Skip to main content

Has Meghan's moment passed?

I was out to dinner with an acquaintance this past weekend, a woman in her 20s visiting from the USA.

We spoke about the various events in the news, and when a celebrity name came up in the conversation, she said, "I just don't care about celebrities any more."

Speaking of celebrities - or would-be celebrities - it's a tough time to be Meghan Markle, whom according to a hopeful headline in today's Daily Mail, is the most talked about woman in the world.


A devalued currency

Meg doesn't have much to sell besides fame, but that currency has suddenly been sharply devalued.

Many people are wrapped up in political topics, and many are also struggling with their household budgets or their health during COVID times.

Does anyone care about a woman who doesn't seem to accomplish much, her husband who definitely doesn't accomplish much, and their child who may or may not exist?


Three books on the way

There are apparently three books about Meghan on the way - one by Lady Colin Campbell that will be published very soon, one by Omid Scobie (written with Harry and Meghan's input) due in August and a newly-announced one by Sunday Times writer Sean Smith set for publication in November. 

A separate book about the feud between Harry and William, due for release in October, will inevitably touch on the Meghan drama.

But the world is moving on quickly. Will there still be an audience for these books by the time they're published?

The Mulroneys are Markled

Ben Mulroney is "stepping down" (was terminated from?) a job on Canadian television, supposedly due to his wife's feud with a Black influencer. 

Based on his short "struggle session" video, Ben seems insufferable, but in general I don't think it's fair for people to be punished for what their spouses get up to. 

Perhaps Ben has some other incident in his background that we haven't been privy to, or maybe CTV wanted to make a change for other reasons and this was a good excuse.

Meghan's failure to stand up for either of the Mulroneys won't benefit her in the long run, however. 

She appears to be quickly running out of friends.


Comments

E said…
Since I'm a lurker I don't always see everything that's discussed here, but does anyone here follow @torontopaper on Twitter? A lot of the posts seem consistent with what I've heard about her over the past few years. Just wondering if you all Nutties give it any weight at all??
Grisham said…
@JL Andrew was a bruiser as a baby. Diana’s fine bone structure is not the only one at play here. Have you seen Thomas Markle? Look at Andrew’s baby photos. Giant kid.
Grisham said…
E, TP never explained how Meghan and Doria became no longer arrested and confined in the tower lol
Scandi Sanskrit said…
@JL: my parents gave me a boring, super common Roman first name. (Probably the most common Catholic female name in the world, and Indonesia the Roman form is what we use as opposed to the Anglo form.) So I shortened it to its more secular, Scandinavian form when I was 19. It's a boring story about a boring name... 🤷🏻‍♀️🐈💜

@Blithe Spirit: if they're boycotting Facebook, does that mean they're boycotting Instagram too, since FB owns IG & WhatsApp? After they helped her & Mr. Just Harry Markle steal the @SussexRoyal handle from a civilian football fan?

Speaking of being derogatory toward Asians, are we really shocked at the hipocrisy of the Woke anymore? Literally someone on CDAN who's as anti-Trump as Meghan is acted like a jingoist/supremacist toward me today!! 😂😂😽 She sounded like she wanted a Wall more than Trump does, described foreigners as "clamoring" to enter the US. Said all sorts of nasty things about Indonesia, yet she can't even accept an election result like an actual citizen of a civilised democracy. ("If Trump gets elected, I'm moving to Canada where I'll be safe under the protection of totes not-and-never-evar-racist Justin Trudeau." 🤣🤣) I wasn't even trolling her I swear. She just got all triggered on her own. Woke Meghan married a Nazi uniform-wearing 1984-born man & together they will lead the BLM movement & take hateful Facebook down. Sure.
Fairy Crocodile said…
@ SKANDI SANSKRIT

didn't instagram refuse to simply transfer all subscribers to their new account when they had to drop the sussex royal? It is against ig policy to do so.

Undoubtedly susSex duo has a huge axe to grind because of that. They are pretty enough and stupid enough.
Grisham said…
As an aside, Charles Spencer appears to have been a giant baby also: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/420382946452142524/
Jenx said…
@E. I follow TP.i think they know things and that they are taunting her. I wouldn't blindly accept everything they say but it is good fun.
lucy said…
@Scandi I am going to guess your given name is Mary. I haven't been to cdan in couple weeks now, site is nearly impossible to load. I do recall interacting with you over there. I remember telling you I thought you were quirky and fun and you should start your own youtube channel, had to be a couple years ago now and no idea of context of conversation other than that but if you remember, that was me, hi! :)

Bless you ladies and your Zoom meetings I could never do that! Conference calls sucked the life out of me, couldn't imagine being On Screen on top of it

I am one of those too that wash their hair every day. On lockdown I didnt and just a greasy mess. I even had free sample of dry shampoo and that proved no help whatsoever

I get Meg wanting to birth an immediate heir but still struggle to grasp why they decided to pull biggest con ever with fake pregnancy. I suppose if only for all eyes to be on Her for 10 months. Crazy
Grisham said…
I don’t know about the pregnancy con, but it’s clear to me that IF there was a surrogate, the entire RF (I mean, HM, PP, C+C, W+K) is complicit in the knowledge of it.
Grisham said…
*are (subject/verb disagreement) Saharan dust is getting to me...
Blithe Spirit said…
@Scandi Sanskrit,

Yes, let's see if they can bring themselves to boycott IG. Not holding my breath.

Sorry you had to deal with that hateful racism. Wilful ignorance and arrogance masquerading as 'woke' warriors are some of the most toxic elements out there.

@Tatty
I don't think you can determine parentage based on a one-year olds looks. Sorry. If you put my adult niece in a room full of other young women and asked to pick out her parents, you'd pick my sister and her husband every time. Its so obvious. Her infant pictures on up she's the spitting image of the two of them. The only problem is, she was adopted. Yep, not a drop of common blood.

Just saying be careful in declaring parentage based on looks.
E said…
Thanks all for answering. I agree with the taunting, based on her pre-JH exploits. I was especially intrigued with TP's Harvey insinuations--which would not surprise me at all if they were true
Grisham said…
@musty I agree. I was responding to a comment about how Archie appears to not have any of Diana’s features. Maybe he will. Maybe he won’t. The Mountbattens,Spencers and Markles all have giant chunky babies in their lineage, so it makes sense that Archie is a giant chunky baby. (Whether real, a doll, a borrowed actor baby or their own child).

My sister’s children look more like they should be my children than my own children.....
I agree on the royal source being Zara.
KC said…
Here is some stuff i had copied to a note from the Kindle version of Lady C's bio of the Queen Mother. The first is so.ething her mother or grandmother told her. Then there is an observation quoted from The Final Curtsey by Margaret Rhodes,niece to QM and cousin to Queen.

1
‘work is the rent you pay for life’ and ‘life is for living and working at. If anything or anyone bores you, then the fault is in yourself.’ These would stand her in good stead with the adult Elizabeth, but for the moment she limited herself to those maxims as well as the one which would ensure that her youngest daughter would have good posture: ‘Never look at your feet.’

2

As her niece Margaret Rhodes observes in her memoir, The Final Curtsey, Elizabeth could not be hurried.

Whether it was the threat of bombs raining down on them during an air raid at Windsor Castle, or something more mundane, such as accepting a proposal she had been angling for, she functioned at her own sweet pace. No one and nothing were permitted to alter that pace. This stillness was both extremely passively aggressive and effective, for it forced everyone and everything to adjust their tempo to hers. In so doing, she silently asserted that their will was subservient to hers. This gave her a tremendous subliminal advantage in her negotiations with others, for, whether they were aware of it or not, once they had adjusted their speed to hers, they were actually declaring that they had surrendered their will to hers.
lucy said…
Cleaning up my bookmarks and for whatever reason I had this in there.. Figured I would share prior to deletion.

Ladies and Gents I present the previously known as Her Royal Highness and current Duchess of Sussex, sleeping on a borrowed couch in LA, Meghan Markle


https://66.media.tumblr.com/20e6565ff544458506b609d371aeaa6c/72ce45aba0def596-9f/s400x600/6f2c104e4bb2cef2c50cb6e495a23b81990377e5.gifv
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bennie said…
@Willie'sNucket...
I just wrote them the other day about my order & here's the reply they sent me! Hope this helps!


Siviwe Combo (Book Depository)
Jun 26, 2020, 10:06 AM GMT+1

Hi Bennie,

Thank you for the lovely feedback! we appreciate you and your loyalty.

Your order is currently awaiting publication and is due to be released on
Publication date 28 Jun 2020

It will be dispatched to you shortly after this date as soon as we have received it from our supplier.
Kind regards,

Siviwe Combo
Customer Advisor
Hikari said…
@Wullie's,

Has anyone else in the US ordered Lady C's book from the Book Depository in the UK? I just checked on the status of my order of the hard copy of the book and was surprised to see it still listed as "Awaiting Publication". Does anyone have any thoughts or insight on what may be happening? I thought it would have been shipped out by now.

I've got my copy on order from them, too. While in this time of Covid anything is possible, I would not panic.

Booksellers (and libraries) are obliged to abide by the 'Street Date'--the official day of publication--before they are allowed to display the item or sell it. I would assume this extends also to shipping. On my Book Depository account the status on my order says 'Shipping 6/28'. Which is a Sunday, but they must be working double-time to fufill all the orders. Techinically they are still 'Awaiting Publication' if the official UK street date isn't until Sunday or Monday.

I used to work in a music store, where Tuesday was 'drop day' on the new releases and we were not allowed to display any of those items until the open of business on Tuesday, even if we had received them prior. I think books are the same, in the U.S., though UK publishers might have a different day of the week. Tuesday was selected to drive retail traffic to the stores at the beginning of the week when things are normally very slow.

Now that I work in a library, we get boxes of new releases from publishers with a 'Do Not Display Until xx/xx/xx" on them. I've heard a few contradictory dates for the UK release and I know some Nutties have already received theirs. The BD website might not have been updated since it's the weekend. I am looking forward to getting my copy next week so I hope there are no snafus, though shipping internationally may be delayed right now. I am consciously avoiding reading too many excerpts until I get my own copy. I don't want to spoil all the tea before I even get it!
Bennie said…
@Wullie'sBucket

Apologies....I meant to type @Wullie'sBucket!
lucy said…
oooooooo I sure hope you all receive soon! Sure looks like a doozie !!!!

https://the-best-soap-opera-ever.tumblr.com/post/621998833031888896/hey-soap-im-back-with-more-from-the-book-this
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Piroska said…
@Wullie'sBucket -If you are in US how did you come by that name? I had completely forgotten about OO Wullie and hus compatriots The Broons - I loved both when I was younger - until I saw you on this blog.

Cannot think of anything to say about MM apart from according to DM she expects to make £1000000 per speking engagement - obviously thinks she is worth more than Obamas
Piroska said…
Oor Wullie his compatriots speaking arthritis in hands causing problems again
Girl with a Hat said…
I am reading Lady Colin Campbell's book. I am into chapter 2 and I am not impressed.

She paints Markle as being a helpful person to classmates but I've heard many rumours that Meghan was the school bully and many had to leave the school because they couldn't stand the bad treatment they received at her hands.

Also,the videos of her ordering around her little friends at her friend's birthday party leads me to believe that Meghan wasn't the little humanitarian she was painted to be.

Disappointed in LCC
Jenx said…
@girlwithahat Keep reading...
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
SwampWoman said…
Cannot think of anything to say about MM apart from according to DM she expects to make £1000000 per speking engagement - obviously thinks she is worth more than Obamas.

Wow, that sounds quite delusional to me. Whenever I've attended some large conference with various motivational speakers, it was either somebody that has some very impressive business building creds or somebody that persevered through incredible odds to conquer in their chosen field. Charities can't pay that amount; corporations can line up a lot of very talented people that actually have useful things to say.

If she had 20 years' worth of successful experience in building businesses/brands and was a great speaker that was capable of imparting the knowledge about how to go forth and conquer to the people listening, maybe.
SwampWoman said…
It sounds like Lady C may have fallen for the version of Markle's school days that some of her teachers tell.

If she's as big a nutcase as I think she is, could be that the teachers don't want to have targets locked on themselves. Look at the mass craziness that has gone on here when people were just discussing the book. I think the crazy would be amped up x 1,000.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Girl with a Hat said…
tell me if you think if you think Markle is attractive in this photo

https://twitter.com/Reashelby1/status/1276975765498867712/photo/1
Piroska said…
And yet another Megs and Harry book
Royals At War: The Inside Story of Harry and Meghan's Shocking Split With the House of Windsor details the couple's struggles moving to LA
The new book is by Andy Tillett and Dylan Howard and it comes out on Tuesday
It also details Meghan Markle's determination 'to always get what she wants'
Piroska said…
@Wullie'sBucket Thank you - Did not have any of the annuals but my parents always read Scottish Sunday Post as did I until I moved to London
none said…
@Girl with a Hat ~ That's quite a difference in arm length on Markle. Her nose looks like the original one. Very odd photo.
gfbcpa said…
I have not received my hard copy either. As I said in a previous post, I ordered through bookdepository.com and I find their service slow based on past experience. I also ordered Royals at War from amazon, which is due to be released on 6/30. Amazon is pretty fast where I live.
@Piroska re Royals At War: The Inside Story of Harry and Meghan's Shocking Split With the House of Windsor...

Have you read any excepts of it? I have, it reads more like a supportive piece overall of them. The cover says A Stunning Expose: InTouch from my understanding InTouch is no better than People or The Enquirer magazines. I’m hoping some of our American Nutties can clarify. ;o)
Miz Malaprop said…
@Raspberry Ruffle

From the Daily Mail

'Meghan has always been fascinated with the creation of a 'brand,'' a former friend told the authors. 'I do not believe she married Harry with that solely in mind, but it was a determining factor.'

I guess the other determining factor was the wealth?
Girl with a Hat said…
@Holly

I was shocked to see her in this photo. I know she isn't as tall as she would like us to believe, but this photo shows her to be very short and disproportionate. I am shocked by her appearance.

I always find that truly unattractive women over compensate for their lack of feminine appeal, but to think that Harry found such a woman attractive enough to marry boggles the mind.
@ Miz Malaprop,

I read the DM’s piece and then looked the book up on Amazon, I wasn’t impressed overall . It doesn’t have positive things to say about the Cambridge’s. I just don’t consider InTouch to be great journalism or to understand a British perspective. :o/
lucy said…
LOL @girl with hat regarding that pic! What the heck. I don't have twitter but you should respond you think her bracelets are now in the potato salad!

That is what I am missing with charlatan duchess gone all the awful pics and snark. We need more! More! More!
hunter said…
Wow, and to imagine people used to complain about tatty - this is off the charts.

Hi @Christine! Welcome to our little zone, it didn't used to be so bad.
lucy said…
Sorry I keep forgetting to put name on (every post I made today?)

*lucy
Hi All
Just thinking about what people are saying re the possibility of a surrogate and did TRF know about it. Possibly an out for them if it is ever reliably confirmed could be along the lines of
“We didnt know about til after the fact (either conception or birth). After discussions with our (appropriate) medical people it was concluded that as a mental health issue best advice was to play along while helping them adjust to reality. If they didnt want to be kind to Megan it could be along the lines of to protect Hs mental health and his physical health if M was going to take it out on him.

Your thought?

On a side note found this while I was looking for extracts

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/james-weir-reality-of-harry-and-meghans-unfortunate-fate/news-story/1922cc5f470d6653ccd839796f4e879b#bottom-share

My favourite para is

They had plans, they said. BIG plans. And what were those plans exactly? Basically to remain famous and have money flow into their bank accounts from … somewhere. Sounds fool proof. I’m kinda annoyed my accountant hasn’t hooked me up on this same financial plan.
Miggy said…
@Girl With a Hat,

I echo what @Jenx said... KEEP READING!! :)
lucy said…
I really believe TRF will always have an out regarding surrogacy. Disappointing it has gone on this long but to see things from their perspective I honestly do not think any of them were prepared for this level of lunacy

Big tell will be how their "year of review" is handled. That to me is make or break time

At some point respect will be lost, they are full on enabling all this and how pathetic it is to read headlines of Charles juggling money to fund them? They both are entirely shameless. I could not imagine asking my dad for $100 let alone millions to fund my unemployed adventures

Good on them for at least seeking their speaking engagements to earn a few bucks but how realistic is that? What in the world do they have to offer? People clamoring to hear them speak of _____?
Nutty Flavor said…
Wow, more than 1000 comments! It’s late here, but I will put up a new post in the morning.
lucy said…
Yay! She is alive! Hopefully partying like a rockstar during hot summer nights and Nutty Dee swirling her post on top of backyard pool, spritz of perfume maybe

GREAT seeing you!
none said…
@Girl with a Hat ~ I read some of the comments and one has an enlarged picture of Markle from the waist down and makes a good case for a photoshop. Especially on the outside of her pant legs. She really does look very unimpressive though. Like a before the makeover pic.
Midge said…
The pap walks,the unsolicited visits,the letters, new releases - sounds a little like desperation to me.
lucy said…
@miggy and much of that costs money, what are they even pulling in? Curious as to what their personal profit and loss looks like. Maybe we will catch it on Meghan's Mirror. New tiny earrings vs DM bill

Have a wonderful evening all!!!!
Girl with a Hat said…
@holly, I hope it is photoshop because I would feel bad making fun of someone who is so obviously deformed.
Sandie said…
@Swampwoman might have hit on a fundamental truth in calling Meghan a nutcase. She knows cameras are capturing every nuance and angle yet for someone concerned with optics she is reckless. Crazy does explain a lot. A few examples: Her behaviour at Wimbledon was bizarre and would only be supported by crazy Meghan fans, one of whom her and Harry spoke to as part of PR. Barging through chairs in the Abbey in an event that was planned to the second was a bizarre lack of control. Gatecrashing the honours ceremony at BP while taking a shortcut was a k nowing major rudeness to the very person giving them an income of millions. I am sure folk here can think of many more examples. it is more than hubris, bad manners, entitlement, and so on; it is not reasonable, rational or normal, and all the more bizarre from an experienced actor.
Mel said…
Another example of rudeness: Did she really think no one was going to notice her thumping H, t to let her go first, multiple times?
CatEyes said…
Maybe the BRF was trying to think of the 'best interests of the child' (meaning Archie not Harry, lol) by obscuring the surrogacy. I know it hard for us to give them a pass since it seems that Meghan and Harry committed a fraud upon the public, if a surrogacy indeed is true. But in the end, it should be the child whose privacy and interests be protected over even the interests of the Crown IMO.

I would like to know if the child is biologically Harry's but it's none of my damn business as an American. It may be the UK public has some viable reason for knowing since it could affect the line of succession in the respected and valued institution which the BRF is to its people. Overall I am trying to be charitable rather than give in to curiosity about someone's private affairs.
CatEyes said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
HappyDays said…
Piroska said…
And yet another Megs and Harry book
Royals At War: The Inside Story of Harry and Meghan's Shocking Split With the House of Windsor details the couple's struggles moving to LA
The new book is by Andy Tillett and Dylan Howard and it comes out on Tuesday
It also details Meghan Markle's determination 'to always get what she wants'.

@Piroska: From reading the DM article, it doesn’t sound like Meghan is being portrayed in a flattering light at all. The pull quotes from the book that made it into this article make Meghan sound like the toxic narcissist most of us know she is.

I think it is more negative than positive about Meghan, and the quotes about Harry cast him correctly as dim-witted and weak minded. I still think things will not end well for him, but I hope it happens after a divorce so Meghan won’t be able to portray herself as a victim and become a professional widow while retaining her title for the remainder of her life. I can easily see her professing some word salad as she suddenly becomes the hollowest of anti-drug and suicide prevention campaigners as she professes her love for someone she didn’t care a rip about as she hops from man to man and bed to bed around the world.
Grisham said…
It looks like those of us in the US can get this new book on Tuesday.
The Cat's Meow said…
UGH....
Apparently there are going to be dueling Bond premieres on each side of the Atlantic....

https://www.thesun.co.uk/uncategorized/11972489/princes-bond-battle-bosses-hollywood-premiere/
HappyDays said…
Hi All,

Here’s the New York Post’s take on the new book coming out next week. I know how to create a link on this blog, so you’ll need to copy and paste the URL below. With the virus seemingly ramping up again here in the States and hitting California hard, the Harkles may be in lockdown until sometime in the fall if things don’t get better soon.

If anything happens to his grandparents, especially PP, Harry will only have himself to blame because he is too weak and fearful to blame any of his predicament on Meghan.

Meghan Markle desperate to fix Prince Harry’s coronavirus ‘cabin fever’
By Jane Ridley
https://nypost.com/2020/06/27/meghan-markle-desperate-to-fix-harrys-coronavirus-cabin-fever/
Scandi Sanskrit said…
To the person above who said they're getting "Awaiting Publication" on bookdepository.Com: that's because it hasn't been released yet. You pre-ordered it. I don't recommend pre-ordering stuff on BD, by the way. Unlike Amazon, you don't get to pay the cheapest price as it fluctuates before release. It's default setting for to-be-released items is 10% off & then on th release date, the price will usually drop somewhat. You end up spending more by ordering PO.

 Fairy Crocodile said...

@ SKANDI SANSKRIT

didn't instagram refuse to simply transfer all subscribers to their new account when they had to drop the sussex royal? It is against ig policy to do so.


Really now? I had no idea about that policy. The thing is, I've seen people change their usernames while I follow them. I mean why can't they just "restart" the account (delete all their posts after backing them up & posting from zero). They can keep their followers that way. I'm all kind of shocked they'd declare boycotting Facebook. But then again we're talking about someone so short-sighted she quit being a royal to be n'a actress in LA again. I was telling someone on CDAN the other day: she must have some type of subconscious self-sabotage issue going on...

Blithe Spirit said...

@Scandi Sanskrit,

Yes, let's see if they can bring themselves to boycott IG. Not holding my breath.

Sorry you had to deal with that hateful racism. Wilful ignorance and arrogance masquerading as 'woke' warriors are some of the most toxic elements out there.


Eh, I'm used to Americans being condescending toward Indonesia... 🤷🏻‍♀️🐈💜 Though I will day one was particularly vicious!! , I'm more amused that she thinks she's a Leftie! 😂😂 I love it when Wokies reveal themselves to be the real bigoted ones. Says more about them than it says about me... 🍹

Unknown said...

@Scandi I am going to guess your given name is Mary. I haven't been to cdan in couple weeks now, site is nearly impossible to load. I do recall interacting with you over there. I remember telling you I thought you were quirky and fun and you should start your own youtube channel, had to be a couple years ago now and no idea of context of conversation other than that but if you remember, that was me, hi! :)

Maria actually. It's so common I have no issue stating it on anonymous blogs because like 10% of the world's female population is named some variation of Mary. Lol... The Scandinavian diminutive is less used... Also thank you for your kind words at CDAN. If you can't get it to load use this link: https://disqus.com/home/forum/crazydaysandnights1/

Hope everyone's having a good weekend/Sunday so far!! 🍹💜💜

@Nutty_Flavor: hey Nutty!!~
Girl with a Hat said…
In articles announcing that new book, there is mention about that argument prior to the wedding, the one that made Catherine cry. The author said that the argument was about the titles given to the royal children not about stockings.

Interesting....
@Nutty,

Good of you to stop by your own blog. If you read your blog's comments, you'll notice that a great amount of the "Wow, more than 1000 posts!" have been made by people causing serious problems on your blog, not posts made by serious or long-time posters. Many of your wonderful regular readers have left because of the hundreds of comments made by people spewing the worst kind of vitriol.

And all we get from you is "Wow! More than 1000 posts," as if that is a good thing. You're smart enough to know that quality is more important than quantity, Nutty.

I know that people will say that if I don't like the way you've run your blog, to just leave, so that's what I'm doing after your so care-free post, congratulating yourself on getting more than 1,000 comments. You show no real interest in helping your regular readers to have a decent place to post. You don't even engage with your readers anymore, and have been absent and completely silent far more than you've taken the time even check on your own blog to clean out the hatred that has been spewed here in recent days.

I had hoped that once you decided to blithely pop in to check your own blog, you'd be horrified by what has been happening here, but all we get from you is "Wow! More than 1,000 posts!" That is really a slap in the face to your faithful commenters who have been with you since your first announcement of this blog on CDAN.

I know that as a reporter, you can bang out your blog subject posts in less than 10 minutes, and then you leave, with no concern as to what has been happening here- on your own blog, and that is pure neglect. If you're too busy to properly admin a blog, perhaps you're too busy to have one.

So, as so many of your other regular, long-time posters have, I'm leaving your blog, too. Hopefully, you will take some interest in your blog in the future, and it will return to the great blog it once was. Your neglect has ruined your own blog, Nutty. Now you have just a handful of posters trying to keep your blog afloat.

I will miss the few wonderful posters that have remained here, and I certainly do miss the many great posters who have already left. Best wishes to all of you.


Girl with a Hat said…
@Jocelyn, give it a rest.

Nutty gave us a blog. She doesn't have to be a police person.

If people leave, that's too bad. There are worse things in life, so stop acting like they were murdered. This blog is for fun and that includes Nutty. Honestly... who do you think you are, scolding her like that?
Aquagirl said…
In terms of The Disastrous Duo’s potential speaking engagements....who the heck would want to see/hear them speak? I wouldn’t. They have absolutely nothing to offer.

I just spoke to a friend who plans meetings/conferences. She works with various trade associations and normally travels a great deal. Often to Florida, the Bahamas, etc. She said that everything is canceled until at least December. She’s been constantly doing Zoom calls, but there will be absolutely no travel until December, and I honestly believe that it will be postponed beyond that. She is not at the level where she would pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a speaker, but I just wanted to note that, for a person who is always planning & overseeing events, absolutely nothing will be happening until next year.

Hopefully there will be a divorce by then.
Shaggy said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Aquagirl said…
As far as this blog, people come, people go, just like a lot of things in life. Everyone has a choice. I choose to stay, not engage, and block the offensive posts. It works for me. Nutty is not a kindergarten teacher, and she has every right to enjoy these long summer days.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Grisham said…
I’m sorry but MM and this blog are really not that important. Nutty gave us a place to hang out. The rest is irrelevant really. She doesn’t need to come by and police us.
Girl with a Hat said…
good riddance to entitled people who feel they can demand the kindness and time of strangers.

TLT said…
I haven’t posted in a while, but I read faithfully. I appreciate this venue Nutty has given us, and I do not believe it’s her job to play babysitter or clean up crew. It’s easy enough to scroll past and ignore a post you don’t like. Many of us do it. I wouldn’t expect a grown woman with a job and life to waste time every day and go through hundreds of comments to delete ones that can be easily ignored. She doesn’t have to provide this place for us. Let’s be grateful she does. It’s clear other things are occupying her time. Would you rather she not create new posts until she can spend more time moderating? Considering how we all were worried last weekend, I’d think the answer is a resounding no.

As for MM and JH, it sure seems they’re no longer dipping their toes into politics. They’re wading in Will HM tolerate it?
Jenx said…
Anyway folks. The disruptors have disrupted and seemed to have moved onto other things, for the most part. Tumblr had similar issues. The fact remains that anything to do with criticising madam will have to endure this because that is what they do to try to shut people down. It happens on Twitter, it happens on YouTube. It is the nature of the beast that is MM. So, as JH would say, "suck it up" (lolz) and continue the fun and be grateful Nutty created this space. It certainly has kept me grounded through this crazy ride! TTFN.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Girl with a Hat said…
Unknown, Nutty doesn't have to do anything she doesn't want to.

If you really can't live without this type of discussion, I suggest you start your own blog and run it as you see fit instead of placing your own sense of obligation onto a complete stranger.
Unknown said…
Girl with a Hat said...
Unknown, Nutty doesn't have to do anything she doesn't want to.

If you really can't live without this type of discussion, I suggest you start your own blog and run it as you see fit instead of placing your own sense of obligation onto a complete stranger.
...........

I expressed my opinion which I am entitled to do and have not placed any sort of obligation on anyone.
It's clear to me there is something preventing Nutty from engaging the way she used to and it's also clear the blog has suffered for it. Those are facts.

I would suggest you take your own advice since as I already pointed out you are behaving in a hypocritical manner by ordering the blog to stop arguing and then engaging in nasty aggressive posts yourself. If you can't live with a chaotic blog then I would suggest you start your own instead of barking at the troll colony in an unmanned forum.
CatEyes said…
@JocelynsBellinis

I agree with what you say but what is ironic is that at least the disruptors have left me alone for like 3/4 day. I hesitate to say it is a permanent fix, but I tried (again) to 'Not engage" as Nutties demanded and at least I have not been slammed. I hope but hesitate to think it is permanent though. Unfortunately, my sleuthing and analysis gave me the identity of who the 'Unknown' is; she is posing as 'Fake 'CatEyes','HapsburgHaunted', 'CatEars' and the poster who caused most of the disruption on the Virus blog. Iam deliberately giving the persona a free pass because I desperately want the temporary peace to continue and the blog to be better permanently.

However the bigger issue is exactly what you pointed out, that Nutty doesn't moderate the blog; she does not seem invested in it anymore. I was shocked at how recently the blog was inoperable for 4-5 days and she didn't realize it. She didn't notice because she wasn't paying attention.

Everyone has been complaining about the awful infighting (similar to what happened on her Virus blog). I have no strong indication why this person 'Unknown; is trying to cause the collapse of Nutty's 2nd blog when it appears personal against me. I was not involved with the Virus blog rabid infighting. I have asked and no Nuttie who was on the Virus blog will say any details on the details of its demise. But one thing is sure, Nutty did not intervene at all and let it die.

I had hoped this brief reprieve will continue and this blog survive however if Nutty doesn't monitor it will be inevitable that problems may arise in the future with human nature being what it is. I wan this blog to continue as I do enjoy it even though these people have driven me to the brink. I have not even addressed 'xxxxx' as I am trying not to get personal and set him off. But civility and complete abstinence of insults needs to happen. In addition, posters need to quit ruminating over the problems and move on. I also get challenged on the minute things with posters demanding to explain why I like the blog or why I find it relaxing. Just give it a rest. Quit reminding everyone of arguments and just move on.

In the end, the success of this blog depends ultimately on Nutty. She needs to tell us all to abide by the Goggle Terms of Service. She needs to warn posters to stick to the topic and not be abusive or they will have their comments deleted and if repeated they will be banned.

In the end we all need to try to make a fresh start and concentrate on the topics. If posters relapse then we should ask Nutty to intervene as she is the blogspot owner and is responsible. She also shouldn't play favorites like she has in the past. That undermines goodwill and breeds discontent.

I am taking a risk writing this because these 'disruptors 'may jump on me or even the everyday Nuttie who has baited me in the last couple of days but I am risking it for the sake of the general good..to save this blog!
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Margery said…
@Scandi Sanskrit,

I think the IG issue is all about control and not giving in. The Queen may have told them not to use the name Sussex Royal, but Markle is not going to give it up. Renaming the account would erase the name. Ideally, she wants a new account with all her old followers, while the Royal account remains unused, but as a memorial and a big passive aggressive shrug toward the Queen.

It must be killing her to go all this time without a social media account to disseminate her propaganda, so you can tell this is a battle she cannot bear to lose.
CatEyes said…
@Multiple Unknowns

Please don't think I am fingering you, since you all choose to use the same name. For the sake of peace at this time I am not letting on who is the troublemaker. I am altruistic and seek the greater good, survival of the blog.




.
TLT said…
@Margery I think you’re spot on. She wants the followers on a new account and she wants the Sussex shrine to remain so no one forgets “all” she did in her less than 365 royal working days.
Hikari said…
Attacks on our hostess and founder of our feast are completely unjustified and out of line. This is Nutty’s hobby, not her job nor her life. She has provided a space for our entertainment on her own time and it is our privilege to participate, not a right. She is not answerable to anyone for how she runs it. If the intent is to aggravate her so much she dismantles this blog, some of you are doing a fine job toward that goal. I’d like to call out some names but I won’t. I will only say that I am appalled at some of the vitriol directed at Nutty for having the gall to live a life in the real world by some posters of whom I expected far better.

The tone in here is degenerating to Markle levels. We are better than that. This is Nutty’s party and we are lucky to be guests at her table. I feel strongly that she is owed an apology from several people here. We need to do what Meg only pays lip service to and be kind. Please.

Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Grisham said…
Let me give it to you straight: Archie is the grandson of the soon to be monarch. NOTHING is ever going to happen regarding him. NEVER. We will not see it while we are alive.
@Hikari

This is Nutty’s party and we are lucky to be guests at her table. I feel strongly that she is owed an apology from several people here.

Amen to that.
Girl with a Hat said…
@Unknown, wow, you really are full of yourself. LOL

Do you think they enjoy the rants you go on addressed to CatEye?

I suggest that if you want the courtiers to read your opinions, that you write them care of Buckingham Palace.

Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
abbyh said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
CatEyes said…
@Hikari

If you have read the Google Terms of Service (IoS) you would know she signed up to agree to its contractual requirements. She is responsible for her blogspot content to conform to the its ToS. We are also responsible for not committing violations.

Since you talk in passionate parochial analogies to excuse Nutty's lack of responsibility than legalities, I wlll use a comparison about being a 'Hostess" (your term). If she was a Hotel owner, hosting people on her site, she would be responsible that laws are followed, the code for hotel operations would be adhered to. If repeated fights, illegal activities, and code violations occurred the Hotel owner would be answerable to infractions and criminal activity.

She decided to start the blog and agreed to the ToS the she needs to fulfill legal, yes Legal obligations! It is my contention if she finally took a strong interest and laid down the law the problems would be solved and future issues would be minor thereby not taking up her precious time.

It is easy for you to let things go unchanged as you are 'Golden' and you never suffer the sling and arrows of abuse. But obviously many if not most posters are wanting things to change for the better; why begrudge them that especially if legally the blog should conform to the law of the land and Googles's ToS at the very least.

A long time ago when Nutty spent time here things were generally better. One thing for sure, they way she is handling it now, Is Not Working!
Flowers Family said…
@Hikari Ditto what you said. I suppose someone complaining might want to start their own blog and spend their time monitoring it.
Girl with a Hat said…
ok, it's looney central in here ...

I am disappointed by Lady C's book. I'm at the part where she talks about Harry in Afghanistan and starting Invictus Games and she paints him out to be a hero.

Please tell me someone that it's not going to be 314 more pages of sycophancy.
abbyh said…
Thoughts about the NYP article (thanks) and the Tuesday book Royals at War

Well, well, well.

“Harry’s biggest fear is not being there if his grandmother were to die,” adds a source in the book.
I would think that if that is real truth, given the age of his grandparents, that kind of thing
a) should have been thought up long before this (and if not - why now?)
b) as in a casual mention during Megexit in terms of how the BRF will plan out how they will present her/his passing and the first couple of days ... photos, appearances and so on.
c) at what point would he think about his grandparents and their passing in terms of how it would impact him (and how he would get to live his life - meaning his brother taking over what had been his father's source for paying JH's monthly allowance money)? My personal guess is that that has been discussed with his wife, and how the money will flow when his father moves up, his brother gets bumped up to take over the Duchy and ... what this means for their future.

M and the BRAND!
Do not know which "former friend" is the source for the idea that it was only part of her decision on marriage. I think about in the same way I think about the Omid+ book mentions that she/always thought about how they would move back to her stomping grounds - eventually where she wanted to be but with an HRH label.

At what point, do any of us, think realistically life will go back to how we used to be? Given that a number of states are (like falling apart into the depths equal to the Marianas Trench) not soon (whether you have money or not). If we are really lucky, maybe next year.

So ... the idea that M can pander to his feelings of frustration and this will somehow alleviate any or all frustration is ... probably not realistic. It's lovely that she introduced him to yoga but that's not the same as the thrill of being on polo ponies = action (or at least it would take a while to move to yoga as equal thrill).

"... To Harry’s credit, he has tried to shield Meghan from his stress. So he’ll confide to friends in London over the phone.” um, which friends? I have no idea but I've seen a lot of information which is sourced by a friend of M's over time when it is highly favorable to her ... so I don't know ... and question a lot more than I used to.

... “They are in touch with a number of LA power players and are looking forward to hosting dinner parties with the likes of George and Amal Clooney and big-time movie producer Jeffrey Katzenberg,” says another insider... Um maybe I am clueless but didn't the Clooney's have a place in the UK so they could have come over for dinner when in town? Back when they were all still in the UK? Wouldn't it make some sense to have them over when you have all this new baby adjustment and being able to talk about it with someone who had it with twins not that long ago?

... Meghan, who recently did a highly-publicized voice-over for the Disney documentary film “Elephants,” loves the idea of being the breadwinner with Harry as a stay-at-home dad. Um, did I not remember things correctly? I was thinking that was work for a donation for a good cause not keep the roof over the head thing. I have been wrong before (and willing to admit this).

As for the whole idea of Catherine is upset about this all, we've discussed this earlier (not likely was the general thought - if anything less stress).
lucy said…
@Jocelyn you really need to check yourself. That was an outrageous read. I started skimming replies then saw unknowns popping in and slid over here quick to make this post. On a selfish note I really hope no one thinks that unknown was me lucy, I said goodnight and now here I am again

Nutty has been distant but did state she was visiting with friends but she needn't answer to us and it was obvious she hadn't been around as she didnt create new post for book release

Everyone needs a break now and again and if that doesn't suit you perhaps you should request refund on your membership fee, oh that's right..

Unbelievable the entitlement! Sorry Nutty wasnt around to delete 200 posts of nonsense from wacko. She checked in well after midnight her time ,but again she owes you or anyone else here NOTHING

I hope for nice fresh start tomorrow with or without your ungratefullness
CatEyes said…
@ Unknown said...

"Why don't YOU start a new one? You contribute FAR more than Nutty does. Or why can't Nutty add YOU as a co-author to this blog? I am merely expressing my opinion and making suggestions. There ARE solutions if she doesn't have the time."

Great idea, I agree Hikari should coauthor the blog or start a new one. Hikari you spend so much time and write such long missives, even dominating (in a good way) you should use your energy to make things better. I say this even though I suspect I am on that list of 'people' you are threatening to name! Lol
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Girl with a Hat said…
hahahahahaha. Oh, you're too much, Unknown. Wow, I feel so sorry for Nutty.

Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Aquagirl said…
@Unknown: Yes, I definitely see a difference in the blog since the beginning. As you said, it started as a hobby and I think it still is. But I still enjoy posting here and like reading/interacting with other posters. For me, it’s such a unique community in that it’s so international and many of the posters have interesting backgrounds/careers that add to the discussion. And I greatly appreciate the level of thought, intelligence, and respect that the majority of the posters exhibit. Also, I need a place to express my thoughts because the majority of my friends and family think that my level of interest in MM is crazy :) !

That being said, I don’t know if I would keep posting if this blog moved to another platform. I have pretty much given up on CDAN since it moved to Disqus. I was already getting bored with the repetitive blinds but would usually still skim & sometimes comment. But IMO, the change to the new platform has worsened the trolling, it has become way too political (and that’s allowed), there is one person and her side-kick who think they own the blog, and technically-speaking, it’s just a disaster. So I really would hope that this blog isn’t moved to Disqus.

As far as Wordpress, I would not comment via Facebook. I hate Facebook, and only have one private account and that’s just so I can use the Messenger function to communicate with my relatives in Europe. So that would be a hard no from me. I would read, but not post.

So all in all, I wish that we could get rid of the trolls here, but I wouldn’t expect Nutty to go through 1000 comments to delete posts. I also wish that she would be more involved, but I find that I’m just cutting everybody a lot of slack these days. The world is in a state of utter chaos, and we truly have no idea of what people are feeling/experiencing in their everyday lives. I’m not angry at a friend who said she’d call me today and didn’t because she got too busy (she’s in the process of moving, works full time, and has 2 young kids) so why would I get angry at Nutty who I don’t even know?!
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
CatEyes said…
@lucy/Unknown

"Sorry Nutty wasn't around to delete 200 posts of nonsense from wacko."

I spent hours today skimming over and picking out the offensive comments including my own and listed the date, times and names not just of the disruptors but the busy bodies who added to the noise. It was less than 30 over 5 days. I am not excusing you(plural not you necessarily) or me for the problem but be accurate. Part of this dissension is that the do-gooders keep the narrative going and won't let things die! They have to keep shaming and blaming. Everyone just take your advice and "Not Engage" like I have been doing for 32 hours.
Starry said…
Girl With a Hat

I finished Lady C's book. Her style is to present a 'balanced' tone to her narrative. I think her strategy to approach the topic this way is to support credibility. By the time you finish the book, you'll see further how/why she does this.

Make no mistake, she's with us on all things Harkle. But I do think that she may have an agenda to support Harry's possible return to the BRF.

Hope you can find some enjoyment in further reading :)
CatEyes said…
I should have clarified I did not engage with 'xxxxx', 'Unknown' HapsburghHauntied and the Fake 'CatEyes' and 'CatEars
.
lucy said…
Wow I just read it all from @Jocelyn on down and am shocked at level of disrespect shown to Nutty from multiple posters

I am so ashamed at being an unknown. One way or another I will fix tomorrow, my issue is technical for those that choose unknown out of privacy or anonymity cant you just create Google account and call yourself a name? I don't see how you feel being "unknown" protects yourself anymore than calling yourself green or purple or at least stick a number after it

Geez poor Nutty waking up to this, real motivating and to nominate others by name to start their own blog is just ill but maybe warranted. Thin the herd only you know She will still sit here too

Such drama I really am ashamed. My apologies to Nutty
CatEyes said…
@AquaGirll

Good Points!!
Natalier said…
I just wish everyone would stop engaging with those trolls. Just skip their posts when you see their names. Also, Nutty is not beholden to us to waste her time cleaning up the blog in lieu of time spent on more enjoyable activities. She has a life too. I am grateful to Nutty that she has given us a platform to read other people's views on the odious pair and to add in my views if I choose to.
CatEyes said…
To Multiple Unknowns

It is a nightmare now with so many and the cacophony is stressful not being able to understand each one's flow of thought and responses etc.

Please get a name for you and for all concerned...respect of others need for clear communication and to attribute and value your contributions! :)
lucy said…
@cateyes I will be blunt. I think you have been downright pleasant these past "32 hours" I am not out to fight. I actually enjoy reading your thoughts and opinions when you are coherent and not completely unhinged. You do add value and perspective. Until @Jocelyn we had great day but please forgive me in what I am about to say and I feel it needs to be said for my own piece of mind.

I feel, and it is entirely my own opinion, that sometimes you may create other accounts to either agree or argue with yourself. I am not being confrontational nor argumentative but is impression I get and if that has happened. I would ask that all of that cease. It is so much more enjoyable with the flowing friendly conversations. Sure we will have differing opinions at times but it keeps things lively, it never need be ugly

If I am wrong in what I have stated I offer my sincere and heartfelt apology and call upon all those embattling you to stop

We could really call all this implosion the past and have great fresh start in morning. I am on your side @cateyes

-lucy
CatEyes said…
Why do certain ones of you Not Want Nutty and us Posters to follow the Google's Terms of Service?

I have never seen in all these months a single answer to this question ever, WHY?
CatEyes said…
@lucy'

See under the guise of being nice to me you act so ugly by sayin nasty things! You are the kind of so-called do-gooder. I remembered many months ago you piled on me with others when I never initiated a comment to you 'lucy'. (I keep a list and your name is near the top). I let it go and that is a hallmark of my humanity but you on the other hand want to say inflammatory things for no good purpise. I pity you, LEAVE ME ALONE FOR THE NTH TIME
lucy said…
I think I made 4 or 5 posts before "admitting" I was lucy. It wasnt that I was hiding .I just commented as normal and do believe on my very first post was like hey why am I unknown. It started with this post so yes it has been days but I stand behind everything I say and don't engage in trickery to battle with others and yes all day I forgot to sign off as lucy.

I know what I do and what I have said it is enough for ME. I do not create random unknowns I own my shit
CatEyes said…
PS 'lucy'

It is an 'Unknown' whom has created multiple accounts...'HapsburghHaunted' 'CatEars' fake 'CatEyes' whether that is you are not doesn't matter, It is nasty to play such games especially when one impersonation is a state jail felony.

I have always been 'CatEyes' and who knows the truth, has direct evidence, it is me not you. You are only speculating and you have what is called in law,,,"unclean hands".
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
jessica said…
If any of you read about personality typing it is my firm belief that Harry is an ISFP and Meghan is an ENFJ. This dynamic makes a lot of sense as you see her ‘lead’ and Harry ‘follow along’. He wasn’t academic, enjoys action and adventure, is laid back, and they tend to look for ‘the one’. Meghan has an achievement complex I’ve seen capture other ENFJs with issues- the need for control, the ‘want’ to be breadwinner (they can’t but they do try), the need to cling onto a partner for personal gain (in all cases screwed up ENFJs I know married strictly for money- they don’t even care if the relationship is bad or abusive as long as they can take away some cash), the virtue signaling type, etc. it’s like spot on. They always remain fringe to causes and stand for not just one thing. It fits her to a T. This is also why she’s bad at business and directionless in her greed. She’s not cut out for it. She’s cut out for networking and event management. Bingo. Right?

As for Harry, both of these types can party HARD. Which is what I think created the attraction and why you see them disheveled. NFJs can drink anyone under the table, and ISFPs love a good time. I do not think they should get married. Harry needed an ESFJ, someone who cares about the family and tradition at their core, not new ideas and adventure. He misunderstands her because she is an ‘ideas’ person and he is a ‘concrete facts’ person. Thus, he can be easily sold by a used car salesman (ie Meghan).

Hope this gives a bit of background to what I’m seeing as they are personality wise. Interestingly, her personality further shows through her communication strategy (never takes responsibility/finds a manipulative way to put the blame elsewhere/convinces her target of her own narrative by twisting everything and making herself a good light/ has ‘friends’ and ‘entities’ speak for them so she can always deflect and confuse) Since they are both deeply unhealthy, entitled, and greedy they will be limited in options. If Meghan wants to be a known entity, she has to become vulnerable which is impossible with her narcissism.
Scandi Sanskrit said…
Leave Nutty alone please. 💜💜🍹

Margery said...

@Scandi Sanskrit,

I think the IG issue is all about control and not giving in. The Queen may have told them not to use the name Sussex Royal, but Markle is not going to give it up. Renaming the account would erase the name. Ideally, she wants a new account with all her old followers, while the Royal account remains unused, but as a memorial and a big passive aggressive shrug toward the Queen.

It must be killing her to go all this time without a social media account to disseminate her propaganda, so you can tell this is a battle she cannot bear to lose.


Oh I get it. She wants her old @SussexRoyal accounts archives like the @POTUS and @FLOTUS accounts. They get archived and their names changed with numbers behind THEM (@FLOTUS44 @POTUS55), and then once you're out of office they issues your personal accounts with their real NAMES, like @MichelleObama & @realDonaldTrump. LOL. Does she really think she's that important?? 😂😂😽

@Aquagirl: you don't need to login via Facebook to use WordPress. You can just get a WordPress account.
jessica said…
Also if you read about Trevor, he is a lot like Prince Harry. So that’s definetely weird. More accomplished though.
CatEyes said…
@jessica

Thanks for changing the subject!
lucy said…
Yes that was totally me making that post and I apologize you got blamed for it as I would have stepped up for the save as I didnt see you take the fall for it.

That is why it is suggested to create your own identity. I have always had avatar prior to this current post. I couldnt imagine being regular contributor forever posting as unknown as there is no way to differentiate
xxxxx said…
Just saying but Habsburg Haunted and the new and improved CatEyes (non-psycho v 2.0) have my vote as newbies of the week.
lucy said…
Like this right here xxxx I believe you are @cateyes. Prove me wrong
lucy said…
@cateyes you get flustered and start this shit and that is what makes this blog unsalvageable as is
Miz Malaprop said…
@ Jessica

Love your insights, though I don't know the personality type info.

For all her and Sunshine's attempts to gt her name out there, after all the Lady C snippets, there is "no there, there" -- all of her branding, PR, styling, and merching madness is all for naught. Yes, she is famous but so is Casey Anthony.

None of her word-salad homilies about kindness and thriving, or photo ops "doing good" are likely to help her conquer Hollywood, Broadway, or the White House. She's a fairly empty vessel, and it doesn't seem like ol' Just Harry can fill that vacuum, so to speak.

How in the world did the Windsors let her marry into the family? Boggles the mind, and I'm just grateful that Nutty has provided this blog to debate the question. (No matter WHAT the riff-raff demand of our hostess!)
CatEyes said…
See these posters are going back and forth and I have nothing to do with it..,.what a relief!!! ROTFLOL
CatEyes said…
These posters are nuts,,,what a stupid waste of energy in their life, Being a farmer makes me grounded.

I can't believe these people want to do this, It is bizarre! But I have to laugh it is so, SO inane!!!!!!!!!! ROTFLOL
lucy said…
I cannot be the only one that sees this

I am not wrong. goodnight and goodluck

-lucy

Oh by the way where is xxxx with her exaltation that she is not @cateyes. Wait for it..

lucy said…
This blog will NEVER be functional with a poster that gets bored or feels slightly uneased and unleashes 4 or 5 different personas . Because there is no way xxxx would not have immediately called me out for insinuating she/he/it was @cateyes

and then there will be volley of unknowns swooping in and it is nonstop like this for MONTHS
lucy
xxxxx said…
To the unknown just above. I do not know which unknown you might happen to be.... But I have only posted here as xxxxx. Too bad Nutty has abandoned her blog. The main reason (80%) was the disruptions cateyes (psycho) that has gone on at least 6 months. This loony must be taking her meds now, maybe she put down the vodka tumbler, because she has made efforts to be a sane poster the last day and a half. Maybe they allow posting (computer access) from a drying out facility these days.
lucy said…
^ 100% cateyes

lucy
xxxxx said…
You are a piss poor detective lucy. Good luck in your other endeavors.
jessica said…
Every time I get all wound up about them I remind myself of their functions lol. Because at the end of the day it actually explains away their behavior so much. ENFJs (Meghan) cannot live with someone else controlling them. Like the RF. She HAD to get out. ISFPs (like Harry) need the structure and someone to lean on in life, usually. They are independent, but don’t like to start things, need an established program to join, or be apart of. Think Harry as corporate guy, and Meghan as startup guy (who can’t actually run a biz because they get quite distracted financially and are a bit slow in that way).

So you have some incompatibility going on. He knows he can always go back to the RF.

What’s more interesting is ISFPs HAVE to be in control within their Relationship. Hence Harry taking full responsibility in that speech ‘left with no other choice’ ‘had to do this’. He has to FEEL like everything they are doing is HIS decision. He actually believes this is HIS DOING and anything going wrong in L.A. is his fault. Thus we see upset or sad looking Harry in videos. He’s probably upset depressed.

Meanwhile Meghan (ENFJ) is there to convince her target that it WAS his decisions all along and SHE’S the victim of things go wrong. Putting him where he WANTs to be (in control) but manipulatively NOT CARING one iota and continuing to
Achieve her personal (separating him from any other influencer) and financial goals (delusionally trying too).

I have seen the look Of an unhealthy ENFJ who thought she married rich and the day after the wedding the guy told
Her he was in deep debt. After 7 years, he outplayed this woman and it was incredible to watch it. So she still sticks around trying to make her own income off of living off of this guys mansion and decent monthly
Income. ENFJ’s accept what’s going on and try to outwork it.
So, Meghan once she realized Harry didn’t control The purse strings ever in the UK, and probably has limited net worth, hightailed it out of there while laying it on thick to Harry (see ITV interview in Africa lol).

This is also why you’ll see her fringe associate with whomever she can. It’s not that it’s bad (it’s apart of who she is) it just won’t get her anywhere because great wealth comes from great work and ownership of it.
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
jessica said…
I agree someone goes nuts here and uses multiple profiles and talks to themselves.

Why? How? The language structure and insults are the same. The writing is the same between the profiles and further not that many people would spend their time on a blog reloading it waiting to respond to ‘defend’ themselves.

It’s a little weird to watch, but I ignore it until others speak up about it.
CatEyes said…
This is hilarious how now, the 'Unknown' is fighting with 'xxxxx' and blaming 'lucy'. And vice versa.


I just have to sit back and laugh. I knew it would come to this!
jessica said…
Without the press coverage the RF gets, it will be very hard for Harry and Meghan to start new social accounts and achieve the same following. Also, if they allow comments, the backlash will be immense. Too much damage would be done if they could speak out now freely, and maybe never will. They are bad for themselves lol.

I think they are waiting it out and may never have personal social accounts. And use ‘Archewell’ charity as their ‘messenger’. Unfortunately for them, someone else owns Archewell Charity and will be suing them over trademark infringement! Which is, hilarious.

xxxxx said…
OK! Hapsburg Hussy. En Garde! I like that. This reflects loony-Cats often referring to her Hapsburg blood.

And don't forget Haunted Hapsburg. En Garde!
lucy said…
@jessica I believe the only reason H&M do not have social media is because they cant transfer their followers and without that their numbers will pale in comparison to their previous bought bots

They either can't afford to do it or actually think somehow they will be able to reactivate sussexroyal

They would look pathetic with 100,000 followers as compared to millions or whatever numbers they had before

Meghan is dying without her access to social media and I believe only reason they haven't come up with even temporary one is they cant legitimately pull those numbers. All that money invested in followers wasted
CatEyes said…
Yes you are right...on the Virus blog 'Anon-Unknown', 'Trudy', 'BlueBellWoods' and 'Unknown' was all the same poster fighting viciously and caused the blog to go under.

The 'Unknown' on this blog is fake 'CatEyes', 'HapsburghHaunted' and 'CatEars'. I went back for two weeks and studied their posts, my posts and how her screen names changed after the post by writing dates, times and details. I am very meticulous and was
certainly motivated to ferret out this obnoxious poster

I am inspecting the internet source code to establish the connections between all of them including 'xxxxx'.

lucy said…
darn it!
-lucy
xxxxx said…
I am inspecting the internet source code to establish the connections between all of them including 'xxxxx'.

Idiot child is inspecting jack-shite. You always lie.
Unknown said…
xxxxx lucy whoever duh
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
CatEyes said…
I love Not Engaging with these posters now, it is so freeing, so calming. so in control while the disruptors implode with their accusations back and forth.
xxxxx said…
It's a Hapsburg hussy of a hypocritical haunting in here and one flew over the cuckoo's nest too! en garde!

Laughing! Well done! You are all seeing and all knowing. Lucy gave it a shot.
Thanks, I think this is all from me tonight.
Jdubya said…
To anyone who has read Lady C's book - i keep seeing a reference to Harry's nickname of Blowjob Harry. This apparently came from the book.

Can anyone explain the context that it is used in the book?

Thank you
Unknown said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
jessica said…
I agree that they won’t have the numbers they did have. They are irrelevant and unimportant and stand for literally nothing (while trying to stand for everything).

They are trying to copy the Royal playbook (being elusive) is all I’m seeing here. As for followers I believe it was 11.4MM as apart of the Royal family.

I truly think that Meghan is preparing to sue them over the use of it, if the Queen boots them out at the year mark. I think Meghan is expecting to be able to stay Royal, stay political, and Be given the freedom to use the Sussex Royal accounts at that time. I think all this virtue signaling and Harry’s videos is an EFFORT to boost their profile AND prove to the Queen they can be ambassadors of the Crown in America.

Of course that won’t happen. I don’t think the Queen will boot them out entirely (would be hard to get away with that in aristocratic circles) but she may. If she doesn’t, we know her interests aren’t in the crown above all, which would jeopardize the monarchy.

The fact she allowed this one year hoopla is a disgrace. I’m betting they will extend it because of ‘Covid’ which is just par for the course. At least until interest (or faked interest) in Harry dies down. It’s clear Harry doesn’t care what he does with his life or which way the wind blows. He’s along for the ride and eventually will go back home.
jessica said…
Most interesting is that the press still doesn’t attack Harry. For that I am guessing they know the Queen is going to be sure he comes back. They are still protecting his ‘image’, even Lady CC states this.

Totally unacceptable. He needs consequences. Unfortunately, he will never get them. Sigh.
Aquagirl said…
@Jessica: Totally agree with you. I think that the one-year clause should be removed right now based upon their behavior. If HM extends it, she will damage the monarchy. I often wonder (and I hate to put this in writing) how HM will be remembered should she pass away in the next six months. Is it worth sullying her entire reign based upon her protection of both Harry and Andrew? It certainly seems that she is putting family before country. And sadly, neither her son nor her grandson will have to pay the consequences.
Aquagirl said…
@Jessica: You are spot on with the personality typing.

I’m just so happy for Trevity-Trev-Trev that he is in a new, seemingly happy, relationship.

I wonder if MM &JH signing up with the agency is a way for some people to clean their money? Maybe that is a way of them making money without Archwell foundation?
They are becoming increasingly irrelevant but some may like them being a thorn in the RF's side.

Clearly there is no interest from real speaking events like the one-off Miami event- so this could circumvent that perhaps?

jessica said…
Aquagirl- yes!!! Trevor! He is married to that beautiful Heiress. She is gorgeous! Good for him. It sounds like what he went through was awful. While Meghan doesn’t care about him anymore, something has got to bother her about how he upgraded lol. Doesn’t really look like spineless Harry was an upgrade for Meghan. Honestly, do you think he notices all the news on her? Must be weird, as she probably is meaningless to the guy now. I’d hope at least.
Starry said…
Jdubya

From Lady C's book:

"The conversation concluded with the information that the recently created Duke of Sussex had gained himself a new nickname at the palace. He was now known as Blow Jobs Harry because people there were convinced that his brains had been addled through mind-blowingly good sex."
jessica said…
Oh also yes I think about that with HMTQ.

I mean, is this what the focus should be on near the end? I hope it’s not the end, just never know at those ages. Seriously, it is shocking to me she doesn’t wrangle her family into order. It’s very embarrassing for the British public.

She sounds like, at her age, she wants to play dotinggrandmother full time. Anything’s acceptable and she doesn’t want old age heartache, which could lead to health issues. Maybe that’s why she’s so easy on Meghan and Harry. She probably knows that marriage won’t last anyway so better to keep on and just pretend to ignore the fact they are part of the RF? Seems to be that way as she refused to take away HRH status, but also maybe thought the LA thing would be temporary for Harry. She knows Harry as an impulsive, bothersome, grandchild. So that’s in line with his typical, albeit poorly timed and outrageous, behavior.

If she’s set of being grandmum first, I really think she needs to step aside and let Charles or even William take over.
jessica said…
Blow jobs Harry

He’s a prince. I’m sure he’s had amazing adventures with desperate women. Why would Meghan, who is not that attractive, really stand out? The poor woman has no body. So much so, People in the DM call her Spongebob.
Re Megsy...

People in the DM call her Spongebob.


Lol Really mean, but oh so funny and accurate! ;o)
Aquagirl said…
@Jessica:

Trevor looks great and he and his beautiful wife are expecting a baby. I’m sure MM is firmly in his rear-view mirror, as she should be.

I think that HM is expecting that the marriage will end and JH will come back; however, the Harkle’s behavior is truly abhorrent. I don’t understand why they were able to keep any of their patronages (especially MM) and their constant Zoom calls, letters, etc. are truly an embarrassment, as are their leaks to the press. And who is paying Sunshine Sachs? The Duchy of Cornwall? At the very least, their Sussex titles should be removed as should MM’s HRH title, which she didn’t deserve in the first place. JH could still return (alone) under those circumstances, and I think that it would make the British people feel as though she’s doing ‘something.’ It isn’t helping her image that she’s in lockdown mode (which she absolutely has needed to be.) I think she’s been doing a great job inspiring the nation during COVID, but yet it appears that she cannot (or will not) get her family in order.
Aquagirl said…
@Scandi: Thanks for clarifying the Wordpress situation. Someone else had posted here that you’d need to comment through FB.
Sandie said…
@Jdubya: BJ Harry was with reference to Meghan using sex to ensnare Harry. Charles supposedly called him C''t struck!
jessica said…
I literally spit out my coffee in a fit of embarrassing laughter whenever I read someone calling her sponge bob squarepants. It is so mean, and so accurate, and so funny. Then I feel bad. I just can’t help it. I read it and it’s too funny each time. I’ve seen it so many times now and whenever I come across someone saying that, there I go again giggling. I even try to stop myself, but I can’t.

I think her boxy shape and real inability to dress herself (what is WITH that)...coupled with the fact she walks with her legs agape in tightish dresses...it looks odd. Why not walk one foot in front of another. And she stands stoically with her legs agape. Her strut and leg positioning actually really bothers me. Close your legs Megs!

Just more lack of etiquette.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Starry

Lets hope his Bye Fellatio uprising comes sooner, rather than later...
The Cat's Meow said…
UGH....
Apparently there are going to be dueling Bond premieres on each side of the Atlantic....

https://www.thesun.co.uk/uncategorized/11972489/princes-bond-battle-bosses-hollywood-premiere/


I found this article really interesting. Could this be another "throw it out and see if the bait is taken" article? Similar to the others when HMTQ was supposed to be hosting her a birthday party at Balmoral or Kate was supposed to be hosting her a baby shower? A couple of things pinged on my radar while reading - "a source" could be just about anyone (not necessarily linked to the producers themselves), and the W&K mentions seem a little passive aggressive. This is the part that caused me to raise an eyebrow:

“For the Hollywood premiere they have signalled they want Harry and Meghan as guests of honour.
“It poses an interesting question over whether William and Kate will attend the London premiere.”


It seems a really weird statement for a source from a producer to make, as if they're hinting that W&K are petty enough to refuse to attend on the grounds that H&M would be asked to attend what's basically separate event a week later on the other side of the Atlantic. To me, that sounds more like something one of MM's pet sources would say.

It'll be very interesting to see if they actually make it there as "guests of honour" or not.
jessica said…
Aquagirl

Yes very fair.

I do not understand the Zooms, and letters, and subliminal support. It really looks like a cheap Royal operation. Why is the RF not overseeing this? Or are they trying to follow guidelines with the blank walls?

It’s all very very odd.

^It'll be very interesting to see if they actually make it there as "guests of honour" or not.

I meant H&M in that last line. Just hit post and realised it looked like I was wondering about W&K so thought I'd better clarify.
Sandie said…
some persistent folk trying to discredit this blog and Nutty and shut down the conversation1 nonetheless, some excellent information and thoughts. new stuff on personality types is fascinating
jessica said…
Totally messed up that Meghan always uses PR to try to bait invitations. She did the same thing with the Met ball.

I don’t believe the Bond films want anything to do with Meghan Markle. At All. Just more PR to raise her profile so those people actually notice her. Since they left the RF, in public, why would any film want their support? It’s also a bit of a low thing for a Royal to attend a movie premiere, no?

Meghan being Meghan, hoping someone bites. I think after the desperate ‘hire Meghan plz’ yellow carpet video at Lion King, the entire industry was put off them. I doubt Iger is petty, but after that tarnished his reputation by association, I imagine they blacklisted her and asked other studio heads to put her aside as well. That’s a small world, and that public faux pax was horrendous.

Remember when Bey was trying to associate with Meghan? Put her pic in her music video. She kept a good image by NOT associating with anyone lowly, and look what happened, pure embarrassment at Lion King.

So I really think Iger and Beyoncé have made sure Megs is blacklisted. There are probably others as well.

She won’t ever be ‘Hollywood’.

Also, the speaking thing, obviously that is for Harry. What the hell would Meghan have to talk about? Marrying rich?
lizzie said…
@Jessica,

I agree M's manner of standing and walking aren't very attractive.

She's either in what I think of as a slutty "cheesecake" pose with one leg bent in front of the other (& if possible with one hand on a hiked up hip) or she's doing the wide-legged drunken sailor stance (which I think is her natural stance.)

She has two different walks too. The slutty hip-swaying garden party exit walk with one foot in front of the other and toes pointing slightly outward or her more natural wide-legged clomping.

I think she's pigeon-toed. Because her feet naturally point slightly inward, that makes her legs and especially her upper thighs spread apart naturally. (Try it-- you can't point your toes inward and keep your legs together.) When she thinks about it, she adopts the slut walk/stance but that's so exaggerated and so different from her natural walk/stance, all that does is draw attention to both walking/standing styles. In other words, she ends up looking unattractive-- at least to me-- because she's too often phony even down to the way she walks.
Magatha Mistie said…
@lizzie

Give her a break, all that kneeling affects her gait..
jessica said…
Whatever it is, her stance drive me nuts.

Your detailed explanation makes a lot of sense. It’s really the only way to clinically explain a woman walking and standing the way she does. Pigeon toed seems accurate. She has that bony leg structure I’ve seen other pigeon toed people have too.

If I was royal and saw myself walking the way she does, or standing like a sailor/sponegbob in a dress, I would hope I noticed and worked on correcting it or wearing clothing that hid it better. I don’t think it helps that she has really large feet either. It makes the whole wall/stance more, pointed, for lack of better word.

I don’t know about others, but I still find it shocking that Harry said when he met Meghan he had to ‘up his game’. She probably walked towards him like a linebacker on a football field. I guess he’s into that? I really wish I was a fly on a wall to see that interaction go down.

Speaking of, him thinking she was out of his league. I always assumed she presented as if she was loaded and from the upper class and he was ‘barely’ good enough for her (pretending she didn’t know who he or the RF was), and how famous she was in N.America (her words, not the public’s). I think he fell for the ‘idea’ she sold him and never double checked any of it, since they barely saw each other and lived at a massive distance to one another. Nothing else
Makes sense.
Weekittylass said…
Maybe by up his game, he meant up the price he was accustomed to paying for a ‘date’? Doesn’t rumor have it that Guy Pelly was somewhere in the mix? Guy Pelly has always been a very naughty boy who has had to take the fall for Just Harry with the public during their wild days.
Maneki Neko said…
@Magatha

Give her a break, all that kneeling affects her gait..

Thank you for injecting a dose humour this morning 😆
jessica said…
That makes sense. Maybe that’s why he flew her off to Africa so quickly.

I mean it’s funny to think about how bad he got played by her. She didn’t make much in suits, came from a non wealthy family, and was about to be out of work. And here she has him thinking she is only used to the best of the best ‘what Meghan wants Meghan gets.’

It was easy for her to laugh off faux paxs by acting like Americans are diffferent. I don’t know though, there are quite a few wealthy Americans in London that go to all the ‘who’s who’ events.

Maybe that was also part of the problem? That she was odd even in front of wealthy American Expats, meanwhile she was meant to be Royal and refined? I could see her plainly not fitting in, and unable to explain herself. Meanwhile Harry acting a wreck trying to keep her behavior in check and keep her insecurities happy. Such a disaster for a supposedly great time in ones life.
Magatha Mistie said…
@Maneki

Cheers, she blew it..😘
Miggy said…
@Magatha Mistie,

Oooooh, you are naughty! LOL
Piroska said…
From Daily Mail Baby Archie wins first court case - use of Archewell. Mr Kantro used Archecare

The similarity could have caused confusion – and because he applied before the Sussexes, he could have had first call, forcing the couple to rebrand.

But they can breathe a sigh of relief, as Mr Kantro's application is now dead in the water after he failed to respond to a court request for extra information in time
Rut said…
I have been thinking (! ) and this is why I think Meghan Markle does not like Kate. Meghan Markle was obsessed with Diana. She watched her funeral many times and owned books about her. There are also a video of Meghan at a friends birthday party as a child, were she pretends to be the Queen of England. There is also a photo of Meghan Markle outside Buckingham palace as a teenager.This makes me think Meghan dreamed about becoming a Queen and knew she could by marrying William. I belive she fantasised about that and when she watched Williams wedding she felt anger towards Kate. She thought that should have been her. And she still thinks so. I think she felt sorry for Harry when she watched the funeral but I don't think a woman with her personality fantasised about marrying Harry, the second in line. No, she dreamed about William. She said "every girl dreams about becoming a princess" but she dreamed about becoming the Queen. She dreamed about Will.
Aquagirl said…
Does anyone remember MM’s lie that she was going to be the next Bond Girl? I doubt they’ll be invited to the premiere just based on that. (I can’t stop thinking about how hot Halle Berry was in her Bond role vs. Sponge-Meg Squarepants. She is truly delusional.)
Aquagirl said…
@Rut: She definitely wanted William. But she’d even settle for Charles.
Rut said…
Aquagirl: Oh yes. Harry was her third choice :)
Magatha Mistie said…
She landed Harry, would much have preferred Wills.
But, mistakenly thought that it was a popularity contest,
it’s not.
none said…
@Magatha ~ Agree and think she planned to get the heir via the spare. Remember the infamous scarfing incident? Wills was not interested. Explains her hatred of Kate.
Miggy said…
Meghan Markle plans to speak with Wisconsin girls after she and Prince Harry talked with Dane County Boys & Girls Clubs CEO.

https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/2020/06/27/prince-harry-meghan-markle-speak-madison-youth-boys-and-girls-club/3273139001/
Miggy said…
Also in Hello.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's future project revealed - and it involves Wisconsin.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2020062892416/meghan-markle-wisconsin-plans-boys-girls-clubs-dane-county/
Jenx said…
Bond. Sponge Bond!!!

NAACP represented by none other than .... Sunshine & Co.

She is never going to go away, is She?

ITA- Wills for the win. That could easily have been her end game.

Someone needs to study this behaviour and report back. An FBI profiler or something. She has become the poster girl for our narcisstic, psychopathic times. Zeitgeist personified.
Piroska said…
@Miggy Meghan Markle plans to speak with Wisconsin girls after she and Prince Harry talked with Dane County Boys & Girls Clubs CEO.

I wondered why Wisconsin then I saw report of bi-racial girl set on fire.
Aquagirl, Does anyone remember MM’s lie that she was going to be the next Bond Girl?

I do, it was a Blind Gossip article. ;o)

I don’t believe a single word the Dubious Duo spin.
CatEyes said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Magatha Mistie said…
I give up, enough!!!
Miggy said…
@Piroska,

Thanks. I've now found the article on the racist attack and it all makes sense.

Nutty Flavor said…
Hi again all. Just a note to say that I'll be putting up a new post shortly.

Sorry to hear some people have been upset by specific comments and commenters.

When I have time, I remove as much of the crazy as I can.

Right now, the sun is shining and the garden is in bloom, so deleting dumb comments has dropped down my list of priorities.

We did have a poll about the blog's future about a month ago, and a majority of people chose the "keep the blog as it is, I'll just scroll past the crazy" option.

CatEyes said…
To repost; it is all well and good that HAMS say they want to help but their efforts are so pitifully tiny, like delivering a few bags of food instead of a substantial donation. It seems words are cheap, even cheaper when they come from those two.

It is the same story every time, a promise and a token effort not something of substance. Harry did well with the Invictus Games but it is said that his assistant Mr. Fox was really the person responsible for that effort. Although Harry did bring attention to the issue but now with no photo opportunity even his wounded veterans are disappointed with a lack of action on his part.
SwampWoman said…
Hikari said: Attacks on our hostess and founder of our feast are completely unjustified and out of line. This is Nutty’s hobby, not her job nor her life. She has provided a space for our entertainment on her own time and it is our privilege to participate, not a right. She is not answerable to anyone for how she runs it. If the intent is to aggravate her so much she dismantles this blog, some of you are doing a fine job toward that goal. I’d like to call out some names but I won’t. I will only say that I am appalled at some of the vitriol directed at Nutty for having the gall to live a life in the real world by some posters of whom I expected far better.

I was astounded by the attacks on Nutty, but I should not have been. When the attacks on the regulars weren't panning out (thanks to collapsing the comments), then they moved on to trying to make Nutty close the blog by insulting her. Interesting. Why? We're just talking about the silly PR stylings of a no-account D-list actress and her formerly royal husband and how they plan to make an opulent living by siphoning money from people who actually work for a living. The only ones it could possibly matter to would be D-list and falling actress.

Personally, I think MM should thank whatever her deity of choice is (Cthulhu?) that we are even aware of her existence. Most Americans get a blank look in their eyes and say "WHO?" when the name gets mentioned.
Jdubya said…
Starry - thank you !!!!

CatEyes said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
CatEyes said…
@Swamp Woman

But you were the most prolific contributor on the Virus blog, so why did it go down when there was NO mention whatsoever of Nutty that I could see?

Why wasn't something done to save that blog? Your insight could be useful here.

Popular posts from this blog

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seein...

The Opening Act of New Adventures in Retail

 I keep thinking things will settle down to the lazy days of spring where the weather is gorgeous and there is a certain sense of peacefulness.  New flowers are coming out. increasing daylight so people can be outside/play and thinking gardening thoughts.  And life is quiet.  Calm. And then something happens like a comet shooting across the sky.  (Out of nowhere it arrives and then leaves almost as quickly.)   An update to a law suit.  Video of the website is released (but doesn't actually promote any specific product which can be purchased from the website).  A delay and then jam is given out (but to whom and possible more importantly - who did not make the list?).  Trophies almost fall (oops).  Information slips out like when the official date of beginning USA residency.  (now, isn't that interesting?) With them, it's always something in play or simmering just below the surface.  The diversity of the endeavors is really ...