, MM can have her cake and eat it too... the royal title without the responsibilities, as well as the actress fame without the actual talent.
Book deals, Oprah specials, and merching galore. $$$$
SwishyFishy said…
That's really disturbing. This couple is imploding and the press is the fuse they are toying with that's going to make all their secrets explode into the public domain. How can they honestly believe that they can keep a handle on all their lies when the horse has already bolted from the barn. The press knows. They press won't keep schtum for much longer. I think the latest slew of negative articles about Meghan are a warning to them and they don't seem to be heeding the klaxon.
SwishyFishy said…
The Queen never received a comprehensive education. It was felt she really didn't need to know a lot, just stick to the tasks of getting your red boxes and being lead by parliament and the PM. Elizabeth really resented this and felt her educational deficiencies keenly. She may not be the smartest person in the room but, yes, her EQ is high, plus she has a curious nature and is interested in things and people. Diana readily admitted she was not very smart and Charles isn't much better. If memory serves, William was considered average, but at least applied himself at school. Harry did nothing and I mean nothing, simply got by on his charm and popularity. It was a relief to the family that he was interested in the military and wasn't going to be another Edward and tap out of that service. They thought it was going to give him direction and purpose. It didn't because he had people enabling him in the military as well. The whole reason he left service is that he got a new commanding officer who was not going to let "Good Time Harry" get away with shit and Harry threw one of his notorious tantrums and quit because he wasn't going to get his way.
abbyh said…
Sadly it is watching a slow motion train wreck in front of your eyes. Or maybe it is more like they have pulled pin and the grenade is now live but people are playing hot potato with it on their hands.
Girl with a Hat said…
celt news on youtube says that Meghan and Harry had a row after the game, and that Chelsy was there. Meghan roared out of the house when she found out. During the whole 3 hours of the game, Meghan was not seen to feed the baby, change it or give it water.
SwishyFishy said…
I know. The kid is 2 months old (supposedly, he's awfully large for 2 months) so how can that many male babies have been born in the last 60 days that the name Archie has suddenly skyrocketed in importance.
d.c. said…
Yeah, when I do it from Safari (even on my computer), that happens to me, consistently. I can only post from Chrome. - this reply even, just disappears after I hit “publish” in Safari. Page reloads, But my response just evaporates. I realized just before hitting “publish” in Safari, so copied my response, as I knew I’d have to redo it in Chrome. I don’t know if other people have an easier time if they try a different browser. I was very relieved to find a way to finally have my responses show up.
Lottie said…
@SwishyFishy
Totally on point and yesterday there was a slew of negative articles
MM blew Wimbledon out of the park, i bet she wished she never ever went LOL
I think the press is just biding their time and by the look of things it's almost 'times up' for these two
PH has been incredibly lucky to have had his real character protected all of these years. Now we finally see who he really is.
PH is showing more and more his sulky, petulant arrogant and rude side. (i could go on.....)
When they attend the Lion King on Sunday it would be interesting to see if the press photograph them or not?
Perhaps it is time to give them all of the 'selected privacy' they crave.
Then they will see who controls the media
Jen said…
I don't think Harry really has the ability to give her permission to move to LA, even part time. I believe, since she is a member of the RF, only the Queen can do that. I could be wrong though.
Now! said…
Apparently Archie has been growing in popularity as UK name since the late 1990s.
Now! said…
The thing is, he must have known abut some of this stuff before they married, particularly the yachting.

Supposedly some of his friends had used her services.

I think cheating may be the way they do get out of it - but Harry's, not Meghan's.

One angle would be to bring in Chelsey, create rumors that Harry has cheated, and then Meg "leaves with her head held high" with the idea of going on to some kind of influencer career in the US. She hopes.

Jen said…
Are we going to have more (better) Wimbledon photos tomorrow? DM says Kate AND Megamoo are attending Serena's final together. *Insert eyeroll* Shall we wager on what Megamoo wears? Will it be another tent? Jeans with holes in them?
Now! said…
So sorry people are having issues. This blog is just a quick, fast, cheap free setup from Google.

I honesty don't have the time or energy to set up anything more complex!

Hopefully we can all find a workaround. Avoiding Safari sounds like a great start.
Now! said…
Ha ha! You're the only one who caught the Guy Fawkes reference! :)

Apparently he actually used the name Guido on occasion. Who knew.

And thank you for your kind words! I'm happy to have brought together such an interesting group of people.
Now! said…
She was always hustling! It got her pretty far, to be honest.
Now! said…
The thing is, people in the entertainment industry don't think highly of her either.

And she doesn't generate interest or profit. They put up with, say, Justin Bieber or Chris Brown because those two ungentle men bring in a lot of cash.

Meg doesn't. I don't know why she thinks great things are awaiting her in LA.
Now! said…
If she has a few coins left to spend on a stylist, now would be the time to do it.

At the very least, a wig stylist. There's no shame in wearing wigs - so many celebs do - but then at least wear a good one.

I wonder if Meg will be bringing her hat. She seems to think she needs to bring it with her every time she attends Wimbledon.
Now! said…
Hi MaLissa! I thought the link was very interesting - it's speculation (just like us!) but clever speculation.

So many potential income streams. If the Sussexes were private citizens, I would respect their (her) hustle.

But they already have income stream #1, which is the British taxpayers, and the deal is generally that it should be their only income stream, even if Meg doesn't think it's enough.

Instead they (or at least she) are not doing their full-time job they get a salary and benefits for; they're putting all their energies into their side hustles.

Not fair.
Anonymous said…
Okay, stupid but sincere question: do you really think it's a wig? If so, why does she wear one? I thought people were just joking?
Anonymous said…
Safari is a disaster for this blog. I am using Firefox b/c just no on Safari.
hardyboys said…
I dont think she needs the queens permission to leave and I dont think the queen has custodial rights over her baby especially if it is not of her body. That's the sheer brilliance of the plan. I actually think she herself is getting so fed up of the bad press and is lonely that she is openly choosing American venues the lion king with beyonce Wimbledon for serena. Tbh I think she is done also and if shes booted out shes got a master plan like the person said above oprah, a tell all book, appearances on Ellen etc..maybe she will be the next kraptashian. I truly think she will never have to worry about a pay cheque again and that is all she cares about. When she goes back she will probably make up with her dad if she isnt secretly leaning on him already. All this negative press on a daily basis has got to consume ones soul. I think her hearing that she got blasted for not carrying archie properly and her tent dress would have driven her to the edge. I know every one has a breaking point. I'm convinced shes almost there
Anonymous said…
@Hitaki, there is an alleged inside scoop at https://the-charlatan-duchess.tumblr.com/ re MMs behavior in Australia and the bad blood between her and PH already happening at that time.
Anonymous said…
@Summer, there's a link above to an inside scoop re MM and PH in Australia. Talks about their relationship. If true, the loved bubble broke awhile ago (which is what I see in his body language).

And good for you for doing what you needed to do. I understand what you mean.
Girl with a Hat said…
she definitely has hair extensions, and a lot of them. At the appearance at Wimbledon, the part on the back of her head was caused by all of the extensions she has. There are so many that that is the reason her hat doesn't fit. Also the reason that her hair seems to have grown at least 4 inches overnight, and why her hair was so thick at the polo match. A lot of women of colour have issues with straightened hair and use extensions, but hers are cheap looking. again, she has no clue whatsoever.
Anonymous said…
I did notice that her hair looked much longer and ragged at the polo match. So then the extensions aren't really wigs? They're just attached to her natural hair? That seems like it would hurt, be hella hard to style, and Harry would get his fingers all caught up in it.
Blackbird said…
I feel a teeny tiny bit sorry for her. She's pretty much isolated emotionally and physically and her reputation is getting worse by the moment. As Veena says, everyone has their breaking point and I worry about that for her (I doubt it's true that she doesn't read the papers or online media). Hers is a cautionary tale in being very careful what you wish for.
hhstarr said…
I sometimes do, too, but then I remember she has done not one single thing to help herself. She isolated herself, she chose to do things and behave in an isolating way. She doesn't learn from her mistakes and she seems to, when a mistake is made, dig in and buck the system even more. She brought the ire on herself, and feeling sorry for someone who causes it all just feeds her want to justify her actions.
Teasmade said…
Not that I know personally, but they're kind of glue-pressed into existing hair a bit away from the roots. Or they're also possibly clip-ins. I agree that these extensions look terrible, cheap and unkempt. Raggedy.

Kate wears them, and you never hear about them anymore. With her, I always wonder about the elaborate updos or backdos -- how difficult it must be to work with the fake hair. Look at Pippa or Carole's hair--that's basically what Kate had to work with originally.
Hikari said…
My friend Mischief Girl, a CDAN regular (lurker) sent me this last night.

(credit: CDAN blind)

I've never seen such a long, extensive entry before.

***************

This celebrity has suffered a string of mishaps in her public life lately.

Then again, “suffered” might be the wrong word, as each error may have been completely unforced! (hint: 'Wimbledon' h.)

Now she is looking to redeem herself by showcasing her charity work.

However, even the way she is going about that may prove to be a problem!

She was advised to engage in good works and let the established media carry the message. She vetoed that and insisted that she should deliver the message personally on social media and via [one chosen outlet]. Those are egotistical and wrong choices.

Why is this a problem?

Proper conduct for public servants who wish to be respected/liked is to be humble, public, selfless and engage the established media. She is choosing to play games to draw attention to herself. That is the conduct of a celebrity.

Isn’t anyone providing her with guidance?

Every day! Although the people who have been doing this for decades have told her what works and what does not, she thinks she is the most clever person in the room. She completely rejects any advice she is given about photos, wardrobe, etc. We are trying to help her, not hurt her, but she is arrogant and duplicitous.

What do you mean by duplicitous?

She says she will do something but does not. As an example, the dress code and decorum for [event] was explained to her in great detail. She nodded and said she understood and agreed… and then proceeded to do the opposite! Then she whinged about the criticism she received.

Do you think she will improve in her role as time goes by?

As long as her desire for celebrity exceeds her desire to serve, that will be difficult.

Every one of her wounds thus far has been completely self-inflicted. She takes no one’s counsel but her own. Until she humbles herself and heeds the counsel of those with more experience, we expect the mistakes and whinging and wails of victimhood to continue in perpetuity. Or until the divorce.

Yikes!

**********

Meg is the agent of her own destruction. At first I thought it so very odd that a woman who is obsessed with her image and looks would go around looking so bad, when she knows how much negative attention she's going to get. There could be a few reasons:

1. She's having a nervous breakdown. OR
2. She's doing that Hamlet thing--putting on a show of having a nervous breakdown so that everyone will feel sorry for her and the Royal Family will feel so bad for how they've been treating her that they will send her for an indefinite stay at a spa in Malibu so she can 'recover'.

I was thinking #1 at first, but I've come 'round to #2. Even someone who was struggling, but who still cared the least tiny bit about keeping up appearances would make more effort than she is, or would stay home out of the public eye, claiming illness or, you know, 'maternity leave.' She is purposely going around making a spectacle of herself.

Does she really think that if she separates (or is separated from) the Royal family if she acts crazy enough, that they will continue to fund her Duchess lifestyle in California (complete with title and deferences) without a peep? Or that anyone in Hollywood would hire her or insure her for so much as a celebrity car-wash fundraiser after the way she has behaved so publicly? They'd love a tell-all memoir, I'm sure, but she won't be allowed to write one (or have one written for her). Time for her to get a taste of her own ironclad NDA medicine . . .
Louise said…
The announcement of Kate and Meghan attending Wimbledon together is the last straw for me.

I don't know what game the RF thinks that it is playing with the public, but as a citizen of a Commonwealth country who was part of the only 15% of Canadians who still supported the monarchy, I am now withdrawing my support and enthusiasm.

Of course, it makes no difference as we can't abolish the Monarchy without opening up the entire Canadian Constitution for debate.

I don't know whether the RF are co conspirators or just enablers, but I am fed up with the lot of them. The Queen may be very cute and pleasant but she is weak, as is her son.
Now! said…
A good example of this is the hat at Wimbledon. It's very clear that Wimbledon does not allow hats. She brought one the first time; OK, beginner's mistake.

But she's brought the same hat every time since.

t's just a middle finger to other people.
Now! said…
Thanks for posting this blind, which is from Blind Gossip, not CDAN. I wonder who its source was, or if Ace is just reading the British media like we are.

The detail about the dress code for Wimbledon being explained sounds like it is supposed to come from an insider.

The word "duplicitous" is good too. And probably not a word that Harry knows, although he may know it now.

I think Meg's just naturally a s***-stirrer. She enjoys conflict; she feels most comfortable with conflict, so she is creating conflict.

Nothing will make her happy or satisfied. She's not built that way.
Girl with a Hat said…
she is doing it because bad press is as good as good press to her. She wants to get notoriety if she can't get fame. The BRF should just respond by having her security team get flat tyres on their way to her destinations, or get lost or stuck in traffic. Or give her the wrong time for an event so she shows up too early or too late. A passive-aggressive reaction just the same way she is.
Now! said…
I agree that wigs and hair extensions can look great if they're done properly.

And many Black women use them; Beyoncé is the most obvious example. Her team makes her look fabulous.

I cannot imagine that Meg can't find someone more competent to do her hair in a large, multicultural city like London.
Girl with a Hat said…
I forgot to add - this is her idea of modernising the monarchy. It's not reaching out to the disenfranchised, it's shit-stirring, and a lot of people, especially in the USA, just love it.
Girl with a Hat said…
One last thought - the palace should enlist Chelsy to show up at all events that Meghan goes to and to sit right behind her. This will ensure she blows up in full public view within a week.
Now! said…
Oh dear, can you imagine the temper tantrum that would emerge from that?

They'd have to send out RPOs wearing earplugs.

And possibly body armor.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jen said…
@Nutty "I cannot imagine that Meg can't find someone more competent to do her hair in a large, multicultural city like London." It's because she hasn't bothered to look. She doesn't wear British designers, so why work with a British hair stylist?
Blackbird said…
I was watching an old episode of Million Dollar Listing LA today, on which there was a British woman viewing houses (with no budget - just whatever ticked all the boxes) ... she was married to some tech guy and the Altman brothers were showing her around. Before they did that though, she had her security guy pat them down, before ushering them in to her husband's "mobile office" which was a kitted-out van.

As I was watching, I thought of the blind that Enty had a while ago about a representative scouting LA on their behalf and had a giggle to myself, imagining Meghan watching MDLLA at some point too, seeing previous episodes where various buyers' representatives / concierge staff will meet the brokers and make up a shortlist of houses they see, and getting an idea from there. Wouldn't it be funny if she actually used one of the brokers from Million Dollar Listing? I wouldn't put it past her! But I think that blind was BS as they don't have anything like the amount that the blind mentioned (I think it was $5m?).

I don't disagree that Meghan has people telling her how things should be done, which she delights in rebelling against, but why is she being allowed to get away with it? I feel like the Queen just doesn't care anymore. Harry and his family just aren't as important as William and his family in the scheme of things but, due to his public profile and following, all this behavior needs to be nipped in the bud, and it needs to happen STAT. But it won't ... the grey men of bygone days who actually took care of this stuff have gone (and Lord Geidt doesn't seem that bothered either).
Hikari said…
Louise,
It's very ironic that the Harkle-Farkle wedding served to re-ignite my interest in the British monarchy. When I was 16, I got up at 4am on July 29, 1981 to watch Harry's mum and dad tie the knot. All that spring and summer, I had compiled 2 scrapbooks of all the clippings on Diana I could find. I followed all her fashion and the pictures of her growing family. To find out along with the rest of the world that the fairytale romance was a cruel hoax was pretty crushing.

While I was waiting for William's wedding to start, back in 2011, I watched the Charles-Di wedding ceremony again. It's glaringly obvious that it wasn't going to work out . . . the groom walks the long aisle of St. Paul's up to the altar wearing the face of a condemned man walking to his execution. I enjoyed the Wills-Kate wedding and even bought myself a costume replica of Diana's engagement ring (now Kate's, the ring is cursed no more and has been given a second life where it gets to be worn and cherished every day) . . but William and Kate had been an item for so long, their wedding felt slightly anticlimactic in a way. To this day, I recall the poise of the bride and her siblings with awe. Young Jamie, 24 years old, read the lesson better than the professional clerics in the room.

What might have been, if Harry had married Pippa instead, I often think. Pippa seems very happy with her husband and their baby, so she had a lucky escape. Harry has not been so lucky in his choice, as we are all now too well aware. But the first time I saw pictures of MM at the engagement, I thought, "She looks a lot like Pippa.' Hmm. The resemblance was fleeting, and I don't see it now, but in the early photos, it was there. Perhaps intentionally, since Smeaghan would have seen, along with everyone else, the obvious chemistry Haz had with the maid of honor at his brother's wedding. The contrast between how Harry looks now and how he looked 8 years ago is so sad to me. He seems like a completely different person.

It was Harry's wedding that got me reading about the Royals again, and delving into their history. I have read several books on QEII's early years, and have watched both seasons of 'The Crown' three or four times. That portrait of the Queen is of a quietly indomitable spirit of great moral convictions. Claire Foy's portrayal, as well as steeping myself in the family photo albums has given me great affection for her . . but I might be in love with the idea of her, the PR gloss. The reality has been fairly underwhelming. HM embraces the dictum of 'Do nothing' a bit too much for my taste. I thought she would have seen that is not always the most effective course after the Diana situation. In MM, they've got another Diana on their hands, in terms of a mentally unstable showboating personality who has an overinflated sense of her own importance in the structure of the monarchy and who loves to play games with the media. Rather than making a strong decisive action/statement, she is burying her head in the sand again, just like before.

Something must come to a head soon.
snarkyatherbest said…
Mischi, the brf needs to put you on staff. I like the way your mind works ;-)
Hikari said…
Thanks for the correction, Nutty. Can you fix it? I have not figured out how to do edits. I am on both sites and I mis-named the one I meant.
Girl with a Hat said…
she uses people's conscientiousness against them. and Harry goes along with it. This is why I think this whole pretend interview is not worth considering. He is a willing participant. But, the BRF should start using her weak points against her. We all know what they are - she flouts protocol, so make her out to be a very unpunctual diva. She's jealous and competitive with women, so have Harry's exes everywhere he goes. She's controlling, so have Harry's mates all around and whispering behind their hands when she's around.
Hikari said…
@Mischi,

Brilliant!!

Yes, the way to make oneself attractive and indispensable to one's husband, to make him so very glad he chose one instead of his blonde ex-girlfriend is to find the most hideous 'garment' available, style one's 'hair' with an egg beater and then stalk them like one of the Furies. Make sure to make oneself as visible as possible from the sidelines, with the aid of a dress made from leftover WW2 desert parachute material, while you hold 'the baby' and wear a face like a thundercloud and Michael Jackson shades. Your spectre-at-the-feast act will guarantee that your husband is so distracted and made anxious that he will lose the match, and maybe even come off his horse, too.

I wouldn't put it past her any more to intentionally try to cause Harry a fatal accident. Then she can play her best 'grieving Jackie O.' role (which will not be very good at all) . . and 'retire' from the RF on a hefty widow's pension, and go home to California where all her Hollywood friends can console her in her grief.
Girl with a Hat said…
Yankee Wally archificial says in one of her videos on youtube that a royal equerry was in Los Angeles looking at $10 million homes.

Oh, and Lainey's opening today talks about "Princess Catherine and Meghan Markle". So, the tone has changed towards her "friend".
BigFanUSA said…
Yesterday I found myself briefly falling for the Rachel sympathy card, which states that the British media is hounding her because she's a black woman and Harry is FED UP (with the media) and everything he does now is to protect his beloved wife. I swear Nutty, they are setting us up for something. When they divorce (because they WILL divorce) they will blame *The UK Media* and they will both be cast as Victims. Their tRUe lOvE story will end tragically because of US, the racist public that cannot ACCEPT her because she's BLACK. They will divorce, Archie will stay in the UK with the Royals, Harry will go to Africa,
and Rachel will return to her native LA, this time living as the First Class A-List Celebrity she has always thought herself to be. I'm a white middle class native Californian, so I do not know what the Black Experience is like. Are there any black men and women reading this blog? Can they help shed light on the racist abuse Rachel has recieved from the UK media? I was called racist on Gary Janeti's Instagram page when I wondered what she would do with her hands during public engagements once she no longer had the baby bump. I did not know Rachel was black until her mother became part of the narrative. I apologize, I feel like I have lost direction for this comment. I will stop here, Haha.
Hikari said…

>>>>I forgot to add - this is her idea of modernising the monarchy. It's not reaching out to the disenfranchised, it's shit-stirring, and a lot of people, especially in the USA, just love it.

We do? I haven't really found any, apart from Smeaghan's stans online, who even know who she is, or care, much less love her antics. I work in a library, so I see the magazines that come in . . . H. and M. have not gotten a cover in ages. I think I was the only person (among a staff of 50 people) who watched the wedding. The overall reaction was . .'So? Not interested.' re. the both of them.

The Internet is such a hothouse bubble, where the chatter/people/events assume a mega-inflated importance that they don't have IRL. I live in the heartland of the USA, in a small city. It's racially diverse, but I really doubt there were too many viewing parties of the wedding here among African-American women. MM's whole lifestyle and way of being is too disconnected from the reality of real women's lives.

For somebody so desperate to be a 'global influencer' her sphere of influence is minimal, and hollow.

But I agree that she thrives on drama and conflict and messing things up/making the atmosphere nasty just because she can, not because it will net her anything positive. It is the dysfunctional operating of a malfunctioning personality/brain. MM does not have a conscience like normal people and she is not bothered by other people's upset. She gets off on it, in fact.

It amazes me that she was actually able to get as far in life as she has, but I think everybody's got her number now. They just don't know what to do about it.
Hikari said…
Piers Morgan's 10 Points for Smeaghan in how to become a popular royal:
"Stop digging holes, Meghan and start planting trees". Very entertaining.

Piers irritates me usually, but he raises good points here. When he's not whining, he shows that he's intelligent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7236767/PIERS-MORGAN-Meghans-10-point-guide-popular-Princess.html
MaLissa said…
Hi Nutty!! Yes I thought some of us folk would like that read. It's very telling if true. I know it is speculation at this point but it wouldn't be that hard to jump from hypothetical to the real thing. I hope that's where it will stay but with these two, not so sure anymore. I know one thing for sure - British taxpayers will definitely not be happy.
MaLissa said…
@Hiraki I have a like/dislike relationship with Piers Morgan. I like this article because they're all good points and honestly, it's very true. Forget Piers and just take the advise - it couldn't hurt and it certainly would help - looking at you Megs.
Anonymous said…
Pity is a tool the narcissist uses to play their victims. Remember that next time you pity MM. She's doing this to herself and your pity helps her because then people back off, feel sorry for her, and she gets away with it again (whatever "it" is). Normal people do not seek pity from others. They make receive pity, but they don't seek it. Read about it.
punkinseed said…
Exactly Nutty! She enjoys getting attention for the stupidest things, and the more negative and in your face she is about it, the more she likes it. Like an immature, defiant mean teen girl in full on rebellion who can't stand the idea of not getting all of the attention because she enjoys fanning the flames. She delights unleashing her flying monkeys to punish those who oppose her. It feeds her unquenchable thirst. She exposed true intentions and self to us when she poked out her tongue in one of her first appearances (poo hat) with royal family. Her hubris is so rampant that she doesn't even bother to mask it.

We want her to change, to treat others well and … behave in a regal, sophisticated manner, but we are the crazy ones to think she can. She simply can't. It's just not in her and let's face it, people can change, but not very much and not often. She's hardwired. She is who she is, sadly. And yes, she's brought it all on herself simply because her hubris trumps humility. I doubt she's ever once admitted to anyone, caught red handed or not that she's ever been wrong, guilty of anything. She's incapable of humility. Such a shame.
Unknown said…
Hi

Correction, that book and author I mentioned previously, not sure if it's relevance is now diluted, is called Camilla, The Kings Mistress by Caroline Graham.
I also watched Charles and Diana's wedding and made up a scrapbook. I was very sad about the divorce. I love watching the Crown and Victoria too.

I am Asian and I don't think or feel that the British press are racist. I don't believe that MM is being harassed or hounded, on the contrary, she wants it that way.

So far I believe everything that Piers has said about this saga is a correct summary. He seems to be one Lone Ranger who is courageous enough to do this. Where are the other figures of authority in or out of the press? We don't need knights in shining armour here, just gentlemen with a backbone. Too many women are writing and talking.

Don't know much about wigs, but I have heard once a wig is on, the head area is off limits for touching. Tactile sensory loss? On whose side? Glue issues? Can glue be seen? So many angles to this. Basic reasons for wigs is to enhance appearances. But they appear to have their drawbacks. From where I come from, unless it's for medical or a society event such as a wedding or a big bash, I have seen people sniggering at others who wear them.

I am disappointed that Kate will be chaperoning MM at the tennis, if she attends. With all the drama unfolding, I wonder why Kate is being so tolerant. She has the ear of the aristocracy, possibly parliament, loads of influential old world moneyed people and millions of British citizens behind her. Why can't she be the person to change this
dumpshow?
Apologies, will add a name once I figure out how this works.




Anonymous said…
You're all completely on point. MM feeds on it and pity is her play. What 38-yo woman in her stable mind would spit her tongue out to be "cute"? None. She shows us who she is every damned day, and yet, there are those who refuse to see it and call it racism when, in fact, we are just seeing indecent, unkind, absurd attention-getting behavior clearly and calling it such.
Anonymous said…
Great points, @Unknown. I haven't read the article about Kate/MM, but it will be painful to watch and I'm sure Kate is being told she must.
LPB said…
Let's hope your article plants a seed with these two that they should come clean!
Mom Mobile said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Now! said…
Hi BigFanUSA! Meghan only seems to bring up her African-American heritage when it benefits her; she joined a white sorority in college, her friends are mostly white, and her former boyfriends and husbands have all been white.

I've said frequently before that I wish Harry had married a beautiful Black woman with style and class, someone from a good family, perhaps someone with a solid education - a lawyer like Chelsey, perhaps, with the looks of Lupita?

There are so many beautiful Black women in the Commonwealth. Couldn't Harry have found one that would have respected what the Royal Family does and helped bring it into the 21st century?

I think on some level Harry was looking for a s***-stirrer, someone who would create problems for the Royal Family in general and his father and brother in particular. A Courtney Love type.

So no, I don't think that finding Meghan to be a troublesome personality is racist. She *is*a troublesome personality.
Anonymous said…
I read a comment on DM that made a great point: this might be a way to avoid MM being booed. It's going to happen. It's inevitable.

Also, the DM referred to Beyonce as a "fan" of MM. Yeah, whatevs. MM will finally get to walk the red carpet, and no suitcase required. I hope Chelsy is there.
Anonymous said…
Does anyone know if Celt News on Youtube is reputable? Because there's a video re MM at the polo match, and it's quite interesting.
QueenWhitby said…
Fear not and have faith fellow Nutties.

Perhaps Catherine has been drafted in to do a job but not the one we think. Happy families would have happened at the polo three days ago if that was the aim. Could this be a Lord G serve to provoke MM?

She will lose her mind if upstaged by the DOC and I am very interested to see the “serve”.

Perhaps a “golden set” for LG?
Hikari said…
Elle,
I remember Harry's trip into the bush to meet with a native tribe. It was a bit of a distance over jouncing pitted track to the community, but the tribal people had prepared a special presentation/dance for their HRHs. Herselfness begged off the trip and had Harry make her apologies, citing 'not feeling well'. Playing the pregnancy card, which at that time, even I bought into. It was feasible that a woman who was still possibly experiencing morning sickness wouldn't want to go over rough track and get bug bites, and maybe the heat was extreme.

But I also remember thinking that the people waiting to meet Harry's bride would have been mightily disappointed that she was a no-show, and now that we know she was not pregnant at the time, her ruse of concern for her unborn child was to get out out of an onerous, boring afternoon in the gross wilderness with incomprehensible rustics so she could lounge poolside at their top hotel and pretend to drink virgin mai tais.

Meggy doesn't like anything too hot, dirty, tiring, boring or in any way difficult. She pulled the same shite in Morocco and disappointed local woman waiting to meet her because of the 'gross' smells and whatnot. And yet she was such a great and profound ambassadoress for African children! I'm sure the minute that photo op was over, she was like, "Ugh, get these smelly urchins away from me!"

The Australia tour was only 5 months into the marriage . . . I feel certain now that things started to unravel between them when she shanghai'd Eugenie's wedding and then insisted on putting on the Pregnancy Show. Harry started to look very unhappy around that time. Before then it was all smiles and loved-up PDA. Footage from Eugenie's wedding shows him repeatedly trying to speak to her and she ignoring him entirely with more of her fake laughs as she talked to Zara. I think she'd told him her plans for her 'Big Reveal' later, and he was frantic to stop her. Of course, she was having none of that.

I don't think Harry was initially in on the Moonbump Mountbatten Windsor show with its extended running time, and didn't want to go along, but she probably convinced him that they had to show a united front against the world and steamrolled over his objections. The time for him to come clean was then. If he'd had the balls to tell Meghan that if she went ahead with the sham, he was going to tell all . . first to his family and then he'd call a press conference . . . how different it might be.

The only way to deal with a blackmailer is to short-stop them with honesty yourself, and then their ammunition is worthless. It takes great courage to face the consequences of admitting whatever you're trying to hide, but fear is what gives the blackmailer his (or her) power.

Too late for dignity and control over this situation, but Haz could *still* choose honesty, even at this late date. Sadly, he seems to be lacking in the requisite courage.
Trudy2 said…
Nutty I know it's a sideline for you but this blog has exploded because it's quite brilliantly addictive, completely spot on and wonderfully written. Not only that but the interactions between commentators are 99.9% polite and intelligent. Any ideas regarding 'crazy eye Sam' and her uncharacteristic silence of late? If you have time, I'd love to see you post your thoughts so we can theorise about that, because it's odd, to say the least.
Catty said…
Thank you Elle - that was very interesting.
hhstarr said…
Cdan seemed to be moderated now, all of a sudden. Guess his warnings weren't heeded. Enjoy this blog!
Catty said…
Your question wasn't racist at all - everyone was wondering the same - it was her lunatic stans that called you a racist - that is their sole excuse for people disliking Meghan never her actual behavior/actions.
Catty said…
I totally agree Louise - it's ridiculous at this point & agreeing with Hikari - did the Queen learn anything from her inaction with Diana? I know she doesn't like to get involved in her family's personal life but once their personal life is affecting the monarchy she has to do something. Seems the only one who in that family with a backbone is William & they keep making him & his wife play nice instead of slapping Harry & Meghan down for once & all.
Catty said…
I'm American & I don't know anyone who approves of how Meghan is behaving - most don't even care about the royal family to begin with. I would look at photos like anyone else - watched Charles & Diana's wedding with my obsessed sister & watched Will & Kate's wedding because I really like them - they just seem to be nice people & I'm glad Will has such a lovely family. But this? I knew something was off with her right off the bat & it just keeps getting worse & worse - it's almost unbelievable at this point - I have to admit I am fascinated & extremely curious as to how this will all end.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hikari said…
Elle,
You're right, it was Fiji where she refused to go to the market. The Morocco trip was so hastily pulled together that I doubt any of the citizens actually knew she was coming. There was a welcoming delegation on the tarmac with a plate of dates or some other local delicacy as a hospitality custom. H. partook; Farkle made a face like she'd just been presented with the carcass of a dead baby goat, fingered some of the samples, smelled it and then *put it back on the plate without eating it*.

Seriously, does she even know how to eat with silverware? A six year old would know it's rude to touch food with your hands on a communal plate and not take it. In the guise of an international diplomatic delegation, it's all the more gauche. I know that Tom & Doria are not from the upper class in America, but they scraped together and sent her to the best schools. So why does she act like she was raised in a barn? I'm sure the nuns at Catholic school cared about table manners.

In Fiji, she bailed on a jaunt to meet some of the citizens of that Commonwealth country . . .because she had to rush back to her four-star hotel in order to get ready for the posh state banquet with her father-in-law. That's where she threw a snit fit over not being able to wear a tiara. She thought it eminently reasonable that Her Maj Fed Ex her a tiara to Fiji because Catherine was going to be wearing a tiara at a state dinner in London, so why couldn't she get one too?

It must have been on that occasion that Chas nicknamed his daughter-in-law 'Tungsten'. Because it is impervious to other elements . . . like the future King of England telling it to its face that it is *not* getting a tiara because it wouldn't be appropriate.

Before I knew about Tiara-gate (or rather, Tiara-gate II), I actually liked Meghan's look that evening. The blue dress in Fiji was the best look she's ever had, and I include the wedding dress.

Jdubya said…
How horrible for Chelsey that would be. The media would turn on her. Which megster would encourage .
TTucker said…
The Global Conference for Media Freedom took place this week in London: Media discussing free, independent, pluralistic media, and their watchdog role, their importance to hold the powerful to account. I do not think that Harry and Meghan have this rights-based approach to media, nor the capability of understanding the concept even. They wouldn't otherwise play games with the UK media. They are the hope to unravel all this, in my view. Not Her Majesty.
Hikari said…
Hi, Trudy,

Thank you. At present I am not writing, except on Internet blogs (:)) but I do have aspirations to get published elsewhere. Having fallen in love with books since I could read, I thought for years that I would become a novelist, but as I got older, I realized that no fictional people I could dream up would be as interesting/infuriating as real ones. So maybe my niche is as a biographer, seeing as 'bitchy Internet gossip columnist' is already filled by Piers Morgan--haha! I would not attempt a royal biography, seeing as I am not British, and I wouldn't touch Farkle with a bargepole. Who knows what I might catch? I'm plenty close enough right here.

One day I hope to realize my dream of being a self-supporting author. Until then, thanks for the encouragement and I will do my best to keep y'all entertained. At length . . 'cause I can't really do 'short'. I try, but find myself with way too much to say about the Hazardous Harkle Hootenanny.

Carry on, everyone. Stiff G&Ts for all . . !
Anonymous said…
Ooooooh, I like this idea! The series of photos where MM doesn't even glance at Louis is proof enough that the polo match didn't serve as bonding time. I hope MM is frisked for weapons first (and no, I'm really not kidding!).
Anonymous said…
Exactly @Jdubya. Chelsy would give MM the pity ploy she's always wanted.
Anonymous said…
Trudy, when I said wrong with his face, I meant that it looks like there is something on one side of his face. Like there's something physically wrong. It could just be the angle and zoom, but IDK.

Jen said…
You don't have to have 5M dollars in order to buy a $5M house. They could very easily buy some extravagant home in LA, and then when the bottom falls out they just sell it. It would sell for a pretty penny because "royalty" owned it. *eye roll*
1 – 200 of 217 Newer Newest

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids