Richard Eden has an interesting article in the DM which references an article in The Guardian about the necessity of the passport applications for the kids as including HRH and the last name of Sussex.
Why? Well supposedly this is all because they want to allow the kids to decide for themselves to become a working royal or continue to stay in private life.
The main focus becomes how this bewilders the Palace considering how difficult the parents found it all and then left. As well has his thoughts that this is about maintaining royal aura ("links" is his term) before ending with how a push for the daughter might be as the American Princess might be helpful to her mommy's business.
What I wonder about is:
What or where did they get the idea that the kids would be welcomed into the fold and become working royal?
I am not convinced that was ever an option once they stepped back.
America doesn't do British history quite the same way or to the same detail. Manners or rather etiquette is different. And the clothing is not SoCal or Hollywood where a lot of skin shows.
Sure some of that can be taught but it takes more than a couple of classes to incorporate the how to respond to a situation and not embarrass the Firm. And yeah they can have dressers help pick appropriate clothing but the person has to be willing to wear it.
It takes years before they let even the adults attend one of the big fancy dress dinners (and even then you start with being seated with "safe" people).
This is assuming that the people in the UK want more than just the current royals available (meaning the Wales and the various cousins/so on). Is there that level of drive to wanting those kids in that kind of positions from the country?
And what about the current King or Prince of Wales? They are or will be running the Working Royal Team. They have to be open to this because if not, then it stops right there even if the kid wants to do this. Right now the BRF is making do and still showing up without Mommy or Daddy of said kids.
So ... another question is: by that time (kid becomes an adult to become a working royal) will there be that level of need considering that by then the three Wales kids will be of age. And they have grown up steeped in the history of the country, taught etiquette when they were little and have grown up seeing how it should be done by their parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and so on. Much less guidance to put them in the schedules.
So ... is it realistic to even think that someone can just step in and be polished, able to handle this kind of job with the finesse it requires or ... is that just another hopeful Hollywood script?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
Quickie 🎤
Apologies: Mary’s Boy Child
HRH Puff n Ruff
Longtime ago in BedlamM
her PR team didn’t say
Megsies first embryo
was bought to save the day
Barks now from the twerking whinge
her prince will have no say
And we will know forever more
all was not au fait…
WildBoar
Fitz fits
Come on Nutties
old and new
Hikari please
we need you
I don't know. Maybe someone said something about if the family doesn't allow you back in, maybe they would the kids? to one of them. After all, there isn't a lot of public response (read as acknowledge/give attention) by the family about anything they have done for a long time.
Besides, it would allow the victimology to continue to the next generation.
Because the sussexes have never shown anyone the true birth certificates of their children I can't see why the subjects of the British Royal Family have any necessity to consider the sussex babies as possible working members in any country where Charles III is the King.
Nice one!
Let's see... FitzAitch? Fitzfaintsandfunnyturns? FitzTwerk?
'
The DM has an article quoting Tina Brown (former editor in chief of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker etc) 'In her book Palace Papers the royal expert wrote: 'So Meghan must have been thrilled with it all... right? No.
'She apparently hated every second of it. She found the itinerary of engagements "pointless", a former Palace employee told me.'
The staffer said Meghan didn't appear to grasp the 'representational role' of the British monarchy when they toured, adding she was more interested in 'causes she wanted to spotlight'.
Quite. The BRF wasn't there for her and her dubious causes, she was there for them. Didn't know, didn't understand and didn't want to.
There are many very stupid people in the world with a heart of gold and decency. Harry is definitely NOT one of them. He is just very stupid and rotten through and through so I hope he suffers as a result of what he has done.
I don't know if wifey allowed/will allow H to watch Trooping the Colour. She wouldn't be able to stomach Harry watching William and Catherine and the children, she'd be consumed with jealousy. I don't think she wants Harry to be reminded of his former life, and she doesn't want to be reminded of her brief stint in the BRF. Harry could have been there had he not be bewitched by that trollop.
'just weeks after enlisting the agency'...?? So the video was recent?? Not done 4 years ago when * wanted to bring on labour? Quelle surprise ! I thought she was probably trolling us, if the info in the article is true, she certainly was. At any rate, she was lying.
'According to Deadline since stepping back from royal duties at least 22 people have left their team, with six in the last two months.'
It does seem excessive, doesn't it? 'European communications director, deputy press secretary, director of communications, a personal assistant, and Meghan's social media manager' - the list is not exhaustive. You wonder what they do all day.
'Meghan and Harry have hired some of the most incredible people at the top of their fields, yet somehow none of them ever work out.' Either there isn't enough work/the work is incredibly dull or else it's their employers.
The duo have 'hired Method Communications, a slick US-based PR firm, in an effort to revamp their public image'. They obviously have never heard of the saying 'putting lipstick on a pig'.
Good Hunting!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpgRBY4zKVE
Controversy EXPLODES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kZpNM2zDZs
Thres also news 1 hr old that she's been talking to people about her marriage.
Another take on it.
I watched the second video you mentioned. South Park say their skit gives her relevance. I don't think it does. Fame, or rather infamy, yes, relevance, no. She is not, and never has been, relevant. She might have been on the margins of relevance when first married but that didn't last long.
Yesa, that bump is moving like a bum bag worn in one's front.
He is nobody's golden boy anymore, it would be better that he got used to it because it would spare him some humiliating blushes.
Mammon
Defending her slut drop
not very wise
Accusing the media of
spreading lies
Latest interview with
Emma Grede
Re-inforced our opinion
she’s Real needy
Her Authentic sly eyes
Didn’t hide madams guise
Determined to quash truths
she’s not sleazy
Just desperate, deranged
immensely Grede…
You asked it mrs sussex so there it is.
. . . 'The Duchess of Sussex said she tries to keep her children grounded by getting them to do gardening, admitting they are 'very lucky' to live in a 'privileged' home.'
. . . * 'said: 'We grow a lot of veggies. We sometimes do a little farmers' market stand.''
I suppose this is * being 'authentic'. She won't show the children's faces but let's them sells at a local farmers' market. This is totally believable (sarc). I don't know why she keeps mentioning the children all the time. Anything to be in the news, I suppose.
My thoughts must have been primed by Mr Wildboar's looking for a thin short-sleeved shirt (we'd misjudged the weather and had come with no tropical kit ) and wondering if he could get away without ironing it. The image instantly conjured up was of ILBW kicking over the `hive' of BP .
I doubt if ILBW ever read `Htwfaip', still less mark, learn and inwardly digest its contents.
It's enough to make a cat laugh.
Here's a deeper reflection on the principle:
https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings/dale-carnegie-if-you-want-to-gather-honey-dont-kick-over-the-beehive
Also, there's a picture of Hairy kissing a newborn "Archie" but the photo is so obviously a doll. The fingers look so plastic and fake, and the face is also too smooth for it to be a real baby. Even newborns have small skin imperfections from the trauma of child birth.
Yet, I haven't seen a single comment about these two issues anywhere. Not at the DM when the photos appeared, and not on twitter.
There's so much to keep track of in their constantly changing stories that people are forgetting the details that could reveal their lying.
After all she is the goddess of Montecito.
NO DNA NO TITLES —-
could it be true, has the Palace finally decided to end the deception? If so could it reveal the truth about Harry? We shall see!
https://x.com/MeghansTowel/status/1935261995541876771
To me, the most notable statement is that she claims never to suffer from Impostor Syndrome 'cos (and I paraphrase) she's 100% authentic/ genuine/ and never for one moment doubts that she is fully qualified to do all she does...
* and Impostor Syndrome can't be used in the same sentence. She fancies herself too much for that. People experiencing Impostor Syndrome often have low self esteem. This is not *'s case, as far as I know. She might feel somewhat insecure under the self-assured facade but I doubt it. 'Grandiose narcissism, characterized by a sense of superiority and entitlement, can be a defense mechanism against underlying feelings of inadequacy, potentially leading to imposter syndrome.' That, or else it's the Dunning–Kruger effect. 'The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities.' This certainly sounds like *.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/06/18/20/99506903-0-image-a-77_1750275484398.jpg
It's one of those tricky questions like if `If a liar tells you she's lying, is she telling the truth? ' Likewise `I'm such a fraud!'
So he thinks that his father His Majesty The King is going to do ALL he can to try and create a world where Harry's children are 1) legitimate 2) Harry's biological children 3) His baroness' (that wife of his) biological children 4) and where they have been born through the birth canal of the said baroness (wife).
And that His Majesty is ready to destroy the whole House of Windsor and the British Monarchy to prove all these things for Harry and his wife.
Well that is interesting.
I have no dog in this fight, I am a foreigner, but I am as curious as hell how this ends.