Skip to main content

Enty's latest podcast about Meghan, with a "secret source": Is this a true story?

Enty's royal sources are hit and miss, but yesterday he announced that he had a new, better source, and dedicated a 27-minute podcast to the Meghan and Harry case.

It all sounds a little shaky to me, but you can decide that for yourself.

My immediate takeaway is that Enty is a man who not only has no children, but has not much understanding of how the female body works. You may agree once we get to the pregnancy section of the story.

In addition, Enty is really committed to his "William and Rose affair" story, although this reliable source - just like his last reliable source - tells him it never happened.

Anywhere, here we go. All the text in blue is a transcript of the podcast, which is subscription-only. (I've left out some of Enty's ums and ahs and a few side references.)

Transcript

Welcome to another episode of the podcast....I got an email today from somebody that I hadn't heard from in many years. This person is an expert in a lot of stuff that I deal with. They are familiar with a lot of yachters and the industry. This person used to be a very big source for a lot of things that would go on in a shadier level.  This kind of came out of nowhere, but they have been talking to people who were involved in certain aspects of Meghan Markle's past, up to an around the Royal Wedding.

This could be an article - it's Daily Beast length - and I'm going to read a lot of it but not all of it.  I've read it a couple times and I agree with a lot of it, but some of it I don't know enough about.  This person is an incredible source and only delivers the good stuff. 

It's apparently common knowledge that Meghan was part of the yachting set, and that she wasn't a particularly popular part of the set. There were women who were much more well-known. It was kind of shocking when one of the men in that scene told her that Prince Harry was interested in spending some time with her. 

This is what brought her to London and a quick drink with Piers Morgan at his favorite local pub, right before that famous "blind date" with Harry. Piers and Morgan were friendly, but not in a sexual way. Just friends, despite the fact that Piers hangs with the Saudi and the yacht community, he's not part of them. And it's unclear how much of that he knew about her at that point. 

She had been manipulating any contact in the British press that she could, because she wanted to get some stage acting jobs there. Not just me, but there was a writer who talked about it, and how it was the most bizarre thing they had encountered. This was that time when she was trying to get that name recognition. The whole Prince Harry thing was going to be nothing more than a way for her to get more career contacts and some free travel to the UK to help that goal.


Meeting Piers Morgan

Piers gave her a good pep talk before this first date, and there was an ulterior motive for Piers. What could be better than a good buddy dating the prince and feeding you info? Meghan thinks she's there to meet Harry as a yacht girl, so her blind date thing for Piers is kind of an act. 

The only thing is, Harry either didn't know this yacht scene or didn't know Meghan was a yachter herself, and at some point Meghan realized that he thought this was a real date and it turned into a real date instead of a straight-up kind of yachting thing.

Meghan keeps on cultivating these press relationships she has been working on. Before she knows it, he's head over heels for her. So let's fast-forward to the engagement. At this point, she's still knee deep into it the press, but on the downlow. And knowing who she's around, the pressure is on her to leak locations that she and other Royals will be at. 

The press sense blood, and they have this arrangement, and they can't quite seem to wriggle out of this arrangement, because of the fear that she will lose Harry. And Harry can't find out that she's talking to the press because there are rules about these things, and she doesn't want to jeopardize the wedding. It's a Catch-22 pickle.

She's made all these secret backchannel deals with the press, but she has to keep honoring them, for fear that they will spill and then she won't get married to Harry.

It's a fairytale for her, because here's a woman who just a year before was begging for face time with the reporters who are now banging down her door.


The wedding

But everyone wants the wedding. The Royals love it. It alleviates their work schedules for a few months, and it takes bad press off them. It's great PR, they're becoming all-inclusive despite their racist history. They like this wedding.

It's also at this point that things are getting harder for her. Getting things to the press is requiring the  use of her personal assistant and leaking stories is complicated. So it's right about now that the suspicions start to arise and as the stories go out, they're thinking that maybe she is the rat. Even Harry.

So she does something crafty, it kind of shows how gullible he was, she plays the blame game, but not before feeding the vultures another story, about Kate and Charlotte and the dress fitting. She's sure to throw in that she's so difficult that she made Kate cry, she's throwing out a lot of minor Bridezillas to throw people off the scent that she is the mole. But Kate and anyone who knows her knows the story is ridiculous because she doesn't burst into tears anywhere in public.

But it becomes even more obvious that Meg is feeding stories when she decides to blame Victoria Beckham for the leak.

(Insert here dull story about the Beckhams. Supposedly Victoria Beckham's red high heels at Meghan's wedding were a sign that she knew Meghan had blamed her for something. Whatever. Too boring to type out.)


The pregnancy

So then you have the wedding happen. There's all those family stories. Honestly I think Meghan's family likes a paycheck. They'll say anything for a paycheck.

Meghan at this point is screwing people over, she's getting rid of assistants before they know too much, the Meghan is difficult to work for stories are out there. Her staff turns over because she doesn't want them talking to her husband or the Queen.

At Kensington there's only one way in and one way out and she's living with Kate and William and it's kind of like Melrose Place, so Meghan's having trouble leaking her stories. 

There's lots of issues. Meghan wanted to be the belle of the ball, and she hated it when anyone got more attention, especially Kate.

There had been the pregnancy talk. Meghan had told more than one ex and ex-friend that she was unable to get pregnant. And if you ask her male exes, that is what they will say. She leaked some kind of exaggerated story of Diana's fertility checks before marriage. And this was done to put up counteroffensive before anyone demanded it of her. So they had no fertility check. 

But Meghan did IVF. So many articles were put out about how she did not do IVF. Everyone's like "She got pregnant so fast!" So then women think, well, I can get pregnant instantly at age 38 also. 

Another thing she did was, a lot of these visits, she went solo, so it wasn't too conspicuous.

And Meghan and Harry did admit to admit to seeing fertility specialists and other health and wellness doctors to make sure they were doing everything healthy. But no one said the words IVF because, imagine the implications. It's not something that has traditionally be done in the Royal family.

Kate is kind of being a pain to Meghan. Meghan is being held to the same standards and getting called out right and left. And she's kind of getting a little upset at the British press, not engaging, and then they start coming for her, because it all goes back to this arrangement that she made.



The Amsterdam connection

Let's not forget all the attention that she wanted from the British press before she started dating Harry, and then she makes these deals. She starts dating Harry and she's got bigger deals to make. Now she's not making these deals so the press is going to go after her. 

Even Piers, supposedly her good friend, starts calling her out on a daily basis. So what can you do? 

Hey, let's just get pregnant.

It's crazy. And there's that Amsterdam weekend party with Harry in 2018, it's one month before they announce that they're pregnant. They went through the whole thing at breakneck speed. 

One of the thing that was odd is that Archie was born in May. But she should have been pregnant in Amsterdam when, by all accounts, she was hammered all weekend. 



Giles Coren

The source talks about the Giles Coren thing, the reporter and TV presenter. He tells her he'll run a story about her from 5 years ago about Giles' wife wanting to get a selfie with her. Meghan claimed to remember the incident, but both of them the selfie story is a lie. Meghan was obscure 5 years ago and no one wanted her picture. 

Now Meghan is shaking in her boots, because who knows what he would tell if he told the real story of what she was doing at a party 5 years ago. But Meghan is getting smarter, so in their drunken state she promises him a bigger story that will shake everything up by throwing someone under the bus, her husband's family. Rose Hanbury.

Why did Meghan pick that friend of all the friends? That is the one who William was cheating on Kate with. So she spills the whole story, very detailed story, to this Giles Coren guy, and he buys it hook line and sinker. 

She's off the hook with him, and she adds a ton more validity by telling him he cannot leak the story until she tells him. Soon, she promises. Otherwise everyone will know it is from her, because it is true and the Royals are a family and confide in her. She says the affair is still going on.

Now, my source says the affair didn't really happen. And that's just another thing where I just don't know enough. She just picked Rose Hanbury out because of some slight. Or a random person like that.


Archie is born

So fast-forward to Meghan is pregnant announcement a month later. A ton of drama going on behind the scenes, because Meghan is mad that Kate and William's children are princes and princesses, and her child is not to be. 

Again, I think they are the ones who chose not to. This is saying that she wanted the title but the Queen was just not going to do it.

And hen you have the tweet from Giles about the affair. "Yes, it's an affair. I haven't read the piece but I know about the affair. Everyone knows about the affair, darling. Even us."

(Note: the real Tweet said, "Even us Jews." Not sure why Enty omitted the final word.)

It wasn't enough that he got the call from Meghan during her 16 day New Zealand tour. It wasn't enough that he leaked the story, thereby getting tons of favors and private props. Now he had to go on Twitter and brag about it, boost himself up, by making it look like he hangs with the Royals all the time. 

After spending a weekend hanging out with Meghan in Amsterdam, but nobody noticed the connection at the time, despite him bragging about the time they spent in Amsterdam in a piece he wrote in the Times in the UK.

(Note: As I recall, plenty of people noted the Giles-Meghan connection at the time, along with Giles' connection to Soho House.)

So people were worried that she was in Amsterdam, and then bam! she's pregnant, and there's no more Amsterdam talk, because that could make it look like she was drinking with the baby.

Not sure if she thought the affair story would bring it all but it doesn't, and it's super-convenient that it explodes when her and Harry are down under for weeks. So the media was like, don't go on the tour because you're so pregnant, she certainly has reason not to go, but she's like no, I'm going.

(Enty's timeline is slightly off here. The pregnancy was officially announced as the Sussexes were already in the air on their way to Australia, so there was no opportunity for the media to suggest that Meghan not travel.)


Frogmore

And then they come home and right away they move to Frogmore where she can do what she wants, and this press chit-chat is slowly morphing into various deals and money. And the press is more interested and boosting them up, chatting about how special Frogmore is, and everything is going great.

This is the time when she starts getting the clothing and all that stuff, and Baby Archie is born, and he's not a prince. 

Private christening, no outside-the-hospital pics, we won't even tell you if we had him in the hospital, maybe at home. It's not until the birth certificate is released, which she loves, because it lists her occupation as Princess of the United Kingdom. She probably has it framed. She made sure it was leaked afterwards.

Meghan feeds the worst picture of William with a grimace at the Christening, and that's the big story.

And then all the Epstein stuff starts coming up, and it's nerve-wracking. She spends a lot of time obsessing over pictures of the Epstein situation, mulling about her yacht days and who she knew.

And then there's the Africa documentary and the lawsuit filed against the newspaper. 


Things fall apart

This is when it kind of falls apart. The source says, there was always going to be a place for Harry and Meghan, and more than enough involvement, in fact more than Harry had ever had.  But Meghan has been playing so many sides and angles that she is waiting for the knives to come from every angle.

And let's not forget that there's a very big-mouthed reporter that she maybe in person gave the cheating story, which is still huge. 

Then you have October 2019 and no one's speaking and Meghan is paranoid plus the Prince Andrew story breaking and Meghan just wants to get out of town again, like New Zealand. Do a runner.

And the announcement comes that they will spend Thanksgiving abroad. And this is kind of where it is. 

Then there was the Christmas speech snub, with no picture of Meghan and Archie, on his first Christmas no less. 

And this is where we at. But this source says that the zinger, what caused Meghan to push the detonator on the whole thing, long before the palace or Harry was ready, was the birthday walk to church.

Usually you only see press coverage of the walk to church on Christmas, but on Jan 5 there was a huge spread, tons of stories on the birthday walk, Kate wearing a fedora and a matching coat, and that she even walked in front of William for the walk to the church, and then the Queen matched her in purple. 

That was just kinda, there was Rose Hanbury again, so that was the kind of thing where everybody kind of said, hey Meghan, we know what you've done. And then she got the message. 

And then, you know, to announce that she and Harry would leave, and they did that on Kate's birthday, because the message was for Kate. "I know you know, I'll leave you be now, they're yours."

And then take the dogs and Archie to Canada. I don't think many people know the whole Rose-Meghan deal, is what they're saying. 

There were so many straws that broke the back, this is kind of their take, and I summarized a bit, because it was so long, I would have been reading for a half an hour.

And that's just a different kind of angle and perspective and filling in the blanks and it's interesting to hear that the Rose thing was just a name picked out.

That there wasn't actually an affair. I'm of the belief that there was an affair, and that Meghan leaked it. This person is saying that there wasn't an affair but that Meghan leaked that there was. 

Hope you guys enjoyed that.

(Transcript ends)

That's it.  What do you think of Enty's source?





Comments

MustySyphone said…
YIKES! Harry really F*d up marrying that one!
So much to read...going back for another read! 🤩

@Nutty, your last post has moderated comments on. 😉
Nutty Flavor said…
Sorry about that, all. We were getting odd spam from someone in Korea and I turned on moderation then forgot about it. Apologies.
Nutty Flavor said…
I've now published all the comments that were held in moderation, except the duplicates.
Nothing new, unexpected or earth shattering.
Nutty Flavor said…
Enty always plays a little fast and loose with the facts, I find. It's only when you really know the story that you can spot where he gets it wrong.
Not sure about Enty’s source, it all seems a bit over dramatic to the point of being unbelievable in parts. Overall it comes across like something you’d read in a Jackie Collins book. 🤔 Does it make it true though, I don’t know. 🥴
Nutty Flavor said…
One clear takeaway from this account, however, is that Meg was never really in love with Harry. Something that always seemed apparent, but this account, if credible, confirms it.
Meghan was never in love, I’ve always thought it, so that I do believe. She used Harry etc., the rest and whatever the ‘truth’ is, is history. 😳
Nutty Flavor said…
It seems she was always obsessed with her career. Still is.
MustySyphone said…
Her "career" was minor at best.

The real question in my mind is will Hollywood accept her now when it rejected her before?

I'm thinking that her ace (Harry) isn't really worth that much any more. They've (apparently) burned bridges (at least she has) back to the BRF and without the BRF Harry (and by extension madam) aren't really worth much.

If Disney (or anyone else) tries to make her a star you can bet this yachting years will come out--too much money for the revealer not to.

You can't polish a piece of poop.
Nutty Flavor said…
Actually, I think Meg is more interested in her influencer career than anything else. She'd like to be Goop or Reese Witherspoon or Martha Stewart. Unfortunately, she doesn't have particularly good taste.
HappyDays said…
@nutty:
I think the info from enty is on the right track.

There used to be a similar, but shorter anonymous email that was on the harrymarkle timeline, but it looks like that part of the timeline has been removed from the harrymarkle blog. The email sounds like it came from just before the wedding in 2018.

The person who writes the harrymarkle blog published the anonymous email in the timeline section between timeline 5 and timeline 6 detailing a number of Meghan’s escapades before the wedding and info about her finances in 2017 and 2018 before the wedding. It says she was flat broke. It also details shadowy dealings similar to what enty is saying. Oddly, timeline 6 and that anonymous email have been removed from the harrymarkle blog within the past month or so. Hmmmm.

I will look around to see if I copied that anonymous email and post it here if I can find it.
Sandie said…
Like Meghan, Enty talks and talks and is not very discerning!

Meghan was certainly on the lookout for a man ... a wealthy tech entrepreneur from Silicone Valley, a Hollywood producer (oh, she got that one and then ditched him), anyone with connections at Soho House (she got a celebrity chef and then cheated on him and ditched him), anyone famous in the UK (why she was set on the UK is a mystery to me as she obviously does not like much about the place). She was never shy in asking to be set up with whatever type of man she was going for at the time, and I can imagine the suggestion of Harry coming up over a few bottles one night at Soho House (who was the friend?) and in a blink of an eye it was done (it was never a blind date for her). The one theory is that the first meeting was at a dinner that Corey catered for and Meghan made the most of that first meeting (the story of a blind date was then a cover up for the cheating and dumping of Corey). Perhaps the real story is a mixture of all of this.

Whether or not she was a yacht girl depends on the definition (women who are paid to spend time on a yacht entertaining a rich client?). She certainly enjoyed spending time on yachts that she did not own, nor did any close friends of hers. She seems to have spent time playing hostess at Soho House venues (travel and accommodation paid for and she gets to network with rich and influential people). I doubt that there was ever straightforward prostitution involved, but truth can be a strange thing!

(By the way, the latest long and detailed tarot reading from my favourite most accurate reader has picked up that Meghan has already connected with her post-Harry man, although the relationship is not romantic yet.)

I doubt very much that the Rose-William affair ever happened (and there are detailed investigations of how this was put out by Giles and then spread by a Meghan sugar who then retracted and admitted she made it up). There is no proof that the rumour (completely untrue) was put out by Meghan, but since there is a connection between Giles and Meghan, the idea is somewhat credible.

As for the pregnancy, I remember in the engagement interview that Meghan stated emphatically that they would start a family immediately; Harry said that they would wait a while. They were noticeably not on the same page on when to start a family, and in the modern age, having a baby in your late 30s or even early 40s is not unusual and under the circumstances it made sense to settle in and establish herself in the BRF and the UK before starting a family. Did she persuade him to change his mind and participate in fertility treatments? He would have to have collaborated if they did IVF treatments.

I still believe that Meghan did fall head over heels in love (she was giddy with it), but not with Harry. She fell completely in love with what he gave her (wealth, status, fame, open doors ...), plus he gave her so much support, adoration and affirmation that he felt like the perfect man to her (perfect to give her everything she ever wanted). The restrictions of the BRF and the UK, which she soon decided she did not like, were inconveniences that she decided to ditch early on, as she has ditched on commitments in the past. As for Harry, he is unstable and needy, and she is going to believe that he is hindering her from achieving the life she wants as Meghan Markle, so she will ditch him.
Himmy said…
If meg thinks she can resurrect her acting career, she is truly delusional. Even the big stars in Hollywood cannot guarantee any box office success. Who would invest money on a d-list aging actress with no talent and stinky attitude. Security alone will be a nightmare to manage.

Meg has leaked so many contradictory stories. I do not know what to believe. I would not be surprised that Enty’s story was leaked by some Meg’s “friend” with her blessing.

Meg will do anything to stay in the news. Without the royal connection, she is just a boring grifter.

none said…
MM is simply too old and lacking in style, brains or beauty to achieve success at any of the plans being floated in the media. She was a nothing before Harry and threw away the one thing that would have brought her the attention she craves. Being a Royal. She's done.
HappyDays said…
Enty’s comments also fit with past readings I recall about one of the reasons that Tom Inskip is not one of Meghan's favorite people is that he knew her from yachting, so he’s a threat to her and blowing her narrative that she didn’t know much about Harry. “Is he nice “
HappyDays said…
It sounds like Meghan’s deception and wheeling and dealing will eventually catch up with her. It may be part of the Megxit deal. Give them a year to distance the royal family from the Sussexes and when the divorce happens and all the dirt about Meghan hots the fan, very little of it will land on The Firm. It will mostly stick to Meghan, with a bit of collateral damage to Harry, who was obviously duped and ensnared by an actress/harlot with a profound case narcissistic personality disorder.
Nutty Flavor said…
@HappyDays, I agree.

Whatever Meg's original feelings about Harry, it's probably difficult for an ambitious woman like Meg to be in love with a guy who is lost and depressed. I once had a partner like this myself: when I left for work in the morning, he was on the couch wearing some red gym shorts. And when I came home from work, he was on the same couch, wearing the same red gym shorts. (He's since sorted himself out and married someone else.)

There was a piece that ran a couple of days ago - in the Sun? - saying that the RPOs were having trouble guarding them, having lost respect for them. They'd lost respect for Harry because of the way he'd tossed aside his military commitments, and for Meg because of "the way she treated her husband." One can imagine some major tantrums from Meg's side, particularly if her Oscar dreams aren't coming true.
abbyh said…

There are parts which make sense and there are parts which are more difficult to navigate around things that are and were "known".

I could believe that she made deals with paps and then had a lot of difficulty fulfilling them without blowing her cover. Diana was a master at that.

As for Kate is kind of a pain, well Kate went through tough times/was called out as well so turning it into she's the source of my problems/lack of tolerance for when I choose to do it my way is a tad narcissistic (but we've questioned that all along anyway). If the source were an M sugar, then this could be a clue.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Looks like Enty's source is the rumor mill. It is basically just the word salad in Megsy's best traditions.

Time to stop taking the Dumbartons seriously, sit and watch them dig their own pits. So far they have done a very good job at it.

If Trump gets re-elected they will be stuck outside of the USA or risk more loud ridicule if they crawl back there despite her loud slaying of Trump. And USA is where she wants to be, in her eyes this is where true success lives.
abbyh said…

Nutty, and probably they(the RPOs) have witnessed a lot of what current reality looks like to H&M.
MustySyphone said…
@happydays:

Interesting take about give it a year so that it doesn't blow back on the BRF. My thought is out it now so that the BRF look like victims. In a year it could be argued that she did all this AFTER she left the BRF.

But I'm not much on social things so I don't really know.

I do find it interesting that Harry has been totally emasculated in all this.

All the articles are about HER (or casually mention him, like he's an acquaintance). All the plans are about what SHE will do. I don't really see any saying Harry will head up this effort or do a voice over for this project. Outside of the rumoured Oprah special-=not much. I'm not even sure if the special will happen or will be broadcast.

And the Oprah special will spectacularly backfire if Enty's gossip is true and gets out. then Oprah either looks complacent or like a fool--neither of which she would tolerate.

Most of all I find it really strange that there have been no sightings of either Harkle.
DesignDoctor said…
@Himmy said:

Meg will do anything to stay in the news. Without the royal connection, she is just a boring grifter.

I could not agree more! She is a boring grifter who has no discernible talent, in acting, writing, speaking, or interpersonal.

She is delusional if she thinks that anyone in Hollywood would want to work with her with her track record of shirking responsibilities, being difficult to work with, and leaving when the going gets tough or when she has had enough of what is being offered.

It seems obvious that she was only out to get the prestige, money, and fame that Harry could offer her. And, I agree that her career goal now is to be an "influencer" a la Goop and someone who has influence on the Hollywood scene.
none said…
Read the Enty podcast twice. Not buying it.
Nutty Flavor said…
That's a good point, @MustySyphone. Perhaps they're trying to build up suspense for the big Oscar appearance.

Someone on another board noted that Harry would have been a natural to introduce the World War I movie "1917", which is about young British soliders, if he hadn't just given up all his military connections.

The Oscar people might let him do it anyway. Not like the creative types there know the fine points of military protocol.

As I said in the previous post, the problem now might be Meg, and her recent admission that she "tricked" the actorsø union. Not a popular thing to do in a company town.
DesignDoctor said…
It seems as if most posters on this blog have a good grasp of narcissism. I read this article yesterday which explains it well.

https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/14-signs-of-narcissism?mbg_mcid=777:5e39f4aa8b58b06266733e4c:ot:5c2d1c269799ec3cc67c0ef2:1&mbg_hash=12e82f6bac303ec31f18e36057ef06b6&utm_source=mbg&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily_v2_20200205
Fairy Crocodile said…
@Himmi

Amazon Prime video now features Meghan Markle's z rated movie Random Encounters and advertises it like this: "Starring our very own Princess, Meghan Markle (Suits), this whirlwind rom-com proves that finding Prince Charming can be a right royal pain"

She is not even a support role there, just an add-on.

I was very satisfied to see nearly quarter of the reviews is one star, and another 14% barely gave it three stars.

If this is anything to go by she will need a giant get through to climb the Hollywood Olympus. A bit late for her now but I am open to surprises. May be she is a hidden acting genius. Ha.
Nutty Flavor said…
I doubt there are acting opportunities for her now. The 40s are a tricky time for actresses - too old to play the ingenue, too young for the interesting Helen Mirren roles. If you're Reese Witherspoon or Jennifer Anniston, someone will write a part for you, but I can't see anyone writing a part for Meg.

Influencer/philanthropist is really her best bet going forward. And philanthropist requires having something to give away.
@Sandie, ‘I still believe that Meghan did fall head over heels in love (she was giddy with it), but not with Harry. She fell completely in love with what he gave her (wealth, status, fame, open doors ...), plus he gave her so much support, adoration and affirmation that he felt like the perfect man to her (perfect to give her everything she ever wanted). The restrictions of the BRF and the UK, which she soon decided she did not like, were inconveniences that she decided to ditch early on, as she has ditched on commitments in the past. As for Harry, he is unstable and needy, and she is going to believe that he is hindering her from achieving the life she wants as Meghan Markle, so she will ditch him. ‘

Exactly this! This I completely agree with. 😁
MeliticusBee said…
@Happy Days...
Her question supposedly asked about her "blind date Prince Harry" was much more contrived and much worse - it was
"Is he KIND?"
Gag.
Bravura said…
I agree that Meg's best bet is Influencer. That's why she's been so strong with her social media presence these past years - she's desperate to cultivate a following that will stick with her after things go south. The sad thing is, they're not really sticking around. She doesn't have nearly the savvy PR machine that PMK (Mama Kris) has for the K Klan nor is she entertaining or charismatic enough to pull off a Chrissy Tiegan move (she was kind of a nobody really before marrying John Legend and now she can absolutely consider herself an independent partner from a very famous husband, something M cannot do well at this point).

I don't buy half the Enty garbage. I've followed Enty for years and he's hit and miss on a lot of stuff. Most of his MM stuff has been utter bullocks and this just fits in with the narrative. It's trying to spin Megan as some kind of victim which I don't agree with. Like we should be sorry for her that this all went beyond her scope of control and it was all a misunderstanding from the start? Nope, not buying it. Elements may be true but the entire narrative seems contrived and controlled just enough to give the impression that there's an element of truth. It's like one of those rules for getting people to believe your lies - tell them something embarrassing and they'll believe the lie more willingly. Same thing here.

I do not believe Megs was ever pregnant. No way, no how. I know folks will disagree with me here but even using the best IVF in the world you have about a 25% chance of success (I know, because I've been trying to conceive for 2 years and am the same age as Megs. Given the issues with fertility for both she AND Harry - you're telling me it magically happened in a few months? BULLOCKS). IVF places tend to inflate their odds of success but overall, they're not as successful as they claim to be. There are a lot of variables that come into play be it the health of the eggs, the mother, the quality of sperm, hormones, etc. Given her history of coke abuse and Harry's history of alcoholism and drug use, you're telling me they magically have perfectly viable sperm and eggs? Sperm takes 3 months to regenerate. So it would take at least 3 months for Harry to clean up his soldiers properly for the sperm to be of viable quality (if they are viable at all) for them to even use his soldiers to impregnate her even in vitro. Just not buying any of this about fertility crap and IVF and such. You cannot keep that stuff *that* hush hush - some news person would have seen something, someone with a cellphone would have seen them in a lobby or whatever.
Unknown said…
A lot of what Enty is saying looks like rehash of what Megxit-ers have been saying about her on gossip sites, Twitter, and Tumblr. I believe Enty’s intel when it is just Meg and situations without the BRF. When Meg’s interacting with the royals, Enty’s either getting warped info from Meg herself or is making it up as he goes.
Unknown said…
@tatty I am reposting here because you wanted some receipts.

Harry’s IQ - no one would have any evidence of that. People are inferring by patterns in his behavior and performance.

Art Project - True story and it was a huge scandal. Here’s a link:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/may/10/schools.alevels2004

Press outing Harry’s location - Another huge story that I heard a decade ago on one of the MSM outlets here in America. Here’s a link:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/princes-cover-in-afghanistan-blown-by-drudge-report-789335.html
HappyDays said…
Blogger Nutty Flavor said...
One clear takeaway from this account, however, is that Meg was never really in love with Harry. Something that always seemed apparent, but this account, if credible, confirms it.

Nutty: I think the gist of this info about Meghan is accurate. In addition to Tom Inskip’s supposed connection to Meghan via yachting, the Page Six item a couple weeks ago described Meghan being ‘well known’ circulating among European elites hunting for a husband. Narcissists are incredibly manipulative schemers who think they are bulletproof. They will do all sorts of outlandish things to achieve a goal.

I have also read that Meghan was down to her last $350,000, which at the rate she is able to spend, was nearly broke for her. Remember, this is a woman who proudly showed off her $40,000 shoe collection on The Tig. Both of her parents have been bankrupt, not exactly good money management models for an overly indulged Meghan.
MustySyphone said…
I don't really get the whole "influencer" thing. She's no Martha Stewart or GOOP,

They have talent to back them up (brains etc).

And I'm thinking the whole influencer thing is starting to run its course.

By the time she got it up and running there will be something else that is more new and exciting.

MM seems to be a little late and a little short on most things.

As to IVF--I agree with Bravura whole heartedly. Have had several friends in their 30s try it. Its three months no alcohol for both parents and very seldom does it take on the first try. There's always a chance but.....So any drinking (even one glass of champagne on the plane) would be prohibited. Although when did she ever follow the rules.

No my best guess is a surrogate. Now that would throw a spanner in the works of the BRF. It would explain no title for Archie (if that is really his name and if a child of theirs really exists). The out of body law and all that. The real evidence is no signatures on the birth certificate. It doesn't violate anyone's privacy. Heck, its a shout out for the attending physicians.

I've always found it odd that pictures of Harry with children show him interacting with them appearing to really enjoy being with them. Haven't seen that with Archie. At all. Not even the picture from Canada--it looks very staged to me. No candid shots of the man who always said he wanted children. Now that he has one, ??????
Glow W said…
I have never felt enty has reliable royal sources.

IVF: ask a few women here, you don’t get pregnant more quickly with IVF. So that part was weird suggesting that because she got pregnant so quickly, it must have been IVF. That is a logical fallacy.
abbyh said…

Hilkari - did she graduate for Northwestern question. I think so. There was a link (from Skippy probably) long ago and far away which offered a 3rd party source for listing of graduates - in this case, Northwestern. It had lots of other schools who are not big, super well known type places (I checked and it had listings from my college which is small at best) so I'm tend to lean on the this is a reliable source.

Tatty -

I like that you often take a position I don't agree with. It makes me think about why I believe what I do.

You once asked for help (from us) so: Please use the word "please" more. It sounds a little less demanding when asking for help of some type (helps take the edge off a little to the reader or a person listening to you).

Thank you for listening Tatty. You add a lot to my thoughts of H&M.
Bravura said…
Thanks MustyPhone! And you're so right! Let's not forget all the bloodwork you need to do, the constant tests and imaging you need to have done. You are constantly at the doctors with fertility stuff so for them to magically have all this time to do this when they lead such busy, Royal lives? I don't buy it. Working Royals have very tight, demanding schedules, albeit even "working" Royals like Megs and Harry. In the beginning they were particularly busy with work, especially coming off the wave of popularity post-wedding - when did they have time to see multiple doctors and clinics for testing, injections, blood work, etc?

And if she was pregnant and it took them the additional cost and work that comes with IVF, why on earth would they subject themselves to potential Zika risks? And travel risks? The first 3 months are crucial and doctors often urge older mums to take it very easy because the risk of miscarriage is so high that first trimester. Any additional stress, say a visit to Australia on tour, could put the fetus at risk. It just boggles my mind that we are supposed to accept that narrative without any question. If a child was *that* important, they wouldn't have risked it. But they did, which leads me to believe she was never pregnant and thus, never had any fears of losing the child. Again, just my thoughts here.
Sandie said…
@Bravura: 'I do not believe Megs was ever pregnant. No way, no how. I know folks will disagree with me here but even using the best IVF in the world you have about a 25% chance of success (I know, because I've been trying to conceive for 2 years and am the same age as Megs. Given the issues with fertility for both she AND Harry - you're telling me it magically happened in a few months? BULLOCKS). IVF places tend to inflate their odds of success but overall, they're not as successful as they claim to be. There are a lot of variables that come into play be it the health of the eggs, the mother, the quality of sperm, hormones, etc. Given her history of coke abuse and Harry's history of alcoholism and drug use, you're telling me they magically have perfectly viable sperm and eggs? Sperm takes 3 months to regenerate. So it would take at least 3 months for Harry to clean up his soldiers properly for the sperm to be of viable quality (if they are viable at all) for them to even use his soldiers to impregnate her even in vitro. Just not buying any of this about fertility crap and IVF and such. You cannot keep that stuff *that* hush hush - some news person would have seen something, someone with a cellphone would have seen them in a lobby or whatever.'

There is another option that I know about because I was working for a woman with a wealthy husband who filled me in on every agonising step of the process:

1. She registered with an agency and got access to an online book of egg donors (photographs of the women as babies, children and adults, plus of any children they had plus all medical and educational history, etc.). She chose a donor (literally rich woman chooses from an online catalogue!

2. Sperm was harvested from her husband and went through a process to increase the chances of a girl (she already had three sons but by then was too old to have viable eggs for another pregnancy).

3. Eggs were harvested from the donor (who was medically prepared and paid to spend a month, or was it three, in town being supervised to ensure good quality eggs). The donor received no fee for donating the eggs (I think it is against the law) but was fully supported for the 3 months and was compensated for not being able to work in that time. (What if the donor decided she wanted the child after it was born? It was a risk the wealthy couple took and they figured that they had more than enough money to out-lawyer/bribe/whatever a woman who changed her mind after the child was born. It very rarely happens, if ever.)

4. Eggs were fertilised in a petrie dish and then fertilised eggs implanted in wealthy woman who wanted another child (a girl). She had also been prepared for this by being pumped with hormones, and so on.

5. Voila, she was pregnant, carried the baby to full term and had a girl.

There are so many ways wealthy people can have a child at just about any age and even choose the gender.

Whatever she did to have a son within a year of marriage must have required the co-operation of Harry, so either he changed his mind about waiting to have children or he was persuaded after that interview to embark on a process of baby making way ahead of the schedule he had in mind at the time of the proposal and engagement.

I think that couple have so many secrets to hide ...!
Bravura said…
@Tatty, I do love that beautiful ring every time I see your avatar. Is that a pink padparadscha sapphire?
Fairy Crocodile said…
@Bravura

True. Add Harry's quizzical question "Is it mine?" when she announced her pregnancy and you have a lot to wonder about. Who would ask his wife that publicly, even as a joke?
Glow W said…
@charade thanks for those links. I’ll read them.

With the downtime, I joined a gym and started swimming lol. And because I have an obsessive mind, I think about HAMS sometimes while swimming.

I’m to the point where I think Harry truly got sick of royal family life (but not the money and the perks because of who he is) and he wants Archie to have as normal a family as possible. Is this so hard to believe?

Harry is well aware that he father didn’t love his mother and she was chosen as a broodmare for lineage. The marriage was a catastrophe and to be honest, Diana wasn’t a great mother if she was leaning on William to be the man of the house. Both sons seem to have beef with Charles never being around. I think Tiggy was probably the most stable person in their lives.

So maybe Harry just had it and said basically I love you guys but I’m not living like this any more and my child is going to have an available mom and dad in the most normal setting considering everything.

Idk. I still feel like Harry is a much larger driving force in all of this than people give him credit for (media in general, not here).

Is it really so terrible he left the royal family? Shouldn’t he have the right to choose?
Glow W said…
@abbyh thank you.
Bravura said…
@Sandie - oh the beauty of wealth, eh? If only us plebeians had such access and options. :(

But if she did go that route, why risk the baby with Zika and travel stress? That's the part that really sticks out to me. But your narrative would also explain why Archie cannot have a title as it's not even her child.
Glow W said…
@bravura I found it on google images. I love it too! I would call this a straight up pink sapphire as a padparadscha sapphire has some salmon to it,
MustySyphone said…
@Bravura:

Agreed, 100%! The trip into Zika territory was either extremely ill-advised or there was no reason to worry. While I appreciate that tours are planned many months in advance making it hard to cancel, MM should (key word should) have known that to get pregnant and then go wouldn't be especially prudent. Rumour has it that the Harkles were urged by the Palace to wait a while before bringing children into the world.

Another thing to consider about her being pregnant is that, at the time, she was very very thin. Thin to the point she may not have had the hormones to get pregnant (naturally any way). I'm not sure how very very thin plays into IVF as the women I know who try it eat a very healthy and meticulous diet to maintain optimum health and a chance at having the IVF work.

Anyone out there know if or how underweight affects IVF?
Unbeweaveable said…
This story doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, except as a vehicle for the narrative that the Rose Hanbury story is false. Who is “the press” she was cultivating and why do they suddenly hate her for no apparent reason? Why didn’t any of this media manipulation come out when she filed a suit against MOS? Why hasn’t Giles Coren called her out if she lied to him about William’s affair? How did she and Harry get their wires crossed on whether it was a real blind date or a paid hookup? And best of all, how did she go to IVF appointments by herself?

I do believe she told all of her exes she couldn’t have children until it was suddenly very very advantageous to have children. I also believe she was trying to swing as many deals as she could, all along.

Regarding the Oscars, BG has a thinly disguised “will they or won’t they go” blind which cites “logistics” as the problem with them attending. That’s always the excuse given for why the Sussexes can’t go (or reason, if the queen has suddenly sent you to Morocco). Thus, I think they won’t be there yet again, probably because the palace clamped down.
Unknown said…
@tatty You’re welcome. Here’s a link about the damages the teacher got.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/feb/14/schools.publicschools
Glow W said…
Damn, that is some crazy stuff about Harry’a Art projects.
Glow W said…
Please excuse the OT. @Bravura I found it!!! It’s for sale $11,500 https://www.jewelsbygrace.com/3-52ct-pink-sapphire-halo-ring
MeliticusBee said…
Sorry but failure to complete an ART project is not due to dumbness (though that might also be true), it is due to laziness.
An ART project. Even a carefully scripted project with words - still it's art with words not physics. Pure laziness.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sandie said…
@tatty: 'Idk. I still feel like Harry is a much larger driving force in all of this than people give him credit for (media in general, not here).

Is it really so terrible he left the royal family? Shouldn’t he have the right to choose?'

It was the way they left and the events leading up to that departure and the context in which it all happened that was the problem. Harry's grandfather is frail and very old and was hospitalised just before Xmas. Harry's family was reeling from the aftershocks of the Andrew/Epstein scandal. And so on ...

Just going by what Meghan and Harry have actually said on camera (including being overheard talking to people in public) and have published via IG and their website:

1. Meghan living in the lap of luxury, whined about not being ok and not thriving and being badly treated by the press (not acknowledging that she was not being picked on by the media as others had been through the same and worse, but that she cannot take criticism of any kind and her response was to run away and be a victim rather than seek help, such as her and Harry were advocating in their 'brilliant' mental health activism).

2. Meghan and Harry decided what their role would be and what funding they would get without a discussion with the monarch or her heirs, and even published their arrogant manifesto for no good reason, giving the BRF 10 minutes' warning. That is not decent behaviour and shows an entitled grandiosity that is breathtaking.

That half in, half out plan of theirs was for Harry, not Meghan. She's done with the BRF and the UK. There is no reason to not keep Frogmore as their home and live as private individuals in the UK (pay rent). Harry was trying to save his marriage. Maybe he would be happier not being a working royal, but he has been close to his family his whole life (including his father, contrary to what people believe), all his friends and his whole lifestyle is based in his country - the UK. (There are other royals who live in the UK, even in Crown properties, who are not working royals.) They are going to end up in LA, where the tabloids and paparazzi do not have the same restraints as in the UK, where it will be a lot more expensive, where Harry will be cut off from his family and friends and the lifestyle he has had his whole life ... Nope, Harry has been manipulated into believing he is protecting his family.

Meghan is obviously not suitable as a working royal (and not wearing stockings is not worthy of discussion as a problem, but not having any respect or regard for the monarch and the monarchy and British culture and history was and is a huge problem) and obviously found nothing she actually liked about the UK. Instead of owning up to that, apologising and making amends, she plays the victim and blames everyone and everything else.

Meghan and Harry have shown themselves to be the kind of parents who will happily leave Archie alone with nanny while they head off to another country for a society wedding, tennis match, to make a woke speech in front of a bunch of woke wealthy people ... every time they have left Archie it was for personal selfish reasons and not for work (as did the Queen, and the modern generation try to do that as little as possible). I don't think Archie has great parents! He does not even have a secure home and has been cut off, by his parents, from his extended family on both sides.

It is not terrible that Harry stepped down as a working royal and yes, he should have the right to choose. It is why and how he did it that is repugnant, and the attitude that him and Meghan have displayed that has shown them lacking in honour and respect and untruthful about their motives and actions.
Unknown said…
@Nutty

Lemon tea here

Without reading anyone's comments, first impression of mine , was that Amsterdam trip and getting hammered.

No pregnant woman , would do that , before , during pregnancy.

Red flags came up , when after the marriage , Markle flew to Canada or somewhere on that part of the earth , and whilst supposedly pregnant , enjoyed champagne on the plane !

The reason I never forgot that , was because I spent many years trying to fall pregnant and now have children , so when I read things like that , I immediately ask questions.

I am stunned about this. And so should any woman who is trying to fall pregnant and have a baby.

Please can someone expose this . How dare this woman do this , and appear to get away with it ?

Nutty, please investigate further.

Lemon tea
MustySyphone said…
@tatty: "s it really so terrible he left the royal family? Shouldn’t he have the right to choose?"

No its not terrible IF they pay their own expenses and not the British Taxpayer.

Frankly at 35 Harry shouldn't be getting an allowance from his Dad either.

They did a crappy job of planning their escape and they were foolish to expect to keep all the Royal perks and money without performing any of the Royal duties (or picking and choosing which they'd do and which they wouldn't do). Its like if you told your boss (I'm assuming you are currently or have once been employed): ok, I'm not happy here so I'm leaving but I expect you to continue paying me and providing my benefits. Also, I'll be back for Joe's Birthday celebration lunch and then I'm gone again".
Glow W said…
@sandie, ok I get that point of view. However, Phillip for instance, isn’t going to get better any time soon. With all the doctor appointments, maybe everyone knew Phillip was as well as he would be for the time being. Just a thought— PP doesn’t have time on his side, though he could have many more years to come.

Yes, I didn’t add MM to my discussion because she surely is the question mark. And point taken about Archie’s parents!

Two more thoughts about “can’t have kids” and IVF:

I don’t think any doctor can ever say for sure someone 100% can’t get pregnant unless she is missing parts. A friend of mine was actually told by her RE that she had the same chance of getting pregnant as a woman with no uterus. They borrowed money from their parents to do IVF. The big day came and they made her do a pregnancy test... which she asked why would she have to if she has the same chance as a woman with no uterus (she was obviously every very insulted and upset by the callousness of the comment).

Yup. Pregnant. All on their own. 9 weeks too as they hurriedly gave her an ultrasound.

Second quick story: Dh’s cousin had a Superman pendant on (cheesy as hell) so I asked him about it. His wife chimed in all lovey that she was always told she would never be able to get pregnant, so they got married knowing that and he got her pregnant. She bought him the Superman pendant and necklace.

Glow W said…
@musty yes, it’s a sign of someone who has been given everything he has wanted since he was little.

@metillicus bee yes, laziness doesn’t equal low intellect, and in some cases actually indicates high IQ/boredom. It seemed manipulative on Harry’s part for sure.

It seems like people have been covering for Harry for a long time.
Sandie said…
@tatty: Sorry for being so vehement! I do feel compassion for Meghan and Harry because they keep tripping over their own characters and messing up when they had access to good loving advice and support. I also feel compassion for the people around them who they hurt, including Archie.

As for the media stories and criticism and the online conspiracies, they were placed in the very family and support system that had experienced the same (Meghan supporters actively seek the death of William and his family) and survived it (heck, William and Kate; Charles and Camilla; etc. are thriving). Many experience online bullying and wild stories being published about them without that support or help of any kind. Harry had no choice because he was born to it, but Meghan actively sought, hustled for and grabbed at the high profile life.
Fairy Crocodile said…
@MustySyphone

Interesting observation about her weight. Estrogen is known to make your weight change. Some people gain weight, some lose it. So may be she was on estrogen when she was thin. Who knows
Fairy Crocodile said…
@Sandie

You are a better person than I am. I have lost all compassion to them the moment Harry accused us all of being "unconscious racists" and she made a teary face at the camera saying that the British stiff upper lip "must be very damaging inside".

She insulted all Brits who had to live through German blitz, rationing and hardships with their stiff upper lip approach. I am done with both of them. Don't wish them harm but have no warmth either.
Unknown said…
@tatty I don’t believe Harry wanted an out from royal life for himself or even Archie. His goodbye speech came off resentful and like a shock. I think he wants royal life plus a celeb life MINUS all the negatives, as in the responsibilities and the public criticism. I doubt he’s learned a very important economic principle: there is no such thing as a free lunch.

The way H&M acted during the “pregnancy” and Archie’s existence has been consistently publicity hungry. Harry has either cosigned or not put a kibosh on the following:
- Disclosing Meg’s “pregnancy” at a wedding viewed by millions and where all British press had their “eyeballs” on
- Disclosing pregnancy in the lead-up of a tour that was always going to garner a high level of public interest
- “Star-studded” baby shower against British traditions with pre-planned pap walks, inviting a journalist that didn’t attend the wedding, and public displays of gifts, flower donations to sick kids, and so on...
- First official picture of Archie was with HMTQ when not a formal occasion, i.e. Christening or a Royal Portrait
- Archie was brought on a tour, put on display meeting a revered historical figure, and when they decided to film a documentary
- After publicizing Archie’s Christmas photo, mere days later had another photo of him published

There are more instances that I think other fonts might be better at bringing up.
Teasmade said…
Off-topic comment:

Regarding the moderation causing silence yesterday/much of today. Just for an idea of my addiction/commitment: I went to the Enty site and did some searches on your name and read down the newer posts, went to CD looking for a comment or an announcement, located a "nuttyflavor" on Twitter (wrong one), and just did a general web search on this blog name.

Not to mention all the times I Ctrl-R'ed.

I was afraid either that you had been banned and forced to close down (which it wasn't, I know) or that Blogger was having some issues.

BIG relief that you're/we're back!

Thanks, Nutty!

Fairy Crocodile said…
@Tatty

Yes, there are many interesting stories about pregnancies. My mom is a gynecologist and she knows many cases when women lost all hope of natural conception and went the adoption route only to conceive after they adopted.

She always marveled about it.
Unknown said…
Hi Nutty

Lemon tea here

Further to this, I wish I could say more, as I struggled for years to fall pregnant, and it bothers me when things like you mentioned , gets said.

I feel that a line has been crossed over , when a pregnancy , for the sake of being pregnant, has happened.

Some of the statements brought back memories of the years of anguish and pain, and never was it thought that these happenings would become exploited to such an extent.

Still trying to get over your main points. Totally shocking ! Your blog comments are now becoming personal.

Lemon tea
Glow W said…
@sandie yes, I have noted her ability to social climb is strong. You didn’t come across as vehement— I’m always interested to read what others have been thinking.

I like everyone else here awaits anything that might be coming down the line about any of this.

@charade, yes, I can see your point. Harry does want to still be privileged but to also not be bothered.

@teasmade I almost posted on CDAN to ask if anyone knew what happened to Nutty’s blog!

@fairy Croc indeed. The mysteries of the human body. As for whether or not she was pg, I’m on the fence about it. Sometimes I think she just got lucky and got pregnant— my friend who didn’t find out until 9 weeks didn’t have symptoms, so maybe something like that accounts for her drinking, etc. Of course, this doesn’t mean she will easily fall pregnant again. I also think there could be some merit to the surrogate theory, but then like when her supposed bump nearly fell down, why didn’t it actually fall out? To me, it’s strange all around. I suppose for me, until we get definite proof she wasn’t pregnant, I assume she was and was just very limber etc, wearing I’ll fitting clothes and perhaps a belly belt— or for all we know Harry made her wear a bullet proof bump protector etc. I feel like nothing on this falls neatly into one category.



Humor Me said…
Nutty - thank you for the transcript of the ENTY podcast.

The CDAN track record is pretty good as far as predictions. So I'm taking him / the source at his word.
This is the best explanation of the timing of the Megxit and why - MM was cornered and she ran.
re: Kate and the tears at the fitting: given the woman was post partum, I could fault hormones, because it did not sound like the Kate the public knows (stiff up lip et al).
re: the affair: I am tore on this one because CDAN continues to say that it is still going. If this were the case, why was Rose at Xmas/ Church with the family. The horrors! I cannot imagine Wills doing this to his wife (and children) remembering what he and his mother went through during his childhood.

Wowzers - poor Harry. He will need mental health counseling more than ever IF this is all true and comes to light.
Ava C said…
I have great difficulty believing Meghan was ever in love with Harry because - well , it's Harry. He doesn't have the looks to excuse his personality or the personality to excuse his looks. I don't even think it was love at one remove, because of what he could give her. The giddiness was all an act, and being Meghan, an act that was breathtakingly awful. So overdone. Again, she underrated the press and public's intelligence. I don't know where she gets the idea that we're all gullible fools to be manipulated whenever she feels like it. I remember in BBC's 'Sherlock' when his brother Mycroft, a true off-the-scale genius, commented "I'm living in a world of goldfish". That's Meghan's deluded mindset in a nutshell.

"The only thing is, Harry either didn't know this yacht scene or didn't know Meghan was a yachter herself"

This does tie in with something Harry Markle or Jerseydeanne or someone else reported quite a while ago.

If I remember correctly, it was around the time of Tom Inskip's wedding - Harry was invited to go a-yachting by one of his chums & planned to take MM as girlfriend. Unbeknown to him, she was also recruited in a `professional’ capacity on same trip.(Did I see a rate of $500 an hour quoted?) Whoops!

I’m sure I saw it somewhere… May have been pure gossip of course...

Simplest explanation of all? She’s just a wh*re.

I have yet to ruminate on the rest of what Enty has to say.

Am never quite sure what to make of Giles Coren - a tad louche perhaps? What might his being Jewish have to do with this - or, as sometimes said, the price of fish, for that matter?
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
Welcome to the blog @Unknown :)

I engaged because I don’t believe @tatty is a troll but a BRF fan. Also, for a good chunk of my life my trajectory has been academia. That goal made it automatic for me to engage with the opposite side and work on building better arguments. I believe diversity of opinion makes everyone smarter.
HappyDays said…
Sandy:

I think Meghan set her sights on the UK because all the men there she’d be interested in marrying speak english as their native language. No matter who became ensnared in her net of deceit, she was planning on making him live in LA, so bagging a man from the UK was the fastest, easiest route to her goal.

I know her sugars say she is fluent in multiple languages, but I think her fluency in anything other than english is overblown. She ptobably speaks nothing more fluent than restaurant and hotel-level communication and that’s it.
Glow W said…
Here is a photo of a concept design for a bullet proof vest for a pregnant woman: https://www.tellerreport.com/post/2019-10-25---art-and-design--bulletproof-vest-for-pregnant-woman-and-360-degree-experience-.H1eQ3g--5H.html

Here are pregnancy support bands: https://www.blanqi.com/collections/bands?gclid=CjwKCAiAj-_xBRBjEiwAmRbqYvOWiXazOb9vsSwnF3GcyJAp3iOw_MzRa2j1zxmpEtCLvLahOPzvNRoCjzgQAvD_BwE#

Different styles: https://www.motherhood.com/maternity-support-belt/006-92200-000-001.html

Of course, google images gives a variety of styles.

Who knows what she was wearing under her non maternity clothes while she was pregnant
Glow W said…
@charade I appreciate your kindness
Glow W said…
OMG, I just found this industrial pregnancy support contraction http://www.wholesalepoint.com/product/Core-6900-L.aspx?gclid=CjwKCAiAj-_xBRBjEiwAmRbqYqXqGoDZNeDsgMQMmpnl4Ce7q9Cwij-tvRkphTeMr_F_8QXJOm_fzxoCVvEQAvD_BwE

Open crotch for easy bathroom use.
Ilona said…
@Sandie You wrote: "By the way, the latest long and detailed tarot reading from my favourite most accurate reader has picked up that Meghan has already connected with her post-Harry man, although the relationship is not romantic yet."

Best news I've heard recently!!! I sincerely hope that MM moves on and becomes a distant memory soon. She is a very toxic person in my opinion. I deplore people who take advantage of others and I believe that she has taken advantage of PH with all his psychological problems and vulnerability.

As for her having a career and making tons of money from now on ... I very much doubt it. She will probably latch on to the next man with money who will entertain her demands for some time and then she will keep repeating the pattern.

Sorry to be so cynical but I have never warmed to that woman ...
Ava C said…
I have difficulty with Giles Coren in all this as I LOVE his writing and always have. His father Alan Coren was one of my all-time favourites and I still dip into an anthology of his funniest articles when I'm down. I wish GC had nothing to do with it.

Just think, one day all of this saga will be out there, as part of history. It's just a matter of time. I wonder if Meghan's yachting may come to be seen like the Wallis Simpson China dossier? That was a step too far and seems to have been a scurrilous rumour encouraged by Queen Elizabeth, later the Queen Mother. However it seems more believable for Meghan.

Wallis Simpson is getting comparatively good press these days, due to the comparison with Meghan. I've always had a soft spot for her myself but my grandmother and her circle wouldn't allow her name to be mentioned. I find myself reassessing their reaction now, as one day, years from now, we may be lecturing the young for mentioning Meghan in our presence!

One thing that emerged comparatively recently was that Edward VIII got what he wanted whereas Wallis would have been happier to remain married to her second husband while enjoying her time as a royal mistress. For all we know, Harry could be providing far more of the driving force behind the FU to his family than Meghan. He can't be totally emasculated yet, as when he's with Meghan she may as well be in purdah as far as paps are concerned. Not an easy task to keep her shut down like that.

I do hope I'm still around when it all comes out definitively. Or as definitive as these things can be. Imagine reading the memoirs of Meghan's equivalent of Ken Wharfe (RPO to William and Harry and then Diana). I don't think there'll ever be an equivalent to Patrick Jephson (Diana's private secretary for years) given she fires them with such regularity.
I don't buy that Harry just randomly wanted to meet Meghan friggin Markle. She had to have been behind him even knowing of her existence, I'm assuming Markus Anderson or some other cohort of hers talked her up to him, so the part where she was surprised he thought it was a real date doesn't ring true at all.
Also, I think they probably kept the fact they used a surrogate pretty quiet so even people who think they're insiders wouldn't have known about it. She was absolutely not pregnant, I'd bet anything on it. Besides her age and the complicated procedure of IVF, we all have eyeballs and some of her moon bumps were beyond ridiculous. Then the no signatures on the birth certificate, etc. My suspicion is that she arranged a surrogate without Harry's "contribution" or knowledge, told him she was pregnant, and by the time he realized she wasn't, it was too late to say anything.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
MustySyphone said…
@fairy croc:

Interesting take on the hormones. My physician told me that in "women of a certain age" (kind way of saying post menopausal) , the fluffy ones tend to keep a little estrogen while the thin ones lose it all. I was wondering if the same was true, or close to it, for younger women of child bearing years. For older women it was something about the estrogen tends to stay in the fat cells.

Also agree about your take on her "stiff upper lip" comment. I know many a nan that would like to slap her up the side of the head for that.
Glow W said…
@musty I hate to bring other women up in regard to this, but you know that designer Rachel Zoe? She was thin to the point where I assumed she had an eating disorder and however it happened, she got pregnant and delivered a healthy baby.
Glow W said…
Zoe at 9 months pregnant with #2!! Crazy thin https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2502091/Im-months-pregnant-Still-slender-Rachel-Zoe-makes-shocking-announcement-shes-birth.html
d.c. said…
er, that transcript is kinda hard to follow (not your fault, nutty, obviously).
but, it sounds like he's saying archie is real... despite all the pictures of the incredibly shrinking pillow, impossible feats of balance in 4-inch stillettos at 8+months (with no hint of help from the supposedly doting husband). so, i'm pretty skeptical of enty's 'source' if the basic claim is archie is real, just ivf. i mean, that photo with the 'baby-wearing' doll... flouncing in the woods... come on.
d.c. said…
i also don't understand what enty is trying to say about kate and the birthday walk, and the wearing of the matching purple with the queen, that this somehow was a message or the last straw triggering MM to announce their departure? If someone could please explain this to me like I'm 5, I'd appreciate it.
lizzie said…
@Humor Me wrote:

>>re: the affair: I am tore on this one because CDAN continues to say that it is still going. If this were the case, why was Rose at Xmas/ Church with the family. The horrors! I cannot imagine Wills doing this to his wife (and children) remembering what he and his mother went through during his childhood.<<

Rose wasn't at the Christmas event. It was Kate's birthday weekend. And I can easily see W&K doing that to shut down rumors (whether there was an affair in the past or not. I don't think one is still going on.) Rose has attended the birthday church walk before but not in recent years. And it was good for Rose too to quiet rumors.
Teasmade said…
@d.c.: I *think* he meant the Christmas walk.
Humor Me said…
@lizzie: thank you for the clarification. Too many "walks".....
MustySyphone said…
@tatty

I have no idea who Rachel Zoe is and I'm ok with that. The point is, I made my statement in general. You can always find an exception to the rule or a friend of a friend who's cousin...... or maybe modern medicine stepped in. I just don't know nor do you. One example (of someone you don't know personally) doesn't make a case is all I'm saying.

@d.c. Normally the only church walk is the Christmas one. For the family to do a church walk for Kate's birthday is out of the ordinary for sure. The Royal always walks ahead--always, thats proper protocol (except for Harry when MM holds him back and gets in front of him). Whether its two fingers to MM , I don't know. The matching the Queen thing is a stretch. Pretty sure Kate and Betty don't phone each other the night before and coordinate outfits (like high school girls do).
Ava C said…
I absolutely loved the Kyle Dunnigan impression of Meghan:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3kSn4ysw8y8

and now there's another clip of him being Meghan, from the US show 'Lights Out' a couple of screens down on:

https://the-charlatan-duchess.tumblr.com

Just hear people tittering in the audience, as soon as 'Meghan's' face comes up on screen. If this impersonation keeps up it's going to be Tina Fey all over again.
Guesser said…
Ok, Enty wants us to believe that she was really pregnant? The moving bump,the constant airline travel, the heels, the secrecy, the odd birth announcement, etc., etc. Is it possible some " insiders" are sharing information to catch a snitch? Maybe they are saying now it was a real birth to allow poor Archie a future title? All the clues add up to a surrogate. But this woman has to disappear. @Nutty, for years many of us, even men, have questioned if Enty has even a simple understanding of female biology. It was a running joke years ago.
Louise said…
Ava C: Those impressions are spot on!
Glow W said…
@musty I’m sorry. I thought it was you who was asking about thinness and getting pregnant or IVF. At any rate, my reply was directed to that person.

I’m rushing... it’s MIL’s birthday and we are taking her out to dinner.

Goodnight, everyone.
Animal Lover said…
@Nutty


I've been reading Enty for years when the blog had a different voice. I find a lot of what he reports as plausible if not totally accurate.

The gist of the podcast is that Meghan is a schemer which no one has refuted.

The DM is reporting H&M have boosted security at the home they are staying at.
Louise said…
Gayle King has been markled:

https://pagesix.com/2020/02/06/snoop-dogg-slams-gayle-king-over-cbs-clip-about-kobe-bryant/

"Snoop Dogg slams Gayle King over CBS clip about Kobe Bryant"

"The interview has enraged Bryant fans and garnered significant backlash across social media."
lizzie said…
@MustySyphone wrote

>>>For the family to do a church walk for Kate's birthday is out of the ordinary for sure<<<

If I'm reading this comment correctly, it's not really unusual. The Middletons and Kate's friends often do a birthday walk the weekend before her birthday because the Cambridges have a gathering at Anmer Hall. And TQ is always at Sandringham in January so other royals may be too.

Last year Kate's birthday weekend walk
https://m.eonline.com/amp/news/1001991/kate-middleton-kicks-off-the-new-year-in-blue-for-church-with-queen-elizabeth- ii

And here's a birthday weekend walk in 2017 Rose attended (Check out Sophie Carter's gorgeous burgundy velvet coat!)
https://hrhduchesskate.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-cambridges-middletons-join-queen.html?m=1
LavenderToast said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lemonfrog said…
Some very interesting tea. That is for sharing. I don’t believe there was an affair, not for one moment. But I do believe a lot of the details here. Could be a lot of truth here.
Lily Love said…
If William had an affair, I do not believe it was with Rose. And to be completely honest, with his parents reputation I don’t think he has slept with anyone but Kate since they have gotten engaged.
Hikari said…
Nutty,

Thanks for typing all that out… It must’ve taken forever. It might be something lost in translation from audio to print, but I find Enty’s narrative pretty garbled and hard to follow. It’s conversational all right, but I guess I would expect a high-powered lawyer to be more articulate. This sounds more like a frat boy’s Campus gossip over some beers. There’s nothing really earth shattering here; I guess the only surprising thing to me was Rach being the source of all the negative Tea about “Dutchess Difficult” and making a four-year-old cry not to mention her mother, who had given birth less than a month prior. Kate is tough but she’s not made of stone, and with a three week old baby at home, She would have been more emotional than usual. There was even a story put about that this episode actually devolved into Rach slapping the child. Now, that I don’t believe, because if Rachel had hit Charlotte, I don’t believe there would’ve been any inducements available To make that wedding go forward. William is a gentleman, but if Harry’s domineering bunt Had hit his daughter? Ramming Rachel’s false teeth down her throat Would’ve been too good for her. And then for extra measure he could’ve marched off to Gan Gan and threatened To abdicate if The wedding was not caught off immediately, and herself removed from coming within 100 miles in his family. At the very least, he could’ve refused categorically to stand up beside Harry Before God as a witness to the travesty. He should’ve let Harry scramble to try and find the best man from among all his ghosted friends, and that would’ve sent a clear message to the world watching that no one in the family supported this marriage.
Ava C said…
Found another Kyle Dunnigan Meghan clip but this time he's doing Harry as well. Think he's captured the post-FU Harry very well:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yxpMEu2b-I0

Welcome to your new life Harry.
SarcasticBimbo said…
I think Enty's a valet or dog walker. There is no way he's an attorney.
Hikari said…
Since the other thread seems to have run its course, I will contribute hear one more idea for Rachel and Harry at the Oscars. If they don’t get a proper invitation to ensure themselves seats, they could volunteer to be seat holders... The dogs bodies who were hired, probably at minimum wage, to sit in celebrity seats when the stars get up to use the toilet or step out to make a phone call or do some lines in the coat room. Having seat fillers fill the holes ensures that whenever the camera pans over the audience, it looks full. But hey, they get to get dressed up And depending on who gets up to pee, They might even get to spend a few minutes close to the stage. Only slightly less humiliating for Rach would be if their seats were way in the back in the last row.

Being at the Oscars, and being seen to be warmly received is crucial for Rach. Everybody who’s anybody in Tinseltown will be there, in the circle she’s so desperate to mingle in. She’s Cinders longing to go to the ball, But she’s already turned into a pumpkin And there’s no going back. If Harry is anyone in the story, he’s one of the mice footmen in livery. And to think, he used to be a real Prince of the kingdom. Now if he’s lucky, he gets to carry her purse.
Mischief Girl said…
Nutty, I would also like to thank you for typing all that out. Unless you have some program that will automatically transcribe speaking, that was a ton of work. Thank you.

I've followed Enty for a couple of years now, and I find his gossip with regards to the BRF sketchy at best. Overall, I thought his podcast was difficult to follow. I did find the comment that MM thought the first "date" was to arrange a possible yachting contract, but Harry thought it was a real date. I was so surprised when Harry first was seen squiring MM around. He had a definite type (VERY blond) and I was really surprised to see him with a brunette. (I had zero idea she was half black until the press reported it.)

I don't believe William had an affair with Rose.

I also simply cannot believe that the Harkles would be welcome at the Oscars. Hollywood is a small enough town that everyone there would know of MM's yachting past, if she had to entertain Weinstein, etc.

The exclusivity of the working actors who are celebrated by Oscar is small enough that I would think there would be HUGE backlash if MM or Harry were celebrated in any way, shape, or form. They just aren't members of "the club".

And the Harkles can offer nothing to these people. They have no platform and no influence over people in power (unless they have blackmail details).

@Charade: In case you aren't looking at the previous blog post, thanks for posting the links to the questions Tatty had. I was going to search for the art project stories because that made such an impression on me. I distinctly remember People magazine having an article with Harry standing in front of two large artwork panels and I was BLOWN AWAY by the talent (I thought) he displayed.

To learn that he cheated is one thing. To learn that he was okay with standing in front of someone else's creative work and claim it as his own was incredibly distasteful to me.

That episode showed me a lot about his character, none of it nice.
Mary said…
Enty is full of the brown stuff. I’m of the opinion that once Markle hired Sunshine Sux Enty was being paid to lay off Markle. There was no affair, I also think this story, is intended to suggest Markle didn’t intend for what happened to happen. They know the whitewash isn’t working
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Glow W said…
@nutty flavor would you do your magic please? Thank you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I didn’t realize you transcribed all of that out, so thank you for taking the time to do that.
Peridot said…
First time posting. During Eugenie's wedding, there was a camera shot of Kate and William that was quite candid. The camera was above the pair and they were not paying attention to anyone around them. This was the period before the wedding commenced. Kate was talking quietly to William and she had her hand on the arm of her chair. William was very visibly upset and she was trying to console him. William had his hand placed over Kate's and he was looking side eye and down a bit with his eyes, but still listening to her. It was a pose that Diana exhibited countless times. William looked up at Kate and it was at that moment that I realized that the two are truly soul mates. It was a poignant moment. I think Enty is wrong about a William and Rose affair.
MissyPab said…
I worked in hospitals in my career. Doctors have a certain amount of time to write their reports and sign off on things. This in the US, it may be different in Britain. It would be unusual to go tel weeks or longer for Doctors not to sign. This shows me more evidence of a deception. I think they had a surrogate. Archie is too big for 8 months.

I don't believe PW had an affair. They would not have her on a walk if they were continuing the affair.

Thank you nuttier for sharing your observations. It helps me with my perspective on them.
Glow W said…
It always bothered me that Enty keeps trying to push the narrative that Bea was raped. suppose she was— enty has NO BUSINESS making that information public, (I don’t think it happened, but If it did, enty deserves bad things)
Glow W said…
@MissyPab sign what?
@peridor I’m glad you posted. Welcome
Unknown said…
Warning: OT and about the social environment of Nutty’s blog. Feel free to scroll by.

Hi @Unknown, thanks for the response. I apologize for not recognizing you. I completely understand and respect your feelings on this matter. In no way do I condone the negative comments and posts that @tatty made. I do not condone it from anyone and never will. I recognize the pain of what other posters experienced. I wish the hurtful situations never happened or repeat themselves. I hope for healing for those who experienced it.

I don’t have a good answer for you because I don’t really know what is the “right” response for any of these negative situations. I am very imperfect and my human-ness makes me prone to errors in judgment. With that frame of mind, I do not believe I have the right to police anyone but me, my actions, and my patterns.

I want to preface this by saying I don’t have a “right” answer, only my limited perspective and my flawed choices. I try my best to engage peacefully with everyone regardless. I am possibly “wrong” but because this is a gossip blog, I consider the stakes lower and believe we have a luxury to physically and mentally ignore the negative if we want to continue participating. That is a luxury we wouldn’t have at say a job, our home, etc... I don’t want to go into details but I have had multiple life-threatening situations and so insults or disagreements online wouldn’t pain me the way it might others. I choose to not engage with the negative and move on when it happens.

However, I cannot make a judgment of what is “right” and “best” for others to do. I only hope that EVERY font here have peace and joy in general. It’s not in my power to guarantee it but it’s in my power to contribute to that goal on the blog as best as I know how to.

Please forgive me @Unknown if I overstepped my bounds with this response. I apologize if I have disappointed you. I can only say that I meant no harm and hope the best for you. May your experience on the blog be fun and happy :)
LavenderToast said…
@Unknown

Gracias tambien! Espero que no mas loco.
Glow W said…
@charade, my reply on the last blog about needing receipts was in response to Hikari’s post stating things as fact such as Harry has low IQ. I don’t recall seeing a post by you, for what is worth.

I had never heard the story about Harry and the art project.

As for unknown this is the same unknown who is completely obsessed with me and will not let things go that are several months old at this point. This unknown is a trouble maker, causes Nutty more work and time to delete her posts and refuses to skip over my posts and scroll and roll.

I don’t know Lavender Toast enough to know why she cares to pile on.


Perhaps because nutty published the backlog of posts in rapid succession, it appeared I was replying to you, I don’t know. I don’t go back to old blogs once a new one is published.

At any rate, @charade, I appreciate that you replied and gave me links.
LavenderToast said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
@tatty No worries. I knew you weren’t replying to me because I was away from the blog for a while. I read your questions and responded because I had the answers. I’ve been skimming so didn’t know you were directly asking Hikari. I posted on blog posts because you mentioned not looking at old posts after new ones go live.

re: Unknown. I posted my peace. Whatever happens, happens. I tried my best and hope for the best. Now to go back OT.
Glow W said…
Since people here care so much about me, this is what I wanted receipts on, and I appreciate those who supplied me with links.

Hikari said:
“I now find everything we were ever told about Haz's military training and service to be pretty suspect and probably more whitewash than reality. After basically flunking out of Eton (his best mark was a D in Geography; his B in Art was completely teacher-made--his art teacher did his project but didn't do it to A level because nobody would have accepted an A as Harry's work) he was admitted to Sandhurst with one of the lower passing scores for cadet candidates. Many people who are not academically inclined excel in the military with its emphasis on doing. I can accept that Harry was trained to fly the Apache helicopters. I don't think it's too likely that the (at that time) #3 to the British crown would have been permitted to fly solo missions in hazardous areas. Haz may have flown with instructors or with more experienced pilots; any solo outings were probably on the training ground, if he was permitted those. Perhaps he really was a bona fide Apache pilot. But if he was qualified to fly on his own and excelled at it, he could have explored other options for flying once returning to civvie life (if being a full time Royal is 'civvie') He didn't. The military service which allegedly meant so much to him (I believe he called his time in Afghanistan 'fun') wasn't important enough to him to fill his military patronages properly, as we have seen. Going to a Disney film was more important.

We were told that Harry was discharged early from his service due to his high profile threatening the security of his unit; actually he was discharged early for chronic insubordination and a number of incidents of racial slurs directed to fellow squaddies. 'Captain Wales', far from being a leader in his unit was an insubordinate, racist toerag who didn't feel the rules of military hierarchy should apply to him since he was a Prince. This kind of attitude would be crap for morale, and I wonder how sorry Harry's squad mates were to see the back of him in actuality. This is life-and-death stuff, not a pampered Prince's playground. I don't think Haz has displayed in his subsequent behavior evidence of inner courage and decency, to be the sort of soldier that could have someone's back in the field . . especially if that someone was a person he'd insulted with derogatory racial names in the barracks.”

She also claimed Harry has about an IQ of 90:

“I peg Haz for the mid-to-high 90s. He seems like he might have AD/HD which would affect his focus and concentration and might be masking his ability to learn in some situations. He definitely appears to be a kinesthetic learner as opposed to more traditional teaching styles favored in schools. Diana was dyslexic, as is Beatrice, so it's there on both sides of the family.”

Unknown said…
* I meant, I posted on both of the last blog posts.
Glow W said…
@charade cool, ok and thanks again.

I now need to look up 1) Harry was fired for insubordination and 2)Diana was dyslexic 3) harry’s Helicopter skills and service was exaggerated
Glow W said…
This says Harry admitted he is dyslexic https://www.kaieteurnewsonline.com/2018/07/10/understanding-dyslexia/

Also here http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/opinion/unlocking-dyslexia-in-jamaica_134154
“Prince Harry said that his personal struggle with dyslexia made school very hard; however, after he graduated from Britain's prestigious Eton College, he took some time off to volunteer in various African countries before choosing a military career (instead of going to university), and underwent officer training at the Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst.”

SarcasticBimbo said…
+1 re: Enty's exploitation of Bea, @tatty.

I also think Enty has no idea when it comes to the BRF.

Glow W said…
https://www.forces.net/news/prince-harry-what-are-his-military-titles-and-patronages

“Prince Harry's military career

Passing his Regular Commissions Board (RCB), the qualification necessary to train at Sandhurst, in September 2004, Prince Harry entered RMAS in May 2005 to begin 44 weeks of Officer Cadet training.

In January 2006, Clarence House announced he was to join the Blues and Royals, after which he was commissioned as an Army officer on 12 April that year.

In 2007, the prince was deployed to Afghanistan for ten weeks, working as a forward air controller, coordinating air strikes on Taliban positions.

However, his tour ended early following reports in international media of his whereabouts.”

(Snipped)

“On 25 February 2008, it was made known Prince Harry had been serving with the Army in Helmand Province, Afghanistan for more than two months.

He was promoted to the rank of Lieutenant with The Household Cavalry on 13 April 2008.

The Duke of Sussex then retrained as an Apache pilot in the Army Air Corps and returned to Afghanistan in 2012 as a helicopter co-pilot and gunner.

His decision to leave the Army was confirmed in March 2015.

Prince Harry ended his military career in June 2015, following a secondment to the Australian military.”
Glow W said…
@sarcastic Bimbo 👍🏻 Agreed
LavenderToast said…
@tatty

You don't know why I said what I did to @Unknown. You make OT comments and I can say esoteric comments also.
Glow W said…
I saw your post before you deleted it.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
LavenderToast said…
@tatty

Did I say your name? Nooooooooooooo
LavenderToast said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Glow W said…
Excerpt from book Prince Harry: Brother, Soldier, son about dyslexics make good pilots.
https://books.google.com/books?id=wEB0AwAAQBAJ&pg=PT278&lpg=PT278&dq=prince+Harry+is+dyslexic&source=bl&ots=7vk3RN_Hi9&sig=ACfU3U1_Wf-QnyuO5WHce2xt7AkFhWsmww&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiP6tr7wr7nAhUCR6wKHZ7vDfI4FBDoATAPegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=prince%20Harry%20is%20dyslexic&f=false

I don’t believe I can cut and paste this
SarcasticBimbo said…
I just watched all of The Windsors on Netflix, and I'm so thankful to Nutty, TP1, Skippy, et al. because the things I know about the royals through these sources, makes that series SO much funnier than it would have been to me if I hadn't discovered these blogs, etc.
HappyDays said…
Hi Nutty: Your post instantly reminded me of this item from harrymarkle. I thought I had copied it, but couldn’t locate it during the limited time I had at my office today to search for it, but I found it this evening. This is long, so it will be in multiple parts:

This is an anonymous email sent to the person who writes the harrymarkle blog. It WAS in the Timeline section, sandwiched between part 5 and Part 6, but I noticed that this item and Part 6 have been removed from the harrymarkle timeline within the past few weeks since I originally saw it and copied it.

It is dated about six weeks before the wedding and echoes much of what your post from enty says about Meghan.

The enty comments, combined with this anonymous email, what I’ve read about Tom Inskip, who warned Harry about moving so fast with Meghan, who may have known her through ‘yachting,’ plus the dodgy story they told during the engagement interview about how they met, and the Cindy Adams Page Six item in the NY Post on January 14. 2020, plus all the other bits and pieces I’ve read about Meghan from people like Ninaki Priddy, Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne, Twitter posts from behind the scenes during their Oceania and Affica tours, plus Meghan’s well documented behaviors of hyperspending, loss of staff, the People magazine article and letter and legal action plus dozens of other examples combine to paint a an extremely unflattering but in my opinion, is a generally accurate character profile of the real Meghan Markle.

And it is ugly, to say the least.

Note: I have removed the user name from the email. The last paragraph is a notation by harrymarkle.
HappyDays said…
Part Two. The Anonymous Email to harrymarkle in March 2018:0:

MARCH 31, 2018
Sent in by ‘XxxxxxXxXxxxxx’
Meghan and Harry started as a play and pay situation.he has always been naughty but he could get away with it.this time harry was very unlucky.he was set up by Misha meghan and some pple.Harry was serious with some1 but meghan was able to work her sex magic and make harry stick around.however harry wasn’t planning to Marty her even to get serious with meghan.

fast forwad to problems after the engagementArguments btwn harry and meghan started the night of their engagement announcement.by xmas holiday harry heard made his mind that meghan is not what he wanted.by mid december harry heard gone quite on meghan hence thats y she turned up for xmas lunch unannounced she was never invited but she turned up forcefully and she was able to manipulate him up to a point where harry fell out with his family and ddnt go for the boxing day hunt.

through manipulation he was willing to try and make the relationship work but it ddnt take long once again for harry to realise that she was a liar a cheat and a manipulator.Meghan was seeing other guys behind Harry’s back who actually conducted harry around February and told him everything all the secrets they even warned him to stay away from meghan.this guys were used by meghan and dumped.some of this guys were taking care of her financially and they were planning a future with her.they were fleeced of their cash and unceremoniously dumped.

the revelations where the final straw that’s when PH ended things with her.from there PH has discovered so many secrets abt his future bride.Harry has told her so many times l dnt want u anymore but she is forcing him into the wedding with threats and desperation.Meghan is seeing 3 guys once again one of those guys even contacted harry last week and he was devastated.the reason y meghan is still around is coz the royals hve been expecting her to use her common sense to see and accept that Harry is done with her but she is not listening soon Henry will tell her in front of the senior royals that he is done with her that’s wen she will leave.blackmailing and threats hve not worked so far.

the royals are decent pple they will give her a bit of money .she is prostituting herself at the moment and also money from magazine covers bt she aint making a lot of money.in summary the relationship ended in February when she was exposed as a cheat by the way Corey and Trevor also spoke to Harry and tell him everything

By the way there are no arrangements or anything done with her by the royals.The other issue as well meghan has got mental health problems.PH knws about that she takes some kind of medication for it By the way the Royals including Harry they are not supporting her financially she has got debts up to her eyebrows where she is staying its expensive.she claimed to be a millionaires so harry basically told her to get on with it but the truth of the matter is that she is broke the money she makes on magazine covers goes to PR accommodation and her clothing but still its not enough that’s y she is dating other guys now for money

Back in the state’s she has nothing even her own home.

Harrymarkle notation at the end of this email: SENT IN FROM AN ANON unedited except for paragraphs, but I think I know who from and they have been pretty reliable.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
@Nutty
Thank you for taking the time to write out the transcripts from the podcast. I'm still reading other comments but I still have a nagging feeling that someone (Soho House?) were helping MM. The whole story of their meeting up is still so murky.

Also, a couple more MM & Harry supporters, if we are still keeping tabs. Former PM David Cameron and British/Scots actor Brian Cox.



Unknown said…
@Nutty Thank you so much for transcribing Enty’s podcast :) That really must have been ordeal! If you don’t mind, I’d love to know how you did it because what you did would have taken me forever. Any tips or are you just a reading, writing, and typing machine?
Unknown said…
@ Nutty Now that I’m thinking about it, as a reporter you might know Shorthand? Gregg Shorthand? And maybe you also use those transcription keyboards they have for court reporting. I actually thought Shorthand was a dead art with modern journalists.
LavenderToast said…
@Unknown

Because you asked my opinion I read it a second time. After the first reading, I did not want to tackle such a poorly written diatribe again. On the whole, I think it is by and large. bunk although there may be some a few truths sprinkled in.

It just seems like someone was following a list of items to create a convincing story but instead of a fluid cohesive summary, it is just alleged facts thrown together with no substance. Much like throwing spaghetti against a wall and see what sticks.

I especially don't believe the IVF aspect of the story as it doesn't make sense. I also don't believe the cheating William rumor. The other big thing I find unbelievable is that the final straw would be the birthday walk which made Meg go nuclear.

So, all in all, I don't believe the gist of it. I think Harry did not want to be a working royal and Meghan and him plotted for a year or more as has been reported. They announced it because the BRF found out and they wanted to stupidly jump the gun (as some article mentioned already)..
.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
"SoHo House: Why I Cancelled My Membership."

This is an interesting article by a former member, and most of the comments are derogatory toward the SoHo House, too. Well worth the read.

https://www.man.london/culture-design/soho-house-why-i-cancelled-my-membership/
Louise said…
Globe and Mail, Canada's leading newspaper, continues to block all but the most flattering comments about the Smirkles. This started quite abruptly last week and is so glaring that they block links to their own previous Globe and Mail stories
Nutty Flavor said…
Good morning!

A fun video from the BBC, of all people.

Catchy tune, too.

https://twitter.com/dave5wol/status/1218226531555782657?s=20
LavenderToast said…
@Unknown

With her penchant for wanting publicity to increase her profile and to aid in her quest for fame and fortune (a la rich husband), I can see her befriending media types like Piers but I don't know about the depth which this 'email' reveals. I believe Meg has been responsible for many PR pieces but to think she was so crafty to control so many reporters seems fantastical to say the least.

And the yachting has been mentioned repeatedly, which makes it hard to believe that the Queen would allow such a skank in the family, As far as Corey goes, I would think he would not be in love with MM if she was carrying on like that. I read he was going to propose but got blindsided by Meg. I do think Meghan met Harry at that dinner hosted by Corey (which goes against that inflammatory email).

I think she got incredibly lucky to meet Harry and he was vulnerable and she was absolutely nothing like his prior girlfriends, I also think she has a svengali hold over Harry, not that it took much to control him. He wanted to leave royal life, was jealous of William, chaffed at royal dutues and he wanted to rebel. He found a partner in crome in Meghan.
I can believe MM was "working" the press, but not working *with* the press. There's a huge difference. Just as she was "working" Piers Morgan until he was of no use to her anymore.
That's what MM does- she sets up false friendships with people (including journalists who fall/fell for it) until they realize that they are being used. However, there are a few "news" outlets such as Kneepads which are obviously pro-MM by choice and do her bidding.

Thanks, Nutty,for transcribing Enty's podcast, but it was such a word salad that very little of it made sense to me. I have never believed the Rose story, and I think that was MM's doing. As for MM being a yacht girl, this is one of the very few times that I would like to see proof that she wasn't. This seems to tie in with rumors about the SoHo House and its various activities. Now we can add in Russian oligarchs and Middle Eastern promoters. Put them all together, and it does not look good for MM. I think Harry knows about her yachting days, and he's so besotted that he just doesn't care. He never had to stoop to her level because he was already there.

I am worried, however, that nefarious characters may be behind MM, gathering info on the BRF through what Harry has told MM and through other means of listening in on conversations. MM pushed the racist card so hard because she knew that would be the big problem that the BRF couldn't ignore if they tried to stop the marriage and in any future negotiations. I think MM had help from somebody or some group to put this all together. Judging from how she works alone, flitting from one thing to another, without a well laid out plan, the meeting and marrying of Harry looks like she was put in place to rope him in. In spy parlance she would be called a "honeypot."

Well, that's my theory, at least for today.




Nutty Flavor said…
@Louise, interesting about the Globe and Mail.

There's been a lot of discussion in the Canadian media recently about news media being regulated - a proposal was presented to Justin Trudeau's government suggesting that news outlets in Canada should be licensed.

Maybe the Globe and Mail is trying to stay on the positive side of the Trudeau government.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Hikari

Thanks for typing all that out… It must’ve taken forever.

It did, and I realized halfway through what I'd gotten myself into, but by then I was too committed to quit.

I think it was the stuff about pregnancy that really annoyed me. Enty seems to think that getting pregnant is like downloading an app.

Bad story in the Daily Mail? Let's download the app and get pregnant today!
@Nutty, that's a horrible thought that news outlets could be made to be licensed (For what and by whom) in Canada. What a blow to freedom of the press! Can you point me toward a good article on this?
Nutty Flavor said…
It all relates back to a report called the “Canada’s Communications Future: Time To Act” submitted to the Trudeau government that includes the recommendation that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) or another regulatory body control licencing of all companies creating “audio, audiovisual, and alphanumeric news content”.

Here's an article on the initial announcement, from a Libertarian outlet :

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/trudeau-government-looking-to-force-news-outlets-to-get-government-licences/

And here's an article about the minister walking it back a bit, from the Business Post

https://business.financialpost.com/telecom/media/minister-walks-back-talk-of-licensing-media-but-crtc-overhaul-plan-still-has-critics-worried

The Toronto Sun (not sure of it's slant) talks about the minister's "awkward about-face"

https://torontosun.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-steven-guilbeaults-awkward-about-face

You can also find clips of the minister on YouTube speaking directly about regulating the media.
@Nutty, thanks! I have a lot of reading to do.

"includes the recommendation that the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) or another regulatory body control licencing of all companies creating “audio, audiovisual, and alphanumeric news content"

Sounds like it wants to control the internet.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
 @JocelynsBellinis:

Thanks for sharing that London Man article!

I used to think members clubs like Soho House were good for people with stalkers.

..........Until............ I realised a very determined (or wealthy) stalker could easily join too. 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

(I'm afraid, like Diana, I'm not the smartest cookie in the jar.)

I mean really I've seen stalkers who produce short films from their own pocket just to get to their target (an actress). It was trap. People are scary like that. By the time the target realised what was happening, the stalker was everywhere, inserted herself in every place/group the actress was part of save for alumni associations& befriended most of her acquaintances.

At least money can still buy you security systems/services.

Shudders.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Nutty Flavor said...

It did, and I realized halfway through what I'd gotten myself into, but by then I was too committed to quit.

Goodness I hope you didn't *manually* type that all!

I'd use the "dictate" function on MS Word 365 and edit it like a Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) Editor.

Thank you for everything you do, Nutty. 🙏🏼 Love this place and the commenters. I like having a place with decent humans who haven't gone crazy "woke", just good old-fashioned normal people! 🍹💜
Scandi, There's a private club in Seattle, the Columbia Tower Club, which opened as a very exclusive club like the SoHo House in the 90s, and has since gone downhill. It was supposed to be for the movers and shakers in Seattle, and at first the price to join was very, very high, and not easy to get into. You had to know somebody to get in and go before a membership panel. Now, it costs about $750 to join and annual dues are about $200 not including drinks and dinner or private dining rooms. Most of the "elite" members have gone elsewhere as it has no cache now. There are better, more exclusive clubs in Seattle that fit the bill for people who want privacy. I think the Soho House has gone the same way.

The ladies restroom, however, has the best view in Seattle! LOL!
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Too bad The Diogenes Club isn't real! 😂😂
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Speaking of restrooms with a view, @JocelynsBellinis said: https://www.asiaone.com/asia/underwater-toilet-japanese-restaurant-offers-visitors-scenic-view
@Scandi, Yikes! Not sure I'd feel comfortable about that! I had a panic attack in one of those tunnel aquariums with sharks. Had to run out of there, and a few weeks later one of them in Japan broke, sending sharks and water all over the tourists!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XlDYJnZCirA
gloriosa said…
@Hikari, @ Nutties

Re MM and slapping P. Charlotte, this was not at the wedding fittings, I heard it happened in January 2019 at KP, before the sudden move to Frogmore. Something to do with said Moonbump. I too would have expected Enty to be more articulate and precise, seeing the he is supposed to be a lawyer (maybe a clerk in a legal firm?). This reads like a bad novella, what a mish mash, not discerible facts, just supposition and things pulled from other sources, gossip??
Magatha Mistie said…
@JocelynsBellinis
Ooh, I love a loo with a view, lovely lavs !

AlI I see is that all roads lead to Soho?

A big turning point in H&M relationship with the press, public & RF appears to me to be Eugenies wedding & Meg letting the world know she was pregnant via her ridiculous maternity coat. Her rolling her eyes at Harry in church, followed by them being ignored by Will & Kate et al outside the church, H&M ran off following Charles. All the reports of the two of them arguing whilst in Oz, & the recent article from Royal reporters saying Harry said to them, on landing in Oz “ thanks for coming, even though you weren’t invited.” Harry then scowled at said reporters the whole trip. It all went downhill from there.

For me, Meg standing on the stage at the Brit fashion awards cupping her bump & looking deranged, showed the real Meg, Mad!
A mixture of baby Jane, & Phoebe in the last scene from All about Eve, clutching a trophy & dreaming of her adoring fans.
Thanks, Nutty. You have certainly given us some food for thought here. While im inclined to believe the message being conveyed through the podcast - that MM is a lying scheming shrew now out of her depths; i poses a few more questions that at least the more curious amongst us would like to be answered. This comment might be long, since im sort trying to detangle he web in my own head , so bear with me please.

Part-1

1. MM the Yacht-girl theory - I am willing to believe that MM could have been a yacht girl. but lets call her a high end escort since that is a term a lot of us have heard before. Yacht girl is just a fancier, more underhanded word thats commonly used in European upper-crust circles, where this practice is also more common. As to why MM was so hell bent on establishing herself in UK/London. Yachting is very prevalent in the European subcontinent, its a favourite summer hobby that a lot of sleazy, not-so sleazy powerful men and entitled rich brats partake in various a-list hotspots in Europe. It is also a lucrative means of income for starlets and society girls. So if MM was subsidising her income this way its understandable for her to use those connections to do a visibility campaign and get some legit work out of it. if for no other reason then to just nbe a better known name in these circles so she could get more escort work. Escort work is very very common for models, newbie actors,starlets,society girls. Hell, ive known some women who do just for pocket money!

2. The blind-date : There seems to be some confusion here, some think they met in May 2015 at the Invictus dinner in Toronto, but acc to Enty here they were set up on a blind date in London. Could it be possible that they did meet in May in Toronto, where MM was schmoozing up to Harry and he took a fancy to her. Since he seemed interested, his friends who knew of her line of work set up the pay for play date. on the date she realised that it was actually i was PH who had insisted on being set up since he was interested and then she decided to ensnare him. Like a sugardaddy situation where the girl just seduces the daddy to be promoted from side chick to mistress/girlfriend/wife? surely not unheard of!

3. MM being in cahoots with the media from the beginning. - 100% believable. At the very least she wanted to elevate her profile through this connection. Just a stroke of luck that it later could be manipulated into a relationship. In my opinion though, this was a convenient arrangement for the two of them and MM made it work in her favour.
Part 2 -

4. MM did trick him into it : Initially the advantages to MM were many - free press, favourable press, raising her profile, lend credibility to any influencer work she does etc etc. For this to work she had to use the press to her advantage. PH didnt really harmed here initially because he gets to be in the papers, he gets build on his image of the most eligible bachelor in the world, it is also an image rehab for him and ties in with his ongoing PR at te time, that of war hero, sporty fun laid back prince charming, the changing face of the BRF! So he nor his PR bother about it all that much because the press attention seems low key favourable.

5. The odd part is the Invictus 2016! MM is seen at the opeing ceremony with MArcus. She clearly looks quite out of it- dazed, drunk, smug. She sits away from him, doesnt look at him at all but is in clear line of view. She has made PH and Trudeu unconfortable, you can see the confusion in their faces. you can see the odd facial expression of MA as wel as the few people sitting around MM. she is then escorted out of the enclosure. This is not hearsay or conjecture, but there are lots of pictures and one can discern for themselves what might have happened.

6. They are then seen a week later attending the closing ceremony together and rumours start a-frenzy. There s no doubt they are now dating. Its easy to guess that post invictus she did milk this opportunity. If she had any reasonably good managers or PR people they would have advised her to do so and make use of this publicity which she did. So one cant really fault her for being media-savvy here.

7. The Rose rumours. Why Rose specifically? It wasnt random surely, Rose is a member of their inner circle, her husband is well know and well connected,she is present at some official evens. So, its easy to put a face to the name. But why her? This must be personal! I dont believe the theory that Harry might have been interested in Rose, she declined so they targeted her. MM wouldn't do that to her own reputation. Her whole brand currently and esp then was that of the most loved couple ever. So was Rose old ex-flame of harrys? Did Rose somehow know of Mms past? Was Roses husband one of the many that either knew of Mms history, had tried to investigate her and tell Harry or was a previous client of hers? or is it because Rose is particularly close to Kate and her kids? she is, i believe, one of their neighbours and close friends in Norfolk. why rose???

PrettyPaws said…
Good morning, Nutties

There are so many interesting posts here today so I thought I would put in my two-penny worth.

Regarding the Enty item, I think it's a load of old codswallop, to put it mildly. It's mainly based on rumours with very little fact and a whole lot of fiction I believe Enty has dreamed up. It makes me wonder what exactly he's imbibing, it can't be anything legal.

First of all, the William/Rose rumour. The first Xmas that MM spent with the RF at Sandringham, she & PH stayed with W & C at Anmer House, on the Sandringham estate. This is probably where she first met Rose. The Marquis & Marchioness (David Rocksavage & Rose) only live about 3 miles down the road from PW & Catherine so probably would have called in to see them over the holidays as they were very close friends.

Now, we all know, or can surmise, that MM is exceedingly jealous of Catherine - and with good cause (or so she might think) as Catherine is very talented. She does/has done the following:

-Won sporting awards during her school-days
-Has taken, and passed, examinations for flute-playing and singing (she was a chorister)
-Is a talented photographer
-Is an artist (she drew/painted the pictures of their local church for Pippa's wedding invitations/order of service)
-Has gained the Duke of Edinburgh's Award at the gold level

Plus, Catherine is a hands-on mother, a supporting wife to William (who adores her) and can look good even in a bin-liner!

Can you imagine how inadequate she must have made MM feel, without even trying?

With all this in her favour, it's no surprise to me to see that Catherine would be the target of all MM's spite and venom.

I sincerely believe that it was MM who first put about the rumour that Wm and Rose were having an affair and, unfortunately, it was picked up (or fed to) a journalist who took it and ran with it - as she later confessed but with not naming MM as the original source. This reporter is also known to be a red-hot supporter of MM so I am not surprised.

As for Giles Coren, he is a food columnist who relies heavily on his late father's reputation. He has often been censored for putting out particularly nasty tweets about his colleagues and is the sort of person who hates people to think that he is not in the royal circle's confidence. He would never admit to not knowing any piece of gossip, no matter how nasty, and would embroider it if he possibly could. It may be just coincidence that his Twitter account was closed just after his William/Rose comments but I don't think so - he probably realised he's gone too far this time, no matter how much he'd had to drink.
SarcasticBimbo said…
I've said this before, and I'll say it again:

I wish Margaret was still alive. I think unleashing Margaret on Meghan's case would be HILARIOUS.
Part 3 -

8. The kate crying rumours - Im willing to believe that was deliberate plant by MM. I have always believed that was a very odd rumour. Why would Kate, KATE! cry at a dress fitting. she has clearly seen all kinds of divas in her lfe. She was there with her kids and was at a place in London, maybe even BP, with some rando Hollywood wannabes (MM and jessica) so why wold she cry? she could be angry, irritated, tired, uninterested, offended that her kid was being treated like a brat, but she would cry. So that did always seem like a brag by MM " I made Kate Middleton cry! haha! Or a way of saying that they were deliberately so mean and condescending to her that surely Kate with the baby weight must have gone home and cried to her husband!

9. MM who is so obsessed with optics failed to notice that Jessicas little girl, who was in the wedding party with the other kids, was the only one who was not wearing flowers in her hair. was the only only with her tied, all other girls had similar hairstyle.s this was odd because amongst all the kids, JMs kids were seemingly treated like they were special. and Ivy was relatively well known because she is regularly featured in JM and her husbands insta is a mini star, so to say. So why was this detail irrelevant.

10. Any mention of the baby shower by Enty? If i remember correctly, it came just after valentines day right, when harry was away for an engagement and there was stupid photo of him in an igloo spending his first valentines day away from here. That seemed like a massive temper tantrum by MM to me so what actually happened then?

11. If Harry was blindsided by all this then how is it that appears that they were working on their website, trademarks, deals and secret projects? Surely they must have had a plan, and even if they were somehow cornered into doing this whatever happened to their plans? And what actually made them do this? Just Kates very happy Birthday church walk?? There was a lot of publicity this ear about how Kate does her birthday walk, how all her family is always present, how they are all at Norfolk and the Queen is also there every year. So was that a deliberate PR attempt by the RF/Cambs this year to somehow send a message to MM and force her hand? Was that also part of the Queen and her 3 heirs PR campaign? Was the 3 heirs campaign in Dec/Jan the tipping point for MM?
Magatha Mistie said…
@PrettyPaws
Don’t forget the story Megs friend Laineys Gossip put out, just after H&M got engaged, that Kate snubbed Meg at KP when she was going shopping, didn’t offer Meg a lift even though they were going to the same shop. Meg has been leaking/lying like a sieve since she got her claws into Harry.
Meg chastising Kate’s staff was at Anmer whilst H&M were staying with them for Christmas. All this before the bloody wedding, why was it allowed?
hunter said…
I was an egg donor and donated eggs with recipient in separate room on ten occasions across seven women.

All of them got pregnant every time.

So yes, some people have to try many times (for their own egg plus spouse) but donor eggs may be a different story.

Regardless, I don't believe she was ever pregnant herself, but I wanted to throw that out there.

Also I MUST go see what poor Skippy makes of this podcast, there's no treason, no tower, she will be furious.
Ozmanda said…
I listene to the podcast and I have to say I was disappointed. I have been a member of enty's site since it started years ago and this on was very light on value. in the description he said he has special sources Andrew info, it was basically a rehash. I have no idea if wills and rose got it on, but enty seems really intent on this being true, to the point that he forgets the premise needs to support the inference.

Really disappointing and combined with the fact half his podcasts are so low in volume I can barely hear them and the whole true crime thing, I am wondering if it is a waste of time.
@ Happy Days
Yes, very ugly indeed

Princely titles for gt.grandchilden?
Not automatic these days - they’re granted by Letters Patent (I think they’re called) from the Sovereign – a sign of favour.

Zika & the babe that met the Archbishop? No problem.
Someone posted in the immediately previous post that rumours were circulating in the advertising/photographic modelling agency worlds there that they’d hired a local child & had wanted exclusive rights for 1 year, presumably to ensure that the child had no further engagements until it had grown beyond a stage where it could be recognised.

Birth certificate? No authenticating stamp.
PrettyPaws said…
@Magatha Mistie

You have just reminded me of a couple of other points re MM and Catherine, for which I thank you.

Let's face it, every single piece of venom that comes from MM's camp is nearly always directed at Catherine. Yes, sometimes William is mentioned but I believe that MM just thinks of him as collateral damage and a bonus score.

This awful woman is pathologically jealous of "our Kate" and can't even bother to hide it. Doesn't she realise that it just makes her seem so petty and mean, as I believe Catherine is quite well thought of in the US although I am willing to admit I may be wrong on that score.

Does MM do this to every other woman she meets? Or perhaps she picked up something from Harry - it was rumoured that he had a bit of a crush on Catherine at one point, even going so far as to say that she was very pretty with "killer legs". Obviously not something you could ever say about "Chicken Legs Markle".

Whilst typing the above, something else has come to mind, another revelation.

Just a day or two after Easter 2019, whilst MM was at home awaiting the imminent birth, Catherine and Harry attended a Commonwealth event in Westminster Abbey whilst William was in New Zealand for the same event. At one point, after the service, both Catherine and Harry were talking to the Dean and Chapter and, whilst Catherine was talking, Harry was snapped gazing at her with a silly smile on his face and looking rather like a lovelorn sheep. If
Magatha Mistie said…
@Wild Boar
Princely titles, I do not believe that madam refused a title for Archie. This is the woman who has HRH stamped on her Lurpak.
They were refused, hence the naming of Archie, & secret christening/godparents.
PrettyPaws said…
Sorry, Magatha, I came to an abrupt end. I will now finish what I was saying:

If MM ever saw that photo her rage would have known no bounds. If my husband ever looked at another woman like that, no matter how long he'd known her, his life would be a living hell for a week at least!
Magatha Mistie said…
@PrettyPaws
I agree, & remember Harry looking fondly at Kate, also as they were walking in to church. Meg was jealous of Kate from the start. Apart from Kate being beautiful, poised & polished, she is married to a future King. Meg didn’t hoist the sheets, tie those knots & scrub the decks on her knees to be second best. She wanted what Kate has, including Will, remember the sickly doe eyes she gave to Wills.
makescakes said…
If Meghan had actually been pregnant, we would have seen pregnancy photo shoots. It would have been the photo opportunity of her life. There is not one photo of anyone but herself touching the bump. She never held the baby comfortably as she would if she were a breastfeeding Mum. I'm surprised her eggs were used for the surrogate pregnancy because of her advanced age.
Sandie said…
Harry and Kate:

I have never seen Harry look at Meghan with love as he looked at Kate at the day of the Commonwealth service, nor look so at ease walking with her and talking to her.

No, I do not think that Harry's feelings for Kate are romantic (if he ever did have a crush on her, he must have outgrown it by now!) ... he loves her as a beloved and cherished sister that he knows well. It's the kind of deep and lasting love that he does not have for Meghan (infatuation and drama and chaos there!).

If Harry had not let Meghan move in with him when she arrived on his doorstep, and even rented a place for her in London for perhaps a year ... said let's spend a year getting to know each other, you getting to now the UK and its people and my family and my life as a royal (and a working one) rather than rushing into marriage like my parents did. Let's give ourselves time to find out if this is a lasting love and if this is the life you want. However, let's face it, she would have played the same sort of games with him and he would still have married her and ended up in the same boat, but maybe all the time and money wasted on making her a royal (and that ridiculous white wedding) would not have happened.
Rufus T said…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51409732

Prince Andrew defers military promotion.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Sandie
I wonder whether Harry may have had second/third thoughts if they had taken more time. We will never know.
What I find telling is Harrys ridiculous statement at the beginning of the relationship, lay off Megs etc. He said lawyers were working around the clock to stop defamatory stories about her, wow, must have been a lot of dirt? He still married her. Says a lot about Harry?
@Magatha Mistie

Exactly!

I'm saying, obliquely, that HM bestowed the titles of Prince/Princess on William's children but there was never any question of Meghan's sprog, even if the fruit of her abdomen lawfully conceived, being anything other than Master or Miss Mountbatten Windsor, except over HM's dead body, both metaphorically and literally.

Whether this happens when/if they become grandchildren of the monarch remains to be seen. It would presumably take a change in the law to prevent it, assuming that such a child or children does/do exist, which I doubt anyway.
FrenchieLiv said…
Rachel will not be a presenter at the Oscar 2020:
The final slate of presenters for the 92nd Oscars telecast has been announced:
https://oscar.go.com/news/oscar-news/final-list-of-oscar-2020-presenter-include-tom-hanks-natalie-portman-chris-rock

I don't think B. invited her to Beyoncé and Jay Z's Gold Party. There can be only one queen.....
She can go to Elton's party (but it would be a poor second choice) or to Netflix Party if she has already signed her big deal.
lucy said…
@nutty LOL! at Twitter link you shared
https://twitter.com/dave5wol/status/1218226531555782657?s=20

surprising to me it originated from BBC

as to enty, from years at cdan it was obvious and perhaps stated by him he has no "in" to royal family/gossip. it's possible now he does but I don't believe as a whole because he seems to imply Meghan carried Archie and she didn't. still can't as shown by her recent walk-in-the-woods ☺️
xxxxx said…
CDAN has its moments but he should stick to his Hollyweird stomping grounds, leave the BRF alone because his sources are pathetic and lying. H&M and BRF are quiet, so here you go......
_______________________________________

The King of the Hollywood Blind Item Reveals All - Vanity Fair
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2016/10/crazy-days-and-nights-enty-interview
Oct 07, 2016 · How an Anonymous Blogger Has Spent a Decade as the King of the Hollywood Blind Item. ... so it’s easy to eye-roll at Crazy Days and Nights—but ignoring Enty’s reveals only goes so far when ...
_______________________________________

Don Henley Arrested For Contributing To The Delinquency Of ...
https://calendar.songfacts.com/november/21/11551
Don Henley Arrested For Contributing To The Delinquency Of A Minor 1980. Don Henley is arrested after calling 911 to save a 16-year-old prostitute who has overdosed on cocaine and Quaaludes at his Los Angeles home.. The night before, Henley hosted a gathering of Eagles crew members and associates as a farewell, since the band was splitting up. He called a madam who arranged for the girl, who ..
________________________________________

The Don Henley (Eagles Rock Band) classic from CDAN with 538 COMMENTS
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2017
Blind Item #1 - He Made Millions From Raping Young Girls - Himmmm
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/blind-item-1-he-made-millions-from.html

_____________________________
Louise said…
Nutty: Licensing media outlets is Trudeau's latest attempt to control the media.

In 2018, the Liberals brought in a $600 million media bail out package in which the money is doled out to various news organizations by a Liberal appointed panel.

However, the G&M continues to have articles critical of the Liberals and certainly allows negative comments about Trudeau and the Liberals, so I don't think that the Liberals were involved in closing down negative comments about Markle. I'm thinking more that they might have received some type of legal notice from the Markles. The last two article that they published were about how the press and Canadians should leave the Markles alone.

I should point out that comments at the G&M are for subscription holders only.. you generally get pretty intelligent comments, even when they are critical.. it's not Yahoo or the Daily Mail.

I was able to post on the initial stories, giving background to those who had not followed the story regularly, and the comments from other posters were both pro and con. But now, the only comments that get through is when (as a test) I posted that "Meghan should be Queen of Canada" and "Meghan is the wonderfulest". Everything else gets blocked. And my comments are factual, rational and not over the top. It is clear that the moderators are under some type of orders.
Mischief Girl said…
I struggle to believe that MM "trapped" Harry into a relationship or marriage.

This guy was one of the most eligible bachelors in the world. I just do not see how a two-bit nobody grifter could "force" Harry into anything.

The formal and informal security around Harry had to have been enormous. If she "just showed up" at an event Harry was at, there's no way she would have been allowed in. The Invictus Games? Sure, she didn't sit next to Harry, but she was, in the scheme of things, relatively close. That doesn't happen by accident.

Tom Inskip's wedding? Is that the one where we've all seen the sequence of photos--Harry ignoring her, MM with her arm draped around him, MM with a look of death on her face--all while they were sitting at a small table with champagne glasses in front of them?

If she wasn't wanted there, she wouldn't have gotten in to the reception. If she somehow did, his friends would have formed a human wall around Harry and made sure she didn't get anywhere near him. She certainly wouldn't have been able to sustain close enough contact to sit at a table and have a drink with him, drape herself over him, kiss his cheek.

Making assumptions about someone's intentions based on a still photograph is tough to do. I've seen the pictures of Harry at Invictus, where some people interpret his look of "worry" or whatever at MM. He could just as easily been looking at someone or something in her general direction, but not at MM at all.

Tatty said recently that Harry may have a bigger part in this drama than we have originally allowed. I agree.

Certainly pre-marriage Harry held ALL the cards. No way could she have pushed or forced him into marriage. I just don't believe it. Even if she had said she was pregnant, he's a younger son and with each child the Cambridges have, less and less relevant to the future of the BRF.

As for his look of love to Kate, I haven't seen that picture, but it's common knowledge that he had a great relationship with Kate. He called her "the big sister I never had" in one interview.

Has he looked at MM in that same way? YES. Just re-watch (if you can stomach it) the wedding. Harry was full-tilt boogie in love overload that day. He was overwhelmed with loving emotion for her.

We can re-write history all we want, but it won't change what actually happened.

Things have gone completely belly-up for the Sussexes, entirely of their own making and 100% their own fault. But at the start, he loved her and was so excited about what their future held.
@Mischief Girl

I do agree with you that Harry isn't as much of a dunce as he is potrayed in the media to be. And no way was he or could he have been forced into this marriage. Takes two to tango!

And yes of course pictures don't really tell the whole story or even the real story at times. That said, we have all made some pretty good guesstimates from pictures of Meghan in various stages of glee. The inskip wedding rumours I'm skeptical about as well. There are very few pictures to draw any conclusion from and that was a private event. The invictus pictures still seem a bit off to me and Mm looks plastred.

As for her jealously of Kate, that is clearly her way of isolating Harry from any influencial female figure in his life. His mum's dead so she can act as her substitute and in order to do that she needed to do away with Kate who has been one of his closest friends almost a motherly/sisterly influence on him. Their close bond has been talked about so much for so many years so that's where her jealously comes from, NOT JUST Kate's looks or her going to be the future queen.
brown-eyed said…
@abbyh @hilkari

Re: Graduation from college

Meghan is listed in the Northwestern U graduation book as graduating with a degree in Communications, if I remember the subject area correctly. She graduated the year that someone b in August 1981 would be expected to graduate. It is, of course, always possible that she unexpectedly did not finish some coursework and did not graduate at the last minute. The university has referred to her as a graduate.

I found an image of the program booklet on the Internet. I’m not positive, but I think I found it on Ancestry.com.

I sent the info to be posted on another blog at least twice and it was never posted.
MeliticusBee said…
@tatty
re pregnancy support contraption...
http://www.wholesalepoint.com/product/Core-6900-L.aspx?gclid=CjwKCAiAj-_xBRBjEiwAmRbqYqXqGoDZNeDsgMQMmpnl4Ce7q9Cwij-tvRkphTeMr_F_8QXJOm_fzxoCVvEQAvD_BwE
Wow! I actually could have used this a few years back when I was pregnant with twins - absolutely miserable from about 7 months on. And it's a bargain at $60 - ntm discounted to $43.93.
Not kidding!
KCM1212 said…
@magatha mistie said:
I wonder whether Harry may have had second/third thoughts if they had taken more time. We will never know.
What I find telling is Harrys ridiculous statement at the beginning of the relationship, lay off Megs etc. He said lawyers were working around the clock to stop defamatory stories about her, wow, must have been a lot of dirt? He still married her. Says a lot about Harry?


Omg! I just realized HARRY and his team of lawyers are what kept Megs sordid past from coming out!!
How did I miss something so obvious? I kept thinking her sordid past didn t come out because of reverence by the press for the RF, plus Harry's c****struck nature kept it all under wraps, (also "racism" worries) .

You really opened my eyes! Thanks!

Lindy said…
Re Hollywood, everyone seems to just focus on acting. She has her eye on producing content, perhaps their own film company. i believe that is her #1 goal. She wants to be a player in Hollywood, if possible.
Madge said…
Good evening Nutties.

Sorry if this is a duplicate. My reaction was "you are joking"! What, on this good green earth, do the Harkles know about the banking industry?!


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7978959/amp/Prince-Harry-Meghan-make-keynote-speech-exclusive-JPMorgan-event-Miami.html
@Madge, ‘Sorry if this is a duplicate. My reaction was "you are joking"! What, on this good green earth, do the Harkles know about the banking industry?!’

I skimmed the article when I saw it (I try not to click on any stories about them now).😉 It shouldn’t surprise us that the dubious duo wouldn’t say no to anything with a payment attached. From what I read Harry spoke about his mother (again) and that he’s been in therapy for 7 years for it. So this is what he’s been to reduced to, he’s using his dead mother to make money, how tawdry and shameless is that. 😟No amount or therapy will help him or bring her back, but it gives him something to talk about! 😖
499lake said…
I bet there was a ton of snickering in that room. The comments behind their backs I would die to hear. I have several friends in investment banking— their comments would be snide and snarky.
Seabee666 said…
@Magatha Mistie Hey, there. To answer your question:

We here in Kamerica (Kardashians' America) adore Catherine! She is such a breath of fresh air. She has her own lips!

If MM was a yachter - with well-known peers (VS models, Hadids, etc.), has pissed off Jennifer Meyer and Victoria Beckham, screwed with Serena Williams' career by grandstanding at all those tournaments she lost, and showed her true colors to Beyonce and Jay Z, she will NOT be welcome in Hollywood. There's also her well-liked and now well-married ex, Trevor and all the other road kill she left behind. Good luck Suxxeses! If you can still call yourselves that!
Unknown said…
It's widely known that there was a "virginity" done on Diana, Princess of Wales, not a fertility test. Enty has his timeline all skewed, sounds like he's trying to justify his existence and I agree with those who say he should stick to Hollyweird. Btw, MM was never pregnant, all her visits to the various patronages, clearly shows that. Her belly popping when she stands up, folding when she bends down, ending up at her knees after a visit and jiggling all the way down the streets of London. The BRF now knows, hence the child-without-a-title. Lord Geidt is a master tactician and notice how it's been reined in since her being appointed VP of Commonwealth Foundation. I don't believe H is with her atm either.
Anonymous said…
@MischiefGirl. I’m thinking, okay, she has a point about a single photograph and inventing an entire narrative around it. UNTIL I got to the justification for this argument by saying, look at Harry’s face during the wedding, like photographs, perhaps? Also, Harry did NOT look like he was overflowing with affection during his wedding. In fact, he looked the opposite. Pensive, worried, nervous, etc. Dare I even say unhappy? And, in addition, I will point out that Kate is under constant scrutiny, and yet rarely do we see a photograph of her looking like she wants to murder people. Stills of her exist looking tired and pensive, rarely angry but occasionally, but it’s on muted. Ninety-five % of the photographs are of her smiling or listening to others. I don’t believe there is an embargo on picturing Kate in negative situations, especially during the Hanbury business. But, wow, are there a zillion photographs of Ms. Markle with a myriad of emotions, none of them pleasant. In fact, I would say that this woman is on the verge of rage all the time based on the photographs unless it’s a pap pointing a camera at her, and then the high beam smile turns on. So, either you can construct a narrative or you can’t based on a photograph, but you cannot have it both ways.
Fahlina Speaks said…
With the Rose story, it had always been my understanding that the rumor was born out of jealousy on Meghan's part. We know from her planting stories anytime Catherine is in the news, that Meghan indeed has a jealous streak and needs to be the center of attention. One thing many people either forget or did not know: While Meghan was engaged to Harry, he attended his very first state dinner. Meghan, being a fiancee was not invited. It was a formal event, complete with white tie, ballgowns and tiaras. Harry, due to his inexperience at these events, was sat with a journalist, and... ROSE HANBURY. This would have set Markle right over the edge. We all know she's dying for a tiara event and felt this should have been hers to attend. William and Catherine were also, of course attending, they are good friends to Rose and her husband. It was known at the time that Will and Kate had reservations about the Harry-Meghan relationship. I think this is exactly WHY this particular woman was chosen for this rumour, which served to get back at Rose, for sitting with Harry, as well as drive a wedge between the future king and queen, payback for daring to doubt her, and denying her what she felt was her due. That is when this rumour was set in motion. I don't believe there was any affair, but it definitely served its goal of causing trouble for Meghan's perceived rivals!
I just stumbled across this article, if someone posted it before, my apologies:

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/harrys_and_meghans_geographic_balance_as_postnational_parasitism.html
Rut said…
I just can't imagine her being a prostitute. She talks so much, not only with her mouth but also with her hands. She is the opposite of exciting. But maybe she roleplayed. Maybe she was a cute little innocent sweet shy giggling girl-prostitute? No..I don't think she was. When would she have done that? She was married to Trevor in her 20:ies and she divorced him when she got the role in Suits. When would she have had time to sell sex?
B. Lee said…
If you've followed her like we have, you've already had suspicions that all of this is teue. We've been saying this for years. No, William did NOT have an affair. Rose was just close to Kate, and Megan killed two birds with one stone, ruining Kate's friendship with Rose and getting out that rumor. We knew she was the one to do this. We also know Megan had her tubes tied, and this baby was from a surrogate. She didn't have to stop drinking, cause she was never pregnant. She has lied and lied and lied. I wonder what Harry knows, and what lies he has swallowed. His whole marriage is based on lies.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids