This idea comes from reader @Happy Days.
Where will Meghan and Harry be in ten years' time - in October 2030?
Archie (assuming he exists) will be about 12 years old.
Will his parents still be married? Will they live in the US, the UK, or someplace else entirely?
Comments
Meg will either be a bothersome quasi-celebrity, à la Morgan Fairchild, or married to some other wealthy fellow, perhaps non-Western.
Archie, if he exists, will be at boarding school, forgotten by his remarried father and remarried mother, and barely known to his royal cousins. Whether he will still be in the line of succession is an interesting question.
Meg will either be a bothersome quasi-celebrity, à la Morgan Fairchild, or married to some other wealthy fellow, perhaps non-Western.
Archie, if he exists, will be at boarding school, forgotten by his remarried father and remarried mother, and barely known to his royal cousins. Whether he will still be in the line of succession is an interesting question.
_____
Ha ha! Or Suzanne Somers. She's a wacky pain in the arse lol...
Re: the U.S. Congressman calling for the British government to remove H$M's titles, Harry will be in Barbados chasing after Rhianna, Archie will be in Tussaud's Wax Museum (he's a doll, after all).
She seems to have made her 15 minutes of fame last longer than I expected, but I could see her on a cheesy reality programme or giving interviews (to anyone who is willing to listen) about her life. Anything to keep her name relevant.
There are so many variables it’s hard to narrow down. Whilst I don’t think Harry will be driven to busking on the streets, he will either be back in Blighty trying desperately to rebuild his image or perhaps more likely living Africa and having a life he once dreamed of.
While I believe he likes the continent for itself (Wasn't there a story about Meghan tricking him early on by saying she wanted to live in Africa after they were married?), he could also see the "banishment" as his family once again putting his older brother first.
Would he be remarried, though? I don't know. I can't imagine a decent woman wanting to have Meghan's sloppy, burned-out, shell-of-a-man seconds.
Then again, you never know . . . Maybe he'd meet a mature woman (a fellow divorcée, I imagine) who was also the victim of a narc spouse, who can meet him where he is, and who won't let him recycle any BS from his first marriage. And here I am trying to take the high ground in my prediction . . . but also kind of hoping that this second wife is African and that they have a baby girl whom they name Diana.
Hazza,not so sure about. Either back inthe UK, after having a mental breakdown,or shunted off to Africa.
/Unless he finds the handbag that contains the royal jewels.
I'm transplanting your comment over from the tail end of the last thread so you can see my reply. This will play into the new thread topic, so I will get there eventually!
Right now, the only thing that makes me believe there is a baby who is genetically Prince Harry's son is that he was so happy during the birth announcement. What keeps coming back to me is Scorpiotwentythree's line (and I may be paraphrasing from memory): "That's the look of a man whose swimmers made it."
Harry was happy even if Meghan wasn't.
By 'happy during the birth announcement' do you mean the appearance he made solo in front of Royal steeds Sir John and George, or the staged press call (for a press of one) in Windsor Castle? With Haz it's hard to tell if he's happy or gormless, as the expression is somewhat the same. He's also got a very shiny forehead all the time, whether naturally or through flop sweat whenever he's dragged in front of a camera. Most distracting, though not as much as Meg's pit stains.
To my eye Harry gave a guise of being happy, but having watched both appearances many times, I detect multiple indicators of deception, particularly in the horse stables video. Lots of hand worrying, shifting from foot to foot, high pitched giggling, staring at the ground, twisting around to look behind him distractedly . . .I did not see a relieved and euphoric delighted new father so much as a frazzled and furtive guy who was trying his best to hit his marks and deliver his rehearsed remarks. Not ruling out either that he was high as a kite.
It could just be that Harry was tired from lack of sleep and is a naturally less-than-confident person in front of cameras at the best of times. He certainly muffed his lines two days later, re. the 'they change so much in two weeks.' And then there was the disturbing digging at the tender arm of the supposedly sleeping babe.
He always seems decidedly uncomfortable when put on the spot, in defiance of his carefully-crafted Hero Hazza, Regaler of the Common Folk image. If the relationship with Meg has highlighted anything, it's the tragedy of a man who is an empty vessel with no strong inner core of personality and no idea of who he is, who just drifts along allowing himself to be filled up by whatever he's hanging around . . drugs, drink, Meghan.
We swallowed the going line that Harry absolutely loved children and couldn't wait to be a dad himself, but I don't see any temperamental characteristics that would support this as true. Perhaps he said that because it was expected, back when he pretended to give a toss about his expected role. If Harry is presently a hands-on resident father to a robust 17 month old named Archie, I see no evidence of it.
I meant to say in my comment to another poster re. Archie that even though Meg ostensibly wanted a girl for merching purposes, IF Archie exists in her care, it's better for him that he's a boy. A girl, particularly if she grew to be a real beauty would be a rival for attention that could not be tolerated.
/Unless he finds the handbag that contains the royal jewels.
_______
Lol! Good one. Bam!
Enbrethiliel said…
And here I am trying to take the high ground in my prediction . . . but also kind of hoping that this second wife is African and that they have a baby girl whom they name Diana.
______________
And this. The petty little witch who lives inside me very, very much hope for this.
But if the BRF play hardball and strip Harry of the title, with him saying it was his idea to lead a simpler life and be "Just Prince Harry (Ha!), for a while, then she'd definitely want to find herself another chump.
Though not before making everyone know what a terrible husband he actually was to her. Oh, she tried her hardest to save him by encouraging him to leave his toxic family -- especially his awful, racist brother and snotty sister-in-law -- but blood proved thicker than water in the end. It will help if she can make a video of him in a drunk rage or get a photo of him passed out after a bender. (You know what? She probably already has!) Meghan will make Angelina Jolie and Amber Heard look like the sweetest ex-wives ever.
She'll also still be trying to make an international humanitarian brand happen. Maybe targeting girls in Africa, just to mess with Harry, the way Edo's ex decided to rent a floor in his office's building.
I think he will be very damaged by his encounter with this venomous narcissist. People on this blog tell us it took them years to recover, and only after they saw what they were dealing with.
Harry doesn't see anything.
Meghan will probably be physically changed--and changed more than one would expect when going from 39 to 49, thanks to multiple plastic surgeries. And she'll probably still be dining out on that darned soap commercial story from age 11! (Along with mean royals stories)
In the immediate future, I foresee that Meg will lose her Mail on Sunday case. Charles will probably pony up a large portion of the settlement fees to the MoS.
Mudslide Manor will be repossessed, or sold to cover Meg's debts. I suppose it is too much to hope that the whole thing would slide into a ravine.
Though I hate to speak of it, the deaths of PP and HM may be the impetus that brings Harry back to England. I think he will eventually break with Meg, especially if she goes to trial for tax evasion, fraud or any number of other schemes. I could see the Harkles separating but staying married for several years like Charles and Di, who separated in 1992, but did not officially divorce until 4 years later. The BRF is going to want to minimize the damage MM can do them in a divorce.
If the origins and existence of Archie are not illuminated by then, I suppose she will have to produce him as part of a divorce trial. Unless the BRF proposes to continue to pay support for a child who does not exist because they have gone along with the fiction thus far.
I can't really think 10 years into the future. Frankly Harry may not survive that long. If he does, he will be a broken man ala the Duke of Windsor, tucked away in Africa or some other far flung corner of the Commonwealth, preferably with spotty Internet reception.
Meg will be like Fergie crossed with Monica Lewinsky . . a notorious figure whose name everyone knows but whom no one wants to be associated with.
I think we will get some clarity on the Archie matter before 10 years go by. As the 'child' gets older, it's going to be harder and harder to keep him hidden, never shown in public. He will have to go to school, for example. If he is not enrolled physically somewhere, the California Dept. of Education will expect some homeschooling curriculum and progress reports filed on his behalf. Questions will be asked about this child's welfare. His parents are high profile and so is he, even if he's a figment. She's not going to be able to outrun a lie of this magnitude forever, if she is in fact making up a baby.
Nice to think it's possible, but I say manifestly not. Harry has shown his true colors and they are ugly. He's got nothing to give a woman, not now and for sure not when Meg is done sucking him dry. He will never be fully restored to his family. Without his royal status, he's nothing . .not even a decent person. He could fall victim to another grifter I suppose, but no decent woman is going to touch him after this. Only paid companions for Harry . . but that's where he's comfortable. It's how he met his current wife, I believe.
Harry married again?
Nice to think it's possible, but I say manifestly not. Harry has shown his true colors and they are ugly. He's got nothing to give a woman, not now and for sure not when Meg is done sucking him dry. He will never be fully restored to his family. Without his royal status, he's nothing . .not even a decent person. He could fall victim to another grifter I suppose, but no decent woman is going to touch him after this. Only paid companions for Harry . . but that's where he's comfortable. It's how he met his current wife, I believe.
His family might 'welcome' him back, but they will never trust him again. That ship has sailed, struck an iceberg, and sunk to the bottom of the sea IMO.
I concur that no decent woman will ever want him, but isn't that how he came up with Markle to begin with?
Yes, I was referring to the solo appearance in front of the stables.
I just watched it again for the first time since last year, and I do see what you've pointed out. The hand rubbing was particularly distracting. And his "I haven't been at many births" line, followed by a nervous laugh at his own joke, reminded me so much of Meghan doing the same thing at the engagement interview. They were talking about how they managed to date each other with such packed calendars, and Meghan mentioned her "filming schedules" and then laughed nervously. It didn't raise a red flag for me at the time, but when watching Fame Vixen's analysis, it hit me that she was making something up and trying to sound more credible.
And Harry is less practiced at outright lying than Meghan is. You've mentioned his "change so much in two weeks" gaffe. Perhaps "I haven't been at many births" came from another clumsily honest place. He hasn't been at ANY births.
So right now I'm agnostic on the DNA question.
I think if she doesn't have an Archie now, she will have to find a permanent one soon!
Or fake his death?
It is horrible to think about, I know, but hey, she already faked his birth . . .
And as a mother grieving a son lost in childhood, she'd get a heck of a lot more interest than what she's scraping by with now.
Meghan will spill all the tea- much of it utter lies- to defame and absolutely destroy Harry.
Honestly I don't know if Harry has what it takes to survive what is coming his way.
Meghan meanwhile will become massively famous- think how the Brad/Jen/Angelina thing provided so much fodder. Free of any constraints she will in our faces non stop.
She will be reviled but will cherish her infamy.
Everyone has good thoughts.
I doubt she would remarry unless it was some sort of set up financially (as I also think she would have difficulty giving up the titles).
I could see her though try more different pitches (from Real Housewives to selling the latest must haves) and still trying to be the great humanitarian to be looked up.
The baby, yeah that will get harder to pull off as he grows (everything about the pregnancy was not normal from the get go).
JH? I don't know. I would hope that Africa would be soothing place for him but isolated from the rest of the family.
Then, by accident, I stumbled upon her dairies. In them, she described the very same behaviors that I was experiencing. So while she may have had a disturbing childhood, much of her misery was a result of being married to my husband.
Mm can easily blamed the failure of her marriage on Harry himself. We can see the evidence she will use in Harry's current behavior. Mm is very good at concocting tales and therefore she could tell an array of convincing stories to prospective suitors. She is so good at lying that she is totally believable, not to us, but those who fall under her spell. Many acquaintances have recanted how charming she is when they first met her. Don't forget, she was an actress, even though not a good one.
I wouldn't underestimate her.
Megalo may have faked a miscarriage to ensnare Harry and theoretically could fake Archie's death but that's a whole different ball game. If that were the case, the police would have to be involved and there would have to be an inquest or the US equivalent. A bridge too far even for Meg's in my opinion.
https://www.farrow-ball.com/paint-colours/middleton-pink
And I'll say it--I think Harry will be dead. I think he's become a miserable human being within this marriage to $mirkle, and he's probably self-medicating with drugs and alcohol. I forsee a sad ending for him, and I think he's going to misjudge a dose or get some bad drugs, and die.
I do not wish that for him at all, but that's how I see it playing out.
If they do divorce, MM will be the instigator, either because she met someone who is richer and more powerful than JH, or simply because he has outlived his usefulness. I can see this happening if their titles are removed; the only reason anyone pays them any attention is because of those royal titles. Without them, they're just an unemployed and unemployable middle aged couple. Being married to just plain Harry Windsor doesn't give her any advantages. She'll make sure she's set for life financially, though.
I can see her on a reality show like DWTS or the Real Housewives in a year or two, but I'm not sure anyone will remember who she is ten years from now.
As for Harry - I doubt he'll remarry. I strongly suspect that Chelsy and Cressida dumped him, not because they felt they couldn't handle royal life, but because they just didn't want to be married to him. Chelsy has never spoken publicly about their on-and-off relationship, but Cressida has hinted, more than once, that he is not a nice person and treats other people badly.
Women who seek out the limelight have a way of being burned by it. They don't seem to understand the dangers they face when being involved with powerful men who are involved with shady people.
I don't see Meghan ageing gracefully and meeting a natural end surrounded by her grandchildren.
Harry will crawl back to the BRF and end his days as the family alcoholic hidden from view, like Andrew is now but for different reasons.
There is no Archie and the BRF will find some convenient excuse to never bring up his name again.
Prince Harry finally has enough and leaves. Meghan releases some scandalous photos she has of him, but his reputation is already so ruined that they don't do much damage. Before he can properly file for divorce, however, Meghan stages Archie's death. (Assuming he exists and gets to grow up with loving foster parents, this would be narc devaluation on a scale we've never seen before!) There is an outpouring of sympathy from all over the world for the "young mother" who so tragically lost a child. The divorce settlement is paltry, but Meghan accepts it, in return for the Royal Family not exposing the truth about her pregnancy, birth and motherhood. Then she finally gets the interviews and speaking gigs she has always wanted. Nothing too prestigious; too many people at the top already know the truth about her. But just enough for her to fly high for a year or two.
Then the Palace announces that Prince Harry has volunteered to give up his dukedom. He still wants to support the monarch (Charles by this time), but he also wants a quieter life. He is photographed with Prince William again, both brothers looking relaxed outside in nature. Harry moves to Africa, where he is set up with both charities and excellent therapists. The Palace begins a steady PR campaign for "Humanitarian Harry," with lots of quotes from ordinary people who also met him before his marriage. They say that he definitely seems more subdued now that he has lost a child, but also more willing to assist others. Meghan continues to use "The Duchess of Sussex" after her name for six months. The sugars never drop it
Harry also quietly goes to AA meetings -- and is part of another support group for victims of narcs. This is how he meets his second wife. At first they are just friends, but it blossoms into something more. The British public may or may not react with seething cynicism. Meghan gives a tearful interview about how painful it is when you're still grieving a dead child but your ex-husband has forgotten him. After two years of dating, Harry and his girlfriend become engaged. Meghan starts promoting a charity that just happens to be doing a lot of work in Harry's new fiancée's country. She flies out for some well-publicized appearances, saying, "Don't be bitter. Be better." The tabloids run old photos of the South African tour. People magazine gushes that Meghan hasn't aged a bit!!! The sugars, still going strong, mock the new fiancée's appearance on social media. The fiancée maintains a dignified silence. There is no engagement interview.
Harry and his new bride have a small, tasteful wedding in Africa. King Charles and Camilla, the Cambridges (but not the children), Peter Phillips, and Zara and Mike Tindall are among the guests. The British public take the news well. Meanwhile, the US tabloids report that Meghan is dating a Saudi billionaire who sends her roses every day.
Six months after the wedding, Harry's new wife announces her pregnancy. Meghan breaks up with the rumored billionaire to take care of her newly-widowed friend Katharine McPhee in the latter's Canada mansion. The tabloids report that she has been a rock to McPhee during the inheritance battle over Foster's fortune, cooking meals for the widow every day. Photographed at the supermarket, she gets to merch not just clothes, but also spice mixes, pickles, and instant coffee. 1/
When little Diana is two years old, Harry and his family are invited back for Trooping the Color. It is his first real appearance in Britain since he first left Meghan and the public have mostly forgiven him. His wife stands on the balcony, too. At one point, Camilla, Princess Consort cuddles toddler Diana. But a source tells the tabloids that the British Royal Family are unimpressed by Harry's new commoner wife, finding her a definite downgrade from the poised and polished Meghan.
Meanwhile, through wrangling herself into the client list of Hollywood's hottest dermatologist, Meghan has been able to befriend a newly-divorced Hailey Baldwin-Bieber. She is generously acting as both Hailey's new mentor and a peacemaker between Hailey and her disapproving father Stephen. Another source says that the entire Baldwin clan is completely charmed by Meghan's warmth, kindness and hard-earned wisdom. When Alec Baldwin does press for a new movie and is asked about her, he looks confused and says: "Who?" Enty "explains" that an angry "permanent A list Oscar winner/nominee" made a pass at a "controversial former alliterate actress" and was rebuffed, but everyone in the comment section just guesses Tia Tequila.
Harry continues to lead a quiet life in Africa, occasionally coming back for major state functions -- such as his father's funeral and his brother's coronation. Right before the second event, US tabloids report that the Democratic National Committee chair personally visited Meghan to beg her to run for office . . . but she declined, saying it would be unfair to the Republican candidate to have to run against someone as popular as she. Instead, she offered to make speeches in favor of the actual Democratic candidate -- a suggestion the DNC chair enthusiastically agreed with. None of the recorded speeches are ever shared on official Democratic Web sites, though one gets extra social media circulation after some people point out odd similarities to an old Ruth Bader Ginsberg speech.
On the tenth year of the prestigious Earthshot Prize, Harry presents the award to a winner from Africa. With his shaved head and new dignified demeanor, he reminds royal watchers of a younger Prince Philip. The rehabilitation of his image has succeeded. 2/2
Will Nutty's blog be here still, with some new posters, and a few of the old timers popping in from time to time--we just cannot stay away!
Now I am going to suppose something that everyone else has already parsed on one of those days I didn't read the comments.....sorry if way late on this...
I was musing about this and that the other day and it occurred to me that the surrogate-maybe pregnancy maybe had to be, if MM had had her tubes tied (potentially reversible) or gotten laproscopy (permanent), knowing that she did not want children because she knew her own mind. At 37 she was old enough for a doctor to have agreed, doctors often would hold off til after 30 or 35 in case the woman might change her mind. And, no stretch marks, kind of a minor point but i bet she is proud of her body except for a few points, feet, maybe. She would not be the only woman to make such a decision for herself.
She would not have foreseen the need for an anchor baby to hold down Harry--or his money. I don't think her biological clock was ticking so loud...and i have read that H&M's first meeting was to be a one-off....but this is all supposition of course. Fiction! Imagination in response to wondering, why IS that? Returning you if still reading, to the Comments!
Some great non-fan fiction here!
I agree with Tatty that they will still be married (unless she leaves him). He's a Virgo. They tend to be loyal to a fault and will hang on for life no matter how miserable they are. She will continue to make the rounds in the social scene a la Wallis. Harry will more than likely live a separate life from her. After 10 years, he will still be needy but bored and seething with contempt. I think they will become very co dependant and enmeshed. After 10 years, it gets iffy.
One think I do have a feeling about and I hate to say it but, she has something on the RF and they will be handing money over for a very long time.
As far as Archie, I still don't have a position on his existence. If he exists, in 10 years I see him being very much like Barron Trump. Sullen, extremely unhappy, embarrassed by a narc parent, alienated from his mom and dad. Ripe for trouble in the rich kids scene. Hopefully, Charles and William will step in and get Guardianship of him and get him a stable life
I think they will be living in the US. She will own his balls for sure in 10 years and it's her way or the highway. L.A. all the way for her. He will shuttle back and forth to the UK to keep his foot in the door as DofS because they will continue to need the titles to exist. He will work on his bad name with the British Citizens
Archie will grow up to be a spoiled, entitled, troubled brat, and be set for life financially thanks to his weak and befuddled grandfather Charles.
He will never know his cousins.
Officially dying! Good one! All the coffees for that fanfic scenario which is so incredibly detailed.
Re: Archie
Pardon some of the descriptors below.
I'm still on the fence about surrogacy & even about Archie's existence at times but think at the very least, M wore padding for months after announcing she was pregnant.
But I have trouble with the notion H&M (or even just M) went the surrogacy route without sex selection IF having a girl was important to M. After all, IF "Archie" has M's DNA, wouldn't sex selection have been a quick and easy add-on to IVF? It's not as though they were using Harry's contribution directly from the source! (With or without M's eggs as long as there was a surrogate.) Or likely even using Harry's stuff gathered with the help of a favorite magazine and delivered with a turkey baster. And if H's sperm wasn't used, same points apply if M's egg was. And if Archie has neither H or M's DNA, why not adopt a baby girl? If that mattered to her? With their resources, just seems that could have happened fast if they were determined to pull a con.
I know sonograms can be wrong re: sex. But IVF with sex selection is a different matter. It's kind of hard to get wrong although it can happen. But that plus wrong sonagrams?
IF M really was pregnant, I can imagine she could have thought she could control the sex of the baby. Not only through scientific recommendations (timing re: ovulation, vaginal pH, positions during intercourse, etc) but also through "spells," crystals, other new age stuff and mostly through "magical thinking." (I want it so it will happen.)
She might go for a first-generation tech millionaire. If he doesn't have much experience with women, she love-bombs him enough, and she can convince him she was always a wholesome, all-American, girl-next-door type whom the British tabloids totally abused, she might have a shot.
Of course, as others have pointed out, she'd only remarry if she actually did lose the Duchess of Sussex title.
Which reminds me . . . Is it true that a US Congressman named Jason Smith wrote the British Ambassador in Washington, D.C. to complain about the Harkles' interference in the election? (I read the letter on Scorpiotwentythree's blog, but the news just broke, so it could be a hoax.) It ends: "I respectfully request the British government ensure The Duke and Duchess of Sussex no longer attempt to interfere in our election or be stripped of all titles, styles and privileges which they currently retain."
Megalo may have faked a miscarriage to ensnare Harry and theoretically could fake Archie's death but that's a whole different ball game. If that were the case, the police would have to be involved and there would have to be an inquest or the US equivalent. A bridge too far even for Meg's in my opinion.
I agree that faking a death would be a more serious matter, with greater consequences, than Meghan has ever done. But she has never really thought things through. On the other hand, perhaps losing the lawsuit against Associated Newspapers (and their countersuit) will teach her about looking before she leaps.
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed my fic.
"I agree that faking a death would be a more serious matter, with greater consequences, than Meghan has ever done. But she has never really thought things through. On the other hand, perhaps losing the lawsuit against Associated Newspapers (and their countersuit) will teach her about looking before she leaps."
I think IF Archie had to go, an unsolved kidnapping would be the plan. Occurring when he's with Harry.
I'm not sure she'll lose the copyright part of the ANL trial. Wish she would, think she should from a moral perspective. But even if she loses, if she has the psychological issues that have been discussed here, she's not going to learn from that. All that will teach her is to fight harder next time for her desired outcome because "the world is unfair" to her.
I think IF Archie had to go, an unsolved kidnapping would be the plan. Occurring when he's with Harry.
Would Prince Harry be in on it, or would Meghan blindside him, going ahead with the plan so that he is forced to play along or also be exposed?
My own "IF Archie had to go" scenario is a bit different. Meghan isn't very original and the last mysterious celebrity death was Naya Rivera's; so she might say Archie disappeared in a boating accident. But this time at sea, so it would be easy to believe his body was lost forever.
Of course, the problem with both scenarios is that there will be many "Archie spottings" for years to come. Lots of people believed the Dauphin was smuggled out of the Bastille and that Princess Anastasia survived the massacre of the Romanovs; a drowning Archie being saved by a school of dolphins wouldn't be that far-fetched. And in the case of a kidnapping, people would love to think that Archie, after being abandoned by his kidnappers, got taken in by a nice American family. (Heck, all of us have been saying for months that we hope Archie, IF he is real, is being cared for by people who love him.) In a couple of decades, some enterprising conmen might even come forward, claiming to be he!
And they'd all be fake, of course. Not that a woman who wore a moonbump for ten months would care. She might even find she likes the chaotic drama of it all.
My guess:
In ten years, Harry has finally found himself. In that he has been acquired by a very strong, dominating woman yet again, but this time she already has a solid career and some fame, and she spits upon titles (luckily since he lost his), and she even dresses a lot like him. It all works better for these reasons! And because she is close to her father, didn’t grow up caring about Diana, and doesn’t care what Harry does most of the time as long as he is there on occasional boat trips or book tours, or keeping an eye on their garden, he feels free at last. To save the planet they decided to have no children especially since the plastic used to make his only son won’t degrade for centuries. He can have all the weed he wants and see old friends. His brother and sister in law don’t mind his new partner much, although she took a bit of getting used to, since they know her goals are simple and of interest to their own kids. An aging Charles, now about to take the throne from his 104 year old mum who is finally thinking of retiring, thinks Harry’s new gal is tops because she gave his wayward son a strict vocation. All in all, it is almost brilliant. Even if the people of the UK still loathe him, Harry is ok with it, because life is finally regimented now and it is like being in the Army again, really. He loves splitting his time between Africa and Sweden, and frankly relishes having a new partner who only speaks when necessary due to her selective mutism: his own true love, a 27 year old Greta Thunberg. They still laugh about the Russian prank phone call. Well, he does.
The irony of life is that although Harry lost his titles for being, as Parliament and the Queen put it, a “complete hot sack of asses’ bile unworthy of walking on our gravel”, Meghan insisted upon using her title for endless surprise appearances at street fairs, as well as when she hosted Netflix’s Dancing with the Cuties, and made her failed presidential run for the short-lived NetFlix party.. She went by “Princess Meghan” her 13-week Netflix After Midnight talk and travel show, The World Through My Mouth, and for her yearly Netflix three hour documentary, “Why I Hate Kate: More Reasons.” Oddly enough, as a ratings grab and to work off the rest of her Netflix contract and legal bills, she agreed to sit down and announce her divorce from Harry and upcoming marriage to a 90 year old frozen food billionaire on a popular program hosted by her old arch enemy Lady C, the Strong Ladies Who Lunch program. Unfortunately, M choked on a tossed salad halfway through denouncing Harry when Lady C showed her a video of Archie getting a battery change that was somehow acquired by Princess Charlotte, now a charming budding student journalist at age 15. Meghan remains in a coma in a kind and loving Arkansas care home selected by the Queen, delaying the final divorce proceedings. There is said to be a potential cure for her coma, but neither Thomas or Doria have rung the care home back to make arrangements of payment, and the frozen food billionaire died while visiting a supportive Lindsay Lohan.
"Would Prince Harry be in on it, or would Meghan blindside him, going ahead with the plan so that he is forced to play along or also be exposed?"
Oh, I definitely think H would be blindsided (although I'm not absolving H of other instances of willing collusion with M.)
And yes, there could be problems with that scenario. Or with your lost at sea scenario. But either way, I somehow doubt a long lost Archie would come forward with M&H's DNA.
As for SkidMarkle, no, she will not remarry, for the following reason: she is far to arrogant and delusional to bag herself a man with money. No grown man, will listen to her self indulgent word salads for longer than 3 minutes, before laughing in her face. She's neither young enough, nor beautiful enough, to get away with such a repulsive and insufferable personality. Her demands and delusions of grandeur will put anyone off; nobody is as dim as Harry.
I know billionaires, I work with them, she's nothing like the women they are attracted to. None of them will indulge her in her insanity.
So she will end up doing the talk show circles, complaining about the quality of men, and how they're all intimidated by her and her feminist star power. Every few years she will publish a book about the same topic. Once the novelty of having her on a talk show has worn off, she will be reduced to making guest appearances for money at unimportant parties, such as that Opera ball in Vienna that saw many impoverished has-beens as special guests for the night.
Her "amicable divorce"-at-first relationship will Harry will get more and more strained because she will trash him publicly, like she has been doing with her and his family, while he will be told to keep quiet.
It’s not a hoax, the letter and the story was in the DM last night and still there (part of the below article now), it detailed how royal titles are removed.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8825367/Prince-Harry-face-telling-Queen-Palace-staff-told-prepare-return.html
God forbid, at least she's not here.
Harking back to bobble-hat baby in ?Canada/Turkey:
Apart from the fact that we know a girl baby belonging to one of Harry’s pals has an identical hat, I was convinced Harry was holding a girl after I’d checked out the differences between male and female skull. (Previously, I was thinking of the work of the Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee but gave the wrong name – I’d meant Prof. Sue Black).
Anyway, the Smithsonian explains it perfectly, as one would expect:
https://naturalhistory.si.edu/sites/default/files/media/file/wibskeletonmaleorfemalefinal.pdf
In this instance, the chin that's critical. Pointed chins are rare in males and square ones in females, assuming that nothing has gone awry in the individual’s development.
Apparently, the first comment ever to be made about my appearance came from the nurse who showed me to my mother - once she’d deigned to enter the delivery room and untangled me from the cord.
`You’ve got a really determined one here.’ She said. `Just look at that chin!’
Yes, it's quite pointed. Mind you, according to Mum, I’d already demonstrated my determination to survive, coughing and spluttering, trying to fight free on my own.
Btw, Generally, I can also tell the sex of most dogs or cats from the face alone, without looking underneath.
October 10, 2020 at 10:16 AM Delete
H can look forward to years in limbo, with the parasite still attached to him, unless something catastrophic happens to the RF and their wealth, like bloody revolution, the homeless packed into Buck House, several hundred to a room, and people like me put against a wall and shot.
She'll only let go when she can see a greater chance of survival by denying that she's anything to do with them.
Meanwhile, Meghan and Harry led a group of nervous teens in deep breathing exercises during a podcast recording, it's been claimed.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex joined the Teenager Therapy podcast to mark World Mental Health Day - with the episode set to be released on Saturday.
Hello! reported the couple were interviewed by three of the five hosts in person at their new hometown in Santa Barbara while wearing facemasks.
The report claimed the pair "led the crew in deep breaths a few times during the conversation to help calm everyone's nerves."
And it appears the episode recording did well, with one of the hosts Gael calling Prince Harry "Big H".
First, make sure you have a gmail account. I recommend using a unique gmail to this blog for extra security and to avoid doxxing.
Second, search Google Accounts. You will land on the page where you can sign into and make updates to your account. If you don't have a gmail, you will be prompted to create one.
Third, go to the Personal Info tab. In the Profile section, you can click on "Name" and change to whatever you like.
Whenever you are logged into your Google Account, your name should post to the blog.
Hope this helps!
The Harkles are locked into a toxic co-dependency, and Harry, though he may not realise it yet, has burnt all the bridges behind him. I doubt that there is a quick and easy way back for him or the support of senior royals to set into motion a huge PR machine to rehabilitate him as a working royal. (Even if the Harkles do divorce, Meghan will always be the ex-wife and mother of his child and she will not go away and will be a thousand times more of a headache than Fergie.)
As a number of astute observers have pointed out here, Meghan is becoming more and more unattractive for a 'next' wealthy man. She still needs Harry for the wealth and the few deals she gets through connection with him (but the delusions are strong with that one so who knows where her hubris will take her) but as a full-blown narc, she probably enjoys having a husband she can control, dominate and manipulate. It reaffirms her self-belief in her superiority. Her talents are hustling and self-promoting so I doubt she will get major deals for herself, and those she does get will probably end in failure. Even the wealthy elite who are tone deaf to what taxpayers actually think and feel and want and have no clue about decent and ethical behaviour are going to get tired of her word salad and diva behaviour. (That Fortune could have put out that short description of her for their latest virtual summit, where she has a platform yet again, and do so with a straight face is quite an eye opener.)
All my opinion, of course!
As for Archie, he is real and he is their child (surrogacy or not), but will have to learn early to be self-sufficient and independent because I doubt he has any kind of stable 'good' parent with him. If the Harkles leave him be and do not drag him into propping up their publicity campaigns for popularity and influence, he may turn out all right.
By the way, why must Africa be dumped with the problem of Harry?😄 Security and inter-continental travel will be costly, as will the staff he will need if he wants to do more than nope around on his own. Sure, he can play polo, and actually enjoy all the luxuries that he does in the UK and US, plus he will have the bush, great weather and so on, but without something useful and practical to do and the full support of royal staff, he is a mess and Africans are not going to put up with the kind of shenanigans we have seen in the US.
As for SkidMarkle, no, she will not remarry, for the following reason: she is far to arrogant and delusional to bag herself a man with money. No grown man, will listen to her self indulgent word salads for longer than 3 minutes, before laughing in her face. She's neither young enough, nor beautiful enough, to get away with such a repulsive and insufferable personality. Her demands and delusions of grandeur will put anyone off; nobody is as dim as Harry.
I know billionaires, I work with them, she's nothing like the women they are attracted to. None of them will indulge her in her insanity.
_______
One would think this to be the case. It is possible some highly ego driven older man my take her on. An Aristotle Onassis type (although La Markle couldn't tie the shoe laces of Mrs.JFK). Those type of men relish claiming the former wife of a revered and very famous alpha male. If just to say "I'm banging so and so's former wife". Granted JH is no great alpha, but he is Royal which gives him the clout as we all know. Egos love being close to the throne...
He can look forward to years in limbo, with the parasite still attached to him, unless something catastrophic happens to the RF and their wealth, like bloody revolution, the homeless packed into Buck House, several hundred to a room, and ***people like me put against a wall and shot.
_____
@Our WBBM,*** I don't ever see this happening. The weakest links in the RF are being dealt with. PA is out to pasture on watch and JH (and his mad monk of a wife) is on Blighty's shit list until kingdom come. Chas cannot ever be an autocrat nor will he be allowed to follow in the doomed footsteps of Cousin Nickey of Russia. All will be well. William is capable of strong arming PC. Unless something very unfortunate happens in reference to one of the Cambridge children, GB will remain the strong democracy that it is.
MM is no trophy, she's a huge liability, and only a really really really stupid man wouldn't see that.
Jackie married Aristotle because she was running out of money, he knew it, and made her sign a marriage contract, so detailed, it even included how many times per month she had to sleep with him. But Jackie prostituted herself with dignity. MM would run screaming to the press, squeezing out tears, sobbing, painting herself as a victim. If the billionaire can't see this coming, then his team of 100 lawyers will.
There is no Aristotle Onassis for Meghan Markle. And she is no Jackie.
There is no Aristotle Onassis for Meghan Markle. And she is no Jackie.
_____
Yes, that's what I said. She is no Jackie- in different words. On Onassis, I disagree. There is always an Onassis type who can be taken in by an older Meghan man eater. Can anyone say Jeff Bezos?
There is a new blind about Meghan stealing the spotlight to her « friend » K. Mc Phee ... + call the pap (again).
I wonder how long will last their « friendship ».
https://blindgossip.com/the-spotlight-stealer/
I agree with you on Jackie Kennedy Onassis. I admired the traits you mentioned. I was using that situation as an example of a rich man absolutely wanting an older woman for whatever reason. I get it... La Markle is no Jackie. But yes she has some social status due to being a member of the RF- she's titled.
Let's not be surprised if it happens is all I am saying...
A hilarious blind indeed!
https://blindgossip.com/the-spotlight-stealer/
He will end up like Bonnie Prince Charlie who was far from bonnie in later life - he was an embittered, maudlin, self-pitying drunk by the time he died, aged about 65. I gathered, from what Compton Mackenzie wrote, that he'd `play De Profundis' on the violin (no indication given as to whether if this was a plainsong melody or a specific composition. His illegitimate daughter looked after him.)
H won't even have that, unless he starts learning the violin as soon as possible.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6129433/amp/Pioneering-software-reveals-Kate-Harry-Meghan-look-like-60s.html
However, with Foster, Markle will not get to abuse him they way she's abused Harry. No, she will have to use all her energy putting on a false front whenever Foster is around. The rest of the time she will be an absolute horror to the help, who will come and go at lightning speed. When Foster becomes aged, Markle's abuse will grow increasingly. Stories will come out of how she kept his children from visiting. Eventually Foster will become Markle's prisoner, a la Casey Kasem, Groucho Marx, maybe Mickey Rooney. All men who became prisoners in their dotage.
Greta and the selective mutism made me laugh out loud. Kudos for creativity (and to @Enbrethilial!)
I see Harry as an aging alcoholic living quietly after MM leaves him and they have the most expensive divorce in UK history. He becomes an organic farmer at the manor near Wales PC offered before. He will be trotted out at special occasions but watched carefully by a cadre of aides who make sure he doesnt drink too much. They don't want a repeat of the "incident" at the Trooping of the Colour 2029. Sightings of him around London become the basis for a popular online game.
MM leaves Harry for a billionaire faucet manufacturer but he dies before she can lock down the marriage. She spends the rest if her life trying to sue his estate. She becomes a pain-in-the-@ss activist a la Rose McGowan, jumping on every hot cause. She eventually gets herself elected the mayor of Bakersfield, but financial irregularities cause her to lose the seat. She milks the RF dry financially, but blows the money on a series of "models" she is "mentoring". She finally ends up in a small apartment in LA, existing on the proceeds of lawsuits she brought against her plastic surgeon.
Archie becomes the " Anastasia," of his day, his identity forever in question. He becomes a celebrity tattoo artist living in Paris and writes a tell-all book about his parents.
He too, makes a tidy sum suing the RF and media outlets. His identity is never really established. He refuses to see or speak to either of his parents.
he'd `play De Profundis' on the violin
_____
What an elegant way to say JH will be forever butt hurt lol...
MM leaves Harry for a billionaire faucet manufacturer but he dies before she can lock down the marriage. She spends the rest if her life trying to sue his estate. She becomes a pain-in-the-@ss activist a la Rose McGowan, jumping on every hot cause. She eventually gets herself elected the mayor of Bakersfield, but financial irregularities cause her to lose the seat. She milks the RF dry financially, but blows the money on a series of "models" she is "mentoring". She finally ends up in a small apartment in LA, existing on the proceeds of lawsuits she brought against her plastic surgeon.
______
This is hilarious! I can really see this happening...
So many fantastic inspirations. Thanks guys!
Perhaps
`Beneath this stone lie the earthly remains of Meghan Markle, an insignificant actress, who lived her life as a Lady Megbeth.
She became a duchess but demanded to be Queen of the United Kingdom.
She never learned that one cannot always have what one wants
Her life was one monstrous lie.
As for her, IMO, she'll be lucky if she end up at Forest Lawn LA, assuming someone else pays for it. Her epitaph could be a variant of `If you offered her California...'.
Perhaps
_____
Oh rats! I was hoping she be planted next to Wallis in FroggyBog. Partners in crime :D
When Foster becomes aged, Markle's abuse will grow increasingly. Stories will come out of how she kept his children from visiting. Eventually Foster will become Markle's prisoner, a la Casey Kasem, Groucho Marx, maybe Mickey Rooney. All men who became prisoners in their dotage.
___________
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Seriously. If there's anybody on the planet who deserves Meghan Markle, it might just be David Foster.
Or perhaps it’d be like that monologue from the 1960s (Bob Newhart?) where the attorney is reading a Will to the assemble relatives? Something like:
`Meghan asked that I remember her in my Will – Hello, Meghan!’
Anyway, she had her feet under the table at his mansion but ends up with no claim on it – the relatives get it, along with all the rest of his assets and they chuck her out penniless and she has to rely on a Welfare Check for the rest of the days, the RF denying all knowledge of her.
Poetic justice.
La Markle's "Welfare Check" unfortunately will be signed by the BRF. For a long time. That's the insidiousness of the whole take down.
It'd have to be a private funeral so we're left guessing -
A riotous Wake the night before, coffin used as the bar. (I expect she's got some Irish ancestors somewhere).
A special procession for the wig, with new rites for this.
Wreaths of garlic.
Eulogy given by Kermit and Miss `Pretentious? Moi?' Piggy.
`Always look on the bright side of life', from the Life of Brian, as the recessional music?
Background sounds of Wallis turning in her grave.
A good turnout, entire family, but kept absolutely secret so the peasants can't say `They all went, just to make sure she was dead'.
All followed by a Right Royal Knees-Up at the castle.
Naughty of me, I know... such poor taste
Don't forget the car HMTQ sent to drive Megsy to the church now being used to drive her to Froggy Bog...lol.
Dark humor is sometimes needed :D
I'd hope for the standard US rate of Welfare as paid to other Down and Outs, as she is a US citizen.
She and H will have to sing `Brother, Can You Spare a Dime?'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I8-CbJYGMA
Thank you.
I have just now read an article About the latest papp settlement from the LA Times.
https://apple.news/Aa-Y3eaDOQteWejJy1ndY9A
According to the article, the photographer agency has apologized to the couple, Agreed to an injunction on any further pictures, and paid a “portion of legal costs associated with the case”. So, in other words, not a huge payday for Meg. And, it seems not onerous on the agency either, who only paid a small fraction of what would’ve been a very brief legal appearance.
At the time that picture of Archie and Doria appeared, we analyzed it and felt that it could just as easily been taken from inside a second story window on a cell phone. Drones are some very sophisticated technology and they can get extremely close and clear photographs. My feeling is if a drone was actually involved, the picture would’ve been much better. This is classic Megan, once again pulling her same tired schtick of Arranging photographs herself and then crying invasion of privacy in high dudgeon and suing. This couple is Sue happy. They sue paparazzi whenever they feel that they are not getting enough attention in the media. They did it for invasion of privacy at the Cotswolds rental, and again over photos of dead frog Archie on the “nature hike in Canada“ which Meg had obviously arranged herself. Haven’t heard anything about that case lately, or if it was even settled. Perhaps not being able to provide proof of a live baby in those photographs Has rented her suit inadmissible, seeing as A doll as a non-living object Has no legally recognized privacy to invade.
Seems like this current agency is a different one from Splash News, The agency that has been embroiled in the previous two legal outings. This is megs signature game she likes to play. Arrange for “unauthorized photos” to be taken. Said photos are splash far and wide all over the media, Garnering her the Narc fuel she craves. By then suing the same photographers that she hired to take the photographs, she gets double duty out of these pictures and keeps her name an image in the news. Whatever the agencies have to pay out in legal fees or deemed worth it because they also are getting publicity for their business and increased cachet because they got photos of the elusive but desirable targets. Can you hear the irony in my virtual voice? Due to the extremely mild penalty incurred by the recent agency, I’m going out on a limb and saying it’s just a pro forma judgment that was completely expected by both sides. The more times Meg can sue for unauthorized pictures of “her child“, the more firmly it will be lodged in the popular mind that she must actually have a toddler whom she loves so very much and just wants to protect him from the nasty media. It’s all part of her calculated ruse, but the pictures are so poor or disturbing Lee inert, they just wind up raising more questions than they answer. But as far as the court is concerned, master Archie Mountbatten Windsor Is A legal entity, having had lawsuits filed on his behalf. So, see—It’s impossible for him to be a phantom! At least so goes Meg’s logic. Let’s see some photos of her producing him in front of a courthouse or a consulate with her legal representatives, and that would convince me more.
Only thing I would say seems unlikely is the saudi billionaire. She doesn't have the looks or personality to hook such a person.
Thanks for reading! I actually agree with you. Most of my Meghan predictions are for what she'll feed to the tabloids, whether or not they're true. In my Saudi billionaire prediction, I imagine Meghan tipping off the press (through another "friend" who is so happy for her) and then sending herself roses every day!
Thanks a lot!
Great yt clip :) good ol Bing. With inflation, she'll be asking for a tenner Ha ha!
What did he do to eventually deserve Markle?
Chatting with Lady C - Princess Diana nanny rebuts falsities/Harry's real father/Meghan/Wallis/loot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obmHGwvmsrY
There is a new blind about Meghan stealing the spotlight to her « friend » K. Mc Phee ... + call the pap (again).
I wonder how long will last their « friendship ».
It's normally child's play for me (as it is, I'm certain, for all Nutties) to figure out which blinds are about Meghan. But that one flew right over my head.
Maybe McPhee isn't very smart? If she expressed being upset that Meghan stole her thunder, Meghan can always trot out her standard non-apology, "Oh, my gosh, I'm so sorry, I would never do that," and claim that she never wanted to happen and had "dressed down" precisely to discourage it. And if you hadn't already figured out what a piece of work she is, that would still sound plausible. Also, McPhee, as a friend, is probably still in the love bombing stage. This may actually take a while longer.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/72j20IYhudLA2qRRXaqrGj?si=cG3tmh7XQG2MpJcB4ua7_w&context=spotify%3Acollection%3Apodcasts%3Adownloads
"Sussex Sninppets"
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com
'I was the most trolled person in the entire world in 2019', says Meghan Markle as she and Prince Harry speak to US teenagers for World Mental Health Day podcast from their Santa Barbara villa.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8826497/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-make-podcast-debut-World-Mental-Health-Da.html
Sussex Snippets
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2020/10/10/sussex-snippets/
« Show me your friends & I will tell you who you are »
You people are on fire today.
this just in.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8826497/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-make-podcast-debut-World-Mental-Health-Da.html
According M, she was the most trolled person in 2019 and 8 months of it was while she was out on maternity leave so she was not visible (her words).
So my comments are:
Who or where to you get the source for the most trolled person (not clear if it was in GB, the world, women, women of some something? who tracks this?
Well she was on maternity leave but yet there were things like the Vogue stuff.
She also talks about how tired she was from the African trip, breast feeding and made an off the cuff remark about no one asks me how I'm doing when someone did. Does that sound realistic?
No comments about keeping her sugars from going after people who might not praise her.
Everyone on the planet has some mental health issues ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8826497/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-make-podcast-debut-World-Mental-Health-Da.html
_____
I had just finished reading it and came here. I'm scratching my head asking myself "how bloodly long are they going to regurgitate the same stale, now dusty message and how much are they getting paid for word vomit?"
I just can't...
'I had to put out positive articles and defend myself with my friends because I was being abused.'
Meghan wasn't the most trolled person. Sidenote: I'm pretty sure Trump was.
Most people in the USA, at least, don't even know who a 'Meghan' is, still.
Not calling 'the baby' by his name....more of the same from Meghan, self-absorbed and desperately trying to counteract all her damage, the court case, and the narrative. Typical manipulative person!
Divorced soon and then (really don't want this) Harry dies of an accidental overdose.
Archie lives quietly and anonymously in UK with an aristocratic/far down the line Royal family. His name never really was "Archie". He never knows his true parents. Its as close to a normal life he will ever experience.
MeMe will live a life a la Fergie but without the Royal connections. Quite simply she will market herself as Duchess with or without the title/permission. She will become a footnote in history and a punchline to many jokes for the rest of her life.
Thomas Markle passes without every meeting his grandson.
I wonder when Meghan will ever meet the friend she deserves!
Perhaps the only greater narcissist I can think of Taylor Swift -- but unlike Meghan, Taylor is also intelligent. Meghan would never be able to get close enough.
It will probably be a young up-and-comer who flatters her way into Meghan's good graces, and whom Meghan thinks she can push around for clout. Then one day, when Meghan is having a talk or throwing a party, her underestimated little mentee will find a way to grab the headlines. It will be epic!
Meghan wasn't the most trolled person. Sidenote: I'm pretty sure Trump was.
Oh, how I wish someone had mentioned that!
If she was offended at being told "You're not the only powerful woman" when the spotlight remained on her and no other names were mentioned, imagine the inner meltdown at being told she comes a distant second in something to one of her perceived nemeses!
It will probably be a young up-and-comer who flatters her way into Meghan's good graces, and whom Meghan thinks she can push around for clout. Then one day, when Meghan is having a talk or throwing a party, her underestimated little mentee will find a way to grab the headlines. It will be epic!
_______
ooooh, All About Eve... a classic tale.
David Foster is friends with with Simon Cowell.
According to the article Harry is friends with Simoon Cowell and a fan of Xfactor Megan friends with Katherine McGhee..
Meghan made a "surprise" appearance on the final of America's Got Talent
EXCLUSIVE
Showbiz
MEGXIT FACTOR Simon Cowell had talks with Prince Harry and Meghan over their multi-million pound TV career
Hannah Hope
21:34, 10 Oct 2020Updated: 21:34, 10 Oct 2020
SIMON Cowell had talks with Prince Harry and Meghan over their new TV career.
He gave informal advice to the pair after they signed a multi-million-pound deal with Netflix.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/12898558/simon-cowell-talks-prince-harry-meghan-tv-career/
Megs and Harry tell the Sussex Squad on Twitter to stop cyber bullying other squaddies. Not a good look when some squaddies harass a big donor because she tweeted about Prince Harry donning a N a z i shirt in 2005.They lied, smeared, harassed, tried to silence and sent sham twitter reports in attempts try to close her account. We saw her CAMFED donation receipts of the over 1000 pounds in the last 2 fundraisers. The receipts also accompanied an email thank you letters from CAMFED Executive Dir. Brooke Hutchinson. The receipts got over 20,000 Facebook hits since October 7th filled with many stating they would no longer donate charities the Sussex Squad bullies associate with.
Megs becomes a third hand wife by marrying Elon musk,Archie and the unpronounceable Elon’s son become best of geeks and constantly give their narcissist parents trouble until Elon in a fit of rage sends them too Mars! Just call me Harry still scratching at the Sussex claw scars on his arm and by now is totally bald comes out from under his African rock to demand that Elon stops feeding his son those pesky planet chocolate bars.
Meghan pushing her best Jackie Kennedy voice and all preaches from her billion dollar mansion that we all must be kind and ask our friends and relatives if they are ok as one day COVID29 will be over and we can all get back our normal lives and poorly paid jobs!
Just Harry is again begging his brother the king for money as his new wife wants a fruit skin wedding dress which will “totally help the planet and climate change” and yes he is Still wearing his grey polo and yet to put shoes on!
More?
'I had to put out positive articles and defend myself with my friends because I was being abused.'
Tell me she actually said this please!!! She just admitted to trying to manipulate the media and "control the narrative" by putting out her own PR stories. Yet, denies she gave her 5 close friends permission to discuss a "secret" letter to her father with People magazine. Isn't that part of her defense in MOS case. Scobie is already on record that none of her friends would speak without permission and that the book was planned even before the wedding. He even cited that he spoke with the couple in the book itself. Her ship just won't sink fast enough. Lmao
I had the hugest smile on my face reading your prediction.
You've quickly become one of my fave commenters :)
KCM1212 — Anastasia! I am jumping with excitement at that reference, I can totally see it happening one day if there is a young Archie. PS-Peter Kurth’s book “Anastasia: The Riddle of Anna Anderson“ and it’s a great read, albeit it was published before the DNA results. Celebrity tattoo artist in Paris! Oh, perfect. And M still rattling from in a “small apartment in LA”....yes.
"He gave informal advice to the pair" ...
I mean, sure, why not. So did Elton John and the whos' who of British Pop Culture. Here you also have Victoria Beckham trying to distance herself 'I've told Meghan to be more Authentic" since Meghan wears her clothes which could be very damaging to her brand that barely makes money anyway....
But see how Simon isn't doing a deal with Meghan or Harry. All they are doing is getting rich friends to give them things, favors, connections. But unless they start working with a real direction and interviewing OTHERS and stop making it about THEMSELVES....ala a talk show by the boring ex-Royals, there's just not much there.
Why would anyone associate in a real way with people about to throw the RF under the bus with a documentary re:Netflix? No one would would that.
These two are not on the 'up and up.' Like the blinds suggest, Meghan is roaming around meeting people and 'whos who' with Harry on her arm, just as she planned. Shes not attractive, not young, doesn't have a career, so she can keep on in the A/B list social circle for another year or two and fade into oblivion.
Considering Netflix doc won't come out till next year EARLIEST, and the world is moving on fast due to Covid and a plethora of other reasons, Meghan's sob story of leaving the RF isn't even going to do well. Netflix will find they have to spend way too much money promoting 'her side of the story' and no one will care. Mark my words on that. Meghan's time has past.
Did anyone else notice of the 10k comments on the teen interview, none were positive? The backlash is getting even worse. She protests too much, and sticks her nose up at everyone. She just needs to admit she is not all that, say publicly how sorry she is, and how she is human and made mistakes. But she can't do it due to her HUUUUUGE ego.
We all know what the David Foster, Katherine McPhee arrangement is. We aren't blind. But the one thing they both have in common are their careers in music. We can't knock that. They do the work and stand on their own in their own rights.
So again, more people that achieved things...then Meghan and Harry pop up...
They are the lamest Trust Fund couple alive.
They each have something big over each other as far as blackmail. She might have information that will hurt the monarchy deeply and he might have the. TRUTH about baby Archie.
She gives me a migraine!
Harry Levin (the owner of TMZ) is one of the most connected men/lawyers in Hollywood. It looks like, if they aren't reporting further on Meghan, then maybe he is doing his part in blacklisting her.
Perez Hilton came out days ago to declare the 'buzz' around Meghan and Harry 'dead' in the US, and that the epidemic wiped out their plans and the runway they needed to be A-list. He's not wrong.
Perez can see the web data I can see and she's been dropping off a cliff as soon as she announced she had stability ala buying her mansion.
No one cares anymore!
I mean, we do, because the whole thing is an interesting puzzled trainwreck, but as for Meghan's grand plans. Nada.
Plus, it seems so unlikely to be true.
Archie was purportedly born in May. The Lion King gig was July 14 while M was on "maternity leave." M attending wearing a black dress that looked so incredibly breast-binding it made my non-nursing boobs hurt. Not typical of a breast-feeding mom.
The US Open was on Sept 8 in NYC. M flew in for that weekend. Yes, she might have pumped. But how likely is that?
The Africa tour wasn't until Sept 23-Oct 2. Then she's exhausted because she's breast-feeding? Plus at the time the PR was that Archie loved looking out the window while being fed. I still haven't figured out how that could work exactly. And now she claims she had to "run back" after every official event to make sure "their son" was fed. Why not do whatever she did while away for the weekend in NYC?
Whatever is happening in 10 years, it will be all about M if she has her way. Even now, Harry is in the way.
Tsessebe Ltd has added Harry as a Person of significant control two days ago. He states the USA is his country of residence. More to follow as we look into things.
How can he be resident in the USA and represent UK charities with a title?
She/he is Just starting to research it.
You are the expert in solving crimes. What can your brain tell us what, where, who, when and how the Sussex doubles, or triplets, will be in ten years?
Sherlock Holmes: if there is anything more trite and boring to any person with an IQ above 80, it is answering this boring question. However, as I am more conceited than any Miss Markle idiocy, I will intensely look at the problem of Just H and M. To all people who think What or where in the world will two people who embrace chipmunk cheeks by shots of plastic, brown contact lenses, Muslim-Chinese hair forcibly cut from the heads of women in slave labor, but M never, ever will defend the rights of certain women from Com-Nazi countries, why will she be talking in round about nursery, I can only say Moriarty should have the pleasure of dealing with the end. The HAMS are becoming boring to death. To keep them relevant, every other day they put out that Netflix is paying them an undisclosed sum, but close to $5 million one day, $250 million the next day. I say bollocks, the two MRkles are so boring, I have no net rest in where they will taking their next pi s. Oh, by the way. Archie Harrison can never have a Royal title, as he automatically would bestowed, because he was born to a surrogate.
Boredom, stupid phrases, weird zooming, photoshopping,
That Company used to be run under Charles, by his staff and Edward lane fox. Harry's old handler.
Now Harry has taken on control.
Interestingly, he files that he is resident of the USA. Guess they aren't worried about Taxes after all.
Why is Charles giving him dormant companies? Is this a tax shelter?
The Duke Of Sussex Henry Charles Albert Windsor ACTIVE
Correspondence address
Clarence House, St. James's, London, SW1A 1BA
Notified on
7 October 2020
Date of birth
September 1984
Nationality
British
Nature of control
Has significant influence or control
Country of residence
United States
Like Lizzie and others here, I do not understand this woman's 'abilities' and 'moves' within the first 18 months of her child's life. She has supposedly done so much in such a short amount of time, including breastfeeding and raising an infant...it is flabbergasting she is hell-bent on the online 'bullying' narrative. That should be the least of her worries (even though she perpetuated it).
Nothing adds up to a normal situation.
is this true?
M, as an American, has to pay taxes in any country she has lived in, or visited. The USA taxes every USA citizen wherever they work or live, and no matter if they pay taxes to say, GB, they still owe American taxes on everything. There is no “diplomatic immunity” for an American who marries a British Prince, and calls herself a Duchess. My neighbor’s dog is named Duchess. M has been in trouble with the IRS at least once, as both her parents, one going to jail because of lying under oath. California will tax you if they find out you have visited the state, staying in a hotel. The state is out of control, and needs military help. I was sent a tax notice when I stayed one night in Napa Valley.
Here you also have Victoria Beckham trying to distance herself 'I've told Meghan to be more Authentic" since Meghan wears her clothes which could be very damaging to her brand that barely makes money anyway....
The last I heard, Meghan was trying to suck up to Victoria so she could get an invitation to one of Brooklyn Beckham's weddings. How is Victoria distancing herself?
Thank you!
Silence is equally meaningful, of course, but it takes a while for it to qualify as a statement. E.g. It took a whole month for TMZ to look as if it were blacklisting the Harkles.
"M, as an American, has to pay taxes in any country she has lived in, or visited. The USA taxes every USA citizen wherever they work or live, and no matter if they pay taxes to say, GB, they still owe American taxes on everything. There is no “diplomatic immunity” for an American who marries a British Prince, and calls herself a Duchess."
I agree M wouldn't have "diplomatic immunity" from US taxes. But the US does have a tax treaty with the UK and many other countries including Canada. So she should be able to largely avoid double taxation on her income.
As we've discussed before though, Harry's status is unclear.
Muslim-Chinese hair forcibly cut from the heads of women in slave labor, but M never, ever will defend the rights of certain women from Com-Nazi countries...
______
This raises a point I've been wanting to make for quite some time. Why hasn't Saint Meghan said one word in defense of women and children (mostly girls) who are living in modern day slavery? Most are in African countries. Harry, what do you say about this tragedy? See antislavery.org.
I think you know the answer to your question, you know it well. The people who scream and rant and 'protest' the loudest, care the least about any of the things they proclaim they care about. What they do is attach themselves to a cause du jour, to use and abuse, for own personal selfish gain, and nothing else. Celebrities and commoners alike. For money, for ego, for self adulation.
That's why they attack the softest targets, those who won't or can't fight back. Because they are cowards and weaklings.
Western nations, which are the most inclusive, most tolerant, most open minded in the world, are attacked from the inside because we have free speech. You're not going to get stoned, or lashed, or hung in a public square, or have your head chopped off, or imprisoned for life, or tortured, or thrown off a rooftop.
There's nothing brave in ranting about slavery from 100 years ago. Go try and rant about slavery in certain other countries, see how far that gets you.
M&H are just pathetic weak stereotypes. If Harry wasn't a Prince, he'd be dressed in black, wearing a balaclava, running around the streets, setting shit on fire and destroying small businesses, because his girlfriend told him it's cool to do that now, it's being the resistance, raised fist and all that jazz.
They are losers, who copy other losers, but on a different level. But still losers, they are.
We do not know if the baby was officially born of a surrogate or exactly why he did not receive a royal title at birth. The best thing we can say is that there was a whole lot of squirrelly things going on at the time of when the birth was supposed to have happened which have resisted logical explanations that we have discussed earlier.
I happen to be on team pillow (had not thought of her possible having surgery earlier in her life but I have heard of even some young people getting it because they were able to convince the doctors they did not and would not ever want kids).
Yes. Thanks for spelling it out. Where I wanted to go is exactly this: cowardice. To be a public figure and speak against the very status quo you are upholding, is deadly. Imagine what would happen to them if they demanded change concerning sex trafficking?
Your scenario on Harry in a black hood (I saw plenty of those in years past) protesting, was absolutely brilliant...
If Rachel was breastfeeding Archie, then that child likely starved to death. Her breast size never changed from the moment she announced her pregnancy up to today. That, to me, is the most telling symptom of her so-called pregnancy. As far as the black dress from the Lion King binding her breasts, it was just too damn tight like the green superwhore get up at the Commonwealth service. The back fat hanging over was quite distracting as well as the torn seam on the too tight sleeve. It’s like she determines she is a certain size and, yet, is not but wears it anyway. That would explain the visible underwear lines, the bunching up, the straining seams, the too long trousers etc.
Which is exactly what it looked like. A bunch of stuff from the prop shop.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/12898558/simon-cowell-talks-prince-harry-meghan-tv-career/
ay, it emerged that Harry and Meghan have recorded a podcast with five teenagers at a studio in Santa Barbara, California, to mark World Mental Health Day.
It’s like she determines she is a certain size and, yet, is not but wears it anyway. That would explain the visible underwear lines, the bunching up, the straining seams, the too long trousers etc.
______
and the pit stains, grease stains, tags hanging off garments etc.
@Superfly,
Western nations, which are the most inclusive, most tolerant, most open minded in the world, are attacked from the inside because we have free speech. You're not going to get stoned, or lashed, or hung in a public square, or have your head chopped off, or imprisoned for life, or tortured, or thrown off a rooftop.
______
While I have a notion your reply to my rhetorical question as to why Saint Meghan has not come for modern slavery in African countries was *possibly thinly veiled, it was very note worthy.
Western nations and "free speech" are great to live in if you are of the dominant culture. Meaning, upholders and promoters of the status quo: corporate mindedness, avarice and greed at all costs, merit based societies (not open to cultural differences in mores and value systems), where marginalized people are shoved so far in the back and muzzled, that when out of extreme frustration and anger they finally are compelled to cry out, they are demonized. Perhaps you and I both know your response to this?
Ms. Meghan Markle and Mr. Harry Windsor do not get to tell Joe and Jane in the street that they are allies. They are not. They know nothing of what it is like to live in an inner city, urban, poverty stricken, demoralizing, existence.
Or of a tragic existence as my maternal great great grandfather lived in coal mining country in West Virginia. He came from Northern Ireland right before the civil war and was a Confederate soldier. The coal mining communities of Kentucky, West Virginia, Wales in the Uk, Ludlow Colorado mining massacre etc. where miners and their families are killed and/or stricken into poverty and debt slavery (are examples of this discourse) if they dare speak out against the coal barons by trying to unionize.
Thank you again for your great reply! It got my juices flowing. These types of exchanges keep my mind young and fresh...sort of... :D
That's kind of what I mean. The article you linked came out less than a week ago, so without an overt move (or a telling omission) from Victoria, it's not clear whether she's distancing herself from Meghan or not.
When I read it last week, I took it as Meghan's way of doing promo for her inevitable reality show. And of telling us how we're supposed to see it. She's not cashing in; she's being real.
I did doubt the story as soon as it broke. "Vic has always benefited from showing the public the 'real' her": First of all, nice use of "Vic" to give a sense of familiarity. Second and much more importantly: Victoria Beckham has terrible PR and a failed reality show. When was the last time she seemed authentic (to borrow Meghan's new favorite word) before the cameras? (My opinion: 2001, at the Ali G interview.) She's hardly a mentor for someone who wants the public to start seeing her differently. Not only do I doubt she gave Meghan any such advice, but I'm amazed Meghan chose her name to drop. Yes, there are superficial similarities between the Beckhams and the Harkles -- and I can see why Meghan would want the kind of press David and "Vic" used to get. But Victoria is terribly unpopular these days and has been for years. It's an awful association.
As in, how could Harry face aristocratic circles and admit to having a surrogate kid with no title or lineage?
Also, it makes sense that Meghan and Harry decided swiftly after 'his birth' to leave the country. It's been one whole year that the Harkles haven't been in the UK, which is a majority of Archie's life. I do also think it's why he has a casual name, is never seen, and is kept away.
It's the most reasonable explanation from the long list of hiding, covering, clothing, and positioning issues Meghan has yet to explain.
It would also make sense that Meghan was stunned silent at the presentation of Archie to the press. She was probably afraid she would say something. At that time, she just looked like someone who put on 20-30 pounds quickly and was quite bloated all over from her ice cream intake, but never looked 'postpartum'.
Welcome Unknown but here's the deal.
Unknown comments are deleted. To avoid this, please get a screen name.
First, make sure you have a gmail account. I recommend using a unique gmail to this blog for extra security and to avoid doxxing.
Second, search Google Accounts. You will land on the page where you can sign into and make updates to your account. If you don't have a gmail, you will be prompted to create one.
Third, go to the Personal Info tab. In the Profile section, you can click on "Name" and change to whatever you like.
Whenever you are logged into your Google Account, your name should post to the blog.
Hope this helps!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8828167/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-join-activist-Malala-Yousafzai-virtual-chat.html
'It's been a lot of really good family time': Meghan Markle and Prince Harry say they feel 'fortunate' to have watched son Archie's 'first steps, first run and first fall' during Covid-19 crisis as they join Malala Yousafzai for virtual chat.
With those two, I require proof or it didn't happen.
Part 1
Seen on tumblr copied from old Gusrdiian.UK article
This article is more than 15 years old
Renegade royal flouts the rules
Sandra Laville
Harry still big problem for PR machine
Thu 13 Jan 2005 08.21 GMTFirst published on Thu 13 Jan 2005 08.21 GMT
In a world of risk-averse royals Prince Harry has yet again broken the rules.
Pictured in a Nazi uniform, clutching a cigarette and a drink and resplendent in a swastika armband, the younger son of Charles appeared disgraced in the tabloids yesterday. It is not the first time he has been criticised for his behaviour.
Prince Harry, with his shock of red hair and Hooray Henry attitude, has always been the renegade royal. From allegations that he was involved in drugs in a pub in Gloucestershire to claims that he attacked a photographer outside a London nightclub, the younger of the two princes had always been a problem for the slick royal PR machine.
He was sent home early in disgrace from Argentina after claims that he had run amok. The allegations were that he was carousing at local bars, but they were denied by local government officials in Argentina and by Buckingham Palace.
"Harry spent the vast majority of his time at the polo ranch where he was staying and went out infrequently," insisted a Clarence House spokesperson. "At no time did he stay out late or become involved in excessive drinking."
The story was different, however, in the native press. The Argentinian media stated that the young prince had to be restrained and controlled as he drank in local bars.
They said he had dodged his police guards, and visited local nightspots and caused chaos.
During his time in Argentina, the prince worked in stables in what Buckingham Palace had hoped would be a respite from his colourful recent escapades.
These included a fracas with a photographer outside a London nightclub last October which was splashed across the tabloid media.
Then there was the furore over claims that the young prince had cheated to obtain his A-level exam at Eton. Edexcel, the exam board involved, ruled there was insufficient evidence to reopen an inquiry into the allegations made by the prince's former teacher that he had cheated.
But the stain on the young prince's name appears to have been indelible.
Prince Harry's choice of outfit a week ago, published last night, was condemned as insensitive and tasteless by Holocaust survivors.
The 20-year-old prince had been a guest at a fancy dress party thrown by the showjumper Richard Meade. Both Prince Harry and his brother William are friends of Mr Meade's son Harry, who was among a group of pro-hunting activists who invaded the Labour party conference in Brighton last September.
According to fellow huntsmen, the Meades are renowned for the parties they throw at home near Chippenham, Wiltshire. Last week's event appears to have been no exception.
But in the current climate, with sections of the countryside at war with the government, the young prince's demeanour could be seen to be a step too far.
In the last few years, Prince Harry had been dogged by drink and drugs scandals. This latest furore involved an incident where he was photographed by a fellow guest at the party who then sold the incriminating pictures to a tabloid newspaper.
Whether it was a mere joke or a desire to earn a financial reward, Jewish groups last night reacted with fury to what they said was Prince Harry's insensitivity at a time when they are commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.
So last night, Prince Harry was, yet again, forced to make a formal apology.
It seems that Princess Diana's youngest son has spent the past few years saying sorry for his irreverent behaviour.
But in between these moments, the young prince, who was pictured with his mother touring central London to visit homeless people, has made a point recently of appearing in public doing good works.
In the past few days he was seen with his brother filling Red Cross parcels for tsunami victims in Asia, and in the weeks before that, the prince was seen doing the same thing for Aids victims in Africa.
Senior courtiers were reported last night as saying that after all that had happened, they could not believe he was so misguided as to dress as a Nazi.
But the public response to this rebel royal is often positive. With Princess Diana gone, his colourful love life has been followed closely by the tabloid newspapers.
Recently he is reported to have started a relationship with 19-year-old Chelsy Davey, the daughter of a controversial Zimbabwean businessman who runs several lucrative hunting outfits and has been reported to have been linked with Robert Mugabe.
According to a guest at a recent society wedding, when questioned about his girlfriend's origins, Prince Harry was said to have retorted that she was not "black or anything, you know".
But despite these indiscretions, the
The Harkles And The Contentious Conversation On Mental Health.
https://harrymarkle.wordpress.com/2020/10/11/the-harkles-and-the-contentious-conversation-on-mental-health/
Apparently Adele was the most trolled celebrity in 2019. Gemma Collins came second and Megalo was next. But in Megalo's tiny bubble world only she exists as the biggest celebrity so naturally she was the most trolled. Adele, a world famous singer, Gemma who was part of The Only Way is Essex and a daughter of Joan Collins ( honest admission: I had to look up Gemma) are nobodies in Megalo world. She never fails to display her textbook narcissim, does she? It's the one dependable thing about her.
Gemma Collins is not the daughter of the actress Joan Collins.
Gemma is a TV reality show personality.
As to the question posed by this post, I have no idea where the Harkles will be. That being said, I will most heartily enjoy watching the ongoing train wreck that is their lives.
This throws back to Nutty's eloquent post on Meghan about 'facts' and what is true, and her being a liar. Either she can't keep her stories straight or is delusional.
And if she is delusional this means she has mental health problems, and married someone else with known and public mental health disturbances to this day.
They are the last people who should be talking about Mental Health, as her Most Trolled comments proved she is still suffering from delusions and instead of preaching she needs to go get help.
Cliffs Minnows, MaryGrove, United Kingdom, 9 minutes ago
Thanks to HM and PC who will not remove their titles and patronages, permit them to keep taxpayer funded security and bankroll their obscenely expensive home, designer clothes, private jet jaunts, wigs, weaves, hair transplants, designer wardrobes, silly, petty and immature law suits, endless plastic surgeries, cr@p interior design items, expensive dinners and who the he ll knows what else, these two dild0s will continue to prate on, non stop, with their dumb@ss word saLads. The reason these two are so poorly behaved is because nobody tells them NO. They are awful, but HM and PC are far, far worse for funding and permitting this never ending sh 1t sH0w to continue. Shame on them both, the People, the Country and the Commonwealth deserve better from their Monarch and the Heir to the Throne. The cold, hard truth is HM and PC are responsible for this fiasco, they have let everyone down, enough is enough. How much more they expect the Public to take ? Remove H&M's titles and funding, NOW.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8828167/Meghan-Markle-Prince-Harry-join-activist-Malala-Yousafzai-virtual-chat.html
Thank you for the clarification.
October 4, 2020
"It might be a documentary, but it has a reality show feel with all of the set pieces trying to show how amazing and wonderful they are. It is a never ending self serving pat on the back because we are so good movie."
Crew member working on the alliterate one's movie.
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
From a comment in that blind
Have heard the embargo on her yachting tapes will end the same time and the bidding is going on . RF don’t have to lift a hand - just can stop “ intervening”. LOL the “ magical boobs in action”
Yeah, M said she has magical boobs...I do wonder what that could even mean. To me, boobs are boobs. Some big, some small, some firm, some floppy. But magical?
As the Harkles overshare with teens in a room filled with props, did they miss out to the best Zoom event of the week, The Carousel of Hope Ball, hosted by Oprah herself with Tom Hanks, Robert DeNiro, Samuel L Jackson, Jane Fonda--the A list of Hollywood Zoomed in. Did their invite get lost in the mail? Could they not afford a donation, assuming the A listers donated to this event or perhaps they are just expecting the huddled masses to do so.
Meghan and Harry will copy William's documentary style for their Netflix program
My theory is that the BRF are slowly allowing the truth about Meghan to come out.
I don't know why oil blotting makeup doesn't seem to work with this problem.
Harry’s shiny forehead could be carpet/claw burns.
Too much grovelling at Megs feet...
to whoever asked why Harry's forehead is so shiny - this is a side effect of Botox injections in the face.
Thanks for the answer and from the internet>>>
The shiny forehead you have observed on some patients who have received Botox injections is normal. A board-certified facial plastic surgeon with expertise in Botox uses only enough of the neuromodulator to relax the muscle underneath the forehead, and it can inhibit the pilosebaceous glands, which might result in a shiny forehead.
Why Does Botox Make Forehead Look Shiny?
www.realself.com/question/Botox-forehead-shiny
What struck me so hard this time was just how rehearsed it seemed and how MM’s Africa Interview had paraphrased/copied/plagiarised so much that Diana said and the extent to which MM had copied almost every wobble of the voice, each micro-expression and every little movement.
It was beyond creepy.
I used to think that MM played only parts which echoed her own character/life but now it bore out what another poster said a couple of weeks ago – that she has constructed her Self from the parts she’s played and she has incorporated whole chunks of Diana as well.
Perhaps we should be thankful that she never got the chance to play Isabella, She-Wolf of France, in any film or TV depiction, or to understudy Sian Phillips as Livia (`Don’t touch the figs!’) wife of Augustus in the TV adaptation of Robert Graves’s I , Claudius.
There was enough to convince me that the programme was shamelessly biased towards Diana and it raises the question `Why now?’ It’s not any sort of anniversary that I can see.
Was it intended as a dig at the RF or MM?
I would also like to point out that what makes me sceptical about Archie, is how these two emphasise normal things, which is what liars do a lot. Harry talking about breastfeeding, her mentioning Archie's first step....hello! Most parents witness their childrens' first steps and my husband has never ever mentioned my breastfeeding. It's like they WANT you to believe all these things REALLY REALLY HARD.
I think Kate (herself, and not William) only mentioned breastfeeding once after having all 3 kids, and in a private chat with a group of new mothers. And not in a group of teens talking about mental health.
These two just try far too hard to be believed in my opinion.
Good moaning WildBoar
I am just pissing by, wonking at you 😉
I needled a good loaf.