Sentebale is suing Harry.
Exact details are not out there (yet) but we do know they were having severe money difficulties.
What we also don't know (yet) how closely Invictus will be following this. Maybe this will allow them to get out from underneath him (and her) as he is too compromised?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation is still on.
Sentebale 'launched a High Court lawsuit for libel and slander against the Duke of Sussex and his friend and former royal equerry Mark Dyer.' (DM). Not many details at the moment although the Independent writes that 'Sentebale . . . have launched defamation action against Harry, alleging “co-ordinated adverse media campaign” which caused “operational disruption and reputational harm”, its board of trustees said.
'It [Sentebale] said: “The charity seeks the court’s intervention, protection, and restitution following a coordinated adverse media campaign conducted since 25 March 2025 that has caused operational disruption and reputational harm to the charity, its leadership, and its strategic partners.'
“The proceedings have been brought against Prince Harry and Mark Dyer, identified through evidence as the architects of that adverse media campaign, which has had significant viral impact and triggered an onslaught of cyber bullying directed at the charity and its leadership.
“Sentebale has experienced the adverse media campaign as false narratives circulated through the media about the charity and its leadership, attempts to undermine its relationships with staff, existing and prospective partners, and the forced diversion of leadership time and resources into managing a reputational crisis not of the charity’s making.”'
https://youtube.com/watch?v=y8ZgD362c_Y&si=8SMFxco6Dw7PBI_3
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15726175/Meghan-Netflix-boss-wife-party-Montecito.html
In the first photo, the Sarandos couple look genuinely affectionate towards each other, with * clinging on them, and ignoring her hubby.
I thought, however, that Sarandos had said horrible things about her, so I am surprised that they are together at any kind of event.
Her dress, it looks like a side zipper in one photo. And it bunches.
As for Nicole's dress, I'm thinking the photos come from two different parties. In the ones with TOW, her attire is black and while but in others it is straight black.
*'s pose with Nicole is exactly the same as with Jessica Mulroney, in her blush colour stained dress.
Rumor has it that Daniel Martin was involved in Mulligan's April magazine shoot (don't remember the magazine name). Wonder if he shared a photo of a dress he saw being fitted.
There's NO way she just lucked into the *same* exact shade as Mulligan's dress.
and other scathing remarks about the female narcissist.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15728403/Meghans-awkward-night-Netflix-party-exaggerated-friendship-bosss-wife-dress-code-clash-star-event-Carey-Mulligan.html
What * still doesn't seem to grasp is that the few moments at the party where she got a bit of attention because she disobeyed the dress code may have cost her good will and future opportunities both in business and in the entertainment field. She always goes for short term gain over long term benefits. That's the main characteristic of someone who has no emotional intelligence.
The question becomes - to whom then will the rules or requests be followed? I would think* that a director or show runner would be looking at this and thinking: having her on the set would be a question of when would the problems start, not if any would start.
*but I have been wrong before and I do not do either job or anything similar. I am, however, careful about what kinds of people I'm willing to hire. Looking for a good fit and all that.
https://www.celebitchy.com/971552/prince_harry_meghan_attended_a_netflix_party_at_ted_sarandos_home_lol/
There is a very clear hierarchy in the BRF, which * was unwilling or unable to understand and accept. I thought there is a very clear hierarchy in the cinema/tv too. I don't know what * was like on set but she couldn't follow the rules, i.e. protocol, once in the BRF. She only follows her own rules.
@Magatha, are your ready with your rotten tomatoes?
I had heard that Meghan rudely did that, but paid no attention at the time because my attention had been drawn to Meghan forcing Dr Chandauka to move from adjacent to Harry while holding the winner’s cup in conjunction with him, to on Meghan’s far side, Meghan actually using her index finger and hand to point to where Dr Chandauka needed to move to (away from Harry), and then the poor lady had to crouch under the trophy and move to where Meghan indicated - - - see from 14.10 - - -
https://tinyurl.com/MeghanSideArmShove
I congratulate Dr Chandauka, the chairman of Sentebale, for her excellent acting skills on stage. I believe I would not have been able to pretend to keep my cool as chairman being forced by a grifting skank (my opinion) to crouch under the cup to inch by Meghan, obeying her finger pointing and arm blocking, but Sophie Chandauka did not flinch nor protest at the time.
They say revenge is a dish best served cold. Dr Chandauka seems to follow that advice: I hope the Sentebale lawsuit against Harry and his crony succeeds.
Dr Chandauka is an admirable woman and admirable executive, and according to those in the know, she has enormous amounts of proof of their knowing-wrongdoing.
She is acting as Deus Ex Machina to those of us who feel the Harry & Meghan clown show is unsolvable and has gone on way too long.
Lots of good tea here from second hand coke, remember her? Why did Sarandos invite her to the Netflix party? First time I've heard of anti-disparagement causes in contracts.
“Why is she dressed like the Bristol scale”
https://tinyurl.com/MeghanDressedAsBristolScale
She did get a photo with Dr Chandauka, poor woman, because Dr is beautiful woman with round flesh in right places and our heroine has nothing in right places.
She (the baroness) in Australia is not photogenic and the look on her face is not a smile but a distorted grimace she seems to believe makes her look like young Julia Roberts. It does not so she ought to stop smiling altogether. I am afraid she is losing all understanding of "normal" behaviour when meeting people who constantly get too much of her wet armpits (you are right Wild Boar Battle-maid!) with her hugs.
Dan Wootton says that the humanitarian baroness said "let's make this quick" before entering the hospital. Attention whore.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/046c346798f954f91e4838bbf51fa3d8ba292c84062abf108fc096274c979866.jpg?w=600&h=635
Also, over at the CDAN thread, there`s an X post where Haznoballs is talking to some woman with * clinging to him and he says "We`re part of the Royal Family" . The post has disappeared from X but you can find it here on the CDAN thread:
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2026/04/blind-item-11_0277605010.html#disqus_thread
Is this the photo you were talking about? As well as the tendons in her neck, the photo shows the prominent vein in her forehead and the exaggerated grin accentuates her wrinkles. Not flattering. As usual, it's the * and Harry show (mostly *).
Anyway, all fur and no knickers.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15731101/Harry-Meghans-Australian-quasi-royal-tour-starts-amid-bafflement-actually-ahead-money-spinning-commercial-engagements-including-1-400-head-girls-weekend.html
She says that Hairy is going to sue some of the authors who came out with books recently. He doesn`t seem to like the story that the Queen insisted on having someone beside her when he called, to act as a witness. And other stories as well.
Where does he get the money for these court cases?
'Prince Harry has said he had to 'cleanse' himself of the past before having children as he revealed the 'struggles' of fatherhood and the 'disconnection' he felt towards his son Archie while his wife Meghan was pregnant.
The Duke of Sussex also discussed his experiences of therapy as he told an audience today that he knew he 'had stuff from the past' that he needed to deal with before he had children.
Harry made the comments while giving a talk on stage at an event about fatherhood hosted by Movember in Melbourne this morning during his four day tour of Australia with Meghan.'
I cannot read any more of that bovine excrement.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15734517/Prince-Harry-tells-struggle-son-Archie-born.html
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2026/04/15/06/1776229886669_wide_galleryImage_14_APRIL_2026_MELBOURNE_A.JPG
Sources have told news.com.au that the Duchess of Sussex, who launched her lifestyle brand As Ever last year in conjunction with her Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, has filmed a special guest role on MasterChef Australia during a gap in her and Harry’s jam-packed itinerary.'
. . . '“As part of her first Australian visit since 2018, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, featured as a guest judge on the country’s most beloved cooking show,” the statement read.' (Herald Sun)
Being a talented chef, of course she had to be a judge on a cooking show. Did she have to hassle the producers to get into the programme? I bet she'll be front and centre on the show.
But I don't wonder his disconnection to his son because he could not follow the pregnancy of his wife like men in normal families can. It must have been very strange for him poor diddums.
I don't believe that people are very interested in the book the baroness is going to publish sooner or later for we all know exactly what is going to be in it (that is the worst thing in the baroness she is SO predictable). BUT I would definitely buy Harry's book where he tells openly and honestly everything that his wife said and did during their time together. That would be a real bestseller!! Imagine "The True Story of My Daughter and Son, (Whose Children They In Reality Are)"!!!
"THEY SACRIFICED HER TO SAVE HIM." PRINCE ... - Facebook
š£ "THEY SACRIFICED HER TO SAVE HIM." PRINCE HARRY JUST DROPPED THE MOST DEVASTATING ACCUSATION OF HIS LIFE. This isn't a memoir. This isn't an interview carefully...
I assume this is fake, although it's feasible that H believes it.
https://www.facebook.com/61564008025109/posts/just-now-they-sacrificed-us-for-the-heir-prince-harry-makes-explosive-claim-abou/122197304282466934/ plus the link below on the FB post.
https://growglobal24.com/thuthao/just-now-they-sacrificed-us-for-the-heir-prince-harry-makes-explosive-claim-about-royal-system/#goog_rewarded
Somebody has seriously brainwashed him, whether wifey or some dodgy therapist or both. If he can't understand that William is the one to succeed the throne, then there's no hope.
For 10 years? Recollections may vary. I don't think she'd met Harry 10 years ago, not quite 10 years, and in the beginning there was no negative publicity. Even when she got married - 8 years ago, maths isn't her forte - most people were enthusiastic - before they saw the real *. What an ungrateful, spiteful, obnoxious witch. Camilla, I remember, got far worse. The difference is upbringing and attitude. She carried on and rose above it, never answering criticisms. 'Never complain, never explain'. * makes is worse for herself every time she whines she's a victim. So does Harry. The two of them feed into their victim hold.
@Sassie
Bristol Scale, love it, thank you
His "mum" was not killed because she was a working royal but precisely because she was not and had not her body guards to protect her against drunken drivers.
And meghanspeak "I am the most trolled person" in normal people's language means she can and will troll, bully and shit over people because she is the most important person in the world and no one else matters.
They do have so much to give to the world, don't you think?
Taking the Pissoir
Stool and Fool
and their effluential pit
He’s wallowing in pity
She’s peddling shit
Wherever they go
Whatever they do
The Bristol Bilges
will be covered in poo
Desperate to be known as a
innovative innovator
She’ll be flushed with success
Merde Macerator…
I'd thought he was talking about the death of his mother, you know the `Grandpa killed Mummy' line, not that * was used to deflect attention from Wm. The needle really has got stuck in the 78rpm shellac record that passes for his brain and/or he's been fitted with a defective bullshit detector.
CuckaBurra
From Darwin to Adelaide
Perth to Sydney
And all in between
Hobart and territory
We think these poor bastards
Moan and Crone known
Should get over themselves
but give them a bone
Soon they’ll be gone
in a cloud of rust dust
As ever megs
and her quest for a crust…
The `olive drab' shift does nothing for her, nor do the black tights. Alcoholic abdomen combined with sarcopenia in the legs? That could explain the apparent loss of calf muscles.
Aussie Band ‘The Angels’
“No Way, Get Fucked, Fuck Off!!
Most of the pics at the Netflix do with * hanging off the Netflix boss and his wife, have been removed.
The only one remaining is one with * lined up beside Hairy and the Netflix couple.
SMM and CDAN have more details.
But the sussexes are very reliable in their stories that change every time they tell them. I doubt that Harry's IQ can be much over 70 if even that, but that is nothing he can do about so it would be easier for him to just shut up.
Meghan told everybody when she came to Britain that she was very intelligent. She is not, though certainly over 70 IQ. If you are intelligent you are capable of learning and she is totally incapable to learn anything. She is constantly repeating same mistakes again and again.
And I think that she is very afraid in the situations when she hysterically hugs people or crush their hands so it looks painful. It was not love towards Harry, the hand holding, it was to secure her in situations she felt timid and unsure and did not know what to do. I mean she lacks all natural sophisticated manners that even lower middle class children grow up with. And even when European conduct was strange to her one learns when one follows what other people do, it is not difficult if one is ready to watch and learn. Her reaction was "I am so much better than anyone here so don't need to learn anything". She is an extremely stupid woman.
You are so right - I predict that when H finally departs this life, he'll choose 1=
Her 2-handed grasp on Harry now looks to me as if she's desperate to stop him escaping.
BTW prepare for mor puke-inducing news. Apparently, they did meet survivors of the Bondi Beach attack.
Unless of course a richer mark comes along.
I looked at the DM article, I don't know where they got their info. All the pix of *&H with Ted Sarandos and his wife are on the internet, including the claw cosying up to Ted S, belly laughing with him and clasping his wife.
Bizarre. The photos are still there for all to see on Google, at least in the UK. Maybe not where you are?
I suffer! I have been suffering for years! You do not know how I have been suffering since my childhood. My father who was the king before me never hugged me or took me to bicycle tours and this has destroyed me. You do not know the horrors of my life.
My mother who has always followed me and has always been telling me what to do even after her death because for her I was the most important person in the world (not my brother whom I hate because even without his hair he is more manly and handsome than me). She is here today because I let them carry her from Althorp to Westminster Abbey to prove that I am the most gifted and loved royal person in my family.
Now when I have this crown you must worship me and understand my suffering and call me king Harry the Great because I am the first great king after Alfred in Britain.
(PS Joke aside if your life's story is like that, even when you get what you desire for the story does not change, because you never change and grow, never ever.)
How much was she paid?
(amounts estimated vary wildly)
(she was only there for 2 hours so that wasn't very long/highly paid by the minute salary but is that a sustainable rate to support you and family on)
How many people actually attended in the end?
I still wonder about their taxes (and how that has been working out). 2025 taxes were due on the 15th.
And that woman does not understand why people do not like her!
https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/news-photo/prince-harry-duke-of-sussex-meghan-duchess-of-sussex-nicole-news-photo/2270939282?adppopup=true
Is she really 51?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDFpF-fag6o
HG Tudor is seething with anger over H's performance at the Australian National War Memorial. See `WTF Harry! The Canberra Charade'.
Essential viewing and listening, I think.
Expirational
Claw needs him
more than he needs hair
No kudo$ as wife of
expired ex spare
Widow Twankey
no spring chicken
Will preserve at all cost
he’s alive and siccing…
@WildBoar
Sounds like “Ladies of Letters”
My heart is aching for all those, living and dead, whom she has insulted, disparaged, and metaphorically spat upon, in her nasty, grasping, evil life.
××× ×× ×××× ×©××ש
Woe unto her and thrice woe
So now she doesn't have fans, she has 'superfans'? In any case, I thought investing in herself was all she's done since planning to meet H.
Does he mind that his son walks on the sand where 15 human beings died and 40 more were wounded enjoying the money his wife makes with her blue shirt ($ 440), white trousers ($ 159,95) and the tote bag ($ 950). And to elevate her looks, as she so likes to do, the baroness's shirt is very near replica of the uniform of the dying prisoners of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
As the sussexes are on the official site of the Royal House as full members of the house the palace could publish a new photo and replace the 2018 photo of them on the Bondi Beach with a new auschwitz version with the baroness's new cloths. The sussexes wanted the palace to upgrade they photos and work on the site, so that would be according their wishes and would help the baroness in her cloths business.
When I read that, what flashed in my mind was the visit to Uyinene Mrwetyana on the trip to South Africa. And the more recent visit to feed people while wearing all kinds of gold jewelry.
`15th June 1215-The Magna Carta (Great Charter) was an historic and revolutionary royal charter which curtailed the unlimited powers of the king ' – see https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Timeline-of-British-Parliament/ established the power of the law.'
The `Model of Kingship’ which is being challenged in the US would be unthinkable in the UK. It may have taken almost 500 years for us to deal with autocratic leaders in the UK (1215 -1688) but deal with it we did and events so frequently blamed on the monarch are in effect the actions of Parliament.
We're just watching Elizabeth: the Unseen Queen. 6.35 pm BBC2. The story of Queen Elizabeth II in her own words, featuring never before home movies.
It is narrated in part by the Queen herself, with a lot of never seen before footage. Beautiful film, and inspiring when you look at certain members of the RF today.
Such beautiful little girls, the `Little Princesses' - so much joy in their lives to this point. We had a delightful neighbour, born some years before the Queen, who had lived close to their London home - he told me of how he was able to hear and see them through the hedge, playing in the garden.
(On the other hand, James II & VI did not abdicate, despite what we are always told - he may have fled the country but it was to regroup and attempt to seize back the Crown. In effect, he was deposed by Parliament inviting his son-in-law to be king instead.)
H would have to be given a choice between renouncing his wife and all titles and living as a genuinely private person like the rest of use. on the National Average Income, no security but subject to Council -and all other taxes, and the Law. Or permanent exile, perhaps as 2nd Duke of Windsor, with minimal financial support, no security and so on.
BTW, I believe in Churchill's dictum about history: `The further back you look, he further forward you can see' (or wtte)
The old footage of the RF was excellent and it was delightful to see Philip playing with Charles and Anne when they were little.
Re the Radio Times, you can seem the listings online.
https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/tv-listings/
'The Duchess of Sussex, 44, had reportedly hoped to catch up with celebrity conservationist Robert Irwin, 22, and his family at Australia Zoo in Queensland.
'Aligning with the Irwins' worthy causes is something that Meghan and Harry could be on board with,' an insider tells this week's New Idea magazine.'
No. */*&H just wanted to piggy back on the Irwins' success as conservationists. It was very good news that 'the Irwins politely declined the invitation due to their strong ties as monarchists'. 'They are all staunch monarchists and fiercely loyal to The Firm,'. The son 'was particularly close to Harry's brother William, as an ambassador for his Earthshot Prize, and didn't want to upset the Prince of Wales by appearing to side with Meghan.'. I feel a bit of schadenfreude but the duo deserve it.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15747113/Meghan-Markle-snubbed-Irwins-Australian-tour.html
Have we ever talked about this HG Tudor...?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DECqlegnEKE
What MI5 Knew About Meghan Markle
Legit, speculation, or what?
you can watch it here for free
'Legit, speculation, or what?'. Exactly. I'm not sure what to make of it. How did HG Tudor managed to get his hands on such info? I'm re-reading it (I only read the transcript) and it says '. . . MI5 only summary for her majesty the American actress Rachel. . . is now confirmed in a romantic relate with Prince Henry of Wales'. How could *, then only 'dating' Harry - this was in 2016 - be referred to as 'her majesty the American actress'?? And Her Majesty refers to a reigning queen, or wife of king. This doesn't pass the smell test (IMHO).
MI5 only summary for Her Majesty:
The American actress, Rachel Meghan Markle....
I read that she got upset that the cooking show people called her royal. Really? When the trips mimic a royal tour with with press releases, meet and greets, constant focus on clothing, accepting flowers, photos of people swarming to take photos (like Diana walking about), crowds and the like? Then if perhaps they were contacting the press and asked them to stop calling the trips royal or royal like tours - then there is a leg to stand on getting upset use of the word with the show in my opinion. Sauce for ganders and all that
You are right, I would have paid more attention... Now it makes sense
Meant @Girl with a Hat. More embarrassment.
That makes two of us, then! ;-)
* 'was criticised after her $2,000 'look' when she met survivors of the massacre was posted on a website where she is paid a percentage from sales.'
. . . 'Critics said that the decision to advertise the duchess's 'look' on a visit to meet terror attack survivors is 'the starkest example yet of Harry and Meghan’s efforts to commercialise their royal brand'.'
Not only shouldn't they commercialise their so-called royal brand, but to do so on the scene of a recent terror attack is in really bad taste. We've learnt to find that * is synonymous with bad taste.
Over at CDAN, they have some info on why people think * is Zandi.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2026/04/blind-items-revealed-1_22.html#disqus_thread
What ever happened to the grand plans to set up a one stop shop to help counseling kind of deal? I remember a lot of corporate/LLC set ups. There was talk about whether or not her mother had the qualifications to run this. I don't recall this on the list.
https://x.com/ThinkBeautiful_/status/1951784986140725363/photo/1
..reminds me of a medieval stained glass image at York Minster.
Sorry, no link as all images have endless URLs - Just Google `wren and spider at York Minster’.
Besides Henry VI was a king who would have suited excellently to modern times.