Skip to main content

A quick change to the blog

Many commenters have noted that they have had trouble posting, and I am sincerely sorry for that.

I know how frustrating it is to write out a thoughtful post and have it eaten by Blogger, because it has happened to me as well.

We're going to do a quick experiment with non-embedded posts, which may make the site more stable.

The negative is that on some platforms, it is not immediately clear which comment you are replying to.

Therefore, you'll have to @ the previous poster - ie "@Mischi, I agree with you on this point."

You can also refer to a specific previous post by putting it into italics: You said: The Royal Family must know what is going on.  To do so, just put a < i > at the front of the italicized area (eliminate spaces) and < / i > at the end.

Let's give it a go.

Comments

Scandi Sanskrit said…
Always "Select All" on longer comments and hit "Copy" before posting your comments if you're on a platform that has a tendency to eat comments/posts. That way as soon as you realise your post wasn't posted, you can just paste it in and try again instead of having to write the whole thing from scratch again!
Nutty Flavor said…
@Scandi, that's a great idea.

Some browsers also support a form recovery plugin - in other words, it keeps a temporary backup of whatever you've typed into the little field.

Google "Form recovery plugin" to find one that works for your system and browser.
Aquagirl said…
@Nutty: Just saw your new post so sending this as a test.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Thanks, Nutty! Didn't know an add-on like that existed!
Anonymous said…
Hi nutty, just commented about the comment change and then I saw a comment about the comments change you did so I'm commenting about the comment change.
Miss K said…
Hi Nutty, I’ve tried to comment many times, to no avail. I finally gave up & usually found that someone else would make a similar comment, so alls well I guess. I hope the change works!
Cabraxas said…
Thank you, Nutty, for trying to make things easier for all of us. Btw, your blog is awesome!
Shazzam said…
Thanks Nutty, maybe now I can comnent.
Mom said…
Hi all,

Just read this article on NPD types and thought we would all enjoy:

20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You

https://thoughtcatalog.com/shahida-arabi/2016/06/20-diversion-tactics-highly-manipulative-narcissists-sociopaths-and-psychopaths-use-to-silence-you/


Cheers
RoyalT said…
Hi Nutty and fellow posters. Thanks for the update Nutty, I can now post after following for months.
@Nutty,

Embedded or not embedded there lies the question! Lol

I use to do the whole copy and paste thing, yes it saved me retyping the whole thing, but it still wouldn’t post at times! Grrr! �� This is a strange format to post in, but if it works for more people the better! ��
Nelo said…
Hello nutty, I can still post with ease. Didn't have issues before. In unrelated news, I notice only daily express and sun had pics of Harry's photop in Angola on their cover. Express had a full cover while sun gave him a small ear piece. I'm shocked that establishment papres like telegraph and times didn't put him on their cover. Even daily mail didn't mention it. What do you think is the reason?
Rainy Day said…
Hmm...DM’s Mail on Sunday is featuring the Duchess of Cambridge in a very flattering piece that mentions at least a few times that her priorities are Queen, country and family. I’m sure the magazine piece was planned for ages, but after MeGhan’s recent comments that pretty much indicate she’s her own #1 priority, the timing is wonderful.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Nelo, I don't know about the print version of the Daily Mail, but the Harry story was featured prominently online yesterday. Last time I looked it had nearly 9000 comments.

Since it happened early yesterday, editors may have thought the story was "too old" for today's print edition.
Isanne said…
Hi Nutty,

Thank you so much for this alteration! I tried to post many times and since non of them came up I assumed my commend was inappropriate in some way... Glad it wasn't that! Thank you for this blog, I'm happy that I can now join in!
Louise said…
I don't think that this format lends itself to having a conversation with other posters, or following conversations between other posters.
NeutralObserver said…
Nutty, this fix might give you comments on a DM scale! LOL. Seems like a lot of folks were having trouble posting. You're so right about the comments on the Telegraph article. They are brutal! I always picture the typical DT reader as being a portly & prosperous Home Counties male who is probably a reflexive monarchist. The comments sound as though they're from rabid Morning Star readers. 'Get rid of the lot of them' is seen more than once. Some might trolls, but usually the comments on DT are anti-Megs, but pro royal family. I have to agree with all who say the RF needs to step in.
CookieShark said…
The Telegraph article comments are very telling indeed. One of them highlighted the issue of MM's telling the women at mothers2mothers to get down on the floor with her. This had been raised in a prior post, but it struck me this morning how culturally offensive that could be. Additionally her choice to give these women Archie's hand me downs is quite offensive. It also seems odd that she wouldn't hold on to them in case she has another child?
NeutralObserver said…
I'm so sorry the UK has to go through this turmoil surrounding the RF, especially during the Brexit debacle. The RF could have been a unifying & reassuring symbol in what is a very worrying situation. Polarization seems to be the norm everywhere, unfortunately, especially as there are so many serious problems to be addressed.
Nelo said…
Nutty, I usually go through British media covers on BBC website and like I said, besides daily express which I don't take seriously and sun which gave Harry and ear piece, his pics didn't make the cover of most. I agree that editors may have thought the story won't be fresh, but pics of George's birthday, Charlotte and Louis were released early and they still made the cover of all the papers expect Guardian. Don't forget that BBC does newspaper review every day on TV. I would have expected that the recreation of such an iconic pic will be used generously by all the media irrespective of when it was released.
abbyh said…
I usually did not have problems with posting ever under the old way (Chrome). I agree with Louise about the following conversations and placement of a comment.

I am having some difficulties today but I am not certain it is this platform where my troubles start.

I appreciate the link to the methods of control (an exaustic week with someone and a recent loop back into my life by another).

Humor Me said…
Greetings all: I am a Chome user.
I had no problems with the previous platform. My problem was the length of a blog post (this is a tip of the hat to you Nutty for having such a great blog!).
Perhaps going to a cut off - say 150, and starting a "new" blog with the same name but page two would help.
IMHO - there will be too many @s to attempt to follow a conversation.
Jules Bergman said…
Very excited to join the party 'officially!' I have so enjoyed following along here - hopped over from CDAN - and wanted to add my thanks to Nutty for a wonderfully written blog and such thoughtful and witty commentary! You guys are like the "friends I never had." (Sorry, I had to.) :-)
Fifi LaRue said…
Thanks Nutty for your blog; people make very thoughtful comments, and are respectful to each other.
Chiland said…
Getting back to the fun of Megsy...(and so excited to be able to post!) read about her secret visit to the Post Office where the tragic rape and murder of a young girl took place. Supposedly her ROP would allow no photos and today, 2 days later, there is a post on their Instagram. She probably did not like the attention The Duke (reminds me of what Wallis used to call David except I read she pronounced it The Dook) has been getting.
PaulaMP said…
Never had an issue, using Chrome
Teasmade said…
Since "Dook" is the American pronunciation, that's probably what MM says as well.

PS--Safari user, never had any problems with the old system, unusually. Safari is often problematic on other sites.
CookieShark said…
Chiland, I believe I read about this in the comments on the Telegraph piece.
Per that commenter, many in SA found her pictures at the memorial offensive.
Miss_Christina said…
Hi Nutty! Testing. This new format seems a little busy, but I hope it works.
The Cat's Meow said…
Hello Nutty,
I love following this blog, and appreciate the time you put in to tweak/maintain! I am happy whichever way you choose to continue, as there are positives and negatives to both options. Either way, I am going to get my Royal Nutty Flavor fix! However, if you do want more options, you might consider moving to another hosting site altogether. One I follow (The Wartburg Watch) uses wordpress I believe. Comments are added chronologically, but you can tag people which makes the continuing conversations easier to find. One thing I specifically wish for your blog is that I could "upvote/agree" with comments. Sometimes I want to support specific things without actually writing a post. My two cents -- but still will thrillingly follow along, whatever you choose!
Unknown said…
Hi
I am able to comment. No clear how to name myself but that's fine.

FGB said…
I also find it rude that she apparently stopped people from taking her photo, but thn posts her own artfully taken photo at the memorial. She is a piece of work and ro the casual observer I'm sure she seems so caring. [rolling eyes dot gif]
Jdubya said…
Test only. I've never seen this format before.
Jodi said…
I've been using Firefox where both blog formats work well.
Louise said…
If anyone was wondering about whether she wears butt pads, this picture at the post office seems to leave no doubt, as she is not wearing them in that photo and her derriere has deflated compared to her butt in the Smart Works pants.

By the way, what happened to the Smart Work clothes that she promised to wear on this tour?
I use Safari and the only way I can comment (sometimes I can’t) is to go into incognito or private browsing, unsure if it will work for anyone else. I did put this solution on Nutty’s blog a while ago and suggested she disabled the embedded comments. However, I do prefer the embedded comments, as others have said, you can’t create a comment thread this way and it’s hard work to follow...moreso on a phone.
I've never posted here but enjoy reading, so this test is my first post. Thanks for such interesting content!
Anonymous said…
Safari doesn't work for me. Nothing. Firefox is without issue until >200 posts, then it's a PITA but still happens.

I found that I can read the post and comments in normal fashion. It is only in funky mode when I'm commenting, so that's my solution.
Button said…
Hello Nutty, I have been following your blogs from the beginning and was just able to post for the first time the other day. Thank you for providing this forum and your insight. I also really enjoy reading what others have to say.
.
On to Megladon. I wonder what will happen, if anything, when they return back to the UK. If there are repercussions I wonder whether we, the general plebs, will know about it.
Girl with a Hat said…
the rumour I heard last night was that Harry and Meghan left Misha's wedding separately. He left with his protection officers, and she left completely alone. It's from Ashlee over at Danja Zone on youtube.
Sunnykm said…
test post I use Safari and was not able to post
Ava C said…
Just testing. And welcome to Cinnamon Sticker!
@Elle, when 200 comments reached don’t you have a....’load more comments’ link showing at the bottom of the comments section? I do when using Safari (incognito). According to Blogger both Google Chrome and Safari are listed as compatible browsers...we all know that isn’t strictly true!
CookieShark said…
Just wondering if any of you think the press will start covering H&M differently due to this tour. Did the Archie unveiling help?
Girl with a Hat said…
someone mentioned writing to the Queen to express your displeasure. This is how to do it:

https://www.royal.uk/contact
Ava C said…
@CookieShark re: whether press will cover H&M differently after tour & whether Archie unveiling will help - there's a lot of resentment in readers' comments because Archie was unveiled outside the UK. I remember a bit of that with Prince George on the Australian tour, but at least I think we had had a few clear(!) informal photos before that. Feels to me that the press are tip-toeing around this. I read the Times, Guardian, Daily Mail and Telegraph every day, so that's covering a reasonable cross-section. Articles are mild, but the readers' comments, when allowed, are as hostile as ever and it's really apparent there's no way back for Meghan. The press seems to be in a holding patter. Undecided where to go next.
Girl with a Hat said…
ha ha. They are going to do a new series of Spitting Image and Meghan and Harry will be featured. Go see what they look like.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7515387/Meghan-Markle-glittery-princess-vest-star-new-episodes-Spitting-Image.html

It will be thin Meghan that will be featured.
Ilona said…
@Nelo Two pages on "In his Mother's footsteps" in the Daily Mail printed edition today, Saturday with pictures (his and hers side by side )and kind commentary.

Also, articles and lots of pictures on the Mail online re his trip to Angola, his homage to his Mother and meeting the same girl the princess had met so many years ago. Here, however, the comments of the public are mainly negative.
Ilona said…
@ Mom "20 Diversion Tactics Highly Manipulative Narcissists, Sociopaths And Psychopaths Use To Silence You"
Excellent read!
Ava C said…
@Mischi - can't wait for Spitting Image but also can't wait for the next series of 'The Windsors'. Meghan was sweet and tremulous but very new age. Loads of fantastic material there, as for Prince Charles. But they'll have to bring in far more negative (and funny) material to show Meghan in a different light. Mind you, that show has continued for a long time with a Kate that was far too idealised. Ironic now that there are signs the real Kate is becoming more like her 'Windsor's' character. She's showing signs of building up to her future role.
SwampWoman said…
@Ilona, re: Also, articles and lots of pictures on the Mail online re his trip to Angola, his homage to his Mother and meeting the same girl the princess had met so many years ago. Here, however, the comments of the public are mainly negative.

I can understand the negative comments. He's 35 years old. It is time he stopped sheltering behind his mother's image and became his own man.

On the Bayou said…
Hello All! The only way I am able to post a comment when it’s embedded is to use google chrome, sign into my google account, then open the Nutty blog and comment. It took me awhile to figure it out, but once I did, it works like a charm. That being said, I agree that it’s easier to follow conversations the old way.

On to the talk. It seems Meghan’s new PR objective is to say she does things in “secret,” but then release the info later to make sure everyone knows about it. Such was the case with the Archie pool donation. FYI Megs, it’s not a secret if it’s done in the person’s name. Now the “secret” visit to the memorial that was shared on their Instagram. Her massive need for attention is disturbing. Also, @Mischi, totally agree that she wears butt pads. Does she not realize that if she wears them selectively it makes it much more obvious that she is indeed wearing them? One day she has a booty and one day she doesn’t. Very strange.
SwampWoman said…
@Louise If anyone was wondering about whether she wears butt pads, this picture at the post office seems to leave no doubt, as she is not wearing them in that photo and her derriere has deflated compared to her butt in the Smart Works pants.

I am going to have to strongly resist the impulse to buy a gaudy tiara, a long stringy wig, and giant butt pads to dress up for Halloween.

Sadly, MM is so far off the radar here that people would just assume that I was doing a homage to reality TV.
SwampWoman said…
On The Bayou said On to the talk. It seems Meghan’s new PR objective is to say she does things in “secret,” but then release the info later to make sure everyone knows about it. Such was the case with the Archie pool donation. FYI Megs, it’s not a secret if it’s done in the person’s name. Now the “secret” visit to the memorial that was shared on their Instagram. Her massive need for attention is disturbing. Also, @Mischi, totally agree that she wears butt pads. Does she not realize that if she wears them selectively it makes it much more obvious that she is indeed wearing them? One day she has a booty and one day she doesn’t. Very strange.

Meg's clandestine secrets and the case of the disappearing booty sounds like it could be a Sherlock Holmes case.
Louise said…
Does anyone have any theories on why the Daily Mail blocked most comments on stories related to this African vacation?
SwampWoman said…
@ Louise: Does anyone have any theories on why the Daily Mail blocked most comments on stories related to this African vacation?

Hmmmm. If it is a public-relations piece approved by their PR firm, could they be paying for the comments to be moderated? (I'm not saying that it is, just asking others in the know whether it is possible. I believe that would be called "speculating" or a wild-assed guess.)
MommaBear said…
Hi Nutty, crossing my fingers that this works!
@Swampwomen, ‘Hmmmm. If it is a public-relations piece approved by their PR firm, could they be paying for the comments to be moderated? (I'm not saying that it is, just asking others in the know whether it is possible. I believe that would be called "speculating" or a wild-assed guess.)’.

Agree it’s either that or that, because I highly doubt BP or KP requested it.
Eowyn said…
Meghan Markle is one-month pregnant, and will announce second pregnancy around Princess Beatrice’s wedding

https://www.ibtimes.com/meghan-markle-will-announce-second-pregnancy-around-princess-beatrices-wedding-2835087
Button said…
@Eowyn,
.
Oh bloody hell. No!! If so I guess she will haul out the bump(s) again and we will be drawn into yet another cluster*uck charade. It begs the question of just how she would get up the duff? Her and Hazza are not sleeping together, from what has been intimated.
The Cat's Meow said…
UGH @ Eowyn, and how predictable!!!

Also, supposedly HMTQ approves of their "informal" tour....

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10024681/queen-delighted-meghan-harrys-informal-unorthodox-royal-tour/
The Cat's Meow said…
Well @ Button, she has already purchased all the bumps....why not use them again?!?!
The Cat's Meow said…
Lastly.....she didn't look preggers at all in the "secret" picture from the Post Office. (Wasn't just the butt pads she forgot lol).

Nutty, another thought re the blog....is there an "editing" option instead of just deleting? Would have preferred to add this to my very recent last post.

Cheers all!
Eowyn said…
@The Cat's Meow:

Re. supposedly HMTQ approves of their "informal" tour
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10024681/queen-delighted-meghan-harrys-informal-unorthodox-royal-tour/

I've had it with the Queen and the Royal Family's indulgence of the insufferable Meghan-Harry duo. Will drastically reduce my time reading about them online.
JLC said…
Think this will show me as "unknown" but going to test posting a comment.

With regard to the Post Office pic, what really boiled my pee was the way her hair was deliberately styled for the shot. Total lack of thought about what actually happened there.
Ilona said…
@Eowyn Just read the article. She is one month pregnant the article says .... Princess B. will probably marry in about 6-8 months from now. Can MM wait for so long?! Well, IF it is true, here we go again for another 9 to 12 months of is she or is she not, is she using a surrogate or is she ordering a baby from Waitrose!!!
MaLissa said…
Late tot he party but I'm here :)
Mimi said…
Hello Nutty, thank you for the change to your blog. Looks like many were having a hard time posting comments. So refreshing to be part of a blog where the people on it are clever, witty, humorous, intelligent, respectful and just plain “kind” (sorry, couldn’t resist) to whoever posts. Harry, by his own admission is clearly in a fragile state mentally so the RF will need to tread lightly, for fear of pushing him over the edge, if they have plans to shut down this insanity that the two of them have brought to them. Harry appears to be getting weaker but Meghan seems to be getting stronger and now with Archie out in public she is completely out of control.
Ava C said…
@Button and @Cat's Meow - let's hope she puts the bumps in date order now!

Separately - I've made quite a number of DM comments recently and the only one that didn't get past the moderators was one about the H&M ad, alerting readers to it ...
Hikari said…
The Markle "pregnant" again? Ha.

If she were truly only one month pregnant, then that is far too soon for most women to have even missed a period yet for certain or have any symptoms of early pregnancy. It's too early even for a doctor visit to confirm this, and yet 'she knows'. Is she claiming she went down to Boots before they went to Africa and peed on a stick? Maybe she did it on the plane over while Archie was sleeping on Daddy's chest.

She is just so bleeping predictable. Also the timing of the 'announcement' is suspicious, coming as it does just two days after the Yorks scooped the Sucks It tour with Bea's engagement. Harry cannot stand to even share a car with her these days, so the chances of her being pregnant, now or last year either is as likely as the Cleveland Browns winning the Super Bowl. If you're a Brownies' fan you know that means somewhere between 0% and "You've GOT to be Kidding!"
Hikari said…
@Illona,

The Markle is going to do herself one better in sabotaging Bea's wedding. Last year she upstaged Eugenie's wedding by pregnancy-signalling with a huge unbuttoned coat. If she's 9 months pregnant next spring for Bea's wedding, she can pretend to go into labor!

God help us all. I hope that she will be removed from this family before then. The frayed nerves of the world can't take much more of this. As for Harry, I'm deeply concerned. He is swirling the drain. Without an intervention I fear that he is going to hurt himself, either accidentally-on-purpose or straight up self-harm. I think Harry is a suicide risk or an overdose waiting to happen. I really do. That's what Narcs do--sap their victims of the will to live.
JenS said…
I don't believe any source could know that's she's "one month" preggers. I like what @Hikari said about this: most women aren't even sure at that point unless they're sick (and M doesn't seem to be).
This is either a deliberate plant by M/her PR to keep up the "happy couple" nonsense and counter all the rumours/proof that the two don't even cohabit, or foreshadow an announcement (probs during the Pakistan tour).

She might do it to forestall the divorce. Can you imagine the sympathy she'll get, and how bad the RF will look, if there's a separation/divorce announcement after she announces #2 is on the way? She may be counting on being able to trap them that way and buy herself more time (to merch and set up post-divorce income, of course). Poor Harry, if this happens. I don't think he can take it.

I can't imagine anyone but her fawning US stans will be happy about a baby announcement; she's already alienated too many people, especially the Brits who pay her way. They won't be thrilled.
Mimi said…
Harry brought this creature in and unleashed her on the world and it is my opinion that only he can get rid of her. It seems that he is unable or unwilling to quit her in anyway as I would think he could very easily refuse to have her at his side at personal appearances. When out in public with her he still appears to be besotted with her and it looks to me like he is even more into her now as evidenced by the way he is constantly putting a loving hand or arm around her back, shoulders or waist, reaching for her hand, and looking at her with that pitiful adoring look in his eyes. It is my opinion that she has an extremely strong grip on him and he is terrified of her and of crossing her. Should he ever come to his senses and asks her for a divorce I can just hear what she’d say to him.....”Go ahead! Try it! I will make your life a living hell!”
Louise said…
Eowyn: Regarding the story in the Sun about the Queen being delighted about this trip, there is absolutely nothing in the text of the article to substantiate the headline, only the musings of a self proclaimed "Royal expert".
Louise said…
Meghan's Mirror is merching the white peasant style top that Markle wore to the memorial for the murdered girl.

I don't care how many times the site claims that it is not related to Markle... because clearly they are linked to her. How else could they identify a blouse that has embroidery on the shoulder straps when the embroidery was not even visible on the memorial site photo??
PaisleyGirl said…
The white peasant top did give off strong 'pregnant' vibes to me...
The Cat's Meow said…
Summary reaction to multiple posts:

I am guessing Meghan's Mirror is run by Jessica Mulrony. Not related....but definitely connected!

I am hoping the RF will massively intervene once they return to English soil. If the story is true that they were in two separate cars post Italian wedding (one with RPOs and the other without) they could order Harry's car to be driven to an in-patient facilty, and drop Markle off at a hotel (since HMTQ owns Frogmore and any other official residences). Yes, it would be ugly, but they could easily just cut her off and put him in care. Then after treatment, if he refuses to divorce, he is banished.

Finally, if she is truly a Narc and he has been used as her "supply" he has been truly suffering abuse. Yes, he is still an adult and is responsible...but he is truly not mentally healthy. It is a perverse state of affairs where we should sympathize but cannot ignore.
NeutralObserver said…
@Louise, I believe Charlatan Duchess & Skippy have done exhaustive blogging on Meg's ties to the Meghan's Mirror crew. The thinking is she's getting a cut of everything they sell. Everyone comments on her inconsistency in the way she presents herself. I think we're all shocked because we're used to highly professional marketing. & presentation. I feel her stuff is DIY. She does stay on brand, though. She's getting pics out there of her being 'a caring humanitarian & loving mom.' I think her professional team of pr advisors are very good a placing her stuff in outlets where they think it will do most good, i.e. American women's mags. A lot of politicians in the US make a concerted effort to go after the 'low information' voter. I think Megs is going after the low information consumer, whom she can sell the dreck she merches to. Soon after the engagement was announced, the Telegraph did a story on a good-looking British designed and made, ( I believe), handbag which sold out almost immediately. It was a nice bag, & British. I don't know why she didn't stick to products like that. Not enough global reach, I guess. Perhaps the mass producers can afford bigger kick backs? This is all pure speculation, of course.
SwampWoman said…
@Louise

Meghan's Mirror is merching the white peasant style top that Markle wore to the memorial for the murdered girl.

Just when I think she can't possibly get any lower, she surprises me again.
SwampWoman said…
@ PaisleyGirl

The white peasant top did give off strong 'pregnant' vibes to me...

I don't think I can take another 8 to 11 months of inflating and deflating and shifting and folding and jiggling bumps, and I'm an American! I can't imagine how it must be for the UK folk. I imagine it is a lot like fingernails on a chalkboard, although most people do not even know how grating that is anymore.

/I'm going to slink off and feel old now, thenkyouveddymuch.
GatorGirl said…
Longtime Nutty fan from CDAN and have been loving this blog from the start! Excited to be able to comment and represent the US.
Here’s an article from Page Six that I wanted to share:

https://pagesix.com/2019/09/28/the-sneaky-ways-meghan-markle-is-fixing-her-tarnished-image/
NeutralObserver said…
Gator Girl, looked at the Page Six article. What's with the beaded bracelet spelling 'Justice?' What are they, 6 years old?
Mom Mobile said…
@GatorGirl, hmm. Just read that Page Six article. Not sure their visit is a "master class" in good PR? Honestly, I'm surprised to read that on Page Six at all since they're usually not shy about calling people out.
Mom Mobile said…
@NeutralObserver, I agree with you about the "low information consumer". That's the perfect description!
abbyh said…
That peasant top and jeans looked too casual and not covered enough for the situation. Too covered is better than too much skin exposed.
The Cat's Meow said…
Another article from the NY Post/Page Six:

https://nypost.com/2019/09/28/fbi-expands-epstein-probe-hopes-to-snare-more-prince-andrew-accusers/

Marie said…
I'm not sure she's merching the Madewell top in the obvious way, i.e. receiving a cut of each item sold. I'm beginning to wonder if she has received a large lump-sum donation from JCrew (parent company of Madewell too) to the Sussex Foundation for wearing their items. She's been wearing JCrew or Madewell in almost every public appearance involving casual clothes since the US Open in NYC. Maybe her whole trip to NYC was to arrange this?
Sooz said…
I think I read somewhere that Harry's infamous gray suit is JCrew ... so @Marie, that makes a lot of sense!
Sooz said…
Actually, maybe it's not that gray one, but some suit recently anyway (oh how I wish for an edit button!)
Marie said…
@annie31 Yes - now that you mention it. I mean Meghan wearing JCrew/Madewell might just be her choice, but getting Harry to wear JCrew suits when he's got Savile Row and they were using money from Charles anyway for their clothing budget...really starting to wonder. And this would start to make her New York trip "just to support Serena" to seem a bit less weird and might explain the ambiguous remark/possible shade made by Serena about the whole visit. I mean, Serena's been winning lots of matches before she ever met Meghan and had her support...maybe Meghan's main purpose was to be in town securing foundation monies for clothing merching and used Serena as an excuse? Like Ralph Lauren (parent company of Club Monaco) gets the dress in Archbishop Tutu photo-op for x-million dollar donation to my foundation, JCrew gets x-number of photo-ops on the SA tour in exchange for x-million dollar donation to my foundation...and so on. H&M has a corporate office in Park Avenue, which would be way more subtle than flying to Stockholm. It was strange she went completely off-radar in NYC. My tinhat is probably on too tight though lol.
Button said…
So there is an article on the Daily Fail that Megapig is on her way to Joburg and she is carrying her passport to lifelong riches,little Archie. Poor little mite. Of course she looks enamoured because the cameras are on her. Pass me the sick bucket. Ugh.
Girl with a Hat said…
she's smothering Archie again. Poor wee lad!

https://twitter.com/KeryknK/status/1178007412432879617
Mimi said…
Does she not know any other way to carry the baby besides smashing him against her chest, with his legs dangling and a blanket all tangled up around him?
Royal Fan said…
Is it just me or is there a bunch of new negative press on DOC today? Harkles strikes again? Kate’s engagement ring is controversial, Kate cried about her wedding dress designer being leaked, and Kate breaks the rules for her kids just to name the top three posts on my browser. 😡🤬😵👿
CookieShark said…
Royal Fan, you are not wrong. I have commented before that in addition to glowing PR about MM, there are far more negative stories than ever about other members of the RF.
This negative press correlates with her joining the RF, although it could be a coincidence.
Just yesterday there was an article about MM fans questioning Beatrice's engagement announcement timing.
Seriously? She couldn't have 48 hours to just enjoy her announcement before the mudslinging started?
What about questioning why on earth she supposedly had to announce her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding? Especially since, according to their own timeline, she would have been very early along?
The way the others have been torn down in the press, especially Kate, it's a miracle they can keep their composure.
Louise said…
OMG. Now Meghan's Mirror is merching a J Crew skirt that Smarkle wore to a private breakfast where she was not seen in public.

Royal Fan said…
@Louise Of course, so MM can get her cut. I wonder how JM set it up? They’ve no shame anymore! It’s blatant merching now!! She marched her baby in front of the world so she’s not going to be subtle anymore. Especially since there have been no consequences thus far!
HappyDays said…
@Mischi: Thank you for posting the palace web address. I plan to write snd mark it to the attention of Lord Geidt. I want to note that Meghan likely has a profound case of Narcissistic Personality Disorder and that no amount of public relations spin will help this toxic personality type in the long run. I plan to suggest they consult a psychiatrist or psychologist who specializes in NPD, particularly in cases when someone is married to a person with NPD. They might be so insulated that nobody has told them that Meghan has a personality disorder. They most likely know something is wrong, but nobody has either had the spine to tell them they have a woman who could
threatens the very existence of the monarchy in their midst.
Jdubya said…
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/james-weir-recaps-the-behind-the-scenes-mess-of-harry-and-meghans-tour-of-south-africa/news-story/f96e5277bdec2cc001dc21f68d84ffd7


see if you can copy and paste this one - got quite a chuckle out of it
abbyh said…
And the DM has a "nice" article on how this tour is undoing the problems. NOT according to the posters.

One specifically mentions that no British firms are promoted.

From what was posted earlier about J Crew and the appearances on this trip, I am adding one and one.

gabes_human said…
Sherlock Holmes And The Case Of The Disappearing Derrière. A short film starring MeGain Murky.

I really hope this posts. I’m still in Safari and I usually have to switch to Chrome if I want to post.

Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/julesverne12345/status/1178131611310837766/photo/2

Harry and Meghan asked to be invited into someone's home. That family spent time and money on making food for them. They only took a bite out of the food that was offered to them.
Rainy Day said…
@annie31 and @Marie. That was me who posted about Harry’s grey J Crew suit! It retails for US 650, and it’s from their Ludlow line. Definitely not high end.

Also, I’d be interested to hear from any other mothers or observant folks. Does it look strange that Meghan always carries Archie in front? I definitely remember my baby-lugging days, and I always carried my little one on my hip and switched sides so my back wouldn’t ache, and that way I always had an arm and hand free for purse, tote, bags or car keys.
Sooz said…
@jdubya ... thanks for the laugh! I have to say that one thing I like about this new linear format is that I no longer have to worry about missing comments upthread ... now it's just scroll to the end and catch up!
gabes_human said…
Ok, it worked. I like the idea of sending a letter to LG but I wonder if it would work if we had one very facile writer write it and all of us sign it rather than many sending separate complaints? My writing skills aren’t what they used to be especially since I’m limited to an IPad lately and I find it difficult to scroll back and forth to reread what I’ve written and edit.

I’m not sure I’m crazy about this new format as we can’t keep a thread running as easily but I won’t complain. Have any of you seen the MM anon puzzle on Skippy’s blog that says that the salad tossing tapes have been sold-ostensibly to HM? As shameless as M seems to be I’m not sure that is any deterrent to her grifting. Not sure she cares who knows what she’s selling as long as someone is still buying. It’s been intimated that she’s smuggling blood diamonds! I don’t put anything past her in her quest to line her pockets.

As far as Harry hoes, I’ve stated before that he needs to be deprogrammed and kept away from her while he gets the psychiatric help he needs. If he’s been documented as staying completely away from M then she would have a hard time claiming she is pregnant by H. In the event that he does file for divorce and she claims to be expecting, I think HM would be fully justified in making her submit to a medical exam. Especially since she already knows the truth about the last “pregnancy”.

Maybe we should expect the shit to hit the fan when they return from this tour and HM returns from Balmoral. She has already said she doesn’t want to hear about them but that’s probably so she can enjoy what’s left of her summer in Scotland. This whole situation has reached crisis proportions and hopefully we can expect it to end soon.
JL said…
It’s unbearable:

“Speaking to a group of prominent anti-apartheid activists and politicians, the Duchess of Sussex said : 'We can learn a certain amount from the outside, by tracking it through the news, but it's not the same as being able to truly understand what it's like on the ground.

'Much of my life I have been advocating for women and girls' rights, so this has been an incredibly powerful moment to hear first-hand from all of you.”
Scandi Sanskrit said…
@JL INSUFFERABLE.

Did Harvey Weinstein's PR firm provide her with a list of buzzwords to spew?
Scandi Sanskrit said…
I swear it's like a buzzwords checklist of words to say to appear "woke". If that' what woke looks like, I'm going back to sleep.
Meowwww said…
Welp hopefully this shows up as previous haven’t.
I think she is pregnant. Her hands want to keep fluttering onto her belly, but she controls them. Harry is on a high, he finally “matters”....except his solo stuff barely makes the news. I work with addicts, and the rumpled appearance, the searching for the next high, etc is such a telltale sign. I can spot him a mile away. And Meghan has her own agenda, so she plays nice.
I am so over the word salad.
On another note, the twitter ThisLittlePetal isn’t her. Too much simplified speech, vague photos, spelling errors. A true narc such as MM only publishes the “best”.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
", but it's not the same as being able to truly understand what it's like on the ground." 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

What does this even MEAN?

Even foreign aid workers don't talk like this.

Even the IVY LEAGUE-EDUCATED aid workers don't talk like this.

Meghan. Honey. Darling. You used to be a pleb too.

You were from "the ground" just like the rest of us.

Only the Queen of England who learns what the plebs are up to from her advisors and the paper clippings can honestly say that.

I feel kind of bad for her now...

She has no girlfriends to give her a little nudge when she's making an ass of herself does she?
Anonymous said…
@louise500, yes, I do have the more comments option, so not a problem. I can read with Safari. but when I try to comment with Safari, it disappears into the ether. So I just use Firefox. Easier. Safari has documented wonkiness.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Eh nevermind what I said about Ivy League aid workers. That was a stupid thing to say on my part.

A well-educated aid worker would *ESPECIALLY* NOT talk like that.

Speaking of buzzwords, Theranos employees used to use buzzwords out of context just to see whether Elizabeth Holmes' boyfriend (who was known to throw these Silicon Valley buzzwords around even if they didn't know what they meant) would start using them. So they'd use these really techy/bizzy words and he did start using them out of context too. Hilarious.
Mimi said…
Her magniloquent speeches make me sick. Where does she get off preaching to people wherever she goes? She has been making her stupid, hypocritical, ignorant, inappropriate, offensive speeches from day one...beginning with her own wedding! I am exhausted! I am taking a break....again! I really mean it this time!!!!!! I hope.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jdubya said…
Regarding the anon riddle on charlatan duchess, and the tapes purchased and buried. I think it is more likely PA tapes/videos vs MM tapes/videos.
Mimi said…
Oh My Goodness Elle, I have never heard you like this. I am so relieved to hear someone put into words what most of us are thinking but are too chicken to say! (so much for my taking a break)
Scandi Sanskrit said…
I wonder if she feels anything when she says that stuff.

Or is it just like, robotic?
Ellen totally nailed it. What WAS he thinking? And Meowww, I've been watching Harry closely, and yes, I agree with you, his appearance and demeanor certainly indicates he is struggle w substance abuse issues.
Someone mentioned that Meghan is starting to look like OctoMom, and my God, isn't THAT the truth? Black wig and inflatable face.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mimi said…
Elle, o.k. shhhhhhh, I won’t say a word. I have always liked your posts, the things you say, the way you express yourself, always so intelligent, sharp, clever, witty, so I was a little surprised when you used such strong language in your post to Rach. It made me so happy to hear you say what you did. It needed to be said .... ...straight up, no holds barred. She doesn’t deserve any kind of respect as she just barged her way in and has ridden rough shod over everybody from the day that unfortunate “ice cube-for-brains” Harry brought her to the doors of the RF and the world. I am going to try to take a break because seriously, this entire shit-show, that NOBODY is doing anything about, and that is getting worse and worse with no end in sight is truly wearing me down and making me SICK! But you continue to put it out there, say what NEEDS to be said.....the TRUTH!!!!! Oh, darn....I think somebody heard me.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
@mimi: re "ridden rough shod"

over everybody and probably over anyone who paid her for it, too. I guess that's fashionable w/the Christian Grey set.

As for the strong language, I did leave the "f" out lol, does that count?
Mimi said…
yes you did Elle, I noticed that! (leaving the “f” off) and it does count, so you’re still good to go!
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Irritating and insufferable as that was, though, it is quite the insight into her psyche.

If she thinks people can that easily forget that she was from "the ground" like the rest of us, no wonder she thought she could get away with saying she "didn't know much about Harry."

Hmn. Fascinating.
Artemisia19 said…
DM reports Scotland Yard spent 6.6 million last year on hotels and travel. It’s being blamed on the globe-trotting royals.
JL said…
@Elle Thank you for the laugh with your perfect posts. I do go in and out of Markle Derangement Syndrome and laughing is the remedy.
And like you I abhore women who sex their way up. BTW re all the flack Harry is getting about dressing badly (@The OnlYRealHeidi, you are right he is using/heavily self medicating) in Angola, I have no doubt MeGain hid the nice navy suit and black shoes he wore for Archbishop Tutu when he was packing. She loves to push him around and make him look bad. Her contempt for him is quite transparent. Meanwhile I think he tolerates her because she is a criminal mastermind and is raking the in the dough via merching, big donations, appearance fees, and God knows what else.
JL said…
PS Re the New York Post Page Six piece on Markle’s PR, my delighted read on this am is that it is extremely snarky to the point of sarcastic. Using the word “sneaky” in the headline is not flattering nor are the quotes about her visit to the memorial. The Post can be like that. It’s been marvelously snotty about NY’s horrid mayor and failed presidential candidate Bill de Blasio, who it turns out is very good buddies with Ken Sunshine of Sunshine Sachs. This factoid encouraged me because it means Sunshine backed a real phoney and loser in Bill just like he has backed Markle so the firm isn’t great. I also have no doubt that, ultimately, SS’s reputation will be damaged more by the Markle Effect than it will ever manage to help that of the Sussexes.
JL said…
@Artemisia the Brits will be spitting mad. Year to year a huge increase. It’s all the Harkles.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
I just Googled "average cost of solving murder".

£6.6 could solve so many unsolved crimes: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/every-murder-costs-3m-amid-emotional-and-physical-fallout-xqlrd3c90

It says 3million but that's including societal damages I think (like if if the economy lost someone of productive age) not just the burden on law enforcement/the legal system.

In the US, 17m but also the overall cost on society: http://homicidecenter.org/one-murder-costs-17-25-million/

No idea how much per case just on law enforcement.

Sorry to be morbid. I was curious.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
@JL:

That PR firm sounds terribly arrogant. It's like the people who run it are so sure of themselves they can handle the most difficult clients nobody else will touch (Weinstein, Michael Jackson). They don't do a very good job, I don't think.

Probably run by raging narcissists with an inflated sense of their own abilities.


Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ilona said…
@ Hikari I agree with you that PH is in danger of hurting himself. I unfortunately have experience of how a narcissistic mother pushed her son over the edge with her awful behaviour. He was a fine young man who fought to make it on his own but had mental problems (as has his sister) and the mother totally ignored him. No matter what the rest of us did to show him love and appreciation it was not enough. I then tried to help his sister who being a narcissist, too (I did not realise it at the time) used me for a while and then "threw me away" when I was no longer needed. Thankfully I am surrounded by strong family members and friends and I put the whole experience down as a very important lesson.
I like PH and I would like him to get away from her clutches. It doesn't matter if he is privileged and 35. He is a vulnerable human being (I work with the vulnerable and I see how difficult it is to overcome one's problems). As for making mistakes, we all do.
Ilona said…
@ Rainy Day. Of course, it's unnatural. All that shielding with the blanket (in hot weather?!) is abnormal. The whole world has seen the baby by now. Why the secrecy? Not to mention that she doesn't even know (or have any natural instinct) of how to hold a real baby.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids