Sitting on an embroidered couch in a receiving room at Windsor Palace, The Duke of Sussex exchanges a smile with his four-month-old son, Archie Harrison.
"He's wonderful," he says, holding the baby on his lap and enjoying its healthy grip around his index finger. "I don't want anyone thinking I love him any less because of the manner in which he came to us. This is my son."
A mature man and a father
Harry is no longer the little boy who walked behind his mother's coffin or the muscular soldier who volunteered for the front lines in Afghanistan. This is a stronger, more mature man - and a father."When we married, Meghan and I were eager to hit the ground running quickly, and that included starting a family," he says in measured tones. "The truth is, both of us had experienced medical problems which affected our fertility. I don't want to be more explicit than that.
"But I can say that the ordinary way of bringing a child into the world would have been difficult for us."
Without consulting his family, Harry and his new wife contracted the services of a specialist in surrogate births, who matched them with an experienced professional surrogate. Ten months later, in March 2019, Archie Harrison was born.
Stress with William
The unconventional method of adding to their family had not been approved by anyone in the Royal Family, and the family was slow to accept it.In particular, his brother William was upset by Meghan's insistence on wearing a false pregnancy belly whilst carrying out Royal engagements.
Harry takes a deep breath before speaking about his brother. "William takes his position very seriously," he says carefully. "He did not like the idea of deceiving anybody. So he was unhappy that Meghan did what she did."
In general, Harry feels his wife has been misunderstood. "She is an actress, a trained actress. Actors learn to see their body as an instrument, which is what she was doing. She wanted everyone to experience the joy of a royal pregnancy, as we were experiencing it."
By contrast, his father Prince Charles was supportive after learning of the couple's choice.
"Pa has been there for both of us, and we are so grateful," Harry said.
The question of titles
Will Archie be part of the Royal Family?
"Archie is my son, so of course he must be part of the family," Harry says. "We want him to get to know his cousins, because growing up my cousins have been some of my closest and most loyal friends."
But Harry understands the edict that children must be born "of the body" of a royal wife in order to be in line for the throne.
"It is an outmoded rule, and I think it should be abolished," he says. "But I understand that it was in force when Archie was born, so I do not expect him to be part of the line of succession.
"This is also why he has not been given a title, which is fine with me. My cousins Zara and Peter have no titles and they are very much part of the Royal Family."
A growing family
The Duke remains committed to his wife and to creating his own family, which will ultimately be based at the still-unfinished Frogmore Cottage.
"We hope to have at least one more child in the same manner," he says.
-------------------
The above text is totally fake - it is solely my idea of what Harry should say to begin putting this whole sad epsisode to rest. Any comments or input?
-------------------
The above text is totally fake - it is solely my idea of what Harry should say to begin putting this whole sad epsisode to rest. Any comments or input?
Comments
I intentionally did not address the DNA situation - was Harry's and Meghan's DNA used, or was it not - because I see no strong indications either way, and I'm not entirely sure it matters.
But yeah, the deceit thing is big. Maybe "Harry" should acknowledge his own role and take a bit of time abroad so the British public can forgive him.
(very funny)
Don't want Lord Geidt coming after me.
If anyone is wondering, I don't think there's any reason to call Protective Services.
Meghan is clearly not the person in charge for caring for that baby, who appears to be clean and well-fed.
My guess is that after the photo session he was returned to his actual caregiver.
Not sure about now.
All those once-trusted names, from Vogue to the Daily Beast to the Guardian to People to Vanity Fair to Oprah & Gayle to CNN. How long have they known it's fake?
Speaking of which, it'll be pretty sad for Vogue if they already have their September issue printed when this thing blows up. Should be going to press right about now.
Your faux interview with Harry is more authentic than anything uttered by the Sussex pair since their engagement. All this time I've been assuming the marriage is legitimate, but who knows, maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury had his fingers crossed while he was administering the vows.
You've made "Harry" hit all the right notes. If and when (not holding my breath), Haz ever does decide to come clean and issue a statement/apology/explanation for the Bizarro Show they have put us through for the last year, I hope it sounds like this. Though if and when he does say anything of the kind, or the Palace does, it will be too unconscionably late to do much good in repairing the damage that has been done. The time for such frankness would have been back in March, when the baby was born, or, ideally, 6 months or so prior, after the surrogate's pregnancy was well-established.
One could argue, fruitlessly, that the best course of all would have been for H. and M. to be honest about their intentions with the Family from the start and demonstrate that they had thought through, and were willing to accept the repercussions of their choice, ie., no title or place in the succession for a child conceived via this route. After all, the thing that really matters, since Harry was never in danger of being anywhere near the crown once William had three children, was that he be able to become a father, something he had been claiming for years now that he wanted more than anything.
Harry is not demonstrably happier since the birth of this child, apart from giddy, incomprehensible 'interviews' about the baby. Regular, more candid shots show a man not pleased with his situation in life at all. He can forget for a few moments, perhaps, when he's at a solo engagement without his encumbrances.
I could totally see Charles accepting the situation better, perhaps, since he was obviously hoping to have a closer relationship to Harry's children than he seems tobe permitted with William's. William apparently, more so than Harry, has never been able to forgive his father for his conduct during his marriage to Diana, and must regard Chas. as a crap dad. It's natural that he would feel more animosity to Charles than Harry does, since he was old enough to understand his mother's unhappiness in a way that Harry wasn't at the time, and since Diana had (quite unfairly) made her eldest son her confidante, pitting his love for Charles against his love for her.
If Charles has welcomed the new baby and is thrilled to have another grandchild to bond with, it is rather quizzical that we've only got one (1) shot of dubious authenticity of him with Archie in the same room. Wouldn't the Sussexes be keen to show up the Cambridges by providing cute snaps of Charles with his latest grandson . . to show how much more inclusive and *forgiving* they are?
The question, then as now, but now even more so . . .Did they also try to deceive the entire BRF with this charade, or just the general public? If the royals are allowing her to walk around in public holding a doll and pretending it's a baby, surely they have to be read in. Not to mention all the 'official' photographs they are allegedly in.
I also briefly considered the possibility that she had been genuinely pregnant, but miscarried early, and the wearing of Moonbump was a form of . . .therapy? Stalling for time? Maybe they were trying to conceive again quickly so they wouldn't have to make a sad announcement . .? I was trying to offer justifications for the bizarreness back then, but I'm done with that. The performance at the polo yesterday has demonstrated amply that they are going to continue this ridiculousness for years to come, if they can get away with it. The giant green muumuu is to prime us for the inevitable pregnancy announcement, next month or the next, probably. They might have another surrogate cooking a sibling for 'Archie' as we speak. 'Cause it went *so smoothly* the last time . . .
An announcement that they were using a surrogate could have been handled straightforwardly, and Meg could still have had the baby shower and the nursery and the congratulations owing to an expectant mum. I love your 'her body is an instrument; she just wanted people to experience the excitement of a Royal pregnancy . . ' In other words, she wanted all eyes on her at all times, lest anyone forget that she was 'expecting a baby!!!!' Other people's happiness is never a factor for Meg, unfortunately. She only pleases herself. But if only the real article were more like the one filtered through your "Harry's" eyes, she at least wouldn't be quite so unpalatable.
In what sodding universe was the travesty we witnessed 'a playdate for Archie and his cousins'?? The insults to our intelligence are legion. Somehow I don't think Royal coverage was this obsequious and fictional, even in the Diana era, was it? Of course coverage was generally skewed in her favor, while Charles was depicted as a goat, but Diana's mental problems were generally kept hidden from journalists, not indulged by them.
What, oh, what, are we going to see coming out in the next weeks or months that is going to dwarf Meg's Monstrous Mess? Will it get a lot worse? Is that possible?
What interesting times we live in.
She seems to be so uninterested by anything UK or Commonwealth related. Nothing but theatre premieres and baseball games for this one......
@Nutty I agree with you - she probably handed him over to a caregiver/nanny after her not so private photo op.
Thank you Nutty for the new post. Excellent job you are doing.🥂
Now I want to find out what happened at Harry's event today where reporters were thrown out...
I was just reading online article from publication New Idea about illegitimate royal children . this magazine is very anti-royal and I'm wondering who is behind it.
Has it been around long? I think RF is going to be hit with a lot of controversy in near future . Between Hardles and Andy/Epstein, going to be very rocky
I have had a shocking 24 hours on twitter I commented on an article about the 2 racist thugs who got prosecuted. I was trying to say not everyone in Britain is racist and basically people can have opinion and debates with out it spiralling into something nasty. F*** me they swarmed me like a horde of angry wasps. I'm still dealing with the fall out now after clarifying what I meant. I have left twitter alone for the last couple of hours as it made me feel so crappy.
But I want to know what Harry did today because really?
I think I'm in shock. OK carry on, nothing to see here....
And yes they could have helped themselves so many times but it seems to me that they don't want to. Still waiting and watching Richard Palmers twitter to see what went down today!!
But in all honesty why should e be offered an out?
In my opinion he is as bad as MM, possibly worse
PH has just been lucky to have been protected by the BRF for a very long time
I, like many others can now see that the happy chappy he has been portraying is a facade
We now get to see the true PH ...He shows that he is an angry,sulky, entitled spoilt brat
I think they are a match made in heaven, or as most people are starting to see it....hell
BTW - this is MLRoda but I had to log out of that account because that is my family reunion site and I forgot about it until I just checked :) LOL :)
Hannah is their niece - their brother's daughter. I don't know how close she is to her aunts.
FWIW, Hannah is biracial, like Meg.
The book on Camilla by ...either Penny Junor or Juror, can't recall exact name , has an interesting quote by Camilla. She mentions...my heart was shattered into a million pieces....this is almost the very same quote that MM used in that staged letter to her father. Both women off course were talking about different people. But. If MM read that book on Camilla and started using that quote.... ask the royal reporters to add plagiarism or plagiarist to this long growing list of untoward names....
The Virginia Roberts stuff has been known for years; it's been "priced in" to Andrew's current low regard in the eyes of the public.
Virginia was 17, which is above the age of consent in many European countries. I don't think plain-vanilla interaction with a female of that age, or even several females of that age, is going to take down the BRF.
Of course, there could be plenty of shocking information on Andrew that hasn't emerged yet. But the Virginia Roberts story isn't shocking any more.
I don't know that William is an intellectual giant, but neither is his grandmother. And sometimes hyper-intelligent people lack emotional intelligence, which the Queen seems to have a lot of.
Charles' way of speaking actually bothers me more than William's. Charles is SO posh, so totally disconnected from the way anyone under 50 speaks English.
If he is infertile then this entire farce is a scam and they owe lots of money and apologies to their Public paying the way. The family should be ashamed for allowing the parade knowing full well he can't produce children.
This proves titles are more important to them than anything. Poor baby.
Coming clean is Step #1 in every misdeed.
Although PH and 'frank' in the same sentence is a fantasy
I have a feeling that PH is behind a lot of the secrecy & privacy issues surrounding Archie.
Maybe it is a trauma from the death of his mother which he blames the press for, forgetting that Diana actually used, courted & manipulated the press for her own means, quite similar to what Harry & Meghan are doing right now.
lollll
I am dead - you're hysterical. Thanks for the laughs. We cry b/c it's true...
I would absolutely love it if this interview, or something like it, ever happened. The gas-lighting by the entire Royal Family, at this point, is far beyond anything that is okay. The whole thing (yes I'm #TeamPillow), from start to finish.
I worry that they will try to follow the current prevailing PR theme of denying everything, admitting nothing, and hoping no one looks for evidence indicating otherwise. I understand it's what they want everyone to believe, and it's too much for a narcissist to bear, to ever even hint at (or imagine) admitting a flaw/mistake, despite all the evidence (I'm carefully avoiding any political references to try and keep our dialogue civil and smoothly flowing). Gah, I think so much could be done to help de-stigmatize surrogacy as an option, they could even try to change the archaic laws if they really wanted to, but they'd have to admit the whole farce first...
Thanks, Nutty, as always, for your blog, and to the all the great commenters - I love reading everyone's (not-attacking each other) thoughts. Also, I hope you know we all really appreciate your blog and this space that you've created for us. I know there are naysayers who negatively spew their judgements, but I hope you see the shield of sanity and love/support we all have created around you and this site. :) <3
And why add to all the gaslighting with all the unnecessary extra lies (breastfeeding, how Meg is basically raising him all on her own - nvm the nannies, Frogmore Cottage, just everything on top of the original lie... it's just snowballing the heck out of reality).
@D.C., the one sure thing that I know about narcissists is that even when called out on the lie, they deny. And they're happy to lie outrageously about things that can be easily verified and yet they still do it. MM did it about so many things, this is really just a different version of the same delusion. It won't stop until she is stopped and I don't know how that last bit happens.
(ok I am especially snarky today, I am really sick and it is early here:)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7236809/Duchess-Sussex-set-walk-red-carpet-glittering-Lion-King-premiere-Prince-Harry.html
So it seems she doesn't care so much about taking "private" time when she gets the chance to waste more money on designer clothing, be on a red carpet and meet "stars" who wouldn't have given her the time of day.
I've been watching this blog from the beginning and have preferred it of late to Harry Markle due to Nutty and the community. When someone posted as Trudy I was surprised because it's not a common name where I live, hence the 2 to differenciate, you used to sign as anon I think?
How can there still be people who think she's the second coming of Diana when they seeing the same pictures we are? It's enough to make me doubt my sanity at times.
Here's a joyful shot of Meghan and Archie cheering Harry on at the polo . .Daddy looks SO cheered (Not.) It's that glum shot of them walking to the car after the match, not speaking. He's staring straight ahead and looked pissed. And I don't think it's just because William got the cup.
---------------------------------
https://duchess-meghan.com/meghan-and-archie-polo/
This is their selection for "Meghan is Back and More Radiant than Ever!"
(Her TOTC carriage ride. Has anyone ever truly looked 'radiant' in baggy navy blue? Another poorly-fitted garment that suggests something a maiden aunt in her 80s might wear to a spring funeral. Radiance does not come to mind.)
-----------------------
https://duchess-meghan.com/duchess-meghan-is-back/
They also want us to know that the SussexRoyal Pride post is VERY IMPORTANT. All the rainbow colors do show up nicely, sure.
This Kool-Aid, it's potent stuff. Harry was the first to drink it, but it seems to be wearing off a bit . . .
I love your spin on your posts, too ... you don't just re-hash what everyone else is reporting; rather, you suggest other perspectives - things others haven't thought of - which is interesting to read and comment on.
Imagine if Harry did give this interview! He would be respected. Although, if he gave it now, people would be outraged ... it would have been far better if he and Meghan announced they were expecting a baby via surrogate - citing their infertility issues as the reason - in an interview conducted after they returned from their tour down under. Instead, we had Meghan trying to upstage Eugenie's wedding, and the constant baby bump focus on that tour, rather than on the actual tour itself.
Dearest commenters, please don't turn on each other ... I know this is Nutty's blog and not mine, but I just don't want to see it go the same way as others have. In the last post, a few people got a bit salty ... just let people have their say and if you don't agree, challenge the argument respectfully or scroll on by.
About M's narcissism. I just wanted to add a new perspective. Growing up, she was different to everyone on Thomas' side of the family because of her colour and I suspect they all made a big deal of it by telling her she was special, she was unique, she was a very bright star, etc. She had what sounds to be an idyllic childhood doing some very cool things (going to a TV set on a regular basis and being educated at a school that obviously harnessed creative talents). What you are exposed to in your first few years on this planet sets you up for life. And that is how she came to be what she is - she still thinks she's special and unique, etc.
One of the Narcs in my life (my mother) was an only child up until the age of seven, and was treated like a princess up until that point. When it came time to share the spotlight with her younger brother there were issues ... and then when her youngest sibling was born another seven years after that, there were even more severe issues. It was what she was exposed to in her first seven years that shaped her into the person she is today, which is not pleasant. She looks down her nose at everyone, does not have anyone to call a true friend, mimics others' behaviours, and inserts herself in younger relatives' lives ... it's a very sad yet dangerous thing to witness.
:-)
Again, its so very sad.
BUT, in his defence, in person, he is a wonderful conversationalist. He doesn't put on airs and graces like Charles does - he talks WITH people rather than AT them ... he's quite charming. He just speaks regular, everyday-person language. He's quite the charmer.
1. They used a surrogate but lied their asses off about it because
2. MM loved the attention and couldn't admit anything otherwise and
3. Foolishly she & PH thought the BRF would not find out so
4. By the time the BRF did find out, it was too late to backtrack because PC and William did not have her sunny-side up -- how would they know without investigating?
5. Plus, see #2 above, and note, a narcissist is not shamed by the truth - their brains work very differently
6. I think that "Archie" might be a real baby, but whether or not she and Harry have custody of him is another story (I hope not, for all of the reasons @Hitaki addressed earlier in her narc post) (Also, I am concerned about his face - what is wrong with his eye and skin?)
7. I think that William and Kate were onto MM from the beginning BUT
8. Narcissists have a way of drawing their prey into their net and PH was prey ready for the taking
9. I think the BRF is letting this all fall down and I can't predict the outcome at all
Also, I could be wrong and this is not set in stone, but a malleable interpretation of facts I have on a given day.
https://princeharryandme.tumblr.com/post/186219930576/this-covers-what-i-believe-to-be-the-sussexes
Give that a read and tell me that this is a bad thing just to confirm.
l think this whole thing with Megan is really out of control and since there is no turning back, wouldn't that be a big stain on the whole RF ??
lt is almost as though Megan went into that family in hopes that in doing all the things against Protocol starting with the Engagement and not wearing leggings,, might bring the downfall of the Monarchy since this has spread across the World now and how do the PR team deal with Megan at this point?? l never thought l would live to see another crisis involving the wives of the RF since Diana..and l have to add, Diana was nothing like Megan and never caused so much damage.
Anyway, I agree with all you said, and there's so much debate about nature v. nurture and narcs/sociopaths, but the one thing we do know for sure is that the family environment can really nurture what is already there in terms of nature.
I have watched it and wondered so many times: how the hell can that person sleep at night? But the truth is, they sleep soundly and do not care. It is that "thing", whatever that thing is, that allows them to do the deed and feel happy that they won or are "important", etc. And it's how fraud aligns with fraud. Some people are just able to cross that line without a care and they look for victims (Harry, I think) and co-conspirators (Markle & Marcus? or ???)
I will predict we will see a recording released that has Haz either drunk or "unaware" he was being recorded laying it all out there. Of course3 he would know but at this stage this is what I can see him thinking this is how he will get out of this whole situation with some of his reputation intact.
Vodka, Rye, and brandied cherries.
Those are supposed to taste quite good with Rye, and the cherry pink to honor Kate's dress. This has the added benefit of the initial play on words re vodka and wry. I would be willing to test case this for everyone. (I'm a humanitarian, too.)
Quoting: "Rye whiskies are known for their biting, spicy flavors, and this vodka made from rye grain proves that those qualities translate to other spirits as well."
1) Grandiose sense of self
2) Olympic champions of lying (so much so they can easily beat a lie detector test as this essential measures blood pressure and pulse fluctuations, which wont happen if you don't think you are deceiving anyone or just don't care)
3) Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt
4) Shallow Emotions and not able to love. They see people as tools to enable them to reach their goal
5) Need for stimulation - This raises the endorphins and is a bit like those who are "adrenaline junkies"
Those with Narcissism Personality Disorder shows similar traits - they are also self centred and arrogate without the empathy or consideration for others and how their actions may impact others. Added to this is the excessive and ongoing need for attention and admiration - which ties in to being manipulative and demanding.
Not saying any of this ties to the situation but....:)
Harry is likely still in his love bubble - although he doesn't appear as loved-up with her as he once was ... but he will be taking any criticism of her personally, as he chose her. I hope he sees for himself what she is really like ... give it time (not too much time), and I think he will. People like this find it very hard to maintain long-lasting relationships.
The questionable baby holding, bizarre privacy requests, non-conformist outfit choices, Wimbledon shenanigans... It's all part of her plan to pull a Wallace Simpson 2.0.
She knows the press is going to eat her alive after her offences. But behind the scenes, I believe she's playing a naive victim to Harry; she knows she can manipulate him due to his myopia and skewed mindset, after what the press did to his mother. I absolutely agree with posters assessing her as being a full blown narcissist/master manipulator. I think her ultimate goal is to reach a point where Harry feels forced to leave (or at the very least gives Meagan and Archie permission to leave) London with his family full-time or at least part-time to LA. That way, MM can have her cake and eat it too... the royal title without the responsibilities, as well as the actress fame without the actual talent.
Book deals, Oprah specials, and merching galore. $$$$
Totally on point and yesterday there was a slew of negative articles
MM blew Wimbledon out of the park, i bet she wished she never ever went LOL
I think the press is just biding their time and by the look of things it's almost 'times up' for these two
PH has been incredibly lucky to have had his real character protected all of these years. Now we finally see who he really is.
PH is showing more and more his sulky, petulant arrogant and rude side. (i could go on.....)
When they attend the Lion King on Sunday it would be interesting to see if the press photograph them or not?
Perhaps it is time to give them all of the 'selected privacy' they crave.
Then they will see who controls the media
Supposedly some of his friends had used her services.
I think cheating may be the way they do get out of it - but Harry's, not Meghan's.
One angle would be to bring in Chelsey, create rumors that Harry has cheated, and then Meg "leaves with her head held high" with the idea of going on to some kind of influencer career in the US. She hopes.
I honesty don't have the time or energy to set up anything more complex!
Hopefully we can all find a workaround. Avoiding Safari sounds like a great start.
Apparently he actually used the name Guido on occasion. Who knew.
And thank you for your kind words! I'm happy to have brought together such an interesting group of people.
And she doesn't generate interest or profit. They put up with, say, Justin Bieber or Chris Brown because those two ungentle men bring in a lot of cash.
Meg doesn't. I don't know why she thinks great things are awaiting her in LA.
At the very least, a wig stylist. There's no shame in wearing wigs - so many celebs do - but then at least wear a good one.
I wonder if Meg will be bringing her hat. She seems to think she needs to bring it with her every time she attends Wimbledon.
So many potential income streams. If the Sussexes were private citizens, I would respect their (her) hustle.
But they already have income stream #1, which is the British taxpayers, and the deal is generally that it should be their only income stream, even if Meg doesn't think it's enough.
Instead they (or at least she) are not doing their full-time job they get a salary and benefits for; they're putting all their energies into their side hustles.
Not fair.
And good for you for doing what you needed to do. I understand what you mean.
Kate wears them, and you never hear about them anymore. With her, I always wonder about the elaborate updos or backdos -- how difficult it must be to work with the fake hair. Look at Pippa or Carole's hair--that's basically what Kate had to work with originally.
(credit: CDAN blind)
I've never seen such a long, extensive entry before.
***************
This celebrity has suffered a string of mishaps in her public life lately.
Then again, “suffered” might be the wrong word, as each error may have been completely unforced! (hint: 'Wimbledon' h.)
Now she is looking to redeem herself by showcasing her charity work.
However, even the way she is going about that may prove to be a problem!
She was advised to engage in good works and let the established media carry the message. She vetoed that and insisted that she should deliver the message personally on social media and via [one chosen outlet]. Those are egotistical and wrong choices.
Why is this a problem?
Proper conduct for public servants who wish to be respected/liked is to be humble, public, selfless and engage the established media. She is choosing to play games to draw attention to herself. That is the conduct of a celebrity.
Isn’t anyone providing her with guidance?
Every day! Although the people who have been doing this for decades have told her what works and what does not, she thinks she is the most clever person in the room. She completely rejects any advice she is given about photos, wardrobe, etc. We are trying to help her, not hurt her, but she is arrogant and duplicitous.
What do you mean by duplicitous?
She says she will do something but does not. As an example, the dress code and decorum for [event] was explained to her in great detail. She nodded and said she understood and agreed… and then proceeded to do the opposite! Then she whinged about the criticism she received.
Do you think she will improve in her role as time goes by?
As long as her desire for celebrity exceeds her desire to serve, that will be difficult.
Every one of her wounds thus far has been completely self-inflicted. She takes no one’s counsel but her own. Until she humbles herself and heeds the counsel of those with more experience, we expect the mistakes and whinging and wails of victimhood to continue in perpetuity. Or until the divorce.
Yikes!
**********
Meg is the agent of her own destruction. At first I thought it so very odd that a woman who is obsessed with her image and looks would go around looking so bad, when she knows how much negative attention she's going to get. There could be a few reasons:
1. She's having a nervous breakdown. OR
2. She's doing that Hamlet thing--putting on a show of having a nervous breakdown so that everyone will feel sorry for her and the Royal Family will feel so bad for how they've been treating her that they will send her for an indefinite stay at a spa in Malibu so she can 'recover'.
I was thinking #1 at first, but I've come 'round to #2. Even someone who was struggling, but who still cared the least tiny bit about keeping up appearances would make more effort than she is, or would stay home out of the public eye, claiming illness or, you know, 'maternity leave.' She is purposely going around making a spectacle of herself.
Does she really think that if she separates (or is separated from) the Royal family if she acts crazy enough, that they will continue to fund her Duchess lifestyle in California (complete with title and deferences) without a peep? Or that anyone in Hollywood would hire her or insure her for so much as a celebrity car-wash fundraiser after the way she has behaved so publicly? They'd love a tell-all memoir, I'm sure, but she won't be allowed to write one (or have one written for her). Time for her to get a taste of her own ironclad NDA medicine . . .
I don't know what game the RF thinks that it is playing with the public, but as a citizen of a Commonwealth country who was part of the only 15% of Canadians who still supported the monarchy, I am now withdrawing my support and enthusiasm.
Of course, it makes no difference as we can't abolish the Monarchy without opening up the entire Canadian Constitution for debate.
I don't know whether the RF are co conspirators or just enablers, but I am fed up with the lot of them. The Queen may be very cute and pleasant but she is weak, as is her son.
But she's brought the same hat every time since.
t's just a middle finger to other people.
The detail about the dress code for Wimbledon being explained sounds like it is supposed to come from an insider.
The word "duplicitous" is good too. And probably not a word that Harry knows, although he may know it now.
I think Meg's just naturally a s***-stirrer. She enjoys conflict; she feels most comfortable with conflict, so she is creating conflict.
Nothing will make her happy or satisfied. She's not built that way.
And many Black women use them; Beyoncé is the most obvious example. Her team makes her look fabulous.
I cannot imagine that Meg can't find someone more competent to do her hair in a large, multicultural city like London.
They'd have to send out RPOs wearing earplugs.
And possibly body armor.
As I was watching, I thought of the blind that Enty had a while ago about a representative scouting LA on their behalf and had a giggle to myself, imagining Meghan watching MDLLA at some point too, seeing previous episodes where various buyers' representatives / concierge staff will meet the brokers and make up a shortlist of houses they see, and getting an idea from there. Wouldn't it be funny if she actually used one of the brokers from Million Dollar Listing? I wouldn't put it past her! But I think that blind was BS as they don't have anything like the amount that the blind mentioned (I think it was $5m?).
I don't disagree that Meghan has people telling her how things should be done, which she delights in rebelling against, but why is she being allowed to get away with it? I feel like the Queen just doesn't care anymore. Harry and his family just aren't as important as William and his family in the scheme of things but, due to his public profile and following, all this behavior needs to be nipped in the bud, and it needs to happen STAT. But it won't ... the grey men of bygone days who actually took care of this stuff have gone (and Lord Geidt doesn't seem that bothered either).
It's very ironic that the Harkle-Farkle wedding served to re-ignite my interest in the British monarchy. When I was 16, I got up at 4am on July 29, 1981 to watch Harry's mum and dad tie the knot. All that spring and summer, I had compiled 2 scrapbooks of all the clippings on Diana I could find. I followed all her fashion and the pictures of her growing family. To find out along with the rest of the world that the fairytale romance was a cruel hoax was pretty crushing.
While I was waiting for William's wedding to start, back in 2011, I watched the Charles-Di wedding ceremony again. It's glaringly obvious that it wasn't going to work out . . . the groom walks the long aisle of St. Paul's up to the altar wearing the face of a condemned man walking to his execution. I enjoyed the Wills-Kate wedding and even bought myself a costume replica of Diana's engagement ring (now Kate's, the ring is cursed no more and has been given a second life where it gets to be worn and cherished every day) . . but William and Kate had been an item for so long, their wedding felt slightly anticlimactic in a way. To this day, I recall the poise of the bride and her siblings with awe. Young Jamie, 24 years old, read the lesson better than the professional clerics in the room.
What might have been, if Harry had married Pippa instead, I often think. Pippa seems very happy with her husband and their baby, so she had a lucky escape. Harry has not been so lucky in his choice, as we are all now too well aware. But the first time I saw pictures of MM at the engagement, I thought, "She looks a lot like Pippa.' Hmm. The resemblance was fleeting, and I don't see it now, but in the early photos, it was there. Perhaps intentionally, since Smeaghan would have seen, along with everyone else, the obvious chemistry Haz had with the maid of honor at his brother's wedding. The contrast between how Harry looks now and how he looked 8 years ago is so sad to me. He seems like a completely different person.
It was Harry's wedding that got me reading about the Royals again, and delving into their history. I have read several books on QEII's early years, and have watched both seasons of 'The Crown' three or four times. That portrait of the Queen is of a quietly indomitable spirit of great moral convictions. Claire Foy's portrayal, as well as steeping myself in the family photo albums has given me great affection for her . . but I might be in love with the idea of her, the PR gloss. The reality has been fairly underwhelming. HM embraces the dictum of 'Do nothing' a bit too much for my taste. I thought she would have seen that is not always the most effective course after the Diana situation. In MM, they've got another Diana on their hands, in terms of a mentally unstable showboating personality who has an overinflated sense of her own importance in the structure of the monarchy and who loves to play games with the media. Rather than making a strong decisive action/statement, she is burying her head in the sand again, just like before.
Something must come to a head soon.
Brilliant!!
Yes, the way to make oneself attractive and indispensable to one's husband, to make him so very glad he chose one instead of his blonde ex-girlfriend is to find the most hideous 'garment' available, style one's 'hair' with an egg beater and then stalk them like one of the Furies. Make sure to make oneself as visible as possible from the sidelines, with the aid of a dress made from leftover WW2 desert parachute material, while you hold 'the baby' and wear a face like a thundercloud and Michael Jackson shades. Your spectre-at-the-feast act will guarantee that your husband is so distracted and made anxious that he will lose the match, and maybe even come off his horse, too.
I wouldn't put it past her any more to intentionally try to cause Harry a fatal accident. Then she can play her best 'grieving Jackie O.' role (which will not be very good at all) . . and 'retire' from the RF on a hefty widow's pension, and go home to California where all her Hollywood friends can console her in her grief.
Oh, and Lainey's opening today talks about "Princess Catherine and Meghan Markle". So, the tone has changed towards her "friend".
and Rachel will return to her native LA, this time living as the First Class A-List Celebrity she has always thought herself to be. I'm a white middle class native Californian, so I do not know what the Black Experience is like. Are there any black men and women reading this blog? Can they help shed light on the racist abuse Rachel has recieved from the UK media? I was called racist on Gary Janeti's Instagram page when I wondered what she would do with her hands during public engagements once she no longer had the baby bump. I did not know Rachel was black until her mother became part of the narrative. I apologize, I feel like I have lost direction for this comment. I will stop here, Haha.
>>>>I forgot to add - this is her idea of modernising the monarchy. It's not reaching out to the disenfranchised, it's shit-stirring, and a lot of people, especially in the USA, just love it.
We do? I haven't really found any, apart from Smeaghan's stans online, who even know who she is, or care, much less love her antics. I work in a library, so I see the magazines that come in . . . H. and M. have not gotten a cover in ages. I think I was the only person (among a staff of 50 people) who watched the wedding. The overall reaction was . .'So? Not interested.' re. the both of them.
The Internet is such a hothouse bubble, where the chatter/people/events assume a mega-inflated importance that they don't have IRL. I live in the heartland of the USA, in a small city. It's racially diverse, but I really doubt there were too many viewing parties of the wedding here among African-American women. MM's whole lifestyle and way of being is too disconnected from the reality of real women's lives.
For somebody so desperate to be a 'global influencer' her sphere of influence is minimal, and hollow.
But I agree that she thrives on drama and conflict and messing things up/making the atmosphere nasty just because she can, not because it will net her anything positive. It is the dysfunctional operating of a malfunctioning personality/brain. MM does not have a conscience like normal people and she is not bothered by other people's upset. She gets off on it, in fact.
It amazes me that she was actually able to get as far in life as she has, but I think everybody's got her number now. They just don't know what to do about it.
"Stop digging holes, Meghan and start planting trees". Very entertaining.
Piers irritates me usually, but he raises good points here. When he's not whining, he shows that he's intelligent.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7236767/PIERS-MORGAN-Meghans-10-point-guide-popular-Princess.html
We want her to change, to treat others well and … behave in a regal, sophisticated manner, but we are the crazy ones to think she can. She simply can't. It's just not in her and let's face it, people can change, but not very much and not often. She's hardwired. She is who she is, sadly. And yes, she's brought it all on herself simply because her hubris trumps humility. I doubt she's ever once admitted to anyone, caught red handed or not that she's ever been wrong, guilty of anything. She's incapable of humility. Such a shame.
Correction, that book and author I mentioned previously, not sure if it's relevance is now diluted, is called Camilla, The Kings Mistress by Caroline Graham.
I also watched Charles and Diana's wedding and made up a scrapbook. I was very sad about the divorce. I love watching the Crown and Victoria too.
I am Asian and I don't think or feel that the British press are racist. I don't believe that MM is being harassed or hounded, on the contrary, she wants it that way.
So far I believe everything that Piers has said about this saga is a correct summary. He seems to be one Lone Ranger who is courageous enough to do this. Where are the other figures of authority in or out of the press? We don't need knights in shining armour here, just gentlemen with a backbone. Too many women are writing and talking.
Don't know much about wigs, but I have heard once a wig is on, the head area is off limits for touching. Tactile sensory loss? On whose side? Glue issues? Can glue be seen? So many angles to this. Basic reasons for wigs is to enhance appearances. But they appear to have their drawbacks. From where I come from, unless it's for medical or a society event such as a wedding or a big bash, I have seen people sniggering at others who wear them.
I am disappointed that Kate will be chaperoning MM at the tennis, if she attends. With all the drama unfolding, I wonder why Kate is being so tolerant. She has the ear of the aristocracy, possibly parliament, loads of influential old world moneyed people and millions of British citizens behind her. Why can't she be the person to change this
dumpshow?
Apologies, will add a name once I figure out how this works.
I've said frequently before that I wish Harry had married a beautiful Black woman with style and class, someone from a good family, perhaps someone with a solid education - a lawyer like Chelsey, perhaps, with the looks of Lupita?
There are so many beautiful Black women in the Commonwealth. Couldn't Harry have found one that would have respected what the Royal Family does and helped bring it into the 21st century?
I think on some level Harry was looking for a s***-stirrer, someone who would create problems for the Royal Family in general and his father and brother in particular. A Courtney Love type.
So no, I don't think that finding Meghan to be a troublesome personality is racist. She *is*a troublesome personality.
Also, the DM referred to Beyonce as a "fan" of MM. Yeah, whatevs. MM will finally get to walk the red carpet, and no suitcase required. I hope Chelsy is there.
Perhaps Catherine has been drafted in to do a job but not the one we think. Happy families would have happened at the polo three days ago if that was the aim. Could this be a Lord G serve to provoke MM?
She will lose her mind if upstaged by the DOC and I am very interested to see the “serve”.
Perhaps a “golden set” for LG?
I remember Harry's trip into the bush to meet with a native tribe. It was a bit of a distance over jouncing pitted track to the community, but the tribal people had prepared a special presentation/dance for their HRHs. Herselfness begged off the trip and had Harry make her apologies, citing 'not feeling well'. Playing the pregnancy card, which at that time, even I bought into. It was feasible that a woman who was still possibly experiencing morning sickness wouldn't want to go over rough track and get bug bites, and maybe the heat was extreme.
But I also remember thinking that the people waiting to meet Harry's bride would have been mightily disappointed that she was a no-show, and now that we know she was not pregnant at the time, her ruse of concern for her unborn child was to get out out of an onerous, boring afternoon in the gross wilderness with incomprehensible rustics so she could lounge poolside at their top hotel and pretend to drink virgin mai tais.
Meggy doesn't like anything too hot, dirty, tiring, boring or in any way difficult. She pulled the same shite in Morocco and disappointed local woman waiting to meet her because of the 'gross' smells and whatnot. And yet she was such a great and profound ambassadoress for African children! I'm sure the minute that photo op was over, she was like, "Ugh, get these smelly urchins away from me!"
The Australia tour was only 5 months into the marriage . . . I feel certain now that things started to unravel between them when she shanghai'd Eugenie's wedding and then insisted on putting on the Pregnancy Show. Harry started to look very unhappy around that time. Before then it was all smiles and loved-up PDA. Footage from Eugenie's wedding shows him repeatedly trying to speak to her and she ignoring him entirely with more of her fake laughs as she talked to Zara. I think she'd told him her plans for her 'Big Reveal' later, and he was frantic to stop her. Of course, she was having none of that.
I don't think Harry was initially in on the Moonbump Mountbatten Windsor show with its extended running time, and didn't want to go along, but she probably convinced him that they had to show a united front against the world and steamrolled over his objections. The time for him to come clean was then. If he'd had the balls to tell Meghan that if she went ahead with the sham, he was going to tell all . . first to his family and then he'd call a press conference . . . how different it might be.
The only way to deal with a blackmailer is to short-stop them with honesty yourself, and then their ammunition is worthless. It takes great courage to face the consequences of admitting whatever you're trying to hide, but fear is what gives the blackmailer his (or her) power.
Too late for dignity and control over this situation, but Haz could *still* choose honesty, even at this late date. Sadly, he seems to be lacking in the requisite courage.
You're right, it was Fiji where she refused to go to the market. The Morocco trip was so hastily pulled together that I doubt any of the citizens actually knew she was coming. There was a welcoming delegation on the tarmac with a plate of dates or some other local delicacy as a hospitality custom. H. partook; Farkle made a face like she'd just been presented with the carcass of a dead baby goat, fingered some of the samples, smelled it and then *put it back on the plate without eating it*.
Seriously, does she even know how to eat with silverware? A six year old would know it's rude to touch food with your hands on a communal plate and not take it. In the guise of an international diplomatic delegation, it's all the more gauche. I know that Tom & Doria are not from the upper class in America, but they scraped together and sent her to the best schools. So why does she act like she was raised in a barn? I'm sure the nuns at Catholic school cared about table manners.
In Fiji, she bailed on a jaunt to meet some of the citizens of that Commonwealth country . . .because she had to rush back to her four-star hotel in order to get ready for the posh state banquet with her father-in-law. That's where she threw a snit fit over not being able to wear a tiara. She thought it eminently reasonable that Her Maj Fed Ex her a tiara to Fiji because Catherine was going to be wearing a tiara at a state dinner in London, so why couldn't she get one too?
It must have been on that occasion that Chas nicknamed his daughter-in-law 'Tungsten'. Because it is impervious to other elements . . . like the future King of England telling it to its face that it is *not* getting a tiara because it wouldn't be appropriate.
Before I knew about Tiara-gate (or rather, Tiara-gate II), I actually liked Meghan's look that evening. The blue dress in Fiji was the best look she's ever had, and I include the wedding dress.
Thank you. At present I am not writing, except on Internet blogs (:)) but I do have aspirations to get published elsewhere. Having fallen in love with books since I could read, I thought for years that I would become a novelist, but as I got older, I realized that no fictional people I could dream up would be as interesting/infuriating as real ones. So maybe my niche is as a biographer, seeing as 'bitchy Internet gossip columnist' is already filled by Piers Morgan--haha! I would not attempt a royal biography, seeing as I am not British, and I wouldn't touch Farkle with a bargepole. Who knows what I might catch? I'm plenty close enough right here.
One day I hope to realize my dream of being a self-supporting author. Until then, thanks for the encouragement and I will do my best to keep y'all entertained. At length . . 'cause I can't really do 'short'. I try, but find myself with way too much to say about the Hazardous Harkle Hootenanny.
Carry on, everyone. Stiff G&Ts for all . . !