Richard Eden has an interesting article in the DM which references an article in The Guardian about the necessity of the passport applications for the kids as including HRH and the last name of Sussex.
Why? Well supposedly this is all because they want to allow the kids to decide for themselves to become a working royal or continue to stay in private life.
The main focus becomes how this bewilders the Palace considering how difficult the parents found it all and then left. As well has his thoughts that this is about maintaining royal aura ("links" is his term) before ending with how a push for the daughter might be as the American Princess might be helpful to her mommy's business.
What I wonder about is:
What or where did they get the idea that the kids would be welcomed into the fold and become working royal?
I am not convinced that was ever an option once they stepped back.
America doesn't do British history quite the same way or to the same detail. Manners or rather etiquette is different. And the clothing is not SoCal or Hollywood where a lot of skin shows.
Sure some of that can be taught but it takes more than a couple of classes to incorporate the how to respond to a situation and not embarrass the Firm. And yeah they can have dressers help pick appropriate clothing but the person has to be willing to wear it.
It takes years before they let even the adults attend one of the big fancy dress dinners (and even then you start with being seated with "safe" people).
This is assuming that the people in the UK want more than just the current royals available (meaning the Wales and the various cousins/so on). Is there that level of drive to wanting those kids in that kind of positions from the country?
And what about the current King or Prince of Wales? They are or will be running the Working Royal Team. They have to be open to this because if not, then it stops right there even if the kid wants to do this. Right now the BRF is making do and still showing up without Mommy or Daddy of said kids.
So ... another question is: by that time (kid becomes an adult to become a working royal) will there be that level of need considering that by then the three Wales kids will be of age. And they have grown up steeped in the history of the country, taught etiquette when they were little and have grown up seeing how it should be done by their parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and so on. Much less guidance to put them in the schedules.
So ... is it realistic to even think that someone can just step in and be polished, able to handle this kind of job with the finesse it requires or ... is that just another hopeful Hollywood script?
Comments
This blog may or may not be the blog you are looking for. If not, we wish you well and hope you find what you are looking for.
Guidelines for this blog is as follows:
-Keep discussions on the Sussexes. Politics must be strictly related to their involvement. Off topic subjects are permissible but should be limited and are subject to the discretion of Mods.
-Be civil and courteous in discussions.
-Posters who are disruptive will not have their posts posted.
-Anonymous or unknown posts are not allowed.
-We know that some of this is not family friendly. It can be a fine line sometimes on the topics such as sex and sexuality. Try to lean towards family friendly (thanks).
-Profanity has not traditionally been a problem, so let's keep it that way.
-We never encourage vindictive or other harmful actions.
-Please try to keep the conspiracy theories down.
-Do not discuss the blog, blog history, or other posters.
-No personal attacks both direct and indirect.
-Please de-escalate "fights" by dropping the subject. (please drop us a message that someone is treading on your last nerve so we can be aware that this is a problem).
-Please remember that the focus of the blog is on others, not any individuals posting here. So if your name is not attached to something posted, please begin with the idea that what is written is not likely to be directed at you if it upsets you.
-Posts which may be deemed too many flat statements/too provocative or mean spirited may not posted on the blog.
-Remember that not every one who reads the posts is happy about what is posted here. Please do not give out personal information. Be safe.
-Your privacy matters.
-Remember that certain sites require prior approval for reuse such as Harry Markle. Please respect their request on how to handle it. Links to share is a great alternative.
Mods do their best to ensure the guidelines are met. However, lapses happen because moderating this blog is a 24/7 responsibility and we all have jobs and families (and laundry) to care for. If you see overlooked issues, please feel free to message us so we can address them.
Thank you again for all your patience and support.
Moderation on.
Quickie 🎤
Apologies: Mary’s Boy Child
HRH Puff n Ruff
Longtime ago in BedlamM
her PR team didn’t say
Megsies first embryo
was bought to save the day
Barks now from the twerking whinge
her prince will have no say
And we will know forever more
all was not au fait…
WildBoar
Fitz fits
Come on Nutties
old and new
Hikari please
we need you
I don't know. Maybe someone said something about if the family doesn't allow you back in, maybe they would the kids? to one of them. After all, there isn't a lot of public response (read as acknowledge/give attention) by the family about anything they have done for a long time.
Besides, it would allow the victimology to continue to the next generation.
Because the sussexes have never shown anyone the true birth certificates of their children I can't see why the subjects of the British Royal Family have any necessity to consider the sussex babies as possible working members in any country where Charles III is the King.
Nice one!
Let's see... FitzAitch? Fitzfaintsandfunnyturns? FitzTwerk?
'
The DM has an article quoting Tina Brown (former editor in chief of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker etc) 'In her book Palace Papers the royal expert wrote: 'So Meghan must have been thrilled with it all... right? No.
'She apparently hated every second of it. She found the itinerary of engagements "pointless", a former Palace employee told me.'
The staffer said Meghan didn't appear to grasp the 'representational role' of the British monarchy when they toured, adding she was more interested in 'causes she wanted to spotlight'.
Quite. The BRF wasn't there for her and her dubious causes, she was there for them. Didn't know, didn't understand and didn't want to.
There are many very stupid people in the world with a heart of gold and decency. Harry is definitely NOT one of them. He is just very stupid and rotten through and through so I hope he suffers as a result of what he has done.
I don't know if wifey allowed/will allow H to watch Trooping the Colour. She wouldn't be able to stomach Harry watching William and Catherine and the children, she'd be consumed with jealousy. I don't think she wants Harry to be reminded of his former life, and she doesn't want to be reminded of her brief stint in the BRF. Harry could have been there had he not be bewitched by that trollop.
'just weeks after enlisting the agency'...?? So the video was recent?? Not done 4 years ago when * wanted to bring on labour? Quelle surprise ! I thought she was probably trolling us, if the info in the article is true, she certainly was. At any rate, she was lying.
'According to Deadline since stepping back from royal duties at least 22 people have left their team, with six in the last two months.'
It does seem excessive, doesn't it? 'European communications director, deputy press secretary, director of communications, a personal assistant, and Meghan's social media manager' - the list is not exhaustive. You wonder what they do all day.
'Meghan and Harry have hired some of the most incredible people at the top of their fields, yet somehow none of them ever work out.' Either there isn't enough work/the work is incredibly dull or else it's their employers.
The duo have 'hired Method Communications, a slick US-based PR firm, in an effort to revamp their public image'. They obviously have never heard of the saying 'putting lipstick on a pig'.
Good Hunting!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpgRBY4zKVE
Controversy EXPLODES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kZpNM2zDZs
Thres also news 1 hr old that she's been talking to people about her marriage.
Another take on it.
I watched the second video you mentioned. South Park say their skit gives her relevance. I don't think it does. Fame, or rather infamy, yes, relevance, no. She is not, and never has been, relevant. She might have been on the margins of relevance when first married but that didn't last long.
Yesa, that bump is moving like a bum bag worn in one's front.
He is nobody's golden boy anymore, it would be better that he got used to it because it would spare him some humiliating blushes.
Mammon
Defending her slut drop
not very wise
Accusing the media of
spreading lies
Latest interview with
Emma Grede
Re-inforced our opinion
she’s Real needy
Her Authentic sly eyes
Didn’t hide madams guise
Determined to quash truths
she’s not sleazy
Just desperate, deranged
immensely Grede…
You asked it mrs sussex so there it is.
. . . 'The Duchess of Sussex said she tries to keep her children grounded by getting them to do gardening, admitting they are 'very lucky' to live in a 'privileged' home.'
. . . * 'said: 'We grow a lot of veggies. We sometimes do a little farmers' market stand.''
I suppose this is * being 'authentic'. She won't show the children's faces but let's them sells at a local farmers' market. This is totally believable (sarc). I don't know why she keeps mentioning the children all the time. Anything to be in the news, I suppose.
My thoughts must have been primed by Mr Wildboar's looking for a thin short-sleeved shirt (we'd misjudged the weather and had come with no tropical kit ) and wondering if he could get away without ironing it. The image instantly conjured up was of ILBW kicking over the `hive' of BP .
I doubt if ILBW ever read `Htwfaip', still less mark, learn and inwardly digest its contents.
It's enough to make a cat laugh.
Here's a deeper reflection on the principle:
https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings/dale-carnegie-if-you-want-to-gather-honey-dont-kick-over-the-beehive
Also, there's a picture of Hairy kissing a newborn "Archie" but the photo is so obviously a doll. The fingers look so plastic and fake, and the face is also too smooth for it to be a real baby. Even newborns have small skin imperfections from the trauma of child birth.
Yet, I haven't seen a single comment about these two issues anywhere. Not at the DM when the photos appeared, and not on twitter.
There's so much to keep track of in their constantly changing stories that people are forgetting the details that could reveal their lying.
After all she is the goddess of Montecito.
NO DNA NO TITLES —-
could it be true, has the Palace finally decided to end the deception? If so could it reveal the truth about Harry? We shall see!
https://x.com/MeghansTowel/status/1935261995541876771
To me, the most notable statement is that she claims never to suffer from Impostor Syndrome 'cos (and I paraphrase) she's 100% authentic/ genuine/ and never for one moment doubts that she is fully qualified to do all she does...
* and Impostor Syndrome can't be used in the same sentence. She fancies herself too much for that. People experiencing Impostor Syndrome often have low self esteem. This is not *'s case, as far as I know. She might feel somewhat insecure under the self-assured facade but I doubt it. 'Grandiose narcissism, characterized by a sense of superiority and entitlement, can be a defense mechanism against underlying feelings of inadequacy, potentially leading to imposter syndrome.' That, or else it's the Dunning–Kruger effect. 'The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people with limited competence in a particular domain overestimate their abilities.' This certainly sounds like *.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/06/18/20/99506903-0-image-a-77_1750275484398.jpg
It's one of those tricky questions like if `If a liar tells you she's lying, is she telling the truth? ' Likewise `I'm such a fraud!'
So he thinks that his father His Majesty The King is going to do ALL he can to try and create a world where Harry's children are 1) legitimate 2) Harry's biological children 3) His baroness' (that wife of his) biological children 4) and where they have been born through the birth canal of the said baroness (wife).
And that His Majesty is ready to destroy the whole House of Windsor and the British Monarchy to prove all these things for Harry and his wife.
Well that is interesting.
I have no dog in this fight, I am a foreigner, but I am as curious as hell how this ends.
'* revealed a trio of new products under her lifestyle brand As Ever today as she launched a Napa Valley rosé wine, an apricot spread and a new honey.' Well, that's a way for us peasants to 'elevate' our dreary existence, I suppose. I don't suppose anyone will be interested but she'll announce that everything sold out within minutes.
Is it made from sour grapes?
---------------------
If so, she'll have gallons and gallons of the stuff
Fakesfear
To quote the Bard
“Though I am not naturally honest
I am sometimes by chance”
Along with a mammoth ego
and ultra confidence
Deep seated insecurities
caused mammons low-down twerk
Madam doth project too much
Her Truth is plain
Berserk…
Youtuber Think Beautiful: "As ever supplier revealed!!"
Whine and Poses
When is a rosé not a rosé
when it’s been trampled
by her feet
Her minimised teef
puffed sleeves, good grief
Swinging like Tweety
yellow-bellied parakeet
Her rosé described as
harsh smotes of stoned jute
General immorality
lasting tarnish, old boot
Sour grapes, musty fust
her bespoke bend
Mean-spirited dregs
Nasti Spewmante bin-end…
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1liz9k7/evidence_points_to_republic_of_teas_being_as/
Apologies: See-saw Marjorie Daw
Harry Haw-Haw
He saw meggie l’hore
Then she became Harry’s master
Harry shall pay
to the end of his day
Because the fool won’t outlast her…
Whine and Poses, love it! 'Nasti Spewmante bin-end…', your plays on words are so clever!
The best I can do is:
`He shall have but a penny a day
because he can't twerk any faster.'
The lead story for this British magazine, is "Did she fake it" about *'s pregnancy, I would assume, since they have a pic of her in the twerking video looking very much like she has a square pillow instead of a baby bump.
the 3 little puppies.
https://thedustybox.com/2016/01/24/william-timym-wuff-snuff-tuff/
`Edith Home' , the agony aunt, was latter revealed to be written by a chap. Ah, such innocent days
CAUTION ⚠️ The PALACE Ain’t Playing! Meghan Markle & Prince Harry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAuEe4x8otM
Lady C says the duo are worried about the children being taken out of the LoS. Apparently, there are all sorts of moves behind the scenes. She says if they haven't convinced anyone, certainly not with the twerking video, and they can always do it properly and legally. She sees not reasons * shouldn't be bound by the same constraints - re royal births - as other royal ladies. She reckons they're not going to het away with it. Bring it on, I say.
Apologies - yes, I was in a hurry.
`She says if they haven't convinced anyone... they can always do it properly and legally.'
Yer wot?
I can't imagine a way they could do that , except in their own minds.
` They can easily show they operated within the constraints that all other Royal woman have adhered to.'
True, if in fact they did adhere to them but I hae ma doots.
`
All she and her husband (you know the guy who stands behind her in all her photos, I can't remember his name) have to do is publish their babies original birth certificates with the doctors' and nurses' signatures. Problem solved.
I she (they) can't do that there must be some reason?
Or?
On the face of it. yes.
Or perhaps not. The medical staff would have to be known to be trustworthy, likewise any `documentation' they produced. After all, * is a known liar.
My opinion on the Birth Certificate they claimed was `Archie's' is well known here!
Good question. I've looked it up and a site mentioned it was 'for privacy reasons for the baby' (Archie). The DT said at the time of Archie's birth:
'The certificate, which will have to list the place of birth for Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, will be submitted as usual with a local registrar but not made available by the palace.
...The Sussexes, on the other hand, will seek to mask the details of where Archie was born for as long as possible, declining to confirm the medical team responsible.
Notably, a declaration of Archie’s birth on an easel on the forecourt of Buckingham Palace on Monday was signed personally by the Queen instead of doctors. ' [I didn't know the Queen had signed it]
No one wants any medical details or the size of the baby etc. Privacy for a baby? How pretentious and ridiculous. Either * enjoys the mystery and teasing us or else she has some other very valid reason that we have discussed...
Someone on Quora posted the birth certs reference numbers, Archie BBU 479581 and Lili 000443035 in Santa Barbara County.
Breached Birth*
Mendacious mongrel meg
is barking mad
Littering the media
tails of whelping lass and lad
Hellhounding confounding
Janus-faced
Her basal instinct
Anus-based…
*Bitch Hitch
Maneki & GWAH
Scraping the bottom of the *farrow here!
*aka non pregnant cow 🙃
First I’ve heard our late Queen
signed the easel declaration?
Apologies: Loewe and Lerner
My Fair Lady
Her reign it’s plain was mainly
golden rain
In Hartlepool Hull and Halifax
Harlot heartily heldforth
But a trip to the North West
Saw her divest
Bump slipped south
should’ve stayed north…
Yes, me too, first I've heard about the Queen signing the declaration of Archie's on an easel. That was in the Telegraph which is normally trustworthy. The article (11 May 2019) is now under a pay wall, which it wasn't when I read it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ViJrhKXjRMM
Video deals well with the emotional aspects of this very well but
seems to miss the political point that they didn't just `challenge tradition', they've attacked the British Constitution. I wonder if they know that `interfering with the Succession' is treason?
According to https://www.heraldsun.com.au/entertainment/celebrity/meghan-and-harry-wont-release-archies-birth-certificate/news-story/8ee0b6c7d06cc8d07a3c9bd3cebe9b87
"A declaration of Archie’s birth on an easel on the forecourt of Buckingham Palace on Monday was signed personally by the Queen instead of doctors", yet there's no sign of a signature in the accompanying photo.
Did they mean the Queen `signed off' the notice, that is, gave it her express approval, rather than literally signed it? I can't imagine anyone would post such a sensitive document without her having sight of it first.
I suppose Nicholas Witchell may have faltered and given up trying to deliver his commentary from outside the Palace gates because he realised what the lack of doctors' signatures meant - `No signatures? No verified princely birth!'
- but he couldn't say that.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tv-radio/royal-baby-correspondent-meghan-markle-birth-nicholas-witchell-video-a8902271.html
`
DL says SHE suffered postpartum pre-eclampsia and that she is prepared to prove all this with a DNA test and documentation.
Interesting.
Information Youtuber Amber Exposé
'I was once only around 2m from the Harkles. In London, at the funeral of her late majesty. The overriding impressions were that he was unkempt, she was much smaller than she had led me (at least) to believe, and that they (or someone very close by) smelled of cigarettes and alcohol. A strong and quite unpleasant odour in this day and age. Finally she was pretty mean to those trying to help her, which Harry was doing his best not to notice (but had).
And I came home wondering at how huge was the disconnect between the irrational love her few, but highly motivated, supporters have for her, and the small, seemingly malodorous, rather mean person I’d just seen.
Life is odd.'
Bejezus
Missed out on a boat trip
our merchant of menace
Given a wide berth
to the nuptials in Venice
La mare de terre
posing on a beach
Rigoletto Puttanesca
disperate
for bleach…
Hahahaha!
Spindle legged sporks
Took a walk on her storks
To show the world she don’t care
She cares very much
She’s not in touch
with those like the Billionaire…
Harry told in some late night tv show that his favorite scent was that of his wife. So maybe old booze and cigarettes charms him. There has been information in the wonderful world of internet that the baroness stinks occasionally very bad and definitely of old alcohol. The way they look sometimes gives vibes of dirty clothes and unwashed bodies. Their little daughter does not see a hairbrush or comb while she has nannies, so make it make sense.
A google search brings up hundreds of results about the rumours of them using a surrogate, but nothing about DL herself.
I watched the video referenced above, but again, nothing about her despite the fact that the video claims that DL has gone public about her identity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zx1fZ0hApSo
Strikes me as good an explanation as any other.
Well, I was wrong. neither has the degree of curl I was expecting. I find this remarkable, although admittedly H did have straight hair as a youngster.
'The Queen's first cousin, who arranged the Queen's 80th birthday party, allegedly said just days before Meghan and Harry's wedding: 'We hope but don’t quite think she is in love. We think she engineered it all.' '
I hope your health gets better and that Magatha's brilliant writing cheers you up.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14859895/Harry-Meghan-Queen-upset-royal-wedding-rows.html
I was going to write about how many times one can play the FOMA dangling the limited quantity available before most people won't even try to buy it.
Now I'm thinking about how it is an exercise in psychology of how true believers continue to believe in spite of all the signs that they ought to walk away but they don't. They don't want to walk back on the time, effort, their thinking, their beliefs, the bonding with others who also believed and their all that this was not what they thought. This is especially true if the friends they made still completely believe (hello traitor) and if they were ridiculed by others for believing.
Anyway, it seems that King Charles has been courting the Clooneys, so that he can flex that he is better friends with them than * is. They appeared at the King's Trust event that was held recently and were photographed there.
Remember that * invited them to her wedding without even having met them.
It seems that the Clooneys need to be courted by the King of England, not the other way around in this maniac's mind.
Was there ever ONE thing she did not lie about?
(youtube Paula M channel)
South Park episode banned .
Or not?
`Hospital Shocks Everyone Saying Meghan Markle NEVER Gave Birth To Baby Archie'
Another video from Amber Expose.
Without naming the hospital, this loses much of its punch - but I suppose that were the name given, the hospital could be in trouble for the denial (breaking medical confidentiality.) Of course, we all know which hospital she alleged it was. it might just be a repeat of the nurses' gossip we knew already.
May she meet her Waterloo very soon...
I do wonder if the point she is making is that they may end up as lord Archie Mountbatten-Windsor and lady Lily Mountbatten-Windsor in the same way that the Ladies Maria and Naomi Gordon-Lennox the daughters of the 10th Duke of Richmond are Ladies as the children of a duke?
Sometimes one marvels at the existence of that lady called Karma, one truly does.
LOL. Her real skin colour and her fake one, in one photo, on the same limb!
I don't think that's how spray tan works - not do the hands?
Now, while working in the garden, I often look at my protected by gloves hands and think about tan lines. But then I remember I'm lowering my chances of skin cancer and maybe ought to put on a long sleeved shirt.
in a Will, there's no law that says the wishes of the Departed have to be obeyed.
I could read it because for me it was free but I can't open it any more because I am not a subscriber.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/king-charles-pancreatic-cancer/
I mean, they didn't just think up what the Queen's should be after she passed. I don't think of In Touch as really a real UK mag so this comes off as they are suddenly needing to put this together because he has cancer.
That might work though for people who don't know a lot about the UK, have no knowledge of the planning which goes into any royal funeral but like the idea of the royals and sad he has cancer.
I googled ‘the Kings funeral Victoria Ward’
The article immediately popped up on Reddit
Basically saying:
the King is hopeful he will reunite
with haz and has factored the Sussexes into the heart of his funeral plans
BP said plans have not been finalised
and cautioned against speculation
Dis-invited
The King I’m sure
would like to decree
Haz can attend
without me me me
Royal protocol
doesn’t work like that
Convention edicts
must invite the twat…
@Ian’s Girl
Thank you
Hope I give you a little respite
from caring for your mum X
GWAH & Maneki
Cheers, I’ll keep going if you do 😉
Amber Exposé
Prince Harry FINALLY Says Meghan Markle LIED About Pregnancy and HIRED a Surrogate
https://youtu.be/yYak2IAULQE?si=JCyU5n7yhsDlBH9p
Is this a reliable source?? I haven't watched the video or read the transcript yet.
Amber Exposé
Prince Harry FINALLY Says Meghan Markle LIED About Pregnancy and HIRED a Surrogate
https://youtu.be/yYak2IAULQE?si=JCyU5n7yhsDlBH9p
Is this a reliable source?? I haven't watched the video or read the transcript yet.
Well said, Magatha, Maneki & GWAH
As for me, wild boar fight to the death. (Medieval boar spears had a cross-piece behind the blade to prevent a skewered animal , thrashing about and slashing with its tusks, wriggling up the shaft to get at the hunter.)
The boar was a powerful symbol for both the Ancient Brits and the Anglo- Saxons and I suppose it's my totem animal -you can keep your owls, frogs and pussy cats.
I'm hanging on here for as long as it takes for their complete downfall, even if I have to make it to a 100 or beyond , or die in the attempt!
I believe it.
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2025/06/blind-item-7_01203582534.html
It's at 1:11, when someone comments about the Bump.
Hilarity all round .
The first dog introduced to her doesn't want to know, then she repeatedly mauls the ears of further dogs. Doesn't offer a single chest-scratch and she'd have us believe she's a dog-lover. Still, it reminds me of the way she `loves' her kids.
Like you, I'm hanging on in there until their grim end. Mind you, she's been on the way down since they left England and there's no way they can be rehabilitated, particularly Mrs Sussex.
re Amber Exposé
I too have been wondering about this site but hesitated to draw attention to it. It's come up with some zingers but I've no idea if if it's just wishful thinking or speculation. Most of it is what we've thought or suspected for a very long time and, despite the title, I didn't hear anything about Harry saying something incriminating.
There aren' t just `guidelines' about legitimacy and the LoS - it's the Law and it has been for a very long time, no ifs, buts or maybes. It's perfectly clear - without verification of a `birth of the body' by pre-approved witnesses (ie the appointed doctors), the children are not in the LoS. The Law may date from the 17thC but it still holds good - it was designed to deal with the threat of `usurping babies' introduced by sleight of hand and deception.
Is it really the `worst thing to happen to the monarchy in a century'? I don't think so. The Abdication crisis of 1936 had no precedent and it involved a king and our relationship with a hostile regime elsewhere, plus a second-in-line about whom there were grave doubts. These two may be deeply disturbed mentally but they are not needed when push comes to shove and i think the majority of the King's subject would be delighted to see the back of them once and for all.
Harry should have paid attention during history classes at school...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-14796917/Royal-proved-compromises-Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-never-work.html
It relates the story of how Edward screwed up when involved with a film company during William's university days. He got a Right Royal Bollocking
from his eldest brother - it's reported that Charles could be heard on the phone, giving him a piece of his mind, from outside the room.
But the truth is she doesn't care as long as she gets her face in the papers. And she does not give a damn what she is doing to her children!!
So vulgar and so cheap.
That is the best France have to offer in a diplomatic evening???
`Not house-trained' - the perfect descriptor. I look forward to the time when all the dirty secrets buried in her litter tray are emptied out for all to see.!
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1lvx8c2/if_harry_ever_divorces_meghan_would_his_uncle/
I think rather that he's more likely be a `guest' somewhere `at His Majesty's pleasure', following a treason trial, if William has anything to do with it. Or, if he's deemed to be legally incompetent, at some other premises where he has enough publicly funded security to keep him happy.
Youtuber Mike Zeroh Wednesday 9 July.
Bourgeois Nouveau
Fancy packaged molasses
Rosé tainted cracked glasses
Muskrat grapes
pounded by big foot
Bottled bunions no appeal
Nor her
hand grown crushed cochineal
Can help her fomented
brute de brut…
Nanasty
Acidic acerbic
a hoary blown rose
Failing actress
not quite quite*
yoga pose
Downward dog
with leg half cocked
Suffice to say
haz was focked…
*Someone not out of the top drawer
And, we haven't heard from Doria in a dog's age. I wonder what she's up to and if they're still on speaking terms.
She is angry that the producers force her enjoy non alcohol wine just to be able to film anything.
Maybe the Royal House could remove her and her husband from their official site.
In Battle of Brothers (p 318) some of what was to potentially be offered under the Royal Sussex trademark name was to offer counseling services, personal care, support groups and mentoring.
Your comment might, just might, spur me to heave another go at reading `Battle of the Brothers' (borrowed from the public library.
I didn't get very far with it - disliked Lacey's snide tone and inability to apply critical thinking.
I had always written off the whole Nazi uniform as just a bad decision on his part and that his brother had not really been part of it (if at all), but apparently one of the issues was that he faced the whole uproar and his brother skated away. That was a bite. I had been thinking that it was some attempt to throw something at people who were bound by the never complain/explain.
Also that the two brothers had been (at some point) in the same rooming area to make security easier on security. What I remember from his book was more about how his brother didn't really give him the time of day.
I could be wrong but I seem to remember something also that he had repeated a year (don't remember reading that before) so that his friends were in different levels, then the you are linked here with your brother, you have to live near enough to each other and that was a bit lonely combined with the fish out of water for the focus on education/what was expected by the school to produce in the student, trailing after the perfect big brother and then feeling that his brother would have nothing to do with him.
Add in that his brother got to go have tea with Granny as PW was on the monarchy track while he was not ... may or may not have been a factor.
It has been a while since I read it and, unless I am documenting for some reason, I try to remember things but I also know I can be wrong. Sorry (again).
https://www.today.com/popculture/prince-harry-nazi-costume-controversy-rcna129075
This seems a fairly balanced report, although I wonder when exactly it was written. If it is to be believed, it shows an entirely different personality to the one we see today.
I'm not sure how to put this but British attitudes towards the Afrika Korps are somewhat nuanced. I think the Wikipedia entry on Rommel covers it quite well:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Rommel
I looked for an image of the Afrika Korps uniform but this stopped me in my tracks:
https://combatminiatures.org/products/world-war-2-german-afrika-korp-flag-water-slide-decal
Remind you of anything?
BTW, should you ever visit a medieval English church and see a swastika at the bottom of a really old stained-glass window, don't panic! It was used in the ancient, widespread, way as a beneficent symbol, long before the Nazis appropriated it and turned it to evil.
PS. The brothers were 2 years apart at Eton. I think it would be most unusual for any boy to be seen to be dependent on his older brother in an English public school (ie an independent one, not `public' in the American sense!)
The Sussexes already leaked the meeting to the press. Not a smart move.