The Sussexes are simply beyond evil.
Lillibet is the Queen's personal nickname; I highly doubt she would want it used for any child, let alone a Sussex child. Using it is a gross invasion of privacy.
Diana wouldn't have been best pleased with what Harry's done with himself, either.
After tearing apart the Royals in public for two years, the Sussexes are trying to stay connected with them via these names, and appropriate their glamour and style.
How tacky.
Also, shout out to Doria and Charles. You're the only parents the Sussexes talk to any more, but no one thought to name a child after you.
Comments
Are these two genuinely insane?
She is EVERYTHING the money-grubbers of Money-cito aren't.
It is nauseating that they would use the Queen's childhood nickname in this way.
I am SICK.
REPOSTING FROM A MINUTE AGO IN THE PREVIOUS THREAD:
Also, UK Nutties, isn’t today the day D-Day is being honored in the UK?
Why did Mr Harry “I Love the Military (except Deal, and not more than Netflix” Mouthhoofin-Windsock decide to
drive attention away from those celebrations, speeches and honors with this basic baby news that has been
old since Friday afternoon and could have waited til Monday?
To overshadow cash-cow Charles' speech?
Or to overshadow: today’s 60 Minutes interview with Piers Morgan going over all Megs’ lies, and try to make Piers look mean for telling the truth about a vicious, psychotic LA woman who just bought a baby?
.🤨
Harry's wife taking the Queen's childhood nickname reminds me of Wallis calling the Queen Mother "Cookie." At first I thought she was just belittling a sister-in-law by forcing an informal relationship with her (which would have been bad enough); but years later, I learned it was an allusion to the possibility that the Queen Mother's biological mother had been a kitchen maid whom her father had had an affair with. The meanness and malice of that nickname goes beyond description.
As I said in the previous thread, narcs are extremely gifted at ferreting out what will make you feel bad and turning it up as high as it will go. And they will do it with glee.
the thing that really upsets me too is that this was said to be Prince Philip private name for her as well, and he was the last in her world to call her "Lilibet".....he is barely gone and these scoundrels slap the name on the surrogate's baby to stab a 95-year-old widow in the heart, even though minutes ago they were describing her as an uncaring racist who put the curse of "genetic pain" upon her family.
The concierge of Hell is probably going, "Damn, now we'll need even more flames for these two!"
I did see in the DM yesterday that their is a new memorial that was just completed for DDay. Seems like thats where I should focus my DM clicks and not on any stories about the private-lives of that privacy obesessed brit expat couple.
So true about narcs. About three years ago, I worked on a project with a company with a narc VP, whose nickname for one of her young staffers was "Chemo" because she was suffering from cancer, and coming into work daily long hours for this witch, once even rolling an IV behind her. I was horrified. Narcs are amazingly sick. They take glee from their vicious acts. They don't care.
Won't Harry get triggered every time Megs yells Lilibet?
Pasting my answer from the last thread:
I'll give Harry some credit. I think he was the first person to be horrified by his wife's choice. And he probably believed he had talked her out of it. I wouldn't put it past her to lie to him and then release the name into the wild without any consideration for his feelings.
And that's where my own consideration for Harry ends. For he's going to stand by her after this, of course.
A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman says: “The Queen, The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall, and The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been informed and are delighted with the news of the birth of a daughter for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex.”
12:35 pm
6/6/21
Spite, pure spite.
The name `Lilibet' is almost sacrosanct - few people had the privilege of calling HM that and now Philip has gone absolutely nobody does. So they not only drag it into their tawdry world but trample it in the mud, if not s*** all over it.
Words almost fail me as I try to describe my utter disgust at these two pieces of excrement.
The only consolation is that this may not even be a real child. If it is, she needs our prayers.
How many websites in that name have they registered already?
I spit on them.
Ruby_2_Zen, LOS ANGELES, United States, moments ago
I guess This is the 1st time the RF is hearing about this birth..lol. No official notice nor should there be one since they are not working Royals. Or they probably never answered the phone thinking it was Harry asking for money again or else he would spill more beans.
.......................
Esem, West Sussex, moments ago
They named their daughter Lillibet Diana to honour - no wait- capitalise on the institution they couldnt wait to escape from. Fortunately they own the copyright to all aspects of their family unit - kerching
....................
Tenor77, Wirral, United Kingdom, moments ago
Desperately trying to claw their way back into favour and hang on to their titles and entitlement.
.....................
mashell, Belfast, United Kingdom, moments ago
Big deal...no need for an announcement, you're private citizens...go away.
........................
Fredrick21, Alabama, Cayman Islands, moments ago
Liliibet will have more marketing power with such a direct link the the Queen
........................
saladme, Manchester, United Kingdom, moments ago
Glad the baby is ok. But what a nerve. Lilibet is Her Majestys pet name by the family. Obviously Diana was going to be in there. Now it will be much harder for their titles being stripped. What a pair of!!!!!! Can't say it won't be printed.
.............................
VegasGirl35, Las Vegas, United States, moments ago
Wow, they have some nerve. After the way they treated the Queen and trashed the family? Unbelievable.
.............................
Pretoriadz1, Richmond, United States, moments ago
Malarkey. They chose those names to continue to suckle for money off of royal prestige. I pray for their children to grow up with sanity, seriously, considering their parents. It's not the babies fault that they have manipulative parents. On one hand, bashing the family for PR and the other, claiming they 'respect' the Queen. There is an old saying that 'they don't have the manners they were born with' and that sure applies to Harry. Don't think Markle was ever taught any manners at all.
From Theresa Longo Fans twitter yesterday, by the way:
THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
·
22h
“Owenshire” property management mistakenly stopped a “fuming” Prince Harry who was cooling off on a walk after a #Megxit Montecito Mansion dust-up. Tension apparently sky high with mere weeks until the birth of baby 2. That’s all the details we have!
........thoughts?
.
so will harry announce in front of the chicken coop similar to the archie announcement in front of the stables.
will the good archbishop fly in for the christening.
will they post an announcement outside the house in montecito
was she silent during delivery because she wasn’t there
and did you see the announcement. all sort of jumbled. it’s pathetic
i sure hope it is a rent a baby because i would hate to have a kid in that environment
I'm sure it's true, of course, but if Harry and his wife (having been given a very stern talking to behind the scenes) were to deny it, that might save the Queen the insult of having her childhood nickname used for merching during the last years of her reign.
Yes, makes sense... And little Lili D. (can't use the full names) will be regaled with bedtime stories of granny Diana who was relentlessly pursued by the paps and who died because of the nasty BRF.
Smooth Kitty, Manhattan Beach CA, United States, 34 minutes ago
HMTQ specifically asked not to be called Lilibet after Phillips passing as it was his pet name for her, and they do this??? Despicable, the abuse they hurl at his family and his poor gran! the grifter and dim bulb name their child after the family they have spewed hate and publicly accused of ra..cis.m and everything else they can think of... reeks of hypocrisy and really makes no sense... anything to keep their wagon hitched to the RF! Markle and Harry are seriously nasty pieces of work!
Lilibet is what the Queen called herself, before she could manage `Elizabeth'.
I suggest we call the child Lil-let. Are the original Lillets still manufactured? Useless pads of cotton wool on a string that one did one's best to stuff into one's whatsit.
This is `Bold' alert:
NB Interesting - I just googled `lilibet.com' - got a warning that `this website is protecting itself from online attack' or words to that effect. They've got the sites registered already.
He then said 'So they're naming the baby after a racist?'
My impression from the few clips I saw of the Oprah interview is that Harry's wife was very careful not to drag the Queen into it. Everyone else in the BRF was fair game for her pollution, but when talking of the Queen, she told a sweet story about the Queen sharing a blanket with her and reminding her of her own grandmother.
If I hadn't been watching this train wreck for years, what would have raised my eyebrows is the odd decision to name someone after a sweet old lady who reminds you of your grandmother . . . and not your grandmother herself. But as @AnT pointed out in the last thread, Harry's wife is only associating herself with the (racisssss) Mountbatten-Windsors these days and doesn't care to remind the world she has a Markle side and a Ragland side.
@Cookieshark, I agree that it will be hard to sell the sugars on the idea that Meg is "finding freedom" by renouncing the Royal Family and then coming up with this name. The least she could have done would have been to throw Doria's name in there. Or some appropriately woke heroine, ie the Black writer Zora Neale Hurston.
"I'm so proud of my Black heritage, which is why I named my daughter after two white women," doesn't sound credible.
BookBug, Airstrip One, United Kingdom, 13 minutes ago
Just when you thought they could sink no lower, this PR move is despicable on several levels. First of all, it horns in on the very private life of the Queen. The name Lilibet was used by her parents because, as a toddler, Princess Margaret had a problem pronouncing Elizabeth. The name stuck, in particular with her beloved father. Prince Philip carried on using the name. It's well known in the UK that after the passing of her father, the only person to call her Lilibet was Prince Philip. It also ensures that for the rest of its life, the public will be reminded of the baby's lineage. Same with using Diana. Using her name ensures the monetising can continue unchecked. The Harkles can continue selling Diana's death to the highest bidder by the life the child. It also ensures that if the Queen removes their titles, they can whine and say ''....but we even named our baby after her''. That poor baby will be the gift that keeps on giving....the never-ending money-spinning accessory.
https://lookup.icann.org/lookup
As for the name 'Diana', it should be 'Diorama' just a miniature version of a real thing.
Tell that to those who died on Omaha & Utah beaches, as well as those on Gold, Sword and Juno.
The Royal Marines are well rid of their former Captain General. I still think he should have been drummed out, with his sword broken and his insignia ripped off, in front of big a parade as the French did to Dreyfus. We may not be able to send him to Devil's Island but the pair of them have the very Devil within them.
"That's an ugly name. I'm just here for the drama."
"I am shocked at the name."
"I don't like the name. My guess is she's going to be referred to by her middle name like Meghan. They might call her Lilly or Diana in private."
"I know it’s the Queen’s nickname but that’s such an ugly first name. Congratulations to them though."
"If my husband came to me, as a mixed-race woman asking that we name our only daughter and probably our last child together after the private nickname of his grandmother on top of the name of his mother I would riot. Based on the name only of those 2 children, you would never guess they have black blood. Poor Doria whose only daughter didn't see fit to honour her and her side of the family. I would be so so sad. They could have named her Elizabeth Diana Doria (in some royal families some siblings have 2 names, other 3 etc it is no problem) or Elizabeth Lloyce or do like Beyonce's parents did and name her Elizabeth Diana Ragland Mountbatten-Windsor etc. I mean even Barack and Michelle gave a Swahili name to their eldest to honour Barack's Kenyan blood."
I agree that it will be hard to sell the sugars on the idea that Meg is "finding freedom" by renouncing the Royal Family and then coming up with this name.
It is indeed an odd contradiction to throw in the face of her staunchest supporters, who took the Oprah interview as their cue to vilify the BRF.
"I'm so proud of my Black heritage, which is why I named my daughter after two white women," doesn't sound credible.
Maybe she realized that naming the baby after Kamala (or Harris!) would get her absolutely nowhere?
I too find the BarkJack account interesting -- they seem to hit it every time, even beyond the royals. My sense is they don't post without good intel.
@WBBM Said:
NB Interesting - I just googled `lilibet.com' - got a warning that `this website is protecting itself from online attack' or words to that effect. They've got the sites registered already..
.......fascinating find, WBBM!!!! Now, how will the RF react when the Harkles start selling clothing, toys, etc w the Queen's name on it? What will it take for them to do more than cough? This other part you added, about the announcement coming from the: "Press secretary' at the `office of the Duke and Duchess...'" Tells me they are definitely poking the bear hard in their teen-like fury at not being given everything they want, and for being lightly admonished for trying to kill their 99-yr-old grandfather.
Hmm....do they think they wiped out Philip, and now this attack will break the Queen down and send her off too, so they can get some interitance money so they can turn on the lawn sprinklers?
Will the RF break down and give them more millions in ransom for a month of peace during the "parental leave" -- or....
I feel confident we'll hear from Kamala with congratulations on the birth.
Is "Lilibet" an unusual name in the places where my fellow Nutties live?
For me, it's an unusual spelling of a fairly popular name. One of my uncle's sisters-in-law is a Lilibeth. And when I entered "Lilibeth" in a search engine just now, the first ten results were from the Philippines. There's a Lilibeth Valdez, a Lilibeth Dela Cruz, a Lilibeth Salvador, a Lilibeth David, a Lilibeth Genuino, a Lilibeth Acosta etc. But perhaps that's just the algorithm assuming I'm looking for local results. Is Lilibeth common enough in your own countries so that only its spelling in this case would raise people's eyebrows?
The names Rache and H chose make the rumors Rache chose surrogates that would give white looking children reasonable. Honestly, I wouldn't be shocked if Baby Rachel turns out blonde and blue-eyed.
HEAVY NOTES ON HER PLACE IN THE LINE OF SUCCESSION:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilibet_Mountbatten-Windsor
yup. here we go.
Other possible reasons why the new baby wasn't named after a strong black woman:
1. The black community has outlived its usefulness to Harry's wife. There's no reason to keep pandering to them.
2. Harry's wife would have liked to continue pandering but has realized that too many people have seen the narc behind the curtain. Any new efforts in that direction would just backfire.
3. The only powerful black woman Harry's wife even considered was herself. (Does anyone remember the interview in which she was told: "You're not the only powerful woman in the world"? She was furious.)
IIRC, I first heard it 60 years ago in O-level European History class, wrt to the `British lion' provoking the `Russian bear', a frequent theme in Punch political cartoons of the time. If you google the phrase in italics and go to `Images' you'll find a rich rich selection of examples.
Worse when they cannot even blame the BRF for vetoing black names or names from Rache's Ragland side.
I had to look up the names of Harry's wife's maternal grandparents. (I assume the paternal side is dead to her.)
Her grandfather was Alvin Azell and her grandmother was Jeanette. According to the article, Jeanette helped Doria with childcare when Doria had to work. Jeanette would have been the one Harry's wife referred to in the Oprah interview when she said that Queen Elizabeth "reminded me of my grandmother." And yet she chose the name of the (supposedly racist, white) woman who was like her grandmother rather than her actual (black) grandmother.
I normally want to be a fly on the wall of Anmer Hall, but today I'd like to go to wherever the highest concentration of sugars is. What they must be saying about this name!!!
good deduction on the name. I think you're probably right.
I was thinking of something like this:
MM: We are pleased to inform you that we will be naming our baby Oprah Michelle Kamala! You may thank us with money.
Oprah and Mrs. Obama and Kamala: Like hell you are, we just called our lawyers and the IRS.
MM: Grrr! I'll show you!!
.
I wonder if they were all approached to be godmothers. The only one I can imagine saying yes is Oprah . . . but if she did, she might be energetically reconsidering it, now that she has heard the name.
The dead don't write checks. Doria knows this. So she is probably pleased with the names.
EXHIBIT A
https://www.cheatsheet.com/entertainment/meghan-markle-sweet-relationship-with-her-grandmother-proves-she-is-genuine.html/
Meghan Markle’s Sweet Relationship With her Grandmother Proves She’s More Genuine Than We Thought
Julia Mullaney. April 19, 2020
.....Ever since Meghan and Harry started dating, there have been problems between her and the media. Stories begun to circulate about Meghan’s troubled relationship with most of her family, which led the public to initially get a bad vibe from her. And then, as her relationship with Harry became more serious, the media only continued to pick out stories that would harm the duchess’ reputation.
The public began to read the stories about Meghan, and it made it very difficult for her to develop a good relationship with the United Kingdom’s people.
Meghan’s sweet relationship with her late grandmother proves her genuine nature
Meghan had a “special” relationship with her father’s mother, Doris, while she was growing up, according to Meghan’s estranged half-brother, Thomas Markle Jr. Markle, who has often had negative things to say about his sister, said that she cared deeply for Doris, who died in 2011.
Doris was living with dementia in a California nursing home, and Thomas told biographer Andrew Morton that the duchess spent as much time with their grandmother as she could — and that Doris would “light up” whenever she saw Meghan, despite having difficulty remembering who Thomas and his father were. Meghan’s close connection with her grandmother shows a side of her that people don’t often see — a side that tends to go unreported by the media.
EXHIBIT B
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5139963/Meghans-grandmother-Jeanette-different-Queen.html
Two proud matriarchs world's apart: How Queen of Meghan's family Gran Jeanette was raised in a VERY different way to Prince Harry's grandmother (but was no less formidable)
Meghan's maternal grandmother Jeanette Ragland died in 2000 aged 71
She helped raise Meghan, 36, when her mother Doria was busy working
When she suffered a stroke later on in life Meghan helped look after her
...Joseph, 68, said: 'Meghan would sit there, talk to her, hold her hand, cook for her and take care of her – whatever she could to bring comfort. She loved her grandmother.'
And, according to Joseph, Jeanette helped raise Meghan while the star's mother Doria was working.
'My mother babysat while Doria was pursuing her career,' said Joseph. 'When Doria got off work she would go over to my mother's house to pick her up.'
Jeanette's father was James Arnold, a bellboy at the St Regis in Cleveland, Ohio, where he fell in love with its lift operator, Netty.
.
A general question:
Is "Lilibet" an unusual name in the places where my fellow Nutties live?
Answer: I'm surprised that anyone at all has used it. I've just searched on Free BMD (https://www.freebmd.org.uk/) - a site which posts the birth details from the Registrar General (England and Wales) from 1837 up the final quarter of 1992.
The particular page is -
https://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/search.pl
IThere are just 4 records of it being used from HM's birth to 1992. Admittedly, not all districts have had their records transcribed yet but I'll bet a penny to a pound that there are no more than 10 instances of its use in E & W all told.
People have , or at least had, too much respect for HM to display such gross impertinence.
HERE IS BABY LILIBET DIANA's ALREADY- LOADED & RUNNING WIKI PAGE
HEAVY NOTES ON HER PLACE IN THE LINE OF SUCCESSION:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilibet_Mountbatten-Windsor
This Insta-Wikipedia page obviously was placed by Sunshine Sachs along with Megs. SS has workers who are able to (trusted by Wikipedia honchos) revise Wiki pages every day of the week for SS clients. Of course Megs had lots of input and direction as for what to emphasize. Such as line of succession for #2 and baby Arch.
BRF--- You snooze, you lose! Outfoxed again by the SS/Megs combo.
Best possible outcome: Harry and his offspring are withdrawn from the line of succession and Andrew withdraws at the same time, bumping Bea and Edo Jr. into sixth place.
Harry and his wife didn't reveal Archie's godparents' names, to thumb their noses at decades of tradition and propriety (while gaslighting us about "privacy"). But I think that if they can scrape together enough big names, they'll be happy to let us know who the new baby's godparents are.
Harry's "foster father" David Foster and Katherine McPhee are very likely out. As are David and Victoria Beckham. (Not a peep from either of their camps in months!) Even Elton John has been silent. And Jay-Z and Beyoncé are probably still disgusted over that stunt at the Lion King premiere. I guess only James Corden is still talking to them. Is he still big enough not to be discarded?
.....indeed. Unless Oprah is part of the management team running the Harkle show for the backers? And this is another step to create a "rival court" in the US, while they work unsuccessfully to crush the real RF.
I am still expecting a dramatic "birth" story, since she has to one-up Zara's home delivery and Catherine's HG.
Hmm.....who has money, will say yes, and won't care if they see the kid or not since they are busy with their own lives, or know the truth?
Oprah
Tyler Perry
Misha Nonoo & rich oil baron hubs
Uncle Elton
Guy running Netflix
That's it. I'm out of ideas.
.
As in, `Let the Germans think we're going to land in the Pas de Calais and we'll catch them out by going for Normandy.'
Yeah, Wikipedia has really jumped the shark when it comes to biographies. Editing is extremely subjective and pages are occasionally locked despite being full of inaccurate information.
Heaven forbid you're right of center. Jack Posobiec's Wikipedia biography makes him sound like Hitler's evil twin brother. Locked for editing, of course.
I've contributed to Wikipedia myself in the past, but lost heart when it came to fighting the editing queens (of all genders and preferences) and the public relations flacks.
"Malia" isn't Swahili. It's Hawaiian for "Mary."
Thomas told biographer Andrew Morton that the duchess spent as much time with their grandmother as she could — and that Doris would “light up” whenever she saw Meghan, despite having difficulty remembering who Thomas and his father were. Meghan’s close connection with her grandmother shows a side of her that people don’t often see — a side that tends to go unreported by the media.
It's worse than I thought. She was close to both grandmothers and certainly well loved by both of them. But it's Harry's (supposedly racist) grandmother whom she openly wants her daughter to identify with.
I get that she wanted to hurt the Queen as much as possible, but . . . Did she even think this through? Her PR team's heads must be spinning!
Dan Wootton
@danwootton
·
2h
Am I the only one thinking it's a bit odd they would give their child a name so connected to the Royal Family they're so desperate to distance themselves from?
Quote Tweet
........901 responses, mostly bashing the Harkles' choice.
Piers Morgan
@piersmorgan
·
27m
To those asking for my reaction to the new royal baby, I am respecting her parents' constant pleas f
or privacy and declining to comment.
.
Thanks for the sleuthing. Why don't they use Jeanette? Oprah for sure is not going to ask.
Re: "Lilibeth"
I wish I knew why this name became relatively common over here, because I'm sure it had nothing to do with the childhood nickname of a Queen reigning a whole continent away!
Apparently, there are a bunch of Lilibeths in Venezuela as well. It's not a traditionally Spanish name, though, so how it caught on in the former Spanish colonies is still a mystery to me. I would have guessed that the name became popular during the Philippines' American era . . . but according to another online search, all American women named Lilibeth are of Filipino descent! Ah, this is just strange . . .
The heavy bronzer and fake tan ceased the minute she left the UK didn't it? She's conspicuously pale again now, under that Californian sun. Added to that, we were reliably informed that she was most put out that racism became the focus after Oprah. She was only ever using it as a personal weapon. She didn't intend the world to keep talking about other people and social issues. Who are they compared to her?
So of course you're right. She's done with pandering to people of colour. Racism remains her weapon of choice against the BRF, along with mental health. Both intended to make her untouchable. Except that it only works with idiots and people who should know better and haven't done their homework. The rest of us will keep calling her out and our ranks are swelling by the day. A new baby, wherever it comes from, makes no difference at all. Apart from massively raising our blood pressure today! That name ..
LOL her handful of famous "special" friends like Ellen and, err, um, Professor Kate Williams are on twitter praising the name.
From the DM:
Meanwhile, comedian and actress Ellen DeGeneres, a friend of the couple, tweeted: 'Congratulations Meghan, Harry and Archie.
'Welcome to the world Lilibet! I am more than a Lilibet excited to meet you.'
Photographer Misan Harriman, who took the pictures Meghan and Harry used to announce the duchess was pregnant, tweeted: 'Lilibet has arrived!
Congratulations to my brave friend and her lovely family! #allthatmatters #babyjoy.'
.
Even if the child was born abroad wouldn't the Palace place a notice outside Buck House?
I think they would . . . but also that they'll take advantage of the weirdness of this particular situation and not put out a notice.
Utter trash
I hope this finally p%$$es HM off and she starts taking things away.
Every thing.
Hasn't her show just been cancelled because she couldn't PR-away all those stories of bullying? I imagine she wants to suck up to Harry and his wife right now. But even they aren't dumb enough to let what's left of their brand be tainted by a further association with her.
Same for Chrissy Teigen, who seemed set to be Harry's wife's new celebrity best friend . . . until her old tweets and own bullying past came to light.
Even the friends who don't drop them don't do them any favors by association.
Prince Harry’s royal title dropped from Diana exhibition
Prince Harry is to have his royal title dropped from the credits of an exhibition at Kensington Palace showing the dresses of his mother Diana, Princess of Wales.
A week ago, the Diana exhibits came with a display panel that said “Lent by HRH [his royal highness] the Duke of Cambridge and HRH the Duke of Sussex”, the Sunday Times reported. But Harry’s HRH is to be removed with its inclusion blamed on “an administrative error”.
So now it will presumably say "Lent by HRH the Duke of Cambridge and the Duke of Sussex”
Hah!!!!!
That's the kind of thing that will drive H wild.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/06/prince-harry-royal-title-dropped-from-diana-exhibition-kensington-palace
I normally want to be a fly on the wall of Anmer Hall, but today I'd like to go to wherever the highest concentration of sugars is. What they must be saying about this name!!!
This is Twitter search--- https://twitter.com/explore
You put in Lilibet and this is what you get --->> https://twitter.com/search?q=lilibet&src=typed_query
Seems to me that the Harkles are getting 85% positive congratulatory comments. However this is distorted by the simple fact when a baby is born you congratulate. If you have something negative you zip your lips. There are some sarcastic Tweets, that they dumped on the BRF the last two months, with the BRF's genetic harming Hapless, then here they are giving $2 two Royal connected names.
My new name for #2 is $2. Their new baby Mercharella.
To BRF- You snooze, you will always lose. Within one year Megs will be merching out $2, such as a line of Royal Sussex baby Lilibet clothing, Megs will defy the BRF, she will ignore any BRF threats to do something about this.
Congratulations to The Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the birth of Lilibet Diana! The Queen, The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall and The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge are delighted with the news.
Lilibet is Her Majesty’s 11th great-grandchild.
This is outrageous after spending three years crapping all over the Queen, her late husband, Charles, the monarchy, and the wonderful people of the UK.
Meghan is profound narcissistic personality disorder at its highest level on display, folks. Harry is just her puppet.
This is also passive-aggressive behavior.
And they are using an innocent baby as the tool to do it.
Added to that, we were reliably informed that she was most put out that racism became the focus after Oprah.
And not just any racism, but racism in the dratted, pesky BRF! Even when she was demonizing them, people preferred to talk about them than about her.
I think she was hoping that the part that would get everyone going was her description of her and Harry's marriage as "greater than any fairytale you've ever read." (Oh, the maudlin prose . . .) She was all set for Harry and herself to shoot to the top of some Hollywood's Greatest Love Stories list . . . only to find that nobody else cared.
And now that Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck are back together (whether it's for PR or not), it will take Harry's wife a lot more than a second Oprah interview to get people talking about her "fairytale" the way she wants them to.
Royal family Twitter has a post now.
Is this the high road again? We've all seen how well that has worked.
But I still have some faith in Prince William's description of the BRF as ducks paddling frantically under the water, while being cool as cucumbers on the surface. He is probably "incandescent with rage" (Ha!) over this direct act of disrespect toward his grandmother and sovereign, but he's too intelligent to indulge a knee-jerk reaction. (Man, am I optimistic!)
I have good news everyone. We can now rest assured that Charles will indeed be slimming down the monarch, cause their is no way there will be a Princess Lilibet after the passing of the one the greatest monarchs of all time, who happened to start her own life as Princess Elizabeth.
They didn’t name this baby Lilibet to honor the Queen. This is a thinly-veiled narcissistic attempt to CONTROL the Queen. .
Well said, HappyDays. I hope the RF realize this, or that Lord Geidt has a call planned with the Queen soon.
------
@Enbrethiliel said, Is this the high road again? We've all seen how well that has worked.
I agree, and I am so tired of this particular road. Can hardly wait for Lady C and River to talk about this naming debacle.
@JennS,
Hello!! I have been trying to mind-channel you for the past couple of hours! Lol, so glad you are here on this big day, in spite of everything you are going through now in preparation for surgery. Sending good vibes to you all week long and will put the good vibes beam on "ultra" this week! (Though I still think you are sipping cocktails with HotRob at a Montecito hideaway.)
You write this and I agree 100%: It really is such a personal and private nickname and the Sussexes choosing it as a formal name for their child is an undignified and intrusive disgrace. And it's far too informal for a royal child's name - even worse than Archie!
Complete invasion of the Queen's privacy! These two lunatics have no "off" button with their hate and madness, do they?
Fan-fic? 12 year old fan fic? Harry?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Meghan,_Duchess_of_Sussex
Catch up later 🙂😳
Do check out the video of cartoon H rapping `black man born in a ginjah' if you need a chuckle.
Why not just name the kid Doria, or is this all about Harry? As usual?
Meghan has done a good job claiming the RF are exceptionally mean to her, while pandering to her husband and forcing him to protect her like Diana.
Unfortunately for him, she also gets to make her own personal fortune off all her 'hardship'.
Not sure the guy is paying any attention at all. Why would anyone want to live like this?
Thanks for beaming good vibes! I wish I was indeed sipping some Crack-Babies with HotRob - I'd be extracting secrets while lounging on the beach!🤣
The idea that "Lilibet" started out as Baby-Maj's garbled attempt to pronounce her own name makes it a highly insulting choice! It's not even an actual name. It's a very private and loving nickname that very few people used.
Also didn't the birth already happen days ago? What's with the delay in reporting this toy-shop delivery of the latest vinyl bundle of joy?
Did they need to make sure they weren't spotted somewhere they should not have been? Were they keeping the paps from figuring out any weird details of their latest plot?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_Meghan,_Duchess_of_Sussex
The Markles are each described in such a negative manner.
Meghan is so predictable.
Lili-BOT's page is already up and running.
The Harkles - especially Meghan are truly revolting.
I see they have actually named the hospital: Lili-BOT made her first appearance at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital.
Despite what I know about NPD, I still don't understand how Markle would NOT be embarrassed at the very obvious sycophantic use of the Queen's nickname.
This is the latest River - the machine got the wrong last time.
Good to see you're around. I don't know if you should watch/read the latest H&M news, the shock and disgust mightn't do your health any good 😬. Good luck for your op.
the Duchess of Sussex said that she had been told that changes would be made to remove that entitlement as part of Charles's reported plans for a slimmed-down monarchy.
Prince Charles's plans for a streamlined monarchy were known to us way before Harry met his current wife. But does anyone else think that removing the entitlement from Harry's children was a much newer idea? Dating no further back than, perhaps, last year?
Harry has been kept occupied by the whirlwind courtship, gobs of sex whenever he saw her, then a quickie engagement, fast wedding and then immediate pregnancy, then secret planning for Megxit, heading to Canada, then fleeing to Cali and crashing at Tyler Perry’s house until they bought the mudslide mansion, the creation of Archewell, signing some contracts to feed off of Diana's corpse, and a second baby, all interspersed with tons of drama while casting shade and crapping all over HMTQ, Philip, Charles, the institution of the monarchy, and the wonderful people of the UK.
But unless Meghan decides to match the Cambridges with one more planned but unplanned third child that knowing Meghan, she might order a set of twins to one-up William and Kate, Meghan has now pretty much checked all the “big moment” boxes in her relationship with Harry.
Even if they are wealthy, the hum-drumness of day-to-day living together will rear its head. After 3 to 5 years of it, this is when many couples break up, which is why many divorces take place around the 7-year mark.
The only reason Meghan will have to keep Harry is if she loses her titles of they divorce.
Unlike Diana and Sarah Ferguson, Meghan is not a British citizen and obviously never intended to become one because she never progressed through the process of getting UK citizenship. Why would she if she never intended to live there in the first place and never intended to spend her life as a working royal. Visiting pet shelters snd homes for the elderly was small potatoes for a self-serving narcissist like Meghan.
But without British citizenship, I think it gives the royal family a solid legal reason to remove her titles if she and Harry ever divorce.
Meghan is enough of an elitist that she may very well think she can bully or manipulate HMTQ, Charles, or even William ( whomever is the reigning monarch is at the time) into allowing her to keep the titles, but by then, I think each of these three royals will have had their fill of her antics and bomb throwing. And perhaps Harry will have had his fill too.
If Harry wants more children, he can have them with his younger British wife after Meghan.
She'll probably snipe back soon, saying that nobody exclusively owns the names (and versions of) Elizabeth and Diana, just as she once said nobody owns the word "royal." (How did that work out for you, Mrs. H?) This might be another "Service is universal" moment.
She would have reaped so much goodwill naming a daughter after her black grandmother who had helped raise her. But it's not goodwill she wants, but chaos.
Here's Murky Meg's offering
Vindictive, therefore ugly.
What a pair of ugly, ugly people.
What a slap in the face to The Queen. Yet another one. At her age.
Ugly.
"""I mean even Barack and Michelle gave a Swahili name to their eldest to honour Barack's Kenyan blood."
"Malia" isn't Swahili. It's Hawaiian for "Mary."""
I know you are responding to a comnent which was in turn copied from LSA, but the original commentator is surprisingly uninformed to claim Malia is a " Swahili name in honour of Barack's Kenyan blood"
A surprisingly statement considering LSA is a forum for African Americans and African diaspora.
Putting aside the entymology of Malia, Swahilis are a very dustinct tribe and culture along the East African coast. Being from Kenya doesn't make one Swahili. There are lots of different tribes in Kenya. Plus it's well known that the Obamas (and Lupita Nyongo) come from a tribe called Luo.
If Harry wants more children, he can have them with his younger British wife after Meghan.
I doubt any British woman would care for Doria's daughter's sloppy seconds. All the same, it amuses me to switch from calling her "Harry's wife" to "Harry's current wife."
WisdomAndLight, Kent, United Kingdom, moments ago
IMO I cannot see how this breaks the genetic pain as Harry is determined to keep reminding us of his relationship with the RF. He has now inflicted genetic pain onto his new born daughter. Well, good job there is no such thing as genetic pain, otherwise poor child.
Narcs feel nothing. And if M is a serious narcissist, she certainly doesn’t care about anyone but herself, not even her kids.
She will therefore name her own children (rental tributes) after family members she actually dislikes, using their private nicknames, and she’ll even name her son via a catalog of Soho House Harrison label home goods; she’s sick.
So the use of this baby name would simply be another ice cold publicity move, from a person who is unevolved, damaged, dead inside —with the added appeal of being insulting and cruel to the Queen.
That’s all I can figure out.
She must have wanted to induce a premature birth as early as April, when the BRF pretended she didn't exist during Prince Philip's funeral. That was likely where she got the "Lilibet" idea, too.
And she could have floated the "summer birth" for the sole purpose of stressing Prince William out. The possibility that she, Diana 2.0, would give birth around the time of the unveiling of the actual Diana's statue, must have lived rent free in his mind for months. And for what? For nothing!
http://m.policy.dcfs.lacounty.gov/Src/Content/Vital_Records_Birth_Deat.htm
@Lt Nyota Uhura
She must have wanted to induce a premature birth as early as April, when the BRF pretended she didn't exist during Prince Philip's funeral. That was likely where she got the "Lilibet" idea, too.
______
Madam has organized births etc. according to her whims. No one has been given any indication of when she will "give" birth.
I don't doubt you. I just am gagging over the ugliness they are putting out with the "Lilibet" nonsense.
I am nowhere near 94. Let her come after me to have my reaction to this incredible slap in the face. HMTQ can't slap her, I guess, but I surely will, if given the chance.
Also, any earlier and there'd be serious questions about the `miscarriage'.
I have a suspicious mind.
A friend emailed me this great insight from her 85 year old aunt....who is furious about the name choice.
Her aunt says that she thinks: that because Megs tried and failed to actually snag WIlliam once she got into the family circle, and because she is insanely jealous of Catherine who did win William, she is trying to steal and recreate what she can:
* a big house like Anmer Hall (“like” only to someone as tacky and unsophisticated as Megs)
* a pregnancy issue like Catherine, though the HG was real and auntie also thinks the miscarriage was fake
* an eldest male child named with George’s nickname,
* now a daughter named in a similar way to Charlotte.
* a book like Kate (though Kate’s is a worthy publication)
Auntie says Megs’ psychotic narc strategy will be trying to message William: “look i am like Catherine but better, pick me”. She says she thinks all of Megs’ games are that simple/stupid: get WIlliam’s attention, win William — like in her mind, she is thinking why isn’t he seeing he can switch to her and have the “same” life with Megsy.
When asked what she thinks about “Archie”, auntie scoffed: those two aren’t parents.
It is super creepy to think about, but auntie says she’s “seen women this crazy before this”.
.
Sit right beside me on the comfy suspicious sofa. Do have some tea! ☺️
I wonder if the baby was born sooner than we've been told and the stated weight is `healthy' in order to circumvent criticism that she's too big for the stated age?
Also, any earlier and there'd be serious questions about the `miscarriage'.
I have a suspicious mind.
______
You and me both.
That whole business of small bump on Oprah, versus big bump in the chicken coop, versus romantic photo with huge bump.
If she is trying to get me to set my rage-O-meter on max, she has succeeded.
, United Kingdom, moments ago
`The Queen, The Prince of Wales and The Duchess of Cornwall, and The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been informed and are delighted with the news of the birth of a daughter for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex.' (Buckingham Palace spokesperson).
Very interesting use of the word "for".....
Oh! Well spotted!
@WBBM, yes you are right-"for" sure is interesting. Come on people in the know, let it loose!
@AnT, I think Auntie has a really good idea there. Oh to be a fly on the wall in Anmer Hall.
The Baby Name Controversy
https://blindgossip.com/the-baby-name-controversy/#more-102546
This is more than a slap. It is a punch in the jaw.
Mmmmmm. What I wouldn't give.
Sorry Swampy - I clicked on the correct URL but the machine had other ideas. Hope you found the correct video in the end
No worries, WBB-m! As soon as I saw the name choice, I wondered what River said and searched. Turns out River said a lot!
My vote is they're both going to crash the statue event and thus get all of the media attention. I hope I'm wrong.
"Woman has a Lil Baby: Spotlight-dodgers ensure totally normal low-key birth by naming kid after Queen"
Daily Star.
Oh, one might ask, was I sick, or am I sickENED.
Well, I, along with every other piece of media I'm seeing, are just sickened.
“For”! Superb catch!
lilibetdiana.com
Hahaha! That headline!
So I just watched River, and am fanning myself in fury too , lol!
They disgust me, ultimate insult
Lese-majeste
God Save the Queen
Normally adjusted people would be horrified to be the object if loathing and worldwide censure. But to the maladjusted like her, it’s the biggest thrill she gets apart from scamming free jewelry and clothes. Notoriety is preferable to being ignored, and she’s done this because the BRF Has been ignoring her for the last year. She’s cried miscarriage, systematic racialist abuse, Suicidal thoughts, “grave pregnancy complications”—gee, The last one was mere days ago. Nothing but crickets from England, and hairy attended his grandfather‘s funeral alone, like the last three years had never happened. What was left that you have this baby, excuse me, alleged baby a month earlier than she had been teasing. Don’t know of three week old newborns get cleared to fly across the ocean, presuming there is a newborn who has a doctor. But her majesty does not have to let Harry’s wife into the country. She is not a British citizen, and she is certainly no loyal subject of the Queen. The statue ceremony is an entirely private event overseen by William, who is in charge of the guest list. If Meg thinks she’s getting an invitation, especially now, she’d better have another think. The gun in her hands is still smoking. I am fairly sure that one of the terms of Megxit Was that smegma never again darken UK shores. They may have to tolerate H because he is blood family, but the IRS is free to treat her exactly like they treated the Duchess of Windsor. Made a non-entity by her treachery.
'Buckingham Palace appeared to be caught on the hop by the announcement. It was also unclear whether the couple had consulted the Queen before choosing her family’s pet name.'
One comment:
HypeMan , ENGLAND, United Kingdom, less than a minute ago
The main news today should be how people have remembered d day today. Not one article.
Very true and it's not right. It's an insult to all the war veterans.
On a more positive note, the new parents are now on parental leave. I think this was going to be for a few months (4? 6?) so with a bit of luck we shouldn't hear a peep from those two.
First they stole Prince George nickname Archie and now, they use The Queen's pet name.
Tacky and unbelievably cruel.
comment over at Dlisted:
UK reporter Julie Burchill @BoozeAndFagz. "What a missed opportunity. They could of called her Georgina Floydina". This is UK media's finest. Taking the p*ss out of a dead Black man
From Skippy's site, and it is correct -- his sabbatical in the US began in May and runs through September:
Archbishop Welby is on a three month sabbatical in the USA. That should come in handy for the christening.
"....The statue ceremony is an entirely private event overseen by William, who is in charge of the guest list. If Meg thinks she’s getting an invitation, especially now, she’d better have another think...."
Maybe.
The statue initiative was originally a joint effort by Will and Harry. Knowing Harry, Will probably did do more of the work from the beginning but I don't think Will's ever been the only one overseeing it or the one "in charge" of it. Since it is a private event and not even a RF family event, I'm not sure why Harry stepping back/down/whatever from royal duties would change anything re: the statue either. Will could throw a hissy fit but I don't think that would be ultimately good for him.
That said, I don't think Meghan will try to come. I think she and Harry will use their spawn to try to interfere from this side of the pond. They're likely willing to even stomp on Diana's memory to punish the RF, or in this case, Will.
River appeared to be so upset that the closed captioning was not turned on.
As someone who uses it a lot in videos and tv, that (to me) was an unexpected turn. I have not seen a lot River's videos but the ones I have ... have always been CC enabled.
Here is how the sugar and buns spin is apparently going to go.....
From the Sun, proving you can have a very low IQ and absolutely no critical thinking skills,
and still be called a "royal expert":
PRINCE Harry and Meghan’s choice to name their daughter Lilibet was last night seen as an attempt to repair relations with the Royal Family.
Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor shares the nickname Prince Philip called his wife the Queen for more than 70 years — while the middle name is a tribute to Harry’s mum.
oyal author Phil Dampier said: “Lilibet is such a personal name to the Queen you would hope they gave the palace the heads-up.
“I suspect Harry and Meghan have realised they’ve overdone their criticism in recent months and the penny has dropped that they’ve caused deep hurt to Harry’s gran and other family members.”
Mr Dampier — who wrote Royally Suited: Harry and Meghan in their own words — added: “They might be trying to undo some of the damage.”
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15181992/meghan-markle-prince-harry-queen-princess-diana-lilibet-diana/
I see Henrietta has posted a link to this item on Blind Gossip, bu I already had it copied so I’m pasting it here in case you don’t use the link.
Also: this DM headline supports what the Blind Gossip item says about the Queen and the family not being given the common consideration that people usually give if they are planning to name a child after another family member, especially THIS family.
This is a combination of attribute appropriation, control, grandiosity, lack of boundary recognition, and generally just being rectal openings on the part of Meghan and Harry.
*********************
The DM headline noting the naming issue:
Harry and Meghan take parental leave from their jobs after revealing birth of daughter Lilibet Diana - as it emerges they told Queen her great-grandchild would be named after her 'before the announcement' (but Palace was still caught cold by timing)
***************
The Blind Gossip item:
The Baby Name Controversy
June 6, 2021
While you may think that naming a baby after a family member is a welcomed gesture of affection, that is not always the case.
In this family, names are usually discussed in advance and family members consulted before using their names to ensure that the all are comfortable and appreciative of the gesture.
This couple just completely violated that tradition!
“They did not consult with [the family] about the name or make any effort to secure anyone’s approval.”
While the couple is, of course, legally free to name their baby anything they want, their choice has roiled their relatives.
From a different source:
“While the couple may claim that they want to “honor” family members, there is absolutely nothing honorable about their actions. I assure you that [his family] is neither “honored” nor “delighted” by their choice of name. To the contrary.”
“[The couple’s] attempts to co-opt private family nicknames for their own use is transparent, manipulative, distasteful and selfish. It also confirms their compulsive need to seek affiliation with [the husband’s family] while simultaneously irritating them.”
“[His family] is keenly aware of this continuous pattern of behavior but will not comment on the matter except to provide generic good wishes.”
We were intrigued by the use of the word “affiliation” rather than “affinity.” The former suggests a desire for an official connection with something, while the latter is about naturally liking something.
That sounds about right. They don’t like his family… but they definitely want to profit off of that official connection!
Couple:
[Optional] What do you think of the name? Why do you think they chose it?
It is understood the Queen was informed by Prince Harry that her great-grandchild would be named in her honour, ahead of their official announcement which was made on their official website.
Who wants to bet that they led her to believe it would be Elizabeth and NOT Lilibet!!
On the other hand, the Hackles are really sick and twisted. They are do nothing crass celebrities. Hazbeen does basically nothing all day long. Same with the wife. They're taking family leave? From what?
She's going to run through the entirety of Hazbeen's money in about two years. PR, facial reconstructions, clothes, jewelry, hired help, house expenses, and recreational drugs.
If the wife shows up for the statue ceremony, there will be booing. She will be humiliated.
If the wife shows up for the statue ceremony, there will be booing. She will be humiliated.
I don't believe the public will be present at the statue unveiling. The press will be there for sure and maybe some invited guests but no public!
You can watch the Australian morning tv interview with Camilla Tominey about the baby on soap's. I can't find another link for the video.
https://the-best-soap-opera-ever.tumblr.com
I just discovered River’s channel the other day, And I’ve only seen part of one video so far, so I don’t know what Haz’s long term views on the Farkles of Montecito are, but I have noticed that many commentators otherwise extremely critical of the duo Stop short of touching the issue if her (to most)!glaringly fake pregnancies and her bizarre play acted motherhood games. Archie may get mentioned and “the new baby” In very vague terms, but it seems like the more politic and self protective of bloggers I don’t want to touch this potential minefield with the barge pole. According2Taz, Who otherwise has megs number in every conceivable way At least pretends to except for the purposes of her channel that Harry & his Cooter are actually parents. Not even Markle Critic Prime, piers Morgan has ever to my knowledge open to the can of worms about her motherhood. He may have his private thoughts, and probably does, but at least for broadcast purposes and in writing,He seems to except at face value that Meg gave birth to Archie. Considering what happened when he dared voice of public opinion questioning her suicidal ideation, Going on the record that Meg’s pregnancies are all elaborate charades is just an absolutely no-win situation for any journalist or a blogger, particularly if male. What they are compelled to say for public consumption due to liable/slander laws, and we know how litigation happy the Duchess of Sucksit is—Might be contrary to their actual beliefs. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens now that Meg has tried her con in the United States. Do we think Harvey at TMZ is going to swallow the official version and let it lie? For all that make raged against the British media, they are still very deferential to the Royals compared to the Hollywood shark tank. Madam keeps digging herself a bigger and bigger hole.
So, here is my own special thing that I invented years ago in my teens after my mother and aunt told me the whole life of this actress after we watched one of her movies on television:
The Elizabeth Taylor Theory of Life.
With extreme highs, come extreme lows.
For every bad thing, a good thing happens. Then, a bad thing.
For every stroke of luck, a Hope Diamond curse is coming.
For every victory, here's comes a defeat. Etc.
She was born breathtakingly beautiful, but had a shi**y stage mother.
She is an acting success, but will be panned for Cleopatra.
She finds love, but it's bloody awful Conrad Hilton.
She finds love again, but he dies in a crash.
She finds love again, but he's a neighbor and married to a beloved star with young children.
She finds love again, but it's wild drunk Burton.
Hope Diamond, but more bad luck.
Etc.
Beauty, and terrific bouts with illness and injury.
But she got to be friends with Michael Jackson and Rock Hudson and stand up for them.
But more illness and injury. Death of her friends.
Basically my theory came about the more tales my aunt and mother told me about famous people.
Clark Cable and Carole Lombard! Isadora Duncan! Etc. Told with dramatic European flair!
I began to see it almost mathematically....a certainty. The more you claw upward and tempt fate,
the higher the chance Fate is planning
something scary for you...
I reckon these two Harkles are soon to step off the edge of the sun.
.
Trevor must be so happy he got away from this creep. She is such a weirdo.
Doggone
It’s not wrong to reason
Next time she’s in season
She opts for tubal ligation
Otherwise I fear
She’ll deliver a litter a year
101 Damnations!
Agreed re tying up the funds -- and just think, from what I've read, Princess Anne happens to be the royal in charge of this!
@jessica,
The way you just described her mode of living is not only ringing true, but it's terrifying. I have to assume Harry is just the
same sort of person, and is her pathological twin. And god, you're so right -- Trevor must be counting his lucky stars daily
that those rings arrived in the mail to free him of this madwoman.
@Magatha Mistie,
101 Damnations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One of your best yet!!!!!!
A retweeted comment on GoFakeYourselfMeghan:
Harry and Meghan named their daughter after someone they implied was a racist, coupling it with a woman who tried to ruin her life/family.
These people are sociopaths.
“[The couple’s] attempts to co-opt private family nicknames for their own use is transparent, manipulative, distasteful and selfish. It also confirms their compulsive need to seek affiliation with [the husband’s family] while simultaneously irritating them.”
I was willing to believe CDAN that Harry's wife named their son "Archie" because it was an anagram of "Rachel," but now that Blind Gossip is contradicting them -- that Lilibet isn't the first time Harry and his wife have co-opted a family nickname -- I'm gonna trust Blind Gossip instead.
What they've done with "Lilibet" is really sick. That they've now done it twice is even sicker.
Harry has to be using again. Even I don't think he would have done this twice.
But we have not really talked about how Prince Charles might be thinking or feeling.
My personal thought is that if he were wavering about some sort of come home, I welcome you with open arms ... I think that moment has passed. He will always love 6 but this is his mother who had just lost her husband, hisfather. And he was dissed in the interview for having the audacity to cut 6/them off financially. Especially after all that money he gave them so she could have the wedding of the century (which she later said they didn't need). Or all the clothing she needed to fit in (while rumors swirl that she was making money off the deals). Or the increasing questions about the home reno.
I can imagine him thinking: how often do I need to be bitten before I realize I need to protect my other members of the family from being bitten too. Or really, how far do I carry duty to my son (6) over my duty to my other family members and country?
This may actually work against them long term. Short term anger, long term fallout.
I read a book on luck once and here was the author's theory about it. He believed that every person has about 10-12 areas to concentrate on in their lives - survival, family, health, career, money, etc. He said that people became unlucky when they concentrated on one area to the expense of another. So, a man who works hard for his career might neglect his children and find that his hard work is outdone by a divorce and the financial and emotional upheaval it brings, etc.
Also known as chasing after the one who doesn't want you and is happy with their spouse.
Reminds me of Gone With The Wind.
It didn't work for Scarlett either.
Record breaking.....
Top comment on the DM article:
Takes a lot of nerve to name the baby that after what they have done. Hope baby is healthy.
# of Likes for this comment: 37,570
Second top comment:
She has the nerves to call her baby after Harry's grandmother, after trashing his family every way possible..unbelievable
#of Likes for this comment: 34,445
I think the Harkles finally jumped the shark.
We were taught a similar theory in a business seminar, and there were 7 areas, just like those you've mentioned.
@abbyh,
It IS like Gone with the Wind, isn't it? Wow. Hadn't thought of that.
Pamela Aust, Melbourne, Australia:
Allegedly the baby girl was born around 2 May, she was very sick baby as well as the real Mother, as the Mother went into hospital early because of problems with the birth. Been waiting wondering when Harry and his wife would announce the so called birth allegedly.
Agree....the one thing that amazes me is the blind spot River has about the idea of surrogacy. There are videos and entire blogs devoted to archiving the evidence, and he needs to put down the fan and partake. Not sure why he is so adamant, though he does say he is willing to change his mind if shown evidence.
I have a feeling that evidence is on the way to the surface. Someone in the Cottage Hospital of Santa Barbara is going to say something to someone who tells someone else and they call TMZ. In fact, TMZ probably already had someone working there as it was the most likely location for the "birth".
There is no polite traditional silence of facts, or royal gag order, in the US. So I am just waiting....
there is no royal gag order, but there is HIPAA to protect health information. On the other hand, if she was never at the hospital, there's no info to divulge...
@AnT
101 Damnations has so many layers 😉
@Puds
Cheers for your earlier comment.
Laugh at ‘em, hard 😘
so I was just posting to GWAH, and now I read your comment and the other DM comment you posted from the Australian woman. That's what I mean (if indeed the reposted comment is based on truth), the story is going to leak out.
The Harkles aren't beloved in America outside the paid media and handful of rabid sugars. They are not America's sweethearts and they've also recently been awful to the queen and their family. Someone who thinks they're ridiculous is going to talk.
People in California and elsewhere are familiar with the concept of selling celeb tidbits or making that tip call. In a hospital, it's going to be loose, stories will be shared, and people need money after a pandemic.
The DM has about 21k comments and about 95% are negative so we're not the only ones who feel this way.
bookworm has a video out
@AnT "The Harkles aren't beloved in America outside the paid media and handful of rabid sugars."
I think AnT has perfect rejoinder to Puds observation. My 2 cents. Fine, go ahead and call your PR, "Press Secretary" and "set up court." Nobody here in America gives a fig about these 2 pretenders. Let them fritter away their wealth and by all means claim delude yourself that you're bigger than Kate and William and their destiny. Outside of the satellite of the RF, they are two big nothin' burgers here.
Look at the Enquirer, TMZ, USWeekly, RadarOnline, other sites that sneak out details of stars who have been in treatment, accidents, etc. For example, all the information that tumbled out with the drowning death of actress Naya Rivera a year ago.
Even local news services about everyday people in car accidents, attacks. The info gets out, HIPAA or not. And, a case could be made for treason, or releasing information related to a possible crime (trying to pass a surrogate child into the line of succession).
In fact, with the advent of vaccine cards and public stadium and convention vaccinations, one could argue the the government already violated HIPAA privacy laws, making it null and void. TMZ, run by a lawyer, would certainly use that approach if needed.
"No his wife is allegedly wants to be a Billionaire, so she is at his back we need more money...Harry thinks he needs to make huge amount of money to make his wife very rich. Most likely allegedly she already has someone in mind to replace Harry, as allegedly there were rumors when his wife when staying at San Ysidro Ranch a number of times without her husband, she is having affair allegedly, if true or not?"
I'm purposefully trying to transcribe exactly and including all the mistakes in the original. Pamela's other comments are all anti-Harry and his wife.
Yes, and look at my recent comment "LIKES" tallies above.
There were over 37,000 likes for the most negative comment about the baby name.
The tally has already jumped to 37,969 LIKES, from 37,570 just a few minutes ago.
Great comments. You're right about the snub mindset, extending all the way back to the snotty remarks about "service" ---- and how the Queen doesn't own the word Royal. This makes me think that Megs broken mind includes a deep freak about not being born the royal she was raised to think she is, and this modern, adulthood obsessive war is the playing out of the burning valley in her mind.
@Henrietta,
Thank you for finding more of that women's comments in the DM.....I can't tell now if she knows something and is getting some info re the hospital, or is repeating speculation from other tweets and sites?
Yesterday, on whichever article about the Markles was the hottest, there were at least three commenters saying the baby was already here. But their other comments were very ordinary so I didn't give them much credit. So many other times the comments will be from a new account, they'll post info that contradicts all other sources, and then they'll just disappear. These I personally find more credible. Pamela Aust is somewhere in between.
Totally understand -- monitoring those comments as you are doing is a great way to sort of cull the stream and see what solid pieces of gold you can find. I do think it is quite possible Pamela heard something from an inside source or credible leak. And to think the Harkles could have saved themselves all of this speculation and the breeding and training of a flock of master sleuths (us! and others like us on LSA and tumbler and elsewhere!) simply by being straightforward and credible.
By being shady, negative, and floating on other lies, they've screwed up their own chances of their games remaining hidden forever. Because now in their effort to build press, they've raised speculations about the extent of their lies.
"Baby allegedly is NOT a Royal baby, Harry is not the
father allegedly."
Another of her comments:
"Even if there is any photo's later allegedly she is very cunning using friends baby or child as if it's their child and its not, or can even allegedly hire a baby or child, they are both con artist's and Harry is just as bad as his wife."
Anybody else notice she aces some English grammar rules and then inexplicably flubs others?
"They have really CROSSED THE LINE HERE, Lilibet was a family pet name for the Queen, not for Harry and his yacht wife to use for this baby. This is really Blackmailing the Queen and the Monarchy trying to stop them from removing their TITLES..."
"Yacht wife"? I only learned that term after months on the DM! And I've never gotten the word "blackmail" through any of DM's filters!
PUBLISHED: 18:14 EDT, 6 June 2021 | UPDATED: 19:16 EDT, 6 June 2021
Lilibet will NOT be a princess just like Archie isn't a prince – a move Meghan and Harry incorrectly told Oprah was because the 'rules were changed' to downgrade them
Lilibet 'Lili' Diana Mountbatten-Windsor has become eighth in line to the throne
But despite being Prince Harry's daughter she does not instantly receive a title
She will however be entitled to be become a Princess - a 'HRH' - following death of The Queen and succession of Prince Charles
Meghan made bombshell suggestion that Archie was banned from being a prince during Oprah Winfrey interview
Prince Harry and Meghan's newborn baby daughter will not instantly become a princess - but will be entitled to be one when the Queen dies.
Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor does not have an official title just like her two-year-old brother Archie.
But they will both be entitled to HRH styles when Charles becomes king because they will have moved up the line of succession to become the children of a son of a monarch.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9658201/Harry-Meghan-birth-Lilibet-NOT-princess-just-like-Archie-isnt-prince.html#comments
The world is enraged—and Smegma is delighted to be the cause. The whole world, or at least the segment of it who even knows who she is—Is full of HER today.
Unfortunately, this is true. In my case alone, it's so true that it's flattering to her!
I had been AWOL from the blog for months simply because Harry and his wife had been boring me for a while. Although I occasionally popped back in to lurk, I couldn't think of anything worthwhile to say. And it seemed that even the best comments were just rehashing things that had been said over and over. The Harkles couldn't get even half the organic interest that Harry Styles and Olivia Wilde were. It seemed as if they were fading into obscurity . . . which would have, of course, been a good thing . . . although an infuriating thing from you-know-who's perspective.
And then this happened. She knows that everyone in the BRF is "incandescent" and the rest of the world is howling along. Apparently, she can still win big.
https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/653024319040061440/i-cant-tell-if-strongwrite-actually-sounds-like
If it's not her, it's someone equally deranged.
Harry has to be using again. Even I don't think he would have done this twice.
He might indeed be using again, but my hunch is that even he knew taking the name Lilibet would go too far. So his wife had to lie to him and release the name against his wishes and behind his back.
He'll be standing by her, though, and letting her say it was "their" idea, so as not to lose face. And that will be all on him.
Megs may have won but at what cost, her reputation is in shreds,she has been proven a liar in the entertainment show and worse for her she is being mocked and laughted at.
She's a true narc. She doesn't care that the world pretty much detests her now. The point is that we're paying attention again and that nobody will ever be able to make her take back this incredible act of public disrespect. Even the Cambridges, through their official Instagram account, expressed delight in the birth of "Lili." She planted a bomb and got away with it. She doesn't care that she has been caught in the act, will be tried in the court of public opinion, and found both guilty and deranged. Let's call it terrorist's delight.
@AnT: At 3:07. That's something. Fortunes rise and fall. ET was a dramatic person, but her heart was very large.
Btw do you really think people will like the idea of copyright the name?"
A physician can write anything on the certificate. Individuals can change gender on their original birth certificates in CA. Since the couple isn't known for their veracity and LA is the city of illusion, I don't think the certificate would be a problem.
All she cares about is the number of clicks she gets, she doesn’t care the reason. This is why I fear that she will continue to escalate, and after she’s run out of fake spawn To christen with appropriated names from the royal family, she could very easily graduate to violence. Who’s to say she hasn’t already? I believe that any living being in the house with her, whether there are actual children there or not, or pets, or staff, or one addled royal husband—Rachel is just a short half away from hurting them, naming or even killing to keep her name in the news.
Per Henrietta’s post re. reports of a frail infant Delivered a month ago buy a sick surrogate, the sudden appearance of late term pregnancy complications for Smeg Make sense if this report is true. It was only what, three days ago that we were discussing what sort of pregnancy complications would lead to persistent nausea in the ninth month. Then 72 hours later, bam, The swift delivery of a healthy girl who was bigger than Archie? Was there some concern the baby wouldn’t survive, hence “complications”? Then the sudden swift turn around within hours to a surprise delivery of a girl named after the queen...If a surrogate had in fact given birth over a month ago, was someone getting ready to talk, and Smeg Had to preempt any leak with a sudden “birth”? For whatever reason, she couldn’t afford to wait to hijack Phillips birthday. They are baiting a recently bereaved 95-year-old woman and the entire family. But there’s no super injunction on the American media to protect them from their own lies.
Perhaps the long awaited Kraken is in the shape of Harvey Levin. Wouldn’t that be just delicious if that were true?
I have an extraordinarily abusive, self-absorbed SIL. I thought she would outlive us all. No. She is in hospice, having done herself in by not eating. She did something stupid, and punished herself. Slow death. The same will happen with the evil one. People like that come to ends that aren't pleasant, by their own doing. It might take 20 years, but she will do herself in by some ways or means.
Or someone will kill her out of rage, at some point.
Using the Queen's pet name is so far beyond the pale that I still have trouble comprehending it. Diana Elizabeth would have been fine, but Lilibet?! So incredibly thoughtless and cruel. On D-day, no less.
I could well believe that hazbeen is stupid and clueless enough to think it was meant as a tribute, but there is no doubt his whore did it out of spite. As he easily could have, too, no trouble believing him capable, but I also think he's thick as a brick.
Hopefully the child will be prettier than swing Archie. It's no wonder they don't show him. Carrot toy Archie was cute, and I think it's the same boy, but I can see why they limit shots and we only see him from certain angles. She ought not have bred with a ginger.
I hope both of these worthless pieces of excrement soon grow bored with their children and let someone else rear them.
Even if the copyright were for the whole name, "Lilibet Diana," it would still be the most shamelessly mercenary thing she has done to date. Which is really saying something!
I can hear the same old excuses from the copyrighting of "Sussex Royal." They were just doing it to protect the brand and to prevent others from capitalizing on it. (Well, why did they never do it for Archie Harrison, then?) The BRF were able to block the use of "royal," but will they be easily successful with "Lilibet"? Although the Queen can be said to own it the way no one else in the world does, she was never crass enough to copyright it.
Harry and Meghan: welcome to the House of Whinger
JENNIFER ORIEL
The Australian Newspaper
12:00AM JUNE 7, 2021
Australia will celebrate the official birthday for Queen Elizabeth II next weekend ahead of her platinum jubilee in 2022. The Queen is a study in resilience and the embodiment of duty, but it has been another annus horribilis for her. The death of her husband, Prince Philip, and her close friend, Michael Oswald, in April were followed by a series of public attacks on the royal family by her wayward grandson, Prince Harry. The royals’ response was a stiff upper lip. They rose to the occasion by rising above the fray.
The great virtue of America is to have produced a first-rate stereotype of how the world sees Hollywood, in the figure of Meghan Markle – a supercilious, self-promoting member of the PC class who bemoans the lot of the poor from a multimillion-dollar mansion in California. She is America’s princess now, but only after she failed to make it in the House of Windsor. Markle’s main virtue is to have whisked hubby Harry away to California where he can reign like pop royalty while his big brother, William, bears the burden of royal duty in Britain.
The Me You Don’t See was the unlikely title of a series about Harry, an already overexposed royal who basks in the spotlight yet deplores the glare of press scrutiny. In recent years, Harry has undergone a transformation. The former party boy known for dropping his trousers at a Las Vegas party later complained his privacy had been violated when photos of his naked romp leaked. Having found himself a 30-something bachelor with no bride in sight, Harry met Meghan, a TV actress with a blog. Shortly after their relationship went public, the dreary duo started to complain. First, they flew at the press. Then, the British public got a serve. And this year, in the warm bosom of an Oprah Winfrey show, Harry and Meghan capitalised on their liberty from royal tradition by trashing the royal family.
Part 2
Harry and Meghan: welcome to the House of Whinger
JENNIFER ORIEL
The Australian Newspaper
12:00AM JUNE 7, 2021
Harry might have been remembered as the royal spare who left luxury behind to fight terrorism in Afghanistan. Post-Meghan, he sounds more like a spoiled toff with an Oedipus complex taking talk therapy to extremes. On Oprah, he compared his wife to his late mother, Diana, Princess of Wales. He also said Prince Charles had stopped taking his calls. Wouldn’t you? We saw a therapy session where he sat arms crossed and eyes closed with his fingers tapping. Apparently, it releases trauma. But his chosen therapy, eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, has been studied in controlled conditions and also shown to increase susceptibility to misinformation as well as inaccurate memories.
In the Armchair Expert podcast, Harry spoke about his relationship with his father and something called “genetic pain”, which he believes is passed down through generations. Like many parents, Harry and Meghan believe they will break the generational cycle of pathos they seem to hold responsible for their own character failings; a serious and constructive goal, but unlikely to come to fruition unless they stop blame-shifting, drop the attitude of entitlement and learn to respect others’ privacy as much as they demand respect for their own.
As long as Meghan and Harry make a profit from trashing family, they can expect some criticism in kind. A recent return-fire incident from England is a kindly invitation issued by Lady Colin Campbell to Prince Harry to have him request that the Queen put his titles into abeyance. At the time of writing, Campbell’s online petition had more than 58,000 signatures, well short of the golden number 75,000, at which point the letter will apparently become “one of the top signed on Change.org!”. It is a dismal exercise, but pales in comparison with 30-something kidults maligning family members on TV.
The exploits of Harry and Meghan have played well in the US. However, Australians maintain loyalty to the royal family. Earlier this year, an Ipsos poll showed 40 per cent reject the idea of Australia becoming a republic while only a third (34 per cent) favour it – the lowest level of support since 1979. Consistent with previous such polls, support for the royal family increases as you travel left to right on the political spectrum. Greens and Labor voters want a republic (46 per cent and 41 per cent, respectively) more than Coalition voters (27 per cent). However, the figure that bodes well for the monarchy is the youth vote, with only a quarter of those aged 18-24 indicating they would support Australia becoming a republic.
Some republic supporters saw Harry and Meghan’s interview as a fresh start for their cause because it was an emotional plea. That theirs is a vulgarity passionately expressed makes it no less vulgar, only more compelling. They excel at the kind of anti-social behaviour that is the stuff of reality TV; interpersonal betrayal masked as a cri de coeur. The violation of privacy involved in publicly betraying loved ones plays into the human desire for voyeurism, gossip and schadenfreude. What makes the Harry-and-Meghan show more devastating is their unwavering sense of personal responsibility for disseminating their truth about the world, even when it happens to be false.
Harry and Meghan left the House of Windsor for the House of Whinger. Their milieu brims with champagne socialists who have revived the Ancien Régime for a new age where “let them eat brioche” is démode but let them eat tosh is de fabulous. All hail Harry, California princeling.
Ends
Blogger Fifi LaRue said...
@Hikari: Narcissists are not above physical violence. I know. My mother and first husband were both violent and physically abusive. I would guess that Harry is covered in bruises on his arms, legs, chest, etc.
I'm sorry to say I think it's more likely that Harry's wife will provoke him to violence because it's all about control to the game-loving sociopath. Once he uses force against her, she can use it against him until the cows come home. How very convenient that Harry has left a paper trail, via his attorneys, to the Blind Gossip item detailing his physical abuse of women prostitutes of color!
Liliput, all part of
LiliPutins Gullible Travails 😉
61,300 so far, still risng