Skip to main content

Meg and Harry's new foundation: "Let's pick a name that no one can pronounce."

One of the challenges I find about living outside my country of origin is pronouncing people's names. I meet people from all over Northern Europe as part of my business life, and it's never a good start to a business conversation to say, "And how do you say your name?"

Meg and Harry - or Meg, let's face it, this was her decision - have put all of their future business contacts into that situation by naming their new foundation "Archewell".

Arche, the Greek word Meg says is at the root of her foundation name, is pronounced ar-khay', with the emphasis on the second syllable.

That would properly make the foundation "Ar-KAY-well".

Or perhaps the foundation should be pronounced like "architect" - in other words "AR-ka-well" in US English or "AR-ki-well" in UK English.

Alternately, it could be pronounced with a silent "e," a bit like Madewell, the successful woman's clothing brand it's probably subliminally inspired by - "ARCH-well"

Or, for our forth and final contender, it could be pronounced to match the name of Meg and Harry's never-seen child: "ARCHIE-well."

That's an awkward pronunciation that sounds like a camel going over a speed bump, but knowing the Sussexes, that's probably what they will use.


The announcement of the name

For non-Telegraph subscribers, here's the text of the article announcing the name:

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are working on plans to run emotional support groups, a multi-media educational empire, and even launch a wellbeing website under a new non-profit organisation named Archewell. 
The Sussexes, who are setting up home in Los Angeles, have drawn up proposals for a vast and ambitious array of projects under the name Archewell, derived from the Greek word for “source of action” and the inspiration behind the name of their baby son, Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.
The couple told the Telegraph they wanted the organisation “to do something of meaning, to do something that matters”.
According to paperwork filed in the United States last month, the couple are considering how to create their own charity and volunteering services, wide-ranging website, and sharing “education and training materials” via films, podcasts and books.
Plans, which so far include trademark requests for everything from motion picture films to paperclips, are far more extensive than those originally intended under Sussex Royal in the UK.
The new American venture could even see the Duchess build on the success of her old Goop-style website The Tig, with a “website featuring information in the field of nutrition, general health and mental health”, along with entertainment.
The couple had not planned to launch details of the “non-profit” just yet, emphasising that they and the world were rightly focusing on the threat posed by coronavirus.
But after paperwork including the name was filed in the public domain in the US, and seen by this newspaper, they confirmed they will be launching under the name Archewell.
The Duke and Duchess told the Telegraph: "Like you, our focus is on supporting efforts to tackle the global Covid-19 pandemic but faced with this information coming to light, we felt compelled to share the story of how this came to be.
“Before SussexRoyal, came the idea of ‘Arche’ - the Greek word meaning ‘source of action’.
“We connected to this concept for the charitable organisation we hoped to build one day, and it became the inspiration for our son’s name. To do something of meaning, to do something that matters.
“Archewell is a name that combines an ancient word for strength and action, and another that evokes the deep resources we each must draw upon. We look forward to launching Archewell when the time is right." 

Arche and what it really means 


It's a measure of the Sussexes' usual bluster that they chose a name based on a Greek concept when neither one of them appears to speak Greek.

My guess is that Meg (or perhaps Harry) found the concept of arche in one of their self-help books or websites.

Like any word translated from one language into another, "Arche" (really arkhē) can mean many things in English.

It can mean "the ultimate" - arch-enemy, arch-angel, archetype.

It can mean "the first, and now left behind" - archive, archaic

It can mean "chief" - ie archbishop, like poor Desmond Tutu. (This actually comes from a similar Greek word, arkhos, meaning chief.)

(One thing it doesn't mean is "arch" like an arch in a building, ie the Golden Arches. That type of arch comes from the Latin arcus for bow. But you can bet a million dollars that there will be an arch somewhere in the Archewell logo.)

"Source of action" is actually pretty far down on the list of potential translations for arche.


Archie's name

Finally, I'm not buying that the concept of arche was behind the naming of the persistantly-unseen Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.

It sounds like revisionism. Didn't Meg have a cat or dog named Archie as a child?



Comments

Portcitygirl said…

Blogger Portcitygirl said...

JOOLS 2, ashington, United Kingdom, 20 minutes ago
What are their efforts then unquote to support the global pandemic???? Donation? Respirators? PPE help both there for the US's as well as here in the UK?? Nope,?? No mention. But compelled to talk about this charity foundation. Plenty on and about that! Too many celebs,footballers,wealthy people have done little to support this pandemic but greedy for us normals to keep funding their wealth and lifestyle. It's time we cut them off . I don't like any charity that takes more money in admin than helping the cause and sometimes at obscene rates. It remains to be seen and shown transparently if this is one of them. After this crisis all charities will be hard hit as people us normals!! have our lives impacted with financial nightmares and anguish of losing loved ones. Homes and job risks. World will change.

I thought "Jools" from DM summed this nicely. Also, I didn't see one positive comment about their new charity.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Portcitygirl said…
That "new" PR guru must not be working out. I thought for a moment when the article came out about them taking a break that they might listen. Surely it is Meghan who pushed to get this out. I can't imagine a highly successful PR person suggesting this would be a great time to inflict this nonsense onto the public during one of the worst times in history for the majority of the world.
Nutty Flavor said…
The timing was awful. The story went live at 10pm UK time yesterday, just a couple of hours after the shocking announcement that Boris Johnson had been taken to the Intensive Care Unit.

Perhaps the print version of the Telegraph had already gone to bed. If it were an online-only story, they could have had it pulled and then run on a slower news day.
Nutty Flavor said…
Also, I would think that by now the General Public would be catching on to the fact that they've been seeing the same photos of the Sussexes with Archie for the past 6 and a half months.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Torontopaper1, the famous troll, wrote after the announcement:

"Darling, it wouldn't be so ridiculous if you didn't name the foundation after a baby which isn't even legally yours."

https://twitter.com/torontopaper1/status/1247322024453824513?s=20
lucy said…
@torontopaper quote gives me a different perspective because I was thinking at least the name isn't a combination of H&M. Archie will always be around ,unlike their marriage
Magatha Mistie said…
Arche is an anagram of Rache,
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said…
@Magatha Mistie Oh my goodness, brilliant: ARCHE -> RACHE. Then we also have ARCHEWELL -> RACHEL LEW?
Unknown said…
If there was a letter D, I think the point would be clear.
Anonymous said…
How about Rachell Ew?
Unknown said…
@Elle That works too :) ARCHEWELL really is a weird name.

I think her naming scheme finally proves that Meg knows no one is interested in her. She has to forever piggyback off of “Just H” and Archie.
Magatha Mistie said…
Raw Lleech & Acrew Hell

And Heel Crawl for @JocelynsBellinis
Magatha Mistie said…
Sorry, Heel Crawl for @JocelynsBelinnis shoes!!
lucy said…
https://www.arche-shoes.com/🤣
Magatha Mistie said…
@Anon-Unknown
I agree, not just bad timing but disgusting given what the world is going through.
Add to that Boris is seriously ill, whether it was too late to pull the article is irrelevant, there should never have been an article in the first place.

I am totally & utterly disgusted with them.
Arche Leather Goods, (shoes) is a French company founded in 1968. They sell at Nordstrom and at Zappo's and elsewhere.

They also have a stand-alone store in Beverly Hills, CA. Of course, MM never passed by that store, did she?
@Nutty

I first thought on reading the super desperate TeleG article was about the pronunciation. In my head I read that as 'Ar-Kay-well' and thought that would be super awkward for people to say. It does not roll off the tongue and is too close- sounding to the word 'archival' to convert the meaning Meg intends to convey.

I don't think MM is so smart that she read some this Greek word as a 10 yr old and has been using this to name everything she can think of. Most likely she had a cat named Archie, then a few years later realized it's an anagram for 'Rachel'. Then a few years later read about this Greek word. Did not know it's right pronunciation. But then thought " Oh my God that means superior, action taker, and my name is almost Archie, I'm destined to be the most famous ever!!!"

And that delusional thought has guided most of her actions ever since. 🙄
I love anagram solvers! Here are the two 7-letter words made out of Archewell:

leacher
welcher

Need I say more?
Magatha Mistie said…
@Alice, Surrey James
“Ar-Kay-Well” is Megs making sure we ask if she’s “Ar-Kay”

@ Wild Boar mentioned on the last post a cartoon “Archie & Mehitabel”
A cockroach & an alley cat!
Magatha Mistie said…
@JocelynsBellinis
Hahaha
Also Her Claw/Claw Her
Ozmanda said…
The name sounds like a non FDA approved medication. Now I am looking at this differently, I would've to see the org structure of this foundation, in my experience with fraud and money laundering cases "foundations" like this are usually shell companies that funnel cash through what may be a legitimate enterprise but it is used to move money without suspicion. As soon as I read this, my antenna went up. I will bet you a triple martini on the rocks that the phantom child is going to be listed. Along with her mother.

But maybe I am just too suspicious :)
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Hahahahaha!!

Oh, my good gosh :)

Okay, at this point I can only share something from Laura Ingalls Wilder --

(Little Town on the Prairie)

"Going to school is lots of fun, from laughing we have gained a ton, we laugh until we have a pain, at Lazy, Lousy, 'Lizy Jane!"

(aka Meghan Markle)
Nelo said…
@Nutty, I doubt the Sussexes are worried about timing because other celebrities are also launching different things. Chris Evans was on the cover of Esquire promoting a series. Rihana just announced the launch of Fenty skin care. Drake released a song on tiktok etc etc.
If these celebrities didn't bother to wait for corona to subside, the Sussexes will think they also can do what others are doing.

The problem i have with them is that they want to use their charity to enrich themselves and let's not be fooled, they will get tons and tons of donors making donation to their charity.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Nelo said...
@Nutty, I doubt the Sussexes are worried about timing because other celebrities are also launching different things. Chris Evans was on the cover of Esquire promoting a series. Rihana just announced the launch of Fenty skin care. Drake released a song on tiktok etc etc.
If these celebrities didn't bother to wait for corona to subside, the Sussexes will think they also can do what others are doing.

The problem i have with them is that they want to use their charity to enrich themselves and let's not be fooled, they will get tons and tons of donors making donation to their charity.

_______________________________________

I hope their money makes them very happy.

(I don't think so.)

The Scripture says, it is easier for a camel to be threaded through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into Heaven.

Good luck, Harkles LOL

Unknown said…
Fair point @Nelo. I’ve been thinking that their bad timing has a lot more to do with them being shut out of any communication with the BRF.

HMTQ’s speech now seems perfectly timed for what was happening with PM Boris Johnson behind the scenes. Camilla’s venture was timed the way it should for a Queen-Consort, day after the HMTQ.

H&M would have known about HMTQ’s speech. They wouldn’t have known about PM Boris Johnson and Camilla.
Unknown said…
The launch of Archewell explains why that story about the Birth Certificate recently came up again.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
charade said...
The launch of Archewell

____________________________

What the fresh hell is "Archewell" … ???
A thought I had is it reminds me a bit of that charity they've done some things for, WellChild. If we take the "Arche" to be meaning Archie (ie their child), then they've literally named it "child well".
Unknown said…
LOL @Lt. Nyota Uhura :) All of us are trying to figure it out. Who knows? H&M seem to be saying it is their new charitable organization:

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/prince-harry-and-meghan-plan-new-archewell-charitable-organisation-2020-04-06
^ perhaps "basically" works better than "literally".
Magatha Mistie said…
@Charade
I know, but it still beggars the question as to why they would start merching now?
Wrong time for them, no matter how desperate they are.
I agree they would not have known about Boris, but they should not have collaborated re the article.

As @Nelo said, other celebrities are also launching.
But they’re not associated with the RF, & the question marks still over tax payers money re security etc.

They are unbelievable.


Unknown said…
LOL @Lurking Spoon :) That was what I wrote on the last post. I took it to mean they are telling us “Archie Well” as in don’t worry that we left our baby twice in Canada and can’t carry him properly with or without a carrier.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
@ charade --

Thanks for the link --

Jeeze. Just when I thought these two could get no worse.

Everyone knows that "charitable" organizations allow 95 percent profit versus 5 percent output. Grin-grin-grin go the Sussexes! Aren't we beautiful!
I also feel that they are now going back to the "we are building the best foundation/non-profit ever" PR because they arnt getting any real work. Their past few months looking for genuine work have been very eye opening. So they go back to the foundation tactic because ultimately that gives them some clout. It also means they get to be liked by everyone because they are such great humanitarian. (Reality is much different, of course)

The Abby merchinh is also going to begin so hard now! That's the only card they got left.
Whatever did Camilla do recently?? Am I missing something?
Nelo said…
The Sussexes won't be the only people to profit from having a foundation or charity with which you can enrich yourself. The Clinton foundation and Trump foundation are prime examples.

I know a lady who started an NGO for domestic violence Victims and started applying to international coporations and organisations for grants. In less than six months, she started receiving donations from different bodies, and people. In her own case, she is very honest and passionate about helping victims.

Why am I sati this? It is because I believe that the Sussexes will be more successful in their charity than people think. They have the fame and contacts to get donations in millions.
If this lady who didn't have contacts could somehow get donations in hundreds of thousands, how much more a well known couple like the Sussexes.


I don't particularly like their attitude but at the same time, I love being realistic. I don't allow my dislike for their behavior cloud my reasoning. The Sussexes will make bank through donations to their charity.
Unknown said…
@Magatha Mistie I completely agree with you. It shows a complete lack of grace on their part and highlights their high-tone greediness. H&M are both REPUGNANT.

My take: the reason that motivated the announcement they are launching ARCHEWELL is HMTQ. Her speech gave them a perfect opportunity to piggyback off their lip-service: “we will be doing private works consistent and supportive of HMTQ.” Now they can pawn off her speech as an unofficial endorsement of their charity via their suspect charity organization. They are gunning to profit through misery and get accolades for it.

H&M are so transparent, it’s like looking through glass. Like I say, H&M are REPUGNANT!
Unknown said…
@Alice, Surrey James https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11341526/camilla-joins-national-help-service/
@charade

Oh, I knew that!! Lol are the Sussexes xompetinywith Camsy nhs volunteer thing??! Seriously. Never thought that would happen, but they are also competing with the Queen's speech for the nation. So ... 🤨
Sorry about the typos, guys. I'm on my phone and can't be arsed to get fire up the laptop.
none said…
Naming their foundation after a child no one ever sees. Very odd.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Charade
Repugnant is perfect.
Reckon Harry is muddling his Shakespeare, & his relevance to Queen & country.

My whore, my whore, my kingdom for my whore.
bootsy said…
@Nelo
I agree, there are lots of corporations/organisations/government bodies (don't forget them!) who jump on board woke culture and throw money at people. Whether we like it or not there is an audience for MM's and PH's self obsessed and self regarding prattle. It just remains to be seen whether their brand will be one of the ones to make money out of their chosen market.
Nelo said…
@bootsy, they will certainly make millions. But if the money they make will be enough for their lifestyle is another thing altogether.
@Charade, ohh sorry, I didn't realise it had already been mentioned, I haven't got around to catching up on the last post yet. I can see the logic behind your thoughts. I found it interesting that it appears to be copying/referencing the charity they've already had involvement in.
Magatha Mistie

`My whore, my whore, my kingdom for my whore.'

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant!

I posted about the origins of the name `Archibald' on the previous thread but after the new one was announced. It isn't Greek at all.

I'll go and find it and repost here for anyone who missed it.
Magatha Mistie said…
Wasn’t Archie the security nickname for Prince George, as reported in multiple papers prior to Archie’s birth?
Reposted (edited)

...`Archae-ology/archeology' - study of ancient/primitive things (all Greek-derived) as in archetype & archaic.

`Monarch' - literally `one ruler/leader' cf oligarch `few leaders'. Greek again, similarly archangel, archbishop, archfiend.

`Archibald' Greek? Nope! Not according to my etymological dictionary.

Now regarded as comical, it was popular in Scotland a couple of generations back ...

Sorry Megsy, you screwed up here.

According to my book, it comes from an Old Germanic name `Ercanbold' - `ercan' = true, `bald' = bold.

It appears to have been influenced by the Greek, by what I'd say was wishful thinking, an attempt, perhaps, at `gentrification' implying a Classical background rather than a barbaric origin among the tribes of the Teutonberg Forest, so hostile to the Romans. Otherwise known as false etymology.

Then there's Archie and Mehitabel - a new designation for archie and megsy (or do i mean harry and megsy, those human cockroaches snug as bugs in a rug in malibu/los angeles...'

(Yoicks! Talley-ho! I've just hunted prunes & linseed to their online lair [Grape Tree-for British readers!]- I'd already rounded up the TP)
Unknown said…
@Lurking Spoon Please don’t apologize. It was great you posted about the similarity to WellChild. I didn’t come up with that connection at all. I was very literal in my reading of Archewell. I thought “Archewell = Archie well.”

My original post:
@Meowwww That was the first question I had. The name is so unappealing. My guess is it is two syllables: Arch-well.

Maybe Meg is trying to give us a subliminal message about Archie. The fonts here worried if the baby is neglected are getting plastered in the face with: he is well.
Unknown said…
@Nelo Something else I though about the timing of Archewell.

Drake, Rihanna, and Chris Evans would have been contractually obligated to go forward with their projects as is regardless of COVID-19. Their projects (TV series, music, makeup line) required a lot of lead-up time for production and release (months if not years) so it would have been a financial and legal disastrous if they did not go forward.

Sussexes launching Archewell do not have contractual obligations to go forward with their announcement. They are just being greedy and opportunistic with COVID-19 and HMTQ’s speech.
Unknown said…
Sorry guys for all the typos, grammar idiosyncrasies, and deluge of posts. I’m having one of those sleepless nights again.

Thank you all for the wonderful and fun thoughts and ideas.

💜💜💜💜💜💜💜
To launch a foundation under such truly worrying global times, when the British Prime minister is in ICU, just shows how appallingly tone deaf these two are; just anything to stay relevant.🙄😤

If I was in the public eye, I’d be calling out these two selfish muppets left right and centre. 😤
CookieShark said…
Emotional support groups already exist, H&M, those are called friends and family
@Nelo,’they will certainly make millions. But if the money they make will be enough for their lifestyle is another thing altogether.’

Agree there’s always individuals just like them who will help with donations. I don’t think they will ever acquire enough money to live the life they want or expect, especially Megsy. 😉
Imabug said…
To explain the terrible U.K. timing, like she always has.

I honestly believe Meg doesn’t see anyone in the U.K. as “her audience” for this charity / foundation / stupid idea. So, she doesn’t care about the U.K. timing of announcements.

Her eyes are clearly on the West Coast of North America, where they have always been.
Artemisia19 said…
Didn't Harry say they decided against a "foundation" because there were too any out there? I believe he said it during the call with "Greta."
Fahlina Speaks said…
Looks like a play on her name Rachel. And/ or Monarch.
Magatha Mistie said…

Richard the Thirds words were twisted
No one knew Megs existed
She scammed and she shammed
And all ways she’s damned
But nothing, no way, worked on Wills
Magatha Mistie said…
@Raspberry Ruffle
They will make money. But not enough for Megs & her lifestyle.
They have both had a shock money wise, Prince Charles isn’t daft, he wants to keep Harry safe but he won’t pay forever.
They need big money, from whom?
Nutty Flavor said…
Interesting, @Fahlina Speaks.

I never thought of the crossover between "Arch" and "Monarch" before.
Royalfan said…
Thank you all for making my isolation morning here in Canada so entertaining! Spilling my morning coffee laughing at the comments!
@Magatha, They will make money. But not enough for Megs & her lifestyle.’

That’s exactly what I said in my comment. She’ll need to meet a billionaire and marry one, but who’d want her?! 😂
Magatha Mistie said…
@Nutty
More like anarchy?
Scandi Sanskrit said…
What a thoroughly narcissistic move. These days everyone wants to be special & be fussed over with their precious pronouns (there are about 6 billion different ones as of April 7, 2020).

Now people want to have their organisation names fussed over too because the owners have boring names nobody has ever fussed over.

I swear there are people in this world who get off on reminding people how their name's "Megynn with a Y and double-N!" And this is no different.

Also, the "we're so sensitive to the fact that we're announcing this in the midst of a pandemic" sounds like a legal disclaimer you have to say so you won't get sued.

Kind of like how people say, "allegedly & for entertainment purposes only."

If they really gave a f*** they wouldn't have done this the day Boris got moved into intensive care while his girlfriend's pregnant.

The only announcements I'm seeing from sincere non-sociopathic a-holes are cancellations of events & refunds.

What a pair of psychos.
I just do get their obsession with having a foundation. They literally said their motivation to leave was to earn more money! And everyone and their nanny knows that you can't donate, let alone have a global foundation if you do not earn money.

Who cares if no one thinks you are humanitarian?! No one is ever going to believe that of you anyway. Just start peddling stuff on your new IG and be done with it. People would even buy loo rolls and toilet cleaners right now.

And talking about their new IG, with this new archewell info now out, what do you think their ig handle will be?? The Arch Official?? Mon-arch.org?? Or ... Archeficial??
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Also, I think one of our very own commenters on this blog came up with the idea to name something after a Latin/Greek word.

I remember this distinctly because I said something like, "don't give them any ideas, I actually think your idea is brilliant/I like it."

Literally someone on this blog.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Scandi
Love your use of the word “fussed” X
Scandi Sanskrit said…
I hope I'm using it correctly!! 😂😂
xxxxx said…
As self-isolation goes up so does Nutty Flavor readership. I see comments by newbies every day. Willkommen!
luxem said…
Meghan is unoriginal and needs to merch off the back of something more successful. I think this is a straight-up ripoff of Madewell. Remember the infamous white panama hat that her friends were awkwardly telling her to put on at Wimbledon? Madewell. As is the knit beanie she wore for her Canada/Archie "walk". According to Meghan's Mirror, "Meghan loves Madewell". Americans (target audience) won't look for a deeper meaning and will likely pronounce it "Arch-well", if they are even aware of it.
@Scandi,’I hope I'm using it correctly!! 😂😂’

Oh yes you are ! 😜We say fussed over in Britain. 🤗
xxxxx said…
Artemisia19 said...
Didn't Harry say they decided against a "foundation" because there were too any out there? I believe he said it during the call with "Greta."

Common practice for the duplicitous duo. They issue all kinds of contradictory pronouncements. They could care less. They throw stuff against the wall to see if it sticks. Their prime target audience are their sugars (their base) and the Dumbartons try to keep them tingling. Sugars will be the ones who will be spending when the Duo starts merching out. By keeping Megsy in the news the Dumbs are priming the pump. The money spending pump.
Snippy said…
When I first read this, I was expecting am immediate denial, thinking it was an April Fool’s that got printed a few days late! I prefer this definition: “Archewell, the ‘h’ being silent and pronounced ‘arse’, ‘well’ for the hole they keep digging themselves deeper into.”
Fairy Crocodile said…
Excellent comments people.
I was also diving into what the Greek community says. Not impressed to put it mildly. First of all, there is no CH in Greek. There is X, roughly pronounced KH. So confusion is guaranteed. Second, the meaning is disputed.
Timing is awful. Who would want to give big sums to two individuals who will be or are in financial trouble? Who would trust Markle's fund management after her disastrous record in UK?
The big donors also prefer giving money under their own name now to claim points for helping during epidemic.
Absolute circus.
Snippy said…
Proper pronunciation is ArKAYwell, Nutty, but yes, so much confusion. Are they going with Arsh-well, Arsh-uh-well, Ark-well, Ark-uh-well, Ar-chee-well, Ar-she-well?? Shades of Anne Boleyn (really Bullen, but not pompous enough to impress Henry) or, Hyacinth Bucket.
Snippy said…
Should have just gone with “Smith-Smythe-Smith” or “Incubator-Jones”!
Teasmade said…
@Snippy, it's very very bad from a branding perspective to have such a mysterious name. It only invites derision. (Which we are : )

Also, somebody needs to Photshop a box of Snackwells cookies!
Unbeweaveable said…
They didn’t name the foundation after the baby, it was the other way around. One of the tumblr sites (CD maybe?) tracked down a list of all the trademarks and website domains registered to Meghan or her associates, and Arche Foundation was in there. Months before his birth, IIRC.

Trying to say that Archie was named for the word arche when the name has an entirely different origin and pronunciation is asinine. It bothered me when she did something similar with The Tig, claiming she named it after her favorite wine, when the wine is actually pronounced Tin-ya-nello.

The story that went around about Archie being George’s nickname was speculation about why he told some lady his name was Archie. I always assumed he heard his parents discussing the name and borrowed it for himself.
CookieShark said…
I believe they are going for Oprah-style empire of multiple revenue streams. It explains their apparent obsession with these weird-ass branding schemes. Over on CB they are fawning how perfect is for the H&M brand, perhaps not understanding that the need to "brand" is what is obscene in the first place. The RF & HMTQ were never going to be a post for MM's Instagram, but they just can't understand it.

Even to an outsider not familiar with marketing, it appears everything they have done is a flop. When they're not suing the media or complaining in interviews, their brand appears to be a handful of ideas that have never gotten off the ground. The Sussex Royal Instagram lasted a year? Who knows what Travalyst is? Did they ever start their foundation? What about their website for their progressive new role?

"Before SussexRoyal came the idea of ‘arche’ — the Greek word meaning ‘source of action,’ ” the couple continued. “We connected to this concept for the charitable organization we hoped to build one day, and it became the inspiration for our son’s name. To do something of meaning, to do something that matters. Archewell is a name that combines an ancient word for strength and action, and another that evokes the deep resources we each must draw upon. We look forward to launching Archewell when the time is right.”

That is such a manipulative statement. To me it says "forget SR, this is what we wanted all along." It is also full of fragmented phrases and bad grammar, which is MM's calling card.
abbyh said…

The whole thing comes off as a throw everything in the mixer, pour it in the pan, bake it and the cake will come out the way we want.

Maybe. Maybe not.

Like the idea they will get all kinds of donations.

I think that many who oversee donation allotment, have a built in detector and just don't throw money at a group because they write in to ask for it. Maybe they did way back when but now, now with all the new groups out looking for funding (restaurant workers out of work for example, in addition to all the usual good and well known groups which are listed in Charity Navigator), they will be just one of many. Especially as we don't have any clue as to what it will support (versus alzheimer in the name).

They will get some but perhaps not as much as if they had Covid in the name.

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Animal Lover said…
@Nelo

I don't particularly like their attitude but at the same time, I love being realistic. I don't allow my dislike for their behavior cloud my reasoning. The Sussexes will make bank through donations to their charity.

Agree and want to add Nutties don't have to support them if they find them offensive.

@ CookieShark

I strongly doubt they will be as successful as Oprah. I remember Oprah in the 1980s when she was new. A lot of women identified with her weight struggles and her childhood abuse.
Oprah was very easy to relate before becoming a billionaire.

Who will identify with M & H, gold diggers and social climbers?
KCM1212 said…
Perhaps it's Narchwell"


@magatha -you need to start writing songs! You crack me up!

Thanks to everyone for their insightful and funny comments

Scandi Sanskrit said…
@ Raspberry Ruffle: Thank you for confirming!

@Magatha thank you for your kind words, I forgot to say thank you~

Take care all! 💜💜🍹
brown-eyed said…
Check @archewell.global . POSSIBLE Instagram home for Archewell. Last night it had extensive links on the bottom of the page, under the photos. The links let to new subject pages. Many categories, but not much focus. “Bullying” was one area. Lots of word salad. Now all of that content is gone.

Archewell = where call

A really unattractive name, in my opinion. Doesn’t mean or tell you anything when you see or hear it.
Stephanie_123 said…
On a lighter note — The name Archewell (however it is pronounced ��) seemed vaguely familiar. The connection just came to me: Archway Cookie Co. Seems there are a couple similarities.

Archway is an American baker of middling, mass-marketed cookies competing in a crowded market. The company mismanaged its finances, declared bankruptcy and closed in 2008. The next year Lance Co., a maker of snacks, bought the name and reopened the bakery.

How long does anyone give the new foundation/charity/golden trough to mismanage, crash and burn?
CookieShark said…
If Archie was truly George's name from his security detail, this sure is a way for the Sussexes (The Ex-Sussexes?) to co-opt it and screams "it's about US, our son, not yours!"

Portcitygirl said…
https://mol.im/a/8195457

I see this has inched up on the front page, but oddly the comments are turned off.
CatEyes said…
@Scandi Sanskrit said…
>>>Also, I think one of our very own commenters on this blog came up with the idea to name something after a Latin/Greek word.

I remember this distinctly because I said something like, "don't give them any ideas, I actually think your idea is brilliant/I like it."

Literally someone on this blog<
It was me. I did a variation of names using 'Sussex' and mostly 'Regal' in Latin. I remember you complimenting then and I Thank you again!



FYI Nutties: I also coined the term "Himalayan Yak hair wig'

@ Nutty: I am of value to this blog even tho you told me to get off.
Greek Mom said…
Long time lurker, first time commenter. I love this blog and have learned so much from all of you wonderful folks.

I am Greek-American and fluent in conversational Greek. The word Arche (which I pronounce more as Ar-hee with a rolling R and a phlemmy H) means beginning, start, source. Although I do see it very low on the list of definitions, I would definitely not think of “source of power” when I see Arche

Again, another shining example of Megsy going off half-cocked and not knowing what the heck she’s doing/talking about.
Glowworm said…
Regarding what Meg’s plans and schemes are and when they were born, i have seen documents put forth in the early 2000’s for what is now the Cambridge’s The Royal Foundation, where Harry was listed as The Duke of Sussex. That information was public. Curious (not really) that I have read that not long afterwards Meg trademarked/copyrighted some names involving his title and her name, such as ‘Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex’. I don’t remember what they were exactly. I have also read where there were trademarked names/phrases involving the word ‘Arch’. I remember that she trademarked her baby’s name long before she ‘got pregnant’...maybe even before they married. I don’t believe a name for a girl was established. or I never saw it. Odd? Maybe or maybe not considering all the mystery surrounding Archie.

Sorry I don’t have links but some of you may remember these clues that point to her setting up this plan to snag Harry quite a few years before their supposed ‘blind date’. She really is an astonishing schemer.
Suzy1972 said…
Looks like this may be the new instagram - https://ibb.co/TY7cb4Z

Also devastated that I was wrong about the Sussex Trust/Sussex Foundation... for now! lol
Teasmade said…
@Greek Mom: Oh yay! Just last night when I commented on the lack of connection between the root form "Arche" and the name "Archie" (or Archibald), I wrote that I hoped a Greek speaker would chime in. And here you are!

As someone who has studied linguistics, I was just amazed at the sloppiness of forcing a connection between a Greek root word and a Germanic/Romance language name. I think this is too sloppy for a professional PR person, so it has to be Rachel's idea. Although . . . I wonder if they were consulting the ancient languages department when they descended upon Stanford?
Suzy1972 said…
Looks like that Archewell may be it - it's the same wordmark that they registered: http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4810:4a20rg.3.1


Curious about how this "compelled" them to launch? Nothing on the application links to them - a trademark attorney and a firm that isn't connected to the Sussexes?
MaLissa said…
As I said in the other post - I seriously doubt that Harry's First Wife is so versed in the classics that she'd pick that. Or you never know, I may be wrong.

Or as her usual MO, she hurriedly looked up Greek names and pounced on Arche because it was so "unique and on point" for her and made her look like she's really "well educated".
Gk for `source of action'? Total bullshit/bollocks/rubbish/codswallop/twaddle/nonsense/
squit/ balderdash...

The the sort of flattering invention from an uninformed commercial company trying to flog `name' mugs, key rings and similar tat.

The Greek does carry the idea of something ancient, primitive, early in time, really really old (as opposed palaeo-) primeval, original, so IF it were Greek it could perhaps be seen as `source' (yeah, but a long time ago)

Think archive, archaic, archaeology...

WEE ARCHIE'S NAME, HOWEVER, IS NOT GREEK !!!

The name `Archibald' and its diminutive Archie became popular in England in the 19th C when there was a fashion for Anglo-Saxon names, (eg Alfred, Edwin, Edgar) as opposed to French or Classical ones. See https://www.freebmd.org.uk/ if you're interested. Just search for babies registered as Archie or Archibald.

The A-Ss made given names from a stock of prefixes and suffixes - Alfred = Elf Counsel, Ethelred = Noble Counsel, Swanilda = Swan Battle Maid. Some modern surnames come from such names, probably as patronymics several centuries later, when the king sent out his tax collector: Woolgar = wolf spear, Woolard = Wolf bold, Barnard and so on.

Then there are the ones imported later from Germany & the Low Countries - Matilda, Brunhilde, Albert, Bernard and so on and so on,

Linguistically, Archiebald is Germanic/Teutonic, not Classical. MM is talking through the wrong end of her alimentary canal.

Why believe her when she's got such a reputation for untruths?

Btw, I'm only an armchair etymologist/linguist but I've the sort of mind that picks up all sorts of things that interest me & I've been around a long time!
Humor Me said…
Good morning Nutties!

Once again Rachel shows her true colors. After announcing they will release the details of their new foundation in a few weeks, allowing for their relocation and (possibly) the pandemic, 24 hours after HMTQ's 5 minute speech, the NEW foundation is proclaimed.

Timing be damned - Boris goes into hospital, the rate is climbing, but that doesn't affect MM. She must be relevant to her people.
She must be THERE for her people. Does this remind anyone of Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park: on a sopabox shouting to the heavens and the public mills abut not paying attention?

Everyone be healthy, social distance and wash your hands.......cyberhugs from the midWest.
Suzy1972 said…
Also from @justmythorts on Twitter:

"Is Archewell really new? Daily Mail noted that Meghan’s business manager created two websites named Arche Foundation back in October 2018. Meghan’s friend Janina Gavanker follows the instagram account. Could Archie be named after the foundation Thinking face?
CookieShark said…
L'Arche of Toronto is calling them out on Twitter. Love it!
Suzy1972 said…
@cookieshark What did they say?
Unknown said…
Here's how a foundation works in the USA. An individual, family or business with a lot of money sets up a foundation for altruistic and/or tax purposes. Funds are put in a trust, endowment or investment portfolio. The foundation board (usually the funders and their advisers) decide what the foundation's specific mission will be - arts, education, healthcare, etc. Then they hire highly educated program officers to select charities to support. Grants are made from a percentage of the interest income earned by the foundation. Here's the rub: H$M have no money to start a foundation. Remember, Bill Gates hoarded all his money until he married Melinda who created the Gates Foundation. As for the Clintons, they have massive influence to pedal and received most of their foundation funds from foreign governments. The Obamas had the proceeds of their books and speaking engagements to start their foundation. Thus, these three couples had massive fortunes to establish their foundations with. M$H want to sell a bunch of crap products and services including speaking engagements to AMASS a personal fortune through the Archewell Foundaton and become billionaires in the process. Just the opposite of the Gates who were billionaires first. Hawking T-shirts, voice overs and psychobabble on social media is not the same as creating Microsoft, being POTUS, or promising favors to the Saudis. What H$M are doing doesn't sound legal and will not meet IRS requirements.
Bones said…
I don't agree that they will be successful in raising massive amounts or several millions from donors(Oprah excluded, she might well be their only benefactor) due to the fact that they have been broadcasting their 'philanthropic'intentions directly for over 6 mo in publie and hinting at it since their departure from the royal foundation, as well as amongst their team. If they were able to attract that kind of backing, it would already have been in the hopper ready for a rollout when they made their dramatic exit announcement.Which really downshifted their PR worldwide,due to no longer being officially royal and (being cut off from the heirs - the real powers) when the economy was seemingly strong. No. They are scrambling behind the curtain trying to make us believe they are the Great and Powerful Sussex' duo when in reality they are adrift with no real plan in place.
Teasmade said…
Oh wow. There are a series of "LArche" organizations in Canada, including this Toronto one, who work with the intellectually disabled. So M might have run into this name before, having lived in Toronto? Not to mention that they should have done due diligence when searching for names.

Sloppy.

Although I do not see L'Arche Toronto calling anyone out on their Twitter feed, they might have posted something on someone else's.
Nahanni said…
Magatha Mistie: Rache is "revenge" in German.
Artemisia19 said…
"Arche is a Greek word with primary senses 'beginning', 'origin' or 'first cause'. Later, 'power', 'sovereignty', 'domination' as extended meanings were accepted by some. This list is extended to 'ultimate underlying substance' and 'ultimate undemonstrable principle'. In the language of the archaic period arche designates the source, origin or root of things that exist. In ancient Greek Philosophy, Aristotle foregrounded the meaning of arche as the element or principle of a thing, which although undemonstrable and intangible in itself, provides the conditions of the possibility of that thing. If a thing is to be well established or founded, its arche or starting point must be secure. The most secure foundations are those provided by the gods—the indestructible, immutable and eternal ordering of things"

https://www.definitions.net/definition/Arche
Christine said…
SO out of touch with the entire world. And of course she would name the foundation after her golden goose, little Archie.

It will be interesting, perplexing, annoying and head scratching to see how their scheme, er I mean foundation, plays out.
I don't disagree about `the meaning of `Arche' in Greek - it's just that the name is NOT GREEK, much as Meghan would like it to be.

Yep, an ancient Greek ruler was an `arkon' but how many Greeks have ever been called Archie or Archibald? How long ago?
lizzie said…
I'm sure they'll amass some money but I don't agree it will be a ton.

If they still had a formal working association with the RF, donors might like feeling "royal-adjacent."

If they were accomplished in their own right (let's face it, no one sane seriously thinks M has much talent) donors might seek "reflected glory."

If they had useful connections to power (royal or other) that would appeal to a certain sort of donor.

If they had a cause (besides themselves-- they've talked about making money too much) and an actual plan vs spouting off "flavors of the day" charitable targets, they might attract like-minded donors.

Simply because deluded "sugars" will donate $100 to a fund to plant trees or to an Archie birthday fund, doesn't mean people with real money will do the same. People with real money are used to being approached by con artists, especially when a foundation is a not-for-profit one, not a non-profit.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Suzy1972 said…
Lol https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=37309174&postID=4433465165092233247&isPopup=true
From:
https://www.historyextra.com/period/modern/royal-baby-archie-harrison-mountbatten-windsor-history-meaning-name-harry-meghan/

"May 9, 2019 at 5:10 pm

"The history of the name ‘Archie’
The name Archie was originally a nickname for Archibald, which derived from the Anglo-Saxon name Eorconbeald, and the Old High German name Erchenbald, which has meanings including ‘noble’ and ‘brave’. Variations of the name are recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086. The name became particularly popular in Scotland from the medieval period all the way to the 19th century."
SDJ said…
@CookieShark
"forget SR, this is what we wanted all along."

You have to wonder, don't you. They change their direction with the breeze. If they had been able to keep SussesRoyal, would its aim be to promote wellness or whatever Archewell's aim is? You would think that after spending so much energy on SR, that they would simply rebrand and carry on. No these two though. They seem to start from scratch with every hiccup, while portraying the change as their intentions all along.

And, although I think Archewell sounds like some kind of mass-market orthotic, as a fan of GBBO, I also keep thinking about Bakewell tarts!
Greek Mom said…
Wild Boar Battle-maid is correct, Archie is NOT a Greek name.

I did know a Greek man who goes by Archie here in the US, but his Greek name is Argyrie
Many Greek names are Americanized here. In fact my Grandfather whose name was Heracles (Hercules) was renamed Frank by an agent when he went through Ellis Island!
References to the L'Arche community, even obliquely, would be the Kiss of Death anyway to this project.

The formerly much-respected founder, Jean Vanier, has just been exposed recently as a sexual abuser.

How ignorant can the stupid woman be - she with her much-vaunted links with Canada?

Unless of course, that was the idea in the first place, to exploit the good reputation of L'Arche itself? Get some reflected glory/respectability from those who are easily duped?

If so, it's backfired.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Vanier

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-51596516

https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/12510/l-arche-in-mourning-over-vanier-abuse-allegations
IEschew said…
Well, if I can say one thing for them, it’s that they write their own satire. The Onion could not do it any better (and I confess I have wondered if this idea was not the brainstorm of a brilliant “advisor” brought in to ensure a swift end to the Harkles’ world-domination plans). I have chuckled over this name, its “compelled” reveal, and all you nutties’ wonderful riffs on it between my worries and well wishes for everyone affected by this virus.

So there is that. Thanks, Meg and H!
Apparently when you type archewellfoundation.com into your browser, you are directed to a music site featuring Kanye West's music video "Gold Digger":

https://tattle.life/threads/harry-and-meghan-15-sweet-dreams-my-la-suss-ex.5252/page-48

You could not make this stuff up. So it begs the question - what kind of research did H & M do before deciding on the name?
Thank you, Greek Mom!

I used to teach more or less in Camden Town, an area of London with a considerable Greek and Cypriot population, and I taught a fair number of Greek lads. Also biology abounds in Greek- derived terms, to say nothing of the New Testament being in the Greek of 2 millennia ago.

As the opening of John's Gospel has it:

εν αρχή (Google's version)

`In The Beginning...'. King James Version (to me, it goes by its earlier CofE name, the Authorised Version))
Unknown said…
I am befuddled. Why name this crazy hybrid of brand sales and philanthropy for a baby no one knows anything about? I can see trying to capitalize off Charlotte Cambridge as she is the darling of the world. Not that anyone would try that - except desperadoes Uncle Harry and Auntie Megs. I hope I didn't just give Archewell any ideas.
Henrietta said…
Barbara from Montreal: "Apparently when you type archewellfoundation.com into your browser, you are directed to a music site featuring Kanye West's music video 'Gold Digger'..."

Someone at MI-6 has too much time on their hands.

As an American, I would pronounce "Archewell" as "Arch" and "well," with a silent "e." All their protestations about being derived from the Greek are just MM's putting on airs. They should have kept it simple and gone with something like Chez Archie.

And I do think it's revisionist as other posters have said, "Archie" and "Archibald" not having Greek origins. I thought Archie was named after one of Harry's mentors in the British Army.
WalkHumbly said…
@MaLissa “ Or as her usual MO, she hurriedly looked up Greek names and pounced on Arche because it was so ‘unique and on point’ for her and made her look like she's really ‘well educated’.”

I guess that, being in a hurry, she only went through the “A” names to find something she could make work!
bootsy said…
Entry in CDAN today claims that the name is actually more of an anagram of her name than anything else because it's always about her.
MM's first name is actually Rachel. Hard to prove whether Enty's comment is correct or not but makes more sense than this ridiculous Greek thing!
@Barbara from Montreal & Henrietta, I plugged that in and it took me directly to Gold Digger. I was laughing so hard! It's brilliant! A thank you sent out into the ether to whoever set that up!
A report from The Daily Telegraph. It makes for harrowing reading -

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/coronanvirus-survivor-describes-tragedy-patient-121826097.html

I hope everyone has made their Will. It'll save added grief for your family, trying to sort it out, if you succumb to the virus.
gabes_human said…
Greetings Nutty and Co. from the Cave of Darkness.

Nutty, for what it’s worth, I ask a person who has an unusual (to me) name “How do you pronounce your name. I’m terrible about massacring names.” That allows for them to have a different pronunciation than what many would see.

On a side note, my rent cheque cleared. Normally that isn’t a concern but my household had just gotten back to work since being closed from the middle of November when this Covid19 mess hit us. Had one little unexpected thing ( AARP subscription, a forgotten 10 day free internet trial...) hit that account I would have been SOL.

Hang in there ladies and germs. I’m so happy you have all given me an outlet other than the tv. Wish me luck in my house-hunting venture. The house I’m pretty sure I want to make an offer on has been under contract amd that expires on the 15th. We’re pretty sure the other party has backed out but will know for sure in a few days.
MustySyphone said…
"Archewell" ????

@Teasmade I too thought of Snackwell cookies (they were horrid) from the fat-free craze days.

On the subject of "Archewell" it seems to me if you're going to name a foundation (or whatever it is) you pick a name that is easy to say and easy to remember. The fact we are debating how to pronounce this "Archewell" is a red flag its a bad choice. They'd have done better with :

The Ginge and Cringe Foundation
The Woke and Joke Foundation
The .....you get my drift

How about "The We Just Want You to Pay for Our Life Style Foundation"

Sorry, ran out of coffee this morning.
SirStinxAlot said…
Rachel W. (For Windsor) = Archwel. Not sure if that's the proper spelling of her first name.
Portcitygirl said…
https://youtu.be/azV53yAEXIk

Found this gem a little while ago. Comments are pur gold.
xxxxx said…
@Bootsy Collins
Entry in CDAN today claims that the name is actually more of an anagram of her name than anything else because it's always about her.
MM's first name is actually Rachel. Hard to prove whether Enty's comment is correct or not but makes more sense than this ridiculous Greek thing!


Enty is good with LA gossip, he has the sources, but is a lamer when it comes to the Doubly Dumped Dumbartons. My bet is he read about the Arch anagram elsewhere, scooped it up to claim as his own. He might have read it here. You rascal, Enty!
lucy said…
actually it was @magatha mistie first thing this morning who first discovered arche = rache
Ava C said…
The world is full of brilliant, dedicated people working for charities for a REASON, often with a personal connection. Something that drives them. Why on earth would anyone waste time on the Harkles who don't even know what they want to focus on from one week to the next? They've even admitted they don't have a specific cause at the moment. Could anything be more feeble?

Every time I think they can sink no lower in my estimation, they prove yet again that there are depths only they know about. The only organisations and people who will give them money will be those without principles or common-sense. Everyone who comes into their orbit becomes tainted sooner or later. We have yet to see anyone 'thrive' who has worked for or with them. Even Disney has discovered this to their cost. Now, with a financial crash around the world worse than 2008, why should anyone give the Harkles money that would have many more uses elsewhere to much greater effect?

I mentioned to my mother that some coverage of the Queen's broadcast had noted the similarity of colour between the Queen's dress and Meghan's last royal engagement outfit and wondered if the Queen was throwing shade of some kind. "Oh the Queen has more important things to think about than HER" my mother replied. Meghan was obviously long gone and the less said about Harry the better. He has betrayed his country. No coming back from that. Not now.
Anonymous said…
The archewellfoundation.com search only took me to Gold Digger using Google, so maybe it's Silicon Valley having a go at Rache. I think her chances of finding #4 there are slim anyway.
Nelo said…
@Unknown, thanks for explaining what a foundation is. I guess what the Sussexes wants to do is an NGO/charity.
Anonymous said…

There's a photo included IDing "the couple" as the ones tagging the elephant. Of course, this wasn't Rache, but they love this photo because it looks like it might have been.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8195457/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-criticised-revealing-Archewell-foundation-coronavirus-pandemic.html

KaySea said…
I didn't see this mentioned above, but I apologize if it was. I've read multiple reports that Arche was going to be the name of their new foundation, as soon as they announced the end to SussexRoyal. Her people registered "archefoundation" 8 days after she announced her pregnancy, and her buddy Janina has been the only follower of @archefoundation on Instagram for the last year+.
Glumdalclitch said…
Thanks for the scoop on archewellfoundation.com. Whoever created that link has a wicked sense of humor. I had a fit of giggles when I tried it out.
Fairy Crocodile said…

Looks like she was planning all this pretty much from the very beginning. They took 30 million quid of taxpayers money for the wedding, plus a million quid on her ill-fitting clothes, plus 3 million quid cottage renovations while knowing they would leave soon without performing their duties.

Madam Markle had only 75 royal engagements in her entire royal life. It gives us her cost at roughly 453 thousand quid per engagement, not including their security and staff and utility bills.

That is a freaking robbery in a daylight, the worst ever investment UK did and the worst ever reputation blow for the royals in modern history.
HappyDays said…
Interesting blind item revealed on CDAN today (Tuesday, April 7, 2020.)

Seems like Meghan is on George’s “Been there, done that” list.

TUESDAY, APRIL 07, 2020

Blind Items Revealed #4
March 29, 2020

This A+/A list mostly movie actor has a much closer connection to this former B+ list actress than was previously known. As was his custom back in the day, he would often test out barely there celebrities. The actress was one of those, but he didn't enjoy his time with her and instead, started hooking up with the former wrestler turned host.

George Clooney/Meghan Markle/Stacy Keibler
Rainy Day said…
Couple of random thoughts....

Enty/CDAN has always said he didn’t have good sources for Royal gossip. Now that M&H have moved to LA, I’m hoping they’ll be in his gossip neighbourhood.

And Tori Spelling is apparently offering her fans (she has any?) an opportunity for an exclusive video chat, limited to 20 people, for $95 each. Maybe MM could look at doing the same but, of course, at a much higher and more exclusive rate. As a bonus, she could retrieve Harry from the laundry room and have him appear in the distance playing with Archie, like they did in SA.
xxxxx said…
Fairy Crocodile said...

Looks like she was planning all this pretty much from the very beginning. They took 30 million quid of taxpayers money for the wedding, plus a million quid on her ill-fitting clothes, plus 3 million quid cottage renovations while knowing they would leave soon without performing their duties.

Madam Markle had only 75 royal engagements in her entire royal life. It gives us her cost at roughly 453 thousand quid per engagement, not including their security and staff and utility bills.


At least half of her royal engagements were for her self-aggrandizement, were for the photo and video ops. Megs could care less about the charities she breezed in on and whose space she invaded. Then before we knew it, she was bringing her own photographer so she could copyright the photos/video and release only the best shots on Instagram. Prolly most were lightly photo shopped. Copyrighting means Megs get paid when the photo is used by others such as Sun and DM. People Mag etc.
Teasmade said…
B+??????

Also, I would say GC was 50-50 movies and TV. There was that sitcom I never saw and then ER for many years. But whatever. I'll allow him that but I can't get past the B+.

Just . . seriously, and not to be mean. C-? D+?
xxxxx said…
Wicked crypto-yachting Clooney-Megs commentary at CDAN which is on blogger too. So your same ID will work there.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2020/04/blind-items-revealed-4_7.html
Platypus said…
There’s a brand new Harry Markle up!!
Sandie said…
A scathing opinion piece on the Harkles' latest debacle from Jan Moir:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-8197967/JAN-MOIR-Not-coronavirus-crisis-stop-Harry-Meghans-scheme-save-world.html
Henrietta said…
DM article re Archie's being named after Harry's former CO:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7019829/Harry-Meghan-named-son-Archie-commanding-officer-saved-princes-army-career.html
YankeeDoodle said…
@Ava C

As soon as I read your comment about the Idiots being in such depths I suddenly had a vision: the Markles are a submarine, but they are having warships sending down depth charges (bombs) waiting for the big blow-up. The Markles submarine is running out of oxygen, they are desperate, and their incredibly tone deaf depth charges are closing in on them. And accidentally, the warships are on the same side as the Markle submarine.
Margery said…
As ridiculous as "Archewell" is for a name, the new Harry Markle post seems to indicate that "Archeway" was an earlier option that seems to have been discarded.
Anonymous said…
Is it my imagination, or are the Malibu Dumbartons missing from the balcony in this photo from TTC.


https://www.royal.uk/role-royal-family
Crumpet said…
@Sandie,

Thanks for that link, to the latest Jan Moir article, the first paragraph is the best:

As the sun rose on another blameless California morning, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex took their daily turmeric shots boosted with raw ginger, naked opportunism and freshly squeezed brass neck.

MustySyphone said…
@Margery

Ewww to "Archeway". Its as bad as "Archewell".

The thing about announcing your new charity/foundation/trust/money grab name during a pandemic is that having the word "well" in it makes you look absolutely opportunistic at a very grave time (which they are and it is).

Tacky does not begin to describe. We are not amused.
Sandie said…
Do you think the Markles open a bottle of wine and roll a couple of joints each evening and then proceed the next day with any inspirational brilliance from the night before?

I understand that Harry is not academically minded but he has been around the planning and execution of long-term projects his whole life, has served in the army and I am sure some kind of intelligence was required to get as far as he did in the army.

Meghan supposedly has a degree from a top USA university, and although nothing about her strikes me as grounded in good academic discipline, she can't be that stupid. What kind of degree did she get? Was she not required to write well researched and constructed essays, submit projects (once again, original idea, well researched and flawlessly presented) and then show brilliance in exams? It is what was expected of me (and, by the way, two majors is a standard requirement so I find it odd that anyone would boast about taking two majors, in the same year), but I went to an African university and not a top (gasp, I am so impressed) USA university.

Apologies for the sarcasm that might sound a bit off, but the actions of these two that have become public knowledge increasingly seem to come from two people facing complete disaster and consoling themselves with alcohol and weed, from which brilliant ideas emerge, which only get them further into the dwang, so more wine and weed and brilliant ideas and execution of such ideas ... is there no one who can save them from themselves?

Archewell (if truly grounded in ancient Greek, then it should be pronounced arkiewell with a gutteral 'r') will be a lot of noise and hype for about 3 months and then will become a thing of the past. The ideas they are throwing out about this are absurd, and why are they calling it a foundation when they said they were not going to start a foundation because, well, everyone was doing that and they wanted to be more innovative and modern and cool.

Does anyone here know if they can call it a foundation but not register it as a foundation? (e.g. I want to start an amazing, cool coffee shop, could I register it as a business and call it 'The Coffee Foundation'?) And why are they still talking about charity when it is quite clear to everyone that they need to earn/get money to pay for their own lifestyles and have got nada for any foundation or for any charities?

Maybe someone will feel sorry for them and offer them a job ... Lord and Lady Governor of The Falklands, or chief fundraisers for The Commonwealth Fund (not the one they are already supposedly linked to but which I cannot find on the Royal Website), so they can go around the world, being put up in governor or ambassador residences, and do appearances/pose for photos and shake people's hands, to raise funds for educational bursaries or something else like that.
lizzie said…
@Elle wrote

"Is it my imagination, or are the Malibu Dumbartons missing from the balcony in this photo from TTC."

I don't see them. But I think I recall reading they left the balcony before the Queen did (a no-no) but some fawning articles said it was because they had to rush inside to Archie.

Still, I wouldn't be surprised to see less of them in photos that are posted on RF sites.
Rainy Day said…
Someone on Skippy described Archewell as “her foundation for high heel wearers suffering from achy feet”!
KCM1212 said…
Any music fans here? John Prine has passed away from Covid-19
lucy said…
just scrolling through all the replies on this. pretty entertaining
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1247441517465214977?s=20
Fifi LaRue said…
A couple of morons who are tone deaf stupid grifters.
Genia said…
Hi Sandie,
It's the crazy Meghan fans who promote the idea that she's some genius. But being a graduate of a top university in the US does not in itself signify intelligence. I wouldn't call a liberal arts degree from Northwestern top notch either. It's so easy for American college students to bullshit through liberal arts degrees. The truly intelligent ones are the STEMI majors, or liberal arts master's degree and above or majors in foreign languages. Drama and communications and related majors are usually for the middling students. Northwestern is also not the top tier, it's more like just beneath the top tier, top tier meaning schools like Stanford, Cal Berkeley, Cal Tech, MIT, the Ivys, Duke, and the like. My granduncle actually went to Northwestern decades ago and received a Ph.D in chemistry at the age of only 24, then became a holder of several chemistry patents. Meghan, let's see hmmm....didn't she flunk the foreign service exam? LOL.

Archewell is an unfortunate name for a foundation. It doesn't mean anything that's obvious to those without insight to reasons for the naming. There's no clear statement of purpose in the name. It's basically an inside joke name, oh how cute they'd named it for their son and some Greek whatchamacallit's word. Talk about obtuse.
FreezeFrame said…
Hi, all.
Long time lurker-this blog is a great refuge for me! Meghan's initial PR tsunami (leading up to the engagement) was "too good to be true" and the skeptic in me woke up, put on a monocle, and gleefully scoffed at every puff piece that was churned out between the engagement announcement and the wedding... so finding this blog was like winning the "I told you so" lottery! I was so happy to discover that I am not the only one who side-eyes Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.

Back to topic- Archewell

I can totally see how Archie might be an anagram for Rachel and that led me to what if the name Archie (Arche) is some kind of acronym for the 8th in line's birth name? Bear with me--

AR= Arthur
C= Charles
HE= Henry

So, perhaps the superficial, yet sneakily secretive Sussexes crafted the name Archie from the first few letters of each of their son's real name? (Arthur Charles Henry Mountbatten-Windsor) Of course the BRF is aware of the baby's real name, but in accordance to his parents wishes, they have refrained from revealing the real name of Archie).

Harry always hammers home, "I must protect my son" so what if they did by announcing his name was, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor when in fact it was a red herring? That might explain why the birth certificate is wonky looking? (I think Wild-Boar Battle maid mentioned that Archie's birth record was missing a red seal?) Also maybe why the queen referred to Archie as her 8th great-grandchild in her 2019 Christmas address?

In re: Archewell- if Arche is a reference to Meghan and Harry's son in addition to that Greek interpretation... the well part? Well could mean well-being or better or a well (hole in ground with water) or an interjection like, "well, you took royal away from us, so what name do you think we'd use next?"

I am probably giving Meghan and Harry too much credit, probably because I cannot fathom them naming the 8th in line to the British throne "Archie Harrison" because I think it is an insult to the monarchy, the Queen and the traditions that the BRF represent.
Anonymous said…
@Lizzie rather significant that the one the BRF chose to post is one sans the Malibu duo.
Crumpet said…
Hello Nutties,

Andrew Neil, a highly respected political journo in the UK, has trashed the Markles. The journalist wrote on the social media platform: "A period of silence from both would be ‘something that’s matters’ to many of us. "Learning from Harry’s grandmother would be something that mattered a lot."
Jdubya said…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5777501/Doomed-marriage-ginger-haired-Duke-Sussex-older-bride.html

Not about Harry - the other one who shared the title.
gabes_human said…
@Freeze Frame

I have to hand it to you, I’ve never thought any parent would actually name their child Archie and have thought all along that this child has a real name. A fresh mind has brought to fore what just may be the actual name of this child. Good job!
Sandie said…
@FreezeFrame:

Hi there!

The birth certificate for Archie published by the media was a copy, which is why it looks incomplete.

This is the coy published by the BBC, and as you can see, it is a certified copy (not a photocopy of the original).

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/208/cpsprodpb/1303F/production/_107078877_054018812-1-nc.png

For the Cambridge children, the original (filled in by hand) was made available to the media, on request, for George and Charlotte:

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/410/media/images/69086000/jpg/_69086888_f394aabd-ddab-4a7d-a184-e17fa864de35.jpg

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/images/birth-certificate-princess-charlotte-1525178159.jpg?crop=1xw:1xh;center,top&resize=480:*

as was done for Prince Louis (you can see it is the original from the signatures and it is not certified as a copy), although we can see that birth certificates are now typed instead of filled in by hand:

https://content.api.news/v3/images/bin/23616d539bfece3abf4e88fccfafde19

Perhaps the City of Westminster has changed its policy of making an original available to the press on request, or maybe Harry somehow arranged to keep the original private. It does seem strange that one rule would be used for the Cambridge children and another for the Sussex child. However, if fraud was in some way committed, I doubt very much that everyone working in the City of Westminster would have colluded with the Sussexes to commit such fraud, and it would have been easy enough to uncover.
FreezeFrame said…
@Sandie

Why was Archie's birth registered in the City of Westminster when his parents live in Frogmore Cottage, Windsor Castle? Is it because Archie was born at Portland Hospital, Westminster? Does the birth month in the Westminster area of London in reset the Entry No. at the beginning of every month? Archie is listed as Entry No. 51 (born May 6 2019) while Prince Louis was listed at Entry No. 268 in (born April 23, 2018).

Archie is listed with a LAST NAME in all caps, but Louis is listed as HRH Prince Louis Arthur Charles of Cambridge

Also, interesting that at the bottom of Archie's certificate there is this line "WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY"

Not saying there is any fraud, not saying anyone in the City of Westminster colluded with the Sussexes to commit fraud, but there are some differences.

Maybe William and Kate released their children's birth certificates to the press and maybe Harry and Meghan made the press find it on their own? (Meghan said, "they don't make it easy for us" at the Lion King thingy... well, y'all didn't bend over backwards for the press either.)
FreezeFrame said…
Another reason why Meghan and Harry may have opted for Archie (if my theory on his real name is correct)

ARthur Charles HEnry

Pippa named her son Arthur (George VI, Charles, William, and Louis all have Arthur in their names)

Charles (Charles, Harry and Louis all have Charles in their name)

Henry (Harry)

So maybe to be "original" and not to be called copycats for their choice of name, M&H opted to call him Archie?
Snippy said…
But FF, there’s an I in there. Ichabod? Ignacio? Maybe they are fans of Iggy Pop!!
FreezeFrame said…
@Snippy

ARCH-iE sounds like a normal name as not one be constantly mispronounced, misinterpreted like Arche?

Or perhaps the "I" stands for on of the following Immobile, Imposter, Imitation, Immortal, Invoice or Infamous? :)
FreezeFrame said…
@ Snippy

I almost forgot Invisible!
Nutty Flavor said…
Good morning, everyone!

@Freezeframe, that's a very interesting idea, with Archie = Arthur Charles Henry. That's a much more suitable name for Harry's social class, and would also explain the bizarre birth certificate.

(It'll be interesting to see if your idea now turns up on Enty's site. Since he's been known to pilfer items from the DM, I'm sure he's not adverse to pilfering ideas from this thread as well.)

Of course, if you want your child to have privacy, it's idiotic to name your foundation after him.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Suzy1972

Curious about how this "compelled" them to launch? Nothing on the application links to them - a trademark attorney and a firm that isn't connected to the Sussexes?

The Sussexes are claiming that the Telegraph tracked down the story and published, forcing them to confirm.

Total nonsense, of course. Like most other traditional news outlets, the Telegraph is bleeding money (their pretax profit fell by 88% last year) and has all hands on deck for the corona crisis.

There's no way they're spending time finding obscure documents on another continent.

What probably really happened: the Sussexes fed The Telegraph the documents for publication Sunday evening for the Monday news cycle, the print edition went to bed, and then the terrible news about Boris Johnson was released around 7pm, overshadowing everything.

Since the Sussex story was already in the print edition, it had to run online, so it went out at 10. The Sussex "response" was planned in advance.
Nutty Flavor said…
@Greek Mom


I am Greek-American and fluent in conversational Greek. The word Arche (which I pronounce more as Ar-hee with a rolling R and a phlemmy H) means beginning, start, source. Although I do see it very low on the list of definitions, I would definitely not think of “source of power” when I see Arche

Again, another shining example of Megsy going off half-cocked and not knowing what the heck she’s doing/talking about.


Welcome, and thanks for your input about the proper pronunciation of "Arche."

It would be interesting to know how Meg and Harry pronounce the name.
Nutty Flavor said…
Apparently when you type archewellfoundation.com into your browser, you are directed to a music site featuring Kanye West's music video "Gold Digger":

https://tattle.life/threads/harry-and-meghan-15-sweet-dreams-my-la-suss-ex.5252/page-48

You could not make this stuff up. So it begs the question - what kind of research did H & M do before deciding on the name?


This is what happens when you don't have a team to challenge you, or point out things like it's important to register all possible domain names in advance.

Registering a domain name on GoDaddy takes no more than 5 minutes, and you don't have to be particularly sophisticated to do it.

The redirect to "Golddigger" could easily be just any random Meghan-hater - it doesn't require any technical knowledge.
Sandie said…
@FreezeFrame:

I do think that the media were rather lazy about asking more questions ...

I find your questions very pertinent and you picked up some oddities that I missed, but why would the media have missed them?

1. Registration is where you are born, not where your parents reside so that is why the registration was done in the City of Westminster (that is where Portland Hospital is).

2. Archie is listed as Entry No. 51 (born May 6 2019) while Prince Louis was listed at Entry No. 268 in (born April 23, 2018) That indeed is odd ... these are figures for births that I could find for the City of Westminster:
Mid-2005: 2,763
Mid-2010: 3,003
Mid-2015: 2,685

The end of the financial year is 31 March (so they may start a new book at the beginning of April), but that does not explain that oddity ... in fact, none of the research I have done explains this difference in numbers.

3. I always assumed that the media sourced the birth certificates from the registry office of The City of Westminster and that with the Cambridge children they were shown the original and took a photograph of it (why request a copy when you have a photograph of the original to publish) but with Archie they were denied access to the original (is that legal?) and were given/shown a certified copy.
Nelo said…
@Nutty, from the response I see on Twitter, not many people believe that the Telegraph just stumbled on the story. But I'm curious to find out how the news was received in the US since that is their target market.

I don't mean to offend, but Americans are not particularly good at being good judges of character so they may swallow the Sussexes lies hook, line a ND sinker. Again, I don't mean to offend.
Nutty Flavor said…
I understand that you don't mean to offend, Nelo, but if you're seeing Americans from a distance, you may not understand the extreme diversity of the country. Not just in terms of ethnicity, but also in terms of economic class, geography, religion, etc.

A teenage Californian won't be the same "judge of character" as a middle-aged Midwesterner or an elderly New Yorker.

It's like comparing a Norwegian to a Frenchwoman to a Bulgarian because they're all European.
Nelo said…
@Nuttu, thanks for the clarification. I really didn't understand why many media people in the US still Stan for her. It's only Wendy Williams that knew right from day one that Meg was in the marriage for herself and not because she's a humanitarian. But others? Till date, any US talk show you watch is all about how Meg is the best thing to happen to the royal family. I don't get it. Why are they not seeing through her?

On Twitter, the people who were still supporting her are all from the US. It's unbelievable. Brits and Canadians have seen through her, but Americans are still up in her ass that is why she is still pumping out PR articles because she knows her people in the dates will buy what she's selling.

Nelo said…
@Nutty, I'm sorry I misspelled your name in the previous post. I don't know how to edit.
As per US media support, anytime I open my Yahoo mail, I see up to 10-15 sugary articles on her all from media like Cosmo, Elle, E, GMA, NBC, CNN, Good Housekeeping, maire Claire, people, vanity Fair, Jezebel, Vogue and countless others.

Imagine the millions of people using Yahoo mail that are bombarded with such fluff pieces about her all the time. It's exhausting. It's obvious that getting PR is very cheap in the US. If it wasn't by now, they should be broke.
The Harkles must be seething that they dropped the new name of their secret new foundation and all that the evil public focuses on is stupid pronunciation.

MM is probably in her Hotmail account as Rachel right now typing "How does it even matter. It's just a word. The Greeks don't own the word arche".

One more day of this confusion and we can be sure to have a new article citing sources clarifying the pronunciation, the actual, meaning and putting it in somewhere that no matter how it seems the couple DOES love their son and even if his name is inspired by the foundation dation he as a person comes first. Lol
In a week we can expect Scoobs' new article... with an exclusive official statement from the beloved duo themselves.
Sample this:

"In view of the extreme interest generated by the name reveal of their new non-profit foundation, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex (who are HRH but graciously asked us not to use that in our articles from now on) feel compelled to clarify that the Greek word Arche is a concept very close to Duchess Megan's heart. She has always identified with the concept of new beginnings and has been steadfast in her endevour to prove that again and again over the span of her 20+ years as an A-list Hollywood celebrity and humanitarian.

TRHs have told this journalist that their foundation name should be pronounced as Arrr-kxxHHH-well which is just as the Greeks would do it.

To prevent any further confusion with the name of their 10 month son Archie, whose name was inspired by the name of their foundationion, which was conceptualised before the short-lived Sussex Royal was even born, the couple has generously decided to launch his new name. He will now be called Archebald, to be pronounced "ar-kxxHHH-baaaald Harrison". This beautiful new name is a novel arcane Anglo-Greek-Moroccan concept keeping with the heritage of Meghan, Harry and their foundation. It means the "Harry's son, the source of all baldness" which dear little Archie has been for Harry since he was first conceptualised."

***
That's it guy's, that has exhausted my literary genius abilities. Back to work now... 🤣🤣🤣
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
lizzie said…
@Nelo, Nutty is correct the US is quite diverse.

You are correct about fawning articles in the press from certain magazine outlets. But if you look at the comments on Yahoo, you'll see not everyone is buying the narrative. Often the comments are brutal. Maybe not quite DM quality but close.

And too, because race is still such a sensitive issue in the US, many people won't openly criticize MM since she has recently decided she is a POC (after calling herself Caucasian on her acting resume for years.)

The situation isn't unique to M. When Barrack Obama was president, often criticisms of policy decisions he made whether related to Middle East war efforts, the budget, immigration, or health care were met with cries of racism. So it's just not worth it to criticize M. She's not important enough. Speaking out when  a president is misguided may be important for the future of our country and people's lives. Openly speaking out about a two-bit hustler who managed to bed and wed a dimwitted British prince? Who cares.

It's pretty obvious to me too many of their celebrity defenders haven't paid much attention to the couple. (Not that we are hearing much from those folks lately.) I'd be surprised if most of them could answer even basic questions about the couple. If they didn't attend the wedding, I doubt most could say when and where the couple married, much less have a clue about how much money was spent on the wedding by the "toxic" RF and the "racist" country. And those who applaud their charitable efforts and thought they were such a "valuable gift" to the UK probably couldn't name 3 charities each of them represented in the UK (other than perhaps Harry's association with Invictus Games, an idea lifted from the US's Wounded Warriors program.) Many probably don't know where Harry falls in the line of succession. (Some likely think he comes right after Will.) Finally, most really and truly don't understand the concept of a monarchy. It's not a system of equality. And there IS a Greek origin to the word "monarch" meaning sole/alone.

Many of the loud "fangirl" voices from the US (like those determined to call Archie "King Archie") belong to people who don't have anything near the kind of money to contribute M&H are seeking. Those who do have money may not openly criticize M, but that doesn't mean they will hand over cash easily.
Perhaps, in the question of the name, she’s channelling Humpty Dumpty:

“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’

’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”

― Lewis Carroll, `Through the Looking Glass'


Although, to be honest, in that green get-up, she looked more like his Caterpillar in `Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.'

Both entirely appropriate images, methinks.
https://mol.im/a/8195457

The comments are still there, nearly 9,000 of them - just click on `Add Your Comment'

One minute they're saying they're not `insensitive' to the Covid 19 situation, with `so don't you dare say we are!' left unsaid. Thereby demonstrating, beyond any shadow of doubt, that they are truly, grossly, obscenely, insensitive.

Then they say they were `compelled'?

Oh yeah?
Who was holding a gun to their heads? The word they wanted, but wouldn't admit to was `IMpelled' - the monstrous need within themselves that forced them to shout as loudly as they could-

"Who cares about Covid 19? The Queen's Speech? The PM in Intensive Care? All those deaths? All that mourning? WHAT ABOUT US?"

The sooner that bloody woman and her lap dog get their comeuppance, the happier I shall be.
Btw: Archway - a district in London N19, around a stretch of the A1 known as Archway Road, spanned by a Victorian viaduct carrying Hornsey Lane.

Not the smartest area.

https://hidden-london.com/gazetteer/archway/
Oh gosh! Thinking of green vermiform humans, I've just remembered a couple of vaguely appropriate Hammer Horror films:

`The Snake Woman’ (1961) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055456/
and
`The Reptile’ (1966) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060893/mediaindex?ref_=tt_pv_mi_sm

Has anyone else come across them?

Both are load of hokum and received poor critical receptions, yet I found some amusing references for the current situation. If nothing else, I can suggest who to cast in the title roles, should there be any more remakes.
SirStinxAlot said…
@Alice, Surrey James... If Archie's name is Archibald why wasn't that on his birth certificate? I think the copy released after he was born was a phoney personally. But compared to US birth certificates it's missing massive amounts of information. My own daughters birth certificate has our address at time of birth, both parents birthdays, race, single/multi birth, etc. All the usual stuff the government wants to know. It also helps with genealogy by knowing which John Smith the child belongs to since every single person in the countries name is not unique like Social security numbers. If it was an authentic BC it could have had sensitive info blacked out. But idk how official British BC are supposed to look other than the Googled pictures and templates for sale online.
luxem said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
luxem said…
@Sandie, @FreezeFrame

Maybe the hospital uses a different numbering list for births depending on the circumstances. A newborn who remains in the custody of the bio mom (like Camb kids) would be documented with one list and a newborn who does NOT remain in the custody of the bio mom - such as private adoption, surrogacy, ward of state - would be documented in a different list for legal purposes. That would support to the theory that Archie was from a surrogate and the wonky birth certificate.
Snippy said…
Alice, you win the interwebs for the day and I haven’t even finished my morning coffee yet!
Teasmade said…
Just saw this on Twitter:

"The Susstlers . . . "

LOL
@SirStinx ... Why isn't the name Archibald on the birth cert??

Who knows?! Who knows anything with these two?! What we can be sure of is that there is something going on iver there with the birth situation. Not for any other reason than the fact they invariably complicate and make a mess of most things they do.

That being said, I do not think he is named Archibald. That's too stuffy for them (I was just making a joke there). But how cool if he was. I'm more willing to believe the bizzare Arthur Charles Henry theory proposed by our new friend upthread. It's just one of those where I'm going for anything everything weird concerning them.


@Snippy ... Enjoy your coffee. Please don't spill or snort it out, u don't want that on my conscience. Lol
Animal Lover said…
@Nutty

What probably really happened: the Sussexes fed The Telegraph the documents for publication Sunday evening for the Monday news cycle, the print edition went to bed, and then the terrible news about Boris Johnson was released around 7pm, overshadowing everything.

Since the Sussex story was already in the print edition, it had to run online, so it went out at 10. The Sussex "response" was planned in advance.

A commentator on DListed who claimed to be a PR specialist said they were 100% sure the Sussexes leaked this to the Telegraph and it was not the first time they used this method to get "news" out.

@Nelo

Vince made the point that some media commentators have an ax to grind and are using Meghan as the vehicle to do so. I agree with this and find not many Americans really care about the Sussexes right now.

Suzy1972 said…
Re: American opinion on the Susstlers:
https://twitter.com/yachtgirlmm/status/1247827688188006400

Our tabloids don't seem to like them much either!
Birth Certificate Numbers:

The number on an English certificate is, I believe, the number of the entry in the Registrar's register. These records are held in different volumes, by date. Nothing to do with the hospital

That could explain what looks like a discrepancy between the Cambridge entries and the Sussex one - they’re in different volumes and the numbering in a later volume has no connection with the numbering in an earlier volume, like page numbers in any multi-volume work.
Suzy1972 said…
Well this is interesting: https://people.com/royals/kate-middleton-and-prince-william-hire-meghan-markle-and-prince-harrys-social-media-manager/

The man behind Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s record-setting Instagram page has been scooped up by other members of the royal family.

Following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s official exit from royal life at the end of March, their digital communications lead, 27-year-old David Watkins, has been hired by Kate Middleton and Prince William. According to his LinkedIn profile, he now serves the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge by handling their digital communications and social media.
Btw, We haven't ever discussed that paradoxical question:

- IF SOMEBODY SAYS "I AM A LIAR", ARE THEY TELLING THE TRUTH?


(Apologies for caps, I don't mean to shout but I don't know what to do to show emphasis!)
Henrietta said…
WBBM,

I loved the Snake Woman! I thought it was very well-done.
1 – 200 of 449 Newer Newest

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids