I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday. It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view. Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite).
So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother. There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all). Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal. Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.
We are also seeing more articles which not only talk about how the whole town is filled with people who have money, status, big houses, what they specifically have accomplished but how they are treated by the local people who work in the shops and restaurants - not special. Isn't that interesting? Why are we reading about this now? A place where there are lots of other rich productive people who are living their life but not making a big deal about it, what they are currently doing or planning to do? And, when they do something, they aren't talking about their life in Montecito.
Except for that one time we saw some shots of a school run, we've not heard or seen anything about this part/or type of daily life. Isn't that interesting? Some think it is about protecting the kids the way we have heard that he felt he was not protected. Maybe. But if you look back at those photos, what you often see is unbridled glee, joy, happiness at doing something with a parent(s). Think about the shot of them riding the boat and being splashed - the kids are having a great time, the parental unit(s) is having a great time - doing something together - just like other families. It can (probably) be said that the kids rode more than just that boat on that one trip (unlike the few "public" happenings which just happen to be a coupe of sequential only shots not repeated again in the entire event).
Articles about filling his now daily day (compared to what it used to be way back when) with walks, rides and an occasional outing to show support for something or other. Kind of sounds like each day is pretty much like the next only differentiated by this one has a dental appointment and that one has the koi people scheduled.
This every day like the next actually sounds a little mind numbing which really makes the days and years go by slower and faster. Slower in that time never seems to change from one day to the next while faster in that the years go by and yet you really don't notice that they did until you come up against some marker day like New Years (resolutions), birthday (another candle), wedding anniversary or, sadly a day marked by the loss of someone you loved.
Forty is kind of pivot year I think. Perhaps I think of it the first half of my life and then the next half. So ... for many people, they start looking of their 40 as similar at what and where have they been successful so far in life. What have they accomplished? But also what do they still want to do? For many, they may be thinking about how to pay for college for the kids or what will my retirement look like (or when or how will I pay for it)? What hobbies to I want to pick up? Former President Bush was still skydiving at 90 so people can make all kinds of changes they suddenly feel freer to try as they get older.
So ... it will be interesting, as always, to see what happens next.
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject.
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or exceptionally mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
This is interesting feedback about their 'work' ... it seems, as I suspected, that they give a small donation and create publicity, but they do not do any actual work. The organization still links Archwell on their site .. perhaps the donation was conditional?
----------
Reply from NSPCC about Parents Network - Archewell
Archewell
Some weeks ago I posted SMM that I had cancelled my donations to UK charity NSPCC because of their association to the Griffters this is their reply
Thank you very much for your call and for sharing your thoughts. I apologise for the length of time it has taken for us to reply to your concerns. We take feedback very seriously as a charity, and your suggestions have been logged and sent on the relevant team to consider and improve the way we work.
We wanted to let you know that the NSPCC does not have an ongoing partnership with the Archewell Foundation or Parents’ Network.
The campaign created a lot of interest in online safety, and at the NSPCC we know how hard it can be for parents to help children navigate the online world. At the NSPCC we always seek to ensure there is advice available for parents to help them start conversations with young people about online safety and resources to help them understand the benefits and risks associated with their children’s online lives. We therefore created a page full of resources and advice for parents and young people who may be concerned about online safety given the publicity of Archewell’s campaign.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fb5hbt/reply_from_nspcc_about_parents_network_archewell/
Christmas at Althorp with Uncle Charles, who doesn't spend Christmas with all his own children?
'The Royal Family may want Prince Harry to remain on a diplomatic visa indefinitely so it does not have to reveal aspects of its finances to the U.S. Government.
If the Duke of Sussex was to become a U.S. citizen, or a permanent resident with a green card, it could be a financial 'dagger in the heart' for the royals, one tax expert told Dailymail.com.
It would mean the Duke having to report his entire worldwide income to America's Internal Revenue Service, including details of any British bank accounts or trusts.
And documents relating to any joint finances involving the rest of the Royal Family would have to be disclosed.
It comes amid growing speculation about the Duke's immigration status in the U.S.
Immigration experts have suggested to Dailymail.com that he may be on an extremely rare A-1 Head of State visa.' . . .
------
More financial mystery. All this is speculation as no one knows what sort of visa Harry is on. I checked who can be on an A-1 Head of State visa and I wouldn't have thought H meets the requirements.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13785465/The-real-reason-Prince-Harry-golden-ticket-diplomatic-visa-U-S-getting-green-card-financial-dagger-heart-Royal-Family.html
There is also a photo of the MoS article that @ Girl with a Hat wanted (which I briefly summarised). You can enlarge the photos - it's a double spread page - and you can read the article.
EXCLUSIVE Prince Harry presses on with legal battle against the Home Office to restore taxpayer-funded security - after losing 'frankly hopeless' bid to appeal decision earlier this year
'Harry, however, reportedly believes that members of his father's household influenced the decision to remove his enhanced security.’
-----------
And he wants to worm his way back into the RF?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fbhyzw/exclusiveprince_harry_presses_on_with_legal/
EXCLUSIVE Prince Harry presses on with legal battle against the Home Office to restore taxpayer-funded security - after losing 'frankly hopeless' bid to appeal decision earlier this year
'Harry, however, reportedly believes that members of his father's household influenced the decision to remove his enhanced security.’
---------
Is he going against legal advice or following legal advice? Again, the only winners will be the lawyers.
Is he trying to worm his way back into the RF? I can't understand why he's trying to get enhanced security unless he wants his IPP status for which neither he nor wifey meet the requirements. He doesn't realise his actions make him more unlikeable every time but I tnk he's egged on by *.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fbhyzw/exclusiveprince_harry_presses_on_with_legal/
A post about his 30th birthday party, held at Clarence House, arranged by his brother with assistance of his father, and 30 of his closest friends invited.
For his 40th birthday, we got PR from wife about the celebrities invited to their home for a party ... the only guest who he has known for longer than he has been in Montecito is Nachos. Without photographic evidence, I do not believe that the handful of celebrities did turn up for a party for him, or that it was held at their home.
'Meghan Markle spoke at her close friend Oprah Winfrey's book club session last night in California where her husband's controversial memoir Spare was proudly on display.
The Duchess, 43, was one of several 'light-filled' speakers who addressed the crowd at Goodmothers bookstore and gathering space in Summerland, located just miles from where she lives in Montecito.
The star-studded event was attended by actor Marco Leone, astrology and psychology expert Dr Jennifer Freed, and author, teacher and psychic medium Laura Lynne Jackson, all of whom highlighted Meghan on their Instagram stories. '
. . .
'While it is unclear what the Duchess said in her address, the crowd appeared to be eating it up with Jackson branding Meghanas one of the evening's 'light-filled speakers'.'
----------
Probably the usual word salad. We looks very smug, very puffed up.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13826505/Meghan-Markle-speaks-Oprah-Winfrey-book-club.html
New bookstore. Oprah was there. TBW was given the microphone yo make a speech. She couldn't be happier!
`Prince Harry labelled 'big time loser' in the US as hopes of a UK return dwindle'
In-ter-est-ing ... This is originally from OK! Have the scales fallen from OK's eyes?
https://uk.style.yahoo.com/meghan-markle-sitting-gold-mine-071704341.html
Is Tom using `imagination' as a euphemism for `delusion'?
I don't know if * has a 'very very vivid imagination' but surely this is not required for an autobiography? Or perhaps it is in her case. I detect heavy sarcasm on Tom's part.
More interesting was the next article about Anne knowing * would have a short shelf life in the RF. She knew being in it was a job, not constantly parading in expensive clothes and turning into a celebrity.
The comments about this article in the Express are excellent :
The timing of Meghan Markle's latest appearance raises eyebrows, as it occurred on the eve of the second anniversary of the late Queen Elizabeth II's passing.
Disrespectful? Check
Self-promotion? Check
Attempting to overshadow an important royal moment? Check
Hanging with "non-entities"? Check
...
----------
TBW turned up at a bookstore to make a speech on the second anniversary of The Queen's death. Is she clueless, oblivious to others or does she do it on purpose to get attention on the coattails of the royals?
A video update from Catherine ... a bit like a Hallmark promo, but uplifting nonetheless. There are some very intimate moments between her and William, and it is obvious the kids are used to it from their parents!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13830129/princess-kate-middleton-cancer-update-statement-chemo.html
The video is professionaly done. It is stunning.
I cannot image what she (or any person of that age range) has gone through with a diagnosis of cancer. The saying, the Good Lord gives us what we can bare, and I know this is true in my own life (CKD - Endstage Renal - Transplant). I wish her the best going forward.
My immediate impression is one you'll probably toss me off the blog for having, so perhaps I ought not share it. 😉 Then it occurred to me that perhaps they know Charles hasn't got very long, and she's told them she wants to spend as much time as possible with her young children, before becoming Queen and having to be gone more.
I've always been fond of him, event through the Diana mess. He's been a wonderful Monarch, and I hope we have him for many more years. God Save the King.
'POLO, the new documentary series following elite global players of the sport, was advertised on Netflix's social media today and has been created by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Archewell Productions.
The announcement came just a few hours after William and Kate posted an emotional video celebrating the end of the Princess's chemotherapy journey following a difficult health crisis earlier this year. '
Oh, what a shame! Never mind.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13830789/prince-harry-netflix-project-kate-middleton-cancer-recovery-video.htmls after Princess Kate's intimate cancer recovery video
@Ian's Girl: It's my belief that William will not invite his brother to his coronation. I also think that no one in the RF reads any celebrity gossip, nor reads any of the letters that Megsy writes, nor do any of them take personal phone calls from the Harkles. They have people for that. The RF keeps themselves insulated from the attempted on-going abuse by the Harkles.
I know it is petty to compare the couples, but the above post does just that in response to some Catherine bashing from sugars.
Summary:
In one corner we have a woman who:
* Dated her boyfriend for 2 years in private before they went public with their relationship
* In 20 years of knowing this man, hasn’t breathed a single word to the press about his family and
* Has upheld her commitments and vows to her husband to make public appearances on the hardest days of her life.
In the other corner, we have a woman who:
* Posted that she was fucking a prince on social media the day after she met him
* Fled when it became too hard and didn’t get what she wanted and
* Gave countless tell-all interviews and statements about his family.
Sure, the woman who shares her husband’s privacy for their personal lives doesn’t love him at all but the one who smashed-and-grabbed the BRF’s reputation for attention is the one who truly loves her husband.
I also think that King Charles will not have a long reign. It is very possible that all William and Catherine's children will not have finished school when they take on the job of monarch and consort.
A positive is that the children have grown up as royals: palaces, coaches, parades, the balcony, ceremonial dress, courtiers ... so the adjustment for them will not be huge.
The post from Tumblr is spot on and really illustrates [one of] the differences between the two couples. Not difficult, one woman is class, the other one trash.
Are they trying to show Charles that they can be useful to him and undertake tours, therefore they need to be reinstated as royals? If so, they're seriously deluded, they're as useful to the RF as a chocolate teapot. Charles needs to stand firm and honour his mother's decision, they cannot be half in, half out. On the other hand, they're giving themselves plenty of rope.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13832823/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-foreign-tour-Lesotho-Botswana.html
'I hear Gaza is nice this time of year, can do a double and visit the West Bank at the same time, I’m sure Hamas will provide security'
We'll see our two humanitarians and philanthropists in action then.
Spareplus to Requirements
Good to see Kate
looking great
As for Polho
well past sell-by date…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fda3mo/expressing_love_and_joy_through_words_vs_actions/
I think I have decided what TBW meant by those words: I am utterly miserable with everything in my life. I am practising the 'self-help' strategy of finding things to be grateful for every day in every part of my life and to keep telling myself that I am experiencing joy. It is intentional because I have to remind myself to do this every day, all day, because my life is actually a mess and I am actually miserable about everything.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
Hammer about to drop this week in a super important call with NETFLIX executives & the Harkles.
Sources leaked info suggesting existing material not proven popular signals reluctance to go forward.
Based on what we know, we are expecting public updates soon from either side.
----------
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
Speaking of Netflix, they have chosen to go with Prince Harry’s Netflix Doc about Polo for now! Announced today, available in December.
Markle’s ARO brand & cooking show have been snarled in copyright issues which explained some “existing material” not being usable.
----------
https://x.com/BarkJack_/status/1833236186074386852
I agree with your comment at 7:07👌
@Ian’s Girl
I don’t believe the bowel mouthed burro
influenced Kate at all
Class over crass 😋
Well, it is good to know that the baroness is the person who has the power to say how the Royal Family is going to celebrate the coming holidays.
Pompous moron, I call her.
A lawsuit brought over Prince Harry's visa status by conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation has been terminated, Newsweek can reveal.
...court records show that the case was terminated on September 9, when several sealed orders were filed in the case, heard in Washington D.C. before Judge Carl J. Nichols.
Little is currently known about exactly why the case was brought to an end, or
whether this means Harry's visa papers will now remain a secret. If that is the outcome, it will likely bring relief for the prince as Heritage had suggested his past drug-taking could undermine his right to live in America.
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-visa-drugs-case-closed-biden-administration-heritage-1951493
A long and very informative post about how the duo are using PR strategies from 2016. Excerpts:
"Old" PR is very much about controlling how people perceive you. The celebrity (or the company) develops relationships with journalists and communicates to their audience through those journalists, who are largely using traditional media ... There's not much interaction with the audience or if there is, it's very one-way ...
"New" PR has evolved to be more about communications and content marketing and, increasingly, involves more and more crisis management. It prioritizes direct, personal two-way relationships with the audience ... More and more nowadays, "new" PR is also about authenticity and transparency. It's still a form of controlling your image, but done correctly, it feels more organic, not as constructed or manufactured. Particularly with the crisis management aspect of "new" PR - that's why we see celebrities making apologies or personal statements directly to their audiences ... Ten years ago, the content celebrities/brands/companies were creating for social media was about and for the celebrity. They were using charities/philanthropy, public appearances, their work (e.g. movies, film, theatre, books, etc.), their brands, their merching to promote or market themselves.
Nowadays, it's mostly the opposite. Celebrities are using their platforms to promote charities, philanthropy, speaking engagements, their work, etc. They're still promoting themselves, it just isn't as obvious and it's more carefully done ...
But above all, Prince Harry’s priority remains fatherhood. In an exclusive email to PEOPLE, Harry says: “The best gift I've ever been given is, without a doubt, my kids. I enjoy watching them grow every single day, and I love being their dad.”
Harry plans to celebrate his big day with Meghan and their children, followed by a gathering with close friends internationally.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1feabvp/piers_prince_privacy_emails_americas_top/
Interesting comments on the drama going on between YouTubers who focus on the duo, which I have noticed. The most interesting comments though are those that point out that these YouTubers are now wading deep into bonkers territory to create content so that their income stream won't dry up. We are lucky here that what we discuss is not connected to an income stream, and we allow f9r different viewpoints and disagreements. I like the different perspectives so that I am not trapped in an echo chamber if my biased beliefs.
---------
Did she attend two events at the bookstore? Sge gave a speech wearing black, but was then there with husband and was wearing cream.
Oprah arrived in the middle of her cringe speech, and this video shows her reaction:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fe78ty/lol_wtf_is_wrong_with_megain/
The Duke of Sussex will reportedly go on the getaway after a birthday party at his £11million California home in Montecito with his family.
https://archive.ph/2024.09.12-030214/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13840677/Prince-Harry-lads-holiday-40th-birthday-Meghan-Markle.html
----------
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fevuc9/harry_didnt_email_people_meghan_did/
I also think that the communication with chosen email outlets is her and not him, which is why it is so confused ... everything she touches turns into a disastrous mess.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1felclt/harry_sobbed_when_he_saw_the_wales_video_meghan/
While the mouse’s away
The rat will play
Bean-ie, Meanie whiny Ho
Watch out meh
Haz’s on the tow…
Exactly
Nowhere to run
Thank
“Everyone’s terrified of Meghan,” claims a source close to the couple. “She belittles people, she doesn’t take advice. They’re both poor decision-makers, they change their minds frequently. Harry is a very, very charming person — no airs at all — but he’s very much an enabler. And she’s just terrible.”
.....
“She’s absolutely relentless,” says one source. “She marches around like a dictator in high heels, fuming and barking orders. I’ve watched her reduce grown men to tears.”
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hollywood-keeps-quitting-prince-harry-meghan-markle-1235996963/
11 years' old and his first flying lesson! George has always been fascinated by flying machines, from a very young age, so I think this is what he wanted.
From the article, this is what I mean by her delusions:
“I find myself cowering and tiptoeing into a room and – the thing I find most embarrassing – when you’re saying a sentence and the intonation goes up, like it’s a question. And you’re like, ‘Oh my God, stop stop like whispering and tiptoeing around it. Just say what it is that you need. You’re allowed to set a boundary. You’re allowed to be clear, it doesn’t make you demanding. It doesn’t make you difficult, it makes you clear.'”
Jon Bon Jovi was filming a video near a bridge where a woman was standing, trying to commit suicide. He was walking with a member of his team and they managed to talk the woman out of jumping.
'The rockstar declined to comment on the incident out of respect for the private citizen who experienced a moment of crisis and needed support (my emphasis).
Bon Jovi and his wife, Dorothea, are founders of the JBJ Soul Foundation,
which routinely helps people in times of crisis from hunger to homelessness, and the singer has had training in speaking to individuals during difficult situations. Earlier this year, the singer was honored as the 2024 MusiCares Person Of The Year for his "impactful philanthropic work" through his foundation.'
---------
Here is genuine caring and philanthropy in action. Harkles, please note.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2024/09/12/jon-bon-jovi-saves-woman-nashville-bridge/75189267007/
I am a huge fan of Bon Jovi ... both as a musician and as a human being!
----------
Rebecca English talks to insiders about the non relationship hapless has with family and friends in the UK, and why it is unlikely to improve:
https://archive.ph/2024.09.14-005424/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-13847489/The-problem-Harry-royal-circles-Hes-left-feelings-disgust-accused-wreaking-Biblical-vengeance-vow-never-speak-Read-REBECCA-ENGLISHS-unrivalled-report.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13849229/Meghan-Markle-leaves-staff-terrified.html
Tabloids insisting that he is leaving her and returning to the UK. Without his children? Abandoning the wife, as he believes his father abandoned his mother? I just do not see that happening. I do see him spending even more time away from her, and perhaps purchasing a bolthole for himself in the UK.
Rejoice!
'Meghan is dubbed 'Duchess Difficult' by 'terrified' US staff as source claims she throws 'tantrums' and 'makes grown men cry' - while 'enabler' Harry is increasingly isolated with his closest friend his bodyguard-for-hire'.
This article is taken from the Hollywood Reporter and says 'The publication reported allegations that Megan was 'absolutely relentless' and that 'she marches around like a dictator in high heels, fuming and barking orders', adding: 'I've watched her reduce grown men to tears'.'
---------------
Whether this is the truth or an exaggeration, who knows, but it's not difficult to imagine.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13849229/Meghan-Markle-leaves-staff-terrified.html
Also in Reddit where you have more comments.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fgfbqj/hw_reporter_article_getting_traction_now_the_dm/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13813999/hollywood-celebrity-friendships-fake-pr-expert.html
Yeah, looks like the sharks are in the water and beginning to circle a bit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fgm49g/the_hollywood_reporters_editor_in_chief_said_that/
'I work for an airline, a colleague - 2 separate ones have both had her on flights. She was with Harry one of the times - in front of him she was polite. When he wasn’t around she was dismissive and cold. On the other occasion she was travelling alone and it was back when they were still dating and she was acting like she was an A list - no one allowed speak to her - very abrupt and rude to crew . The other crew corroborated the story as they also had a flight with her . She has one face for who she wants to impress or dupe but behind closed doors she’s not a nice person. She can play Miss nice girl but her real self is angry at the world'
No surprises there.
This is the photo of hapless that the royal family posted on social media when wishing him a happy birthday. They cropped out the wife!
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fh92s6/now_william_and_catherine_prince_and_prince_of/
William and Catherine belatedly wished him happy birthday on their social media, using the same photo.
This article, from a dodgy source, claims that Lady Sarah (Diana's sister) is trying to reconcile the brothers, and that the brothers did have a secret meeting at the memorial.
The reconciliation between the brothers narrative is playing out in all the media in the UK. I wonder if there is any truth to the story, and if it has been planted by BP.
What would it take for her to experience complete narcissistic collapse? Is this what she is experiencing behind closed doors? Does she get her validation from being papped and getting a microphone in her hand?
This is a very interesting article about the different ways a narc handles the threat of narcissistic collapse in different settings:
https://www.choosingtherapy.com/narcissistic-collapse/#:~:text=A%20narcissist%20may%20have%20a,of%20showcasing%20intense%20mental%20suffering.
She seems to turn to old habits: shopping, getting papped, making a speech, bullying staff ...and doing anything to get attention, like launching a non-existent brand.
https://balanceluxuryrehab.com/narcissistic-collapse/
An excellent article about narcissistic collapse.
1. Humiliation In Public Collapse: When a narcissist comes under criticism or unrestricted scrutiny, his imprudently built facade can collapse. This is a personality collapse due to humiliation in a public space. (She obsessed about any perceived criticism in the media and on social media accounts.)
2. Relational Collapse: As an individual’s value is often bound up with external endorsement, the breakup of a vital relationship can cause narcissistic collapse. (She dumps before she can be dumped?)
3. Status Loss Collapse: Any occurrence that shrinks the narcissist’s proclaimed power or status can cause a collapse, as their uniqueness is carefully tied to these outside pointers. (Has she noticed that even staff are ignoring NDAs and talking to the media about how awful she is, and that she is seen as increasingly trashy?)
https://x.com/ukroyaltea
I don’t think the birthday wishes for Harry are an olive branch, I think it’s the RF trying to avoid unfair stories about how they “ignored” the birthday of someone who has relentlessly slandered and harassed them and is basically extorting them for security.
----------
What Harry wants hasn’t changed in four years. Why are we acting like it’s news?
He wants to make money, not be held accountable by the press and be able to only work with “friendly” outlets, and still stand on balconies and attend military events.
----------
The man does not want to be a working royal. He does want to be able to work more in the UK - and in fact feels deeply entitled to that.
His people can say there is no blueprint, but they planned a week in NYC with all royal-era patronages and bringing Invictus to Birmingham.
----------
Basically, this is all semantics.
He doesn’t want to be a working royal, he does want to work more in the UK and be included in royal events as Charles’ son.
He doesn’t have a blueprint, but he’s been making moves and plans.
It’s the same it’s always been.
----------
Let’s read between the lines. Why would a man with a wife & children in the US who will not come to the U.K. because of “safety” be thinking about how to spend more time working and living in the country?
Also, the first thing they should tell him to do is stop suing everyone.
The center of focus is him, pretty straight on versus the middle between the two of them plus her with him more of an angle. The glass in front of her is in front of his elbow. Different backgrounds.
They could do it (heavy photoshop). It would involve rotating his shoulders/body, replacing the background (orange versus yellow/beige, filling in what is covered by the person to his right, partial versus full view of the glass and so on. No doubt they have -people who are good at that kind of thing.
But the background is so different? Odd.
Well spotted. I perhaps had a look at the two photos with confirmation bias!
‘Did you get my message, James?’ she asked me the first time I visited. ‘Ella is welcome to stay in your room.’
How thoughtful of the Queen to make a special concession for Ella. Naturally she wasn’t allowed to wander at will round the grand house, so I kept popping up to check on her and take her for walks.
On one visit, I didn’t close the bedroom door properly, and Ella made it her mission to find me and demonstrate her annoyance at being left behind. I didn’t realise this until a footman glided up to me and whispered: ‘I believe your dog has found her way into the kitchen.’
I quickly made my excuses and followed him to find a delighted Ella lying on her back, having her tummy rubbed by a friendly chef.
Ella made quite a habit of ambling off during family occasions. One Christmas, I popped into Highgrove to visit Catherine and William, who were staying with the King, who was then Prince Charles.
Catherine and I were having a catch-up over a cup of tea and Ella was sitting at my feet. Then I realised she had wandered off.
It wasn’t till later that I learned that she had made her way up to a private bathroom and had pushed open the door to say hello to the occupant as they were having a bath.
I was absolutely mortified.
I didn’t imagine the Queen would ever find out about Ella’s little adventure into the Sandringham kitchens, but nothing escaped her. She said to me: ‘I hear Ella had a nice little wander round earlier.’ I apologised profusely, expecting a gentle telling-off.
Instead, with the understanding that comes from long association with dogs, she gave me a conspiratorial smile and said: ‘Well, dogs will be dogs.’ Everyone knows about her corgis, but few are aware that she also had a line of spaniels. One lunchtime, we were engrossed in a long conversation about them, and I was thrilled to discover she was extremely knowledgeable about the breed.
She was always kind and solicitous about my dogs, too. ‘Have you taken Ella out, James?’ or ‘Are your dogs happy?’ she’d ask with genuine concern.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240915013132/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-13850189/JAMES-MIDDLETON-moment-knew-William-right-Catherine.html
No doubt, she will spin this story as them rejecting her because of racism.
-------
And there we have one of the reasons they bonded....angry at the world.
It's one of her core tenets.
It used to be a relatively minor tenet for H, but she's brought it to the forefront.
His PW jealousy was also a mild tenet, but she's brought that to the forefront also.
The center of focus is him, pretty straight on versus the middle between the two of them plus her with him more of an angle. The glass in front of her is in front of his elbow. Different backgrounds.
--------------
That's my take on it, also. It looked to me that the 2 photos were taken from different angles.
But it's gotta annoy Mm that sooo many people believe she was excised. :-)
https://x.com/andrea_younker/status/1835208354538377456
ZDF in Germany is going to say that Markle had a child in 1997, a daughter who is now 27, and has a child of her own. The documentary will air in December, because they are still checking facts.
Way back, the above account had insider information on how Oprah groomed the duo for that interview. Did she do it because she wanted the scoop, or was it because she knew she could groom them to spill all and that would hurt the royal family? I think she deeply resents the royal family for being born into all that she had to work so hard to obtain.
And there is more ...
https://x.com/BarkJack_/status/1706454390838571024
https://archive.ph/2024.09.15-091705/https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1948708/prince-harry-meghan-camp-concerned-dictator-in-heels
----------
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'deeply concerned' by bombshell article
EXCLUSIVE: There are fears that there could be a disgruntled former member of staff who is putting out mistruths which are designed to make the Sussexes look bad, according to a source.
A source close to the couple told this newspaper: "The Sussex team have had more than enough of these types of articles, it's simply not true.
"Everyone is deeply concerned over the timing of the article because it was published just days before Harry's birthday. (I fail to see what his birthday has to do with the issue. Besides she is the one who looks really bad in the article. And who is everyone? And what is the concern ... that she may have a meltdown and ruin his birthday?)
"There are fears that there could be a disgruntled former member of staff who is putting out mistruths which are designed to make them look bad.”(Nope, the article claims to have 12 sources ... former and present members of staff.)
They added: "The focus for Camp Sussex now is to build on the success of the last year and to take that positive momentum forward into 2025 and beyond.” (What successes? Her getting attention through faux royal tours and finding gullible people who will let them get on stage and make a speech, and maybe even give them an award?)
https://youtu.be/lPcy--CMs0o?si=X_4LkgkEjEHavdUK
About halfway through they reveal that they are friends with someone who has actually encountered TBW, from the early days of her brief stint as a working royal ... before the pregnancy. All he could say about her is that she is a b*****. Pluto and Zach worked out, by what their friend does, that it was at that engagement where she was wearing the canary yellow dress. Remember, it was also the occasion when she turned and glared at him and then blinkiled rapidly when he dared to speak.
How did he fall in love with and marry such a rude and unhinged person?
Tyler Perry's birthday: 13 September. Harold's birthday: 15 September. Tyler had his birthday party on the night of Harold's birthday. That cheapo couple grifted a birthday party from someone else!
Why is she fake laughing, whereas he does not seem to be interacting with anyone at all? Actually, he seems to be holding his camera up and filming. She called the paps and was putting on a show for them. They are both deranged ... my opinion.
https://x.com/baddietvv/status/1835786506985951460
Most odd that Harold spent his birthday with all her friends, or all the people she wants to be her friends.
I call Bollocks. Nothing short of cast-iron DNA results will convince me that the 76ers have sired two children, even via surrogate.
In the rather early days of their marriage, there was a rumor circulating that Harry’s wife was actually a biological male. That was a step too far, even for a TOW Hater like myself. Six years on, I’m not entirely convinced that there wasn’t something to that rumor. I’m happy to entertain the possibility that the Duchess of Sussex suffers from the same melody that dogged the Duchess of Windsor all those years ago. Wallis had no less than 3 legal husbands and untold legions of paid and unpaid companionship for decades with no issue. Her figure and mien were extremely boyish. Rumors abounded. I want to elaborate further except to observe that both Edward VIII and Harold seem to have very kinky proclivities. Harold is with the Claw Because he likes to freak in the bedroom and that freak has blackmail material on him. I am absolutely convinced of this. Love had nothing to do with it and certainly not procreation. That is my opinion, but I 100% own it. When Harold talked about generational trauma, he didn’t even understand half of what he was saying.
Think about Baroness Kilkeel’s extremely masculine attributes and get back to me. She certainly would not be the first to turn gender androgyny into a lucrative career.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13858471/Royal-family-drug-problem-cocaine-mental-health.html
I'm not sure I see a connection with the son of Princess Mette-Marit of Norway and Harry. Her son is from a previous relationship with a 'Norwegian convicted felon' and is not a royal. She had an unconventional and rebellious life before settling down. Also Norway has a big alcohol problem. He does admit to drug use and 'severe mental health disorders' but the article doesn't say much more.
I was just thinking about how a lot of in appropriate behaviors used to swept under the rug for "important" people like royals, their families. Now, maybe not so much. (granted, it was a heck of a lot easier before TV, 24 hour news and cameras in phones)
Think of how different royal families are handling change - taking away titles, letting people face their actions.
Sophie visits Tanzania, on a genuine royal visit. I don't know much about the country, other than that they have world-class game reserves.
Appropriately dressed, no fake smiling for the camera, no husband in tow like an appendage, no gifts received, no bodyguards in sight ...
The duo look more ridiculous in comparison.
Sophie's visits are very discreet and low key. I didn't even know she was in Tanzania. Note that this visit was ' at the request of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office', unlike the Harkles' visits. She's been to Kosovo, the Netherlands, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Iraq, to name a few places, often focusing on women's rights and conflict-based sexual violence. You can't compare her to */the Harkles, one is class, the other/s crass.
Friar Tuck will be in the UK for the Well Child celebrations.
It is an observation that the name of the elder sibling (ie`Archie') isn't on the vaccination register for CA...
"Tuesday, August 20, 2024
Blind Item #15
The name on the birth certificate of the older child isn't in the California vaccine computer system anywhere. So, what name is the offspring of the alliterate one using?
Posted by ent lawyer at 12:15 PM ''
From SMM at
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fkjkw2/richard_eden_if_dictator_in_high_heels_meghan_and/
The Reddit poster's comments on the above article are on point.
Meghan Markle is "genuinely happy" for Kate Middleton following the news she has finished her chemotherapy treatment.
The Princess of Wales had been undergoing treatment for an undisclosed type of cancer and announced in a video released last week that her treatment has come to an end. However, Kate stressed she is still recovering from the cancer.
A source has now said the Duchess of Sussex is "incredibly relieved" that Kate is doing better. However, they admitted Meghan and her husband Prince Harry have "complicated" feelings in regards to Kate's video update.
"There's still an element of guilt that she and Harry are grappling with. They both have regrets over going so public with their complaints about the family and Kate in particular," the source claimed.
Speaking to Closer Magazine, they added: "When they spoke out, Meghan felt they had no other choice, but now that time has passed and those heightened feelings have cooled off, she realizes things could have been handled more discreetly. It's not something she likes to dwell on, but of course watching Kate's video brought it all to the surface."
The source also suggested Meghan is upset over the different treatment of her and Kate. They said: "Any time Meghan tries to open up and share her truth, the way Kate did in her video, she seems to get slammed for it."
The source said Meghan feels it's "very unfair" but can't see a way out of it. They added: "The video has left her feeling like she's backed into a corner where there's no way she can have that rapport with the public that Kate does."
https://archive.is/2024.09.18-182642/https://www.themirror.com/news/royals/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-relationship-698417
It's not. It's a question of people in the UK and elsewhere not wanting to put a vindictive, petty narcissist in a socially prominent position. No one wants a royal or a prime minister who is seen as vindictive and nasty.
And the media should just stop trying to "make fetch happen" as the Americans would say. No one wants anything to do with her because she is just not likable.
I agree with you and I too think the story is meant to play on our heartstrings. I don't want to be cynical but I don't believe the story, it just doesn't sound like * IMO. *&H apparently 'have "complicated" feelings in regards to Kate's video update.' If * is supposedly "genuinely happy" for Catherine then why the complicated feelings? I don't believe * is capable of feeling guilt, H maybe but not her.
Also to me, this is very revealing: 'The source also suggested Meghan is upset over the different treatment of her and Kate.' Yes, this is the nub of the problem, Catherine has been, still is and always will be above * in the hierarchy of the BRF and this is something she'll never be able to accept.
Well, if she means it why not publish that plain and straight in every newspaper that published that false news ten months ago?
I believe she is beginning to see that she is facing her own ENDGAME after the Hollywood Reporter told to everyone what an unspeakable person she truly is.
Maybe Harry and his wife truly believe they can waltz back to frontside roles in Britain just saying "maybe somethings weren't so bad with the royal family (in minuscule) as we said earlier"? And "Here we are, the Power Couple of the British Royal Family (with capital letters) ready to work again!!"
Well, they have succeeded in absolutely nothing after their "freedom flight" and they have lost their reputation in USA and around the world so they are extremely damaged goods. I doubt the British Royal Family sees anything high prestige producing in this couple and the subjects of His Majesty King Charles around the world have certainly their own opinions about the duke and his spouse.
If the baroness does not sue her half brother (or her ex-husband) for telling the world that she has no uterus does that mean the story is true?
Or maybe she is the only woman in the world who has given birth twice quite normally without any female reproductive organs. After all she is the amazing, stunning, whip smart this-one's-wife and can do anything she chooses!!
Persons like baroness Kilkeel do not change. They are always ready to do more harm to their families when they get a chance. Been there, seen that myself, so I pray she gets her comeuppance in the end.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
Oprah called up, and took Meghan to task this week for barking up the wrong tree after the disastrous press by The Hollywood Reporter.
Details of the call are unknown; only that Oprah scheduled it; & that Oprah wasn’t pleased Markle chewed out certain people for that article.
https://x.com/BarkJack_/status/1837298976560648696
Alison Boshoff in Daily Mail ... their reputation is trash in Hollywood, because of arrogant attitude, lack of talent and laziness (my words).
----------
@GWAH
That is interesting. What was Oprah annoyed about?
The clips from the bookstore are most interesting. Oprah walks in during the middle of her speech to a captive audience. The body language from TBW is most interesting. She points and directs Oprah to go and fetch a book, then there is a major tongue jut, which is a sign of disgust. Her arrogance is off the charts. It is Oprah's book club! I wonder if Oprah arrived late to try and miss the speech? Oprah then seems to have done a sit-down chat, after which TBW rushes the stage with arms outstretched to make a grab for Oprah Oprah awkwardly gets up from the chair, and she looks intimidated. Is it fear of a deranged woman?
----------
https://archive.ph/2024.09.21-075759/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13875773/sick-meghan-markle-prince-harry-kevin-costner-charity-event.html
Hapless turned up for the Kevin Costner event, taking prominent part in the proceedings and looking happy. TBW was sick and stayed at home. Hapless is now off to New York, and then he is due to visit the UK fir the Well Child event.
She is fighting back against the HR article! The post above does a good job in tackling the rebuttal and defending her.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fldbcp/some_tea_about_sussex_response_to_hwr/
Supposedly they threatened THR ... both of them.
There was also a reminder in the Mail that when Di took the boys on a yacht trip on a-F's boat with Dodi, she called the paps and William was furious about it.
charity event as royal takes to stage to honour first responders
A solo Prince Harry attended Kevin Costner's charity concert event after Meghan Markle was reportedly 'sick'.
The Duke of Sussex honoured a Santa Barbara helicopter pilot at the One805Live! concert, which is held at Costner's oceanside estate in California.
Several A-listers, such as Jeff Bridges, Rob Lowe and Pink, were in attendance to celebrate the heroism of first responders.
--------
Couldn't be bothered, maybe, or else she was concerned about not being centre stage. Or else there's nothing in it for her.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13875773/sick-meghan-markle-prince-harry-kevin-costner-charity-event.html
With regards to the texting during out-of-work hours, I do give her some leeway with this. She fires out texts according to her mood or the emergence of a 'brilliant idea'. Staff are not obliged to even read the text outside of working hours. She realizes (or he did) that she got into trouble in the UK, so rather than adjust her behaviour, she included the message in her emails that staff are not obliged to engage outside of work hours. See how I have mixed up texts and emails? I wonder if she still troubles staff with texts outside of work hours, depending on her mood. However, I do see this as some adjustment to behaviour that was unacceptable, although she will never admit it. Probably, in her mind, staff are at fault for complaining and she has to go out of her way to compensate for this.
Another of her clapbacks via anonymous sources is that she cannot possibly march around the office in stilettos as she is in Montecito and the office is in LA. Well, the article did not say that all employees work for Archewell, she does visit the office in LA, and the LA staff do go on tour with them. Besides, I am sure there are video calls, and I can imagine her dramatically pacing in her high heels in front of her Mac as she berates someone for something. However, it is a pity that there aren't specific anecdotes, but I suppose they had to keep it general to protect identities.
I feel for the staff with them specifying one is still on staff. They will be going through emails trying to find the identity. I have always tried to protect an on-staff source by rolling their info into that given me by my once source that I mention here.
Btw. I don't have a house source right now Meghan. You fired every single one of them, regardless of whether they were the one talking because you couldn't figure out who it was. I don't have a house source now, and if I did, I'd never let it be known.
Just FYI, Kind, compassionate, authentic, strong women of color don't just unilaterally fire their staff, most of whom are minorities, because they can't figure out who might be reporting on their own inhumane behavior.
https://archive.md/2024.09.21-214023/https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fl8nxm/the_hollywood_reporter_pushing_back_rachel_has/lo7bxne/
If she is in meltdown, as so many sources are claiming, how come her husband was out at the Kevin Costner event looking very happy and being very sociable?
CDAN blind says even People magazine won't publish her clapback to the latest debacle.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fmaeuy/cdan_love_this_for_her/
From the CDAN blind at https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2024/09/blind-item-6_21.html#disqus_thread
This comment:
Jax Rainey
3 hours ago
In a series of comments in thread here a few days ago I talked through possible sources for the Hollywood Reporter article until I finally landed on Ari Emanuel himself. I mean, the conversation started with looking at wording about how the HR editor said there were 12 sources who formerly or currently “work closely with” the couple in different capacities and that expands to people far beyond those hired by MM and PH. Ari has certainly worked with them and reportedly — I mean news articles reported this a year ago — was furious with her, threw her out of the office over ridiculous demands she had. He at the least gave HR the green light confidence to run it without destroying their access to all of his clients forever.
That story is really becoming a big deal.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fmi4ij/lady_c_tea_youtube_92124_a_few_nuggets/
The OP is long and goes into the thinking of Lady C and her source close to the duo.
I am trying to think rationally ... HR initiated this investigation themselves. She got wind of it and tried to control it, but her word salad instructions barked at staff made no difference. Remember, there were at least 12 sources for the story. She is trying to use the victim narrative to overcome this ... the racist allegations were so useful in distracting from the brewing scandal in the UK, as she thought. After all, millions was pouring in from Spotify, Netflix ... and they were being invited everywhere and paps and the media could not get enough of them.
My opinion: she is in meltdown. What happens to her and what is her reaction when she goes into meltdown? Hollywood was her childhood dream, and this is Hollywood that has exposed her and is gossiping about her and looking down at her. It must be devastating for her.
But the handbag husband is out there having fun at the Costner event and is off to New York for all sorts of 'important' appearances. What is going on in that marriage?
People are cottoning on ... the sources of the story are not all Archewell employees. But the comment is interesting as it extends sources to people who work with them but are not necessarily employed by them. The stiletto comment makes much more sense in this context.
They actually violated their 501 c-3 status. A couple more clicks and they went too far. IRS and Delaware will soon come knocking. how careless of them.
Can anyone American commenters here weigh in as to whether they got too political in their comments when urging people to go out to vote?
I did some digging and those photos are from the Colombia trip.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fmwkqo/so_whos_paying_for_prince_harrys_private_jet_to/
----------
CDAN blind says that hapless had a long phone conversation with Costner on Saturday (staff leaking like a sieve to everyone?), ... speculation about a quick divorce without costing you your fortune
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fn2oey/what_do_you_notice_about_this_photo/
-------
Not much parenting. They're hardly ever home.
This is really sad ... a vet in a wheelchair participated in the last IG. The 50-page instruction booklet they get from IG does, in passing, mention medical insurance. So, he got injured at the IG, and was not covered. Supposedly a lot of athletes participating did not realize that they had to take care of insurance themselves. Abandoned by their governments, then used and not taken care of by the IG, which is a PR vehicle for the duo ... that is why I think it is so sad and why I will never support the IG. It uses disabled vets, but does not help them.
... a spokesman for the gallery, whose patron is the Princess of Wales, said: 'The portrait of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex was acquired for the Gallery's photographs collection in May 2024.
Following cataloguing and its digitisation, the portrait was added to our website at the beginning of this month. There are no current plans to display the portrait in the gallery.'
... the Royal Collection has no photographs of Meghan in its vast archives of more than a million objects
The National Portrait Gallery holds one of the world's greatest collection of portraits, but its patron Kate has no say over which are added to the collection.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13881503/Prince-Harry-visit-New-York-London-without-Meghan.html
I had a look at the regulations for 501(c)(3) companies, and it seems to be quite complicated.
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501c3-tax-exempt-organizations
If you look at the above, it is permissable to campaign for people to get registered and to vote, and the duo have pretty much stayed within those guidelines.
"voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention'
The phone calls she made to senators about parental leave seem to be problematic, but did she phone as Duchess of Sussex or as head of Archwell?
"In general, no organization may qualify for section 501(c)(3) status if a substantial part of its activities is attempting to influence legislation (commonly known as lobbying). A 501(c)(3) organization may engage in some lobbying, but too much lobbying activity risks loss of tax-exempt status.
Legislation includes action by Congress, any state legislature, any local council, or similar governing body, with respect to acts, bills, resolutions, or similar items (such as legislative confirmation of appointive office), or by the public in referendum, ballot initiative, constitutional amendment, or similar procedure. It does not include actions by executive, judicial, or administrative bodies.
An organization will be regarded as attempting to influence legislation if it contacts, or urges the public to contact, members or employees of a legislative body for the purpose of proposing, supporting, or opposing legislation, or if the organization advocates the adoption or rejection of legislation.
Organizations may, however, involve themselves in issues of public policy without the activity being considered as lobbying. For example, organizations may conduct educational meetings, prepare and distribute educational materials, or otherwise consider public policy issues in an educational manner without jeopardizing their tax-exempt status."
Slapped Arse
All sass
no class
Trailer trash
Hollywood’s delivered
a kick up her ass…
Is a malignant toxic narc capable of feeling shame and going underground because if it?
@GWAH, and others ...
Did she cross a line by cold calling senators for parental leave? And does the government sometimes delay in doing investigations? The duo have crossed so many lines and seem to be so messy in how they do business, are they now going to be tied up in court cases?
https://archive.ph/2024.09.23-233347/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lifestyle/lifestyle-news/kate-princess-of-wales-first-public-appearance-cancer-treatment-1236009091/
Is HR throwing shade by reposting this Associated Press article about Catherine?
Blind Item #3
The exact phrase was "She's got a bit of a thing right now." Translation is that the alliterate one yelled at her husband all night night long which is why he looked like crap at a very high profile government type function. He also reeked of booze and pot.
'Mr Roshan told Access Hollywood: ‘Our reporter talked to a very high up source who works for the couple and said: “Everyone is terrified of Meghan”.
‘Duchess Difficult is a nickname that has trailed Meghan Markle for quite a few years. What is new is that this notion, since coming to America, that a lot of these rumours were manufactured by the Palace and the reporting that we did suggests that probably isn’t true and there is still this undercurrent of fear’.'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13885089/Meghan-Markle-Duchess-Difficult-staff.html
She got US Weekly to write up a long and sugary article about what incredible bosses they are.
I haven't compared both articles but the DM has one in the same vein as the US magazine one, possibly even very similar. Incidentally, I couldn't open the link until I just started at Https:// www.usmagazine.com etc.
'Harry and Meghan bad bosses? Nonsense, say loyal staffers who gush that the Sussexes 'water the seeds so that we can flourish' in flood of online posts after claims 'Duchess Difficult' was 'a dictator in high heels' who 'terrified' workers'
Apparently, staff gave a glowing report on the duo. 'Current and former staff staged an extraordinary intervention in friendly American media, describing the Sussexes as 'caring' bosses who give staff their children's old baby clothes, fresh flowers and 'care packages'.
I wonder how spontaneous these comments are. It's really vomit inducing.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13887545/Team-Meghan-Duchess-Difficult-dictator-high-heels-staffers.html?ico=related-replace
An analysis of why her obvious clapback is so bad for her, with the following comment perhaps being most informative:
When the employee had surgery and M called her husband every single day for weeks with apparent "support", to me that seemed like a passive agressive way of her saying "When are you getting back?". Once or twice is nice, but who the heck wants their boss calling every day when they're recovering? It's WEIRD.
Why was her employee sitting on a cold, hard kitchen floor while M was making calls?
I would feel very uncomfortable if my boss was constantly gifting me things, especially expensive items. It's WEIRD.
The constant hugging and crying. It's WEIRD.
UK employees said that M would be very nice on some days and would give out freebie designer clothes, and on other days she would be cruel. This caused them to walk on eggshells because they never knew which version of M they would be getting that day. I think it's similar here.
Josh K. and Catherine are vague and succinct in their “praise” of Meghan. For example, Josh only said he received a warm welcome.
Ben is using strange phrasing that also suggests he is making sure he has an out.
The overall thing is overly gushy, in particular, Dayani’s perspective.
It suggests an unhealthy work dynamic where people don’t get anything done.
Meghan is probably freaking out and making people go on record to figure out who talked.
Most of these people probably talked to both publications.
This clapback won’t help because THR is a trusted publication and US Weekly isn’t.
Meghan just thrust this story back into the spotlight when she should have let it die.
Some of the sources said things that gave the audience new info such as refuting they are a criminal organization. Although it does sound like a throwaway comment. 🤷♀️THR never accused them of that.
Richard Eden points out that Dan Wakeford of the clapback US Weekly article is the same reporter of the infamous five friends People article.
Her attempt to squash the story of just how problematic she is seems to simply have given it longevity...
----------
Meghan Markle was a “demon” who had “psycho moments” as a boss, people who worked for her have told The Daily Beast.
The former employees spoke out after a carefully curated crop of former and current staffers said she was the best boss ever, who gives her staff bundles of freshly cut flowers and home-produced eggs, and makes her staff feel like seeds being watered.
The positive portrait of Meghan’s management style was painted in Us Weekly on Tuesday, as Team Meghan launched a fightback against a report in The Hollywood Reporter that claimed Meghan was a “dictator in high heels” who reduced “grown men to tears.” Sources close to the couple denied that story as a “fabrication” to The Daily Beast last week.
However, one courtier who worked for Meghan and Prince Harry as part of their service at the palace told The Daily Beast: “There have been plenty of difficult royals over the years, and I do think that after the ill-feeling of Megxit (when Harry and Meghan left the royal family), Meghan’s bad moments were amplified and distorted and blown out of proportion. Princess Margaret regularly got people to hold out their hands to use as ashtrays, for example, and that’s just laughed off as hilarious eccentricity. Look at Prince Andrew, he was unbelievable to the staff.
...
“But it was an incredibly fraught time and I’m inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt. She has said herself she was suicidal at times.”
The source pointed out that Jason Knauf, who was press secretary to Meghan when she was a royal, complained about her.
Indeed, it is a matter of public record that in 2018, Knauf wrote to Simon Case, then Prince William’s private secretary, saying: “I am very concerned that the duchess was able to bully two PAs out of the household in the past year. The treatment of X was totally unacceptable.”
He added: “The duchess seems intent on having someone in her sights. She is bullying Y and seeking to undermine her confidence. We have had report after report from people who have witnessed unacceptable behaviour towards Y.”
Meghan and Harry’s office said Wednesday they would not comment on the new criticisms of Meghan made to The Daily Beast. However, Meghan previously accused the London Times of perpetrating a smear on her when it published the Knauf letter, noting that the revelations were published just days before Meghan’s much-anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey aired.
Another person who worked with Meghan in the run-up to her wedding told The Daily Beast: “I always thought she was a classic narcissist and getting her staff to tell a magazine how amazing she is only confirms that in my mind.
“She is lovely when it is all going her way but a demon when the worm turns.”
...
“They vowed never to work with her again, despite the prestige of having her as a client. If you were working for her, you were often treated like a tradesman who could be treated like s--t.”
Tuesday’s positive testimonials included Prince Harry’s former chief of staff, Josh Kettler—who notoriously parted company with Harry after just three months in the role—giving the couple a carefully calibrated endorsement.
Kettler—who did not elaborate on why he actually left the couple’s employ—said he was “warmly welcomed” by the couple, adding: “They are dedicated and hardworking. It was impressive to witness.”
Another former chief of staff, Catherine St-Laurent, told Us: “The time I spent working with Prince Harry and Meghan was incredibly meaningful to me.”
Ashley Hansen, the duke and duchess’s global head of press was as flattering to the couple as only someone professionally tasked with making them look good in the media could be, saying that when she had surgery, “I was met with the kind of concern and care a parent would express if it were their own child.”
Another anonymous staffer said: “Harry and Meghan picked the best of the best from every field and watered the seeds for them to flourish.”
My favourite example: when Hitler ended his life in a bunker, his devoted wife and devoted allies, along with families, also ended their lives with him. Because you have people who adore you, does not make you a good person.
NY Post article quotes someone who says she has psycho moments.
One of the family narcs will give stuff but it doesn't always come off as what I thought the recipient wanted but more of what the giver decided they wanted to give. I saw a great deal on headphones so here's one for you without acknowledging that they didn't have anything which needed headphones or that they already had a set they liked.
It does have a boss who wants to be friends when convenient for the boss (in need of a friend) vibe.
As for Jason complaining about her, he actually was pointing out there is a problem and it has impacted other people (therefore my concern - others, which has the potential to increase in number) which not the same as griping about how my boss didn't like my work and took me down a peg which upset me (personal hurting me).
TBH, I can't think of many bosses I've had over the years that I really wanted to be friends with.
Royal Tea
@UKRoyalTea
·
Sep 12
If you have Netflix, WME, and internal PR staff working with you and this still comes out in one of the outlets EVERYONE in the industry reads…it’s not good. And it means the sources ARE good.
-----
The fact that Meghan could only get Us Weekly - not even People - to publish this shows what an absolute farce it all is.
-----
Jack Royston
@Jack_Royston
Meghan Markle's staff break silence over bullying allegations. Us Weekly and The Hollywood Reporter appear locked in a battle for Meghan's soul/reputation.
Royal Tea
@UKRoyalTea
·
14h
Nothing should be funnier to any legitimate journalist or person working with media than the idea of Us Weekly and The Hollywood Reporter being “locked in a battle” for someone’s SOUL???? Jack, get a grip.
There are family and friends who give gifts that are what you like and want, and then there are family and friends who give gifts that they think you should have or, at worst, that will make them look generous and kind and thoughtful and ...
And Jason could not ignore staff being abused without not only becoming complicit in the bullying but also potentially allowing reputational damage to Prince William's office. Narcs only think of themselves in any situation, and never consider the context (in that case, the monarchy as an institution).
Re phoning someone on sick leave, I did phone staff I line managed when on sick leave for over a week or two - we were allowed to by HR but that was purely to enquire how the member of staff was, nothing else. It showed we cared. The HR manager did ring me at home once when I was on sick leave and I did appreciate it.
https://www.tumblr.com/brf-rumortrackinganon/762627604078575616/its-like-a-ping-pong-game-now-isnt-it-and-mm?source=share
@BarkJack_
·
Apr 23
Same acct posted rare seen, uninteresting footage of Meg “singing” suggests she’s a stage star.
A downright pathetic, obvious attempt at image curation & talent.
A former housekeeper told us MM scrolls X daily for hrs. Considers herself perfect. Wants us all to think the same.
https://x.com/BarkJack_/status/1782676008228786443
NDAs do not necessarily stop staff from talking.
So much for her work ethic! We know from the results we see that she has a lousy work ethic and dress sense, and is remarkably devoid of financially lucrative talent.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
However on a different occasion, when things weren’t going “her way” amid #Megxit there were times she was “spitting, screaming mad” over what was being written online. She doesn’t seem to stay mad; she gets even.
-----
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
Of the bad stuff I was told she “gets off on it”. Loves it. Eats it all up. Dances around the room when the pot is stirred & everyone talks. Loves the hate. Loves the attention.
Both Beatrice and Sarah are in New York at the same time as happess.
The video mostly focuses on Beatrice, but has a clip of hapless giving a speech. He actually speaks some sense. Teaching kids the skills to identify online 'threats' and giving them the strength and resilience to ignore or block is the best thing you can do for children. But I do think that protecting anonymity is important for safety. Unfortunately, we live in the narcissistic age of selfies and earning an income through oversharing personal lives ...! I suppose the best we can do is teach mutual respect and tolerance for others making mistakes, because we all do.
My narc ex-husband used to fly into yelling rages, until one day I refused to argue my case with him. He announced that he'd written to a relative from whom he had `expectations', to tell her what a horrible, grasping , woman I was and he told me to read it so I couldn't say he was telling lies about me.
Which of course he was (eg that I'd only married him for his money and wanted the whole of the marital home as a divorce settlement - er, no, I asked for only one seventh of the value, what I'd put into the purchase price, in accordance with the rules for marriages of short duration.)
I decided that acting was called for. I took a deep breath, held my hands down so I wasn't threatening him, and bellowed `HOW DARE YOU!!!' and continued at that volume, telling him what I thought of him.
He cowered in from of me and, when I'd finished, he slunk away. Not my most ladylike performance. I was calm inside - but realised I was now on a on a high and that it could perhaps be like a drug.
I felt fantastic, powerful, invincible. (Hyperventilation?) and I realised what he got out of behaving like that. I never repeated the performance but moved out asap and communicated only through my solicitor thereafter.
* would have known that members of the RF cannot accept gifts. This might not apply to the royal household but should have made her more circumspect. Mind you, she only has to look at our own PM to see he's accepted free gifts and hospitality.
Not the first time this claim has been made ... that sge wants to live in Windsor Castle, this time by Neil Sean. Not going to happen!
https://youtu.be/d5VtTHFnkXk?si=G-078Ebhd2DrjHyC
Right at the beginning, she states clearly that the narc often realizes that their behaviour is causing problems but the compulsion is too strong for them to overcome and they feel entitled anyway. Rage is their response, by the way!
Hollywood: We have seen her go-to response of getting people to defend her. In this case, she was really scraping the barrell in finding an outlet for this obvious tactic, which does not seem to be working. But, she will be raging because the shame of having Hollywood (her ultimate goal in life has always to be a famous A-lister in Hollywood) not only reject her, but also call out her behaviour. I don't think she minds the gossip ... that is narcissistic supply for her. According to what Dr Ramani says, her rage and bad behaviour in response will escalate.
Hapless: I think that when they are out in public, he lets her dominate and control, and quickly reaches out to soothe her when she makes a fool of herself and risks feeling shame. In that interview, he seemed to be knid of grey rocking her, but he willingly spent his birthday giving her the limelight. Who knows what happens at home, but I guess that he smokes a lot of dope . He seems to be still fully on board with letting her run the show with Archewell stuff, but I wonder how he got her to stay away from this New York trip. And why has she not done a pap walk to draw the limelight away from him? Perhaps too busy raging about the HT expose?
That story you told is epic! The 'power' you felt in that moment of the narc cowering before you is a drug to the narc, and they are addicted. But beneath it all is this tremendous feeling of entitlement.
Madams Family
Megticia and Gnomez
spectres transparent
Same can’t be said
of their heirs
non apparent
Grandmamma cares for the
obscure infants
Loving Kindness to
Caspare and Casparent
Tom Sykes
Fri 27 September 2024 at 10:53 am BST
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/camilla-wants-sick-charles-skip-095324593.html
What do Nutties think? Apart from `Thank Heavens for Camilla'.
I can understand Camilla wishing to shield Charles from any stress and unpleasantness should he meet H, and as a parent I can also understand Charles' desire to see his son. We don't know H's ultimate goal, i.e. does he want to make sure his father is fine and doing well or is there some ulterior motive, such as a financial one? If there is to be a meeting, someone else, perhaps Camilla, should be present but silent and the meeting should just be for H to reassure himself that his father is doing well, nothing else. I can't see H going to Balmoral (too unsafe! Unless he flies private) and Charles shouldn't and can't travel to London just to see the prodigal son. Hard to say.
Did others as well but it allows her to be the baddy?
I've had it recently. My most recent narc has been diagnosed with something nasty and mutual friends have encouraged me to re-establish cordial relations with this person `before it's too late'.
I've been No-Contact with this person for years, I wish them no ill but have no wish to open the door to further abuse which would be sure to happen. I talked it over with my counsellor (at a price, of course) and settled for sending a kindly-worded message, written as if from me & my husband, which nevertheless didn't encourage a reply.
Even so, I believe I did it from base motives - I didn't want other friends to think ill of me and I feel I was manipulated.
It's a miserable bind to be in and I just wish other parties would STFU in these situations. I can only think it's far worse for HM the King.
Harry, meanwhile, was accompanied by his own powerful group, as he was flanked by members of his security team, dressed in dark green slacks and gray polo shirts.
One of the individuals, however, was wearing a suit, and we’ve been told it’s believed the man works for the New York Police Department and has been assigned to be part of the prince’s detail for his NYC trip.
As further evidence that there was a police presence, video Page Six obtained shows that aside from Harry’s black vehicle, there were two NYPD cars accompanying him from the front and back.
However, a source exclusively reveals to us that Harry did not actually get a tattoo during his visit to the famed shop Wednesday, as he was just there for a promotional stunt he’s filming for an upcoming project.
https://archive.ph/2024.09.27-155216/https://pagesix.com/2024/09/27/royal-family/prince-harry-rolls-up-to-nyc-tattoo-shop-with-nypd-security-personnel/
Someone does not seem in a hurry to go home. He is supposedly travelling with a team and will be having a high-level workshop in Johannesburg. It all sounds very grandiose. Has he asked Southern Africa if they want his interference?
-----
our ambition has grown, giving us the confidence to bring our skills and experience in designing solutions with young people, and to leveraging our convening power to engage with leading regional players and global funders so we can add Sentebale’s voice to addressing the challenges faced by the next generation in Southern Africa," he said.
On the trip, the group (which includes corporate foundations and philanthropists) will head to Lesotho "to witness Sentebale’s programs at work." In Lesotho, Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso will meet with local leaders and youth advocates. After, they will go to Johannesburg, South Africa for working sessions with "leading Southern Africa-based business leaders, foundations and organizations already active in the youth sector." Per Sentebale, "these sessions will explore collaborative strategies to deploy expertise and innovative capital to reduce the digital divide and ensure youth access to healthcare, education, entrepreneurship, and employment opportunities."
https://archive.ph/2024.09.27-205947/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2024/09/27/palace-did-not-ask-boris-johnson-to-persuade-harry-stay-uk/
Biography if TBW in The Hill is rather bizarre.
It claims she is the 'former Duchess of Sussex'.
It attributes her with one child: Archie.
It claims she is a fashion designer (television actor, blogger, fashion designer).
It claims she lives in Beverley Hills.
'The couple signed a five-year deal in 2020 for several shows, but one Hollywood producer told me: ‘What Netflix have received in return doesn’t look great. People want personal stuff.
'Apart from their documentary series, which had the drama of them quitting the Royal Family, everything else they’ve produced has been underwhelming.'
'https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-13902657/Tensions-emerge-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markles-Netflix-polo-documentary-bosses-unhappy-Dukes-absence-five-series.html'
Another disappointing venture, unsurprisingly. I guess the money won't be rolling in.
I saw this over at CDAN . A German magazine is asking if they needed a surrogate for their babies.
Rudimentary Channel
She planted the seeds
no doubt to embellish
Her tales of woe
by the royals, was hellish
The bullying claims
she claimed were a smear
Called for her left eye
to drop a fake tear
Her Vernacular Disease
or a shortened appellation
Caused us to question
her hybrid pollination
Still digging for gold
and self-adulation
She’s muddied the waters
through self-irrigation…
Whoretoculture
From tiny little acorns
mighty oak trees grow
From tiny little Beans
parasitic Mistoetoe…
Whoretoculture
From tiny little acorns
mighty oak trees grow
From tiny little Beans
Parasitic Mistletoe…
'Harry and Meghan's missing millions: Archewell Foundation didn't declare $4MILLION on latest tax return - as all eyes turn to Sussexes' upcoming declaration with questions over where money went
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's charity Archewell was gifted two grants of more than $6million over the last two years - but both are missing from the charity's latest 990 form tax return, MailOnline can reveal.
The discovery has prompted speculation over what has happened to the Sussexes' missing millions, although it is understood Archewell believes its records that only declared $2,000,911 are correct and MailOnline can confirm it is legal and possible the money will appear on the next return.'
----------
The article has screenshots of IRS forms.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13595335/Harry-Meghan-missing-millions-Archewell-Foundation-4MILLION-tax-Sussexes-money.html
DM takes a close look at the finances of Archewell. Why are people giving them millions? How do they get these donations?
While she was living there, the alliterate one was asked to be a patron of this black ballet company in Toronto. She refused and said people would get the wrong idea. The wrong idea about what?
POSTED BY ENT LAWYER AT 10:30 AM 125 COMMENTS ”
LoveRudimentary Channel. Very apt (like all your poems)
My German is pretty rudimentary ,but thanks to Google Translate, the headline translates as
`A surrogate mother gave birth to her babies? The half-brother dropped the bombshell'.
Will she try to sue?
According to the Sun, the film - said to be titled Camilla: Harry’s ‘Wicked’ Stepmother? - will portray the 77-year-old as the 'wicked mother' of Prince Harry, 40.
---------
If Camilla is H's 'wicked mother', is she not William's too? Or was she nice to William and horrible to H? Of course, it makes a poor victim. Camilla has always supported Charles and the RF, which is more thàn can said ofH&*. I
thought that both William and Harry had come to terms with their father being with Camilla. William grew up, that's the difference.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13904307/Queen-Camilla-set-presented-Prince-Harrys-wicked-stepmother-new-controversial-Channel-4-documentary.html
Hallmark Publishing
@HallmarkPublish
Relive the royal wedding by tasting the royal cake! The #DatersHandbook comes with a recipe for lemon elderflower cake, the same cake #MeghanMarkle served at the #RoyalWedding!
https://x.com/HallmarkPublish/status/1003335512101441547
https://www.brides.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-wedding-cake-5184981
An interesting blind from CDAN. In brief: she filed a lawsuit in a 'hit minute' but dropped it when she realized that her on/gyn would be deposed.
----------
https://www.newsweek.com/prince-harry-cowardly-controversial-project-african-parks-podcast-1959150
Interesting article about how African Parks is shutting out the media. I wonder for how long this organization is going to be investigating itself?
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
As you all see in Sept. there is a full blown campaign in print & Network TV, among other means, to promote “Prince Harry”.
A member of production said Jimmy Fallon was reportedly incredulous to the moment Harry raised his fist to one of the maze actors who frightened him.
-----
There seems to be a push to promote Harry & a push to criticise Meggsie. What is going on?
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
·
5h
She cannot escape the criticism.
& Harry is the only other option.
@BarkJack_
·
5h
Change Maker month turned cringe maker for Harkles as they are told by higher ups to get their businesses and charities in order after suffering a disasterous month of publicity.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
·
5h
Markle was always coached that September was the best month to relentlessly release everything you've got after that, people are too preoccupied by ThxGiving & Christmas & NYE to care.
He is away from home for an extended period.
She has not done a pap walk.
But she keeps churning out people to defend her, using her obvious word salad
It is all very odd.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240929214851/https://www.dailysquib.co.uk/entertainment/57726-meghan-markles-pr-executive-praises-her-wonderful-character.html
According to some US tabloid magazine, Ashley Hansen, Head of PR for the Montecito, California celebrity, said she was treated by Meghan with the love and care a parent would give to her children.
The Head of PR, would of course put out a statement as crass and false as that, who wouldn’t if they were being paid shedloads of money by Meghan Markle? If anyone at the Daily Squib were being paid that kind of wonga we would attest that singing white doves fly out of Meghan Markle’s arse every half an hour along with bright rays of sunshine lighting up the entire universe.
Isn’t it great that the news is now being flooded by story after story praising the Mother Theresa virtues of Meghan Markle? Naturally, this fantastic ‘love bombing’ fluff session is being forcibly ejaculated out after a plethora of horrific accounts of bullying and nastiness committed by the errant Duchess of Sussex upon former employees ‘somehow’ leaked out.
The accounts that former employees have been telling the press are indeed very colourful, and portray the narcissist grifter Markle as we all know her as a “manipulative vindictive bully” and a “prima donna”.
This is why the media has now been flooded by anonymous former employees extolling the virtues of Markle about what a fucking “sweetheart” she is. This unfortunate deluge of cringeworthy fake praise will most probably be ongoing for the next few months, so batten down the hatches.
@BarkJack_
Update here, the Sussexes came out swinging today, denying any missing money. Let this be known.
-----
However despite this … it does appear two grants of more than 6 million over the last two years are missing from the latest 990 form tax return. However Archewell says $2,000,911 is correct and we will see the rest money on the next return.
CDAN blind claims that hapless has just signed a lease fjr a house. No more details.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
·
Mar 9
Replying to
@TheFabBookLover
She bullied our news team. Her fake bot legions somehow pulled strings to get our original breaking news acct banned (
@barkjack
reported without incident for 9 years). Her squad once shut down our office in Rome due to mailed threats, including a 💣 threat. She’s horrid.
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
Despite the online gossip at this time, there is no solid evidence a Harkle split is imminent.
Further, it is rather common for production companies to lease houses or properties for short durations.
-----
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
·
9h
You’ll get a kick out of this but some close to them say they are puffing up chests more than ever. Them vs everyone. They are isolating themselves further and yes they did it themselves. However they have this delusional entitlement that stands to this day. Sadly.
-----
Theresa Longo Fans
@BarkJack_
·
7h
As much as I love a good train wreck Five and five, must be forthright and transparent. I know Montecito media. I know and talk to their neighbours. LOL they likely know this, too. They know, that I know. 😬😩👍 Train still on the track for now.
Lainey Lui, *'s ass kisser, actually wrote an article trying to discredit the Hollywood Reporter for that bullying story, as though it was a hit piece, and that * should fight back. It's too insane for me to be able to summarize here, because the logic is so convoluted. Lui takes *'s side but isn't able to explain why no other magazines wanted to handle *'s rebuttal.
`Soho House billionaire in row with Cotswolds locals over ‘ludicrous’ mansion plans'
https://uk.yahoo.com/news/soho-house-billionaire-row-cotswolds-125139233.html
Does one laugh or cry at the sheer vulgarity? The Cotswolds aren't Las Vegas and Quinlan Terry (https://qtarchitects.com/) really should know better. I see he's now 87 - might that explain it?
This is such a heartwarming story. Catherine and William did an official engagement at Windsor Castle. They did not invite the royal rota nor royal photographers. One of the guests at the event is a young girl with aggressive cancer, who is also a keen amateur photographer. She took the photos and has copyright and complete control over what photos and story is shared. Classy move, and genuine.
Blind Item #13
The alliterate one had lunch with a woman who runs a surrogacy agency. Is this the way she plans on getting people on her side? Or, was it just lunch?
Posted by ent lawyer at 11:45 AM 10 Comments
-----
What is this about? Marriage in trouble so fix it by having another child? Just stirring the pot so that people will talk about her?
I am a but dubious as everyone is attached to their phone and I doubt she would have gone out in public without someone sneaking a pic.
Another post about the Catherine story. Well worth reading for the comments.
https://www.instyle.com/meghan-markle-suits-patrick-j-adams-chemistry-8721485
She has rolled out a couple of Suits actors to gush over her. She did not make it big in anything she tried (acting, modelling, blogging, harassing the UN ...). She conned a not too bright and lonely, but wealthy and very famous, British prince (with substance abuse issues) to marry her.
Royal Tea
@UKRoyalTea
Harry is not "rebranding" - he is reverting to his old brand. It's 90% working royal-era patronages & projects, with a smattering of digital citizenship, mental health and "fun Harry" appearances. His only content project is about polo. This is not a new Harry in any sense.
-----
https://x.com/UKRoyalTea/status/1840786547395748322
A lot of pertinent comments on the thread.
From Eden ... detailing the generosity the Beckhams showed TBW and how rude she was in return. The woman is barking mad!
Meghan Markle will divorce this year, but she will also be ruined by 2032. Specifically in 2027 during the year of the Goat, or even well before 2027.
--------
Not much else that is interesting.
https://www.tumblr.com/celticcrossanon/711417616818929664/rebog-from-lenormand-cards-and-tarot
The tea is at the beginning of the video. River has heard from a source that she is working on a book. It is not a memoir, but she envisages it as a cookery and lifestyle book to go with the release of her cookery/lifestyle TV show, and presumably to launch ARO. As River says, her recipe fir strawberry jam is not going to sell books, so she has been persuaded to include personal anecdotes and family ... and the more drama the better.
This article claims that William is concerned about what happened to Diana's jewellery that was given to TBW. I see a lot of misunderstanding in the article:
"The late Princess possessed a large private jewellery collection made up of pieces given to Diana by Prince Charles, foreign royalty and her last boyfriend Dodi Fayed as well as family heirlooms."
Any gifts given to her by Charles would be in her private collection. We do not have a full record of what happened to all of it?
Anything given to her by foreign royalty would be in the Royal Collection?
I doubt that William would want anything to do with jewellery Dodi gave her.
Did she have any family heirlooms?
TBW did use to wear the Sapphire ring, which Diana bought herself after the divorce, and does still wear the tank watch.
She was given jewellery when she was part of the Royal Family, which belongs in the Royal Collection. Traditionally she can wear it as long as she lives, and no one else does unless she gives permission. I wonder if she has repurposed that jewellery. Remember the blood diamonds? She loves diamonds and I think it is possible that she had that necklace broken down and other jewellery made from the diamonds.
There is a wonderful spreadsheet of all of Diana's known jewellery here (and the division between the two wives of the private jewellery seems about even, but Catherine got the Royal Collection stuff):
https://www.tumblr.com/brf-rumortrackinganon/762719593495248896/an-unofficial-tracking-of-dianas-jewelry?source=share
The motto of Mike and Zara, who have built a large fortune for themselves and remained on very good terms with the royal family. They are also quite relaxed about their kids being photographed.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1fve3p5/quelle_surprise_harold_and_his_wife_are_doing_it/
Celebrating 10 years of William's Step Into Health programme. Basically it is about retraining vets to work in the NHS (values match).
What is the other brother doing ... showcasing his media-hungry wife with brief appearances at the Invictus Games!
The judge wrote: “I have previously indicated to the parties that this individual claim … although it raises important issues, is starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court’s resources, contrary to the requirement in the overriding objective to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.
“It is now doing so.
“The claim at times resembles more an entrenched front in a campaign between two obdurate but well-resourced armies than a claim for misuse of private information.
“It is unsatisfactory to say the least that the court should be faced a second time with having to resolve such a large extent of disputed material on amendments to a statement of case.”
In his 12-page written ruling, the judge said he had “perhaps unduly optimistically, expected that the residual disputed material would be limited” in light of his decisions in May over how Harry could argue his case.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/04/high-court-judge-criticises-legal-battle-between-prince-harry-and-the-sun
Insiders say that what’s unfolding reflects a clear shift in the couple’s public lives. While Harry is immersed in philanthropic efforts, Meghan is leaning into entrepreneurial projects and commercial ventures.
“It’s clear that a twin-track approach is evolving," a friend tells PEOPLE.
A royal insider echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the evolution of their working dynamic. "The Duke and Duchess have now hit their stride as individuals – not just as a couple. The Duke appears focused on his patronage work, and the Duchess focused on her entrepreneurial track," the insider says.
https://archive.ph/2024.10.04-144034/https://people.com/meghan-markle-prince-harry-new-dynamic-twin-track-exclusive-8722498
Is the royal insider TBW? So, she is focused on making money and he is focused on making royal appearances? But how does she get the attention she craves with this arrangement? Is this a way to deflect from and sugar coat what is essentially a separation, or the beginninng of a separation?