Skip to main content

Prince Andrew and Meghan


Prince Andrew's Instagram post from Christmas 2018 is a major dig at Meghan. She is in the frame - but she is entirely hidden behind Prince Charles. All you can see is the tiny blue feather of her hat peeping out over Charles' head.

Of all the photos taken that day, why would Andrew choose this particular one to post?

I see him as Meghan's greatest enemy within the family.

First of all, given his own salacious habits it's not impossible that he knows Meghan from her yachting days.

Secondly, Meghan is getting the kind of royal engagements and positions Andrew has long sought for his own daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie. Charles is trying to slim down the monarchy and cut costs - a basic survival mechanism in a changing Britain - and has so far refused to add the girls to the public payroll. 

(I think he will need them at some point, however, since hundreds of royal engagements every year are currently carried out by over-65s like Princess Anne, the Kents, and the Duke of Glouchester. Who is going to open the Bath Canine Society Championships Dog Show when they pass on?)


Thirdly, Meghan openly disrespected Andrew's daughter Eugenie, first by forcing Eugenie to push her long-planned spring 2018 wedding to October 2018, and then by announcing her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding, taking the spotlight off the bride. The pregnancy announcement meant that in the week following the wedding most of the press was focused on Meghan, not on the long-suffering Eugenie and her very pretty wedding dress.

Nobody knows when Meghan is due, but if it is April as advertised, there was no need to announce on that particular day in October.

Andrew, as the family's least popular member, has very little to lose. There's not much chance of rehabilitating his own reputation (everyone knows about his ties to convicted sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and various dictators and despots), but he has two daughters that he would like to see treated as important royals.

If the price of getting Bea and Eugenie placed as full-time working royals is taking down Meghan, I'm sure he'd be happy to do that. 


Comments

Fifi LaRue said…
Look at Harry. Head facing the ground. Sure sign of low self-esteem, IMO.
Now! said…
Actually, I think he was bowing as the Queen went by! Meghan is curtseying, which is why she is hidden behind Charles. William is also bowing - you can see the top of his bald head.

Charles and Andrew are presumably not bowing because they were staying with the Queen at Sandringham and had already seen her once that day. Apparently you only bow or curtsey the first time you see the monarch on any given day.

That said, I agree with you that Harry looks like he has low self-esteem in most of the photos coming out recently. He looked crushed the other evening when they were boo'ed at Royal Albert Hall.
Unknown said…
Thanks for creating this page. I cannot stand that woman. Her and her Moonbump have so many fooled.
Bluestar said…
I always felt Andrew did not approve of Meghan. Andrew is probably the best one - of the three brothers - to spot a social climbing yacht girl. Not that I'd judge anyone for their life choices but MM seems so devious and so obvious in her lust for the lux life, the estate, the galas, the adoration, the gowns, standing on stage holding her baby bump as if she expected everyone to love her. She's not right in the head but she pulled it off. I can see her with pal Marcus sipping chilled rose and planning her conquest of Harry at Soho House. It was all a set up and by the time anyone was on to her she'd be pregnant and there's no turning back. Her dad probably knows his daughter too well that's why he's been ghosted.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids