Skip to main content

Oh Look! It's been 7 years.

 Oh my gosh.  Really? Seven years? 

Apparently the appropriate gift is copper because it is warm, conducts heat and has energy.  Who knew?


I had sort of noticed a slight uptick in stories about them, the leading up to the wedding and so on but that it was today didn't really register.  At least for me.  Sorry.  

What was noticeable is that the stories were negative.  Harry was close to his grandmother and then he lost that.  The tiff about visiting with the hair dresser.  Or the chef berated over alleged egg (as if a good chef (let alone one who worked for HM) would want to secretly put something in which might be an allergy).  


The song in my head is from the Grateful Dead about the part about ... what a long strange trip it's been.


Where has the time flown?



Comments

OCGal said…
Emails please
Girl with a Hat said…
I just had a quick look at the headline article about her memory board on DM.
The picture of Lilli shows a young one with blonde hair.
The pictures we were recently shown of the back of Lilli's head shows a ginger.
Given her delight in romantic fiction, TBW.. should try writing for Mills and Boon. I'd love to read the publisher's response to her offering, given she has such ability in that genre.
Maneki Neko said…
The pix don't really show very much and some have notes written in *'s pretend calligraphy. There is a photo taken at Christmas with a note saying 2022 but the children look rather big if the photo was taken two and a half years ago (I think).

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/05/19/18/98535835-14727567-image-a-1_1747675888361.jpg
Girl with a Hat said…
Hilarious article over at the DM about * wishing herself a happy wedding anniversary without mentioning Hairy. Same as when she wished herself a happy mother's day and said that she was a great mother.
Maneki Neko said…
Ha ha! No mention of Harry, and yet she says 'Sometimes two is better than one.' - a very profound statement, you'll agree. Note that she 'posted her own personal wedding anniversary tribute to Harry on her Instagram page'. If it was that personal, why would she put it on her Instagram page, unless of course she wanted the whole world to read it. Very personal indeed!
Maneki Neko said…
'Harry and Meghan DON'T make Time100 'philanthropy' list but Kate and William do - despite Sussexes going to New York summit last month

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have failed to make an influential new list of the world's greatest do-gooders curated by Time Magazine.' (So much for being such great philanthropists).

. . . 'There is one royal power couple who did make the list: the Prince and Princess of Wales, William and Kate, who are congratulated for their efforts to address homelessness and early years development through the Royal Foundation.

William's Earthshot Prize, which recognises bold new environmental initiatives, was also given a nod.'

I bet that hurt.
I can't now remember which trashy mag at an M-way WHSmith's
had * & ?Nicola on the cover with * asserting that they would be `the next Fab Four' and `will be getting their own back'.

Such delightful people.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1krk2o8/eagle_eye_spotting_from_the_royal_rogue/

Online discussion about what the heck * is wearing. I say it's a shroud.
Girl with a Hat said…
Thx. I particularly enjoyed this comment:

Why is everything associated with her so creepy??? Even casual photographs contain multiple hinky aspects. She is like some alien sent here to study and mimic humans, except she was at the bottom of her class on her planet, so she's very, very bad at her assignment.

And the response:

That would explain why she's always doing the weird thrusting of her pelvis forward when she walks.. 👽🛸
How many medical conditions does this photo of the Harkles at a concert suggest, do you suppose, even by just looking at their hands?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/?feedViewType=classicView
His sunken fingernails look pathological for a start; hers look as if they belong to someone twice her alleged age.
Magatha Mistie said…

The lining from her wedding dress or
Haz Apache parachute
I see that she's now elevating Mexican Fleabane (scientific name Erigeron karvinskianus), a plant that looks lovely in someone else's garden but is a weed in one's own. it's commonly known as `Crazy Daisy' - how very appropriate.
Magatha Mistie said…

Hitched Cock

Without a Shadow of a Doubt
Suspicion must fall
On the Notorious Psycho
Sabotage madams call
The Trouble with Harry
she chose The Wrong Man
Trapped between Torn Curtain
Rear Window her plan
Caught in a Frenzy
Family Plot merger
The 39 Steps to
Dial M for Murder…

Magatha Mistie said…

GWAH- she moves like a
preying mantis, check it out 😉
Magatha Mistie said…

Twelfth of As Never

It meggars belief
the one with big teef
Hasn’t restocked her pantry
with more syrup and dried grief
Two months on
the fructoes con
Is still muddling the orders
The wait will be long…

Girl with a Hat said…
https://x.com/Kristine_Froeba/status/1925959742481915913

You have to watch the video of this photoshoot and how she turns on the fake laugh and sheepish look.
Girl with a Hat said…
You've got me in stitches, Magatha. Fructoes indeed.
Girl with a Hat said…
So * took a commercial flight!!! Is this a sign that she is running out of $?
And she wrote a note to her flight attendant on a napkin (I think this was a set up because who can write on these without them tearing? Also, the flight crew were all big fans of hers from her Suits days. Who even watched that?)
Then, one of the attendants released a video about the entire incident, but the video didn't get any traction online. The video was released the same day that Catherine was baptizing that ship up in Scotland and was meant to upstage her.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1ktydu6/as_evera_pointless_insta_post_for_the_weekend/

What the ....? Holding a ?wooden spoon like a pen? And those unengaged fingers flapping about - she could stir whatever it is without a spoon with those.
Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

Thanks for the video of the photoshoot. One word, that * loves to use: 'authentic' (sarc).
@Maneki Neko
- Authentic' - ah yes, another over-used word demonstrating that that's the last thing she is.
Girl with a Hat said…
Anyone hear anything about this?

@MeghansTowel
So the con artist is allegedly going to say the Royal Family made her do it because the Royal Family wanted white grandchildren in the LOS. Sound familiar? It should. Many of you predicted this is how she would play it.
She’s going to play the race card and the victim card once again. One thing she didn’t bank on is that the RF might take it to court calling the Fertility Doctor to testify. 🤡🌎
Get the popcorn ready!

https://x.com/MeghansTowel/status/1926440125141061771
Maneki Neko said…
'Harry and Meghan are accused of hypocrisy over Montecito 'royal' court after they decried life as royals - as experts ridicule new group as 'expensive bureaucrats trying to save their brand' '

. . . Apparently, a 'Meredith Kendall Maines, a seasoned communications strategist, will be at the helm of a team of 11, operating out of Montecito, California, and the UK.'

How much this is going to cost and how they can afford it is anyone's guess.
I predict another roaring success. I'm sure Charles and William are shaking in their boots.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1kuqvaa/harrys_new_royal_court_incalifornia_staff_shakeup/
I like the idea of what is suggested in the piece linked by GWAH,
that of them being taken to court by the Royal family (in one form or another).
Perhaps information could be released by order of the Court without the RF having to bring it forward off its own bat. It puts a little distance between them and the release of incendiary info, if a judge decides what is to be revealed.
Girl with a Hat said…
11! if she doesn't listen to them, she could have 200 and it wouldn't make a difference.
Girl with a Hat said…
there was a special on Channel 5 in the UK - "Harry: can he be forgiven". People who watched it said that for once, the media hasn't tried to rationalize his(their) behaviour. Anyone see it? It's supposed to be on youtube soon
Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

I didn't watch the programme so looked for it on Channel5 on demand. It's 90 minutes long, so I fast forwarded quite a bit. There was a lot of rehashing of well known facts. In the end, we're no further forward. Here are the most interesting comments.
-He is the victim of his own decisions
-Whether he fully realised the implications of what he was doing when he decided to leave, I'm not sure.
-Control [of money] was the issue. At the moment, they're better off financially in their current position.
-Harry has no role to play in the RF and has no defined role in the USA either.
There were the usual comments about Searching for identity. Security. Visa.
-Any public figure has problems with the press. That just goes with the territory.. . . That is an occupational hazard of public life. The other Royals coped magnificently with it, and there's no reason why Harry shouldn't.
-In order for Harry to be forgiven could one of his first steps after a reconciliation with his family be ato make up with the press?
-If he finds a direction to his life that commands respect, that could cause the press and Harry to reconcile.-Keep things private now.
-He left for a reason and whatever he took with him hasn't been resolved.
-I don't think he will come back unless he comes back on his own.
-How much does his wife (*) want to come back to Britain? I would hazard a guess... not at all.
Holiday home in Portugal, where Eugenie lives/has a home. Eugenie could be the bridge that brings them together.
-It's going to take a lot of trust on both sides for a reconciliation to happen, but someone has to make the first move. Peace negotiations will have to happen out of the public eye.
-It's not a question of forgiveness, it's more a question of Harry putting a sock in it, publicly.
Why does this charming couple believe that paid employees can change their image to something positive on the world stage without changing their own behaviour for better? I don't understand.

What I do understand is the enormous satisfaction she gets when she post pictures of herself on instagram. There is nothing in her world she adores as deeply as her own face, that Mrs. I-My-Me-Mine. And as long as people can't comment her ageing face and artificial convulsive smile she is happy.

It is almost eight weeks people have been waiting her as ever spread.......

One do wonders.

Girl with a Hat said…
MeghansMole©️
@MeghansMole
·
1h
Prince Harry is in Shanghai with his hands out begging for money for Travalyst under the guise of “helping the world travel more sustainably—made a bold call to climate action, urging the Asia-Pacific travel industry to support sustainable travel and tourism”

https://x.com/MeghansMole/status/1927050426630738108
Maneki Neko said…
CDAN. Blind item#8

If you are a designer and want to feel confident in your future, the editor better not discover that you are giving the alliterate one free stuff to wear.

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/05/blind-item-8_26.html#disqus_thread
Maneki Neko said…
CDAN. Blind item#8

If you are a designer and want to feel confident in your future, the editor better not discover that you are giving the alliterate one free stuff to wear.

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/05/blind-item-8_26.html#disqus_thread
Maneki Neko said…
This photo of the Sussex children - allegedly - shows them in their beekeeping outfits. I don't know when the photo was taken but Lili is much shorter than on the recent pix * condescended to show us.

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4969de4ca94f1cca9c8035d411591dac8a10897b2f66feadccbf21d339271a36.jpg
Girl with a Hat said…
This made me laugh. Who is going to give her their stuff to wear?
Girl with a Hat said…
I saw a video of her dragging "Archie" to the bee hive with both wearing beekeeper's outfit. She didn't seem to care whether he wanted to or not. And his headgear didn't seem to be provide complete protection as the neckline wasn't sitting properly
Maneki Neko said…
Sounds like * is trying hard to convince the world that she carried two children and therefore gave birth.

Meghan Markle has discussed the difficulties of wearing heels whilst pregnant with Archie and Lilibet in her latest podcast after the choice divided fans.

. . . 'I gained 65 pounds with both pregnancies,' the Duchess revealed, continuing: 'And you're in these five-inch pointy-toed stilettos.

'You have the most enormous bump, and your tiny little ankles are bracing themselves in these high heels, but all of my weight was in the front, so you're just going how on earth am I not just tipping, you know faceplanting.

'I was clinging very closely to my husband, I was like please don't let me fall.'

As ever, it's got to be all about her. As for clinging very closely to Harry, there are videos of her being very sure footed and striding along very confidently sans Harry. More baloney.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14752991/Meghan-Markle-stilettos-pregnant-Archie-Lilibet-podcast.html
Girl with a Hat said…
BS! There is no way she looked 65 lbs heavier. The baby weighs under 10 lbs, and the amniotic sack, another 10 lbs. Let's say she had another extra 5 lbs of fluid in her body, which didn't show , by the way, because no swollen legs or ankles or arms, that's 25 lbs, not 60 lbs.
Girl with a Hat said…
Meghan Markle admits she may NEVER restock sell-out jam because she 'wants to step back to assess As Ever brand'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14752991/Meghan-Markle-stilettos-pregnant-Archie-Lilibet-podcast.html


LOL - I have never seen such a bad work ethic as this woman possesses. And yet, she was up at 5 a.m . to harass her assistants
abbyh said…
I saw that (not restocking the fruit spread).

Eh, so how is that going to play with Netflix? This was supposed to be the good cross sell in their stores by not just having it there but using it in the restaurant.

My next thought was about they ran the numbers and it did not turn out to be nearly as profitable as hoped for (maybe came close to being a loss or would be if it went the Netflix stores?).

I don't know. I have noticed that their events seem to come off as achieving smaller and smaller attention. Sure we notice and her fans appear to be ever faithful but most of the world seems to be moving on. During covid, the interview was a distraction from being house bound. The funerals were a big deal at the time. But since then, the blips of Netflix, two podcast series, the saga of what her company's name will be and there really isn't anything one event one can point to as THE BIG DEAL which was sustained enough for everyone to say: WOW!. It's all an occasional shot of the back of one of the alleged kids when nothing else news wise is being pushed by the team or teams.

Side note: As much as she talks about being a mommy and they know to find me working, what you don't see is her doing this on take your kid to work day or while she is working at work either. It's like the photos of her with one of her subordinates picking up fast food. You don't see her doing that with the kids but you see her doing it for her. Talking or doing but not a kid in sight when it is happening.
Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

I know, 65lbs is just not believable. That's 29½ kg or nearly 5 stone. It would have made a huge difference on her. Maybe her interviewee (and friend!) put on a lot of weight during pregnancy so copycat * had to say the same.

As for her raspberry spread etc, her venture smacks of a lack of forethought. As usual, there's no planning. I think as it wasn't successful, she'll latch onto something else: she's planning to launch 'a new range of merchandise in early 2026'. This is before a foray into fashion 'at a later date'. I think she should steer well clear of fashion, given her sartorial disasters. I suppose after more failures next year, she'll move onto something else. There's makeup, children's fashion etc. The opportunities are endless.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.geo.tv/latest/606322-meghan-markle-getting-divorce-body-ready-with-plastic-surgeries

the title speaks for itself
@GWAH
Hmm... or is this just intended as extra `proof' that she's been genuinely pregnant?
Maneki Neko said…
Yes, more 'evidence' with the mention of * wanting 'to get her body back to pre-pregnancy level', plus the extra 65lbs. I wonder why she now feels the need to impress upon the world that she did carry two children when that was years ago.
Maneki Neko said…
I didn't know, or else forgot, that Graydon Carter, former VF editor, called * 'The Undine Spragg of Montecito.' Not knowing who that was, I looked it up. It was a character from Edith Wharton's 1913 novel The Custom of the Country. satirical examination of New York society and the American Dream through the lens of Undine Spragg, 'a materialistic and ambitious young woman from the Midwest, is determined to climb Manhattan's social ladder. She uses her beauty and ambition to navigate four marriages, each more financially advantageous than the last.' Quite apt.
Girl with a Hat said…
Meghan Markle has left people baffled after sharing a wholesome picture of her morning 'garden haul'.

The Duchess of Sussex, 43, last night posted a sweet image of her and Prince Harry's beagle Mia sniffing a basket of fresh produce grown in the garden of her Montecito mansion in California.

Referring to Mia, who the Sussexes rescued in 2022, Meghan captioned her post: 'The unofficial quality inspector of this morning's garden haul.'

The 'haul' comprised of broccoli, carrots, corn, red peppers and squash as well as spring onions and an assortment of fresh herbs as Mia buried her face in the produce.

But not everyone was convinced, and people soon pointed out inconsistencies with the Instagram-perfect picture.

Taking note of the squeaky-clean vegetables, fans noted there wasn't even a 'speck of dirt', despite appearing to be freshly picked, while others noted that, in California, May could be too early in the year to harvest several crops.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14760581/meghan-markle-garden-haul-mistake-vegetables-season.html
Girl with a Hat said…
This comment from a CDAN thread:

Does your moonbump hang low?
Does it wobble to and fro?
Does it wiggle from side to side?
Can you squat real low?
Can it fall below your thigh?
Can we be done with this charade and expose her lie?!

https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/05/blind-item-7_28.html#disqus_thread6
OKay said…
It makes me sad that there aren't many posts/posters here anymore, but I get it. While the details change, there's never really anything new with Harry's wife. I can't muster up outrage or even surprise when she says something stupid or otherwise gets it all wrong anymore. This little saga might just indeed be ending, for her and for us, not with a bang, but a whimper.
I looked at that CDAN thread, for which many thanks, GWAH (It reminds me of Lonnie Donegan's ` Does your chewing gum lose its flavour on the bedpost overnight?' , also `Swing low, sweet Moonbump...'
That aside, there was this at the very top of the post:

Wednesday, May 28, 2025
Blind Item #7

`A long time ago in this space I wrote about a lawsuit that the ob/gyn of the alliterate one faced. The doctor was going to have to turn over records related to the alliterate one so closed her practice instead. The mainstream media is finally catching on. How much was she paid to close her practice and disappear?'
Girl with a Hat said…
Here is AI generated adding 65lbs. 😂

https://x.com/Ambitchous402/status/1927780063790948521
Girl with a Hat said…
I haven`t seen you post anything for ages.
abbyh said…
Exiting with a whimper. Could be, could be. If so, it must be the longest close before the curtain shuts I think.

Sheesh. It's been drama for years and years now but no clear end in sight.
Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

Hilarious! I don't know anyone who put on 65lbs when pregnant. The photo showing her old CV showed her weight then as 113lbs, so she put on a lot more than half her weight. If you're going to lie, try and make it believable.
OKay said…
@GWAH I've been here since Day 1, but I have rarely ever posted. Far more analytical minds than mine did a very good job of summarizing and speculating about the Harkles, for a very long time. I miss it, but again, it's completely understandable as there's simply not much left to say.
abbyh said…
I was thinking it was as a positive good to see you. There are a lot of people who used to post and have not in a long time. There are a number of people I miss and when I see someone I have not seen post in a while, I smile.

Girl with a Hat said…
It's never going to end. She's going to hang in, like Wallis did*
@Abbyh
I like your theatrical simile - she comes back for encore after encore even when the audience has had more than enough. I once attended a Marisa Robles harp recital - she wouldn't let the audience go even though the applause was fading noticeably.
Maneki Neko said…
New Harry Markle up, with a breakdown of the likes * got recently on her social media. * is not quite as popular as she would like and as she would have us believe.
Girl with a Hat said…
s royal reporter Kinsey Schofield exclusively revealed on my podcast, The Nerve with Maureen Callahan, Meghan allegedly approached none other than Dolly Parton to appear on her Netflix show, 'With Love, Meghan' — and was summarily dismissed.
Dolly, that absolute legend, joins Taylor Swift and Beyoncé in reportedly turning down Meghan's entreaties to join her in any given enterprise.
As Kinsey told me, Dolly's team were 'livid… they don't want to risk Dolly's epic popularity by associating with Meghan Markle.'

https://archive.is/zfcqK#selection-1151.53-1177.128
Girl with a Hat said…
https://x.com/PaulyRubino/status/1928291713728004223
Girl with a Hat said…
Hairy asked his uncle, Diana's brother, if he should change his name to Spencer.
I see the long, bony raptor like hand of * behind this.
What better way to remind people of the link with Princess Di. She would probably tell Mindy Kaling now "You know, it's Meghan Spencer now!"
Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZsBS9MBwyc&t=312s

Basically in the few minutes the two couples stood in the vestibule, Meghan made a royal ass of herself. Celt had heard that Megs told Charles & Camilla that it was too bad Diana couldn’t have been there to enjoy the party. She “flirted w/ Charles” (whatever that means) & made Camilla the focus of some venom. She told Camilla that she didn’t know how to dress & really should get someone to help her choose outfits. At some point (perhaps later in the party) she stuck her tongue out at Camilla. Then after more of this in a similar vein & after Camilla’s SOSed to the world, the two couples turned to adjourn from the foyer, Meg generously allowing Charles & Camilla to exit first. Harry, though, was firmly instructed to follow behind.

from a thread at https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l131av/the_truth_about_that_long_ago_garden_party/


* told Camilla that it was a shame that Diana wasn't alive to enjoy the party? I am just laughing at this, it's such nasty behaviour
Girl with a Hat said…
Just to clarify - the youtube link is where Celt talks about the garden party and makes the remarks about *`s behaviour.
The second link is the SMM thread where all this is discussed.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/69ebf2b9642413e40ea384f929b95f48e0202d4cc7234c98cb31ed0151907f53.jpg

wow, he threw another fit in China during his Travelyst visit.
Girl with a Hat said…
LOL.

Spotify is thinking of making a series about the whole Markle debacle as a way of making the money they lost on the duo back. Says Neil Sean.
Maneki Neko said…
'Meghan Markle has suggested she is considering going into business with her daughter Princess Lilibet in future, while interviewing Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles.

The Duchess of Sussex spoke about 'building something' with three-year-old Lilibet, who is seventh in line to the throne and turns four tomorrow, during her podcast Confessions of a Female Founder.

. . . Now, the Duchess has talked about running a business with Lilibet in future – having launched her lifestyle brand As Ever in April, with the first batch of products including flower sprinkles and herbal tea quickly selling out.'

Her latest commercial venture was so successful, I'm sure the next or a later one with Lili$ucks will be just a good. As she considered that Lili might well have her own career and not want anything to do with a business venture with mommy?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14774815/Meghan-Markle-Beyonce-mother-Tina-Knowles-podcast.html

abbyh said…
Yeah but where would that leave her son? kind of hanging in the same position as his father had where PW was the designated future of the family company.

What if the daughter wants to ran away and become a tattoo artist while the son gets an MBA and wants to run a company?

(I still read that every time as Confessions of a Female Flounder) Perhaps I need more caff?
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l2b56e/she_just_dropped_the_newest_villain_now_its_fda/

Has it really only just sunk in that any commercial food producer, on even the smallest scale, has to comply with food safety regulations?
In the UK, these mean that while I'm happy to sell unprocessed veg plot surpluses through Country Market (formerly the WI Market) I'm not prepared to convert them to jam or chutney. That would involve passing a food hygiene course (with regular updating), having my kitchen liable to be checked by the local council, listing every ingredient, and ingredients of ingredients (with statutory allergens in Bold), being accurate with stated weights, and using approves packaging, and putting my name & address on each item, just as if I were Cadbury or Unilever.
No thank you. The Wild Boars will eat it all themselves.


Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Boar

Good point about food regulations. But why is the FDA interested in * spread now? * 'produced' some strawberry jam last year and there was no information on the label, yet I didn't hear about the FDA looking into it. Maybe it wasn't for sale, but then what's the point. I think 10 were given to so-called friends, I'm not sure what happened to the rest.
Girl with a Hat said…
She's taking photos of Hairy when he's sleeping!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/358f1b91440cda8c2d1426b51d35b7ab4ce0238c0e776c3f046fa2012eb918b5.jpg

Girl with a Hat said…
She bought herself another award - the LA Museum of Natural History. LOL

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a4c08ab19ac4ac0236d8e8c30fdc0726e38aaf68eb14fcde2b44c6a39896287a.jpg
Maneki Neko said…
She'll be honoured - any honour will do - at LA Museum of Natural History? In what capacity, prehistoric monster? Perhaps a Tyrannosaurus.
Maneki Neko said…
* wishes Lilibet a happy birthday, showing part of her face, in the time honoured b&s photo. It could be any child. The article has several photos, most of them seen before, with one showing * cutting a slice of honeycomb and holding it with her bare fingers. So much for hygiene if she intends to sell it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14775201/Meghan-wishes-daughter-Lilibet-happy-fourth-birthday-shares-unseen-picture.html
Magatha Mistie said…

Meg-donor and Child

Her latest photos
hope to quell speculation
Dispel mis-con-ception
of her miraculous gestation
All I see
her homely mottled face
As for the babe
not a trace
Shagged through a hedge backwards
would account for her hair
But there’s no accounting to prove
‘twas the spare….


Maneki Neko said…
Thanks again. @Magatha, for another brilliant ditty. Always so witty and to the point.
Maneki Neko said…
The DM has an article on * with a video of her twerking in a hospital room to bring on labour. She seems to be enjoying herself and laughing. Strangely enough, I wasn't laughing or dancing, never mind twerking, when full term and in labour. Another piece of 'evidence' that she gave birth but she didn't share this at the time, so why now?
Maneki Neko said…
Sorry for yet another post. In the b&w photo of * with a newborn, allegedly Lili, I thought the baby's hand looked weird but didn't look too closely. Reading the comments on * twerking - so classy, so regal! - I see that commenters have noticed the hand is actually the wrong way round!!! Here is the photo showing the baby's right hand on the left side.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/06/04/08/99023397-14775201-Taking_to_Instagram_the_Duchess_of_Sussex_wished_her_daughter_wh-a-13_1749021255659.jpg
Girl with a Hat said…
oh my. She has really overdone her crazy antics by releasing a video or photos of her twerking with a huge moonbump pretending that she was trying to induce labour while pregnant with Lillibucks
I have never met a woman who has so colourful pregnancy histories as mrs sussex-spencer. They almost sound as fairytales!

Nothing says True Royalty as a prince who dances caressing his genitalia in his wife's birthing chamber.

Poor King Charles.

Maneki Neko said…
@alianor

Quite. * didn't reveal anything re labour/giving birth at the time but she does now, and the details are more and more outlandish, from postpartum eclampsia with Archie to twerking before Lily's birth, supposedly. We never heard anything from Catherine, apart from her hyperemesis gravidarum but we never had any grisly details, just class and decorum.
Girl with a Hat said…
I wonder if she's doing this ridiculous release of so called pregnancy photos to cement her creds with the AA community or as a person of colour
Girl with a Hat said…
Taz on the twerking

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FTTRiZ6WrM
Subheading from the DM:
`AMANDA PLATELL: Meghan and Harry's twerking video makes a mockery of their desire for privacy. I know the pathetic, desperate reason behind it'

...and so, I imagine, do we...

How gross can she get? No, don't answer that - I'm sure she's capable of much. much, worse.
With her claimed 65lbs of extra weight all in front of her, how does she manage to stand up from that wide-legged squat? Funny how she can stand perfectly upright, even. I've heard of `buns of steel' but her must be full of lead to be an adequate counterweight to her 65lb /30kg abdominal load.

Even 35-40lb loads carried in front or to the side require a compensatory adjustment of the spine - I speak from toting a postal pouch (as a `Christmas Casual') or a rucksack for hill walking - and when I've put my pack down after a long flog through the mountains I've felt as if I've risen off the ground, so noticeable is the reduction in gravitational pull!

Twerking? Pull the other one. She really thinks we were born yesterday. What a total nincompoop. `Outlandish' is certainly the right word, thanks Maneki.
@Maneki Neko - Thanks for pointing out that the baby has her arms on the wrong way around - didn't look that closely. An adult only does that pose when using the right hand to hold a tethered phone to the left ear . I doubt if a newborn's arms would reach anyway.
I've been revisiting Tom Lehrer's songs recently and what we need is a parody of Vatican Rag. Instead of `Genuflect! Genuflect! Genuflect! ', it'd be `Photoshop! Photoshop! Photoshop! '
When does King Charles begin to take care of the Monarchy? Or does he not care anymore? When historians write about his reign there will be nothing about his time on the throne and everything about endless moaning, unedifying tv shows, uneatable jams and obscene twerking. It will not look good, that's all I can say.


Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

Thank you for the Taz video. It was excruciating enough the first time but then to have to watch it again in her video was painful! I noticed that the man was barely visible and like the first time, I couldn't make out his face and I did wonder if it's Harold. Quite a few of the comments say the same.
I was 7 stone/98lbs when I first got pregnant so not elephant-like, had been doing a dance/exercise class for a few years and then a dance class until I was 7 months pregnant. There is no way I would have been able to move like *. Sorry, I forgot, her prowess must be due to all that yoga.
Like all liars, * has added too many details. I shudder to think what the RF think. What an embarrassment to the King and country!

@Alinanor
I believe that whatever the King does, he can't do the `right' thing because there is no `right' option.
Have you ever had to go No Contact with a narcissist? It's very hard to stick to, if one is any sort of `normal' person..
I broke with one some years ago - it chewed me up inside but I had to do it for my own sanity and that of my husband. Since then, this person has become terminally ill - did I ignore it or open up contact again?
I took the dilemma to my counsellor - with her help I found what I hoped was the kindest response - I wrote a brief wrote a brief but sympathetic letter, but made it clear that it did not require an answer. Also, I told mutual friends what I had said - a parallel ,perhaps, to the King wishing `Archie' well `wherever he is'. Now all I have to decide is whether to go to the funeral or not, when the time comes – yes, it sounds brutal but that’s how it is.
The King gives every impression of being a warm compassionate man but one who has made a positive decision to stick to no-contact. Whether he were to embrace the sinner or to strip him of his title, the consequences could be far worse than the present situation. He can't heal a situation he didn't create, even if in the minds of the Harkles he did. True forgiveness is not possible without contrition on the part of the other; anything else is capitulation.. OTOH, to remove titles would look like petty revenge and trigger a barrage of very public screaming.
The Harkles have done their utmost to get HIs Majesty over a barrel/impale him on the horns of a dilemma, whichever metaphor you choose. He has resisted the urge to try to resolve it, as it could only make matters worse. Sooner or later, something will happen to resolve the situation.
It's not indecisiveness. I believe the King has made a difficult decision and is sticking to it. I admire him.

If the King doesn’t respond to this latest outrage, it may well push them to perform even crazier stunts for attention, to the point that they truly destroy themselves, assuming of course that they released that video and that it was not, as someone on SMM suggests, put out by a disgruntled member of their staff. It’s very sobering to consider the number of people who accept it as Gospel Truth and who would demand the King’s blood if he removed the titles.
Better that they are seen as the authors of their own downfall than for CRIII to be seen to have an obvious part in it. Not one of us is immortal so the present reign is finite. There will be change then, even if nothing else alters in the meantime.
Girl with a Hat said…
I wonder if that was filmed recently or if it was really filmed during her megnancy with Lillibet. If so, do they have a closet full of crazy stunts they filmed and will release when they feel the time is right? To put more and more pressure on Charles?
abbyh said…
Going no contact is very difficult. Even more so when it is family. Layer in that there are power dynamics (driving part of the problem - wanting his father, in the position as King, to use his authority to order the security, dispatch the legal problems).

What made it easy, in some ways, is that it was legally to protect the King, the monarchy, to have no contact as it had the potential to be used as some kind of weapon - perhaps implying something which was not said.

Sure as something they are likely to push those boundaries even farther with the not getting any response back.

A couple of sobering thoughts:

This is kind of how Diana went down. She left the Family, still kept her lifestyle kind of the same but still pushing the boundaries of what she would not have done/who she got involved with had she stayed (like participating in the book, playing the press with photos and dating because she could). No doubt in my mind that then PC was less than happy with how she was cavorting across the world with cameras following her every move and all that behavior.

Prince William, on the other hand, has had decades of dealing with his more than a handful brother in a way that his father has not. So it may be a bit more personal in terms of how things get handled.

Which may be actually a continuation of no contact. Roll that around. Staying the course, as a response, may be the worst thing for the couple. No matter what they do, they don't get a rise from the people they are most trying to trigger and they get some relatively minor ink in the press. Same o Same o as before.

What ever dirt they know about her may get loose though.

And William, as King, will be very busy figuring out how to run a slimmed down monarchy and the country.
Girl with a Hat said…
A lot of comments at DM say that they didn't believe the fake pregnancy rumours previously, but now that they see this video, they do.
Maneki Neko said…
That's right. There's no way a real bump could move like hers. That and baby Lily's hand, not only on the wrong side but bent a strange way. Where is *'s much vaunted 'forensic eye to detail'?
She doesn't look a post-Ozempic Skinny Malinky in this video, rather a reasonably solid mesomorph. Some are claiming that it's pregnancy gain but I see it as evidence that the film was made sometime before she hit the slimming medication.
Were they on the spot in Santa Barbara for the surrogate's delivery? If so, did she wear the preggy get-up in case she was seen entering the hospital? Doubtless she'd shed it ASAP, proving how quick and easy the birth was...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Up2rKmrBBmE
`They're coming to take me away...'
How soon before one or other, or both, of them sings this ditty
Strange that she showed herself without the Pan Stik/Leichner slap in the pic with newborn Lily - the freckles are scary. has she never worn sunscreen? Am I right in assuming that bleached skin is more vulnerable to solar damage than natural fair skin?
abbyh said…
So I keep looking at the clip of the video and am trying to put my finger on what bothers me as looks as something is a half inch out of place.

The room seems very basic - not very high end for what is medically described as a geriatric pregnancy of someone who is special enough and has the money to have all kinds of comfort pampering. (people who get expensive push presents don't do basic room + this is near LA - space can be made up to rent for people to do all kinds of home movies, videos).

The camera is in focus on her but at a distance. Yes she's always in focus but usually much closer to the action so we can see detail of her face. Distance is not really her norm when she is directing.

Which brings me to the other detail - how out of focus the camera is on him. It's like grey smoke so we cannot see any detail of his face.

But when you look at his body when he's moving and grooving, he's male dance thin and H really doesn't have that going for him. He's always been a bit of a stocky guy, enjoying the good life and hasn't needed to be military in shape for quite some time. This body shape reminds me of the photos of them doing deliveries around the start of covid where we didn't see facial detail (sunglasses, hood, cap, so on) where people questioned if it really was him with her.

This his moving in front of her totally reminds me of the count the basketball passes but miss the baboon walking in the background distraction/attention video. What is it we are not supposed to be looking at because we are looking at him?

Totally comes off as a recent pull off.
Girl with a Hat said…
You think she bleached her skin?
Yes Battle-maid I have gone to No Contact with a narcissist. She is/WAS my sister, who tried to destroy my daughter and her two little sons just to show whose games my family must play. I told her that I would not come to her funeral and that I would see that she would not have any chance to come to mine. That was over 10 years ago and so shall it be.

But I DO understand what you say about the situation His Majesty is in and it is horrible. What all this does to his heath one does not want to think.

There must be a very special place for sons like Harry in hell I believe, one hopes he considers it some day.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXW572-QgdY

Bozhe moy!
This little snippet of Russian is the only way I can express my response to this video from Duchess of NarcSussex on SMM. Words almost fail me at what she says, regarding the C(o)untess of Dumbarton and her associates and what they'd like to do to Yankee Wally. It seems so far-fetched but also sadly not beyond the realm of possibility. After all, close to the start of all this , Harry Markle foresaw * and her coterie ending up in the dock at the Old bailey.

By the by, is Harry truly so low IQ man that he does not understand that a mating dance is a bit late when your partner is 41 weeks pregnant and is about to give birth?

Girl with a Hat said…
still from a video - it looks like * is arguing rather vehemently with a staffer - maybe Jason Knauf? she has that dress on which she wore to her engagement with the Queen, the one where her hair was flying all over the place. This is also on Saint Meghan Markle

https://x.com/sage1411/status/1930761827195183391
Girl with a Hat said…
Some people are saying that it's AI
@GWAH
Well, it has long been said that she used skin lighteners when young - I didn't mean `bleach' in the specific sense of a household cleaning product but in the more general sense. Or did she paint on all the dark spots?
Body Language Guy is lost for words:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QPepLgVAYsU
Maneki Neko said…
If the twerking video was fake/AI wouldn't * or *&H hotly deny it's them?
Magatha Mistie said…

Singalong 🎵
Apologies: Does Your Ear Hang Low

Plush Present

Does your bump swing low
Does it gyrate like a ho
Can you twerk it like a Thot
Can you jerk it like yo-yo
Can you throw it under cover
Like a non - expectant mother
Does your bump scream Faux…

Magatha Mistie said…

Pillowried

How low can they go
With their shite show
Overstuffed cushions
plush butt pads no-no
Haz the jerk
looks like he’s been tasered
He’s happy for once
to be included and favoured
Alas I feel
they’re losing their stuffing
As ever downward spiral
will result in Nothing…


Girl with a Hat said…
@Magatha, bravo! You've outdone yourself

You're not going to believe this. * had 3 more videos similar to the twerking one, says Neil Sean. In one of them, Hairy is pushing her while she's in bed down a hospital corridor, in another, she's twerking in the hospital corridor, etc.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2aBFEgzsHc
A thought about the apparent ignoring of `Archie' by Twerkle -
Is it because there is a real secret Archie, fathered by H, back in the UK, either from Harry's wild oats grown in another `field ', or a surrogate mother who kept him, born 2 weeks ahead of any pseudo-son at the Portland Hospital. A child that is nothing to do with Twerkle, who is being supported by H (thereby depriving the Twerp of money and attention)? H refers to `my son' but never `my daughter' as far as I'm aware. A child for whom provision has been made in the event of anything happening to H?

Remember, there was that enigmatic statement, apparently from a royal source, about the time that Twerkle was obliged to clear off to Canada and people were wondering about `Archie'. It said wtte : `Archie is well and with his family who love him'.
I still believe the Twerk never became pregnant during this mockery of a marriage.

PS `Archie Mountbatten Windsor' is a name that stands up well besides those 2 medieval pretenders, Perkin Warbeck and Lambert Simnel.
Maneki Neko said…
@Magatha

Well done again! You always capture the duo's crassness. They deserve to be laughed at.
Girl with a Hat said…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wUxEw3mV00

The Body Language Guy does a slow motion zoomed analysis of the twerking, kind of like in the movie JFK
abbyh said…
Like that's odd. I've been looking at the dance video more and more.

In the video there is a white widish band on her right wrist. There is some stuff on the left but nothing else on the right.

Hospitals place the ID band on the left wrist normally as most are right handed (ie put on non dominant side to minimize problems) when you go in. The other thing about that band is that it is not skin tight. It has "some" space but not a lot. And, it often has a loop on it where it doubles back as wrist size can vary. And it is the level of plastic that it needs scissors to cut.

I can be wrong but that wrist stuff seems off.


So Harry wants his children have hrh's in their passports because they can then be working royals if they want.

It is not just very low iq, but brains have lost any functioning at all because of the drugs.

Maneki Neko said…
@Girl with a Hat

I endured the video. This only confirms what I thought, i.e. the bump just cannot bounce up and down like that. There are so many red flags, I wonder if she be that careless or if she's trolling us.
Maneki Neko said…
A parody of * twerking, trying to induce labour. This will brighten your day.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKiU3CFyTQ6/
I share abbyh's doubts about the male dancer. It's strange how people assume it's Harry `because Harry can't dance'. As I see it, this guy's movements are those of a trained dancer, fluid, expressive and well co-ordinated, not those of an . Also, as abby points out, where's his beer gut?

The other question is what is *'s motivation. It's like her triumphant grin when carrying dead-frog Archie - is it `Sucks Yah! Boo! Yes, it's fake but wotcha gonna do about it?
Girl with a Hat said…
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/06/07/18/99129021-14790335-Meghan_Markle_43_and_husband_Prince_Harry_40_whisked_themselves_-a-6_1749316998625.jpg

This is a pic of "Lilibet" at Disneyland. Notice the toes.

Where did her Morton's toe from the Christmas pics where * is picking her up when she was a baby?
If you have to tell the world every bloody day how happy, happy, happy you are the world will ask "are you though?" And very much doubt it.

She does not smile anymore. She has queer wide openmouthed grimaces and she has contaminated her husbands smiles too.

Are those two ever sober nowadays?

Girl with a Hat said…
That wide open mouthed grimace is her imitation of Catherine's laugh.
Girl with a Hat said…
this is the picture of Lillibucks as a baby with the very long second toe

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/06/07/18/97745353-14790335-The_Duke_and_Duchess_of_Sussex_with_their_son_Archie_and_daughte-a-16_1749317076700.jpg

Compare the two
Magatha Mistie said…

WildBoar

African Shag

Whilst you’re down on your knees
Castrating haz royalties
Bow your head ‘til it’s erect
then Disaffect Misdirect Disrespect…

Magatha Mistie said…
@Maneki
They put the ass in crass 🫣
@GWAH
I believe it, the twerks are off
their trolley 🙄

@GWAH
That's one heck of a Morton's foot on that baby `Lilibet' at https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2019111/prince-archie-princess-lilibet-american-accents-meghan. As you say, no sign of it now.
OTOH, that's a very odd shadow on her in the Disneyland photo. Or does this poor child had vitiligo?

Meanwhile, I found this full-face photo of yet another `Lilibet' which I don't recall seeing before:
https://storyurl.com/2023/03/03/the-birth-certificate-for-lilibet-diana-contains-an-incredible-detail/ (Spoiler: he calls himself HRH)

And on a third hand, we have this:
https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/archie-and-lilibet-of-sussex-on-instagram-in-this-photo-theres-a-lot-of-ressemblence-on-lilibet-and-charlotte-i-hope-we-can-see-a-photo-of-them-togeth--431219733082652989/
@alianor
Indeed. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.
Magatha Mistie said…

@Maneki
I reckon she’s trolling us
I was 5 days overdue with my second, fit & healthy
No way could I have squatted/gyrated even with the aid of a pole 😉
and I wasn’t carrying an extra 65 pounds
Awaiting the vid of her singing to the seals whilst clapping and balancing
haz balls on her nose 🦭


OCGal said…
I read an excellent name on X for the tiresome skank

“ Her Royal Hoeness, Duchess Twerkle of the Kingdom of Griftalot”

Other posters are just calling the couple “The Twerkles”
Sassie said…
Emails please, thank you
Maneki Neko said…
@Wild Board

I opened the 2nd link, I reckon the photo has been photoshopped. Harry's head looks completely wrong, size, direction, colour, it looks like it's been added on.
I opened the 3rd link but there's no relevant photo.
Maneki Neko said…
@Magatha

Not only is she trolling us, I think, but she's taunting the BRF. They haven't risen to the bait and won't.
@magatha
What a wonderful image that conjures up!
Maneki Neko said…
The delusions continue.

'And The Mail on Sunday can reveal that, despite the backlash over her dodgy dancing with Harry to the soundtrack of Starrkeisha’s Baby Mama song, defiant Meghan is thrilled by the reaction in America.

Last night a source close to the Sussexes said: ‘Meghan is very pleased with the video. In the UK everyone’s reaction has been a bit prudish but everywhere else, particularly in America and especially with young people, it has been a huge hit.’'

A bit prudish? No, it has nothing to do with it. Shows out of touch she is. As for the young, I'm sure they don't care and I seriously doubt that farce was a hit. Once again, a big FU to the UK, including the BRF.
I don't believe that the Americans consider the twerking video a hit. One of my reasons is that mrs sussex looked very ugly in it with a stupid face. Not charming.

Another thing is the fact that the Americans are definitely not lowlifes like mrs sussex. She is very cheap and vulgar. People who like that kind of behaviour are a minority in any culture and certainly in the USA.

She is totally incapable of reading ANY room, isn't she?

I wonder, just how young is `young' when it comes to Twerk's desired demographic? Given that she's almost 44 (at the very least!) and is ageing badly, I wonder how old they think she is?
I know I'm very bad at it assessing younger people (even before I retired, I used to think that newly-qualified teachers were only 16 or 17!) but when I was in my early 20s, I thought 30 was knocking on a bit. To a young person, I'd guess she looks 50+, positively elderly in their eyes.
It's all very subjective.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6ohwd/todays_uk_press_little_bits_from_the_foreign_tabs/#lightbox

6th page, article & pics - if only.
For those who say that Diana couldn't have got pregnant within 6 months of Wm's birth, it wasn't that unusual before the Pill for a woman to produce `a baby a year'.
Girl with a Hat said…
That's what people used to call "Irish twins". My sister and I were born 15 months apart, so my mother got pregnant within 6 months of my birth.
@GWAH
Precisely. I wonder how many new mothers take a chance on it and find that lactation isn't all it's cracked to be?
Girl with a Hat said…
Funnily enough, it was not the suggestion of racism, which was levelled at the Royal Family in the famous 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview. Offensive as that was, senior royals always firmly placed their trust in the public who they hoped - and believed - would see this attempt at slandering them for the cheap shot it was.
Nor was it anything to do with titles, funding or even that well-worn bugbear of Harry’s security.
In fact it was contained in a throwaway line at the end of their dramatic first public statement on ‘Megxit’ in January 2020.
Announcing their decision to step back from their position as senior working royals in order to ‘carve out a progressive new role within this institution’ as financially independent individuals, the couple concluded: ‘We will continue to collaborate with Her Majesty The Queen, The Prince of Wales, The Duke of Cambridge and all relevant parties’.
And there it was – the word ‘collaborate’.
‘No-one "collaborates" with the Queen. This is not one of those "Kate Moss Top Shop tie-ups",' one well-placed source raged to me at the time.

https://archive.is/u2kBb#selection-771.0-797.142
Girl with a Hat said…
In my endocrinology course in Uni, the professor made sure to emphasize that lactation was not a foolproof birth control method.
"The world hasn't seen the real (mrs sussex) yet" says our mrs herself! (But I thought we saw her in the Archetypes?)

The twerking was for the empowerment of all women and mothers and we saw how she shows us all how to be relatable and organic true selves.( Is that even any true English?)

The magazine story I would be very ready to pay to read would be an IQ test of the baroness. Now that would be interesting! Does she get same IQ points as Harry, her husband? If she does it explains a lot. A love story made in heaven.
Magatha Mistie said…

Merchant of Menace

The merching of Lili
not long to wait
She’s launching her brand
Strawberry Shortbait…

Girl with a Hat said…
Remember, she bought this award from the LA Natural History Museum? LOL As though she ever had anything to do with anything natural....

Meghan Markle loses her chance to shine as LA Natural History Museum cancels glam gala as riots turn LA into a warzone

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14799601/Meghan-Markle-cancelled-LA-Museum-gala-honor-warzone.html
abbyh said…
Battle of Brothers (Robert Lacey) worth the read

Like on page 318, he mentions some of the kitchen sink listings of what was listed in trademark application for Sussex Royal. " 'social care services ... counseling services; emotional support services; ... Mentoring and personal care services.' "

No wonder the Queen put the kabosh on the half in/half out.


Girl with a Hat said…
In Brazil, people are really into these reborn dolls that look very real. You know why I'm referring to this. Anyway, here's an article in the NY times about them:

In the northwestern Brazilian state of Amazonas, one lawmaker, João Luiz, recently carried one of the dolls into the legislature and argued, without evidence, that some women have been demanding public benefits for the dolls. His colleague Joana Darc also voiced concern.

“You just can’t force a doctor in a hospital, for example, to treat a reborn doll as if it were a child, which is a living being,” she said on the floor. “You can’t force a teacher to accept a child in a day care center because the person wants the reborn doll to study.”

She asked where it would end: with people taking “reborn pets” to the veterinarian to be neutered?

In what looked like a bit of trolling, the official social media account of Curitiba warned the “mothers” of reborn dolls not to sit in the yellow seats on city buses reserved for pregnant women. “Reborns are cute, but they don’t guarantee a place in the yellow seat, OK?” the post read.

In defense of the dolls, the Rio de Janeiro City Council approved a proposal to make Sept. 4 Reborn Stork Day, a holiday honoring the artisans who make the dolls.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/world/americas/reborn-baby-dolls-brazil.html
Girl with a Hat said…
Have you noticed how everything she plans is cursed? There was the pandemic, the wild fires, the Queen's death, Trump winning the election, and now the riots in LA. She has some seriously bad karma.
@alianor
Leaving aside the cynical definition' of `intelligence' as the ability to pass intelligence tests, I usually think of it as being `quick to cotton on' and the ability to learn from experience. I suspect her score on those criteria would be very low indeed, falling into range of insanity.

I once watched a life-and-death struggle between an osprey and a salmon at Speymouth in Scotland. The bird had seized the fish in its talons but struggled to lift it from the water and was almost dragged under. It's possible that the bird could not, rather than would not, let go, it's claws being embedded in the fish. Watching was heart-stopping. until the bird won and flew off inland with its prize, presumably to feed its chicks.

* is incapable of letting of her obsessions and will probably hang on with her claws until her dying day. Whether the load she carries will ever be so heavy that it `drowns' her remains to be seen.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1l6ohwd/todays_uk_press_little_bits_from_the_foreign_tabs/#lightbox

A lengthy video about H being addressed as `Mr Windsor' at the Shanghai event - and his alleged response. (Spoiler: He didn't like it, apparently) I gave up about half way through, am unsure whether it happened or not. Has anyone else watched it?
Girl with a Hat said…
No, but I know he really wasn't happy with the level of security he got from the organizers and was very unpleasant about it throughout the conference. Some people said that he threw a fit about it.
It is interesting that the baroness uses time, people and money to convince the world that she is a kind and nice person and at the same time treats other human beings like shit, bullying them brutally constantly. It would be so much cheaper and easier to just behave, wouldn't it?

Dan Wootton outspoken has a story of her loving relation with her young son on a flight to South Africa and her true attitude towards the stewardesses around the world.

A comment in response to Mail article re Guardian article concerning the Twerklets are being referred to a s `HRHs':

Freespirit77, Near but far, United Kingdom, moments ago
`Harry likes the herb..that’s why he’s a Herbert 👍'

Ooh! Someone's in no doubt about H's parentage...

H hasn't twigged that it's not up to him whether the children are Royal Highnesses or not.

Popular posts from this blog

Gosh It Is Quiet In Here

 There just hasn't been a lot from really either of them together or individually lately, has there? But why? Have they blown all their bridges, connections and are down to toss the proverbial kitchen sink for attention? I don't know.  We've heard that moving vans showed up at the house.  And nothing more like pictures from a neighbor happy to see the back of them. We've heard they bought a house on Portugal.   But the wording was kind of funny.  Multiple sources of the same thing - yes but that isn't a guarantee of proof as it could all be from the same source.  It was more along the lines of "We've been told that...".  It came off as a we really don't know if we believe this to be true or not so we are putting it out there but hedging our bets.  Or at least it did to me. And nothing more like exactly when, where or for how much or when they might visit it again.  Or pictures of the awesome inside.  Or outside.  Or requisite ...

As Time Passes and We Get Older

 I started thinking about how time passes when reading some of the articles about the birthday.  It was interesting to think about it from the different points of view.  Besides, it kind of fits as a follow up the last post (the whole saga of can the two brothers reunite). So there is the requisite article about how he will be getting all kinds of money willed to him from his great-grandmother.  There were stories about Princess Anne as trustee (and not allowing earliest access to it all).  Whether or not any or all of this is true (there was money for him and/or other kids) has been debated with claims she actually died owing money with the Queen paying the debts to avoid scandal.  Don't know but I seem to remember that royal estates are shrouded from the public so we may not (ever) know. However, strange things like assisting in a book after repeated denials have popped up in legal papers so nothing is ever really predicable.   We are also seein...

Will She or Won't She?

 I am talking about Catherine and Trooping the Color. It's barely over a week away and will she/won't she decision is leaning toward not in public media. The ceremony is almost three and a half hours beginning really at 10, parade starting 10:30 and flyover at 1.   That's a long time even if you are sitting.  Especially if you have not been out in public in a long time plus you have or feel you have to be the face of being the parent while your spouse is busy being officially second to His Majesty.  And He won't be on a horse this time (uproar over tradition). Yeah but, but ... what if she showed up for just part of it, like the flyover? OH, that would be heartwarming after worrying about her as she has been coping with her disease.   But ... eh, my guess is not.  Just because if she showed up, it would become the Catherine's back show instead of the celebration of the King's birthday.  And Catherine is known for being able to  be in the...