And we have yet another person making the rounds about how she ought to come back to acting, yada, yada, family would likely support this and so on (claims of how good she is).
This time it is Eric Roberts who worked beside her (no idea if he was invited to the wedding or not). Last month or maybe it was the month before there was some other article about being in some movie thing with lots of others. Her part was for a day or two as I recall.
Before that it was in a clip for Clevr Brands. Don't know if you can count the various Netflix shows or not.
When I think of where she lives, it's not near the centers of where things are really happening in acting world. That would make it hard to get back into that kind of circulation. Montecito reminds me of Frogmore. Each was out there and far from a lot of other action, nightlife, edgy events. But what do I know? I don't live near either and have no real direct knowledge. Just what I have read.
Is this another trial balloon? Maybe? Is it possible that this is some attempt to bring in money? Probably (hence the idea of family supporting her decision).
But ... do you think that she will likely get a lot of real offers?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation is still on.
There are service stations that are closed down due to lack of petrol
I saw one video of a young woman in a supermarket where the shelves were almost completely bare because everyone had bought up everything in case there was a scarcity of food.
She is truly a weapon of mass destruction.
https://archive.is/qGSxb
Private detective Gavin Burrows insisted statements submitted to the High Court in his name were 'complete and utter untruth,' adding that Baroness Lawrence, Prince Harry and other public figures in the case were 'seriously misled'.
Giving evidence, Mr Burrows, 55, repeatedly denied he had worked for the Daily Mail or The Mail On Sunday.
Baroness Lawrence, 73, and the Duke of Sussex, 41, are among seven public figures involved in a breach of privacy case against the Mail and the MoS.
Associated Newspapers, which publishes both titles, denies its journalists commissioned private detectives to hack voicemails, intercept landline calls, bug vehicles and properties and 'blag' their private information.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15672887/Doreen-Lawrence-conned-joint-privacy-claim-against-Mail.html
I had forgotten this case was still ongoing.
Her visit to Australia looks like it's in jeopardy. She'll have to resort to plan B to get more money coming in.
This is an interesting thread over at CDAN.
They discuss the Harkles` visit to Oz.
But, what intrigued me is the post about the date of the Queen's death. Someone predicted the exact date months before it happened, and also predicted that Charles would die this 28th of March. Let's pray it doesn't happen.
Montecito neighbours giving the Harkles the cold shoulder
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are set to arrive Down Under next month, but ahead of their trip, an advocacy group, Beyond Australia, has urged the government not to use taxpayer funds for the couple's security, logistics and other requirements.
As of this evening, the petition on Change.org titled No Taxpayer-Funding or Official Support for Harry & Meghan's Private Visit to Australia had reached a total of 32,715 signatures.' . . .
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15675317/Australians-demand-Harry-Meghan-pay-visit-petition-signatures.html
https://www.gbnews.com/royal/meghan-markle-prince-harry-taxpayer-duke-duchess-of-sussex-australia
And will he win his court case against Daily Mail because he said so?
One by Hugo Vickers, of which you can read an excerpt here:
https://archive.is/2xjOV
And I believe the Tom Bowers book is finally available in the UK
I have the audiobook version and I will listen to it while painting my kitchen
Le Métier de Madame 'Arry is to be The Dark Shadow of A Princess, strange!
https://youtu.be/zkweQKALEeQ?si=eSPOxRppnan7D02l
even Diana knew!
The public is really against it. Read the room.
The King, the Queen get it full time because he is king and she is his wife. William and family get it full time because they are next in line. No one else in the family gets it full time (that I know of). Everyone goes about living their lives and security shows up when they are to go off and do something in service to King and Country.
And what's changed since they last had it? Nothing to them in UK terms but the cautionary tale of Andrew's really trended downward (and out of the family public orbit), the world has all kinds of wars going off, many are having difficulty financially, job wise, (there are those who still remember rationing) so splashing out in more people, fancy cars with flags and people riding motorcycles to clear the way might not be - well, this might not be the best time to think that a return of privileges which requires UK people to spend all kinds of money (they don't have) supporting this big expense for a whole family - the adults who have not come off as very supportive of the public's concerns, respect for the Commonwealth, recent history of interviews, books, documentaries and so on.
By delaying the decision, they are making absolutely certain they are not overlooking some reason which could make it justifiable to resume their security. Checking every dot and crossing every t. They don't want to appear to be overlooking something.
There is a part of me which is kind of also thinking they keep kicking the decision down the street (farther and farther) maybe because they know it won't go down well in Montecito. No one wants to deliver bad news while sitting across an angry H (and by extension, her).
I still scrape every last smear of butter from its wrapping and shake out every last tea leaf from the shiny wrapping, just like Mum did, and chase the final drop of egg white from the shell!
I've long thought that H is safe from terrorists because they've realise the reaction to something happening to H might not be the national grief that the death of his mother precipitated...
Tom Bower and *'s past as a yacht girl
I wonder what the Harkles see that news.
Scratch that. I don't think they look at news.
I guess since we haven't heard any news, the King is still among us.
According to Daily beast prince Baldilocks can "consider" a visit to Sandringham during the summer if his father sorts a full security circus for him. And if he gets the security then he can bring his children. That's called dirty blackmail in normal decent person's language.
Because if the King gives in and organizes full security for Harry he comes alone (again) and says na-na-na-naa my wife and children could not come because na-na na-na-NAA, old man. But I demand LOTS of photos of ME and you that I can sell to papers for good money to prove that I am a FULL MEMBER OF THE ROYAL FAMILY and the most important too!
The possible visit is now in the national news.
'Now the Sunday Times reports 'those close to Harry' say he 'would welcome an invitation to Sandringham' this summer when he flies to Britain to attend events connected with his Invictus Games.
Notably the Prince and Princess of Wales – from whom he remains firmly estranged – also spend much of their holidays at Sandringham, where they have a country home, Anmer Hall.' (DM)
The RF is at Balmoral in summer, not Sandringham (Christmas). The Independent states “He always loves seeing his father and would love to see him as much as possible.”. I don't know what 'as much as possible' is, Harry has only seen his father twice in two years, and let's not forget Charles had cancer then.
If you want to be invited, you wait for an invitation. By stating publicly that he wants Charles to invite him, it looks like Harry is trying to force his hand. This could put Charles in a difficult position. In any case, if Harry, with or without wifey/children, does not announce his visit and slips in quietly into the country, no one will notice. After all, he was able to slip in and out of the UK and into Toronto unnoticed when seeing *. Once in a royal property, he'll have security. I hope the King says no.
If mrs baldilocks does not get what she wants she is surely going to revenge with blood. But the truth is that after these six years of her cheap tricks nobody is going to believe her stories and the damage she caused to the family with her "racism" story etc. will not function anymore. AND that has nothing to do with the family but everything to do with her own lies and hypocrisy!
On the final episode of their Elizabeth I podcast miniseries, Queens, Kings and Dastardly Things hosts Robert Hardman and Professor Kate Williams unpick why the Virgin Queen never married during her unprecedented 44-year reign.
Available on youtube.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1s95x7b/fun_sarcasm_from_the_wombat_tribune_on_instagram/
Journalists from the Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday (MoS) faced 'frankly desperate allegations' during their evidence to the trial brought by Harry and six other public figures, the newspapers' barrister said.' (DM)
Excerpts from Reuters:
'The judge overseeing the lawsuit brought by Prince Harry, singer Elton John and other high-profile figures against the publisher of the Daily Mail at London's High Court said on Tuesday it would take some time before he could deliver his ruling.'
'The publisher rejects their case as being "preposterous smears".'
'The publisher's lawyer Antony White argued that there was no evidence to back up the allegations, the claimants' witnesses were unreliable, and the case against the papers was scattergun and part of a conspiracy by people with a grudge against the press.'
We shall see.
Thank you for this. It's very funny and I hope most Australians don't take H&* seriously. Good on them to take the pee out of them.
https://shorturl.at/KhjXG
Dodgy - not certain even though I know it would be helpful.
You know who does post archived pages? The SMM sinners. They discuss things we don't always talk about. I know the topic has been talked about at some point or another and another over there. I am suspecting you could find links there.
Thank you for thinking of us.
Piste de dissonance
Desperate for a piste of the action
Posing haz
to cause distraction
Poles apart
slippery slope
Abandon all hope
Windsor Easter
summit attraction…
Take the bus? I filled up today, pricey
but less than last week!
Usual traffic jams for long weekend
getaways
Remote areas, different
Hopefully there’s an aviation
fuel shortage 😉
Windsor is missing it’s idiot?
* claims that this is Archie skiing but all the commenters say that it could be any young boy since we don't see a face.
Speaking of coke, it sounds like the ginger haired cuck one would do a couple of lines and then call and scream at grandma.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2026/04/blind-item-12_053410962.html#disqus_thread
As for the cdan blind item, it's really horrible. Some posts are very good and I always like the ones by media_lush. His/her posts never disappoint and the pix on this blind item are worth a look.
Royal Rogue's good for a giggle on the Aussie venture and the ski video.
I don't mean any disrespect, truly, I am just wondering for he has no warm messages to Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists or Jews but just one group.
His time as a monarch has been so chaotic that he may earn a name in history as "Charles III l'Impuissant" or "Charles III le Vacillant". Maybe, just maybe Princess Diana was right when she had thoughts about her husband's ability to handle the "top job".
(PS I know that every person's days are numbered, mine too)
The whole thing smells to me like the fuss over the one-and-only flag (at the time, on Buck House) not being flown at half-staff when Diana died. That was stirred up by mischief makers, ignoring h convention that the Royal Standard denoted only the presence/absence of the monarch - lowered when the Queen left the building, raised when she returned and came in. In the meantime, a small version was flown on the Royal car.
The response was to put a second flagpole on BH and fly the Union Flag which would be lowered to half -staff as deemed appropriate . (It all goes back to what happened if a ship of one nation is captured by an enemy - the original flag was lowered to make room for the flag of the victor. For mourning, the space is making room for the flag of Death.
Any parent knows that one shouldn't show favouritism towards one child. The same principle applies to the father of the nation.
Not mischief making. He is my monarch as well, and I find it shameful and pig headed that he has decided not to do so.
But I DO NOT want to harp on about this because I have respect for the King as the head of state and it is not my place. In my country we have problems with politicians who are quite ready to accept almost anything from immigrants but not a thing from our own Christian people and it is disgusting.
https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2026/04/04/en-photo--justin-trudeau-fait-du-ski-avec-le-prince-harry-et-la-championne-olympique-eileen-gu
With a lovely photo of *.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1sd2f2v/happiness_for_meghan_meghans_mole_security_concern/
https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/archbishop-of-canterbury-easter-message-call-peace-iran-war-5HjdXL2_2/
There is no way Harry ever read William Faulkner. And the only book we can say with certainty he has held in his hands was a children's book about some trains but he did not read it just held it in a Youtube piece.
So I will leave the book be for I believe it is just a tale of an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
With the drinking and drugs, clear hate of the media and others who he felt let him down - it was intense to read as what was clearly viewed as personal. Other parts just did not make sense.
Gosh that was a long time ago.
New video out titled "The End Is Nigh ...!" and Our Glorious Narrator has moved up the timeline on Harry's wife's disengagement from Harry. It will happen sooner than the years out he previously thought. He now says this year or next (!).
In a nutshell, Harry is now dead weight and actually in the way of his wife achieving the prime aims. HG says disengagement is in sight. This video is not one to miss!
Meggxit
Megg so eggstatic with
flicks of her chicks
Eggstravagant poses
desperate for clicks
Eggxacting eggxtreme
over egging
Tungsten shell kraken
eggxtra pegging…
I wouldn’t waste my petrol 😉
or ‘rotten egg’ throwing skills
on those two
Hard enough drumming up ditties
boring, bland, blank!
Happy Easter (belated)
Hope, renewal and the
triumph of light over darkness
Eggxactly
@WildBoar
Tradition was upheld
nothing to do with the King
Long Live the King
@Humor Me
‘Eggmazing Egg Decorator’
Love it!
Ferkle*
Their last time down under
Caused haz to sunder
those that gave him merit
Their behaviour we heard
Obnoxious tres merde
Exposed the ferreting ferret…
*Urban dictionary