So often in life at the start of new year, there is this tendency to focus on what changes will be made in the upcoming year. So we create this list of what we will start to do and what we aren't going to do any more. This year is going to be so wonderful and better than the last one. Or so we plan (giggle - like we really have all that much control over external forces which grind forward like a glacier over our intentions?).
Apparently January 17th is known as Ditch your New Year's resolutions day. Oh well. Carry on.
Pivot away from the future:
So I was thinking about the past year in general and how crazy it was for myself, friends and family outside of Nutty life. Great drama. From that, I started thinking about what this year has been for the Royal Family.
The first Christmas without Prince Philip. The great Jubilee the likes of which we won't see again. The Queen passed. That was huge and emotional. And some interestingly phrased announcements, or some omissions(?), from the Palace. Plans are in motion for the coronation. People are moving on.
And then, there was the couple who live (should we say allegedly?) in Montecito. What changes in their lives? More people have come and gone. A few more pictures of the kids. Many, many photos of them out and about, some familiar and others are new. Lots of things have leaked out while others leapt out in Netflix. People are starting lists to track the lies - hardly a positive move to make one look good.
The Andrew Wallenstein's Variety article was a tad stunning in some ways. It came at a time of year when there is a focus on nice articles which are positive human interest, tug at heart strings and lovely photo ops of how public people are celebrating the holiday season and being doers of charitable deeds. Instead, he talked of how bored people will be with the pity party it's not my fault, I have awful family members (and, ours is a love story unlike any other was or will ever be). And that's a serious roadblock to explain away in any and all future pitches - whether they be Hollywood, tech, political aspirations or a direction we don't know about yet.
On the heels of that, the recent article by Joanna Weiss and then that Spiked piece. Notice how the sugars don't seem to have turned on Variety the way they have the Joanna piece (demanding an apology). That's interesting because the people who read Variety are people the couple appear to want and need to move up to the next levels or forward after all this. That won't be an easy to bury on the net.
We are seeing a distinct rip tide of public articles pulling them down and farther from the coastline of positive high end pr of picture perfect attire, sunsets in the background in a wonderful (controlled for public viewing) life. No longer is it just this or that British paper. No, the negative articles are seeping into the US markets now. And that, is trouble my friends. Right here in Montecito.
Comments
Charles was jealous that ‘resplendent’ Meghan would steal his limelight, Prince Harry claims
Duke of Sussex alleges in his book that his father wanted to avoid financially supporting someone who would ‘dominate the monarchy’
“Harry details the moment at Sandringham when he asked the late Queen whether he could marry Meghan, writing that she seemed surprised at needing to grant her permission and, after appearing to hesitate, said: ‘I suppose I have to say yes to you.’
He claims the apparently ambiguous answer left him doubting whether she was sincere in saying yes or was joking with him a little”
____________
“In another section of the book, he describes visiting Diana’s grave at Althorp with Meghan. They rowed out together to the island in a lake on which she was laid to rest.
He sensed Meghan wanted time alone at the tomb and left her there. ‘When I returned, she was on her knees with her eyes closed and her palms flat against the stone,” he writes, adding that Meghan had told him she had asked his late mother for “clarity and guidance’. 🤢
In a separate chapter, he says he visited the grave with Prince William on the 20th anniversary of her death and told his brother he believed Diana had “guided” him to Meghan..”
Prince Harry confirms him and Meghan DID announce the Duchess' pregnancy at Princess Eugenie's wedding - and he 'delivered' Lilibet so his was the 'first face she saw'…
That makes for interesting reading! 😂😳 Well…we can make a lot of the fact he helped deliver Lilibet! A play on words I’d say…. he picked her up from the woman who gave birth to her and took her home…too much laughing gas has muddled his tiny Mole brain cell.
I don’t buy the story….
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11607535/Prince-Harry-confirms-Meghan-DID-announce-Duchess-pregnancy-Princess-Eugenies-wedding.html
Wasn't there a report in the early days about * behaving atrociously in dinner parties? Perhaps putting her next to H meant that only one poor bloke had to sit next to her, rather than her being inflicted on two?
"Charles was jealous that ‘resplendent’ Meghan would steal his limelight, Prince Harry claims
Duke of Sussex alleges in his book that his father wanted to avoid financially supporting someone who would ‘dominate the monarchy’"
IMO, these are both perfectly understandable fears, under the circumstances, although I would never describe* as `resplendent'.
I entirely agree with your 3rd paragraph and pray that our Security chaps are onto it.
The duke faces an intense backlash after writing about his time in Afghanistan in his controversial memoir, Spare.
A retired British Army colonel, a senior Taliban leader and a former Defence Secretary are among those criticising the Duke of Sussex over disclosures that he killed 25 people in Afghanistan.
Colonel Tim Collins, known for a pre-battle speech he made in Iraq, said Harry has now turned against his “other family, the military”.
“So, my number is 25. It’s not a number that fills me with satisfaction, but nor does it embarrass me,” he wrote.
But Col Collins criticised Harry for making the disclosure, calling it “a tragic money-making scam”.
He told Forces News on Friday: “Amongst his assertions is a claim that he killed 25 people in Afghanistan.
“That’s not how you behave in the Army; it’s not how we think.”
Col Collins later added: “Harry has now turned against the other family, the military, that once embraced him, having trashed his birth family.”
He also accused Harry of taking a path that is “alien” to those in the UK and the Commonwealth, adding that the duke is “pursuing US identity politics and casting slurs or racism around where none exists”.
“I wonder whose path he has chosen? In the end I see only disappointment and misery in his pursuit of riches he does not need and his rejection of family and comradely love that he badly needs,” he said.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/afghanistan-richard-barrons-taliban-defence-secretary-british-army-b2257335.html
Nothing says 'mentally healthy' like keeping his dead mother's hair next to his bed to help him knock up the wife, am I right?
KCIII and PoW probably gave themselves concussions from the self-inflicted face palms. Holy crap. These are probably the more sane things that he has claimed. Can you even imagine what has been edited out? Unless, of course, these are all Meghan's insertions.
He sensed Meghan wanted time alone at the tomb and left her there. ‘When I returned, she was on her knees with her eyes closed and her palms flat against the stone,” he writes, adding that Meghan had told him she had asked his late mother for “clarity and guidance’. 🤢
In a separate chapter, he says he visited the grave with Prince William on the 20th anniversary of her death and told his brother he believed Diana had “guided” him to Meghan..”
Now the question for me is whether he was this batsh*t crazy before, or is this just the California New Age Gospel (helped along by taking the sacraments of drugs and alcohol as preached by the wife and the mother in law) talking?
JAN MOIR: The 20 questions our interrogator would ask Prince Harry…
https://mol.im/a/11607827
@observant one, where can one find peach oolong tea? It sounds like an awesome tea.
I remember reading last week about increase in security due to coronation. I'm wondering if a copy of the book made way to intelligences and how much is due to the book.
I wonder if his kill count was actually from his video games. Also it does reek of stupidity putting this out there to try and get free security. Is Meghan trying to become a widow? Or is she hoping for that "plane crash" via terrorists?
Thank you for all the Nutties with such laughs, posting items I wouldn't have been able to read and learning so much. Especially as I'm not aging as gracefully as planned.
I expect that in a lot of households, the conversation is something like "Martha! If exercising in pants is good enough for the King, it's good enough for me!"
It is hard to overstate the profound dismay which has greeted the Duke of Sussex’s tell-all memoir.
Even Harry’s most ardent sympathisers would concede that in trashing his brother and disclosing private remarks made by his grieving father at Prince Philip’s funeral, he has managed to insult both his family and the institution to which he owes his gilded existence.
But of all the revelations splashed across 550 pages of rage and self-pity, none threatens to carry more serious ramifications than the prince’s irresponsible boast of killing 25 Taliban fighters during his 20-week tour of Afghanistan in 2012.
Not only was his reference to those he killed as ‘chess pieces’ deeply offensive, his comments are also a shameful betrayal of his former comrades
As Andrew Neil points out in the pages opposite, the prince has broken one of the Armed Forces’ most long-standing omertas: Never brag about your kill count.
Indeed, many of us have loved ones who have fought bravely for their country yet would never dream of discussing something quite so personal as to whether they killed anyone, least of all publicly.
Small wonder, then, that both senior military personnel and veterans have reacted with horror to Harry’s indiscretion.
On top of that, the prince’s comments demonstrate an extraordinary recklessness, especially when you consider how much he understandably stresses the need to protect his family.
By antagonising the extremists, he might have jeopardised not just the safety of himself and those closest to him but also British soldiers who continue to be deployed around the world.
The Taliban certainly wasted no time in capitalising on Harry’s comments yesterday, branding him ‘cruel’ and ‘barbaric’ – words which will send chills through the Sussexes’ private protection team in Montecito.
Doubtless the prince will now renew his calls to be given police protection when he visits this country. But why should he, now that he is a private citizen?
Besides, considering the fallout from these latest bombshells, it would probably be wise for the time being for him to stay well away from these shores altogether.
https://mol.im/a/11608317
I think you might be right that our boy Harold actually had confirmed kills at his video game console, playing Call of Duty. I still can’t believe that he actually shared that information and it made the final cut on the book. Neither of these two have any sense of propriety. They might have done this in hopes of getting the government to pay for their security, but I’m not sure either of them are smart enough to have pieced that together.
None of us are aging as gracefully as we planned, so don’t worry about that.
Before their first event together at the Royal Foundation forum in February 2018, Harry detailed one exchange, via Page Six: Kate didn’t exactly give Meghan the warmest reception during the beginning of their working relationship. Meghan had asked to borrow Kate’s lip gloss because she forgot hers, an “American thing,” as Harry described it.
“Kate, taken aback, went into her handbag and reluctantly pulled out a small tube,” Harry continued. “Meg squeezed some onto her finger and applied it to her lips. Kate grimaced.” He believed Meghan, William, Kate, and him “should’ve been able to laugh about [the moment],” but the press “sensed [it was] something bigger.” Harry speculated that Kate was likely “on edge,” understanding that she was now “going to be compared to, and forced to compete with, Meg.” Kate indeed was by tabloids, although she received far more favorable coverage than Meghan by those publications.
That is filthy and definitely NOT* an American thing! I suppose if Meghan says it is an American thing, it must be an American thing. Wake up Harry! Nobody does this except tween girls and women making a power play. What next? Saying that her nose is running, she forgot her handkerchief, and she needs to wipe it on Catherine's sleeve because it is "an American thing"?
*Maybe it is on the floating bordellos. Kate probably threw it away immediately because she knows where those lips have been.
The book coverage is getting exhausting, but my take on it is that the book is a big ole TMI nothing burger, which will wind up being a huge own goal for the Hazmats, especially for Mr. Hazmat. Apologies for the metaphor mashup.
Houseplantfan has the video of Megyn Kelly talking to Tom Bower about the book. Bower thinks the duo is dangerous to Britain, the Commonwealth & the RF, & is afraid that the international audience might sympathize with the Hazmats, because they don't have all the info the Brits have seen. I'm not so sure. People are facing hardships in many parts of the world, & lots of them might not take kindly to two privileged nincompoops slagging off their families, royal or not royal. I think that if the two stay married, they might wind up like the D & D of Windsor, wandering around the world, constantly worried about money & asking the RF for handouts. They would be smart not to undermine their last hope of financial support! LOL!
Have a nice evening or whatever time it is for you, Nutties!
Apparently we are supposed to be outraged that KCIII does exercises for his bad back in his underwear.
___
I think Harold’s intent was to cause his father embarrassment and to diminish him. Same with the revelation that the King always travels with his childhood Teddy bear. Of all the intimate family details in Spare that have been written about so far, these two really make my blood boil. Gratuitous and sadistic cruelty.
Prince Harry’s Royal family ambushes ‘harmed Queen’s health’
Monarch was impacted by Duke’s attacks in her final months, say sources
It was also revealed the Duke had initially attempted to cancel the publication of the memoir after visiting the late Queen last summer. The team working on Spare were told: "He’s pulled it. He doesn’t want to do it,” The Times reported citing a US publishing source.
The Prince writes affectionately about his grandmother in the memoir, but those who knew her have disclosed that she suffered as a result of the campaign he has waged against his family since moving to California almost three years ago.
One friend of the late Queen said: “She never wanted to deal with confrontation, even going as far back as the start of Prince Andrew’s troubles, and this stuff was shoved in her face on an almost weekly basis.
“It had an impact. She had lost Prince Philip, and then the constant ambushing of the Royal family by a much-loved grandson did take its toll. At that stage in your life and your reign, you just don’t need that on top of everything else.”
Another well-placed source said they had “absolutely” no doubt that the allegations made by the Sussexes affected the late Queen’s health.
The first source questioned how the Prince could possibly achieve the reconciliation he says he wants with his family, adding: “He says he wants a reconciliation then he sticks this enormous machete in their backs.”
The source also said the Duchess of Sussex had said she wanted to be part of a family, “but how are their kids going to be part of a family now? It’s out of the question”.
The Duke of Sussex wanted to cancel the publication of his memoir during his visit to Britain last summer, a US publishing source has claimed.
The team working on Spare, the duke’s memoir, were believed to have been told: “He’s pulled it. He doesn’t want to do it.”
Harry is understood to have had second thoughts about going ahead with the book, for which he was paid a multimillion-pound advance, when he was in the UK for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations in June.
Insiders at Penguin Random House speculated that the royal family told him that if the book were published while Queen Elizabeth was alive there would be “no way back”.
“That was such a dark day. Everyone had been working so hard on this project in utmost secrecy — and with the expectation this would turn out to be one of the biggest and most historic books we would ever get to publish.
“And then, just after Harry’s last trip to London, the boss walked in and said: ‘He’s pulled it. He doesn’t want to do it.’ I can’t tell you — it is an enormous and expensive operation getting a book like this ready and everyone involved was devastated.”
Although Harry changed his mind again in favour of publication, his hesitation could shed light on his mixed feelings about writing such a devastating memoir.
The decision not to publish was taken two weeks after the duke and his wife had visited London to attend the jubilee celebrations. Although no definitive reason has ever been given, there were rumours within his publishers at the time that Harry had been given an ultimatum by the palace. “The rumour was that during the visit it was made clear to him that if he published while the Queen was still alive there would be no way back. Obviously that all changed with the monarch’s death in September.” The source also described how the book had to be translated from American English into the British tongue.
“It was extraordinary. A member of the royal family describing everything as ‘awesome’ and using phraseology like: ‘We had gotten ourselves into a difficult situation’ — we had to go through the whole manuscript to make it sound like he was actually English.”
During one Zoom call the young children of a senior publishing executive accidentally walked past his computer screen and a furious Harry demanded that he be removed from the project. “Prince Harry’s whole thing is about control,” the insider said. “He feels he’s never had it — but boy did he demand it with this book.”
The source said that contrary to speculation there were no significant revisions made after the Queen’s death.
“Be in no doubt though, there will be some who read Spare and think he’d better continue cultivating that American accent. For Brits especially, they may feel there is no way back.”
Now people from the publishing side are leaking. It sounds plausible to me. What I find odd is the claim that he was told, at the Jubilee celebrations, that if he published when the Queen was still alive there would be no way back for him. So, he had to wait for her to die before publishing? How callous! He/they have a way back after the numerous attacks on William, and Catherine, in the book?
Can anyone think what happened at the Jubilee to give him second thoughts? Did TBW feel what it was like to be 'out' and have second thoughts and try and stop the book? Or did he have second thoughts for sentimental reasons and TBW persuaded him to 'publish and be damned'? And why no second thoughts after the funeral of Prince Phillip?
Thanks for the articles.
@NeutralObserver @SwampWoman
Thanks for the American perspective. She got very favourable treatment from the media because so much of her bad and inappropriate behaviour was excused because it was 'American'. A rude bully is a rude bully, either side of the pond is what I always thought.
In his book he has inadvertantly revealed that the family, from day 1, knew she was trouble and was not going to fit in. We can now see how they really tried to make it work and be open-minded. But, besides her narcissism, or perhaps because of it, she has some major character flaws that always made that impossible. One is that she does not know how to distinguish between assertiveness, when appropriate, and rudeness.
.
Looking up `poppers’ in Wikipedia told me more than I wish to know, but this gives you some idea:
`In the late 1970s Time magazine[14] and The Wall Street Journal[15] reported that popper use among gay men began as a way to enhance sexual pleasure, but "quickly spread to avant-garde heterosexuals". A series of interviews conducted in the late 1970s revealed a wide spectrum of users’.
If he really means laughing gas, I’m afraid there are plenty of opportunities to get hold of it in the UK. Apparently `it’s the 4th most common gas’ used in the UK club/rave scene, though I don’t know how far it lags behind other psychoactive substances.
Regarding circumcision of male infants, apparently this was routinely practised among the English middle- and upper-classes in the 1930s, mainly as a hygiene precaution. My own (ahem…) observations on my near-contemporaries bears this out. I don’t know what the situation is now, beyond the fact there are now activists campaigning against it- I don’t know how mixed their motives are. That is, is it a matter for them of what they perceive as cruelty to children or a means to attack certain religious groups?
Nor do I know when epidemiology discovered that cervical cancer occurs at very much lower rates among nuns and Jewish women ( we certainly didn’t know about the Human Papilloma Virus [HPV] then so obviously there was no vaccine to protect females from infection by the most likely suspect.)
Here's a link to an original report:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/nov/07/monarchy.wildlife
Two hen harriers dead, one prince questioned, no charges
· Police not seeking anyone else over killings
· 'Fact that bodies could not be found is disappointing'
`Not seeking anyone ese over the killing' usually means the police are sure they know who the culprit is but the evidence is not strong enough to stand up in court.
Funnily enough, it gets a mention in the Radio Times entry for a programme on TV this evening, Channel 5, 8.30-930 pm GMT (Universal time?). The prog.is presented by Kate Williams ( yes, the pro-* professor I mentioned earlier) but the review on p40 ends-
`Oh, and the small matter of which member of the Windsor clan shot down two rare birds above the Sandringham estate...' (my emphasis)
`reporting from Los Angeles... Americans thought at first it was a parody but now they're getting in the popcorn...'
Now I wonder what they were talking about????
Didn't * demand to be seated next to H? This was interpreted as meaning she needed to be able to control him and keep him away from other women. They were reported as carrying on their own conversation, clearly excluding the other guests to the point of rudeness. It was regarded as understandable when they were engaged but not once they were married.
I wonder how this got out?
One is the future Queen; the other is the equivalent of a Days Inn maid who rummages through your suitcases while the family is at the pool.
Spawe the Snow-man
Thelma Crudd
The pea shooting dudd
Has exposed much more than his willy
With his ice bitten crown
Ergo, permafrost frown
Hawwy’s weawwy vewy siwwy…
@Maneki- Tchin Tchin 🥂
@Rebecca- thanks.
Really appreciate
all the articles.
Was thinking semifreddo,
decided mezzo cotto
half baked haz 😉
@WildBoar- I hear you,
everyone’s in bed when I
come out to play!!
You coul find where H wrote about circumcision. There have been so many articles and so many revelations it's hard to remember where you read something. He did write about it and it was in the DM. I think we need a trigger warning with each article.
I don't think he would have disgraced himself more if he'd mooned at a crowd.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11604237/Prince-Harry-talks-penis.html
In the article posted by Raspberry Ruffle at 10:59 PM, Harry stated that he said he took “laughing gas to calm his nerves.” Laughing gas is a prescription anesthesia gas that must be administered by a doctor or dentist. What the heck is he talking about?
____________
So-called 'laughing gas', or nitrous oxide, is used by young people as a recreational drug by young people. It's sold in silver canisters and inhaled with a balloon, I believe. It's not rare to see these silver canisters in streets and parks.
Scroll through for more coverage of the book.
There is nothing that they can do to stop this ... as long as any direct quotes are kept within fair use, trying to sue anyone is a waste of money.
Schlock, Mock and
Toot Smoking Harold
Harry isn’t
anyones best man
Disloyal to country
military and his Gran
Hope he’s happy
with his excremental download
Watch out hazard
you’re about to implode…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-64194347
Almost wall-to-wall H.
https://tinyurl.com/32rv8a63
I know recollections may vary but I'm now wondering if I am living in a parallel universe or is H?
Hankenwhine
Soddom and Gomorrah
have made it quite clear
They’ll do owt for a dollar
much like her career
The minger stallion
has been taken for a ride
But not all can be blamed
on his unfortunate faced bride…
The laughing gas thing came from Mole when he said he tried it during Maggot’s labour. 🙄 I gave a link to the article at the time. 😁 I don’t think he’s bright enough to confuse the latter with poppers. 😳
Lady C said some months back that Mole wanted to cancel the book…it seems she was correct yet again going on the latest disclosure. 😃
The prince said he considered telling his father the cost of providing Meghan with food and shelter was minimal, given that she did not have a large appetite and could make her own clothes.
Ha ha ha! As if * was going to make her own outfits, especially for formal occasions. Has she ever used a needle and thread? You really have to laugh, although this isn't funny.
Cheers! Chin chin! 🍾🥂
Spare can provide you with an unlimited source of inspiration 😁
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382098/Royal-wedding-speech-Prince-Harry-pays-tribute-Prince-William.html
They twist the truth, leave out details and try to gaslight the entire world. There are hundreds of people who were at that reception who can call out his lie ... his family do not have to say anything.
I don't want to derail the thread ... but, how do you create a spare like Princess Anne rather than hapless or even Andrew? And what do you do if the spare is as thick as two planks and of weak character?
I do think hapless, like his wife, grew up with parents who were too indulgent and not always present (obviously that was not Diana's fault). But, unlike her, he had a sibling he was close to and many cousins and other family, whom he saw regularly at family gatherings that happened like clockwork. He also had staff and many others to guide and assist him in a public role, his whole life. Invictus Games was a success because of that.
Richard Eden
@richardaeden
If you think #PrinceHarry's claims in his memoirs are shocking, imagine what he left out! His and #Meghan's cheerleader Omid Scobie says lawyers at the publisher Penguin Random House sent back FORTY ONE pages of questions after Harry's ghostwriter submitted a final draft. #royal
H denying he was `Best Man' -
Perhaps it's just that technicality which emerged at Andrew's wedding in '86, ie the Royals speak of `Supporters' and may have more than one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/105etrf/jimmy_kimmels_latest_video_on_harrys_frozen/
@WBBM and Maneki Neko. Thank you for the info on laughing gas/nitrous oxide. My concern/question was his implication that he used laughing gas to “calm his nerves” just before the baby was delivered. I have no idea how this baby was delivered, by courier🤭, at home or in a delivery room, I just thought it was ridiculous that he would use laughing gas in the presence of a medical provider. I envisioned him using it from the port in the wall of the delivery room, likely in full view of at least a nurse.
Hawwy is now claiming he wasn’t William’s best man? Oh, Hawwy, none of us peons who weren’t invited to “the evening do” can personally attest that you stood up and gave the best man’s speech… But I would say conservative estimate, at least 200 million televisions all over the world I prove that you are full of bollocks, because they bore witness to the fact that you most certainly stood up with William at his wedding. I took a half day off work to watch, and I saw with my own two eyeballs when you turned to your brother and said “Wait until you see her!” You and your brother were both standing at the top of the aisle in Westminster Abbey at the time. Just double checking a point of fact: the best man does stand next to the bride groom, both in their best outfits generally, yes? You can’t claim that you were captured standing beside William as Catherine approached at the aisle in her wedding dress because you got stalled up there whilst searching for the toilets. Then later, that was you or someone who looked exactly like you waving from the BP balcony while stood next to Pippa Middleton, the maid of honor. Isn’t it customary for the best man to stand next to the maid of honor for photo opportunities such as these? I suppose we could check the wedding registry from the day and see if you did in fact sign it as a witness, note that your signature would be legible.
What are you playing at, you ginger toerag? What is caustic little lying toad you are.
Nitrous oxide is sold in small canisters for use by cooks. It makes whipped cream without the whipping. These little canisters litter public spaces everywhere because people buy them to get high.
They are also sold on the black market because shops will not sell them to minors who don't usually make a lot of pastries and baked goods.
That is so interesting ... Lady C must have an inside source!
I sometimes get the sense that she knows more but is careful about what she spills and when.
-----
She called him after the first date, the same night ...
https://www.tumblr.com/lila4/705777107503071232
They have a way of omitting details to convey a different meaning and then have plausible deniability.
So, royals do not have a best man, and technically he did not have the role that we would think of as a best man. Just as he did not give a speech at the morning reception but did at the evening reception.
What he put in the memoir is misleading.
@snarkyatherbest
I checked that tweet and all the people who liked it and could not find the ghostwriter.
nah. I think it was he was more worried about her attempts to spend every last penny of the monarchy that she could.
Someone mentioned not knowing how to do italics (bold is b, a is a hypertext link)
open tag: < i >
in front of what you want you type without the spaces I have to (otherwise it won't show up)
close tag: < / i >
and at the end of the italics
When you get the message unclosed tag that usually means that there is no / (but I think I once typed a ) instead of > and got that message.
The idea makes me sick. Somehow the powers-that-be MUST get that truly dangerous duo out of the line of succession as soon as possible.
—————————
*Andrew Roberts. @aroberts_andrew
·
22h
Prince Harry's remarks should remind the Palace how IMPERATIVE it is that Prince William's family never travel anywhere all together, as they did by helicopter in the past. What a King Harry & Queen Meghan could do to the monarchy & nation doesn't bear contemplation #PrinceHarry
I wonder if the pictures of the idiot in the rain with the dog means he's been kicked out to the dog house. Or will his next story be he has to live in his car now to keep his pretend family safe. Poor dog.
Wonder where they went when residents Monticeso was evacuated due to rain and mudslides.
HG Tudor said the leaked copy in Spain was deliberate. He said a publisher said on Radio 4 said the leak was done to create excitement about the book, nothing accidental about it. 😁
Harry´s Wife : Is That All You've Got ( Meghan Markle)
https://youtu.be/Ifopn_SShfY
Lady C says Mole is suffering from Confession through Projection.
It was Mole of took a swipe at William…
Why William SLUGGED Harry (his Dad?)/BULLYING&LEAKS/DISSING Kate/Queen's...
https://youtu.be/Hp4JMCoqRfw
To paraphrase an old saying, Harry was stuck between a Queen and a hard place.
The advance money had probably already been spent by Meghan as soon as the check hit their bank account.
By last summer after the Jubilee, Penguin/Random House had already spent loads of its own money on the ghost writer and paying others of its staff who were already working on the editing, proofreading, marketing, cover photography and everything else that goes into a major book project like this. Penguin/Random House had a signed contract and they held him to it, which is how things work in the adult world of business.
Just as Harry and Meghan reportedly played hardball with the original group of publishers bidding to get a book deal with them, it was time for Penguin/Random House play hardball with Harry and hold him to rude awakening that he signed a contract. A deal is a deal.
If anybody thinks Harry’s book is unloading massive venom on his family, the monarchy, the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth, just wait fir Meghan’s book. It will make Harry’s book look like a church pamphlet.
In a way, she likely thinks she has no skin in the game. She will damn well write whatever she wants to write and being a narcissist, she will try to outdo Harry’s book in terms of outrageous lies and attacks. The final product will so poisonous that it will come with a pair of rubber gloves and a toxicity warning label. It will be THAT NASTY. And due to her narcissism, she will not care one bit if there is a negative impact on those around her, including Harry and the alleged children.
She will do what she has always done, which is to call everyone a racist, play the victim, and walk away.
1. Pleasurable 9 minute piece on Sky News Australia “Horrible Harry’s Bizarre Bombshells”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HvfcldlXLpo&feature=youtu.be
2. The Sky News presenter Daisy Cousens is wearing a smashing piece of clothing with a “Snakes and Ladders” child’s game print fabric. One can read a lot into that: my top interpretation is that Harry is the snake and Meghan is determined to climb the ladder.
I absolutely loved that game as a kid, but Harry and Meghan are not playing a child’s game. They are ruthless, out for blood, unrelenting and thus far unstoppable.
3. One of the first quotes and graphics Daisy Cousens gives is from Andrew Bolt of Herald Sun, a portion of which I’ve cut and pasted here. At this point I must agree with Andrew Bolt: this devastation is all on Harry.
“Royal crisis shaking monarchy all about jealousy
Enough of the old, sexist game of blame-the-witch. No more excuses for Harry. With his new memoir, Spare, and the two interviews (edit: now three) he’s given to promote it, he stands as chief villain in this disgusting farce…/Prince Harry, not Meghan Markle, is doing the real damage to the royal family.” Link to Heraldsun.co.au shorturl.at/bcT29
The Sussex brand will be so toxic that although there will be a few idiot hangers-on, nobody of the elite and powerful who is in their right mind will want to be associated with them personally or in any sort of business or philanthropic endeavors.
Just my opinion, folks.
also saw on tumbler by one of the tarot card readers an aside about pr. said the us pr people love “surprised drops” yeah we like sensationalism her ain’t gonna lie. so this points to US pr effort. sloppy so not SS. i’m thinking SS and Danayi et al were smart to slink away ahead of this. what a sh!t show. if this doesn’t cause a break up i do t know what will. his brand is toast there is no way she wants to be linked with failure. so what will her next step be.
Surely they expected hapless to get married someday, and it was highly possible that the wife would want to support him as a working royal (like Sophie)?
Were they making huge financial demands on Charles? Remember, she was already making use of royal protection as a girlfriend, and she spent wildly on clothes.
Did his family see the trainwreck ahead and were trying to slow down the rush to get married? (In the book, he says they wanted to get married much quicker than they did.)
It can still be a case of accidentally on purpose scenario if you see what I mean. Who believes Scabies anyhow?! 😂
@Sandie, Lady C has her reliable sources everywhere! 😁
@Maneki Neko, I will follow the link. I just can’t believe Mole would put that kind of info out in the public domain…but nothing should surprise us anymore! 🫤
Remember, The Guardian got an English copy before the Spanish book went on sale. It seems the Guardian source has a friend at the publishers as this is not the first time he has pipped everyone to the post in getting hold of a copy of a book.
The duo probably crafted publication day to overshadow the royals in some way and to break records. They keep trying but never learn that they cannot control and are lousy at strategizing, in my opinion. Are they delighted with the attention the book is getting, furious that their carefully crafted launch plan did not work, or furious at the criticsm?
I have always thought the book would sell well. Publishing so many translations will boost sales even more. However, will the short-term success be worth the damage they have done to themselves? Even the money won't last long and, although a book can theoretically never stop earning an income, it is not going to stay on the besteller list for long.
How many copies have the publishers printed? Reprints is where the money is to be made. (Traditionally, the first print run carries all the production costs for the book so the big profit margins are in the reprints.)
I would be surprised if the book bombs (fails to sell the almost two million copies to begin to justify the royalties, including all the translations) and it is found in bargain bins within a month or in large piles on the floor of remainder stores (like her book). But I would not be disappointed.
All Nutties I encourage you to click on https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-the-papers-64194347 and go to 7th piece down, which is a wonderfully snarky image of Harry in crown with commentary:
“Readers of the Daily Star are offered a cut-out mask of Prince Harry for those who ‘don't want to take any responsibility’ for their actions.”
This makes me feel hope for the RF’s future in that delusional loser Harry is now a worldwide object of derision.
A long article but well worth the read.
My opinion: give a toxic narc half an inch and they will try to take the whole country. The duo will never admit to any wrong and will demand apologies, retribution and compensation for what never happened.
His friends are threatening to talk ... and have said that there is a lot they covered up for him.
I can only hear the sound of crickets chirping in the dead of night.
The most self-unaware, deluded pair going. 😁
https://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Books/zgbs/books/283155#:~:text=Amazon%20Best%20SellersOur%20most%20popular%20products%20based%20on,stars%20136%20Hardcover%2040%20offers%20from%20%2410.88%20%233
If you want to follow the link, I'd strongly recommend a stiff drink near at hand.
@JimmyKimmelLive
A video reenactment of Prince William & Prince Harry’s fistfight! ���� ------- Funny!!!
https://tinyurl.com/bd2mz2dj
William broke protocol when he appointed Harry as his best man at his wedding, according to the Guardian. Their father, the Prince of Wales, chose his brothers, Andrew and Edward, to be his supporters when he married Diana at St. Paul's Cathedral in 1981. And Prince Edward chose his brothers Charles and Andrew to be his supporters.
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a13988481/prince-harry-best-man-prince-william/
I suspect that hapless denies he was best man because there is no such tradition in the royal family, although William may have chosen to go against tradition and have his one brother as a best man rather than 'suporters'. From what his friends said, as reported in the Times article, he did not want to give a speech at the reception and begged the two best friends of William to do so. Did he also give a speech in the evening as reported in the media, or was that made up?
I don't know if he explained the background of royal tradition and did not simply say that he was not best man as most people would understand the role. He whined and attacked instead of taking the opportunity to explain royal tradition and how that was changed for his and William's wedding.
Jimmy Kimmel video replay of the William and Harry tussle
From Australia:
January 5th
Andrew Bolt: Royal crisis shaking the monarchy all about jealousy
Enough of the old, sexist game of blame-the-witch, Prince Harry, not Meghan Markle, is doing the real damage to the royal family.
It’s too easy to blame Meghan Markle more than Prince Harry. She’s the social climber who tells the most outrageous lies.
Did she tell you the one about her son having to be plucked from a burning bedroom? About the Archbishop of Canterbury marrying her twice to Harry?
Prince Harry, in contrast, tends to be the one we excuse.
He’s just weak, we say. He’s dim and damaged from losing his mother so young, and now the poor dope is the victim of a Lady Macbeth who’s magicked him with her sex and cunning.
But enough of this old, sexist game of blame-the-witch. No more excuses for Harry. With his new memoir, Spare, and the two interviews he’s given to promote it, he stands revealed as the chief villain in this disgusting farce.
Nothing can excuse what this mewling, vain, self-centred, poor-me hypocrite is doing to his father, his brother and his country.
He’s full of the vicious resentments and jealousies that explain why many kings in more savage times – from the Ottoman’s Sultan Mehmed III to Britain’s Richard III – thought it safer to kill every relative who might eye off their throne.
(excerpt)
Food, Fash, Fit @FoodFashFit. Jan 6
Biggest revelation of Spare so far seems to be that Meghan speaks more to the ghost of Harry’s dead mum than she does to her own father, who is very much alive.
Prince Harry 'has been written out of King Charles' Coronation and will have no official role in the service if he attends' after he left Prince William 'burning with anger' following release of tell-all memoir
Prince Harry has been written out of King Charles' Coronation script, it was claimed today, as royal insiders said Prince William is 'burning with anger' amid the bombshell revelations in the Duke of Sussex's memoirs.
In his new tell-all autobiography Spare, Harry made a series of sensational claims about his brother and father, describing the Prince of Wales as his 'arch-nemisis' and accusing the King of being worried he would be 'overshadowed' by Meghan's Hollywood star power.
The Royal Family has thus far remained silent on the matter, refusing to respond to the Duke's incendiary anecdotes, but the Sunday Times today said a royal source claimed Harry has been omitted from the proceedings of King Charles' upcoming Coronation in May.
'Prince Harry has been written out of the script for the Coronation, with no official role in the service if he attends. Breaking with tradition, Charles will scrap royal dukes kneeling and paying homage to the monarch. Only William will perform that role,' the paper's Royal Editor tweeted.
'As things stand, there is no role for Harry in the service,' a royal source reportedly declared.
MailOnline has approached Buckingham Palace and the Duke of Sussex's representatives for comment.
Meanwhile, friends of William told the Sunday Times that the heir is 'burning with anger' but is also 'anxious and sad' over Harry's comments, which one friend described as 'cowardly'.
'[William] won't retaliate, he never would, because he's dignified and unbelievably loyal,' one friend said.
'It's cruel, cowardly and so sad for William to keep taking the punches. He's keeping quiet for the good of his family and the country.' Another said: 'He's anxious and he's sad - he's concentrating on his wife and his children... He's handling it so well on the outside, inside he's burning,' before one other associate chipped in: 'He's not going to roll over.
Spare revealed the brothers share a complex relationship, with Harry, 38, describing William, 40, as both his 'beloved brother' but also his 'arch-nemisis'.
The Duke kept nothing back, laying bare his bitter frustrations over his role as the 'spare' to William, who is the heir to the throne.
[Later in the article this is revealed]
Harry was officially considered his brother's best man at the nuptial and even travelled with his father and future King to Westminster Abbey in a Bentley that day.
But in 'Spare' the Duke declares the best man stunt was all for show and his brother's friends, James Meade and Thomas Van Straubenzee, gave the traditional speech at the reception.
King Charles has been spared the flogging that befell William in Harry's autobiography.
But in one bombshell excerpt from 'Spare', Harry claimed his father said that Meghan was not welcome at Balmoral on the day the Queen died.
The Duke wrote that his father instructed him not to bring his wife to visit the dying Queen Elizabeth II, citing 'nonsensical and disrespectful' reasons.
Royal sources meanwhile have claimed the Royal Family are 'completely exhausted' with the 'stream of misinformation' from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex ahead of Harry's hotly anticipated interview with Tom Bradby on Sunday evening.
A royal insider told the Mirror: 'It all feels very repetitive. Harry's constant sniping is rather draining and he knows full well it is highly unlikely they will engage in a tit-for-tat battle of words.'
Another source added that the Duke's claim that his family refused to reconcile with him was 'unadulterated nonsense.'
Buckingham Palace has refused to comment on the trailer for Bradby's interview which was filmed at a hired ranch in Montecito.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11609873/Prince-Harry-written-King-Charles-Coronation.html?ito=push-notification&ci=G8OTBaJpup&cri=bS_6_Tn2VR&si=zQcVM4D2CmeP&xi=c3c56fff-5cc1-48ae-bf7c-2ed9417ca9bb&ai=11609873
Prince Harry 'has been written out of King Charles' Coronation….
https://mol.im/a/11609873
Although while I was online, I checked the hardcopy reservations, which are up to 623 from 424 or so, in a few days. Evidently the publicity is having its effect on others.
Regarding Mole’s kill tally, I don’t think Parliament will intervene quite yet…and that’s if they do, going on Rishi Sunak’s no comment response so far. I think it’s down to the military to reprimand him and his Father. 🥴
https://the-cat-with-the-emerald-tiara-1.tumblr.com/post/705806821740462080/submission
https://www.instagram.com/marklenews1/?hl=en
Can you imagine the tripe Maggot will come up with if she writes her own book? It will be a cross between a George Martin GOT fantasy & tweener mean girl literature written by a dimwit. I pity the poor souls who might have to review it.
Moehringer's book with Andre Agassi is apparently very good, but then Andre was a world class athlete, who managed to survive his demanding father, build a great career & have a long lasting marriage to another tennis great, Steffi Graf. It's like comparing a steak to pink slime.That goes for the wives as well as the husbands.
Think of how many people who know what's really been going on, but have kept quiet, may now be prepared to speak up - friends, servants, actors, drivers... he list goes on.
They've shown the world what they're really like - and many of the cultures that might have accepted the r-ce allegations have profound regard for the elderly, whether they are related or not. The ancestors are also respected and privileged school kids who regard their ancestral links as meaningless must seem the lowest of the low.
On the subject of respect or otherwise, the quotation that Cat Eyes has given us, namely:
`The Duke wrote that his father instructed him not to bring his wife to visit the dying Queen Elizabeth II, citing 'nonsensical and disrespectful' reasons.'
is surely written by a narcissist, even if we don't know which one. In my experience they attach a high value to themselves being respected, while trampling over others, attempting to sabotage their events and claiming all glory for themselves.
Too late to rewrite it now - basically it was about respect. That is, for one's own forebears and for the the elderly in generally. Also the about narcissist's obsession about `respect for themselves combined with them trampling over everyone else.
Note the bit about `channelling' the voice of his subject - did JRM keep H's words exactly, in order not to do him any favours?
"Moehringer's book with Andre Agassi is apparently very good, but then Andre was a world class athlete, who managed to survive his demanding father, build a great career & have a long lasting marriage to another tennis great, Steffi Graf. It's like comparing a steak to pink slime.That goes for the wives as well as the husbands."
Final two sentences slayed me.
Well, there can be a sense of coercion if you feel you are forced to participate in some activity which you know is illegal (or you may later find out is illegal). That somehow your testimony is now tainted because you did, in fact, do something illegal which now you are complaining about to "authorities".
perfumes, clothing ... my mind wanders and thinks of what might have been offered to JK or was he skipped because he was too straight arrow about rules?
Prince William 'lunged at Prince Harry and grabbed his shirt twice' and used secret code phrase about Diana in row over Oprah Winfrey interview after in front of Charles after Philip's funeral
Prince Harry claims his brother 'lunged' at him and 'grabbed his shirt twice' in front of their father during a row over his interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Harry, in his bombshell memoir, details how Prince William was 'shouting' and 'really steaming' when he grasped at him during the dispute in front of then-Prince Charles following the funeral of their grandfather, Prince Philip.
William is said to have then used a secret code phrase about Princess Diana and embraced Harry in a hug, telling him: 'I love you' and 'I just want you to be happy.'
Details of the row emerged just days after it was revealed that Harry claims in his book that a 'piping hot' William once injured him by pushing him onto a dog bowl on the kitchen floor of his cottage home in the grounds of Kensington Palace in 2019.
In his new autobiography 'Spare', the Duke of Sussex, 38, writes how his brother got heated during a half-hour walk near Frogmore Cottage following Philip's funeral on April 17, 2021.
Harry, William and Charles were reportedly discussing the interview he and Meghan Markle gave to Oprah the month before.
Harry claims was trying to address bullying allegations made against Meghan, but his father and brother 'weren't listening.'
The California-based royal went on to allege that William was 'really steaming' and grasped at him as he tried to walk away.
'I waved a hand, disgusted, but he lunged, grabbed my shirt. "Listen to me, Harold,"' Harry wrote in his book, according to The Sun.
'I pulled away, refused to meet his gaze. He forced me to look into his eyes. "Listen to me, Harold, listen! I love you, Harold! I want you to be happy."'
Harry claims he replied: 'I love you too…but your stubbornness is extraordinary!'
0
The Duke reportedly tried to pull away, but William allegedly 'grabbed him again' and 'twisted him' so the pair could maintain eye contact.
William then evoked the brother's so-called 'secret code' and swore on Princess Diana's life that his intentions were genuine, Harry penned.
He writes that William said: 'Harold, you must listen to me! I just want you to be happy, Harold. I swear I swear on Mummy's life.' Harry claims his 'voice broke' and he 'softly' told William: 'I really don't think you do.'
The elder brother then allegedly hugged Harry and said: 'I love you'.
Harry continued: 'He stopped. I stopped. Pa stopped. He'd gone there.
'He'd used the secret code, the universal password. Ever since we were boys those three words were to be used only in times of extreme crisis.' The Duke claimed his brother 'wasn't quite ready to accept defeat' and claimed to be 'properly sick and ill' over the tensions between the pair. William allegedly reiterated: 'I swear to you now on Mummy's life that I just want you to be happy'.
Harry claims his 'voice broke' and he 'softly' told William: 'I really don't think you do.'
The elder brother then allegedly hugged Harry and said: 'I love you'. The latest allegation comes after just days after a leaked extract of the upcoming memoir revealed that Harry alleged William injured him by pushing him onto a dog bowl.
Harry alleged that he fought with his brother at Nottingham Cottage in early 2019 during a conversation about their relationship, Harry's rows with the press and Meghan.
The Duke of Sussex claims that William then grabbed him by the collar, ripped his necklace then pushed him over in the kitchen, causing him to land on a dog bowl that shattered and injured his back.
Harry and Meghan lived in the London home - dubbed 'Nott Cott' - set within the grounds of Kensington Palace, from 2016 before they moved to Frogmore Cottage in the Windsor estate in April 2019. In their explosive Netflix series Harry & Meghan, the couple described the home as 'so small', with clips from the documentary showing cobbled walkways and shrubs sprouting in the borders.
Harry said in an interview for the series: 'The whole thing is on a slight lean, [with] really low ceilings. So I don't know who was there before but they must have been very short.'Meghan laughed, revealing Harry would 'hit his head constantly because he is so tall'.
Clips also showed Harry and Meghan doing DIY, the Duke varnishing a summer house and Meghan gardening. The Duchess of Sussex said: 'It was a time in our lives that people probably couldn't believe what was going on behind the scenes.' Another snap with a homely feels shows Harry eating chicken and cuddling up with Meghan's dog Guy on a cream sofa. Oprah was among the guests who came to visit the Sussexes at the cottage.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11610257/Prince-William-lunged-Prince-Harry-grabbed-shirt-twice-row-Oprah-interview.html?ito=windows-widget-push-notification&ci=553132
Woops notices
I have that happen to me (and it just did - gnashes teeth). I used to be fanatical about copy before posting.
What I do now is hit the back button and it seems to make my comment appear as if it has not posted (or at least it works that way on this machine). I then check it from another screen to see if it has posted before doing anything else.
Your mileage may vary.
jennysexposes.quora.com/A-better-understanding-Maybe-people-will-understand-a-bit-more-after-what-happened-in-Britain-this-afternoon-T
Think of how many people who know what's really been going on, but have kept quiet, may now be prepared to speak up - friends, servants, actors, drivers... he list goes on.
____
These 3 paragraphs from the Times really jumped out at me:
Harry’s disloyalty in spilling the beans has staggered lifelong friends of the brothers, who thought they would always have each other’s backs, no matter how distant they grew. While fisticuffs in the Nottingham Cottage kitchen in 2019 have long been known about in their tight-knit group, nobody thought Harry would go there. Why? Because of how much “shit” on Harry friends and family have kept under wraps for years, much of which has so far not emerged in the book’s leaked extracts.
“I don’t know how you can do that to your brother, even if you don’t like or get on with him any more,” says a friend of the royal family. “William was always there to pick up the pieces for Harry, he was his mum [after Diana]. There’s so much stuff over the years that Harry has rung friends up about and said, ‘throw away that photo, promise you won’t speak about this’. You could have a f***ing field day with shit on Harry. So could William, who (in comparison) is as clean as a whistle.I can’t believe he’d stoop so low. It’s outrageously disloyal.”
Another close friend of the brothers says: “It’s strategically not clever. Harry is good at getting his narrative out there but we know so much, we’ve cleaned up so many messes over the years, there is so much we could say.”Several friends of Harry, once loyal to him, say they are considering whether to go on the record to debunk some of his claims as “bollocks” and drop counter-bombshells of their own. “Loyalty works both ways,” warns one.
https://jennysexposes.quora.com/A-better-understanding-Maybe-people-will-understand-a-bit-more-after-what-happened-in-Britain-this-afternoon-This-m?ch=18&oid=95384071&share=06f3c97b&srid=ut6Tok&target_type=post
And now the the Daily Mail has this article:
EXCLUSIVE: After Harry’s revelation that he killed 25 Taliban in Afghanistan... Now hate preacher who inspired Lee Rigby killers tells jihadis to target British troops
Extremist Anjem Choudary claimed Duke of Sussex has shown ‘his true colours’
Infamous preacher accused Royals of a ‘dark history of occupying Muslim lands’
Politicians have warned of a raised threat to the Royal Family and Armed Forces
Perhaps this explains the blackout?
————————————————-
CRAZY DAYS AND NIGHTS
SATURDAY, JANUARY 07, 2023
Blind Item #8
The alliterate one is tired of borrowing jets from friends and is shopping for her very own.
—————————————-
My guess is that nobody wants to let her use their private jets anymore. As a narcissist who is full of entitlement and grandiosity, she and Harry probably do not ever even offer pony up any money to contribute to the cost of the flights they have been bumming from others.
If this CDAN blind is true, then Harry’s wife will surely get herself and Harry in deep financial trouble. I’ve worked for two companies tha both had at least two private jets. The cost to own a jet is incredibly high, even if you buy an older used jet.
Harry’s wife obviously wants to join the “club” of private jet owners, but I doubt she’ll be able to afford it, even of she runs it through Archewell.
But to join that exclusive club, you need a LOT of money, which I don’t think will be rolling in to the after they complete their obligations yo their current contracts.
I think the interest in being associated with them will fall off a cliff due to the backlash reaction to Harry’s book and the Netflix docuseries while the interest and popularity of Charles, Camilla, William and Kate will soar. And don’t forget, Meghan reportedly has her “memoir” or “maimoir” depending on how you look at it, will be coming out in Q4 2023, most likely spewing enough venom to kill every rattlesnake in Texas as it continues to damage their already tattered brand even more.
As someone in the DM comments said a few weeks ago about the Sussexes: “You cant make a career crapping on your family.”
She won’t have the money to buy a private jet unless they sell everything they own and move in with her dad in Mexico.
***************
The dangerous situation he has singlehandedly brought about -- courtesy of his delusional boastful book Spare -- is shocking and unforgiveable.
"So let me get this straight. Harold has now admitted to the Taliban and every other extremist and terrorist group involved the world that he is not potty trained, he’s hurt (that) his necklace got broken when his brother attempted unsuccessfully to knock some sense into him, that he has a circumcised penis prone to frostbite, that he has engaged in drug use that renders him ineligible for any immigration benefit in the United States (green card and naturalization), that he took home a dead fetus in violation of the law, holds no qualms about breaching the national security of not just the nation in which he holds citizenship and is fifth in line to the throne but also the nation in which he ostensibly holds permanent residency, and his children and wife are citizens. Did I get it all?"
The whole situation defies belief.
"ISTG Harold and Mads and their immature fixations on peeing (in bushes, in their pants on boats, whatev), penises (frostbitten, circumcised, or Sharpied bananas), vaginas, roast chickens, crocodiles, etc...NEITHER of these two successfully resolved ANY of Freud's 5 stages of psychosexual development as children (anal, oral, phallic, latent, vaginal). What an Oedipal/Electral mess they are!"
Why do the loathsome twosome keep claiming they demand privacy, but keep spewing this volcano of unpleasant information which we, the innocent public, keep having shoved in our unwilling faces?
Prince Harry could be barred from the US and has put visa 'at risk' after his admission he has taken drugs
Prince Harry could be barred from the US and has put visa 'at risk' after admitting about his illicit drug usage, immigration experts have warned.
The Duke of Sussex, 38, confessed to doing cocaine, smoking cannabis and taking hallucinogenic mushrooms in his upcoming memoir.
Typical applicants would be denied a visa over their history with illegal substances, but US authorities note entry into the country is granted on a 'case-by-case' basis.
It is unclear if Harry, who moved to California with his wife Meghan Markle in 2020, detailed his drug use on his visa application. Immigration experts warn that if he 'lied' about his past, the Duke could have his visa revoked.
In his new autobiography 'Spare', Harry revealed that he first took cocaine on a shooting weekend at age 17. He did a 'few more lines' on other occasions.
The one hard-partier also admitted to hallucinating during a celebrity-filled event in California and smoking cannabis after his first date with Meghan.
Most applicants with a history of drug use would be denied American visas, however immigration decisions are made on a 'case-by-case' basis, The Sunday Times reported.
US immigration rules state an individual's 'current and/or past actions, such as drug or criminal activities . . . may make the applicant ineligible for a visa'.
It is unclear what type of US visa Harry holds, but analysts speculate he either holds a spousal visa - sponsored by his American wife - or a O-1 visa which is given to people with 'extraordinary ability'. If Harry holds an O-1 visa, which is often given to celebrities and athletes, it would have to be renewed after three years.
The Sussexes relocated to California in 2020, meaning his visa could be set to expire this year. His renewal application could be impacted by his newly admitted history with drugs.
Immigration experts, however, note Harry should have been denied residency in the US if he failed to disclose his drug usage during the application process.
Anyone seeking temporary or permanent residency in the US must answer a series of questions about their criminal and drug history during when applying.
'He would have been asked [about drug use]. If he was truthful in his answers, he should have been denied,' Prof Alberto Benítez, director of George Washington University's Immigration Clinic, told The Telegraph.
The professor argued that if Harry did not detail his drug use, he would have been 'perjuring himself on an official US government document'.
He claimed honesty would have been in the Duke's 'best interest' and noted he may have received discretion from immigration officials because of his royal status.
'If he wasn't Prince Harry, if was 'Fred Jones' and he had this kind of a background, he'd have a lot more scrutiny and I could certainly see the green card being denied,' Prof Benitez added.
US State Department officials declined to answer the newspaper's query about whether or not his admission of drug use would 'cause difficulties' with his immigration status.
'Visa records are confidential under US law; therefore, we cannot discuss the details of individual visa cases. We cannot speculate on whether someone may or may not be eligible for a visa,' a spokesperson told the Times.
'Whenever an individual applies for a US visa, a consular officer reviews the facts of the case and determines whether the applicant is eligible for that visa based on US law.'
The spokesperson added: 'All visa applications are adjudicated on a case-by-case basis.'
MailOnline has approached representatives for Harry and the US State Department for comment.
Kick him out, please!
One can wish!
By now any competent meganolog knows that she is incapable to write a book and incapable to let anyone else to write it for her. So no book but a lot of talk about it is going to be The Project of 2023.
https://anonymoushouseplantfan.tumblr.com/post/705855552485523456
...supposedly 49 pages about Caroline Flack, Kate Middleton and Chelsy Davey.
But this might be a case of broken telephone, started by thus from Richard Eden:
“If you think PrinceHarry’s claims in his memoirs are shocking, imagine what he left out! His and Meghan’s cheerleader Omid Scobie says lawyers at the publisher Penguin Random House sent back FORTY ONE pages of questions after Harry’s ghostwriter submitted a final draft.
That comment on Instagram is excellent.
-----
I hope they get investigated because there’s a lot more than just freebies. The reason I started blogging about the merching and St Lucia five years ago is because I personally knew a company who paid her to wear their product after the relationship was leaked and I also knew a business who comped her during the Caribbean tour.
I can’t reveal those because my contacts still work there, but I also know of a company who paid her to wear merchandise during the Australia tour and they fired most of the staff after they were sold, so I can reveal this one. She was paid $250k to wear a pair of boots during an official event while representing the Queen. Here’s a completely unrelated link mentioning a brand that may or may not have paid these idiots (Harry wore them too!) an insane amount of money for product placement.
https://fashionista.com/2018/10/meghan-markle-wore-muck-waterproof-rubber-boots
The kicker is that it was a US brand hoping the royal seal of approval (notice the name of the boot!) would help them compete with a heritage UK brand (Hunter boots). It didn’t work and no one cared that Markle wore the boots, but they tried.
If you check out the article the boots are just one of four brands mentioned. If she charged each brand $250k that means she made a cool $1M from one official appearance. The tour lasted 16 days and she had multiple clothing changes each day, so she made more than $16M during that tour.
So, yeah, I’m glad he owned up to the freebies and I hope they investigate the shit out of them because there’s a lot more in there.
https://anonymoushouseplantfan.tumblr.com/post/705833969582833664/so-essentially-the-freebies-were-bribes-its-ok-if
She is also such a fantasist and inveterate liar that any book of hers would have to go in the fiction section.
His grandmother, mother of his father, Queen and longest-reigning monarch, is literally dying and he reprimands his father for being disrespectful about his wife! (Note that he did not repeat what his father actually said that offended him so much.)
The account of his encounter with his brother and father after Phillip's funeral is heartbreaking. His brother hugs him, tells him he loves him and wants him to be happy, uses the special oath invoking Mummy, and all the brainwashed idiot can think of is getting back to TBW, like a drug addict. (I personally have quite a bit of experience of drug addiction, and this is how drug addicts behave.)
@BarkJack_
·
11h
Comparing edits of #SPARE. Early 2022 a bound galley of Spare was reviewed by us for 2 hours after signing an NDA. Spare was eventually re-written and readied prior to HMTQ passing. Thread below.
-----
Initial version omitted
-lurid details of his member
-W&C encouraged costume (oddly in version 1 HE took all responsibility)
-referring to Wills as 'Archenemy'
1st draft DID have the fight details & Camilla bs which I found unsurprising. Boring.
-----
The 1st draft omitted
-Wills knocked him down during a fight "about Meghan"
1st draft DID say him and Wills did 'fight' on occasion pushed, traded swings & grappling on occasion throughout their lives.
Key difference is original context wasn't a blowup over Meg
-----
Barker told me #FrozenTodger happened on the 2011 North Pole trip but what you all don't know is that mans was soused in a snowbank while out on a piss and promptly found after not returning for over 10 minutes!
I had a left-wing friend who alerted me to `reading between the lines' of news reports - for example, when something is mentioned in the brief round-up of breaking news at the start of the bulletin but is not mentioned again, especially when it's something catastrophic.
One evening in June 1982, I got home from work just after 6pm and switched on the radio for the main news of the day. I caught the end of something very serious, presumably from the Falklands, so listened carefully to the end of the bulletin. Not a word about it. Zilch. Crickets.
So I guessed `D notice'.
It turned out to have been the bombing of the Sir Galahad; this report is sobering reading:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-61551116
To think, this traitor we call `H' was once Captain General of the Royal Marines.
Part of our Constitution involves building the Armed Forces' loyalty to the Crown as represented by the Royal Colonels-in-Chief, rather than directly to Westminster. (It's a subtle but important difference, designed to deter Parliament raising an army against the Crown as happened in the 17th century. Conversely, the Crown can't take on the Government because HMG controls their resources, and makes it difficult for the Forces to stage a coup against either.
Goodness knows what effect this will have.
Will Harry's drugs be the equivalent of Capone's tax affairs?
Tiaragate has been excavated and displayed once more - Harry's version. Our hero was frightened by a look from the Queen's Dresser.
Re the Battle of the Dogbowl, I wonder who first resorted to fisticuffs? There's evidence that H habitually gets his blow in first.
The tiring of private jet lending Lady C bought up late last year…she said the residents of Monticello were thoroughly fed up with the pair asking to use their jets (I’m paraphrasing). 🥴
I guess CDAN got it from there! 😁She adds all kinds of tip bits…
@WBBM, I write all my comments up in Notes and Copy and Paste them to the blog. I’ve lost comments in the past…never again as it’s hard enough on my phone. 🥴
Also: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/how-stupid-can-you-be-harry-accused-of-putting-family-in-danger-after-claiming-25-kills-in-afghanistan/ar-AA161zDR
‘How stupid can you be?’ Harry accused of putting family in danger after claiming 25 kills in Afghanistan
Memoir revelation ‘an absolute nightmare for his security teams’ it is claimed
Jane Dalton
Prince Harry has been accused of putting his family’s safety at risk after saying he killed 25 Taliban fighters in Afghanistan in his autobiography.
Critics said the Duke of Sussex had turned himself into an even higher terrorist target with the details of his involvement in the conflict.
Twitter users in Afghanistan and Pakistan have branded Harry a “murderer” and a “crusader” after extracts from the book ‘Spare’ were leaked ahead of the planned release next week.
In the memoir, Harry says he killed more than two dozen people when he was an Apache helicopter pilot during his second tour of duty in Afghanistan.
He flew on six missions that resulted in “the taking of human lives”, something of which he is “neither proud nor ashamed”, he said.
In the heat of combat, the prince did not think of the 25 as “people” but instead as “chess pieces” taken off the board.
But his comments about the war have raised renewed questions about his security. The prince lost his taxpayer-funded protection when he and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, stepped back from royal duties in 2020.
Andrew Neil wrote on Twitter: “Harry’s claim that he killed 25 Taliban is a nightmare – an absolute nightmare – for his security teams. How stupid can you be?”
Publicist Mark Borkowski said giving away his track record in Afghanistan was disastrous as the prince had put his wife and children at risk.
“He’s put a target on his back and if he’s protecting his family,” Mr Borkowski said on Sky News. “He’s put them in the greatest danger because I don’t believe they’ve got the same level of security he would have enjoyed while he was a member of the royal family.”
And a severely injured war veteran and friend of Prince Harry has told him to stop airing grievances against his family, following the book leaks.
Former commando Ben McBean, who was hailed a hero by the Duke of Sussex after losing an arm and leg in a bomb blast in Afghanistan, wrote on social media: “Love you Prince Harry but you need to shut up! Makes you wonder about the people he’s hanging around with.
“If it was good people somebody by now would have told him to stop.”
I totally believe that *, who has to slither into everything, helped write the book or wrote most of it. Some of the prose sounds just like her, e.g. H's account of his fight with William in the kitchen. It is too full of unnecessary details and they are too ridiculous. Apologies for repeating myself but *'s account of her mythcarriage in the NY Post immediately sprang to mind. She probably thought everybody would feel sorry for H. Big mistake.
OT
Re losing your post, sometimes I've pressed publish only to realise I may have forgotten something, for instance. As @abbyh said, just press the backbutton/left arrow and your latest post will appear. It doesn't matter how long ago you posted as long as it is the latest one.
Yes, he was 'best man' and:
But the guest recalled: “The speech was a three-way. Harry MC’d it. James and Thomas spoke, with Harry bringing them in, doing the banter. And the irony is that Harry was the funniest of the three. He had the guests in stitches.”
----
Why do they tell such obvious lies?
Yes, his family will maintain dignified silence (they won't get the drama from the Palace that they want) and staff will probably stay silent and loyal, but there are plenty of friends and other witnesses who will speak.
Angela Kelly - her third book may be rather interesting! The duo have made all sorts of claims about what the Kate Queen Saud and did because they knew she would not respond when she was alive (in addition, she had debilitating bone marrow cancer), and now that she is dead they think they can say whatever they want.
-----
One passage also stands out, for its genuine poignancy. Talking about attending church at Balmoral, the very next morning after that fateful night in Paris, Harry writes: ‘I couldn’t hear anything except the rhythmic clicks from across the road. The press. I reached for my father’s hand, to comfort myself, and then I cursed myself because that gesture triggered an explosion of clicks. I had given them exactly what they wanted. Emotion. Drama. Pain.’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11610149/He-compared-Meghan-Diana-thrall-vultures-unsure-trust-thats-Harry.html
https://twitter.com/artemisgoog
Her cartoons are biting, up with the best that Rowlandson, Cruikshank and Gillray (especially Gillray) ever produced - I wonder what Hogarth would have made of our traitors?
@Maneki Neko, @alianor, I & many others are on the same page about who contributed the less believable, (& more poorly written) material in the book.
@OCGal, thanks for the compliment. In the NYTimes article on ghostwriters that @WBBM linked to, Agassi mentioned that as someone who grew up honing a craft, he appreciated the same accomplishment in others.
Twit & Twat seem to lack all appreciation of others, as well as empathy. (Probably why Twat is such a poor actress.) Twit used to be able to seem warm & genial toward others. What happened to him?
I should have added that there's some strong tea there at 17th Dec '22 which I sincerely hope is true.
Very clearly not a complete blackout, the DM (via another newspaper?) had an article yesterday listing tweets by many of the known jihadists etc., threatening Harry and the UK. 🫤
1. Harry once claimed that his mother was hounded (& perhaps even murdered) because she was seeing 'a man of color,' then boasts of his alleged 25 kills of Muslims in Afghanistan. Weren't they 'of color'?
2. Twat is forever yammering on about women being 'strong,' 'powerful,' etc. She jeers at (bullies) Catherine for her alleged 'baby brain,' & implies that C was weak, but she pled fragility in her alleged 'pregnancies,' even used it to influence the judge in her Daily Mail case. It was always, 'I was so vulnerable, because I was pregnant, boo-hoo-hoo!' Unbelievable.
For the record, giving birth to my kids was just about the happiest thing that ever happened to me. I was as healthy as a horse while pregnant, but my doctors insisted on C-sections. When I got home from the hospital, rapidly changing hormones & exhaustion made me weepy for a short time. I can totally understand why Catherine would be a tad touchy in dealing with Twat. Catherine's pregnancies were much more difficult than most. She couldn't keep anything down. Her slimness after giving birth to her three children must have made Twat rage with jealousy, if she ever really was pregnant. LOL!
Just one more thing, what's with the photos on social media of Twat holding 2 very golden haired young children? What color is their hair, red, brown, blonde? I couldn't have carried my four year old & one year old at the same time, & I had tennis player/swimmer arms at the time. (Not now, sadly!)
Wow! (An excerpt of a chapter in above post.)
TBW has not seemed to have changed him for the good. In Canada, they were rumoured to have been sending out security (paid for by the British) for takeaways.
For many years Nutties had been publically writing (and members of other blogs), that Harry has been a drug user past and present. The "US authorities" are aware and don't care; just like they don't care about a certain someone (carrying drugs?) who flew as a beloved passenger on Air Force One. Guess that's their judgement of a "case-by-case basis! [Hurrumph!]
I have a friend's relative that was in their Montecito house doing some work last year and they said that there was not one single item that indicated any children lived there. No toys, no kids, no baby bottles or anything that indicated children lived there. But there were dog stuff scattered about and they did come across the dogs every time they had to be in the house. And they said that most of the rooms had no furniture whatsoever, just lots and lots of boxes and random stuff lying around, no organization whatsoever. This person not even see PH/MM either. Back patios did not have any furniture either, and definitely no toys. Very bare. Weird.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/prince-harry-has-done-something-unforgivable/
`Very clearly not a complete blackout, the DM (via another newspaper?) had an article yesterday listing tweets by many of the known jihadists etc., threatening Harry and the UK.'
Sometimes it's just delay before the go-ahead.
The following paragraph reveals the above as ridiculous fiction:
"Under the supposed deal, Meghan Markle would get a lump-sum $50 million payout, generous child support, a magnificent U.S. mansion – and sole ownership of Prince Harry’s British home, Frogmore Cottage. The mom of two would reportedly also be able to keep her coveted royal title while living in America with the children."
-----
But is this TBW trying to manifest a way out of a marriage to a man she no longer wants? Behind closed doors, she has always known about, and tolerated, the swearing, the drugs, the spitefulness, the lazy entitlement, and so on, but now the cover has been blown and the whole world knows ...?
Wow! Just wow!
I have long suspected that the mansion is sparsely and poorly furnished, which is what I see from the glimpses we got in the Mockumentary.
As for the children, it is possible that she confines them to a nursery wing for whatever weird reason. The journalist who did The Cut interview went to their house and saw the children in the house, sat on one of the patios (where she did the interview), and at least saw the kitchen area. I suspect that Doria lives in the guesthouse and perhaps the children are sent to be with granny if they have to have work done on the house.
It comes off as sour grapes. Had he aides who had been able to find some glimmer of different resolution, then his aides would probably been nicknamed words like Slayer, Avenger and Victory is Mine.
But his team never really understood the rules of life, specifically for the British Royal Family life. Or later, perhaps Hollywood. Or even an ordinary life with everyday type job. So they never really understood the options, why some were off the table or how to manage what wealth/life/resources they did have when they walked away.
That was like bringing a pocket knife to a fencing match with a gold metal Olympian.
As for Maggot shopping for a private jet, that's all smoke and mirrors. They can't afford a private jet, and the pilot who must be on retainer at all time to fly it. If Maggot's playing that game, they really are broke and down to the nibs of their money.
On some points, very few, I agree with H. I completely discarded his lines about William. At that point, I understood that he wanted to convey to the audience how he is able to control his inner rage and William is not. Wanting to get the reader to think about whether this man we want as King of the United Kingdom. For me, the book is not aimed at an American audience, but at a British audience.
Their PR tactic was also positive. a) Leak from The Guardian about the Battle of the Dog Bowl and W&C advising he to wear Nazi uniform.The media should cover this extensively. His scheduled interviews with TB and AC would increase the audience with everyone interested in these aspects.Week later, on the 8th, the book would be officially released, and in the meantime other pieces favorable to H
would be leaked.Meanwhile, Omid and H's minions would have already promoted the virtual lynching of PW. And when the book was released and only afterwards, other narratives would gain the public's and media's predilection, but H would already have dragged PW.With hashtags like: william is bully, William is abuser shot on twitter.
Behold, the Spanish fleet appears in favor of the King of England. And the British media and people (rightly so) turned the Taliban killings episode into an episode where they portray H as a complete idiot. I do not believe he did this out of his desire for his RF paid security, but to show how unfair it is that the British people do not agree to pay, for he has given so much of himself to his country and to the British Army, whose rights to wear the uniform and lay wreaths on the Cenotaph have been taken away from him.
I could make other notes, but I'll leave just two;
a) I'm surprised by H's disconnected, childish and frivolous lines. Words like my father looked like an old man, the loss of virginity, the frozen p@@@, the lack of lust for the teacher, William and his bald head. H is shown to be sexist, sexist, idiotic, leading us to believe in a severe lack of mature cognitive functions.
b) the seals singing to MM. MM trying to extract advice from Diana's grave. The psychic medium who communicated with Diana (remember Diana liked that too). Here I began to ask myself if that nameless psychic medium might not be the MM herself who tells H that she has the ability to communicate, speak or even incarnate Diana.
Turning a blind eye, 😧corruption at that level, I really shouldn’t be shocked or surprised, but I am disappointed. I thought by him publicly admitting to it, it would make a difference.😬
YESSSSS...to your points!!!
From the DM
Caroline Flack's agent slams Harry for writing about 'tainted' affair
Alex Mullen, long time agent of the TV presenter, who died by suicide in 2020, called the Prince 'absolutely gross' for discussing their brief relationship in Spare
Harry says in his memoir, published officially on Tuesday, that the press described Caroline Flack as his ’bit of rough' after they dated briefly in 2009
Mullen said the Duke of Sussex has brought up again the 'old forgotten slur she had to suffer in full view of the public around the world'
https://mol.im/a/11611521
Mole is beneath contempt and so much more! 😡
@WBBM,
What truly amazes me is how the British media thought it was a good idea in the first place to report on the damaging kill count. 😡They should’ve exercised restraint. 🤔
Re the Reddit piece.
Yes, Lady C said both Maggot and her Mother entertained in certain types of establishments (I’m paraphrasing because I can’t remember how she worded it), but she’s alluded to it on more than one occasion. 🫢
I assume this is Meghan's fantasy? Whoever wrote this doesn't understand about Crown
property.
Seriously - if this is true, she is in a world of hurt.
About the title "spare part man". I heard that Harold went so far as to suggest that he was born simply to provide William with a kidney or any other body parts William might require. There's an element of histrionics in that kind of claim. Most people want a family with 2 or more children, and that is why Harry was born. Not to satisfy one of William's non-existent requirements.
Harold reminds me of a narc I knew who was kindly treated by my friend, a physician for depression. My friend gave the narc free of charge some new anti-depressant medication samples which he received from a pharmaceutical rep, and told the narc that he wanted to try this new medication. The narc then turned around and told everyone that she was being treated as a guinea pig, as though the physician was carrying out medical trials on her. Most people who heard the story believed her because they weren't aware of the details, nor of the fact that clinical trials aren't done in this way.
Needless to say, that was the last time my physician friend gave anyone samples of medication to people outside of his office environment.
On amazon.co.uk, the book is exactly half-price at £14.00, same for the kindle edition and free audio as above.
I don't know how it will sell considering people have found out so much and considering the tone of the book. On the other hand, some people might be curious and buy the book to try and find more gossip. I hope it tanks.
WBBM. hmmm did the fly them out to the uk in exchange for cash? can’t imagine the sequence of events with lilibuck$ since she allegedly came from the US. a curious bit of tea there but if true makes me feel better that kids aren’t suffering
I suppose the pregnant surrogate for Archi ecould have entered the UK quietly and in good time for the birth, then had the child here. There'd have been a proper birth certificate issued which might have enabled H to get the certificate they showed us, which IMO looked like an interim one to cover an adopted child, ie one that doesn't reveal its true origin. The `true' certificate would have been sealed until the child was of age and entitled to know it was adopted, whether or not the parents had revealed it sooner.
On the other hand, we did speculate that the child was conceived & born in the US on a `click & collect' basis and that the `baby shower' visit to NY was for that purpose. After all, she seems to have returned with Amal aboard the Clooney private jet and possibly smuggled the baby in then.
I haven't a clue about Lilibuck's birth.
I'm sure that both kids could have been brought into the UK surreptitiously if they travelled with the birth mother(s) using passports in their birth names/ had their names added to a parent's documents.
NB I don't know what, if anything, really happened, just trying a thought-experiment to guess what might have happened.
Perhaps after all that, there were no babies and if any children came for the Jubilee, they might have been the hirelings who entered the country normally with their parents.
He is disgusting to call Caroline Flack a "bit of rough". What does he think his wife is, exactly? His wife who is alive and able, all too well, to defend herself. And that description of, what was it, the disabled matron at Eton? That didn't get a lot of posting but I can go find it.
One final thing (I hope) for today. Not sure about the forces, but is he not responsible under the Official Secrets Act not to run his mouth? (Yeah, I know he's not "responsible" in general, but as a category.)
"@WBBM The Reddit post has been deleted. I gather Harry was hung over on Boxing Day...any other pertinent details we should know?"
Sorry, I don't recall reading about H being hungover on Boxing Day and can't add to it.
------
Re the Reddit piece.
"Yes, Lady C said both Maggot and her Mother entertained in certain types of establishments (I’m paraphrasing because I can’t remember how she worded it), but she’s alluded to it on more than one occasion."
Your guess is as good as mine on that one, though I can't imaging Doria as a stripper.
"What truly amazes me is how the British media thought it was a good idea in the first place to report on the damaging kill count. They should’ve exercised restraint. "
I agree but they probably use what `Ed Reardon' calls `the 12-year olds' as sub-editors.
This radio sitcom character `... author, pipe smoker, consummate fare-dodger and master of the abusive email...' tries `...to survive in a world where the media seems to be run by idiots and charlatans.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006r5ck
As I recall, having signed the Official Secrets Act each time I've taken a temporary job in the Civil Service, one is bound by it for good.
"MM trying to extract advice from Diana's grave. The psychic medium who communicated with Diana (remember Diana liked that too). Here I began to ask myself if that nameless psychic medium might not be the MM herself who tells H that she has the ability to communicate, speak or even incarnate Diana."
Yes! I can envision her manipulating the loser by claiming she is Diana come to life, or communicates with dead Diana and thus has his complete obedience when she tells him where and when and what to do, to say, to buy.
They deserve one another.
Most people want a family with 2 or more children, and that is why Harry was born.
______________
That's very true and the story that H was born simply to provide a body part is totally ridiculous. Nutties might remember that Charles wanted a girl and was allegedly rather disappointed to have another boy.
@Karla - your insight is amazing and I think you’re right about the early leaks being carefully curated as part of their PR plan. I believe that * wrote or dictated a great deal of the stories. I recognize her storytelling style and descriptive language.
@ alianor d'aquitaine - “Spare part man” is a great visual and suitable purpose for Harold.
But in one bombshell excerpt from 'Spare', Harry claimed his father said that Meghan was not welcome at Balmoral on the day the Queen died.
The Duke wrote that his father instructed him not to bring his wife to visit the dying Queen Elizabeth II, citing 'nonsensical and disrespectful' reasons.
As a child of a dying mother, my brother and I absolutely did not let anybody else in during her last days per her request except for hospice people. As the daughter-in-law of a dying mother-in-law, we absolutely did not have anybody there during the dying process except her pastor and hospice. Disruptive family members that liked to cause drama, absolutely not. We thought it would be disrespectful to have argumentative family members that wanted to weep and wail that, during her life, caused her a lot of grief.
I completely respect King Charles' decision. That woman caused a lot of grief to his parents. There is no way that I would allow her/them in to pollute her last moments. We wouldn't have wanted William to strain his back tossing them down the stairs. If there had been more time, they could have invited all the people that the *itch had bullied to stand guard at the stairwells.
I am glad that he of the frostbitten peepee was not there. If it were my mother (or mother in law), he would have had to stand outside in the rain.
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2023/01/08/12/66322745-11611639-image-a-10_1673179708100.jpg
I certainly hope Doria was nowhere near a strippers pole! 😂😳I prefer to believe she could’ve been in attendance to oversee Maggot’s exploits, but of course she could’ve had her own clientele as well. 🫢🫣
You read my thoughts regarding what other offerings Mole could’ve told us! I hope the frost bite is the limit….😳
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11611717/Harry-Meghans-25-page-rebuttal-bullying-claims-Prince-rails-against-royal-staff-lies.html
Quote: "The Duke claimed his brother 'wasn't quite ready to accept defeat' and claimed to be 'properly sick and ill' over the tensions between the pair."
_________________________________________________________________________
Well I'm awaiting going to the ER now (surgery repair completely came undone today) and now I feel actually sick after reading the article's eadlines and H' alleged imperious and holier than thou "No, I don't think so" in this article; so I'm asking doctor for nausea medicine and let him think I'm just upset over my foot situation. Please don't think I'm being as dramatic as baby-Hawwy, but I think ya'll can relate.
Bye bye for now!
'I've got a second family out there. A group of friends that literally brought me up.'
. . .
Royal biographers have claimed that the bond between them was so close, Harry used to jokingly call Ms Jenkins 'mom'.
I thought David Foster was his second father, now he had a second mother? These friends literally brought him up? Is that the family he never had, like *? I presume he thought he didn't have a family of his own. How insulting.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11611527/Prince-Harry-uses-memoir-thank-gypsy-spirit-film-producer-cameraman-brought-up.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11612407/Prince-Harry-tells-Tom-Bradby-Royal-Family-shown-no-willingness-reconcile.html#comments
Prince Harry tonight astonishingly likens his family to abusers, accuses them of 'getting into bed with the devil' and claims they have 'shown no willingness to reconcile'.
In his first primetime television interview promoting his memoir, the Duke suggests other senior royals had sought to burnish their reputation 'to the detriment' of him and Meghan and they were 'complicit' in their 'pain and suffering'.
He tells ITV's Tom Bradby: 'I'm not sure how honesty is burning bridges. You know, silence only allows the abuser to abuse. Right? So I don't know how staying silent is ever gonna make things better. That's genuinely what I believe.'
Delivering yet another volley of acid barbs at his family, Harry also says Meghan and Kate 'never got on' and suggests his wife was the victim of 'stereotyping' from his relatives due to her being an 'American, biracial actress'.
(Excerpt)
Do you think he took drugs before his interviews? Or is just evidence of his being a user?
I've revised my estimate of his IQ down by a lot. I used to think that he was *maybe* in the 85-89 range, low normal. His deficits would seem to be such that he is incapable of independent living at this point. As for the mental illness part, apparently the Spencer side (Diana's dad and granddad) suffered from sudden rages and beat their women.
I’ve never been happier, said miserable Prince Harry
By Quentin Letts
For almost two verminous hours a designer-bearded princeling bewailed his lot and claimed he was going to have to change the world because no one else would do the job. His family had briefed against him. “At the moment I don’t recognise them.” Everything was Fleet Street’s fault, except when it was Camilla’s fault or William’s fault or the fault of his poor, loving father whose lone-parenting skills had been measured and found not up to Californian snuff.
Now he, Harry, was going to act as “spokesman for the world”. He had alighted upon his life’s “mission of changing the media landscape in the UK”. The 21st century had found its Cnut. The scummy tide of social media was going to ebb at his very feet, just you see!
The more the Duke of Sussex spoke, the more he sniffed and the more ITV’s Tom Bradby stared at his interlocutor with apparent bafflement. It was the “blimey, we’ve got a right one here” look a medical orderly might give a park-bench crazy brought in for tests.
Our setting? The ducal drawing room in Montecito, California. Sunlit yellow cushions, gold printed linen curtains, Roman blinds, an empire drum lampshade, oval looking-glass and Zeigler oriental rug. Looked pricey.
The first of the programme’s six segments was devoted to the death of Diana. Both Harry and William had had themselves driven at speed through the Parisian tunnel where their mother was killed in a car accident in 1997. Charles, telling his younger son the terrible news that night, had called him “darling boy”. Harry repeatedly claimed that he loved his father. But he loved his mission more.
The funeral had seared him, as had a secret government file he was shown by an aide, but he did not have post-traumatic stress disorder. He felt it was merely “post-traumatic stress injury”.
“I am not a person with a disorder,” he said, as if from memory. If there was something rote-learned about that, it had an echo at the end when he kept claiming he had “never been happier”.
Bradby, Sherborne’s answer to Oprah Winfrey, proved commendably more rigorous than the queen of American daytime. After hearing Harry’s whinges about press intrusions, Bradby suggested that he himself was betraying confidences. The orange beardlet shrugged. “They’ve written countless books,” Harry replied, suggesting that Camilla and others had leaked to the press.
He had earlier spoken of the “mental wall” that wiped his childhood memories. Perhaps that was why he forgets that his own mother collaborated with Andrew Morton on the biography in Act I of this tragedy.
Jeepers, this was like watching offal being scissored. Fresh offal. Still pretty much twitching.
For all the rage against William, the person most damaged may be Harry himself. Those of us that have lost older brothers can still count themselves more fortunate than this ill-guided babbler. When my brother was dying I wrote him a letter to thank him for being my hero and protector. Our boyhood was full of laughter. My bro’ was glamorous, clever, sporty, made a fortune. I was, and remain, unswervingly proud of him.
It is hard to see how Prince Harry will ever be able to write such a letter. All the coronets of Christendom, all the lemons of southern California, could not expiate such a sacrifice.