Skip to main content

Meg's DIY Press Campaign: Doing it herself, and doing it badly

Have you ever seen a home whose owner attempted to "do it yourself" without the proper training?

Pipes that leak, floorboards with gaps, patterned wallpaper that doesn't match at the seams, ceiling fans hung so low that they give tall people a haircut.

As a media professional, that's what I see when I look at Meghan's press campaigns over the past ten days. Despite her vaunted "all-female team", from what I can see, this is a one-female team: Meghan herself.

She is engaged in DIY public relations, and she is doing a terrible job.

The pub trip that never was 

First, there was a story attributed to an unnamed "53 year old businessman" about how Meghan, Harry and Archificial had dined at the Rose & Crown pub in Winkfield, Berkshire, choosing a table inside on one of the hottest days of the year. (Does the Rose & Crown have air conditioning? It's not clear from the website.)

Anyway, the idea behind this planted story was apparently to show that Meg and Harry were just ordinary folk enjoying a pub lunch, a way to counteract their use of expensive private planes.

The 53-year-old-businessman, who for some reason was willing to share his age but not his name, described Archificial as extremely quiet and well-behaved during the two-hour lunch. "The little lad was as good as gold. I didn't hear him cry once while he was there," he said.

(Way to give a shout-out to the people who believe Archie is actually a high-end Latex doll. In every public appearance, Archie appears to be unnaturally quiet and unmoving.)

Unfortunately, not only had Harry and Meghan not dined at the pub, they had failed to arrange for the pub to lie for them when the press called. This resulted in a number of embarrassing retractions, including some from the Duchess' preferred media, like Vanity Fair and Harper's Bazaar.

A professional PR person would have had this all sewed up in advance. Find "The Roaring Donkey" or some other colorfully named pub that needs a bit of publicity, prepare the publican for an onslaught of media, and there you go.

Extra points if you can find either an extremely British pub owner - some round, rosy-cheeked type from Central Casting - or a diversity hire, perhaps a woman of African or Asian descent who now owns a traditional English pub.

Taking Archie to visit Diana's grave

Then there was the pathos-laden story that the pair would be taking little Archie to visit Diana's grave on the anniversary of her death.

Access to the grave is a tricky matter, since it is controlled by Diana's rather sleazy brother Earl Spencer, who reportedly refused her permission to live at the family home shortly before her death.

But even if Earl was willing to give Meg and Harry a chance to visit, what meaning could it possibly have to drag a 4-month-old out to an island to visit a grave?

Assuming Archificial is an actual baby in the Sussexes' actual custody, all he wants is affection, attention, good food and a nice place to sleep. He's not ready to start mining Diana's memory for his own benefit, although he might be in 20 years, particularly if he's raised by the grasping Meg.

There was a separate story planted about Meg and Harry putting a photo of Diana in Archie's nursery, which made only slightly more sense.

Until he's 6 or 7, Archie's won't be able to separate Princess Diana from Princess Jasmine, Princess Tiana, and every other beautiful-but-not-present female figure he sees images of.

A professional PR person might have warned Meg away from exploiting Diana's memory at a time when Meg herself is so unpopular, but if Meg insisted, they could have done something about setting one of Diana's possessions aside for Archie - a book, an artefact, something from Diana's beloved father - for him to appreciate when he was older.

Feeling homesick for Malibu

Finally, there was today's story in the Daily Mail, suggesting that Meghan and Harry are looking for a home in Malibu because she feels "homesick."

Homesick for Malibu? She never lived in Malibu; she grew up in Crenshaw. That's like someone who grew up in suburban Long Island "feeling homesick" for a Park Avenue penthouse.

Again, a talented PR person could have spun this better, by suggesting a more modest neighborhood and putting out the message that Meg and Harry were so tired of the cruel, cruel British media and the vicious British public that they were willing to downgrade to a smaller place in Meghan's hometown.

Nobody expects them to live in a walk-up flat in Silver Lake, but certainly they could have found a less pretentious and overpriced area than Malibu. Los Angeles peeps, what would you recommend? Santa Monica? Hancock Park?

The father story runs and runs

Meanwhile, the publicity about Meghan's estranged father Thomas runs and runs; on Sunday, Thomas confirmed that he had paid for Meg's university education and offered to show bank statements to prove it.  

That contradicts Meg's speech to a crowd of girls in Fiji, in which she claimed to have been forced by adversity to work her way through school and received substantial financial aid. 

A professional PR person would have shut this father and daughter story down a long time ago, or in the best case even prevented it from ever getting started.

As of September 2019, a tearful reunion photo with Archificial in attendance is long overdue. Meg seems to think she's keeping this as her ace in a hole when things get really bad - but things are already really bad. 

Not only is Meg widely disliked, people are losing interest in her story, as her descent down the "most read" columns of the Daily Express and People Magazine would indicate.

And her bad karma is starting to spread to Prince Harry, who is also less popular than he was a year ago, and the Royal Family as a whole, which is already under strain from Prince Andrew's misdeeds and Brexit. 

It would be useful to the Royals if the Sussexes were a plus now instead of a minus.

And for Meg: there's really no point in hiring an all-female team if you're going to ignore their advice and insist on doing things yourself - and doing them badly. 

Comments

Kate said…
Agreed. I saw the homesick article today in the DailyMail. So ridiculous! Poor little Smegs can’t hack it in the UK. She just wants to spend all Harry’s money as fast as she can.
Mims said…
We are all fed up and getting a little angry about the constant rubbish PR, Mostly made up PR. Does MM live in a world of her own making?? she fails to understand the public don't like her, don't believe her and want her gone. When will the RF take note and bring out the truth of who she is and these hinted at sex tapes. Allegedly of course.
Now! said…
California is a community property state. As soon as Harry buys something there, half of it immediately belongs to Meg in case of a divorce.

Not to mention child support for Archficial. If Meg has managed to gain custody of a baby, any (boy) baby, Harry will be on the hook for generous payments until the child is 18.
Now! said…
I think Andrew's troubles have made the sex tapes a moot point for the moment. Nobody wants another Royal pervert, particularly during the delicate Brexit period and the regency/transition to Charles' reign soon after that.

Meg needs to be paid to go. The only question is the amount, and whether or not Harry will go with her.
NikNak said…
So glad you've done another post Nutty! I was afraid you had been silenced!

Megcon has been unusually quiet in the UK press this month. When I read the pub lunch story I think all of UK collectively snorted into our cups of tea. Sure Megs. Luckily for them Andrew has taken the heat recently but she sure knows how to still piss people off. My mum who is pro royal family even turned to me a few days ago and said '"Where is this baby?!" I can only assume its her last card to play when things get really bad. Which they have.

I read somewhere (Daily Mail so grain of salt) that Harry and Megs would be finally be joining the Queen at Balmoral, I'll believe that when the Council calls me to say they are reimbursing all my taxes of this year.

There was also the first page headline that the Cambridges and Sussexs have legally separated there charity 'fab four' arrangement. Clearly William is not fucking around when it comes to distancing himself from this mess.

Finally, first Ibiza now Malibu? with a 4 month old? and on their third 'nanny' what is this..? I thought they wanted a nice little life at Frogmore Cottage as a new family, instead its becoming fairly close to my questionable early 20's drink fest summer travels just without the private plane (you have to love last minute British Airways offers)

What are they up to? Harry hasn't a clue, Archie is still 'sleeping' and Megcon is working on her list of celebrities she wants to hug.

Now! said…
Sorry to cause concern! I was just preoccupied with other work. I generally pop up whenever I feel inspired, or when a post goes over 200 comments, because that's when the commenting system starts to break down.

I also noted the Balmoral story - I guess that's planned for next weekend. I'm not sure if that's palace publicity ("We did everything to include her") or another one of Meg's missives.

In early August Meg put out one of her patented "wishing will make it so" pieces, stating that the Queen was going to invite her to Balmoral for a "special tea party" birthday celebration. (Google "Meghan Markle birthday: The Queen to give Meghan ‘huge honour’ for her birthday" for one of the articles)

Apparently the special tea party was so special it never happened, and Meg went to Ibiza for her birthday instead.

It'll be interesting to see if she and Harry do the church run with the Queen next Sunday. Meg is soooooo religious, I'm sure she wouldn't want to miss a Sunday service.

As for Frogmore Cottage: Future home of Eugenie and Jack, Beatrice and Edo, or possibly a retirement home for one of the elderly Kensington Palace relatives, someone uninteresting enough to need only minimal security.

NikNak said…
Meghan does seem oblivious to the negativity surrounding her life at the moment. I fail to understand how she can be so 'out of sync' with everyone else. It leads me to believe she is a narcissist, as any normal person would have their finger on the pulse (so to speak) when it came to feedback/criticism. I know I would.

Things aren't great here in the UK at the moment, Megs don't make it worse.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Harry has an inheritance, but not the 'casually drop £10m on a US mansion without sweating it' kind. The royals rarely indulge in buying property as they own plenty, last I can remember was Andrew & Fergie having a house built at great expense, which got a very negative reaction.

Harry owns no property, so nothing to try and claim in the event of divorce. No wonder she's trying to bounce him into ponying up for a house.

This sounds like more woeful spin from Megzzzz and co.
Kat said…
Her planted stories are a mess. She seems like the type to just go and do whatever she wants, whenever she wants.
The whole visiting Diana's memorial seemed like it was a siren call for the media to show up and take pictures... except she didn't realize it's not actually accessible to the public.
She was ready to be dressed in black, layers of veils, and to throw herself on the grave in tears. Only if cameras were present though.
I don't think she's even doing the basic background of checking where Archie should be (I mean besides the cardboard box he got shipped in from the factory), Google should be her friend. Instead she seems insistent on selling her rose-colored version of life, even when it makes no sense.
I'm sure she has people on the payroll, as her all woman pr staff, but she sure is making them look incompetent. Time to update those resumes ladies.
Emily said…
They will needs the Queen's permission to take Archie to live in America. She effectively owns the kids, especially if they are close inline to the throne.
Mims said…
Some great comments here, do we believe that the RF will pay her to go. I don't think so there would be a public outcry unless they used their own funds which I doubt. Why oh why was she allowed into the family in the first place?? highly unsuitable.
Girl with a Hat said…
also, they just spent 2.4 million pounds on renovations. Do you think people will be happy to hear they are spending millions to have these two clowns live overseas?

I think it's one of the trial balloons she sends out like birthday party with the Queen which never happened, Christmas dinner for Doria with the Queen, babyshower given by Kate.
Now! said…
Yeah, I was surprised that their newest hire, Fiona McUnspellableName, wanted to work with them. Perhaps she's been given the job of shipping them out of Britain - something she might be able to succeed at.

I guess the moving-to-Africa project didn't get much traction. Meg really missed an opportunity there: Africa is a great bet for the future, one of the few places in the world where population is growing instead of contracting, giving it a youthful energy that Europe lacks.

But no one ever said Meg was smart or imaginative.
Now! said…
They would have to use their own private funds, probably Charles'.

If I were him, I'd want Meghan out of the picture before he begins his reign. He'll have enough headaches.
Now! said…
That 2.4 million pounds is a scandal in the making. Nobody has seen any renovations at Frogmore Cottage.

At some point, some media organization will show some images of an empty house and there are going to be big questions.
Girl with a Hat said…
she waited too long and now with Brexit, people will not be as tolerant. Even two weeks ago, with the controversy with the private planes, people would have been happy to see her go. Now, with the country in turmoil, no one has any patience with her antics.

I think Harry married her not out of love but because she offered him a business plan to achieve his unsavoury goals of surpassing his brother in fame and wealth. She sold him on this celebrity and merching life and even offered him an open marriage, I believe, as long as it doesn't reflect back on her. She appealed not to his heart, but to his ambition. It's the only thing that makes sense.
Mrs Trestle said…
Hi Nutty
Love your blog and have been following for some time. Thanks for doing this. I feel that it gives a voice to many in Britain who believe their concerns about these two are being silenced by the mainstream media.

I think the Diana pilgrimage thingy was in the cards, at some version of it. But the connotations of it were so bad that this one time third PR advisors we're able to open the whole thing.

Maybe in a few months, or weeks, we might get to hear more of it. Some pictures of the pilgrimage "secretly" undertaken by the Sussexes, but publicised on Insta at a later date.

By now we have seen the trend is to always put pictures on their Ig after the even had happened, and say she did it secretly. She seems to love the word "secret". Even all her engagements are always secret. So we will hear more of this I'm sure. Just not now, because the death is this weekend and it will mean a lot of backlash for the vulgar and crass optics of it all.

The Balmoral visit might happen next week, basically to offset all the negative press. But we all know that summer is practically over by now, and so they wouldn't have to meet any of the family. they could even avoid meeting the queen , I'm sure HM isn't so keen on spending her summer day listening to Mms drivel. Do that would just be for the photo ops.

And something tells me post the SA tour, a visit to LA/US is on the cards. It's already being planned, an unofficial trip reminiscent of the baby shower NYC trip....maybe around the Oscars or later around Met Gala. She will definitely have plans on being at the Met Gala.

If you think about it, she has a way with the PR, most of these stories never really need official confirmation because the royals don't talk about their day to day life so much. That way when she actually makes an appearance she makes a statement one way or the other. Plus she them gets the excuse that everything written about her is negative, so she gets to build on the victim narrative that way.
Now! said…
You're welcome - and there's always the Daily Mail comment section too! Mixed in among the angry one-liners and paid Meg PR comments are some thoughtful perspectives.
Now! said…
Yes, they do seem to be letting her run the Instagram entirely by herself with no supervision. I don't think they quite understand how powerful social media are, particularly among the under-30 set.

Did you see that today's Instagram entry is signed just "The Duke"?

Are they trying to make Harry like Elvis, "The King"? Or like David Bowie, who was "The Thin White Duke"?

Also if Harry is "THE Duke", what is William? Or Philip, for that matter?

Anyway, I've had that old fifties song "Duke of Earl" in my head ever since. https://youtu.be/h6Uht69h8Is
HappyDays said…
Hi Nutty,

New to reading you within the last few months. You possess a great way with words and your insights into the H&M debacle are spot on. The level of discourse as you and the people who post here is on a high level - generally quite thoughtful with some great zingers.

My view of this mess generally agrees with this community: Harry got sucked into a marriage by a profound narcissist. These relationships happen all the time on a smaller scale among everyday people. But in this case, it is playing out on a world stage, on a grand scale. It is fueled by royal status, a potentially bottomless supply of money, her emotionally-damaged husband-prince, an aging queen and weak successor to the throne, a wedge driven between once-close brothers, and a masterful narcissist who is playing this situation for all its worth at a breakneck pace.

In short, Harry was reeled-in by a stalker who is bat-shit crazy.

It is fascinating, appalling, and sad, but impossible not to watch.

Basically, Harry was reeled-in by a stalker who is bat-shit crazy.

It is fascinating, appalling, and sad, but impossible not to watch.
fordgirl said…
I am tired of this two. I love this blog and all the ladies (LOL i assume we are all ladies) who comment here, but I am so tired of MM trying to be clever that the rest of the world. She is not! I am not a PR expert but it is obvious that she was running all from behind (and from the front: "a close source to MM said...") because all her stories made no sense and were amateurish. The one of the pub was too much! You can smell its fakeness from kilometers away. People Magazine is unbearable. A couple of months ago I made a promise to myself of not clicking anything related to MM. I am glad to read that the reading index is lowering. What is the worst of the situation is that, divorced or not, we are going to continue hearing from her for the rest of our lives. Because if they divorce, she is going to do whatever she wants, give as many interviews as she wants and it is going to be worse for all of us. This is a problem without solution.
HappyDays said…
Oops. I repeated myself by mistake at the end part. Apologies.
Now! said…
Nah, I think that the public will get tired of her.

The sort of celebrities that stick around are people with a strong, solid following (Beyoncé, Bette Midler, Barry Manilow, JLo, Adele, Cher) or people whose image sells magazines (Reese Witherspoon, Zendaya, etc.)

Meg isn't either one of those. Within a few months of the divorce, she'll have largely disappeared. Magazines are too dependent on clicks to run interviews with someone who doesn't sell.
Hello from the UK! I found your fabulous and witty blog a few days ago via a DM reader/commenter! I’ve had a few problems commenting due to safari and its default settings, I may have it sussed now!
Now! said…
"It is fueled by royal status, a potentially bottomless supply of money, her emotionally-damaged husband-prince, an aging queen and weak successor to the throne, a wedge driven between once-close brothers, and a masterful narcissist who is playing this situation for all its worth at a breakneck pace. "

Yes, it is Shakespearean, isn't it?

The story could get even better once they solve the mystery of who Archie really is. Born by surrogate? Meg's child only, Harry's child only, or neither? Latex doll in varying sizes?

It's truly stranger than fiction. You couldn't make it up.
MaLissa said…
Nutty, 2.4 million pounds and no movement at Frogmore Cottage. Where are they living and is the 2.4 million pounds paying for their rent somewhere? From all accounts, there's NO ONE at FrogCott according to people that have visited Frogmore House and its surrounds.
Now! said…
Welcome! Exciting to hear I've appeared in the DM, without having to result to a busty display or showing my endless pins.
Now! said…
And what's even stranger is that no one in the mainstream media reports on it.

It's common knowledge on social media - seems like a good scoop for somebody. What's the hold-up?
Girl with a Hat said…
The photos of HM going to church today have finally appeared and no Meghan in sight.
fordgirl said…
Let's hope 🙏. But she will try, try and try!
Now! said…
Wasn't their Balmoral trip supposed to be next weekend?
skydives1 said…
Hi Nutty, long time lurker. I love your blog and all of the commenters.

Having said that, did you see Hello Magazine and the article about the Cambridges going to a pub for dinner, complete with quotes from the owner.
Humor Me said…
Happy Labor Day Weekend Nutty and all USA readers - and everyone abroad!
So the pub dinner was fiction. Sad. And Balmoral is coming up - finally. And now the announcement that MM is homesick and wants to go home - to Malibu, where the beach in eroding up to the homes.
I digress.
The Queen is not that dodgy that she does not forget EdwardVII and that fiasco. I hope she spells it out for Harry AND Meghan just what this little house foray will really cost them. And I agree with the poster who commented that Charles needs to get this under control (or exclude her from the RF) before he assumes the Crown.
MM, for being so media savy, is clueless with the Andrew storm swirling around the Family, and cries for a Republic once the Queen passes. Her timing for her demands are, SMH, unreal given what is currently facing the nation and the family.
The visit is scheduled for next week, yes.
Or by showcasing a single thing! Lol

So many here are hoping the Sussex’s move abroad and very soon. I don’t believe they could continue to be royals living in another country (which isn’t part of the commonwealth) with British tax payer’s footing the bill. Harry’s money won’t last long with Meghan’s spending habits, and would Meghan be happy with this arrangement and stay around? I think not.

I cannot believe how she was ever thought to be suitable and allowed to marry into our Royal Family, it’s been one mess after another. She and Harry are both so out of sync with normal people, I think they’ve lost the plot....well and truly! I think these two, a long with Andrew’s dubious relationship with Epstein could signal worrying times for the Royal Family as a whole. People have little or no time for arrogance and self-entitled behaviour, not forgetting the lies too.
HappyDays said…
If there’s anything left of Harry’s inheritance from Diana, she’ll go after that and any annual allowance he receives from the Duchy of Cornwall. California is a community property state.
Where are they residing then? Why make up they are living at Frogmore? Hmm...I find it hard to believe the cottage would have suited either of them anyhow, not grand enough for a royal home. 😛
Fifi LaRue said…
Enty, people are not paying attention to Megs now. I was recently at a major airport, and was looking over the selection of magazines. Megs was not on even one cover, nor even a mention of her name, and a story in some back pages. Megs is invisible to the majority of people, except of course, all of us commenting here.
HappyDays said…
Speaking of Shakespearean, somebody, hopefully with a background in psychology or psychiatry, will write a book that psychologically dissects both Meghan and Harry while chronicling this relationship to reveal how it evolved snd was allowed to happen by the RF and its advisors. They really need to dig into Harry’s history to show why he was the perfect narcissistic target, and especially Meghan's history and sort out fact from fiction. I think the facts, plus a timeline if her behavior and the calculated manipulations of Harry and the RF and the psychology behind the manipulations would be quite a page-turner made more so because it would be non-fiction.
Now! said…
Interesting. I also think there's a PhD thesis to be written about the Daily Mail comments and their effect on public policy.

The DM comments are one of the few places where the average Joe or Jane can get an immediate international audience on matters of public interest, and the pure number of comments on any given story is an interesting gauge of the level of public interest in specific topics, although of course an imperfect gauge.
Now! said…
Agreed Rabbit (and I assume you meant Nutty and not Enty). Meg doesn't sell. Gayle King didn't get good ratings on either one of her Meg TV specials. And I haven't heard that her September Vogue issue sold out.
Agree, Harry’s money won’t last long if they do move and have to fund themselves. Once Prince Charles is King, it will be down to William and whether he’ll pay any allowance to the Sussex’s. Didn’t Nutty say, they may have been cut off financially already...so we’ll have to wait and see on that one. None of the royals privately own their home (apart from Balmoral and Sandringham). The Queen has given her children and grand children either a home or money to build one (The York’s and their Tesco’s supermarket lookalike home, before it became derelict and was sold).
SwampWoman said…
NikNak, I'm just a simple rural granny from the USA state of Florida, so everybody can take what I think with a grain of salt (or the entire box).

If I worked at a rich and prestigious company and wanted to get out of my employment contract ASAP but keep some or all of the money, I'd make it so unpleasant for the company that they would happily pay me lots of money to relinquish the contract and, of course, a nice bonus to make it worth my while to go, and perhaps to keep my mouth shut with no bad mouthing the company. I wouldn't do anything illegal that could cause me to be released for cause, of course, because I wouldn't want to spoil my payday. I think this is what we are seeing here and it would no surprise me if her entire family (and some friends) were involved in it.
Lurking said…
Megal lived in Hancock Park with her 2nd husband. Home recently went up for sale. I lived in the neighborhood for 3 years. If what they are looking for is someplace quiet, Hancock Park isn't it. It's very congested, although centrally located just south of Hollywood, easy access to the west side.

Cheviot Hills is on the west side, upper middle class neighborhood. Maybe West Hollywood, in the hills adjacent to Beverly Hills. Laurel Canyon, Hollywood hills, off Mulholland?
Lurking said…
Nutty... California is a community property state, however it's more nuanced than buy something here and it's a marital asset. If he purchases property with assets from the trust, either the underlying property held by the trust or income from the trust (his $300K allowance), it is his separate property unless he indicates he is gifting an ownership interest to Smeg. His intent to gift or not to gift can be indicated by placing her name on the deed, a later document indicating the gift, oral or written statement, referring to it as "our" house and using marital assets (income earned during the marriage) for maintenance and improvements on the home. However, the trust likely is very specific regarding what can and cannot be done with the assets held in trust and whether Harry can deplete the trust, liquidate the assets, access more than the specified income from the trust. A very likely scenario is that a home would be purchased with assets from the trust and titled in the name of the trust. Smeg would have a hell of a hard time proving the home is a marital asset.

As for child support... child support is based on income, not assets owned. Distributions from the trust may be considered income for purposes of determining child support, maybe not. Does Harry have a job from which he earns an income? Smeg's income would also be taken into consideration in determining child support.

I've read that the queen is the guardian of all royal children, or at least children in the line of succession. If this is the case and Smeg attempts to divorce in a California court seeking custody, it would be really interesting. I don't think any US court has ever determined parental custody where a foreign monarch is the guardian of the child.

If it does come to a divorce, Smeg would want to divorce in the US (California) and Harry would want the divorce in the UK.
Lurking said…
HappyDays... doesn't work that way. Inheritances are not community property. An inheritance is considered separate property. The trust created upon Diana's death is Harry's separate property. Smeg would have to show Harry in some way gifted it to her AND that the trust allows for such gifts. Maybe the allowance he receives from the trust is potentially accessible to her, maybe not. Same is true regarding the allowance from the Duchy of Cornwall, really Chuck. If it's a gift to Harry personally, then it's his separate property. If it's to them both as a married couple, then maybe. I have no idea if there is any documentation of the allowance or if such exists, that it cannot be altered to exclude Smegs from any such gifts/allowances from the Duchy.
Now! said…
Sounds like you really know what you're talking about, Lurking! Thanks for your comments.
could the rift between the brothers be about money? i keep thinking it is possible that William confronted Harry about Meghan's spending habits and how it could look like she was taking from their joint charity fund and that was what brought about the Sussex's being dumped from the charity and pushed into forming their own charity. i do think she will have no problem at all with using the money given to charity for her own lifestyle
hardyboys said…
What is with the William goes to a pub with his family story now? Is this how lame Cain and Abel have become. I'm convinced that the Malibu story is true that sparkles wants to move there but she cant get dimwit to move bc hes at least smart enough to know that his privileges end and begin in the UK. Wonder what made Sir Thomas Markle come out and speak out again? He knows it doesn't work? Why does he keep repeating over and over and every time he does he dribbles a new pic or a new letter lmao..like were all dying for a piece of MM's trailer park childhood. Her dad knows her reputation is going to splatters it is odd he would pick now to being her down. As Lainey the world's worst dresser and book selector would say conspiracy or coincidence? Non?
Lurking said…
Nutty... Love your blog.

If Meghan's plan to was raid the trust, getting her claws on the assets, she may be in for a world of disappointment. Crossing my fingers, hoping that the lawyers who drafted the trust knew their stuff. How likely is it that the royal family doesn't know how to protect assets?
fordgirl said…
Yes, that's true. She is invisible for the majority, but she is so annoying.
Mims said…
Perhaps they are all in it together, fleece the Royal family and the tax payer.
Mims said…
It is obvious that they do not and never have lived at Frogmore, so where is the 2,4 million spent?? There is no proof of these renovations, why has the press not picked up on where they live and present the true facts. Are the press being told not to print anything??
I really don’t believe nor think they are seeking peace and quiet etc. She or maybe both of them, want to be in the limelight and be centre of attention too much. It would be great if they were simply ignored. If they lost their royal status of sorts, they’d have less interest value too. Sarah Ferguson milked it as far as she could, but if America’s interest is waning (over these two) too, it won’t be a good move for them.
KnitWit said…
There may have been a prenup. I would assume the royal family insisted. Fergie had money trouble after divorce in spite of 2 daughters to support. Di dated rich men. I suspect that was Dodi's appeal.
Emily said…
According to reports, the Queen insisted on a pre-nup before they got married as Harry(Meghan) didnt want one. Any money she gets comes from Harry's inheritance, furniture, art works etc to be handed back. Cant remember what was said about Diana's jewellery and there will probably be an iron clad non disclosure in there too.

Meghan is reportedly is living in Knightsbridge and Harry is back at KP
SDJ said…
If the Balmoral trip next week is real, then I predict it will be Philip who has a "word" with Harry. Philip will want to go shooting with Harry, Meghan will tsk tsk Harry and Harry will tell his Grandfather he can't go. Staff will then hear Philip bellowing "Good God boy! Your wife is carrying your balls around in her purse. For heaven's sake, get her under control".

Harry will slink back to their quarters, where he finds MM polishing his balls and making demands of the staff.

I can only wish that MM gets an earful from Philip as well, but I have a feeling he will just freeze her out like he has done with Sarah. Maybe Philip and the Queen will ask Anne to have a no-nonsense word with The American.
@Veena, William and Catherine have always tried to be more normal, so the pub thing seems very in keeping with them as a whole. I’m not suggesting they are perfect, they have public funding for their homes too. They just don’t do things for attention seeking purposes, and do act what is expected of a royal couple.
The Cat's Meow said…
Wow -- this is TRUE!
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2019090177154/kate-middleton-spotted-in-pub-prince-george-princess-charlotte-prince-louis/

My guess would be that MM had heard about this article coming up....and decided to try to get the attention first!
Girl with a Hat said…
I highly doubt there will be a trip to Balmoral. Both QE and PP are fed up and can deal with her through the aides, etc. And besides, what will she do about Archie for the few days she's there? Pretend that a doll is their greatgrandchild?
Emily said…
Veena, William and Kate have been going to that pub for years. The former landlord was invited to their wedding. The new landlord has made a huge mistake by talking about them going there. Dont think they will be back.
Now! said…
Could be! This would make sense, particularly if Meg was upset about being shown up by the whole Cambridges-on-a-budget-airline.

It would be interesting to know what day of the week this issue of Hello! was put to bed (got locked down and sent to the printer) and whether Meg could have gotten ahold of an pre-publication copy, either paper or digital. Or maybe one of the staff let something slip.

Meg trying to get ahead of the Cambridges is a much nicer story than the Cambridges trying to play tit-for-tat with Meg, which should be beneath them.
Now! said…
I wonder what that "experienced nanny" the Sussexes hired does with her days.
Now! said…
Unless it was planned publicity - happy families, ordinary pub lunch.

Hard to tell.

The Royals are dearly in need of some positive publicity these days, given Andrew's problems, Harry's problems, and the Queen's unavoidable role in Brexit.
Now! said…
I think Sarah was much more widely liked than Meghan is.
Now! said…
Oh, I agree that she won't have any problem repurposing charity money.

She'll argue that she's "raising awareness" and needs a nice dress to raise awareness in, plus first-class airfare to wherever awareness must be raised, and a fine hotel to recuperate from the trip before the awareness-raising event.
HappyDays said…
I have read some blinds that Meghan doesn’t want anything to do with Africa on a long-term basis, which must mean more than a one week romp in a tent while glamping or having people bow and curtsey to her for a couple weeks this fall. HM tell them at Balmoral she plans to send them to Africa for two or three years.
@Nutty, agree, which is why she was able to make so much money for anything she said or did. I think people felt sorry for her, which helped her cause. Meghan on the other hand won’t have that kind of cache.
The Cat's Meow said…
Agreed; I hope that is the case too (MM led, rather than Cambridge led)
The Wiz said…
I rolled with laughter when I read this: "I don't think she's even doing the basic background of checking where Archie should be (I mean besides the cardboard box he got shipped in from the factory), …. " Good one, Kat!
MaLissa said…
@Emily so if they're living separately, why do the media, tabloids, newspapers, et al keep saying their home is Frogmore Cottage? Why don't they just say where they're living. The 2.4 million pounds being thrown in people's faces just makes people angry and very pissed off and would probably want a detailed account of where that money is - if it's truly been spent.
@KnitWit, Diana got a large divorce settlement from Charles, Fergie on the other hand did not. Andrew just didn’t have the disposable income to pay out.

It was the first I’ve heard about the Sussex’s not living at Frogmore Cottage was here, on this blog. If they aren’t, why not? Agree with so many others, why isn’t the press racking over this if so. So odd. 🥴
MaLissa said…
But this isn't news. Will and Kate have been going to their local for years!
Girl with a Hat said…
on twitter, FawnOverMeGain @Crystal96867741 has a clip of Prince Harry telling the head of Disney at the premiere of the Lion King that Meghan is available for voice overs in movies. Amazing! These people are worse than I can even imagine!

abbyh said…
A couple of thoughts:

Trial balloons - there have been a number of them like we'd love to live at Windsor, well then how about some other spare property that Charles won't need. So moving to CA ballon certainly is in line with prior behavior. Strictly speculation is that there is a lot of negotiations going on (perhaps have been ongoing on the down low) and this is part of a visible power message to the other side.

Lurking is correct. Community property is not a flat out now it becomes mine easy grab once we cross the state line and you drop money into a tangible object. Expensive but just for those cases, forensic accountants can tease out, trace back and separate his from hers.

The question I wonder about is there a pre-nup? and what might that say about money (his and the BRF)?

Not CA but another community property state, a friend was divorcing and his soon to be ex was counting on getting half of the country house. Alas for her, he had purchased it before wedding, with his money and paid the mortgage out of his checking, not hers. It's been years but I believe all she got (for the house part) was her half of the value it had risen since the marriage started.



Lurking said…
They want the limelight on their own terms. They think they can compartmentalize their lives. Access only when they are performing official duties, privacy at all other times or when they allow it. They've done a crappy job of walking that tight rope so far.
Girl with a Hat said…
they wouldn't want privacy if they weren't 1. hiding a surrogate birth,
2. screaming at each other every chance they got.
3. hiding the fraud of Frogmore.
Ava C said…
Thinking of Meghan's apparently firm belief that she and Harry would continue to be welcomed on equal terms by A-listers after they leave the Royal fold, I'm reminded of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Richard Burton mentioned them occasionally in his 1960s-70s diaries and they come across as rather sad hangers-on at parties. He described them as "chipped around the edges" and "marred royalty". They were tolerated but not truly welcomed or respected, even at their own parties. Whereas when Burton was expecting a call from Princess Margaret he was on his best behaviour.

Making the outlook still worse for Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Windsor's exile was far more insulated financially, as the Duke had stashed away a lot of money the BRF knew nothing about until the abdication arrangements were settled. So they could be more inviting to the jet-set of the time. Greater wealth than Harry and Meghan are ever likely to have, more luxurious surroundings, the Duchess of Windsor an excellent and witty hostess and the Duke a former king and emperor. Yet for all they had to offer, they were still met with badly-concealed embarrassment about their status, from the people they wished to call their peers. Harry and Meghan don't stand a chance.

Meghan's severely scraped-back bun and stark, dark, ultra-expensive clothes remind me of the Duchess of Windsor too (although not the silhouette!). Sometimes I wonder if she has a fellow-feeling for Wallis and is exacting some kind of revenge on the BRF and the British people, but I think that gives her too much credit. Any moments of introspection being strictly for Instagram.
NikNak said…
@Nutty Has the pleasure of dressing a doll. Where do I sign up? hell, I'll even cry and give the doll my tears for realistic value on a decent non-disclosure contract. Don't piss me off though Meg. I may accidentally be photographed holding a reborn bag.
@Lurking, so agree, it will more of the same behaviour and nonsense from them.

@Mischi, great points.
@Nutty, maybe she’ll be bouncing latex baby Archie, practicing her football skills. He has to be real surely?! Would the royal family go a long with such a farce? Lol Not too many decades ago where they used to check if a baby was smuggled in a warming bedpan. Reborn though, that’s a whole other thing! Lol
Fifi LaRue said…
Yes! I meant Nutty, not the other name.
EFarrell said…
Hi Nutty! So happy you were able to post. So much going on and I always look forward to your take along with my fellow readers.
So I’m a local yokel, born and raised in Los Angeles. I’m a realtor so I like to consider myself an expert on LA neighborhoods. I think your Los Feliz suggestion is perfect, or even Silverlake or the Hollywood Hills. Santa Monica is super crowded and not a ton of beach front. So I don’t think Meg will want something that isn’t a name brand neighborhood like Malibu. Malibu is a tricky place. Super expensive and very difficult to get in and out of. Canyons Or Pacific Coast Highway(PCH). You have to get in a car to get anywhere. Also it’s crazy expensive. I just sold a beachfront studio condo, that was a fixer, for 700K! And we really feel like we got a deal!
Anyway, she’s not going to want anything less than Beverly Hills or Malibu. Considering Hidden Hills/Calabasas is technically the Valley, she won’t be into that because she’s a label whore.
Does anyone know where her dad lived when she went to the Little Red School House?
Humor Me said…
@Mischi: agree to disagree. I believe Balmoral is on - it is a command performance, as such. I cannot image Harry refusing his grandmother's request.
HMTQ is not stupid; this couple smacks of Wallis 2.0 and this is the opportunity to Lay the Cards on the Table, so to speak, in a private way. I cannot image Harry defying the Queen and go off doing what they want as far as moves, etc, as #6 in Line. Nope. We have wondered if the funds have been curtailed - that type of defiance will result in a public take down.
Rut said…
Trying to make people call Harry "the Duke" is so typical Meghan. When they first introduced Archie to the press Meghan said she and Harry had bumped into the duke on their way to the pressmeeting. Meaning prince Philip. Then she must have thought "hmmm the Duke...thats a cool name. We should trademark that name for Harry" And today was the first time she throw it out there. But Im sure its not the last. Soon Harry will be known as "the Duke" So silly.
I’d add, Meghan has clearly always wanted fame etc. Instead, what’s she’s getting is infamy, all of her own making too.
Girl with a Hat said…
even if the funds have been cut off, I think that people like Elton John, with more money than sense, will help them out.
Unknown said…
I'll be honest I'm fuming over all this now. Enough is enough. How long is this charade going to carry on for? Most of the world now can see straight through her and yet we are still suffering her torrent of ridiculous PR.

On the Diana story, she seems to have forgotten that when they got engaged she put out some crap about going to the grave to 'talk to' Hazmat's mum. It took me about five seconds to confirm this on google.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/911276/Megan-Markle-Prince-Harry-visit-Princess-Diana-wedding-engagement-grave

As far as the move, just who is paying for this mansion? How can they work for the UK, as BRITISH PUBLIC SERVANTS, living in sunny California? (Sorry for shouting but, like I said, fuming!) Are they to private jet over for engagements?

She married into the royal family of another country. Picking up and going 'home' (Malibu! *snort*) is not an option, unless they relinquish all support from the crown. I doubt she will want to do, as neither of them have enough skills to earn the type of money they'll need to live their very lavish lifestyle. Unless of course, you count her bedroom skills, but even then it wouldn't be earning the millions they need.

If they do give up the money and titles and say they're going to support themselves, then bon voyage! I would happily wish them luck as they clamber into their private jet, made carbon neutral by Elton John paying someone to plant some trees. We'd be well rid and no one would have to be worried that Kate would end up meeting with an unfortunate accident. (It's been on my mind since that video of Smeghead glaring at her).

If the Queen's plan was to ignore this and hope it will go away (She has been known to do this), then she needs to give her head a wobble. We need to see that she does not support the Harkles behaviour. Instead it seems that she is allowing this behaviour. Why would HMTQ agree to this? Has anyone let her know just how annoyed the tax payers are getting over this shit show? Her judgement is being questioned. The whole article about how Smeghead is 'choosing to rise above' the jet/hypocrisy scandal is mind blowingly arrogant. Who the fuck does she think she is? She can 'rise above it' all she likes, the tax payers want some answers. Ignoring these sort of things just shows me how much contempt they have for us and that they obviously think themselves beyond having to justify their actions. Err, no!

The same could be said of the Andrew scandal. All of this is just reminding the public that we are paying for a family to live in massive luxury; who abuse the power they have been given and are allowed to cover shit up and escape justice. They have not earned these things, it was an accident of birth. I'm sure Prince Phillip knows only too well what happens when a country turns on their monarchs. People are being told the NHS is struggling to give cancer treatments, Brexit & parliment is out of control, there are zero hours contracts being issued more than a little and folk are having to choose between eating or paying bills, meanwhile they're jetting off all over the world and flaunting just how fabulous their lives are. It is not on.

A hell of a lot of damage has been done, the only thing that's stopped it getting worse is Princess Anne's and Kate & William's flawless dedication to Queen & country. Something needs doing.... now!

As for her father, I feel he will never get what he wants from her. She is done with him. I've seen on twitter that now some of her sugars are trying to claim he was abusive to her. *sigh* That poor man deserves better and she deserves a lot more crap for her actions towards him.

Sorry for the rant, the Harkles make my blood boil.
Humor Me said…
Mischi - Even Elton does not have THAT much money to sustain MM in the style to which she has become accustomed.
SwishyFishy said…
That's not how the Duchy of Cornwall works. It was set up to find the Duke of Cornwall/Prince of Wales and his immediate family ONLY. Harry will not get any funds from that source because he is not the offspring of William. Once Charles becomes king, Harry's funding will come from an even bigger fish: The Duchy of Lancaster. Meghan's money wide will never end so long as they remain married and no one cuts off their funding.
SwishyFishy said…
Gawd. "The Duke"... *sigh* Meghan tries to make everything sound like a damn romance novel.
SwishyFishy said…
A lot of people, myself included, never get their comments on Meghan stories posted on the DM. I think some people have been blacklisted. I can comment on every other story, just not Meghan. Nothing shows up. I've tried over and over again, even with 2 separate accounts and for a while my second account made it in, but now, nothing for both. It's really odd. Some poster's names you see a lot, so I dont' know why they can post but others cannot.
SwishyFishy said…
Psychologically speaking, it's pretty easy to figure out how she snared him. Yes, sex was a biggie. I think she has learned a lot of skills in her Yachting days. But more importantly, she appealed to his "shadow side". It's Jungian. That shadow side in all of us is a pretty potent thing. Like the master manipulator she is, she was able to identify all his hidden insecurities, wants, desires, pettiness etc. and puff him up. She was the first woman who "saw" him, dark side and all, and validated him, made him feel important in his own right, made him feel like they could be the power couple to change the wold. He bought into it hook line and sinker. It's why he's having such a hard time pulling away. She's made him think that he can't function as well without her, will never reach his dreams, will never be better than William. Harry has an inferiority complex, in addition to many other problems. Without Meghan propping him up, he feels weak, powerless and insecure.
SwishyFishy said…
I dont know Nutty, no woman makes it onto the DM without "flaunting" something or other! ;-)
SwishyFishy said…
Meghan's visit is suspiciously timed to coincide with Charlotte's first day of school. It will be dueling photo ops at dawn.
SwishyFishy said…
Ava, you should read "Scotty and the Secret History of Hollywood" or watch the documentary. He has a few choice nuggets about the Duke and Duchess of Windsor an their predilections.
Anonymous said…
What is bizarre about this fantasy of moving to the U.S.--let's assume they are floating a trial balloon--is that once they are freed from the trappings of the BRF, they will be nothing. Media will not be interested in her because she has nothing to offer other than her proximity to the BRF. She will garner headlines in People magazine because they will print anything, but her days of gracing the cover of Vanity Fair are OVER. Another Vogue issue? Don't make me laugh. She is photographed and followed because she is now riding in royal carriages and is within spitting distance of the Queen of England. Take that away from her and she is nothing. NOTHING. She proved that with her lackluster career that never took off.

There are people who have enough personal charisma to pull this off should they move to California. She is not one of them. Take any carefully crafted scripts away from her and she stumbles and stumbles badly. She cannot hide that ever move she makes is calculated. The retaliatory PR against the Cambs, the flicking back of the coat hem, the unbuttoned coats(!), and the non-maternity dresses stretched to the max (of course depending on what size bump she put on that day) are the most obvious examples. All of it calculated. And she doesn't quite realize in the throes of her narcissism that it's SO OBVIOUS that it's cringe inducing. And all of it captured on video tape. ALL OF IT. She doesn't get it. The farther away from the BRF she is, the worse she looks. She cannot help but broadcast her true colors when AWAY from them and their carefully scripted public personas.

Harry? Sigh. He seems sort of dim, someone you'd meet in a pub and have a good time with, but nothing more than that. Perhaps if you met him again, you'd think to yourself, this guy isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, but he's always up for a party, so good lad. So much of his allure is predicated on him being Diana's son. I think both of them have swallowed a bucket load of kool-aid regarding their popularity. Once freed of the constraints placed on him by HRM, I predict more scenes akin to him naked in hot tubs, surrounded by hookers. The BRF keeps him in check. Once out from under their guidance, I think he will fall apart. It's already happening.

At numerous events she looked stoned out of her mind (Wimbledon in particular was a low point), and in several events he looks just as looped. Allegedly. So if he is taken off that tight leash imposed ever since that Las Vegas debacle, I predict very sad times ahead for our lad. Aided and abetted by his fame-hungry wife.
EFarrell said…
Well said. Bravo. 👏
Ozmanda said…
All her PR stuff lately is just so messy and amateurish I cant help but wonder if that is on purpose. I get the feeling MeAgain is laying the foundation to establish for herself a goop like "lifestyle" brand - the whole food thing, hippy dippy "be kind" dribble. Of course she would love them to move to the US, she can cash in on her title without the responsibilities. There is also that whole community property thing also:)
Emily said…
@abby, @MaLissa, @Louise, mentioned earlier that the Queen insisted on a pre-nup before the wedding. Any money she gets comes from Harry's inheritance, anything loaned to be handed back, any there will be an iron clad non disclosure.
As for Frogmore, journalists camped out near the property, along with the locals who live there, and they have all said the house is empty. There could be a ban on reporting about it, just as there was about her false baby bump.
It amazed me that her PR team kept putting out stories regarding them living there, and being caught out. Watching lawn bowls from her bedroom window was the worst one. Not so many stories now though.
abbyh said…
Well well well.

So I went down a rabbit hole. https://lokagraph.com/listing/the-house-where-meghan-markle-grew-up/

Ok. I was thinking about this whole PR convo (I am reminded of the pie scene in The Great Race and trying to avoid and watching to see what happens next) ... and then casually wondered what the value of the mother's house was.

Lead me to our friends at zillow
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/5241-Angeles-Vista-Blvd-View-Park-CA-90043/20567578_zpid/

But this, this is not like zillow I've seen before. Inside the home pictures? Contingent.

Sounds like Doria is taking her money off the table and splitting for parts unknown to us (at least).

My take away: Mom may or may not still be in town if MM decided to move back to CA.
abbyh said…
The difficulty is in enforcing any non disclosure. Not convinced she would carry her part of the bargain.

Completely agree with you about the claims of they living there.
The Cat's Meow said…
Another MM diy update?!
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9842451/meghan-markle-cuts-ties-dad-thomas-archie/
The Cat's Meow said…
A strange article.....a week (or so) ago, there was an article about HRH Kate being "Queen Thrifty" or some such title. Now we coincidentally have this...which includes the doubtful roast dinner.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/9811894/meghan-markle-thrifty-roast-dinner-ms/

Seriously, this is like a car wreck. I just can't look away.
LadyJaneJagger said…
"Diana's rather sleazy brother Earl Spencer"

Oh, he's not "rather" sleazy, Nutty, he's a fully formed sleazeball.
gabes_human said…
This is very off topic... . Swampwoman or any of our Floridian gal pals out there: y’all have a M Fer of a storm headed at you. I’m on the Gulf coat of Texas and mi casa es su casa. I’ve been through Camille, Frederick, Katrina and Ike. If all the hotels are booked, just go West young woman.
HappyDays said…
Swishy, you are so right about the lure of sex. If you ever get a chance to speak with someone who has been the victim of a narcissist, they will often report the sex at first was mind-blowing. The best they ever had. At first, that is. The great sex, along with love bombing is used to initially hook the victim. Then the narc emotionally isolates the victim from family and friends to make the victim totally emotionally dependent on the narc. Both of which Meghan has done with Harry. She boffed his brains out for that week in a tent in Africa on their third “date.”

She has also driven a wedge between Harry and William, Kate too, and many of Harry’s longtime close friends. Then the sex usually degrades considerably or ends, only to be brought out as s reward or when the narc fears they might lose the victim.

Those two narc behaviors alone I believe played a large role in quickly getting Harry down the aisle and having an asap anchor baby for Meghan.

The only part that didn’t work out in her master plan is she had a boy. I would bet money she wanted a girl so badly she could taste it. I know they said they hoped for a girl when she was pregnant, but from what I’ve read, they knew it was a boy fairly early.

I hope any other children she has are boys. My guess is her next pregnancy will yield twins, which will likely be the result of either IVF or fertility drugs to allow them to get around the public pledge to have only two children.
PaulaMP said…
Nutty, I hope you are at least rocking all of your outfits? LOL The expressions they use in the DM articles are hilarious but it's the comments there that keep me going.
PaulaMP said…
Unknown: Sometimes I get that feeling too, that her entire family is "in" on the whole scam. I hope eventually is all revealed. Where was it I read that all of them use the same agency, maybe on the Charlatan Duchess page.
The Cat's Meow said…
I am actually wondering if the Harry Markles might be looking for a property that has an in-law house for Doria as well. Win-win ;)
Teasmade said…
abbyh, have you seen (probably on here) the news/rumor that Doria's net worth has increased by millions recently (like, in the past six months)? And that the supposition is that MM's merching activity profits are being money-laundered through her?

If so, then MM probably is aware of this sale/move, which may be a part of, or the result of, the laundering.

Anybody with me here?
Girl with a Hat said…
abbyh, I have no idea what that means. Contingent?
Girl with a Hat said…
from twitter, talking about Sara Lantham(spelling?):

There's something funny with these ladies and the foundation. Over in tumblr land someone was writing about Sara and Meghan not getting along. Meghan got abusive. Sara said lawsuit, I know people. RF said we will continue to pay you just keep quiet. Natalie got similar deal
Jdubya said…
Contingent usually means they have offer already and are taking backup offers.

Are you saying this is Doria's place? Or is this just a sample listing?

Now! said…
Hm. I wonder if they have blacklisted your IP address. Might be interesting to try posting a comment from Starbucks or McDonalds or whatever public WiFi is convenient.
Now! said…
Yes, they have an argot of their own, don’t they? Whenever a celeb wears something ridiculous, they “opt” for it. “Princess Beatrice opted for a shiny green ruffled dress for the ceremony.” It’s also used for boring clothing. “Her partner, Edo, opted for a tailored business suit.”
Now! said…
Thanks for your expertise!

You’re so right that brand names are important to Meg, and Malibu is a brand name.
abbyh said…
This is the start: Doria owns this from 2012.
https://blockshopper.com/ca/los-angeles-county/ladera-heights-viewpark-windsor-hills-cdp/property/5012028015/5127-angeles-vista-boulevard

I was wrong.

I just noticed. This has her at 5127 and somehow I must have mistyped the address and got the 5241 address with the zillow for sale.
Now! said…
Well, Sara Latham definitely knows people. She knows the Clintons, and we know what that means. Dangerous waters.

I would think Natalie would just go back to the Cambridges. She was with the Sussexes for such a short time.

But this all relates back to the original theme of this post: Meghan wants to do it all herself, and is certain that her way is best, even when it isn't.

People want to help her avoid some of the mistakes she's been making, but she won't let them.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Absolutely brilliant rant.

The shit is really hitting the fan politically this week, so this dullard would be well advised to steer clear of attention seeking stunts.

She won't, though.
@Swishy, the monarch does not have access to the capital of the Duchy of Lancaster, just the income. The net income for the Duchy last year was 20 million pounds, and is almost the same amount Charles got from the Duchy of Cornwall. If the Sussex’s live abroad they should receive zilch from any Duchy and zilch from the tax payer too. I can only hope the Sussex’s have been or in the very least had their income allowance curtailed significantly.

The Queen could live as long as her Mother...so we could have a few more years of her reign to go yet. She will never abdicate. She has given over a lot of the red box duty to Charles, and of course he travels on her behalf now . She will be monarch till the day she dies, and feel the monarchy and the royal family will come at an end soon after.
‘The Duke’ sounds so horribly pretentious and bumptious!
NikNak said…
@Happy Ooooh great take, I buy this! Why do you think she wanted a girl though? and what makes you think they knew the gender? I was under the impression it was a surprise?
NikNak said…
@Nutty, I want to sit Beatrice down and very calmly and sensitively explain to her that no matter what her gut tells her, no matter how much she loves the colour/fabric/cut, never, ever dress herself. She looked like princess Fiona in that green thing, the ogre version.
The infamy MM is getting exactly bad for her, atleast fromwhere she sees it. For every ridiculous move she makes, she has hoards of stand defending her like their life depends on it. And that is the drug she is getting high on. And that's the behaviour she is encouraging.

It is my opinion that a lot of the negative comments and criticism she is being insulated from, either herself or by her team. Most of the harshest criticism her way is being censored. Most of these forums and IG/tumbler etc are now more careful with their access. So what she is directly seeing is the unfiltered adulation from her hardcore fans. I was reading the comments section of their latest IG post, the one with the Africa countdown. And the positive comments there are aplenty. The snarky comments are there, but mostly as sarcasm. Not outright criticism.

So she is able to justify to her self that the moves she is making are right, and just what her fandom needs. I feel she never really grasped the gravity or seriousness of her role as a member of the BRF. Part of it is because of the huge class/culture divide. Fro .someone who is not from the UK, the customs, culture and formalities involved in being a working representative of the BRF are incomprehensible. Plus, Harry probably made a huge deal of the fact that he doesn't like doing most of these lame ass things, but has to because granny/papa/advisors say so. So she encouraged him to rebel and purposefully set out out to be the rouge agent against the archaic (acc to her) system.

She will never ever understand because attention seeking is in her DNA. So she will get what it means to be hardworking and not seek a reward for it.
@Swishy, I have similar problems posting on the DM, I’m not blacklisted but very few of my comments make it on any Meghan or Harry articles. Today on the Mr Markle article, only 1 comment out of 3 made it. I noticed another commenter replying to a pro Meghan commenter over the
15 comments she had made on that one article, they were all super pro Meghan and very anti Kate and they added how busy she must have been! I’ve seen this pro Meghan commenter a lot. Why aren’t they blacklisted for troll like behaviour? Are they paid PR peeps?! I do think the DM has an agenda, set at any given time of day, and it can change from the morning to a different one by nighttime!

@Nutty, methinks it’s entirely based on account holder. I’ve commented (or tried to) via 4G and had no more luck with my comments.
Unknown said…
Hello Nutty

Was'nt there recently a Queen from the UAE who plotted her divorce from her millionaire husband, and secretly fled with about 30 million in cash into Britain?

My question is, can this happen in this current situation with Ms Harkle?

Does she have British bank accounts or American? Just wondering.
HappyDays said…
Tweeny, Yes, I’ve also read that Doria’s net worth has grown considerably since the wedding. Perhaps the money Meghan gets from her reported couture clothing scam jointly operated with her stylist Jessica Mulroney. It supposedly goes something like this. Jessica obtains free clothing from designers. An invoice is created for the item(s) and given to Charles, who is paying for her wardrobe with funds from the Duchy of Cornwall. Meghan and Jessica split the check from the Duchy and pocket the money. Also, tags are not removed from clothing she wears that has bern paid for by the Duchy. The items are returned and Meg and Jess split the money. Hence, the dangling tags on the red dress she wore during their fall tour down under.
Girl with a Hat said…
Town and Country have printed a retraction of their story about Meghan and Harry and Archie going to a pub near Frogmore after learning that the story wasn't true. I don't have the link but it was on twitter.

Also, the royal correspondent from the Express, Richard Palmer I think it is, had tweeted that he had called the pub and that the story was true, which it isn't.

Now all of these journalists and magazines and newspapers have egg on their face. How many bridges can Meghan burn before her charade is up? Or is this her plan? To get ridden out of the UK on a wave of hatred so strong it hasn't been seen since Charles I?
Teasmade said…
Not to harp on this (two posts in one day--I'm not obsessed with this idea, honestly!) but if the merch/scam/yachting money is being funneled to Doria, MM wouldn't necessarily need any accounts at all. If I were doing it, though, I'd have accounts in both countries with moderate, traceable amounts in both.
Girl with a Hat said…
the accounts could be set up offshore as well, although as Americans, both Doria and Meghan need to pay American taxes on all revenue worldwide. Unless it is being funneled to a company which is registered outside the USA. Any money they do get would have to have taxes paid on them.
Now! said…
One of the most interesting revelations from Thomas Markle in his most recent outburst was that he'd tried to contact Meghan via her "financial advisor in Los Angeles."

What does someone who has married into the British Royal Family, supposedly for a lifetime until death us do part, need with a financial advisor in Los Angeles?

Particularly someone who doesn't seem to have any US-based assets, such as real estate or a trust fund. Given Meghan's spending habits, it also seems unlikely she'd have a stock or bond portfolio, or any leftover funds from her divorce from Trevor.

And Doria and Thomas Markle's twin bankruptcies make it unlikely that she has a big inheritance coming her way.

What assets would a Los Angeles financial advisor be working with?
Now! said…
Palmer said:

"I made a simple phone call and was happy to report that they did go to the pub."

"I checked this story and was happy that they did go to the pub for lunch on Sunday."

He might have called/checked with one of the Sussex stooges, not the pub.
Agree about the non disclosure and the enforceability of if. It would take an awful lot of money to keep Meghan quiet with or without one. Unsure about the pre-nup though, they aren’t legally binding in the UK like they are in America, so not sure how the royals get around divorces and payouts.
Now! said…
I wonder if Meg is managing Harry’s trust.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Unlikely, I'd say, UK trusts normally have named individuals or organisations when set up. Legal firms are often used. Diana would have tied that up pretty tightly -the royals do generally get sound financial advice.
Girl with a Hat said…
no. there would be no way she could do that. Trustees usually are named in the will and cannot be changed.

I think it has to do with her own money and the money she made from merching.
PaulaMP said…
I haven't noticed the "opt" for it, now it will be all I see!
Jen said…
@wizardwench, everything you just said about Harry is the reason why they will continue to Grace People magazine, TMZ and other social media platforms. Regardless of whether or not he is still a member of the royal family, he will always be Diana son and the Queen's grandson. That is not something that will ever change and we'll always make him newsworthy.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Absolutely cracking story in The Sun tomorrow:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9849833/meghan-markle-weinstein-jackson-pr/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=sunmaintwitter&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1567458395

I think the tabloids are trolling her now.
Kat said…
I was in the checkout line at Target today and saw this cover of In Touch Weekly. At home with Meghan! Touring the Stables! Cooking for Harry! Throwing dinner parties!
I'm honestly surprised she got so much cover space.
https://pdfunlimited.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/In-Touch-Weekly-%E2%80%93-September-02-2019.jpg
Humor Me said…
Quoting Nelson Mandela about mending / building on the same day the news breaks that MM is breaking ties with her father, and that Archie will not meet him. SMH.
KnitWit said…
I saw it yesterday too. I didn't have time to browse the magazine and didn't want to buy it. I planned to check online and forgot. I am in Florida. This is my first hurricane in Florida. Kind of going crazier than usual lately.
Jdubya said…
Maybe daddy is helping to make public some information. How would he know she has financial advisor in LA unless it was from pre-Harry? That could be. Maybe he is exposing some of her scam stuff, either accidentally or intentionally?
abbyh said…
Her estate according to the mag? I thought it was the Queen's and a grace and favor.

As for the timing of the Nelson quote on mending/building with the she will never have her kid meet his grandfather - oh, Shakespeare - where art thou when we need you most to help us watch this (trainwreck) show?

Sarc off - KnitWit - life is crazy during these and they will never get any less stressful no matter how many you go through.

Always have at least 3 to 5 days worth of food and water (for you and any pets).
Always have at least 2 to 3 months worth of medications (for you and any pets).
Grocery will come back but it will take a while for medications and any pet related food/meds long after human needs. FWIW, dehydrated food in pouches from camping stores is a great toss in the emergency box. They will need extra water. And, camping or any type of stove should never be used indoors - ever (carbon monoxide).

In spelunking, you always have at least 3 sources of light. Think variations. Candles can be dangerous (tip/burn but can be inside a glass centered with sand - google hurricane glass) but suggest waterproof matches. Flash lights are good but different ones (different battery sizes and a spare bulb) give better diverse options.

All the canned food in the world will not help you if you are dependent upon an electric can opener and the power is out. manual for those which are not pop offs.

Bleach as a disinfectant: roughly 1 part bleach to 9 parts water for cleaning
Bleach as disinfectant to drink: 16 drops bleach per gallon
Last I heard but things can always be updated. fyi: basic cheap bleach not special no this or that or scented.

If you have pets, chipping is good (AKC is one of the cheapest and most widespread - you only pay once unlike some). the other big pet suggestions are to have copies of the recent pet visits (most list the next vax requirements), pictures of the pets with you (proof of ownership) and phone numbers in marker on their belly (local and a family/friend out of the disaster area). And, think of animals in crates (even cats) in an inner room where nothing like a bookcase can fall on them.

Ozmanda said…
Tweeny - absolutely I actually made this inference on one of the other threads. Sparkles is a experienced grifter, I would be shocked if she wasn't squirreling the profits from her merch activity to her mother (who as a US citizen would be difficult to obtain financial details without a warrant) or offshore accounts.
Ozmanda said…
Lets also consider:
1) He was a bit cruel to people actually, but she seems to not be keen on actual research
2) I note the tie to Africa here - or maybe I am just over analysing
Anonymous said…
I sort of wonder about that because as I do think there is a breaking point regarding media myths. Diana and I aren't that far apart in age (had she lived). And I'm looking at this now-grown man, and I find my sympathies for him waning. There is only so much mileage to be eked out of his mother's death. A few more photos of him in Nazi regalia and I think a lot of people will stop giving him what I call the "Diana" Pass. I wish I could believe, like some bloggers, that he is merely playing along until she is exposed for unprincipled person I believe she is, but I don't believe it anymore. I'm old. I've seen a lot of people marry others who make them a better person. I've also seen a lot of couples who marry and who bring out the WORST in each other. She brings out the worst in him. He's not smart enough to understand that she's playing him like a violin (that whole speech about two children max when his brother has THREE children).
By now it's clear she is making almost all.moves knowing full well that she is not liked all that much. Most intelligent, sane, reasonable people, and most people around her probably don't like her or give her time. So these quotes especially are very passive aggressive.

Also, isn't there anything else in world that she can inspire about. Why her all her quotes sort of about her victim mentality, rising from the ashes, you are so misunderstood blah blah.

How about regular quotes like " Health is wealth" , "Cleanliness is next to godliness", " Roses are red, violets are blue, if you are reading my Instagram then I love you. " ...! All these would make her followers just as happy.

fairylights said…
Knitwit, Abbyh has great advice, the first one is always the worst. Words of wisdom from the other side of the Gulf (Think Harveyland), if you have a gas water heater and gas oven/stove, you are a step up. We lost electricity for three weeks with Ike, but were able to take a hot shower and cook on the range top because we had gas.

Have a folder with all the important information in it (birth certificates, vet visit information for shelters, immunization records for you and any kids, most recent report card, any professional papers you need to prove your level of education/profession.). Any time we evacuated, I grabbed that folder and knew that if the worst happened, I had everything I needed to register the kids for school in any state, and my professional papers to get a job. I always packed an interview outfit just in case as well.

Clean out a tub and fill it with water. You may need the water to flush toilets, or to cook with. We were glad we had when our water treatment plant was submerged when we lived in NJ.

Don't be to proud to take the ice/MREs that the National Guard gives out after the storm. They can be a lifesaver.

Good luck, y'all are in my thoughts and prayers!
Aquagirl said…
I doubt that the Sussexes will be moving to CA. First off, they don’t even live together now, so why would PH move to CA with her? I believe that there is a lot going on behind the scenes with Lord G., and MM may possibly wind up in jail for treason (in the UK), or for tax evasion (in the US)
She could also wind up in an institution (there is no doubt that she’s mentally ill.) I don’t see them letting her just divorce, no matter the payout. There’s no way she’d keep to the terms of an NDA. She’s proven over and over again that she’s a pathological liar who uses people. Were she trustworthy, I doubt that this wedding would’ve happened in the first place. Harry was coerced into it. I expect something major to happen soon. (And not a trip to South Africa.)
I too wonder why none of the press is reporting that they don’t live at Frogmore. It’s mentioned so often that they do, the public is quite annoyed by the supposed expenditures, yet it’s obvious that they don’t live there.





Aquagirl said…
@SwampWoman: Her friends are certainly involved, and I believe that her family is as well. Notice how we hadn’t heard from Thomas in quite so time, and then once she had so much negative PR, Thomas was back in the DM? The problem with Meghan is getting her to keep to the terms of a NDA. She’ll never do it.
Aquagirl said…
The post that was signed ‘The Duke’, has now been changed to ‘The Duke of Sussex.’
Aquagirl said…
@Mischi: I’ve always heard it was blackmail and he was coerced into marrying her. She was offered a payoff to cancel the wedding. At first she said yes, then she changed her mind. The issue is, if they get divorced now, how do they keep her quiet?
Rainy Day said…
First of all, to KnitWit and any others in the path of Dorian, please look after yourselves and your loved ones, and take care. Fairylights and abbyh offered what sounds like hard-learned good advice; it's very kind of you to offer those suggestions. We worry more about earthquakes where I live, but some of those ideas could apply to any natural disaster.

And now, on to the debacle of this weekend. Did Media Meg get a new turbo-charged keyboard, or what on earth happened? This is such an apt post from Nutty - Smirk's and Jerk's new PR strategy seems to be to throw anything and everything into the cyberverse, and hope something works. First of all, you have that ridiculous message, supposedly from Harry, in which he lets everyone know that their trip to Africa will be meaningful and not just an all-expenses-paid vacation and boondoggle, and then they have helpfully included a countdown clock. I'm blaming their new social media guru, David Watkins, for that one. I can't believe the BRF is allowing this - with all the other turmoil going on in the UK right now, I really thought/hoped the Queen would cancel the trip. Nope. And the photos that they posted - all right out of colonial Africa. Harry obviously doesn't think there are white people, cities, or beautiful natural scenic wonders anywhere in Africa.

And then someone poked the bear and Thomas Markle made another appearance. I wish he'd just post those bank statements that prove he paid for Meg's education and be done with it. And to have that Nelson Mandela quote about "make peace and build" appear on the Sussex Royal IG at the same time is probably one of the most tone-deaf things Meg's ever posted. Does she understand irony?

And then there's the new PR firm. The-Charlatan-Duchess has a wonderful grouping of photos of M&H, Michael Jackson, and Weinstein - yup, she's in great company now. Apparently this was another end run around BP. It makes me believe someone else's recent posting that Sara Latham is on the outs with Meg, and is just sitting around collecting a paycheque for staying quiet.

This really can't continue. Can it?
Aquagirl said…
@Nutty and All: What I find fascinating about this so-called relationship is that the majority of it was faked by photoshop and PR. They either met in May (when she was still living with Corey) or July (her corrected version). Supposedly saw each other twice, then went to Botswana. HarryMarkle has great timelines of the relationship. Based on her IG and The Tig, plus his public schedule, there were very few times that they were even together, yet she photoshopped pictures and her contacts at Hello magazine and her pal Lainey did her bidding. He was done with her by December of that year. So how many times were they even together? 20? 25? Then she started crashing events like Skippy’s wedding and the polo, but they really were broken up all that time until the set-up of Harry at the Toronto Invictus games. So roughly 9 months apart? But she was keeping it going with the help of 4 PR firms & even did the Vanity Fair interview during the split. That takes balls. Then suddenly, a few months after Toronto Invictus they’re engaged? She forced the marriage and basically these two barely knew each other (except for the extensive files that I’m sure she kept on him.) Supposedly she never lived with him at Nott Cott (she was living at SoHo House) and she doesn’t live with him
now, so it’s possible that they’ve never even lived together since she moved to London. I find her quite despicable, but on the other hand, it’s fascinating that she was able to pull this off. Actually, terrifying is probably a better word.
Aquagirl said…
If they show up at Balmoral, I believe it’s for a serious Come-To-Jesus moment. I actually think that Harry wants a divorce, and his family and legal team are advising him. He clearly can’t stand her, so why would he continue the charade if there’s a way out? There are many stories about how they don’t sleep together when they travel and how they constantly fight so why would he want to stay in this ‘marriage?’ She would, for obvious reasons. If they don’t show, it was just more of MM’s fantasy PR. Like her special birthday tea with the Queen.
@Aqua, our Treason laws were removed by Tony Blair, so unfortunately that won’t happen.


On another note, I still question Meghan’s citizenship status. To gain British citizenship she’s needed to be a resident between 3 to 5 years, depending on her circumstances as to why she’s here. So technically she still should only hold an American citizenship (unless the Royal Family have flouted the rules - which is easily questionable). If she doesn’t have duel citizenship, she’s not legally allowed to use her title of Duchess etc. She did so as soon as she was married. Only British or members of the Commonwealth can. This little detail has never appeared in the media. The whole thing is very fishy.
Aquagirl said…
I honestly thought that things would be winding down by the fall (6 months after the ‘birth’). As in terms of an upcoming divorce. They’ve given her enough rope to hang herself, but everything just seems to be getting worse. Every lie that is told (even simple lies such as that they ate at the pub), is another hit to not only H&M but to the entire BRF. It’s a 🎪. I don’t believe anything that I read anymore. If Lord G was truly brought in to take care of the Meghan situation, what is taking so long? The fake pregnancy, the merching, the fake PR, the excessive spending, the ‘for profit’ foundation—the list goes on. Any one of these things would be enough to take her out. How about the fact that there’s no baby and she was never pregnant? That alone is treason. The BRF certainly have a lot on their respective plates, but the longer this goes on, the worse it’s going to look. When the British public finds out about Fraudmore and Archeficial, what does HM think the public’s reaction will be?The veracity of the entire family, including HM, will be questioned, because they’ve supported these lies (even if only through omission.) Tick Tock.
Now! said…
Plus there's the obvious question - who is paying Sunshine Sachs' substantial fees?

Are they charging it to the Sussex Foundation?

Disney's $3 million will only take them so far.
Now! said…
Agreed, and in my opinion the Royal Family is making a complete hash of Brexit. Their entire reason for being is to be a steady hand in times of trouble. These are times of trouble - where the hell are they?

I understand that they are not supposed to be political, but they should at least be *visible.*

This would be a fine time to be doing well-publicized engagements highlighting anodyne things that everyone can agree upon. ("Trees are good" "Kids need love and safety" "Safe NHS for all") It's September; vacation should be over, at least for Charles, Camilla, and the Cambridges.

As it is, the last person to do a public engagement (according to the court circular) was Andrew, on August 30.

Now! said…
The Sun in particular doesn't like her, because she/her team fed them false information on the day of Archificial's "birth", which they ran and then had to retract.
Now! said…
Emerald City, a CDAN poster who seems to have inside knowledge of the royals, stated recently that Harry has had full access to the monies in his trust since he turned 30.
Now! said…
Also, Meg's "all female team" didn't last long.
@Nutty, the royal family are apolitical, tis why they aren’t involved in any political talk, publicly at least. It would be very bad form all round if they did, because they aren’t elected. The Queen doesn’t have a lot of power anyhow, that’s down to her PM and Parliament. Which leads to another reason why Meghan isn’t liked because she’s been publicly vocal about politics etc., and the British public don’t like it.
@Rainy, excellent comment!

I’ve just seen the article in the DM this morning, they must be very desperate to employ such a PR firm with that kind of past and present clientele! Agree too about Mr Markle, I wish he show the bank statements etc., to prove he paid, they would shut down a lot of the negativity he receives, and show Meghan up for who she is...a liar.
I’ve just received this weeks copy of Hello! It’s got the story of Meghan and Harry’s pub lunch in it. It seems they’ve not been told it was a fabricated trip! Oops!
Harry did have access to trust at 30, I think he had partial access at age 25 too. With regard to trustees, trustees are named on the trust documentation when it’s set-up. I know this because my family has one. So Meghan has zero control there, because she wouldn’t be a named trustee.

So many comments on one post, I really must try and behave!
hunter said…
I've been following MM's incognito account on Twitter @ThisLittlePetal and I'm pretty sure it is actually her. She is pretty obvious about it.

The dead ringer is her shitty personality. Wow, she's really an INCREDIBLE poser and bitch. She must be locked up somewhere for sure, you can tell by the fantasy bullshit she posts. It's so WEIRD and she is a bad speller (still) AND - here's the clincher and I really had a hard time believing it but between Nutty's post here and actually watching her This Little Petal account - she's... incredibly dumb.

I have such a hard time understanding this but it appears to be true. Narcissistic and really fricking DUMB. People make perfectly valid points and all she does it round up her haters all day and engage with them online. She has multiple accounts.

She's in a tower for sure. She's a real bitch too. Who else says #YouAreBeneathMe ???
Lime_Smoothie said…
Hiring Weinstein's crisis management team? If true, make me suspect there's a lot of very negative stuff about to drop. Would suggest Epstein links, or similar.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Watching the news, because today is a big day politically in the UK. Not much happening yet, so they have cut to Harry giving a speech in Amsterdam about environmental awareness.

So far it is a load of trite nonsense, but they have briefed the press that he travelled by scheduled flight. Of course, he could have gone on the Eurostar train, but I guess that's just for the little people.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Summary: I've travelled to lots of places to realise that over tourism is terrible, and you, the ordinary people, need to cut it out.

Sky News got bored and went back to interviewing people about parliamentary procedure.
I’m amazed he chose today of all days to do this ! Maybe he hopes it will get buried under ‘other’ news and we won’t notice what an absolute scam it is, and really the visit is just about another murky business scheme for him and Meghan to make money. He said and I quote, ‘ that he travel’s commercial 99% of the time, and any other time is about security for him and his family’. So what was the security issue with a jolly to Ibiza and Nice? What danger could they possibly be in going to those destinations?! Does he think he’s more under threat than his Brother and Father then? He’s slowly turning into Prince Andrew thinking he’s above others in his family and more important. Further, is he telling us he flew commercial each and every time he went to Toronto to see Meghan? The man is a complete and utter joke. He and Meghan have turned our royal family into nothing better than the Kardashian’s; I’m totally appalled and embarrassed.
Kate said…
I just read @ThisLittlePetal entries as well. Wow!! Definitely is her!!! She loves all the same things as Smegs and is so obnoxious! I don’t understand what planet she is living on. She is seriously disturbed.
Trudy2 said…
The DM don't even appear to be bothering to sensor comments today. They're reflective of the general mood with these eejits in the UK right now.
Lime_Smoothie said…
Honestly, it was such bollocks. He didn't even really address his own conduct properly, just in passing.

I switched over to BBC News and they'd wheeled out Nick Witchell to slag him off, and the ill-advised intervention of 'friends' over the private jet issue. It was hilarious.

It will get totally buried, due to all the other important stuff going on today.
Totally agree! He came across as a right numpty and I don’t think anyone was taking him seriously, just more howls of laughter ! It was the worse piece of PR he could have done. I wish I turned over to see Nick, he manages to be snarky just at the right moment.
abbyh said…
Bank statements only need to be kept for a number of years legally. Now that digital access is so easy, it will be interesting to see what banks and others like credit cards do.

Unless he kept the statements, the stubs (with them actually written on it) or the carbon copy back, he's probably out of luck. Most people were not saving that sort of thing so it often is not available for personal scanning later.

We used to actually get the checks back (I would pull what I thought were the ones I might need down the road like IRS) and then they started printing what had cleared at the bottom of the statement. Now, it is just a number and an amount on paper.
Lime_Smoothie said…
You know what Witchell is like, he was very withering...
Girl with a Hat said…
she takes on all the people who make nasty comments, as though that is all she has to do all day. And, everyone seems to know that it's Meghan.
Lady Luvgood said…
Just in from the DM, they used a picture of Madame Tussaud’s waxworks for a picture of Preach & Leech, on the BBC broadcast this AM!! ROFL

Seems, Harry preaching do as I say and not as I do, isn’t going over well, and I don’t think the waxworks were an accident.

That’s a sick burn.

Stay safe, all who are in Dorian’s path.

Lady Luvgood said…
Harry’s assertion he needs to fly private is a load of BS, who exactly poses a threat to their vaunted selves? How does Wills and Catherine do it considering they are 2nd and 3rd in line for the throne?

More like Meggy has to hide Archificial and doesn’t want to breathe the same air as the plebes.

Remember her Airport row, before the engagement was announced and she said “This is the last time I will move for anyone”

Megtoinette, indeed.
After that speech, I definitely think the gloves are off and the press will just savage the Sussex’s from now on, and anyone else with a fully functioning brain cell can see right through the Sussex’s farcical pantomime. They won’t be able to pull anymore stunts without being laughed off as a complete joke.
Girl with a Hat said…
I don't think Hello! care if it's true or not. LOL
Humor Me said…
One word: "Travelyst"
Lady Luvgood said…
I saw that, too!

Their arrogance is stunning to behold and hiring a Firm associated with men accused of serious sexual harassment/abuse claims, only serves to make you look worse.

But, do you Meggy, as we know you’re the smartest 😉
Kat said…
I went and checked in on her Twitter and his morning.

It's just pure awful. She uses hashtags the way people did ten years ago. I hadn't seen them used that was in ages. The only thing it's missing is a selfie, though it appears most of the pictures are ones she steals.
She really isn't good at pretending. If she wanted an incognito account she really shouldn't be complaining about people against herself, or appear worried over a YouTube tarot reading (by trying to wave it off).
It's all so ridiculous.
How has she not had all technology taken away, she's for sure cut off from the rest of the family.
Or does she have one person on her side who let's her use their phone?
Now! said…
Oh, I agree that they shouldn't be political. I think now would be a good time to for them to be visible and accessible doing nonpolitical things. They seem to be MIA.
Now! said…
Probably true, particularly if it had good pictures. Alternately, maybe it went to print before the denial came out.
Now! said…
That said, he's an older fellow, and old people do like to keep pieces of paper. I believe he's also had tax trouble, hasn't he? That might encourage keeping more paper than would otherwise be the case.
Now! said…
Also, just to address Aquagirl's point about Geidt - perhaps someone is counteracting Geidt's influence and encouraging a more permissive approach to Harry and Meghan. My guess is that person's first name begins with C and ends with S. No one else would have enough power.
@Mischi, agree! Lol

@Nutty, only old stock photos, so just another sycophantic story for them.
KayeC said…
Dorian is moving slowly and they have closed schools, so I am catching up from Labor Day weekend and WOW.....

Just when we thought their hypocrisy couldn't get worse! That speech was "cringe-worthy," and said absolutely nothing. Here's a quote from the end, "By promoting and incentivising sustainable decision-making, by helping us as consumers stay better informed, and by empowering communities, Travalyst will strive to change both the travel industry and the world for the better— and for the long term."

All I heard was ....These companies, Bookings (US,) Ctrip (China,) Skyscanner (owned by Ctrip,) and Visa (US,) will now be giving us incentives to preach to you about the environment through our foundation.

Most of us who live on the Southern Coast (or any tourist destination) know that tourism is the life-blood of the community. So, is he saying don't come here and spend money? Or that we that live in tourist destinations are so stupid, we don't know what to do with the money?? He also said "I" so many times, thought I was listening to a politician! He also looked like sh*t!
KayeC said…
@Unknown, from your mouth to the Queen's ears! You have said it perfectly!
KayeC said…
Also, what does he mean by "buy-in" (he said that several times)? That's a poker term to me, not sure what it means in business, whoops, I mean charity??
abbyh said…
I can see that. A lot of people can and do. I have that personally but now I have a scanner.

I also see people leaving all kinds of stuff behind when they move (eh, I don't need that anymore and I'm just not going to carry it around any more). Especially if there are some bad memories of why you needed it at one point.

And, there are people who willfully will not learn from the past (errors or not, personal or observed). You cannot tell them X even if it would be so much better short and long term every which way to Sunday. They develop a blind spot and cement themselves down. No discussion. My mother had one which cost her dearly but no one was able to get her to change the trajectory. Not love. Not money (thousands).

Beth said…
I agree that whoever is behind the @This Little Petal account is one seriously disturbed individual but I think it's someone getting kicks out of everyone thinking that it's MM. It is just too obvious and they are trying too hard to drop clues and hints. Then again, what do I know? I thought she was really pregnant! Silly me.
1 – 200 of 223 Newer Newest

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids