Let's continue the conversation...
Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce. And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before? which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know. I'm not a lawyer. One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away". That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice. But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance. Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei
Comments
`Relativity.
There was a young lady named Bright
Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day
In a relative way
And returned on the previous night.'
https://quoteinvestigator.com/2013/12/19/lady-bright/
Hahaha@WildBoar
Grease’D’ lightning
Was never that bright
Sold her soul, to Oprah’s delight
With all that teeth whitening
She could guide rockets, frightening
No time left to come to the light
Rumpy Pumpy
Humpy and Dumpy shat on us all
Stumpy and Bumpy are set for a fall
All the Queen’s family
And all her grey men
Couldn’t care less
If they never see them again
"Royal Family Reportedly Plans on forgiving H$M by 2022" followed by
"The DoS writing career could be hampered by publishing row"
Who writes these headlines for petes sake?!?! No, I am not reading this tripe.
Harry and Meghan's estimated joint worth is $10 million, as Forbes reported. Back in May 2019, Harry was estimated to be worth between $25 million and $40 million—about the same as Prince William given their similar sources of income at the time, according to Money.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/amp23379222/meghan-markle-net-worth-prince-harry-kate-middleton-prince-william-compared/
Many others have circulated the article claiming the Disastrous Duo are worth much less than previously thought. I personally think the $30-40million has been an exaggeration for years. Same with all the other royals "worth".
@WildBoar
Revelation(s) may vary 😉
Welby helped release the dragon..
@SirStinx
Whatever Harry is worth, it won’t last
long the way these two are going.
I would hazard a guess they are in
strife already.
We will never know the true wealth
of the Queen, etc, her art collection
alone is estimated at 10 billion pounds.
As for cold, hard cash, I imagine most of
it will be tied up in trusts. I doubt megs will
get anywhere near the billion she’s
clearly banking on.
Few million, move along, next! 😉
The Proof is in the Pudding
For Harry and his 3 times bride
It’s proving to be an expensive ride
For Harry and his progeny
We need clear proof
No surrogacy
It's a disagreement between Random House/Penguin & whatever they call themselves, and Waterstones. I wondered why I'd not noticed Penguin books in Waterstones - they have them `under the counter' so to speak tho' I bought `Liberal Fascism' from them not so long ago. Didn't bother to follow the ramifications of of the dispute.
How else could Yahoo get the customers to read about something as dull as this business item?
Unfortunately, I don't think the ducal author has much to worry about, people will just get the trash from Amazon
Piers Morgan interview coming up
according to DM, with Karl Stefanovic
(Aus presenter, can’t stand him)
discussing megs.
Bring it on Piers!!
Karl was a fan of madams,
might have changed!!
"Royal Family Reportedly Plans on forgiving H$M by 2022"
I've taken one for you!
The source is Page 6, quoting an `insider' and framing it as `reportedly'. Sounds like an extrapolation from `Of course they'll be invited to the Jubilee' - said in a less- than -convincing-over-enthusiastic tone.
It did say `at least reduce the bad blood' or wtte.
Can anyone ever `plan' to forgive someone? How does one define `forgiveness' anyway?
My approach'd be `I'll see how I feel in a year's time...' though I don't think I'd aim to harbour a grudge/plot revenge (I might enjoy thinking about it tho'!. I'd hope not to become bitter and twisted myself.
Even if I forgave, I wouldn't forget. Nor would make excuses for someone and/or I pretend it hadn't happened.
Love Rumpy Dumpy. I was eating when I read 'Humpy and Dumpy shat on us all', laughed and nearly spat my food out! Excellent and so true!! 🤣
May you keep brightening up our days 😁
Are you ready for some laughs?
People provides a vomity fawning preview of the upcoming Lifetime feature: Harry and Meghan: Escaping the Palace. Including a science chez famille on the beach with Doria—the best sighting of Archie so far and I dare say equally authentic. What’s yet one more child actor playing Archie after all?
The whole demented saga has lurched into parody. Laugh, cry, hurl objects at the television—viewers’ call. This is the third installment of H$M’s Epic Merchmance in the last 3 years. Interestingly, this will be the third time as well the lead roles have been recast. It appears that nobody wants to play these two losers more than once.
https://apple.news/AXKigCn6VRRqhm1MVUCrhEA
You little gem you! I am laughing and want so much to buy your Humpy, Dumpy, Stumpy and Rumpy action figures, please. I will line them up on my desk and splot paper clips at ‘em.
🤣❤️👏🥰
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/penguin-random-house-canada-staff-reportedly-cry-after-news-of-jordan-peterson-book/ar-BB1bkkER
Penguin Random House Canada staff reportedly cry after news of Jordan Peterson book
Spencer Neale 11/25/2020
Employees at Penguin Random House Canada were reportedly besieged by their emotions after finding out the company will publish Dr. Jordan Peterson's book Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life in March 2021.
Peterson's book, which follows up where his bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos left off, caused consternation at the publisher, with several employees becoming emotionally overwhelmed at the prospect of the company releasing it, according to four staff members.
"Several employees cried at the meeting discussing how Peterson's views have negatively impacted their lives," VICE's Manisha Krishnan, who first reported the story, tweeted on Tuesday. "One told me: 'He is an icon of hate speech and transphobia and the fact that he’s an icon of white supremacy... I’m not proud to work for a company that publishes him.'"
The employees gathered for what was described as an "emotional town hall" on Monday, during which staff members were allegedly “crying in the meeting about how Jordan Peterson has affected their lives."
Peterson is a University of Toronto professor who rose to international prominence as a vocal critic of the Canadian government's Bill C-16, which sought to establish "gender identity or expression" as a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Peterson objected on the grounds that the law could force him to address a transgender student by his or her preferred pronoun or else be faced with prosecution under human rights laws.
The bill passed and became law in 2017.
Penguin Random House Canada said it was open to hearing the opinions of its staff but did not commit to scrapping the publication.
“We announced yesterday that we will publish Jordan Peterson’s new book Beyond Order this coming March," the statement read. "Immediately following the announcement, we held a forum and provided a space for our employees to express their views and offer feedback. Our employees have started an anonymous feedback channel, which we fully support. We are open to hearing our employees’ feedback and answering all of their questions. We remain committed to publishing a range of voices and viewpoints."
Peterson's book will be published by Portfolio in the United States and Portfolio Press in the United Kingdom, both subsidiaries of the Penguin Random House company.
Thank you.
Hardly a production calling for Burton and Taylor is it?
Apart from the Large Woolly Phallus apparently emerging from H's crotch, on which `Archie' appears to be standing (boom mike?), H does look authentically pleased to see somebody.
What an embarrassing photo, entirely appropriate for the subject, I'd say.
Oh my god.
That looks like a five dollar movie budget, doesn’t it?
...like they are re-enacting a moving scene of an Oklahoma family at a swimming hole discussing who forgot to bring the baby wipes.
I especially like Chunky Ten-Pancakes Harry. At least the four year old posing as 1-1/2 year old Harry is near accurate.
The DM version of this mess leads with a first bullet point noting the actress is wearing a fake bump. Bring it, DM! 😆
.
@Hikari
A sunny day AND it’s a Friday AND Hikari brought us choice meat AND I am alive to read @WBBM use the phrase “Large Woody Phallus”.
All is right with the world, at least in Nutty land, 😘
...”1-1/2 year old Harry”. Lol what a slip. I am mixing up my tantrum-prone brats although “Archie” seems consistently placid by comparison, while his “father”.......
Lucky movie director though. He or she can just shout “cut! That’s a wrap!” And it’s all finally over!
That first title sounded familiar - I have a copy must re-read.
Table of Contents alone is something H could benefit from:
Rule 2: Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping.
Rule 6: Set your house in perfect order before you criticise the world
Rule7 Pursue what is meaningful (not what is expedient)
Rule 8: Tell the truth - or, at least. don't lie.
The `preferred pronoun' issue can be real heffalump trap - even a slip of the tongue has landed at least one British teacher in deep trouble. My first job was in a boys' school and more than once in a practical class I called a boy to order when he had his back to me, only to be answered
`Sorry, Sir!'
Cue great mirth from rest of class, boy going bright red in the face.
What did I do? I felt for the cringing boy, so just smiled sweetly and said not to worry, it's easily done.
Also DH has a slight build hair that's longer than usual and we're often addressed as `ladies' or him as `madam'. It's always inadvertent and we reassure the person that we're not at all offended. Now I suppose anyone slipping up like that expects to be handed their P45 without being able to defend themselves.
Oh — reminds me of the story I heard a few months ago from my LA industry friend hears all the rumors, that supposedly right around the time they moved to Canada, just before Tyler Perry’s, before Montecito, that she was trying to generate interest in the idea that she would replace Wonder Woman star Gal Gadot in her role, to be a “younger woman of color for little girls to look up to.” The response was something like “Gal is five years younger than you, and.....”. Thanks, next!
“from the office of” is also what one associates in America with the letterhead of the U.S. President’s Office
The Office of Presidential Correspondence, is one of the oldest original White House departments, for example.
Just think: a failed cable tv bit player who never had a real job — and swiftly failed at royal duties, too — is marching around in her sloppy oversized man heels fantasizing that she is just what the world needs to lead it.
She probably thinks if she can grind Putin and Xi, like Corey, Trevor, and Harry, they’ll pay off the national debt and she’ll get a parade.
.....that was what the “....and...” part finished as. Yes.
Puds, you just gave M her next book idea: The Naughty Bench. Where when Mummy gets mad, she puts Harry and Archie, William and Charles, Catherine and Charlotte, Sophie and Camilla, the Queen and George, Angela Kelly and Piers Morgan, Dan Wootton and Maggie Foster, Marvel Studios and Tyler Perry, Adele and Angela Levin, Chelsy and Cressida........why, it’s the Longest Bench in the World!
Before I lower the tone any more, I'd like to share a comment from the DM:
`is she gonna do another about her bond with her mum called THE JAIL-'
....that comment! The Jail! Ha! Perfect.
@Puds,
The quietness of Megs tells me something is up so she may well sploot out insane presidential memos as the Bidens meet the Queen.
Also from Yahoo (which tells me the Sussex PR machine is running out of money),...
The Sucksmess Squad just announced they raised $73,000 in honor of Archie’s 2nd birthday and the #2Baby Shower.
All those kids without their weekend pizza money.
Come to think of it, the criminal court will probably be the only court they'll ever appear in.
BTW, this year's the Queen's Birthday Parade (aka Trooping the Colour) will be another low-key event in Windsor - tomorrow week, 12th June.
Ask parents perhaps. doh!
Remember when she amended it to add HRH? (Doubled down on a hospital too) Mere days prior to exit ,hmm
I am lost today. I read bunch of posts last night but too tired to comment, fails me as following day onto the next!
RF/HM are clever. The way I see it the only one left holding "Archie" is AofC. When is that sabbatical? 😉
I looked into reborn dolls (😳) they appear to be quite popular. Some as therapy but quite a following of people that just like hanging out with them (😳😳) . Difficult to find videos under 20 minutes. Kinda spooky. But they are so realistic.
Check out a couple "short" examples. *warning* may be disturbing to some, just remember not real. HM saw him once, twice? If I saw this baby swaddled in blanket I would be goochie goochie gooing right along with her. Although Her Majesty doesn't strike me as a goochie gooer 😁
https://youtu.be/nhxv3cqMYk0
This one just because she is Asian and wouldn't that be a hoot and a Christmas card?
https://youtu.be/ESX0ZDYV3AE
The Markles offer praise and thanks to their small army of fans, whilst at the same time ignoring the brutal trolling these same fans do to Harry's brother and wife, including death threat, whilst campaigning against the very behaviour exhibited by their fans and never calling them out or asking them to dial it down. It look so greedy and bad.
John Lennon was killed by a fan. They may be afraid of them (crazy fans).
Your 7:31PM comment is perfect, soooooooo true. It is really sad, isn’t it, these delusional fans dumping their coins on these two spoiled rich fools who would probably look down their noses at them. Your description of their merching and the piles of Sussex junk gathering dust in the homes of fans is so depressing and yet so spot on. Agreed, it is also about collecting those bits of fan data to $ell. When the extent of the Sussex scam breaks open one day, my guess is that it will be epic.
@jessica,
Right? Barely enough for an LA spa weekend for their heroine. Maybe the fans are saving up to buy the book and Baby Diana T-shirts. I can hardly wait until California opens up and Megs has to go out in public and cope with real people again. Oh the tales of disappointed fans being brushed off will be delicious.
I should have added `Defamation'!
I understand that only twins/multiple births have their time of birth recorded by the Registrar so that the birth order is known for possible later legal use (perhaps when some twit in a home-made will makes a bequest to `My oldest son/ youngest daughter' without naming them. It settles any dispute about who is the intended recipient. I expect it goes into every newborn's medical record but don't know for sure.
My mother told me I must have heard the rattle of teacups as I arrived at 4.15pm.
LOL.
I do hope your suggestion doesn't give her the idea, but I expect she's already thought of it.
@AnT, damn, only $73k? Looks like that big time foundation and all of that staff isn't very successful. Ouch. 73k is peanuts-won't even cover their monthly water bill or the fine silk diapers made from silk woven by tiny-fingered blind children that #2 is going to need! ha!
I wonder how much came from Oprah?
I so agree re that $73,000 collected for the COVID relief effort. *sigh* Let me tell you my perspective about how sad that is. I live outside a small town of 1,200 people. A local well-known nice guy's wife suffered a severe medical event. Word passed around and people started donating quietly. A couple of days later, he was presented with a check for $40,000. That was done with no TV, no publicity, no radio, no Go Fund Me, just people saying "Have you heard that X's wife is in the hospital? They're donating money to help at a local business."
I think Campbell lost followers with that tomato that went splat. 🍅
My time of birth is on my birth certificate, 10:59 a.m. I still don't like to eat before noon (grin).
To clarify to make sure we are on the same page, in my comment I wrote:
Also from Yahoo (which tells me the Sussex PR machine is running out of money),...
The Sucksmess Squad just announced they raised $73,000 in honor of Archie’s 2nd birthday and the #2Baby Shower.
In other words, the $73K was raised by the "squad" and not Archewell. Here's the link.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/prince-harry-meghan-markle-supporters-150000133.html
it says, in part,
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle adhere to the creed that “service is universal.” In the spirit of that mantra, their supporters—dubbed the Sussex Squad—raised over $73K for four charities in their honor.
Their supporters created the viral hashtags #SussexBabyShower and #Archies2ndbirthday to raise funds for charities that have been associated with the couple: Baby2Baby (provides children living in poverty with diapers, clothing, and all the basic necessities), Homeboy Industries (offers second chances to those previously incarcerated), The Loveland Foundation (committed to supporting mental health, especially for Black women) and The Mission Continues (veterans who are now serving their communities).
he fundraiser began on April 1 and ran through May 31 with a goal of $10K. That was exceeded within days and the final tally was $73,195.01.
Each organization received more than $16K in donations from the campaign.
SO the Squad keeps digging into their pockets for money from its "members" while their mansion-dwelling, designer-wearing Duchess can only muster up $10 for a dog shelter.
@ConstantGardener33,
see my note to SwampWoman above at 9:52 PM --- the funds were raised by the Squad. I was not referring to Archewell. Archwell? I just realized I don't know how it is spelled, lol.
.
https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/angelina-jolie-brad-pitt-and-i-were-already-married-before-wedding-201591/
I also came across this. Was it discussed here? If so, I missed it. They play their games. Both losers,or is one about to step out for the win?
https://www.theroyalobserver.com/p/meghan-markle-pal-jessica-mulroney-posts-cryptic-message-prince-harry-talks-wife-suicidal-thoughts
I just reread article. Didn't H say he went for help and they refused? Now here he is too ashamed? In my best Don Pardo "Tune in next time IF there is a next time"
Unfortnately there will be. Oh that reminds me of this oldie I happened upon https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1325436/meghan-markle-prince-harry-sussex-royal-duchess-sussex-royal-family-news-spt
Turned around and did same damn thing. Or is this same money where they were recently found to be "careless" non criminals 🙄 Was the mystery donor ever discovered? Who delayed the missus' payment? Whose jewelry,dress, shoes did she stop wearing same time? 🤔 🤨
Or was it Charles cutting them off? 😳
Too much to think about. I want to share one last pic and then off for a bit. Have to search for it though. First time I ever saw M when she was black, young but not child. Only took 20 years and a Prince to bring back the black. Pay no mind to interim 40+ medical procedures she endured to completely remake her face, race is ripe and bronzer is a steal
Bonus blinking baby as I search https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/AS02OOtF5jJ_nitm5IR0_yEEO4MYZ0j12OCQ5ziVJK42_3zKV4u5ubMPS_d7W1flvQ0IqqT2prejPs24W-RHBiQ/
"@Puds...the media has been exaggerating how much X person is worth for ages. Show me a copy of Dianas will and I will believe it, til then smoke and mirrors. I think Diana had millions in land, art, assets, jewlry, etc. . But she also had taxes, debts, and expenses too. NOT everything appreciates in value over time, nor is considered a liquid asset like CASH. Cash $$$ is what the Sussexs need, not old family heirlooms that collect dust in the attic."
Diana's wealth is definitely exaggerated as is the money inherited by the brothers from her.
Diana didn't have that much wealth despite coming from a wealthy family.
Like all aristocratic families, daughters are shafted in these things as entire estate is entailed to the heir and they receive whatever money the titleholder chooses to give them and rarely is it a trustfund. She had some money gifted tk her and her siblings from a grandmother and her father bought each of them a flat in London and that was all.
When her father died, she got a million or two which was considered unusual, and the gossip was that she got it because her father wanted to give her a more solid platform even though she was married into the royals.
When she died, her will was made public. Total wealth revealed including assets was £21M, of which £17M was the recently received divorce cash settlement from Charles.
She died before she'd done any estate planning because that September was going to be the start of any such activities. She didn't even see her newly completed refurbished KP apartment.
Her estate was subjected to 40% inheritance tax as well as any debts and the remainder invested in trusts for William and Harry to be shared equally on their 25th birthdays.
Her executors changed the date of the trusts to their 30th birthdays.
When they turned 30yrs old, William and Harry each received £10M and full control of her estate, rights, memorial fund etc.
The times announced the trust amounts received in 2012
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dianas-pound10m-birthday-present-to-william-zpwv2qkdglp
So did DM:
William in 2012
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2143799/Prince-William-line-10m-payout-Dianas-estate-turns-30.html
Harry in 2014
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2673853/Happy-10million-birthday-Harry-Prince-inheritance-Diana-turns-30-September-4million-goes-straight-tax-man.html
What is interesting about both articles is they claim that the inherited trusts were subjected to an additional 40% tax which is characterised as inheritance tax which implies that it wasn't paid back in 1997 because i'm pretty sure you don't pay 2 lots of inheritance tax, but i'm happy to be corrected.
Either way, the brothers inherited £10M each before tax.
There is the matter of the QM's trusts created in 1994 to each of her then living great grandchildren + Margaret's children. It was thought to be £19M shared between 8 beneficiaries to be handed out in two parts, at 25yrs old and at 40yrs old except for those beneficiaries that had already passed the 25yr mark who received their entire share at 40yrs.
It was thought that she divested £9M to be shared between William and Harry and the other £10M between the other 6 - Zara, Peter, B, E, David and Sarah.
On the assumption that the QM trust information is correct and true, Harry is worth anywhere before or just over £15M before tax.
If the QM information isn't true then he is £10M before tax.
He is pissed that for the first time he has to pay from his own pocket instead of being subsidised by the taxpayers or daddy.
Wild Boar Battle-maid said...
@ Sir Stinxalot
"Royal Family Reportedly Plans on forgiving H$M by 2022"
I've taken one for you!
The source is Page 6, quoting an `insider' and framing it as `reportedly'. Sounds like an extrapolation from `Of course they'll be invited to the Jubilee' - said in a less- than -convincing-over-enthusiastic tone.
It did say `at least reduce the bad blood' or wtte.
Can anyone ever `plan' to forgive someone? How does one define `forgiveness' anyway?
My approach'd be `I'll see how I feel in a year's time...' though I don't think I'd aim to harbour a grudge/plot revenge (I might enjoy thinking about it tho'!. I'd hope not to become bitter and twisted myself.
Even if I forgave, I wouldn't forget. Nor would make excuses for someone and/or I pretend it hadn't happened.
WBBM...thanks for reading over that article gor me. Funny thing is, you only need FORGIVENESS when you know you have done something wrong. PUBLIC ADMISSION of guilt? Will it be followed by a PUBLIC APOLOGY? Will the Disastrous Duo admit that they "are such a fraud" ( per M admission)?
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle adhere to the creed that “service is universal.” In the spirit of that mantra, their supporters—dubbed the Sussex Squad—raised over $73K for four charities in their honor.
Ummm, divide $73K between FOUR CHARITIES and that approximately $18,250 each charity. Do the Sussex Squad take a percentage for administrative and handling costs??
No worries -- in rereading my comment I can see how it was confusingly worded -- "they" could have been either.
SO....how about this:
Piers Morgan vows to 'take fight to Palace' as he slams Meghan Markle for 'downright lies'
PIERS Morgan has blasted Meghan Markle for telling "downright lies" as he appeared in a dramatic trailer for a new interview.
The former Good Morning Britain presenter is set to speak out on Australian show 60 Minutes. In a bombshell teaser released ahead of the programme on Sunday, Morgan hits out at the Duchess of Sussex for telling "downright lies" in her and Prince Harry's controversial Oprah Winfrey interview in March.
In the trailer, the ex-newspaper editor refers to Meghan's claim - which has since been debunked - that she and Harry tied the knot secretly in their "backyard" days before their extravagant Windsor wedding.
Morgan says: "They were downright lies.
"That would make the Archbishop of Canterbury a criminal."
The teaser also warns that Morgan is "taking his fight straight to the Palace".
....Read the rest here:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1445607/piers-morgan-news-meghan-markle-oprah-winfrey-interview-prince-harry
Clearly one of Mrs 6's manifesting articles of what she wants.
How magnanimous of her to plan her own forgiveness just in time to be front and centre at all the Jubilee events.
I'd file this in that file tyat includes a Sandrigham christmas invitation for Doria, Dior contracts, Superhero and Bond girl film roles Queen writing personal thank you notes for good tour and also throwing her a birthday tea or was it a party.
You have to give her kudos for having the balls to publicly name what she'd like to manifest.
Also, kinda interesting to see how she's now using pagesix for her exclusives.
Fresh from giving them Archie pap shots and not suing despite Harry complaining on a podcast.
@SirStinxAlot said...
"Prince Harry and Meghan Markle adhere to the creed that “service is universal.” In the spirit of that mantra, their supporters—dubbed the Sussex Squad—raised over $73K for four charities in their honor.
Ummm, divide $73K between FOUR CHARITIES and that approximately $18,250 each charity. Do the Sussex Squad take a percentage for administrative and handling costs??"
It's interesting that the Sussex Squad's fundraising drives tend to go directly to the named charities even if they do it in the name of the no 6s.
Except for money derived from sales of The Bench, and the Grenfell cookbook, they've not sent any money, goods or services to Archewell and any of the No6s personal charities.
Money from the cookbook goes to the royal foundation which distributes it in their name. Money from the bench is going straight to Mrs 6's bank account which means that the Sussex Squad's desire to turn mrs 6 into a bestselling author by buying multiples of her book are directly funding her.
Btw, the charity commission investigation into sussexroyal/ travalyst funding has finally concluded that money wasn't misused or misplaced, BUT they made the point that almost all of it was used up in admin costs which wasn't made clear in the available public records of both entities.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9617211/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-did-not-break-charity-law-says-regulator.html
I think that is proof positive that any money going into Archiewell will disappear in simikar, but legal manner.
This from TheresaLongoFans Twitter @BarkJack:
June 2
Remember who told you first: we knew with certainly in May and told you the deal: they aren’t going.
Quote Tweet
THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
· May 17
Neither #Megxit member to be in attendance at Diana Statue unveiling; but both plan on marking the occasion —according to a very close friend of the pair.
.....interesting.
And the laughs just keep coming, Nutties!
Someone in Montecito hasn’t been getting enough attention...And she’s got to be aware that having promised the public vaguely that baby princess Diana is due “sometime in June”-ish, People are wondering how much longer she’s going to milk the Blessed child gig.
Meg is Having Problems, people. She is Suffering—Says she’s having really bad nausea. Copying Kate’s HG, I suppose—Though it would be extremely unusual to still be experiencing debilitating morning sickness just weeks away from giving birth. But why the hell not, anything for sympathy. Cue the miniature violin army.
If I believed Meg is pregnant I Would be sympathetic to pregnancy complications. In her case however, “pregnancy complications” mean something has fallen through with her sourced baby/baby actors/surrogate womb. She is utterly sickeningly predictable, because Trooping
the Colour is coming up next Saturday, right? Followed a couple weeks later by Diana’s statue event. Shunned from either, her only tack is
to have a pregnancy related medical emergency...Right on cue. This will cover Harry’s non-attendance at both events as well. Stay tuned for a dramatic pre-eclampsia near death experience!
My thoughts are with all the mothers, past, currently, and in the future to come who suffer from genuine pregnancy complications, pregnancy loss, and all of the bad things that can happen. This fake hollow excuse for a human being and her invented Life dramas hijacks Other people is real pain personal gain And just because she has no idea how to be any way else. Let’s pray that their disgusting house of cards is all come tumbling down.
Leaked stories
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/04/out-of-touch-bishops-pushing-church-brink-ruin/
I read this article that emphasises that the Smythe abuse scandal has not gone away ; that there are people in senior positions who have had minimal involvement with parish ministry; whose management of their responsibilities leave much to be desired; and whose entire qualification for ordination & ministry is in doubt.
Winchester diocese is a case in point – there have been some very unholy goings on: problems with funding traditional rural parishes compared with urban Evangelical centres, to say nothing of episcopal mishandling of church matters in Jersey, in the Channel Islands. There is an open revolt in progress -
https://anglican.ink/2021/05/28/winchester-prepared-to-bounce-bullying-bishop/
If Welby quits, it won’t be just being Markled that brings him down, The CofE is in big trouble.
Do we suppose that Markle is setting us up for a “stillbirth”? Perhaps she has been told in no uncertain terms by the Palace that there cannot be a second fake birth circus, and she has to either cease and desist or provide them with proof absolute that she is currently gestating Harry’s child. I theorized before that if BP ever admitted to their part in a cover-up involving “Archie”, that Markle Would turn around and blame them for her lies—Claim that either her fragile mental health lead her to pretend she was pregnant as a means of feeling accepted by Harry’s family but That backfired, and then she couldn’t stop pretending. Or, what is equally or more likely after her revelations on Oprah—That the royal family itself compelled her to use a surrogate to ensure the child was 100% white. I can smell this coming a mile off. I hope the RF is prepared for this. These two are never ever going to stop as long as they both draw breath.
I wonder how we'd feel if MM really is pregnant and doesn't survive?
Would we feel guilty?
FRIDAY, JUNE 04, 2021
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2021/06/blind-items-revealed-2_4.html?m=1, JUNE 04, 2021
Blind Items Revealed #2
October 7, 2020
Not the greatest of days for a former financial benefactor of the alliterate one. She thought she struck gold with him a couple of years before meeting the ginger headed one. Probably a good thing he found her wanting or she could be involved in that huge money laundering scandal surrounding him.
Mansoor Hussain/Meghan Markle
https://pasteboard.co/K55K0sF.jpg
Yesterday at store I saw the LA times mag with H&M on cover and she looked so bad. Old pic as I recognized outfit , awful headshot. People Royal Spring issue has Catherine on cover with tiny text implying story of what Meghan's new life is like. Hmm I actually do think it read M and not DoS ,nonetheless on cover of Royals issue. There was also beautiful picture of HM &PP on a collector issue type magazine (unsure) it was $15 . I would have bought it but it made me feel sad. I may pick up later, has anyone seen or purchased?
On radio there was story in 3 or so years United Airlines is bringing back updated version of Concorde jet. They claim it will be just as fast but with ZERO carbon footprint. Could have been possible coupling with Travalyst (if even still around ) a true venture not involving dead mom but what legit company would want anything to do with him now?
I watched M's 11year old dishsoap commercial again. I hadn't seen since first made rounds. To me she comes off snotty and defensive. Her comments didn't strike me as budding feminist but of anger and defense of dad. Mom's don't do everything . My mom is no longer here kind of feel. Is this same timeframe Doria was in prison? I feel she was bit off even younger but her mom gone seemed to have really set trajectory. They even comment on her pretty cursive, now evolved to whatever that is we see today? Shame as Thomas seemed like good dad and wanting to fix her pain but the obvious overcompensation spawned today 🙁
Sad if indeed disconnected.
Enjoy your evening everyone! My tea time is at 5:46 😏
Tatty - you asked who had made such a claim about the delivery of the baby and I provided you with an answer. You then derided that answer as not good enough.
Regardless of your opinion of her, Lady Colin Campbell has published multiple biographies of royal relationships and history without inciting lawsuits of defamation.
If she was not credible, she would not have the following she does. I'm afraid you being unimpressed with her history does not actually invalidate it.
Are you familiar with why she left her husband? Tell me why you're so staunch in defending the use of his title.
The unvarnished answer straight from my heart is no, I would not. The demise of Harry’s wife would bring shock but relief too. No one who is life she touches will ever know peace as long as she is in the world. It would be prudent to stop short of admitting the news of her death would actually make me happy, but I don’t feel prudent today, but at least I’m honest.
I would feel awful if she were actually pregnant and the baby were to die. That isn’t something I lie awake nights worrying about. If Meg wants us truly worried about her unborn baby, that ship sailed with all of her lies and deceit. We wished her well the first time, and she and the alleged sperm donor have been laughing at us and taking the piss for nearly three years. Right now, after all of her antics, for me to believe that she is actually pregnant right now would require the sworn testimony of more than one legitimate medical professional who she hasn’t been able to bribe. I would trust Dr. Fauci if he went on CNN and announced that he’s personally examined her and she is indeed pregnant. Until then I’m going to remain Skeptical, because that is what she has earned.
Choccywoccydoodah, St. Ives, UK
Pinocchio, Snow White, and Superman are out for a stroll in town one day. As they walk, they come across a sign that says, "Beauty contest for the most beautiful woman in the world." Snow White says, "I am entering." After half an hour she comes out, and they ask her, "Well, how'd ya do?" "First place," says Snow White. They continue walking, and they see a sign, "Contest for the strongest man in the world." "I'm entering," says Superman. Half an hour later he walks out, and they ask, "How did you do?" "First place," says Superman. "Did you ever doubt?" They continue walking and see a sign, "Contest! Who is the greatest liar in the world?" Pinnochio says, "This is mine." Half an hour later, he returns with tears in his eyes. "What happened?" they ask. "I lost!" he cries. "Who the hell is Meghan Markle?"
After I read the blind from CDAN that you posted I remembered that there was a lot of publicity about Mansoor Hussain. I Googled Mansoor Hussain to check. The Daily Mail along with other newspapers carry the story. They have included a large pic of MM draped all over Mansoor, This pic was from 2013. Wasn't this about the time she was hoping to bag a millionaire or a famous footballer. Before she got her talons into Harry. Interesting story if any Nutties want to check it out.
I'd never even heard Mansoor Hussain mentioned in connection to NeverWas before. I didn't know what to make of the blind. (I rarely do!) Her picture with him isn't doing her any favors now. Not very indicative of somebody who is supposedly "whip-smart." How could you see all the wealth and have no idea where it came from?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54442979
Unexplained Wealth Orders: Suspected money launderer gives up £10m of property
By Dominic Casciani
BBC home affairs correspondent
7 October 2020
The Leeds businessman Manni Hussain handed over 45 properties after investigators used an Unexplained Wealth Order
Around £10m of property has been surrendered in a major victory against some of northern England's most dangerous criminals.
The apartments and homes were given up to the National Crime Agency by a Leeds businessman who investigators suspect of being a major money-launderer.
The NCA says Mansoor Mahmood Hussain acted for gangsters, including a murderer and drug trafficker.
The agency believes he laundered their profits through a property empire.
Just a thought -
I wonder how we'd feel if MM really is pregnant and doesn't survive?
Would we feel guilty?
I trust this isn't keeping you up at night, WBBM, because I really don't think she's pregnant.
It's way the hell too coincidental that her two most recent exes, Trevor and Corey, both became fathers before she could marry again.
That joke is sublime! I am laughing my head off. Thank you for sharing it with us!
Must agree with you with regard to Megs not being pregnant. She’s addicted to attention and victimhood and sainthood, So logically she should be out and about, like the other pregnant Hollywood A-listers she envies. This opportunity is bigger than vanity, and even if she looks tired or heavier, it makes her another kind of victim if anyone says anything.
She should be out in Montecito and Beverly Hills, showing off her huge bump, which based on the Feb photos must now be the size of the Unisphere in Queens, while Harry holds her hand as if it’s 2017 all over again.
But she isn’t. Once more, she isn’t. And there wasn’t a pandemic last time, hmmm.
Why is she missing the chance to have all these earth mother of Hollywood photos taken, which would be so useful in her presidential election website carousel? Why is she missing all the adulation offered to “young” mothers-to-be in LA? Why does she always disappear at this time? Instead of milking it? Why no intimate Zoom chats to other mothers from her sofa? Why no photos of a doting Doria having a cozy tea or admiring the nursery with her only child — or is Doria just seen as “hired nanny help” as per the awful press put out by the press team? Why no images of our heavily pregnant Megs doing calming meditation with mama Doria in the beautiful garden? Why missing chances to endorse maternity yoga gear, or jewelry for mums-to-be?
Why? I think it is because isn’t pregnant, and she gets bored with the buckle-on-bumps at this point, and slags off with cosmetic tweaks and “treats” knowing she won’t be called out on it, knowing there at least 73,000 sugars in the world who believe whatever her team says, and journalists who won’t say a thing, and guys like Archbishop Welby and Harry who will fabricate anything for a buck or a pound.
Don’t worry about Megs. Worry about the kid she hires to be Baby Sally Diana.
.
The media propels the world. The spotlight has never been on the Wessexes, and yet they have so much more to offer and are really interesting people!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-W0EuY-F1I
He talks about how Will & Kate don't want the dastardly duo to attend the Jubilee next year but the reeeaallllll interesting part is all about Doria.
That's right, DORIA - he explains what her personality is like and what her deal is. Very illuminating. Use this link to go direct to the Doria part, starting at 21:29:
https://youtu.be/S-W0EuY-F1I?t=1289
I don't know who told him all this but he seems to know what he's talking about. Very insider scoop.
Martha - we could certainly do a lot worse than the Wessexes. What is the Soap blog you're referring to?
She definitely gets lots of cosmetic surgery, and if is doing so now, that also confirms she isn’t pregnant. Her inability to stay with a project and not jump around reactively, or be impulsive, always hangs her lies out to be seen.
NewLy tweaked face appears after July 1, and we have another winner in the fake baby line up.
River certainly did serve hot tea tonight! Thank you for letting us know there was a new one, I forgot to check. Just finished listening (and admiring his eyeshadow, he does it so well and he is so naturally striking anyway) —
....but, did you also happen to read the comments about Doria on his video? If true (scroll scroll scroll til you get there)....there’s one...wow.
I was puzzled about the recent date on the reports cited - I'd picked up on him much earlier, almost 2 yrs ago (July '19) at the time of the first Unexplained Wealth Order. I'm sure I was lurking here then but didn't have the nerve to contribute nor did I have the right email.
His connection with the Duchess in Name Only was mentioned (with photo of the 2 of them) but the press didn't dig very hard. This is a retrospective report from 13th January 2020:
The agency also obtained an Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) back in July 2019, in relation to eight UK properties which had been purchased by Mr Hussain.
He was ordered to reveal the source of funds used to acquire and develop the £10 million property portfolio.
Officers believe the purchases were funded by a number of criminal associates involved in drug trafficking, armed robberies and supplying firearms.
The court also imposed orders preventing the properties from being sold, transferred or dissipated during the NCA’s investigation.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/18156910.nca-freeze-1-13-million-account-linked-mansoor-hussain/
They also said 'the royals remain a family 'no matter what happens'.' This is couched very diplomatically and if M thought the BRF would disparage her, she must be very disappointed. This is the official version, though. Unlike her, they have good breeding.
One very good comment sums up Oprah:
CindyP894, New York, United States, 5 hours ago
Oprah gives marriage advice when she's never been married. Gives parenting advice when she has no kids. Gives health advice when she's as big as a house. Lectures on income inequality when she's a billionaire. Am I wrong for asking why people listen to this woman?
Sorry, I forgot the link:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9653959/Prince-Edward-Sophie-Wessex-joke-Oprah-Harry-Meghan-saying-royals-family.html
This is from 2014 - if you really want to wallow in it:
https://www.thecut.com/2014/10/desperately-seeking-oprah.html
THE BIG O OCT. 1, 2014
`I Survived a Weekend With the Cult of Oprah'
I'd feel relief more than anything I believe. I haven't actually wished her dead, just that she's go away and shut up.
Were she to dematerialise in a puff of sulphurous (sorry, even Brits are supposed to say `sulfurous' now) smoke, I'd be delighted - it'd be entirely appropriate for her although still leaving the possibility of a reappearance.
I wonder if a virtual exorcism might have any effect?
I posed my `How would you feel?' question in place of saying sarcastically that at least we can be sure she won't die in childbirth, but that seemed a tad too bitchy.
I would characterize that as realistic rather than bitchy. I wouldn't feel bad if she met an untimely demise. Let me rephrase that: The only "bad" feels that I would have would have to do with the fact that the Royal Family will be blamed. Witch decides to suicide because her lies have caught up with her? BRFs fault because she crashed and burned. Witch takes too many party pharmaceuticals and dies? BRFs fault and white pipo's fault because racism. (Not that I think it would be more than a tempest in a teacup; she has zero personal magnetism.)
"From what River said (love the eye makeup, fan, and jewels BTW) Doria would appear to be what we would call a "shit stirrer". She works the party dropping little words of poison here and there until the mood changes from festive to unhappy. Seems her daughter was an eager student as is her son in law."
I have a cousin who has a similar effect on any conversation. She's both poisonous and deeply unhappy. A real debbie downer who can be relied upon to find the most negative interpretation of any situation.
We have a family joke that if we plan to meet up with her, make sure to do it on your happiest day because by the time you part ways your mood will have shifted down to vaguely sad or if you are really lucky, normal mood. Avoid meeting her on a normal day and absolutely never if you are sad or having a bad day because you might do something very drastic afterwards.
`Although he had sought mental health treatment before meeting Meghan, she was the catalyst for finding a therapist who could finally provide him with the care and support he needed.'
Sadly, I don't seem to have noted the reference - I wonder how far Meghan had to look before finding the `therapist?
-------------------------
When I was reading about the current woes of the CofE, I came across an assertion that many women involved in MOW (Movement for the Ordination of Women) appear now to have been staunch feminists applying `Entryism':
From Google:
entryism
/ˈɛntrɪɪz(ə)m/
noun
the infiltration of a political party by members of another group, with the intention of subverting its policies or objectives:
"cases of alleged entryism have been reported in many constituencies"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
The author didn't say it in so many words but implied that they had come in under a false flag, professing to have discerned that they had a vocation within the Church when the ulterior motive was to `smash the patriarchy'. Many have now left, abandoning their parishes and the people they undertook to serve. Or else they preach Cultural Marxism/ Intersectionality/ Wokery rather than the Gospel.
Does this remind you of Someone Else? Even though she won't go away?
For eg the Bishop of St Davids (not CofE but Church in Wales) had to apologise recently for her tweeted comments full of hatred for members of a political party which doesn't share her views.
Also, from comments about the effect on potential candidates, it seems to reinforce my comment that Welby may have been the best of a bad job. Certainly the Bp of Winchester, 3rd in precedence among the diocesan bishops, seems to have had a similar academic path to Bashir (degree from a College of Higher Education, followed by the King's College London MA, but much is obscure after that) and is another wearer of the purple who doesn't seem up to the job.
YouTube comment I believe AnT was referring to on River's video:
Doria hasn’t been seen or photographed since fall 2020. In the fall a report said she was sent back to prison for probation violation(s) allegedly. (4 years tax evasion prison was in the past) Searches showed she was not in a California prison but tips led to New Jersey prisons. Did H’s wife get her into a high end type of prison?
Long ago there was a planned photo of them in a vehicle. Their PR said D was in the back seat. Face not visible. When she has been mentioned (rarely) we don’t see her. Just like the invisible baby.
Huh.
Think that was a cover story for something else?
I found the URL
https://the-best-soap-opera-ever.tumblr.com/
aka team Cambridge all the way
Gosh, the way M does that pelvic thrust at the bloke going behind her!
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are DEMOTED on Royal Family website below Sophie Wessex, Prince Edward and Prince Andrew
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9655131/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-DEMOTED-Royal-Family-website.html
From
https://yankeewally.tumblr.com/
Meghan Markle Plans To Give Birth The 'Scientology' Way: Silent Birth Explained
A close source revealed that the couple were considering silent birth for the arrival of their baby girl.
sandiedog
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were considering a “Scientology” method of giving birth for the arrival of their baby girl.
A source recently told New Idea that the couple is planning to have their child through silent birth, “Meghan and Harry feel they’ve been through enough in their own lives and are anxious to start over with their baby girl, and that means giving her the most peaceful entrance possible into the world,” the source stated.
“There will be no doctors screaming ‘push’ at Meghan or anything like that.” the source added. This came after the couple had allegedly experienced psychological trauma while being a part of the royal family to ensure that they, and their children will have a healthier mental head space.
WHAT IS SILENT BIRTH?
According to The Church of Scientology, reported by The Bump, the words that a newly-birth child hears during its labor may have an impact throughout its life that’s why they want to eliminate any noises.
“My understanding is that when the woman is laboring, the intent is that people who are in her immediate environment are not talking, that the environment is one that is quiet… That the patient is as much at peace as possible,” Michael P. Nageotte MD of Long Beach Memorial Medical Center and Miller Children’s Hospital Long Beach. explains.
In a different report published by The Guardian, L Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, explains the importance of silence during birth. Giving birth without any noise can avoid “engrams” which is “the impressions formed in the brain because of “physical pain or painful” experiences.“
mapleleaf2rouge:
how can somebody who is not preggy give birth, yell in silence as she pulls the latest doll out of the box
Source sandiedog
Was it was another Diana-aping - the belief that Charles was involved with the nanny being replayed? Did she catch H in flagrante?
My opinions:
Silent Birth (hilarious find, by the way!) — Either she is desperate to be part of Hollywood and thinking the now failing Scientology cult, exposed across the world at this point, is still the Hollywood power-push it was in the 90s (her era of reference since she appears to be mentally stunted). She will blow the rest of Harry’s money to join and ———- maybe her backers were of Scientology all along —David Miscavage and Tom Cruise wanted her to secure a royal to add to their stable, promising her she will become little Tom Cruise’s next Queen?
Otherwise, silent birth also handy as a concept to make sure there are no doctors or witnesses, she has the Doll unboxed in her bedroom with Scientology handmaidens only, and NO ONE can visit post-birth either — kid must be surrounded by silence until peddled off to bidder. Sorry McPhee and Foster, Oprah and HotRob— no visitors allowed during our six month time-off sabbatical and the life of Baby Sally Diana!
Night Nanny Mystery —I think there was never a nanny, since they had no child, and never lived in Frogmore anyway. But putting a crazy story like this out lets the gullible public, and under-educated sugars, and cooing mommy brigade members, think they WERE at Frogmore, they HAD custody of a baby, they WERE together, they DID hire a nanny out of love and fired her in a fit of parenting horror! In fact all the nannies that filed in and out were evil! “Harry, I saved your doll four times from paps dressed as nannies—!” Because of course top-flight nanny agencies hire unchecked criminals, and Megsy stopped all that!
This way, anyhow, the public is fooled about the invisible kid —- and she getS to charge Charles for a bunch of nannies AND whine and cry her sad tales of nanny abuse and fear so Charles will pity her and keep sending the money to the account. And then, it is useful so she canmake up a story about why they don’t want anyone near the Doll, day or night: Trauma! Nanny PTSD! And yes, maybe a chance to conjure up the old Tiggy rumors and simultaneously make Harry look guilty, OR make Charles look guilty for an old invisible Nanny crime.
Of course this is another pile, in my opinion.
Her playbook is entirely a matter of dropping ugly innuendo and lies about people, and then hiding behind the sofa. In my opinion!
.
Saying they'd be silent, of course, is a handy get-out clause if any of their premises have been bugged - explains why listeners heard nothing.
I agree that the Scientologists would fit the bill as sinister backers - I don't know a great about them, only what Louis Theroux revealed in one of his programmes - that was enough for me!
Just more proof that this grifter has no idea what giving birth is like.
MYSTERIES: Does Harry HATE William? Meghan's babies? Fake offers? Jealousy? Tiggy erasedMeghan's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZ99GPsYatg
Hadn’t even considered the use of “silence” against a premises that has been bugged by royals — or Russians. That’s brilliant. Regarding Scientology, I have seen the Leah Rimini series and read reports by Village Voice journalist Tony Ortega (tonyortega.org). Terrifying. It is a cult that is somehow allowed to carry on. I remember Sci was outright banned in Germany.
✨✨✨✨
@Teasmade — ha, oh my. His totally true! Only the male founder of the Sci cult could imagine silent birth as a good thing. Though my friend is a doctor who volunteered for a year in a Tanzanian village clinic told us he was shocked that some women would come in and give birth in utter silence. It brought him to tears talking about it, that they felt they felt they had to suffer that without a sound.
✨✨✨✨
@AvaC, — But could Megs follow their orders and rules and hand over the money —-or do you think would she be like Tom Cruise, with his impoverished starving cult-supplied servants? Since she brought them an excised, vulnerable royal prince to exploit? Mind control next.
.
Oh no, this will never happen.
🤣🤣🤣 Lol! You’re right — truth is her kryptonite!
so east to be silent when someone in another room or county is the one pushing.
scientology is her attempt to get back into hollywood but somehow i think the cult i mean organization would rather snag the mr than the mrs. maybe she’s angling for tom cruise as hubby number 4 😉.
When she got her freedom you can see a whole new woman emerged. She fought hard for her own identity. I admire what she's achieved but also believe her to be hard as nails when needed. With more than one skeleton in her closet. She's successfully obscured the fact that she went after the man she left Elvis for, knowing he had a small child and that his wife was pregnant. When do you ever read about that? Her teenaged sexual life with Elvis is something she's whitewashed her entire adult life. She has supported the Baz Luhrmann Elvis film coming out next year with Tom Hanks. That's a bomb waiting to go off in this era of Me Too. Her daughter desperately tried to stop her co-operating for that reason. Elvis Presley Enterprises, with Priscilla as the one who started it all with her corporate backers and experts, is ruthless and soulless.
Yet Priscilla will have had to do this audit. She would have had to divulge truths that would fundamentally challenge the edifice she has built and that her life as she knows it depends on. Especially now her daughter is bankrupt. I agree with others that the reason she went to Scientology is that Elvis detested them. I also believe that as an ultra-controlling person she was attracted to a rigidly controlled all-or-nothing organisation. Like attracts like. She is also believed to have parted with some of her wealth yet money means everything to her. I entirely understand why. It bought her freedom. Control over her own money when she had no control over any aspect of her life with Elvis. No control whatsoever. Yet she gave them money. Some of that hard-won, precious money she valued down to the last dollar.
Scientology also has an overwhelming sense of secrecy. It's a fortress with incredibly powerful supporters. Priscilla is up there with Tom Cruise and John Travolta. I can easily imagine M wanting to be up there with them. She wants to be in the 'A' lister world for more than a weekend by an Italian lake. Other 'A' listers will never accept her, but if she gets into the Church of Scientology, she's finally bracketed with some 'A' listers on an ongoing basis, and no doubt would feel buttressed by the power of the organisation. She would feel important just because she was wanted by them. If she IS wanted that is. She probably doesn't have enough money for them, yet the power of being linked to a British prince may still appeal to them. The British prince himself, of course, is an easy conquest. His mind has already been conquered. His family is gone. Nothing could be simpler.
'A couple of weeks ago, I came across this:
`Although he had sought mental health treatment before meeting Meghan, she was the catalyst for finding a therapist who could finally provide him with the care and support he needed.'
Sadly, I don't seem to have noted the reference - I wonder how far Meghan had to look before finding the `therapist?'
----------------
I found it came from an article in the Express (also Buzzfeed news), and the above sentence is about ¾ of the way down. The BuzzFeed reporter, Ellie Hall, talks about H taking on the role of revisionist historian, contradicting past statements he’s made about his mental health issues and the support — or lack thereof — he received from the royal family. Correct!
The article, however, doesn't mention how far M has to look to find a 'therapist'.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1444869/prince-harry-meghan-markle-buzzfeed-inconsistencies-mental-health-oprah-winfrey-spt
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/prince-harry-contradictions
'Of the website change, Buckingham Palace told MailOnline it had no comment 'other than that we refresh the website regularly'.'
Yes ,sure 😉. That way,the duo can't complain if now and again the info is updated. M, though, will be spitting feathers that she is not getting top billing.
Thanks for the link to River's YouTube most enlightening!
I bet the Queen is delighted 🙄
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9655779/Harry-Meghans-baby-daughter-THURSDAY-Philips-100th-birthday.html
Now I'm off to read the article.
I did say a while back that she might try something like Lilibet somI wasn't far off but I shouldn't be so surprised at Pip after Prince Philip. If they go ahead with these choices, I bet the BRF will be impressed 🤢
I tend to doubt the comment story about Doria as well, but thought it odd they used a detail like New Jersey.
Not dingos, but......
from the MIRROR:
Meghan Markle and Harry must tighten security as 4 bears prowling around LA pad
EXCLUSIVE: The same bear tried to attack a neighbour's chicken coop and is now prowling near the home of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle - and that's not the only one in the vicinity
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-harry-meghan-must-tighten-24257091
Four black bears have been seen prowling near Harry and Meghan’s California home.
The Duke of Sussex and his heavily pregnant wife are now being warned to tighten their security measures to keep the animals at bay.
The alert comes after the Sunday Mirror told how a bear tried to attack a neighbour’s chicken coop last month.
Now two adults have been spotted roaming in upmarket Montecito in the hills of Santa Barbara – with a later sighting of a mother with two cubs
A residents’ group, which counts Harry and Meghan as members, has sent emails alerting them to the dangers and telling them what they should do to secure their chickens.
Sharon Byrne, boss of the Montecito Association, said during the online meeting: “We’ve nicknamed the male bear Carlos and now he has a Carla to go with him. It’s spring, they’ve woken up and they’ve been seen in the past two weeks.
"One at the eastern edge of Montecito and one at the western edge in the space of a day. We’ve also had a sighting of the mama bear with cubs.”
The animal-loving Duke and Duchess have been urged to buy bear-resistant bins, keep their chickens in a secure yard and to freeze waste food so the smell doesn’t attract the bears.
Harry, 36, and Meghan, 39, moved to A-list favourite Montecito after stepping back from their roles as working royals.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife said: “People should not give bears access to food.
“If you come across one, talk quietly and back off slowly.” Montecito local Penny Bianchi built a “predatorproof ” coop last month after a male bear ate her chickens.
She said: “Last time he was here, I scared him off by banging frying pans together.”
Earlier today it was revealed that the couple has been moved below the Wessexes on the Royal Family's website following their move.
The Sussexes now sit beneath Harry's father Prince Charles and Camilla, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, Princess Anne, Prince Andrew and the Wessexes.
The website says the couple will be “balancing their time” between the UK and North America, in light of their move to Los Angeles.
The heavily pregnant Duchess has not made her due date public – and refuses to even be drawn on the month her baby is predicted to arrive.
Meghan is reportedly planning a home birth in California, US, and the Sussexes will take time to bond as a family of four.
Sources close to the couple claim that they plan to take both paternity and maternity leave when their baby girl arrives.
That, one royal expert suggests, could be "any day now".
####
Stop press! According to the DM, Megsy is due on Thursday on what would have been Prince Philip's birthday!
@Maneki Neko: This just screams that this item is a plant from Sunshine Sachs. Meghan and Harry are paying them a lot of money to keep them in the headlines.
If this child is born on Philip’s100th, it will be by a scheduled C-section if Meghan is actually pregnant or the surrogate’s due date just happens to be Philip’s birthday.
The wretch Harry married is attempting to curry favor with HMTQ and Charles because she is afraid they have gone too far and she will loose her reason for breathing — her titles.
She also wants her kids to receive titles, but the only titles they will likely be able to claim when they are older is PTSD victims, due to having a profoundly narcissistic mother.
Stop press! According to the DM, Megsy is due on Thursday on what would have been Prince Philip's birthday!
I bet the Queen is delighted 🙄
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9655779/Harry-Meghans-baby-daughter-THURSDAY-Philips-100th-birthday.html
Now I'm off to read the article.”
If we jog our memories to end of October, this is when Meghan told Justice Warby she was pregnant so ‘rule in my favor, this case is over.’ Next came the miscarriage story (after she would have been confirmed pregnant and out of her first trimester) on Thanksgiving. This baby is now timed right before the release of her children’s book about a Bench on Father’s Day. Looks like Megs has planned to ‘own’ June for a long time. Too bad for her everyone is on vacation and out shopping as the pandemic in the US is pretty much over.
I’m loving this blog and seeing her PR play out. Are they taking their strategy from this blog? She knows associating the speculation of the birth name to the RF will cause a stir and we see her front and center now playing to that speculation in the DM.
Why is she drawing attention to the due date? For the book? What else does she have up her sleeve....
I love Sophie Wessex more and more and more.
Asked if they had watched the interview by the Telegraph's royal editor Camilla Tominey, Prince Edward feigned ignorance and replied: "Oprah who?’"
While Sophie chuckled: "Yes, what interview?"
In response to an anecdote about the Archbishop of Canterbury not knowing who Oprah was at Harry and Meghan's wedding, The Countess added: "You know, if you’re not into chat shows, there’s no reason why you should know who she is." The Countess added: "Certainly not in this country, anyway."
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1445970/harry-and-meghan-news-sophie-wessex-interview-oprah-winfrey-evg
.....NATURALLY, sugars and buns jumped up in outrage to point out that Sophie has spoken to Oprah in the past -- not getting thatthis was a funny swipe a la Mariah Carey's famous "I don't know her" quip about J-Lo.
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2016/09/mariah-carey-i-dont-know-her-meme
.
We all "Gotta Serve Somebody" as the Bob Dylan tune goes. Though Mr. D obviously meant Jesus Christ. This tune being from back in that era of his.
The revamped Royal website says along the lines that the Markles will split their time between UK and USA and support their UK patronages. That seems almost what Megs wanted, half in half out. I expect by this inclusion rather than a statement the that Markles are no longer working Royals means they can claim security and expenses when in the UK when they make appearances at Royal events.
It's fine if the Queen wants to keep Harry and Megs in her family but its not fine for the rest of the UK to have to put up with these two making money off their links to the UK they hate or that the Markles appear to represent the taxpayer who they hate and publicly abuse to suit Megs politics and Harry's projecting (yes Harry you were the racist).
File this one under "Keep your enemies closer" (Godfather movies)
This must be very galling for UK citizens and taxpayers. It pisses me off, an American. Hopefully this is happy talk and accommodating talk from the BRF for image purposes. PR purposes. That meanwhile, behind the scenes, the BRF is being strict, getting stricter with the runaway (ex) Royals squatting in their mudslide mansion.
Lord Christopher Geidt, please be advising Prince William and Katherine on the QT. They need you.
Love it!
I like your idea that Meghan will debut Princenot Doriana on Phil’s 100th. I think she’ll be more inclined to announce it on Diana statue day.
The expectant parents are considering the names Pip and Lily, sources have said
Another option being considered is Diana, after Prince Harry's late mother
The new baby - a daughter - will the couple's second child after their son Archie
___________________
Above from the DM with 2.2K mostly blistering comments. Thank God Megs is in far off Montecito where she cannot read them. (/sarcasm)
___________________
DM wise guys are saying--->>> (So uncharitable!)--->>>>
eyespyagain, Colchester, United Kingdom, 17 minutes ago
They cannot induce a fake bump. The last bump folded in half when Megs bent down and then made a popping sound when she stood up. And she was always rubbing it to make sure it was staying in place. This time she is hiding away to save wearing the fake bump.
......................
Really1, Belfast, United Kingdom, 2 hours ago
Of course it's not due on Thursday. They're just looking for publicity.
......................
Hywel Dda, Cadair Idris, United Kingdom, 16 minutes ago
Oh, trust me, even if it's not due it will plop out. Chemically.
......................
Piper45, Tampa, United States, 10 minutes ago
I totally believe the kid was already born OR won't be born for awhile yet. They are lying POSs
About The Duchess of Sussex
The Duchess of Sussex, born Rachel Meghan Markle, married Prince Harry at St George's Chapel, Windsor in May 2018. The Duke and Duchess have one child, Archie Mountbatten-Windsor.
As announced in January, The Duke and Duchess have stepped back as senior members of The Royal Family. They are balancing their time between the United Kingdom and North America, continuing to honour their duty to The Queen, the Commonwealth, and their patronages. Frogmore Cottage in the UK remains their family home.
The Duchess will continue to support a number of charitable causes and organisations which reflect the issues with which she has long been associated including the arts, access to education, support for women and animal welfare.
The Duchess’ official titles are The Duchess of Sussex, Countess of Dumbarton and Baroness Kilkeel.
https://www.royal.uk/archie-harrison-mountbatten-windsor
https://www.royal.uk/princess-charlotte
In Archie’s profile, it’s clear Charles and William have never met Archie. They also make clear that the (photoshopped) christening never happened, otherwise why is charlottes mentioned and not archies? Also, no location of birth, nor witnesses.
I agree. I don’t know any family with grown adults that would keep treating the grown adults as if everything they do is ok. It would be a better example to show the world how appropriate it is to have BOUNDARIES. In the US, consequence is a big word with a big reality.
Using the ‘guarding the RF image’ as the excuse to play up the ‘we will always be family’ quotes (such as Sophie used) makes me think the RF still feels more powerful than whatever Meg and her backers have planned. I view that as ignorant and averting real leadership. Continuing to allow Harry to not suffer from consequences is embarrassing.
Technically they are still senior Royals with HRH status, which means they do represent the Queen.
Well, kind of makes sense, really, as god knows she is pump pump pumping them both for money and deals! 🤣🙄
Well, kind of makes sense, really, as god knows she is pump pump pumping them both for money and deals! 🤣🙄
Here is the profiles of Archie, and notice the difference for Charlotte:
https://www.royal.uk/archie-harrison-mountbatten-windsor
https://www.royal.uk/princess-charlotte
In Archie’s profile, it’s clear Charles and William have never met Archie. They also make clear that the (photoshopped) christening never happened, otherwise why is charlottes mentioned and not archies? Also, no location of birth, nor witnesses.
I never would have noticed any of this if you hadn't pointed it out, Jessica. And Charlotte's profile even includes the names of her godparents.
It is very suggestive that they don't include anything about Archie's christening.
Yes the RF profiles have really caught my eye! Apparently they are trying to cover their tracks with other Archie, and remain ‘above-board’ with Megs antics, all the while pandering to her stupidity with including the reference to splitting their time between US and USA and basically emphasizing they still are representing the Queen (which should be embarrassing to M and H for not denouncing their titles and being contradictory in their actions.)
So maybe the RF page reflects this stance....
Lol you’re right. Pump pump pump! Like pumping and dumping stocks.
Strange choice of words from Megs, as usual.
Exactly— glad you caught my meaning. It’s like the weird Harkles version of securities fraud.
It’s almost like someone is titillated by throwing constant clues out to the world — bizarre words, actions, mysteries — about a scam going on, almost hoping to get caught.
Does anyone here other than Tatty still believe that Haz didn’t force his family to accept his hooker for hire as his wife? I have never seen a wedding in my life other than this one where the spectators were so entirely diss interested in the vows. They looked either bored or nauseated depending on the face. In the normal course of events, everyone is usually transfixed on what is happening down front. From Markle’s wedding, It was extremely notable that none of the parents of the bridal couple actually looked at the vows taking place. Camila and Kate shared copious side eye With each other, that both Doria and Charles had their faces glued to their programs for the entirety of the vows. Charles had only seen one child get married before, so one would’ve thought he would’ve been glued to the proceedings. Doria only has the one child that we know of, but since this was Mugsy‘s third wedding, the mother of the bride was very blasé under the circumstances; she had seen her daughter bilking a white man and his family before, multiple times.
So I have no trouble believing that Meg with fake an entire pregnancy and actually fake an entire human being in order to squeeze more money and publicity out of her “motherhood”, imagine the brass balls it would take on H To insist on conning his entire family, including his nonagenarian grandparents, and his sister-in-law, the mother of three, That he’s actually fathered a son called Archie. The entire royal family has gone along with this charade, it’s only by their silence, as they have been wantonly hijacked without their consent into Photoshop projects to prop up the insanity of their son and his wife. It really boggles the mind. Has the Queen, in her great years, decided to except the path of least resistance and pretend that everything was normal with her granddaughter in law‘s pregnancy and the subsequent child? I can’t help thinking that Harry has continually threatened harm to himself unless his family went along with the wedding and the bogus pregnancy narrative., I think they’ve got along with everything because they’re that terrified that he would kill himself if he didn’t get his way.
Now that they seem to be calling his bluff, he remains to be seen whether he will be good on his word, or if he will renege on that promise the way he has done with all of the others he’s made to his grandmother.
So strip titles and after this baby step, after an interlude, remove the Hapless turncoat from the line of succession. The Harry Markle blogger wants this too. This California based twosome are an insult to the British people. The BRF are making a mistake by not acting. They are testing the loyalty of their constituents, the British public.
I started chuckling when I read that, coming so soon after this was news in the UK...
---
The California girl who pushed a bear to protect her dogs.
Footage shows the moment a teenage girl in California gets the better of a bear fighting with her pets.
(video on link)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-57325483
---
When this popped up on our news a few days ago my first thought was "I wonder if M is having a "hold my beer" moment?"
(almost typed "hold my bear" then lol)