Skip to main content

Open post: The Megxit Summit

Today Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry will meet at Sandringham to discuss the future relationship between the Royal Family and Harry, Meghan, and Archie.

Let's discuss here as developments emerge.

Comments

PaisleyGirl said…
I meant Liver Bird. Sorry, my autocorrect is going mental again.
The Cat's Meow said…
Second mistake....it was The Sun!

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10727060/prince-harry-meghan-markle-sandringham-summit-queen-arrival/

It is in the first line of the article.
Fairy Crocodile said…
I thought i would add the link to the monkey picture that is now paraded as THE proof of racism in UK. The biggest irony? It comes from the TWEET by the BBC radio 5 presenter, the leftiest, wokest and most haughty broadcaster imaginable.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7009283/BBC-Radio-5-Live-host-Danny-Baker-tweets-racist-Royal-Baby-monkey-image.html
SwampWoman said…
Sandie, Elle, OMG. Oh, yes, I do believe that the duchess of woke has gotten on Mr. Alexis Ohanian's last nerve (and maybe his wife's, too, but she's too diplomatic to say anything).
Camper said…
The Sun newspaper now has a small side story saying Harry and Meg now deny plans for tell all interview!
Written by Brittany Vonow, but she doesn’t give a source.....just another way to fill up the front sheet?
Sandie said…
So much noise in the media today ...

There is this piece of fantasy (or misinformation from Megsy):

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10726112/meghan-markle-prince-harry-beyonce-holiday/

1. Beyonce and Jay Z wanting to holiday with Megsy and Harry? I don't think so!
2. Megsy and Harry were stopped by aides? I don't think so!

Some humour from Piers Morgan:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10725591/prince-harry-la-stoner-relocates-meghan-markle-piers-morgan/

Go for it Harry ... best way to deal with the endless word salad and manipulation is to take another puff of the joint and smile beatifically (just make sure it is good stuff because some of the stuff out there is mixed and dangerous, i.e. you may end up hitting her over the head with a heavy cast-iron frying pan).

Lots of speculation about the meeting. It is speculation folks. No one has insider information (unless senior royals want it leaked).

Nothing new here, but a reminder that Meghan was fully informed about what being royal means and she misled everyone in agreeing to everything:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-harrys-frank-warning-meghan-21271571

A couple of tarot readings are in and a few interesting insights emerge:

1. Negotiation and reconciliation is more possible without Meghan there.

2. Meghan is driving this, not Harry. For her it is all about control and money. She is not a person who can negotiate or compromise (she wants what she wants and she is getting impatient about that). She is not going to get the deal she wants, not immediately anyway, although it may seem that way.

3. For the senior royals, although they love Harry and desperately want to help him, it is about protecting the institution.

4. The Queen and Charles will offer money from their personal wealth to assist them in transition from funded royals to financially independent non-working royals. Megsy wants the monthly payments.

5. The senior royals want more of a detailed plan (kind of like a business plan) and want to know why they need so much more money.

6. Megsy will drop out of the meeting (communication suddenly cut off). She knows what she wants, she is not too invested in the outcome ... she's done, ready for her exit, and dreaming of the billions she is going to make (but she still needs bridging finance while she signs all those deals). She's partying while this meeting is going on.

7. William is going to try to protect Harry's inheritance. Megsy is not happy with this.

8. Harry will be shown the full consequences and details of their demands and he is in shock.

9. Harry wants to keep Frogmore Cottage. Meghan could not care less about it.

10. The Queen is the only one who will remain calm throughout the meeting.

11. Seems that titles may go. It is the Sussex Royal Megsy wants ... she doesn't care about the HRH. The BRF can't have her merching the crown, the royal part of Sussex, so they are going to try to stipulate conditions.
Liver Bird said…
"I thought i would add the link to the monkey picture that is now paraded as THE proof of racism in UK. The biggest irony? It comes from the TWEET by the BBC radio 5 presenter, the leftiest, wokest and most haughty broadcaster imaginable."

Not to mention that the tweet was universally condemmned and the presenter was instantly sacked. If Britain were so racist, surely he'd still be in a job today?
CookieShark said…
PH & MM could have certainly scaled back their work if they wanted to be defacto part-time Royals. I guess the Vogue edit & Smart Works exhausted MM and now, less than 2 years into the marriage, she can't be bothered to be in the same country with her husband while he hammers out a deal for their future.

I really think the "step back" move was driven by her need to merch. The Jennifer Meyer incident showed the palace had MM's number when it came to merching and she wouldn't be able to do it on the sly anymore.

Ridiculous that they require additional funding to become financially independent. I commuted once over 60 miles one way to a job, getting up at 4:00 AM. I do not think they have the slightest idea what actual work is.
Ellie said…
Rebecca English reporting William, Charles and Harry seen leaving Sandringham.
Glow W said…
8 minutes ago Richard Palmer said no confirmation but colleagues at Sandringham said the meeting has broken up and major parties have left.
SwampWoman said…
Liver Bird said...
@PaisleyGirl

That's what I think too. We were told the date and location of the 'summit', and even the time it would begin, almost as though they wanted people to be speculating and have reporters camped out at the gates to Sandringham. Have the royals ever done that before?

Also, a reminder that Harry's appearance at the Rugby World Cup drawn in Buckingham Palace on Thursday is still scheduled to go ahead. Mark that date in your diaries!


Seems like one of those magician tricks again pointing at one location to draw people's attention while doing something at quite another.
Marie said…
@Sandie, thank you for pointing out the Alex Ohanian tweets. I love it! Strategic sycophancy. Meghan in her blog was always writing about how she "fangirled" meeting this person and that. I was shocked that nobody saw through that. But Alex, as an angel investor, probably has to be much shrewder about personality and people talking a big game.It seemed even Serena said something vaguely strange about Meghan leaving behind her baby just for a tennis match, so the sentiment must have been brewing.
SwampWoman said…
Hunh. What's up with the time stamp?

Did the meeting last the time allotted? It seems to have been gotten over with very quickly.
NeutralObserver said…
Wow, so many great comments. Even though I'm American, & have admitted that what the RF does is none of my business, I am fascinated because of all the tea leaf reading involved, & because the family angle is one everyone can relate to.

I think most of here, left-leaning, right leaning, are probably in agreement on things like character & values, & that they make a difference. In my old age I can see what my elders hated about Bill Clinton's draft dodging, I didn't inhale ways. Boy, were they right! When he ran for president I thought they were just old reactionaries.

After the inflating, deflating baby bump, what did it for me re: Megs was the way she treated her blood family. When her mom was the only relative at her wedding I thought it was weird, & that perhaps her dad had been an abusive monster, but weren't there any other relatives who could have been stuffed into morning suits & fancy hats for day or two? If she were really a millionaire, as reported, she could have paid for the tickets & hotels herself. Lots of families pick up the tab for wedding guests. I know sometimes there are family issues which call for a limited guest list, but in that case, have a small private wedding, don't blast it over international tv at the British public's expense while they're going through the stress of Brexit. I know, maybe the RF thought it would cheer people up, but big mistake.

When the Harkles dumped on his aging & ailing grandparents, is when I blew a gasket & called for the RF to release the Kraken. As I've told my kids, you just don't do that to your olds, no matter how big a pain in the rear they are. Harry & Megs both have much to be grateful for in the way their families have treated them.

We've all seen very intelligent people do self-destructive things, but at the risk of sounding 'IQist,' I've wondered if part of Harry's problem is not just poor impulse control, damage from his mother's death, but that he's just not that smart.
Was he the one his mother was pregnant with when she allegedly threw herself down the stairs? One of my kids was fascinated by swastikas for a brief time, mainly because when he drew one, we adults acted as if he had dropped a big one on the floor, but he was 4 years old. Harry was in his teens when he did the Nazi party stunt. Just dumb, as well as entitled.

I hope that the RF aren't so dumb as to reward bad behavior, that always leads to big problems down the road. Megs needs to be cut off at the knees somehow. She's toxic for them. I'm beginning to wonder if the Tom Bradby stuff is a trap of sorts for the Harkles. They don't look very good trying to blackmail a beloved grandmother in her 90s who just happens to be the Queen of England.

Elle, most of us love your posts, even if you go off topic. If you cross the line. Nutty will tell you. On another thread, people were talking about their Myers Briggs profiles. Can't remember if I've ever taken one, but I'm definitely an extrovert of some sort. I've been lucky enough to have lived all over the place, known all sorts of people & had a blast. Perhaps growing up in a family in which the males outnumbered the females gave me a thick skin, but it really pains me more to have to dislike someone than to know that they dislike me. That happens, I'm not perfect. It's their problem, not mine. I've been called a 'POS' & 'sick' on these pages, but whatever. My advice, don't leave unless Nutty bans you, or you get bored. Also, sometimes if people get cranky there's something in their life that's stressing them, & you're not really the target. Just give them their space & let it go.
abbyh said…
Almost tea time.
Liver Bird said…
"Seems like one of those magician tricks again pointing at one location to draw people's attention while doing something at quite another."

Quite possibly. Plus it seems all the main players have just now left Sandringham. Could a meeting lasting under 3 hours really thrash out all the legal, constitutional, financial, logistic etc aspects of two senior royals doing their own thing and moving to another continent? I highly doubt it.

It really seems like this is smoke and mirrors. I also doubt Meghan participated in the 'conference' by phone, because who would trust her not to record it and sell it to the media (which she hates so much)? Unless they got her to do it in the secure room of a British embassy!
none said…
@Swampwoman Yes...shiny objects and all.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Spot On Liver Bird.

Not only he was fired, he profusely apologized explaining it by "not knowing it was Meghan who had given birth". He thought it was somebody else in the RF. The moron wanted to mock the WHITE members of the RF.

God has spectacular sense of humor.
xxxxx said…
The BRF should let Harry leave without an agreement. Then the BRF tracks the Gruesomes activities, if they start merching then cut off the Cornwall cash and strip Sussex titles.

But if there is an agreement I see this:
Sussex Royal Foundation - Allowed
Sussex Royal merching and branding - Not allowed
Cornwall Cash money - Keeps flowing but at half the rate due to Harry doing half his Royal duties (of course he will shirk them)

H$M both Representing and traveling for The Queen's Commonwealth Trust - Yes and Encouraged by Charles
Security expenses- Will continue to be publically funded, split by Canada and UK
Froggy's Moor --- Available rent free
The Cat's Meow said…
@Swampwoman...

PC left the meeting at 4:30 their time. Was scheduled to last till 5.

Guess time passes quickly when one's having fun!!!
The Cat's Meow said…
Ok...so looks like Harry has left too.

I am American so I am hearing the Jeopardy theme song in my head LOL
Ava C said…
The Sun says Prince Charles left at 4.30pm. And I thought the meeting would be too short from 2-5pm. What does it mean if so?

Also I thought PC would naturally stay there tonight, since he doesn't have an Amner Hall nearby, but of course he's the busiest royal of all.
Liver Bird said…
HM has spoken. Sounds like a right royal fudge.
The Cat's Meow said…
There is a statement from HMTQ! On Charlatan Duchess (tumblr).

Really says nothing much that's new. Discussions ongoing.

TORTURE!!!

Ok, back to my laundry.
CookieShark said…
@ Neutral Observer re: MM the millionaire

The herd over at CB likes to declare that MM has her own money, 5 million of it to boot (I don't know where this figure comes from but it's cited quite often). I think her history shows she is quite reckless with money. I doubt she came to the marriage with any substantial assets. Perhaps this is why she's so set on merching and is demanding so much of it now. She knows the PR and the insanely expensive wardrobe she insists wearing won't pay for themselves.
Ava C said…
@Liver Bird I'm with you about the likelihood of Meghan being on the line for the actual meeting. The risk would be too great. They can't possibly trust her.
Liver Bird said…
Maybe just maybe I'm clutching at straws but.... is it significant that she reffered to them as plain 'Harry and Meghan' rather than TRH The Duke and Duchess of Sussex?

Probably not. Just looking for something positive!
punkinseed said…
"... Cambridge children and allow them to cut Rach out of each of the cards before putting the stand-alone Harry cards back on the display stand." And, and and, would love to see those photos on the queen's mantle of exactly that! All of Harry and Archie with Rach cut out would sure send that woman a message!
Sandie said…
Predictions: Archie? Meghan needed to get Archie out of the country before she dropped the bomb. She succeeded in that. The divorce settlement will give joint custody, but Archie will end up spending most of his time with Harry (Megsy is not cut out to be a full-time Mom). Kate will fully embrace Archie (yay, he will grow up with his cousins) and even William will come around.

My reading of the situation is that any restrictions the family put on merching for Meghan will hasten the divorce (besides, they should know by now that Meghan cannot be trusted). They are protecting the firm, not trying to get at Rachel, but she will perceive it that way. She is delusional and messy with details, so the billions and global fame and adoration and influence she is dreaming about will not happen, but she will do well on her own. She is a good hustler.
Camper said…
There’s a period of transition, but they can live between Canada and U.K., without being reliant on public funds.

Final decisions will be reached in the coming days.........so, they didn’t mention titles and called them Harry and Meghan, interesting.
Glow W said…
statement from the queen

https://mobile.twitter.com/re_dailymail/status/1216767628544479237

The Cat's Meow said…
@Elle and @punkinseed

YES lol! For next year's Christmas speech ;)
SwampWoman said…
My gracious, I haven't done a BIT of work today. Time for me to go do something so that I won't be starving in the street and the royal family will have to sell their jewels to feed me because it is all their fault.

/Scorecard for the humor impaired: I don't need anybody to sell their jewels, royal or otherwise, for my funding. I just need to get off my *ss and quit watching the slow motion wreck of the Harry and Meghan show.
Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
The Cat's Meow said…
@Liver Bird

Very good catch re: "Harry and Meghan"
Glow W said…
1) family had constructive discussions on grandson’s and his family’s future

2) the RF is entirely supportive of the H&M creating a new life as a young family

3) we preferred them to remain full time working royals but understand wish to live more independent while remaining valued part of the family

4) H+M made clear they do now wish to be reliant on public funds in their new lives

5) will be a period of transition in where Sussex will spend time in Canada and the U.K.

6’) matters are complex to resolve, more work to be done, resolution expected in next few days.
xxxxx said…
Sandie said...
So much noise in the media today ...
Some humour from Piers Morgan:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/10725591/prince-harry-la-stoner-relocates-meghan-markle-piers-morgan/


He is now known as the dynamic and irrepressible Piers Morgan. Check out his twitter. He takes on all comers and gets the better of them. Insulting all kinds of woke social justice warriors that try to take him on. Shame him on alleged racism and so on...

I like his sidekick on GMB, Susanna Reid gets paid millions for nodding and her facial expressions, while motor mouth Piers rants. Not that I ever saw the show, just seen clips in America.
Glow W said…
***4) do NOT wish to be reliant on public funds
PaisleyGirl said…
@The Cat's meow: perhaps the Queen was speaking as granny and was therefore more informal? Or do you all think it is significant that she did not mention their titles?
none said…
I don't think the lack of titles is a big deal at this point and matches the informal tone of the statement. What I do think is telling is the "my grandson and his family" part.
The Cat's Meow said…
@PaisleyGirl

Who knows? Just definitely worth noting due to the formality of The Firm.

Though this was obviously a familial announcement as opposed to professional: she stated "my family" quite often. So perhaps this was to de-escalate and make things seem a lot more intimate than just a business decision.

(Now instead of "Jeopardy" theme I am hearing "The Godfather"....it's nothing personal, just good business)

Short version...who knows, we will wait and see.
Princess Mrs. B said…
@Paisley Girl, I think that it is definitely significant. The Queen doesn't do informal, especially on an official announcement.
Mom Mobile said…
Apparently Lainey Gossip made USA Today stateside. Something about an alleged intentional/accidental leak stemming from the friendship between Duchess Kate of Cambridge's press spokesman, Christian Jones, and Dan Wootton, a reporter for The Sun.

Woko's still going after Kate and her staff.
The Cat's Meow said…
Oh boy....now MM is dragging Doria back in for the PityParty

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7881909/Meghan-Markle-support-mom-Doria-Ragland-miserable-UK.html
Liver Bird said…
Really not sure what to make of this, which is probably the point. I think the queen is letting the public know that she's onto it - this is her first personal statement on the whole fiasco - she's portraying herself as the kindly grandmother who understands the wishes of the 'young family' but also makes sure to get in the bit about how they don't want public funds. However, 'public funds' is kind of a debatable term - the royals would probably argue that the Duchy is not 'public money' but others would disagree.

And while I'd like to think that the absence of their royal titles is significant, HM also refers to the Duke of Edinburgh as 'Philip' or 'my husband' in official statements. So unfortunately it's probably not what we'd like to think it is.
Fairy Crocodile said…
"Harry and Meghan made it clear they do not want to rely on public funds in their new lives"

Translation: they tried to milk public funds and were told no.

The rest is just the world salad a-la Markle. "We would prefer them to stay the fully working members of the family but understand their desire...."

SwampWoman said…
@The Cat's meow: perhaps the Queen was speaking as granny and was therefore more informal? Or do you all think it is significant that she did not mention their titles?

I think HM is *very* careful about what she says.

If it were my family and I made a comment about a money-grubbing soon to be former in law right after a meeting in which she was demanding to be kept on the payroll but do nothing, there wouldn't be enough bleeps to possibly make it airway friendly.
Liver Bird said…
Also, is it significant that she referred to them as 'the Sussexes'? Do royals normally refer to each other as such in their official statements?

Also, what's this 'transition period'? 'Transitioning' to what, exactly? I think this may turn out to be the key here.
Sandie said…
Here is the statement:

"Today my family had very constructive discussions on the future of my grandson and his family.

"My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan's desire to create a new life as a young family.

"Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working Members of the Royal Family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a
valued part of my family.

"Harry and Meghan have made clear that they do not want to be reliant on public funds in their new lives.

"It has therefore been agreed that there will be a period of transition in which the Sussexes will spend time in Canada and
the UK.

"These are complex matters for my family to resolve, and there is some more work to be done, but I have asked for final
decisions to be reached in the coming days."
abbyh said…

Smoke and mirrors, reading the tea leaves ... reminds me of the show Lost

Liver Bird said…
So the claim that Trudeau is going to fund their security has been officially denied, as I had expected.
none said…
The meeting and statement are to placate the public. As other posters have astutely pointed out when the BRF meets it's not publicized.
SwampWoman said…
The Cat's Meow said: (Now instead of "Jeopardy" theme I am hearing "The Godfather"....it's nothing personal, just good business)

Perhaps we will hear of her demise in a tragic fishing accident soon.
Mom Mobile said…
@The Cat's Meow: Woko must think the "mental health card" is the new "race card". She has such a destructive bag of tricks!
hardyboys said…
They got a sweetheart deal. They got what they wanted. Today the articles are coming out how Megs is never coming back and that she had anxiety and panic attacks. I don't see it lasting too long or Harry lasting too long in Canada aka Toronto. They will likely live in Toronto and rent a huge mansion in Rosedale or the Bridlepath. Megs will live the life of Riley.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Did you notice she said "My family and I are entirely supportive to Harry and Meghan..."? As if she and the family are now separate from HazMeg? No titles.

It is either significant or just badly written.
The Cat's Meow said…
@abbyh Yes! I loved Lost until the final episode....let's hope this little drama has a much better ending!

@Twinsmama....I don't think they actually got a sweetheart deal. I think that this statement is just to delay...and drive MM more batshit-crazy.@Fairy Crocodile was probably right when she said that the translation of "they made it clear they didn't want public funds" means they were denied.

Let's watch her unravel. Ok...I have GOT to accomplish something today!
xxxxx said…
The friend explained Meghan was 'miserable in the UK' and 'wasn’t sleeping well and started having anxiety attacks about her future'
They also said Meghan has no 'intention' to return to the UK to live permanently, saying: 'She doesn’t want to raise Archie there and she doesn’t want to schlep back and forth'
Prince Harry is set to follow Meghan across the Atlantic later this week with no clue of when he will be returning
Now across the pond, the friend said of Meghan: 'This was her plan all along, to eventually leave the UK and build her own empire with Harry'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7881909/Meghan-Markle-support-mom-Doria-Ragland-miserable-UK.html

****THIS!
After her super expensive Royal wedding in the UK, now Megs hates the UK. All those millions blown on Frogmore renovations to suit this flighty ingrate. And now Charles says he blew a few million on her for expensive clothing and new Frogmore furnishings. She creates chaos wherever she goes.
Megs is one of the worst things to happen to the UK in the last few years.
Glow W said…
I also think they got at least 90% of what they wanted.

I wonder why Wills didn’t go to lunch and if that had been planned that Harry wanted to talk to PC and TQ alone (not suggesting anything untoward to William)
Ava C said…
There's a DM article about criticisms the team behind the H&M ITV documentary last night are all white. My comment:

"I thought they were meticulously even-handed in that documentary. Every time I got apoplectic with rage at the woke brigade I had an equal amount of time to calm down again."
Ava C said…
Re: the Queen's statement after the summit, the line "Harry and Meghan have made clear that they do not want to be reliant on public funds in their new lives" is carefully phrased, i.e.they "do not want" rather than "they will not" be reliant on public funds. A world of difference.

Note reports Prince Charles has given them huge sums of money of "his own" in addition to Duchy funds.
abbyh said…

Cat's Meow I saw that. my thoughts: needs to pull out her mother's support (hint: the friends are no longer supporting her publically) to leave GB behind, anxiety attacks about her future and the continued pitch that being miserable behind the scenes was very real and sad that no one was asking her how she felt.

If I did half the things she did for the last 2+ years, I would be having anxiety attacks over how I screwed my future up that it wouldn't be what I dreamed and wanted it to be. She could have had almost everything (not William or Queen Consort) but almost everything.

Poor poor M. major victim from all sides or so we are to believe. (as if the SA whinamentary didn't get enough support so let me keep trying). As some point, people notice how much the pity card is played and they stop responding to it.

no titles? She usually is very precise but ... as she said, still work to be done.
Liver Bird said…
Another thing - as mentioned above, Harry has an engagement in London on Thursday.

Perhaps they want to postpone any major announcement until after then?
Humor Me said…
The announcement leaves much unsaid:

They are referred to as Harry and Meghan. One can hope the titles have been taken away and HE is back to Prince Henry/ Harry.

Two hour meeting is a short meeting. Makes one wonder if Harry truly understands the financial implications of leaving.
The taxes. Merciful God in Heaven - the taxes will eat through his inheritance in a few years.
IF they are merchandizing, how will it affect the Royal Family.
The place in the line of succession. .....I would say he is out. One can hope.

Harry - SMH.
abbyh said…

How will her refusal to return impact her lawsuit?
It's over.

I was in my darkened room & all but the crucial bits - will know more at 6pm (local time now 5.39)

Is the Queen killing them with sugar & honey? Charles to pick up the bill from personal account, over & above Duchy cash, as has done all all along.

Transition period in Canada, warned of tax traps , respects their wish to leave blah, blah.

Is C's health OK? How long before it's W's pidgin?

Try BBC News 24 live online in 16/17 mins time
Glow W said…
@Liver Bird I thought that too. As to not overshadow the RF engagements for the rest of the week, any final decisions will be released on Friday or after Harry’s last engagement this week.
Liver Bird said…
@Ava

"Re: the Queen's statement after the summit, the line "Harry and Meghan have made clear that they do not want to be reliant on public funds in their new lives" is carefully phrased, i.e.they "do not want" rather than "they will not" be reliant on public funds. A world of difference."

That's true.

However, another way of looking at it might be to say that HM is basically putting the responsibility back on the Harkles. So she's not saying 'we will not allow them to use any public money', she's saying 'they want not to have any public money'. So if it turns out - and that's a big 'if' - that all public funding, incl security, is taken away, she can always say 'Well, this is what you wanted, isn't it?'

Although as I mentioned above, the royals wouldn't consider Duchy funds to be 'public' (although many would disagree) so may not make such a huge difference in practice.
Maggie said…
If I was the Cambridges I'd be seriously considering whether or not to stick with the tedious royal treadmill.

To treat Harry so generously and bow down to the repulsive wife is to treat those who have taken their duties seriously absolutely shoddily.

Perhaps HMQ is referencing the parable of the prodigal son? Wonder what they'll demand next.

I'm afraid the Queen isn't fit for the role.
Camper said…
Huh, whilst feeling vulnerable whilst pregnant and then a new mother, not sleeping blah blah, she managed to stride around like a show pony. The victim storyline is going to get boring fast. Note in the Doria Ragland article her friend says she wants a country home near Whistler AND a house in Toronto!! Who’s paying for them?
Glow W said…
I suspect they will only be able to be in Canada for 163 days or less(or whatever it is that is the day the tax situation kicks in). Otherwise, it would just be stupid unless there are loopholes they can take advantage of.

I don’t care how rich you are, no one wants to give taxes to 2-3 governments.
SwampWoman said…
I can hear Harry now on the phone to MM "Well, yes, I told them exactly what our demands are. I read them from the note that you sent. Say, would you pay for my plane ticket? My credit card isn't working, and nobody is answering their phone, guess they're busy."
The Queen’s statement also said, she’s agreed they can quit as royals, and split their time between Britain and Canada during the transitional period.

I noted the word ‘quit’, no mention of being part time royals, and I also don’t assume splitting their time between countries means ‘working’ either.
Glow W said…
@raspberry, the word quit is not in the statement
Unknown said…
Long time lurker, first time poster. I just want
to share an observation about sussexroyal. The first time I saw it, I focused on the last part. exroyal. You could even do some mental gymnastics to make it mean us ex royal. Play on words? Unconsciously revealing their plan all along? Who knows with these two.

Sorry folks, I'm behind the times. I hadn't found the end of the thread. Posted old stuff.
none said…
Well one thing's for certain...MM is never going back to the UK.
Liver Bird said…
"I noted the word ‘quit’, no mention of being part time royals, and I also don’t assume splitting their time between countries means ‘working’ either."

I don't think she uses the word 'quit'?

And "we preferred them to remain full time working royals but understand wish to live more independent while remaining valued part of the family" could be interpreted to mean they could have a 'hybrid' role though I don't see how this could work in practice.

I also think the first part of the sentence is significant - she is making it clear that this is the Harkles' decision and was in no way imposed upon them, as the sugars would have you believe.
Glow W said…
Maybe transitional period means “the time in which Harry leaves, they get divorced and he comes back”?
abbyh said…

Raspberry Ruffle

I noted the word ‘quit’, no mention of being part time royals, and I also don’t assume splitting their time between countries means ‘working’ either.

nice catch

If BP is having a lot of difficulty trying to contain them when their office is local, having a second office far away would be even more undoable.
Maggie said…
HMQ has totally disrespected the public. I really think she's lost it and the monarchy is on borrowed time.
NeutralObserver said…
So many posts, I can't keep up.

@KnitWit. I read somewhere, In a reliable, 'real' news source, not a Markle-skeptic blog, IIRC, that Archbishop Justin Welby was the one who arranged for the clergyman who officiated at the Harkle wedding. I remember thinking he was a bit of a 'holy roller' or overly excitable, but they exist here in the states in both black & white congregations. Welby may have thought him refreshingly novel, & not realized how the man would come across on tv. One of my kids was christened by a gay, black Episcopal clergyman many years ago, he was much more subdued. My guess is that the Episcopal Church is trying to woo black parishioners in elevating Rev. Curry (I finally remembered his name!) to the position of Bishop, & good for them.

@MobileMom, I remember reading in the DM, so may have been untrue, that poor Doria was terrified because she had been told to never speak to the press or even to her family & friends about Harkle stuff. No idea whether this was because she had been pressured by Megs, or the RF, or if it was completely untrue. Whatever the case, she has been very discreet.
SwampWoman said…
Camper said...
Huh, whilst feeling vulnerable whilst pregnant and then a new mother, not sleeping blah blah, she managed to stride around like a show pony. The victim storyline is going to get boring fast. Note in the Doria Ragland article her friend says she wants a country home near Whistler AND a house in Toronto!! Who’s paying for them?


I think Doria Ragland's 'friend' is code for MM. Perhaps that is her new demand for removing The Claw (insert TM symbol here) from Harry's back.
ALICE FRANCE said…
I don't think Meghan is in a depressed state, that she's had a difficult life in the royal family, that the tabloids have persecuted..... etc. She's playing the role of a victim, a fragile woman and a mother who wants to protect her child. All of this is a scenario. She had only one objective: to leave the United Kingdom, to renounce her royal obligations and to be able to live free and in luxury. Today, it seems that the royal family has fallen into the trap.
Portcitygirl said…
Looks like all the demands were met. The only hope now is if they are just waiting it out. The divorce that is. Also, I think she/they are very aware of PH's mental health. There is no doubt that she wants to be bigger them the Monarch and set up her own court from whence she
rules. Where she will land remains to be seen. I still feel she is gearing up to run for political office in California
We have to ask ourselves. Why are all the top dem players sniffing around her and Harry? I can guess it's not because they love him as his own blood family does.
@tatty, that’s what was reported here, they are leaving, so it’s agreed they can quit.

However, there’s a period of transition, what’s finally agreed remains unsaid IMO.
SwampWoman said…
Alice France says: She had only one objective: to leave the United Kingdom, to renounce her royal obligations and to be able to live free and in luxury. Today, it seems that the royal family has fallen into the trap.

I'm not sure where you are getting that information. From HM's statement, no details have been worked out yet except there will be no public funding.

I also do not think Harry understands taxes. Welcome to the jungle, it will be short and brutal.
Glow W said…
@raspberry it’s not in the statement from the queen, that is what I meant. Yes, it’s is vague what “valued members of the family” means and it does sound like they won’t be lesser working royals. That allows them to merch, I suppose??? Can’t wait until Thursday/Friday...
Jen said…
I'm not sure why everyone believes that all of their demands have been met. The only message that I got was that the Queen understands that they want to live abroad and that they want to step away from Royal duties and that they will do so without Public Funding. That doesn't sound to me like all of their demands have been met. I think we need to just wait until everything has been hashed out and details have been shared before we start disrespecting the Queen.
Ròn said…
Just seen the statement- clear as mud. Surely the BRF don't think they can send H & M out on any public engagements ?? You'd be able to hear the boos from space.
Liver Bird said…
Not sure why eeryone is so convinced that the Harkles 'won'? What is there in the statement to suggest that? It reads very ambiguously to me, no doubt deliberately so.
SwampWoman said…
Holy guacamole at her delusion that she can be bigger than or equal to Jeff Bezos. He will be a billionaire until the NEXT retail revolution comes along and then, if the Amazon business model can't be adjusted to match those pesky start ups in a timely fashion, it too will enter the history books as a closed company. (But he will likely have sold his stock and moved on well before that time because he will have lots of people doing long-term planning*.)

I do not think that she has the business acumen to run with the big dogs.

*I prefer the stress-free life of rocking on the porch, myself, and having a small enough company so that I can work when I want.
The Cat's Meow said…
Agree with @Jen and @Liver Bird that there is nothing to prove that the Harkles got what they wanted. In fact, the recent "report" from "Doria" could actually mean the opposite.

Agree that it is likely no specifics will come out until Harry's final engagement. Whether they are holding back on purpose or maybe nothing is actually decided...who knows?

Obviously I lied. I am still getting nothing done ;)
Hikari said…
Just arrived to my computer and do have to make a serious show of doing work today. I spent most of Friday on this saga and over the weekend via my demonic phone.

I can't comment on any announcement until I can read it/them and all the comments I missed this morning (PM for Harry . . I was watching the clock and glad I was not him today.)

You all might be as amused by this as I was . . I listen to pop radio while getting ready for work. Wondering if my local DJ has been following this, or it's just my obsessional paranoia speaking, but, I kid you not . . in quick succession, in the space of 20 minutes, this was the playlist as the minutes ticked down to the end of the Sandringham Showdown:

DON'T GO CHASING WATERFALLS (This means you, Haz, you thickie)
A lonely mother gazing out of her window
Staring at a son that she just can't touch
If at any time he's in a jam she'll be by his side
But he doesn't realize he hurts her so much
But all the praying just ain't helping at all
'Cause he can't seem to keep his self out of trouble
So, he goes out and he makes his money the best way he know how
Another body laying cold in the gutter
Listen to me
Don't go chasing waterfalls
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all
But I think you're moving too fast
Little precious has a natural obsession for temptation
But he just can't see
She give him loving that his body can't handle
But all he can say is, "Baby, it's good to me"
One day he goes and takes a glimpse in the mirror
But he doesn't recognize his own face
His health is fading and he doesn't know why
Three letters took him to his final resting place
Y'all don't hear me
Don't go chasing waterfalls
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all
But I think you're moving too fast
I seen rainbow yesterday
But too many storms have come and gone
Leavin' a trace of not on God-given ray
Is it because my life is ten shades of gray
I pray all ten fade away
Seldom praise Him for the sunny days
And like his promise is true
Only my faith can undo
The many chances I blew
To bring my life to anew
Clear blue and unconditional skies
Have dried the tears from my eyes
No more lonely cries
My only bleedin' hope
Is for the folk who can't cope
Wit such an endurin' pain
That it keeps 'em in the pourin' rain
Who's to blame
For tootin' caine in your own vein
What a shame
You shoot and aim for someone else's brain
You claim the insane
And name this day in time
For fallin prey to crime
I say the system got you victim to your own mind
Dreams are hopeless aspirations
In hopes of comin' true
Believe in yourself
The rest is up to me and you
Don't go chasing waterfalls
Please stick to the rivers and the lakes that you're used to
I know that you're gonna have it your way or nothing at all
But I think you're moving too fast

******

Hikari said…
Next up was one from the Biebs and Harry buddy Ed Sheeran. Makes me wonder if Ed knew something:

HELL, YEAH (Harry's Theme)
I'm at a party I don't wanna be at
And I don't ever wear a suit and tie
Wonderin' if I could sneak out the back
Nobody's even lookin' me in my eyes
Then you take my hand
Finish my drink, say, "Shall we dance?" Hell, yeah
You know I love you, did I ever tell you?
You make it better like that
Don't think I fit in at this party
Everyone's got so much to say, yeah
I always feel like I'm nobody, mm
Who wants to fit in anyway?
'Cause I don't care when I'm with my baby, yeah
All the bad things disappear
And you're making me feel like maybe I am somebody
I can deal with the bad nights
When I'm with my baby, yeah
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh
'Cause I don't care, as long as you just hold me near
You can take me anywhere
And you're making me feel like I'm loved by somebody
I can deal with the bad nights
When I'm with my baby, yeah
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh
We at a party we don't wanna be at
Tryna talk, but we can't hear ourselves
Read your lips, I'd rather kiss 'em right back
With all these people all around
I'm crippled with anxiety
But I'm told it's where I'm supposed to be
You know what? It's kinda crazy 'cause I really don't mind
And you make it better like that
Don't think we fit in at this party
Everyone's got so much to say, oh yeah, yeah
When we walked in, I said I'm sorry, mm
But now I think that we should stay
'Cause I don't care when I'm with my baby, yeah
All the bad things disappear
Yeah, you're making me feel like maybe I am somebody
I can deal with the bad nights when I'm with my baby, yeah
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (oh yeah, yeah, yeah)
'Cause I don't care as long as you just hold me near
You can take me anywhere
And you're making me feel like I'm loved by somebody
I can deal with the bad nights when I'm with my baby, yeah
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (no)
I don't like nobody but you
It's like you're the only one here
I don't like nobody but you
Baby, I don't care
I don't like nobody but you
I hate everyone here
I don't like nobody but you
Baby, yeah
'Cause I don't care (don't care) when I'm with my baby, yeah (oh yeah)
All the bad things disappear (disappear)
And you're making me feel like maybe I am somebody (maybe I'm somebody)
I can deal with the bad nights (with the bad nights)
When I'm with my baby, yeah
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh (oh yeah, yeah, yeah)
'Cause I don't care as long as you just hold me near (me near)
You can take me anywhere (anywhere, anywhere)
And you're making me feel like I'm loved by somebody (I'm loved by somebody)
I can deal with the bad nights (yeah, yeah, yeah)
When I'm with my baby, yeah (oh)
Ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh, ooh

Only, Haz, you were so wrong about this, weren't you?

******
Hikari said…
Next up, and you will really appreciate this one, Nuttiers . .

EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE (I'll Be Watching You) (William's ode to Meghan. He's tight with MI6 now)
Every breath you take and every move you make
Every bond you break, every step you take, I'll be watching you
Every single day and every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay, I'll be watching you
Oh, can't you see you belong to me
How my poor heart aches with every step you take
Every move you make, and every vow you break
Every smile you fake, every claim you stake, I'll be watching you


(Harry chimes in for this bit)
Since you've gone I've been lost without a trace
I dream at night, I can only see your face
I look around but it's you I can't replace
I feel so cold and I long for your embrace
I keep crying, "Baby, baby, please"
Oh, can't you see you belong to me
How my poor heart aches with every step you take

(William resumes)
Every move you make and every vow you break
Every smile you fake, every claim you stake, I'll be watching you
Every move you make, every step you take, I'll be watching you
I'll be watching you
Every breath you take and every move you make
Every bond you break, every step you take (I'll be watching you)
Every single day, every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay (I'll be watching you)
Every move you make, every vow you break
Every smile you fake, every claim you stake (I'll be watching you)
Every single day, every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay (I'll be watching you)
Every breath you take, every move you make
Every bond you break, every step you take (I'll be watching you)
Every single day, every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay (I'll be watching you)
Every move you make, every vow you break
Every smile you fake, every claim you stake (I'll be watching you)
Every single day, every word you say
Every game you play, every night you stay, I'll be watching you

********
Hikari said…

Next was, not kidding . .

1999 (The Dumbartons' Lament)

I was dreamin' when I wrote this
Forgive me if it goes astray
But when I woke up this mornin'
Could have sworn it was Judgment Day<<<<<------Love this part!
The sky was all purple
There were people runnin' everywhere
Tryin' to run from the destruction
You know I didn't even care
They say two thousand zero, zero
Party over
Oops, out of time
So tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1999
I was dreamin' when I wrote this
So sue me if I go too fast
But life is just a party
And parties weren't meant to last
War is all around us
My mind says prepare to fight
So if I gotta die
I'm gonna listen to my body tonight, yeah
They say two thousand zero, zero
Party over
Oops, out of time
So tonight I'm gonna party like it's 1999
Yeah
Let me tell you somethin'
If you didn't come to party
Don't bother knockin' on…

********

Finally, some advice to Harry from Huey Lewis . .

POWER OF LOVE
The power of love is a curious thing
Make a one man weep, make another man sing
Change a heart to a little white dove
More than a feeling, that's the power of love
Tougher than diamonds, whips like cream
Stronger and harder than a bad girls dream
Make a bad one good, mmm make a wrong right
Power of love will keep you home at night
Don't need money, don't take fame
Don't need no credit card to ride this train
It's strong and it's sudden and it's cruel sometimes
But it might just save your life
That's the power of love
That's the power of love
First time you feed it might make you sad
Next time you feed it might make you mad
But you'll be glad baby when you've found
That's the power that makes the world go round
Don't need money, don't take fame
Don't need no credit card to ride this train
It's strong and it's sudden and it's cruel sometimes
But it might just save your life
They say that all in love is fair
Yeah but you don't care
But you know what to do
When it gets hold of you
And with a little help from above
You feel the power of love
You feel the power of love
Can you feel it?
Don't take money, don't take fame
Don't need no credit card to ride this train
Tougher than diamonds and stronger than steel
You won't feel it until you feel
You feel the power, feel the power of love
That's the power, that's the power of love
You feel the power of love
You feel the power of love
You feel the power of love

************

I couldn't believe it was happening, but I testify that this is 100% true. Seems like a lot of pop songs were prescient about the current situation. Maybe all these people have loved Narcs in their lives???
The Cat's Meow said…
@SwampWoman yes she is delusional! And if she actually wants to be like Bezos, goodbye to the humanitarian line, as he basically gave zilch to the Australian fire benefit.

I agree with you...would much rather live a quiet life rocking on my porch drinking all types of tea (American version either being sweet Southern tea or Long Island-type tea...along with British tea aka "hot tea" and or "gossip")

Dido said…
@wizardwench: If he did exist, you can be sure they would be merching the hell out of him. Showing endless pictures of him so she could merch outfits on Archie’s Mirror. He would be an unparalleled revenue stream. I do not believe her nonsense of raising him out of the spotlight. This woman LIVES for that spotlight, and narcs only see their children as extensions of themselves. She’s been doing to Harry for the last two years. His only function is to draw attention to her.

I think MM is withholding pics of Archie b/c is her gambit fails and her Megxit demands are not met, then one of her back up plans is to use Archie as a prop. She will go out and about with Archie in public and demand a cut of profits from paparazzi. By controlling the amount of photos out there in the media of Archie since his birth- she is making sure her meal ticket is in demand if she someday needs additional source of income.

Here is a list of Archie photos that have been snapped/released so far (that I can think of--let me know if I have forgotten any)

-May 8: Archie is presented at Windsor with Meghan & Harry
-May 8: Archie with HMTQ, PP, Meghan, Harry & Doria
-Mother's Day: Archie's feet
-Father's Day: Weird black & white photo of Archie with Harry's fingers in the way
-Archie's Christening photo in Green Room of Windsor with Meghan, Harry, Doria, Kate, William & Diana's sisters
-Archie at Polo with Meghan
-Photo exiting private plane after jaunt to South of France
-Archie with Meghan & Harry eating at some pub in Windsor
-Photo of Archie with toboggan with dangling pom poms as Meghan & Harry arrive in SA
-Desmond Tutu- "Live Archie"
-Archie being cradled by Meghan in airport in SA
-Archie in black & white gif Christmas card
-Archie with Harry in "Canada"

Another point I would like y'all's opinion on... @Elle posted a link from The Mirror of Kate being papped as she drove her children to school. Kate being photographed doing normal, mundane errands is not a rare occurrence. I cannot think of a time since her engagement that I have seen Meghan papped running errands or anything like that. Why? The only time Meghan is photographed is when she is attending a scheduled event. Any thoughts? Isn't this weird?
SwampWoman said…
@ Cat's Meow: Obviously I lied. I am still getting nothing done ;)

Me either! I shall have to catch up on the latest in approximately 8 hours and by that time, the thread will probably take 3 to 4 hours to read.
Glow W said…
Thanks for that @Hikari as I had to sing the song along with reading the lyrics. I’m sure it will be my ear worm today. Good song.
Unbeweaveable said…
So....the Sussexes got nothing and no decisions were made. The only thing announced was that the queen wouldn’t chain them to the engagements rota in the UK.

Any delays in a final, jointly announced outcome will benefit the BRF, since nobody is going to sign a deal with the Sussexes as long as their ability to commit is in limbo. And letting Harry go back and forth means they have plenty of time with him alone, and without her whispering in his ear. She’ll need another trap baby ASAP.
The Cat's Meow said…
OMG hilarious @Hikari!

And I so sympathize with your having to make a "serious show" of doing work today.

Sigh.
lizzie said…
The issue re: public money is that the RF doesn't consider Duchy funds to be public money. Others do.

It seems there's a lot we don't know. But I don't see we've been given any hints about these biggies:

1) Who pays the security costs including the extra ones required to live abroad? That IS public money but saying H&M don't *want* to be reliant on public money doesn't mean the public won't pay for that and perhaps other costs. Nowhere does TQ's statement say public money *won't* be spent on them.

2) Can they freely engage in merching?
Camper said…
@liver bird

My sentiments exactly. They can leave, not be full time royals, it needs to be hammered out over the coming days and yes they can live in Canada and U.K. during the ‘transition period’. How long will the transition period be? It was a very thin statement. Can’t wait to see if Tom Bradby pokes his head above the parapet again, he went quiet fast when Harry was linked to that statement with William. Doesn’t mean Harry didn’t suggest to Tom that’s what he wanted to put out, just that Harry had to capitulate. Tells you who has the upper hand in the negotiations.

I’m looking forward to the royal commentators giving their insights into what they think it means.
The Cat's Meow said…
Oh no @Unbeweaveable (great handle) re: another ASAP baby trap.

Maybe the BRF could give him a shot of "anti-Viagra" ?!?!
NeutralObserver said…
Earth to Prince Charles: Man up, you big eared hippy. Don't worry about American opinion, remember what we did to your Hanoverian ancestors? Don't get paranoid about the Commonwealth, they'll understand this is a family matter, & if one of their politicians tries to call you racist, show them all the stuff about her that doesn't reflect well on any race or ethnicity. Don't box your family in for a lifetime of pain. As I said earlier, if Megs can't merch, she's ditching Harry & Archie immediately, & you can be there for them.
Glow W said…
@camper yes I am waiting (still in pajamas) for real royal commentators, those that know laws etc, to write some articles. Maybe BBC.

Brits, please keep us posted on commentary thanks.
HappyDays said…
Vince said: But their supposed annoyance at not being included tells you everything. They want things their way, regardless of their actual position in the family and regardless of any other considerations.

@Vince: Meghan has absorbed and digested Harry. All that’s left is a shell. He is under complete dominance and control of a woman with a profound case of narcissistic personality disorder also known as NPD. For some eye-opening appraisals of Meghan and how she operates, check out the 8 (and counting) commentaries titled A Very Royal Narcissist on narcsite.com.
@Liver Bird, ‘Not sure why eeryone is so convinced that the Harkles 'won'? What is there in the statement to suggest that? It reads very ambiguously to me, no doubt deliberately so. ‘

I completely agree. This transitional period can mean so much. They haven’t said they will be working royals, no mention of anything specific, whether titles will remain or etc. Just that they can leave. What’s ‘unsaid’ speaks volumes to me.
Unknown said…
Just need to add, I read this blog daily. I sometimes comment but usually don't. When I figure out how to name myself, you all will be the first to know.

@ Knitwit , I agree with most of your numbered theories, but it was the 12th one that stopped me in my tracks. Regarding eggs and sperm, who controls what happens to his sperm bank, if at all its in a bank? The wife? Markle ? Unlimited possibilities what can happen here.

Just as curious as everyone on what the " verdict " is going to be tonight.

I don't think Markle left the baby in Canada. Just my thoughts. She very well could be in the radius of Britain, not near enough, perhaps outer regions . Also surely she would have been seen leaving or flying out.

@ mom mobile , food for thought as you said....which reputable news agency will do that tell all. I doubt any would.

For that Disney voice over payment. I think she was going to take the payment but with all the recent press about Andrew using his Royal connections, I think she tanked that idea and donated the cash.

To me the worst crime has been committed already. Blackmailing the Queen. Markle may end up with everything she desires, but nobody will forget that she blackmailed the Queen. Markle has acheived remarkable notoriety for someone who wanted to be famous.

As for the marriage, I don't think there is talk of a divorce just yet. Pardon the pun, but staying married is Markles "Trump " card. She will just have to get used to organising her life around Harry's little blue pills.
Camper said…
Nicholas Witchell on the BBC said that the transition period could be a cooling off period! Interesting way of looking at it.
Glow W said…
Re: spermbank, when you leave a deposit, you have to fill out all sorts of legal and notorized forms about who gets access to it, what if you die, what if you don’t need it any more, then do you want it to be destroyed or used for research purposes.

CookieShark said…
@ Dido I think MM not being papped is bc she controls her image so much she brings photographers to events, allegedly. She can't have possession of pap photos or copyright them. So she doesn't let them happen. I bet photos of Meg don't sell that well either. Remember the photo of her from SA at the memorial for the mudured young woman? Allegedly that was her personal photographer at work.
Glow W said…
Also, I believe as a US citizen, she can stay 6 months? Or is that U.K. citizen? Anyone remember? This is for visiting. I think they got visas in progress
Ròn said…
The William the Bully story was denied by both parties. Do we think now she's been told to can the leaks whilst negotiations are ongoing? Or will she not be able to help herself.....? Maybe over the next few days her leaks might give an indication of how things are progressing?
KayeC said…
I think calling them, "Harry and Megan," in the announcement is a big deal. I checked the first page of press releases on the RF website, and she always states titles or styles. There is one dated October 17, 2019, and she calls DoE Prince Phillip. I think Harry is in and MM is out!
Glow W said…
Meghan myth is nonsense... Harry always wanted out

Jonny Dymond

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51084706

“There is no application form for the Royal Family. No interview, no appeal, few in the way of entrances or exits. It is that strange lottery, an accident of birth.
But to stay royal you have to do two things. Serve, and survive.
You have to do some service. Some of it ceremonial, and often dull. Some of it - if it involves celebrities or travel - less dull. A lot of it is woven into the civic life of the UK - openings, namings, lunches and dinners.
You have to survive. You have to aid - and certainly not threaten - the survival of the House of Windsor and the British monarchy.
It's not a bad life. It is a constrained life, often unchosen. In exchange for a pretty comfortable standard of living in perpetuity, you lose a lot of choice.
But you must do these two things if you want to remain a royal.
And it's not clear that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex really want to do either.”

(Snipped)
Hikari said…
@Dido

Thanks for the reminder of the paltry few 'proofs' we've got that the Sussexes have a son called Archie. Given Megsie's addiction to Instagramming every moment of her life, it's very, very odd that she hasn't given us a few more photos. His cute infant days are very limited. Pretty soon he'll be walking, if he isn't already, being closer to 13 months in my opinion . . good luck getting merchable pictures from a racing toddler:


-May 8: Archie is presented at Windsor with Meghan & Harry
-May 8: Archie with HMTQ, PP, Meghan, Harry & Doria

The Queen obliquely acknowledged these events, so I suppose I have to accept that there was a real baby on her premises that day.


-Mother's Day: Archie's feet
-Father's Day: Weird black & white photo of Archie with Harry's fingers in the way

These Adventures in Photoshop do not qualify in my book as legit photos of Archie. Particularly the doll feet, as several people close to Windsor say there are no fields of Diana's favorite bluebells in the area. And also that the weather was soggy and unconducive to posing with a live baby outside.


-Archie's Christening photo in Green Room of Windsor with Meghan, Harry, Doria, Kate, William & Diana's sisters

Um. Deeply suspect, this. I believe Meg and Harry sat on a couch with a cute baby but still not sure there were actual witnesses.

There is also the B&W closeup shot of the 'loving parents' and Archie. Ditto.

-Archie at Polo with Meghan

Pretty d@mn sure this one was a doll. Very stiff and inert for a baby outside on a warm day. Bit odd that he did not stir for the better part of an hour. Also, clock the faces of anybody around the Refugee from a Couture Tent City Madonna and her inert bebe, including Catherine and family friends, the Gilkses. Kate: bemused WTH!!! Mrs. Gilkes: profoundly disturbed at mental woman wandering round polo ground clutching a doll


-Photo exiting private plane after jaunt to South of France

Dangling limb limbs on very blurry tot. Nope.

-Archie with Meghan & Harry eating at some pub in Windsor

Archie doll deployed with Minge and Ginge stand-ins. Else, why so blurry? Pub was 'deserted', on a Bank Holiday weekend. Sure.

-Photo of Archie with toboggan with dangling pom poms as Meghan & Harry arrive in SA

Live child. Cute. Very big and good neck control for 4 month old. Overdressed, even if it was winter in SA. 'Winter' means . . . mid to high 60s in AM? Copying Diana's iconic photo exiting Scottish plane in Balmoral for Christmas with 2-month old Harry in bobble hat--check.

-Desmond Tutu- "Live Archie"

Real boy. Socks much too small. 4 month old getting ready to cruise, by the looks

-Archie being cradled by Meghan in airport in SA

Probably. Got handed off to the nanny once out of camera range.

-Archie in black & white gif Christmas card

That's a good one!

-Archie with Harry in "Canada"

A blogger on CharlDuchess claims to be a photo editor and directs us to look at Harry's thumb against the baby in particular. I looked . . it is out of focus and a weird flattened shape. Plus there's the fact that Haz seems to be either standing on or walking on water in this shot.

********

All in all, Meghan, a pathetic display. Showing us candid shots of your real bouncing boy would have earned you so much good will and might have mitigated some of the charges that you are a Liar Liar pants on fire. But you didn't do it. Because you couldn't . .and don't spin the tired story about Feed Time! from your own (multiply adulterated) breasts again. If you were really breastfeeding a child, he'd be sucking plastic at every Feed Time.
Fairy Crocodile said…
Minister of Finance of Canada says "We only pay for the members of the royal family officially representing the Queen"

Oops. Trudeau spoke too soon. Something tells me the whole thing will boil down to who pays for their security. It is going to be a very hefty bill, much more than it has been so far.

Charles will need to increase sales of the Duchy produce to pay for the scroungers. Looks like not many governments will want to risk their a***s by using taxpayers funds to guard two former royal nobodies.
Unbeweaveable said…
@cats meow, anti viagra may not be required. I can’t imagine this is an exceptionally romantic time for the Sussexes. I am in the minority—I think she was actually pregnant with Harry’s baby, although I also think she got some IVF/IUI help.
KayeC said…
The transition will be we are told they are together, but really he's in UK and she's in Canada. Eventual separation then divorce announcement. The only thing I cannot figure out is Archie, but I don't think she has him at all. Just my opinions.
It sure if this has been posted...

‘Duke and Duchess who? Queen refers to 'Harry and Meghan' in statement after Sandringham summit - as fans question whether it was a gesture of warmth or a hint they will lose their HRH titles.’


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7882783/The-Queen-drops-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markles-royal-titles-particular-statement.html
KayeC said…
I'm telling y'all, it's a big deal....long time royal watcher. HM is formal to a T.
Anonymous said…
I'm with @Jen and @Liver Bird on this-- hard to see a clear win for the Dumbartons in this statement. I think Her Maj's "casual" announcement is of the nothing to see here type. I think time is on the side of the BRF because (here's where I go off the deep end) I think there is more news coming about Rach. Her "friends" would not be distancing themselves so directly and publicly for no reason. I think some know something we don't know yet, and I believe it is quite damning. I also agree that Harry's next public appearance might be a little rough.

@NeutralObserver, thank you. I am not getting my feelings hurt, but I just wanted to hear straight from Nutty about whether she thought me leaving was the solution. She doesn't, so I'm not :) There is more on the last post if anyone has any questions on where I stand.
KayeC said…
I also noted that Nutty has been correct with the protocol breaks. While this drove me crazy, Nutty always said that it was protection. For saying, "See, we tried, look what we did for her." It makes so much sense now.
none said…
@KayeC I agree with you about the living arrangements and divorce. It's a process that is being meted out for public consumption.
Liver Bird said…
I don't buy the 'Harry always wanted out' line at all. Sure, he may have whined about the hardships of being royal once or twice, the poor dear, but what moves did he actually make to leave the royal family? Precisely none. If he hated the royal life so much, why did he leave the army so soon? Wouldn't that have been the best choice for him, and indeed the normal one for the 'spare'? Andrew stayed in the navy until he was 40. Why couldn't Harry have done something similar?
Humor Me said…
@LIverBird - I heard/ read that Harry was unable to pass the tests required for advancement. so he became a working royal.
KitKatKisses said…
My interpretation:

"This is stage one. We tried to talk Harry out of throwing his life away over this bimbo but you can only lead a horse to water, you can't make him drink. So, he's going to leave. This is a family, not a prison. After Harry signed an agreement to give up titles and public funding, we ***therefore*** agreed to a timetable where Harry will be phased out from public life in the UK, but not from our family. We don't expect to see Meghan again but you never know because she is crazy."
SirStinxAlot said…
I bet Harry and Meghan found out what kind of deal Andrew got. I would lay odds it's better than the palace made it out to be. They wanted the same exit package or something similar. They could care less what the public thinks.
The Cat's Meow said…
Good analysis by "fabfoxly" posted over at Charlatan Duchess.

One new point brought up is that when HMTQ says "my family" she means her personal family, not official family of The Firm.
Liver Bird said…
@Humor me

That's possible. We're talking about a man who only scraped 2 A levels with 'help' from his teachers. I also heard that the next step for him in the army would have been a desk job but hapless didn't fancy that. Either way, he certainly never took any steps towards leaving the royals until you-know-who came along. What would he do? He has no skills or qualifications whatsoever.
lizzie said…
@Liver Bird,

I thought Harry was essentially told he had to leave the Army by the Army. Insubordination, was going to be "advanced" to "desk job" but couldn't cut it because of written tests....
Gosh, horrible memories surfacing of when Diana died -

HM used the `Granny card ', if I dare demean it like that, in her Diana speech, when the crowds(mob?) were at the gates (stirred up by the Press I might add).

It worked. it was a sharp reminder that there were two young lads up in Scotland who had just lost their mother and who were a damn' sight more important than the whingeing masses who'd been goaded into complaining that she wasn't `showing that she cared' by racing back to London from Balmoral.

Diana died Saturday night/Sunday morning. HM was severely criticised for sticking to schedule on Sunday morning and everyone going to church as usual, with the minister preaching the sermon he'd already planned.

What were they supposed to do? Stay inside & wail? Rend their garments? Pour ashes on their heads? Get plastered? Have a party? No, keep calm and carry on. That's what we do. Go through the motions when we're numb and don't know what else to do. The press screamed as if going to church was some sort of punishment for the boys; at best it might have been a spiritual help, at worst a welcome distraction.

A lot has been made of their being made to walk in the funeral procession. Apparently, it was Philip who realised that a huge gesture was needed to mollify the crowd/potential mob. He, Charles and Earl Spencer might not have been enough, although that would have been usual. So Philip is said to have somehow invited the boys. I can't remember what his words were supposed to have been but it struck me that they appealed to a developing sense of manly solidarity and the boys agreed.

Likewise the fuss about the lack of a flag at half mast on Buck House, mischievously got up by a Daily Express reporter, it seems. My father taught me when I was very small that the only flag ever flown there was the Royal Standard, and then only when the Monarch was literally `at home'. A flag is flown at half-mast to symbolise Death's flag flown above it. In a hereditary monarchy that can never happen - the moment a monarch dies, the next comes into being.'The King is Dead - Long Live the King'.

The Union Flag was installed on Buck House only so it could be lowered at times of national mourning - and to avoid deliberate misunderstandings.
Hikari said…
Wonder if Megsie was really on the WhatsApp or if she flushed her phone down the loo in a rage.

The fact that the meeting was even shorter than advertised, and the Prince of Wales left half an hour early does not bode well for the idea that the BRF signed off on the list of extortions without comment so that everybody could knock off and have tea sandwiches.

When your grandmother meets your act of global betrayal with the reply that she will shoehorn in a meeting with you, her erstwhile beloved grandson, to discuss 'your terms for separation' between her breakfast and her teatime, but your destruction of her monarchy is under no circumstances going to cause her to miss her tea . . I dunno . . I read that as her not taking your tantrum all that seriously.

Harry is either roaming at will punching out walls or they have administered him a sedative.
From this article - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7882589/Prince-Harry-Prince-William-Prince-Charles-leave-Sandringham-separate-cars.html. within is a very helpful What Does The Queen's Statement Really mean

Highlighting two paras that give me hope:

1) "My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan's desire to create a new life as a young family."

A deliberate attempt to display a unified front amid speculation of anger from within the ranks, particularly from Prince William who was 'incandescent' and Harry's blindsiding of him in his decision to quit.

Her Majesty's reference to 'Harry and Meghan', rather than 'the Duke and Duchess of Sussex', as is protocol for official Palace statements, could be an indicator the couple are poised to be stripped of the HRH titles.

2) "It has therefore been agreed that there will be a period of transition in which the Sussexes will spend time in Canada and the UK."

A grey area where the couple will begin to gradually wind down their duties and begin to forge a new life abroad.

Note that during the, when referencing the transition phase, the couple are referred to as 'the Sussexes', indicating they will keep their titles during this window.

So there's that... (apologies if this has already been posted. these comments move at lightning speed!)
Glow W said…
(Snipped)
Historian Robert Lacey told the BBC Radio 4's PM programme the Queen's statement following the meeting was unusually personal, with several references to "my family" and "my grandson".
"It is remarkably hands-on. I mean it may have been processed through officials but this is the Queen, speaking to her people and speaking about her family, and I think coming right through it is the concern she feels," he said.
Instead of using the formal titles of the couple - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex - the Queen simply called them "Harry and Meghan".
(Snipped)

And within the article:
“The Queen's regret is obvious'
Analysis box by Jonny Dymond, royal correspondent
This is a remarkably candid and informal, almost personal, statement from the Queen.
Her regret over Harry and Meghan's move is obvious - she would have preferred them to stay in their current roles.
But she also makes clear that they are still royals and that they will be valued in the family as they become a more independent couple.
There are buckets of questions outstanding - on their future royal role, their relationship with the rest of the Palace, on who will pay what (not, the Queen says, the taxpayer), and on how Harry and Meghan will support themselves.
There's still a lot to thrash out and to agree on. Not all of it may become public.
And it looks like the Queen sees this as a process, not an event. She writes of a transition period when Harry and Meghan divide their time between Canada and the UK.
The Queen has asked for decisions to be made over the next few days. But those decisions may well be up for review in the coming months and years.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51099102
Hikari said…
"Luncheon" that should have read.
@KitKatKisses:

Dear Dorothy Parker re horticulture:

`You can lead a whore to culture but you can't make her think.'
Liver Bird said…
"I thought Harry was essentially told he had to leave the Army by the Army. Insubordination, was going to be "advanced" to "desk job" but couldn't cut it because of written tests...."

Interesting. Expect to see stories like this popping up in the papers, now that the gloves are off and the press have nothing to lose by unleashing everything they've got on this pair of chancers.
Glow W said…
Whoever said they doubt she is in Canada, Victoria airport confirmed they had a VIP last week the day and timeframe she would)@=2 arrived there. I posted the link I don’t know how many posts ago. Maybe last post from nutty.
hardyboys said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
NeutralObserver said…
I think Her Maj's use of the 'my family' is a very subtle 'us' vs. 'them' hint. She's separating the Harkles from 'her' family, but not saying she's disowning them. I think Harry would be wise to consider the implications.
poppycock said…
Maggie said...
HMQ has totally disrespected the public. I really think she's lost it and the monarchy is on borrowed time.

Completely agree. Instead of showing decisiveness and intelligence of a leader, her statement sounds short-sighted and flaccid. By mentioning family so many times throughout, I believe she wanted to say it's a family matter, and the public doesn't count. Even if the Harkles destroy themselves in this 'transitioning period', none of it will be seen as the merit of the Queen or PC. No wonder Philip left.
Glow W said…
I agree she is separating her family from the public.
Rut said…
Maybe you dont have to post songlyrics in this blog? It takes up a lot of space and have got nothing to do with the subject we are discussing.
Glow W said…
Dan Wooton, Richard Eden and Piers morgan all gave opinions on twitter that the queen caved and gave them what they want.
Anonymous said…
CookieShark, there's a bit of a breakdown here re their earnings:

https://www.businessinsider.com/prince-harry-net-worth-2018-4#plus-prince-harry-served-in-the-british-royal-air-force-for-10-years-4

"She was also earning a five-figure income from endorsement deals and sponsorships. I guess she needed Harry to kick it up to six-figure (I read $50K with endorsements and merching)

And here's what they need to continue to live their to-the-manor-born lifestyle:

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-much-money-meghan-markle-prince-harry-need-financial-independence-2020-1#home-meghan-and-harry-reportedly-spent-nearly-4-million-on-home-renovations-2

Glow W said…
Victoria Derbyshire noted “my family” x 4 saying the queen doesn’t want to ostracize Harry and Meghan.
KitKatKisses said…
It's too early to say. The Queen gave them what they wanted in terms of leaving from being Working Royals. But how would she make them stay? It's the U.K., not North Korea.

They are not referred to by their titles.

And to me the most interesting part is where it says "they do no wasn't public money."....THEREFORE, it has been agreed.
KitKatKisses said…
Sorry, "do not want public money..."
Maggie said…
Maybe you dont have to post songlyrics in this blog?

Agreed, it's making it hard to follow the conversation
none said…
Interesting how there are so many differing opinions in the media and online about the Queen's statement.
Glow W said…
“Here Are 20 Headlines Comparing Meghan Markle To Kate Middleton That Might Show Why She And Prince Harry Are Cutting Off Royal Reporters”

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-double-standards-royal
Anonymous said…
OT, but not totally: I used my phone's stopwatch and timed it - at most, it takes 12 seconds to scroll past the lyrics. Just sayin'.

And I'm with the Nuttiers who agree that this was an awfully short between lunch and tea meeting for such a big discussion. This doesn't make sense...
@tatty, that’s not what’s being said on our telly news In Britain. They say there’s still lots of unanswered questions. Reporters said ‘might’ be revealed over the coming days.
Glow W said…
@raspberry, thanks for the local update!!
Sorry, I have an over excited gremlin in my phone!

@tatty, that’s not what’s being said on our telly news in Britain. They say there’s still lots of unanswered questions. Reporters said more ‘might’ be revealed over the coming days.
Anonymous said…
Well, since @Hikari started it lol, I find these especially telling re Harry, and apparently a favorite song on his playlist, and I cut the lyrics down to the essentials for those who are frustrated about song lyrics. I do think that these lines are quite telling about Harry's internal state, but feel free to scroll past my comment as I scroll past many as well.


Looking for Knives
DYAN
...

And I wanted a map, I got directions back home...

I went looking for knives, And I was looking for you

And I wanted a rush, But they're giving me time...

I went looking for body, But they're giving me thin

I was hoping to sail though, But they're making me swim...



Anyway, I blame Hikari, but these lyrics seem spot-on relevant for today, and apparently, the song was used on a show called Lucifer? Seriously, you can't make this stuff up.


If their titles are gone, Rach is out totally. Somehow Harry promising her, "but I'll still call you "princess", Princess", isn't going to be quite enough IMO.

So, @Nutty, if I may be so bold as to suggest a topic for an upcoming post:

Federal Express or UPS -- Which Carrier Will Rach Use to Return the Rings?


@Swampwoman etc. ditto on no work done. I'm actually frozen and iced in today which as just as well because I would have burst waiting on news till 6ish!
none said…
Yes @Raspberry Ruffle appreciate the information about what the mainstream news in Great Britain is reporting. Twitter and internet sites can be very misleading.
Glow W said…
I expect that Harry will go to Canada Thursday or Friday and If he doesn’t, then that would be something to make me go hummmmm...
Anonymous said…
Whew! Raspberry Ruffle! Thank you for the update.
Sandie said…
I don't understand why commentators are saying that Meghan and Harry got what they wanted or that the Queen, Charles and William caved into their demands. I am not reading the statement like that at all.

There was going to be no punishment or vengeance. Harry is family. They are not going to do that to him. At present, to punish Meghan would be to punish Harry, and even then, I don't think they are vindictive people.

No one can force Harry to remain a working royal or to remain in the UK. I am sure they tried to persuade him, but he knows he loses Meghan if he chooses those things (heads up Harry ... you are going to lose her anyway).

The statement makes it clear that they will live without public funding. I still predict that there will be payments made from Charles and the Queen to assist them in setting up home elsewhere (gosh, Charles must be tired of reaching into his pocket for those two). I don't think they will get the ongoing funding from Charles (equal to what the Cambridges get and sometimes more ... the selfish, ruthless entitlement of that woman is astonishing). Income from the Duchy of Cornwall, although not legally stated anywhere, has been intended for the heir (will be next monarch) and his/her heirs. Harry is not going to be king and is stepping down as a working royal and even leaving the country so he does not qualify for funding from this source (and the British people have made their opinions about this quite clear - the people living in the Duchy of Cornwall work hard to make that money).

The transition phase and living part-time in Canada (we assume) and the UK is to try and keep Harry close as long as possible and to allow time to sort out tax issues. Long-term, Harry will not be able to keep Frogmore without signing a lease and paying rent. When that arrangement will kick in remains to be seen (how long is this transition period?).

I think Meghan is going to lose HRH. This is not spite but practicalities. She is not a British citizen, is not going to reside in the UK, and is not going to represent the royal family. (I hope they make a new rule that titles will not be awarded to anyone marrying into the family who is not a British citizen and has nothing to earn such an honour.)

I doubt that Harry will lose his HRH (some tarot readers disagree with me on this).

The Sussex titles are problematic (Meghan really wants this, and she has branded it and trademarked it as Sussex Royal). The symbolism is actually not significant. She was messy with details and someone in Europe has applied to register trademark for the name in that jurisdiction. Megsy does NOT control the whole world (her grandiosity trips her up every time). There are hundreds of businesses and trademarks out there using the word royal. I am sure the press will do the research and publish some fun articles about that (and the BRF will make it quite clear, over and over again, that the Sussexes do not represent them in any way). Megsy also has no connection to Sussex at all, so comedians and the media can have a lot of fun with that as well.

The BRF know that citizens will not be happy to pay for security in the UK or Canada. It is complex and expensive. The BRF will want Harry to be protected (and that includes protecting him from the devastation of harm to his wife and child). I have no idea how they are going to solve this one, but the statement seems to indicate that they will NOT get publicly funded security.
Liver Bird said…
"And I'm with the Nuttiers who agree that this was an awfully short between lunch and tea meeting for such a big discussion. This doesn't make sense... "

It's all smoke and mirrors. Royal theatre. The palace knew public sentiment was running high - and not in favour of the Harkles - and needed to be seen to be doing something. The statement is basically a fudge. Not sure how anyone can see it as saying that the Harkles 'won'. As I said above, I think any major announcement is going to be delayed until after Harry's appearance (his last as a royal?) at the rugby world cup draw on Thursday.
Glow W said…
Tin foil hat time...

What if the entire BRG is in on the media lawsuits and H+M need to move out of the country to bolster their case and show the mental anguish they experienced in the UK. The transition period is non committal and could be the expected length of lawsuit, where after they win, they can go back to U.K. with presumed much milder coverage of them.

How nuts is that?
Sandie said…
IMO Meghan is not having panic attacks and suffering severe anxiety. She is acting and Harry does not know how to tell the difference between soap opera acting Meghan and authentic Meghan.

If one is having panic attacks and are suffering severe anxiety, one seeks the help of a mental health practitioner and accepts treatment.
octobergirl said…
Meghan Markle has the 'full support' of her mother Doria Ragland, as she and Prince Harry quit as senior royals, a friend exclusively told DailyMail.com
Ragland has been 'really worried about Meghan... and is relieved that her daughter is putting her mental health and well being first'
Meghan, 38, admitted to struggling after the birth of the couple's son Archie


The friend explained Meghan was 'miserable in the UK' and 'wasn’t sleeping well and started having anxiety attacks about her future'"

They also said Meghan has no 'intention' to return to the UK to live permanently, saying: 'She doesn’t want to raise Archie there and she doesn’t want to schlep back and forth'
Prince Harry is set to follow Meghan across the Atlantic later this week with no clue of when he will be returning

Now across the pond, the friend said of Meghan: 'This was her plan all along, to eventually leave the UK and build her own empire with Harry'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7881909/Meghan-Markle-support-mom-Doria-Ragland-miserable-UK.html
DesignDoctor said…
@Elle--your spot-on, often humorous, pithy comments would be sorely missed by me!

Who among us (who have to earn a living) does not feel "tethered by our responsibilities?" Give me a break!
Wouldn't we all like to have the privileges, help, and "freebies" that H&M enjoy?
They are BEYOND ridiculous in their demands.
Liver Bird said…
"The statement makes it clear that they will live without public funding."

This is kind of ambiguous though.

Even the Harkles said they would no longer get the 5% of their funding which comes from unambiguously public money - the Sovereign Grant. That leaves open the vast majority, which is from the Duchy of Cornwall. The royals would argue that this is 'private' money but many would disagree. There's also the very thorny issue of their security, which could rise to maybe a million quid if they are 'dividing' their time between GB and Canada. And that is 100% taxpayer funded.I think they'll find a way round this by having Charles fund their security like Andrew does for his daughters. I really cannot see taxpayers either side of the Atlantic being happy to reach into their pockets to support these chancers' lifestyle choices.
Ava C said…
I don't agree at all that it's settled and clear they won't have public funds. As I said earlier, not wanting to rely on public funding is not the same as not relying on public funding.

Referring to them as 'the Sussexes' also undermines the 'Harry and Meghan' earlier in the statement. As does the remaining valued members of my family. The only wriggle room I see here is 'my family' as the royal family has a public and a private sphere. This would indicate remaining in the family in the private sphere.

Overall, it's the word salad we feared.
Liver Bird said…
"What if the entire BRG is in on the media lawsuits and H+M need to move out of the country to bolster their case and show the mental anguish they experienced in the UK. The transition period is non committal and could be the expected length of lawsuit, where after they win, they can go back to U.K. with presumed much milder coverage of them.

How nuts is that?"

Off the scales.
octobergirl said…
I wonder if the Queen will ever see Archie again. Probably not.
Hikari said…
@Rut,

>>>Maybe you dont have to post songlyrics in this blog? It takes up a lot of space and have got nothing to do with the subject we are discussing.<<<

Actually we've found some that are extremely apropos to the Dumbarton Debacle, if you study the lyrics. Haz's toxic love imbroglio has a lot of echoes in popular culture.

Just trying to lighten the mood a bit.
Glow W said…
@Sandie I agree with a lot of what you said.

The transition period is curious. Is it simply a practical matter of giving them time to make money to stand on their own? Does it have anything to do with taxes or loopholes? It is in preparation or expectation of the inevitable divorce (I have always considered this as an option with the caveat that they could make it ten years or so)?

Panic attacks and anxiety: two of my kids have it, one worse than the other. Aside from therapies like the eye movement therapy (emdr I thin is what it’s called) and meds like beta blockers and antidepressants, etc, they don’t just go away. I have had a few in my life and once one starts, there is no stopping it until it decides to end.
Anonymous said…
Hikari LOLOLOLOLove it!

Now I know what we & Kate will be singing after a few too many Contemptinis! Hit it, Wills!

EVERY BREATH YOU TAKE (I'll Be Watching You) (William's ode to Meghan. He's tight with MI6 now)


NeutralO Shortening that to say blog space :) so, re this: "Don't worry about American opinion, remember what we did to your Hanoverian ancestors?"

IMO they have to worry about American opinion because merching. This needs to be a thorough job done and the Sussex Stop & Shops shut down globally. US is Rach's intended market. They're going to blow that up, and I think the merde is going to be thrown at the fan, BRF style.
KitKatKisses said…
They are out of The Firm. Notice "Working Members of The Royal Family", in capital letters.

They (Harry) is still welcome in the family (lower case letters).
He will need someone to pick up the pieces when she leaves him.

There will be a transition time for legal reasons; Meghan will never come back to the U.K. and they are unsure about Harry.
Liver Bird said…
The idea that Meghan is having panic attacks at the mere fact of living in Britain - in a luxury home renovated and guarded at public expense - makes me cross.

FFS she's talking about a country which, for all its faults, is one of the most progressive liberal democracies on earth. You'd swear she was in North Korea. To insult an entire country - which has given her an awful lot more than her own country ever did - is shockingly arrogant and incredibly rude. She is an appalling person and it says a lot for Harry that he has allowed this grifter to treat his family and country like this.

Without Britain and the British people, she'd be just another D list actress pushing 40 and begging for supporting roles in Lifetime films.
Anonymous said…
Agreed, @Hikari, and I'll add, I don't know about you, but I'm Queen of Scroll, tons of things that offend me that I move right on past. I do try to correct completely absurd "factual" statements when relevant, but I leave the rest alone and @ those with whom I agree & can share an LOL. If I'm in a hurry, I just do a Ctrl+F and look for those comments from Nuttiers whom I always follow.
IEschew said…
Of course I also have to work today. My quick reactions:

1. “My family” vs “My grandson and his family”—and n’er the two shall meet. She draws a distinction.
2. “Harry and Meghan” = not royal. I’m with KayeC on this. What happens to SussexRoyal, then? HRHs?
3. Canada and UK “during transition” means not both beyond the transition

I still think the marriage is over. I have no idea if there’s an Archie but I agree with the poster this morning who said the RF would have made damn sure an endangered baby was safe and secure before doing anything else.

Suck it, Meghan. You got a big fat stall tactic, the Queen called you by your common name to the whole world, and your famous friends have learned enough about you that they do not want your association.
Anonymous said…
LiverBird this poor me panic attacks in Britain BS is typical narc 101 and certainly Rach redux. Pity play. She dissed and ditched everything. Alexis (Mr. Serena) nailed her in three tweets.
Glow W said…
@liver bird 🤪😉🤣🤣 I agree. But I’m a thinker so I like to think about everything.

@design doctor seriously. DH grew up poor (2nd generation American) and I grew up with mentally ill parents who had spending issues where our home and our lives were always in jeopardy. Not a good way to live. This is why DH and I are overachievers and yes, are teachers to our jobs and our responsibilities. DH is a workaholic. I’m a hustler, but I find balance between my side jobs and doing things like sitting here in pajamas obsessing about people who have nothing to do with me).

My eldest I should have named Harry, except he is super intelligent. Boy won’t get a part time job while he is at university. I am about ready to put him in a car and drive him up and down the highway (big city) and make him go in each establishment asking if they need help. This kid enjoys a relaxing lifestyle with no stress. Has zero drive to get off the meal ticket. We are about to come down hard on him, but he is the one with extreme anxiety, so I do feel for the RF with having a somewhat delicate situation to deal with. This kid is going to be late to launch, and I have admitted that I feel he is going to need a type A woman/mother to marry...Uugh.
Hikari said…
@octobergirl,

>>>I wonder if the Queen will ever see Archie again. Probably not.<<<

An even better question is "I wonder if anybody will ever see Archie again?'

I am in the school of thought that thinks that Meghan hightailed it out of Britain with her her filched couture and wigs, but no Archie. I might be wrong, but in my view, if a demonstrably unstable and vindictive woman had a vulnerable baby 4500 miles away from his Royal family, I would think they would play softly, softly catchee monkey with her and at least pretend to go along with her demands in order to get the baby back.

I have yet to read Archie being a salient talking point in these discussions, though it may resurface again in a divorce. If someone as negligent as Meg had control of the baby, thee talks would have gone more her way to make sure she did not harm the baby in retaliation.

Yes, I believe she would do that.

I do not believe the Harkles were permitted to take an infant out of the UK on an extended break to God knows where and the attendant security nightmare. One posed photo of the baby and Harry does not prove he was there then or is there now.

Still waiting for the full truth about Archie Mountbatten-Windsor. When the BRF releases what they know about him, that will be the Kraken.
Sandie said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Glow W said…
*are teathered not teachers
KitKatKisses said…
LadyGrayhound 93 on Tumblr has a picture of a newspaper showing Meghan arriving at Canada House and saying "she formally filed her application for asylum."

Yours truly guessed last week that Meghan was filing for asylum. You have to do that at the embassy in the country where you were last in residence.

Does not surprise me at all.
Glow W said…
Re: the kracken

Read me out...

If Harry and Archie stay in the line of succession, there will be no Kraken released. Suppose Charles gets cancer or has a heart attack and dies either before his kingship or shortly after. William becomes king. Like PP’s sister, what if (GOD FORBID) they all fly together and the plane crashes. Harry and Archie are now up. In this far fetched but theoretically possible scenario, Archie would become king one day.

They will never release the Kracken because of this.

If Archie was 20th in line, maybe.
KitKatKisses said…
Tatty, the monarch and the heir are not allowed to travel together.
Glow W said…
KitKatKisses notice there was no link or no reference to where that photo description came from. I suspect it was made up. If you find it, would you please post the link? Thanks.
Glow W said…
@kitkat ok, so they travel together now, but once William becomes king, they won’t be able to? Good!
Lurking said…
Speculation in tabloids that Queen referring to them as Harry and Meghan in the official announcement after the meeting indicates they may loose their titles. Thoughts?

I still think they left Archie (who names a baby that?) behind so he couldn't be kept in the UK. Now thinking Smeg is avoiding the US due to tax issues... the IRS wants their money!

MissyPab said…
On Facebbook, the Duchess of Cambridge shared this.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/465885826856296/permalink/2464133543698171/ regarding PH and Sparkles.
Lurking said…
Regarding the line of succession. At one time EQ@ was 6th in line to the throne. Strange things and accidents do happen.
octobergirl said…
I was listening to CNN on satellite radio in my car and a reporter said that Charles and Harry showed up for lunch. William didn't. He arrived about 15 minutes before the meeting started.
KitKatKisses said…
Tatty, are we not allowed to share speculation?
Glow W said…
@lurking, I believe the IRS can gets its money no matter where you live in the world. She has to pay US taxes on worldwide earnings anyway since she is a citizen. She really has a big tax liability, but I know several us citizens who work around the world, so people do it.
NeutralObserver said…
Queen Victoria was not a direct heir, neither was QEll.'s father. In both cases they family maneuvered until they found someone suitable. If Harry is the weak link we think he is, neither he nor poor little Archie will get anywhere near the throne, if there still is a throne. Harry has shown himself incapable of performing even modest royal duties. He wasn't even allowed to stay in the military. There are strong rumors that he was pretty much a waste of space.
Glow W said…
@kitkatkisses I do not follow your question about speculation. I suspect you read something of mine in a tone in which I did not intend. Please elaborate so I can clarify, thank you.

Popular posts from this blog

Is This the REAL THING THIS TIME? or is this just stringing people along?

Recently there was (yet another) post somewhere out in the world about how they will soon divorce.  And my first thought was: Haven't I heard this before?  which moved quickly to: how many times have I heard this (through the years)? There were a number of questions raised which ... I don't know.  I'm not a lawyer.  One of the points which has been raised is that KC would somehow be shelling out beaucoup money to get her to go "away".  That he has all this money stashed away and can pull it out at a moment's notice.  But does he? He inherited a lot of "stuff" from his mother but ... isn't it a lot of tangible stuff like properties? and with that staff to maintain it and insurance.  Inside said properties is art, antique furniture and other "old stuff" which may be valuable" but ... that kind of thing is subject to the whims and bank accounts of the rarified people who may be interested in it (which is not most of us in terms of bei

A Quiet Interlude

 Not much appears to be going on. Living Legends came and went without fanfare ... what's the next event?   Super Bowl - Sunday February 11th?  Oscar's - March 10th?   In the mean time, some things are still rolling along in various starts and stops like Samantha's law suit. Or tax season is about to begin in the US.  The IRS just never goes away.  Nor do bills (utility, cable, mortgage, food, cars, security, landscape people, cleaning people, koi person and so on).  There's always another one.  Elsewhere others just continue to glide forward without a real hint of being disrupted by some news out of California.   That would be the new King and Queen or the Prince/Princess of Wales.   Yes there are health risks which seemed to come out of nowhere.  But.  The difference is that these people are calmly living their lives with minimal drama.  

Christmas is Coming

 The recent post which does mention that the information is speculative and the response got me thinking. It was the one about having them be present at Christmas but must produce the kids. Interesting thought, isn't it? Would they show?  What would we see?  Would there now be photos from the rota?   We often hear of just some rando meeting of rando strangers.  It's odd, isn't it that random strangers just happen to recognize her/them and they have a whole conversation.  Most recently it was from some stranger who raved in some video (link not supplied in the article) that they met and talked and listened to HW talk about her daughter.  There was the requisite comment about HW of how she is/was so kind).  If people are kind, does the world need strangers to tell us (are we that kind of stupid?) or can we come to that conclusion by seeing their kindness in action?  Service. They seem to always be talking about their kids, parenthood and yet, they never seem to have the kids