Skip to main content

Open Post: Day 2 of Meg and Harry's South Africa Trip

Day One of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's official trip to Africa went surprisingly well.

Meg's wardrobe was better than usual, although she did show a slightly excessive amount of decollatage, at least for daytime, in a black-and-white cotton wrap dress made in nearby Malawi.

Prince Harry, unfortunately, appeared to be freeballin' it beneath his crumpled trousers. His continued poor grooming suggests larger health problems, mental or physical or both. He trailed behind Meg all day.

Anyway, Meg's second dress of the day was a rewear of a blue shirtdress that first appeared on the Sussexes' previous tour of Oceania.

Meg likes this dress; a photo of her wearing it graces the Royal thank-you notes she sends out to her fans.

The ring question

The only sour note was the apparent absence of Meg's diamond engagement ring, although some commmenters suggested that perhaps she had just turned it around.

Diamonds are a fraught topic in Africa due to the "blood diamonds" controversy, and there were also sour suggestions that Meg was afraid to wear her rock for fear it might fall victim to local criminals.

The whole diamond ring thing was a lost opportunity for Meg's paid cheerleaders at Sunshine Sachs.

Here's how it's done, boys: a few days before the trip, you plant a story about how Meg has "damaged" her ring at home while lovingly caring for Archificial and a "stone has fallen out" and it was "rushed to the jeweler to be repaired."

Oh dear, the ring can't come along to Africa. The repair is taking too long. We'll pick it up when we get back to London. 

Media coverage of the trip

Media coverage of the trip was mostly positive, with almost all of the UK papers featuring the expected photos of Meg with pretty African children on their front pages.

That's all well and good, but they're only going to do that once. Better come up with something else for subsequent tour days.

Comments

hello nutty, the thing about the engagement ring seems logical to me that she didn't use it, they are in areas that look somewhat poor and the most logical thing is not to look ostentatious ... wearing a dress from a previous trip and another dressed in a lower price ... it makes sense if you want to paint yourself as a humanitarian.


  by the way excellent blog and sorry for my english.
Liver Bird said…
Must say I've been impressed by her thus far. If she keeps it up, I might even have to change my opinion on her, and that would never do!

They flew commercial, gave us a glimpse of the golden child, she wore a reasonably priced African made dress to the first event and repeated a dress to the next (not sure why an outfit change was required at all but that's a minor point), and seemed engaged with the people at her events. I even think not wearing the engagement ring was a smart move, as it would be a more than a little tacky to flash super-expensive diamonds in a poor township. Yes, her 'I am am a woman of colour and your sister too' speech was cringey, but not outrageous.

So all in all, credit where it's due, I have to say, good show Megz. Now about your husband.... had he taken full advantage of the free bar in the first class lounge or what?
Nutty Flavor said…
Never worry about your English! We can understand you just fine.

I agree it was a good idea not to look ostentatious. I just think a convenient pre-planned cover story would have eliminated the diamond issue entirely.

They knew enough not to send Meg in a tiara, so they should have also figured out that the diamond might be an issue.
Nutty Flavor said…
Yeah, Harry looked awful. Maybe he'll pep up a little on his side trips without Meg.

Although I think this was one of Meg's better days, I wouldn't say she's winning me over.

She didn't connect well with her African audiences, in my opinion.

And really, what's in it for them? Here comes an American lady and a bloke from the UK, let's line up and have our pictures taken. Are they coming with a contribution to the cause or not?

Meg's speech was really for Western media consumption.
Liver Bird said…
In fairness royals never bring contributions to the charities. The idea is that their mere presence, and the attendant media coverage, will highlight the causes. Most of the locals seemed quite happy to have them at the events. Maybe you're right about the way she interacted with them - I only saw still pics rather than videos so will have to look again. But overall I do think she did a good job yesterday. If she was like this all the time I suspect few people would have a problem with her.

The question is, what has brought about this change in demeanour, and will it last? Is this SS finally earning their fee? It doesn't seem like their style. Or has the palace finally put its foot down and told them no more shenanigans... or else? If so, why is the queen's grandson still looking like he slept in his clothes and had a few too many?

I will be watching with interest!
Nutty Flavor said…
Perhaps the change of demeanor is linked to their new Foreign Office handler, Fiona McUnspellableName.

At any rate, dressing down works well for Meg. She appears friendly and accessible. If she really wants a “brand” that would be different from Will and Kate’s, this would be a good one.
I admit her first day looks like a good start. But....only for the reasons that she and her camp utilized Kate’s tactics — her low-key fashion, “dancing” and interacting pleasantly with locals, and finally showing Archie.

On the one hand, Meghan is probably quite pleased with her success of a day. On the other hand, it probably kills her that she hasn’t been able to win with her own strategy and that she had to try mirroring Kate instead.

Also, finally showing Archie must have been a real kick in the gut for Meghan. He was her biggest bargaining chip for money, and now she was forced to show him publicly in order to gain some desperately needed positive press.
Liver Bird said…
I don't think she's really 'mirroring Kate'. It's pretty much the norm for royals to be low key and modest. They're supposed to be there as representative of HM, not as 'stars' in their own right. Megz hadn't got that message previously. Maybe she has now? Let's see.
Liver Bird said…
So it seems the Harkles are giving their fist interview since the birth of Arche to... CNN. An American channel. That's obviously going to annoy the British RRS big time, which of course her sugars will see as a major result. What they don't understand is that it's incredibly foolish to piss off the British press - they're not going anywhere and they don't forget. That's why the other royals - even William, who hates the media because of what he considers their role in Diana's death - have come to a sort of modus vivendi with them. We give you access, and in return you play nice with us. It more or less works for the other royals, but not of course for the Harkles. But it's really not clever to make an enemy of the British press. Not clever at all.
Nutty Flavor said…
Interesting choice. CNN has terrible ratings these days, far below FoxNews and MSNBC, and it's particularly weak in the younger demographic the Sussexes claim to be after.

CNN has, however, been very supportive in the "It's all racism!" narrative Meg wants to promote.

Personally, I think that's a losing strategy, and "laid back California girl in the British Royal Family" could take her much further.
Nutty Flavor said…
Oh, I think she can still milk a lot out of Archie.

Show off his "tufts of red hair", show him in cute little outfits, show him looking cute at home.

Definitely a shot of him interacting with something old and Royal/a gift from someone Royal/something of Diana's.

Here's Archie with Diana's favorite teddy bear!
Liver Bird said…
Yeah I agree. If she'd played by the rules, and just added a bit of 'yoga and avocados', mainly playing up (inventing?) her 'Hollywood' career for a touch of added glamour, she could have been on to a winner with the British people, most of whom, despite what you'll hear from the 'racism' brigade, were quite favourable to her when she first married Harry.

And alienating the British press is terribly stupid. After all, it's not CNN who'll be there when she open an old folks home in Basingstoke or visits a sheep farm in Wales, is it? Then again, I guess she feels she's above all that stuff so it probably doesn't matter for her. Foolish.
PaisleyGirl said…
I agree, she looks pretty good when dressed down and casual. As you say, friendly and accessible. It would be good to continue that trend when back in the UK: no more expensive designer dresses but high street finds combined with slightly more expensive British brands. On another topic: in the pictures this morning she looks like she might be pregnant. Or is that just my imagination? And what is going on with Harry's hair? He is losing it very fast and his hairstyle is adding to his unkempt look. He needs to have the back trimmed at least.
Seeing today's pictures I think they have very much decided to go with the 'laid back California girl in British Royal Family' image for her. Both of them are super casual with their clothes. Meg is wearing a jean jacket and jeggings (really?!?) With messy hair. Her get up is the female equivalent of Harry's grey suit. And Harry is just so meh. Both look like your typical tourists.

And the appearances so far are also quite strategic - young children, dancing, centre for girls, self defense classes... It's the age demographic, happy faces photoops that they aim at. Nothing serious so far.

Let's see what the rest of the week brings.
Nutty Flavor said…
I see that Meg has decided "parenting" is her new strength; at least this is what she told an African coach teaching her a "power hand" ritual as part of a mindfulness exercise.

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-opens-up-about-parenting-with-prince-harry-hes-the-best-dad/

Maybe the surrogate really has turned over Archificial!

If not, she really does have balls of tungsten.
hardyboys said…
I think shes trying really hard to turn around the bad press. Someone commented on Harry's teeth so I did a close up. They r gross and yellow. He defo self medicates. I agree with Nutty archie is MMs ace up her sleeve. I think she looks nice and she looks like the bad press hasn't bothered her at all and shes still trying. That's enough to turn the tide. Everybody loves an underdog she should play that role and she can come kn top. Nutty i dont see why she has to do a big long prologue on what happened to her diamond ring. Its pretty obvious dont wear it bc its ostentatious and your arm could get hacked off. I wouldn't wear diamonds to india ever. It's too dangerous. Not saying anything would happen but why create temptation. So far they are keeping it light dancing with school children. Let's see how they hold up when they meet boring officials and have to appear interested. Day 2 and MM is working on turning the tide...and shes doing a good job. They are talking about what great parents they are....positive press
SwampWoman said…
My goodness, she is TINY in flats.
hardyboys said…
Ok so now I'm thinking all her gleeful and joyful pictures are designed for insta. The ink isn't even dry on the pics and shes posted them already showing how happy cheerful and delightful she is. I read some of the DM comments today. The vitriol and hate is still there. It's hard for me to think someone is so delightful and gleeful when they hate their dad bc he took 2 pics of himself measuring himself getting a suit fitted. Ffs give the man a break. I'm not even Christian and I know love thy father. Shes such a fake pompous arrogant ass
Louise said…
This would have been the perfect opportunity for her to wear the white shirt from her Smart Works collection, but I guess she didn't want anyone to make the white shirt-Mischa Nonoo-$14,000 Valentino dress connection.

Clever.
Jen said…
@Liverbird...the black and white dress and shoes were very Kate. That's very much her style.
Louise said…
Paisley Girl: I have the same body type as Markle. We carry weight in the middle of the body, while keeping skinny arms and legs, like Mrs Potato Head (if anyone remembers those).

I have been mistaken for early pregnacy when I put on weight.
Lilalee said…
Her not wearing the ring doesn’t bother me too much. I mean it really doesn’t look like anything special (though I do like the simplicity of it) and I do know about the whole blood diamond issues so I can understand. Diana didn’t always wear her ring either. I’m actually surprised Kate wears it ALL the time. Diana used hers more as an accessory than a permanent engagement ring.
As for her dresses. I really do not understand her love for belted dresses and coats. They are just so messy and unkempt looking. I know her figure isn’t perfect but there are other ways to mask it. I’m just not a fan of the sloppy belt ties. And what is up with her rug burns again on her knees? She just comes across as a mess and awkward looking.
As for success, yes it seems so since SS has inundated the papers with fluff piece after another.
Girl with a Hat said…
and she had huuuuuge feet.
Girl with a Hat said…
I don't think she did as well as you all seem to think she did. She looked clumsy and artificial in her demeanour and the women surrounding her didn't seem to be impressed with her. The children had to be cajoled to approach her.

And that woman running out of the crowd to embrace Harry and her seemed too contrived. Where was security to stop her?
CookieShark said…
What happens after the South Africa tour? Do they go back to talking up Travalyst (still not sure what that is)? Have we earned our respite for enduring the PR marathon that has been in a blitz since July? How will MM get supply now that the Vogue issue, Smart Works, & the SA trip have wrapped? Does Harry get a new suit & shoes?

I liked her wrap dress yesterday. In typical MM style though, she showed up at the event and grabbed the mic. I would have advised touring for a few days, thanking the citizens for hosting them at events, and engaging in some active listening rather than the fresh off the flight pontificating.
PaisleyGirl said…
Louise, I remember Mrs Potato Head, ha ha. In fact, I used to own a Mr Potato Head in the 1970's. I'm not body shaming Markle in any way, she just appeared in the early stages of pregnancy to me, perhaps also because she is fuller in the face and has this glow about her (although that may be the massive bronzer application she favours...).
CookieShark said…
Just saw Scobie's Twitter post in which MM says that "No matter where you are, everyone is dealing with a different version of the same thing" re: mental health.

Word salad at its best! Someone from SS needs to get them to stick with the script, and fast.

"Harry and I enjoy learning about mental health from the experts who so kindly advise us on these projects."
Girl with a Hat said…
over at DM, people were complaining that her black and white dress was very low cut and we could see a lot of her breasts, and this on an appearance with children. I hadn't noticed but she kept the buttons of her second dress unbuttoned and her bra was also visible.
I didn't like the look either. It was too clumsy. Hair everywhere, she looked bland and sweaty. Seemed to be wearing Harry's white shirt from yesterday, husband shirt bahh. Unroyal. Deliberately as non royal as she could possible look.
gabes_human said…
Good morning all. Well, for a first day I think MeGain did a good job. She wasn’t swanning around in God-awful, ill-fitting, expensive couture. She did flash “Archie” for a hot minute but we still haven’t gotten a good look at him or seen him actually move. Maybe she doesn’t know that her nephew Louis has stolen our hearts and that A (if he’s real) could do the same thing. I do wonder how long she’ll be able to keep up her good behaviour. She was still rushing in front of Harry which she should know better than by now even though he looked a mess. Those damn grey suits! Maybe Santa will visit him early with a parcel from Seville Row. I think she will get back on her high horse as soon as H is gone and probably has some speaking engagements lined up for a fee. I hope H will be in a better mood when he meets up with Adam which I believe is his reason for being there in the first place. My local news has already been reporting on them and the plan d’ jour although neither of them had put in an appearance yet. It seems that today is a local holiday so the schools are out and there’s a parade planned. I’m just going to wait and see what happens.
Girl with a Hat said…
I find that Kate, even when she dresses in jeans, looks extremely well groomed and put together. Meghan, not so much.
Ava C said…
I particularly dislike the photos on DM today of Harry and Meghan kissing. As if they're on a film poster kissing I mean. The only time they should be doing that, as part of their royal lives, is on the balcony of Buckingham Palace on their wedding day. They can do it all they want if they leave the BRF. For me, this tour looks like a foretaste of their future as Harry and Meghan. Not as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
Nelo said…
Seems the supreme Court, the queen and Boris Johnson news has overtaken the Sussex tour
Girl with a Hat said…
yes, quite a shock. And it was a unanimous decision.
Girl with a Hat said…
I meant she HAS huge feet. I've never seen anything like it.
Girl with a Hat said…
did you see these pics? her in a headscarf and a tent for a visit to a mosque?

Oh.my.God! the dress is too long and too big, and the headscarf looks like a winter scarf she put on her head.
gabes_human said…
Mischi, lol, I didn’t say she was great but she hadn’t told her hostess to F$$k Off or asked “Do you know who I am?” There’s still plenty of time for her to lob a pot of tea. I know she’s a bitch but I wonder how much of her high-handedness in Aus was showing off because Jessica was with her. We still have nine days for her true colors to show.
CookieShark said…
@ Mischi, I agree 100% the dress was too low cut. She has left buttons undone before, I believe she did this at a wedding shortly after their marriage. Fine for Instagram, but not for representing HM. I think with the low cut dress yesterday she was going for the "I'm breastfeeding" story but it's just not believable. She would have needed pads for her bra or a bra cami underneath the dress. And if Archie still needs to feed so regularly, she wouldn't be able to make all of the engagements, especially sitting through a tennis match or a lavish wedding. Within a few hours you have to feed the baby or pump.
Miss_Christina said…
Cynical me thinks the outfit choices aren't because Megs is trying to do her job better, but is a combo of not being able to buy anything lately, or find a company willing to lend her more expensive stuff, or an inability to fit her larger square self into anything, with a dash of SS practically forcing her to leave the big fancy jewels at home this time.
SwampWoman said…
CookieShark, it does give one pause. I will have to spend all day wandering about pondering on how my mental health problems are exactly the same yet different from anybody else's. Those South Africans in the township that have a 1 out of 200 chance of being murdered will likely have quite different mental health challenges than I do. The South African women who can't allow their infants out of their sight for fear that they will be raped have waaaaay different mental health problems than I do. In their cases, killing strangers and known baddies would seem to be a survival strategy, not a mental health issue.
I had to go looking for the Sussex’s articles...a first ever! Little buries politics.
Yeah the head scarf looks like a last minute grab. Doesn't gonwith the outfit. Nor does her hair style. And outfit seems to be made of rexine! What material is that?!! She needs a stylist AND a mirror asap.

She seems to be very intent on showing off her extensions. The middle parting is so obvious, and she keeps parting it like a curtain. It's almost like a substitute for the baby bump.

Her entourage had a hairdresser, whatever happened to him/her? These hair styles are so basic Archie's nanny could have done these.
Well they are a tacky pair, what else could we expect? They constantly go in for PDA’s, so kissing for all and sundry to see is the next step...downwards! 🙄🤮
Miss_Christina said…
She's a mess. A complete mess. She does know the head scarf is supposed to cover her hair, right?
Girl with a Hat said…
Miss_Christina, not necessarily completely cover her hair, but some of it. It looks like she is too vain to wear a headscarf! LOL
SwampWoman said…
Wait, what? I thought that you were supposed to wear a headscarf and a tent to visit mosques! (Hey, it beats bra or boob flashing.) She looked surprisingly good in that color; it isn't one that many can wear well.
Girl with a Hat said…
She also left one button too many unbuttoned on her white shirt with the jean jacket. From the side, her bra was very visible. Again, this is an event with children.
Girl with a Hat said…
gabes, LOL! that's setting the bar pretty low.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/goo_gunner/status/1176465787306930178
PaisleyGirl said…
That dress was way too long though...
PaisleyGirl said…
Miss Christina, you're absolutely right, but this may turn out to be a good thing. More inexpensive outfits and less flashy jewelry may endear her more to the British public than her ill-fitting ten thousand pound dresses..
hardyboys said…
The things this stupid couple has to do to eat....you have to fly to SA and do these outings....it has to be stupendously boring...and that dress doesn't go with the head scarf...nice try Diana -2.0...….she keeps changing and changing...out of 5 outfits the only one that is nice is the blue dress....Harry doesn't appear to be in coke withdrawal today...
SwampWoman said…
Yeah, length would probably work better wearing stilettos. Maybe that is how she tried it on. (I've screwed up on length when trying on something with a shoe other than what I would be wearing it with.) OTOH, she has never been bothered by length or fit before, why start now? I think being covered up was a win. No spangles, no see through, no visible thighs or boobs, win.

I suppose that I have lowered the bar for acceptable fashion and behavior to ground level. It used to be that I expected them to be appropriately turned out for the job with professional behavior. Now I'm happy with them wearing actual clothes and undergarments with no sex in public.

Mischi, I wear that color very well. I may be outraged that she is out-swamping me.

Tin Hatter said…
The headscarf was totally a fail. She obviously didn't consult or learn from the Muslims she met when working on her cookbook. The photos I saw of her in the headscarf show cleavage. SO disrespectful for a mosque visit.
Girl with a Hat said…
Tinny, also, you are supposed to cover your arms in a mosque, and not touch people of the opposite sex. She was hugging some men. The hair was barely covered and was a complete mess.

I didn't like the dress, at all. It really didn't do her any favours.
hildarumpole said…
She's a sloppy mess for the mosque visit. Bare arms, cleavage, scarf thrown on her head as an afterthought, hair poking out all over the place. It's disrespectful. Her rear end looks like it got some artificial assistance.
JL said…
It feels like the British people are paying for their second honeymoon. The low cut dress was pregnancy signaling or for Harry, it’s never about the actual event.


JL said…
The only thing I can think of re their branding themselves as “mental health ambassadors,” is a) how laughable it is that two peoplr with such obvious issues have chosen this and more importantly, b) how this was William and Kate’s chosen issue then they agreed to share it for the Fab Four. Harry decided to take the issue and run with it for himself all the way to Oprah and in direct competition to the DOCs. What an ass.

JL said…
In addition to the teeth you point out, what is it with the brown shoes????? Doesn’t he own another pair, some hiking boots? He’s unkept.
JL said…
Touching the hair constantly is gross because of the amount of product on it. Then she shakes hands on passes the product on. Shudder.
Miss_Christina said…
And is that a........buttpad under the dress? What in the actual hell?
JL said…
Re Harry looking awful Nutty. In addition to the weight loss and unhealthy pallor, which is marked, I noticed in the video of them arriving at Nonoo’s wedding that he has quite a hunch now, like the weight of the world is in his shoulders, which in a way it is.
Liver Bird said…
I don't mind the half on half off headscarf so much as the handholding. They're supposedly at 'work', representing HM, and in a place of worship. Would it kill them to act like adults for 5 minutes? This whole 'tour' seems more like a holiday than an official royal tour.
hildarumpole said…
JL, Meghan is a chronic copycat. This entire trip is about improving the reputation of these two. Whatever nonsense comes out of their mouths is irrelevant. It's the images of the smiling, hugging, waving, kissing, clapping, laughing, hand holding pair with their South African props beamed to the world that are important, to finally get everyone to realize, they truly are as awesome as they think they are in their own heads.
Girl with a Hat said…
Miss_Christina, yes, it does seem she thought it was a good idea to pad her back side this time instead of her pregnant belly.
Liver Bird said…
Also... a denim jacket on a royal tour? I get looking casual and approachable, but denim is not appropriate.

And lest I be accused of being sexist by only focussing on the woman's attire.... Haz is an absolute mess from scuffed shoes to balding head. Again, casual is one thing, unkempt is another. You're (supposedly?) representing queen and country. Make a bit of effort ffs!
punkinseed said…
Well said SwampWoman. SA women, along with the migrant Nigerian women and kids surely are in a constant state of flight or fight awareness.
The first time I recall learning the definition of "word salad" was in college in psych. class. The reference was about how people with mental health disorders string words together that don't make sense to anyone but themselves.
Ha haaaa. Megs using her favorite buzzword again: "... who so KINDLY..." sheesh.
Girl with a Hat said…
swamp woman, I just saw your comment about the algae green dress. LOL
Nelo said…
Saw this on LSA: "Also, spotted in the pages of Tatler - how Meghan called the designer of Oscar de la Renta (even though he has no idea how she got his number) and gave him a self important 15 minute speech on dressing her mother"
PaisleyGirl said…
@Veena: Perhaps i am very naive but I didn't know about the connection between yellow teeth and drugs/medication. I just figured he was perhaps a heavy smoker or had been a smoker in the past. What kind of medication does yellow teeth indicate?
abbyh said…
As a side note, the exposure in the bra/shirt does not show appropriate modesty in a mosque.

Liver Bird said…
I also think that she's definitely wearing Pippa-esque butt pads! Yes, I know pregnancy can change your body but it doesn't give you a perfectly rounded little bum where none previously existed. And just when she was doing so well....
Girl with a Hat said…
Liver, she can only act sane for a short period of time before the crazy comes out. She had to pack those butt pads in her luggage beforehand. Twirling motion of finger near my temple. To those people who said that she was trying to be a Kardashian - you were right!
Girl with a Hat said…
Paisley, I found this:

Whether snorting cocaine in its powder form or smoking the substance, the chemicals in cocaine can wreak havoc on the system, and it all starts inside the mouth. A healthy human body needs a number of nutrients to run efficiently; ingesting powder cocaine on a daily basis will strip the body of its essentials, such as vitamin C and calcium.
Button said…
Hello all..I have been following Nuttys` blog since the beginning, but each time I tried to post it never worked. I really enjoy the commentary and all the contributors. Anyway, I really think that perhaps someone very senior had a word with Wrinkle and Crinkle and told them " Toe the bloody line and behave or bugger off ". Crinkle is just putting on a show. I have a sense of impending doom in that I don't think she is going anywhere. We of the Commonwealth are stuck with her.
hardyboys said…
I'm not racist whatsoever, but I'm not a fan of Dorito's hair at any of her daughter's functions. Her daughter who is white has to wear extensions from all the chemical straightners she has been killing her hair with for the last 20 years while Mom who is black insists on wearing her hair in braids. Again, I'm an Indian female who was called Paki a lot growing up so I'm not being judgmental, but why can't these two just get it right like Michelle Obama, Oprah or Gayle King with their hair between the two of these bumpkins? One is white the other one is black. FFS. The Oscar outfits Dorito wore were classy enough for a woman who likes to wear tracksuits 24/7.
Liver Bird said…
Keeping Up With The Harkles - the Africa episode.
Girl with a Hat said…
No one thinks you're racist for saying this, Veena. There are tons of WOC whose hair looks great no matter how they style it. But matted or fake aren't good looks no matter who you are.

The overuse of hair extensions which make your hair look fake with the addition of tons of pomade to tame it, isn't a good look on anyone.
SwampWoman said…
@Miss Christina, oh, my, I just saw the rear view of the dress. It is always appropriate to wear a huge fake a$$ in an extremely conservative house of worship, right? (Especially one that would immediately kill a female of their own religion for dressing and acting as she did.)

Well, she had a one-day streak of dressing almost appropriately. I suppose it will be all downhill from here.
SwampWoman said…
Oh, I agree 1,000 percent that Harry is an absolute mess. Good grief. All he has to do is wear a pressed suit (in any color except that nasty grey) but nooooooo.
FGB said…
Anyone who thinks Meghan gets attacked for racist reasons should go back and read the comments about Kate on articles like this.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2203059/Kate-Middleton-makes-visit-mosque--wears-veil-attire-like-Princess-Diana-did.html#comments
Marie said…
This tour is definitely better. But it seems there was a lot of intervention, as you see the unsupervised Meghan pop out every now and again, like in the make-out session with Harry at the kids' surf club to show everyone how much in love they are after the earlier series of photos in the blue dress where he looks positively annoyed with her, the sexy bedhead/beachwaves hair and open-chest dress barely covered by a headscarf as if to say that she doesn't quite approve of the patriarchal, anti-women-empowerment parts of Islam, and so on.

I still think they behave as if they're on a holiday or third honeymoon. And the hypocrisy of being a humanitarian when she uses her dad on her Insta to improve her image and then cast him off without even sending him an invitation to the wedding or introducing him to her fiancé visit him, not to mention that the boring events like cutting ribbons at dull village fairs or talking to poor, underserved youth centers in Britain do not seem to fit into her vision of what her royal role is. Until she does these things, like reconcile with her dad (who cares about her sister) and primarily do the unglamorous events in the UK without mingling with Hollywood friends or use the opportunity to pretend she had a career in fashion or use POC as props for how woke she is, I'm not going to be convinced.
HappyDays said…
In light of the public outrage over the endless OTT spenfing spree by these two, which is no doubt heavily influenced by Meghan, Charles might have reduced Meghan’s clothing allowance to force her to wear more moderately priced clothes and re-wear other items.

But I am likely dreaming. Charles is spineless and narcissists do not improve their behavior. They only get worse. This trip is likely a breather from spending brought on solely by SS snd perhaps some of their personal staff and maybe Lord Geidt.

An appropriate reminder for this trip for those who might be fooled by Meghan: Leopards never change their spots.
JL said…
Hildarumpole, I don’t think you realized that I went off the topic if the tour and was speaking to a)Harry’s interview in the Telegraph on his seeking mental health counseling (hope he is again mow) and b) thr upcoming TV series on mental health he is doing with Oprah. Now even Markle is spouting off about it. My point: mental health is a William and Kate initiative so the competition is interesting. Of course the tour is all obnoxious optics. But they have this mental health series bubbling in the cauldron as well. Not a good look to have competing royals.
JL said…
Overuse of extensions is also foolish because plenty of WOC have permanent hair loss as a result.
Ugh, that horrid, diarrhoea, baby-poo coloured long dress she wore 😖 not to mention the continued pawing at Harry Was it really appropriate to hug that muslim man outside the mosque? thought muslim men weren't allowed to even shake a woman's hand if she's not his wife or an immediate relation? 🤔
Liver Bird said…
So now they're at the 'do' at the embassy, and she's wearing another dress she wore on the Australia tour last year. What's going on? She never used to repeat anything, yet now we've had 3 repeats in 2 days? And for a - supposedly - official tour? Nobody would mind if she wore new pieces so long as they were reasonably priced. So why all the 'repeats'? She's definitely on a PR mission but why and at whose prompting?
SwampWoman said…
Veena, I think getting rid of the hair was a business decision on her part. In order to play women of different ethnicities, her hair had to cooperate and not scream "black woman". If I were her, I'd have had my hairdresser give me a *very* short Pixie-type cut and wear short wigs (if necessary) during the re-grow period once I had that royal wedding ring. She may have some alopecia from the straightening treatments, though.

I think the curly hair would be a better nod to her ethnic background than all the fake bronzer on the face while having Casper the friendly ghost legs.
Girl with a Hat said…
Swampie, you know even if she was seen to be wearing wigs of different types, it wouldn't be the end of the world. Hair is a big issue with WOC and we can all sympathise. Who hasn't had one day of untameable hair? But to pretend that that excessive amount of hair is her own is an insult to our intelligence.

The same thing she should have used with her infertility - be upfront about it.
HappyDays said…
It’s incredibly ironic that these two are spouting off about mental health.

They both need a good psychiatrist or psychologist, but even a top notch psychiatrist or psychologist can’t help someone who doesn’t think they have a mental health issue and that it’s everyone else who is in the wrong.
NeutralObserver said…
Just so puzzling. Today's pics make the Harkles look very much like the RF's B or C team. The two DDC teams are always impeccably turned out when they're overseas. Do the Harkles come across as approachable, or just sloppy? Yesterday, I thought they had turned a page & were embarking on redeeming themselves. I'm confused as to how 'official' this visit is. It doesn't have any of the bells & whistles that their Commonwealth tour seemed to. Were the reports of a huge entourage traveling with them just planted by Lord Geidt for a laugh? Curiouser & curiouser.
Emily said…
I think that by her wearing these dresses from the last tour, is meant to help with her image. Part of her PR drive for this tour. Hoping that she gets the same praise that Kate gets for wearing an outfit more than once. The problem is her body shape has changed from last year, so they no longer fit properly, not that they ever did.
Button said…
I think Wrinkle and Crinkle realise just how bad things have become re: the general consensus with the public and have come to the conclusion that unless they really really step up and behave they will be tossed out on their collective arses, without titles, without Chazs` money, without a proverbial pot to piss in. But as someone mentioned above, a leopard cannot change its` spots.
Liver Bird said…
"Wrinkle and Crinkle" - very good!

Maybe they have finally received a stern warning from the palace, which would be great. But I still think she could get away with a modestly priced new dress from a British or South African designer, so clearly she is trying to Make A Point. Also, I wonder if it's any accident that all the pieces she's 'repeated' in these 2 days have been from the Oz tour?

And while I might say that the dress she's wearing now, while suitable for a beach in Oz, is a bit casual for an official embassy reception, the real mess here is Harry. The Queen's grandson, on a supposedly official tour in the British embassy, wearing dirty shoes and a wrinkled suit he's been wearing since he landed, and during the flight going by the state of it? It's just so disrespectful to his hosts, his family and indeed to Britain.
JL said…
So they decide to make out. LOL. Dumb and dumber. Or they are just so excited that the tour seems an outstanding success to them that they can’t restrain themselves.
Button said…
Oh dear..yes there is that, and it was so .....icky. That's the best I can come up with!
There are a few more days to go on this jolly and I think the best is yet to come.
Ombrofil65 said…
Just saw the pictures of Kate.

And if Kate got critisism for that, people should be screaming at MM. Actually MM should just have been shown out of the mosque.
FGB said…
Thought the same thing. At least Kate knew to cover her arms and chest. And most of her hair.
MaLissa said…
At least his shoes don't have holes in them this time. @LiverBird I agree - denim jacket on a royal tour? Kate had casual on her royal tours and she looked immaculate not a hot mess like Murky.
SwampWoman said…
I wonder because she is "recycling" the clothing from the pregnancy tour.
While it might be most other royals’ norm to be low-key, I’be noticed Meghan usually wears high-end, expensive styles, often ill-fitted, excessive jewelry and shoes that are too big. Her overall appearance at past events has been more along the line of inappropriate or out of touch. On her first day in SA, her style was much more toned down and as if she was trying to be more presentable and relatable, much more like Kate is at her appearances. And presenting Archie in a normal, casual manner with his face shown seems the go in the face of her “privacy” tradition, and much more like Kate/Will are in giving the press some access to the kiddos.

@Nutty I do think you’re right that’s she will definitely find ways to mercy off of Archie, I would suspect that a magazine cover with hos first public appearance is perhaps off the table since he’s been revealed coming off the plane (?)
MaLissa said…
Well, it's to let the rest of us mere mortals know that they're "so in love and they show it almost 2 years on (unlike that other couple who don't ever show it) and we should eat our hearts out" /grabs the sick bucket

Honestly - this is a working tour isn't it? So they should be a bit professional shouldn't they? All the PDA and hand holding is just so inappropriate. @Button - I love the new names - Wrinkle and Crinkle :) LOL
Ilona said…
I quite agree with Lilalee re the belted dresses. I find that long green shiny one totally ridiculous. Combined with the fly away hair under that flowing scarf and those girly flats. Perhaps I am getting too old ...
Ava C said…
On BBC TV News at 6pm this evening the royal tour was in the "and now for other news" section at the end of the bulletin, for under 10 seconds. Nothing shown of note. Mainly a load of dancing skirts, as if we're back to old Pathé newsreels and it was Harry rather than a young Duke of Edinburgh (I know which one I'd choose). Today's a heavy news day in the UK, to say the least, but feels like Harry and Megan will easily become afterthoughts for good, unless she manages to stave this off by good behaviour. There are some signs that she's trying, but Harry's not helping at all. In appearance he's coming across as a grudging adolescent, forced out of bed by his elders. Personal grooming is not on his radar.
PaisleyGirl said…
I noticed that as well: the recycling of the (early) pregnancy clothes from last tour and the fuller face and figure. I would not be surprised if she is pregnant, for real this time.
Liver Bird said…
Agreed. Unless you're a 'royal watcher' chances are you'd have no clue that this tour is even happening. The fact that there's a LOT going on in real news doesn't help of course, but even if it were a slow day, I really don't think too many people care if Cringe 'n' Ginge are dancing with kids in Cape Town. Fast forward 10 years, with the Harkles well into middle age and the Cambridge kids growing into adulthood, and they'll be a footnote, assuming they're still together which I doubt.

Also agree with you about hypothetically choosing between Hazbeen and the young Duke of Edinburgh. The latter was absolutely gorgeous in his day and even if he may not have been the nicest person, did have a certain manly bearing to him. Haz? Not so much.
PaulaMP said…
I can't get past her looks/behavior in the mosque. And people try and tell us how intelligent she is.
HappyDays said…
Liver Bird, I think her funding might have been cut or sone other serious threat was made, or Harry might be waking from his lust coma.

Unfortunateky, like all good narcs, Meghan will be nice to get what she wants and then return to her usual behavior. As some others here have commented, she has had some public slips already on this tour. And I still am guessing she’s still nasty in private at the places they are staying when away from the cameras.

I read that during last fall’s tour, she was pleasant to staffers she judged to be good looking and very rude to the ones who weren’t.
Nutty Flavor said…
Welcome Button! For others who are having trouble posting, I have heard that the Safari browser makes it easier.
Ava C said…
Liver Bird, you've made me think further about comparisons with the Duke of Edinburgh. Just think, he's royal himself and a proud man. He was captain of a ship in the Royal Navy, enjoyed his career and got deep satisfaction from it. He fought in the Second World War. Yet for royal events and tours he followed all the rules and gave precedence to the Queen. There were also the entrenched, traditional male/female roles of the time, that he had to overcome, as a very traditional man, as they were reversed for him. He overcame them.

Compare Meghan to this. Her acting CV is negligible and at times embarrassing. She's not of royal birth and as a woman she doesn't have the reversal of male/female roles to overcome (which still exist in lesser form) so it wouldn't be so embarrassing to give precedence to Harry. Yet she pushes in, cuts him off and walks ahead. And even if she was, for example, both a princess and a brilliant surgeon or QC, she would still have to give way. Yet she never seems to get it. The constant PDAs are perhaps her way of smudging the rules of precedence out of existence. By clinging on to Harry, she's No. 1 too. After all, she did it not just on a DIY tour like today, but at the Lion King premiere.

Even more damning is a comparison to an equivalent couple today. Jack and Eugenie. Someone posted photos today on the Lizzie blog of their visit to the hospital that helped Eugenie with her scoliosis, where she was in intensive care for three days. This was back in March I believe, and it passed me by at the time. Eugenie is dressed neatly and elegantly and Jack supports her perfectly. He stands and walks where he should, when he should. As at their wedding, they are the breath of fresh air, not H&M, as they behaved as proper representatives of the royal family.

In the programme for the Queen's 90th birthday I was also impressed by the interviews with Beatrice. I know Prince Charles wants to cut down the BRF to just him and his sons, but one of his sons, at this rate, won't deserve that place, and one or both of the York princesses may well deserve it more.
JenS said…
PaisleyGirl, I think that's just what she's hoping everyone will wonder. Even if she isn't pregnant and doesn't intend (at the moment, anyway) to announce a pregnancy, she will get buzz about it (and therefore more attention) by rewearing the early-pregnancy clothes from the Oz tour.
That dress was not only a truly horrid diarrhoea colour, but the fabric looked like tent material ! She’s looked her best for a while though, and not dressed over the top....so far.
Liver Bird said…
I reckon Harry is every bit as besotted as ever. There are pics of him basically chasing after her practically begging her to hold his hand, like a little boy running after his mummy.

As for funds being cut off.... maybe. But then how do you explain the 10K dress for the wedding in Rome only a few days ago? Also, for foreign tours isn't it the FCO, not the Duchy, which funds all expenses, including clothing? I reckon it's her basically saying 'You wanted me to spend less and recycle clothes. Well, here I am doing just that. What say you now?'

But Harry is the real disgrace on this tour if you ask me. A born prince, grandson of the queen and son of a future king, and he can't be bothered to have one of his minions bring him a freshly ironed suit? What a little spoiled brat.
Girl with a Hat said…
I get what you are saying. I work in a traditional professional, and my husband, in another. When we go to a social event for his work, he takes precedence, and vice-versa. There is no reason to push one's way ahead of one's partner unless one is completely lacking in self-confidence and self-esteem.
Girl with a Hat said…
I should add that my husband's profession requires him to interface with lots and lots of people, whereas mine is more solitary. So, he is often the star of the show, so to speak. He gets tons of Christmas presents from people. I know he works very hard for these people, so I am pleased they appreciate him. As for me, my satisfaction lies elsewhere.
Louise said…
I'm pretty certain that the re-cyling of outfits is meant to show us how "down to earth" she is. She probably wasn't anticipating that her $14,000 dress would be seen and identified by the commoners.

This has Sunshine Sachs all over it, although I could have told her to dress more modestly and for a much lower fee.
Liver Bird said…
Yes, Philip harboured a lot of resentment towards his wife which may seem incredibly petty by modern standards, but for a man of his time and class was probably quite normal. More to the point, he never ever showed this in public and - gaffes aside - has played the role of royal consort very gracefully for more than half a century.

Meghan, however, despite being merely a D list actress married to an increasingly irrelevant royal, thinks she's the star of the show. And Harry encourages it.
Louise said…
Melania Trump wore a similar safari style dress on her trip to Africa, but Melania is statuesque.

I also didn't understand the head covering.. not very feminist when the men are allowed to be uncovered.
Button said…
Fellow nutties, perhaps you can clear something up for me. Seriously. I do not know much about hair, extensions, things like that. If Crinkle wears wigs, or has extensions, wouldn't they ( the wig/extensions ) fall out? Move around? Does one sleep in them? How do you take care of your hair? When I see photos of her with her hair severely tied back it looks to me a wee bit gray but natural. Looking at the photos in the Daily Fail it appears that her hair has ' multiplied ' overnight. ??
indybear said…
It's not going to Gayle King? Huh. CNN is an odd choice.
Girl with a Hat said…
I don't know much about all of them, but there are some extensions that have a type of comb built into them, which you can simply attach to your own hair, either on top of it, or under it. These can be removed and put back in quickly.

There are other extensions that come on a kind of rope that you fix under your own hair as well. These add volume and can be attached and removed quickly as well.

There are other extensions that have to be glued to your hair. These can damage your own hair.

That's all I know about the stuff.
Nelo said…
Lainey hasn't posted anything about the Sussexes SA trip and how it's a master class in PR or how Meghan is flexing her Hollywood star power.
Girl with a Hat said…
Interestingly, I heard that Philip reached out to the husband of the queen of the Netherlands to give him advice and guidance on how to deal with his role.

The Queen and Philip expected them to have to wait decades before she ascended the throne.
Tin Hatter said…
Mischi, you are correct about Mosque etiquette. I have been to several mosques, both in the US and in Muslim countries. When they invite non-Muslim guests, they always brief them on appropriate attire and behavior. I almost didn't get to go into one mosque because my skirt showed my ankles (which is why Meg's dress length doesn't bother me here). The royal family HAS to be aware of this etiquette. I'm sure she was briefed before coming to Africa and just before visiting the mosque. The fact that she completely disregarded so many etiquette rules is mind boggling. It's one more IDGAF from the Dimwit Duchess.

How many times does she have to metaphorically give the world the bird before the Queen says enough?
hardyboys said…
Bc she is too busy making comments about the celebs and what they wore and how she is leading authority on fashion books makeup music hair etc.
Ava C said…
Did you all see the little DM article about the jeweller who designed the 'H' necklace back in the spooning banana days? She says she was nervous about the design in case she couldn't cope with the spike in demand when Meghan wore it! Cue the usual DM readers' derision but a little less than usual. I think they're all exhausted, as we are. H&M Fatigue.

There's one good thing on a personal level. I used to like some modern jewellery similar to that worn by Meghan in her more attractive phase (not the merchy stacks of rings she wore for Eugenie's wedding). I dislike it all now. She's done wonders for my bank balance.

How Harry must long to hear those words. I think she's having to spend more of his money now.
Tin Hatter said…
I still can't put my head around how she ever got into Northwestern. My BFF's daughter, who was valedictorian of a huge high school, good standardized test scores, lots of activities, so a good package, didn't get in.
NeutralObserver said…
Looked at the 2012 photos of Kate & Wills in a mosque in KL . Kate looks exquisite in a pale grey dress and headscarf. Not a hair out of place. Her make up might look heavier in person, but in the photos it looks appropriately subtle, all this in humid weather probably in excess of 90°. The articles mention that Wills & Kate asked lots of questions about the places they were seeing, but also that they were very well informed. No lectures about how the people of KL should live their lives. As FGB notes, while there are a lot fewer comments, and most of them are positive, a lot of them complain about the money being spent on the Cambridges, compare Kate very unfavorably to Diana, say she's probably almost bald under her hair extensions, and complain about her expensive shoes (under £200), etc..

But the point is, this sounds like a typical royal visit to a foreign country. Uncontroversial, nice photos, every i dotted and t crossed. One assumes Kate & Wills were thoroughly briefed on how to behave and what to do before they got there, and had ample and competent support staff while they were in KL. I've always assumed royal ladies had someone like Lady Mary's maid Anna on Downton Abbey to help with dressing and hairdos. Is it so hard to avoid looking like a dog's dinner while traveling for the queen? There were reports of all the staff that the Harkles were taking to SA. Were they really there? Are Megs and Harry being cut off from funds and support staff? Do they get briefed? Do they listen to advice? There were reports of Megs barking at underlings trying to help her with her clothing on her earlier trips, so maybe its hard getting people to work for them. Harry's appearance in SA is shocking. He doesn't look healthy, never mind well groomed. At least his fly was closed. That is a small mercy. Sorry my posts are always so TL/DNR!
Girl with a Hat said…
https://twitter.com/Cece90406552/status/1176577932606758912
NeutralObserver said…
@Tin Hatter: You might enjoy Nutty's post on Sept 19, Is Meghan really "highly intelligent" and "whip-smart"? We ponder how bright Megs might be.
Teasmade said…
I just saw a pic of that mosque outfit. She even has those hair -- what would you call it -- those escaping extra tresses hanging OUTSIDE of the scarf. Don't know how to link to a Twitter post, but it's from KIRTY DWH. She looks like a drenched cat. A longhair cat.
NeutralObserver said…
Melania was a professional model, & always looks as though she's ready for Vogue. She's got superb posture & always looks immaculate.

@Louise: When in Rome. Women are supposed to cover hair, arms chest, & even ankles in mosques, someone here has pointed out. When I was in Burma (now Myanmar) many years ago, we had to take off our shoes to enter Buddhist temples, which usually had floors covered with bat s**t.
NeutralObserver said…
@HappyDays: You know more than I do about NPD, I wonder if you've read about abusive behavior from people with NPD. We're speculating about Harry's recreational & medical drug use, but could he also be in an abusive relationship? It happens to men as well as women. I've read that one of the first things abusers do is isolate their victim from friends & family who might give them support, & that abusers are very jealous of their victim. Megs seems to be doing this to Harry in a big way. Some of the more doubtful tabs (National Enquirer) have had headlines about Meg's screaming tantrums at Harry. Didn't read them, but sometimes even the Enquirer is right.
Jdubya said…
Harry Markle new post
NeutralObserver said…
Yes, she never seems to get it quite right, but at least she's noticed, & that's probably what she mainly wants.
Royal Fan said…
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/meghan-markle-denim-jacket_l_5d8a4bb4e4b0c2a85cb2247a/amp

Major faux pas! Bra is visible in this pic because her buttons are not done!! Really??
Lurking said…
I've complied a few photos for your perusal. Question: Pregnant or hanging onto baby weight?

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/24/16/18878138-7498827-image-a-13_1569340455165.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/24/16/18872930-7498827-image-a-152_1569337443890.jpg

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/24/15/18872342-7498827-image-a-121_1569334862149.jpg
Mom Mobile said…
Thanks @Jdubya! I love the "Endure the Tour" countdown clock she has up. LOL.
Mischief Girl said…
I'm in a minority, but I didn't mind the poo colored dress she wore to the mosque. Let me be clear--I liked it as a dress and, for me, the color is fine, but with the short sleeves it isn't appropriate for a mosque visit.

I also have zero problems with her recycling outfits. Her clothes cost too much, but she needed a year to generate a wardrobe. Now that she has, it's fine if she starts recycling. We can't be mad at her for buying new clothes all the time and then be mad at her when she re-wears them.

I saw on another blog that the Sussexes would like to be called Harry and Meg while in Africa. If that is true, I think that is so disrespectful and simply wrong. Her Majesty's tax payers are covering the cost of this trip. They are there to represent Her Majesty and promote British/Africa relationships. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were asked to take on that task, not "Harry and Meg". So, NO, you two imbeciles, you don't get to be called Harry and Meg while you're there. Because people want to see royalty, not be a party to wokeness and preaching. Poor Hikari, I just blasted her in email in all caps because I was so annoyed at Ginge and Cringe over that.

I'm also debating whether or not to mail a few safety pins to Buckingham Palace to be forwarded wherever Smirkle is, so she can ensure her bra remains a mystery.

Just unreal. How many more days of this nonsense do we have to endure? (And you're darn tooting I'm going to be reviewing every photo I see, every day, as I "endure" their shenanigans.)
Liver Bird said…
Since Archie is only 4 months old - at least for those of us who don't buy into any of the conspiracy theories - it seems rather unlikely that she would already be pregnant enough to be showing so soon.
Liver Bird said…
The 'just call me Harry' thing is utterly cringey. As you say, people come out to see them not because they are such wonderful people but because they are there to represent the crown. It's the equivalent of the 'cool' teacher insisting that all the 'kids' call him by his first name, blissfully unaware that said 'kids' are rolling their eyes at him. Hard.
NeutralObserver said…
Speaking of horrible appearances, the pics of her with her big baby bump in her black & white dress at the Women's Day rally is something we all probably wish we could unsee. There is a widely seen photo of her at US Open of her grinning while her raised bare leg rests against a railing. #NotMyDuchess showed it with the caption: 'Airing out her cooter for the world to see.' Megs' triumphant grin combined with the caption made me burst out laughing, & I had never even heard of the word cooter. Not too hard to figure out what was meant! LOL. Has she no clue?

https://ladygreyhound93.tumblr.com/search/cooter
Lurking said…
@ Liver Bird - I have a friend who is 10 month older than his sister. 4 months, 2 weeks.
Ozmanda said…
My thoughts -
I know a lot of people think Megs is doing sort of well during this trip but I am seeing something else (maybe I am reading too much into things - I am a analyst so it is what I do:). I think She was given the riot act on her return from NYC and as a result is putting on a act so either Haz or Queen doesn't turf her. Her dresses are ok however I will bet she is marching them to the 9th degree.

To me it is clear she has had hair extensions - not even great ones as you can easily noticed the break from her natural hair to the lengths. I wonder if she has also had a boob job or maybe pregnant?

Her and Haz displaying affection is contrived because reading the body language there is no togetherness - you can tell a true couple but their bodies closing space between them, when they have kissed for the camera's from the neck down he is maintaining a certain distance. When the videos of him engaging locals, you can clearly see him totally dismiss her without being obvious - as evidence by a couple of clips out there showing her pat his back to get his attention and he doesn't acknowledge her at all.

Photos of them holding hands shows her smugness but he looks down and he is noticeably disheveled and looks exhausted. He has a pallor and body language that I would attribute to substance withdrawal (not saying this is the case but just my observations - I have been around people who have gone through this so I tend to take notice)

Hope that makes sense it is early here so need my coffee:)
NeutralObserver said…
When Megs' engagement to Harry was announced, I read a few of the articles about her, maybe Vanity Fair, or even the Guardian. I believed every word. I thought she'd be a poised, disciplined representative of the royal family & advocate for the British people, & that she'd give the role her unique American stamp. I thought that since actresses have to do publicity for their projects, she'd be able to withstand all the scrutiny, & just see it as part of her job. I thought she'd carefully study her adopted family & country & learn how best to adapt to her new role. What a rube I am! I now see her as an unscrupulous fame hog out to make a killing. I hope for the British public's sake she can somehow be detached from her latest gravy train.
CookieShark said…
Recycling the clothes is not nearly as important as changing the behavior. No one believes they are humanitarians, so they might as well stop chasing that. Clearly they like expensive things and luxury vacations, like many Royals. The difference is that they lecture us on a regular basis and we're over it.

Demands for privacy make no sense when they show up at celebrity events. Saying things like "They don't make it easy" is classless and ungrateful. You know what is not easy? Being so poor you have to choose between food or medicine. Living in a war zone. Being stuck in a cycle of a crummy job and needing to pay for childcare, wanting to break out of it, but not having the help or resources to get more education so that you can provide more for your child.

The need for so many celebs to speak publicly about defending her from criticism makes her appear quite fragile and very narcissistic. It doesn't mesh with her "I'm tough, I'm a force of change" persona she is trying to sell. What it telegraphs is "Don't you dare say anything negative against me, or I'll sic my friends on you."

"Archie has been such a good baby," is a very bizarre statement indeed. It sounds like an experience that is wrapping up. Is she intending on giving him back to the nanny? When asked about my kid I say "She's doing well" or "She's impossible today."
CookieShark said…
Ozmanda, you bring up a good point with the back patting. She has done it at other events and there is literally video of her dragging him away from interactions with other people at events. There is also video of her shoving other people to the side as she makes her way to greet others. In both cases the people look shocked so she has to be aware she is doing it.

This is where I am afraid she is just not listening to advisors. Surely they have let her know that dragging Harry away from interactions is incredibly rude. These actions make the rumors of her behavior believable.
NeutralObserver said…
Well said. I agree with every word. So tired of all these pampered virtue signalers. It's one of the reasons Trump was elected. I think a lot of his voters don't even like him, they're just sick of smug & hypocritical do-gooders telling them what to do.
Girl with a Hat said…
that would put her at 3 months max if she were pregnant, so hardly showing.
My sister and I are only 12 months apart.

But, for her to get pregnant, it would have to be the immaculate conception because we know that Harry can barely tolerate to look at her in his unguarded moments.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ann Christensen said…
Mischi my older sister is very petite with long feet. She always says," Just think how long I'd be if God hadn't turned so much under! I'd be a runway model. She is so stylish that if she didn't call attention to it, few would notice.
gabes_human said…
Uh huh. I hate being disappointed.
Ann Christensen said…
Yes but if she reaches the bar set loe, it is progress!
gabes_human said…
The head scarf is supposed to completely cover a woman’s hair lest the men be tantalised beyond their control. In her effort to imitate Diana again she just chose to position it so that it framed her face prettily.
Ann Christensen said…
I agree. And I don' that "just call us Harry and Megs" is an adequate excuse for extreme rude insensitivity as to mosque etiquette.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
SwampWoman said…
Sorry, Button, but better you having her than us in the USA! (grin) Yes, I know, that is NOT going to make any friends for me and will probably end in death threats.
gabes_human said…
YES!! We’re all looking at a slight improvement for two whole days as an epiphany and a sign that this leopard has changed her spots. Do we think that the awful woman of the past three years has reformed? Let’s all keep reminding ourselves of the abhorrent behaviour so we don’t start thinking she’s a nice person.
Mom Mobile said…
@NeutralObserver, I thought the same too. Until the wedding. Then I thought, "Ooooh. This is going to be interesting!"
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Now Harry has told a member of the public on this disastrous tour that he struggles to get out of bed each morning because of the World's problems (!)

The number of comments online about the Harkles' appearance - unkempt, dirty, drugged-up etc is astonishing. Me-again is clearly a narcissist with a personality disorder & Harry seems to be suffering from clinical depression. It is obvious the Palace needs to step in asap otherwise I dread to think what might happen. This "Royal" couple are simply not up to the job of representing UK pLc either at home or abroad & ought to be removed from their duties forthwith preferably with an investigation into their "charity foundation" & possible financial irregularities. Just take a look at the photo's of this tour, the Sussex's are out of their depth it's embarrassing. Please, someone senior at Buckingham Palace - act now, save Harry from himself as he obviously cannot.
HappyDays said…
Liver Bird, Meghan isn’t planning to visit old folks homes or sheep farms if she can help it. She might go if Rhianna, Bey and Jay make a return trip or the Obamas suddenly take an interest shearing sheep or George and Amal appear.

I think this trip is mainly an attempt to rehab their images, especially Meghan’s. But you can tell her true nature is lurking just beneath the facade she’s presenting for public consumption via jumping out in front of Harry to shake hands at the mosque, her numerous obvious attempts to force Harry to hold hands, and the cleavage action dresses yesterday and the peek-a-boob unbuttoned shirt today.

Also, I noticed today that Meghan always has the same cookie cutter wide open mouth smile in many photos.

It is the same smile as she had in a group shot from her trip to Africa in 2015 or 2016 when she was polishing up her humanitarian credentials up as she stalked Harry. Meghan gets in center surrounded by happy little faces of brown people as she opens her gaping smile to pretend she’s having the time of her life when in reality, she can’t wait for the photo op to be finished so she can leave, never to be seen again.
She got what she wanted from these people and that’s all she really cares about.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
KnitWit said…
Mental Health Ambassadors???? Well, they are mental!
KnitWit said…
Modesty isn't in her wheelhouse.

Headscarves should cover the hair. That it is the point.

I know where she got her wigs, she stole them from the wardrobe department. I was watching a TV Western. All of the American Indian actors had too much bronzer and ratty black wigs.
Bacon Barkle said…
Rewearing old clothing... perhaps her clothing budget was reduced?

Looking disheveled with under garments showing, buttons bursting, cleavage on display and hair/make-up a mess... perhaps she isn’t being provided a stylist.

Obvious wigs and hair extensions... perhaps she doesn’t have a hair dresser in tow.

Being called Harry & Meg... is someone removing her title or is MM trying to avoid them being called the Prince & Duchess? After all, she failed at calling H “The Duke.”

She’s trying to show the BRF that she can do this all on her own and it’s torturous watching her make a fool of herself.

I still question what lends to her manic behavior - the wobbly euphoria at the engagement announcement for starters. She looks to hang on H sometimes for balance. She reminds me of a drunk college girl trying to walk a straight line.

It’s all too much... she’s bizarre, erratic, & manipulative... a child is supposedly involved (one who can’t have had the recommended vaccines for this trip) and now H is talking about not wanting to get out of bed because of the problems in the world. This is getting worse quickly and I don’t like where it’s leading.
Button said…
I think that the Markle knows exactly what she is doing, even though it is possible that both of them were given a few choice words prior to this fiasco. Flipping the bird at the BRF, the people of the UK and the Commonwealth. She is probably pissed at " having " to produce Archie ( poor wee baby ) to the Plebs. Most of us do not have personnel hair dressers, stylists, nor makeup artists and we manage to look presentable and professional when needs be. There are rumours flying about that they are both drug users. That would certainly explain the manic behavior and euphoria, and the godawful appearance. That one photo of them sitting in the mosque. My lord they both of them look as though they were dragged through a hedge backwards.
Agree, she doesn't have nice hips or waist to show off, those clothes make her look more square and scruffy. What a waste of money.
PaulaMP said…
Yes! I was going to post something like this, almost all of us here manage to present ourselves to the world daily, maybe not fashion plates, but I am quite sure I manage to cover my underwear, have pants that are not dragging through the dirt, and wear clothes and shoes that are my size, even if it's a size I'm not happy with. Surely she could manage that even without a stylist.
emeraldcity said…
Harry is a chain smoker, he was supposed to have given it up for Megs , but obviously he hasn't or has gone back to it.

As for the teeth and drugs thing, drugs do not generally yellow the teeth (oral thrush medications may) or it may be simply a lack of dental hygiene. Hard drugs (especially opiates) destroy the teeth rather than yellow them, the teeth simply crumble and fall out, accompanied by decay and gum disease which addicts are rarely inclined to deal with. Rich addicts go for implants which are much harder to destroy.
emeraldcity said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
Again, we have the conflict over her pathetic need to prove how "woke" she is versus the reality of being respectful of another country's protocols. Her rapacious need to feed whatever bottonless pit that exists in her psyche always trumps social situations. This isn't ROYAL protocol; it is simply acknowledging that a country's mores and customs are bigger than you are (apparently not in Meghan-land) and should be respected. Honestly, I was pretty shocked at her total lack of awareness regarding Muslim customs. Didn't cover arms. Wore shoes. Didn't cover her hair, appropriately because had to show off that wig. Indulged in numerous displays of calculated acts of PDA in a country where that is cultural anathema. What is she trying to prove here? That's she so "woke" that she can march into a country and insult them every five minutes with her inappropriate attire (button up your shirts for heaven's sake!, it's not that hard, most three-year-old kidscan manage buttons)? Her manic need to prove herself (god knows what the bar is!) will be her undoing. Had she observed ANY modesty or acknowledgment of local customs it would have been a step of restoring her image. But she's incapable of getting it through her cleavage-baring head that to ignore protocol is not being modern. It's being disrespectful, regardless of any royal protocol. It's HUMAN protocol to respect others. She's not even smart enough as a narc to play along. Her ego won't let her, hence the schizophrenic messages she's constantly sending out, exposing her as the hedonistic social climber that she is. The camera doesn't lie.

This is more evidence of the schizophrenic messages that she sends out and her completely inability to see the complete world around her and is constantly hampered by her limited lens. Those stupid bananas. Bringing crayons and coloring books to children who are witnessing staggering violence on a daily basis. These are nothing more than facile attempts to prove to herself that she cares. Do we really think that those prostitutes walked away with a bunch of bananas in hand feeling empowered by her simplistic messages? How are we supposed to ignore someone whose hypocrisy is on display every single day. Waxing passionately about the environment and eschewing anything but private jets for her travel. Bleating about women's issues while running a blog that focuses solely on expensive vacations and boozing it up as much as possible in revealing poses. I wish I had a dollar for every selfie or shot she took that featured alcohol. THIS IS WHY PEOPLE THINK SHE'S AN EFFING HYPOCRIT. There is nothing in her history beyond a bunch of speeches and staged photo ops that show any dedication to any cause except the ones that fuel her shallow passion for clothes, celebrity, and fame. She named her blog after an expensive wine. It wasn't labeled, Women Together, or Save Our Oceans, or another title that might reflect something other than her feeding her shallow needs. Maybe it's just me., but "The Tig" doesn't sound very woke to me. And that is her problem. As a no one, this schizophrenia was more or less hidden. How many followers did she have pre-Harry? Fifty on a good day? No amount of spin can hide what a shallow, egotistical person she is. She can hug a zillion kids with that manic smile. The fact that she's doing is baring a bunch of boob says all we need to know.
emeraldcity said…
Apparently the Kacky dress was made of.......recycled Nylon. Excellent choice if you want a hot and sticky meet and greet. She seems to have no common sense at all.
Jdubya said…
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B2ygG3cnz5Q/

just came across this link - Megs taking over the conversation - again
hardyboys said…
Nutty how come you never comment after the first 5 or 6 comments? I've noticed u moderate and then take little discussion after that? Is that bc u think we are all running wild in different directions with our opinions?
Bacon Barkle said…
Perhaps she’s being passive-aggressive and showing the RF that this is what they get when they slash her clothing budget and staff. If they want refined elegance, it comes with a cost. She’s showing that she won’t be controlled or overshadowed. She’ll spend $10k for a dress she wears once for only one photo. Don’t pay the large price tag & she’ll unbutton her clothing as low as she pleases. She’ll make their lives miserable until they pay her to go away.
emeraldcity said…
If you compare Kate/William's walk abouts to those of the Sussex's . Kate and William stay together for a few minutes and then seperate to cover more of the crowd, 10 or 15 minutes later they re-unite and then depart together all very co-ordinated and professional. Meg and Harry stay glued at the hip, screeching insecure and needy and self absorbed , very unprofessional behaviour on an offical trip.
JL said…
Don’t need to say to this crew that there are many different kinds of intelligence. Her strengths being driven by an enormous ego, crazy ambition and a conniving bent of mind. They’ve brought her far, but I don’t consider the combo to be intelligence. As for Harry, I’m in the minority that I do think he is bright, but suffers from terribly poor judgment maybe due to too much partying. IMO judgment can be fixed, lying and conniving not so much.
JL said…
There is a photo of Harry staring at her cleavage. I swear he’s checking to see if she’s buttoned up properly. This whole tour he seems to be staying close as though he’s minding her. To me he is looking so depressed as though he’s waiting for the other shoe to drop and for her to do the worst thing possible.
Girl with a Hat said…
it's because she's in a different time zone. 9 hours difference from the east coast.
Fifi LaRue said…
Nutty, you are too kind. Harry Markle came out with two new posts. Markle was sporting cleavage, and also had her shirt unbuttoned to show off her bra. Too bizarre! Does she think she's too sexy? And all that hair spreading out from the head wrap. Just too gross and totally unkempt in a nastily grandiose way.
Girl with a Hat said…
this is my theory - she recently got a boob job and is trying to get people to notice.

I think she is going to try to make herself curvier. That's why she has the butt pads. She will eventually get some inserted surgically. She will really truly Kardashianise the BRF.
Girl with a Hat said…
people are also sick and tired of other people trying to control every little word they say and write. It's got to the point where 50 people have to walk on eggshells to avoid saying or doing something someone else might find objectionable. And, you never know what that's going to be.

It reminds me of these situations in certain places where 49 people speak 2 languages but try to have a conversation in the national language, but because one expat who has lived here for 40 years has never bothered to learn a word of the language, we all have to speak our 2nd or 3rd or even our 4th language, so that person can understand. So 49 people uncomfortable, so that 1 can be comfortable.
Lurking said…
Comments paid for? "These two have their hands on the pulse of what’s hypnotic with people on an everyday basis. They get it!!!!!" Laughing like a hyena while trying to suppress dry heaves.
Ozmanda said…
Bacon - the problem with that theory is she managed to make her expensive dresses cheap and unattractive. It really goes to show that some people like to wear these designers and others are actually able to wear them.
Louise said…
She talks such clichéd, meaningless, gibberish.
Anonymous said…
Too true, @HappyDays and Trudy. And Narcissists and Sociopaths just love to play the sympathy card. She didn't change her entire character overnight, and the problem most of us have with her is her character, not her clothes. If she were a wonderful person and just dressed abysmally, I'm pretty sure Nutty wouldn't have a blog.

Of course, today's Diana cosplay, the slut strands with the headscarf, the hooter show, the uneaten cake and tea and the faces of MM and PH, the whole spectacle de merde that was today wipes out the 15 minutes of decency from yesterday anyway. That baby-poo-brown sack she wore to the mosque made her look dumpier than ever - just heinous. And the unbuttoned blouse - why would she do this? I'm just getting caught up on the past two days, and it seems it's spinning out of control already.
Louise said…
It was reported that she does have a hairdresser in her entourage. But that wig is really fugly.
JL said…
Oy that video. She is just so full of crap. Her aspirational lifestyle just did not expose her to anything that would deepen her understanding. It’s pure superficiality. And yapping about mental health again. Those two!!
Anonymous said…
I'm just getting caught up on their past two days, but I have to say that the mosque / Diana cosplay and that dress and the slut strands with the head covering -- FFS. She looks like an audition reject for the role of Mary Magdalene in a low-rent remake of Jesus Christ Superstar. And FFS, I had to see her bra and those breasts squeezed up out of the black and white too-tight wrap dress. The only good part of this was the piece by the guy who licked her teacup and snarked her about the unbuttoned buttons. And Harry. I think it's time for the BRF to do an intervention with Harry. Also, is it my imagination or is Archie the same size as he was at the polo match? And still not moving (although I guess his hand moved? I read that, didn't see it.)
Louise said…
Mischi: In that photo, it appears that she forgot to fully pencil in her right eyebrow.
1 – 200 of 228 Newer Newest

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids