Well that time is coming up for the Daytime Emmy Awards. October 30th.
I don't know but I suspect there is a lot pinned on this for her and I suppose him too (in support of her dreams).
Perhaps the dream is it would lead back to work in Hollywood, Netflix and more producer work. It would be away from the UK and more in the direction of California. Maybe?
Or she wins but they are not interested as what has come through is not compelling enough for someone to hire her. It appears that Hollywood seems to look at the most recent finished piece but they are known to take into account the person's past history when they think they might have difficulty getting the person covered by insurance. Could be?
Or she loses. And, then what?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Nutty and us Mods strive as much as possible to make this a welcome and
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions. Nothing you would not mind having your name associated with on the front page of the local paper, above the fold.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation is still on. x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WsO8p-LMtU
He's the last person who should think that he has anything to teach us about how to handle the death of a loved one.
And, they are hilarious.
“ For his MasterClass, Prince Harry joined neuroscientist Dr. Mary-Frances O’Connor and opened the class with the following words: “Let’s fu--ing go,”
Is it ever appropriate to begin a class this way?” - end snip -
“Prince” H is amongst the most loathsome adults I have ever had the misfortune of learning about. He actually, genuinely turns my stomach and, well, I will refrain from continuing because my comment will be deleted if I say anything more.
All adults know that after great sorrow losing someone the life goes on and so should you for the life is for living.
I will not read anything about Diana for I want remember her without all that nastiness that papers write. She was beautiful young woman with a big heart and some human faults and I hope her peace is total where ever she is and that is all.
Miss Fark-all
Body like a marrow
Herculolotte’ Sparrow
dressed as a desperate sad sack
Shoplifting pants dragging
Poor Malala lagging
Margaret Rutherford
wants her cape back…
Reign and Babel
He Just doesn’t get it
as ever the dill
Him and his wife
mean nothing to Will
Spraying himself
with his mother’s scent
Brain boggling bullshit
from the the Duke of Dement…
Beige a Vu
Bra showing thru
Hair like Irn Bru
Frantically clawing her prey
Does Malala understand
megs reasons, underhand
She wants the same sécurité
@Sassie
Probably foreplay from meh 😉
... 'A spokesman for Harry confirmed he was paid by MasterClass - which gets celebrity experts and industry icons to teach pre-recorded classes about their craft, art or business - for taking part in Redefining Grief: Building Resilience Through Loss but they declined to comment further.'
This is obscene. Basically, paid for his tales of woe is me. His masterclass has obviously not worked as he doesn't display any resilience. He's been dining out on his grief at Diana's passing for far too long.
Additionally, your poem entitled ‘Miss Fark-all’ is, I think, your best yet*, although I’ve loved every single one we’ve been lucky enough to read over these many years.
They say every cloud has a silver lining, and for me, this blog, and your creative taunting poetry are the silver lining to the fetid poisonous cloud which is the noisome DukeDuchess duo.
——————————————————————————————————————
* “shoplifting pants””Margaret Rutherford cape” etc I can’t stop chortling. I would love to get a look inside your noggin’
! I've just remembered the scene in the Norman Wisdom film `Trouble in Store' released in 1953 in which MR steals an electric toy train by letting it run up into her sleeve !
Found it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9mnxcrHYJY
at 1:13:22 - 1:13:40
'It is understood that the prince was booed by fans at the Leicester rugby ground when he was shown on the big screen before cameras quickly cut away.' Oh dear, not quite the welcome he was hoping for.
take away: Doubt they would be interested in sinking more money into another series with her showing off her life.
What William does I can do better?
Well he did not quite succeed.
Regarding the movie to which you linked, I was unfamiliar with its star Norman Wisdom, and his ultra-painful early-years bio, which contrasts strikingly with looser whiner selfish self-obsessed lazy Prince Harry’s. The man became Sir Norman Wisdom due to consistent hard work and honor over his 95 years. I read with such sorrow a brief bio of his unbelievably difficult early life, effectively orphaned as a child when his mother died and his father dumped him completely, leaving him homeless and familyless; he hardscrabbled jobs to keep himself alive, culminating in joining the British Army age 14 which was a lifesaver for him. Yes, age 14.
I cheer Norman Wisdom’s successes and lifelong gratefulness in spite of having endured the most appalling early life, then look at the angry freeloading entitlement-demanding exemplar which is HRH Harry.
I compare, and find Prince Harry wanting in every conceivable way. My distaste for him grows ever stronger, which I didn’t even know possible
https://x.com/ARamblingRoyal/status/2108684621177291145?s=20
He was "emotionally dumb" because " nobody told me joy was still allowed"!!!!!
He finds it HORRIBLE that the whole family and all the people around him did not understand that HE was the MAIN PERSON in this drama!!
This much ice cold egoism feels like severe mental illness in a middle aged man.
They're rumoured to be going to Montecito, or at least the US, for Christmas. We need a welcome rest from them.
"Becoming a father is a emotional rollercoaster. I wish I'd known how hard being a father was gonna be."
One comment in reply to Harry’s whining is
‘“ Harry ALWAYS whines “I wish someone had told me…” IT’S NOT OTHER PEOPLE’S RESPONSIBILITY TO MANAGE YOUR LIFE, HARRY!”’ - end snippet -
In fact almost all the comments are very insightful, and I say worth watching and reading below linked video. Fellow Nutties:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/s/PsbnMZqnp4
The whole movie is online. Norman Wisdom was regarded as a hero in Albania in Communist times as the `little man ' who resisted authority and the downtrodden folk of that country identified with him. As a child, I loved his films but the sophisticated had a low opinion of him.
* meeting Malala at Claridge's was a great find. It's hilarious. I'll have to watch it now and again during the day, it's a great morale booster.
All the luxury in the world cannot buy integrity, manufacture genuine values or give substance to an empty image. Meghan can keep spending money on the appearance of importance, but the price tag will never be proof of the person beneath it. She remains a shameless self-promoter masquerading as a humanitarian.” - end snip -
Link to the whole comment, which is worth reading:
https://x.com/XOQueenEsther/status/2109298974276677861?s=20
Well there will certainly be those metal fences to stop the enormous hordes of "royal fans" when the golden couple step out of the convoy of cars, but I am not sure about those hordes. It may be an encore of the sitution that humiliated them in Australia and people do not give a damn showing it by staying at home.
He is never responsible for anything and I believe that at a very young age he learned coolly to use Diana's memory to get out of his misdemeanors without any consequences.
His attitude seems to be that he can do whatever just because Diana died but I trust less and less that his hysterical stories are true for he seems to ENJOY too much telling them.
One thing I absolutely hated was when people found out that my parent had died, and then started treating me differently, with pity, almost. I really didn't want that and I was only 8 at the time. I wanted people to be understanding of my situation, but not to treat me like I was weak or damaged in any way.
I even hated telling people about it, when asked about my parents, because then people would look at me with these pitying eyes that I knew so well. I didn't want their pity.
Harry demands the whole world to pity him and that is disgusting. There is no greater sorrow than his so everybody send him your money for he has earned it by wringing his hands and moaning.
Thank you fpr the link to Queen Esther. That piece says it all.
This guy hired bodyguards although he's not famous or rich, to see people's reactions.
(Lady Colin Campbell)
Another horrible thing to do to a kid, to lead him to believe that his birthday is on a day that it's not. Yes, he's too young to know now, but in the future, the fake birthdate will be out there and he will have to accommodate her lies by altering his most basic attribute.
Harry may well have made a slip of the tongue when he said Archie was two weeks old on 8th May but the •official• date of birth is the 6th, although the true date may be different. We're used to untruths with these two. Official documents such as a passport will also bear that date so even if Archie was born two weeks before his 'presentation' at Windsor, he'll never know.
This reminds me of the US House of Representatives member who is now under investigation because of immigration issues. As a minor, she was allowed to become a US citizen because of her father, but it turns out that she may have been 19 years old, so not legally allowed to do so. She has now updated her birth year in many places, including Wikipedia, but.... the statute of limitations for the first alleged offense may be long past, but the current US administration is trying to find a way to use her use of an incorrect birth year as a federal offense (on passports, or on any other legal document)!!!!
Interesting! lt could well apply to Archie in the future. Imagine the repercussions...
(Paula M Channel)
No problem.
Isn't photoshop wonderful? This is the first time in years that I haven't seen photos of * and thought `***, she's so ugly!' But what on earth is her companion, ?George Northwood , wearing? Is he trying to express solidarity with the Great Subcontinent?
I read about the police cars outside Claridge's but thought they were for Malala. I hope they were.
The problem with the baroness is always the same. She cannot not let be and exaggerate and it always gives her plans away. Idiot woman.
Didn't they read the memo properly?
Catherine moves beautifully with an easy rhythm and elegance from one person to another and says few words with a smile and she makes it look so effortless and it is clear that she gives always impression that she is enjoying meeting people and it is clear that people enjoy meeting her. She is such a classy and beautiful lady that it is a pleasure to look at her at work.
Was today a great success? They were not booed. (The King was in Wales, rudely)
An extraordinary briefing, from a friend of the Sussexes to Hello! magazine before their day trip, spelt it out.
“They never agreed they wouldn’t be half in half out,” it said. “That was what was decided and foisted upon them.”
It is true to say that there is no Sandringham Summit contract, with a flourish of Meghan’s calligraphy signature across the bottom. But there was an agreement, whether Prince Harry liked it or not.
It seemed, for a while, that the Sussexes had settled into it. Sure, they staged a quasi-royal tour occasionally, but that did not greatly trouble the scores. The Duke was set to focus on Invictus, the Duchess on As Ever. In Britain for an “extended stay”, the children settled into their (second) school, and things have changed.
But this is it. “That was what was decided". Precisely. Whether they liked it or not, that was what the Queen had decided for them. They just don't get it: 'they do not feel bound by the “no half-in half-out” agreement set by the late Queen'. I hope they get a good rollicking by the Palace, if not Charles himself.
And, while it is true that she did not sign it but what the statement is leaving out is that she was not present at negotiations to sign what was finally agreed to. Her husband was there and was there representing them both. Neither may like it but they also did not immediately publicly state they were choosing not to abide by it.
So when I look at the "They never agreed ...", what it sounds like what is really going on is that she never agreed and now she is pushing the idea that they both never agreed to this and she/they? are trying to get out of it.
IF the thinking is that because the Queen has passed and therefore the agreement is now null, well I doubt, seriously doubt, that there is something somewhere that states when one person in the agreement passes, then the whole thing is over and done, no longer needing to be adhered to. Knowing that the Queen, at her then age, would not likely outlive H&M one might suspect that someone did say something about how this is the agreement, it holds after the Queen, his father, his brother and the kids have passed + they were given time to decide: meaning they had choice for a year.
Somehow saying that one/both parties were not bound would be like saying I crossed my fingers when I was signing so it does not count.
George felt disrespected in his job, so he announces in a work meeting that he is quitting. However, he changes his mind and doesn't know what to do, so he just continues to go to work, and pretends that the incident never happened.
Tonguesten
Tongue poking out
from the back of the car
Window wound down
‘She’s not come very far’
from her early days
using forked tongue
Plum Duff’s desperate
to repeat royal run
Nothing-ham I’m sure
would’ve preferred Notting Hill
‘I’m just me me, standing in front of a crowd, asking them to swallow’
too big a pill…
Thank you, it means a lot
knowing that I’m hitting
the markle
The inside of my noggin
hahaha, who knows 😉
I’ve not seen that film, will
check it out
Last time I saw Norman Wisdom
was in an episode of
Dalziel and Pascoe
I love Arthur Askey in
Ghost Train
Hopefully the boos get louder
As far as I know Malala
has protection for life
Articles regarding this from
The Times etc
are behind a paywall
@abbyh
Whether she agreed
neither here or there
The rules were made plain
to the expunged ex spare…
Youtube the Body language guy: "What fresh hell is this!?"
No wonder he thinks his father can do everything Harry demands, when his family (with the help of British military) have created this tale of military hero. "He has led his troops in battle" we are informed except that is a lie. When a man has group of personal bodyguards all around him to protect his life he is not leading anyone in a battle.
It is easy to lie when your whole life is built on constant lies from your childhood to build up a man that does not exist. Sad, but so it is.
1952-2022 The Reign of HM Elizabeth II
2022-20?? The Harry Markle circus
20?? The Reign of HM William V
This will be the truth if Harry and his wife go on with torturing King Charles. Those people who BOO to the Monarch are going to be happy every time the King is taking care of his work and Harry organizes the British press to take photos of his old and ugly wife at the same time! He is the head of state!!! Can no-one explain this very slowly and simply to Harry what it means. His father is representing the people with his work, he is not playing any "who is the most popular member in this family"-games!!
Indeed. Moreover, the headline says “Meghan Markle was 'used' by Netflix to promote Guy Ritchie's series The Gentlemen, friends claim”. Did they fact check this? Is it possible that she actually has two friends?
I recommend you read, you will shake your heads in acknowledgment at each bad action.
“Different people. Different countries. Different decades. Family, friends, staff, bosses, in-laws, designers, agents. One name in every story.
And in every story, by her account, she was the one wronged. Not once has she said 'that was me.' Not once.” Please read the whole post:
https://x.com/QLoTII/status/2111740217119920446?s=20
- * was not a person who was looking to become a famous actress in Hollywood. She seems to have given up that dream a long time ago and decided to concentrate on playing with rich men for other rich men (sometimes). Her ultimate goal was to become rich or to marry a rich man.
- she was involved with some very crooked people, perhaps just as an acquaintance but her name comes up in the Epstein files
- she was very present in the European scene for much longer than I originally thought and is friends or is acquainted with some other European royal wives prior to meeting Harry, like Sofia of Sweden who was the beneficiary of an Epstein investment in her yoga studio in NYC
Basically, the story we thought we all knew about * has a lot more unpleasant aspects to it, and many rich and powerful people seem to be involved.
Nutties, read the link at bottom to an X post in which every sentence re Private Citizens H & M is spot on, and absolutely worth reading. I’m certain you will nod your head in agreement at every observation.
One commenter in reaction wrote:
“Harry was born with & Meg was handed unearned privilege, entitlement, wealth & status. With mind-boggling ignorance & arrogance H&M believed their own press. They’ll never, ever have the opportunities once at their fingertips”
Juicy post link:
https://x.com/InsightfulWatch/status/2112099048245346727?s=20
In the clip posted on X, the blonde-haired woman began her demonstration by telling Meghan the task was 'not very difficult' and held up a bag for her to fill as they stood in front of a crate full of baked beans.
Seemingly confused, Meghan asked whether she should go to 'another station', but the volunteer shook her head and authoritatively told Meghan to take the bag and follow her.
Royal watchers were baffled by the Duchess's 'performative' stream of questions considering the task was so 'basic', with one writing on X: 'It’s wild how she doesn’t understand how an operation of that kind works.'
I'm not on X but the article is in the DM.
Why is William responsible for Harry's life when it is Harry who is constantly screwing it?
and Meghan have lost their two ‘champions’ at Netflix as the streaming giant takes the axe to projects delivering them 'zero financial return'.
The Sussexes appear to have been caught up in the streamer’s brutal cost-cutting drive, with an insider claiming bosses have concluded viewers will not subscribe ‘to see a Meghan show’.
Netflix has cut 1,000 jobs around the world, including executives who brought With Love, Meghan to screens and backed the Sussexes’ explosive docuseries about their rift with the Royal Family.
The couple will now be without their ‘human shields’ after Meghan's lifestyle show and Harry's polo series both flopped, the source said.
Netflix's new British-born TV boss is expected to shun costly ‘royal-linked vanity projects’ and focus instead on finding the next Stranger Things.
As it laid off around one in 20 staff this week, it emerged that original series director Carolina Garcia, the Netflix executive who oversaw the streaming giant’s relationship with Harry and Meghan’s Archewell Productions, has left after a decade.
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16222929/Harry-Meghans-greatest-champions-leave-Netflix-Streaming-giant-exodus-targets-royal-vanity-projects-bosses-axe-series-zero-financial-return.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1xask3b/we_knew_itharry_announces_this_on_the_day_of_the/
Harry is a moron. Once again an important state visit is just a scenery for Harry's drama. Does that not disturb the British Government?
They just can't conceive that people are that unbalanced cannot be trusted any farther than you or I could throw a living adult elephant.
There is something here which I have not thought through about how people (I feel) misunderstand the idea of Christian forgiveness and what that really means in the real world. Let me know if you want me to write that out.
William and Catherine have three young children to raise and before they are adult and capable to take care of their own lives it is going to take several years. I have a feeling that Harry hates his brother and maybe his children too because they are something his own are not. I can't say how things are with Harry and his own children but what I understand about parental love it is a thing that is lacking in the marriage of Harry and his wife. If you care about your little ones it shows as with William and Catherine.
I hope you can make some sense of that, I am tired and English is my third language.
There are a couple of different threads of William should because in the William ought to reach out to Harry. I don't think of them as one and the same.
Forgiveness is pretty straight forward. I did something to you and it was wrong of me. I took your sausage. I tripped you. I broke something and told Mom you did it. I'm sorry. It was wrong of me. Please forgive me.
What we don't know is what went on between the brothers on either side (other than what was in the book and it may or may not be an accurate tale of that encounter). Forgiveness is a personal thing and should not be forced into public by one side.
Ian's Girl makes a good point about how it is to keep you not embedded in the anger/frustration of what happened. You move on.
It does not mean that there are no consequences after being given forgiveness. I stole your car and you now forgave me but I still go to jail.
Looking at the book, shows and interviews, there are consequences.
It does not mean that the relationship is unchanged. Trust (something) was broken and it may or may not ever go back to the level it was. It might never come back at all if what was done was that bad. Meaning William is not forced to make nice. (no matter how much H may want it, it's not up to H but William to decide how he participates in the relationship)
William ought because of someone else's feelings (thoughts). Oh, guilt, baby, guilt. No. One is only responsible for their feelings and not others. One can try not to hurt other's feelings but that's kind of as far as it goes. So you don't want to feel happy, there is nada I can do about it.
So layering on about their mother would feel X about them not getting along is all about putting guilt as trying to get William to do something he might otherwise not do. We don't really know what their mother might think or want to do about how things are today. This is a how many angels are dancing on the head of a pin argument.
It is ok to say no. Jesus did not come down hard on the wise maidens just because someone asked(demanded) they share what oil they had. I grew up thinking that I had to always give what was ever asked of me or I would be thought of as bad Christian.
Furthermore, one can only forgive the hurt done to oneself. Willian cannot forgive that done to Catherine, only Catherine can do that. This applies right down to the very least British citizen who has been accused of racism. (This cropped up some years ago, following a lethal terrorist outrage, when a virtue signaller, with nothing to do with the incident, announced that they forgave the perpetrators. )
La Douchass “…could set an example by reconciling with her family too, although we all know that will never happen. Besides, there is no money on that side of the family so reconciliation is not needed.”
You’ve said it all: there is no money on that side of the family so reconciliation is not needed.
Will this charade, circus of evil, pathetic grasping for filthy lucre, outrageous lying conduct including under oath, and constantly sticking the shiv into innocent good people’s backs never end? I think not.
After three and a half years hell when I thought that we would never get back my grandchildren when it happened something changed in my life profoundly. Since then seven years ago every night before sleep and every morning when i wake up I feel something more than just happiness. It is a feeling of profound gratitude that did not exist in my life earlier and that feeling washes away every ugly thought, they have no place in my life.
When I have sometimes wondered how William and Catherine can be so joyous when they do their work with this markle drama in the background it must be that their life is on an another level after William got his wife back healthy. The sewer that is Harry's life does not truly touch them and they go on with what is important to them, I believe.
I think of her often and pray that she is happy but I know I cannot ever even consider the thought of reconciliation because I refuse to be treated so poorly.
I think that the BRF feel the same way about Hairy.
Thomas Markle Sr being investigated for child porn images, reported by his own son.
I wonder who hasn't paid them yet for the work they've done?
I wonder if Tom Junior did this in order to shoot his half-sister's fox?
'A source close to Meghan told The Sun: “Now maybe people will finally understand why she has had nothing to do with her father since 2018.”' I don't think * knew then and her father was definitely invited and coming to the wedding. Unless she now claims that she found out and that was the reason why he didn't attend. Another embarrassment for the RF.
On the one hand, we have 'Meghan Markle was alerted to 'disturbing' allegations against her father in the months after her wedding to Prince Harry, it emerged today.
Meghan Markle was alerted to 'disturbing' allegations against her father in the months after her wedding to Prince Harry, it emerged today.'
On the other hand, 'He [Thomas Markle junior] triggered the investigation after searching for a phone for his Filipino girlfriend’s father in boxes of Thomas Snr’s belongings.'. This was as recently as July, so it doesn't make much sense to my little brain. If the allegations are true and 'a letter was sent to the Metropolitan Police's royal protection team', wouldn't MI6 have been alerted and have alerted the RF?
We'll have to wait and see if anything is proven. I am certainly no fan of *'s but I hope the allegations are not true. This is very murky.
What did this unknown person expect the Met to do about these `allegations'? TM Senior is not a British subject/citizen, nor as far as we know, has he been anywhere covered by British law, let alone committed an offence here. All they could do would have been to pass the information on to the US/Thai /Phillipino authorities.
Why now? Is it just a desperate bid for attention!
*claims that she knew about this 8 years ago yet apparently did nothing - except join her husband in pontificating about online child safety.
at https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1xdltmr/the_strange_accusation_against_thomas_markle/
It's a long piece but very readable and she is convinced that * is behind it. Her final words are
`This is really ugly'.
In the DM, 'Meghan Markle has revealed she cut off contact with her father Thomas to safeguard her children, amid an investigation into 'disturbing' accusations he collected child sex images.'
But she cut him off just before the wedding and didn't have any children then. The whole thing is very odd.
Well thinking about the timeline.
Just after Tom Sr stops supporting Tom Jr (if this part is true, that is a story worth reading as to why, etc) then that is something odd. Sibling supporting sibling or parent can shift like the wind. Money is a big driver of family fights, just saying. And some people are more focused on revenge than others.
It doesn't make sense to not at least privately say something to the BRF (Charles, the Queen) about why pushing her to reconcile with her father might not be a welcome idea way back when. After all, up until a week, two weeks before the wedding, she appeared to be all in for him to be there (a suit waiting for him in Spare, right?). Allegedly the King still has no idea why she would not want to even call her father as late as July. Surely that could have been mentioned when they all met up, right?
So why now? good question.
Maybe it is so basic as nothing else is working for them (so far on the return back) so maybe this will draw sympathy, support (and a groundswell of welcoming her back, welcoming in ways she/they have not seen seen since the engagement)?
On a different note, I saw a recent copy of AARP's cover. Martha. And it has all kinds of statements about how she is able to still stay ahead of cultural changes.
Execrable
Feeling sick rather queasy
So disgustingly sleazy
What’s next in their
tawdry tainted tale
Who knew what or when
Why no action taken then
All involved gone
far beyond the pale…
Excreta Forgeia
Ours lot to reason why
Hers but to tell a lie
Finding the truth
is never black or white
When dealing with madam
and her endless shite
Latest revelations regarding her Pa
I truly believe she’d go that far
Hoping to garner positive thoughts
She’s opened a can of worms
and warts
Hopefully now the Daily Mail
will deliver
Exposing her and family
even her squad won’t forgive her…
Serpents Teef
True or not
Our exhausting Thot
Will spin this
her cruel way
If the charges are true
He’ll get what he’s due
Locked up for a very long stay
If proven wrong
Chances are strong
He’ll be Markled
till his dying day…
She is desperate for sympathy
and support and anything
that gets her mug on the Mail
front page
She sickens me
Very murky/mucky indeed
If true the man is a monster
If not the man is now broken
Thank God our late Queen
wasn’t privy to this
Sickens me
'Addressing the discrepancy between 2018, when Meghan said she was made aware of the claims, and 2019 when the Met said they received the letter, the Duchess acknowledged she may have been 'mistaken by a few months'.
Her spokesman said: 'In recalling events from more than seven years ago, without the benefit of a diary entry or contemporaneous record, it is understandable that she may have been mistaken by a few months.'
Yes, recollections may vary, indeed. I thought Megsy was taking notes on everything going on and sending them to the US. She's lied so often that no one believes her. Nothing is ever clear or straightforward with the Harkles. If this is to garner sympathy, I'm afraid the move will backfire.
I gave away my copy of the book long ago but I recall Lady C stating that she had been approached on the phone by mysterious persons encouraging her (with offer of money) to include something about TMS abusing * when she was a younger. Apparently, Lady C `told them where to get off' and suggested to her followers that * was planning to slander her father once he was dead and could not defend himself.
So the convoluted story that is now emerging comes as no surprise to me. Each day it seems increasingly likely to me that the true instigator is * herself. Consequently, she should be charged with wasting police time at the very least. After all, she does have `form' for this way back in her Toronto days.
“ As has been frequently mentioned here, I think Meghan has been holding out on a tell-all book about her father until he passed on. I believe she saw this as a block-buster reveal that would be salacious, sensational, and pull in millions of dollars. She assumed she'd have full control over the narrative, and that it would create a media shockwave that would reverberate for months.
However, her dear half-wit, half-brother has stolen her thunder! There can never be a future big reveal from this. There is no way she can put this toothpaste back in the tube. A Markle has been Markled by a Markle about a Markle!”
- end -
“Stolen Thunder!,” and the LOL sentence is "A Markle has been markled by a Markle about a Markle".
I agree that La Doucheass planned this newly-revealed awful accusation by her half brother to be the shocking centerpiece of a book which is likely already set to roll on the presses the minute her dad dies. The book, with plenty of salacious allegations he could no longer deny since he would be dead, would’ve been an immediate best seller.
Yes, Thos Markle Jr just slickly stole her thunder. And I pray the accusations prove untrue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKTKdUMuqhk
Why am I not surprised?
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/angela-rayner-sympathises-meghan-markle-103349804.html
What is interesting is how Lady C mentioned that this was dangled in front of her while Lady C was working on the first book. Way back when.
Who knew what when and who legally had the authority to do something about it - all good questions we are unlikely to read the answers to in People. Many people like to play internet sleuth for true crime - maybe they will dig into this?
On a sad note, someone in my family was SA and two others are suspected victims as well. Past the limitations deadline and so ... our victims are left with God/karma for justice.
So legally I would like for us all to remember that (in most countries) one is innocent before a trial - all of them. So as much as we may think/feel/want person X and or Y to be guilty/planting evidence and so on, let's not be judge and jury as write that they are guilty already. Thank you.
That's all we need, the likes of Angela Rayner sticking her oar in. She was asked if she felt sorry for *, mind, but she should stick to her brief.
Warning. I don't know if you're planning a visit to Blighty and more specifically, Selfridge's, but our esteemed (sarc) mayor of London has pedestrianised Oxford Street (it is just closed to traffic now, not properly pedestrianised yet). Bikes - not allowed - are ignoring it. I was there on Saturday and didn't realise it would happen so soon.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1xfqmkq/thomas_markle_srs_allegations_my_deep_dive_into/
My own thoughts are
that TMjr is the one who packed the boxes for he and his father in the move to Thailand.
According to Samantha I believe, her father had no access to the boxes.
According to Samantha I believe, TMSr cut off TMjr over money (something Iike $80K or so).
TMsr gets the letter while in the hospital (filmed) and doesn't remember what it said and hasn't seen it since.
What if TMjr found that letter and decided to use it to his advantage?
What would be interesting to uncover (in the investigation by someone) is contact between TMjr and * with how this all fits in the overall timeline of disclosure.
We are seeing this story move to hurt people who are innocent in all this.
Will the truth of Harry's children some day be "the Royal family forced me to do all this" tells the baroness tears running her left cheek while she is shaking with sobs?
Maybe a way for her to weather the storm away from the mum.
That's what I thought right at the outset - perhaps to recreate the division created by Diana's death in hope of destabilising the country. That, however, is considered as `conspiracy theory'. Now I don't know what to think. At any rate, it demonstrates the damage that can be caused by a monstrous ego.
i reckon 2 of them could apply to someone we know - what do you think?
Just sitting here and reflecting on if she had and what a crazy shite show that would have created.
Grateful I suppose that it would be one argument neither the still sick king or William have to deal with now. Or we have to read about.
Well she must always tell tall tales to make people to understand how hugely popular she is. Except she is not. Only in her own mind, not in the real world.
Not many people have asked her if she's ok, remember. That was in South Africa. Now she has 'friends all over the world - she has friends? - asking if she is OK'? I smell BS.
Who knows?
@alianor
I'm not sure * is actually fleeing the country as such but the lure of more $$$ is irresistible. She'll only be co-presenting •Junior•MasterChef. As a former British resident in Australia said, “She thinks she is a chef... She just wants money. She is there only trading on royalty, which she is no longer.”
Nothing has been said about Ravec's decision and Paula M is not reliable.
Where is the invisible line that is protecting the daughter-in-law of the Monarch before he removes her from the Royal Family website?
Yes that is exactly as grave thing as the state visit of His Majesty to the Caribbean and it is right that we are informed about it.
They are a such pompous pair of brainless nonentities, truly!