The Sussexes are simply beyond evil.
Lillibet is the Queen's personal nickname; I highly doubt she would want it used for any child, let alone a Sussex child. Using it is a gross invasion of privacy.
Diana wouldn't have been best pleased with what Harry's done with himself, either.
After tearing apart the Royals in public for two years, the Sussexes are trying to stay connected with them via these names, and appropriate their glamour and style.
How tacky.
Also, shout out to Doria and Charles. You're the only parents the Sussexes talk to any more, but no one thought to name a child after you.
Comments
appearance in pic. What a foolish misstep. How did that photoshoot look ? Doll smothered in bedspread, galactic sized moon belly, possible fake husband. Photographer taking pics from iPad come on! I remember thinking photographer's post was written by M too as it was so OTT endearing .
Enough internet for me tonight but was earlier thinking wo uldn't it be funny if Torontopaper was JM. I could see her doing glass of wine in hand. Just because. Goodnight!
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Reportedly “Troubled” by the “Lapse of Contact” With Prince Charles
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2021/06/prince-harry-meghan-markle-troubled-prince-charles-lack-of-contact-focus-on-daughter-lili
They insulted Prince Charles but poured sycophantic oil on the Queen. Now they've insulted the Queen so go creeping back to Prince Charles. They're like a bullet ricocheting in a room packed with royals A bullet with a mind. (No parallels with Ekaterinburg intended).
https://mobile.twitter.com/richardaeden/status/1402500855866200065
Ok now really leaving bye
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Son Archie 'Is Very Happy to Have a Little Sister'
"They prepared Archie by talking a lot about the baby," a source tells PEOPLE
https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-son-archie-very-happy-have-little-sister-lilibet-diana/?
Just think, in the Sussex family the traditional stories for children of the stork bringing the baby aren't far wrong.
They can do a slew of parenting articles now and we'll be back to the days of Elizabeth and Margaret Rose - the two little princesses - that feature so much in 1930s-40s magazines and newspapers. Very beautifully photographed. This time, the supermarket tabloid version.
I note this morning there's repeated reference to the Sussex 'completed family' coming from their sources. Yes it ties in with H's preposterous green oneupmanship with his brother over family size (though he still apparently needs the giant SUV) but the Sussexes have sunk to such a depth that it now sounds like coded messages from blackmailers to their victims. If you play nice, this will be the final baby saga.
That's just horrible about Shelly possibly being frozen. Yikes. I've heard that she's in The Hole, at Scientology's Gold Base in San Jacinto, CA. I'm guessing that Misgavige didn't want to have her around any longer. There's a lot of vacant land around Gold Base to bury a body. I hate to even think of this.
It seems that although she posted the first tweet on the 5th (before we knew the baby had been born the day before) the actual day Harry was seen walking near HotRob's old property was earlier last week and she thinks it wasn't connected to the birth.????
But then she tweets saying this pregnancy was tougher on Markle - does Longo believe MM actually carried her child?
Also, why would the security at Owenshire stop Angry Harry if he wasn't actually on the property - only near it? I had assumed he was walking on his own lot and wandered into the next one by mistake. Maybe he was on the road?
🌟THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
“Owenshire” property management mistakenly stopped a “fuming” Prince Harry who was cooling off on a walk after a #Megxit Montecito Mansion dust-up. Tension apparently sky high with mere weeks until the birth of baby 2. That’s all the details we have!
3:12 PM · Jun 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
🌟THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
Jun 6
"the walk" occurred early last week, not likely connected to the birth.
🌟THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
Replying to
@mandey1104
and
@LillcyTweets
Thanks. There were reports this pregnancy was "tougher" for her.
10:08 PM · Jun 6, 2021·Twitter Web App
🌟THERESA LONGO FANS
@BarkJack
Replying to
@Nekrasova0128
He wasn’t on the Owenshire property, quite near it though.
4:40 PM · Jun 5, 2021·Twitter for iPhone
we'll be back to the days of Elizabeth and Margaret Rose - the two little princesses - that feature so much in 1930s-40s magazines and newspapers.
...................
My Mom who was a few years younger than the Queen enjoyed following the sister princesses especially during the war.
https://youtu.be/8qKgQY3mtKU
Lady C has long questioned the ridiculous size a and changing of Maggots bump. 🤥I think we can safely say the new baby is a product of a surrogate. 🤔 Lady C even analysis the announcements of the new baby from the Duo and the royal family and stated it’s how you announce an adoption or a baby via a surrogate. 😐
Lady C also says Maggot farts in people’s faces...she has total contempt for us all. 🤢
Thank you.
You've really done a great service to RF buying and having the idea . I tried to purchase this name but took late..lilibetroyal
'lilibetroyal.com is taken'
Hopefully taken by someone other than the wife
The Lillibet boutique name was of its time perhaps old fashioned now
I hope that you are now feeling much better in yourself nowc.
It was hesrt rendering reading of your struggle being so ill with the virus (Christine too) .You were very brave showed such coursge going through what you did . I hope that your health has improved a great deal and with each day cintinues and that you are very soon back to your full heath as before and enjoy life again.
The same also goes for everyone ho has shared their lives their health job worries .illnesses life lessons on this blog. Know that doing so helps so much imo sharing life tips knowledge & experiences (and tea)
.This blog and all posters are al so unique.There is such a great camarader amongst you all and such good humour too .
Posters & readers will really learn so much from your posts .Thank you one and all
I'm in awe of all your writing talent your expert knowledge g history the wonderful output of talent from Magatha
@Jenna Best wishes for your operation wishing you a full recovery afterwards.
@Wlld Boar-battle-maid .May your test results return swiftly and be positive in a goiod way.
Hope thi blog aids all nutty posters who are going through /have experienced stressful stuff .
I believe this blog has helped many.The blog posters who were giid to share with others. to know that genuinely good real people on this blog care and are compassionate to realise that that you are not alone .
Long may tbis nutty blog exist to do good over evil forces .To expose the truth and see the end of this what appears to be a long con
God save the Queen
I put the two photos for comparison plus some other pics up on my blog...
I included the full-size original photos which I enhanced a little, plus close-ups of the Harkles and the landscape.
Also uploaded 2 images from the interview in the chicken coop - MM's belly seems too big for that time.
Plus 2 more obscure photos from the Archie pregnancy - they show a very strangely shaped belly and weird changing sizes.
Also pics of a young and handsome Will, a funny pre-markle Harry and a really young HotRob!
Click on my avatar to get there...
Let me know what you think.
@WildBoar
What do you think of the Scientology / psychology info? Do you agree that they would not touch the Harkles? Just wondering what others think about this.
They apparently use their religion to address any "spiritual" issues members may have. I don't think they recognize psychiatric illnesses. The Harkles have been preaching more mainstream therapies, they recognize depression and preach about seeking professional help. I just don't think the Harkles would be found acceptable. I don't know much else about them though...
Do you think the Harkles may change the baby's name? They are getting so much negativity over it.
I think that Scientology involvement is not beyond the realms of possibility (Interestingly, their UK HQ is in Sussex...)
This article is from last year,The article wont open for me on my elderly computer, only on my tablet, which won't let me copy and paste. This is the google header:
May 19, 2020 — At the top of the list has to be Doria Ragland, the mother of Meghan Markle. ... Friends like Marianne Williamson, who Doria introduced to Prince Harry ... written by members of the Scientology cult that back her claims up.
https://www.google.fr/amp/s/www.ccn.com/meghan-markle-cut-prince-harry-friends-family-devastating-effect/
Read the full article - clearly there seems to be an influence.
It was a good point a fellow Nutty made earlier (sorry I can't remember who) that M need not be in the Church of S but still use their techniques. I think that very likely as I don't think she is a desirable prize for them in herself. Scientology after all mirrors malignant narcissist techniques, which are as old as time. It institutionalises those techniques. Puts them into mass production so to speak. M and the Church of S are basically bedfellows.
I think Lady C's insights are particularly effective as she often refers to her narcissist mother. I find M's malevolence really disturbing and at times frightening, so it is reassuring to have Lady C on board. A veteran. Going back over those pre and post-M photos of H, I was reminded of that summer wedding in the country, when she turned up like a raven at the van Straubenzee wedding. Her hat even suggested black feathers.
https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-prince-harry-attend-friend-wedding/
She was always dressed like the wicked fairy or stepmother at the wedding or christening. Or on a balcony. She wants to unsettle people at all times. I'm sure of it. If she succeeds at being the cloud that passes over their sun, she thinks she's winning. Didn't @WBBM remember when she seemed to be trying to do it to the entire nation via camera at Eugenie's wedding? Trying to hex us all.
I love the original Star Trek series. I wish we could send for Captain James T. Kirk to vaporise her or leave her on a deserted planet as a hazard to be kept away from mankind. I was so disappointed to see he has congratulated her on her new baby. There's delivery and there's delivery. We know what kind she had.
Oprah is too canny to allow her fortune to be swallowed up by Scientology, however, that wouldn't bar her from supporting them in other ways perhaps?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9667207/Harry-Meghan-NEVER-asked-Queen-naming-daughter-Lilibet-source-says.html#article-9667207
Either that or an ambulance from LA County Mental Health Department.....
I know that it is fashionable to blame our past for our personal circumstances and search for a cure via therapist (psychologist or psychiatrist), but is therapy a cure all? I think that for some people it exists as a crutch to rehash their problems and avoid doing what has to be done to address them. What (talk) therapy can do is point out thinking problems and hopefully correct them but that will take effort on the part of the therapee.
If a person has a brain* problem such as bipolar disorder or major depression, that will take medical (drug) intervention and close followup. Concurrent talk therapy could be helpful to assist the person in establishing a routine tailored to their specific needs.
If Harry has been in therapy, what does he have to show for it? He's still stuck somewhere in perpetual early adolescence and has not reached the point where he is taking personal responsibility for his problems (unless running away from friends and family is now called taking responsibility). Whatever he is doing or has done clearly is not working/has not worked for him. Maybe he is off his meds (if any) and this is the result.
*There is so much that we do not yet know about brain (and body) function. Are the foods that we are eating contributing to gut dysfunction that may in turn lead to brain dysfunction? We know through rat studies that foods contaminated with glyphosate (herbicide) can change the bacterial composition in the gut. We as a species have not evolved to live surrounded by electromagnetic fields; what is that doing to us, if anything? Do the changes in the magnetic fields surrounding us have any effect on us?
If I was the Queen, aged 95, newly widowed, I'd say enough is enough. My mother and I were discussing the Sussexes this morning and remembered how lovely it was in 2012. William and Catherine had married the year before. We had a fantastic Olympics. There were huge jubilee celebrations and the Queen basked in an appropriately golden glow. We thought she would coast like that to the end of her reign. Little did we know.
There is no way in hell H&M are supported or aligned with Scientology for all the reasons already provided.
- psychological help; it's a total no-no
- money; they are too stingy to pay Scio for anything
- CONTROL; Scientology would call the shots, NOT Meghan (this would never work)
- effort/dedication; those classes & auditing take a lot of time
- brainwashing; nobody is gonna brainwash Harry except Meghan
As for Oprah, Scientology has a lot of members and affiliations throughout LA and just like being pals w/ Weinstein & Geffen is useful, so is giving the Scios a pass because they will not attack her which makes her life easier.
Scientology in general is massively circling the drain financially and organizationally.
- brainwashing; nobody is gonna brainwash Harry except Meghan
LOL. She might even be able to teach them a thing or two.
I agree absolutely. Total Grey Rock time is the only way to go. Including cutting off every last farthing of funding to them which H did not already have earmarked for him before he left. The money from his mother is probably nearly gone if he's been allowed to touch the principal.
If a Prince of the United Kingdom winds up as a hopeless addict living in the Chateau Marmont or Skid F***ing Row, so be it. Pull up the drawbridge, Your Majesty. Maybe Charles is sufficiently pissed off now that he can hold the line against wheedling from Montecito. It has got to be a knife in his heart every day to see his younger son taking a giant dump all over the Queen's legacy and Charles's future reign. William's time is far enough into the future that hopefully this mess will be just a bad memory by then. Harry is probably not going to survive his union with the Wife from Hell. Sadly, as I've expressed before, I don't think that healing for the family is going to be possible as long as Haz and Mess are free-range in the world.
Unless H can somehow, through emissaries, get a message to his father that he wants to come home and get help, sans Claw, and casts Her off, he should be disowned completely. Just leave the titles such as they are but for all intents and purposes, act like the pair does not exist. Let the media scream and howl over racism and cold-heartedness, etc. This was inevitable, and because the RF was afraid to face down these allegations three-plus years ago, back when she was just Harry's lay-du-jour and could have been more easily dealt with, they have to endure it now. By allowing her to siphon away their son and parade around pretending that she is mother to two Royal babies, they have made their task so much worse than it need to have been three years ago.
My heart goes out to the entire Royal Family, but especially the Queen, and William, who should have been born an only child. For all practical purposes, he is now.
As some pointed out, it's the color of the DONOR not the SURROGATE which affects the child's skin tone.
The messed up thing is nobody will be allowed to say anything, what a classic Meghan move.
It's interesting we are all (including Lady C) terribly concerned about this poor little girl and her terrifying childhood with a psycho mother yet nobody is super worried about Archie because nobody believes he exists! ha ha!
I was telling my mom this too - poor Lili, we are very worried about her, but Archie is no biggie because he is plastic and will probably get "leukemia" soon anyway.
If they were involved with Scientology you would hear it in their use of language.
With the psycho-babble you hear certain terms they've clearly picked up - if they were Scientologists you would instead here some uniquely Scio-type phrases and we have not.
As this blog is filled with Alumina of the said University what excuse do you have for this insult. I have to say (and I was reading yesterday and with interest what Ava C had to say about Cambridge) when I was at Law College and later Conservatoire all I did was study and the same went for my now elderly and part gone co-students.
I just want to say if little Lili is darker than Doria you KNOW some major bullshit has taken place and personally I will be furious.
As some pointed out, it's the color of the DONOR not the SURROGATE which affects the child's skin tone.
The messed up thing is nobody will be allowed to say anything, what a classic Meghan move.
It's interesting we are all (including Lady C) terribly concerned about this poor little girl and her terrifying childhood with a psycho mother yet nobody is super worried about Archie because nobody believes he exists! ha ha!
I was telling my mom this too - poor Lili, we are very worried about her, but Archie is no biggie because he is plastic and will probably get "leukemia" soon anyway.
Yes. If she wants a darker child, she will have to get a donor egg.
Premise of the bit is he says things (which aren't true) to passers-by (who've clearly been prepped) and they respond as though the information is accurate, it's called Lie Witness News.
The funny part is how much he is obviously looking to make Meghan look like a total trash person (based on the questions they ask), I kinda love it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K7yGudza2g
I also think this little girl (Lili) already has to carry the burden of her name and existence, being the only black kid in a family of white people and uplifted as the embodied token of tangible wokeness would be SO F'ED UP!!!
Good god this poor little girl. I'm going to hope that is just some crazy speculation on our part and her little girl will not have been "bred" for such purposes.
Respectful is as respectful does. Madam Smeg hasn't given anyone respect in her life and she certainly doesn't deserve any. Jimmy Kimmel is an entertainment big shot . . .maybe not on a par with Jimmy Fallon of the Tonight Show but certainly the equal of James Corden. If he's taking the p!$$ out of her openly, she's finished in Hollywood. Not that she ever really started. But I'd expect entertainment figures like him to be 100% pro-woke BS. Smegma no doubt expected people like JK calling and begging her to be on their shows. Not gonna happen. Sounds like the woke brigade is turning on itself.
The funny part is how much he is obviously looking to make Meghan look like a total trash person (based on the questions they ask), I kinda love it.
Well, she IS a total trash person, and finally somebody with a big enough profile in American entertainment is pointing it out.
I have no sympathy whatsoever for her. None. Harry, either. I did have, for him, once, but the only persons I truly care about now are the children, if there are in fact, any. I remain extremely agnostic as to the actual existence of 'Archie' and 'Lilibet Diana'. We' have seen *some* children supposed to be Archie--multiple ones, for anybody with eyes. Can't wait to see who she hires to play her newest con.
If this is the beginning of the end for her, I couldn't be happier. Bring it on.
As for Harry's latest fight against BBC, this further exposes his hostility toward press and self-obsession. At what should be the happiest time of his life, free from the "shackles" of having a family and the birth of a daughter, this is where his attention is. And everyone but the woke crowd is rolling their eyes at his latest reactive temper tantrum.
And so it goes....
❤️🌻🌸
Sending all good wishes for you, JennS, as you prepare for surgery. I read you won’t be peeking in evenings until after, but maybe you will see this! The HotRob photo!
.
Could it be that if they saw the Harkles as a possible conduit to money, lots of it, and as a route to more power by undermining our monarchy, they might be prepared to take them on, as they are even more ruthless than MM? Could they assume that they could get the upper hand over her? Exploit the exploiter?
Might the Harkles be useful to them achieving their ultimate aim, especially as in the long run, they could be disposable?
From what I've read, I'd say they have a pragmatic approach to, ahem, psychotropic substances and psychological manipulation.
Or I have read more into their dark deeds than is justified?
Or has MM just `borrowed' some of their tactics/
I don't anything for certain.
Seeing that latest DM headline of H threatening legal action to the BBC, I'm reminded of a DM reader's comment this morning about the poor Queen. That she must wake up every morning and think "What the hell's going to happen today?"
Ha! Had to laugh at my mental picture of Her Maj tsk tsking over her morning fare saying "My word. What fresh Hell is this?"
I hope to God she has retained her iron skin now that she's in her vulnerable years.
If someone has given Megs any sort of damning information about Andrew, she might be able to do as she pleases (demanding a public friendship with Eugenie) for now.
Even if Andy knows he saw her “on yachts” shall we say, at this point, he can’t say so, without smearing himself.
For now, she may control the Yorks by such blackmail, and make demands. This will thrill her; so next, on to busting up the York sisters.
.
Re: Eugenie. I believe the reason stories keep coming up with Eugenie is that the duo are trying to show they still have royal connections, and Eugenie has never denied any of the prior stories linking her to them. Notice she never tries this angle with Sophie. Unfortunately, I think if Eugenie had denied the first story about her and the duo, they would not keep trying.
Qui tacet consentire videtur.
He who remains silent, gives consent.
The problem facing the RF as they deal with this is that no one has encountered a creature like Meg before. Someone SO ill-bred, nasty, conniving and RELENTLESS. Palace intrigue was ever thus, behind closed doors but to display such bad manners so openly and defiantly regardless of gentle hints, offers of help, outright discipline . . is something they haven't dealt with much if ever in their circles.
A person with normal emotions or some level of concern for his/her own reputations if not others' comfort level, would have responded to criticisms of their behavior by toning things down and behaving appropriately. Not Meg. She will never, ever stop. There is no modicum of respect whatsover for a 95-year-old woman who has been the Queen of many realms for nearly 70 years. Meg is not cowed at all . . she just sees a frail little old lady she thinks she can manipulate.
I'm thinking the incarceration meted out to Dr. Lechter in the Silence of the Lambs is about right for her. She needs to be muzzled and locked away from society. Not a single redeeming feature exists in her. She's a rabid dog in human form, but actually, not human. A crucial part of what comprises humanity is missing in her and always will be.
What Eugenie needs to do to shut down this constant drip of Sussex PR re. her is to pose her next happy family shot outside of their actual home, with a caption identifying where they are. Oh, not Frogmore Cottage? Meg will once again be exposed as a liar. If the Queen has actually given her Frogmore as her residence seeing as Harry was no longer using it, then something along the lines of "Jack and I and Baby August are so happy in our new home of Frogmore Cottage & we are so grateful to the Queen for providing us with such a lovely and peaceful home. We love it." No reference at all to the Sussexes.
Whenever Meg prints some of her fantasias, anyone in the RF needs to rebut with a breezy, happy confirmation of the reality, with no reference to whatever drivel Smug has put out in the past. She lies like a rug, and people are starting to cotton on if they hadn't already.
I meself seriously doubt Spare and the wife would entertain ideas of joining church of Scientology due to thier inability to keep their traps shut for one second.
The upper echelons of that "church" know full well the Spares will bleat secrets on Oprah.
Lili (on its own) is a curious choice as the phrase that comes to mind is ... lily white.
Do they think any of this through?
Heads of straw?
It could also be evidence of a cult at work. How would we know the difference?
Is her estrangement from the rest of the Markles purely her own doing? Was it? Or was a third party/parties involved? How might we know?
We've been interpreting everything through the lens of narcissism alone - have we missed something?
Is this a combination of her narcissism plus something else?
But no, they have to wait until after the baby is born to mention it to the Queen? After they've already decided on the name?
The upper echelons of that "church" know full well the Spares will bleat secrets on Oprah.
LL,
I think you are right. Besides their mutual verbal diarrhea, which Scientology's celebrity clientele certainly would not appreciate, their mutual hobbies of the pharmaceutical/herbaceous variety would be frowned on. Temple of the body and all that. Tom Cruise may be cuckoo for cocoapuffs but he certainly takes care of himself.
If Markle reached her tentacles out re. joining the Church of S. and was rebuffed, she may still be using her patented MO of copying that to which she aspires. Getting H off his prescribed medications is one method of control, along with cutting him off from all family and friends.
All along, we have seen Markle's separation of H from friends and family as evidence of her narcissism.
It could also be evidence of a cult at work. How would we know the difference?
-----
I read somewhere recently that CoS "auditing" focuses primarily on isolation of the member from familial-and ANY bonds-that are undermining to the organization.
I'll go back to my bookmarks to see if I can find the exact quote.
My belief is Mrs. Spare understands well the mindset of a cult leader. I believe rather than bow down to the CoS (as she refused to go along with the protocols of the BRF) she may be plotting to start her own organization in order to utilize the power she can garner over her sugars.
Scary thought there...
I’m with you on that —- the CoS being “pragmatic” with its higher value members —- or those they are trying to reel in. Remember, Netflix was furious that they gave her a big press splash and high cash PR, but she was still playing coy about signing on the dotted line. It went on like this a few months, and I hear it was Harry who finally inked.
While I find it soothingly fresh and kind of adorable to see people still saying “but the RULES are, so she couldn’t possibly....”. It makes me sigh. It makes me feel like I have spent the last twenty years on a Vicious pirate trawler in the sea.
Because I have seen people break the most sacrosanct and celebrated rules, promises, logic for years to get what they want, I have see pink-cheeked sweethearts and sleek CEOs and namaste-puffs cut their colleagues throats, lie in contracts, refuse to behave, undermine organizations.
Impossible because Megs “gosh I forgot” to use phrases, promised to send the check later (“I will call my accountant again”) etc?
They are promised a prince to use for PR to shore up flagging membership and sagging funds. Even country clubs and yacht clubs wave fees for high value members. CoS will be no different because Megs can bring them hoarded of undereducated, dim-bulb, easily-swayed potential members who wil never look behind the curtain.
Even Harry’s new lawsuit threats against the BBC make sense: the BBC has been outing the CoS since 2004.
Secret christening, the never-ending shadiness of their Archbishop pal and his sudden desire to spend summer 2021 in the US....
So I still see no reason to scratch a possible CoS connection off the board.
Little Tom and Shelley Miscavige’s widower need a PR Queen to start the bucks wheel spinning again. Will Megs be devoutly into CoS? Hell no, but she will find a way to use them. Wouldn’t it be funny if they were her downfall though?
she may still be using her patented MO of copying that to which she aspires
----
Yes! Please see my post above @7:55pm.
If someone has given Megs any sort of damning information about Andrew, she might be able to do as she pleases (demanding a public friendship with Eugenie) for now.
Even if Andy knows he saw her “on yachts” shall we say, at this point, he can’t say so, without smearing himself.
I have always had a sneaking suspicion that Andrew *did* indeed encounter Meg on the yachting circuit or in some sort of party for hire situation via Epstein. Madam would have been long in the tooth for his tastes even if this occurred 10 years ago, so perhaps he was not actually a client of her services . . but only a witness. Or, imagine if Andrew did have carnal knowledge of his nephew's fiancee before Harry himself did. Wouldn't that be a turn up? Andrew's animosity toward Meg seemed rather personal, seeing as he didn't know her, officially before the engagement. How many times would they have even met (officially) prior to the Harkle Wedding? A. may have merely perceived her as a threat to his daughters (in which he turned out to be prescient) but I always wondered and semi-expected that there had to be More behind the visible hostility. (cf. 'The Scarlet Wall of York' on the BP Balcony during TOC 2019)
The thing is that the smearing goes both ways. Andrew is already tainted and seedy. He's suspected of lewd, potentially illegal things he may not even have done. But basically he's got nothing left to lose, really, and something to gain by exposing her. What if he admitted that yes, he had a prior acquaintance with his now-niece-by-marriage and in fact met her at an Epstein party(ies). He's already acknowledged that he attended those parties. Whether or not he slept with It--he was not married and she was not underage. (Hardly, if she was already over 30.) If we have confirmation, from Harry's uncle no less that she was a yacht girl, then her humanitarian so in lurve act is further decimated. If Andrew admits to this, then wouldn't any hold she's got over his daughters, acting to protect him, possibly--evaporate?
Andy's a tool and I doubt he'd speak up, too worried about his own neck. So then perhaps it's time for Guy Pelly and Skippy Inskip to let it be known that they 'knew' Meghan before Haz himself 'knew' Meghan. This has been intimated before, that both Guy and Skippy tried desperately to dissuade Haz from this relationship--out and out admitted that they *knew the bride* while on a yachting holiday . . .Haz would not hear it and both guys, his best mates from Eton days were swiftly excised from his life. Shocked either of them got a wedding invitation, but they were not included in the evening 'do.
Here's the quote on Harry and CoS. Unfortunately I failed to notice who said it. I've Googled the quote with no luck. Maybe more astute Nutties can find the source.
I saved it to use in my own dealings with a narc who married into my family.
----
"She says that Harry's wife is involved in Scientology because so many big players in Hollywood are part of that organization and they really help their members get ahead.
Well, Harry seems to be going through the auditing stage where he looks at his family and how they have affected him. Also, part of the auditing stage is to live apart from your loved ones to be able to take better stock of if they are helpful to you or not.
Scientology encourages their members to cut off ties with family and loved ones considered to be "unhelpful"."
While I find it soothingly fresh and kind of adorable to see people still saying “but the RULES are, so she couldn’t possibly....”. It makes me sigh. It makes me feel like I have spent the last twenty years on a Vicious pirate trawler in the sea.
Because I have seen people break the most sacrosanct and celebrated rules, promises, logic for years to get what they want, I have see pink-cheeked sweethearts and sleek CEOs and namaste-puffs cut their colleagues throats, lie in contracts, refuse to behave, undermine organizations.
___
The difference is CoS is not above seriously threating someone's life and possible following through.
I believe a megalomanic like Mrs. Spare will not put herself in that position. She's too about self preservation at all costs...
Good day.
I also wish Princess Eugenie would be more proactive about telling the truth. Heck, I wish the whole BRF would and I can't understand why they let themselves get dragged through the mud over things that are so easily clarified.
Perhaps what we see as proactive is, to them, actually reactive. To respond directly to Harry's wife is to play her game in some way and that they'd rather not do.
If you have a newborn, if you have a toddler at home, who has time for this drama. The baby is pooping its diaper like 12X per day and smelling anything but like a flower, the toddler is having tantrums (well because of his mom) because this crying creature had invaded his home. No one is sleeping more than 2 hours at time. Who has time to scour social media for how its all being perceived and for all the PR drama.
Mrs. you keep proving again and again that you dont have actual physical custody of those kids.
Andy's a tool and I doubt he'd speak up, too worried about his own neck. So then perhaps it's time for Guy Pelly and Skippy Inskip to let it be known that they 'knew' Meghan before Haz himself 'knew' Meghan.
Wouldn't Guy and Skippy have something to lose by admitting it, though? At this point, any man who even touched Harry's wife with a barge pole seems tainted by association.
The exceptions would be Trevor and Corey. But both have the respectability of the honest husband/boyfriend who was betrayed. They obviously had good intentions toward their ex. Guy and Skippy would have been with her for purely hedonistic reasons. I know that usually the woman ends up carrying the can after these encounters, but society seems to be learning disgust for "manwhores" and "f---boys" these days. Do Guy and Skippy really want to fall on their swords for a former friend who dumped them before all the world?
I feel very for those of you who are still wearing rose colored glasses for H. H is garbage, he always has been. M didn't create H, the Royal Family DID! M merely accepts him as the garbage he is because she knows she is the same. They deserve each other.
The genetic pain H mentioned is probably commonly known as AFLUENZA. Yes, the Royal Family is responsible for that too. As long as Bank of Dad keeps the money rolling, things will continue down the same path.
M$H are litigous. The Royal Family knows this. If the Royal Family wanted to leak something about the Sussexs, why not leak to TMZ or any other American publication? After all, we have the 'bonkers' First Amendment here in the US to protect anyone involved. Is it because we allow larger settlement for damages if a case could be proven? Or do they realize H$M are trying to poke the bear so they can monumentalky sue members of the Royal Family and staff publicly? They know the palace wont respond adequately to their lies a treacherous behavior.
H$M put out stories recently about worrying about titles being stripped after H Apple interviews. That was definitely a set up to make H the fall if it happens. It would make them both victims in the eyes of the public that supports them.
If HMTQ strips the titles before her death, It would take the burden off of Charles reign. If anything H$M should have honored Charles with the babys name. Charlize, Charlene, or Chamomille would have been lovely. Lili is fine too, but obviously vindictive.
Will continue later...back to work!
Wow -- amazing find. Another breadloaf on the trail we are following!!
@LavenderLady,
I complete get your point about how Sci might respond, and I would normally fully agree. But:
1. Megs is an extreme narc who's outfoxed the royals and others -- she wouldn't have the mind capacity to fear the CoS. Like a thirteen-year-old spoiled diva, she thinks nothing can harm her. She buried her past, worked without a SAG card, tricked the royals, Oprah, etc. She thinks she is the queen above all, controlling all. As some here have said, she has the survival skills of a cockroach. Nothing stops her. And.....make no mistake: she would probably offer up anyone in her life as a "tribute" to save herself. They threaten her dad, kids, Harry, mom? My guess is, she wouldn't care. She only thinks short-term anyway: there is always another man to bail her out, another house to move to, another PR piece to put out, another salad to toss to win. She would also 100% drown us in "the CoS threatened me, a young mother" press releases and Netflix documentaries to boot. She doesn't care what they can do. Her mental illness is her armor.
2. Katie Holmes, Leah Rimini, and Nicole Kidman got out. Megs will know that, and might feel she can do the and live well, too.
3. CoS isn't what it was. Too much is out about them, they are nearly out of funds as hunter pointed out. They couldn't roam around recruiting in a pandemic, so they had to run a tv ad on Oprah's Harry & Meghan interview -- and Oprah's team allowed it. In this swirling-the-drain moment, Megs could get away with a lot with CoS. Tom is running out of steam, too, I think. As I said in my first point above, she could also play victim yet again and do a documentary series and book about them threatening her, copying Leah Rimini's footsteps (without Leah's intellect, or honesty). She sues and threatens everyone, and I simply don't think is mentally lucid enough to fear them.
.
Exactly!!!!!!!
In short, one part of the University administration had put out a document to condemn staff who committed `micro-aggressions' against students, such as looking at someone in `the wrong way', or raising an eyebrow at the wrong moment, or anything else that could be perceived as a slight by those of a highly sensitive disposition. To say nothing of opposing the `no-platforming' business or cancellation.
This itself provoked such a reaction that the parties concerned have had to back pedal.
It got to the point where Isaac Newton (Trinity College) has, IIRC, been criticised for some of his social views - though I'm not sure how they would propose to cancel his Principia and his Laws of Motion and Gravity.
Also, some academic departments have been under pressure from activists, outsiders sometimes, to change their identities or cease to exist - for example, `Oriental Studies' have been deemed `colonialist'/racist for presuming to teach subjects such as Japanese language and culture.
The department dealing with the whole world of Early Medieval North-Western European Language, History and Culture came has come under fire for presuming to call itself the Anglo-Saxon, Norse and Celtic Department (ASNC), thanks to certain Transatlantic individuals having a very narrow view of the term `Anglo Saxon'.
If you are interested in this area, there are videos under the heading `History with Hilbert', including a spirited defence of the Dept. `Hilbert' comes from Newcastle, if you wonder about the accent, although his parents are Dutch, as he has said in one video.
Is "Anglo-Saxon" A Racist Term And Should My Degree Be Banned?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdPK_3J2Ppc
Wouldn't Guy and Skippy have something to lose by admitting it, though? At this point, any man who even touched Harry's wife with a barge pole seems tainted by association.
Very true. If either of these guys had sexual contact with Meg, let's hope they got a check-up afterwards and didn't bring anything into subsequent real relationships. Now that they are both married family men, you're right, there's nothing in it for them. Too much time has gone by and why should they stick their necks out for a former friend who has treated them like dirt ever since the Narc took custody of his balls?
I don't think, even in better times, that H was ever a particularly good friend to anyone. He called them if he felt like it; otherwise nobody could get him. He must have been busy on this supposed yachting holiday. Just imagine how much pain could have been saved if he'd sampled her tired-ass wares years ago and moved on?
After scrutinizing Harry for the last 3 1/2 years the way I never did before, I have come to seriously question whether he is strictly heterosexual. He's always had a girlfriend(s), at least two serious ones. He was with Chelsy when they were very young, early 20s. Maybe still in upheaval about his sexual orientation then. This whole Harry-the-Lad narrative of his before he was married now smacks of some overcompensation perhaps and also indirect competition with William . ."Look how I score all these gorgeous birds around the world while you've been with the same suburban wannabe for a million years---boring!" I didn't really find out about Cressida until she and Harry were nearly over, so she really wasn't around long. As arm candy for a bachelor prince, beards do not come more attractive or convincing than that, if that's what she was.
Whether H prefers girls or boys or samples freely from both, there seems to be decent anecdotal evidence that he has participated in rough/deviant types of acts. There's a definite BDSM vibe/component of the Sussex pairing. Just like Great-great-Uncle David. He got in with a circle that catered to perverse sexual activities and it has bitten him in the arse. Hard.
We will have to agree to disagree.
@Jocelyn I don't know if Shelley is dead. But it has been 10 years now . I remember hearing while back someone filed missing person report forcing sheriff to follow up. He claimed to have made contact with her, that is last I heard aside from chatter of others saying he had been paid off.
When I was looking into if O was secret scientologist. Consensus was not. However it was mentioned, and true, O never once has had episode on scientology. She is granted access to Cruise and other scientologists because of her relationship with John Travolta, she believes they are soulmates ??? I will try to find article
What was interesting to me is all the random names that kept coming up shared link to Dax Shepherd podcast. I know nothing of him aside from when Harry was on show and both him and his wife are from close to where I live. There is some speculation that they are both secret ones.
Although Dax is recovering addict and takes antidepressants (from what I read). But interesting when I looked up his wife first article that came up was how her and her mom disagree on religion and disappointed they did not baptize kids (S do not baptize). Also one of kristen Bell's costars was S who committed suicide and many found it odd she didn't tweet condolences or mention him (no idea if true as did not look further). Some say it would make her a sympathetic and catch ire of S
Last bit I read was Dax was cast on the Ranch after Masterson ,a S, was fired and is currently on trial for rape. Certainly is interesting circle. I also previously came across same article up above regarding Mattheson (project angel) she too S connection and Doria friend of many years
The new baby cannot have darker skin. Two light skinned people cannot produce a darker skinned baby. That would be proof positive that they lied about the baby’s origins.
If HMTQ strips the titles before her death, It would take the burden off of Charles reign. If anything H$M should have honored Charles with the babys name. Charlize, Charlene, or Chamomille would have been lovely. Lili is fine too, but obviously vindictive.
Princess Chamomile! Rofl! Thanks for the laugh. Latte for you.
I'm disappointed that there is not a single homage to Megdeath's favorite, avocadoes, after all the speculation we here wasted on the baby's name.
Snarky,
Hikari - we are americans and we are up for a good fight. Bring it on. The British fight differently by rarely if ever acknowledging the duo they are doing their version of ghosting them. Maybe the BRF has their own pr spies offering up tidbits behind fake twitter/dm/nutty accounts. (i would want to be that intern; i would gladly sign and NDA and be a anti-Harkle bot) My theory was it could have been you but alas it is not. maybe Ant? JennS? Princess Eugenia? Somehow some of this drama gets out and riles the masses against the duo and the BRF keeps themselves clean. Great strategy and they keep the door open if suicidal number 6 ever leaves and wants to come back
Britons are indeed less confrontational as a rule than Americans. We prize directness as a virtue but that can easily be twisted into being too blunt, cruel or downright violent with those who do not share the same views. What happened at the U.S. Capitol would not be likely to occur in England. I spent time in Japan where the attitudes about being too blunt or confrontational are very similar. Maybe because both are island nations. To oppose someone openly/berate/dispute with or slap with direct "No!" is considered not only rude but a loss of self-control such as would be exhibited by a child. (These rules are suspended in Parliament. lol) The 'adult' way is to keep a cool head, do not allow oneself to be riled and abide by 'gentlemanly' codes of address. Direct confrontation is to be avoided unless there's a physical altercation involved.
Which is why it would be helpful, from a diplomatic standpoint, if HM could shed clarity upon Harry's current actual status as a Royal family member. Does he still merit diplomatic status? (What a fekking joke if so.) The IRS is going to be very interested in his activities in America. How much does Uncle Sam need to defer to the Queen? I don't think we NEED to do anything--any concessions Harry gets are just a courtesy to a Allied nation since he is not an official representative of the Queen here. He is just another entitled mooch. What would happen if Harry did something so egregious he would deserve deportation? So many things to choose from, in collusion with his wife: Drugs . . use, potentially, distributing . .money laundering, tax fraud, sedition (undermining the government of the United States by going on social media and denigrating our Constitution) . . add to it some very shadowy, unsettling behaviors/actions/photographs around his alleged 'parenthood'. I think there are a number of concerns that would warrant law enforcement surveillance of the property in Montecito and Harry and Wife's 'business dealings' and the associates that surround them. If Harry's American hosts get tired of offering him shelter and kick him out, back to his 'heartless, racist family', wouldn't that just be too bad.
Disagreeing is fine, discussing and sharing thoughts is what's good! None of us know for sure, anyway; we are all info explorers here basically. My mind can be changed with new intel at any time. Who knows what tomorrow will bring, as they say! :-)
@Jenn The photo you posted of H&M at Ascot...
Get a load of this one... https://www.chatelaine.com/living/entertainment/meghan-markle-kissed-by-another-man/
And this one: https://etcanada.com/news/339288/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-join-the-queen-at-the-royal-ascot-2018-see-the-pics/ He looks like he's searching for escape.
One more: https://pagesix.com/2020/01/10/prince-charles-threatens-to-cut-off-funding-to-prince-harry-and-meghan/
There are lots of photos from that day where it was clearly not a good day for Harry... You can dismiss one as a simple bad change of features caught in a wrong moment, but not all of these... Sheesh.
Thank you for posting the photos on your blog. The crouching down/standing up bump expansion one is amazing.
You asked if we thought they might change the baby's name due to so much negative press.
NO! Narcs do not admit their mistakes.
As for Oxford's Magdalen College woke students voting to remove HM's portrait, I'm appalled. I went to grad school for three years at Cambridge and was active in my college's student government. The MCR, grads' common room, was full of colonials and ex-colonials like me, and we would NEVER have voted to do such a thing. The undergrads at that time, IDK. But I do remember one of them "correcting" me when I referred to a mixed group as "you guys". He said "you mean you people". I said nothing in return but continued to say "you guys". That was the mid-80s. I can only imagine how woke some of them are now. And even though Oxbridge students are all supposed to be ultra-smart, I can tell you from personal experience that that is not true. And they can be just as immature and naive as anyone else.
you said "If Yak Hair (brilliant, BTW, whoever thought of it!)..."
I came up with this. It was actually stated as "Himalayan Yak hair wig". And of course I was inspired by Meghan's lousy hair and her disheveled look which reminded me of a unkempt yak's tresses.
It is the one contribution I can say I felt appreciated, something to this blog among many others Wonderful comments from everyone over the last 2 years.