Skip to main content

Netflix Trailer

 Well that's out now.  

Timing is suspicious I suppose.  They may claim that since it is coming out soon they needed it to drop now. 

How will it impact the current bruhaha from the other side of the pond?  

I don't know.  

Some will use this to carry water that this shows proof of all kinds of inherent problems but maybe not.  Maybe people will recognize that you have no control over what others say because they have a family member who can and will say things which others disagree with.  Those people will understand and feel sympathy.  


What is good about this is that it will drive interest in PoW and PsoW because right now they will be front and center for cameras.  They are professionals.  They look good.  And this will leave a lasting impression in people's minds. 

When the show finally does appear, it will be interesting to read the reviews of how people who haven't really been following this saga view it with fresh eyes.  It just may be a little too much - sugar?  them?  how the stars align always in a way against them?  too too? 

Watching it may be all some people do with that information.  They are now onto the next bing.

It may also trigger people into looking for alternatives to the Sussex version of reality.  They may find the constant me and victimization to be over the top?  Or not credible?  They may go looking and find articles of how, say, the interview had a few false statements.  So it may open eyes to how things really were.  

To paraphrase what was said in the trailer: something about making better or more sense to get the information from the source?  

That is a shot over the bow, isn't it?  Similar in some ways to the comment about not signing any papers.

It will be interesting to see things are edited.  In the interview, there were a number of statements later proven to be false.  NF doesn't do retractions.  But they do make shows which don't always make people look as wonderful as they thought they would show up.  



Comments

live stuff at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-63876934
10.40 am GMT BBC News

It's been out 2 hrs.

`Harry says it's his duty to uncover exploitation and bribery in the media'

Hark who say which, as we used to say. I switched off.
SwampWoman said…
Raspberry Ruffle says: And that this beatification by the Kennedys — the closest thing America has to a royal family of its own — dovetails rather beautifully into their slick, ongoing self-justifying, self-serving, propaganda machine.

Do people overseas really believe that about the Kennedys? Nobody here regards them as such. We know too many bad things about them.
Magatha Mistie said…

Ragged Tigged and Bobtailed

Doria let out of her box
Sans nose ring
tats and dreadlocks
Trying to cosplay
Mother of Sunday
Both are off their
effing rocks…

abbyh said…
Update:

New post out.

It does not allow me to move from the prior post to the new one (copy and paste is the only option).

@SwampWoman,

I was quoting Jan Moir. 🤗

Personally, I don’t believe the Kennedy’s are seen that way, not anytime recently…maybe during the 1960s till the 1970s. 🫤
OKay said…
@Sandie Could you reprint the Tumblr bit? I'm not on that platform and have no interest in signing up just to read what was written.
Oldest Older 401 – 407 of 407

Popular posts from this blog

So, when does the dirt on Meghan come out?

"This is only hearsay, but in London a Brit socialite who knew her way around money, Europe, royalty told me - and my companion, so I wasn't alone in hearing this - that Meghan was known in the old days. 'She was around the famous playgrounds Europeans visit...and known to be shopping for a rich husband.'" That's a quote from Cindy Adams in yesterday's New York Post . Cindy is old - so old that she interviewed the original Duchess of Windsor. "Who was also American,"  writes Cindy.   "She was not happy afterward. She was tough. I interviewed her. She was constantly looking to negotiate some sort of financial betterment." So, when does the dirt start coming out? How about now. Who will drop the information? We've had more than 1200 comments since the Sussex summit on Monday, so please allow me to repeat part of my answer to a question hidden somewhere within that forest of text. A regular commenter asked for my input ...

Meghan, Harry, and Community Property in California

This is what happens when I take too long to write a post. My original idea - that Meghan and Harry should consider purchasing one of the " cheap old houses " popular on Instagram and fix it up as part of a reality series - seems to have been overtaken by events. Page Six is reporting today that Meghan and Harry already have a house in Santa Barbara, near Oprah and Ellen's pads, and in fact have been living there for at least six weeks. (This is not entirely unexpected; Harry's most recent hostage video had a different background than usual.) "This is the first home either of them has ever owned," writes the couple's PR agent via Page 6. "It has been a very special time for them as a couple and as a family - to have complete privacy for six weeks since they moved in." They could probably still be having complete privacy if the couple's PR team wasn't leveraging their real estate news in order to promote the new book "Finding Freed...

New Year (and what's next?)

 Another year and what will it bring for them (and us who watch)?   One thing I thought of is control of their image for appearances.  It isn't just that they have lost so many people in such a fairly short time period but who they lost.  The people who advised, handled details to make the events happen - road trips to volunteering.  We've been saying all along that each loss is a ripple of warning towards a potential new hire coming in.  New hires, yes but what about fund raising?  Cash flow?  This, from SMM, is an interesting read: https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1puzsvh/impact_report_990_review_from_a_nonprofit/ Which leads us to money.  Keeping their image engine running costs a lot.  No doubt there are a lot details, paperwork, contracts to negotiate and find new groups to partner with.  Hence the need for a good team. The duo could do some of it or all but for how long?   side note: the peopl...