Skip to main content

Prince Andrew and Meghan


Prince Andrew's Instagram post from Christmas 2018 is a major dig at Meghan. She is in the frame - but she is entirely hidden behind Prince Charles. All you can see is the tiny blue feather of her hat peeping out over Charles' head.

Of all the photos taken that day, why would Andrew choose this particular one to post?

I see him as Meghan's greatest enemy within the family.

First of all, given his own salacious habits it's not impossible that he knows Meghan from her yachting days.

Secondly, Meghan is getting the kind of royal engagements and positions Andrew has long sought for his own daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie. Charles is trying to slim down the monarchy and cut costs - a basic survival mechanism in a changing Britain - and has so far refused to add the girls to the public payroll. 

(I think he will need them at some point, however, since hundreds of royal engagements every year are currently carried out by over-65s like Princess Anne, the Kents, and the Duke of Glouchester. Who is going to open the Bath Canine Society Championships Dog Show when they pass on?)


Thirdly, Meghan openly disrespected Andrew's daughter Eugenie, first by forcing Eugenie to push her long-planned spring 2018 wedding to October 2018, and then by announcing her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding, taking the spotlight off the bride. The pregnancy announcement meant that in the week following the wedding most of the press was focused on Meghan, not on the long-suffering Eugenie and her very pretty wedding dress.

Nobody knows when Meghan is due, but if it is April as advertised, there was no need to announce on that particular day in October.

Andrew, as the family's least popular member, has very little to lose. There's not much chance of rehabilitating his own reputation (everyone knows about his ties to convicted sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and various dictators and despots), but he has two daughters that he would like to see treated as important royals.

If the price of getting Bea and Eugenie placed as full-time working royals is taking down Meghan, I'm sure he'd be happy to do that. 


Comments

Fifi LaRue said…
Look at Harry. Head facing the ground. Sure sign of low self-esteem, IMO.
Now! said…
Actually, I think he was bowing as the Queen went by! Meghan is curtseying, which is why she is hidden behind Charles. William is also bowing - you can see the top of his bald head.

Charles and Andrew are presumably not bowing because they were staying with the Queen at Sandringham and had already seen her once that day. Apparently you only bow or curtsey the first time you see the monarch on any given day.

That said, I agree with you that Harry looks like he has low self-esteem in most of the photos coming out recently. He looked crushed the other evening when they were boo'ed at Royal Albert Hall.
Unknown said…
Thanks for creating this page. I cannot stand that woman. Her and her Moonbump have so many fooled.
Bluestar said…
I always felt Andrew did not approve of Meghan. Andrew is probably the best one - of the three brothers - to spot a social climbing yacht girl. Not that I'd judge anyone for their life choices but MM seems so devious and so obvious in her lust for the lux life, the estate, the galas, the adoration, the gowns, standing on stage holding her baby bump as if she expected everyone to love her. She's not right in the head but she pulled it off. I can see her with pal Marcus sipping chilled rose and planning her conquest of Harry at Soho House. It was all a set up and by the time anyone was on to her she'd be pregnant and there's no turning back. Her dad probably knows his daughter too well that's why he's been ghosted.

Popular posts from this blog

New Year (and what's next?)

 Another year and what will it bring for them (and us who watch)?   One thing I thought of is control of their image for appearances.  It isn't just that they have lost so many people in such a fairly short time period but who they lost.  The people who advised, handled details to make the events happen - road trips to volunteering.  We've been saying all along that each loss is a ripple of warning towards a potential new hire coming in.  New hires, yes but what about fund raising?  Cash flow?  This, from SMM, is an interesting read: https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1puzsvh/impact_report_990_review_from_a_nonprofit/ Which leads us to money.  Keeping their image engine running costs a lot.  No doubt there are a lot details, paperwork, contracts to negotiate and find new groups to partner with.  Hence the need for a good team. The duo could do some of it or all but for how long?   side note: the peopl...

So, when does the dirt on Meghan come out?

"This is only hearsay, but in London a Brit socialite who knew her way around money, Europe, royalty told me - and my companion, so I wasn't alone in hearing this - that Meghan was known in the old days. 'She was around the famous playgrounds Europeans visit...and known to be shopping for a rich husband.'" That's a quote from Cindy Adams in yesterday's New York Post . Cindy is old - so old that she interviewed the original Duchess of Windsor. "Who was also American,"  writes Cindy.   "She was not happy afterward. She was tough. I interviewed her. She was constantly looking to negotiate some sort of financial betterment." So, when does the dirt start coming out? How about now. Who will drop the information? We've had more than 1200 comments since the Sussex summit on Monday, so please allow me to repeat part of my answer to a question hidden somewhere within that forest of text. A regular commenter asked for my input ...