So I started thinking about the whole history of her and them which leads up to now she's done with the British Royal Family.
I was influenced by Beeb's video of how she believes that there is a case that they expected to be chased to come back into the family, get everything they wanted when they left.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK9uNrbb-lg
I don't think it was the first bluff though. For me, I think it may have started maybe about the time he "asked" the Queen about her approval of marriage to *. Her comment was more along the lines of I guess I have to agree to this. I remember reading it in his book and thinking: Boy, that is just not a ringing endorsement by her, is it?
Then there was the wedding date. That whole pushing aside his cousin so he could get married before her. That degree of rush, rush kind of sounds like a need (for appearances) rather than a desire to marry.
All the family has done is to repeatedly not engage to negative outbursts. While being blamed loudly on and off the world's stage. Years.
And yet, the tide is turning on that part of the negative public opinion of the British Family. Respect for dealing with him, her, them. More and more people are looking differently at the endless drama and questioning it.
So ... is she really done?
Maybe? Maybe not? Is this another bluff? (the snarky side of me says: Is that a promise or threat that you can be held to?)
It's hard to tell.
She needs them more than they need her. So I suspect that she will continue to try to get what she wants but will redouble her efforts by continuing working through him rather than a direct approach. Sandringham? Frog Cott? Charities? and the removal list rises while they lose time and time again.
So not much has worked yet (for the couple). It's kind of like watching someone try to play chess while using strategy they learned from checkers. The opposition - the monarchy, the palace, the British royal family all have a clear and good sense of who they are, what they can and cannot do and have good advisors at every step of the path. They have built this for a good thousand years.
It is their chessboard.
I wrote this and then the news blew up that there was a secret meeting.
I still don't know but ...
It's kind of hard to walk back from implying that I would not have anything to do with you ever again and act like it was your evil twin who must have been the one who was the source of this.
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Nutty and us Mods strive as much as possible to make this a welcome and
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
If TW was at that meeting, do you realize she had to curtsy to Camilla? That Harry had to bow to Camilla? You might say it was a "private meeting"—sure, but protocol is protocol.
2. If TW was at that meeting, do you realize she was there without a single one of her demands being met? No apologies, no equality with Kate, nothing.
3. Highgrove. People say "Charles's private home." No. Highgrove is Charles's "leased" home. Highgrove is owned by William. So that meeting, there, took place with William's knowledge and under William's rules.
4. Regarding Highgrove: After Charles and Diana’s marriage in 1981, the rooms at Highgrove were decorated by interior designer Dudley Poplak in shades of lime and aquamarine; later, however, Camilla commissioned decorator Robert Kime to create a different atmosphere. In other words, the Highgrove Harry knew—and where Diana once lived—is not the Highgrove he visited today.
5. William and Kate were out in public at a polo match, looking very relaxed. So, did William know about this? He knew. He absolutely knew.
6. Was this what Harry wanted? Some might say, "He wanted the meeting, and he got it." Yes. But he didn't want the meeting to happen this way.
In one way or another the King and his courtiers will end up with several eggs in their faces for that is the MO of the sussexes.
As for the children, perhaps Charles could surreptitiously get some DNA from the children and check their maternal parentage. One can dream.
I don't know the next move as Harry has been to Birmingham for Invictus, so is it now back to California after less than 24 hours in the UK or is the visit covering the weekend as well?
'Celebrity Traitors'? I hope Harry sees the irony.
I still wonder about the photos taken at that exhibition commemorating the Investiture of Charles as PoW in 1969, when he was 21. It was gatecrashed by the Harkles, - they were told `You're not supposed to be here'.
As I understand the law about taking pictures on private premise, regardless of who took them the Queen had the right to control what was done with the images. That is, the Palace may not have been able to say anything about the Harkles behaviour but they could show us what was going on. That's how I see it.
'The Duke of Sussex ended his recent family visit to the UK with an unconventional public appearance, participating in "goat yoga" and being pelted with water bombs.'
I saw he was literally acting the goat but didn't know about water bombs. The article is behind a pay wall.
The DM article is behind a paywall and therefore from the text based site. Some sentences are captions but there are no photos.
https://www.dailymail.com/textbased/lifestyle/fitness-wellbeing/text-15971913/DR-MAX-PEMBERTON-Harry-misguided-actions.html
These claimants wanted to crush the press, the Mail in particular, make them pay astronomical punitive cash awards for the nonexistent hacking, and tried deliberately to crush the Mail’s reporters and ruin their long-standing good reputations and careers. Worth a read.
To cap it off ‘in a post-judgment outburst on Tuesday Harry and (Baroness) Lawrence accused the judge of “a complete and obvious whitewash”.’ Harry will never quit, he wants a payday.
https://tinyurl.com/Synopsis-Mail-Hacking-Trial
https://tinyurl.com/hacking-case-article-more
Yes, Doreen Lawrence's attitude leaves a bad taste in the mouth. I feel for her as a mother, certainly, but her son's friend, who was with him that night, had rather harsh words for her and he held her responsible (her son had a curfew, beyond which he had to stay out). The guilty ones are of course the young lads who killed Stephen but she didn't help. What grates is that the DM, which she tried to blackmail, as you said, was the paper than named the killers on their front page, with the then editor sticking his neck out.
@Sassie
In case you were not aware, and I wasn't/couldn't remember until I read about it a day or two ago, Doreen Lawrence had Stephen's body brought back to the UK - he was buried in Jamaica where his father tended his grave - without consulting her ex-husband. To this day, Neville Lawrence doesn't know where his son is buried. This tells you all you need to know about her.
They all deserve one another.
'Harry and Meghan’s ‘truth’ has been exposed for what it is, and I feel vindicated
Strip away the grievance, the victimhood and the drama, and what remains? A couple of former royals with a fading brand'.
Well worth a read.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/10/harry-and-meghans-truth-has-been-exposed-for-what-it-is/
May I suggest a large humble pie? With dried flowers sprinkled on top, obviously.
If someone has previously answered please disregard. I only check here once a week or so. Same with SMM which I learnt about from you. They really are so boring now.The Chilean lawyer is HE. Human Economics with some added numbers?on SMM. Some people on there seem to complain that she gets he and she mixed up but evidently it is a Spanish language thing with genders in the language? She did amazing explanations of the Daily Mail case. Sensible posts in everyday language for people to understand and follow.
She posts about other things too but the legal stuff is what I read. It was fascinating . I’m sure she will do the same for the costings stuff at the end of the month. You should definitely check it out.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-15978785/Meghan-earns-surprise-Emmy-nomination.html
Just when I think I may have heard it all ...
Today's SMM seemed to be dominated by those critical of His Maj, when frankly, nobody knows exactly what happened.
It reminds me of something a counsellor once said to me - `Nobody knows what really goes on within a marriage - least of all the couple themselves'. I doubt if H had a clue about what his father was really saying, just like their last rendezvous at Clarence House - `when he King was reported as saying , almost in wonderment, it seemed to me, `He still doesn't get it...'
Indubitably.
2h ago
ElleEmGee
👑 Recollections may vary 👑
The delusion is strong:
'The Duchess held a private audience with His Majesty at his Highgrove home [...]'
News/Media/Tabloids
Unarchived link / archived link (thanks to Danglyweed and tenthcat!)
"Relevant: "The Duchess of Sussex held a private audience with His Majesty at his Highgrove home last Friday, with details of the meeting kept under wraps. She was joined by her husband, Prince Harry and their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, in what is their first meeting with the monarch in four years."
This had to have come from TW, because everything is centered on and focused on her--she held a meeting with the King; she was joined by Hazbeen and the Invisikids.
I hope that whatever KCIII got out of the visit was worth the bullshit we're all now living with.'
I spent the rest of the journey praying she wouldn't accuse me of r-ism.
Such beauty - spoiled .
That strumpet had a private audience with the King?? Whatever for, pray? I don't understand, if she supposedly had a private audience, then she was alone with Charles, and then she was joined by H and the children. Or was it the four of them and that's what she calls a private audience? I wonder what she had to say to Charles and, more to the point, he to *. Delusional doesn't come near but I agree that this has to come from her. No doubt she'll let some info re the meeting trickle out.
And I guess that is to be expected - having the last word so she appears to be running things.
On a different note, someone mentioned the idea that perhaps part of separating from Netflix was the push to receive a nomination.
. . . 'Another insider said Meghan 'is very supportive' of Harry, but that there was 'a lot of sadness' at being unable to stand alongside him publicly in London and Birmingham.' I bet it hurt not to be front and centre, snapped by paps. Harry's activities had nothing to do with her, especially Invictus. Know your place, *.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/new/
She seems very lively and even agitated when she speaks about their facial features and colouring.
Ann Widdecombe on * - Found on SMM
https://youtu.be/W1bkdQocdnQ?is=Z-7m0gHH0kqQ3LdM
Another Dan Wootton video, a short one, about* being dropped by Balenciaga. She arrived late for the fashion show, stopped to pose for the paps and giggled when a modern tripped on the runway.
https://youtube.com/shorts/NE776lzOnFA?is=xnTqfEnIf5D3wFOB
Lady C says that Hairy is in love with a woman who loves him. At the 12:00 minute mark.
If Harry's answer is no that is end of the baroness.
Think about the Oprah interview about "the DISCUSSIONS about the skin colour of Archie". That is the child that had none of her black DNA.
That woman would lose all her cards. Every and each one of them.
Own Goal
A private audience for meg
chance to sit up and beg
Proffering their broken dog bowl
The King isn’t daft
he and the Queen would’ve laughed
As the farquits fell down their
own hole…
AristoScats
The Enema award
goes to she who’s abhorred
Enough to make a cat larf
More trinkets to hoard
desirous for applaud
Hairballs boaking bile barf…
The delusion is real with
Mehgan, scarily so…
Par for the course 😉
Nah, no one could love harry!!
I was so shocked by Ann Wiiddecombes death, so very sad
that her life ended so brutally
A lovely woman, principled and
stalwart, a good Christian woman
I didn’t agree with some of her
principles but she always stood her
ground
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/prince-harry-wants-more-uk-124154816.html
There are several sources for this tory that he wants to bring the Invisikids here more often - as long as he gets tax-payer funded security. This is from the Independent.
Given the rumours in circulation about increases in personal taxation (savings to be taxed at higher rate, council tax to rise if they think your garden would be good development land, taxable ISAs, )there could be an even bigger stink now than 6 months ago.
Another queer would be: did your wife physically give birth to the children?
As for skin colour, a biracial parents and a white one do not necessarily produce slightly 'coloured' offsprings for want of a better word. The gene distribution for skin colour is random. I knew a very white girl, red hair,green eyes, who had two children with her dark skinned husband ( black mother, white father), both children were white skinned and blue eyed. We can't infer anything from Archie & Lili skin colour. More to the point is were they born of the body?
The meeting, not a reunion. (how corporate)
Private talk before the rest of the family joins the group*.
Strict rules of conduct (before and after), probable penalties linked
What is played: the long game versus the immediate flash of fame which dwindles to burning out.
*Let's think about what ever was said to him, in private, would have been something he would not likely want to hear (about him, the kids, the future, money and so on). Then, they open the door to let her (who has not traditionally delt well with being controlled by others - especially linked to his family) and the kids in. He then has to act normal, as if this is all good, right? Do I think the King and Queen can pull themselves together to act as if nothing unpleasant just happened? yes. Do I think he can too? no, he has not had the years of practice of self control (waiting to be king, be with the woman he loved and so on) that his father had by H's age.
IF there is truth to the rumor he has found someone else and leaves, how does he balance this in his head? Isn't this what his father did and how he publicly trashed his stepmother, and more importantly, made his mother a saint?
Storks and gooseberry bushes made me laugh properly, so thanks it saved my day!!
When was very small, I asked Mummy where I'd come from - she told me that she'd bought me in Woolworth's...I didn't entirely believe hr 'cos as far as I could see Woollies sold toys , sweets and boring household stuff - I hadn't notice any babies displayed on their counters.
* was born 1981.
In 2000, harvesting/storing eggs was considered experimental. It had a low success rate which did not really get better until about 2007.
Cost to harvest back then (2000) was close to $12K.
Most harvesting is/was not covered by insurance unless it was because of chemo or similar.
Storage, back then, was about $500 to $1000 annually.
Social Harvesting took off about 2012 (* @31). She was married to Trevor and started Suits the year before.
so, she did have access to money from him and less likely her father (although if he had been paying for this before this time, he would likely have receipts like for the tuition) at this time period. And, could be considered something perhaps within the agreement they had (IRC that she had some stipulations about getting back into shape post pregnancy and similar). And, after divorce, he certainly would be unlikely to want to hold onto "his" control of the eggs (although I have heard of some men wanting this as a control of soon to be ex).
Costly at a time when she did not have a car and other similar big expenses. And, more likely done in LA so far away way from the day to day life in Canada. Perhaps something which might or might not feel important (to maintain) in the grand plan at the time?
Add in the number of times we have all read of mishaps into the wrong body implantation (which could allow for a "I'm shocked. I was told ...". Face saving).
1. harvesting eggs requires estrogen shots to push the eggs further into the monthly cycle, so not sure if this would be a good idea for someone looking at a hysterectomy. Estrogen can aggravate fibroids and accelerate any cancer so this may not be recommended
2. harvesting eggs is probably much cheaper in Canada than in the USA
This comment really sums up what they have become:
"Its at the point now where the only attention they get is overwhelmingly negative- degrading comments, disliked, laughed at, his own family doesn't want them to stay in the family home, Brits dont want them, Americans wish they would leave. As bad as it is they'll take that attention because its all they can get. Two pathetic narcissistic losers who just dont know when to give it up, crawl under a rock and stay there."
Those poor poor tots they have no winning situation and no chances to grow up as individuals with free lives and free wills.
'Following in his mother's footsteps! How Archie has adopted Meghan's love of going barefoot' - (yes, while * was on the beach in trainers). It looks to me like he's also adopted her walk, he looks pigeon-toed like his mother, that's the resemblance. If so, I hope his parents keep an eye on it and get Archie treated if need be.
https://i.dailymail.com/1s/2026/07/24/14/110226285-16002779-image-m-95_1784901427288.jpg
She has destroyed every thing she has tried to accomplish and every human contact that was on her side for six years ago. Her only great gift seems to be total demolition of everything, that's all. She is a moron pure and simple.
This made me laugh out loud
You can watch the entire episode of Masterchef australia here, completely free of charge. The fawning over * begins around 3:40
She can not act, she can not feign, she can not interest anyone, she is not visually pleasant and she was dressed for a funeral. Her smiles were like a hungry sharks with all the teeth showing and her tongue like a hungry snakes and she was booooooring, so boooooooooring.
It is quite clear she is very rapidly losing it and is incapable to perform to earn any money.
I couldn't open the link to Masterchef Australia as I kept getting the message 'This site can’t provide a secure connection'. I have found, however, a video about the episode called Why the internet is calling it a joke: 'Reviews not good. Reception not good. Credentials not good'.
https://youtu.be/U-S7nHvjX_Q?is=jf98qLLYGvgKCPcV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3TXrDZ1puk
Prince Harry's doomed phone hacking case against the Daily Mail was conducted so 'outside the norm' that he and his fellow claimants should be made to pay a substantial part of Associated's legal costs, the High Court heard today.'
Too right.
...and judged to be a vexatious litigant to stop this nonsense once and for all. That's what the `vexatious' rules are for, I believe.
It should be 'will have', not 'may' foot the legal bill. Let's hope that having to pay a hefty bill will put a stop to Harry''s (and also the others') court cases.
The sussexes are truly archmorons.
Harry's wife lying and bigging her personal moron again.
Obamas, Clintons, Trump's children among those who received taxpayer-funded security
Canadian taxpayers spent more to protect Prince Harry over five years during his visits to Canada than any other internationally protected person over the same period, CBC News has learned.
According to a document obtained by CBC News under Canada's access to information law, the RCMP spent at least $539,575 to provide security between 2014/15 and 2019/20 when Prince Harry travelled to Canada for events like the Invictus Games and to date his future wife, Meghan Markle.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/prince-harry-rcmp-security-9.7287916
Simon Morgan is a former U.K. Metropolitan Police officer who has protected senior members of the Royal Family and founded the London-based Trojan Consultancy security firm.
Morgan said taxpayer-funded protection for internationally protected persons is part of an international system set up by the United Nations. Protection is generally associated with the role that someone occupies — and is something that even the wealthiest person in the world can't buy.
Our heroine did not want yell that information so she insisted that she would go from one participant to next to next to last and individually announce them about the timeline. And OH SHE WAS HAPPY!!!!! She could walk round the studio oozing her "sexuality" to four different males and whisper her four words that were very easy to remember and the camera(!!) followed her all the time and she was the most important person on the set and OH, she was so happy, so happy!!!
That is the baroness in her esse: walking around in clothes she believes are sexy from one male after another whispering a line that is short and easy to remember when the cameras (!!!) are following her. And if she could she would do this "WORK" several hours every day all year around and be totally happy.
At least have a few tidbits about your favourite dishes, or things you have tried to cook for your family and how they reacted.
Tell a few stories about unusual recipes that you have seen that you wanted to try, or restaurant meals you wanted to try to copy.
But her? Nothing. Nada. Zilch.
Too much work.
I`m surprised she brushed her hair to show up.