Skip to main content

Meg and Harry's new foundation: "Let's pick a name that no one can pronounce."

One of the challenges I find about living outside my country of origin is pronouncing people's names. I meet people from all over Northern Europe as part of my business life, and it's never a good start to a business conversation to say, "And how do you say your name?"

Meg and Harry - or Meg, let's face it, this was her decision - have put all of their future business contacts into that situation by naming their new foundation "Archewell".

Arche, the Greek word Meg says is at the root of her foundation name, is pronounced ar-khay', with the emphasis on the second syllable.

That would properly make the foundation "Ar-KAY-well".

Or perhaps the foundation should be pronounced like "architect" - in other words "AR-ka-well" in US English or "AR-ki-well" in UK English.

Alternately, it could be pronounced with a silent "e," a bit like Madewell, the successful woman's clothing brand it's probably subliminally inspired by - "ARCH-well"

Or, for our forth and final contender, it could be pronounced to match the name of Meg and Harry's never-seen child: "ARCHIE-well."

That's an awkward pronunciation that sounds like a camel going over a speed bump, but knowing the Sussexes, that's probably what they will use.


The announcement of the name

For non-Telegraph subscribers, here's the text of the article announcing the name:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are working on plans to run emotional support groups, a multi-media educational empire, and even launch a wellbeing website under a new non-profit organisation named Archewell. 
The Sussexes, who are setting up home in Los Angeles, have drawn up proposals for a vast and ambitious array of projects under the name Archewell, derived from the Greek word for “source of action” and the inspiration behind the name of their baby son, Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.
The couple told the Telegraph they wanted the organisation “to do something of meaning, to do something that matters”.
According to paperwork filed in the United States last month, the couple are considering how to create their own charity and volunteering services, wide-ranging website, and sharing “education and training materials” via films, podcasts and books.
Plans, which so far include trademark requests for everything from motion picture films to paperclips, are far more extensive than those originally intended under Sussex Royal in the UK.
The new American venture could even see the Duchess build on the success of her old Goop-style website The Tig, with a “website featuring information in the field of nutrition, general health and mental health”, along with entertainment.
The couple had not planned to launch details of the “non-profit” just yet, emphasising that they and the world were rightly focusing on the threat posed by coronavirus.
But after paperwork including the name was filed in the public domain in the US, and seen by this newspaper, they confirmed they will be launching under the name Archewell.
The Duke and Duchess told the Telegraph: "Like you, our focus is on supporting efforts to tackle the global Covid-19 pandemic but faced with this information coming to light, we felt compelled to share the story of how this came to be.
“Before SussexRoyal, came the idea of ‘Arche’ - the Greek word meaning ‘source of action’.
“We connected to this concept for the charitable organisation we hoped to build one day, and it became the inspiration for our son’s name. To do something of meaning, to do something that matters.
“Archewell is a name that combines an ancient word for strength and action, and another that evokes the deep resources we each must draw upon. We look forward to launching Archewell when the time is right." 

Arche and what it really means 


It's a measure of the Sussexes' usual bluster that they chose a name based on a Greek concept when neither one of them appears to speak Greek.

My guess is that Meg (or perhaps Harry) found the concept of arche in one of their self-help books or websites.

Like any word translated from one language into another, "Arche" (really arkhฤ“) can mean many things in English.

It can mean "the ultimate" - arch-enemy, arch-angel, archetype.

It can mean "the first, and now left behind" - archive, archaic

It can mean "chief" - ie archbishop, like poor Desmond Tutu. (This actually comes from a similar Greek word, arkhos, meaning chief.)

(One thing it doesn't mean is "arch" like an arch in a building, ie the Golden Arches. That type of arch comes from the Latin arcus for bow. But you can bet a million dollars that there will be an arch somewhere in the Archewell logo.)

"Source of action" is actually pretty far down on the list of potential translations for arche.


Archie's name

Finally, I'm not buying that the concept of arche was behind the naming of the persistantly-unseen Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.

It sounds like revisionism. Didn't Meg have a cat or dog named Archie as a child?



Comments

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/major-developments-coronavirus-wednesday-8-april-140006498.html

Wow!

HM's up in lights at Piccadilly Circus!
Fairy Crocodile said…
Judging from comments here, in the press and on other blogs the world is truly losing interest in the dismal duo. The only thing I am afraid of is them sneaking back into UK. Megsy is too divisive, we don't need her.
Unknown said…
Long time, first time

All this talk about Archie’s birth certificate made me remember a suspicious detail I read a while back in the DM comments.

Archie was born May 6, 2019 at 5:26am. Although the time of birth was not recorded in the birth certificate, it was noted in the “birth announcement” posted outside Buckingham Palace.

Conveniently, sunrise on this day in Windsor was also 5:26am.

I’m firmly in the surrogate camp and believe they obscured his real birthdate to hide this deception, giving them the leeway to pick a day/time of their choosing.

Of course “King Archie” emerged into the world just as the first ray of light shone. Sooooo typical of Meghan to believe the sun literally rises and sets with her. Yet ANOTHER dubious oddity about Archie’s birth that raises major red flags.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
SirStinxAlot said…
If it ever comes out that the birth certificate and pregnancy was a fake, I could seriously see the monarchy ceasing to exist. The RF had to have known about the deception. That's why no title for Archie. This could really backfire on the monarchy on so many levels.
They allowed her an extravagant £30 million wedding paid for by taxpayers, knowing what a divorced con artist she is.
Millions in taxpayers money wasted on security in multiple countries.
Decieving the public with the birth announcement and faux birth certificate.
Misleading the public with line of succession.
Heaven forbid, Archie grows up and demands a title/money/recognition he may not be entitled to if he was adopted or born of surrogate.
Making an announcement at Eugenie wedding. Disrespectful.
What a mess they have made. Hope it all comes out in a divorce. Hope the RF has their story straight by then. The only recovery they could hope for is Harry making a public apology and coming clean about everything and giving up his title and any public funding.

Random.. there are a heat sensor apps you can download on your phone. With so many people not believing she was pregnant, it wouldn't surprise me if someone took a heat photo of her faux moonbump.
Unknown- Sunrise! Well spotted - the dawn of a new era of wealth beyond dreams of avarice.

In her dreams.
Henrietta said…
Blogger SirStinxAlot said...

If it ever comes out that the birth certificate and pregnancy was a fake, I could seriously see the monarchy ceasing to exist.


I don't think it will be the end of the monarchy if they play it right. But it will be the end of PH and MM, jointly and individually. I agree it's probably going to take a public confession by PH. (He also needs to withdraw from the line of succession.)

But if the story breaks independently of the RF, I'm not sure what will happen. Maybe ERII can pull the family out of it. But I fear someone royal is going to have to fall on their sword, and Harry's doing so might not be enough.
Glowworm said…
Please ignore this:
testing to see if I am doing this right
(Thanks for the instructions, Elle)
Glowworm said…
Hooray for the ๐Ÿ›!
Sandie said…
HG Tudor has a new post about Megsy:

https://narcsite.com/2020/04/08/a-not-so-royal-narcissist-part-14/

Note that this is how he defines Megsy:

The subject is a Mid Range Narcissist, this means she does not know what she is, does not see anything wrong with what she does, operates purely by instinct and will not change.

I think it is a rather good post that actually makes sense of the bizarre behaviour of the Sussexes.

I haven't checked the HG Tudor site in quite a while, so found another Meghan update that I had missed (scroll down past the repeated intro paras in bold):

https://narcsite.com/2020/02/21/a-very-royal-narcissist-part-13-snapshot-analysis/

It is a good summary of labelling narc behaviours.
Sandie said…
A brilliant post that summarises how Meghan got that marriage but also how she always eventually 'shoots herself in the foot':

https://anonymoushouseplantfan.tumblr.com/post/614853572946984961/can-you-elaborate-on-what-wasis-the-everyone#notes


================================================================
Anonymous asked:

Can you elaborate on what was/is the "everyone loves classy" PR drive? I don't think I was in the fandom at the time to spot specifically that "era" of her branding.
=====================================================================
It started in late December 2016. The goal was to convince the brf to let the marriage go through. Check out that last line, “the person who would take her new responsibilities (if they married) very seriously).” LOLOLOLOLOLOL.

https://blindgossip.com/everyone-loves-classy/

I think it lasted until March 2017 when she published the menstruation essay in Time magazine. Her pr started to break down after that. The highlights of the pr drive were her long stay at Nott Cott, Skippy’s wedding, the India trip and essay, One Young World, and the closing down of her blog. It really is amazing how much they did with so little content.

During “everyone loves classy” she was putting out several articles a day, pap-walking several times a week, and leaking stories every couple of days. Whenever a negative story popped up (Samantha snarking, her brother getting arrested, nude pics, NBC using the relationship to promote Suits) Sunshine Sachs would come up with a fake story that moved the relationship forward (Polar bear vacay, Meghan meeting Kate, Harry meeting her dad, Harry giving her a promise ring, dino date). That strategy was very effective and it buried a lot of negative stories.

They also used old convention clips (particularly the one where she talked about going to auditions in a beat up car) to craft a “girl next door image” for her, and milked her three-day India trip for all they could. I know SS aren’t exactly covering themselves in glory right now, but that was a fantastic pr drive. It got her the engagement ring, the VF cover, and an early exit from Suits. I suspect it was also instrumental in getting Harry to commit to her. It made him believe she really had to potential to be the next Diana.

The image started to break down when the VF cover came out. That’s when we started to see the real Meghan, but by then it was too late and the marriage had already been approved.


Portcitygirl said…
Glowworm

It looks nice!๐Ÿ˜Š
FrenchieLiv said…
Get That Oscar Ready :-)
https://blindgossip.com/get-that-oscar-ready/
CookieShark said…
@ Sandie: I also enjoy reading the Tudor series. I think the key to MM is, as described, she does not see anything wrong with what she does. Otherwise I can't understand how she could ever be OK with being so cruel to so many people. And people who have met her have described her as being quite mean.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Daily Mail picked up Achewell.com redirection to the Gold Digger song and ran the article. People are enjoying it!

A bit of a distraction to laugh at. Markles look absolutely stupid.
LynnRon said…
@ Elle

Re H&M not in this TTC picture: https://www.royal.uk/role-royal-family

Check out the tiles below this main picture. One for every Royal - EXCEPT Meghan.

SNAP!
Fairy Crocodile said…
They stopped it and redirected everything to GoDaddy. Megsy had a screaming fit on the phone to her PR slaves. Priceless!
Fairy Crocodile said…
Works again!!! 250 million hits and growing. It has been there a while but hits are counting up!
They are still streaming their wedding though, on the Royal YT channel.
Sandie said…
@FrenchieLiv:
Get That Oscar Ready :-)
https://blindgossip.com/get-that-oscar-ready/


I am having a spectacularly awful day, and then I see the above post and read the blindgossip post. Laughter is such good medicine!

Seriously, there are charismatic people who cannot act but who do very well in Hollywood movies and make a lot of money, but never win Oscars and are not even nominated (e.g. Arnold Schwarzenegger).

Then there are superb actors (Megsy is a bad actress and is not even a charismatic screen presence) who have been nominated but never won:

Amy Adams, Rachel McAdams, and Glenn Close are all big draws at the box office who haven't received the same respect of the Academy that they have from audiences. While they've all been nominated for Oscars, they've never taken home the big prize. Other top actresses without Oscars include Michelle Pfeiffer, Annette Bening, Sigourney Weaver, Helena Bonham Carter, and Christina Ricci. This list of female Hollywood celebrities who have no Academy Awards also includes black actresses, like Angela Bassett, and famous classic stars, like Greta Garbo and Judy Garland. With six nominations, Thelma Ritter has the most nominations without winning the Oscar.
FrenchieLiv said…
@Sandie : ' Also had a good laugh, she is SO delusional...
I imagine you all have heard about the failure of the Sussexes to register the website for their Archewell Foundation, and the hilarious result.
I have just watched the Jamie Foxx/Kanye West video you are directed to if you google www.archewellfoundation.com and the lyrics could not be more appropriate—especially the following:

18 Years, 18 Years
She Got One Of Yo Kids Got You For 18 Years
I Know Somebody Payin Child Support For One Of His Kids
His Baby Momma's Car And Crib Is Bigger Than His
You Will See Him On Tv Any Given Sunday
Win The Superbowl And Drive Off In A Hyundai
She Was Spose To Buy Ya Shorty Tyco With Ya Money
She Went To The Doctor Got Lypo With Ya Money
She Walkin Around Lookin Like Micheal With Ya Money
Should Of Got That Insured Geico For Ya Moneeey
If You Aint No Punk Holla We Want Prenup
We Want Prenup!, Yeaah
It's Something That You Need To Have
Cause When She Leave Yo Ass She Gone Leave With Half
18 Years, 18 Years
And On Her 18th Birthday He Found Out It Wasn't His
(She Take My Money)
Now I Aint Sayin She A Gold Digger (When I'm Need)
But She Aint Messin Wit No Broke Niggaz (Broke)
Snippy said…
Rebecca,the comments on the DM are priceless! Glad whoever the genius was who was behind this was able to bring some levity to the British public at a time like this. And at the Harkles' expense, just icing on the cake!
Fairy Crocodile said…
@Rebecca B

Personally I didn't like the song and didn't even listen to it past the beginning. But whoever did this redirection has a very deep dislike of Meghan on more than one level.

It was a cruel and very efficient prank. I actually almost feel sorry for Harry, he could have possibly believed they would do something good with the new money laundering initiative. The guy is totally blind to what he married.
@Snippy
@Fairy Crocodile

The carelessness on the part of JH and M is astounding. How could they be so, well, stooopid??
FrenchieLiv said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8201421/Prince-William-Kate-Middleton-carry-royal-engagement-video-call.html
"The Duke said his favourite people weren't actually famous.'":-)

The timing is interesting (usually, the Cambridge post earlier in the day). Camilla & Charles also published a lovely photo tonight.
3 options IMO:
1/ a coincidence (I don't think so)
2/ advice of David Watkins, their new social media manager
3/ similar strategy used by the Sussex who usually leak their information at the end of the day (in Europe) to catch the attention of the US audience but also to upstage the Cambridge and Clarence House.
Humor Me said…
"Gold Digger"

ROTFLMAO
Sandie said…
Some tea from LSA that is too good not to share (link below copied text of story):

I was talking to a friend - or, to be more precise, an acquaintance - a few hours ago.

She worked at 10 Downing Street when Theresa May was Prime Minister. We were talking of May versus Boris during the last days of May's premiership when she said, sort of apropos of nothing -

'...and of course around this time Theresa already knew that Harry and Meghan wanted to move to Los Angeles to make money.'

Her exact words.

And please note: Theresa May resigned as Prime Minister on 7 June 2019.

So before that date, people in the British Government already knew!

Interesting, I thought....


https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/meghan-markle-unpopular-opinions-thread-pt-2.2215591/page-3407#post-56557323
SirStinxAlot said…
@Sandie. There have been numerous articles since they married claiming they wanted to move to Canada, USA or South Africa. It should not have been a surprise to anyone really. Especially those who called her a grifter, social climber, and a narcissist. Harry himself has said during interviews he wanted to leave the UK over the years. They should have never been given titles if the RF knew that in the beginning though. Its just bad optics.
SirStinxAlot said…
The Queen offered to let them go their in the beginning.

https://www.msn.com/en-au/lifestyle/lifestyleroyals/queen-offered-harry-and-meghan-life-without-royal-titles-before-wedding/ar-BBZndh0
Glowworm said…
Just looking at the Gold Digger Video...it has 249+ million views, I refreshed about a half hour later and the number of views jumped to approximately 26,000 more! What the h€ll is going on? The thought of MM’s reported screaming fit makes my day.
Anonymous said…
@Glowworm Woot! Woot! Glad it's working for you!

@LynnRon Thanks! I'll check it out and lololol it lol.

@FrenchieLiv I'm sure Wills had an extra smirk when he said that his favourite people weren't actually famous.' knowing too well that Rache wasn't actually famous before H, either.

And redirecting from Gold Digger to Go Daddy, that's perfection.
Glowworm said…
@Elle, thanks again...now, what about changing the text to A different color? Like red?
๐Ÿ›
SirStinxAlot said…
@ glowworm..it's a bit sad that so many people are even looking at the Archewell foundation. 26k people donating $10 each is $260,000. Not a billion but donations will vary.
Imabug said…
Pretty sure people are hitting it right now because it’s so awesome they want to see for themselves.

That’s what I did, and I will NEVER donate to any charity of theirs.
@Glowworm

“...the Gold Digger Video...it has 249+ million views”

Yes, but the video has been on YouTube since 2009.
Glowworm said…
I know, @SirStinxAlot, but, how many would donate to an organization that was so poorly run that it made such an incredibly stupid mistake?
Glowworm said…
Yeah, I saw that, @Rebecca. Gotta wonder how many have viewed it since yesterday. I’m guessing a lot based on how fast the number is going up...whether that’s due to the Harkle’s stupidity or people just curious about their new foundaton.
@Glowworm

I hope the “owner” of the website doesn’t sell it to the Harkles so it gets shut down. At least not for a good week or 2!

Schadenfreude!! :)
Glumdalclitch said…
TMZ, The Daily Beast, and Page Six are all running the "Gold Digger" story. Page Six even kindly supplied the link to archewellfoundation.com. With peopled cooped up at home, there will be a lot of foot traffic to Kanye's video.
The .org version leads to the Queens speech. The DM comments are ruthless.
Teasmade said…
The video is not actually terrible, and I am an old, opera-loving white lady who had never seen Kanye before. Jamie Foxx channeling Ray Charles was a bonus. (In fact, I am so old that I remember Ray's "I Gotta Woman" from the early 60s, which is what this is riffing on.

Try it! (YouTube).
CookieShark said…
Looking back at a few pictures of Harry with Chelsey, it is obvious they were actually quite in love. No magazine covers or interviews needed. They look so happy together. It looks tender and true.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Nahanni
Thanks for Rache means Revenge in German Hahahaha!


Harrywood and Megibu
Set off to claim their unearned due
They upped and ran to a new abode
Desperately digging for the mother lode
Their hunt for fame and fortune bigger
Alas resulted in claims of Gold Digger
Flooper said…
What happened to all the posters?Things have really slowed down here and so many old favs are missing.Sad.
Anonymous said…
Didn't they make this same mistake before with Sussex Royal?


@Magatha, Harrywood and Megibu, this should break the internet lol. Perfect.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Flooper
I know, very quiet. There’s only so much to say about the “bag” and her “handle”
They really are becoming irrelevant, although their latest glitch is truly hilarious.

@Elle
Cheers, fear I’m going slowly mad ๐Ÿฅด
Anonymous said…
@Magatha

Today I realized that self-discipline is the key to this isolation thing, so I switched out of my pajama t-shirt and yoga pants I'd worn all day, and put on dressier pajamas before my class started tonight. It made all the difference lol. I was quite busy today, but this never leaving the house thing... if I wasn't feral before, I will be now.

Even though it seems a bit less Nutty here today, there are still 250 comments on a post less than 48 hours old, all relevant & insightful sans drama. I've no doubt that Harrywood and Megibu will be up to tricks again soon, and this calm will pass.
Flooper said…
@Magatha Mistie

Lol, Bag and her handle, too funny. I can't believe they haven't gone on Ophra or Ellen for an interview. I wonder if this Archewell will be like the health & wellness multi-marketing scheme that was a big thing in the states like around 1998 or so. It made people big money for awhile until like most multi-marketing schemes, people realized you had to keep recruiting and selling the vitamins to go on endlessly. The original few levels would make money then farther down the line they would not possibly be able to recruit and sell enough.

I can see Meg trying to push videos of her doing yoga with guided imagery using her oh-so-soothing voice. Maybe Harry can attempt to look like a stud muffin in yoga pants, lol.
Anonymous said…
@Glowworm I tried changing the color and get a message that the font tag isn't allowed on the blog, so ICBW, but I don't think you can change font colors. Looks like bold, italics, and hyperlink are the only ones. Won't even let me underline.
Williams video chat with the kids... When he asks the little girl "Is that a hamdbag?" And the little girl is like Nooooooo..!


Lol I laughed so hard. I think that could our 2020 William the scarfer meme. Every time there are new pap pics of Megs and Harks, Wills is gonna be like "Is that a handbag?"

๐Ÿคฃ
Nutties, I just had my morning coffee and it fired up my brain cells. The great Greek gods gave me insight and I just realized this :

Remember how yesterday we were discussing how Archewell is an anagram for Rachell and that lonesome W was sitting in a corner asking 'what about me??!". Ahem ahem... I think the W stands for William! Hahaha... She still morning over him.

Some of you will say W is for Windsor, but I'll stick to my theory for now. :)
Nutty Flavor said…
Good morning, all!

@Unknown, that's an interesting detail about 5:26 am being the time of sunrise on that day and also of Archie's "birth."

@Nelo

Imagine the millions of people using Yahoo mail that are bombarded with such fluff pieces about her all the time. It's exhausting. It's obvious that getting PR is very cheap in the US. If it wasn't by now, they should be broke.

PR is cheap because major media outlets are broke and thousands of journalists have been laid off, but they still have space to fill. If a PR company provides a ready-to-run fluff piece, there is a very good chance it will be used.

Magatha Mistie said…
@Flooper
Maybe Meg & Oprah in leg warmers doing a Jane Fonda workout?

@Elle
I admire your self discipline, & I also admire the fact you have “dressy” pyjamas.
Mine tend to be well worn & well past it, apart from a couple of silk numbers better left in the drawer ๐Ÿ˜‰
My real discipline is not having a Gin until 5pm, 7 minutes to go, cheers!
In my mind’s ear, I can hear Edith Evans as Lady Bracknell:

`A handbag???'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyuoUwxCLMs
Magatha Mistie said…
Morning @ Wild Boar

Hahaha, yes, which reminds me of “a woman of no importance”
The only Oscar relevant to Megs!!
From Dunkling,L., The Guinness Book of Names, Revised Edition 1993:

Page 86 `Naming the baby’ has a set of questions parents should ask themselves when choosing a name for their sprog, including:

`Do you think a name’s original meaning is important? ….check origin of name you have chosen.
`Is it clear how the name should be pronounced? (Try it on your friends)
`Is the name free of verbal associations eg `Simple Simon’? ’
And finally –
`Have you chosen a name with your child in mind rather than yourself?’

That’s a fail, then.

Of course, the real question is `Which is really your `baby’? Archie or Archewell?
Magatha Mistie said…
Knowing Megs love of languages
Fools Gold in Romanian translates as
Prostii de aur
`A Woman of No Importance' - wonderful. Thanks Magatha.

The Harkles - The Gift To Humour That Goes On giving.

Thinking back to before the wedding, I remember not quite having the nerve to toddle down the the bookies to find out what odds they were laying on her clearing off to Hollywood, with her new-found `fame' and box-office appeal, with a view to starring in a blockbuster of a movie.

I wonder if there's anyone rich enough and vindictive enough to set her up to fail in a big production so she fails spectacularly on a global level. A world-wide laughing stock?

`The Harkles - an everyday story of deluded folk'
Magatha Mistie said…
DM comments on “Golden Gate” are brutal & bloody hilarious.
My fave is the “Archeoles” hahaha!
Magatha Mistie said…
Apparently the Archewell fundation now takes you to a Dixie Chicks video.
Called Gaslighter hahaha.
Leela said…
@Magatha Mistie: I bet that “Archewell fundation” was nit a typo, was it?

Good one!
Magatha Mistie said…
@Leela
Thanks for getting it, t’was meant ๐Ÿ˜‰
Unknown said…
It's not a criticism because I like and respect him but William could blow that pair right out of the water permanently if he actually DID go back as an aur ambulance pilot instead of saying he just misses it.....I have gone back as a hospital nurse at age of 60 having been away from hands on clinical care for 20 years so I'm not just saying it from the safety of my front room!!!
Magatha Mistie said…
@Leela
Took three tries to over ride!!
Magatha Mistie said…
@Unknown
Thank you, thank you for going back to help in this dangerous, catastrophic situation.
As for William, I think he’s better served doing what he’s doing now.
If he was to return to Air Ambulance the press would follow, this isn’t the time for glory operations.
Thank you again, for all that you are doing.
FrenchieLiv said…
@Unknown:
As a service member in the French Air Force I can tell you when a pilot doesn't fly for a while, it can take weeks (accelerated training) or months (normal training) to regain qualifications (day flight/night flight/ Lightweight Night Vision Goggle...).
Not sure about the rules in the UK, but I highly doubt this is something you take for granted.
I can’t imagine an exception for the Heir to the Throne because this is not PR which are at stakes but flight security/people’s life…
In addition, we have no information concerning William's health: would he still be suitable for flying (eye examination? hearing capability?).
Portcitygirl said…
I loved the video of PW and DC. They are so lovely in every way.
So thankful HM has them.

This latest blunder by the Harkles is of epic proportions. How in the world did their " people " miss this? At this point can anyone look away? What a train wreck!! Lol.
Imabug said…
Here is the big question: once they launch their social media account...

Do we Think the Stupid Random Caps will still be a Thing?
SirStinxAlot said…
@alice.. Harry attended school and military under the Wales surname. I assumed it was Wales but possibly Windsor.
Magatha Mistie said…
@FrenchieLiv
High Five, I’m ex British Army.

@Portcitygirl
Absolute train wreck, silly sods have no idea.

@Imabug
They were only a thing whilst Royal. Now...
xxxxx said…
Blogger Portcitygirl said...


This latest blunder by the Harkles is of epic proportions. How in the world did their " people " miss this? At this point can anyone look away? What a train wreck!! Lol.

This tells me that the Double Dumped are winging it these days, and doing it on the cheap. The only "staff" they might have are real estate agents as they search for their next Marvey Manse to do their couch surfing. What happened to the freebie Gated Mansion that Mr-Mrs Nonoo offered a few months ago? Are The Nonoos isolating from the Dumbartons?
xxxxx said…
Dang! No more redirects or anything at Archewell foundation. Best case scenario is that the person who snagged the domain gets beaucoup bucks to sell it to the runaway ex-Royals. Who pay with Cornwall Duchy money anyway. Duchy money coming from Charles' rent payers. From his tenant farmers.
Bottom line_ This is quite the Royale Scam!
Jenx said…
This is way out there, but maybe, just maybe, all this disaster circus around the desperate duo is a great big troll. That this is somehow a cleverly orchestrated campaign to discredit them once and for all? Hmmmm ... it just all seems too surreal.
KCM1212 said…
Good morning all.

Yankee Wallys blog has an audio of Prince Charles reading Tintern Abbey by William Wordsworth.

It's beautiful!

Harry should have been pimping Charles, not The Boss.

https://yankeewally.tumblr.com
Svetlana said…
I’m a writer, or supposed to be, and I struggle to articulate when it come to Harry and the missus.

So loved a post on The Charlatan Duchess site calling them “increasingly preposterous”.

Perfect.
Anonymous said…
This latest gaffe with the domain names seems so elementary, so shockingly inept, that I’m wondering if Markle isn’t having a bit of a breakdown as all her machinations (that seem to have been YEARS in the making) are falling apart. It is out of the question that Harry has any role in the particulars of setting up a legal business as he’s had people do everything for him (with the exception of picking out clean clothes for the day and shoes without holes in their soles). So this is on her.

It makes me think that either she’s disintegrating mentally or she’s always had a cadre of people leaping up to respond to her “requests.” Now that these minions are gone, she is having to deal with all these pesky details herself and is failing big time. Honestly, if I’d been orchestrating this “debut” (and is there ANY doubt that she decided to upstage the queen with this Telegraph piece?) , I think I’d slink away and never show my face again. It’s SO badly done, with SUCH an abysmal knowledge of how all this works. I’m thinking that she’s nearly as clueless as JH is. And most telling? That they don’t have the money to hire people to do this sort of thing. It lends credence to the rumor that they are flat broke.

Finally, I don’t know if anyone else thinks this, but I’m wondering if she’s severely ADHD or ADD. This lack of follow-through dogs her (as we can see with her relationships), and certainly would explain why she keeps changing the theme of all her get-Uber-rich quick schemes, abandoning a concept if it doesn’t immediately light the world on fire, or just abandons it because she’s bored with the idea. There are SO many initiatives that she could have exploited had she invested some time in them, but since she’s looking for photo ops as opposed to opportunities, all her initiatives are in service of her PR machine.

Despite her fervent Diana cosplay, because of Markle’s own issues, she can’t appreciate that Diana picked a cause or cause(s) and stuck with them through thick and thin. It would be difficult to criticize anyone who advocates banning the use of land mines, but when she embraced AIDS patients, that took some serious stones. This was in the early days of the AIDS epidemic and criticism of her was pretty vocal. She didn’t abandon her support for AIDS patients because of that criticism. Also, what financial gain could Diana get out of either banning land mines or advocating for AIDS patients; none in the short term. But in the long term it gave her unassailable credibility and cemented her place in history (despite the fact that in real life she was rather manipulative and vindictive).

This is all beyond Markle, obviously. She doesn’t do a deep dive into anything. She sees a dress that is similar to what Diana wore to some function and thinks that emulating that dress will be another step in becoming as iconic as Diana is. This is TRULY delusional. And I’m beginning to think that she is, in a clinical sense, actually delusional.
Thank you , whoever posted that, in her tiny mind, she thought being `Royal' in Hollywood meant the `racist' barriers to her success would melt away.

It never occurs to the poor diddums that her reputation for being difficult, to say nothing of her simple inability to act, might be far more of a hindrance to her cinematic success than any racism, real or imaginary.

Let me spell it out - They Don't Like You, Kid.

(Thanks Elle, but my machine is playing silly blighters)
SDJ said…
@KCM1212
Good morning all.

Yankee Wallys blog has an audio of Prince Charles reading Tintern Abbey by William Wordsworth.

It's beautiful!

Harry should have been pimping Charles, not The Boss.



Seems Charles' voiceover work is of a much higher calibre than that of his daughter-in-law....
OMG - Blind Gossip has a new item out, which is clearly about MM. It says that she wants to win an Oscar, and that she feels that the only reason she wasn't previously cast in major roles in major films was because of racism. Now that she's the Duchess of Sussex, she thinks that directors will be falling all over themselves to cast her.

A little while ago, Foxella reported that one of the issues she raised at her meeting with administrators at Stanford University was them awarding her an honorary doctorate.

If these two items are true, her self-regard is pathologically high - it's NPD on steroids.
Animal Lover said…
I noticed that none of the tabloids are carrying stories about the Sussexes. Could they have been threatened with legal action or did the Palace intervene?
Christine said…
What do you guys think of this Golddigger website prank? Someone is absolutely after H&M. It's honestly hilarious. Even though I don't like Meghan Markle at all, I hate to laugh at such misfortune, but honestly, WHAT is going on here? Between the Greta Thurnberg prank, the ill timed announcement of the stupidly named Archewell, and now this Golddigger misstep with the website, I guess I am wondering what theories you guys have?

Why, why...why would they not secure the domain name for Archewell before making that announcement? I get that Meghan is highly narcissistic and Harry isn't too smart, but that's just a regular business practice. I read too that the pranksters are using muliple sites to link to other songs, like Gaslighter. Some unknown entity is literally putting their foot up their a**ses. You have to shake your head!!!
Christine said…
@wizard wench- I am sorry I didn't see your comment previously but I agree, this is clearly all on Meghan. She calls the shots, she gives the staff orders. They are just out there in the wind with no idea wtf they are doing!

@Animal Lover- Yeah the DM has the Golddigger story now pushed way down on their queue of stories.
Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Sandie said…
There is an Anon submission on anonymoushouseplant's blog that gives some very interesting background on Meghan. I'm going to copy the post and give the link below, but it has changed my mind about something:

The minor success of The Tig was down to other people, not Meghan, and her entire reputation was a created PR myth. Is she going to be able to find someone to do this for her post-royalty (and then post-divorce) and will she able to step back and be directed and managed by others (because when she does it for herself she makes an awful mess of things).

Anon: “Wait so all The Tig posts weren’t written by MM?” Plant: “Nope. She had two staffers and at lest two branding/publicity firms working on the blog.” —— You wrote about this a few years ago,

https://anonymoushouseplantfan.tumblr.com/post/159844908631/jerseydeanne-amazing-what-you-can-found-on-her

Your theory at the time, and I agree with you, is that ETuke likely set up the blog for one client through which to promote her other brand clients, including the infamous Vitamix. It was a win-win-win for Tuke – she promoted Meghan, Vitamix, etc. and got paid by all of them. Cross-promotional opportunities up the ying-yang through a very easy third party vehicle. Tuke herself wrote the other year,

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/culture/features/a20091506/meghan-markle-fashion-profile/

Six months after dressing Meghan for the gala, I left the corporate world to open my own PR firm, Tuke Consulting. Around the same time, Meghan was launching a new lifestyle Website called the Tig. She soon became my client.
I don’t think this was as random as ET makes it sound, though. I think setting up MM with The Tig helped ET kickstart her new business. As you wrote then, ET used Exsite in Toronto (now Article) for the Tig’s web development, and most recently for the Sussex Royal website. ET then designed the look and voice of the blog – basically coming up with all the Tig’s branding that became MM’s branding. One of ET’s staff members went off to another company where she had Serena as a client, and lo and behold MM and Serena were matched up. And IIRC, she befriended Toronto photographer Jake Rosenberg of Coveteur fame, who helped her with photography for the blog; worth noting too that Jake is pals with Oprah. I think there was probably an arrangement between ET and MM where ET set up MM with the blog, and then expanded it to use one of her staffers when that staffer moved on to another position. It worked for all of them because it facilitated a lot “native advertising”. PS That HB article by ETuke is also useful because it’s one of the few factual descriptions of Meghan’s “UN speech”. What she attended was “Step It Up for Gender Equality”, a UN Women’s celebratory event for the 20th anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. It wasn’t held at the UN, it was held at a NYC event space, the Manhattan Center at 311 West 34th St. UN Women didn’t even mention her in the PR,

https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/3/media-advisory-planet-50-50-by-2030-step-it-up-for-gender-equality

But none of that stopped Meghan and all her PR companies from spinning that one event as “Meghan Markle giving a speech at the UN”. Incredible.

https://anonymoushouseplantfan.tumblr.com/post/614940621308936192/submitted#notes
IEschew said…
@Christine, I think Meg has crossed too many people. I am tempted to say the Mail on Sunday suit triggered this retaliation, but when you have Markled so many and it’s clear the general public’s goodwill has dried up, who is to say who’s behind all of this?

What’s remarkable to me is the continued silence from those who have real stories to tell. The former partners, the PA, the nannies, etc etc. If the press see enough interest - and maybe they are gauging that now, because I honestly think it’s possible that most people just don’t care - they can offer to pay the paltry NDA penalties, and that may become the Harkles’ main source of income, LOL.

It doesn’t feel right at this tenuous time to have Schadenfreude, but I’m guessing that is what the folks she has crossed are resisting right now. IF they have the time the think of the Harkles at all in the midst of their COVID coping.

And I wonder if the Windsors hope and pray that Harry will soon bottom out and return. I am no longer sure.
Sandie said…
I am going to repeat an excerpt from above because it is so revealing.

She really is a fraud and made a fool of the BRF and the press held back from investigating thoroughly and publishing fully ...

That HB article by ETuke is also useful because it’s one of the few factual descriptions of Meghan’s “UN speech”. What she attended was “Step It Up for Gender Equality”, a UN Women’s celebratory event for the 20th anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. It wasn’t held at the UN, it was held at a NYC event space, the Manhattan Center at 311 West 34th St. UN Women didn’t even mention her in the PR,

https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/3/media-advisory-planet-50-50-by-2030-step-it-up-for-gender-equality

But none of that stopped Meghan and all her PR companies from spinning that one event as “Meghan Markle giving a speech at the UN”. Incredible.
Sandie said…
Meghan was a 'space filler' at that event. I have organised events where I have made use of space fillers, and I have myself been used as a space filler at events! Sometimes space fillers go down really well and go on to great things, but if they try and hype up their appearance at the event, people who were there will always know and a reputation for dishonesty will dog them. On the other hand, if you are inconsequential, no one really cares what porkers you tell as long as it is not about someone else!
IEschew said…
@Sandie, yes, isn’t that something? IIRC it has been stated elsewhere that it was not a “UN speech,” and I can’t look it up now, but I don’t think Meg first described it as such. Of course, she was only too happy for it to then go uncorrected. She is full of baloney and talentless, and none of her fauxmanitarian work was for big orgs. She is a dime a dozen in LA. Basic.

IMO, the only things that make her unique are gullible Harry and the BRF’s fear of being called racist. And Meg has made the latter concern irrelevant with her reckless, ruthless, and grasping behavior.
Barbara from Montreal-

Thanks Barbara, 'twas you with info that `Royalty trumps Racism'.

You mean, she actually Asked for an Hon.deg. from Stanford?

My jaw is almost dislocated -

I always thought the worst case of Hon.deg. arrogance was Berlioz being offered one by Cambridge but he wasn't going to make the effort to come to England for the ceremony. The University took profound offence and he didn't get his Hon.Doc. Mus.

But this, for sheer effrontery, takes the biscuit. Berlioz at least had the qualifications.
Perhaps Stanford could set her up, a Doctorate in Bloody Nerve. Offer her a DBn, without explaining, apart from saying it was specially for her, then publicly humiliate her.
Henrietta said…
DM is saying Boris Johnson is out of ICU. I'm really happy for all our U.K. members.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
BTW, I just tried http://archewellfoundation.org/ and it goes to The Queen and her speech.

Nothing for .com. Server not found.

.net goes to "Name Cheap" where it says it's just been registered there.
TexxMaam said…
PLEASE tell me y'all were able to catch the "Archewellfoundation.com" hijacking? It was redirected to Kanye West's "Gold Digger" video.

Made my night! It's down now, but really spectacular job, whoever did it.

It's been blunder after blunder. They couldn't have worse timing on Megxit, Travelyst, Arch-ee-well, etc, if they tried.

Henrietta said…
New DM article on MM, "She's Back":

https://mol.im/a/8200245
Christine said…
Yes I saw that 'She's Back' article on DM. Clearly meant to be some lame distraction from the Golddigger story.

@Elle and IEschew- I definitely agree with both of you. Trying to see if I think it's a geek attack or whether there is something more to it. I'm not much of a conspiratorialist so I'll go with the former. Either way, absolutely funny for most of the world during these bleak times.

Where did the story come from that Meghan was furious? Even though, I am positive that she was that!
Fairy Crocodile said…
I saw some suggestions that the redirection was done by Americans, not Brits. Looks like her new audience is distinctly underwhelmed
Fairy Crocodile said…
@Henrietta

Thank you! When Boris went to ICU I was really scared. He is the one holding Conservatives together. I so much hope he recovers well and goes back to work.

There is a lot of work to do with UK's obsolete inefficient "public service" systems.
SDJ said…
@Sandie
What she attended was “Step It Up for Gender Equality”, a UN Women’s celebratory event for the 20th anniversary of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. It wasn’t held at the UN, it was held at a NYC event space, the Manhattan Center at 311 West 34th St. UN Women didn’t even mention her in the PR,

Not only this, but MM wrote about it in Elle Magazine stating:

When I gave a speech for International Women's Day, and Ban Ki-moon led the standing ovation,,

Then, when you watch this speech on YouTube(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zkb-zg4JCLk), it is clear that NO ONE STOOD. NO ONE. skip to the 09:32 mark if you want to skip her speech and just watch the audience sitting.


(link to Elle mag: https://www.elle.com/uk/life-and-culture/elle-voices/articles/a32612/meghan-markle-fame-comes-responsibility/)
@Fairy Crocodile,’I saw some suggestions that the redirection was done by Americans, not Brits. Looks like her new audience is distinctly underwhelmed.’

This is even better, isn’t America her desired audience?!! ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚ I thought the Gold digger and Gaslighting re-direction was hysterical. Someone is having the biggest laugh and dig at the Dubious Duo! ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฉ
CookieShark said…
The idea that the name Archewell predated their child is completely bizarre. What if it was a girl? Would her name be Archina?
Teasmade said…
@Cookie: Probably CHERA for a girl.

LOL
Fairy Crocodile said…
Did you notice in "she is back article" the SoHo house is prominent as her old stomping ground? I bet the whole article was done to remind people of her connection to it.

Whether accurate or not speculation about SoHo is quite colorful and entertaining to read.
xxxxx said…
Henrietta said...
New DM article on MM, "She's Back":
https://mol.im/a/8200245 ____ EXCLUSIVE: She's back! Take a trip down memory lane as Meghan returns to her old LA stomping grounds where she'll have celeb friends and mother nearby, volunteer at her favorite soup kitchen, dine at snooty Soho House and workout with her BFF


MORE:
MOM DORIA'S NEIGHBORHOOD

Despite her daughter's meteoric rise to superstardom, yoga instructor Doria continues to live in a modest Mediterranean-style bungalow in South LA which she inherited from her father.

Her neighborhood's name - Windsor Hills – inadvertently hints at the 63-year-old former social worker's royal connections. Nicknamed the 'Black Beverly Hills', the area is respectable and has spectacular views of Downtown LA's looming skyscrapers.

But it is still a far cry from the palace life Harry has grown up in and the glitz and glam Meghan has become used to.


****The most sugary they have ever posted. DM has outdone itself to get the clicks-onto. That bring in money from their adverts/ This reads like a release from a skilled PR agent.
I predict a razzing ratio of 30 to 1
Imabug said…
She probably knew she would have a boy.

Either by “genetical selection” or buying the child, depending on the theory you believe.
SirStinxAlot said…
I would not rule out ADD/ADHD. However, as another poster mentioned Adderall helps with weight loss. Adderall is prescribed for ADHD. If you use it and don't actually have the illness, it causes your brain to go into overdrive mode. Instead of being able to focus, you experience a variety of other side effects. It may explain all the chaotic and careless behavior in their disorganized announcements, IG posts, and appearances.

https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/adderall-addiction/related-topics/adhd-and-adderall/#gref
Sandie said…
@SDJ:

Thanks for filling in some more gaps.

There really is no long-term genuine commitment for anything but self promotion for her.

I am still reeling from the shock of realising that The Tig was not her work but work done for her, an image created for her. She just took lots of photographs for the people running the blog to use! Even the deals for freebies and appearances/speeches were arranged by others.

The sad thing is she captured a man who did have long-term commitments to and passion for some key causes and who was building a significant body of work (with the right advisers and staff helping him do that). All that is now gone, and as events unfold, to me, it seems more likely that Harry will never return to the life he had. If he will be happy fading into obscurity and living in the country somewhere he might just have a happy life, albeit he will always be connected to Meghan through Archie.

Meghan? She needs to find someone who will take charge of any work or publicity she does and then step back and let that person do so. I can't see her being happy in obscurity and living a simple life, so she needs to be rescued by a very wealthy man.
New Royal Round Up from Saffy - Yippee! Today, 9th April

https://thecrownsofbritain.com/


Elle: I was referring to trying to apply the instructions you posted re Bold. So far, no luck.
Teasmade said…
@Wild-Boar

Go like this (here is your sentence as was):

I was referring to trying to apply the instructions you posted re Bold. So far, no luck.
Before it, put
After it, put


I can't do it or it would turn bold. Hoping just putting the code by itself will suffice! If not, I'll try again.
Teasmade said…
Boar, okay, that didn't work. Go here:

https://www.w3schools.com/html/html_formatting.asp

and look at the first. example

Sandie said…
@Wild Boar Battle-maid:
New Royal Round Up from Saffy - Yippee! Today, 9th April

https://thecrownsofbritain.com/

Yippee indeed! For those of you unfamiliar with this blogger, here is a sample of the brilliance (and it is a brilliant blog):

Unable to possibly fathom being stranded in the terrifying war-zone that is Western Canada, and growing increasingly pissed off that the Canadian government told them to go fuck themselves when they asked them to pay for their security, Meghan promptly moved her family from one rent-free accommodation to another, all the while complaining how “difficult” life had become.

Her use of photos and gifs nd the captioning thereof must take a lot of time but they are brilliant ...

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Portcitygirl said…
Watching the finale of Modern Family and guess what is advertised during the commercials - thr elephant doc- nice little fluff piece. At least Natalie Portman got credit first- know that had to burn MM.
Anonymous said…
And ,@Wildboar & Teasmade, the format is right below the comment box if you make the comment on your computer. IDK if it shows up on phone browser, but if you enter comments by clicking on comments from the post, it should pop up the format of the HTML tags below.
Thank you so much for giving us the info about thecrownsofbritain blog. It's brilliant and hilarious.
Sandie said…
Graffiti art of Harry in LA (a few photographs in the article):

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp32093886/prince-harry-graffiti-los-angeles/

And this one in London:

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/prince-harry-graffiti-london-pegasus-a4332016.html

Anonymous said…
Are we in pre-pre-divorce phase yet?

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1266663/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-regret-isolated-Megxit-news-Royal-Family-latest-update
Sandie said…
https://66.media.tumblr.com/e429b48ca8fa7c64951c45f42b23d531/3904b2cad1d09efc-7b/s1280x1920/2189567675867d302e2d019bd6f01a8ea05f1422.jpg

https://66.media.tumblr.com/a92f8364331105fa2b56bb1dcfbb7e85/3904b2cad1d09efc-ae/s1280x1920/9011ca11eff9d33c2c4ec69b6f2db7145b2e5f9b.jpg

Meghan should really consider this (but she won't ... she has been doing the long, straightened hair with bits hanging on her face since she was a teenager, despite what some hairdresser says about 'creating a duchess style') ... a shaved head would look good on her, that is if she does not have some kind of weird bumps or other things going on underneath the hair.

Harry just looks like some kind of dodgy cave man!
Fairy Crocodile said…
Elle,

I don't think they will divorce yet. Harry is completely under her heel and thinks sun is shining out of all her orifices. She is not done with him yet, she hopes Harry's name will still open doors for her.

He believes they two hold the fort against the whole evil of this world.

Crowns of Britain was right calling them TweedleDumb and TweedleDumber.
SirStinxAlot said…
Personally, I think MM would like nice with a pixie cut. It would make her look younger. Also, she could check the "Diana 2.0" box. Since she desperately copies Diana fashion. Why not go for it.
Anonymous said…
You may be right @Fairy Crocodile, probably are, but I've noticed quite a few of these, and can't help but think how things must be falling apart behind the scene.
FreezeFrame said…
@Elle ...but I've noticed quite a few of these, and can't help but think how things must be falling apart behind the scene.

What if all of these articles implying that Harry "feels isolated" and maybe regrets Megxit is part of a larger PR storyline? Meghan loves attention- good, bad, and ugly... it defines her relevance and sense of importance.

-Megxit to Canada
-Megxit to US
-Archewell announcement
-Harry feels isolated (We are here)
-Harry and Meghan stressed in LA- things aren't going as planned
-Archie's first birthday
-Harry and Meghan's 2 year anniversary... Amazing what can happen in 2 years storylines...
-Cornavirus lockdown ends and people can begin to move about
-Harry is furious with US paps, they are relentless in their pursuit of the couple
-Harry and Meghan fight over $$$
-Harry and Meghan "take a break"
-Harry moves into suite at SoHo hotel-- headlines screech "Are Harry and Meghan O-V-E-R??"
-Harry and Meghan papped visiting a "marriage therapist"/meditation expert/cloud observer/candlemaker
-After 6-9 weeks of tabloids/DM/media speculation of "Are Duke and Duchess of Sussex permanent residents of Splitsville?", the couple reunite (insert eye roll)
-In podcast or Oprah special, Harry and Meghan discuss their road back to one another and introduce the world to their new non-profit, Archewell.

Also, I wouldn't be surprised if someone on 4chan /pol/ is responsible for the archewellfoundation.com link to Golddigger... believe it or not, there are threads on Harry and Meghan... (just waaaaaaay more raunchy, vile and inappropriate) They aren't fans of MM at all.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
And by "behind the scenes", I mean that I can't believe it's bliss in the Dumbarton household.
FreezeFrame said…
Also "possible" things that I didn't add to my list of Sussex PR nonsense... because it sounds too far-fetched (even for them)

-Harry and Meghan take Archie trick-or-treating (Archie dressed up as a banana and Harry and Meghan as Ross and Rachel from Friends)
-Harry and Meghan adopt an orphan
-Harry and Meghan visit Thomas Markle
HappyDays said…
Hi All,

While were on the topic of mew posts, over at narcsite.com, H.G. Tudor has a new post in his A Very Royal Narcissist series, but now that Megxit has taken place, the 14th post in this series has a modified name, now going by A Not So Royal Narcissist — Part 14.

H.G. Tudor continues his analysis of Meghan’s narcissistic personality disorder and how it affects Harry, Archie, the RF and a cast of millions on both sides of the pond.
abbyh said…

Finally, I have caught up a bit.

So, I've been pondering about the comments of how little staff they seem to be down to, the fall out from the website going to the video ...

so what I'm questioning: didn't they just hire someone from the Gates Foundation? Wouldn't website/ownership question for new foundation have come up in the job interview? or even if it was later, surely it must have come up as part of your united media campaign.
xxxxx said…
'Crowns of Britain' is very funny indeed this week. She put lots of effort into it.
Nutty Flavor said…
Good morning, all!

That's an excellent question about the Gates hire, @abbyh.

Unless it's yet another example of Meg hiring someone and then refusing to listen to their advice.

Nutty Flavor said…
@FreezeFrame, very interesting narrative ideas.

I've long thought that the reunion with Thomas Markle was the very last arrow Meg had in her quiver. She's not going to do that until she has absolutely nothing else.

Also, re: isolation for the Sussexes, I've read that the drug supply to the area has been cut off by the lockdown. Might be pertinent.

There was some speculation that a drug supply cutoff might have been behind their quickie departure from Canada. Pure speculation without evidence.

Harry did look thin and twitchy during his last UK appearances, but maybe that was just a new diet or something.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Sandie, thanks for the graffiti artist images.

I wonder if either of the artists were paid by Meg's people.

If so, it would be an unusually clever approach to PR.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Elle, interesting link.

It quotes "royal commentator Angela Mollard" saying " Harry will now be reflecting on his decision to step away from the Royal Family and may be feeling tremendously isolated."

With these Royal Commentator people, I'm never sure who to believe and how much access they have.

If you Google "Angela Mollard" you get a lady who lives in Sydney, Australia and has just published a book entitled, "The Smallest Things: Thoughts on Making a Happy Family". Nice. She also has a public Facebook page, https://www.facebook.com/AngelaMollardOnline/, that doesn't include a single mention of the Royal Family.

Why, then, is she a guest on "Royals podcast with host Zoe Burrell" and quoted in the Daily Express?

FWIW, Zoe Burrell is also based in Australia and seems to write mostly about The Voice Australia. https://www.who.com.au/zoe-burrell

Thanks, Daily Express, for bringing us these two well-informed "experts".
xxxxx said…
Harry did look thin and twitchy during his last UK appearances, but maybe that was just a new diet or something.

Nutty- He needs more avocado toast made by Megsy. There is never an avocado shortage in California. The Mexican border is very locked down these days due to Covid19. So yes, there might be a drug shortage in the LA area. Or prices have gone so high that the Meandering Malibu Two cannot afford them. Not until her next high powered acting gig comes in.
Nutty Flavor said…
@xxxx

LOL. Could be.

I also see that California has classified marijuana as an "essential item" during the lockdown (it probably is, for people with medical conditions), so there's that. Plus alcohol.

Both known to be among's Meg's favorites, re: past entries in The Tig.
Crumpet said…
Hello Nutties!

Just in case you were saving your pennies to run out and buy the MAY Vogue, Gal Gadot is on the cover, not MM. A back up plan? I doubt it, too late to make such a huge change. MM was creating her own version of reality again!
Nutty Flavor said…
Interesting, @Crumpet.

Wasn't Gal's new Wonder Woman movie supposed to come out right about now? Might have been a planned promo to have Gal on the cover.

I think there was also a rumor that the Sussexes would be on the cover of Vanity Fair.

Has the May issue of VF come out yet?
Crumpet said…
@Nutty,

The May Vogue has a blurb, advertorial, in the DM!
Many thanks, Elle, for your efforts

Still trying to get this right, without success. It's a combination of a dodgy machine and my own lack of savvy.

My desktop has been unreliable for weeks. It's been taken back to factory settings and `rebuilt' and I am still having to do restarts several times a day. It defeats our guru completely. He's spent hours on it and can't the source of the problem.

What a time for it to play up. It'll have to be replaced when/if this virus is (ever) over.

Also I don't speak the language/ understand the messages about tag not being `closed'.We

don't have any family to help either - I get very cross if some smart*rse says `Ask a child!'

I'll have to think of a way to indicate that I'd like to use Bold, if only I could!
Portcitygirl said…
https://www.ccn.com/meghan-markle-weasel-slur-should-be-a-wake-up-call-for-prince-harry/

Wendy Williams calls Meghan out. Ruh roh. The gloves are off. Comments and extra unflattering articles at the end.
Nelo said…
@Elle, I don't take daily express seriously. Most of their stories are clickbait
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Nelo said…
@Elle and @Nutty, these so called royal experts know nothing so I don't take them seriously. They are just conjuring up what they think is happening in the Sussex household. They don't know what is happening. Even Omid Scoobie and Lainey sometimes don't know what the Sussex are up to.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Hikari said…
This is a test!

If this works, Thanks, Elle!
Anonymous said…
@Hikari!! A+ on your test! Now, if you want to to italics, I bet you know which letter to use in place of B :) And you can do both, too!

Portcitygirl said…
@Elle

I'm interested in the real papers as well. I will have to check out The Telegraph. Maybe there should be a list here. So we will all know.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Portcitygirl said…
@Elle

Haha. Too funny and correct! I found one similar, which did include the Daily Express, but there was so much profanity I didn't think it appropriate here.☺
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
PortCity, who did it say reads the Express?
Portcitygirl said…
@Elle

Sorry for delay. Difficulty with link.

Warning!!! Bad language๐Ÿ˜œ


https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-majority-of-UK-newspapers-right-wing?top_ans=125057819
@Elle, I use Safari as my browser and I’ve never been able to use the tags, for bold or italic, which is why I quote a persons comment in inverted commas. ๐Ÿ˜

I can only comment on Nutty’s blogs when comments are not embedded. ๐Ÿฅด Blogger has always had a ton of issues wrong with it, tis why I gave up trying to resolve any issues with it ages ago. ๐Ÿ˜
Hi Elle,

I'm on Google Chrome but have option of Edge - might that be better?


I've tried it every which way - even if it looks OK it get this - in red - when I press `preview'

Your HTML cannot be accepted: Tag is not closed: B

Does this mean anything to you?

Please don't lose sleep over it!
@Wild Boar’Your HTML cannot be accepted: Tag is not closed: B’

That’s the same error messages as I get. As said to Elle, I gave up ages ago trying to make the tags work and I did HTML coding as a free choice Uni (extra) course. ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ˜œ
abbyh said…
WBBM

copy this below and take out the spaces between the letters:

want to make the word success in bold

< b >bold< / b >

see the < b > that's the open tag
see the < / b > that's the close tag

it's like a gate, if you open it, you need to close it.

Portcitygirl said…
@Elle

When you follow the link- click on Mark Pokes comment.
abbyh said…
oops I wrote success and typed bold

< b >success< / b >
Nelo said Elle... ‘I don't take daily express seriously. Most of their stories are clickbait.’

I can’t stand the paper, it’s terrible and like a comic and not worth the money nor the time to read it. This is the printed version too. It wasn’t like it a few years ago. ๐Ÿฅด
abbyh said…

Nutty re: the woman who worked for the Gates foundation That would have been a big: what have I done moment.

I wonder how long she will stay?
@abbyh, reply to WBBM,’ copy this below and take out the spaces between the letters:

want to make the word success in bold

< b >bold< / b >

see the < b > that's the open tag
see the < / b > that's the close tag

it's like a gate, if you open it, you need to close it..

I tried this method ages ago too, I gave up. ๐Ÿคช Maybe Wild Boar will get luckier than me. ๐Ÿค—
Has anyone seen the new Royal family insta post. They are sharing an Easter Cookie recipe. And a video showing how to. I think this might be Burberry guy's doing! Any thoughts Nutties?
Glowworm said…
Ha ha ha
archewellfoundation.uk Goes to a youTube of Dire Straits singing “Money for Nothing”
Suzy1972 said…
@Alice

I thought it was a bit odd that none of the royals are in it. It just looked like a Tasty recipe post or something like that.
Even if it was the chef of the household making them, that would’ve been a cute thing to showcase - plus someone who works so hard for the family would get their moment to shine!
Portcitygirl said…
Glowworm

Thanks for the first lol today!๐Ÿ˜‚

Someone is definitely trolling them! Maybe it's the Russians again. They must be fuming. Doesn't look like the Gate's woman is working out too well.
Portcitygirl said…
Omg! This is just too too funny.๐Ÿ˜‚ Wonder what it will be tomorrow?

My guess is the domain is being held for ransom. Maybe their good friend Bill G could loan them some money. I would love to know their price.
Glowworm said…
YW, Portcitygirl! I just left a comment under it...that it was Meghan and Harry’s and it was perfect. Lol
HappyDays said…
I’d think locking down the Archewell website name would have been the first thing they would have done as soon as Meghan came up with the name. She likely came up with the name before hiring the woman from Melinda Gates.

BTW: Their Gates hire likely isn’t going to work for them for a piddly salary. That, plus all the other overhead they currently have, must be absolutely bleeding them. A speech for an investment house here and there isn’t even a drop in the income bucket these two require to maintain the facade Meghan wants to put forth to the world.

Nutty: A post taking a look at their probable expenses and income might be interesting. Mundane things like taxes, transportation, housing, security, public relations, website management, insurance, healthcare, grooming, utilities, etc. eats up a lot of money.

Harry can’t get every penny from Charles forever. Charles will eventually reduce it or cut them off due to a need for protecting his image as future monarch. He has to look like he has at least a bit of strength when it comes to his hapless son and devious wife. Charles’ public image could suffer if he just keeps doling out money to a pair that the UK public regards as selfish, turncoat wastrels.
KCM1212 said…
@happy Days

Staff has got to be eating them up as well. Nannies, cooks, housekeepers, aides..

My guess is that Charles is paying their expenses for a year. That's why they have to buy a house quickly. And get their website built, staff in place and foundation going. Charles may pay for it all.

I hope not. I hope he has given them an allowance that does not include buying a mansion.

Who knows...maybe both Harry and Charles just assume *all* houses cost 15 m!
MustySyphone said…
@HappyDays

Agreed on a post discussing back-of-the-envelope type estimates as to their living expenses. I wondered on an earlier Nutty post about the cost of just the hired help: security (somewhat documented), nanny, housekeeper, maid(s), chef, PAs (one for each of them), plus PR, spokesperson, etc. Also health insurance (no NHS in America).

I read somewhere that the Gates hire was paid a year's salary in advance (so it was paid by Charles and not the Duke and Duchess of Encino).

Finally, I do think PC's image has been damaged by this. It looks like he let these two walk all over him (and the taxpayer) and he just rolled over and played dead for most of it.

test

MustySyphone said…
@KCM1212
Sorry my post is similar to yours. I didn't refresh (and see your post) before I posted mine.
Miggy said…
@Wild Boar Battle-maid,

I also use Google Chrome and bold and italic both work fine for me.
Fairy Crocodile said…
I think Nutty is right. No professional PR person would make such basic mistake with web site registration. Looks like Megs and Harry. And they appear either not having advice or not following it, perhaps they are indeed under influence of drugs or alcohol.
London Gent said…
@WBBM and @Raspberry Ruffle --

I'm jumping on the bold / italic bandwagon to help if I can --

As others have said, you need a begin "tag" ( < b > (for bold)) and an end tag ( < / b > (to end bold) right at the beginning and end of the word or phrase, no spaces.

However, in order to demonstrate this, as others have said, you can't explain it without taking out spaces in the tags. Otherwise, explainers will just post in bold, adding to frustration!

For example --

< b > (take out the spaces between the < and > ) and you get bold BE SURE AND BUTT UP YOUR TAGS DIRECTLY AGAINST THE WORD OR PHRASE at both beginning and end of bolding -- NO SPACES

< / b > To end where you want the bold to end (otherwise the whole rest of your post will be bold, without the "end" tag) -- thusly, taking out the spaces between the < and / and b and > -- bold and end bold

Best of luck!
Miggy said…
@Wild Boar,

Does seeing it like this make it any easier to understand?

< b > I want to write this in bold < / b >

< i > I want to wrote this in italic < / i >

< i > < b > I want to wrote this in both bold and italic < / b > < / i >

The only thing you have to remember is not to leave spaces inbetween ... < i > etc etc
Miggy said…
* write not wrote

Cripes... what a typo!
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8150405/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-planning-3m-Costwolds-bolthole-near-Soho-Farmhouse.

Has anybody seen other sources for this story?

I'm amazed she's got the gall to show her face her - on second thoughts, it's bloody typical.
Miggy: Does seeing it like this make it any easier to understand?

< b > I want to write this in bold < / b >

< i > I want to wrote this in italic < / i >

< i > < b > I want to wrote this in both bold and italic < / b > < / i >

The only thing you have to remember is not to leave spaces inbetween ... < i > etc etc


Me: Ok, I'll try again:

embolden (there, no spaces - but no bold)
italic as above, no spaces, no effect.

I think that's what I'm suppose to do...

Is it my keyboard?

There's something wrong somewhere in the machine. I'll try again when we've replaced it.

Meanwhile, thanks to everyone who has tried to sort it out for me.
Miggy said…
@WBBM,

It's worked!
Oh, I see -it only happens after hitting `Publish!

Easy when you know how!
Miggy said…
@Wild Boar Battle-maid,

Congratulations! :-)

It should now also work in preview.
xxxxx said…
KCM1212 said...
Staff has got to be eating them up as well. Nannies, cooks, housekeepers, aides..
My guess is that Charles is paying their expenses for a year. That's why they have to buy a house quickly. And get their website built, staff in place and foundation going. Charles may pay for it all.


The tenant farmers and other rent payers to the Duchy of Cornwall are paying. The Prince Charles money spigot is merely conveying the rents of these hard working people to the Malibu couch surfers. This is despicable and a gross insult to these tenants. I know I would be extremely pissed off.
Charles wake up! The reputations of the Malibu Two are in ruins and yours will also be. Their reputations will spread to you like a virus.
xxxxx said…
Glowworm said...
Ha ha ha
archewellfoundation.uk Goes to a youTube of Dire Straits singing “Money for Nothing”


Yes indeed. At least for now. And the "the hits keep on coming" for The Royally Dumped Duo. I thought Gold Digger was the best. Brilliant lyrics that I never read before. Rap ain't my thing.
@Musty Syphone wrote: "Finally, I do think PC's image has been damaged by this. It looks like he let these two walk all over him (and the taxpayer) and he just rolled over and played dead for most of it."

Yes! Didn't PC pay for that ultra-extravagant wedding, as well as MM's wardrobe (just one million dollars for the first year, according to estimates)? And this is how the dastardly duo have paid him back. If PC wants to preserve his image and his reputation, he should cut off the funding ASAP. Didn't they want to be financially independent? Believe me, no matter how much the duo whinge and scream, the public will be on his side, not theirs.
SirStinxAlot said…
@Wild Boar Battle Maid... I saw that article several weeks ago. They were hugely criticized for wanting another home in UK after spending $3million renovating Frog Cott. No idea how they are going to pay for all these homes everywhere. LA, Canada, Frog Cott, Cotswolds, etc. I think it was another, maybe if we suggest a more glamorous residence, PC will buy it for us so he can see his grand child situation. As another commenter posted, she puts out articles that are untrue, hoping for a bite so they can become true.
In one of its earlier posts, the Crowns of Britain blog references an incident which happened last year when the dastardly duo were still staying in Canada. They tries to make reservations a a local, award-winning restaurant, but they were refused because the owner said he "couldn't fulfill their security requirements", which is a bit odd since a lot of celebrities dine out at restaurants without any problems.

According to Foxella, this is what really went down: Meghan wanted all of the other customers to sign non-disclosure agreements AND hand over their cellphones to the Sussex bodyguards. It was never about security; it was about a paranoid control freak not wanting people to take unauthorized photographs of them or talking about them to the media. Not surprisingly, the restaurant owner said no.
Wild Boar I’m going to use your comment. I have to try again and then hitting publish after preview?!

I want to write this in bold

I want to wrote this in italic

I want to wrote this in both bold and italic

I tried it again and it worked for me too! So you have to hit preview otherwise it doesn’t work. Who’d-a thought it! ����

So a big thank you from me too and for Wild Boar for persevering! ��
xxxxx said…
Says at bottom of yr comment box >>You can use some HTML tags, such as <b>, <i>, <a>   ------
I drag and drop them from the bottom into what I write, but you must remember to close them on your way out by
adding a / in front of the above letters. As in </b>, </i>, </a>
Portcitygirl said…
Yay๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ˜„

Now will have to try again on my tab. It is old and wonky.
Is anyone else's internet slow? Arghh.

Many thanks to the resident IT specialists๐Ÿ‘†❤
@London Gent, I have tried with no spaces before and it worked once, but then stopped. I think Safari and Blogger are basically incompatible and thus it’s a very fickle union. ๐Ÿ˜ I will keep using this method with the preview/publish combo and see if it continues to work for me. Thank you for your added assistance. ๐Ÿคฉ
Anonymous said…
@Wild Boar YES, this does mean something: Your HTML cannot be accepted: Tag is not closed: B

Does this mean anything to you?


It means you've left off the tag at the end, the one with /b! But it also means you're almost there.

I see there has been a tag party going on above without me, so now I'm going to see how it worked out! I wish we had a confetti tag lol!
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
CookieShark said…
@ Barbara I remember the restaurant incident. And it is not surprising. Their IG was full of perfectly staged photographs. Why would she not want the pap shots and publicity though? And why would she need people to sign NDAs for a dinner?

This makes me think she has asked people in the past to sign NDAs, which is why we don't hear juicy gossip about her past. It might explain where all her money went. Come to think of it, where DID it go? She was always getting things comped if I remember correctly.
London Gent said…
HURRAY!!! for all the freshly added bolders and italicizers! :)

It does make a difference, especially if the only way to add emphasis is to use all caps, and then one's shouting at people :(

So, well done! :)
@CookieShark: She probably didn't want people taking less-than-flattering pictures of her with their cell phones (remember, unlike paps, they're not professional photographers, and she pap shots of her in Canada all seemed posed). As for the NDA's, again, she didn't want people to contact the tabloids and give them an account of what she and Harry did at dinner, it case the accounts are less than flattering. I'm sure she had every one of her employees sign a NDA, although these are people who have to sign them to get or keep their jobs; it's not going to go over well with members of the general public.
SirStinxAlot said…
@Cookie Shark...it would be PR nightmare if a 5 star exclusive club or restaurant had a cockroach in the food or a mouse in the dining room.๐Ÿ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿค”
KCM1212 said…
@Sir Stinx

I think if the Dumbarton duo were in the house, they would have
both a cockroach and a mouse!
@musty
Good catch on the health insurance! That would be a cause Megs could get behind!
KCM1212 said…
I did it!!!!

Yay ya'all! Thanks!

And a telehealth appt this morning!

SO tech savvy
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids