When the Daily Beast, one of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's favorite PR outlets, reported yesterday that the duo had been bothered by drones over their current couchsurf in Los Angeles, I rolled my eyes.
Yet another fabrication, courtesy Duchess Meghan. Who really cares enough about these people to fly drones over their residence?
Unauthorized drone photos generally can't be sold to commercial publications for legal reasons, so there's not much financial incentive to take photos from above.
(The Beast suggested that some recent blurry photos of Harry playing with a dog outdoors were taken by a drone; other bloggers calculated angles that suggest the photographer was inside the house.)
Even if drone photos were publishable, who cares about the Sussexes sitting by their pool? That's not an exciting photograph. Who can use that?
In addition, if the drones were to catch Meghan topless - as they once caught Kate with long-lens cameras - the photos wouldn't have much news value.
Most of us have already seen Meghan nude from the waist up.
It sounds a lot about the lies she told about paparazzi terrorizing her in Toronto - no police report was ever filed - and in London, where it was claimed she was the subject of a "wave of harassment and abuse" because she is (a little bit) Black.
Meg has lied about so many things, it made me think:
What about Meghan do we know to be true?
Yet another fabrication, courtesy Duchess Meghan. Who really cares enough about these people to fly drones over their residence?
Unauthorized drone photos generally can't be sold to commercial publications for legal reasons, so there's not much financial incentive to take photos from above.
(The Beast suggested that some recent blurry photos of Harry playing with a dog outdoors were taken by a drone; other bloggers calculated angles that suggest the photographer was inside the house.)
Even if drone photos were publishable, who cares about the Sussexes sitting by their pool? That's not an exciting photograph. Who can use that?
In addition, if the drones were to catch Meghan topless - as they once caught Kate with long-lens cameras - the photos wouldn't have much news value.
Most of us have already seen Meghan nude from the waist up.
Yet another lie
My assumption is that Meghan was lying about the drones, as well as the "unimaginable" levels of intrusion in Los Angeles that has the Sussexes "followed every day" (at a time when California is still mostly under lockdown) leaving them "rattled" at the cars "being driven very erratically" behind them.It sounds a lot about the lies she told about paparazzi terrorizing her in Toronto - no police report was ever filed - and in London, where it was claimed she was the subject of a "wave of harassment and abuse" because she is (a little bit) Black.
Meg has lied about so many things, it made me think:
What about Meghan do we know to be true?
A few basics
There's never been any question, to my knowledge, that Doria and Thomas are Meg's parents, and that she grew up in the Los Angeles area, although there is some dispute about her age.
We know that Meg was married to Trevor Engelson from 2011-2013.
Her tenure on "Suits" from 2011-2017 cannot be denied, nor can her blog "The Tig", which lasted from 2014-2017.
Then, of course, we all saw Meghan get married for the second (third?) time on May 19, 2018, and there were a few documented Royal engagements during her 18-odd months in the United Kingdom.
What else about Meghan is absolutely known to be true?
Comments
She is a fraud. Yes, this we know because she said it during an interview with her Suits co-star when she admitted to lying to get her job. "I am such a fraud" are her exact words.
There isn't much to be absolutely known about Rachel Meghan Markle (well maybe her name) and the other things mentioned because she doesn't set any roots down. She's moving almost constantly. Moving onto other things, other people, up and up. I can imagine that her 'friends' don't know much about her at all. I don't think she allows people to know too much about her because they will find out things that she just doesn't want them to know.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/6129031499001/Meghan-Markle-admits-I-was-such-a-fraud-in-2015
People drift in and then out of her life with regularity. (and you may not hear them trash her publicly but you don't hear a lot of them talking publicly about how much they miss her when it happens to them ... other than some paid service people).
She has a number of friends who regularly are willing to speak on her behalf if there appears to be some sort of misinformation about her which needs correcting.
There always appears a cloud of turmoil follows in her wake - family to family, from country to country.
good question
And, she is very good at being able to stand just so for any camera around.
>> Pap attack <<
A right Royal mess
Harry and Meghan's ingenious plan to avoid unwanted press intrusion by moving to the peaceful remote village of Los Angeles has hit up against a few new teething problems.
It seems there's a photo agency based out of LA (what are the chances?) that has been flying drones over their property to catch pictures of them in the garden to sell to tabloids. It's got so bad that the Sussexes have had to call the LAPD five times this month already.
Who is behind this persistent photography? Could it possibly be the same agency that set up the infamous photoshoot with Thomas Markle, kicking the whole 'Markle Debacle' off in the first place?
Why, yes it could! Manning the drones are the Sussexes' old foes (and new LA neighbours)... Coleman-Rayner!
The irony is that if they were still in the UK, Harry and Meghan would have a decent chance of suing the paps for contravening their rights under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act. In LA though, they're going to struggle.
She wears lots of wigs, straightens her hair and also has extensions.
She lied about when she met Harry (Vanity Fair article stated May and then she had them change it to July) Hmmmmm....overlapping living with Corey?
She wore wrong sizes and shapes of moon bumps
She is a terrible actress
Lying is her reality
She wears shoes two sizes too big
She hates pantyhose
She likes to slather foundation all over her face
She loves avocado on toast
She is the "friend" who talks to the media
She loves to hold Harry's hand
She loves to pat Harry on the back
She loves to shove Harry aside and go FIRST
She wants to have us believe she is Diana2
She has the vilest of stans
I could go on and on but for now this is my sample of truths when it comes to MM
We know that she cannot dress properly (in spite of the money spent on clothes).
We know she had a very expensive baby shower paid for by friends and travelled to NYC by private jet.
Her relationship with dogs has had its ups and downs with what appears to be like a lack of warm connection (eg, broken legs, abandonment, the infamous dog walking photo in Canada).
Maybe she should buy a pet goldfish (no legs to break and if she kills it it can be easily said it drowned on its own and she can flush the evidence down the toilet, sorry, 'loo')
The security stories are also hilarious. Meghan has her team put out that they are repaying for Frogmore. Someone (probably Charles) puts out that they can only afford to because he is paying their security costs. They run to they Daily Beast to say no, Charles isn’t paying, Tyler Perry is. Is that...better? They want us to know they still can’t afford their own security but are happy to have some random stranger pick up the tab? Maybe the current random stranger is getting tired of footing the bill and they are on the hunt for a new victim/random generous stranger?
Hello, Hollywood, we are looking for a generous benefactor to fly us around in his/her private plane, let us live rent-free and indefinitely in their very large house, and pay for our security while we “work” behind the scenes on projects that are so secret it’s likely no one will ever even see them! In return we will film zoom videos that make your property look like the worst kind of pre-fab home, erect ugly screens around your house that ironically neither you nor any of your very famous neighbors will have ever needed before, and drop your name more often than a wet ball with absolutely zero regard for your wishes or reputation. . Sound good? Call us! Sincerely, the Sussexes
Megsy ran with this, lied, made the drones threatening and much worse than they were. If she ain't lying, she's just not living.
Her time at Northwestern and at the US Embassy in Argentina are clouded in mystery; I believe she was in both places, but it’s hard to know when. Joseph Goldman-Giuliano may be a factor here.
She took lessons on how to act when partaking in the British custom of having tea; which Did Not include instructions on how to throw a teapot at your staff.
Meghan's maid of honour at her first wedding blames the future Royal for the mysterious end to the marriage: Friend since the age of two describes how fame changed Harry's bride-to-be
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5137785/Meghan-Markle-revelations-friend-knew-best.html
We know she is incapable of being humble. Would it kill her to dress and groom appropriately for a visit to a pensioners' home? Apparently it would have as she did not make an effort--except to merch a dress that clearly wasn't meant for maternity wea
https://madworldnews.com/ex-royals-terror-threats-cops/
We know she hates Catherine Duchess of Cambridge.
I think that's the saddest part of this. Imagine being Catherine, who has always been decent to H, having to wake up every day wondering what fresh hell her sister-in-law is going to put her through.
Catherine and her family don't deserve any part of this, imo.
She is married ti a PRINCE!
She has a ver large one year old baby!!!!
Oh....wait.....
Put another way: she is prepared to put lies in writing
The fact that she is cringeworthy, is just my opinion though.
Ex-Royals Cry ‘Terror Threats’ Hoping Taxpayers Foot Security, Cops Torch Them....
https://madworldnews.com/ex-royals-terror-threats-cops/
Yikes. That article is scorching.
I believe Meghan loves to spend $$ but hates accounting for it since it's taxpayers funded. She also loves "secret" meetings.
We know she left Harry to conference with his family after dropping the Megxit bomb. Whether this was always the plan, she wasn't there and was photographed in Canada several times in his absence.
We know she left Archie over the summer to watch Serena play tennis, when he was allegedly a very young infant.
She has a history of financial disarray as do her parents.
She has a penchant for luxury travel, staying in hotel rooms, but it's nearly June and there's no evidence that she and Harry have rented/bought a home yet.
We also know MeAgain lies ALOT!! I actually think she believes her own lies.
We know MeAgain went to a Catholic Girls school her Father paid for.
There's Video proof!
Always the centre of attention!
She is a versatile wiz in the kitchen--anything from grilling burgers, roasting chicken, preparing avocado toast for tea, or baking a sugar-free strawberry birthday cake.
Her culinary skills also extend to tossing a mean salad and skillfully knowing her way around a banana or two when the occasion calls for it.
Isn't that enough?
And then she packs up and leaves.
Her humanitarianism was fake; just photo-ops so that she could add it to her resume. She never received a standing ovation at the UN. She was not responsible for the P&G protest; it was a class project.
She was/is obsessed with Diana.
She had breast implants which she subsequently had removed.
She is a horrible actress.
She praised her father for years before subsequently dumping him.
She is an-over-the-top flirt who is willing to flaunt her body and is not concerned about the marital status of her targets. (See Craig Ferguson & Larry King interviews, her flashing Serena’s husband at US open.)
She was willing to use her body and her sexuality to make money (see Deal or No Deal, Men’s Health grilling video, 90210 scene, Suits file-cabinet scene.)
She has no problem with lying and shows no remorse (I’m a fraud!)
She can’t stand not being the center of attention and thinks she’s more important than she is (see interviews while on Suits where she lambasts reporter for looking over her shoulder while interviewing her.)
She is very proud to be from LA (she brings this up in any interview that I’ve seen.)
She tried to pass as Caucasian for most of her life.
She spent time on the set of ‘Married with Children’ as a child.
She has spent a great deal of time at various SoHo House locations.
It's to the point where a white board is needed to construct a timeline starting with her childhood, and also a list of all the people who have been in her life and their backstories. All the conflicting stories, dates, information to hide not only her past, but also her present. I've never seen anything like it.
I don't think there's a whiteboard big enough! Well, maybe they can spare a wing in Buckingham Palace....
"We know Meghan and Harry look at each other with love. We know they are physically demonstrative with each other. They had a beautiful wedding where the emotion and love for each other was self evident. We know that Meghan and Harry made a charming reading video with their son Archie - who is the spitting image of both Harry and Meghan.
Isn't that enough?"
.
I almost snorted my tea through my nose reading this rubbish...LOL
Instagram, where she lets people assume that she is the veterinarian in Africa.)
She takes the spotlight away from others (see School Visit on the day of Camilla’s DV speech, her behavior at Eugenie’s wedding, the multiple times that she’s released articles on the day that other RF members have an important event.)
We know MM is enamored with WORDS! Words said by famous people but twisted into MM word salad on IG pages. Words written on bananas. Words speeches, whether true or not. And especially words written with calligraphy.
Words mean everything and nothing, words validate multiple realities, words create a narcissistic fantasy world.
1 She ghosted her family members
2 She ghosted Trevor
3 She ghosted friends
4 She ghosted the Royal Family
5 She ghosted the UK
6 She ghosted Canada.
7 She ghosted Piers Morgan
She also ghosted that Uncle who got her the internship. No good deed was left unpunished by her, nor will any.
@unknown
We may have sugars and we may have trolls. Hopefully they will chase each other away.
It is true that she is greedy and highly money-oriented. It is discussed in a reading of her birth chart, if you believe in them. The reading dates from Oct 2018. Birth charts never change. It is uncanny how many of the astrologer’s words have been proven to be true in the past 1.75 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9alhQJn2-0
The reading starts about Her positive traits, the segues to her family and money Issues at around 4:40.
At the Commonwealth service she, in head to toe green, barged like an aggressive caterpillar through the chairs to edge out Edward & Sophie, who were ironically waiting as politely as can be (they have manners).
At the International Women's Day roundtable she very rudely told the moderator she did not read anything such as Twitter about herself.
8. We hope and pray she "ghosts" the USA.
“embryonic kicking of feminism”
In her cushion.
She loves secrets. The more unnecessary the better. This brings her more attention.
She does not take the advice she pays for. As a result She loses good staff. This is because She knows she is the smartest person in the room. Any room.
Meghan is the source behind the leaked stories. Not friends, not experts, not sources. It is Meghan.
Meghan sets up the paparazzi shots. This is a very deliberate strategy.
Any publicity is good publicity to Meghan. Positive or megative, it feeds her. She needs attention like others need food.
(Ha! "Megative" ^^. I'm keeping it)
She lies. Compulsively, comprehensively, and remorselessly.
Megative love it hehe.
How about Megsist, Megsism, to counter the schisms/isms
we know she loves to use
A Meghan fact: Meghan bragged about her $40,000 shoe collection when she had The Tig.
The irony of that "civil servant in a tiara"-- she never got to wear a tiara, apart from her wedding day, did she?
That's my hope!
$40,000 on shoes before she gained access to the Bank of PC? oh oh my, I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around where you have the money to buy that much just in shoes. If I sunk that a fraction of that kind of money into shoes, I'd still be afraid to wear them. I would take such care of them like maybe just at home.
It is similar to the idea that you need to have all these different extremely expensive purses. That you have to have not just the box it came in but the special keep it soft bag. sigh. That is a lifestyle which is an open ended universe - with that kind of consumption thinking, you never reach the point of not wanting more.
All that money in something which is nice, pretty in the same way as the shoes, but so what? You are only as valuable as your possessions. There's always someone who has more of those purses or will buy the one you were thinking you would get next. Then what? You have to step back on that merry-go-round to try to out do them to get the next "it" thing that everyone will want.
And, it doesn't help you buy a house.
Ah, yes, Joseph Goldman-Giuliano, the rumored first husband. I suppose it’s too much to hope that he and Trevor Engelson cooperated with Lady Colin Campbell (or might do so with Tom Bower).
1. We know she is fluent in French, Spanish and English. That last one because she took English in her 1st seem at Uni.
2. We know she is great speech writer.
3. We know she is a makeup expert because she famously did a silly cutesey video with Bobby Brown herself in a car.
4. We know she thinks she can sing.
5. We know she loves her own handwriting. She is so good that she made money out of it. (No I'm not talking of the silly daddy's letter, but her wedding invite writing business)
6. We know she is 5'6" (As if!!)
7. We know she is/was/always will be a super model. We saw recent evidence of it in pictures published with that bunion article. She obviously does heroin chic much much better than Kate moss ever did. (I still have nightmares from those pictures)
8. We know she is super talented at tennis. That is because Serena is her bestest friend ever. That's why she always goes to Wimbledon. It was also evident from the extremely pained OTT expressions Megsy hammed at the USOpen recently sitting next to Serena's mum.
Oh and also bcz she had plans to have a private tennis court at her beloved Frogmore. She is the best at tennis.
9. She is super good at ballet, tap dance (I'd give anything to see that!!), Martial arts (hahahahaaa...) And kick boxing ( yah sure!). This is all on her CV obviously.
10. We know she is and was always a multimillionaire. That's how she could afford all the endless European holiday I, expensive hotels, yachts, dining out etc etc.
11. We know we never deserved her. She is steeped in such inate pricessness and has so much royalness that the queen of England can eat her hat!
Your we knows about She Who Knows Everything is priceless!
12. We know she is the best at walking in heels. (That's also how she gets to be 5'6" 5'7" whatever she cliams to be)
13. We know she loves peppermint tea. Infact all kinds of tea. Tea, tea, tea...it's all the tea that gives her superpowers to be the best feminist imstagram.ever produced)
14. We know she is a somewhat vegan. She is still trying to nail that, she is just on a sabbatical for health reasons or whatever.
15. We know she hates smoking, drinking or late nights. So strong is her dislike that she effectively banned her Harry from doing that too. Leaving a shell.of his former self vecayleta face it what else did he do before she came along!
16. She loves animals. That's because she is the president or whatever of that animal charity she visits wearing white body hugging clothes. And because she adopted 2 dogs. Then bought a lab while in London. She loves animals so much that she almost adopted a new dog at in Canada before the evil xandaians chased her out. She loves animals so much that she treats her husband like one too, always has him in a leash.
17. We know she tried to modernize the monarchy, the poor lost petal :(
18. We know she has the most loyal friends ever. All of Hollywood and everyone who ever won an Oscar is her friend! Everyone who is an SS client is her friend. Everyone who is a member is her friend. Everyone who has a yatch or a private jet is her friend. Everyone except the tabloids.
- she thinks her horrible handwriting qualifies as calligraphy.
-she's claimed to be a proficient horsewoman
- she's afraid of Shetland ponies
- she didn't realise it can rain in Edinburgh and that water lies in puddles.
- she goes commando
- her `teeth' jig up and down
I want to see that! She couldn't even pretend to enjoy Harry's polo game. Horsewoman my arse!
She would probably fall off George's wooden rocking horse.
My reaction too! She was reported as saying she wanted to learn to play polo. She has been photographed sitting on horse, snug in a Western saddle, on holiday with her father.
As a 5 year-old, I was photographed astride a photographer's stuffed lion, at Cromer IIRC. I still wouldn't claim to be a big game hunter, a wildlife expert or a taxidermist on the strength of it though.
We also know that one of the few true statements in the Tatler article is that Harry and Meghan are selfish.
(I still can't get over that one lol)
I'm afraid she might just have, at some point, even thought Turkey is vegan approved 😅😂😂😂
Put the video on the slowest setting so that you get the time to see every pic. It is a collection of all the pics from The Tig.
This is the image Meghan wanted to portray and the life she wanted, so I suppose it is about as close to her truth as you can get! (Me, Food, Wine, Holidays, Dogs are top of the list of what is important to her according to her IG posts) Have a look and see if you can summarise and describe the real Meghan Markle!
Note:
1. She met Harry before the wedding where she was bridesmaid.
2. There are a few photos of her wearing those bracelets from Harry and they pop up long before the photo always shown in the press.
3. She really did not do much 'humanitarian'/'women's empowerment' stuff and had to keep recycling photos from the little she did do.
I wonder what pushed her to get that marriage proposal from Harry? Was her tenure on Suits coming to an end and there were no future roles for her that would support her lifestyle? Was it clear by then that all the endless work she did for self promotion and getting a cooking spot on a show, a fashion spot on a show, a fashion line for promotion, endless photo shoots and interviews for magazines ... she was still unknown and then she met Harry and took him to her bed and her profile sky rocketed. To get photographed with him and to be confirmed as being in a relationship with him, she needed to be out and about with him, thus to have the relationship be serious. Did she fall in love with her own storyline? Or was it Catch-22 ... to get the benefits (fame and attention and raising of profile way beyond what she was actually worth) she had to not only be connected with him but be seen with him, clearly as his serious partner with the love story; to be seen with him and connected with him, the relationship had to get serious; for the relationship to get serious, she had to really invest in it ... she jeopardised and lost her old life to climb higher and I suspect that she would love to have that old life back, but is that possible?
Interesting:
Markus Andersen features a lot in her photos.
The three men she was romantically involved with for the duration of The Tig (Trevor, whom she divorced soon after launching The Tig; Corey, who she was with for two years; and Harry, who she romanced for how long before she closed down The Tig?) do not appear directly.
* There is a post of flowers she was given on Valentines Day from Trevor.
* There are photos of her in bed with her dogs, and who knows how many other photos of her and photos of food taken by her, that were taken by Corey or by her when she was with Corey.
* There are lots of hints at a relationship with Harry and one photograph that appears to be Harry. (A few posts with clear sexual innuendo after she met Harry.)
It is difficult to assign a timeline to the photos as they appear as we know some things are not in sequence. I don't know if that was how The Tig was constructed or if that is how the person who compiled the video put together the photographs.
- she wore glasses at one point as a child
No one camped outside FC or Northcott for hours to pap their every move.
She was never spotted out and about by members of the public in the UK ever. Never running any errands, never out to the salon or on a run. Never out for dinner. Never out shopping in London or Bicester, ever!
We know she never drove in London and found that restricting and suffocating.
@Alice, I wouldn't put anything past her at this point lol we know she doesn't seem to worry about wearing leather. Using that logic, maybe the leather skirt was actually made out of turkey skin and therefore classed as vegan? :OP
HA! I just quickly Googled "Meghan maroon leather skirt" to double check it was the one I was thinking of, and when I'd got as far as "sk" in the last word it wanted to autocomplete it as "skin". I'm not sure I'm ever going to be able to lose that mental image now! Apologies if I've inadvertently given anyone else nightmares.
- rhinoplasty.
- hair straightening since the age of 16, which can be seen in the pictures of her at that age (while her mother is proud of her origins and keeps her natural hair).
And now Meghan calls herself a black woman and a victim of racism. Incredible hypocrisy.
We know that she is a casting error for the role of the British Royal Highness.
We know that it will only get worse, and that one day we will see her fall. The decline is underway.
We know that we will continue to watch the Harry and Meghan saga, and that will give us the opportunity to share our opinions on this great blog.
Re the Red+Green leather skirts Mm wore - I have never gone online to find the details of the whatever company made those skirts. But many leather goods companies and new-agey companies advertise "Vegan leather goods". How is that possible you ask??? Simple, dear simpleton. You just get the hide of animals that died of natural causes. So you are not endorsing animal cruelty. But you are encouraging sustainability.
PS: don't roll your eyes, fellow Nutties. This is an actual thing I swear. And I won't be susrised if someday in the future we hear these words coming out of megsy's mouth when asked about her love for leather.
'Sarah Hastelow [Mayhew media officer] told Newsweek she couldn't give details of the contact, but explained: 'She's been such a champion of animals and animal welfare. It's always been a passion of hers.' We know she is such an animal lover...
We know MM is predictable and unoriginal.
She posted the photo of two spooning bananas on her instagram for everyone to see instead of just sending it to Harry in private.
"Assassin racist drones". Lol
I believe, IIRC, the LurkerLou was on a thread the other day and introduced herself as "sugary". I think, and man I may have this wrong, but she was educating herself on the opposition as it were. I can't find the post now, of course.
I think it was on the ugly thread and easily overlooked.
I was impressed she introduced herself, and as long as she isn't educating herself with a view to doxxing...or causing trouble....And I doubt if she would introduce herself if that was her aim.
@LurkerLou, you can come out. We'll twig you a bit, of course, but why don't you tell us what you are up to?
Again, supposedly, the chap's name was Joe Gulliano and he came from a very rich Chicago family which paid to have the marriage annulled.
One site I saw in the early days, before her history on the web was scrubbed, showed a photo of him. He looked like your average rich Ivy League type.
Someone HAS STOLEN MY IDENTITY again, and has posted this ridiculous post above about "frogs". I suspect IT IS 'an 'Unknown' SINCE THE OTHER NIGHT THEY POSTED a similar post about frogs and was indirectly insulting me talking about eating tuna and using a litter box.
I AM NOT GOINT TO RENAME MYSELF as I have been 'CatEyes' going on two years and it will only happene again most likely; besides I don't cower from bullies!
I suspect this happened because my last post said to "scroll past...just scroll past". I am not scrolling past this because I need to address identity theft of my name and them writing something stupid and off the topic (I don't think anyone here wants someone to do the same to you).
Its no wonder why the HAMS don't file a police report on the alleged drones, because if so and it was discovered they filed a false P.R. then they would have violated the law and find themselves in trouble, if not have egg on their face.
But then again, we sort of know that these charity/fundraiser fan initiatives are basically their own PR ploys. But seriously, Sussexes fans should start a charity fundraiser for their security. This whole damn mess would at least end. So.much of crying and whining and burning bridges over a burly body guard or two! Urghh ... Enough already! 🙄
We know because we witnessed and/or it is documented:
1. She did not return an extended gaze from the Duchess of Cornwall in Westminster Abbey. She looked down. At same ceremony, the Duchess of Cambridge declined to greet her
2. (Contrast with item 1) Before Harry arrived in CA, she participated in a walk with “Archie” and dogs in which she smiled directly into the cameras of “paparazzi”
3. She said things during her engagement interview that conflict with other evidence (eg, Vanity Fair date discrepancy, teenaged photos in front of BP and testimony from old friends/acquaintances that she was a Princess Diana fan)
4. She participated in a “baby shower” in NYC and opted to use front hotel entrance for herself, friends, and vendors to enter/exit vs side doors (per official report from NY officers who provided security support)
All fact, no opinion.
Bond screenwriter Bruce Felrstein muses on Harry and Meghan’s fate in Los Angeles: Each day brings us closer to that night when Harry and Meghan - without real money and without real portfolio - find themselves invited to a celebratory dinner at the Chateau Marmont, seated a bit below the salt, dress extras at somebody’s else’s film premiere. Dystopian?’
Oh I did chuckle at this piece. ;o)
A bit off topic I know. ;o)
We know she does not hesitate to make undiplomatic comments on the internal affairs of her hosts when on an official visit.
We know she can't be trusted to represent the Queen and the UK when on an official visit.
We know she wears outrageously expensive clothes when making `secret' & `surprise' visits to poor people.
We know she loves gatecrashing.
We know she talks at great length about how HM will make her welcome at Balmoral but she never puts it to the test.
We know she says she has a baby that couldn't cope with a quick flight to Scotland but then tries to show us he can fly to Ibiza and South S.Africa without problems.
We know she hates her feet showing but has no qualms about displaying her armpits.
She does things in secret because she thinks she is just like her BFF Beyoncé (insert sarcasm here)
She sadly doesn't realize she has no waist and all her belted outfits only draw more attention to her spongebob square-pants body. Its the only explanation why she would insist to dress the way she dresses.
She likes to ghost people and one day she is going to ghost the wrong person with nothing to lose in going on an all out tell all. (i.e. Daddy Dearest is coming)
She cannot even hold her own child even sitting down with him which goes to show just how much hands on she is with her own child.
But the cracks are beginning to show.
It's all balderdash,
Tripe, piffle and trash.
Begad! She's now stooping so low!
Marriage of Thomas and Doria (Ragland) Markle
Name: Thomas W Markle
Gender: Male
Birth Year: abt 1944
Age: 35
Marriage Date: 23 Dec 1979
Marriage Place: Los Angeles, California, USA
Spouse Name: D L Ragland
Spouse Age:23
Source Information:
Ancestry.com. California, Marriage Index, 1960-1985 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2007.
Original data:
State of California. California Marriage Index, 1960-1985. Microfiche. Center for Health Statistics, California Department of Health Services, Sacramento, California.
Description:
This database contains a statewide index to over 4.8 million marriages that were performed in California between 1960 and 1985. Information that may be found in this database includes the bride's and groom's names, their ages, the marriage county, and the marriage date.
State of California Birth Index, 1905-1995, published online at Ancestry.com ($$):
Name: Rachel Meghan Markle
Birth Date: 4 Aug 1981
Gender: Female
Mother's Maiden Name: Ragland
Birth County: Los Angeles
Source Citation:
Birthdate: 4 Aug 1981; Birth County: Los Angeles
Source Information:
Ancestry.com. California Birth Index, 1905-1995 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2005.
Original data:
State of California. California Birth Index, 1905-1995. Sacramento, CA, USA: State of California Department of Health Services, Center for Health Statistics.
Wasn't part of their exit deal that other members of the Royal family were "off limits?"
If so, have they violated this tenent already?
another Harry appearance on video
We know that her shoes are often dirty.
We know that her clothing is usually ill-fitting, often out-of-season, and not appropriate for the event.
We know that she wears lots of jewelry, especially gold rings. We also know that she redesigned her engagement ring. We know that she was called out for merching Jennifer Meyer's jewelry.
We know that she doesn't adhere to the simplest of royal protocol: she only wore hosiery at Charles' garden party, she did not wear a hat when she traveled with HM (let alone not knowing how to get into the car), she wore that off-the-shoulder pink suit at Trooping the Color.
We know that she doesn't adhere to protocol when attending events. Cutting in front of Harry, insulting the Moroccan King, walking in front of the woman (can't remember her title) when she was wearing the red dress with the tag hanging out.
I read the Catherine the Great article in Tatler - very nasty and mean-spirited attack on Kate and her family. This one has MM's dirty fingerprints all over it. Consider this: the author of the article, Anna Pasternak, is a former co-worker and good friend of Vanessa Mulroney, who is the sister-in-law of Jessica Mulroney (aka MM's current bestie).
I some how doubt it was commissioned by Meghan herself. It's too far fetched. It is however very reminiscent of the waiting kaity period where the tabloids were vicious to Catherine and her family. Almost seems like now that MM is old drama, the certain set that supposedly looked down upon the Midds is back thier old games and the Middleton's are free for all.
Happy that KP put a stop to it. It was disheartening back then to see Kate and her family being dragged through the mud like this.
Which reminds me...
1. KP took/was made to take an official stance and defend MM very early on. The Toronto paps harassment statement... wills supporting Hs statement with his own statement... Something just before the wedding... The KP social media guidelines!! Etc etc
and the nasty excerpts i’ve read seemed very elitetest, classist and snobby toward Kate’s middle class upbringing, when they were trying to paint her family in the social climbing light.
the snooty excerpts didnt come off well in my view. the writer was obviously trying to hard.
She didn't even give a year of public service with her pregnancy post and pre, she coulnd't even honour her "hit the ground running" commitment for more than 3 months straight. Vanity projects with Vogue and picking out last years clothes for a Smart Works does not count. They only thing she truly did during her tenure was a cookbook that she then has never corrected the full credit of writing the cookbook and putting it together when all she did was write an introduction.
She went on to have a PR Baby complete with padding (yes I do believe she was pregnant) why the padding I don't know she's an attention whore.
Instead of commitment to the RF she instead had tantrums over tiaras, pushing her husband out of the way, spending outrageous amounts of money and then sued a newspaper over a story about an Avocado story and a copper tub.
Then her stans/sugars wonder why she is despised. Its not racism its her insufferable spoiled privileged and burning it all to the ground that makes people not like her.
We know she claimed to be able to watch the bowling green from Froggy Towers(!)
We know she has some very dodgy friends at Soho House.
Followed by erratic drivers? Welcome to Southern California. There is crazy every day on the freeways and surface roads.
By and large the people of the US do not care about MM or PH. What is true about MM? She's a whiner. She takes no accountability for her actions and decisions. It's always somebody else's fault. She's married to a middle-aged brat. She's a liar.
We know she has no qualms about signing up to different faiths when it suits her bank balance.
We know she has pulled the wool over Justin Welby's eyes.
We know she is prepared to spoil another bride's wedding day.
We know she had the Christening photo faked.
We know she sticks her tongue out even when going to church.
We know that she has no experience or understanding of ancient buildings.
We know that she doesn't know how to behave in church.
We know that she hates being moved out of the centre of a photo.
We know she does not recognise, or may be does not respect our National Anthem.
We know she has to be told by her husband how to behave when the Anthem is played.
We know she is tearful when her husband ticks her off.
We know she can weep to order and is proud of that acting skill.
We know that she doesn't realise that when she makes an official appearance in her `go-to-meeting' outfit, her audience thinks she looks like Octavia Spencer playing Minnie Jackson in `The Help', and that they immediately think of how she dishes up her own version of Chocolate Pie to the in-laws.
We know that she looked like Michael Jackson at Wimbledon but she doesn't know that that's what we thought.(She probably does now!)
We know she was caught on camera rifling through Harry’s car until she was caught.
We know she has one look for the cameras and quite another when she’s unaware of being filmed.
We know she has zero manners or sophistication.
This is the first I’ve heard this, why couldn’t it be considered legal?
I honestly don’t think the royal family are this arrogant or stupid as to sign off a (possible) fraudulent wedding. :o/
I gather the main reason that greater care is exercised because an `elderly prima gravida' has no`track record' of giving birth so the medics nowadays play it safe.
We don't know, though if she was a PG; rumour says otherwise. In her case, it is surprising how soon she `fell', given the rumours as to the state of her innards and that she herself is supposed to have said she couldn't have children.
OT: It's a strange thought that the egg that gave rise to each of us was in our mothers' ovaries when they were born. Half our chromosomes go back as many years as our age added to our mother's age at our conception, plus a few months. That means 115 years in my case. Quite possibly you beat me, Cass.
- date and place of her birth
- where she went to school
- that she always wanted to be an actress but had difficulty finding roles
- most of her roles were short episodes
- she spent six years in Suits and this is her only major acting job
- she always pushed the racial agenda
- she had been married and had a number of other relationships
- she married Harry
- she has a coat of arms approved by the Queen
- her life in the RF was about three times shorter than her role in the cable drama
It may be a `sham marriage', one of `convenience' conducted for reasons other than the desire to live together as man and wife.
Think of people who are paid to go through a marriage ceremony to a foreigner who wants British residence rights.
There was a case in 2010 where a vicar was investigated because he had married a remarkable number of African men to Eastern European women living here legally. He and the other 2 people running the racket got prison sentences.
Full details at
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/vicar-jailed-over-sham-marriages-2071508.html
There are also `fraudulent marriages', where one partner, normally the richer one, is sincere and marries in good faith but the other is only after the money. Or has told their partner a pack of lies about themselves.
There were rumours about odd goings-on in the vestry, when H$M went in to sign the Register - did Wm refuse to sign as a witness? Did H hold up the Register so no one could see what he wrote?
Pure conjecture of course, and I'm not a lawyer, but Wikipedia explains it fully.
It would depend on the extent to which H was conned into the marriage as to whether it could be found to be sham or fraudulent - were neither acting in good faith or was it just one? Both are scams and criminal acts.
Shine a light that was a good one
The moment Harry demonstrated he holds us poor folk responsible for the environment but will do as he himself pleases my opinion of him hit the floor, broke it and went down to Antarctica. The rest of hos failures were merely the spicing on the ache.
Do you know that Pasternak was very widely ridiculed for her book Princess in Love about Diana's affair with Hewitt? Her prose was absolutely cringe worthy, sugary, over the top drivel.
The book sank Hewitt and tuned him into an object of hate.
Pasternak is distantly related to a Russian writer Boris Pasternak who was a good one. It serves to show that talent is not passed automatically in the family.
It is narcissistic to assume the participants want praise from H&M. I would take no stock in their support, allegedly they abandoned the UK and quit their duties! Why would I care what they think?
It seems they pop in whenever they need fuel to boost their ego. Vampires.
We don't know if it was indoors or out, US or UK?
We know that he seemed more normal than he has done recently.
We know that Philip Schofield said on live TV that `Harry sounds Scottish' in the Duck Rabbit travesty.
We don't know if Harry was there with her and the child or not.
We know she didn't like the child saying `Dadd-a'.
We don't know for certain where H is.
We don't know for certain it was H behind the `mask'. Or in the garden with the dog.
We have known from the start that she did Yoga
Yet we have only just found out that she had been into Kick-boxing, from a 3rd party.
We know she likes `secrets' - but was kick-boxing one she really didn't want known? If so, why?
Re the marriage - we don't know who were the witnesses who signed the Register. Presumably one was Doris, representing her side. Could all Royals have refused to sign it? Did the DoE sign himself `Mickey Mouse'? Did the Groom sign himself as Donald Duck? Doris and MM were outnumbered I think. What an entertaining thought - pure conjecture, of course.
Were I HM, I'd have taken serious legal advice as to how to make sure the marriage wasn't valid. If it turned out that they were a truly loving couple, I'd ensure nothing was said. On the other hand, if it didn't, I'd have an ace of a switcheroo up my sleeve -
`Divorce? What divorce? There wasn't even a marriage - hard cheese, Meghan'.
In your dreams, Wild Boar!
I remember "Princess in Love" it was derided as being on the level of a Harlequin romance novel and greatly embarrassed Princess Diana and the rest of the royal family. What really sank James -Hewitt, though, was the fact that the cooperated with the author - a huge no-no, since it broke the unspoken rule that "Gentlemen don't kiss and tell". That really gave him a reputation as a cad, something he's never been able to overcome.