Skip to main content

Open Post: What is Meg and Harry's daily life like now?

Supposedly, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are living in a borrowed or rented house somewhere in the Los Angeles area.

Supposedly, they are parents to a child named Archie who is about to turn one year old, who lives with them in California.

Supposedly, they're working hard to launch a new charity venture, assisted by Catherine St-Laurent, a former employee of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who focused on women's health issues.

Supposedly, Meg is looking for acting jobs and Harry is still maintaining connections to his veteran's charities.

Are any of the above true? All of them? None of them?

The Sussexes' finances

Also, while I generally believe it is poor manners to peek into other people's finances, I'll make an exception for the Sussexes.

How much money do you think they have left? And, given that a lot of it seems to go for PR, what do they use it on? Food, security, fashion, drugs?  Health care or health insurance?

How many staff do you think they have left? Are they doing their own online food ordering, cooking, child (?) care, cleaning? Do they get any physical exercise?

How much of Harry's trust fund from Diana has he spent?

Meg's entire family - mom, dad, her cousins, herself - has flirted with either deep debt, tax problems, or bankruptcy. Are the Sussexes on their way there now?

And if so, how far will Prince Charles let them fall?

Comments

Nutty Flavor said…
Anyway, back to the main topic of the blog.

@Stephanie_123 made an excellent point when she pointed out that, like Peter Phillips, much of Harry's inheritance from his grandmother might be in non-liquid items, like paintings. Could he borrow against these items, I wonder?

@HappyDays, thanks for the Mel Gibson link. I highly doubt they bought that home - how in the world could they afford to maintain it? Taxes, staff, etc. In fact, I doubt they're buying anything - renting at best.





Anonymous said…
Nutty thank you, but it's really not your fault, and I know that it's just crazy acting out, but it's what I said to @Leela above. I know Cat Eyes/flooper/apples/oranges/etc. will not stay away, so I thought maybe if I did, it would slow her down a bit.
Nutty Flavor said…
Oh, just to follow up on @xxxxx's comment:

How to Block a User on Blogspot. Sign in to your Blogger dashboard. Click on the "Followers" link beneath "Manage Blogs.". This opens the list of blog followers/users. Click on the user you want to block. Click on "Block this User," and then click "Block.". Click on "Home," and then "Show Blocked Users" to bring up the list of blocked users.
How to Block a User on Blogspot | Chron.com
smallbusiness.chron.com/block-user-blogspot-33884.html


Unfortunately, that only works for someone who has chosen to "follow" the blog.

This blog had more than 11,000 views on its last post - and precisely 8 followers.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Nutty Flavor said...
At any rate, I do apologize for everyone who has to put up with a single poster's nonsense, even during Easter and Passover.

I delete as much as I can, as quickly as I can.

The problem with Google Blogger is that it is impossible to block people effectively.

I suppose it would be possible to set up a WordPress sitwoule, although that would be a lot of extra work for me with only one benefit.
____________________________________

Sorry, didn't see this until I posted.

I would like to punch people in the head who take advantage of you.
HappyDays said…
Nutty said...@HappyDays, thanks for the Mel Gibson link. I highly doubt they bought that home - how in the world could they afford to maintain it? Taxes, staff, etc. In fact, I doubt they're buying anything - renting at best.

When I read this item, I thought the same thing. I doubt they would be able to buy anything to Meghan’s liking in cash, so they’d likely have a massive mortgage payment. Then add in all the expenses associated with a home like that, plus the cost for security personnel. I don’t think they can live in a home in that price range.

Unless Charles foots the bill or a large part of it, they won’t be buying a property in a super exclusive neighborhood.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
@ Happy Days --

Any way you look at it, it is a LOT of money. Me, I would like to know where it comes from
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Elle, Reine des Abeilles said...


Additionally, even rich people have to have a way to repay the loan, or the lender keeps the asset. If Harry is liquidating for cash, an auction might raise more money for him, but what a fool if he does that. Maybe he can ask Chas to cosign the loan for him, but if I were Chas, I'd check to make sure the Duke wasn't trying to borrow against his inheritance, too, lol.
________________________________________

Hmm.

Even so, doesn't it still run out eventually??
Nelo said…
@Nutty, Catylin Jenner said last year that Kylie spends 400k every month on security alone, that is over 4.2 million a year just on security. That is twice what Charles gives the Sussexes every year.

From every indication, the Sussexes are likely to spend more than Kylie on security, so let us have that at the back of our minds. It means what Charles is giving them yearly can only offset half of their security costs alone. Just half. Trust me, they are already spending from their savings like everyone else and the lock down in LA is going to extend to the end of May. That means more expenses for them without any income. That is why Meg is desperate and is putting out advertisements saying she wants to do Japanese ads and is shopping for an interview. They are spending a lot but they are not getting any single income except what Charles is giving them which doesn't even cover their security costs if we go by how much Kylie spends on hers. Their money is running out. They have to keep paying for PR. They have two cases in court and they have to pay lawyers. They have to pay their household staff. Water and light bills, foodstuff, etc and somehow we are to believe that Harry's so called 40m is still intact.

TMZ said the Sussexes didn't buy the house and short of sounding like a broken record, I don't think they cannot afford it, I KNOW, that they can't afford it because they are not multi millionaires. Harry would prefer to embiggen himself by pushing the narrative that he is worth 40m dollars but he isn't. Neither is Meg worth even 2m dollars.

The highest paid actor on suits didn't even earn 40k per episode. Meg's net salary on suits per episode if you deduct taxes, agent fees etc was around 8 to 10k dollars per episode and suits filmed about 16 episodes a year.
She wasn't making much from the Tig either because she wasn't the one running the website. It was a consulting firm that was doing it.if Meg had money, she would have owned expensive jewelery or at least a house. But she didn't come into the marriage with very expensive jewelry.

The Sussexes want to live the Beyonce, Oprah Winfrey, George Clooney, Obama billionaire lifestyle but with Amber Rose, Blac Chyna and Rita Ora income. Lol. Doesn't work that way. They want to live the Uber rich lifestyle but they don't have the resources these people have. They think they deserve an opulent life that's why they are squatting in a neighborhood they can't afford.






Anonymous said…
Lt. Sorry to be dense, but long day lol. Which part runs out eventually?
Sandie said…
The folk at LSA are now rehashing conversations about the engagement interview (body language and lies told ... I love this remark: 'They said they were going to hit the ground running and be so hardworking and turned out to be the laziest royal couple ever.')

An in-depth analysis of the wedding dress has just ended (that occupied a few pages).

Did they or did they not buy Mel Gibson's house? Convincing arguments for yes and for no.

Perhaps like us, the folk at LSA are so used to extreme drama from the Harkles that we are kind of lost with this withdrawal (they have no IG to promote Meghan, there are no appearances, no pap walks, no big interview, no public service in the time of corona ... well, that foray into turning their IG into a central place for information about all things COVID-19 was bizarre and embarrassing ...!).

What are their daily lives like in lockdown in LA? I think there is a lot of conflict between them. These two are used to taking time out from each other regularly. He is going deeper and deeper into risky territory to please her and save his marriage (family, country, friends, interests, patronages ... all gone, and nothing definite in place to pay for the lifestyle she wants, which may include her own fashion label, and those are real cash consumers ...). In addition, he has insulted everything that he had in his life, for her, and burned a lot of bridges. I have a lot of experience of drug addicts at all stages and he is like a drug addict heading for rock bottom but everyone (most) is pretending that the drugs are not a problem and going along for the ride and treating it as normal (unfortunately, in Hollywood it probably is).

Plus, neither of them paint, read good books, pursue further learning, do gardening, do real cooking/baking, have anything to support via virtual meetings and calls or have beloved family to chat to regularly, like the Cambridges, have any kind of practical or intellectual hobby (which the royal family are well known for). How much avocado toast and roast chicken can one eat, wine can one drink, heavy breathing gymnastics against a bookcase can one do, yoga can one do, smoking while sunbathing by the pool can one do? ... No IG to post those pithy quotes (and by now she has found them ALL on the Internet) and house hunting virtually is just not as much fun as actually going to the places and acting like a Duchess ...
Anonymous said…
@Nutty What times of day do you generally moderate the blog? Maybe I'll only post during those time because it could keep the clean-up to a minimum, and I could still participate? It's not fair for you to wake up to this in the a.m. just because crazy happens.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Elle, Reine des Abeilles said...
Lt. Sorry to be dense, but long day lol. Which part runs out eventually?
__________________________________

Any part, when it comes to money -- even if Markle earnt 100K, or 1000K, the money would have to run out eventually, wouldn't it?
Nutty Flavor said…
@Elle, I'm on EET, Eastern European time - the time the blog is set to.

So, I generally go to bed at around 10pm Eastern European time, and get up around 7.

It's that 9-hour period when much of the mischief seems to happen.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Sleepy now, sorry … hope that when I re-visit this lovely blog, the malcontents will be gone :)
FreezeFrame said…
@Elle
@Nutty & @Stephanie_123 , re borrowing against the art, yes, he could. You can borrow against any asset provided that you can find a lender who's willing to take that risk. Lenders generally like to secure debt with things they can smash and grab if needed.

What if Harry decides to make quick money and tries to sell some letters/notes that Diana wrote to him? Or some of her clothing? Paul Burrell got in a lot of trouble doing just that (and hoarding a bunch of Diana memorabilia in his home). Evidently, there was some evidence Burrell either had possession of or alluded to that would have opened a firestorm of suspicion around the uncomfortable activities of Charles's staff (Michael Fawcett's sexual assault of a footman)

In Rebel Prince Tom Bower covered the fall out that ensued when the authorities were trying to convict Burrell... his saving grace turned out to be a recollection HMTQ mentioned in passing to Charles during the trial. (Some think that it was Charles's PR team that came up with this solution). Also worth mentioning, 6 tapes Diana recorded in practice sessions before the Bashir interview have never been located. It is believed that they contain some unflattering comments re: Charles in general and the back story of the sexual assault.
CatEyes said, No, it is a historical fact that Harry lost his mother at age 12 and as an earlier poster pointed out, Harry can barely remember his mother.

The reason why that poster said Harry could barely remember his Mother was because they thought he was 6 when she died. I was the one that stated he was a few days off his 13th birthday, so in fact he would have had a lot of memories of her. It was simply Megsy playing havoc with his mental state that caused him to say ridiculous things, like he can barely remember her. Tragic.
Anonymous said…
Nutty, that makes it easy enough. I'll just post at night owl times and quit screwing around during the day avoiding all the stuff I should be doing (and that's a lot of stuff lol). Maybe that will help because I do seem to be the current target. If you think it might work, I'll give it a try. I really don't want to leave, but I really would if it would help avoid the descent into madness. Today felt like it was directed by David Lynch, only things missing were a red room and a llama.


And @Lt., yep, the money eventually runs out and loans eventually have to be repaid or at least refinanced, and my guess is that every time they'd refi, they'd need more, more, more so that they can pay off the loan and then borrow more on top of it. Without some serious cash flow, how do they do that? And IDK what Harry will inherit from HMTQ, but I think it's safe to say Wills won't be the Cash Flow King of Rache's dreams.
Off topic for Ava C try Sainsbury’s they have delivery slots. They emailed the vulnerable and elderly and give them priority delivery slots. You are able to contact them, the info is on their website.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Off topic for Ava C My tiny local community has a FB page which will collect prescriptions, buy food and give all kinds of useful local contacts for anything one would need. If you are on FB, I’d strongly suggest looking for your local group and ask to join.
Ava: Off Topic -I hunted without success for Tesco slots in afternoons & evenings for 3 weeks. Tried at 9am yesterday - Success!
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Off topik:



 Raspberry Ruffle said...

Off topic for Ava C try Sainsbury’s they have delivery slots. They emailed the vulnerable and elderly and give them priority delivery slots. You are able to contact them, the info is on their website.


I heard elderly people's groceries were getting stolen in England. If you're expecting a grocery delivery, watch your porch.

Not trying to scare anyone. Just saying. People are nuts.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Indeed. Same here in America. Stay on top of it. Ask them to call you on the phone when they arrive.
@Scandi I heard elderly people's groceries were getting stolen in England. If you're expecting a grocery delivery, watch your porch.

Not heard of that one, a supermarket delivery is quite a bit different you need to open the door and be there, even though strict social distancing is observed. What you’re stating sounds like small items or small amounts left near someone’s door when they might not don’t know.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Elle, Reine des Abeilles said..

And @Lt., yep, the money eventually runs out and loans eventually have to be repaid or at least refinanced, and my guess is that every time they'd refi, they'd need more, more, more so that they can pay off the loan and then borrow more on top of it. Without some serious cash flow, how do they do that? And IDK what Harry will inherit from HMTQ, but I think it's safe to say Wills won't be the Cash Flow King of Rache's dreams.
_______________________________________

@Elle,

One thing Americans don't understand is that a lot, if not most, of the Queen's *wealth* is in things that belong to the United Kingdom, like art treasures etc. She can't *convert* it into cash.

Prince Charles doesn't have an unlimited ATM as people think he does. Therefore, neither does Harry. Am I right?
@Scandi, I should add that you chose a time slot, so you know when they are due too, some send a text to let you know they are near by, and/or ring the door bell. 🤗
Scandi Sanskrit said…
I gave up on the groceries stores with time slots!! 😂😂

I just do the mom&pops shops that list their stores on Indonesian equivalent to Amazon & pray for the best~ ✨☄🙏🏼🤣

We put a sign up letting courier guys leave our packages on the porch now (after one time a delivery guy looked visibly scared when my dad tried to tip him).

Sorry I'll stop being off-topic now. I know this isn't the virus blog.
Ava C: Have you tried Iceland They are delivering only to the `vulnerable' but it includes the over 70s, who are all supposed to be shut in. There's a declaration to be made.

Can you get it ordered in your father's name?

Their stock is limited but I did get the fresh food I ordered.

I think the key to Tesco ordering may be to try early morning.

Back on topic When I was considering self-employment once, I read the easiest way to get a small fortune is to start with a large one.
Anonymous said…
@Lt., re this Prince Charles doesn't have an unlimited ATM as people think he does. Therefore, neither does Harry. Am I right?

Chas made $28.1 million from the Duchy last year, so I think he's got decent cash flow. You're right, though, that a lot of what they have belongs to GB, but I think the cash is pretty solid, too, and of course, they even have the requisite off-shore accounts, so I don't think we'll have to take up a collection for any of them. Now, whether Harry is going to be able to tap that, that's a whole other question.

Weekittylass said…
FFS shut up Cat Eyes. You’re the type of Christian that turns people into atheists.
Weekittylass said…
Nutty, reading through Cat Eye’s posts, they look suspiciously like a poster who got kicked off TamaraTattles for the same garbage. Her username was Cat. You might want to shoot TT an email. She dealt with her quite effectively.
Remember folks, we're all entitled to our opinions, even if they irritate others.

If you disagree with someone, there's no need to chuck oil on the fire.

If must answer, draft out your response, then think and think again, and cut half of it out before you press `publish'.

Ask yourself -

-is my post going to poke some of the bears out there?

-is this a measured response or am I simply reacting?

- am I making things worse?

-am I guilty of what I criticise others for?.

-am I coming over as intolerant?

These are difficult times for everyone. The cat-fights are distressing to the rest of us.

Regarding Chas & Di - nobody ever really knows what goes between a couple - and very often the couple are clueless as well.
SwampWoman said…
There have been many crazy eruptions here under different "names" which are, IMO, the same author. Once I have their number, I just scroll past. No point in reading or engaging, y'all.
@WBBM, having self governing rules before commenting is fine, but if you have people who don’t want to or don’t think they’re saying anything wrong, those rules just don’t work.

I’ve noticed patterns on this blog like Elle has, and I noticed very early on. It’s probably wiser just not to engage with certain posters (and scroll past) , but everyone would need to adhere to that mindset for it to work,
@ Raspberry Ruffle:

Quite.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Oops, sorry, WBBM! And Nutty!
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
Ugh -- how can I edit out all those spaces? Or anything, for that matter?
@Lt. Uhura,
My posts do that occasionally, and I'm not sure why. I don't think there is any way that you can fix it, except to delete it and re-post.
Lt. Nyota Uhura said…
JocelynsBellinis said...
@Lt. Uhura,
My posts do that occasionally, and I'm not sure why. I don't think there is any way that you can fix it, except to delete it and re-post.
_____________________

Thanks, JocelynsBellinis -- How do I delete, then? (Woefully ignorant of the ways of Blogger)
KCM1212 said…
@lt. Units

Is there a tiny trash can under your post?

I don't know how to edit, but That will delete it.

New post up
KCM1212 said…
Blasted autocorrect.

I'm sorry Uhura, that post was directed to you
CatEyes said…
@Rasberry Ruffle said...

>>>CatEyes said, No, it is a historical fact that Harry lost his mother at age 12 and as an earlier poster pointed out, Harry can barely remember his mother.

The reason why that poster said Harry could barely remember his Mother was because they thought he was 6 when she died. I was the one that stated he was a few days off his 13th birthday, so in fact he would have had a lot of memories of her. It was simply Megsy playing havoc with his mental state that caused him to say ridiculous things, like he can barely remember her. Tragic.
April 13, 2020 at 10:04 AM <<<<

Yes it could have been a poster saying that but I have also read the same thing, a direct quote from Harry stating he "does not remember much about his mother". I think, yes it is possible Meghan may have feed Harry awful things to mess with his seemingly feeble mind.
But the premise is the same, Harry does not remember Diana so her most pronounced effect on him seems little IMO. I think Harry has deep seated feelings based on a myriad of reasons some of which may be his resentment about William becoming King and he has been treated 'as a spare'. It is a shame as it did appear he had a close relationship with William and Kate.
Fahlina Speaks said…
The only "check" these two are receiving is a much needed reality check...
CatEyes said…
@Nutty

>>>>Nutty Flavor said…
@Elle, I'm sorry that you seem to be the target of this situation, as @Tatty once was.

None of this is your fault. It is one troubled person, acting out.
April 13, 2020 at 9:01 AM<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

If you were referring to me, you are entirely wrong! Elle started attacking me over and over, fomenting anger with other posters to bully me. You have condoned this behavior by doing nothing to stop it then promoting it by making the statement above to the ring leader of the abuse. Many will not forget how Tatty started insulting your posters way before she did it to me. I just took a stand to prevent the abuse and slander in writing. Now you condone Elle's slander in writing again. Just an incredible violation of the Google's Term of Service.
AnnabelleHector said…
Camilla did not meet the remit for being a virgin and did not come from aristocracy (unlike lady Diana Spencer, whose pedigree proved to be more royal that Charles”!) She was a commoner. By the laws of the land Charles was not permitted to marry Camilla (as a divorcee,) and was only legally permitted to marry Camilla on Diana’s death, as a widower.
Constitutionally, when Charles takes the throne, Camilla WILL be his Queen by law, and nothing can change this, it is just an indisputable fact and was always the plan, after gradually ingratiating Camilla into the Royal family and seeking public acceptance over time
Oldest Older 401 – 447 of 447

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids