Supposedly, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are living in a borrowed or rented house somewhere in the Los Angeles area.
Supposedly, they are parents to a child named Archie who is about to turn one year old, who lives with them in California.
Supposedly, they're working hard to launch a new charity venture, assisted by Catherine St-Laurent, a former employee of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who focused on women's health issues.
Supposedly, Meg is looking for acting jobs and Harry is still maintaining connections to his veteran's charities.
Are any of the above true? All of them? None of them?
How much money do you think they have left? And, given that a lot of it seems to go for PR, what do they use it on? Food, security, fashion, drugs? Health care or health insurance?
How many staff do you think they have left? Are they doing their own online food ordering, cooking, child (?) care, cleaning? Do they get any physical exercise?
How much of Harry's trust fund from Diana has he spent?
Meg's entire family - mom, dad, her cousins, herself - has flirted with either deep debt, tax problems, or bankruptcy. Are the Sussexes on their way there now?
And if so, how far will Prince Charles let them fall?
Supposedly, they are parents to a child named Archie who is about to turn one year old, who lives with them in California.
Supposedly, they're working hard to launch a new charity venture, assisted by Catherine St-Laurent, a former employee of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who focused on women's health issues.
Supposedly, Meg is looking for acting jobs and Harry is still maintaining connections to his veteran's charities.
Are any of the above true? All of them? None of them?
The Sussexes' finances
Also, while I generally believe it is poor manners to peek into other people's finances, I'll make an exception for the Sussexes.How much money do you think they have left? And, given that a lot of it seems to go for PR, what do they use it on? Food, security, fashion, drugs? Health care or health insurance?
How many staff do you think they have left? Are they doing their own online food ordering, cooking, child (?) care, cleaning? Do they get any physical exercise?
How much of Harry's trust fund from Diana has he spent?
Meg's entire family - mom, dad, her cousins, herself - has flirted with either deep debt, tax problems, or bankruptcy. Are the Sussexes on their way there now?
And if so, how far will Prince Charles let them fall?
Comments
Good night dears
The DM had a recent story within the past ten days or so about Meghan wanting to work with A-list directors as she plays the lead role and that the projects she’s been offered are “beneath her.” Blind Gossip also just had an item during the past week about Meghan believing she will eventually win an Oscar as a lead actress, so this story seems to have some credibility to it. I don’t think these stories are feeding off each other. And Disney apparently didn’t offer Meghan a development deal after her less-than-impressive narration gig. If they had, Meghan would have leaked it.
Entertainment is a business. Nobody in their right mind is going to blow a hundred million dollars on a project and cast her in a lead role to satisfy her need for a vanity project. These people have their own careers and reputations to worry about, and there are many women amazing actresses who have proven box office track records and younger up and coming actresses who can run circles around Meghsn when it comes to talent and ability.
It is looking like the Duchess of Sussex title isn’t as marketable as Meghan thinks it is. That, plus her behavior during her brief stint as a royal and they way she treated HMTQ, PP, PC, and William and Kate, who by the way are the REAL royal family compared to Harry and Meghan, doesn’t shine a positive spotlight on her.
Before Harry fell into the grip of Meghan, he seemed content to live a fairly simple life in Nottingham Cottage that was nowhere near the lavish, grandiosity jet-setter lifestyle since Meghan took over his life.
Harry has some money, but it is likely far from the amount that will be required to pay for the lifestyle Meghan demands and feels entitled to have. As others here have said, Meghan probably made a total of $5 million pre-Harry, but that’s gone.
Meghan is a profoundly narcissistic person. Her behavior checks off all the boxes for narcissistic personality disorder. So far, this is a textbook narcissistic relationship. It has happened to millions of other people including some who have commented on this blog. What makes this different and so incredibly fascinating is that it is the British Royal Family and it’s playing out on the world stage.
Her greed will be the root of their problems. I don’t think they have anywhere near the amount of money to satisfy her appetite. They will never have enough money because a narcissist like Meghan running wild through Harry’s life will never be satisfied. Narcissists can never get enough. Never.
We never refer to our family member as Dr. (has a Ph.D in chemistry from Oxbridge), but when addressing a letter etc., we always write Dr. etc. I’m certain they’re referred to as Dr. within professional circles, just not in social settings etc.
HM is Head of State
The Prime Minister (Boris Johnson) is Head of Her Majesty's Government.
This means HM Government determines national policy . HM has no executive power - but she maycounsel and advise.)
whereas
Donald Trump is Head of State, Head of Government, has executive power.
NB:
CofE is Established Church in England only
HM is Supreme Governor of Church of England
Christ is Head of the Church.
The Queen is Sovereign in Parliament.
IMHO no, I agree with Nelo’s comment. I started reading it ages ago and it didn’t take long to realise a lot was made up and never proven, Blind Gossip had been proven right many times over.
PoW's marriage to Camilla presented a whole new problem. Whereas in the past, she would have been queen regardless of what the plebs thought, now, even more than 30 years after the death of Diana, that has to be taken into account.
I don't know how large the `Diana is the rightful queen' contingent is now. The divorced Diana was `Princess of Wales', not `The Princess of Wales'. Public opinion could just about swallow the idea of Camilla as Duchess of Cornwall, although she's the wife of the Prince of Wales.
(Down here, the press & TV always refers to them by the Cornwall title. I've no idea what they're called elsewhere in England.)
I've heard it said that Camilla's title, when Charles is king, may be `Princess Consort', by analogy with Prince Albert and the Duke of Edinburgh. It's matrimonially tricky when the wife's the monarch!
Quentin Letts included Diana in his book `Fifty People Who Buggered Up Britain'. He was thinking of all the mawkish sentimentality that broke forth. Sadly, he was even closer to the mark than we realised.
The Prince's full style and title is: His Royal Highness Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales, KG, KT, GCB, OM, AK, QSO, CC, PC, ADC, Earl of Chester, Duke of Cornwall, Duke of Rothesay, Earl of Carrick, Baron of Renfrew, Lord of the Isles and Prince and Great Steward of Scotland
On this Easter Day, I just want to share two hymns --
I Know That My Redeemer Liveth (Handel) — Choir of New College, Oxford https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Q0qho_hKEg
Cwm Rhondda - Guide Me O Thou Great Redeemer (Orig Jehovah)
https://www.youtube.=7s1suWhb5KA&list=PLF274EE6B0669BD30&index=2
Turn up the volume :)
Please stay safe, everyone, and love your family, friends and neighbors.
Happy Easter and Passover!
I don't think M would do a tell-all for a million but I do think she'd do one.
I wish she would do one... lol
Just in case anyone's confused (not sure how common the term is outside the UK):
http://www.britishslang.co.uk/slang/do-one
This one's for Passover -- kind of slim on Scripture, but long on cool :)
May everyone on this Earth stay safe, healthy, and happy. May we get peace on Earth soon.
She can produce some real RF damage and embarrassment if she hires some researchers to look into the RF and RF finances for book number one. Prince Andrew's shenanigans for example. What has the high Hapless unthinkingly revealed to her? Hopefully The Queen never sees this sht-show. As the Royally Dumped Dumbarton Desperadoes get more Desperate they might do the above.
"You step out with actresses, you never marry one" - What Prince Phillip allegedly counseled Harry before marrying Megsy.
Quite rightly it has been pointed out that the BRF keeps all the meaningful, real, rock-solid wealth for the monarch and immediate heirs, as does the British aristocracy. We can all see the perfectly sound reasons for this, and in Harry we have a textbook example of what happens when that rule is not followed.
The culprit here, of course, is Diana. Who continues to destabilise the monarchy from her grave. She brought up her sons as equally as possible, which was the origin of all this mess we are witnessing now. Harry was not and never should have been equal to William or even approaching William. It's tough. It's unfair. But that's how it is. The Queen Mother was the arch-realist there, much as I disliked her.
So Diana planted all these seeds in little Harry's brain, like spores, and now they are multiplying wildly. "You are not going to be king but you are just as important and just as loved and just think, you can do anything you want, unlike William!" That mantra has been running through Harry's brain for three decades. Is it any wonder this has happened, having found his own personal agent of chaos in Meghan Markle?
Moreover, Diana gave them equal access to her own wealth through her will. As all wealth seems to be in this saga, this came from Prince Charles, as true to the system, the Spencers concentrated all their wealth in her brother Charles. Diana's untimely death then made a possibly disastrous outcome for Harry a certainty.
Harry had, from the time he was 12, a significant inheritance to rely on in the future. Even more temptation and reason than a minor royal usually has to waste their formative years and fail to equip themselves for a productive life. Harry will have felt more powerful, more grandiose, more invulnerable than he actually was. Because it was a sure thing that once he got his hands on his inheritance, even that wouldn't be enough. It wouldn't have been enough for Diana herself, who lived VERY expensively.
This inheritance, even if nearly gone, remains a factor because it made Harry what he is today, in the worst senses. That money, from Diana, operated like a sharp little drill, splintering Harry off from his grandparents, his father and his brother and sending fault lines shooting off in all directions within the family. Poor Kate and poor George most of all. They have to make good all that Harry has vandalised.
The only positive side I can see is that Harry has provided the ultimate warning to Charlotte and Louis to work hard at their education, have friends who want the best for them and to keep their heads down. In a nutshell, 'Don't go getting any fancy ideas about yourself!" Someone needs to embroider that on a sampler and put it in Louis' bedroom.
@lizzie
I only read the New York Post story about the hoped-for $1 million interview today, and it sounds like the Harkles want to use such an event to jump start their “careers” in the States. They reportedly would open their home and introduce the mythical Archie on network TV, in order to show us plebs just how great they really are. Good luck with that.
The Jane Goodall puff piece would seem to have the same purpose—humanize JH and M and make us like them. I think that ship has sailed and sunk to the bottom of the Mariana Trench, but clearly they believe otherwise.
Conciliatory murmurs were made when they married to give the impression that some little solution would be found to avoid offending the Great British Public but they, quite rightly I think, relied on the Queen's robust health and steadiness. Enough time would go by before it would really matter.
I think they are close to achieving that now, with their 15th wedding anniversary. My attention was grabbed when I saw that they have now been married longer than Prince Charles was to Diana. That means a lot. They look happy.
Camilla, like Kate, kept her side of the bargain when she married into the royal family. After Meghan, this could be the final winning point that indeed makes Camilla Queen, as all other English/British queens have been, when married to the reigning monarch.
@Lt.
Thank you for the songs
@Ava C
Your posts are always so insightful.
@Lt. Nyota Uhura - yes, I agree Camilla's place in history will always be tainted to some degree, but a lot depends upon whether you were around when Diana was alive. Younger people don't feel it in the same way and 'blended families' are more and more common. I think compromise and making the best of things are valued more highly than they were, as is unsentimentality. Charles and Diana were disastrously matched. It should never have happened. Apportioning blame just makes it worse. "We are where we are", as our estate agent said when our house sale was frozen last month.
____________________________________________
Yes, quite true.
But just look at the knowledge of David and Wallis. It is different with the Royal Family.
Perhaps you are right. But I stand by my instincts. Camilla may be a saint -- and I like her, admire her, for all of her efforts.
But with her history, and Charles' history, it will never be the same.
I hate to say it, but I am glad that Charles' and her "reign" will be brief.
We also mustn't overlook that Prince Charles has had a one-man pity party going on his whole life. Ample sources for this. And going by that awful tapped phone call with Camilla years ago she indulged him in that to a ridiculous degree. He's so visibly happy with her we can only assume she's carried on that way. The self-pity Harry displays is the No. 1 irritant for me, even more than Meghan, and it's obvious where he gets it from.
I'm no fan of the RF and no fan of Charles either as I think he's a spoiled, bumbling entitled fool who thinks he's a lot cleverer than he actually is. He also treated Diana terribly.
But I also (strangely enough) feel sorry for him. His Dad was a tough military man who took no nonsense and belittled Charles by all accounts. You'd have to be built of stern military stuff to not be affected by Philip and Charles was just a nice sensitive boy who was bullied by his father. He got sent to a distant, tough and bloody awful public school where he was badly bullied there as well by all accounts.
And then he was cajoled into a marriage with someone he wasn't really interested in.
So yes, Charles is just not that impressive as a person. But what more proof is there that hereditary power is a bad thing as those who are destined to take the reins aren't necessarily the best candidates. Imagine if Princess Anne (who Philip really likes I think?) was next in line to the throne and was dealing with all this instead of Charles. What a different story that would be!
Our Dearest Desperado Duchess has to think like a Misha Nonoo, who is blessed with inherited brains. The Iraqi derived Nonoo family is very wealthy, she married well with Mr Davis, into a marriage that will last. Wiki-"Misha Nonoo was born in Bahrain to an Iraqi father of Jewish descent and an English mother"
Maximizing revenue with Misha Nonoo:
Misha will tell M -
Your most lucrative TV interview will be with Oprah. Bring Harry and Archie on in the last ten minutes for the oohs and ahs. For Archie's well deserved round of "so cutes". Keep Archie clothed with a hat and obscured. You need to save the full Archie reveal for your book of family and Royal Family photos that you snapped on the sly. This book will include a one time use password to see an online gallery of videos, secretly recorded BRF audio and more photos. Wow! Did you ever capture Prince Charles and Wills rattling on! Your cadre of Meghan youth, your one million hard core sugars, will have a collective meltdown.
Misha went on-
And this way you and Hapless can afford to pay us rent for our surplus gated mansion. The freebie one where you lot, you Toothsome Two have been couch surfing, getting high on our best California medical marijuana, watching daytime television on the 75 incher we lent you. Then when the munchies kick in, downing half a loaf of organic, seven grain avocado toasts at a time. Washing this (unholy mess) down with almond milk and Erewhon's organic grape sodas and root beer. Lastly Megsy, my dear Duchess of Money For Nothing, when you want to thank me and Mikey, you should say it with cash.
SFh is less than 40 miles from Highgrove, Cashpoint Charlie's country hounse.
And then he was cajoled into a marriage with someone he wasn't really interested in.
Charles had Royal duties to produce heirs sometime, was 32, so he had to get married. Maybe Queenie egged him on. (Wills was 29 at marriage.) With Diana being so much younger at 20, thus more fertile, this was a good match. She would bear three with an optimum of four, even five. People can say there was little Charles-Diana love, but Royal Families must carry on. They must perpetuate themselves.
"Lie back and think of England" -- a well known quote
So when Charles becomes King, it is in his right to announce Camilla as his Queen. Which is why I thought it had already been decided that Camilla would NOT have that title. Just like right now she is NOT a Princess. Out for respect for Diana, they chose for Camilla not to have that Princess title. (I suppose she might be Princess Charles of Wales, but she isn't Camilla, Princess of Wales.)
And while Charles I think would like her to be considered Queen, It was my understanding that when he becomes King, she will Princess Consort. (like Philip) Personally, I don't think Camilla really cares. I think she has shown a lot of respect for Diana in her decisions. I think she has tried really hard with William and Harry. And I think she is good for Charles, she gives him confidence.
As I've already mentioned, she will always hold a special place in my heart because of the Meghan church stare-down. Man, I LOVED that.
I've read a lot about Wallis. I don't agree that David and Wallis were a great love story. I don't think Wallis was capable of having "a love of her life." It seems like they both regretted David's decision in the many years that followed. They thought they would still be well-loved, cherished and probably be better off without being part of the Royal Family. That their connections would make life grand. Without a doubt, they thought that England would beg to have them back within a couple years. I don't think they ever understood how being banished really affected them and their marriage. And especially their status around the world.
As an American, I'm not a royalist. But I have always been extremely fascinated by the royal family and nobility, in general.
Taken from a feature in todays uk Sunday Time Magazine Style Magazine
'There’s a new app called Botnet. It’s a simulated social media platform, where the user posts messages or photos and is guaranteed a meteoric level of positive engagement — hundreds and thousands of likes and comments from thousands of other users, but they’re all bots.
Lizzie said…
I don't think M would do a tell-all for a million but I do think she'd do one.
@Lizzie: Oh yes, a book is in the offing to be sure, either by Meghan only with a ghostwriter or jointly with Harry.
It’s now April. Blockbuster books are published in the fall, usually in October, for the Christmas gift-giving season. They could get a book written, edited, and published in time for the 2020 holidays, and it would garner lots of attention. It might already be well underway, with the finishing touches put on it over the past winter in Canada and their current “time off” in LA.
If a book doesn’t happen this year, I’d bet money on one appearing in autumn 2021, especially if the Sussexes are as cash strapped as many people think they are.
From her beginning with Harry, Meghan has reportedly been sending packages of extensive notes to someone in North America for safe-keeping. Most likely the notes will support a book, and perhaps Meghan’s people will shop it for a movie or mini-series.
A leading candidate for the recipient of these shipments of copious notes is Lindsay Roth. Lindsay is a friend of Meghan’s from the notoriously snotty Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority both belonged to at Northwestern.
In 2015, about a year before Meghan conveniently met Harry, Roth had a New York Times bestselling fiction book titled What Pretty Girls Are Made Of.
Roth sent a copy if the book to Kate at Meghan’s suggestion that year, which is another reason to suspect the stalking campaign to snag Harry was in full force by the woman who claimed to “ not know much about the royal family” at her engagement interview with Hapless Harry. Roth received a generic thank you note written on behalf of Kate by a member of Kate’s staff.
To go with the notes, Meghan already has lots of copyrighted photos during her brief stint as a working royal. I’d also bet there is a large stash of personal photos, shot by her or Harry in private. Of course, Meghan will be sure to make full use of Archie by putting lots of Archie photos in the book as an additional draw. I’m sure Archie is being a good little prop/model for mommy’$ book.
Ithink it might be an ideal pastime for the duo
"Just made a cheese sandwich for dinner,” is my first Botnet post. Ten minutes later it has a quarter of a million likes and 45 comments (“That is amazing”, “What the hell is a cheese sandwich?”, “Woah”
Hampshire to Northumberland? Shropshire to Norfolk? Prince of Wales or Dk of Cornwall?
Of course it's different in Scotland, and I expect Wales & Northern Ireland too, but what about in London? the other English counties?
Btw,I also think we'll be in for another headache when it comes to the next coronation, now the Stone of Scone is back north of the Border. The original Scottish Gvt. undertook to let it come back to London, so the future monarchs can be crowned monarch of Scotland in Westminster Abbey.
The colour of that gvt. has changed though - I wonder if they'll insist that the Stone stays where it is so Charles has to go to Edinburgh for another coronation, with the Scottish Regalia?
You read it here first!
Megs will use multiple ghost writers, same as she goes through nannies, PR people and personal assistants. They will be forced to sign iron clad NDAs and will not be paid in full. They will leave with a sour taste in their mouths.
Hillary kept her ghost writer very well hidden, but the ghost writer was eventually discovered. Megs will do a much better job at this and will claim she wrote the book all by herself. It's The Meghan Way!
How difficult can it be to write her books(s) when Megs has a competent ghost writer? This looks simples to me and that this can be pulled off very quickly. With the economy stalled out due to this virus, there must be tons of very good ghost writers who will chance working for Megs, despite her despotic reputation.
Royal family stands with the nation, the dismal duo doesn't have anybody to stand with
@ Happy Days: According to Blind Gossip, the BRF learned of MM's copious note-taking and suspected she was gathering material for a tell-all book, which is why they froze her out and ignored her at family gatherings. MM of course spun this as evidence of how the BRF was mean to her.
__________________________________
Not surprised in the slightest. This matches neatly with such leftist sentiments as Markle has demonstrated which accuse the opposition of the very thing they are doing.
But this is Markle *shrug*
Am I the only one sending they lose relevance a mile a minute? Bye Harry, bye Megsy.
Royal family stands with the nation, the dismal duo doesn't have anybody to stand with
___________________________________
Yep, you nailed it.
How difficult can it be to write her books(s) when Megs has a competent ghost writer?
I'm laughing because the answer of course is "VERY difficult". MM will dictate a flowery paragraph that says nothing, the ghost-writer will try and tighten things up, fix grammar, make it make sense. MM will then re-write the ghost-written part, doubling down on her verbal diarrhea. She would be a nightmare client.
Well here in Norfolk I only hear him called Prince Charles.
As mentioned above, I'm in the camp she would go through multiple ghost writers.
Timing: If they want it to come out in the fall (for Christmas), they need it to be in finished form 3 to 6 months ahead of time (roughly).
An anon at The Best Soap Opera Ever Tumblr blog says:
Anonymous asked:
Lol when the media and her sugars talk about Harry's 30 million wealth they should consider that in the Duchy of Cornwall documentary Prince Charles said Harry had spent half his inheritance. So Harry has blown through some 15 million in less than 5 years. So he does not have 30 mill he has at best 15 mil and he only gets the interest income from that which at best is about 750k. How reckless to lose half your money in 5 yrs too! Won't last long at that rate
So WITHOUT the Markle he managed to blow through a lot.
Diana is accused of not loving Charles wen she married, far from the truth. She did love him and acted just the opposite of a 'Meghan'. How did Charles repay her loyalty upon marriage he immediately kept his lust for Camilla (herself a married woman, by even Diana's detractors). Camilla was in a good marriage". She propositioned Charles right from the start, what a slut.
Then those claim Diana was unstable. What would you detractors do if your newly married husband was committed the worst kind of horror, marrying you by false pretenses. Then he immediately turned his back on you, just used you as a brood mare.
What was Diana to do.,..she couldn't let down the Monarchy (something Camilla did not consider upon their marriage. No, Camilla was lustful and backstabbed Diana (the pregnant Princess ready to give the BRF an heir (not once but twice). How utterly devoid of Christianity Charles and Camilla did to violate their marriage vows and wreck Diana's marriage!
So what if Diana cheated, Charles forced her to find a lover as he did. Would any of you women criticizing Diana put up with the 24/7 abuse Charles heaped upon his young sensitive wife. There is a term 'crazy-making' and that is what Charles and Camilla did to poor Diana..they pushed the young mother over the edge.
I don't condone Diana's adultry but I understand it. To those who shame her, why don't you shame Camilla for taking up with Charles from the beginning of the marriage?
Then Charles and the tampon talk, how utterly crude. You never heard Di say such lowlife obscene tasteless things. Calling Camilla a 'Rotweiller...well, Camilla brought it on herself. If she had not grabbed Diana's husband for her own selfish desires she would not have been called that. Any of you detractors did you get cheated on praise the 'other woman', I think not.
Camilla came close to destabilizing the marriage.
Camilla never gave the BRF the likes of wonderful William. No she was a pass-around-girl who had sex with many. I suspect people who slam Diana is because they have the same morals as Camilla.
And if Camilla was so wonderful Charles could had insisted that he marry Camilla but he didn't want her. He thought she was just a good-time-gal quick for a easy lay.
To the poster who said Diana is still destabilizing the Monarchy from the grave, that is utter rubbish. Harry is as much Charles son and Charles raised him during his formative years, so Charles should take the blame; indeed Charles supported Meghan in grand style and continutues to support these two awful royals, Diana doesn't.
Regarding Harry’s inheritances: When Peter and Autumn Phillips married back in May 2008, they sold the exclusive photo rights from the wedding to Hello Magazine. Peter and Autumn reportedly received £500,000 or approximately $1M from the magazine. The royal family was very upset and new rules were enacted to make sure royals could not profit from commercializing certain things.
In the aftermath of the wedding, Peter gave a short interview to explain his side of events. He stated that even though he was a royal grandchild, he had nowhere near the wealth of his cousins, particularly William — and that the money from the photos would “make a big difference” for him and Autumn. He also touched on his inheritance from the Queen Mother. Yes, he said, the value of his inheritance had been about £1 - £1.5M BUT it had consisted of “mostly jewelry and other things that one would not necessarily be inclined to sell (paraphrasing a bit from memory). If I recall correctly, he also mentioned there was a bit of pressure from his family not to sell the inherited items.
This may be the case for Harry, as well. The Queen Mother was “cash poor” but she did own jewelry, paintings, etc. Perhaps Harry also inherited items instead of money from her.
Who knows? Prince Charles may continue funding Harry so that the Royal Family does not have the embarrassment of Harry auctioning off the family silver.
We have 12 yr. olds now who are far from 'innocent' and are little whores in good families.
That's a lot of hatred on this beautiful Easter (or any other time). Wow.
Some say this is a blackmail threat to the RF but I would imagine they would call her bluff. They know about her past and that Meghan and Harry faked the pregnancy. Would the RF give the go ahead to an American journalist to investigate then publish? That story would humiliate them both and end any chance they had to make any money.
The RF would also be accused of allowing the cover up, but they could say they were caught off guard and never had to deal with this type situation. The Kensington Palace post on the day Archie was born, said the surrogate had given birth, but was quickly removed and replaced with Meghan had given birth.
The drama surrounding them both is deafening and imo will only get worse the more they try to succeed, but getting no where.
Fun fact: whoever hacked their Archewell website has now redirected it to a site which tells you 10 ways to recognize a narcissist.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8208309/Ex-staff-Soho-Farmhouse-accuse-members-club-unfair-dismissal.html
Did Oliver Hoare's wife have a substandard hymen at the time of their marriage that excused Diana's hysterical and appalling behavior towards her?
I still can't believe what I've just read.
Mel Gibson made his huge amounts of money from Apocalypto that I really liked and Passion of The Christ. Producing, writing and directing both. He had some co-producers, and co-writers on the screen plays. Directing was just Mel. This was Mel at the height of his energies. Quite a guy. Then he got what amounted to a 10 year shunning and ban from Hollywood due to his anti-Semitic run-in with LAPD.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3396361/Jewish-police-officer-anti-Semitic-slurs-hurled-Mel-Gibson-DUI-arrest-investigation-superiors-9-years-leaked-police-report.html
Weekittylass said...
Kyle Dunnigan does a very obscene but hilarious send up of HAMS on YouTube.
Foul and funny! Funky but chic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1twvxJnVJv0
he also did this hillarious take on Megsy as a gum chewing valley girl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kSn4ysw8y8
Lottery winners have a 70% rate of bankruptcy too. If Harry never learned to manage money before he was 30, getting his hands on his trust would have been like winning the lottery.
https://www.ryanhart.org/lottery-winner-statistics/
@ Happy Days: Mel Gibson has an estimated net worth of $425 million; he can easily afford an oceanfront mansion in Malibu. If the Harkles really did buy his mansion, they're going to blow through the rest of Harry's inheritance in no time. Or are they still expecting millions to flow into their coffers through paid appearances and other commercial ventures?
Fun fact: whoever hacked their Archewell website has now redirected it to a site which tells you 10 ways to recognize a narcissist.
____________________________________________
Every eyeball is going to be on the Harkles' finances, which, I suspect, are running dry as we speak. Prince Charles can only cough up so much.
I don't know anything about Mel Gibson, but I would think he didn't get to be worth $425M by being a dupe for two idiots.
The firm selling the property have not confirmed news of a royal purchase, but a source claimed to the Sun the property, in one of Los Angeles' glitziest enclaves, had been sold.
A total lie to move a property in a dead and declining greater LA market. This is the doing of a money grabber real estate agent. M/H have plausible deniability, they were couch surfing all last week. They also hit their Pilates instructor's Covid shuttered studio a few times where the Pilates racks are all set up. Wheat grass, celery, ginger drinks were served for after session refreshments.
Truth: I have downed celery-ginger juice and lots more than once.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1268010/royal-family-latest-prince-harry-meghan-markle-megxit-updates-archewell
… "After the couple’s move to California, Prince Harry set up an office in Beverly Hills and another in London.
On official documents Harry is referred to as: 'Individual Person with Significant Control'.
The source of the business is listed as "other professional, scientific and technical activities not elsewhere classified".
According to the Royal Family website: “The Prince of Wales chooses to alter the present decisions when he becomes king, he will continue to be of the House of Windsor and his grandchildren will use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor.”
"We have 12 yr. olds now who are far from 'innocent' and are little whores in good families."
>>>That's a lot of hatred on this beautiful Easter (or any other time). Wow.<<<
Funny how posters can call Meghan a whore but think its ok for good families to have 12 yr. old children having sex (parents even buying contraceptives and abortions for them). These people should have guilt for setting their children up like this and if not, maybe shame is in order.
@Aliops said...
>>>Slut-shaming preteens and pensioners all in one go! Wow.
Did Oliver Hoare's wife have a substandard hymen at the time of their marriage that excused Diana's hysterical and appalling behavior towards her?
I still can't believe what I've just read.<<<
I can't believe you used "wow" just like AVerySunshineyday...hmmmm maybe the same poster?
Was Camilla a pensioner when she had sex with Diana's husband. NO.
Do you approve of a married woman stalking a newly married husband of a young innocent royal wife? I can't believe that you wrote what you did.
My 3 children were all virgins at 12, 15, 18 and beyond. So was I. I followed Jesus words.
Hahahaha!Who knew Easter was also Opposite Day? Nothing is ever straightforward with these chancers.
Chinese economy already shrunk 10% thanks to corona, Europe's and USA's and Canada's and NZ and Australia's will follow, EU was finally cornered by Italy with demand for a £247 billion bailout, no doubt other countries like Spain heavily hit will demand billions in bailout as well. Northern Europe is not going to be happy about it, because they will bear most of the weight.
Sorry to flood with statistics but with all this in the background Harry and his houses and rents and cars and greedy wife's pitiful efforts to remain relevant just causes irritation. The best thing they can do is shut up and disappear. Their demands and whining are working as a red cloth for an angry bull now.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said...
What the H** is this?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1268010/royal-family-latest-prince-harry-meghan-markle-megxit-updates-archewell
… "After the couple’s move to California, Prince Harry set up an office in Beverly Hills and another in London.
On official documents Harry is referred to as: 'Individual Person with Significant Control'.
The source of the business is listed as "other professional, scientific and technical activities not elsewhere classified".
According to the Royal Family website: “The Prince of Wales chooses to alter the present decisions when he becomes king, he will continue to be of the House of Windsor and his grandchildren will use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor.”
In one of her Instagram videos, she said she spends approx 300k every month on expenses which includes providing for her extended security.
She also said that the IRS takes 45 percent of her earnings and that most celebrities we see aren't as rich as we think they are.
I remember her saying that if a celebrity spends 500k on something, it means that the celebrity must have earned at least a minimum of 1.5m to be able to spend 500k.
One of the leaks from Clarence House in which Charles threatened to 'turn off the tap' if the Sussexes misbehave said Harry's entire worth isnt above 20m and that Meg isn't worth much. That piece of info came directly from Charles camp but it was buried in the story. Bottom line is that Harry's price range of any house shouldn't exceed 5m.
No, not the same poster. Perhaps more than one person had a similar reaction to your odd and distasteful comment?
PS - Rebutting with a chastity-status of your own children is really beyond the Pale. IMO
Harry can't afford a 12m dollar house because he doesn't have that kind of money. There is something Cardi B said when she was talking about how much she spends in a month.
In one of her Instagram videos, she said she spends approx 300k every month on expenses which includes providing for her extended security.
She also said that the IRS takes 45 percent of her earnings and that most celebrities we see aren't as rich as we think they are.
I remember her saying that if a celebrity spends 500k on something, it means that the celebrity must have earned at least a minimum of 1.5m to be able to spend 500k.
One of the leaks from Clarence House in which Charles threatened to 'turn off the tap' if the Sussexes misbehave said Harry's entire worth isnt above 20m and that Meg isn't worth much. That piece of info came directly from Charles camp but it was buried in the story. Bottom line is that Harry's price range of any house shouldn't exceed 5m.
_________________________________________
Copying this to make sure there is a record.
"One of the leaks from Clarence House in which Charles threatened to 'turn off the tap' if the Sussexes misbehave said Harry's entire worth isnt above 20m and that Meg isn't worth much. That piece of info came directly from Charles camp but it was buried in the story. Bottom line is that Harry's price range of any house shouldn't exceed 5m."
That sounds like the RF's final offer to me. A nice enough place for Archie to holiday, but not too OTT.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1268010/royal-family-latest-prince-harry-meghan-markle-megxit-updates-archewell
was sloppy. The same mistake occurred in the article in the Sun. The Royal Family website
https://www.royal.uk/ royal-family-name
actually says "Unless The Prince of Wales chooses to alter....."
Makes a bit of a difference!
… "After the couple’s move to California, Prince Harry set up an office in Beverly Hills and another in London.
On official documents Harry is referred to as: 'Individual Person with Significant Control'.
The source of the business is listed as "other professional, scientific and technical activities not elsewhere classified".
According to the Royal Family website: “The Prince of Wales chooses to alter the present decisions when he becomes king, he will continue to be of the House of Windsor and his grandchildren will use the surname Mountbatten-Windsor.”
@CatEyes
No, not the same poster. Perhaps more than one person had a similar reaction to your odd and distasteful comment?PS - Rebutting with a chastity-status of your own children is really beyond the Pale. IMO<<
Ewwww...You just can't stop can you. So I am just responding to your fixation now. Guess you don't understand that Jesus taught chastity and many Christians follow his rule and pledge to be chaste before marriage. I didn't say it to rebut your comment, I said it because I am proud of myself and them as many Christian parents are. Sorry this seems an horrible concept to you. I know I see a lot of it in the world and it does not elevate the human spirit like respecting your body and keeping it special especially when young children (12 yr olds) are too young to be having relations which many times end up in unwanted pregnancies and other difficult situations.
It seems you might shame Diana for being innocent/chaste, how sad! I guess the world would rather want a Meghan (see where that got Harry and he would of benefitted maybe from keeping his pants on too. lol). I know I had over a dozen marriage proposals and one reason was because I was a 'good girl' the kind of woman a man wants to take home to their Mother and have children by (as they said numerous times). So there is value in chastity for so many reasons.
It is very distasteful to promote sex for 12 yr olds (which is your inference). After all this crowd said so when they suspected Andy was fooling around with a 18/17 yr. old.
Blogger AliOops said...
@CatEyes
No, not the same poster. Perhaps more than one person had a similar reaction to your odd and distasteful comment?
PS - Rebutting with a chastity-status of your own children is really beyond the Pale. IMO
No one is on this site for catechism hour. However, I would like to point out that Jesus' bestie was a certain Mary Magdalene...
Nothing in your three paragraphs of utter shite could be inferred from my response to you, but I do see that you enjoy a spot of sermonising, so have at it Lady Chaste!
Have all of the virgins at your dinner table already stabbed themselves in the temple with their dinner forks?
The usual confontational tone I'm sorry to see. We are all allowed to express opinions here without being shot down.
I am that poster and I would gently point out that Prince Charles is a famous workaholic and saw far less of his children than Diana did. Diaries and many other primary sources show that.
Add to that the fact that when William and Harry were small children they more naturally fell into their mother's sphere. This has always been the case for the royal family. You may know that there has been much historical speculation about the effect this had on Henry VIII, who remained far longer with his mother because he was the second son. His older brother Prince Arthur (who died aged 15) spent time with his grandmother Lady Margaret Beaufort and his father Henry VII learning about the royal household and statecraft.
Prince William spent time as a small boy with the Queen Mother and the Queen for the same reason. Harry had a softer time of it, with a mother who did her utmost to give him as easy a royal life as possible. Quite naturally, this has had an effect on the development of his character, just as Prince Charles will have had an effect as a father. My opinion is that Diana's influence was the stronger at the most formative stage.
I believe you are in UK. In the US at least, for Anthony Fauci and his anti-virus team, their role will be declining while Kudlow and his team are on the ascendant, as Trump hints, then broadly hints and moves towards re-opening the US economy. Kudlow being Trump's prime economic adviser. NYC is in bad shape, we have other smaller hot spots. However the rest of this nation can move forward, getting our economy back into gear. A bright spring is ahead. I have difficulty making heads/tails of the UK's covid status. With Boris having his good scare, you in the UK will move more cautiously.
Your Queen just gave a great, positive and heartening speech for Easter, the time for Resurrection, redemption, renewal.
____________
Queen calls for 'light and life' to overcome despair as she declares Easter is 'not cancelled' in special message
Her Majesty, 93, has delivered what is believed to be her first Easter address - which had a resolute message
The monarch's pre-recorded speech offered support to those marking Easter privately and the wider country
She said 'by keeping apart we keep others safe' and added 'we know that coronavirus will not overcome us'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8210791/Queen-stresses-importance-maintaining-coronavirus-lockdown-Easter-address.html
_____________
Revealed: Hero NHS nurses Jenny and Luis who Boris Johnson said 'stood by my ICU bedside for 48 hours when things could have gone either way'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8212427/PM-thanks-NHS-staff-life-saving-care-special-mention-two-medics.html
_____________
'Moving, mesmerising, magnificent!' Andrea Bocelli leaves viewers in tears as 3.4 million watch his Music For Hope concert live from the deserted Duomo di Milano on Easter Sunday
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8212333/Andrea-Bocelli-streams-stunning-Music-Hope-concert-live-Duomo-di-Milano-Easter-Sunday.html
"our real estate sources have confirmed there's been no such deal."
https://www.tmz.com/2020/04/12/meghan-markle-prince-harry-did-not-buy-mel-gibson-malibu-mansion/
I do think they're broken and desperately try to stay in the headlines (Angelina, Oscar role, Foundation/Charity, Gold digger, house hunting in UK and in L.A, Australian firebombing air tanker, Sabrina Elba, Meghan's hairdresser ...)
@AliPoops
You keep on and on, yet you attack me for responding to your "pensioner shaming" yourself
I gave kudos to 12 yr. olds who follow Jesus teachings. You seem to have forgotton to point out Jesus told Mary Magdalene 'to sin no more" and she then repented, hence at that point she followed him. She Did Not continue to sleep with men.
Jesus would want the same of 12 yr. olds who have sex outside of marriage.
If 12 or 15 yr. olds or whomever sin, Jesus would want them to repent. Period.
But you infer sexual sinners should not feel shame? Hardly what Jesus says (must be a different bible than the one I read). Jesus wants us to live as our best selves according to his rules (not mine).
Heaven help the children of the world if they are encouraged to have sex at age 12. Sorry but that is child abuse in my eyes (and the law in most countries) Afterall Nutty posters didn't think it was right about Epstein young associates because it was a crime against them (some, not me, even put forth his alleged 'victims' were enjoying the perks associated with their sexual interludes, again not me).
Jesus wants children to be pure like the wonderful ideal he had for them when he created them. He doesn't want them falling victim to misguided adults who do not care enough to correct them. I am sorry you cannot understand the concept of children being as Jesus wants them to live. So sorry. I saw the wonderful effect of good guidance among Christian families who set down rules and made an environment conducive to children having a happy childhood free from sexual abuse and misuse.
Maybe you are in the camp of thinking Epstein's young associates were loving the perks and environment and all that went with it. I don't.
Is this them? No confirmation, but they have over 4000 followers
>>>I am that poster and I would gently point out that Prince Charles is a famous workaholic and saw far less of his children than Diana did.<<<
No, it is a historical fact that Harry lost his mother at age 12 and as an earlier poster pointed out, Harry can barely remember his mother. The boys were with their dad much of their time. Charles job is hardly a 60 hr. work week it appeared (maybe he should not have wasted so much time seeing Camilla on the sly at other people's homes and been around his son's more).
If there is any endorsement of the good effect of Diana it was on William who did remember his Mother and was around her more (and as you say Charles was not in the picture so much).
William has his mother's heart and he emulates that tenderness toward the disenfranchised while Harry appears to want to get his selfish desires met, a lot like Charles did by not ending his affair with Camilla. But even Charles has done better by the UK people who lease land from the Duchy (although I hear he raised their rent during this awful CV-19 crisis) while Harry is a deserte4r to the UK public and worse.
I do think Camilla is a good partner for Charles and that is why he should be faulted for not marrying her in the first place. But he was a playboy (from what I read about his dalliances before Diana)and did not want Camilla for a wife then.
Not even a nice try. Sad and pathetic - yes. The mental parkour is astounding.
This whole thing you do, where anyone who disagrees with any of your self-righteous spiels, is thereafter instantly accused of egregious, ad hominem, grasping-at-straw lies, is really quite despicable. You are not a marketable "face" for your chaste and kindly "faith".
Sincerely,
A Member of the Public
xoxoxo
Personally, I don't think it matters if Harry was closer to his dad or to his mom. The bottom line is that losing a parent tragically like that at a young age is extremely difficult. Diana was no doubt influential in both her children's lives, as they have honored her time and time again.
Charles grew up not close to either of his parents. It is one of the reasons he was so close to the Queen Mother and his uncle, Lord Mountbatten. I think that definitely had an impact on his own parenting. He seemed to take a more active role after Diana's death. But then obviously, as the only parent, he would. So maybe that's just how it was perceived in the media, even if it wasn't categorically true.
This article and one from the express make it sound like that is one of the pranked accounts but 4k followers would suggest something more...Could that many just want to see what happens next? Covid-boredom, perhaps.
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/uk-news/pranksters-hijack-harry-meghan-markles-18080502
I am afraid I cannot find much sympathy within me even so. He has privileges beyond measure. Think of the children trapped in abusive homes during this lockdown, while Harry's father continues to offer (as far as we know) continued unstinting support to his adult son and receives no gratitude or respect or care in return.
We just have to accept that neither Prince Charles or Princess Diana covered themselves as glory as parents, despite their good points which I freely accept. William combines the good in both his mother and his father (it is his father who is teaching him about the Duchy of Cornwall after all and William is now becoming more even-handed in his approach to his paternal upbringing and ongoing influences).
Maybe the answer to all this is Kate. Harry needed a wife like Kate, with a stable family to take him in, but unfortunately there is only one Kate.
CatEyes I was saddened/distressed to read that you were raped. Sigh. I would hope that you were able to get good care (medically and mentally) for dealing with that horrid happening.
I don't always agree with things you post or how you view the world. But ... I wanted to let you know that hearing you had this happen to you, makes me sad.
these come out every time she goes off on one of these blithering tirades. I no longer believe her. She has played the pity card every time. Now it's rape. Before it was her brother's illness, disabled, etc., etc,. etc.. Look for the pattern in her cycle, don't just fall for the one-off yet again. Sorry, but after months of this, there's a pattern, and I'm sure others have seen it as well.
I wish you wouldn't leave. Even though this is easy to say, try not to take it personally. If you aren't here, it will just be someone else and so on. A couple posts ago, when I was called a series of names for something silly, I realized there is no trying to reason with the unreasonable. I put a box around it, and moved on. It's actually made quite a difference.
I enjoy this thread for the different perspectives people bring. Engage with the people that make your time here worthwhile.
https://www.magzter.com/US/American-Media,-Inc./National-Enquirer/Celebrity/
Sure, there are no tabloid newspapers in America...
+1 I’m very sorry to see you leave, Elle, but it does seem as though there’s always one person in every family or blog to spoil things for the rest of us. Enjoy your break, good luck with the new job, and maybe MM will do something so outrageous that you won’t be able to resist coming back!
This is a really tough time for everyone. I'm dipping in and out of here while trying to get groceries delivered for my parents in their 80s. So far we haven't had one delivery and it's now been a month. I am down to one meal a day. I eat at night, like Scarlett O'Hara, so I can sleep OK. We're far from the rest of our family. So it's a shame to have to be seeing angst here, instead of warmth and support. No aspersions on you Elle. It dates back before this virus for you.
Right. I'm off to give my undivided attention to Tesco's website. Yet again (approaching midnight).
From a purely practical sense how to they “move” so quickly, quietly and easily. My understanding is that they went to Canada for a holiday. Fine, they took there dogs. Some people would do that it they had money I’m sure. How do you pack up all your gear though and sneak off without anyone noticing you are taking ALL your stuff. Maybe they only had clothes to take but Megan had lots of clothes.
Same for the move from Canada to L. A. How much room are there in private jets or did they have the rest freighted later. Does H not have any memory trinkets that he wants to keep rather than leaving in England?
Glad that you aren't taking it personally. I just don't agree that it will stop because you are gone. Because it seems that it happens to anyone that disagrees or has an issue with those posts. I've noticed the circles as well.
I do agree that Nutty having to clean up every morning must be frustrating, tedious and embarrassing. Maybe it's worse than normal because of the craziness in the world and the extra time most of us have now. I don't know.
Do what's best for you. I'll just miss your insights.
Welcome!
I read somewhere that Meghan kept a bunch of stuff in storage in Canada. Including clothes that she starting wearing again in January, after the announcement of them stepping back.
I'm guessing, that because they knew the move to Canada would be brief, most of both of their belongings are still at Frogmore. And since they are squatting right now in LA, once they find more permanent housing and not being in a pandemic the rest will get moved later on.
Sorry if you feel like you have to take a break. Your posts are always interesting and on point.
I get it. I really do, but you will be surely missed.
Please come back soon.
BELIEVE them when they
SHOW themselves to be TWATS
ball big time. It is also obvious he had a family that adored him. From the Queen on down.
Markle convinced him otherwise and I believe led him to believe he could bigger than the Monarchy. He can't and he won't. The tide has turned and no one cares about celebs anymore or the wokeness brigade, or their useless charities and foundations. ( some are legit and terrific) , just not the duo's. Heck, even the globalists are losing ground in popularity.
This is a new dawn and a new day. The elite are hiding and regular people all over are asking some hard questions about their rulers' decisions and lack there of. Hardships abound and will only get worse going forward. No one cares about Sparkle and her Hollywood adventures.
Maybe they could post some bikini pics of MM or some new pics of Archie, but even then, they will still be a laughing stock and mocked as the hypocrites they are.
Don't mess with HM, she will always win. Always. God bless her and long may she reign!
How to Block a User on Blogspot | Chron.com
smallbusiness.chron.com/block-user-blogspot-33884.html
This is off topic and I'm sorry, but I'm very worried about you! Are you not getting groceries as well? And your poor parents! Is there a community organizer that can help?
What can we do?
This is not good.
here. You would have thousands of karma if we could all give you upvotes like Reddit.❤😍
There are always trolls everywhere. Don't let it get to you. You are golden, like Ponyboy,
Don't feed the troll and don't leave us. You will be sorely missed by the majority here.
You were reading my mind! Many thanks!
@CaroleBaskin
"@AVerySunshineyday
@AliPoops
You keep on and on, yet you attack me for responding to your "pensioner shaming" yourself"
Keep on and on, eh? Poor beleaguered martyr CatEyes. The heart bleeds. What's next, nobody understands how hard it was for you to endure cancer/diabetes/polio whilst fighting against the scourge in Afghanistan, and trying to adopt a Burmese (chaste) orphan? Do one Cat Eyes.
Amazing Grace- Bocelli
Sorry this is off topic folks. I'll say one thing for this experience - it's been the most effective diet I've ever done.
I have encountered loony internet disruptors three times. The first time was back in usenet days. Loony female disruptor on the Rolling Stones usenet group. She contributed nothing useful while telling all kinds of tales. I could tell she was certifiable in the real world too. She often used the word "stalk" and its variations. Same as our nutty CatsEyes. She was at it for 8 months having a jolly old time.
It got so bad that a prominent member broke away and put up his own Rolling Stones message board that he banned her from. That became ultra popular with all kinds of meet ups at concerts and at the Jersey Shore each fall. So lots of good came from this disruptor. You can look it up under StonesDoug. This board is quiet these days due to a lot less activity by Jagger-Keith and company. I left it a while ago.
Next time was on a gardening board. This guy was a decent to excellent contributor but was harassing a woman so much that he got banned. Its seemed he would get drunk and let loose on the board. IOW he would vomit on the board.
Third time is with CatsEyes with her stalking this and stalking that. And Yikes! I could never manically type so much lengthy swill.
Cat- Take your meds for your own sake! Or lay off the booze or whatever it is.
Profanity - word of the day.
No matter what I post, I manage feel I have upset the applecart. Not the intention.
I did not play the pity party, I cited what Jesus said.did. I cited that Jesus did not want us to be immoral and sin sexually. I an not a martyr of that, I as I benefited tremendously because of that and said so. You try to impute things I did not say or even hint at. I was blest for following Jesus words in raising my children.
No Elle, you are expressing some vague allegation about some unnamed person that you are "being liked stalked but weirder". Yours words...I couldn't make that up.
You go on and on about me and just are so fixated on me. Words cannot express the weirdness of that.
You do your tactic of appealing to posters that you are so put upon ny me when I have not been conversing with you at all; not for days!!! Not one word until you attack me just now. I did not say one single word to you today. As a famous lawyer taught me, tell me exactly what I said to YOU (not Nitty) today. I hear crickets...because I did not address you today nor yesterday!!!!!
The Duke of Windsor plead poverty when he negotiated the sale of Balmoral and Sandringham to Bertie (and a pension), but Bertie found out later that he had secretly saved about a million pounds from his PoW income. That was a lot of money in 1936. No wonder they resisted raising the pension when post-war inflation ate away at it.
______________________________________________________
Yes, and he and Wallis spent the rest of their lives "allowing" everyone else to pay for their expenses, IIRC (parallels to Harry and Meghan).
":hird time is with CatsEyes with her stalking this and stalking that. And Yikes! I could never manically type so much lengthy swill. Cat- Take your meds for your own sake! Or lay off the booze or whatever it is. <<<
It was Elle who was complaining of stalking, She did it at April 12, 2020 about 5:28am (second time she has done this) Right Elle you had to apologize to the woman then you went back and deleted your comment (sanitizing your history here) I checked, lol I didn't stalk and you knew it. Not me at 5:28am I wasn't around, I was asleep.
You are a bully @xxxx because I was talking about Jesus and you attack me because Elle is attacking me. Does that make you a big man?
You see I don't respond with libel like you do. I am too smart for that and I have self control which you and the other posters pilin on don't. That is why my children were good Christians from a Christian home. Jesus would find disfavor with you saying what you are saying and the law would find you bullying me.
And this goes for @VerySunshiney & #Alipoops, You are upset because I quote Jesus and stand up for Christian values for children and their parents. You try to stifle a different viewpoint but I am successful in my Christian faith and evil does not scare me. It is you people who throw out curse words and slander in written form. I have allowed you to speak freely and you won't leave me alone but Jesus sees what you are doing (criticizing my cathecism and faith in him) on Easter no less. I also feel sorry for you since you did not appreciate my recounting that Jesus "wants us to live our best lives" according to his standards and "rules".
I see why you can talk about Meghan and Harry with such authority and insight...that which I don't have because I have no frame of reference as it is foreign to me.
I suspect that they too grew tired of her.
>>>Please get off the board, CatEyes.<<<
God Bless You!
<<<Surely there must be must be "I'm SO much more Saved and HOLIER and Blessed (whilst also having overcome TRIALS that would HUMBLE those with less FAITH and FORTITUDE, and frankly not of the ELECT) sites" that would appeal to Carole better?
I suspect that they too grew tired of her.<<<
God Bless You!
>>>>For the lovely and harassed Elle and everyone
I have encountered loony internet disruptors three times. The first time was back in usenet days. Loony female disruptor on the Rolling Stones usenet group. She contributed nothing useful while telling all kinds of tales. I could tell she was certifiable in the real world too. She often used the word "stalk" and its variations. Same as our nutty CatsEyes. She was at it for 8 months having a jolly old time.
It got so bad that a prominent member broke away and put up his own Rolling Stones message board that he banned her from. That became ultra popular with all kinds of meet ups at concerts and at the Jersey Shore each fall. So lots of good came from this disruptor. You can look it up under StonesDoug. This board is quiet these days due to a lot less activity by Jagger-Keith and company. I left it a while ago.
Next time was on a gardening board. This guy was a decent to excellent contributor but was harassing a woman so much that he got banned. Its seemed he would get drunk and let loose on the board. IOW he would vomit on the board.
Third time is with CatsEyes with her stalking this and stalking that. And Yikes! I could never manically type so much lengthy swill.
Cat- Take your meds for your own sake! Or lay off the booze or whatever it is.<<<
April 13, 2020 at 3:33 AM
God Bless You!
That is one of her go-to technique...threatening to leave so her minions will beg her to stay. She won't leave as she loves dominating this blog. She grooms you all by her compliments! LOL Grooms you!!! And you don't see it. If would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
And you used to appreciate my posts until you had to fall in line with your guru Elle. Good for you!
God Bless You too!
>>>This is what makes it hard, Imabug and AvaC and RainyDay, and I don't want to leave, and I wouldn't call it "leaving" so much as giving Nutty time to find a way to dial Cat Eyes down. This has been going on for months and months. It's not about the craziness in the world, it's about the craziness in a person who's just got some real issues. This happened pre-rona and will happen post-rona. It's not fair to anyone, but Cat Eyes doesn't care or stop, which leads me to believe it's because she can't, and I don't know why, but I do know that Nutty works hard on this, and it's got to be hella frustrating to come out and see this from adults. So, if my taking a step back helps, then that's great, and if it doesn't, then Plan B, and that's for Nutty to decide.<<<
You always threaten to leave because you want people to BEG you to stay. You have done this over and over and not just naming me but others too in the past. It is your 'go-to technique' one of many you use to solicit compliments, adoration, fawning sycophancy. Also you like to fake apologize so people will think you are so humble when really you tell us how superior your knowledge is on various subjects (like trusts). Remember you called yourself the 'Queen Bee' (but thought better of it and poof the remark disappeared).
You had me in your sights sinced I showed you up when it came to discussing law and you had to admit you didn't really know what you were talking about you only was relying on sources (which you accused me of) But no, I had direct knowledge of the law I was discussing. You always want to be the dominate force on this site. I don't. I just want to post my humor and my few points that I know about (I don't mind read the Harkles nor call them drug addicts). I don't care about having fans/stans etc. I just want you to quit fomenting anger towards me. I am ill. elderly and disabled and I find bullying abusive to me.
I have animals to take care of and I am so happy with my baby chicks, turkeys, ducks and guineas. Much more pleasant than a dumb blog.
God Bless You Elle!
Some kind of feud going on.
If I were Nutty Flavor, I would stop it in its tracks. I have very much liked this blog, not only because of the main theme of the Harkles, which is why I myself am here, but also because everyone respects one another. A rarity in blog-dom.
At least, up till now.
On Nutty's Virus blog some regulars are saying the lockdown in their state (USA) is going to be extended to at least mid-May, if not until the beginning of July.
The Sussexes must have access to huge amount of funds to be able to live for so long without earning any income. Rent, security, staff, luxury foods, toiletries, cosmetics and whatever else they need as 'basics' must be adding up. In reality they have been on funded holiday since about November last year (and Meghan was on funded maternity leave for much of the year before that), so they do seem to show an entitled attitude to such a way of life.
Having extra time to plan their route to becoming billionaires and the most influential and famous people on the planet (yep, that is sarcasm) should result in a better plan, being better informed, learning more, but with the Sussexes I do not thinks so. (They could have joined some kind of volunteer organisation to do public work during the time of coronavirus ...). So, what can we expect?
* From what has emerged about the registration of Travelyst, it is a business. Eco travel is well established in many parts of the world, including Africa, so other than being royal I do not know what Harry is going to contribute to this industry (and why wold anyone cut him into any business they already have?). But, the wealthy will have plenty of money to travel so he may just have success (being surrounded by so much depression and so many poor people is so depressing ... I just must get away and that elite eco-friendly place is just the perfect way to rejuvenate).
* From all that Meghan has said and what has been published about her (contradictory, implausible, perplexing) I have no clue what she will be trying to set up. Blatant consumerism will not go down well, but dressed up as charity (donations) is a tactic the celebrity culture is going to choose. However, I do not see Meghan being valuable for such advertising. The only talent she has is hustling and grifting so I am not sure what she is actually going to do. (My favourite tarot reader says she saw Meghan being involved in some kind of property deals and hooking up with a wealthy and connected man who will help her get good deals.)
* Harry has become quite eccentric in what he is willing to do 'to protect his son'; Meghan wants to use him for financial gain. It will be interesting to see what we see of Archie and in what context. (They do not even have IG for the release of a home-done, copyrighted, trademarked photo of him.)
* I doubt that any of them will return to the UK unless it is Harry relocating there after being dumped by Meghan (and even then, I think he would go to Australia or somewhere in Africa to lick his wounds).
Anyway, the bad news seems to be that other than something completely unexpected or a big leak from somewhere, the Sussexes will find it difficult to be relevant enough to be in the news for another two months at least. There will be a growing silence or irrelevance or we will be thrashing around in a storm of rumours ...
People feel big calling me names, using curse words, telling me I should take medication or I am drunk (just Tatty all over again). I don't say such slander. EVER. I dared one of them to repeat one statement that I said like that. She couldn't. I rest my case.
Amen to your prediction especially "we will be thrashing around in a storm of rumours.."
Howver, I don't see how Travalyst on the surface will make Harry much money from consumers as it is too vague at this point (having looked at his website) but maybe from the companies listed who may give him a cut of commissions or some other fee arrangement. Of course, travel agencies could steer people to Travalyst and thus enrich them both.
Time to call time on this stuff, Nutty Flavor.
Please ease up on the religion, CatEyes - you're beginning to make Isis followers seem like moderates.
I did not start this. One of my attackers mentioned Easter and Mary Magdalen first. I was put on the defensive so I responded with Jesus as a basis for my belief (sorry that you find Christianity offensive that you would shame me for it). Sorry but see who started this and it wasn't me!
God Bless You Pretty Paws...oh sorry maybe I am being Isis-like because I mention God?! Wow, oh wow. It was a kindness, now you've think it is terrorist or something?? What won't you people say next????
She looks nervous in the following ... why? I am perplexed.
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/GleamingAdmiredEasteuropeanshepherd-size_restricted.gif
"That is one of her go-to technique...threatening to leave so her minions will beg her to stay. She won't leave as she loves dominating this blog. She grooms you all by her compliments! LOL Grooms you!!! And you don't see it. If would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
"
Let's do an informal experiment! Could be fun. We could start by CatEyes throwing the toys out of the pram. Okay, okay. Fast forward. Cue the begging minions beseeching the maligned CatEyes to stay..... Ummmmmm
Carole, you can always start your own blog; you don't have to be the second in line! Harness your spectacular vague, boring, ephemeral load of absolute and complete utter nonsense to your heart's content.
Thank you for the blessings. Same to you, and everyone here.
-Harry is playing with his son trying to plot how they can escape.
-Harry is playing video games (Candy Crush)
-Harry is asking Meg to make Bangers and Mash (I think that's what they're called)
-Meg is busy with her PR machine, dreaming up new ideas which will flop anyway
-Meg is reading scripts for lame reality shows
-Meg is trying to wrangle an interview deal for a million bucks (but Ophra's not buying)
-Harry is secretly texting his friends, but they aren't texting back, lol)
-Meg is looking at printed publications of multimillion dollar hones she wants Harry to buy
-Harry is playing soccer with the security detail
-Archie is getting restless and bored
=Meg is screaming at the hired help (when she's not yelling in the phone at her agents)
Nutty Flavor, get rid of these toxic persons, please, so that we can get back to discussion.
I would be fearful for whoever you think you are naming because that is not my name. Now you have risen to the level of libeling and bullying someone named Carole Baskin. Thai is not my name nor has it ever been.
Shame on you. I feel sorry you have done this to some woman with that name. You better hope she does not read you doing this.
God Bless You!
I have called no posters any "abhorrent names" as you falsely alleged. Amen!
You are part of the problem by commenting and mischaracterizing facts.
God Bless You!
What an intelligent remark.
God Bless You!
Yeah Elle has been at it for weeks. Like now, she just won't quit!
God Bless You!
God Bless you too!!
Glad to hear it!
JESUS IS NOT AN EXCUSE FOR ANYTHING
holy crap.
May Jesus Bless Your 'Heart' for your sincerity!
Ha ha bet she is both Cat Eyes and Elle
Why is everyone responding to this????
You are making it worse!!!!
We're in the middle of a pandemic and you guys are arguing and egging on someone who is obviously deeply troubled and may also be intoxicated.
Please STOP!
Uhura - I don't think Nutty is here at this time of the day - different timezone in Estonia.
_________________________________
@Anon-Unknown
This stuff is unbelievable on this blog.
I hope Nutty Flavor cleans it up, I truly do. This is just wrong.
When I was growing up, I was taught that it was very impolite to inject religion or politics into any conversation - they were supposed to be private topics. I feel that here on this blog it's very like being in a multi-personnel conversation and so we should perhaps try and stick to this etiquette, if only for our own peace of mind. Anyway, it's completely off-topic and not really what we're here for, is it? Or have I got this completely wrong? I am sure that someone will advise me if I have erred.
I shall be posting once I have simmered down and got my temper under control. Until then I shall just enjoy reading the sensible, debatable points that are usually being made.
Re Harry and protecting his son, just saw where they denied an Australian fire fighter plane to be called Archie...some press publications are calling it a major snub. "The New South Wales (NSW) government was planning to commemorate the fact that Meghan announced her pregnancy during a royal tour to Australia in 2018 by calling the plane Archie. The 737 Large Air Tanker played a key role in helping put out bushfires that consumed the state over the course of the Australian summer."
As for politics and religion being "impolite" being mentioned, it is not unusual to see it on this blog, from people commenting to and fro against Trump, the CoE, the Clintons, Obama, the Labour Party, BoJo, the Conservatives, people wishing prayers for another. What is preferable is that people have a free exchange of ideas and show tolerance toward one another, IMO.
On the subject of the Harkles, I think they are waiting for May to come round. Isn't that the month that includes Mothers' Day in the US? I reckon MM must be climbing the walls right now at all the press William & Catherine are getting, despite the covid-19 so she must be planning a revenge "bombshell" to pay them out for being so popular! Having said that I think a turd on the pavement must be more popular right now than those two losers in LA.
CatEyes - I'm still sad if you were raped but this is exactly what I was talking about when I said I didn't agree with your comments or world view.
You made a comment about Diana and the innocence and we may talk about M in ways that might be similar*, which could be valid, both have come up before but you added a provocative twist to it and then claimed that people were attacking you when they expressed that they felt it crossed a line.
This is a pattern that I have observed with you before.
I don't agree with this.
*In a lot of cases, here it is not gratuitous in the way some of the posts are elsewhere there are cartoons and similar. Here we tend to stick to the old time news sources and some youtube.
Following my previous post, I am really hoping that MM gets so mad about not being in the news that she allows her narcissism to over-rule her common sense and does something really over-the-top which carries a hell of a backlash.
The reason? Charles is willing to supplement their income for this coming year but there is to be a review next March/April (in 2021).
Whilst we're all on lockdown, Charles can't attend meetings, events, etc so just might be catching up on his newspaper reading. If so, he will be seeing other members of the RF doing their "bit" to help out but the Harkles are doing exactly what? A big, fat zilch, that's what.
What makes it even worse for the Harkles is that Prince Andrew was caught in a photo helping Fergie to pack up cupcakes for a local hospice in Windsor. Yes, Prince Andrew!
What will the "optics" of that be for the Harkles, when Andrew, with his reputation in shreds, is seen to be doing more than those two so-called humanitarians?
Charles just might be moved to re-consider his payments to these worthless scroungers, especially if Camilla has a "word" in his ear (at great volume). Add to this an attention-grabbing stunt from MM which fails completely and, maybe, reflects badly on the RF and I could easily see Charles pulling the plug on them. Whoopee!
Your comments are informative, fun and light hearted.
Please stay and let’s all just scroll...scroll...scroll.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8211711/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-buy-Mel-Gibsons-12million-mansion-Malibu.html
Check out the photos- gorgeous property and looks like it could provide privacy and there is not so much land that they would need a ton of security on patrol. The layout of the house seems nice, but the decor and material selections are not my personal taste. One has to wonder what Meghan would think if Charles surprised Harry & Meghan and purchased this home (with furnishings) for them?
Megs would probably melt down due to the overuse of exposed brick/stone, wood beams, and faux fur throws... and it would be even more fun if Charles failed to give them an additional budget to redecorate! (Harry would probably love it because it looks like a cross between Gaston's house in "Beauty and the Beast" and a grotto.)
The sprawling mansion has recently been renovated and has its own gym, five acres of grounds, views of the Pacific, two swimming pools and comes with a beach club membership.
Speaking to the Daily Mail's Weekend Magazine, Dr Goodall said Harry had told her he didn't want Archie growing up with the airs and graces of a royal - suggesting he and Meghan, 38, already had other plans for their future. 'At the end [of the conversation] Meghan came in to listen with Archie,' Dr Goodall recalled.
'He was very tiny and very sleepy – not too pleased to be passed from his mummy. I think I was one of the first to cuddle him outside the family.' Dr Goodall continued: 'I made Archie do the Queen’s wave, saying, “I suppose he’ll have to learn this”. Harry said, “No, he’s not growing up like that.”'
The exchange took place at the end of an interview Prince Harry conducted with Dr Goodall for Meghan's September issue of British Vogue. The interview is thought to have taken place when Harry joined Dr Goodall at an event to raise awareness of her Roots & Shoots programme at St George's House, Windsor Castle, in July last year.
From The Sun: But a source claimed the property had sold recently.
Asked if the Sussexes were the buyers, the source added: “Non-disclosure agreements have been signed. But you’re very warm.”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11379631/meghan-markle-prince-harry-sale-mel-gibsons-mansion/
So, perhaps Charles bought the property for the Harkles? (using a LLC?) Or maybe Harry & Meghan did using a LLC? Or maybe this is just a marketing stunt used by the real estate company trying to sell the property? All speculation, of course!
And yes, I could just scroll past as she escalates, and that is what I have had to do for months. But do you know how irritating that is? How much it takes the fun out of being here if I'm always scrolling past someone saying nasty things about me? Lying about me? (for example, I never claimed I was the Queen Bee; I'm Queen of the Bees because I was going to raise Mason Bees). I can't even just do an @Elle search to read to see what others have left for me, if anything. She's always there just waiting to start. I don't need to defend myself to her or explain my education and professional experience, but it's constant. It doesn't matter what it is, either. It's not just trust or a legal issue, it's bloody everything.
I don't have these kinds of people in my life, and I'd never walk on eggshells around anyone, not even Brad Pitt, but sure as hell not some BSC woman on a blog. I've stayed away for chunks of time because she makes this so deeply unpleasant that I find myself dreading what should be a fun, lighthearted distraction from the serious stress of life and the disaster du jour. Instead, sometimes it is a trip into someone else's highly dysfunctional and unstable life. Just no. That's not okay. I feel sorry for her because I cannot imagine what it is like to be in her head and think any of what she thinks, much less thinking all of it, but I'm to the point where I do not care. I pity her, but I do not care about her, and I do not want contact with her, and I do not want to dread coming here.
This is the only blog I've ever posted on because it felt safe to do it. But she makes it unsafe and unfun. I'm tired of everything being about her. I'm tired of all of us walking on eggshells with her.
So, you're right, if I leave, she wins, but if I stay, she wins, too, because she will just be allowed to continue. There has to be another way. Nutty has asked her - told her- to leave several times, and to no avail. I thought that if I could get her to buy in to my leaving and she'd leave everyone else alone, it was worth a shot. Anyway, sorry for the long response, but I just needed to say it.
I don't understand this need to infect a place like a bacillus. Isn't it bad enough that there is a real infectious agent amongst us now?
Anyway, I would like us all to go back to discussions of the Harkles/Royal Family as we did before. WITHOUT the stupid back and forth, disguised as *real* argument that I am seeing.
Nutty Flavor, I am sorry to see this kind of thing taking place. I am new here, but I assure you I am not one of those who pretends to be well, pretends.
All of you who are infecting this place, shame on you.
@abbyh, would you kindly drop me an email at nuttyflavor88@gmail.com? Thank you.
I delete as much as I can, as quickly as I can.
The problem with Google Blogger is that it is impossible to block people effectively.
I suppose it would be possible to set up a WordPress site, although that would be a lot of extra work for me with only one benefit.
None of this is your fault. It is one troubled person, acting out.
Seems to me you could spend all day *moderating* the idiots who pretend to be legitimate posters here.
Even the ones who have been posting for yonks.
Isn't there a way for Blogger to allow you to block them?