How interesting to receive this "promoted Tweet", aka paid advertisement, today September 13.
The date on the Tweet is June 10, and it comes from an account with only 333 followers, managed by someone called "Axe Publications Ltd." A quick Google search turns up no company by that name.
Clearly, the photos have been chosen to make the Duchess of Cambridge look a bit louche. (The article itself is quite tame. Among the facts you didn't know is "she is a skilled athlete" and "she is allergic to horses")
Who would be interested in paying for this three-month-old Tweet featuring 10-year-old images to be promoted right now?
Having worked with Twitter Ads myself, I know that you target specific age groups, genders, and locations. Who is paying to reach European women aged 25-60 and why?
I should add that this article was served to my business account, which intentionally does not follow any Royal-related media.
Meghan's new PR firm Sunshine Sachs is known to play dirty. Is this some of their fine work?
Comments
If you read over the speech, she really did bad mouth the clothes and ultimately those who donated before her arrival.
Wanted to add that if someone can sew (which is really easy because if you mess up, you take out the stiches and start over) your closet can be reworked in many ways. Got a hole in your favorite pants? Cut them off and make them shorts. Have a jacket that fits perfectly but sleeves are too long? Hem the up to fit, same with pants. Repurposing saves money and clothes going in the landfill.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/12/t-magazine/the-distinctly-american-ethos-of-the-grifter.html?searchResultPosition=1
‘Does it make you feel little guilty inside for criticising her for buying clothes for herself?’
I’m another British tax payer don’t feel guilty at all either, not one tintsy bit!
As for Murky buying buying clothes for herself? Do you seriously think she does? Honestly?! Lol Not ever likely since she’s been married! The PoW pays for her, Catherine and Camilla, whether he really does pick up the bill (or the tax payer) I’m not sure. I could go on forever and a day about Murky and her greedy grasping behaviour and more, but the other posters within this thread have done a superb job at defining what I think and feel perfectly.
Yup now MM is really “an American diplomat” and also so renewed her Tig licenses so clearly she’s setting up her exit stage left
Thankfully I appear somewhat lucid on computer as compared to phone.
Seriously (I was thinking profanity or naughty words - Elle I miss you).
Why does the Commonwealth need her to stand up and represent American values?
What does that mean to the Commonwealth?
and ... why should Her Magistry take the word from a former Secretary of State over that of a current one? (wtheck?)
What does it show: Kate and Kate as everything M would want her body to be: thin, lithe, hair which looks wonderful, looking like a great person, approachable and the list goes on.
I cannot imagine that this was from KP/BP/PC/yada knowing that SS is known for these tactics. Says a lot about their souls and what kind of person each is inside.
I know which side I would want to be friends with and who ... I am reminded of an essay by Martha Beck in O magazine (2010) where she writes about when you need to hold a grudge.
To me he almost as dreadful as Markle.
She isn't part of the whole Democratic (sh**)show right now ... but that doesn't mean she might not have made some deal to be able to come back as SOS in the same kind of thing as BO will run again and back off). ... hmmm Had not thought of that....
Why tossing M this? Don't know but suspect it is part of or a combination of SS and Bill as he may be linked in ways we do not know about Epstein. I DO NOT KNOW PARTICULARS. I am guessing.
Why?
We know SS hits comes out with guns blazing (defense/pressure - that old high school cheerleading rant) and her comments came out of Did Not See That Coming from her for prior recent support (was she at the wedding?). And we know that Bill flew/was around Epstein. Interesting math equation.
I play a lot of Sudoku (came out of playing 3D tic tac toe as a kid). This kind of weaving back and forth, in and out, reminds me of what it is like to play sudoku where you have irregular houses or multiple houses. You have to think about where a number CAN BE as well as where it CANNOT BE ... to finish ... successfully.
"American values". Pft...
SMDH.
'According to a royal source, Archie Mountbatten Windsor was at Trooping the Colour this weekend. Meghan spent most of her time attending to the child, but focussed on other members of the Royal Family throughout the day. The source said: “She has spent almost every moment with him and saying goodbye was very difficult. But Meghan truly wanted to be at the celebration for the queen...Meghan loved seeing all the other royal children and was doting on them.”'
There was zero evidence of past or present doting at the polo. You can't even excuse it by saying she was busy managing the baby(!) as a child as young as Louis would pay no attention to that. He would just pile in, with the baby. 'Royal sources' are meaningless these days. Increasingly feels like Soviet Russia, with the media feeding the people with laughable falsehoods and the people getting more and more frustrated but unable to stop it.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/queen-reveals-not-want-talk-20066141
Even included in the German paper Bild, widely read. Bild reports the relationship between the Queen, Harry and Meghan is cooling down more and more.
This blog is great Nutty, such fantastic pontificating, sources and critical thinking. I like to joke that if you have a mystery put some frustrated women on it and they will GET TO THE BOTTOM of everything, like LaToya, but better.
(Also, I didn't realize that Meghan and Misha probably met at a Soho House party, and that they were only friends for about a few months before she met Harry. I love how even the NYT picked up that Misha pretended to be friends for SOOO long and that they met at an "intellectual" event. Look at us, look how cultured and sophisticated we were that we discussed equality and women's empowerment at a seated lunch at an exclusive, cultural event like Art Basel. That has the hand of Meghan and her PR firms all over it.