Skip to main content

The Nutty Challenge: What does Meghan do all day?

It's a time-tested parlour game: What is celebrity X doing right this minute?

In the case of celebrity women who are roughly Duchess Meghan's age (Beyoncé, Chrissy Teigen, the Duchess of Cambridge) the answers are pretty easy. Spending time with the kids. Having a wardrobe fitting. Working with trusted staff to plan future projects.

But if you assume that Meg doesn't have custody of her (potentially nonexistent) son Archificial, can't keep staff, has no announced future projects, and certainly doesn't do much wardrobe fitting - what, in fact, does she do all day?

You can only spend so much time writing Word Salad posts for @SussexRoyal Instagram and harassing royal reporters using multiple pseudonyms on Twitter.

What do you think Duchess Meghan's daily routine consists of?

Comments

Girl with a Hat said…
@KayeC, Chinese astrology is very good at describing people's personalities. Also with the person's Chinese ascendant taken into account, the description of the person matches their personalities to a tee.
fordgirl said…
I am a rooster and i don't like neither conflict nor attention.
Girl with a Hat said…
@fordgirl, then look at your Chinese ascendant. It varies with your time of birth with the rat being the period from 12 midnight to 2 a.m. and so on following the order of the Chinese zodiac.
Hikari said…
Fudging one's age is very common in show business for actresses, but it was a lot easier to shave several years off one's birthday back when documentation was spotty. Some people were never issued a proper birth certificate if they were born at home or had other itinerant circumstances growing up. There must be an official birth certificate registered for Rachel Meghan Markle in the County of Los Angeles. It's certainly not a common name. Likewise, there are school yearbooks with her photos in them and she was a minor television celebrity in a Nickelodeon piece where she states that she is 12 years old and in the 6th grade. The date of that broadcast would be easy to verify.

I'm not saying she isn't fudging her age, because that would be a typically brazen Markle tactic . . but for the skeptical, it shouldn't be very hard to determine whether she was born on this day in 1981 or not.
Hikari said…
Each of the animal zodiac signs is broken down into four 'elements' to account for variations in personality within the broader general group. I get to be a 'Wood Snake' . . aren't I lucky? :p

Girl with a Hat said…
Prince Charles is a rat as well as Harry. I can see it in his face and his behaviour but also confirmed that he is.
Girl with a Hat said…
that explains his reaction towards Diana's greater popularity.
Hikari said…
And they love belly rubs! LOL
Hikari said…
Andrew is the father of two daughters who are now young women on either side of 30, but during the time of some of these alleged underage girl hookups, his daughters would have been the same age as the teenage girls he was having sex with.

It takes a special kind of compartmentalization skill in my opinion to not make the connection between one's own adolescent daughters and the same-age girl, the daughter of another man, whom he is having carnal knowledge of. Presumably Andrew would not have been OK with sweaty, fat, middle-aged men groping and violating *his* daughters . . but it's OK as long as it's not personal.

It's always personal for somebody.
Fifi LaRue said…
Since Meghan's stuck in a time warp, she must be embellishing her scrapbooks with lots of stickers, and fancy sticky tape. She's about 13 emotionally.
Ozmanda said…
In most countries, anyone under the age of 14(could differ from a year or so depending on country) is deemed to be incapable of being charged as a adult for a crime. Reason for this is the assertion that due to several neurological areas not developed, they lack the capacity for understanding the difference between wrong or right. There are a few exceptions (most notably the bulger murder).

Also when someone starts taking regular illegal narcotics, their emotional brain state is arrested at the age it starts. I don't know if Harry has any of these issues, but I have noted this his life has been not just about being coddled, but impulsive decisions without a mature process put into place. The defence forces finds this a good fit for their ground forces, as soldiers rely on the "fight or flight" chemicals in the brain to act on orders.

I think that Harry may be impaired - either due to drugs, impairment or psychological issues. But I also don't think he has been held accountable for his many screw ups.
SwampWoman said…
@KayeC, I believe we are in sync re the deleterious effect of infantilizing pre-teens and teens. Learned helplessness is difficult to counter. I have found that the younger the age that skills are acquired, the better.

Husband and I have had conversations about the lack of opportunity and freedom for kids now as opposed to when we were growing up.
Girl with a Hat said…
maybe Meghan is a Rooster:

One of the prominent shortcomings of Roosters is that they are vain but realistic in society and always hope to be superior to others and flattered by more people. Therefore, they are usually dressed in the crowd and believe they will be respected in this way, so as to get certain comfort inside.

They attach great importance to interest, mainly in terms of making friends. Generally, they choose to make friends with those rich and beautiful but ignore the poor and ugly.

Rooster people are a little stubborn, face-saving and unwilling to acknowledge their mistakes, and they hardly change their minds once they are determined. In addition, their commanding attitude often makes others feel repulsive.

Once they feel the dreaming life goals are too distant to realize, they will be down in the dumps and at a loss, wandering on the way and accomplishing nothing. In a word, they are the brave knights working hard for their dreams, also the dreamy "heroes" failing to make their dreams come true.

Roosters like to be praised and they are swanky and selfish, unwilling to admit their mistakes and very sensitive to criticism. On the contrary, they try every means to discredit their opponent.
Anonymous said…
Well, I don't come here to talk politics, the Clintons, deep state, women's rights, abortion, and/or social justice. If I wanted that, I'd just go to Twitter and find the like-minded. All I will add to this topic is that case law needs to catch up so there is some consistent precedent re: sexual predators. Regardless of gender. There was a woman in Arizona sentenced to 20 years for sex with a 13 year old boy and a male bus driver in NY who raped a young girl and got no jail time. I see this as a cultural issue, and I'll stop there, but consistent sentencing has been addressed by some states, just not all.
Oldest Older 201 – 214 of 214

Popular posts from this blog

Gosh It Is Quiet In Here

 There just hasn't been a lot from really either of them together or individually lately, has there? But why? Have they blown all their bridges, connections and are down to toss the proverbial kitchen sink for attention? I don't know.  We've heard that moving vans showed up at the house.  And nothing more like pictures from a neighbor happy to see the back of them. We've heard they bought a house on Portugal.   But the wording was kind of funny.  Multiple sources of the same thing - yes but that isn't a guarantee of proof as it could all be from the same source.  It was more along the lines of "We've been told that...".  It came off as a we really don't know if we believe this to be true or not so we are putting it out there but hedging our bets.  Or at least it did to me. And nothing more like exactly when, where or for how much or when they might visit it again.  Or pictures of the awesome inside.  Or outside.  Or requisite ...

Cliff Hanger

Deadlines for responses have passed.  Will they show?  Won't they show?   And, rumors of demands for money to cross hands to make appearances (new level of pay to play). Such drama.  You would think this was a soap opera where every episode ends with a crazy cliff hanger story plot to drive the next installment.  Sadly, I don't expect it to change any time soon either.  No.  For them, there appears to be way too much energy left in the will they, won't they to end it now even though everyone else is pretty much tired of it.  Hardly something one can point to and claim that they are trying to reconcile with those who feel distressed about what was printed. Just noticed something: remember that talk of trying to reach out and reconcile after the book, etc.?  It seems to have drifted away, hasn't it?  Hmm.  Interesting.  I wonder if that is recognized as a total lost cause or just delayed into the summer (or fall) campaign (c...

Here comes Trevor

If you're a Beatles fan, you'll know that in the fifty years since the group went its separate ways, almost everyone involved with them has sold his or her story. Only one major figure has not: Jane Asher , who was Paul McCartney's girlfriend for five years during the heyday of the group, and accompanied him on the famous trip to India in 1968. An actress, Jane went on to become a TV personality and famous cake-baker. She has never spoken about her time with McCartney and dislikes being asked. Until recently, the Sussex saga had included a similar figure: Trevor Engelson, Meghan Markle's ex-husband.  Trevor has never spoken about Meg. But he has done well for himself: he married a wealthy woman , continues to work as a producer , and seems to have a loyal (and multi-racial!) circle of friends , unlike some people we know.  He appeared to have excused himself from the whole soggy mess.  Until yesterday, when he was papped. Driving his black Porsch...